==== Front Sensors (Basel) Sensors (Basel) sensors Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 1424-8220 MDPI 33261021 10.3390/s20236783 sensors-20-06783 Review Advances in Sensor Technologies in the Era of Smart Factory and Industry 4.0 † https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9177-1665Kalsoom Tahera 1* Ramzan Naeem 1 Ahmed Shehzad 2 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6926-7983Ur-Rehman Masood 3 1 School of Computing, Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of West of Scotland, Paisley PA1 2BE, UK; naeem.ramzan@uws.ac.uk 2 School of Business and Creative Industries, University of West of Scotland, Paisley PA1 2BE, UK; shehzad.ahmed@uws.ac.uk 3 James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK; masood.urrehman@glasgow.ac.uk * Correspondence: tahera.kalsoom@uws.ac.uk† This paper is an extended version of our paper published in Kalsoom T.; Ramzan, N.; Ahmed, S. Societal Impact of IoT-Lead Smart Factory in the Context of Industry 4.0. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on UK-China Emerging Technologies (UCET), Glasgow, United Kingdom, 20–21 August 2020; pp. 1–5. 27 11 2020 12 2020 20 23 678302 10 2020 23 11 2020 © 2020 by the authors.2020Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).The evolution of intelligent manufacturing has had a profound and lasting effect on the future of global manufacturing. Industry 4.0 based smart factories merge physical and cyber technologies, making the involved technologies more intricate and accurate; improving the performance, quality, controllability, management, and transparency of manufacturing processes in the era of the internet-of-things (IoT). Advanced low-cost sensor technologies are essential for gathering data and utilizing it for effective performance by manufacturing companies and supply chains. Different types of low power/low cost sensors allow for greatly expanded data collection on different devices across the manufacturing processes. While a lot of research has been carried out with a focus on analyzing the performance, processes, and implementation of smart factories, most firms still lack in-depth insight into the difference between traditional and smart factory systems, as well as the wide set of different sensor technologies associated with Industry 4.0. This paper identifies the different available sensor technologies of Industry 4.0, and identifies the differences between traditional and smart factories. In addition, this paper reviews existing research that has been done on the smart factory; and therefore provides a broad overview of the extant literature on smart factories, summarizes the variations between traditional and smart factories, outlines different types of sensors used in a smart factory, and creates an agenda for future research that encompasses the vigorous evolution of Industry 4.0 based smart factories. smart factoryinternet-of-thingssensorsmanufacturingIndustry 4.0 ==== Body 1. Introduction With its introduction in Germany in 2011, Industry 4.0 instantly became the focus of a global world that promoted the computerization of manufacturing [1]. Industry 4.0 has revolutionized the manufacturing process, leading to intelligent manufacturing promising self-sufficient manufacturing processes by using machines and devices that communicate with each other through digital connectivity [2,3]. Although most of the design philosophies and technologies of Industry 4.0, such as the internet of things (IoT), cyber-physical systems (CPSs), and artificial intelligence are already in use, most firms lack insight into the wide set of technologies offered by Industry 4.0 that provide devices with seamless connectivity, interoperability, visibility, and intelligence capabilities. Applications in traditional manufacturing are stand-alone and segregated [4], and lack automated monitoring and control capabilities [5]. There are a series of distinct and independent steps, including marketing, product development, manufacturing, and distribution to customers [1]. As a result, the reuse of systems, and the integration of physical and digital systems, in traditional manufacturing is poor [6]. Some advanced manufacturing strategies, such as intelligent manufacturing, flexible manufacturing, and agile manufacturing have the potential to overcome the drawbacks of traditional manufacturing [7,8,9]. These manufacturing schemes are the pioneers of Industry 4.0 smart manufacturing, where machines and products interact with each other without, or with minimal, human control [4,6]. Manufacturing industry plays a crucial role in the evolution of modern society. Industry 4.0, which is the pioneer of smart factories, has access to various advanced technologies such as big data analytics, artificial intelligence, advanced robotics, 3D printing, and cloud computing [1,3]. The vast implementation of computer numerical control (CNC) and industrial robots has enabled a flexibility in manufacturing systems [10,11,12]; whereas computer-aided design (CAD) and computer-aided processing planning (CAPP) have made computer integrated manufacturing practical [13,14]. The actual uses of the IoT have enabled manufacturers to adopt digital transformations from different prospects, such as efficient productivity, automation, customer focus, competitive advantages, and enhancing the value chain and rapid returns [15,16]. In an attempt to understand the efficient use of the IoT in the manufacturing industry, it is imperative to recognize the different technologies, especially sensors that make the performance of manufacturing firms efficient in using Industry 4.0. By combining everyday objects with connected devices through IoT, it is possible to gather information, analyze it, and create an action that learns from processes. The focal objective of the concept of Industry 4.0 is to characterize highly digitized manufacturing processes, where flow of information amid different devices is controlled in an environment with very limited human intervention [3,5,17]. Cloud-based IoT platforms have the ability to connect the real world with the virtual world, enabling companies to manage IoT device connectivity and flexibility [18]. In addition, the IoT architecture must be flexible enough to operate different wireless protocols and accommodate additions of new sensor inputs (e.g., USB) [19]. This can also be acknowledged in terms of physical flexibility, which can include wearable devices, carry devices, battery usage, etc. [7]. The use of sensors makes this achievable. Recently, Industry 4.0 based manufacturing processes have attracted a lot of attention from academia [5,6,7,20], with the main focus on different areas such as sustainability, organizational structure, lean manufacturing, product development, and strategic management within the manufacturing industry. Researchers have investigated the relationship between different optimal control models and an Industry 4.0 based smart factory system [9]. Comprehensive work has been done in analyzing the benefits, challenges, and risks involved with implementing smart factories. The majority of the extant literature focuses on the contributions and threats of IoT related to flexibility, transparency, information sharing, connectivity, traceability, and tracking within Industry 4.0. While a lot of research has been carried out with a focus on analyzing the performance, processes, and implementation of Industry 4.0 based smart factories, it has been found that most firms still lack in-depth insight into the difference between traditional and smart factory systems, as well as the wide set of different sensor technologies associated with Industry 4.0. This paper tries to fill this gap by identifying the different sensor technologies of Industry 4.0 available, and identifying the differences between traditional and smart factories. In addition, this paper reviews existing research that has been done on Industry 4.0; therefore, provides a broad overview of the extant literature on Industry 4.0, summarizes the variations between traditional and smart factories, and creates an agenda for future research that encompasses the vigorous evolution of Industry 4.0. 2. Smart Factory Although automation has become a crucial part of the factory, innovative manufacturers have taken the opportunity to take it to a whole new level through the application of IoT and artificial intelligence in production processes. With enhancing the complexity of cyber physical systems, the physical machines and business processes have combined with automation to give rise to complex optimization decisions that were made traditionally by humans [5,21,22]. This has enabled manufacturers to integrate the floor decisions and perceptions with the supply chain, giving birth to what we now call a smart factory. The introduction of mechanical manufacturing equipment marked the first industrial revolution, followed by the development of the mass production of goods [13]. The digital revolution was considered to be the adoption of increased automation and control in manufacturing processes by using electronics and IT [12]. The adoption of IoT in these processes has given rise to the deviation of the centralized factory system to a decentralized system [12,13,14]. This technology has enabled machines and industries to go through a self-optimization and reconfiguration, to adapt their behavior to changes in orders and operating conditions [23,24]. The core of smart factories is the technology that makes data collection possible. This technology includes intelligent sensors, motors, and robotics which are employed on the production and assembly lines of the manufacturing industry [17]. Smart Factory vs. Traditional Factory In order to meet drastic changes in customer demands, the manufacturing process requires abilities that help in adjusting product type and production capacity, to enable the handling of multiple product varieties [25]. Manufacturing should have adequate functionality, scalability, and connectivity with customers and suppliers to meet such challenges. Traditional factories lack capabilities that allow them to monitor and control automated and complex manufacturing to enable efficient production of customized products [26]. Traditional factories have stand-alone and segregated applications with less integration of the production system, product life cycle, and value chain. Consequently, there is poor reuse of systems and integration between real and virtual systems in a traditional set-up. A general concept of a smart factory can be seen in Figure 1. The smart factory is an upgrade from old-fashioned automation to a linked and flexible system, and which constitutes a continual data stream through highly connected operations and production systems which can learn and adapt to changing demands [26,27,28]. These factories can assimilate data from physical, operational, and human assets to drive manufacturing, maintenance, inventory tracking, digitization of operations, and other activities in manufacturing systems [29]. The main aim of smart factories is to use intelligent production systems and suitable engineering methods for the successful and interconnected implementation of production facilities [25,30]. It is an engineering system that operates on interconnection, collaboration, and execution. Interconnecting devices in smart factories allow the exchange of information, recognize and assess situations, and integrate the physical world with the digital world, making smart factories adaptive in nature [23,31]. In other words, the smart factory integrates physical and cyber technologies and makes the involved technologies more accurate, enhancing the performance, quality, controllability, management, and transparency of the manufacturing processes. In such a smart factory environment, the manufacturer has the ability to meet customer requirements by changing the production specifications and other settings of the machines at the last minute. This ability is not present in traditional factories [32] (Table 1). The true feature of a smart factory lies in its capability to readjust and evolve along with the growing needs of the organization [32,33]. These needs can be categorized into: changing customer demands, emergence of new markets, development of new products and services, enhanced productive approaches to operations, and use of advanced technologies in maintenance processes [13,34,35]. The ability to tailor and learn from real-time data makes smart factories more receptive and predictive, to avoid operational downtime and other possible failures in processes [12,29]. A smart factory is characterized by four intelligent features:Sensors: these are devices that have the ability to self-organize, learn, and maintain environmental information to analyze behaviors and abilities. Therefore, sensors can make decisions that enable them to adjust to changes in the environment. Interoperability: through interconnection between different devices, coordination between them can be enhanced, allowing flexibility in configuration protocols of the production system. Integration: robots and artificial intelligence (AI) allow smart factories to have a high level of integration among processes. AI, along with the integration of human intellectual capabilities, enables factories to perform analysis and decision making. Virtual reality (VR) techniques: as one of the high-level components of smart factories, VR facilitates human–machine integration by virtualizing manufacturing processes using computers, signal processing, animation technology, intelligent reasoning, prediction, and simulation and multimedia technologies. 3. Key Sensing Technologies in a Smart Factory Smart factories are comprised of intelligent machines, devices, and control equipment that monitor vital parameters of the manufacturing processes [5]. These improvements have not only altered the factory floor infrastructure, promoting steady and precise collaboration between machines, but have also altered machinery requirements, increasing demand for reliable sensors [10]. This section gives brief information about the key sensors used in a smart factory. 3.1. Passive Sensors The current manufacturing system is defined by different technologies, however the main technologies used are sensors, actuators, effectors, controllers, and control loops [36]. A vital role is played by sensors in a smart factory, as they collect and implement accurate data into the manufacturing processes to enhance product quality. Sensors are electrical, opto-electrical, or electronic devices consisting of sensitive materials that help to determine the presence of a particular entity or function [37]. In many cases, a physical stimulus is transformed into an electrical signal using sensors, which then can be evaluated and analyzed for making decisions about the operations being carried out [5,36]. Recent developments in sensor technology have enabled manufacturers to control and acquire data like never before. Sensors can operate either actively or passively [36,38]. When operating actively, a particular physical stimulus is required for the sensor to work. For example, color identification sensors are active as they need visible light to illuminate the object so that the sensor can receive a physical stimulus. In the passive instance, the physical stimulus is already present and does not have to be provided [38]. For example, infrared devices are passive as the stimulus is already being generated from infrared radiation that is linked with the temperature of a body. Several types of sensors have been developed and used successfully in industrial process control. Smart factories use a variety of sensor types, from basic temperature to humidity monitoring to sophisticated position and product sensing [39,40]. These sensors make manufacturing efficient by helping in advance factory operations, such as moving products, controlling robotic and milling processes, and sensing environmental factors. The main measurement and control parameters in a factory environment are temperature, position, force, pressure, and flow [40]. 3.1.1. Temperature Sensors As temperature directly affects material properties and product quality, it is one of the crucial parameters to be measured and controlled in industrial plants. A temperature sensor is a device that has the ability to collect temperature concerned information from a resource, and then changes it into information that can be understood by another device [41]. These sensors have the ability to measure the thermal characteristics of gases, liquids, and solids. Several temperature sensors have been developed in recent years which can be used in electrically and chemically hostile environments. These sensors can be divided into two groups: (1) low-temperature sensors, with a range of −100 to +400 °C, using sensing materials such as phosphors, semi-conductors, and liquid crystals; and (2) high-temperature sensors with a range of 500 to 2000 °C, based on blackbody radiations [25,40,42]. Table 2 shows the different sub-types of temperature sensor, along with their key features. 3.1.2. Pressure Sensors Pressure sensors have the ability to capture pressure changes and transform them into an electrical signal, where the applied pressure defines its quantity. These are electro-mechanical devices that identify force in gases or liquids and provide control signals to display devices [25,37,43]. These sensors can also be used to detect atmospheric changes [51]. For example, barometric pressure sensors have the ability to detect changes in the atmosphere that are helpful for the prediction of weather patterns and changes. Another example is vacuum sensors, which are used when pressure in a vacuum is below atmospheric pressure levels, which can be difficult to detect using mechanical methods. Table 3 shows the different sub-types of pressure sensors along with their key features. 3.1.3. Position Sensors These sensors are used to sense the positions of valves, doors, throttles etc. These sensors are equipped with location tracking abilities that help to determine the precise positions of work-in-progress, tools, and other production-relevant items within the facility [57,58]. Motion sensors (which trigger actions such as illuminating a floodlight by detecting movement of an object) and proximity sensors (which detect that an object has come within the range of a sensor) are worth mentioning as they serve functions similar to position sensors [59,60]. Table 4 shows the different sub-types of position sensors along with their key features. 3.1.4. Force Sensors Force sensors are designated to translate applied forces (such as tensile, compressive force, etc.) into electric signals which reflect the degree of force [63,64]. These signals are then sent to indicators, controllers, or computers that inform operators about the processes, or serve as inputs that help to achieve control over machinery and processes. A variety of force sensors are being used in smart factories depending on the type of force being measured [65]. For instance, load cells measure compressive forces, strain gauges measure the internal resistance forces, and force sensing resistors measure the rate of change of an applied force. Table 5 shows the different sub-types of force sensors, along with their key features. 3.1.5. Flow Sensors These sensors have the ability to sense the movement of gases, liquids, or solids within a pipe or a conduit. These sensors have extensive uses in processing industries, and allow operation of the machinery at an optimum performance level [67,68]. A flow sensor can be electronic, using ultrasonic detection of the flow, or partially mechanical [69]. For instance, flow sensors in automobiles measure air intake in the engine and adjust fuel delivery to the fuel injectors in order to provide optimum fuel to the engine. Flow sensors are also used in medical ventilators, where the correct rate of delivery of air and oxygen to patients is needed for respiration [70]. Table 6 shows the different sub-types of flow sensors along with their key features. 3.2. Smart Sensors Among other recent advances in technology, smart sensors have been in the spotlight in terms of their potential significance and wide range of application areas. With the integration of computing and IoT in industrial processes, ordinary sensors have been transformed into smart sensors providing them with abilities to carry out complex calculations with collected data [37,40]. Apart from increased capabilities, smart sensors have also become remarkably small and exceedingly flexible, turning bulky machines into high-tech intel. Equipped with signal conditioning, embedded algorithms, and digital interfaces, smart sensors have become devices with detection and self-awareness capabilities [25,72]. These sensors are built as IoT components that convert real-time information into digital data that can be transmitted to a gateway [36,73]. These abilities allow smart sensors to predict and monitor real time scenarios and take corrective actions in an instant. Complex multi-layered operations such as collecting raw data, adjusting sensitivity, and filtering, motion detection, analysis, and communication are the main functions of intelligent sensors [38]. For instance, wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are one of the applications of smart sensors, whose nodes are connected with one or more other sensors and sensor hubs, making a communication technology of some kind. In addition, information from multiple sensors can be combined to deduce conclusions about an existing problem; for instance, temperature and pressure sensor data can be used to infer the onset of a mechanical failure. Figure 2 shows the building blocks of a typical smart sensor [41], while Figure 3 summarizes the key features of smart sensors [51,72]. 3.2.1. Calibration Capability The ability of a sensor to determine its normal function is termed calibration capability [39]. Self-calibration is simple in many cases, and different calibration techniques are available for different types of sensors:Sensors with an electric output carry out calibration by using a known reference of voltage level. Sensors such as load cells used for weighing systems can adjust their output to zero when no force is being applied [27]. Other sensors can use look-up tables for calibration. However, to carry out calibration using look-up tables, a huge amount of memory capacity must be available to store correction points due to the large volume of data gathered during the process. On the contrary, an interpolation method is preferable in which a small matrix of correction points is required [35]. 3.2.2. Self-Diagnosis of Faults Smart sensors carry out self-diagnosis by observing internal signals for evidence of faults. Differentiating between normal measurement deviations and sensor faults can be a challenge for some sensors [72]. This challenge is overcome by storing multiple measured values around a set-up point and calculating minimum and maximum values for the measured quantity [51]. In order to measure the impact of sensor fault on the measured quantity, uncertainty techniques are used. This enables the continuation of using a sensor after the fault has arisen. 3.3. Nuclear Sensors Nuclear sensors are very uncommon [37,74] due to two reasons: they are costly and have strict safety regulations for their use. Recent developments have made the availability of low-level radiation sources for safe use of these sensors [37]. Table 7 summarizes the pros and cons of these sensors. 3.4. Micro-Sensors (MEMS Sensors) Micro-sensors contain two and three dimensional micro-machined structures that are a part of microelectromechanical system (MEMS) devices [74,75]. These sensors can be regarded as small sized transducers, as they convert mechanical signals from an energy source into electrical form. Currently, sensors that measure temperature, pressure, force, speed, sound, magnetic field, optical, biomedical, and chemical features are being used successfully by industries [37,74]. Table 7 summarizes the main characteristics of these sensors. 3.5. Nano-Sensors (NEMS) Nano-sensors, based on nanotechnology, are the most recent development in sensing technology [72,75]. These are a part of nano-elctromechanical system (NEMS) devices which include nano-actuators as well. Table 7 gives a summary of these sensors. 4. Conclusions This paper has discussed the different types of sensor technology used in the manufacturing industry, specifically in smart factories. An extensive review of the extant literature is also presented on the technology lead smart factory. Key differences between a smart factory and traditional factory have been highlighted. Use of sensors, interoperability of different IoT devices, integration of robotics and AI, and use of VR techniques were found to be the key intelligent features of a smart factory. As sensors are an important component of a smart factory, the main sensor types and their sub-types, along with their characteristics, materials, uses, application areas, advantages and disadvantages have been identified in this paper. Sensors and Wi-fi are changing the way people communicate with the surrounding world, bringing a new era of connectivity, termed the internet of things. This technology has the potential to provide virtually boundless opportunities to businesses and communities, with enhanced connectivity and use of collected data. With the help of these technologies, data flow is integrated between partners, suppliers, and customers, as well as organizations to develop a finalized product according to customer demands. Manufacturers around the world are beginning to realize the importance of sensors, and the benefits of merging traditional operations and IoT. Therefore, a developing trend for the smart factory is human–machine collaboration. This paper attempted to provide a broad overview of the extant literature on Industry 4.0, summarizing the variations between traditional and smart factories, and the main sensors used within a smart factory setup. While aspects of the smart factory have been successfully implemented in several key industries (e.g., the chemical industry), it has been found that there are technological, cost, and knowledge barriers to the broader implementation of sensors across manufacturing [20]. These barriers also include standardization, cyber security, and risk concerns, which may enhance organizational resistance to automation within the factory. In terms of standardization, two Industry 4.0 reference architectures have been standardized, namely, Reference Architecture Model Industry 4.0, from the International Electrotechnical Commission, and Industrial Internet Reference Architecture, from the Object Management Group. A discussion on these standardized architectures and the compatibility of each Industry 4.0 proposal to these standards is needed. Moreover, the concept of digital twin in the manufacturing system configuration stage, which can enable the validation of system performance in a semi-physical simulation manner, is gaining interest. The digital twin conducts a direct test and validation that can quickly locate the problem and malfunctioning part, rectify the design mistakes, and test the workability of equipment in the system execution [76,77]. In addition, a deficiency of labor skills and manufacturer technical willingness relative to available technologies can be limiting. It has been revealed that there is a scarcity of studies that address these issues. Furthermore, artificial intelligence, block chain, cloud computing, and big data analytics (also known as ABCD) are known for the generation of information technology [76]. The employment of blockchain in smart factories is known to enable increased security, enhanced traceability, and reduced costs [76,77]. These features along with standardization and cyber security issues need a detailed study and therefore, are identified as a future extension of this work. Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Author Contributions Conceptualization, T.K., N.R. and S.A.; methodology, T.K. and S.A.; formal analysis, T.K.; investigation, T.K.; resources, N.R. and M.U.-R.; data curation, T.K.; writing—original draft preparation, T.K. and S.A.; writing—review and editing, T.K. and M.U.-R.; visualization, T.K.; supervision, N.R. and S.A.; funding acquisition, N.R.; project administration, N.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding This research received no external funding. Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. Figure 1 Concept of a smart factory. Figure 2 Smart sensor building blocks. Figure 3 Features of a smart sensor. sensors-20-06783-t001_Table 1Table 1 Key differences between the traditional manufacturing factory and smart factory. Traditional Factory Smart Factory Manual and isolated processes, operations; no integration with different systems and tools. Digitized and integrated processes, operations; complete integration with existing systems, new systems and tools. Legacy systems with frequent machine failures and increased maintenance costs. Smart systems with improved machine utilization and reduced maintenance costs. Tied to systems or machines for data, therefore zero or limited data for decision making; process-driven decision making. Update or receive data on the go, therefore complete data for faster decision making; data-driven decision making. Limited technology involvement. Internet-of-things (IoT), sensor, mobile app, radio frequency identification (RFID) enabled. Zero or limited visibility on operations, productivity data. Increased transparency, visibility on operations and production data. Limited innovation in production development. Smart and intelligent products. Inaccurate asset tracking process and poor resource utilization. Accurate asset tracking using IoT, RFID; improved resource utilization. Poor interoperability. High interoperability. The production line is fixed unless manually reconfigured by people with system power down. When switching between different types of products, the needed resources and the route to link these resources should be reconfigured automatically and online. sensors-20-06783-t002_Table 2Table 2 Key features of temperature sensors. Sensor Types Characteristics Material Uses Advantages Disadvantages Source Thermistor Additionally called thermally sensitive resistors, change their physical appearance with changes in temperature. The effective operating range is −50 °C to 250 °C. Ceramic such as oxides of nickel, manganese or cobalt coated in glass. Widely used in automobile industry to detect the intake and coolant temperature. Fast thermal response; lead wire resistance results in small error. Limited temperature range; low resistance to shock. [42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50] Resistance Thermometer Have a fixed relationship with temperature, resistance changes as temperature changes. Known for accuracy and stability, these sensors detect temperature changes ranging from −50 °C to 500 °C for thin film, and −200 °C to 850 °C for wide film. High purity conducting metals such as platinum, copper or nickel wound into a coil. Most widely used as HVAC, room, duct and refrigerant temperature, motors for overload protection and in automotives for air and oil temperature detection. High precision and stability; strong output signal and high sensitivity; good stability (can maintain temperatures below 0.1 °C for a long time). Expensive; easily influenced by lead wire resistance; slow thermal response; low resistance to shock and vibration. Thermocouple Temperature changes cause a temperature dependent voltage which is in turn converted into a temperature reading. Detect temperatures as high as 3000 °C and as low as −250 °C. Two junctions of different materials such as copper and constantan that are welded together. Most widely used in industrial measurement due to inexpensive, rugged and reliable nature. Wide temperature range; high temperature measurement; high resistance to shock and vibration; fast thermal response. Compensating conductors needed when extending lead wires. sensors-20-06783-t003_Table 3Table 3 Key features of pressure sensors. Sensor Type Characteristics Material Uses Advantages Disadvantages Source Resonant Follows the principle of vibrating wire, where a magnetic coil is attached to a diaphragm which vibrates when faced by a magnetic field conducting an electric current. The vibration frequency depends on pressure applied. Metal resistive element such as silicon and quartz. Used in industrial gauge and vacuum measurement. High over-pressure and burst pressure capabilities. Expensive; limited machining processes of quartz. [48,52,53,54,55,56] Capacitive Most commonly used. Display change in capacitance when pressure is applied to the diaphragm creating an oscillator frequency. Metals such as copper and indium tin oxide. Ideal for flow applications. Highly sensitive, can measure high and low changes; measure pressures below 10 mbar; withstand large overloads. Material constraints and joining and sealing requirements restrict applications. Piezoelectric Use the properties of piezoelectric materials such as quartz to create a charge which is proportional to the force applied on the surface when pressure is applied. Piezoelectric materials such as quartz, rochelle salt, barium titanium, and tourmaline. Widely used for dynamic pressure measurement in turbulence, blast and engine combustion, also used in some medical applications such as monitoring arterial pulse. Measures fast changing dynamic pressures. Need high impedance circuit; susceptible to noise; unable to measure solid state pressure due to dynamic nature. Optical Use interferometry to detect changes in pressure in optical fiber. Can be created using tiny components or micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) technology. Use a Fabry-Perot interferometer, with two partially reflecting mirrors made of glass or quartz. Most widely used in radiography equipment. Not disturbed by electromagnetic interference, allowing use in noisy conditions; highly sensitive, small size, and long life span; medically safe for implantation. Costly; susceptible to interference from environmental effects and physical damage. sensors-20-06783-t004_Table 4Table 4 Key features of position sensors. Sensor Type Characteristics Material Uses Advantages Disadvantages Source Potentiometric Resistance-based sensors, use a resistive track with a wiper which moves with the movement of the object. Carbon film. Commonly used in computer game joysticks, steering wheels, industrial and robot applications. Inexpensive and easy to use. Wear easily due to moving parts; low accuracy, repeatability and limited frequency response; limited detection range due to small size of the wiper. [57,59,60,61,62] Capacitive Consist of two plates separated by a dielectric material. Rely on detecting change in capacitance to measure the position of an object either by changing the dielectric constant or overlapping area. Metallic electrodes used as plates, with a dielectric material between them. Widely used in accelerometers, ice detection, spacing and thickness of materials. Non-contact measurement; high resolution; can detect motion in both linear and angular directions; different material detection such as skin, plastic, metal, liquid, etc. Sensitive to environmental changes such as humidity, temperature etc. Magnetostrictive Linear Position Material changes its size or shape when in the presence of a magnetic field to detect the position of an object. Ferromagnetic materials such as iron, nickel, and cobalt. Used in the controlling of gaps between rollers, hydraulic or pneumatic cylinders, in automotive industry and electric actuators. Non-contact; ability to detect position in the presence of a barrier between magnet and sensing rod; ability to measure multiple magnets with a single sensing rod. Dead band on each side of the sensor cannot be reduced to zero. Eddy Current based Work with induced currents that occur in a conductive material in the presence of a changing magnetic field using Faraday’s law of induction. Conductive material such as copper, aluminum, titanium alloy etc. Widely used in automation applications, machine tool mounting, final assembly of delicate machinery and monitoring drive shafts. Functional in dirty environments; less expensive; unaffected by most contaminants. Omnidirectional, can only determine the distance of the object not the direction of the object from the sensor. Optical Work two ways: (1) light is transmitted from an emitter and sent to a receiver at the other end of the sensor; (2) emitted light signal is reflected from the monitored object towards the light source. Change in light characteristics are used to determine the position. Glass or plastic disc used as an encoder, with LED used as a light source, and a photodetector as light receiver. Widely used in deadbeat galvanometers, induction motors, induction furnaces, electric brakes, and speedometers. Both linear and rotational movement can be detected. Large amount of heat is produced in the soft core of transformers, induction coil, electric motors, etc., reducing the efficiency of these machines. sensors-20-06783-t005_Table 5Table 5 Key features of force sensors. Sensor Type Characteristics Material Uses Advantages Disadvantages Source Load cells Convert applied force into an output signal measuring force such as compressive forces. Include pneumatic, hydraulic, piezoelectric crystal, inductive, capacitive, and magnetostrictive load cells. Materials such as ferromagnetic, metal resistive elements, metallic electrodes etc. Commonly used in truck scales. Performance is affected by no-axial force; requires temperature network; excessive force may damage the load cells permanently. Small and compact in size; good accuracy; less expensive; good sensitivity. [58,63,64,65,66] Strain gauges Sensors whose electrical resistance changes with applied force. An insulating substrate with a conductive metallic foil. Widely used in load measuring applications, from truck scales to bolt tensioning devices. High resolution; small size; measures both static and rapidly changing stress; low price. Low accuracy; need to be calibrated after installation. Force Sensing Resistors (FSR) Use a type of piezoresistive technology consisting of a semi-conductor material or ink sandwiched between substrates separated by a separator. A conductive film is formed with applied force and presses against a conductive ink printed on the substrate. Electronic and electronic components; PCB, conductive foam. Used in foot pronation systems, automobiles like car sensors, resistive touch pads, etc. Thin and flexible; available in variety of sizes and shapes; low power consumption; low cost. Low in precision and repeatability, repeated measurements vary by 10% or more. sensors-20-06783-t006_Table 6Table 6 Key features of flow sensors. Sensor Types Characteristics Material Uses Advantages Disadvantages Source Positive displacement Perform direct measurement of volume of the fluid passing through the device. A known volume of fluid is trapped and moved through the sensor using rotating parts that effectively pass the fluid along sequentially before allowing more fluid to enter the device. Stainless steel. Used in measuring oils, gasoline, hydraulic fluids, and home installed metering of water and gas. Function over a wide range of fluid viscosities; high accuracy; low maintenance requirements; provide mechanical or electronic interface. Extremely expensive to install and maintain due to moving parts. [46,67,68,69,70,71] Mass flow Detect energy transfer from a heated surface to a flowing fluid following different ways: (1) introducing thermal energy and measuring change in temperature; (2) maintaining constant temperature and measuring the amount of energy needed to do so; (3) introducing electric current to a resistive wire and measuring the current needed to maintain temperature. Special alloys to cope with aggressive gases. Widely used in automotive applications. Directly measure liquid flow with high accuracy; wide range of measurable fluids, including highly viscous liquids; bidirectional flow measurement. Poor zero stability; cannot measure liquids with low density; highly sensitive to vibration interference. Velocity flow Sensors detect flow rate by measuring the velocity of fluid flowing through the sensor. Mechanical: Fluid flow measured by the movement of a paddle wheel detected by a magnetic coil or infrared sensor. Stainless steel. Commonly used in water/waste treatment plants. Cost effective; compact; need very little energy to operate; detect a wide variety of fluids. Moving parts are subject to wear; build-up of contamination due to flow of dirty fluids; a minimum amount of fluid needed to move the paddle wheel. Electromagnetic: Operate on Faraday’s law of induction. A coil induces a magnetic field in the fluid being measured and uses a set of electrodes to measure the induced voltage. Hastelloy, tantalum 90% platinum 10%, iridium and titanium for electrodes. Widely used in chemical manufacturing, petrochemical industries. Can measure liquids with some degree of contamination; pressure drop is not induced in the pipe. Do not function with non-conductive fluids; not suitable for vacuum conditions; require fluids to have some level of minimum conductivity. Ultrasonic: A pair of ultrasonic transducers generate a signal directed into the fluid flow, each signal is directed back to the receiver using a set of mirrors. Stainless steel pipe wall. Used in facilities management, aquafarms, pulp and paper manufacturing. Used for both conductive and non-conductive fluids; handle high temperatures and pressures; can be non-wetted. Fluids with air bubbles cannot pass through ultrasonic energy; high vibrations cause difficulty in reading; high cost. sensors-20-06783-t007_Table 7Table 7 Key features of nuclear, micro, and nano sensors. Sensor Type Characteristics Material Uses Advantages Disadvantages Source Nuclear sensor Operate following the principles of optical sensors, where a medium facilitates the transmission of radiation between a source and a detector; and the magnitude of transmission is attenuated according to the measured variable. Cesium 137—as gamma ray source; sodium diode device as gamma ray detector. Mass flow measurement and medical scanning applications. Zero carbon emission; energy independence. Very expensive; are prone to contamination by background radiation. [74,75] Micro-sensors An element with some sort of mechanical functionality is integrated with microelectronics. The typical sizes of these sensors range between 0.01 mm or 10–5 m to 5 mm. Silicon semiconductor material; sometimes fabricated with metals, plastics, polymers, gasses, and ceramics deposited on the silicon base. Largely used in the automotive industry and medical equipment, such as blood pressure measurement. Smaller size; improved performance; better reliability; lower production costs. Have low capacitance; output signals prone to noise contamination; produce output signals of very low magnitude. [74,75] Nano-sensors Vary in size from 1 to 1000 mm, using nanotechnology. Thin layers of metal films or semiconductors; more advance than MEMS using special forms of etching, optical lithography or electron beam lithography. Used as accelerometers, biological sensors and sensors for airborne chemicals. Lower production costs; reduced power consumption; smaller size. Complicate to handle; short-term noise issues. [72,74] ==== Refs References 1. Chang W. Ellinger A.E. Kim K. Franke G.R. Supply chain integration and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis of positional advantage mediation and moderating factors Eur. Manag. J. 2016 34 282 295 10.1016/j.emj.2015.11.008 2. Afzal B. Umair M. Shah G.A. Ahmed E. Enabling IoT platforms for social IoT applications: Vision, feature mapping, and challenges Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2019 92 718 731 10.1016/j.future.2017.12.002 3. Castelo-Branco I. Cruz-Jesus F. Oliveira T. Assessing Industry 4.0 readiness in manufacturing: Evidence for the European Union Comput. Ind. 2019 107 22 32 10.1016/j.compind.2019.01.007 4. Shi Z. Xie Y. Xue W. Chen Y. Fu L. Xu X. Smart factory in Industry 4.0 Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 2020 37 607 617 10.1002/sres.2704 5. Lass S. Gronau N. A factory operating system for extending existing factories to Industry 4.0 Comput. Ind. 2020 115 103128 10.1016/j.compind.2019.103128 6. Xie Y. Yin Y. Xue W. Shi H. Chong D. Intelligent supply chain performance measurement in Industry 4.0 Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 2020 37 711 718 10.1002/sres.2712 7. Ortiz A.M. Hussein D. Park S. Han S.N. Crespi N. The Cluster between Internet of Things and Social Networks: Review and Research Challenges IEEE Internet Things J. 2014 1 206 215 10.1109/JIOT.2014.2318835 8. Agostini L. Filippini R. Organizational and managerial challenges in the path toward Industry 4.0 Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 2019 22 406 421 10.1108/EJIM-02-2018-0030 9. Tortorella G.L. Giglio R. Van Dun D.H. Industry 4.0 adoption as a moderator of the impact of lean production practices on operational performance improvement Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2019 39 860 886 10.1108/IJOPM-01-2019-0005 10. Cimini C. Pirola F. Pinto R. Cavalieri S. A human-in-the-loop manufacturing control architecture for the next generation of production systems J. Manuf. Syst. 2020 54 258 271 10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.01.002 11. Tao F. Qi Q. Liu A. Kusiak A. Data-driven smart manufacturing J. Manuf. Syst. 2018 48 157 169 10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.01.006 12. Wilkesmann M. Wilkesmann U. Industry 4.0—organizing routines or innovations? VINE J. Inf. Knowl. Manag. Syst. 2018 48 238 254 10.1108/VJIKMS-04-2017-0019 13. Shrouf F. Ordieres J. Miragliotta G. Smart factories in Industry 4.0: A review of the concept and of energy management approached in production based on the Internet of Things paradigm Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management Bandar Sunway, Malaysia 9–12 December 2014 697 701 14. Kaur J. Kaur K. A fuzzy approach for an IoT-based automated employee performance appraisal Comput. Mater. Contin. 2017 53 24 38 15. Zanella A. Bui N. Castellani A. Vangelista L. Zorzi M. Internet of things for smart cities IEEE Internet Things J. 2014 1 22 32 10.1109/JIOT.2014.2306328 16. Ghasemaghaei M. Ebrahimi S. Hassanein K. Data analytics competency for improving firm decision making performance J. Strat. Inf. Syst. 2018 27 101 113 10.1016/j.jsis.2017.10.001 17. Benitez G.B. Ayala N.F. Frank A.G. Industry 4.0 innovation ecosystems: An evolutionary perspective on value cocreation Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020 228 107735 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107735 18. Mehami J. Nawi M. Zhong R.Y. Smart automated guided vehicles for manufacturing in the context of Industry 4.0 Procedia Manuf. 2018 26 1077 1086 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.144 19. Aydiner A.S. Tatoglu E. Bayraktar E. Zaim S. Information system capabilities and firm performance: Opening the black box through decision-making performance and business-process performance Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2019 47 168 182 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.12.015 20. Ghobakhloo M. The future of manufacturing industry: A strategic roadmap toward Industry 4.0 J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2018 29 910 936 10.1108/JMTM-02-2018-0057 21. Ning F. Zhou W. Zhang F. Yin Q. Ni X. The architecture of cloud maufacturing and its key technologies research Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing and Intelligence Systems Beijing, China 15–17 September 2011 259 263 22. Xu M. Song C. Ji Y. Shih M.-W. Lu K. Zheng C. Duan R. Jang Y. Lee B. Qian C. Toward Engineering a Secure Android Ecosystem ACM Comput. Surv. 2016 49 1 47 10.1145/2963145 23. Dalenogare L.S. Benitez G.B. Ayala N.F. Frank A.G. The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2018 204 383 394 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.019 24. Manavalan E. Jayakrishna K. A review of Internet of Things (IoT) embedded sustainable supply chain for industry 4.0 requirements Comput. Ind. Eng. 2019 127 925 953 10.1016/j.cie.2018.11.030 25. Choy J.L.C. Wu J. Long C. Lin Y.-B. Ubiquitous and Low Power Vehicles Speed Monitoring for Intelligent Transport Systems IEEE Sens. J. 2020 20 5656 5665 10.1109/JSEN.2020.2974829 26. Farhangi H. Smart Grid Encycl. Sustain. Technol. 2017 195 203 27. Gattullo M. Scurati G.W. Fiorentino M. Uva A.E. Ferrise F. Bordegoni M. Towards augmented reality manuals for industry 4.0: A methodology Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2019 56 276 286 10.1016/j.rcim.2018.10.001 28. Punithavathi P. Geetha S. Karuppiah M. Islam S.H. Hassan M.M. Choo K.-K.R. A lightweight machine learning-based authentication framework for smart IoT devices Inf. Sci. 2019 484 255 268 10.1016/j.ins.2019.01.073 29. Burke R. Mussomeli A. Laaper S. Hartigan M. Sniderman B. The smart Factory. Responsive, adaptive, connected manufacturing Deloitte 2014 31 1 10 30. Kimani K. Oduol V. Langat K. Cyber security challenges for IoT-based smart grid networks Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot. 2019 25 36 49 10.1016/j.ijcip.2019.01.001 31. Frank A.G. Dalenogare L.S. Ayala N.F. Industry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2019 210 15 26 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.004 32. Ivanov D. Dolgui A. Sokolov B. Werner F. Ivanova M. A dynamic model and an algorithm for short-term supply chain scheduling in the smart factory industry 4.0 Int. J. Prod. Res. 2016 54 386 402 10.1080/00207543.2014.999958 33. Agrifoglio R. Cannavale C. Laurenza E. Metallo C. How emerging digital technologies affect operations management through co-creation. Empirical evidence from the maritime industry Prod. Plan. Control 2017 28 1298 1306 10.1080/09537287.2017.1375150 34. Lightfoot H. Baines T. Smart P. The servitization of manufacturing: A systematic literature review of interdependent trends Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2013 33 1408 1434 10.1108/IJOPM-07-2010-0196 35. Tanyingyong V. Olsson R. Cho J.-W. Hidell M. Sjodin P. IoT-Grid: IoT Communication for Smart DC Grids Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) Washington, DC, USA 4–8 December 2016 1 7 36. Herrojo C. Paredes F. Mata-Contreras J. Martín F. Chipless-RFID: A review and recent developments Sensors 2019 19 3385 10.3390/s19153385 37. Bibby L. Dehe B. Defining and assessing industry 4.0 maturity levels-case of the defence sector Prod. Plan. Control 2018 29 1030 1043 10.1080/09537287.2018.1503355 38. Mulloni V. Donelli M. Chipless RFID Sensors for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities Sensors 2020 20 2135 10.3390/s20072135 32290109 39. Jeon B. Yoon J.S. Um J. Suh S.H. The architecture development of Industry 4.0 compliant smart machine tool system (SMTS) J. Intell. Manuf. 2020 31 1837 1859 10.1007/s10845-020-01539-4 40. Landaluce H. Arjona L. Perallos A. Falcone F. Angulo I. Muralter F. A Review of IoT Sensing Applications and Challenges Using RFID and Wireless Sensor Networks Sensors 2020 20 2495 10.3390/s20092495 41. Le D.N. Le Tuan L. Tuan M.N.D. Smart-building management system: An Internet-of-Things (IoT) application business model in Vietnam Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2019 141 22 35 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.01.002 42. Kadechkar A. Riba J.-R. Moreno-Eguilaz M. Perez J. SmartConnector: A Self-Powered IoT Solution to Ease Predictive Maintenance in Substations IEEE Sens. J. 2020 20 11632 11641 10.1109/JSEN.2020.2998157 43. Sattar H. Bajwa I.S. Amin R.U. Sarwar N. Jamil N. Malik M.G.A. Mahmood A. Shafi U. An IoT-Based Intelligent Wound Monitoring System IEEE Access 2019 7 144500 144515 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2940622 44. Leal-Junior A. Casas J. Marques C. Pontes M.J. Frizera A. Application of Additive Layer Manufacturing Technique on the Development of High Sensitive Fiber Bragg Grating Temperature Sensors Sensors 2018 18 4120 10.3390/s18124120 45. Bentley J.P. Temperature sensor characteristics and measurement system design J. Phys. E Sci. Instrum. 1984 17 430 439 10.1088/0022-3735/17/6/002 46. Lewis G.D. Merken P. Vandewal M. Enhanced Accuracy of CMOS Smart Temperature Sensors by Nonlinear Curvature Correction Sensors 2018 18 4087 10.3390/s18124087 47. Herter J. Wunderlich V. Janeczka C. Zamora V. Experimental Demonstration of Temperature Sensing with Packaged Glass Bottle Microresonators Sensors 2018 18 4321 10.3390/s18124321 48. Tao W. Lu Z. He Q. Lv P. Wang Q. Zhao H. Research on the Temperature Characteristics of the Photoacoustic Sensor of Glucose Solution Sensors 2018 18 4323 10.3390/s18124323 49. Sakamoto T. Kimura S. Plant temperature sensors Sensors 2018 18 4365 10.3390/s18124365 50. Clark J. Self-Calibration and Performance Control of MEMS with Applications for IoT Sensors 2018 18 4411 10.3390/s18124411 51. Zuo G. Dou Y. Chang X. Chen Y. Ma C. Design and Performance Analysis of a Multilayer Sea Ice Temperature Sensor Used in Polar Region Sensors 2018 18 4467 10.3390/s18124467 52. Monea B.F. Ionete E.I. Spiridon S.I. Ion-Ebrasu D. Petre A.E. Carbon Nanotubes and Carbon Nanotube Structures Used for Temperature Measurement Sensors 2019 19 2464 10.3390/s19112464 53. Eaton W.P. Smith J.H. Micromachined pressure sensors: Review and recent developments Smart Mater. Struct. 1997 6 530 539 10.1088/0964-1726/6/5/004 54. Mathias K.A. Kulkarni S.M. Investigation on Influence of Geometry on Performance of a Cavity-less Pressure Sensor IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018 417 012035 10.1088/1757-899X/417/1/012035 55. Tessarolo M. Possanzini L. Campari E.G. Bonfiglioli R. Violante F.S. Bonfiglio A. Fraboni B. Adaptable pressure textile sensors based on a conductive polymer Flex. Print. Electron. 2018 3 034001 10.1088/2058-8585/aacbee 56. Wang F. Zhu B. Shu L. Tao X.-M. Flexible pressure sensors for smart protective clothing against impact loading Smart Mater. Struct. 2013 23 015001 10.1088/0964-1726/23/1/015001 57. Islam M.M.M. Sohaib M. Kim J. Kim J.-M. Crack Classification of a Pressure Vessel Using Feature Selection and Deep Learning Methods Sensors 2018 18 4379 10.3390/s18124379 58. Petrov R.V. Sokolov O.V. Bichurin M.I. Petrova A.R. Bozhkov S. Milenov I. Bozhkov P. Strength of multiferroic layered structures in position sensor structures IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020 939 012058 10.1088/1757-899X/939/1/012058 59. Gödecke M.L. Bett C.M. Buchta D. Frenner K. Osten W. Optical sensor design for fast and process-robust position measurements on small diffraction gratings Opt. Lasers Eng. 2020 134 106267 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2020.106267 60. Chan Y.J. Carr A.R. Charkhabi S. Furnish M. Beierle A.M. Reuel N.F. Wireless position sensing and normalization of embedded resonant sensors using a resonator array Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2020 303 111853 10.1016/j.sna.2020.111853 61. Kim J.-A. Kim J.W. Kang C.-S. Lee J.Y. Jin J. On-machine calibration of angular position and runout of a precision rotation stage using two absolute position sensors Measurement 2020 153 107399 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.107399 62. Helseth L.E. On the accuracy of an interdigital electrostatic position sensor J. Electrost. 2020 107 103480 10.1016/j.elstat.2020.103480 63. Xu L. Wang S. Zheng P. Huang Z. Luo X. Investigation into position deviation effect on micro newton force sensor IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020 799 10.1088/1757-899X/799/1/012017 64. Cherkun A. Mishakov G. Sharkov A. Demikhov E. The use of a piezoelectric force sensor in the magnetic force microscopy of thin permalloy films Ultramicroscopy 2020 217 113072 10.1016/j.ultramic.2020.113072 32717555 65. Nastro A. Ferrari M. Ferrari V. Double-actuator position-feedback mechanism for adjustable sensitivity in electrostatic-capacitive MEMS force sensors Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2020 312 112127 10.1016/j.sna.2020.112127 66. Templeman J.O. Sheil B.B. Sun T. Multi-axis force sensors: A state-of-the-art review Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2020 304 111772 10.1016/j.sna.2019.111772 67. Zang H. Zhang X. Zhu B. Fatikow S. Recent advances in non-contact force sensors used for micro/nano manipulation Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2019 296 155 177 10.1016/j.sna.2019.07.007 68. Palmer K. Kratz H. Nguyen H. Thornell G. A highly integratable silicon thermal gas flow sensor J. Micromech. Microeng. 2012 22 65015 10.1088/0960-1317/22/6/065015 69. Garrett A. Soler G.J. DiLuna M.L. Grant R.A. Zaveri H.P. Hoshino K. A passive, biocompatible microfluidic flow sensor to assess flows in a cerebral spinal fluid shunt Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2020 312 112110 10.1016/j.sna.2020.112110 70. Bekraoui A. Hadjadj A. Thermal flow sensor used for thermal mass flowmeter Microelectron. J. 2020 103 104871 10.1016/j.mejo.2020.104871 71. Ejeian F. Azadi S. Razmjou A. Orooji Y. Kottapalli A. Warkiani M.E. Asadnia M. Design and applications of MEMS flow sensors: A review Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2019 295 483 502 10.1016/j.sna.2019.06.020 72. Kim J. Cho H. Han S.-I. Han A. Han K.-H. A disposable microfluidic flow sensor with a reusable sensing substrate Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019 288 147 154 10.1016/j.snb.2019.02.088 73. Dahlin A.B. Size Matters: Problems and Advantages Associated with Highly Miniaturized Sensors Sensors 2012 12 3018 3036 10.3390/s120303018 22736990 74. Li J. Xing F. Chu D. Liu Z. High-Accuracy Self-Calibration for Smart, Optical Orbiting Payloads Integrated with Attitude and Position Determination Sensors 2016 16 1176 10.3390/s16081176 75. Shkel M. Smart MEMS: Micro-structures with error-suppression and self-calibration control capabilities Proc. Am. Control Conf. 2001 2 1208 1213 76. Leng J. Yan D. Liu Q. Xu K. Zhao J.L. Shi R. Wei L. Zhang D. Chen X. ManuChain: Combining Permissioned Blockchain With a Holistic Optimization Model as Bi-Level Intelligence for Smart Manufacturing IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 2019 50 1 11 10.1109/TSMC.2019.2930418 77. Leng J. Ruan G. Jiang P. Xu K. Liu Q. Zhou X. Liu C. Blockchain-empowered sustainable manufacturing and product lifecycle management in industry 4.0: A survey Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020 132 110112 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110112