==== Front Medicine (Baltimore) Medicine (Baltimore) MEDI Medicine 0025-7974 1536-5964 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Hagerstown, MD MD-D-20-09881 10.1097/MD.0000000000023238 23238 3800 Research Article Study Protocol Systematic Review The effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for scoliosis A protocol for systematic review and/or meta-analysisChoi Seong-Kyeong KMD, BSca Jo Hyo-Rim KMD, BSca Park Seo-Hyun KMD, MSb http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0585-9693Sung Won-Suk KMD, PhDa Keum Dong-Ho KMD, PhDb Kim Eun-Jung KMD, PhDa∗ a Department of Acupuncture & Moxibustion b Department of Rehabilitation Medicine of Korean Medicine, Dongguk University Bundang Oriental Hospital, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea. ∗ Correspondence: Eun-Jung Kim, Department of Acupuncture & Moxibustion, Dongguk University Bundang Oriental Hospital, 268, Buljeong-ro, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do 13601, Republic of Korea (e-mail: hanijjung@naver.com). 11 12 2020 11 12 2020 99 50 e2323814 10 2020 19 10 2020 Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.2020This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0Abstract Background: Scoliosis is a disease that affects all age groups and alters the three-dimensional deviation of the spinal axis. It is diagnosed when Cobb angle presents over 10 degrees and the reasons include aging, traumatic injuries, unknown origin, and disorders of congenital, neurological, musculoskeletal, and connective tissue. Scoliosis treatments are divided into surgical and conservative options. Surgery can correct the curved spine but has associated risks and economic burden. Conservative treatments, particularly bracing, prevent the progression of scoliosis, but still remains potential ingredient of curvation and patients poor compliance. Recent studies reported that various types of acupuncture can improve the curvation and the associated pain. However, there has been no systematic review on this issue. Therefore, this study will review the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture on scoliosis. Methods: Searching randomized controlled trials about the use of acupuncture for scoliosis will be performed using multiple electronic databases, manual search, and contact to authors e-mail if needed. We will select studies by the pre-defined criteria and summarize the data on study participants, interventions, control groups, outcome measurement, adverse events, and risk of bias. The primary outcome will be the Cobb angle, which is objective, and the secondary outcomes are associated with patient-centered indices (pain, functional status, and quality of life), which are subjective and adverse events. We will use Review Manager software (Version 5.3; Copenhagen; The Nordic Cochrane Center, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014) to perform a meta-analysis and Cochrane Collaboration “risk of bias” tools to assess the risk of bias. Results: Our study will investigate the clinical evidence on the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture on scoliosis. Conclusion: Our study will be informative to scoliosis patients, clinicians, policy makers, and researchers working with conservative management for scoliosis. Keywords acupuncturemeta-analysisrandomized controlled trialsscoliosissystematic reviewDongguk University Research fundID0E3HAE72019Eun Jung KimOPEN-ACCESSTRUE ==== Body 1 Introduction Scoliosis is defined as a three-dimensional deviation of the spinal axis. It is diagnosed when Cobb angle of subjects presents over 10 degrees on any part of the spine (cervical, thoracic, and lumbar part).[1] Scoliosis can affect all age groups.[2] During the lifetime, there are various reasons that may lead to scoliosis development, including congenital disorders, neurological disorders, musculoskeletal disorders, connective tissue disorders, aging, and traumatic injuries. Furthermore, it can have an unknown origin (idiopathic scoliosis), which can make spine curved[3,4] and is known to be responsible for most cases (>60%). In age-stratified sub-groups, the prevalence of adolescent scoliosis is reportedly 4.7% to 5.2%[5] with some other articles reporting a higher percentage. A study in Korea in 2009 revealed that 1532 Korean men among 28,779 had scoliosis, suggesting a prevalence of 5.3%.[6] In a study in Turkey in 2020, it was reported that up to 10.4% of 1065 adolescents had thoracic scoliosis,[7] and an Iranian study in 2018 revealed that 1.4% of students had definite scoliosis, and 10.4% were suspected to have mild spine abnormality.[8] In adults aged 25 to 74 adults, the scoliosis prevalence was 8.3% in the United States.[9] The problems caused by scoliosis are similar regardless of its etiology. Patients have leg length discrepancy, back pain, impaired seating posture, and gait imperfection, resulting in lower health-related quality of life than healthy peers. Regarding psychological aspects, they have poor self-conception, leading to a passive social life.[10–14] In addition, scoliosis can give burden to their caregiver. Caregivers life satisfaction, emotion, and economical state are also affected.[15] As the treatment period prolongs, the burden increases. The only way to reduce the stress is patients recovery from the condition.[16] Scoliosis treatments are divided into surgical and conservative options. Surgery is needed in scoliosis occurring from congenital and neuromuscular reasons and high Cobb angle. Early onset (age less than 10 year) of spine deformity due to the congenital, neuromuscular, or idiopathic reasons can affect spinal and pulmonary growth and leads to thoracic insufficiency syndrome.[13,17] Regarding high Cobb angle, adolescents with Cobb angle >45°or multiple curves[1] and adults with lumbar curves >30° and/or >6 mm of lateral listhesis are the indications of surgery.[18,19] Conservative therapies include observational, bracing, casting, and physiotherapy. They are usually used to prevent the progression of scoliosis. Bracing is particularly considered to be most effective and helpful for the patient[20,21]; therefore, 2016 guidelines of the International Society on Scoliosis Orthopedic and Rehabilitation Treatment primarily recommend bracing for adolescent idiopathic patients.[1] Conventional treatments still have their limitations. Surgery can correct the curved spine, but it has associated risks[22,23] and economic burden, and there is the possibility of surgical adverse effects including infection, pulmonary embolism, cardiac arrest, nerve injury, and postoperative neuropathic pain.[24,25] Living with braces still remains a potential ingredient of curvation and patients poor brace compliance[26,27] and can have a negative effect on patients psychological, motor, social, and school environment.[28] Recent reports suggest that acupuncture can be helpful in scoliosis. Weiss et al conducted a study and described that 1 practice of acupuncture could improve surface rotation when compared to sham needle.[29] Wei et al. conducted a randomized control trial (RCT) and reported that Cobb angle of scoliosis patients significantly decreased after acupotomy, Tuina, and Daoyin therapy 1 to 2 times a week for 12 months.[30] Liu et al also performed acupuncture 3 times a week for 6 weeks and reported that acupuncture not only reduced the pain but also corrected the curve.[31] Regarding the Vickerss suggestion about the effectiveness of acupuncture on chronic disease,[32] acupuncture could be a method to treat scoliosis and prevent its consequences with high cost-effectiveness compared to other treatments.[33] However, there is a paper that present opposite suggestion. Kims review regarded that acupuncture has not proven its effectiveness as actual treatment.[20] For now, there is limited evidence on the effect of acupuncture on scoliosis. Therefore, this review will focus on the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture on scoliosis by measuring the Cobb angle, patient-centered outcomes, and adverse events. 2 Methods 2.1 Study design We willconduct this systematic review (SR) in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 Statement.[34] 2.2 Ethics No ethical statement is required since there is no patient recruitment and personal information collection. 2.3 Study registration The protocol was registered in Research Registry (Registration number: reviewregistry977). 2.4 Eligibility criteria 2.4.1 Participants Patients who were diagnosed as having scoliosis will be included. Scoliosis is a spine abnormality wherein the spine has a lateral deviation at least 10° with vertebral rotation. This SR will include all types of scoliosis regardless of the patient age and causation, including congenital disorders, neurological disorders, musculoskeletal disorders, connective tissue disorders, aging, traumatic injuries, and unknown origin. 2.4.2 Types of interventions Various acupuncture types including acupuncture, electroacupuncture, thread-embedding acupuncture, and acupotomy for improving scoliosis will be considered eligible. The use of combination therapy during acupuncture will be accepted if the only difference between groups is acupuncture. Studies that compared between acupuncture according to the treatment duration and different acupuncture points will be excluded. 2.4.3 Type of studies This review will include RCTs. If the study did not provide the description or used an incorrect randomization method, it will be excluded from the SR and meta-analysis of acupuncture for scoliosis. Case reports, observational studies, cross-sectional studies, pilot studies, and SR protocols will be excluded. 2.4.4 Outcome measures Cobb angle will be the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures are to be considered depending on review findings, such as patient-centered outcomes including pain index (visual analog scale and numerical rating scale), functional status (Japanese Orthopedic Association score and curative rates), quality of life (EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire, Short Form 36-item) score, and adverse effects. 2.4.5 Language There will be no limits on the language. 2.5 Information sources and search strategy The following electronic databases will be used from their inception to February 2021:MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (Chinese database), CiNii, J-STAGE (Japanese database), KoreaMed, Korean Medical Database, Korean Studies Information Service System, National Digital Science Library, Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, and Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System. Researchers will perform a search using terms with a combination of diagnoses (such as scoliosis, spine curvatures, idiopathic scoliosis, degenerative scoliosis, neuromuscular scoliosis, and secondary scoliosis) and treatments (the names of various acupuncture types, such as acupuncture, electroacupuncture, thread-embedding acupuncture, and acupotomy) in each databases own language. Search will be continued from relevant gray literature sources, reports, and dissertations. If needed, manual search, such as the textbooks on acupuncture and the references and contact to authors e-mail, was also done (Table 1). Table 1 Search strategy for the MEDLINE via PubMed. No. Search terms #1 “scoliosis”[MeSH] OR “scoliosis”[Title/abstract] #2 “scoliosis”[MeSH] OR “scoliosis”[Title/abstract] OR “congenital scoliosis”[Title/abstract] OR “musculoskeletal scoliosis”[Title/abstract] OR “connective tissue disorder”[Title/abstract] OR “degenerative scoliosis”[Title/abstract] OR “traumatic scoliosis”[Title/abstract] OR “idiopathic scoliosis”[Title/abstract] #3 “acupuncture”[MeSH] OR “acupuncture treatment”[MeSH] OR “acupuncture therapy”[MeSH] OR “electroacupuncture”[MeSH] OR “thread-embedding acupuncture”[MeSH] OR “acupotomy”[MeSH] OR “acupuncture”[Title/abstract] OR “acupuncture treatment”[Title/abstract] OR “acupuncture therapy”[Title/abstract] OR “electroacupuncture”[Title/abstract] OR “thread-embedding acupuncture”[Title/abstract] OR “acupotomy”[Title/abstract] OR randomized controlled trial∗[Title/abstract] OR clinical trial∗ [Title/abstract] OR random∗ [Title/abstract] #4 #1 AND #2 AND #3 2.6 Study selection After 2 researchers are briefed about the designed qualification, each individual will independently screen the output based on the titles, abstracts, and full-text (if needed) to exclude duplicates and irrelevant reports. And then, the 2 researchers will review the studies by reading their full-texts. Disagreement between the 2 researchers will be resolved through discussion. If not possible, a third reviewer will include to mediate it (Fig. 1). Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram. 2.7 Data management Researchers will use the Endnote X9 to manage the studies. 2.8 Data extraction Two reviewers will gather data including patient characteristics, control characteristics, interventions, outcome measures, results, and information indicative of study quality. Any disagreement of opinion between the 2 reviewers will be solved by discussion. If a discrepancy still persists, a third reviewer will include to resolve it. If relevant data are not usable, the original author will be contacted to obtain the missing data by e-mail. If the author or data are no available, we will exclude those data and describe the reason on the paper. 2.9 Data synthesis and analysis The changes from baseline in the included RCTs will be used to perform meta-analysis with Review Manager software (Version5.3; Copenhagen; The Nordic Cochrane Center, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014). The mean difference and 95% confidence intervals (CI) in the same outcome measure, and the standardized mean difference and 95% CI in the different outcome measure will be calculated to estimate the effect. The heterogeneity assessment will be calculated by Chi-Squared and I-squared and be interpreted as follows; unimportant heterogeneity, 0% to 40%; moderate heterogeneity, 30% to 60%; substantial heterogeneity, 50% to 90%; and considerable heterogeneity, 75% to 100%. If possible, the subgroup analysis will be conducted based on different intervention and control interventions. If needed, the subgroup analysis with different population and the sensitivity analysis will be performed additionally. If quantitative synthesis is not possible, a narrative synthesis will be conducted based on available data. Regarding publication bias, it is planned to use Funnel-plot when there are more than 10 identified studies in the meta-analysis. To rate the quality of evidence for each outcome, we will use the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method. 2.10 Risk of bias assessment Cochrane Collaboration “risk of bias” (6 domains: sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants, blinding of outcome assessors, incomplete outcome data, and selective outcome reporting) tool will be used[35] to access the risk of bias by the 2 reviewers independently as high/low/unclear. Dissensus will be solved by discussion, and a third person will be brought on board to arbitrate if no consensus is reached. 3 Discussion Scoliosis is a condition that affects a persons life by causing pain and morphological change. Treatments with conventional and surgical methods are helpful but have their limitations. Recently, some reports have suggested that using acupuncture for scoliosis could help with both organic and functional aspects. However, there is no SR on this issue so far. We anticipate that our study will provide the clinical evidence on the effectiveness of acupuncture on scoliosis. We hope that it will be useful a resource for health policy makers, practitioners, patients, and researchers with their further research on scoliosis. Author contributions Conceptualization: Won-Suk Sung, Eun Jung Kim. Funding acquisition: Eun Jung Kim. Investigation: Seong-Kyeong Choi, Hyo-Rim Jo. Methodology: Seo-Hyun Park, Won-Suk Sung. Project administration: Dong-Ho Keum, Eun Jung Kim. Supervision: Eun Jung Kim. Writing – original draft: Seong-Kyeong Choi, Won-Suk Sung. Writing – review & editing: Seo-Hyun Park, Won-Suk Sung, Eun Jung Kim. Abbreviations: CI = confidence intervals, RCT = randomized clinical trial, SR = systematic review. How to cite this article: Choi SK, Jo HR, Park SH, Sung WS, Keum DH, Kim EJ. The effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for scoliosis: a protocol for systematic review and/or meta-analysis. Medicine. 2020;99:50(e23238). This study was supported by the Dongguk University Research fund of 2017. Funder did not have any involvement in the review, editing, or the submission of the manuscript for publication. The authors declare that no conflict of interest. The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. ==== Refs References [1] Negrini S Donzelli S Aulisa AG 2016 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth . Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2018 ;13 :3 .29435499 [2] Trobisch P Suess O Schwab F Idiopathic scoliosis . DtschArztebl Int 2010 ;107 :875 –84 . [3] Janicki JA Alman B Scoliosis: Review of diagnosis and treatment . Paediatr Child Health 2007 ;12 :771 –6 .19030463 [4] Rosenberg JJ Scoliosis . Pediatr Rev 2011 ;32 :397 –8 .21885664 [5] Konieczny MR Senyurt H Krauspe R Epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis . J Child Orthop 2013 ;7 :3 –9 .24432052 [6] Oh CH Jahng YJ Lee JH Scoliosis in a nineteen years old male: prevalence study . Korean J Spine 2010 ;7 :161 –6 . [7] Ekşi MŞ Özcan-Ekşi EE Huet SE Prevalence of thoracic scoliosis in adolescents in Turkey: analysis of 1065 chest radiographs . World Neurosurg 2020 ;135 :e527 –40 .31863897 [8] Moalej S Asadabadi M Hashemi R Screening of scoliosis in school children in Tehran: the prevalence rate of idiopathic scoliosis . J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2018 ;31 :767 –74 .29578478 [9] Carter OD Haynes SG Prevalence rates for scoliosis in US adults: results from the first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey . Int J Epidemiol 1987 ;16 :537 –44 .3501989 [10] Hsu PC Feng CK Huang SH Health-related quality of life in children and adolescent with different types of scoliosis: a cross-sectional study . J Chin Med Assoc 2019 ;82 :161 –5 .30839509 [11] Tones M Moss N Polly DW Jr A review of quality of life and psychosocial issues in scoliosis . Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006 ;31 :3027 –38 .17173000 [12] Weinstein SL Dolan LA Spratt KF Health and function of patients with untreated idiopathic scoliosis: a 50-year natural history study . JAMA 2003 ;289 :559 –67 .12578488 [13] Cunin V Early-onset scoliosis: current treatment . Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2015 ;101 : 1 Suppl : S109 –18 .25623270 [14] Blevins K Battenberg A Beck A Management of Scoliosis . Adv Pediatr 2018 ;65 :249 –66 .30053928 [15] Li C Miao J Gao X Factors associated with caregiver burden in primary caregivers of patients with adolescent scoliosis: a descriptive cross-sectional study . Med Sci Monit 2018 ;24 :6472 –9 .30218532 [16] Pinquart M Sörensen S Associations of caregiver stressors and uplifts with subjective well-being and depressive mood: a meta-analytic comparison . Aging Ment Health 2004 ;8 :438 –49 .15511742 [17] Campbell RM JrSmith MD Thoracic insufficiency syndrome and exotic scoliosis . J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007 ;89 : Suppl 1 : 108 –22 .17272428 [18] Silva FE Lenke LG Adult degenerative scoliosis: evaluation and management . Neurosurg Focus 2010 ;28 :E1 . [19] Graham RB Sugrue PA Koski TR Adult degenerative scoliosis . Clin Spine Surg 2016 ;29 :95 –107 .26945131 [20] Kim HS Evidence-based of nonoperative treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis . Asian Spine J 2014 ;8 :695 –702 .25346826 [21] Negrini S Donzelli S Lusini M The effectiveness of combined bracing and exercise in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis based on SRS and SOSORT criteria: a prospective study . BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014 ;15 :263 .25095800 [22] Subramanyam R Schaffzin J Cudilo EM Systematic review of risk factors for surgical site infection in pediatric scoliosis surgery . Spine J 2015 ;15 :1422 –31 .25796355 [23] Al-Mohrej OA Aldakhil SS Al-Rabiah MA Surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: complications . Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2020 ;52 :19 –23 .32153775 [24] Julien-Marsollier F David R Hilly J Predictors of chronic neuropathic pain after scoliosis surgery in children . Scand J Pain 2017 ;17 :339 –44 .28958698 [25] Basques BA Chung SH Lukasiewicz AM Predicting short-term morbidity in patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion for neuromuscular scoliosis . Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2015 ;40 :1910 –7 .26261918 [26] Hawary RE Zaaroor-Regev D Floman Y Brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: risk factors for failure-a literature review . Spine J 2019 ;19 :1917 –25 .31325626 [27] Karol LA Virostek D Felton K Effect of compliance counseling on brace use and success in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis . J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016 ;98 :9 –14 .26738898 [28] Piantoni L Tello CA Remondino RG Quality of life and patient satisfaction in bracing treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis . Scoliosis Spinal Disord 2018 ;13 :26 .30564635 [29] Weiss HR Bohr S Jahnke A Acupucture in the treatment of scoliosis - a single blind controlled pilot study . Scoliosis 2008 ;3 :4 .18226193 [30] Wei H Xu J Jiang Z Effect of a Traditional Chinese Medicine combined therapy on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a randomized controlled trial . J Tradit Chin Med 2015 ;35 :514 –9 .26591680 [31] Liu CT Chen KC Chiu EH Adult degenerative scoliosis treated by acupuncture . J Altern Complement Med 2009 ;15 :935 –7 .19678786 [32] Vickers AJ Vertosick EA Lewith G Acupuncture for chronic pain: update of an individual patient data meta-analysis . J Pain 2018 ;19 :455 –74 .29198932 [33] Taylor P Pezzullo L Grant SJ Cost-effectiveness of acupuncture for chronic nonspecific low back pain . Pain Pract 2014 ;14 :599 –606 .24138020 [34] Moher D Shamseer L Clarke M Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement . Syst Rev 2015 ;4 :1 .25554246 [35] Higgins JP Altman DG Gøtzsche PC The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials . BMJ 2011 ;343 :d5928 .22008217