==== Front Materials (Basel) Materials (Basel) materials Materials 1996-1944 MDPI 33260433 10.3390/ma13235443 materials-13-05443 Article Dilatometric Analysis of the Austenite Decomposition in Undeformed and Deformed Low-Carbon Structural Steel https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1500-1228Morawiec Mateusz https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8342-8640Skowronek Adam https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6703-5019Król Mariusz https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5520-9683Grajcar Adam * Department of Engineering Materials and Biomaterials, Silesian University of Technology, 18A Konarskiego Street, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland; mateusz.morawiec@polsl.pl (M.M.); adam.skowronek@polsl.pl (A.S.); mariusz.krol@polsl.pl (M.K.) * Correspondence: adam.grajcar@polsl.pl; Tel.: +48-322372933 29 11 2020 12 2020 13 23 544309 11 2020 25 11 2020 © 2020 by the authors.2020Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).This paper aims to analyze the effect of deformation on the phase transformation kinetics of low-carbon structural steel. The steel used for the investigation was subjected to two different dilatometric analyses using a DIL 805A/D device. The first analysis was to determine the phase transformation kinetics without deformation of austenite before cooling. Then, the analysis under deformation conditions was conducted to investigate the deformation effect on the transformation kinetics. Microscopic studies by light microscopy were performed. The essential part of the research was hardness analysis for different cooling rates and the creation of continuous-cooling-transformation (CCT) and deformation continuous-cooling-transformation (DCCT) diagrams. It was found that the deformation of the samples before cooling increases a diffusion rate in the austenite resulting in the corresponding increase of ferritic, pearlitic, and bainitic start temperatures, as well as shifting the austenite transformation product regions to a longer time. The increase of the transformation area and a decrease in grain size are observed for the deformed samples. structural steellow-carbon steeldilatometric analysisphase transformation kineticsCCT diagramDCCT diagram ==== Body 1. Introduction Conventional low-carbon structural steels are still one of the most used steel grades of wide application areas [1,2]. The reason for this is their low price, good weldability, formability, and their lean chemical composition [3,4]. These steels are composed of a ferritic matrix with pearlite, which amount depends on a carbon level. These steels are used for many elements, which are usually produced by different hot-working and cold metal forming methods [5,6]. That is why it is important to comprehend the plastic deformation influence on the phase transformation kinetics of these steels, which selects the best deformation/heat treatment conditions for obtaining the desired microstructure and mechanical properties [7,8,9]. Deformation strongly influences the phase transformation kinetics [10,11], which is caused by the change in a state of microstructure. Undergoing deformation, the dislocation density in austenite increases leading to a higher preferential ferrite/bainite nucleation sites, such as grain boundaries or shear bands [12,13]. On the other side, a thermal cycle (heating and cooling) also influences the phase transformation kinetics. The start and finish transformation temperatures depend on the heating and cooling rates [14,15]. The austenite transformation to ferrite/pearlite/bainite and martensite depends on a cooling rate, which is directly connected to the steel hardenability [16]. The best way to determine the phase transformation kinetics in undeformed and deformed states is a dilatometric analysis [17]. This method uses the principle of linear thermal expansion of a sample during heating and cooling to determine the start and finish temperatures of different phases during heat treatment. The same phenomenon is used during the deformation of the sample. Based on the results from the dilatometric analysis, together with microstructure investigations and hardness measurements, it is possible to determine the phase transformation kinetics and to develop continuous-cooling-transformation (CCT and DCCT) diagrams [18,19]. These diagrams present the areas of transformations taking place at different deformation and heat treatment conditions. A number of works focus on presenting the effect of cooling rate on the kinetics of phase transformations. However, in industrial conditions, the vast majority of this process is associated with the hot-working that takes place during the production and forming processes. Considering the above issues, the following work aims at determining the effect of heat treatment and deformation on the kinetics of phase transformations in low-carbon structural steel. 2. Materials and Methods The investigated steel is a conventionally used low-carbon s235JR grade structural steel. The mechanical properties of this steel are: Yield point 235 MPa, tensile strength 340 MPa, and the total elongation of 26%. The chemical composition of the investigated steel was 0.2% C, 1.5% Mn, and 0.009 and 0.045% of S and P, respectively. A steel bar with a 50 × 50 mm2, square section was used for the investigations (Figure 1). The first step of the analysis was a dilatometric test. The samples of 4 mm and 5 mm in diameter, and 10 mm length were machined. The tests were performed using a BAHR dilatometer 805 A/D (TA Instruments, Wetzlar, Germany) with a vacuum chamber and induction heating. The investigation and analysis of dilatograms and determination of critical temperatures were made according to ASTM A1033-04 [20]. One sample was subjected to very slow heating to 1100 °C at a rate of 0.25 °C/s to determine the austenite start (Ac1) and finish (Ac3) temperatures of the steel. For the purpose of CCT and DCCT diagrams, the samples were heated to 1050 °C at a rate of 1 °C/s. After obtaining the austenitization temperature, the samples were held for 5 min to homogenize the temperature and chemical composition. Next, the samples were cooled to 900 °C at a rate of 4 °C/s, kept for 20 s, and cooled to room temperature at different rates. In the case of deformation, the samples were subjected to 50% deformation at 900 °C at a rate of 1 mm/s, after which they were cooled to room temperature (Figure 2). The heating process was conducted in a vacuum, whereas, the cooling of samples to room temperature was performed using argon. The selected cooling rates are presented in Table 1. After the dilatometric analysis, the samples were prepared for metallographic investigations using standard metallography procedures [21]. The samples were cut in half (non-deformed samples) and in 1/3 of the length parallel to the deformation direction (the representing deformation region for compressed specimens) and ground using various SiC-based papers of: 220, 500, 800, and 1200 gradation. After grinding, the samples were polished using the diamond paste of 3 and 1 µm and etched in 5% Nital. The effect of the different heat treatments on the mechanical properties was assessed using hardness tests. They were performed using the Vickers method with a load of 9.81 N (HV1). 3. Results and Discussion 3.1. Dilatometric Analysis The first step of the analysis was to determine the austenite formation start (Ac1) and finish (Ac3) temperatures of steel during heating. For this purpose, a sample was heated to 1100 °C at a rate of 4 °C/min to simulate near-equilibrium conditions. The results of this analysis are presented in Figure 3. Based on the dilatometric results, the critical temperatures were determined. The austenite transformation starts at 727 °C and finishes at 882 °C. After determining the critical temperatures, the analysis of the phase transformation kinetics during cooling was performed. Results are presented in Figure 4. It can be noticed that with increasing cooling rate, the start and finish transformation temperatures decrease in undeformed samples. The same results were obtained for deformed conditions. The reason for this is a decreasing diffusion time at faster cooling rates [22,23,24]. When the cooling is faster, it takes a longer time to start the diffusion processes. In this case, for ferrite and pearlite transformations, a longer time is necessary for the transformation to be completed. In the case of deformed samples, one more thing was determined, namely, the phase transformation temperatures are higher compared to the same cooling rate in non-deformed samples. This effect corresponds to the higher dislocation density [25] in the austenite deformed at 900 °C. It leads to a higher number of preferable places for ferrite nucleation and a resulting increase in transformation temperatures [26,27,28]. In industrial applications, understanding this relationship is very important for obtaining proper microstructures. The selected registered dilatometric curves are presented in Figure 5. The results show the dilatometric and differential curves for undeformed and deformed samples cooled to room temperature at a rate of: 8 °C/min (Figure 5a,d), 2 °C/sec (Figure 5b,e), and 25 °C/sec (Figure 5c,f). Figure 6a also shows the way used for the determination of ferritic and pearlitic transformation start and finish temperatures. The pearlitic transformation, in this case is hard to be identified using only dilatometric curves. They only show the start and finish temperatures of the whole transformation, which prevents a good identification of temperatures at which different transformations take place. This is the reason why the differential curve was used. The first peak on a differential curve corresponds to a ferrite transformation. This phase is created first because of a low carbon concentration in steel, which is too small for pearlite forming in the initial state of transformation. After the first peak, the second small one can be seen, which represents the pearlite transformation. The size of the second peak reflects the amount of pearlite in the microstructure. The shape of the peaks corresponds to the amount of a phase formed during cooling. As the peak is wide, it means that the transformation takes a longer time to be finished. At the same time, an increase in the peak height is correlated with the power of the signal from the transformation. The more phase is formed, the higher peak is observed [29]. For this cooling rate, the microstructure should be composed mainly of ferrite with a small fraction of pearlite. In this case, the ferrite start temperature (Fs) was determined to be 833 °C; for the pearlite, the transformation starts temperature (Ps) was 721 °C, which at the same time was the ferrite finish temperature (Ff). The pearlite transformation is completed (Pf) at 675 °C, indicating in this case, the whole transformation finish temperature. 3.2. Microstructure Evolution The microstructure investigations after the dilatometric analysis of non-deformed and deformed samples are presented in Figure 6 and Figure 7. It can be seen that for the non-deformed samples, the microstructure comprises the ferritic matrix with some fraction of pearlite. Starting from the cooling rate of 0.125 °C/s to 4 °C/s the morphology of the ferrite is regular (globular shape) (Figure 6a,c,e,g), but when the cooling rate increases to 15 °C/s and faster rates (Figure 7c,e,g) the ferrite changes its morphology to more lath-like [30]. This kind of morphology is present because the cooling rate is still too low to produce bainite or martensite (low hardenability of the steel) [31], but fast enough to decrease the necessary time for ferrite to form globular grains. This kind of lath-like morphology (Figure 7g) slightly increases the hardness of the ferrite. In the case of deformation, the samples present globular grains in the whole range of cooling rates. The plastic deformation also reduces the grain size. This phenomenon is described by Inoue et al. [32]. Additionally, when the cooling rate increases to 8 °C/s, a small fraction of globular bainite is present in the microstructure (Figure 7b). The microstructure does not show any type of lath-like morphology compared to the non-deformed samples. The reason for this may be a higher phase transformation start temperature for ferrite, as the dilatometric analysis indicated. Based on the obtained microstructures, a mean diameter of the grain was calculated according to ASTM E112-113 standard [33]. The results of this analysis are presented in Table 2. According to the results, it can be seen that the increase in a cooling rate leads to a decrease in the grain size diameter. At the same time, the deformation of the material results in further grain refinement of the grains. However, the change of grain size after the deformation is not significant in this steel. Moreover, for the highest cooling rate, the undeformed samples are characterized by lath-like morphology. This makes it impossible to determine the grain size. 3.3. Hardness Analysis The next step of the work was the analysis of the steel hardness after the dilatometric tests. The hardness was measured by the Vickers method. During the test, ten values were registered, and the average was calculated. The results of the hardness measurements are presented in Table 3, and a change in hardness as a function of cooling rate is illustrated in Figure 8. The hardness changes together with different cooling rates; higher cooling rates applied during the cooling increase the hardness of the material. The reason for this is a smaller grain size of samples cooled at faster rates according to the Hall-Petch relationship [34]. The second effect corresponds to a shorter time (for the faster cooling rate) for the carbon diffusion during cooling, which leads to a higher carbon concentration in the phase. For the higher cooling rates, the hardness increase corresponds to the production of higher strength phases [35] (in this case bainite). The hardness of the material subjected to the deformation is slightly higher compared to non-deformed samples. The reason for this is a stronger grain refinement after deformation, which further increases the strength of the steel. 3.4. CCT and DCCT Diagrams The final step of the investigation was preparing CCT and DCCT diagrams based on the dilatometric curves, microstructure analysis, and hardness measurement. The results of the mentioned analyses for undeformed and deformed samples are presented in Table 4 and Table 5. Based on the above-mentioned results, both diagrams were created. The corresponding CCT and DCCT diagrams are presented in Figure 9 and Figure 10, respectively. The diagrams are created by connecting the red dots corresponding to the characteristic temperatures listed in Table 4 and Table 5. The color lines connecting the dots (the blue lines in Figure 9 and Figure 10) form the phase transformation zones of the different structural constituents. Based on presented diagrams, it can be stated that the deformation enhances the diffusion intensity [35]. This phenomenon is revealed as a shift of individual phase regions. After deformation, the ferrite, pearlite, and bainite start temperatures increase to higher values, and the phase areas (ferrite and pearlite) are wider when compared to the undeformed material (Figure 10). Similarly, the phase transformation areas are shifted to lower cooling rates. In the case of bainite, a necessary minimal cooling rate for its formation drops from 150 °C/s to 8 °C/s after deformation. Therefore, for low-carbon structural steels of low hardenability, the deformation before cooling is a good way for increasing their strength by grain refinement and induction of hard phases. 4. Conclusions The following work concerns the effect of heat treatment and hot deformation on the kinetics of phase transformations in low-carbon structural steel. The analyzed low-C steel is suitable for the production of ferrite-based microstructures because of its low carbon content and resulting in low hardenability. The hot deformation performed before cooling increases the diffusion rate of elements and highly influences the phase transformation kinetics. The deformation shifts the phase transformation product regions to higher temperatures and slower cooling rates. The deformation causes an increase of strain-induced preferable nucleation places for ferrite, pearlite, and bainite formation, which are diffusional or semi-diffusional (bainite) phase transformations. The necessary minimal cooling rate for bainite formation strongly decreases after deformation from 150 to 8 °C/s. The plastic deformation substantially enhanced grain refinement in the whole range of applied cooling rates. The hardness of the steel increases along with the increasing cooling rate, due to progressive grain refinement and lower transformation start temperatures, also inducing smaller grain sizes. Acknowledgments The authors acknowledge the support of the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland. Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Author Contributions Conceptualization, M.M. and A.S.; Formal analysis, A.G.; Funding acquisition, M.M.; Investigation, M.M., M.K. and A.G.; Methodology, M.M. and A.S.; Software, M.K.; Validation, M.M.; Visualization, A.S.; Writing—original draft, M.M. and A.S.; Writing—review & editing, M.K. and A.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding Mateusz Morawiec acknowledges the financial support through the 10/010/BKM20/0376 project. Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. Figure 1 The geometry of the initial material and dilatometric specimens. Figure 2 Thermal cycles of dilatometric analysis for non-deformed and deformed austenite; AT—austenitizing temperature, At—austenitizing time. Figure 3 Dilatometric analysis of Ac1 and Ac3 temperatures. Figure 4 Dilatometric curves of undeformed steel samples at different cooling rates. Figure 5 Dilatometric and differential curves of undeformed (a–c) and deformed (d–f) samples subjected to different cooling rates: (a,d): 8 °C/min, (b,e): 2 °C/s, (c,f): 25 °C/s. Figure 6 Microstructures of non-deformed and deformed samples at different cooling rates: (a,b): 0.125 °C/s, (c,d): 1 °C/s, (e,f): 2 °C/s, (g,h): 4 °C/s. Figure 7 Microstructures of non-deformed and deformed samples at different cooling rates: (a,b): 8 °C/s, (c,d): 15 °C/s, (e,f): 25 °C/s, (g,h): 50 °C/s. Figure 8 Hardness results for the undeformed and deformed samples cooled at different rates. Figure 9 Continuous-cooling-transformation (CCT) diagram of the investigated low-carbon structural steel; blue lines denote the phase transformation zones. Figure 10 Deformation continuous-cooling-transformation (DCCT) diagram of the investigated low-carbon structural steel; blue lines denote the phase transformation zones. materials-13-05443-t001_Table 1Table 1 Cooling rates selected for the dilatometric analysis. Sample Undeformed Deformed 1 0.125 °C/s 0.125 °C/s 2 1 °C/s 1 °C/s 3 2 °C/s 2 °C/s 4 4 °C/s 4 °C/s 5 8 °C/s 8 °C/s 6 15 °C/s 15 °C/s 7 25 °C/s 25 °C/s 8 50 °C/s 50 °C/s 9 150 °C/s - 10 220 °C/s - materials-13-05443-t002_Table 2Table 2 Grain size diameter as a function of the cooling rate for non-deformed and deformed samples. Cooling Rate, °C/s 0.125 1 2 4 8 15 25 50 ND, µm 53 50 34 34 34 19 15 LM D, µm 53 49 30 30 30 15 14 13 Note: ND—non-deformed, D—deformed, LM—lath morphology. materials-13-05443-t003_Table 3Table 3 Hardness measurements of non-deformed and deformed samples. Cooling Rate Hardness, HV1 Non-Deformed Deformed 8 °C/min 110 ± 3 130 ± 4 1 °C/s 125 ± 3 146 ± 3 2 °C/s 131 ± 3 148 ± 3 4 °C/s 137 ± 3 153 ± 4 8 °C/s 143 ± 4 158 ± 3 15 °C/s 148 ± 3 163 ± 3 25 °C/s 162 ± 3 172 ± 3 50 °C/s 163 ± 4 175 ± 3 150 °C/s 172 ± 3 - 220 °C/s 179 ± 3 - materials-13-05443-t004_Table 4Table 4 Transformation start and finish temperatures are determined based on dilatometric analysis for undeformed samples. Vcooling °C/s Hardness HV1 Transformation Start and Finish Temperatures Bs Bf Ps Pf Fs Ff 220 179 482 415 - - 605 482 150 172 550 516 - - 673 550 50 163 - - 602 550 698 602 25 162 - - 637 582 748 637 15 148 - - 650 609 764 650 8 143 - - 683 618 789 680 4 137 - - 682 640 797 682 2 131 - - 692 648 806 692 1 125 - - 707 653 811 707 0.125 110 - - 714 672 826 714 Note: Bs—bainite start temperature, Bf—bainite finish temperature, Ps—pearlite start temperature, Pf—pearlite finish temperature, Fs—ferrite start temperature, Ff—ferrite finish temperature. materials-13-05443-t005_Table 5Table 5 Transformation start and finish temperatures are determined based on dilatometric analysis for deformed samples. Vcooling °C/s Hardness HV1 Transformation Start and Finish Temperatures Bs Bf Ps Pf Fs Ff 50 172 541 470 660 541 800 660 25 165 560 485 660 560 810 660 15 163 569 492 668 569 820 668 8 158 626 542 673 626 820 673 4 153 - - 680 641 857 680 2 148 - - 682 639 860 682 1 146 - - 683 642 862 683 0.125 130 - - 685 576 882 685 ==== Refs References 1. Inoue T. Ueji R. Improvement of strength, toughness and ductility in ultrafine-grained low-carbon steel processed by warm bi-axial rolling Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2020 786 139415 10.1016/j.msea.2020.139415 2. Ahmed M. Bepari M.M.A. Galib R.H. Effects of Chromium and Nickel Additions on the Austenite Grain Coarsening of Low Carbon Structural Steels Containing 0.13% C Appl. Mech. Mater. 2016 860 152 157 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.860.152 3. Garcia-Mateo C. Paul G. Somani M. Porter D. Bracke L. Latz A. Garcia De Andres C. Caballero F. Transferring nanoscale bainite concept to lower C contents: A perspective Metals 2017 7 159 10.3390/met7050159 4. Gorka J. Opiela M. Structure and properties of high-strength low-alloy steel melted by the laser beam Mater. Perform. Charact. 2019 8 1 10 10.1520/MPC20190059 5. Dobrzański L.A. Czaja M. Borek W. Labisz K. Tański T. Influence of Hot-Working Conditions on a Structure of X11MnSiAl17-1-3 Steel Adv. Mater. Res. 2014 1036 122 127 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1036.122 6. Caballero F.G. Allain S. Cornide J. Puerta Velásquez J.D. Garcia-Mateo C. Miller M.K. Design of cold rolled and continuous annealed carbide-free bainitic steels for automotive application Mater. Des. 2013 49 667 680 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.046 7. Kawulok R. Opěla P. Schindler I. Kawulok P. Mizera J. Rusz S. Olszar M. Čmiel K.M. The Influence of a Cooling Rate on the Evolution of Microstructure and Hardness of the Steel 27MnCrB5 Arch. Metall. Mater. 2018 63 907 914 10.24425/122421 8. Grajcar A. Kuziak R. Zalecki W. Designing of cooling conditions for Si-Al microalloyed TRIP steel on the basis of DCCT diagrams J. Achiev. Mater. Manuf. Eng. 2011 45 115 124 9. Kučerová L. Opatová K. Káňa J. Jirková H. High versatility of niobium alloyed AHSS Rch. Metall. Mater. 2017 62 1485 1491 10.1515/amm-2017-0230 10. Yin S. Sun X. Liu Q. Zhang Z. Influence of deformation on transformation of low-carbon and high Nb-containing steel during continuous cooling J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 2010 17 43 47 10.1016/S1006-706X(10)60057-X 11. Olasolo M. Uranga P. Rodriguez-Ibabe J.M. López B. Effect of austenite microstructure and cooling rate on transformation characteristics in a low carbon Nb–V microalloyed steel Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2011 528 2559 2569 10.1016/j.msea.2010.11.078 12. Eghbali B. Abdollah-Zadeh A. Deformation-induced ferrite transformation in a low carbon Nb–Ti microalloyed steel Mater. Des. 2007 28 1021 1026 10.1016/j.matdes.2005.11.006 13. Nürnberger F. Grydin O. Schaper M. Bach F.-W. Koczurkiewicz B. Milenin A. Microstructure Transformations in Tempering Steels during Continuous Cooling from Hot Forging Temperatures Steel Res. Int. 2010 81 224 233 10.1002/srin.200900132 14. Grajcar A. Lesz S. Influence of Nb microaddition on a microstructure of low-alloyed steels with increased manganese content Mater. Sci. Forum 2012 706 2124 2129 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.706-709.2124 15. Bai D.Q. Yue S. Maccagno T.M. Jonas J.J. Effect of Deformation and Cooling Rate on the Microstructures of Low Carbon Nb-B Steels ISIJ Int. 1998 38 371 379 10.2355/isijinternational.38.371 16. Junhua K. Lin Z. Bin G. Pinghe L. Aihua W. Changsheng X. Influence of Mo content on microstructure and mechanical properties of high strength pipeline steel Mater. Des. 2004 25 723 728 10.1016/j.matdes.2004.03.009 17. Pawłowski B. Bała P. Dziurka R. Improper interpretation of dilatometric data for cooling transformation in steels Arch. Metall. Mater. 2014 59 1159 1161 10.2478/amm-2014-0202 18. Sourmail T. Garcia-Mateo C. Caballero F.G. Cazottes S. Epicier T. Danoix F. Milbourn D. The Influence of Vanadium on Ferrite and Bainite Formation in a Medium Carbon Steel Metall. Mat. Trans. A 2017 48 3985 3996 10.1007/s11661-017-4188-5 19. Trzaska J. Jagiełło A. Dobrzański L.A. The calculation of CCT diagrams for engineering steels Arch. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2009 39 13 20 20. ASTM A1033-04 Standard Practice for Quantitative Measurement and Reporting of Hypoeutectoid Carbon and Low-Alloy Steel Phase Transformations ASTM International West Conshohocken, PA, USA 2004 Available online: https://www.astm.org/ (accessed on 25 March 2020) 21. ASTM E3-11 Standard Guide for Preparation of Metallographic Specimens ASTM International West Conshohocken, PA, USA 2011 Available online: http://www.astm.org/ (accessed on 20 October 2020) 22. Calvo J. Jung I.-H. Elwazri A.M. Bai D. Yue S. Influence of the chemical composition on transformation behaviour of low carbon microalloyed steels Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2009 520 90 96 10.1016/j.msea.2009.05.027 23. Denis S. Gautier E. Simon A. Beck G. Stress–phase-transformation interactions–basic principles, modelling, and calculation of internal stresses Mater. Sci. Technol. 1985 1 805 814 10.1179/mst.1985.1.10.805 24. Barcellona A. Palmeri D. Effect of Plastic Hot Deformation on the Hardness and Continuous Cooling Transformations of 22MnB5 Microalloyed Boron Steel Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2009 40 1160 1174 10.1007/s11661-009-9790-8 25. Opiela M. Grajcar A. Elaboration of forging conditions on the basis of the precipitation analysis of MX type phase in microalloyed steels Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 2012 12 427 435 10.1016/j.acme.2012.06.013 26. Li H.-P. Jiang R. He L.-F. Yang H. Wang C. Zhang C.-Z. Influence of Deformation Degree and Cooling Rate on Microstructure and Phase Transformation Temperature of B1500HS Steel Acta Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.) 2018 31 33 47 10.1007/s40195-017-0594-3 27. Nakajima K. Apel M. Steinbach I. The role of carbon diffusion in ferrite on the kinetics of cooperative growth of pearlite: A multi-phase field study Acta Materialia 2006 54 3665 3672 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.03.050 28. Zhang M. Li L. Fu R.Y. Krizan D. De Cooman B.C. Continuous cooling transformation diagrams and properties of micro-alloyed TRIP steels Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2006 438–440 296 299 10.1016/j.msea.2006.01.128 29. Liu T. Long M. Fan H. Cheng D. Chen H. Duan H. Jiang W. He W. Dilatometric determination of four criticial temperatures and phase transition fraction for austenite decomposition in hypo-eutectoid steels using peak separation method J. Mater. Rese. 2018 33 1 11 10.1557/jmr.2017.484 30. Fan L. Zhou D. Wang T. Li S. Wang Q. Tensile properties of an acicular ferrite and martensite/austenite constituent steel with varying cooling rates Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2014 590 224 231 10.1016/j.msea.2013.10.037 31. Zhou X. Liu Y. Qiao Z. Guo Q. Liu C. Yu L. Li H. Effects of cooling rates on δ-ferrite/γ-austenite formation and martensitic transformation in modified ferritic heat resistant steel Fusion Eng. Des. 2017 125 354 360 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.05.095 32. Inoue T. Torizuka S. Nagai K. Formation of uniformly fine grained ferrite structure through multidirectional deformation Mater. Sci. Technol. 2001 17 1329 1338 10.1179/026708301101509520 33. ASTM E112-13 Standard Test Methods for Determining Average Grain Size ASTM International West Conshohocken, PA, USA 2013 Available online: http://www.astm.org/ (accessed on 20 October 2020) 34. Qi Y. Li J. Shi C. Zhu Q. Continuous Cooling Transformation of Undeformed and Deformed High Strength Crack-Arrest Steel Plates for Large Container Ships High Temp. Mater. Process. 2019 38 183 191 10.1515/htmp-2018-0003 35. Zhao M.-C. Yang K. Xiao F.-R. Shan Y.-Y. Continuous cooling transformation of undeformed and deformed low carbon pipeline steels Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2003 355 126 136 10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00074-1