==== Front Int J Environ Res Public Health Int J Environ Res Public Health ijerph International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 1661-7827 1660-4601 MDPI 33291535 10.3390/ijerph17239037 ijerph-17-09037 Article Acute Effects of Brief Mindfulness Intervention Coupled with Carbohydrate Ingestion to Re-Energize Soccer Players: A Randomized Crossover Trial https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3888-1336Zhu Yuxin 1 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5251-4087Sun Fenghua 1* https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9959-5029Li Chunxiao 2 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9333-4920Chow Daniel Hung Kay 1 1 Department of Health and Physical Education, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; im.usinzu@gmail.com (Y.Z.); danielchow@eduhk.hk (D.H.K.C.) 2 School of Physical Education & Sports Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China; cxlilee@gmail.com * Correspondence: fhsun@eduhk.hk; Tel.: +852-2948-7854 04 12 2020 12 2020 17 23 903718 11 2020 01 12 2020 © 2020 by the authors.2020Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Background: This field experiment investigated the acute effects of brief mindfulness-based intervention (MBI) coupled with carbohydrate (CHO) intake on players’ recovery from half-time break in a simulated soccer competition. Methods: In a single-blinded randomized crossover experiment, 14 male players received 3 treatments (Control: non-carbohydrate solution + travelling introduction audio; CHO: CHO–electrolyte solution + travelling introduction audio; and CHO_M: CHO–electrolyte solution + MBI) during simulated half-time breaks. Vertical jump, sprint performance, mindfulness level, rate of perceived exertion, muscle pain, mental fatigue, blood glucose, and lactate were measured immediately before, during, and after the exercise. Results: (1) MBI significantly increased participants’ mindfulness level (Control vs. CHO_M, p < 0.01; CHO vs. CHO_M, p < 0.01) and decreased mental fatigue for CHO_M condition (pre vs. post, p < 0.01); (2) participants in the CHO_M condition performed better in the repeated sprint tests than in the Control and CHO condition (Control vs. CHO_M, p = 0.02; CHO vs. CHO_M, p = 0.02). Conclusion: Findings of this study provide preliminary evidence of the positive effect of MBI coupled with CHO ingestion on athletes’ recovery from fatigue in the early stage of the second half of a game. recoveryteam sportfatigue ==== Body 1. Introduction The game of soccer involves high-intensity intermittent exercise that can cause physiological and mental fatigue [1]. Physiological fatigue is generally defined as maximal voluntary muscle force reduction caused by exercise, while mental fatigue refers to a psychobiological status involving feelings of tiredness and lack of energy [1]. Laboratory-based research has demonstrated that both types of fatigue could adversely affect athletic performance. For example, muscle damage, resulting in physiological fatigue, impairs an athlete’s performance by increasing muscle pain and decreasing muscle force [2]. Meanwhile, research has shown that mental fatigue causes altered attentional focus and reduces the speed and preciseness of responses [3]. Thus, fast recovery from fatigue is crucial to an athlete’s performance. In soccer, the half-time break has been regarded as a good opportunity to recover from fatigue [4]. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate whether any strategies could facilitate soccer players’ recovery from physiological and mental fatigue during that critical period. Fluid intake in the form of common sports drinks is one of the most popular recovery strategies, as it prevents excessive dehydration and provides various nutrients for recovery. Nutrients with fluids, such as carbohydrate (CHO), have been found to be important for both anaerobic and aerobic energy systems [5]. Research suggests that CHO ingestion during a soccer match maintains the blood glucose concentration and spares muscle glycogen, which may improve performance in soccer [6]. Although numerous studies have investigated the effects of fluid intake on recovery from physiological fatigue, little attention has been paid to understand the recovery of mental fatigue. Recently, the potential benefits of mindfulness have been researched widely by scholars in a diverse number of fields, including psychology, education, healthcare, and sports (e.g., athletes’ sleep [7,8] and burnout [9]). Mindfulness is defined as the awareness that emerges from paying attention to objects on purpose and without judging the unfolding of experience moment by moment [10]. The mindfulness-based intervention (MBI) programs that typically last for 8–12 weeks have been shown to reduce stress, anxiety, burnout, and pain [11]. In addition, brief MBI (i.e., 5–20 min/session) programs have been found to reduce chronic pain or increase pain tolerance [12,13], benefit cardiovascular and respiratory modulation [14], and help physiological relaxation responses [15]. To date, MBI has not been studied as a recovery tool in the context of sports competition. Considering the effectiveness of MBI in improving psychological outcomes [12,13,14,15,16,17], it is highly possible that MBI may provide beneficial effects in fatigue recovery after a 45 min soccer match. The present study therefore investigated the effect of brief MBI as an adjunct to CHO fluid intake to reenergize soccer players during half-time breaks. We hypothesized that the combination strategy would yield the best effect on recovery when compared with the other two conditions, i.e., CHO fluid intake with control audio and non-CHO fluid intake with control audio, respectively. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Participants In total, 18 male soccer players were recruited, of which 14 completed the whole experiment (age: 24.3 ± 3.7 year, height: 1.74 ± 0.05 cm, weight: 68.3 ± 5.1 kg, VO2max: 47.0 ± 4.4 mL/kg/min; average training years: 2.5 years; drop-out rate: 22%). Participants reported no history of MBI practice. The present research was approved by the University Human Research Ethics Committee (Ref. no. 2018-2019-0221). All the participants gave their written consent prior to joining the experiment. 2.2. Experimental Protocol A 3-treatment, single-blinded, randomized, crossover design was used [17]. All the participants completed 1 pretrial and 3 main trials in 1 month. To prevent a carry-over effect and the effect of individual differences in recovery, washout periods of at least 72 h were arranged [2]. On the trial day, participants were refrained from ingesting any food or drink with caffeine, alcohol, or nicotine. In addition, they had restrictions on performing heavy exercises on the day before the main trial. For the main trials, participants were allocated to different small groups based on their maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max), i.e., participants with similar VO2max were assigned to the same group. Each participant was randomized to a sequence of three treatments (i.e., Control; CHO; CHO_M) by using Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). 2.2.1. Pretrial To estimate VO2max in the pretrial, the participants were instructed to finish a 20 m beep test (starting at 8.0 km/h and increasing by 0.5 km/h for each one-minute stage) after a warm-up session [18]. The warm-up protocol involved running for five laps around the field (i.e., 600 m) with low to moderate intensity, both static and dynamic stretching, 20 m of running at 55% VO2max, 20 m of running at 95% VO2max, and vertical jump (as high as possible) for three times. Participants could change warm-up intensity and time based on their personal habits, as long as it was finished within ten minutes. After that, participants had their body height and weight measured, and a detailed demographic information form completed. Furthermore, participants read the hard copy of the experimental protocol of the main trial to familiarize themselves with the study procedures. 2.2.2. Main Trial The main trials were conducted during the daytime (i.e., 9:00 a.m.–5:30 p.m.). The average temperature was 28.9 ± 5.2 °C and average air humidity was 75.7% ± 5.8%. Two hours before entering the test field, participants were instructed to drink 500 mL of plain water to be normally hydrated [19]. Bladders were to be completely emptied before the main trials The Loughborough Intermittent Shuttle Test [20] was selected, given that it is a reliable action mode to simulate athletic performance in soccer matches. The protocol consists of six 15-min blocks of exercise separated by 3-min rest periods. The exercises of each block include 10–12 cycles of different activities (i.e., a 20-min walk, 20-min maximal sprint, 4-s standing rest, 20-min run at approximately 55% VO2max pace, and 20-min run at approximately 95% VO2max pace). In the main trials, participants were instructed to finish the first 3 blocks of protocol to simulate the exercise intensity of the first half of a soccer match, and to finish the Stroop test on screen during the interval of each block to simulate the cognitive consumption of playing a soccer match. [21]. Participants’ blood samples in the pretest were collected after they arrived at the test field. Then they were instructed to complete a 10-min warm-up following a standard protocol as described in pretrial. Subsequently, the warm-up vertical jump, 20-m sprint, rating of perceived exertion (RPE), muscle pain, and mental fatigue were measured. During the break between two blocks, participants were asked to report their RPE level (i.e., second and third tests) and complete one Stroop test to induce mental fatigue. After finishing the first 3 blocks of exercise protocol, all participants had a half-time break that simulated the half-time break of a real soccer match. At the start of half-time, participants were asked to report their RPE (i.e., fourth test), provide a blood sample (i.e., mid-test), and drink a beverage. There were 2 different beverages (i.e., with and without CHO) contained in unmarked paper cups. Then they were required to listen to a 6-min audio labelled with numbers followed by the report of mindfulness level, muscle pain and mental fatigue. To avoid injury and maintain sport performance, they were instructed to do a standardized warm-up for 3 min (i.e., 200 m running, dynamic stretches, a 90% VO2max sprint for 50 m and 2 vertical jumps) before the posttest for vertical jump and sprint performance. The processes of post tests were the same as those of the pretest except that the sprint performance test was repeated 6 times with a 30-s interval. Finally, participants’ RPE (posttest) and blood samples (i.e., posttest) were collected. The protocol is illustrated in Figure 1. 2.3. Treatment In the half-time break, three different treatments (i.e., CHO, CHO_M, and Control, as defined below) were applied. Treatment CHO involved a CHO-electrolyte solution (Aquarius®, Coca-Cola Co., Hong Kong, China), contained with 4.2 g CHO, 30 mg sodium, 7 mg potassium, 0.7 mg calcium, 1.1 mg magnesium, and 18 kcal energy, 3 mL/kg of which was to be consumed by the participants in each trial [22]. In addition, the researchers instructed them to listen to a 6-min travelling introduction, an audio recording of a Chinese tourist attraction, without mindfulness content, as an active control. Treatment CHO_M involved the same CHO-electrolyte solution as well as a 6-min MBI comprising mindful breathing and body scanning. The Control treatment involved the same electrolyte solution but without CHO and energy (Aquarius Zero®, Coca-Cola Co., Hong Kong, China), with the same volume, time, and steps, as stated in CHO treatment. 2.4. Measurements 2.4.1. Heart Rate The researchers recorded the heart rate (HR) during the half-time using an HR monitor (Polar H10, Polar Electro Oy, Kempele, Finland) and an iPad (2018 version, Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA, USA). 2.4.2. Blood Samples Blood glucose was measured using a portable glucose analyzer (Accu-Chek Performa Nano, Roche, Germany). Blood lactate was assessed using a handheld portable lactate analyzer (Lactate Plus, Nova Biomedical, Waltham, MA, USA). 2.4.3. Vertical Jump Vertical jump performance (i.e., jump height, flight time, velocity, force, and power) was assessed through the application “My Jump II” on the iPad (2018 version, Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA, USA). Jump height is determined by the app using the equation h = t2 × 1.22625, described by Bosco et al., where h stands for the jump height and t for flight time [23]. All collections were made with the same iPad and by the same researcher with no professional experience in video analysis. The researcher was always recording from the same position and with the same distance from the participants (i.e., 1.5 m). The validity and reliability of the application has previously been proven [24]. 2.4.4. Sprint Performance The 20-m sprint performance was measured using the Kinematic Measurement System ((KMS) Innervation, Perth, Australia), a visible red-light system modulated by a single beam with 2 sets of gates and polarizing filters. The time between the points when the participants passed through the first and second gates was recorded as the sprint performance. 2.4.5. Mindfulness State Similar to other studies [17], the researchers asked the participants to answer 2 statements (“I felt in touch with my body” and “I focused on my breathing”) as a manipulation check of mindfulness induction immediately after completing the treatments. A 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (very slightly or not at all) to 6 (extremely), was used for responses. A higher mindfulness score by averaging the two responses indicated a higher mindfulness level. 2.4.6. Muscle Pain Levels of muscle pain were evaluated by a pain intensity scale ranging from 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (extremely unbearable), as used in previous research [25]. 2.4.7. Perceived Exertion The RPE was assessed using the Borg 15-point RPE scale [26], ranging from 6 (very light) to 20 (extremely unbearable). 2.5. Statistical Analysis A normality test was assessed for all variables. ANOVAs were performed, as the F-test remains a valid statistical procedure under non-normality in a variety of conditions [27,28]. A two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to detect the main and interactive effects of treatments (i.e., Control, CHO, and CHO_M) and time (i.e., pretest and posttest) on participants’ performance (i.e., vertical jump, sprint performance, RPE level, blood glucose and lactate, muscle pain, and mental fatigue). A one-way repeated ANOVA was used to test the difference of mindfulness state among three groups. For variables that adopted multiple posttests (i.e., sprint), the difference between pretest and each posttest was computed for further analysis. If a significant effect was observed, post hoc tests with Bonferroni correction were conducted. The significance level was set at α = 0.05, and effect size was referred to by ŋ2 (partial eta squared). The analyses were conducted in SPSS 25.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). 3. Results 3.1. Vertical Jump Table 1 presents the mean (M) and standard deviation (SD) of five indices of vertical jump (i.e., height, flight time, velocity, force, and power). The five indices did not exhibit any interactive and treatment effects. Three indices exhibited significant time differences, with the values of pretest being higher than those of posttest (p < 0.01, partial ŋ2 = 0.65 for flight time; p < 0.01, partial ŋ2 = 0.65 for velocity; and p < 0.01, partial ŋ2 = 0.67 for height). 3.2. Sprint Performance 3.2.1. Sprint Performance—Difference between Pretest and Each of the Posttests Table 2 presents the difference of sprint performance between pretest and each of six posttests. A significant interactive effect (p = 0.02, partial ŋ2 = 0.20) and treatment effect (p = 0.01, partial ŋ2 = 0.30) was observed. Post hoc analysis revealed that the CHO_M group performed better than the CHO (p = 0.02) and Control groups (p = 0.02) in post repeated sprint tests. No group differences were detected between CHO and Control groups (p = 1.00) (Table 2). 3.2.2. Sprint Performance—Pretest and First Posttest No significant interaction effect on sprint performance (p = 0.12, partial ŋ2 = 0.30) was found. There was no significant treatment effect on sprint performance (p = 0.60, partial ŋ2 = 0.08), but time had a significant main effect (p < 0.01, partial ŋ2 = 0.50). Post hoc analysis revealed that sprint performance in the pretest (M = 3.32, SD = 0.03) was significantly better than that in the first posttest (M = 3.42, SD = 0.05; p < 0.01). 3.3. Mindfulness State The mindfulness state of the three groups showed significant differences (p < 0.01, partial η2 = 0.97). The post hoc tests showed that participants in the CHO_M group had significantly higher mindfulness levels (M = 5.32; SD = 0.15) than those in the Control (M = 2.11; SD = 0.19; p < 0.01) and CHO groups (M = 2.43; SD = 0.27; p < 0.01). However, the Control and CHO groups showed no significant difference (p = 1.00). 3.4. Blood Glucose and Lactate The interaction effect was not statistically significant in terms of blood glucose (p = 0.60, partial ŋ2 = 0.22). The treatment had no significant effect (p = 0.86, partial ŋ2 = 0.03), but there was significant time effect on blood glucose (p < 0.01, partial ŋ2 = 0.60). Post hoc analysis revealed that the mid-test glucose level (M = 6.61, SD = 0.21) was significantly higher than that of the posttest (M = 5.74, SD = 0.11; p < 0.01). For lactate, there was no interactive effect (p = 0.31, partial ŋ2 = 0.09). A significant main effect was revealed in terms of time (p < 0.01, partial ŋ2 = 0.96) but not on treatment (p = 0.15, partial ŋ2 = 0.27). The post hoc test showed that the mid-test lactate level (M = 6.06, SD = 0.33) was significantly higher than that of the pretest (M = 1.58, SD = 0.16; p < 0.01) and posttest (M = 5.82, SD = 0.29; p < 0.01). Moreover, the posttest lactate level was higher than that of the pretest (p < 0.01). 3.5. Muscle Pain and Mental Fatigue The interaction effect between treatment and time was not statistically significant in terms of muscle pain (p = 0.29, partial ŋ2 = 0.19). There was no significant treatment effect (p = 0.51, partial ŋ2 = 0.11), but time had a significant main effect (p < 0.01, partial ŋ2 = 0.89). Post hoc analysis revealed that the muscle pain in the pretest (M = 1.93, SD = 0.24) was significantly lower than that in the posttest (M = 4.76, SD = 0.26; p < 0.01). Regarding mental fatigue, a significant interactive effect was observed (p < 0.01, partial ŋ2 = 0.65). Post hoc analysis showed that there was a significant treatment effect in posttest (Control vs. CHO vs. CHO_M: 52.14 ± 7.43 vs. 67.14 ± 4.25 vs. 28.57 ± 6.10; p = 0.23 for Control vs. CHO; p = 0.05 for CHO vs. CHO_M and p < 0.01 for Control vs. CHO_M). A significant within group difference was also observed in both CHO (pre vs. post: 47.86 ± 23.92 vs. 67.14 ± 15.90, p < 0.01) and CHO_M groups (pre vs. post: 59.29 ± 15.92 vs. 28.57 ± 22.82, p < 0.01) but not in the control group (pre vs. post: 55.00 ± 14.01 vs. 52.14 ± 27.78, p = 0.68) (Figure 2). 3.6. Rate of Perceived Exertion The interaction was not significant (p = 0.44, partial ŋ2 = 0.07). No significant treatment effect was detected (p = 0.77, partial ŋ2 = 0.04), but the main effect of time was significant (p < 0.01, partial ŋ2 = 0.95). According to the post hoc analysis, the pretest scores (M = 8.33, SD = 0.42) were significantly lower than other following scores. Scores of the third (M = 18.69, SD = 0.41) and fourth tests (M = 19.31, SD = 0.23) were the two highest, followed by the second (M = 16.244, SD = 0.41) and posttest (M = 16.17, SD = 0.27). No difference was found between the third and mid-tests and between the second and posttest. 3.7. Heart Rate Results indicated that no interactive effect was detected (p = 0.26, partial ŋ2 = 0.09). There was no significant treatment effect (p = 0.24, partial ŋ2 = 0.20), but a significant time effect (p < 0.01, partial ŋ2 = 0.73). Post hoc analysis showed that participants’ heartrate decreased significantly during the intervention period (pre vs. post: M = 129.14, SD = 11.27; M = 115.19, SD = 11.71, p < 0.01). 4. Discussion To our knowledge, this study is the first field trial that investigated the application of brief MBI coupled with CHO on soccer players’ recovery during a half-time break. Applying brief MBI coupled with CHO ingestion during half-time breaks was found to significantly increase athletes’ mindfulness levels and decrease athletes’ mental fatigue. In addition, compared with the participants in Control and CHO groups, participants in the CHO_M performed better in the repeated sprint tests but not in single measures (e.g., vertical jump, pretest, and first posttest in sprint performance). As hypothesized, participants who received brief MBI coupled with CHO during the half-time break performed better in some facets when compared with those who received other treatments (e.g., sprint performance). Brief MBI was also helpful for recovery from mental fatigue. As previous literature has demonstrated that both acceptant mood and relaxing breath positively affect the brain, the capacity of mindfulness to improve acceptance and relaxation can affect the biological system that regulates the generation of mental fatigue [29]. With regard to our observations about mental fatigue, three potential mechanisms were raised. First, as Smith [30] pointed out in a review study, the causation of mental fatigue during a soccer games is influenced by the anterior cingulate cortex (i.e., it increases adenosine and decreases dopamine). Given that previous studies have demonstrated stronger subgenual and adjacent ventral anterior cingulate cortex activity, which controls parasympathetic activity, in the MBI condition through imaging data [31], it is possible to restore mental fatigue through MBI. Second, MBI has been proven to improve respiratory sinus arrhythmia [32], a variation of heart rate in synchrony with respiration [33] that increases in the resting state and decreases in conditions of stress or tension. Therefore, possibly, the increase of respiratory sinus arrhythmia is closer to the resting state and thus relieves mental fatigue. Third, respiratory sinus arrhythmia is a valid and reliable biomarker of emotional regulation capacity in humans, and has been frequently used as a noninvasive method for investigating cardiac vagal tone [34,35]. In addition, mindfulness is beneficial to the prefrontal cortex, which can modulate brain activities in multiple emotion-processing systems [36]. Therefore, mindfulness has potential effects on emotional regulation and mental fatigue. One explanation for the observed improvement in repetitive sprinting is that, in general, the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) are in equilibrium in the rest state. During exercise, increased levels of SNS activity upsets the balance, leading to biological changes such as pupil dilation, faster heart beats, atelectasis, and blood pressure elevation [37]. After receiving the acceptance hint (i.e., MBI), the activity levels of the PNS are induced, thus promoting the “rest and digest” response that calms the body down [16]. Another reason for the observed improvement in repeated sprinting is that it might be affected by cerebral oxygenation, which is related to the prefrontal cortex [38]. Previous fMRI studies have determined that MBI regulates the activity of the prefrontal cortex [36]. Therefore, we observed an increase in repeated sprinting performance. For vertical jump, three of the five indices exhibited significant pre–post differences, while the other two did not. This is not very surprising, as a previous review study has indicated that compared with other indices, power should be reported with caution [39]. Additionally, one possible explanation is that after half time break, athletes’ power and force recovered relatively faster than the other three indices. Although some previous studies have confirmed the immediate effect of MBI on releasing pathological pain [13], the same results were not observed in the present research. Probably, short-term mindfulness training for acute pain is not always effective [40]. This is because the mechanisms that cause pathological pain and those that cause exercise-induced muscle pain are different from each other [41,42]. As the improved immune system is probably the mediator between MBI and pathological pain [11], such a link may be absent in sports-related muscle damage. Another potential reason might be that there was no effect of mindfulness on adjusting endorphin levels, which can cause muscle pain [43]. Further, although previous studies have asserted that MBI positively affects HR recovery by improving cardiac efficiency [14], no statistically significant group difference was observed in our research. This is probably due to participants in this study being beginners in the use of mindfulness techniques. Another possible reason is that the period of receiving MBI in this study was also the period of a transition from high-intensity exercise to a relaxed state. Therefore, the heart rate changes due to the difference of activity state may buffer the change caused by MBI. Further research on this phenomenon is necessary. No statistically significant influence was observed on the values of blood glucose and lactate between the Control, CHO, and CHO_M groups. This result is consistent with previous studies in which both ingestion of a CHO beverage before and during a competition had no effect on participants’ blood glucose [44]. A possible explanation is that respiratory sinus arrhythmia may have evolved to save energy for both cardiac and respiratory systems by suppressing unnecessary heartbeats during exhalation and ineffective ventilation during the ebb of perfusion (delivery of blood from arteries to capillaries for oxygenation and nutrition) [33,45]. Therefore, MBI practice may delay the effect of CHO digestion and glucose absorption at the capillaries during the test. Our findings also indicate that the ingestion of CHO during a half-time break may have both positive and negative effects on the initial stage of second-half performance. Although previous review studies have reported that the ingestion of CHO in prolonged exercise can enhance athletes’ performance and maintain their endurance [6], this study found CHO to have a significant negative effect on mental fatigue. This is in line with a previous meta-analysis that concluded that CHO ingestion does not have a beneficial effect on mood and may increase fatigue within 30 min post-consumption [46]. In reference to the mentioned results, MBI seems to have the effect of buffering the negative influence of CHO. This point also requires further investigation. The results of our study have practical implications. It has been confirmed that MBI can be used during half-time breaks of soccer games. Although mindfulness resulted in a significant increase in RSA compared with a relaxation strategy in a nonathletic- or nonexercise-population [32], considering that half-time is short and important, MBI’s superiority to other mainstream psychological interventions (e.g., self-talk, goal setting, imagery) needs to be further investigated. The current study was a field test that could simulate exercise intensity but not athletes’ moods during the game. Future studies should be conducted in real games. This study has several limitations. First, although the current trial simulated the exercise intensity of half of a soccer match, the atmosphere of competition was not simulated. As previous studies have suggested, athletes’ moods could affect their performance [47], and it is possible that the atmosphere of real competition may affect the physiological and psychological measurements in the current study. Future studies may consider conducting trials in a real soccer competition. Second, although ingesting CHO is a convenient and common recovery strategy during the half-time break, no control group with MBI alone was involved in the current study. Future research may consider investigating the unique effect of brief MBI alone on soccer players. 5. Conclusions In conclusion, our field experiment provides preliminary evidence of the positive effects of brief MBI coupled with ingestion of CHO on athletes’ recovery from fatigue in the initial stage of the second half of a game. Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Author Contributions Conceptualization, Y.Z., F.S., C.L. and D.H.K.C.; Formal analysis, Y.Z. and C.L.; Funding acquisition, F.S.; Methodology, Y.Z., F.S., C.L. and D.H.K.C.; Resources, F.S.; Supervision, F.S.; Writing—original draft, Y.Z.; Writing—review and editing, F.S., C.L. and D.H.K.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding The work was partly supported by Internal Research Grant of Education University of Hong Kong (RG91/17-18R). Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results. Figure 1 Adopted from the Loughborough Intermittent Shuttle Test. Figure 2 Changes in the 3 groups’ mental fatigue through time. * p = 0.05; ** p < 0.01. ijerph-17-09037-t001_Table 1Table 1 The performance of five dimensions for vertical jump between pre and post-test (M ± SD). Variable Pre Post Control CHO CHO_M Control CHO CHO_M Height (cm) 42.92 42.08 43.27 39.45 40.32 41.84 (6.93) (8.10) (8.08) (7.48) (8.15) (8.28) Flight time (ms) 589.93 583.43 591.71 564.86 570.93 581.64 (46.81) (55.51) (54.41) (53.42) (56.72) (56.68) Velocity (m/s) 1.45 1.43 1.45 1.39 1.40 1.43 (0.11) (0.14) (0.13) (0.13) (0.14) (0.14) Force (N) 1308.92 1365.90 1360.36 1294.10 1376.68 1356.29 (139.02) (232.93) (179.85) (188.70) (213.91) (177.09) Power (W) 1905.58 1976.70 1988.99 1809.15 1945.52 1941.32 (337.06) (500.84) (405.81) (396.63) (454.65) (413.26) ijerph-17-09037-t002_Table 2Table 2 The sprint performance—difference between pretest and each of the posttests (M ± SD). Post 1 2 3 4 5 6 Control 0.10 (0.20) 0.10 (0.26) 0.15 (0.16) 0.19 (0.24) 0.48 (0.14) 0.11 (0.12) CHO 0.15 (0.20) 0.15 (0.22) 0.13 (0.14) 0.10 (0.17) 0.85 (0.12) 0.07 (0.15) CHO_M a,b 0.14 (0.19) 0.06 (0.23) 0.16 (0.15) 0.05 (0.19) 0.07 (0.12) −0.01 (0.15) ap < 0.05, CHO_M vs. Control; b p < 0.05, CHO_M vs. CHO. ==== Refs References 1. Mohr M. Krustrup P. Bangsbo J. Fatigue in soccer: A brief review J. Sports Sci. 2005 23 593 599 10.1080/02640410400021286 16195008 2. Ispirlidis I. Fatouros I.G. Jamurtas A.Z. Nikolaidis M.G. Michailidis I. Douroudos I. Margonis K. Chatzinikolaou A. Kalistratos E. Katrabasas I. Time-course of changes in inflammatory and performance responses following a soccer game Clin. J. Sport Med. 2008 18 423 431 10.1097/JSM.0b013e3181818e0b 18806550 3. Boksem M.A.S. Meijman T.F. Lorist M.M. Effects of mental fatigue on attention: An ERP study Cogn. Brain Res. 2005 25 107 116 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.04.011 15913965 4. Russell M. West D.J. Harper L.D. Cook C.J. Kilduff L.P. Half-time strategies to enhance second-half performance in team-sports players: A review and recommendations Sport. Med. 2015 45 353 364 10.1007/s40279-014-0297-0 25504550 5. Holway F.E. Spriet L.L. Sport-specific nutrition: Practical strategies for team sports J. Sports Sci. 2011 29 S115 S125 10.1080/02640414.2011.605459 21831001 6. Pöchmüller M. Schwingshackl L. Colombani P.C. Hoffmann G. A systematic review and meta-analysis of carbohydrate benefits associated with randomized controlled competition-based performance trials J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 2016 13 27 10.1186/s12970-016-0139-6 27408608 7. Li C. Kee Y.H. Lam L.S. Effect of brief mindfulness induction on university athletes’ sleep quality following night training Front. Psychol. 2018 9 508 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00508 29706914 8. Li C. Zhu Y. Zhang M. Gustafsson H. Chen T. Mindfulness and athlete burnout: A systematic review and meta-analysis Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019 16 449 10.3390/ijerph16030449 9. Kee Y.H. Li C. Kong L.C. Tang C.J. Chuang K.-L. Scoping review of mindfulness research: A topic modelling approach Mindfulness 2019 10 1474 1488 10.1007/s12671-019-01136-4 10. Kabat-Zinn J. Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future Clin. Psychol. Sci. Pract. 2003 10 144 156 10.1093/clipsy.bpg016 11. Creswell J.D. Mindfulness Interventions Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2017 68 491 516 10.1146/annurev-psych-042716-051139 27687118 12. Sollgruber A. Bornemann-Cimenti H. Szilagyi I.S. Sandner-Kiesling A. Spirituality in pain medicine: A randomized experiment of pain perception, heart rate and religious spiritual well-being by using a single session meditation methodology PLoS ONE 2018 13 e0203336 10.1371/journal.pone.0203336 30192807 13. Ussher M. Spatz A. Copland C. Nicolaou A. Cargill A. Amini-Tabrizi N. McCracken L.M. Immediate effects of a brief mindfulness-based body scan on patients with chronic pain J. Behav. Med. 2014 37 127 134 10.1007/s10865-012-9466-5 23129105 14. May R.W. Bamber M. Seibert G.S. Sanchez-Gonzalez M.A. Leonard J.T. Salsbury R.A. Fincham F.D. Understanding the physiology of mindfulness: Aortic hemodynamics and heart rate variability Stress 2016 19 168 174 10.3109/10253890.2016.1146669 26822542 15. Singh Y. Sharma R. Talwar A. Immediate and long-term effects of meditation on acute stress reactivity, cognitive functions, and intelligence Altern. Ther. Health Med. 2012 18 46 53 23251943 16. Soni R. Muniyandi M. Breath rate variability: Anovel measure to study the meditation effects Int. J. Yoga 2019 12 45 10.4103/ijoy.ijoy_27_17 30692783 17. Zhu Y. Sun F. Li C. Chow D.H.K. Wang K. Acute effect of brief mindfulness-based intervention coupled with fluid intake on athletes’ cognitive function J. Sports Sci. Med. 2020 19 753 760 33239950 18. Léger L. Gadoury C. Validity of the 20 m shuttle run test with 1 min stages to predict VO2max in adults Can. J. Sport Sci. 1989 14 21 26 2924218 19. Sun F.-H. Cooper S.B. Chak-Fung Tse F. Effects of different solutions consumed during exercise on cognitive function of male college soccer players J. Exerc. Sci. Fit. 2020 18 155 161 10.1016/j.jesf.2020.06.003 32636892 20. Nicholas C.W. Nuttall F.E. Williams C. The loughborough intermittent shuttle test: A field test that simulates the activity pattern of soccer J. Sports Sci. 2000 18 97 104 10.1080/026404100365162 10718565 21. Smith M.R. Coutts A.J. Merlini M. Deprez D. Lenoir M. Marcora S.M. Mental fatigue impairs soccer-specific physical and technical performance Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2016 48 267 276 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000762 26312616 22. Foskett A. Ali A. Gant N. Caffeine enhances cognitive function and skill performance during simulated soccer activity Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 2009 19 410 423 10.1123/ijsnem.19.4.410 19827465 23. Bosco C. Luhtanen P. Komi P.V. A simple method for measurement of mechanical power in jumping Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 1983 50 273 282 10.1007/BF00422166 6681758 24. Balsalobre-Fernández C. Glaister M. Lockey R.A. The validity and reliability of an iPhone app for measuring vertical jump performance J. Sports Sci. 2015 33 1574 1579 10.1080/02640414.2014.996184 25555023 25. Qin L. Wong S.H.S. Sun F.H. Huang Y. Sheridan S. Sit C.H.P. Effects of alpha-lactalbumin or whey protein isolate on muscle damage, muscle pain, and mood states following prolonged strenuous endurance exercise Front. Physiol. 2017 8 754 10.3389/fphys.2017.00754 29033851 26. Borg G.A.V. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1954 14 377 381 10.1249/00005768-198205000-00012 27. Schmider E. Ziegler M. Danay E. Beyer L. Bühner M. Is it really robust? Reinvestigating the robustness of ANOVA against violations of the normal distribution assumption Methodology 2010 6 147 151 10.1027/1614-2241/a000016 28. Blanca M.J. Alarcón R. Arnau J. Bono R. Bendayan R. Non-normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option? Psicothema 2017 29 552 557 29048317 29. Creswell J.D. Chapter: Biological pathways linking mindfulness with health Handbook of Mindfulness: Theory, Research, and Practice The Guilford Press New York, NY, USA 2015 426 440 30. Smith M.R. Thompson C. Marcora S.M. Skorski S. Meyer T. Coutts A.J. Mental fatigue and soccer: Current knowledge and future directions Sport. Med. 2018 48 1525 1532 10.1007/s40279-018-0908-2 31. Tang Y.Y. Ma Y. Fan Y. Feng H. Wang J. Feng S. Lu Q. Hu B. Lin Y. Li J. Central and autonomic nervous system interaction is altered by short-term meditation Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009 106 8865 8870 10.1073/pnas.0904031106 19451642 32. Ditto B. Eclache M. Goldman N. Short-term autonomic and cardiovascular effects of mindfulness body scan meditation Ann. Behav. Med. 2006 32 227 234 10.1207/s15324796abm3203_9 17107296 33. Ben-Tal A. Shamailov S.S. Paton J.F.R. Evaluating the physiological significance of respiratory sinus arrhythmia: Looking beyond ventilation-perfusion efficiency J. Physiol. 2012 590 1989 2008 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.222422 22289913 34. Grossman P. Taylor E.W. Toward understanding respiratory sinus arrhythmia: Relations to cardiac vagal tone, evolution and biobehavioral functions Biol. Psychol. 2007 74 263 285 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.11.014 17081672 35. Porges S.W. Doussard-Roosevelt J.A. Maiti A.K. Vagal tone and the physiological regulation of emotion Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev. 1994 59 167 186 10.1111/j.1540-5834.1994.tb01283.x 7984159 36. Chen F. Lv X. Fang J. Yu S. Sui J. Fan L. Li T. Hong Y. Wang X.L. Wang W. The effect of body-mind relaxation meditation induction on major depressive disorder: A resting-state fMRI study J. Affect. Disord. 2015 183 75 82 10.1016/j.jad.2015.04.030 26001666 37. Fisher J.P. Young C.N. Fadel P.J. Autonomic adjustments to exercise in humans Compr. Physiol. 2015 5 475 512 10.1002/cphy.c140022 25880502 38. Smith K.J. Billaut F. Influence of cerebral and muscle oxygenation on repeated-sprint ability Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2010 109 989 999 10.1007/s00421-010-1444-4 20354718 39. Sharp A. Cronin J. Neville J. Using smartphones for jump diagnostics: A brief review of the validity and reliability of the my jump app Strength Cond. J. 2019 41 96 107 10.1519/SSC.0000000000000472 40. Evans D.R. Eisenlohr-Moul T.A. Button D.F. Baer R.A. Segerstrom S.C. Self-regulatory deficits associated with unpracticed mindfulness strategies for coping with acute pain J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2014 44 23 30 10.1111/jasp.12196 25843972 41. Grace P.M. Gaudet A.D. Staikopoulos V. Maier S.F. Hutchinson M.R. Salvemini D. Watkins L.R. Nitroxidative signaling mechanisms in pathological pain Trends Neurosci. 2016 39 862 879 10.1016/j.tins.2016.10.003 27842920 42. Smith B.E. Hendrick P. Bateman M. Holden S. Littlewood C. Smith T.O. Logan P. Musculoskeletal pain and exercise—Challenging existing paradigms and introducing new Br. J. Sports Med. 2019 53 907 912 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098983 29925503 43. Maybery D.J. Graham D. The influence of physical and mental training on plasma beta-endorphin level and pain perception after intensive physical exercise Stress Health 2001 17 121 127 10.1002/smi.892 44. Russell M. Benton D. Kingsley M. Carbohydrate ingestion before and during soccer match play and blood glucose and lactate concentrations J. Athl. Train. 2014 49 447 453 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.12 24933430 45. Hayano J. Yasuma F. Okada A. Mukai S. Fujinami T. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia: A phenomenon improving pulmonary gas exchange and circulatory efficiency Circulation 1996 94 842 847 10.1161/01.CIR.94.4.842 8772709 46. Mantantzis K. Schlaghecken F. Sünram-Lea S.I. Maylor E.A. Sugar rush or sugar crash? A meta-analysis of carbohydrate effects on mood Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2019 101 45 67 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.03.016 30951762 47. Hassmén P. Blomstrand E. Mood state relationships and soccer team performance Sport Psychol. 1995 9 297 308 10.1123/tsp.9.3.297