==== Front
Innov Aging
Innov Aging
innovateage
Innovation in Aging
2399-5300 Oxford University Press US 

10.1093/geroni/igaa057.2812
igaa057.2812
Abstracts
Session 7145 (Symposium)
AcademicSubjects/SOC02600
Are all homebound older adults frail?
Sheehan Orla 1 Bandeen-Roche Karen 2 Ritchie Christine 3 Chung Shang-En 4 Walston Jeremy 4 Roth David 4 Leff Bruce 1 1 
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
2 
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
3 
UCSF, San Francisco, California, United States
4 
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
2020 
16 12 2020 
16 12 2020 
4 Suppl 1 Program Abstracts from The GSA 2020 Annual Scientific Meeting “Turning 75: Why Age Matters”777 778
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America.2020This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.Abstract
Seven million adults in the United States are homebound and suffer the negative, powerful synergies of multiple chronic conditions, functional impairment, social stressors, and limited social capital. The prevalence of frailty in this vulnerable homebound population is unknown. Using representative data from the National Health and Aging Trends study (NHATS) study linked to Medicare claims (n=4756) we sought to assess the prevalence of frailty in the homebound population (n=361). Among the homebound, 68.5% met the frailty criteria compared to 12.3% of the non-homebound population. The frail homebound had lower educational attainment, were more likely to live alone, self-reported poorer health and more chronic physical and mental health conditions than the non-frail homebound (p<0.05 for all). Frail homebound older adults utilized more health services utilization than non-frail homebound and were twice as likely to be hospitalized (49.8% versus 28.0%, p=0.004).