==== Front Int J Environ Res Public Health Int J Environ Res Public Health ijerph International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 1661-7827 1660-4601 MDPI 33287377 10.3390/ijerph17239023 ijerph-17-09023 Article Associations of Relative Humidity and Lifestyles with Metabolic Syndrome among the Ecuadorian Adult Population: Ecuador National Health and Nutrition Survey (ENSANUT-ECU) 2012 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1293-6925Juna Christian F. 12 Cho Yoon Hee 3* https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2433-2280Ham Dongwoo 4 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1182-7786Joung Hyojee 14* 1 Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea; christian@snu.ac.kr 2 Facultad de Enfermería, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito 170525, Ecuador 3 Department of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA 4 Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea; dwhampch@snu.ac.kr * Correspondence: yoonhee.cho@umontana.edu (Y.H.C.); hjjoung@snu.ac.kr (H.J.); Tel.: +1-406-243-4529 (Y.H.C.); +82-2-880-2831 (H.J.) 03 12 2020 12 2020 17 23 902321 10 2020 01 12 2020 © 2020 by the authors.2020Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).The effects of the physical environment on metabolic syndrome (MetS) are still largely unexplained. This study aimed to analyze the associations of relative humidity of residence, lifestyles, and MetS among Ecuadorian adults. Data from 6024 people aged 20 to 60 years were obtained from an Ecuador national population-based health and nutrition survey (i.e., ENSANUT-ECU, 2012) and the mean annual relative humidity (%) from the Ecuador National Institute for Meteorology and Hydrology (2012). Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for MetS according to groups of relative humidity were calculated using multiple logistic regression. Living in high relative humidity (>80%) increased ORs of reduced high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (1.25; 95 % CI, 1.06–1.56) and MetS (OR = 1.20; 95 % CI,1.01–1.42) in women. Furthermore, physically active men living in high relative humidity showed lower OR of elevated triglycerides (0.56; 95 % CI,0.37–0.85) while menopausal women living in high relative humidity showed increased ORs of MetS (5.42; 95 % CI, 1.92–15.27), elevated blood pressure (3.10; 95 % CI, 1.15–8.35), and increased waist circumference (OR = 1.34; 95 % CI, 1.09–1.63). Our results show that residence in high relative humidity and menopausal status increase ORs of MetS and its components in Ecuadorian women; however, physical activity significantly reduces the OR of elevated triglycerides in men. The obtained findings may help make public health policies regarding environmental humidity management, nutritional education, menopausal care, and physical activity promotion to prevent the onset of MetS among Ecuadorian adults. relative humiditymetabolic syndromephysical activitymenopauseENSANUT-ECU2012 ==== Body 1. Introduction Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is comprised of elevated fasting glucose, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and abdominal obesity [1] and can lead to type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2), heart disease, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) [2]. Over a billion people of the world population are estimated to have MetS [3]; in Latin American countries, a higher prevalence is observed, especially in women [4]. Human biology, lifestyle, and the environment have been found to promote the onset of MetS, though the specific causes are still unknown [5]. Like other Latin American countries, 31.2% of adults in Ecuador have MetS and approximately 85% of the total population have at least one of the MetS abnormalities [6]. Ischemic heart disease, DM2, and CVD were the top three causes of mortality in the Ecuadorian adult population in 2019 (3.1%, 6.5%, and 6.2% of the annual total mortality, respectively) [7]. Therefore, it is important to identify potential determinants of MetS development in Ecuador to set up strategies to minimize MetS onset as well as its subsequent diseases. Biological factors (i.e., sex (female) and age (>40 years old)) and lifestyle patterns (i.e., smoking, alcohol consumption, unhealthy dietary habits, and physical inactivity) are recognized as risk factors for MetS development. In addition, physical environments, including elevation and climatic factors, have been reported to be associated with onset of metabolic diseases [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Among several physical environments, humidity is the most debated due to its inconsistent results in human health studies [16]. Humidity is linked to physiological responses through heat stress and hydration states [17]. Despite the importance of humidity on human body metabolism, it is rarely incorporated as an independent variable in many research studies. Rather, humidity is considered a confounding variable that may be related to the exposure and/or health outcomes [18]. Studies supporting the association of metabolic disorders and humidity are limited; however, a few studies showed that mortality in the USA tends to increase in hot and humid areas [19]. The less humid mountainous regions on the other hand showed the lowest prevalence of obesity (<30%) and MetS (30–35%) compared to the rest of the country [20]. Another study showed a positive association between diabetes mellitus, central obesity, higher systolic blood pressure, and lower physical activity in elder residents of the Mediterranean islands living in high relative humidity areas [21]. In addition, sociodemographic characteristics, epidemiological transition, globalization, and changes in lifestyle patterns (i.e., reduced physical activity and increased consumption of macronutrients and alcohol, and smoking) may modify these associations [6,22]. We hypothesized that relative humidity is associated with risk of MetS and that lifestyle patterns could modify the risk. To this end, we determined the associations of relative humidity, lifestyles, and dietary patterns with MetS among Ecuadorian adults based on data from the ENSANUT-ECU 2012 and the National Institute for Meteorology and Hydrology (INAMHI). 2. Methods 2.1. Study Design A cross-sectional study was performed using ENSANUT-ECU, a nation-wide population-based health and nutrition survey conducted by the Ecuadorian Government and its Ministry of Public Health. Detailed explanations of the study design and data source profiles of ENSANUT-ECU are available elsewhere [23]. In brief, ENSANUT-ECU collected data that included sociodemographic characteristics of the population, housing, risk factors, food consumption, anthropometry, blood pressure, and nutritional biomarkers. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants using consent forms, and a protocol of the study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University (code: SNU 19–04–003, date: 13 May 2019). 2.2. Subjects A total of 11,044 participants over 20 years of age was initially included for ENSANUT-ECU with complete variables related to MetS. Among these individuals, we excluded 4166 rural residents who did not have physical activity data and other risk factors (n = 493) as well as participants who took medication for hypertension (n = 361). Thus, 6024 adult Ecuadorians (1964 men and 4060 women) were finally included in this study, as illustrated in Figure 1. 2.3. General Characteristics The general information of participants, including age, sex, ethnicity, education level, and economic status of family, was collected from the housing questionnaire of ENSANUT-ECU 2012. Data regarding elevation of residence was also obtained. Ethnicity was classified as mestizo (Indian with European mix) and others (i.e., indigenous, montubio, afro-descendent, and white); education level was classified as primary, secondary, and college or higher; and economic status of family was classified as poor (Q1), middle (Q2 and Q3), and rich (Q4 and Q5). For menopause status, we subdivided women in two groups: menopausal stage “yes” for ≥50 years of age and “no” for <50 years old. This classification was based on the WHO parameters. 2.4. Lifestyles Information regarding lifestyles was included as follows: current alcohol consumption and smoking (“yes” or “no”) were based on alcohol beverage intake and smoking in the past 30 days according to the United States National Survey on Drug Use and Health and WHO-Ecuador [24]. Physical activity was divided in two groups: “yes” for the performance of vigorous-intensity activity for at least 1 h 15 min, moderate-intensity activity for at least 2 h 30 min, or both for the past 7 days prior to the collection of data, and “no” for any activity that that took less than 1 h 15 min [25]. 2.5. Anthropometric Measurements Anthropometric measurements, including body mass index (BMI), height, weight, and waist circumference of participants, were performed at their residence by trained technicians using standardized procedures and portable equipment [26]. Blood pressure was measured twice using a sphygmomanometer according to standardized measurement techniques [26]; the mean of the readings was used in this study. Blood samples of total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, and glucose were collected from participants under an 8-h fasting period and measured using an enzymatic-colorimetric assay Modular Evo-800 (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). The Friedewald’s formula was used to calculate low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol [27]. Detailed explanations of the laboratory procedures are reported in the ENSANUT-ECU [23]. 2.6. Dietary Intake For dietary intakes, trained technicians collected data using the 1-day 24-h dietary recall method at the participants’ houses. The daily energy intake was calculated using the food composition table of the Food Dietary Guidelines for the Ecuadorian population (GABA) [28]. Analyses of calorie intake and estimated energy requirements (EER), according to age-, sex-, weight-, height- and physical activity level-specific equations were included in our study [29,30]. 2.7. Relative Humidity The mean annual relative humidity (%) of the urban area for 2012 was obtained from the National Institute for Meteorology and Hydrology INAMHI [31] and was used as a proxy for relative humidity at the participants’ cities of residence in order to assess the long-term association of ambient humidity with metabolic dysfunction. Areas above 80% were categorized as high relative humidity, and the rest were categorized as low-humidity areas. This categorization was based on the assumption that relative humidity above 80% is considered high and causes thermal discomfort and adverse health outcomes in hot-humid tropics [21,32,33], as in the case in Ecuador. 2.8. Metabolic Syndrome The diagnosis of MetS was based on the harmonized guidelines of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III and the Latin American Diabetes Association as the presence of three or more of the following components: waist circumference (men ≥ 94 cm and women ≥ 88), blood pressure (systolic ≥ 130 mmHg and/or diastolic ≥ 85 mmHg), HDL cholesterol (men < 40 mg/dL and women < 50 mg/dL), elevated triglycerides (≥150 mg/dL), or fasting glucose (≥100 mg/dL). 2.9. Statistical Analyses All analyses were stratified by sex and relative humidity, with data presented as percentages or means with standard errors depending on the type of analysis. Differences in groups were compared using Chi-square and t-tests depending on the variable that was analyzed. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for MetS across the relative humidity groups were estimated using multiple logistic regression analysis. In the regression model, general and sociodemographic variables (age, ethnicity, economic status, and education level), anthropometric measurements (BMI, except for the model of waist circumference), lifestyles (physical activity, current alcohol consumption, current smoking, and total energy intake), elevation of residence, and menopausal status were considered. Statistical significance was defined as p-value < 0.05 in a two-tailed manner. Statistical analyses were performed using the PROC SURVEY procedures of SAS version 9.4 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) [34]. 3. Results The analyzed characteristics of the participants according to sex and relative humidity are shown in Table 1. The mean ages of participants were 34.6 ± 0.44 (SE) for men and 35.2 ± 0.35 years of age for women. A significant difference between groups was found in the following variables: ethnicity, economic status, education level, physical activity, elevation, and ambient temperature of residence (p < 0.05). However, age and smoking were significantly different in women only (p = 0.0332, p < 0.0001, respectively). Table 2 shows that men had higher levels of blood pressure, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and energy intake, whereas women had higher BMI and EER (%). BMI was significantly different in women in the high relative humidity group only (p = 0.0461). Both sexes showed higher HDL cholesterol in high relative humidity (men p = 0.0278; women p = 0.0146). Additionally, in the high relative humidity sex groups, a significant increase of energy intake and EER (%) was observed (p < 0.05). The prevalence and ORs for MetS according to relative humidity are presented in Table 3. Living in high relative humidity had effects on women only; they showed significant ORs of having reduced HDL cholesterol (1.25; 95% CI, 1.06–1.56) and MetS (OR = 1.20; 95% CI, 1.01–1.42) after adjusting for confounders. Table 4 shows that current alcohol consumption and smoking enhanced increase of ORs of reduced HDL cholesterol and elevated triglycerides in women residing in high humidity (compared to Table 3). Interestingly, physically active men living in high relative humidity showed significantly lower ORs of elevated triglycerides (0.59; 95 % CI, 0.37–0.85). Additionally, ORs for MetS in women according to their menopausal status and relative humidity of residence are presented in Table 5. Menopausal women living in high relative humidity showed increased ORs of MetS (5.42; 95 % CI, 1.92–15.27), elevated blood pressure (3.10; 95 % CI, 1.15–8.35), and increased waist circumference (OR = 1.34; 95 % CI, 1.09–1.63) compared to women without menopause. 4. Discussion This study showed a positive association between relative humidity and MetS as well as reduced HDL cholesterol in women. Menopausal women living in high relative humidity showed higher ORs of MetS, elevated blood pressure, and increased waist circumference. Moreover, physically active men living in high relative humidity had lower OR of elevated triglycerides compared to physically inactive men living in the same humidity. To our knowledge, this is the first study to suggest that relative humidity is associated with MetS in an adult population using nationally representative data. The prevalence of MetS in adult Ecuadorians shows similar trends with other Latin American countries and the USA [4,21]. However, higher OR of MetS in populations living in high relative humidity has never been reported before. An approximation to this finding could be observed in a study in the USA, where high relative humidity states presented a higher prevalence of MetS, obesity, and DM2 [21]. To further explore our findings, we performed additional analyses of MetS abnormalities, lifestyle patterns, and relative humidity. In women who reside in high relative humidity, who consume alcohol, and who smoke, higher ORs of reduced HDL cholesterol and physical inactivity increased the OR of MetS. These lifestyle factors could play moderating roles in MetS. Apart from the lack of previous studies on relative humidity and MetS, complementary research has investigated the effect of physical environment (i.e., humidity, temperature, elevation, radiation, etc.) on people’s health [19,35,36,37,38]. It was found that disparities in ambient temperature and relative humidity are associated with CVD [36], myocardial infarction morbidity and mortality [39,40], acute coronary syndrome [41,42], and DM2 [21]. Ecuador has four different geographical regions. The coast and the Galapagos Islands have the highest prevalence of MetS (35.0% and 41.9%, respectively), while the highlands and the Amazon have prevalence of 29.9% and 26.6%, respectively [6]. Each region has different environmental conditions and climatological patterns. According to Köppen’s climate classification, Ecuador has 11 different types of microclimates ranging from tropical to oceanic. Ecuador is situated on the equatorial line and thus produces little seasonality throughout the year: a warm rainy season lasts from January to April, with a cool and dry season from May through December [43]. The mean annual humidity in the coastal region is around 65%, while in the Amazon, it is around 85% [31]. The effects of high air humidity on human health are still controversial [44], and whether these climatological patterns may trigger MetS is difficult to answer here. In order to identify a difference between sex, we analyzed sex and relative humidity individually. It was found that women living in high relative humidity had higher ORs of MetS and low HDL cholesterol. These pathophysiological differences may be explained by the effects of sexual hormones on the human body physiology [45,46]. The metabolism of lipids is modulated by endogenous sex hormones that might cause insulin resistance and abnormalities in the lipid profile [47]. Additionally, menopausal stage increased ORs of MetS, elevated blood pressure, and increased waist circumference in women living in high relative humidity compared to non-menopausal women living at the same humidity levels, indicating sex hormones may explain these differences. Several studies also revealed that menopause is associated with an increased risk of MetS and its components, which supports our outcomes [48,49,50]. Energy intake differed by sex and relative humidity (p < 0.05). This association suggested a regulatory role of hormones on appetite regulation and the onset of metabolic abnormalities. In contrast with our findings, other studies reported that exposure to high ambient temperatures and humidity under resting conditions caused poor appetite and reduced energy intake [51,52], which may be explained by some physiological factors such as reduced digestive enzyme activity and metabolic rate decrease [53]. Moreover, it has been proposed that an increase in relative humidity is associated with physical activity impairment [54,55]. Our findings indicate that physical activity is inversely associated with MetS and elevated triglycerides, similar to other studies that have shown a positive impact with exercise on cholesterol and triglyceride profile, abdominal obesity, and DM2 [56,57]. Several studies have described the benefits of physical activity on MetS and its components. However, the measurement of physical activity becomes difficult due to the use of different methods; thus, this should be considered when interpreting our results. Alcohol consumption and current smoking were also associated with reduced HDL cholesterol in women living in high relative humidity areas. Some studies have shown that alcohol consumption has negative effects on the metabolism of glucose, cholesterol, and triglycerides [58,59]. In addition, smoking has been shown to alter the lipids and lipoprotein metabolism. Smokers have also shown lower adjusted levels of HDL cholesterol than nonsmokers [60,61]. This study must be interpreted considering the following limitations. First, among initial participants (n = 11,044), physical activity data was collected only for the urban population; thus, we excluded rural residents (n = 4166) and others (n = 854), resulting in a total of 6024 urban participants included for this study. Therefore, we cannot exclude the possibility of residual bias, and our results should be interpreted with caution. Second, casual inferences were excluded due to its cross-sectional design. Third, we could not infer the individual’s usual energy intake using a 1-day 24-h dietary recall. Forth, missing data on leptin and/or irisin concentration, which may help to better elucidate the association between humidity and MetS, is another limitation of the study. Therefore, further studies in the fields of human biology and environment are needed to determine the influence of relative humidity on MetS in the adult population. Despite these limitations, we utilized data from the ENSANUT-ECU 2012 which was conducted on a nation-wide scale across the entire country using standardized protocols and instruments and is the only survey the collected all the required biomarkers for diagnosis of MetS. Moreover, to our knowledge, this is the first study determining the association of relative humidity with MetS in a nationally representative population sample. 5. Conclusions Our study suggests that living in high relative humidity (>80%) increases ORs of MetS and reduces HDL cholesterol in women. Furthermore, menopausal status enhances increase in OR of MetS and augments ORs of elevated blood pressure and increased waist circumference, while performing physical activity decreases the OR of elevated triglycerides in men. These findings come from nation-wide data and highlight the importance of management of relative humidity and lifestyles in Ecuadorians. Intersectoral programs aimed at controlling relative humidity in homes and work environments, providing nutritional education and menopause care, and increasing physical activity are needed to promote healthy life conditions and to prevent metabolic disorders. Acknowledgments We especially thank to Ho Kim for his expert assistance with statistical analyses. Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Author Contributions Conceptualization, C.F.J. and H.J.; methodology, C.F.J., Y.H.C., and H.J.; formal analysis, C.F.J., Y.H.C., and D.H.; investigation, C.F.J., and Y.H.C.; data curation, C.F.J. and D.H.; writing—original draft preparation, C.F.J.; writing—review and editing, C.F.J., Y.H.C., and D.H.; supervision, Y.H.C. and H.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding This research received no external funding. Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. Figure 1 Flow diagram for the selection of study participants. ijerph-17-09023-t001_Table 1Table 1 Descriptive characteristics of participants according to relative humidity of residence. Variables Men Women Low Relative Humidity High Relative Humidity p-Value Low Relative Humidity High Relative Humidity p-Value Number of people, N (%) 869 (44.2) 1095 (55.8) 1525 (37.6) 2535 (62.4) Age, years, N (%) 0.744 0.0332 20–29 305 (38.5) 400 (38.7) 498 (33.5) 923 (39.6) 30–39 292 (29.6) 367 (28.7) 544 (30.3) 913 (30.0) 40–49 198 (20.9) 249 (19.5) 397 (25.5) 595 (20.5) 50–59 74 (11.0) 79 (13.1) 86 (10.7) 104 (9.9) Ethnicity, N (%) <0.0001 0.0003 Mestizo 802 (88.2) 937 (73.4) 1397 (86.4) 2186 (79.0) Others 67 (11.8) 158 (26.6) 128 (13.6) 349 (21.0) Family economic status a, N (%) <0.0001 <0.0001 Low 191 (21.3) 342 (32.9) 400 (22.8) 835 (33.6) Middle 391 (44.4) 542 (49.6) 637 (40.6) 1245 (49.7) High 287 (34.3) 211 (17.5) 488 (36.6) 455 (16.7) Education level, N (%) 0.0004 <0.0001 Primary school 217 (22.9) 290 (28.9) 415 (24.3) 716 (32.6) Secondary school 395 (48.4) 569 (52.5) 694 (47.3) 1218 (45.4) College or higher 257 (28.7) 236 (18.6) 416 (28.4) 601 (22.0) Current alcohol consumption b, N (%) 0.2684 0.9006 Yes 478 (56.6) 631 (59.9) 392 (25.7) 672 (25.4) No 391 (43.4) 464 (40.1) 1133 (74.3) 1863 (74.6) Current smoking c, N (%) 0.1086 <0.0001 Yes 303 (30.9) 350 (26.5) 114 (8.1) 118 (3.5) No 566 (69.1) 745 (73.5) 1411 (91.9) 2417 (96.5) Physical activity d, N (%) 0.0432 0.0007 Yes 394 (44.7) 456 (38.6) 276 (20.0) 400 (14.2) No 475 (55.3) 639 (61.4) 1249 (80.0) 2135 (85.8) Environmental conditions (mean ± SE) Elevation (masl) 1345.7 ± 58.6 703.1 ± 45.8 <0.0001 1456.8 ± 48.9 650.7 ± 28.7 <0.0001 Temperature (°C) 20.4 ± 0.2 22.6 ± 0.2 <0.0001 20 ± 0.2 22.7 ± 0.1 <0.0001 a Low (Q1 and Q2), middle (Q3 and Q4), and high (Q5) according to the Wealth Index; b “yes” alcoholic beverage consumption in the past 30 days; c “yes” cigarette smoking in the past 30 days; d “yes” vigorous-intensity activities performance for at least 1 h 15 min or moderate-intensity activities for at least 2 h 30 min during the past seven days; masl, meters above sea level. ijerph-17-09023-t002_Table 2Table 2 Anthropometry, biomarkers of metabolic syndrome (MetS), and energy intake by relative humidity of residence. Variables Low Relative Humidity High Relative Humidity p-Value Low Relative Humidity High Relative Humidity p-Value (869) (1095) (1525) (2535) Anthropometric and biochemical variable (mean ± SE) BMI (kg/m2) 26.5 ± 0.2 26.8 ± 0.2 0.4684 27.2 ± 0.2 27.6 ± 0.2 0.0461 Waist circumference (cm) 94.7 ± 2.2 95.6 ± 2.4 0.7722 98.3 ± 3.7 91.5 ± 1.3 0.0796 SBP (mmHg) 125.1 ± 2.1 123.9 ± 1.7 0.6468 116.3 ± 1.3 115.6 ± 0.9 0.6341 DBP (mmHg) 79.9 ± 2.2 79.0 ± 1.7 0.7634 73.7 ± 1.3 72.3 ± 0.8 0.3956 Fasting glucose (mg/dL) 93.8 ± 1.2 95.2 ± 1.9 0.5249 92.7 ± 0.8 93.0 ± 1.1 0.8312 Total cholesterol (mg/dL) 186.7 ± 1.8 184.8 ± 1.8 0.4416 181.4 ± 1.3 178.3 ± 1.3 0.0899 HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) 40.6 ± 0.5 42.2 ± 0.6 0.0278 45.5 ± 0.5 47.0 ± 0.4 0.0146 LDL cholesterol (mg/dL) 112.2 ± 1.5 110.4 ± 1.5 0.3928 108.9 ± 1.1 108.7 ± 1.0 0.8622 Triglyceride (mg/dL) 179.2 ± 5.5 169.4 ± 6.7 0.2589 129.7 ± 3.2 122.2 ± 2.3 0.0541 Macronutrient intake (mean ± SE) Energy (kcal) 2123.8 ± 20.2 2210.5 ± 20.8 0.0028 1826.9 ± 15.1 1868.5 ± 14.3 0.0463 EER (%) 81.6 ± 1.0 86.1 ± 1.0 0.0033 97.1 ± 0.9 99.8 ± 0.9 0.0364 BMI, body mass index; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; SBP, systolic blood pressure; EER, estimated energy requirement. ijerph-17-09023-t003_Table 3Table 3 Prevalence and adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence intervals) for MetS by relative humidity of residence. Men Women Components of MetS Low Relative Humidity High Relative Humidity Low Relative Humidity High Relative Humidity (n = 869) (n = 1095) (n = 1525) (n = 2535) Increased waist circumference Prevalence (%) 34.00 19.17 41.14 25.62 OR (95 % CI) 1.00 (ref) 1.13 (0.85–1.48) 1.00 (ref) 1.21 (0.95–1.53) Elevated blood pressure Prevalence (%) 18.50 9.99 8.85 5.35 OR (95 % CI) 1.00 (ref) 0.96(0.71–1.28) 1.00 (ref) 1.02 (0.75–1.38) Reduced HDL cholesterol Prevalence (%) 33.34 16.33 25.55 38.69 OR (95 % CI) 1.00 (ref) 0.87 (0.66–1.13) 1.00 (ref) 1.25 (1.06–1.56) Elevated triglycerides Prevalence (%) 30.98 14.22 16.96 9.30 OR (95 % CI) 1.00 (ref) 0.80 (0.61–1.06) 1.00 (ref) 0.87 (0.68–1.11) Elevated fasting glucose Prevalence (%) 9.24 7.13 9.31 5.73 OR (95 % CI) 1.00 (ref) 1.20 (084–1.70) 1.00 (ref) 0.83 (0.61–1.12) Metabolic syndrome Prevalence (%) 24.13 12.41 11.53 17.73 OR (95 % CI) 1.00 (ref) 0.84 (0.61–1.14) 1.00 (ref) 1.20 (1.01–1.42) All values accounted for the complex sampling design effect using the PROC SURVEY procedure. OR, odd ratio; CI, confidence interval; HDL, high-density lipoprotein. The multiple logistic regression analysis was adjusted for age, ethnicity, family economic status, education level, BMI (except for the model of waist circumference), physical activity, alcohol consumption, smoking, energy intake, and resident elevation. ijerph-17-09023-t004_Table 4Table 4 Odds ratios for MetS among residents living in high relative humidity according to lifestyle factors. Components of MetS Men Women Yes (95 % CI) p-Value No (95 % CI) p-Value Yes (95 % CI) p-Value No (95 % CI) p-Value Current alcohol consumption Increased waist circumference 1.18 (0.81 ± 1.73) 0.3817 0.99 (0.65 ± 1.51) 0.9757 1.58 (0.99 ± 2.51) 0.0552 0.93 (0.70 ± 1.25) 0.6386 Elevated blood pressure 1.09 (0.78 ± 1.53) 0.6478 1.03 (0.69 ± 1.54) 0.9025 0.83 (0.50 ± 1.37) 0.1115 1.02 (0.78 ± 1.34) 0.8161 Reduced HDL cholesterol 0.86 (0.58 ± 1.27) 0.4400 0.77 (0.48 ± 1.23) 0.2400 1.31 (1.01 ± 1.69) 0.0350 0.99 (0.65 ± 1.53) 0.9746 Elevated triglycerides 0.76 (0.52 ± 1.10) 0.1464 0.78 (051 ± 1.19) 0.2487 0.88 (0.49 ± 1.56) 0.4711 1.03 (0.80 ± 1.34) 0.8119 Elevated fasting glucose 1.09 (0.70 ± 1.73) 0.6922 1.60 (0.94 ± 2.70) 0.0785 0.54 (0.27 ± 1.06) 0.0735 0.95 (0.68 ± 1.33) 0.7663 Metabolic syndrome 0.87 (0.60 ± 1.32) 0.4988 0.88 (0.54 ± 1.41) 0.7616 0.79 (0.47 ± 1.33) 0.3849 1.16 (0.87 ± 1.54) 0.3078 Current smoking Increased waist circumference 1.24 (0.78 ± 1.96) 0.3684 1.19 (0.86 ± 1.64) 0.3030 1.43 (0.90 ± 2.28) 0.1290 0.56 (0.21 ± 1.50) 0.2464 Elevated blood pressure 0.56 (0.36 ± 0.87) 0.0101 0.87 (0.61 ± 1.25) 0.4605 0.89 (0.27 ± 2.95) 0.8537 0.91 (0.69 ± 1.19) 0.4910 Reduced HDL cholesterol 0.89 (0.57 ± 1.38) 0.5916 0.99 (0.73 ± 1.36) 0.9612 1.95 (1.30 ± 2.93) 0.0013 1.08 (0.83 ± 1.39) 0.5484 Elevated triglycerides 1.00 (0.63 ± 1.59) 0.9877 0.78 (0.56 ± 1.16) 0.1177 0.41 (0.15 ± 1.07) 0.0681 1.07 (0.86 ± 1.33) 0.5359 Elevated fasting glucose 1.21 (0.62 ± 2.36) 0.5720 0.88 (0.60 ± 1.29) 0.5017 0.66 (0.12 ± 3.60) 0.6278 0.81 (0.61 ± 1.08) 0.1480 Metabolic syndrome 1.03 (0.64 ± 1.65) 0.9118 1.05 (0.67 ± 1.66) 0.7658 0.35 (0.11 ± 1.05) 0.0623 1.09 (0.82 ± 1.47) 0.4500 Physical activity Increased waist circumference 0.98 (0.60 ± 1.61) 0.9300 1.37 (0.85 ± 2.20) 0.1937 0.83 (0.44 ± 1.58) 0.5655 1.15 (0.88 ± 1.47) 0.2747 Elevated blood pressure 1.04 (0.70 ± 1.55) 0.7428 1.13 (0.80 ± 1.60) 0.4095 0.69 (1.05 ± 1.13) 0.3457 1.06 (0.78 ± 1.43) 0.7264 Reduced HDL cholesterol 0.94 (0.64 ± 1.38) 0.7484 0.86 (0.58 ± 1.26) 0.4387 1.28 (0.77 ± 2.12) 0.3349 1.20 (0.97 ± 1.48) 0.0975 Elevated triglycerides 0.59 (0.37 ± 0.85) 0.0067 0.94 (0.64 ± 1.38) 0.7556 0.88 (0.49 ± 1.59) 0.6650 1.01 (0.80 ± 1.28) 0.9145 Elevated fasting glucose 1.16 (0.65 ± 2.08) 0.6210 0.84 (0.55 ± 1.27) 0.4022 0.96 (0.42 ± 2.24) 0.9325 0.79 (0.59 ± 1.06) 0.1125 Metabolic syndrome 0.87 (0.54 ± 1.45) 0.5708 0.79 (0.52 ± 1.22) 0.2860 1.03 (0.55 ± 1.91) 0.9368 1.23 (1.02 ± 1.48) 0.0301 High a (95 % CI) p-Value Low (95 % CI) p-Value High a (95 % CI) p-Value Low (95 % CI) p-Value % EER Increased waist circumference 0.91 (0.45 ± 1.87) 0.8163 1.24 (0.85 ± 1.80) 0.2672 1.35 (0.98 ± 1.86) 0.0645 0.85 (0.60 ± 1.18) 0.3307 Elevated blood pressure 1.06 (0.52 ± 2.15) 0.6800 1.11 (0.81 ± 1.52) 0.5308 1.18 (0.78 ± 1.78) 0.5875 0.96 (0.71 ± 1.32) 0.3117 Reduced HDL cholesterol 0.96 (0.46 ± 1.99) 0.4993 0.77 (0.53 ± 1.13) 0.2813 1.06 (0.77 ± 1.63) 0.6920 1.32 (0.99 ± 1.79) 0.0578 Elevated triglycerides 0.86 (0.39 ± 1.87) 0.8164 0.82 (0.50 ± 1.06) 0.1985 0.88 (0.66 ± 1.64) 0.4841 1.05 (0.80 ± 1.41) 0.7065 Elevated fasting glucose 0.88 (0.43 ± 1.80) 0.7201 1.01 (0.68 ± 1.56) 0.9564 0.85 (0.55 ± 1.30) 0.4597 0.77 (0.53 ± 1.11) 0.1605 Metabolic syndrome 0.81 (0.33 ± 1.92) 0.6444 0.91 (0.65 ± 1.28) 0.5948 0.91 (0.64 ± 1.29) 0.6005 1.22 (0.91 ± 1.65) 0.1808 ORs were calculated based on low relative humidity residents (reference); a high (>100%) or low (≤100%) for EER; CI, confidence interval; HDL high-density lipoprotein; EER, estimated energy requirement. ijerph-17-09023-t005_Table 5Table 5 Odds ratios for MetS among women living in high relative humidity according to menopausal stage. Components of MetS Women (n = 4060) Yes (95 % CI) p-Value No (95 % CI) p-Value Menopausal stage Increased waist circumference 1.34 (1.09 ± 1.63) 0.0045 0.22 (0.02 ± 3.04) 0.2550 Elevated blood pressure 3.10 (1.15 ± 8.35) 0.0253 0.80 (0.60 ± 1.07) 0.1382 Reduced HDL cholesterol 1.48 (0.59 ± 3.74) 0.4064 1.13 (0.93 ± 1.37) 0.2243 Elevated triglycerides 2.37 (0.96 ± 5.90) 0.0627 0.87 (0.70 ± 1.08) 0.2130 Elevated fasting glucose 0.90 (0.31 ± 2.64) 0.8510 0.81 (0.61 ± 1.08) 0.1442 Metabolic syndrome 5.42 (1.92 ± 15.27) 0.0015 0.89 (0.71 ± 1.12) 0.3177 ORs were calculated based on low relative humidity residents (reference). CI, confidence interval; HDL high-density lipoprotein. ==== Refs References 1. Alberti K.G. Zimmet P. Shaw J. The metabolic syndrome-a new worldwide definition Lancet 2005 366 1059 1062 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67402-8 16182882 2. Kassi E. Pervanidou P. Kaltsas G. Chrousos G. Metabolic syndrome: Definitions and controversies BMC Med. 2011 9 10.1186/1741-7015-9-48 3. Saklayen M.G. The Global Epidemic of the Metabolic Syndrome Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 2018 20 10.1007/s11906-018-0812-z 29480368 4. Wong-McClure R.A. Gregg E.W. Barceló A. Lee K. Abarca-Gómez L. Sanabria-López L. Tortós-Guzmán J. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Central America: A cross-sectional population-based study Rev. Panam. Salud Pública 2015 38 202 208 26757998 5. Gosadi I.M. Assessment of the environmental and genetic factors influencing prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Saudi Arabia Saudi Med. J. 2016 37 12 20 10.15537/smj.2016.1.12675 26739969 6. Pérez-Galarza J. Baldeón L. Franco O.H. Muka T. Drexhage H.A. Voortman T. Freire W.B. Prevalence of overweight and metabolic syndrome, and associated sociodemographic factors among adult Ecuadorian populations: The ENSANUT-ECU study J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2020 10.1007/s40618-020-01267-9 32430865 7. Yearbook of Vital Statistics Births and Deaths 2019 National Institute of Statistics and Censuses Quito, Ecuador 2019 Available online: https://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/documentos/webinec/Poblacion_y_Demografia/Nacimientos_Defunciones/2020/Boletin_%20tecnico_%20EDG%202019%20prov.pdf (accessed on 5 June 2020) 8. Burtscher M. Effects of living at higher altitudes on mortality: A narrative review Aging Dis. 2014 5 274 280 25110611 9. Voss J.D. Masuoka P. Webber B.J. Scher A.I. Atkinson R.L. Association of elevation, urbanization and ambient temperature with obesity prevalence in the United States Int. J. Obes. 2013 37 1407 1412 10.1038/ijo.2013.5 10. Juna C.F. Cho Y.H. Joung H. Low Elevation and Physical Inactivity Are Associated with a Higher Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Ecuadorian Adults: A National Cross-Sectional Study Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. 2020 13 2217 2226 10.2147/DMSO.S253099 32612377 11. Pallubinsky H. Phielix E. Dautzenberg B. Schaart G. Connell N.J. de Wit-Verheggen V. Havekes B. van Baak M.A. Schrauwen P. van Marken Lichtenbelt W.D. Passive exposure to heat improves glucose metabolism in overweight humans Acta Physiol. 2020 229 10.1111/apha.13488 12. van Marken Lichtenbelt W. Hanssen M. Pallubinsky H. Kingma B. Schellen L. Healthy excursions outside the thermal comfort zone Build. Res. J. 2017 45 819 827 10.1080/09613218.2017.1307647 13. Johnson F. Mavrogianni A. Ucci M. Vidal-Puig A. Wardle J. Could increase time spent in a thermal comfort zone contribute to population increases in obesity? Obes. Rev. 2011 12 543 551 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00851.x 21261804 14. Valdés S. Maldonado-Araque C. García-Torres F. Goday A. Bosch-Comas A. Bordiu E. Calle-Pascual A. Carmena R. Casamitjana R. Castaño L. Ambient temperature and prevalence of obesity in the Spanish population: The Di@bet.es study Obesity 2014 22 2328 2332 10.1002/oby.20866 25124468 15. Speakman J.R. Heidari-Bakavoli S. Type 2 diabetes, but not obesity, prevalence is positively associated with ambient temperature Sci. Rep. 2016 6 6 10.1038/srep30409 28442741 16. Panagiotakos D.B. Chrysohoou C. Pitsavos C. Nastos P. Anadiotis A. Tentolouris C. Stefanadis C. Toutouzas P. Paliatsos A. Climatological variations in daily hospital admissions for acute coronary syndromes Int. J. Cardiol. 2004 94 229 233 10.1016/j.ijcard.2003.04.050 15093986 17. Parsons K. Human Thermal Environments: The Effects of Hot, Moderate, and Cold Environments on Human Health, Comfort and Performance 3rd ed. Taylor and Francis Group London, UK 2003 18. Barnett A.G. Tong S. Clements A.C.A. What measure of temperature is the best predictor of mortality? Environ. Res. 2010 110 604 611 10.1016/j.envres.2010.05.006 20519131 19. Barreca A.I. Climate change, humidity, and mortality in the United States J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2012 63 19 34 10.1016/j.jeem.2011.07.004 20. Gurka M.J. Filipp S.L. DeBoer M.D. Geographical variation in the prevalence of obesity, metabolic syndrome, and diabetes among US adults Nutr. Diabetes 2018 8 14 10.1038/s41387-018-0024-2 29549249 21. Tyrovolas S. Chalkias C. Morena M. Kalogeropoulos K. Tsakountakis N. Zeimbekis A. Gotsis E. Metallinos G. Bountziouka V. Lionis C. High relative environmental humidity is associated with diabetes among elders living in Mediterranean islands J. Diabetes Metab. Disord. 2014 13 10.1186/2251-6581-13-25 22. Kaur J.A. Comprehensive review on metabolic syndrome Cardiol. Res. Pract. 2014 2014 10.1155/2014/943162 23. Freire W.B. Ramírez-Luzuriaga M.J. Belmont P. Mendieta M.J. SilvaJaramillo K. Romero N. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición de la Población Ecuatoriana de cero a 59 años. ENSANUT-ECU 2012 1st ed. Ministerio de Salud Pública/Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos Quito, Ecuador 2014 24. Ryan H. Trosclair A. Gfroerer J. Adult current smoking: Differences in definitions and prevalence estimates—NHIS and NSDUH, 2008 J. Environ. Public Health 2012 2012 10.1155/2012/918368 22649464 25. US Department of Health and Human Services 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans US Department of Health and Human Services Hyattsville, MD, USA 2008 Available online: http://www.health.gov/paguidelines (accessed on 5 January 2020) 26. de Onis M. Habicht J.P. Anthropometric reference data for international use: Recommendations from a World Health Organization Expert Committee Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1996 64 650 658 10.1093/ajcn/64.4.650 8839517 27. Eblen-Zajjur A. Eblen-Zajjur M. Calculo de la concentración de colesterol de la lipoproteína de baja densidad: Análisis de regresión versus formula de Friedewald Rev. Med. Chile 2001 129 263 270 10.4067/S0034-98872001001100005 28. Documento Técnico de las Guías Alimentarias Basadas en Alimentos (GABA) del Ecuador. GABA-ECU 2018 Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador y Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura Quito, Ecuador 2018 29. Trumbo P. Schlicker S. Yates A.A. Poos M. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein and Amino Acids J. Am. Diet Assoc. 2002 102 1621 1630 10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90346-9 12449285 30. Institute of Medicine Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein and Amino Acids National Academy Press Washington, DC, USA 2005 31. Anuario Meteorológico No. 52-2012 Instituto Nacional de Meteorología e Hidrología de Ecuador Quito, Ecuador 2015 Available online: http://www.serviciometeorologico.gob.ec/wpcontent/uploads/anuarios/meteorologicos/Am%202012.pdf (accessed on 5 January 2020) 32. Nicol F. Adaptive thermal comfort standards in the hot–humid tropics Energy Build. 2004 36 628 637 10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.01.016 33. Buonocore C. de Vecchi R. Scalco V. Lamberts R. Influence of relative air humidity and movement on human thermal perception in classrooms in a hot and humid climate Build. Environ. 2018 146 98 106 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.036 34. SAS, Version 9.4 SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA 2014 35. Tamerius J.D. Perzanowski M.S. Acosta L.M. Jacobson J.S. Goldstein I.F. Quinn J.W. Rundle A.G. Shaman J. Socioeconomic and outdoor meteorological determinants of indoor temperature and humidity in New York City dwellings Weather Clim. Soc. 2013 5 168 179 10.1175/WCAS-D-12-00030.1 24077420 36. Davis R.E. McGregor G.R. Enfield K.B. Humidity: A review and primer on atmospheric moisture and human health Environ. Res. 2016 144 106 116 10.1016/j.envres.2015.10.014 26599589 37. Bentayeb M. Simoni M. Baiz N. Norback D. Baldacci S. Maio S. Viegi G. Annesi-Maesano I. Adverse respiratory effects of outdoor air pollution in the elderly Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2012 16 1149 1161 10.5588/ijtld.11.0666 22871325 38. Huang J. Wang J. Yu W. The lag effects and vulnerabilities of temperature effects on cardiovascular disease mortality in a subtropical climate zone in China Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014 11 3982 3994 10.3390/ijerph110403982 24733034 39. Abrignani M.G. Corrao S. Biondo G.B. Renda N. Braschi A. Novo G. Di Girolamo A. Braschi G.B. Novo S. Influence of climatic variables on acute myocardial infarction hospital admissions Int. J. Cardiol. 2009 137 123 129 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.06.036 18694607 40. Dilaveris P. Synetos A. Giannopoulos G. Gialafos E. Pantazis A. Stefanadis C. CLimate Impacts on Myocardial infarction deaths in the Athens Territory: The CLIMATE study Heart 2006 92 1747 1751 10.1136/hrt.2006.091884 16840509 41. Ravljen M. Bilban M. Kajfez-Bogataj L. Hovelja T. Vavpotic D. Influence of daily individual meteorological parameters on the incidence of acute coronary syndrome Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014 11 11616 11626 10.3390/ijerph111111616 25396770 42. Sharif Nia H. Chan Y.H. Froelicher E.S. Pahlevan Sharif S. Yaghoobzadeh A. Jafari A. Goudarzian A.H. Pourkia R. Haghdoost A.A. Arefinia F. Weather fluctuations: Predictive factors in the prevalence of acute coronary syndrome Health Promot. Perspect. 2019 9 123 130 10.15171/hpp.2019.17 31249799 43. Morán-Tejeda E. Bazo J. López-Moreno J.I. Aguilar E. Azorín-Molina C. Sanchez-Lorenzo A. Martínez R. Nieto J.J. Mejía R. Martín-Hernández N. Climate Trends and Variability in Ecuador (1966–2011) Int. J. Climatol. 2016 36 3839 3855 10.1002/joc.4597 44. Armstrong B. Sera F. Vicedo-Cabrera A.M. Abrutzky R. Åström D.O. Bell M.L. Chen B.Y. de Sousa Zanotti Stagliorio Coelho M. Correa P.M. Dang T.N. The Role of Humidity in Associations of High Temperature with Mortality: A Multicountry, Multicity Study Environ. Health Perspect. 2019 127 10.1289/EHP5430 45. Matsushita M. Yoneshiro T. Aita S. Kameya T. Sugie H. Saito M. Impact of brown adipose tissue on body fatness and glucose metabolism in healthy humans Int. J. Obes. 2014 38 812 817 10.1038/ijo.2013.206 46. Orava J. Nuutila P. Lidell M.E. Oikonen V. Noponen T. Viljanen T. Scheinin M. Taittonen M. Niemi T. Enerbäck S. Different metabolic responses of human brown adipose tissue to activation by cold and insulin Cell Metab. 2011 14 272 279 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.06.012 21803297 47. Savva C. Korach-Andre M. Estrogen Receptor beta (ERbeta) Regulation of Lipid Homeostasis-Does Sex Matter? Metabolites 2020 10 116 10.3390/metabo10030116 48. Christakis M.K. Hasan H. De Souza L.R. Shirreff L. The effect of menopause on metabolic syndrome: Cross-sectional results from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging Menopause 2020 27 999 1009 10.1097/GME.0000000000001575 32852451 49. Lobo R.A. Metabolic syndrome after menopause and the role of hormones Maturitas 2008 60 10 18 10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.02.008 18407440 50. Jouyandeh Z. Nayebzadeh F. Qorbani M. Asadi M. Metabolic syndrome and menopause J. Diabetes Metab. Disord. 2013 12 10.1186/2251-6581-12-1 23497470 51. Zheng G. Li K. Wang Y. The Effects of High-Temperature Weather on Human Sleep Quality and Appetite Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019 16 270 10.3390/ijerph16020270 30669302 52. Herman C.P. Effects of heat on appetite Nutritional Needs in Hot Environments: Applications for Military Personnel in Field Operations Marriott B.M. National Academy Press Washington, DC, USA 1993 187 214 53. Pilgrim A.L. Robinson S.M. Sayer A.A. Roberts H.C. An overview of appetite decline in older people Nurs. Older People 2015 27 29 35 10.7748/nop.27.5.29.e697 54. Maughan R.J. Otani H. Watson P. Influence of relative humidity on prolonged exercise capacity in a warm environment Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2012 112 2313 2321 10.1007/s00421-011-2206-7 22012542 55. Chmura P. Konefal M. Andrzejewski M. Kosowski J. Rokita A. Chmura J. Physical activity profile of 2014 FIFA World Cup players, with regard to different ranges of air temperature and relative humidity Int. J. Biometeorol. 2017 61 677 684 10.1007/s00484-016-1245-5 27618828 56. Rennie K.L. McCarthy N. Yazdgerdi S. Marmot M. Brunner E. Association of the metabolic syndrome with both vigorous and moderate physical activity Int. J. Epidemiol. 2003 32 600 606 10.1093/ije/dyg179 12913036 57. Myers J. Kokkinos P. Nyelin E. Physical Activity, Cardiorespiratory Fitness, and the Metabolic Syndrome Nutrients 2019 11 1652 10.3390/nu11071652 58. van der Gaag M.S. van Tol A. Vermunt S.H. Scheek L.M. Schaafsma G. Hendriks H.F. Alcohol consumption stimulates early steps in reverse cholesterol transport J. Lipid. Res. 2001 42 2077 2083 11734581 59. Du D. Bruno R. Blizzard L. Venn A. Dwyer T. Smith K.J. Magnussen C.G. Gall S. The metabolomic signatures of alcohol consumption in young adults Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2020 27 840 849 10.1177/2047487319834767 30857428 60. Jung I.K. Association of Smoking Status and High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol in Males in the Fifth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Korean J. Health Promot. 2017 17 289 297 10.15384/kjhp.2017.17.4.289 61. Jain R.B. Ducatman A. Associations between smoking and lipid/lipoprotein concentrations among US adults aged ≥20 years J. Circ. Biomark. 2018 7 10.1177/1849454418779310 29899809