==== Front Microbes Environ Microbes Environ JSME2 Microbes and Environments 1342-6311 1347-4405 1342-6311Japanese Society of Microbial Ecology / Japanese Society of Soil Microbiology / Taiwan Society of Microbial Ecology / Japanese Society of Plant Microbe Interactions / Japanese Society for Extremophiles 33281126 DN/JST.JSTAGE/jsme2/ME20100 10.1264/jsme2.ME20100 ME20100 Short Communication An Unknown Non-denitrifier Bacterium Isolated from Soil Actively Reduces Nitrous Oxide under High pH Conditions Non-denitrifier Reduces N2O at High pHTakatsu Yuta 1 Miyamoto Toshizumi 1* Hashidoko Yasuyuki 1† 1 Research Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Kita 9, Nishi 9, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060–8589, Japan * Corresponding author. E-mail: tmiyamot@for.agr.hokudai.ac.jp; Tel: +81–11–706–3854; Fax: +81–11–706–3854.† Deceased November 22, 2019 2020 5 12 2020 35 4 ME2010018 7 2020 16 10 2020 2020 by Japanese Society of Microbial Ecology / Japanese Society of Soil Microbiology / Taiwan Society of Microbial Ecology / Japanese Society of Plant Microbe Interactions / Japanese Society for Extremophiles.2020This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.A nitrous oxide (N2O)-consuming bacterium isolated from farmland soil actively consumed N2O under high pH conditions. An acetylene inhibition assay did not show the denitrification of N2 to N2O by this bacterium. When N2O was injected as the only nitrogen source, this bacterium did not assimilate N2O. A polymerase chain reaction demonstrated that this bacterium did not have the typical nosZ gene. This bacterium belonged to Chitinophagaceae, but did not belong to known families that include bacteria with the atypical nosZ. This is the first study to show that a non-denitrifier actively reduces N2O, even under high pH conditions. bacteriafarmland soilN2ON2O reductionnosZ ==== Body Although carbon dioxide is a well-known greenhouse gas (GHG), other GHG also influence climate change (Montzka et al., 2011). Among these GHG, nitrous oxide (N2O) has a major impact on global warming. N2O absorbs infrared radiation, and its potential to cause global warming is 298-fold that of carbon dioxide and, thus, is regarded as the most important ozone-depleting substance in this century (Ravishankara et al., 2009; Montzka et al., 2011). The emission of N2O from agricultural soil is accelerated by the addition of large amounts of nitrogen-containing fertilizers to farmlands, and accounts for 60% of the atmosphere (Mosier et al., 1998; Zhou et al., 2015). Various methods have been attempted to mitigate N2O emissions. Recent studies reported that N2O emissions may be suppressed by the addition of a substance used as an agrochemical (Obia et al., 2015; Abbruzzini et al., 2019; Takatsu et al., 2019). However, the use of agrochemicals is associated with a number of issues, such as the loss of soil biodiversity and the persistence of soil chemicals (Stolte et al., 2016; Silva et al., 2018), thereby necessitating other methods. Therefore, N2O-reducing microorganisms have been attracting increasing attention (Hallin et al., 2018). N2O is emitted from soil into the atmosphere through the processes of nitrification and denitrification by soil microorganisms, which are major sources of N2O in soil (Skiba and Rees, 2014). In the denitrification pathway, complete denitrifiers (NO3–/NO2– → NO → N2O → N2) and incomplete denitrifiers (NO3–/NO2– → NO → N2O) contribute to the emission of N2O. Complete denitrifiers possess the nosZ gene, which encodes N2O reductase (Zumft, 1997; Wunsch and Zumft, 2005). Furthermore, some non-denitrifying N2O-reducing microorganisms lack the pathway for the conversion of NO3 to N2O, but have the capacity to convert N2O to N2 (Payne et al., 1982; Simon et al., 2004). Therefore, non-denitrifying N2O-reducing microorganisms have the potential to be true N2O sinks without contributing to N2O production (Hallin et al., 2018). NosZ protein phylogeny has two distinct groups, clade I and II nosZ (Hallin et al., 2018). These clades have been reported as typical and atypical nosZ (Sanford et al., 2012). Clade I nosZ comprises alpha-, beta-, or gamma-proteobacteria, while clade II nosZ consists of a large range of archaeal and bacterial phyla (Jones et al., 2013). Non-denitrifying N2O-reducing microorganisms belong to clade II and possess abundant diversity in all ecosystems (Hallin et al., 2018). Complete denitrifiers utilize the N2O present in soil gas as the final electron acceptor in the nitrate respiratory system and emit N2 as the final product into the atmosphere (Hutchins, 1991; Wunsch and Zumft, 2005). N2O is used to promote cell survival, even in the absence of oxygen (Park et al., 2017). Based on the assimilation of N as a nutrient, when N2O is abundant, from the perspective of activation energy, it is more efficient in the assimilation of N2O than N2 fixation (Kryachko et al., 2001). Available N (NO3– and NH4+) in soil is limited, even in relatively fertile soils because these nitrogen sources are competitively assimilated by plants and other microorganisms (Kaye and Hart, 1997). In terms of a survival strategy for bacteria, the assimilation of N2O is advantageous when N2O is abundant. Therefore, some bacteria that positively absorb N2O for assimilation may exist; however, this has not yet been demonstrated. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to search for a bacterium in soil that consumes N2O. We hypothesized that some bacteria among N2O-consuming microorganisms in farmland soil may assimilate N2O when it is abundant through the denitrification process. By detecting changes in N2O concentrations in gas chromatography vials injected with N2O before incubations, strains with the potential to consume N2O were screened among bacteria isolated from farmland soil. Furthermore, an acetylene inhibition assay was conducted to establish whether the decrease in N2O concentrations was due to assimilation or reduction. We herein report the taxonomic affiliation and optimal pH conditions required for N2O reduction by this isolated N2O-reducing bacterium. Andisol was collected on April 14, 2016 from a pasture farmland and the maize field at the Hokkaido University Shizunai Experimental Livestock Farm (Shinhidaka, Hokkaido, Japan [42°25'9"N, 142°29'1"E]) (Katayanagi et al., 2008). Soil samples were collected at a depth of 0–10‍ ‍cm and used in the N2O reduction assay and the isolation of microorganisms. We used soil from the maize field. The soil suspension was prepared as described previously (Hashidoko et al., 2008). Winograsky’s mineral solution containing 0.5% (w/v) sucrose and 5‍ ‍mM KNO3 (0.52‍ ‍g L–1) was used as the medium in the culture-based N2O reduction assay (Hara et al., 2009; Nie et al., 2015). Since pH plays a key role in the emission of N2O (Nie et al., 2015), the pH of the solution was adjusted to various values (4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0) using 2 M H2SO4 and 1 M KOH that was gelled with 0.5% (w/v) gellan gum and then autoclaved. The same medium was used in subsequent experiments. N2O levels were measured as described in a previous study (Nie et al., 2015). N2O was emitted in the culture at pH 4.5–7.5 (Fig. 1). However, N2O emissions decreased in the culture at pH 8.5. This decrease in N2O emissions indicated the presence of N2O-consuming microorganisms. Therefore, we focused on this culture and isolated the bacterium from N2O-consuming microorganisms. To screen for N2O-consuming microorganisms, colonies were isolated as described in a previous study (Nie et al., 2015). Fifteen distinguishable bacterial colonies, marked A to O, were identified. Standard N2O gas (GL Sciences) was injected using a gas-tight syringe into the headspace of gas‍ ‍chromatography vials to a final concentration of 2,000‍ ‍ppmv. After incubations for 0, 1, and 4 days at pH 8.5, N2O concentrations in the headspace gas were measured. The results obtained showed that strain A (Sac-f1) exhibited the greatest consumption of N2O (Fig. 2). To examine the potential of N2O reducers to reduce N2O to N2, 10% volume (2.25‍ ‍mL) acetylene gas and N2O (12,000 ppmv) were injected into the headspace of the assay vials immediately after the inoculation of the isolated bacterium, and media were then incubated at 25°C for 0, 1, 2, 3, and 6‍ ‍weeks. The concentration of N2O was measured after these incubation periods. N2O concentrations did not decrease with the acetylene gas treatment, which confirmed that the bacterium reduced N2O (Fig. 3). Based on the results of OD660 measurements in the medium, when N2O was injected into gas chromatography vials as the only nitrogen source, this bacterium displayed no growth. This result indicated that this bacterium did not use N2O as a nutrient. Furthermore, N2O concentrations did not increase during the incubation with the acetylene gas treatment (Fig. 3). Therefore, the bacterium reduced, but did not assimilate, N2O and did not denitrify NO3– to N2O. The DNA of this bacterium was extracted using an Isoplant II DNA Extraction kit (Nippon Gene), and the nosZ gene was subjected to a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using nosZ gene-specific primers (nosZ-1111F and nosZ-1773R) (Scala and Kerkhof, 1998). The 16S rRNA region was amplified with PCR using the primers 27F and 1525R (Lane, 1991; Weisburg et al., 1991). PCR amplicons using the specific primers were purified by agarose gel electrophoresis. Pseudomonas denitrificans NBRC 12442 was used as the positive control. This bacterium did not have a nosZ gene (Fig. 4), and the region of 16S rRNA was successfully amplified from the DNA template. The 16S rRNA sequence of the isolated bacterium was highly homologous to those of the species belonging to Chitinophagaceae. The closest species to the isolated bacterium was Chitinophaga eiseniae (96.35% similarity). A phylogenetic analysis was performed based on the neighbor-joining method using MEGA X (Kumar et al., 2018). The sequences of the species belonging to Chitinophagaceae were retrieved from the GenBank database. A similar phylogenetic analysis was performed using the 16S rRNA sequence data of previously characterized bacteria showing an atypical nosZ gene (Liu et al., 2008; Sanford et al., 2012; Jones et al., 2013; Park et al., 2017; Hallin et al., 2018) to identify the taxonomic group of the isolated bacterium. We reviewed these studies for species with an atypical nosZ gene in cases where 16S rRNA sequence data were not available. Consequently, this isolated bacterium belonged to the genus Chitinophaga (Fig. 5A). However, it was not reported whether the bacteria from this family belonged to clade II nosZ (Fig. 5B). To assess the effects of pH on N2O reduction by the isolated bacterium, the pH of the media was adjusted to various values (4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0), followed by incubations for 0, 1, 2, and 3‍ ‍weeks. N2O was injected as described earlier. This isolated bacterium reduced N2O at pH in the range of 4.5 to 9.0, with the optimum pH being 8.5 (Fig. 6). Previous studies reported that soil microorganisms belonging to clade II reduce N2O at pH 7.0–7.5 (Liu et al., 2008; Sanford et al., 2012; Jones et al., 2013; Park et al., 2017; Hallin et al., 2018), whereas the isolated bacterium in the present study reduced N2O under alkaline rather than neutral conditions (Fig. 6). The present results clearly demonstrated that the isolated bacterium did not assimilate N2O, but reduced N2O to N2. The results of the phylogenetic tree analysis revealed that this bacterium was an unknown species belonging to Chitinophagaceae and reduced N2O at high pH (8.5). Since the application of nitrogen fertilizers, such as urea, to farmlands results in the largest increase in pH (Black et al., 1985) and accelerates N2O emissions (Zhou et al., 2015), a fertilizer inoculated with this isolated bacterium may be used to suppress the N2O flux from agricultural soil. Further investigations, draft genome analyses, and measurements of enzyme activity are needed to clarify the genetic background of this isolated bacterium. Nucleotide sequence accession number The 16S rRNA sequence obtained in the present study has been deposited under the following GenBank/ENE/DDBJ accession number: LC554186. Citation Takatsu, Y., Miyamoto, T., and Hashidoko, Y. (2020) An Unknown Non-denitrifier Bacterium Isolated from Soil Actively Reduces Nitrous Oxide under High pH Conditions. Microbes Environ 35: ME20100. https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME20100 Acknowledgements We are grateful to Dr. Makoto Hashimoto and Dr. Yasuko Sakihama for their helpful discussions (Laboratory of Molecular and Ecological Chemistry, Research Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Japan). We thank Dr. Ryusuke Hatano for providing the gas chromatography instruments used in the N2O assay (Soil Science Laboratory, Research Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Japan). This study was designed by Professor Yasuyuki Hashidoko, and experiments were conducted under his instruction. However, he died during the course of this study in 2019. May he rest in peace. Fig. 1. Responses of N2O-consuming communities in the soil suspension to optimal pH. The soft gel medium for the culture-based N2O reduction assay was adjusted to alternative pH values (4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0), and the soil suspension was incubated at 25°C for 3‍ ‍weeks. Error bars indicate SE (n=3). Fig. 2. N2O-consuming activities of the isolated bacterium in the N2O reduction assay. The N2O reduction activities of 15 isolates were tested together with a blank in the soft gel medium for the culture-based N2O reduction assay (pH 8.5). Among those tested, one isolate (marked as A) reduced the concentration of N2O from the background levels of N2O (2,000 ppmv) and media were incubated at 25°C for 4 days before N2O (approximately 2,000 ppmv) was injected into gas chromatography vials. Blank indicates no bacterial inoculation treatment. The arrow indicates the greatest consumption of N2O (A=Sac-f1). Fig. 3. Responses of N2O reducers to 10% acetylene gas. The soft gel medium for the culture-based N2O reduction assay was adjusted to pH 8.5, and media were incubated at 25°C for 6‍ ‍weeks before N2O (about 10,000 ppmv) was injected into gas chromatography vials. Control indicates no acetylene treatment, and +10% acetylene indicates the acetylene treatment. Blank indicates no bacterial inoculation treatment. Error bars indicate SE (n=3). Fig. 4. Agarose gel showing the species-specific amplification of the 662-bp fragment. Fluorescence and related species obtained using the primers nosZ 1111 F and nosZ 1773 R. Lane 1: marker gene, lane 2: Pseudomonas denitrificans NBRC 12442 (positive control), lane 3: isolated bacterium, and lane 4: Blank. Fig. 5. The neighbor-joining tree shows phylogenetic relationships of the isolated bacterium. Similarity and distance matrices were calculated using MEGA X. The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on available 16S rRNA sequences. A) Phylogenetic tree with references from Chitinophagaceae. B) Phylogenetic tree with references from the atypical nosZ clade. We used the neighbor-joining method with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. The scale bar represents the expected number of changes per sequence position. Fig. 6. Responses of the isolated bacterium, a N2O reducer, to optimal pH. The soft gel medium for the culture-based N2O reduction assay was adjusted to alternative pH values (4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0), and media were incubated at 25°C for 3‍ ‍weeks before N2O (approximately 10,000 ppmv) was injected into gas chromatography vials. Blank indicates no bacterial inoculation treatment. Error bars indicate SE (n=3). ==== Refs References Abbruzzini T.F. , Davies C.A. , Toledo F.H. , and Cerri C.E.P. (2019 ) Dynamic biochar effects on nitrogen use efficiency, crop yield and soil nitrous oxide emissions during a tropical wheat-growing season . J Environ Manage 252 : 109638 .31586743 Black A.S. , Sherlock R.R. , Smith N.P. , Cameron K.C. , and Goh K.M. (1985 ) Effects of form of nitrogen, season, and urea application rate on ammonia volatilisation from pastures . N Z J Agric Res 28 : 469 –474 . Hallin S. , Philippot L. , Löffler F.E. , Sanford R.A. , and Jones C.M. (2018 ) Genomics and ecology of novel N2O-reducing microorganisms . Trends Microbiol 26 : 43 –55 .28803698 Hara S. , Hashidoko Y. , Desyatkin R.V. , Hatano R. , and Tahara S. (2009 ) High rate of N2 fixation by East Siberian cryophilic soil bacteria as determined by measuring acetylene reduction in nitrogen-poor medium solidified with gellan gum . Appl Environ Microbiol 75 : 2811 –2819 .19286791 Hashidoko Y. , Takakai F. , Toma Y. , Darung U. , Melling L. , Tahara S. , and Hatano R. (2008 ) Emergence and behaviors of acid-tolerant Janthino bacterium sp. that evolves N2O from deforested tropical peatland . Soil Biol Biochem 40 : 116 –125 . Hutchins S.R. (1991 ) Biodegradation of monoaromatic hydrocarbons by aquifer microorganisms using oxygen, nitrate, or nitrous oxide as the terminal electron acceptor . Appl Environ Microbiol 57 : 2403 –2407 .1768110 Jones C.M. , Graf D.R. , Bru D. , Philippot L. , and Hallin S. (2013 ) The unaccounted yet abundant nitrous oxide-reducing microbial community: a potential nitrous oxide sink . ISME J 7 : 417 –426 .23151640 Katayanagi N. , Sawamoto T. , Hayakawa A. , and Hatano R. (2008 ) Nitrous oxide and nitric oxide fluxes from cornfield, grassland, pasture and forest in a watershed in Southern Hokkaido, Japan . Soil Sci Plant Nutr 54 : 662 –680 . Kaye J.P. , and Hart S.C. (1997 ) Competition for nitrogen between plants and soil microorganisms . Trends Ecol Evol 12 : 139 –143 .21238010 Kryachko E.S. , Vinckier C. , and Nguyen M.T. (2001 ) Another look at the electron attachment to nitrous oxide . J Chem Phys 114 : 7911 –7917 . Kumar S. , Stecher G. , Li M. , Knyaz C. , and Tamura K. (2018 ) MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms . Mol Biol Evol 35 : 1547 –1549 .29722887 Liu X. , Gao C. , Zhang A. , Jin P. , Wang L. , and Feng L. (2008 ) The nos gene cluster from gram-positive bacterium Geobacillus thermodenitrificans NG80-2 and functional characterization of the recombinant NosZ . FEMS Microbiol Lett 289 : 46 –52 .19054093 Montzka S.A. , Dlugokencky E.J. , and Butler J.H. (2011 ) Non-CO2 greenhouse gases and climate change . Nature 476 : 43 –50 .21814274 Mosier A. , Kroeze C. , Nevison C. , Oenema O. , Seitzinger S. , and Cleemput O.V. (1998 ) Closing the global N2O budget: nitrous oxide emissions through the agricultural nitrogen cycle . Nutr Cycling Agroecosyst 52 : 225 –248 . Nie Y. , Li L. , Wang M. , Tahvanainen T. , and Hashidoko Y. (2015 ) Nitrous oxide emission potentials of Burkholderia species isolated from the leaves of a boreal peat moss Sphagnum fuscum . Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 79 : 2086 –2095 .26167675 Obia A. , Cornelissen G. , Mulder J. , and Dörsch P. (2015 ) Effect of soil pH increase by biochar on NO, N2O and N2 production during denitrification in acid soils . PLoS One 10 : e0138781 .26397367 Park D. , Kim H. , and Yoon S. (2017 ) Nitrous oxide reduction by an obligate aerobic bacterium, Gemmatimonas aurantiaca Strain T-27 . Appl Environ Microbiol 83 : e00502 -17 .28389533 Payne W.J. , Grant M.A. , Shapleigh J. , and Hoffman P. (1982 ) Nitrous oxide reduction in Wolinella succinogenes and Campylobacter species . J Bacteriol 152 : 915 –918 .7130133 Ravishankara A.R. , Daniel J.S. , and Portmann R.W. (2009 ) Nitrous oxide (N2O): The dominant ozone-depleting substance emitted in the 21st century . Science 326 : 123 –125 .19713491 Sanford R.A. , Wagner D.D. , Wuc Q. , Chee-Sanford J.C. , Thomas S.H. , Cruz-García C. , et al. (2012 ) Unexpected nondenitrifier nitrous oxide reductase gene diversity and abundance in soils . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109 : 19709 –19714 .23150571 Scala D.J. , and Kerkhof L.J. (1998 ) Nitrous oxide reductase (nosZ) gene-specific PCR primers for detection of denitrifiers and three nosZ genes from marine sediments . FEMS Microbiol Lett 162 : 61 –68 .9595664 Silva V. , Mol H.G.J. , Zomer P. , Tienstra M. , Ritsema C.J. , and Geissen V. (2018 ) Pesticide residues in European agricultural soils—a hidden reality unfolded . Sci Total Environ 653 : 1532 –1545 .30759587 Simon J. , Einsle O. , Kroneck P.M.H. , and Zumft W.G. (2004 ) The unprecedented nos gene cluster of Wolinella succinogenes encodes a novel respiratory electron transfer pathway to cytochrome c nitrous oxide reductase . FEBS Lett 569 : 7 –12 .15225600 Skiba U.M. , and Rees R.M. (2014 ) Nitrous oxide, climate change and agriculture . CAB Rev 9 : 1 –7 . Stolte, J., Tesfai, M., Øygarden, L., Kværnø, S., Keizer, J., Verheijen, F., et al. (2016) Soil Threats in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Takatsu Y. , Lau S.Y.L. , Li L. , and Hashidoko Y. (2019 ) Effects of some hill reaction-inhibiting herbicides on nitrous oxide emission from nitrogen-input farming soil . Appl Sci 9 : 1903 . Wunsch P. , and Zumft W.G. (2005 ) Functional domains of NosR, a novel transmembrane iron-sulfur flavoprotein necessary for nitrous oxide respiration . J Bacteriol 187 : 1992 –2001 .15743947 Zhou M. , Zhu B. , Brüggemann N. , Wang X. , Zheng X. , and Butterbach-Bahl K. (2015 ) Nitrous oxide and methane emissions from a subtropical rice–rapeseed rotation system in China: A 3-year field case study . Agric, Ecosyst Environ 212 : 297 –309 . Zumft W.G. (1997 ) Cell biology and molecular basis of denitrification . Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61 : 533 –616 .9409151