==== Front J Arthropod Borne Dis J Arthropod Borne Dis JAD JAD Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases 2322-1984 2322-2271 Tehran University of Medical Sciences 10.18502/jad.v14i2.3734 jad-14-162 Original Article Evaluation of Larvicidal Efficacy of Ricinus communis (Castor) Plant Extract and Synthesized Green Silver Nanoparticles against Aedes albopictus Waris Muhammad Nasir Shabab * Rasule Azhar Yousaf Iqra Department of Zoology, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan * Corresponding author: Dr Shabab Nasir, E-mail: flourenceshabab@yahoo.com 6 2020 30 6 2020 14 2 162 172 14 11 2018 19 5 2020 Copyright© Iranian Society of Medical Entomology & Tehran University of Medical Sciences2020This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.Background: Aedes mosquitoes are the most important group of vectors having ability of transmitting pathogens including arboviruses that can cause serious diseases like Chikungunya fever, Dengue fever and Zika virus in human. Biosynthesis and the use of green silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) is an important step in the search of reliable and ecofriendly control of these vectors. Methods: In this study an aqueous leaves extract of Ricinus communis (castor) and silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) synthesized from this extract were evaluated as larvicidal agent for 2nd and 3rd instar larvae of the Aedes albopictus. Different concentrations (50, 100, 150, 200 and 250ppm) of plant extract and synthesized nanoparticles were prepared and applied on second and third instar larvae. The percent mortality was noted after 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42 and 48H of exposure and subjected to probit analysis to calculate LC50 and LC90. Results: Synthesized Ag+ nanoparticles were characterized by UV-Vis spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (XRD). The nanoparticles were more toxic against larvae of Ae. albopictus with LC50 value (49.43ppm) and LC90 value (93.65ppm) for 2nd instar larvae and LC50 (84.98ppm) and LC90 (163.89ppm) for 3rd instar larvae as compared to the plant extract (149.58ppm, 268.93ppm) and (155.58ppm, 279.93ppm) for 2nd and 3rd instar larvae of Ae. albopictus respectively after 48H. Conclusion: Our results suggest the extract of R. communis and synthesized nanoparticles as excellent replacement of chemical pesticides to control the vector mosquitoes. Dengue mosquitoLarvicidalRicinus communisMosquito larvaeSilver nanoparticles (AgNPs) ==== Body Introduction Mosquitoes cause a serious threat to public health (1–2). Vector-borne diseases such as malaria, dengue, chikungunya, Zika virus, Japanese encephalitis, filariasis, are being spread by mosquitoes (3). These diseases are found all over the world and cause millions of deaths annually (4). Pakistan is at the great risk of vector-borne diseases especially dengue due to it’s over crowded cities, insanitation and poor vaccination. In Pakistan, dengue cases are reported throughout the year but situation, usually, become worst in the post monsoon period (5). Pakistan had the worst dengue epidemic in 2011, during which more than 20,000 cases and 300 deaths were reported officially. In Khyber Pakhtunkhwa of Pakistan, July to end of September 2017 a total of, 52 926 cases of dengue fever including 38 deaths were reported (6) Chikungunya virus was detected in 1983 (7) and more than 4000 cases have confirmed through qualitative RT-PCR. Zika virus has reached near border areas in neighboring countries like China and India, so outbreak of the disease may occur in Pakistan (8). The easy solution to avoid mosquito-borne diseases is the management of mosquito population. This management through chemicals causes health risks to human beings, environmental pollution and insecticidal resistance in mosquitoes (9). This prompted the need of searching for new chemical compounds and alternative strategies, as novel biological tools. So, medicinal plants can be used as an alternate for this purpose because these plants have many types of target specific, rapidly biodegradable, ecofriendly, and less toxic to human health larvicidal phytochemicals such as saponins, isoflavonoids, tannins, terpenes, steroids, etc. (10–11). Plants are good source of bioactive insecticidal phytochemicals that can kill mosquito larvae with high mortality rate (12–14) by bringing changes in development, midgut epithelium (15), mutation in DNA and production of reactive oxygen species (16–17). They have different mechanisms of action that reduce the chance of resistance development in mosquitoes (18). Biologists have begun the use these phytochemicals as larvicides to control the mosquitoes (19). One step ahead, green silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) synthesized from plant extracts are proved more toxic than phytochemical as larvicides (20). Green silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have high larvicidal effect because of small size ranging 1–100nm (21) and large surface area. These characteristics of AgNPs made them a unique larvicide at very low concentrations. These have been tested in a variety of entomological research because these are safe, low cost, easily available and have a simple easy biosynthesis process (21–22). Ricinus communis (castor) plant belongs to a big family Euphorbiaceae contains nearly about 300 genera and 7500 species. Ricinus communis (castor) is a flowering plant, has high medicinal value for healthy human life. This plant is used as laxative, fungicide, anti-oxidant, anti-asthmatic, antiulcer, wound healing, insecticidal and larvicidal agent. It has important phytochemicals like glycosides, alkaloids, flavonoids, steroids and saponins. that are helpful in controlling mosquitoes (23–24) (Fig. 1). Due to these reasons, the present study was designed to evaluate the larvicidal potential of the plant extract and AgNPs synthesized from this extract of R. communis (castor) against 2nd and 3rd larvae of Ae. albopictus under laboratory conditions. UV-Vis spectroscopy analysis, Powdered X-ray diffraction (PXRD) and Fourier Transform Infrared Radiation (FTIR) spectroscopy were used to confirm the biosynthesis of AgNPs. Fig. 1. Ricinus communis (castor) plant (original photo) Materials and Methods Preparation of leaf extract Healthy and fresh leaves of the R. communis (castor) plants were collected (hand plucked) from the old campus of University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan during the month of May, 2017. Leaves were cleaned with cloth and washed with tap water to remove dust. Then the leaves were dried in shady place at room temperature and grinded in an electric grinder (Anex Germany) (25). Fifty grams powder of leaves was mixed with 250ml acetone as solvent in the Soxhlet apparatus and boiled gently at boiling point range 55.5–56.5 °C for complete extraction (8h) and stored at 4 °C (26). Preparation of Green AgNPs Silver nitrate (AgNO3) of Sigma was purchased and 1mM solution of silver nitrate (AgNO3) was prepared in 250mL Erlenmeyer flask in the darkness to avoid action of light. 10ml acetone plant extracts of R. communis (castor) was put in 250ml conical flask having 90ml of 1mM silver nitrate solution. Two to three drops of 1% NaOH were added for the adjustment of pH at 8 and mixed continuously by magnetic stirrer. This mixture was kept at 40 °C for one hour under clear sky condition for irradiation. Colour change of the solution indicated the formation of AgNPs. Reaction completed on attaining reddish brown colour. Solution was cooled and stored in amber bottle at 4 °C, then centrifuged for three times at 5000rpm for 20 minutes to obtain pellets. Purified suspension was made by dissolving pellets in double distilled water and was frozen for further use (27). Characterization of AgNPs. The biosynthesized silver nanoparticles were characterized by UV-Vis spectroscopy analysis, Powdered X-ray diffraction (PXRD) and Fourier Transform Infrared Radiation (FTIR) spectroscopy assistance through High Tech central laboratory of Government College University Faisalabad. UV-Vis absorbance spectroscopy. To monitor formation of the green silver nanoparticles, absorption spectra were taken at a scanning speed of 200 to 800nm using a Cary 60 double beam UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Spectramax M3 molecular devices) operating at the resolution of 1nm. UV-Vis spectra were recorded after 15 and 30 minutes (28). Powdered X-ray Diffraction (PXRD) The shape of structure and size of the silver nanoparticles was calculated through diffracted intensities at 40kV voltage and 30mA current with the range of 0°–80° 2θ in CuKα radiation (Rigaku, Ultima IV, and X-ray diffractometer system). Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy The residue solution of 100ml was centrifuged at 5,000rpm for 10 minutes after reaction to remove impurities. To obtain pure pellet of AgNPs the supernatant was again centrifuged at 10000rpm for 60 minutes. All measurements were carried out in the range of 400–4000cm−1 at a resolution of 4cm−1 (29). Fresh samples having volume of 1–2ml in aqueous form were sent for FTIR Analysis to Hi-Tech Lab, Government College University Faisalabad. (1) Percentage Mortality = Number of dead larvaeNumber of larvae introduced×100 Collection and rearing of mosquitoes Larvae and pupae were collected with dippers from a forest near Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan (31° 25′ 7.3740″ N and 73° 4′ 44.7924″ E, 192 meters above the sea level). Collected immature stages of mosquito were brought back to the Zoology Lab, department of Zoology, Government College University, Faisalabad, inside beakers closed with muslin cloth. Larvae and pupae of Ae. albopictus were identified with the help of identification keys (30–31), reared to adults in 1000ml beakers containing water under lab conditions at 25±5 °C and 80±5% RH (32). Adults further reared in separate glass cages. Male adults were fed with 10% sugar solution and females with blood on live white rats in separate glass cages for egg laying (33). Larvae emerged from the eggs were reared in batches of 300 each, in 1200ml deionized water in stainless steel trays (35x 30x 5cm) for the bioassays (34). Fifth generation larvae were used for the bioassay. Bioassay Group of 20 actively swimming 2nd and 3rd instar larvae (identified from the shed cuticle and from the size and colour of the larvae) of Ae. albopictus were released in 250ml beaker containing 200ml distilled water separately. Five concentrations including 50, 100, 150, 200 and 250ppm of larvicidal solution of R. communis extract and green AgNPs synthesized from the extract were prepared using distilled water and subjected for mortality assays separately. Bioassay was conducted at 27±3 °C, 80±3% relative humidity (RH) and a photoperiod of 16: 8 (L: D) hours (35). The control was set up with dechlorinated tap water and five replications were done for each treatment. Mortality rates were calculated using the WHO (3) bioassay protocol with slight modifications. The percentage mortalities were corrected by using Abbott’s formula (36). (2) Corrected mortality = Observed mortality in treatment−Observed mortality in control100− Control mortality×100 The average larval mortality data was subjected to probit analysis using Minitab −17 statistical software (2017) for calculating lethal concentration 50% (LC50) and 90% (LC90) of larvae and for getting dose and time mortality regression lines. Results Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Formation of green AgNPs through the reduction of the silver metal ions by the extract of R. communis that turned the colour of mixture (plant extract +AgNO3 Solution) into reddish brown in 1H at 40 °C (Fig. 2). Fig. 2. Bioreduction of AgNO3 into AgNPs using plant extract (colour change) UV-Vis spectrum of silver nanoparticles The progress of the reaction between Ag+ and the leaf extract was monitored by UV–visible spectra of silver nanoparticles in aqueous solution with different reaction times that are shown (Fig. 3). It was observed from the figure that localized surface plasmon resonance band showed maximum absorbance at 430nm after 30 minutes of reaction time. Fig. 3. Ultraviolet-Visible spectra of silver nanoparticles synthesized by treating R. communis leaf extract with 1 mM AgNO3 solution Powdered X-ray Diffraction (PXRD) Studies Result of PXRD (Fig. 4) showed intense silver nanoparticle (AgNPs) diffraction peaks at 38.10, 44.46, 64.45, 77.51, and 81.60, corresponding to facets 113, 202, 221, 310, and 223 of the face-centered cubic crystal structure. Fig. 4. Powdered X-ray diffraction Fourier Transform Infrared Radiation Spectroscopy (FTIR) Analysis The FTIR spectra of silver nanoparticles prepared from the R. communis leaf extract (Fig. 5) showed transmittance peaks at 1263.2, 978.6, 849.1, 710.5, 662.8, 502.7, and 435.6/cm. The carbonyl group formed amino acid residues which capped the silver nanoparticles indicated by these peaks. These residues prevent from agglomeration of AgNPs, and made the medium stable. FTIR clearly indicate role of proteins and other compounds of leaf extract in the formation and stabilization of AgNPs. Fig. 5. Fourier Transform Infrared Radiation spectra of AgNPs synthesized from leaf extract of R. communis (Castor) Larvicidal activity of leaf extracts and synthesized silver nanoparticles The results of the larvicidal activity of leaf extract of R. communis (Castor) and synthesized AgNPs with different concentrations (50–250ppm) after different exposure times (6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42 and 48H) showed a dose and time-dependent toxic effects against 2nd and 3rd instar larvae of Ae. albopictus. No mortality was observed in the control group. AgNPs synthesized from R. communis showed 100% mortality for all the exposed larvae after 36H at the concentration of 250ppm (Table 1). The synthesized AgNPs showed least values of LC50 (49.43ppm) and LC90 (93.65ppm) after 48H with regression equation Y= −1.208+0.1521x against 2nd instar larvae of Ae. albopictus. Similarly for the 3rd instar larvae, the least values of LC50 and LC90 were 84.98 and 163.89ppm respectively after 48H with regression equation Y= −1.072+0.1461x as shown in Table 1. Table 1. Larvicidal activity of AgNPs synthesized from R.communis against Ae. albopictus larvae Time Larval instars % Mortality±SD Lethal concentration FL at 95% C.I Chi-square P value Regression equation 6H 2nd 10±0.27 LC50 523.02 384.98–1129.65 3.52 0.319 Y= −2.30+0.0044x LC90 813.34 564.21–1925.07 3.52 0.319 Y= −2.30+0.0044x 3rd 9±0.27 LC50 565.14 400.52–1494.50 3.72 0.292 Y= −2.27+0.0040x LC90 883.53 589.09–2568.35 3.72 0.292 Y= −2.27+0.0040x 12H 2nd 15±0.24 LC50 471.43 363.43–827.90 2.16 0.539 Y= −2.19+0.0046x LC90 747.16 543.88–1430.95 2.16 0.539 Y= −2.19+0.0046x 3rd 10±0.21 LC50 513.08 380.19–1034.82 1.34 0.712 Y= −.96+0.0038x LC90 847.98 591.32–1873.27 1.34 0.712 Y= −1.96+0.0038x 18H 2nd 20±0.20 LC50 437.37 344.45–706.71 0.54 0.909 Y= −1.96+0.0038x LC90 728.90 541.17–1285.97 0.54 0.909 Y= −1.96+0.0038x 3rd 16±0.21 LC50 513.08 380.19–1034.82 0.13 0.718 Y= −.96+0.0038x LC90 847.98 591.32–1873.27 0.13 0.718 Y= −1.96+0.0038x 24H 2nd 25±0.19 LC50 384.70 316.42–547.57 0.84 0.809 Y= −1.89+0.0049x LC90 645.16 501.53–998.63 0.84 0.809 Y= −1.96+0.0038x 3rd 20±0.19 LC50 455.96 351.97–786.41 0.17 0.918 Y= −1.83+0.0040x LC90 774.01 561.84–1463.36 0.17 0.918 Y= −1.83+0.0040x 30H 2nd 50±0.16 LC50 245.24 222.17–280.11 0.34 0.809 Y= −1.70+0.0059x LC90 430.12 526.76–372.84 0.34 0.809 Y= −1.70+0.0059x 3rd 35±0.19 LC50 339.95 291.79–435.60 0.17 0.244 Y= −1.99+0.0058x LC90 558.36 455.79–770.54 0.17 0.244 Y= −1.99+0.0058x 36H 2nd 70±0.15 LC50 188.19 172.39–207.37 0.77 0.809 Y= −1.42+0.0075x LC90 357.11 317.50–418.58 0.77 0.809 Y= −1.42+0.0075x 3rd 50±0.16 LC50 242.61 220.36–275.70 4.17 0.253 Y= −1.719+0.0070x LC90 423.45 368.57–514.79 4.17 0.253 Y= −1.719+0.0070x 42H 2nd 100±0.15 LC50 104.99 90.40–117.45 5.77 0.033 Y= −1.43+0.1545x LC90 217.85 202.21–238.34 5.77 0.033 Y= −1.43+0.1545x 3rd 95±0.14 LC50 115.02 103.75–125.31 1.67 0.000 Y= −1.077+0.0108x LC90 229.82 211.09–225.49 1.67 0.00 Y= −1.077+0.0108x 48H 2nd 100±0.12 LC50 49.43 37.51–59.44 6.77 0.032 Y= −1.208+0.1521x LC90 93.65 81.06–110.33 6.77 0.032 Y= −1.208+0.1521x 3rd 100±0.12 LC50 84.98 70.40–101.45 1.27 0.303 Y= −1.077+0.1461x LC90 163.89 151.09–175.49 1.27 0.303 Y= −1.077+0.1461x LC50: lethal concentration that kills 50% of the exposed larvae; LC90: lethal concentration that kills 90% of the exposed larvae. The mortality rate of 2nd and 3rd instar larvae of Ae. albopictus was noted as 98 and 96% respectively after 48H at 250ppm concentration of R. communis leaves extract (Table 2). The least values of LC50 and LC90 were 149.57 and 268.92ppm for 2nd instar larvae and 155.57 and 279.92ppm for 3rd instar respectively with regression equations Y= −1.16+0.129x and Y= −1.210+0.113x after 48H. The extract of R. communis exhibited prominent larvicidal activity against the 2nd instar larvae of Ae. albopictus. All the concentrations of plant extracts used in the present study exhibited repellency activity. Table 2. Larvicidal activity of leaf extracts of R. communis against Ae.s albopictus larvae Time Larval instars %Mortality±SD Lethal concentration FL at 95% C.I Chi-square P value Regression equation 6H 2nd 9±0.28 LC50 572.94 403.52–1584.71 5.12 0.163 Y= −2.31+0.004x LC90 889.79 589.68–2705.85 5.12 0.163 Y= −2.31+0.004x 3rd 6±0.27 LC50 725.56 448.49–1927.47 4.22 0.238 Y= −2.19+0.003x LC90 1148.36 664.68–2035.2 4.22 0.238 Y= −2.19+0.003x 12H 2nd 15±0.22 LC50 537.82 403.69–1002.15 1.35 0.717 Y= −2.06+0.041x LC90 778.85 559.72–1546.13 1.35 0.717 Y= −2.06+0.041x 3rd 11±0.27 LC50 725.56 448.49–1927.47 4.22 0.238 Y= −2.19+0.003x LC90 1148.31 664.68–2035.20 4.22 0.238 Y= −2.19+0.003x 18H 2nd 25±0.20 LC50 407.93 329.78–608.36 0.92 0.81 Y= −2.06+0.041x LC90 679.10 518.69–1101.86 0.92 0.81 Y= −2.06+0.041x 3rd 18±0.19 LC50 507.42 374.13–1045.96 0.06 0.995 Y= −1.79+0.003x LC90 869.61 601.13–1974.48 0.06 0.995 Y= −1.79+0.003x 24H 2nd 30±0.16 LC50 313.16 265.99–411.52 2.08 0.554 Y= −1.48+0.005x LC90 583.50 465.24–845.33 2.08 0.554 Y= −2.06+0.041x 3rd 22±0.19 LC50 470.34 356.20–869.28 0.49 0.921 Y= −1.18+0.004x LC90 820.08 582.04–1670.4 0.49 0.921 Y= −1.18+0.004x 30H 2nd 40±0.16 LC50 313.16 265.99–411.52 2.08 0.554 Y= −1.48+0.005x LC90 583.50 465.24–845.33 2.08 0.554 Y= −1.48+0.041x 3rd 30±0.18 LC50 370.21 303.81–530.08 0.054 0.997 Y= −1.65+0.004x LC90 656.65 506.69–1031.3 0.054 0.997 Y= −1.65+0.004x 36H 2nd 50±0.16 LC50 258.97 229.21–309.36 0.67 0.880 Y= −1.46+0.006x LC90 485.52 406.70–633.31 0.67 0.880 Y= −1.46+0.046x 3rd 40±0.17 LC50 317.15 272.97–403.39 2.05 0.532 Y= −1.71+0.005x LC90 554.63 451.92–766.05 2.05 0.532 Y= −1.71+0.005x 42H 2nd 88±0.15 LC50 197.93 176.04–209.75 3.26 0.114 Y= −1.51+0.153x LC90 323.98 301.79–336.20 3.26 0.114 Y= −1.51+0.153x 3rd 87±0.15 LC50 276.36 244.35–288.73 0.55 0.832 Y= −1.517+0.010x LC90 372.02 350.53–401.52 0.55 0.832 Y= −1.517+0.010x 48H 2nd 98±0.14 LC50 149.57 138.29–159.74 2.06 0.518 Y= −1.16+0.129x LC90 268.92 254.26–280.00 2.06 0.518 Y= −1.16+0.129x 3rd 96±0.15 LC50 155.57 139.29–170.74 1.65 0.102 Y= −1.210+0.113x LC90 279.92 252.26–295.00 1.65 0.102 Y= −1.210+0.113x LC50: lethal concentration that kills 50% of the exposed larvae; LC90: lethal concentration that kills 90% of the exposed larvae Discussion Nanotechnology is an emerging technology in modern era that enables scientists to synthesize particles of different sizes, forms and components. Hence synthesized nanoparticles of gold, silver and platinum are being used for insect vectors control and in pharmaceutical industries (17). During current study, change in colour (reddish brown) of the solution indicated the formation of AgNPs due to the reduction of silver metal ions by the extract of R. communis and was confirmed by the localized surface plasmon resonance band absorbance at 430nm after 30 minutes of reaction time. Previous studies also indicated the similar colour changes and maximum absorbance at 430nm (37). Our result of PXRD indicated intense silver nanoparticle (AgNPs) diffraction peaks at 38.10, 44.46, 64.45, 77.51 and 81.60 corresponding to facets 113, 202, 221, 310 and 223 of the face-centered cubic crystal structure. Sathyavathi et al. (25) also reported diffraction peaks at 44.50, 52.20, and 76.7, which correspond to the 111, 200, and 222 facets of the face-centered cubic crystal structure. XRD result of silver nanoparticles reported by Nirmala et al. (38) is also close to the cited results. The FTIR spectra of current study showed transmittance peaks at 1263.2, 978.6, 849.1, 710.5, 662.8, 502.7, and 435.6/cm. The carbonyl group formed amino acid residues which capped the silver nanoparticles indicated by these peaks. These residues prevent from agglomeration of AgNPs, and made the medium stable. FTIR clearly indicate role of proteins and other compounds of leaf extract in the formation and stabilization of AgNPs (37–40). In our study, the R. communis AgNPs showed 100% mortality at 250ppm for Ae. albopictus after 48H, with LC50 and LC90 values 49.43, 93.65ppm and 84.98, 163.89ppm for 2nd and 3rd instar larvae respectively, while LC50 and LC90 values of the leaf extract of R. communis after 48h exposure were 149.57, 268.92ppm and 155.57, 279.92ppm for 2nd and 3rd instar larvae respectively. These results clearly indicated that R. communis AgNPs were more potent than leaf extract of R. communis due to less LC50 and LC90 values. These results are in line with the results of other scientists who also reported more potency of AgNPs than simple plant extracts (38–39). Karthikeyan et al. (39) also reported the toxicity of AgNPs synthesized from Euphorbia hirta leaf extract against An.stephensi 1st to 4th instar larvae with LC50 (10.14, 16.82, 21.51, and 27.89ppm, respectively) after 24H. This high potency of AgNPs was due to high surface area-to-volume ratio, that imparts different biological and catalytic activities in them (30–40). Hemant et al. (40) also reported the potency of AgNPs of Euphorbia tirucalli against 2nd and 4th instar larvae with least LC50 values (3.50 to 7.01ppm) and (4.44 to 8.74ppm) respectively after 24 hrs. Our findings are at par with the previous findings that simple leaf extracts are less potent than AgNPs. The larvicidal effects of leaves extracts of R. communis showed the LC50 values of 1091.44, 1364.58 and 1445.44ppm against 2nd, 3rd and 4th larval instars of Cx. quinquefasciatus (41). Basheer (42) also used R. communis extracts through different solvents and found ethyl acetate extract more potent than others against 3rd instar larvae of Ae. albopictus. He also noted that LC50 values decreased with time. These results are similar with our findings. Mandal (43) also noted that R. communis seed extract exhibited larvicidal effects with 100% mortality at concentrations 32–64μg/mL, with LC50 value 16.84μg/mL for Ae. albopictus larvae. All previous scientists studied either plant extracts or their AgNPs separately but the present study compared the plant extract with its AgNPs. Cited results are close to our findings but not exactly same due to using different plant, mosquito species, larval stage and solvent for plant extraction. Results of our study suggested that the leaf extract of R. communis is toxic to Ae. albopictus larvae and toxicity increased when extract combined with AgNPs. Our results clearly proved the excellent larvicidal efficacy of R. communis against Ae. albopictus. Conclusion It is concluded from our findings that, the leaf extract and synthesized silver nanoparticles of R. communis had excellent potential for killing the of mosquito larvae. The application of this plant extract along with silver nanoparticle on mosquito breeding places surely decrease the population of vector mosquitoes, control many dreadful diseases and prevent environmental pollution. ==== Refs References 1. Rozendaal JA (1997 ) Mosquitos and other biting Diptera vectors of malaria leishmaniasis filariasis onchocerciasis dengue yellow fever and other diseases . In: Rozendaal JA (Eds): Vector Control Methods for Use by Individuals and Communities , World Health Organization , Geneva, Switzerland , pp. 7 –177 . 2. Service M (2004 ) Medical Entomology for Students . 3rd edition , Cambridge University Press , UK . 3. WHO (2006 ) Pesticides and their application for the control of vectors and pests of public health importance . World Health Organization , Geneva, Switzerland , p.114 . 4. Rajkumar G Rahuman A (2011 ) Larvicidal activity of synthesized silver nanoparticles using Eclipta prostrata leaf extract against filariasis and malaria vectors . Acta Trop . 118 : 196 –203 .21419749 5. Jahan F (2011 ) Dengue Fever (DF) in Pakistan . Asia Pac Fam Med . 10 (1 ): 1 .21349169 6. WHO (2017 ) EMRO Weekly Epidemiological Monitor . 10 : 40 . 7. Darwish MA Hoogstraal H Roerts TJ Ahmed IP Omar F (1983 ) A sero-epidemiological survey for certain arboviruses (Togaviridae) in Pakistan . Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg . 77 : 442 –445 .6314612 8. Rauf M Fatima-tuz-Zahra Sobia M Azra M Shameem B (2017 ) Outbreak of chikungunya in Pakistan . Lancet Infect Dis . 17 : 258 . 9. Isman MB (2006 ) Botanical insecticides deterrents and repellents in modern agriculture and an increasingly regulated world . Ann Rev Entomol . 51 : 45 –66 .16332203 10. Zhu J Zeng X Neal OM Schultz G (2008 ) Mosquito larvicidal activity of botanical based mosquito repellents . J Am Mosq Control Assoc 24 : 161 –8 .18437833 11. Ghosh A Chowdhury N Chandra G (2012 ) Plant extracts as potential mosquito larvicides . Indian J Med Res . 135 : 581 –98 .22771587 12. Khair-ul-Bariyah S Ahmed D Ikram M (2015 ) Ocimum basilicum: a review on phytochemical and pharmacological studies . Pak J Chem . 2 : 78 –85 . 13. Mdoe FP Cheng SS Msangi S Nkwengulila G Chang ST Kweka EJ (2014 ) Activity of Cinnamomum osmophloeum leaf essential oil against Anopheles gambiae. Parasit Vectors . 7 : 209 . 24885613 14. Pavela R (2016 ) History presence and perspective of using plant extracts as commercial botanical insecticides and farm products for protection against insects - A review . Plant Protect Sci. 52 : 229 –241 . 15. Al-Mekhlafi FA (2018 ) Larvicidal ovicidal activities and histopathological alterations induced by Carum copticum (Apiaceae) extract against Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) . Saudi J Biol Sci . 25 : 52 –56 .29379357 16. Arjunan N Murugan K Rejeeth C Madhiyazhagan Barnard D (2012 ) Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles for the control of mosquito vectors of malaria, filariasis, and dengue . Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis . 12 : 262 –8 .22022807 17. Subramaniam J Murugan K Panneerselvam C (2015 ) Ecofriendly control of malaria and arbovirus vectors using the mosquitofish Gambusia affinis and ultra-low dosages of Mimusops elengi-synthesized silver nanoparticles: towards an integrative approach . Environ Sci Pollut Res Int . 22 : 20067 –83 .26300364 18. Okumu FO Knols BG Fillinger U (2007 ) Larvicidal effects of a neem (Azadirachta indica) oil formulation on the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae . Malar J . 6 : 63 1 –8 .17519000 19. Eliman MA Elmalik KH Ali FS (2009 ) Efficacy of leaves extract of Calotropis procera Ait. (Asclepiadaceae) in controlling Anopheles arabiensis and Culex quinoquefasciatus mosquito . Saudi J Biol Sci . 16 : 95 –100 .23961048 20. Bilal H Hassan SA (2012 ) Plants secondary metabolites for mosquito control . Asian Pac J Trop Dis . 2 : 168 –168 . 21. Borase H Patil C Patil R (2013 ) Phyto-synthesized silver nanoparticles: a potent mosquito biolarvicidal agent . J Nanomed Biotech Dis . 3 (1 ): 1 –7 . 22. Muthukumaran U Govindarajan U Rajeswary M Hoti S (2015 ) Synthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticles using Gmelina asiatica leaf extract against filariasis, dengue, and malaria vector mosquitoes . Parasitol Res . 114 : 1817 –1827 .25666372 23. Jitendra J Ashish KG (2012 ) Ricinus communis Linn: A phytopharmacological Review . Int J Pharm Pharmaceutical Sci . 4 : 0975 –1491 . 24. Palanivelu J Kunjumon MM Suresh A Nair A Ramalingam C (2015 ) Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles from Dracaena mahatma leaf extract and its antimicrobial activity . J Pharmaceutical Sci Res . 7 : 690 –695 . 25. Satyavani K Ramanathan T Gurudeeban S (2011 ) Plant mediated synthesis of biomedical silver nanoparticles by leaf extract of Citrullus colosynthis . Res J Nano Tech . 1 : 95 –101 . 26. Vogel AI (1978 ) Text Book of Practical Organic Chemistry . The English Language Book Society and Longman , London pp. 1540 . 27. Sathyavathi R Krishna KB Venugopal Rao M (2010 ) Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using Coriandrum sativum leaf extract and their application in nonlinear optics . Adv Sci Letters. 3 : 1 –6 . 28. Rajesh WR Jaya RL Niranjan SK Vijay DM Sahelebrao BK (2009 ) Phyto synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Gliricidia sepium (Jaeq) . Current Nanosci . 5 : 117 –122 . 29. Vivek M Kumar PS Steffi S Sudha S (2011 ) Biogenic silver nanoparticles by Gelidiella acerosa extract and their antifungal effects . Avicenna J Med Biotechnol . 3 : 143 –8 .23408653 30. Barraud PJ (1934 ) The Fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma . Diptera family Culicidae. Tribe Megarhinini and Culicini . Taylor Francis , London , pp. 463 . 31. Qasim M Naeem M Bodlah I (2014 ) Mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) of Murree Hills, Punjab, Pakistan . Pak J Zool . 46 : 523 –529 . 32. Akram W Khan HAA Hafeez F Bilal H Kim YK Lee JJ (2010 ) Potential of citrus seed extracts against dengue fever mosquito, Aedes albopictus (Skuse) (Culicdae: Dipetra) . Pak J Bot . 42 : 3343 –3348 . 33. Arivoli S Ravindran KJ Raveen R Tennyson S (2012 ) Larvicidal activity of botanicals against the filarial vector Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae) . Int J Zool Res . 2 : 13 –17 . 34. Murthy JM Rani PU (2009 ) Biological activity of certain botanical extracts as larvicides against the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti . J Biopest . 2 : 72 –76 . 35. Soni S Prakash S (2013 ) Possible mosquito control by silver nanoparticles synthesized by soil fungus (Aspergillus niger) . Adv Nanoparticles . 2 : 125 –132 . 36. Abbott WS (1925 ) A method of computing the effectiveness of insecticide . J Econ Entomol . 18 : 265 –267 . 37. Ahmed S Ahmad M Swami BL Ikram S (2016 ) A review on plants extract mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles for antimicrobial applications: a green expertise . J Adv Res . 7 : 17 –28 .26843966 38. Jinu U Rajakumaran S Senthil-Nathan S Geetha N Venkatachalam P (2018 ) Potential larvicidal activity of silver nanohybrids synthesized using leaf extracts of Cleistanthus collinus (Roxb.) Benth. ex Hook.f. and Strychnos nuxvomica L. nuxvomica against dengue, Chikungunya and Zika vectors . Physiol Mol Plant Pathol . 101 : 163 –171 . 39. Karthikeyan AP Kadarkarai M Chellasamy P (2012 ) Biolarvicidal and pupicidal potential of silver nanoparticles synthesized using Euphorbia hirta against Anopheles stephensi Liston (Diptera: Culicidae) Parasitol Res . 111 : 997 –1006 .22562234 40. Hemant PB Chandrashekhar DP Rahul BS (2013 ) Phyto-synthesized silver nanoparticles: a potent mosquito biolarvicidal agent . J Nanomed Biotherapeutic Dis . 3 : 1 . 41. Elimam AM Elmalik KH Ali FS (2009 ) Larvicidal, adult emergence inhibition and oviposition deterrent effects of foliage extract from Ricinus communis L. against Anopheles arabiensis and Culex quinquefasciatus in Sudan . Trop Biomed . 26 (2 ): 130 –139 .19901899 42. Basheer AGM (2014 ) Ricinus communis (CASTOR) as larvicide on Anopheles arabiensis Patton . Int J Adv Pha Biol Chem . 3 : 2277 –4688 . 43. Mandal S (2010 ) Exploration of larvicidal and adult emergence inhibition activities of Ricinus communis seed extract against three potential mosquito vectors in Kolkata, India . Asian Pac J Trop Med . 3 (8 ): 605 –609 .