==== Front Innov Aging Innov Aging innovateage Innovation in Aging 2399-5300 Oxford University Press US 10.1093/geroni/igaa057.792 igaa057.792 Abstracts Session 2910 (Poster) Advance Care Planning and End-of-Life Issues AcademicSubjects/SOC02600 Priorities for End-of-Life Care Reporting in Nursing Homes: Results From a Mixed-Methods Study Gruneir Andrea 1 Hoben Matthias 1 Jensen Charlotte 2 Buencamino Monica 3 Easterbrook Adam 4 Marshall Sheila 5 Keefe Janice 6 Estabrooks Carole 1 1 University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 2 Staff, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 3 University of Alberta, Calgary, Alberta, Canada 4 Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 5 University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 6 Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, Alberta, Canada 2020 16 12 2020 16 12 2020 4 Suppl 1 Program Abstracts from The GSA 2020 Annual Scientific Meeting “Turning 75: Why Age Matters”245 246 © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America.2020This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.Abstract The aim of the “Trajectories” project is to compile measures of nursing home (NH) quality to better characterize the final year of life for residents. In the first phase, we worked with various stakeholder groups to identify their priorities to focus the selection of possible outcomes relevant to end-of-life needs. Policy- and decision-makers from 5 Canadian health regions participated in an on-line, modified Delphi process to reach consensus on 3-4 measures of each burdensome symptoms and potentially inappropriate care practices. NH residents and families or care aides participated in an interview process using the Action Project Method. To date, all participants identified pain, mental health care, polypharmacy, and dyspnea as priorities. Policy- and decision-makers additionally identified infections and acute care transfers as priorities, while residents and families additionally identified mobility, cognition, and pressure ulcer care as priorities. There was general consistency across groups in terms of priorities but additional measures seemed to reflect either a system-wide or more personal perspective, depending on the source. Data collection with frontline staff and managers is on-going. Moving forward, we will use this list of prioritized outcomes to quantitatively assess the trajectories of these outcomes and associated factors, and to create a profile that allows for monitoring of end-of-life care in NHs.