==== Front
Innov Aging
Innov Aging
innovateage
Innovation in Aging
2399-5300 Oxford University Press US 

10.1093/geroni/igaa057.2369
igaa057.2369
Abstracts
Session 6060 (Symposium)
AcademicSubjects/SOC02600
Political Impediments to Aging in Place: The Example of Informal Caregiving Policy
Chattopadhyay Jacqueline  
UNC Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
2020 
16 12 2020 
16 12 2020 
4 Suppl 1 Program Abstracts from The GSA 2020 Annual Scientific Meeting “Turning 75: Why Age Matters”680 681
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America.2020This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.Abstract
Most Americans prefer to “age-in-place” as long as possible, but to do so often need overlapping resources—one of which is help from “formal” or “informal” caregivers (family and friends). Family and friends often want to provide care for as long as safely possible. However, informal caregiving can pose financial and physical risks to the caregiver that—as many scholars have noted—public policy in the U.S. does relatively little to mitigate. This policy shortfall also hurts care recipients since the risks that informal caregivers face can prematurely curtail their ability to provide care. Why does policy in the U.S. not better support informal caregivers? By synthesizing family caregiving research and political science research that has addressed long-term care, this paper surveys nine factors in the political system that may help answer this question. Four emanate from policy history. Three concern the mass public. Two vary at the policy level.