==== Front Innov Aging Innov Aging innovateage Innovation in Aging 2399-5300 Oxford University Press US 10.1093/geroni/igaa057.113 igaa057.113 Abstracts Session 2823 (Paper) Services and Intervention AcademicSubjects/SOC02600 Oregon's Behavioral Health Initiative for Older Adults and People With Disabilities at 5 Years: Where to From Here? Dawson Walter 1 Stodola Allyson 2 Hasworth Serena 2 Kyler-Yano Jason 2 Winfree Jaclyn 2 Dreyer Linda 2 1 Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States 2 Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, United States 2020 16 12 2020 16 12 2020 4 Suppl 1 Program Abstracts from The GSA 2020 Annual Scientific Meeting “Turning 75: Why Age Matters”35 35 © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America.2020This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.Abstract Oregon’s Behavioral Health Initiative for Older Adults and People with Disabilities is entering its fifth year. This novel state-level Initiative seeks to better coordinate services and resources for older adults and people with disabilities who have behavioral health needs by assigning a Behavioral Health Specialist (BHS) for every 60,000 adults 65 + and embedding them within local service agencies around Oregon. BHS primary job functions include improving coordination and collaboration between local service agencies, providing complex case consultations (CCC), and delivering workforce development training and community education. Five years of data from Portland State University’s Institute on Aging’s ongoing evaluation of the Initiative suggests significant impact in terms of workforce development trainings, community education, and new community partnerships. Data are collected from BHS and Initiative stakeholders (e.g., aging services agencies). Data collection tools include quarterly reports from the BHS, including a CCC reporting instrument; semi-structured interviews with stakeholders assessing Initiative involvement; and an electronic post-training survey (and two-month follow-up survey) for stakeholders attending BHS trainings. After five years, the evaluation appears to show the Initiative has delivered an abundance of innovative collaborations, workforce trainings, and educational opportunities aimed at better supporting the behavioral health of older Oregonians. It also highlights several persistent systemic barriers including a need for additional public funding of behavioral health, the challenges of accessing Medicare for behavioral health, and siloed agencies and organizations. Future evaluative efforts could explore adding outcomes-based assessments of the Initiative, including local-level quality improvement projects initiated by BHS within their communities.