==== Front Int J Mol Sci Int J Mol Sci ijms International Journal of Molecular Sciences 1422-0067 MDPI 10.3390/ijms21239324 ijms-21-09324 Review Immunostimulatory Effects of Radiotherapy for Local and Systemic Control of Melanoma: A Review https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1941-0136Takahashi Junko 1* Nagasawa Shinsuke 2 1 Health and Medical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8566, Japan 2 Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan; snaga@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp * Correspondence: junko.takahashi10@gmail.com; Tel.: +81-29-861-2706 07 12 2020 12 2020 21 23 932430 9 2020 05 12 2020 © 2020 by the authors.2020Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Recently, modern therapies involving immune checkpoint inhibitors, cytokines, and oncolytic virus have been developed. Because of the limited treatment effect of modern therapy alone, the immunostimulatory effect of radiotherapy attracted increasing attention. The combined use of radiotherapy and modern therapy has been examined clinically and non-clinically, and its effectiveness has been confirmed recently. Because melanomas have high immunogenicity, better therapeutic outcomes are desired when using immunotherapy. However, sufficient therapeutic effects have not yet been achieved. Thus far, radiotherapy has been used only for local control of tumors. Although extremely rare, radiotherapy has also been reported for systemic control, i.e., abscopal effect. This is thought to be due to an antitumor immune response. Therefore, we herein summarize past information on not only the mechanism of immune effects on radiotherapy but also biomarkers reported in case reports on abscopal effects. We also reviewed the animal model suitable for evaluating abscopal effects. These results pave the way for further basic research or clinical studies on new treatment methods for melanoma. Currently, palliative radiation is administered to patients with metastatic melanoma for local control. If it is feasible to provide both systemic and local control, the treatment benefit for the patients is very large. radiotherapyradioimmunotherapyabscopal effectmelanomaimmunotherapy ==== Body 1. Introduction According to information from the Sydney Melanoma Unit database, the initial presentation of recurrence in 873 melanoma patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage I and II disease treated during 1960–2002 was as follows: local, 95 patients (10.9%); in-transit, 86 patients (9.9%); regional lymph nodes (LNs), 300 patients (34.4%); and distant, 392 patients (44.9%) [1]. The median survival time of 1,521 patients with AJCC stage IV melanoma treated during 1971–1993 was 7.5 months, and the estimated five-year survival rate was 6%. Melanoma patients could be divided into three distinct prognostic groups according to the initial site of metastases: cutaneous, nodal, or gastrointestinal metastases (median survival: 12.5 months; estimated five-year survival rate: 14%); pulmonary metastases (8.3 months; 4%); and metastases to the liver, brain, or bone (4.4 months; 3%). No significant difference was observed in the survival rate of patients with AJCC stage IV melanoma during the 22-year review period [2]. Therefore, cutaneous melanoma is reported to be a highly aggressive cancer with a strong propensity for metastases and is associated with a very poor prognosis. Therefore, in addition to topical treatment, treatment for systemic control and metastasis is required. Modern immunotherapy together with targeted therapy has been effective at treating melanoma metastasis. Currently, immunotherapy together with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1), or programmed cell death 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor with specific monoclonal antibodies has been effective at treating advanced melanoma, lung cancer, renal cancer, and other types of cancers [3]. However, this treatment modality has three serious drawbacks: high cost, severe side effects, and effectiveness limited only to approximately 50% of patients [3]. Alternatively, radiotherapy (RT) is a topical approach for treating cancer. However, very rarely, a systemic therapeutic effect called “the abscopal effect” is observed. The abscopal effect includes tumor regression outside of the irradiated field and has been attributed to immunostimulatory effects [4]. Therefore, modern immunotherapy together with RT is considered effective at improving immunotherapy. Many preclinical and clinical studies have investigated the combination of RT and ICIs (reviewed in [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]). Some studies have reported that the abscopal effect is induced by this combination (RT and ICIs), although there are still individual differences in the effect of the two therapies. Moreover, it seems unclear whether a sufficient outcome can be obtained with this combination. Chicas-Sett et al. listed four items as key aspects for combined RT and immunotherapy: (1) methods and condition of the RT technique for more immunogenicity, (2) ideal treatment sequence (concurrent RT with anti-PD-1/L1, or sequential RT after anti-CTLA-4), (3) whether multisite irradiation would be adequate rather than single-site irradiation, and (4) biomarkers that can guide patient selection [5]. The answer to these questions is yet to be obtained owing to a lack of understanding of the ICIs and the mechanism underlying the abscopal effects of RT. Therefore, herein, we present a review of the use of RT for the systemic and local control of melanoma. We also investigated the mechanism underlying the abscopal effect, case studies on the abscopal effect, and the candidate biomarkers used in those published case studies. Additionally, we reviewed suitable animal model wherein the abscopal effect was evaluated. This review provides information for planning basic research for developing new treatment methods or clinical studies to optimize systemic treatment for melanoma. 2. Review 2.1. Role of RT RT is one of the three major treatment modalities used in the management of cancer patients. RT, when used either alone or in combination with surgery or chemotherapy, displays a wide range of antitumor effects [5]. An understanding of the basic principles of RT is essential in comprehending its role in the immune effects. 2.1.1. Mechanism of RT RT aims toward topical control of the tumor. The biological mechanisms underlying the topical antitumor effect of RT have been well established for decades [11]. Briefly, RT induces DNA damage, interrupts cell cycle, and causes tumor cell death through apoptosis and necrosis [12]. When radiation energy is absorbed by the cells, it results in direct macromolecular damage, to some extent. Alternatively, when radiation energy is absorbed by water, it induces radiolysis of water and leads to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as hydroxyl (OH) radicals, thereby leading to DNA damage [13]. In addition, the bystander effect, which causes cellular damage, is transmitted to an adjacent cell through the communicating gap junctions, and soluble factors such as lipid peroxide products, inosine nucleotides, and cytokines are released from the irradiated cells [14,15,16]. Moreover, radiation-induced vascular fibrosis and occlusion cause nutrient depletion in the tumor [17,18]. Such topical effects are considered to be the main mechanism of RT with conventionally fractionated radiation. Technical advances in delivering RT, such as intensity-modulated, radiosurgery, proton therapy, and electron brachytherapy, enable the routine delivery of a higher radiation dose per fraction [19,20,21]. High doses of radiation, such as in radiosurgery, are thought to induce endothelial cell death, resulting in vascular damage and increased T cell priming in draining lymphoid tissues [13,22,23]. Traditionally, malignant melanoma is thought to be a radio-resistant tumor; however, substantial radiobiological and clinical evidence of cutaneous malignant melanoma is available to refute this notion. Local control has been improved with the use of adjuvant RT, wherein the primary site or regional lymphatics is irradiated in patients with high-risk clinical or pathological features [24]. RT plays an important role in the palliation of metastatic disease and as a treatment for malignant melanoma [25]. Mucosal melanoma is associated with a worse prognosis when compared to the cutaneous form, and the benefit of adjuvant RT has been controversial [6]. Palliative RT offers effective symptom control for focal disease due to cancer. During palliative RT in patients with advanced metastases, shrinkage of tumors outside the area of irradiation is rarely observed. This phenomenon was originally described as “abscopal effect” by Mole in 1953 [26]. The presumed mechanism of the abscopal effect has long been thought to be immune response, and it is difficult to prove the mechanism because the abscopal effect has been observed very infrequently. 2.1.2. Mechanism of Immune Effects on RT Originally, RT has been considered to have rather an immunosuppressive effect. However, the abscopal effect is considered to be an immunostimulatory effect. The mechanism underlying the immunosuppressive or stimulating effect of radiation is very complex, although much remains unknown (reviewed in [4,5,10,11,13,27]). The process of T cell priming is thought to be the main part of the immunostimulatory effect of RT. Radiation-induced T cell priming was caused by damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), which are molecules that are secreted, released, or surface-exposed due to death, stress, or injury in cells. DAMPs such as surface-exposed calreticulin, which secrete ATP and passively release high-mobility group protein B1 (HMGB1), are vital for the immunogenic cell death of cancer cells [28]. Calreticulin triggers the phagocytosis of the irradiated tumor cells by dendritic cells and increases the lysis of the irradiated tumor cells by cytotoxic lymphocytes [29,30,31,32]. ATP is released from the irradiated tumor cells, and this release is dependent on the expression of the autophagy factor ATG5 [29,33]. HMGB1 triggers antigen presentation by dendritic cells and priming of antigen-specific T cells after RT in a TLR4-dependent manner [29,30,34]. Other signals involved in radiation-induced T cell priming are interferon (IFN) α/β and complement. IFNs, which are induced by RT, can directly activate lymphocytes including T cells [35,36,37]. The activated lymphocytes express a stimulator molecule of IFN genes (STING) and therefore result in the release of IFN-γ [38]. The effects of such signals on tumor cell in terms of T cell- or natural killer cell-mediated lysis by RT involve major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) [39,40], natural killer cell receptor NKG2D ligands, tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily (TNFRSF) members, immune checkpoint molecules, and others. NKG2D is bound to MHC class I-related chain A/B (MICB or MICA) on the tumor cell surface, which is upregulated in stem-like cancer cells preferentially [41,42,43,44]. Fas induction of tumor cells by RT increases susceptibility to T cell-mediated lysis and is associated with increased NK cell-mediated lysis [40,45,46]. Upregulation of PL-D1 is induced by RT alone or by chemoradiotherapy in various cancer cells such as B16-F10, GL261, A549, U2OS, H1299, DU145 [47,48,49]. DNA double-strand break-dependent PD-L1 upregulation is caused by ATM/ATR–Chk1/2 activation, followed by STAT-IRF1 activation [49,50]. Upregulation of PD-L1 expression in tumor cells is triggered by activation of the cGAS/STING pathway, followed by IFNα/β, or IFN-γ by CD8+ T cells, or the IL-6-mediated STAT-IRF1 pathway [50,51,52,53]. Cytokine, macrophage, and immunosuppressive leukocyte cause radiation-induced changes in the tumor microenvironment. IFN-α/β and IFN-γ favor tumor control [35,36,37,38], whereas TGF-β, IL-6, and CSF-1 favor tumor growth [54,55,56,57]. Adhesion molecules and chemokines are involved in radiation-induced leukocyte filtration. Vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1) is mediated by Inos-positive macrophages and IFN-γ produced by hematopoietic cells [36,58]. STING-dependent induction of type I IFNs mediates the upregulation of CXCL 10 expression and subsequent infiltration of T-cell, macrophage, and dendritic cells (DC). RT-induced secretion of CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL16 attracts primed effector T cells to the tumor microenvironment [35,37,59,60]. CXCL12 induced by irradiation recruits CD11b+ myeloid cells, which mediate vasculogenesis, and recruits suppressive myeloid cells to the tumor microenvironment [61,62]. 2.2. Case Reports of Abscopal Effects of RT To understand the mechanism of the abscopal effect, it is necessary to understand the phenomena occurring in the clinical setting. Abscopal effects are very rare events that are observed when palliative RT is performed. Therefore, we performed a literature search on PubMed data published from 1989 to August 2020 using the following search terms: “abscopal” and “palliative” in Title/Abstract. Full articles were retrieved when the abstract was considered relevant and only papers published in English were considered. The bibliographies of retrieved papers and reviews were also sought to identify other relevant articles for inclusion. Case reports wherein the abscopal effect was observed after RT were considered eligible. The results are shown in Table 1. There were descriptions about biomarkers in white blood cells, serum, and tumors. 2.2.1. Biomarkers in Leukocytes The abscopal effects in patients with malignant lymphomas were reported by Antoniades et al. That report presents the cases of two patients with clinical stage III non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma who exhibited marked reduction in the size of the abdominal lymph nodes following irradiation to the mantle [64]. Both of them showed a decrease in total leucocyte count after irradiation, with an increased ratio of segmented neutrophils and a decreased ratio of lymphocyte [64]. It is very important to take a closer look at the white blood cell status before and after the occurrence of the abscopal effect. Golden et al. reported the first abscopal response to one of the hepatic metastases and ipilimumab in a treatment-refractory lung cancer patient treated with RT [76]. They observed that the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) increased after RT and ipilimumab treatment. The absolute eosinophil count (AEC) also increased between the first two infusions of ipilimumab [76]. ALCs and AECs are two biomarkers associated with improved survival rates in ipilimumab-treated melanoma patients [99,100,101]. Additionally, post-treatment carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, a non-specific tumor marker, demonstrated a dramatic drop to normal levels after a peak of 119.6 ng/mL. The pathologic evaluation of a persistent supraclavicular LN showed increased CD8+ cell count and FoxP3+ cell count and a high ratio of CD8+/FoxP3+ cells. 2.2.2. Biomarkers in the Serum Ohba et al. reported the case of a 76-year-old Japanese man with hepatocellular carcinoma that regressed after RT for thoracic vertebral bone metastasis. They performed serial measurements of serum concentrations of IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, HGF, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) before and after RT using sera stored at −80 °C. Serum levels of TNF-α increased and reached 102 pg/mL after RT. They inferred the following: the findings suggest that such abscopal effect-related regression may be associated with host immune response, involving cytokines such as TNF-α [66]. Takaya et al. reported the case of a 69-year-old woman with advanced uterine cervical carcinoma with toruliform para-aortic LN metastases that showed an abscopal effect due to RT (effect outside of the irradiated field). The patient received RT without chemotherapy only for the primary pelvic lesions. After treatment, not only did the cervical tumor in the irradiated field disappear, but the toruliform para-aortic LN swelling outside the irradiated field also spontaneously disappeared. The patient’s laboratory data before irradiation showed normal values except for elevated levels of serum squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) antigen, which increased to 73.5 ng/mL (normal range: 0–1.5 ng/mL) The serum level of the SCC antigen after irradiation had also decreased to the normal range (0.6 ng/mL) [68]. Whether or not tumor antigen levels correlate with systemic response will not be known without accumulating more data. Postow et al. reported a case of abscopal effect in a patient with NY-ESO-1-positive melanoma treated with ipilimumab and RT [74]. NY-ESO-1 is a molecule belonging to the CTAg (Cancer/testis antigens) family. NY-ESO-1 is a cancer antigen expressed in 30–40% of patients with advanced melanoma, but it is not present in normal adult tissues except testicular germ cells and placenta [102]. NY-ESO-1 expression in a pulmonary nodule removed before ipilimumab treatment was confirmed by immunohistochemical analysis. In serum samples collected before the first ipilimumab treatment and before and after RT, titers of antibody against the NY-ESO-1 protein increased with disease progression, and when ipilimumab therapy was administered, the titers diminished with disease response after RT. This behavior of NY-ESO-1 may reflect the activation of immunity by RT. The authors also monitored the levels of CD4+ Inducible co-stimulator (ICOS)-high in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. ICOS is a marker of activated T cells. An increase in CD4+ ICOS-high cells is associated with clinical benefit from ipilimumab [103]. The number of CD4+ ICOS-high cells increased during ipilimumab induction but decreased before RT. After RT, there was a second increase in the levels. Stamell et al. reported a case of primary melanoma lesion on the skin of the scalp. With this treatment, serum analysis revealed an increase in the level of autoantibodies against melanoma antigen A3 (MAGEA3) and response to cancer antigen PAS domain-containing 1 (PASD1), indicating a systemic antitumor immune response. Anti-MAGEA3 antibodies were found upon serological testing, and there was an association between the abscopal effect and a systemic antitumor immune response [77]. 2.2.3. Biomarkers in Tumors Joe et al. reported the case of the abscopal effect in squamous carcinoma of the anal canal, with metastases to the pelvic LN, liver, and bone [79]. After palliative RT to the pelvis with sensitizing chemotherapy but without immunotherapy, complete response was observed not only in the primary tumor but also in the bone and multiple liver metastases at 4 months after treatment. SCC antigen levels were elevated at 4.7 µg/L (normal <1.5 µg/L) before RT and decreased at 1.5 µg/L at 5 weeks after RT. The patient received chemotherapy but not immunotherapy. The patient received chemotherapy but not immunotherapy. Immunohistochemical staining of the tumor using immune markers such as PD1, PDL1, CD163, CD3, and CD8 showed heterogeneity depending on the regions within the tumor. Lymphocytes, including CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, were thickly infiltrated in some regions, which suggests an abundance of the immune response. Most of the intra-tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) co-expressed PD1, but lymphocytes present at the boundary between the stroma and the epithelium did not co-express PD1. PDL1 expression was also observed in the tumor and stromal macrophages [79]. Brenneman reported the case of a 67-year-old female with inoperable metastatic unclassified round cell retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) treated with palliative proton RT only to the primary tumor. After completion of RT, the patient demonstrated complete regression of all un-irradiated metastases, and near-complete response of the primary lesion without additional therapy. They evaluated CD4 and CD8 of TILs before and after irradiation. The study on TILs revealed that the patient’s pretreatment of primary tumor showed CD4/CD8 infiltration, which suggests immunogenicity. The non-treated metastatic lesion after RT also showed CD4/CD8 infiltration and the CD4/CD8 TIL ratio was similar to that in the pretreated primary tumor [87]. Yaguchi et al. reported the case of a patient with rapidly progressive systemic metastasis and the recurrence of pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma early after surgery. Bone metastasis was treated with palliative RT, followed by the administration of an ICI, nivolumab, and a marked effect was noted after only three cycles, achieving a near-complete response. IHC analysis before irradiation showed that the tumor cells strongly expressed PD-L1 in the resected lung [92]. D’Andrea and Reddy reported a case of abscopal response in a 42-year-old female patient with brain metastatic melanoma [93]. BRAF mutation and expression of excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1), O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT), and class III β-tubulin (TUBB3) were observed on the initial biopsy of the chest lesions before RT [93]. Another study reported the case of a 40-year-old woman who was diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at 3 months after RT, and the levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), hemoglobin (Hb), and platelet (Plt values) were found to be normalized [98]. Several prognostic markers have been reported in RCCs. High CRP, low Hb, and thrombocythemia were also associated with poorer prognosis in RCCs. Histological analysis of the primary RCC lesion was performed by staining with hematoxylin and eosin, anti-CD8 antibody, anti-HLA class 1 antibody, and anti-PD-L1 antibody. Histological re-examination showed the heterogeneity of the primary RCC lesions in this case [98]. Before the development of immunotherapy, the abscopal effects varied considerably from one individual to another and was very infrequent. For this reason, in literature, there are few descriptions of biomarkers for understanding the mechanism, biomarkers for predicting good results of RT, and biomarkers for evaluating therapeutic effects. However, in the future, it will be possible to store samples and evaluate them retrospectively for serum components and tumors. In addition, systematic measurement in future clinical trials will advance the understanding of the immunostimulatory mechanism of RT. 2.3. Animal Model for Evaluating the Abscopal Effect We performed a literature search on PubMed data published from 1989 to August 2020 using the following search terms when found in the title/abstract: “abscopal” and “model” and “mouse.” Full articles were retrieved when the abstract was considered relevant. The bibliographies of retrieved papers and reviews were also sought to identify other relevant articles to be included. Papers were considered eligible when the experimental protocol for evaluating the abscopal effect of RT was well defined. The results are shown in Table 2. Here, we have confirmed the usefulness of these models, not those target to examined using these animal models. Usually, to evaluate the occurrence of distant metastasis through the abscopal effect, tumor cells were inoculated subcutaneously on the left and right sides, or up and down. Irradiation at any one of the tumors with X-rays showed the local control of the tumor, and the non-irradiated tumor showed the abscopal effect [55,104,106,107,109,112,114,117,118]. As their purpose was to investigate distant metastases of the cancer, the same cell line was inoculated in the left and right sides. However, Dewan et al. used two cell lines [107]. BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice were injected s.c. with 1 × 105 TSA (mouse mammary carcinoma cell line) and 5 × 105 MCA38 (mouse colon carcinoma) cells, respectively, on the right flank on day 0 (primary tumor) and in the left flank on day 2 (secondary tumor). The mice received a single radiation dose of 20 Gy, in three fractions of 8 Gy, or in five fractions of 6 Gy in the right flank continuously for the first time from the 12th day. CTLA-4–blocking mAb 9H10 or vehicle (PBS) was administered i.p. at a dose of 200 μg/mouse (10 mg/kg) on days 14, 17, and 20. The frequency of CD8+ T cells showing tumor-specific IFN-gamma production was proportional to the inhibition of the secondary tumor [107]. C57BL/6 mice were injected s.c. with 2 × 105 B16-F10 cells (mouse melanoma cell line) in the right flank (primary tumor) and 1 × 104 B16-F10 cells in the left flank. The mice received a single radiation dose of 5, 10, or 20 Gy on the ninth day after inoculation. The tumors were then treated with five intratumoral administration of Newcastle disease virus at 106 PFU/dose every 2 days and three i.p. injections of anti-PD1 (200 μg) every 4 days. Tumor volumes were measured until the humane endpoint was 1,000 mm3. The result suggests that the abscopal effect is driven primarily by the virus, and radiation adds superior local control while not hampering the development of systemic immunity [115]. Tumors to observe the abscopal effect usually inoculate fewer cells than tumor for irradiation, or delay inoculation a few days. This is because if the tumor grows too large, even if the abscopal effect occurs, the effect is small and difficult to observe. Six-week-old mice have been used in many experiments. However, Markovsky et al. used 12-week-old mice in order to allow to mature the immune response [112]. 2.3.1. Model of Metastasis Pfannenstiel et al. [113] used a brain metastasis mice model for irradiating brain tumors with X-rays and observing body tumors. C57BL/6 mice were injected with 1 × 104 D4M cells (mouse melanoma cell line) on the right frontal lobes and s.c. with 1.5 × 105 D4M cells on the right flank (primary tumor). The mice received a fractionated irradiation (2 Gy × 4) on the 15th day after inoculation. For antibody treatment, anti-PD-1 antibody or an IgG control was injected at 150 μg/dose i.p. starting five days before irradiation and continuing every fifth day for the entire duration of the experiment. Combination treatment produced a stronger systemic antitumor immune response than either treatment alone [113]. Xia et al. used the mouse model of metastatic osteosarcoma to the brain. They tried to explore the ability of local radiation and anti-PD-1 blockade to induce beneficial antitumor immune responses against distant, un-irradiated brain metastatic tumors by irradiation to flank tumors [111]. For ethical reasons, it is not possible to resect LNs from patients during the course of RT for metastatic LNs (MLNs) or carry out histopathological examination over time. Thus, the effect of radiation on the histopathology of MLNs has remained unclear. Kikuchi et al. succeeded in irradiating individual MLNs through a hole in a lead shield, using mice with swollen LNs. They used MXH10/Mo/lpr mice whose immune system is functional except for the signaling pathway related to Fas. A 60-μL aliquot of tumor cells (3.3 × 105 cells/mL) was manually injected into the subiliac LNs (SiLN) to produce metastasis in the ipsilateral proper axillary LN (PALN). The PALN has LNs of comparable size to those found in humans, approximately 10 mm in size, which permits shielding of sites other than the target LN with a lead plate [116]. Yasuda et al. used a BALB/c mouse model of simultaneous subcutaneous tumor and liver metastasis of Colon26. Colon26 cells were implanted subcutaneously (s.c) in the left flanks of BALB/c mice. The liver metastasis was produced by intra-splenic injection of colon 26 cells at 3 weeks after s.c. inoculation. They showed that topical administration of IL-2 not only enhances shrinkage of the irradiated tumor itself but can also suppress the development of distant metastasis of tumors located outside the RT field, possibly through the induction of a systemic T cell response [108]. 2.3.2. Verification of the Abscopal Effect Using Immunodeficient Mice Based on classical radiobiology, the tumor response of RT is caused by radiation-induced DNA damage produced within the primary radiation field. However, RT also affects the tumor microenvironment and alters the balance of inflammatory signals in the tumor [112]. Markovsky et al. investigated 67NR murine orthotopic breast tumors in both immunocompetent and nude mice. They examined the effect of hemi vs. full-tumor irradiation. The expectation is that a hemi-irradiated tumor would undergo no more than 50% cell killing and this was confirmed in nude mice. However, hemi-irradiation resulted in several (five of 15) tumor cures in immunocompetent BALB/c mice. These results showed that the tumor response of RT is due to radiation-induced DNA damage produced within the primary radiation field. They experimentally verified that ICAM, FTZ720 (a compound that inhibits T-cell egress from LNs), CD8, etc. are immune mediators [112]. Blanquicett et al. examined the effect of X-ray irradiation alone and in combination with capecitabine and/or celecoxib using nude mice bearing BxPC-3 pancreatic in both irradiated and lead-shielded contralateral BxPC-3 human pancreatic xenografts. As a result, they showed that treatment with X-ray irradiation in combination with capecitabine and/or celecoxib suppressed not only the tumors present in the irradiation field but also the tumors outside the field of irradiation [106]. Strigari et al. investigated whether the abscopal effect induced by RT is able to sterilize non-irradiated tumor cells. Athymic female nude mice bearing wild-type (wt)-p53 or p53-null HCT116 human colon cancer xenografts were irradiated at a dose of 10 or 20 Gy (IR groups), delivered using a 10-MeV electron beam. All directly irradiated tumors, showed a dose-dependent delayed and reduced regrowth, independent of the p53 status. Importantly, a significant effect on tumor growth inhibition was also demonstrated in a non-irradiated tumor of wt-p53 tumors in the 20 Gy-irradiation group, but no significant difference was observed in the NIR p53-null tumors, independent of the dose delivered. These results suggest that the interplay between the delivered dose and p53 status might help sterilize out-of-field tumor cells [109]. The results of Blanquicett et al. and Strigari et al. indicate that not only the immune system by T cells but also another mechanism occurs in the abscopal effect. 2.3.3. Other Models Experiments have also been conducted to observe the regression of cancer by irradiating normal tissue with X-rays instead of cancer. The Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) cell line was implanted in the midline dorsum of C57BL/6 mice. At day 10 in post-implantation animals with tumors, irradiation was initiated on day 10 and 10 Gy was delivered for 5 consecutive days for the leg. The tumors in the mice that received radiation treatment to the leg grew at a significantly slower rate than those in the mice of the non-irradiated group [105]. Aravindan et al. investigated the effects of non-targeted distant organs by irradiation on normal tissues [110]. They examined the orchestration of NF-κB signaling after ischemia-reperfusion (IR) in the heart, a non-targeted distant organ, tissues of C57/BL6 mice exposed, limiting to lower abdomen 1-cm diameter, to single-dose IR (2 or 10 Gy) or fractionated IR (2 Gy per day for 5 days). As result, some genes showed dose- and fractionation-independent upregulation. Immunohistochemistry revealed a robust increase in p65 and cMyc expression in the distant heart after single-dose and fractionated irradiation [110]. Rationally designing the treatment for understanding the mechanism of the abscopal effect may have a great impact on the treatment of metastatic disease. 3. Discussion 3.1. Immunogenicity of Melanoma Cells Is Immunostimulated Not Only by Immunotherapy But Also by RT Melanoma has been regarded as a malignant tumor with high immunogenicity. The presence of TILs, defined as a polymorphic group composed mainly of effector T lymphocytes, Tregs, NK cells, dendritic cells, and macrophages, is a well-described feature as a favorable prognostic factor in melanoma [119,120]. The immunogenic property of melanoma caused improvement of the median overall survival and provided hope to many melanoma patients in terms of using inhibition of immune checkpoints [121]. However, because of primary (intrinsic) and secondary (acquired) resistance to ICIs, not all patients derive benefit from ICI treatment. Patients experience immune-related adverse events such as colitis, hypothyroidism, hepatitis, hypophysitis, hyperthyroidism, and pneumonitis, which are significantly escalated when combined with anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 therapy [122]. Historically, the immune effect of RT was considered to be suppressive. However, in the light of recent research, it has been shown that its interaction with the immune system is much more complex [123]. With the progress of immunotherapy, the immunostimulatory mechanism of RT is drawing attention. The largest clinical case showing the immunostimulatory effect of radiation is the abscopal effect, which, although very infrequently, has manifested as an actual therapeutic effect, and cases have been published with radiation alone. Similar to immune reactions, the abscopal effect requires priming of immune cells against tumor antigens [124]. The abscopal effects of RT is enhanced when combined with ICI drugs such as ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, etc., which induces the systemic antitumor immune response [125]. Furthermore, taking advantage of the immunogenicity of RT, its combined use with treatment methods other than the inhibition of immune checkpoints, such as the combined use with cytokine treatment, such as IL-2, IL-15, GM-CSF, IFN-α, TNF-α, and IL-12, has been studied, and clinical effects have been obtained by the combination of some of them with RT [27]. 3.2. Enhanced RT Induced Immunity with Other Modern Therapies To improve the therapeutic effect of RT using the immunogenicity of radiation, the combined treatment of RT and oncolytic viruses, hyperthermia, photodynamic therapy, etc. is being studied. Oncolytic viruses preferentially replicate in tumors, compared to that in normal tissue and promote ICD and induction of host systemic antitumor immunity. Research indicated that the combination of viral therapy and RT has synergistic antitumor effects both in vitro and in vivo [126]. In addition, oncolytic viruses are studied as a combination treatment with ICI. Anti-murine PD1 antibody showed enhanced antitumor effects with the combination with Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1). HSV-1 is the only oncolytic immunotherapy treatment that has received approval from the Food and Drug Approval, and have suggested to lead immunological memory [127]. Hyperthermia application in combination with RT and/or chemotherapy may not only improve local tumor control but also lead to systemic and immune mediated antitumor responses according to recent research [128]. 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) mediated photodynamic therapy, an established approach for topical cancers, can induce an effective antitumor immune response [129]. Zhang et al. demonstrated that dendritic cell stimulated by 5-ALA mediated photodynamic therapy can induce immune responses against cancers. Similar to RT, photodynamic treatment, which is thought to be a topical treatment approach, also affects the systemic immune system [129]. Immune activations of carbon ion or proton beams, which are the modern RT technologies, have also been investigated. Response to proton irradiation, a considerable immune response was showed by gene expression profile analysis of breast cancer xenograft model [130]. Using the cell surface translocation of calreticulin (ecto-CRT) as an “eat me” signal for phagocytosis of dying cells in vitro, proton and photon increased ecto-CRT exposure with dose escalation up to 10 Gy, while carbon-ion increased most ecto-CRT exposure at 4 Gy rather than 10 or 2 Gy [131]. A new RT method, “radiodynamic therapy (RDT),” which produces a larger amount and type of ROS in the tumor by a physicochemical reaction of protoporphyrin IX with radiation [132], also showed higher immunostimulatory effect than RT [133,134]. In this way, research on the immunostimulatory effect of modern RT-induced immunity are being advanced. 3.3. Evaluation of the Abscopal Effect Using Nude Mice The study that reported abscopal effects in nude mice are to be highlighted [106,109]. Nude mice are partially immune-deficient; hence, if the abscopal effect occurs in producing mature T-cell-dependent manner, then the abscopal effect should not occur. In nude mice, T cell precursors do not have a defect, and some functional mature T cells can be found especially in adult animals. A nude mouse is a strain with a genetic mutation that causes a deteriorated or absent thymus, resulting in an inhibited immune system due to a greatly reduced number of T cells. However, their response to T-independent antigens is normal, having an increased response of macrophage and NK cells [135]. Thus, the abscopal effect observed in nude mice seems to suggest that other immune mechanisms different from T cell priming may play a role. This aspect seems to be very important in considering the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of the combination of immunotherapy and RT and their factors. 3.4. Biomarker of Immune Response Research on the biomarkers for immune response during treatment is ongoing. Some predictive biomarkers including protein, DNA and mRNA, in melanoma immunotherapy, such as PDL1(protein), TMB (tumor mutational burden, DNA), B2m (β- microglobulin 2 gene, DNA, mRNA), associated with the tumor microenvironment and associated with the whole organism with melanoma, were candidates (reviewed in [3]). However, there are only a few studies, and there are still many unknown factors. Three categories of biomarkers may be needed to further sophisticate to conventional melanoma treatments, (1) to understand the mechanism, (2) predict the therapeutic effect, and (3) evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness. Abscopal case reports of RT showed that information could be obtained from the serum, white blood cells, and tumors. However, as can be seen from the case report, there is too little information on clinical biomarkers. When conducting prospective clinical trials, it is desirable to obtain this information as systematically as possible [64,68,74,76,77,79,87,92,93,98]. Because the activation of the abscopal effect requires immune preparation, tumor antigen of serum, cytokines of serum, and monitoring the status of leukocyte in the blood and tumors seem essential. Animal models are very useful for assessing the systemic effects of RT and for evaluating the effects of the abscopal effect. In addition, to investigate which biomarker should be focused on, research involving preclinical studies using the abscopal animal models is required. For these purposes, the vertically or left and right transplantation model of the body [55,104,106,107,109,112,114,115,117,118], the brain metastasis model [111,113], the lung metastasis model [104], the LN metastasis model [116], the liver metastasis model [108], etc. will be very useful. In addition, the use of nude mice makes it possible to separate T cells effect from other factors. However, there are only a few studies, and there are still many unknown factors; therefore, further investigations are needed. The vast amount of basic research as well as clinical studies focused on the immune effect mechanisms of RT, immunotherapy, and combined therapy provides hope for melanoma treatment in the future. 4. Conclusions Palliative RT is provided to patients with metastatic melanoma for local control. However, as shown through the abscopal effect, RT has the potential for not only local control but also systemic control. In recent years, modern therapies such as ICIs, cytokines, and oncolytic virus treatment have been developed. Furthermore, the immunostimulatory effect of X-rays has attracted increasing attention, and research on the combined use with ICIs and cytokines is progressing clinically and non-clinically, and its effectiveness is being verified. Currently, there is not enough accumulated knowledge for immunoregulation, although research and development of therapeutic methods that output systemic control is desired. Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Author Contributions Conceptualization, J.T.; writing–original draft preparation, J.T.; writing–review and editing, J.T. and S.N. Both authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI, Grant Numbers 18H02705, 19K22609, and 20K08003. Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. Abbreviations CTLA-4 Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 ICAM-1 Intercellular adhesion molecule 1 ICI Immune checkpoint inhibitor DAMPs Damage-associated molecular patterns HMGB1 High-mobility group protein B1 IFN Interferon LN Lymph node MDSCs Myeloid-derived suppressor cells MICA/B Major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain A/B NK cells Natural killer cells PD-1 Programmed cell death 1 PD-L1 Programmed death-ligand 1 ROS Reactive oxygen species RT Radiotherapy STING Stimulator of IFN genes TILs Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes TNFRSF Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily Tregs Regulatory T lymphocytes VCAM-1 Vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 ijms-21-09324-t001_Table 1Table 1 Details of published case reports on abscopal effects. Histopathology Age Gender RT Time for Abscopal Markers Reference Adenocarcinoma of unknown origin 35 F 30 Gy, 20 fr 2 weeks Ehlers et al.,1973 [63] Lymphoma 44 M 40 Gy, 20 fr NR numbers and percentages of total leukocyte, band neutrophils, segmented neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils,.basophils, Antoniades et al., 1977 [64] Lymphocytic lymphoma 40 M 40 Gy, 20 fr NR Mixed-cellularity Hodgkin lymphoma NR NR 35 Gy, 28 days NR Rees et al., 1981 [65] Hepatocellular carcinoma 76 M 36 Gy, NR 10 Months serum level of IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, HGF and TNF-α Ohba et al., 1998 [66] Renal cell carcinoma 83 F 32 Gy, 4 fr 2 years Wersäll et al., 2006 [67] Renal cell carcinoma 64 F NR NR Renal cell carcinoma 69 M NR NR Renal cell carcinoma 55 F 32 Gy, 4 fr 5 months Uterine cervix 69 F 1.8 Gy, 16 fr 2.0 Gy 21 fr 6 Gy,4 fr (total 74.8 Gy) NR serum levels of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) antigen Takaya et al., 2007 [68] Chronic lymphocytic leukemia 65 F 24 Gy, 12 fr during treatment Lakshmanagowda et al., 2009 [69] Hepatocellular carcinoma 63 M 60.25 Gy, 27 fr NR Okuma et al., 2011 [70] Merkel cell carcinoma 70 M 12 Gy, 2 fr 1 month Cotter et al., 2011 [71] Medullary thyriod carcinoma 72 M 30 Gy, 3 fr 1 month Tubin et al., 2012 [72] Renal cell carcinoma 61 M 40 Gy, 5 fr 1 month Ishiyama et al., 2012 [73] Melanoma 33 F 28.5 Gy, 3 fr 4 months levels of CD4+ ICOShigh cells, HLA-DR expression on monocytes, MDSCs (CD14+ HLA-DRlow) of peripheral-blood mononuclear cells Postow et al., 2012 [74] Adenocarcinoma of lung 78 F 26 Gy, 1 fr 12 months Siva et al., 2013 [75] Adenocarcinoma of lung 64 M 30 Gy, 5 fr 2.5 months the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), the absolute eosinophil count (AEC), white blood cells (WBCs), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) of peripheral-blood Golden et al., 2013 [76] Melanoma 67 M 24 Gy, 3 fr 8 months melanoma antigen A3 (MEGA3), PAS domain containing 1 (PASD1) level of serum Stamell et al., 2013 [77] Melanoma 44 M 30 Gy, 10 fr 2 months Thallinger et al., 2014 [78] Squamous carcinoma of the anal canal 57 F 54 Gy, 30 fr 1 month PD-1, PD-L1, CD163, CD3, CD8 expression of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) Joe et al., 2017 [79] Melanoma 36 F 20 or 24 Gy, 1 fr 9 months Sperduto et al., 2017 [80] Renal cell carcinoma 66 F 36 Gy, 12 fr 1 month van Gysen et al., 2018 [81] Esophageal adenocarcinoma 74 M 30 Gy, 10 fr 2 months Bruton et al., 2018 [82] Malignant melanoma of unknown primary 51 F 20 Gy, NR Chantharasamee et al., 2018 [83] Merkel cell carcinoma 69 M 8 Gy, 1 fr 12 months Xu et al., 2018 [84] Merkel cell carcinoma 72 F 8 Gy, 1 fr 2 months Mucosal melanom 65 F 24 Gy, 3 fr 1 month Tsui et al., 2018 [85] Gastric adenocarcinoma 78 F 30 Gy, 10 fr 3 months Bonilla et al., 2019 [86] Retroperitoneal sarcomas 67 F 50 Cobalt Gray Equivalents, 25 fr 5 months PD-L1, CD4, CD8 expression of tumor TILs Brenneman et al., 2019 [87] Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma 75 M 3.7 Gy twice a day, 2 fr (total 14.8 Gy) 2 weeks Shinde et al., 2019 [88] Urinary bladder cancer 65 M 30 Gy, 12 fr 4 months Abbas et al., 2019 [89] Malignant pleural mesothelioma 67 M 30 Gy, 10 fr Barsky et al., 2019 [90] Cholangiocarcinoma 70 M 48 Gy, 4 fr 3 months Kim et al., 2019 [91] Pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma 63 M 30 Gy, NR PD-L1 expression of tumor Yaguchi et al., 2019 [92] Melanoma 42 F 30 Gy, 15 fr 3 weeks ERCC1, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, TUBB3, PDL-1, TrK A/B/C, MGMT expression of tumor D’Andrea et al., 2019 [93] Renal cell carcinoma 62 M 36 Gy, 12 fr 1.5 months Matushita et al., 2019 [94] Renal cell carcinoma 71 M 66 Gy, 33 fr 1.5 months Melanoma 71 M 50 Gy, 5 fr 1 month Moran et al., 2019 [95] Mucosal melanoma 66 M 25 Gy, 5 fr 4 months Sohal et al., 2020 [96] Salivary gland carcinoma 84 F 50 Gy, 20 fr 2 weeks Ellerin et al., 2020 [97] Renal cell carcinoma 40 F 30 or 40 Gy, 10 fr 6 months HLA class1, CD8, PD-L1 expression of tumor Hori et al., 2020 [98] F, female; M, male; fr, fraction; NR, not reported; MDSCs, myeloid-derived suppressor cells. ijms-21-09324-t002_Table 2Table 2 Animal models used in past studies for evaluating abscopal effects. Mouse Strain Age Cancer Cell Line Cell Type Condition of Inoculation RT Treatment (Total Dose, Fraction) Endpoint Note Reference C57BL/6 8 weeks MC38 mouse colon adenocarcinoma right flank (MC38-CEA+), left frank (MC38-CEA-) 8 Gy, 1 fr tumor growth Hodge et al., 2012 [104] C57BL/6 transgenic for human CEA LL/2 mouse lung adenocarcinoma, right frank (LL2-CEA+), intravenously (LL2-CEA+) 125I -brachytherapy 72 h exposure pulmonary metastasis lung metastasis model C57BL/6, p53 null B6.129S2- Trp53 tm1Tyj 4–6 weeks LLC-LM, T241 Lewis lung carcinoma, fibrosarcoma midline dorsum 24 Gy, 12 fr tumor growth irradiate non tumor site, leg Camphausen et al., 2003 [105] NCr nu/nu BxPC-3 pancreatic carcinoma cells right and left flank 10 Gy, 5 fr tumor growth Nude mouse Blanquicett et al., 2005 [106] BALB/c, C57BL/6 6–8 weeks TSA, MCA38 mouse breast carcinoma, mouse colon carcinoma right and left flank 20 Gy, 1 fr 24 Gy, 3 fr 30 Gy, 5 fr tumor growth Dewan et al., 2009 [107] BALB/c 8 weeks colon26 mouse colon adenocarcinoma left frank, after 3 weeks intra-splenic injection 20 Gy, 10 fr tumor growth (liver weight) liver metastasis model Yasuda et al., 2011 [108] CD1 nu/nu HCT116, A549 human colorectal cancer, human lung adenocarcinoma right and left flank 10 Gy, 2 fr 20 Gy, 3 fr tumor growth nude mouse Strigari et al., 2014 [109] C57BL/6 4 weeks none 2 Gy, 1 fr 10 Gy, 1 fr 10 Gy, 5 fr norml tissue response abscopal model without cancer Aravindan et al., 2014 [110] BALB/c 4T1, TSA mouse mammary carcinoma, mammaryadenocarcinoma right and lefl flank 30 Gy, 1fr tumor growth Vanpouille-Box et al., 2015 [55] BALB/c 6 weeks K7M2 mouse osteosarcoma subcutaneous, right frontal lobes 40 Gy (2Gy × 4, five consecutive days) immune markers from peripheral brood brain metastasis, irradiate for subcutaneous tumor Xia et al., 2018 [111] BALB/c, C57BL/6, athymic nude mice 12 weeks 67NR breast cancer, Lewis lung carcinoma right and left mammary fat pad 10 Gy, 1 fr 15 Gy, 1 fr tumor growth, survival compare the response of immunocompetent mouse with nude mouse Markovsky et al., 2019 [112] C57BL/6 B16-F10, D4M mouse melanoma subcutaneous, right frontal lobes 8 Gy, 4 fr tumor growth brain metastasis, irradiate for brain tumor Pfannenstiel et al., 2018 [113] FVB (JAX) Myc-CaP mouse prostate cancer frank and leg 20 Gy, 2 fr tumor growth, survival Dudzinski et al., 2019 [114] C57BL/6 B16-F10 mouse melanoma right and left flank 5 Gy, 1 fr 10 Gy, 1 fr 20 Gy, 1 fr tumor growth, survival Vijayakumar et al., 2019 [115] MXH10/Mo/Lpr FM3A-Luc mouse mamary carcinoma cells lymph node 8 Gy, 1 fr tumor growth lymph node metastasis model Kikuchi et al., 2019 [116] C57BL/6 MC38, B16F10 mouse colon adenocarcinoma cell, mouse melanoma upper and lower dorsum 6 Gy, 3 fr 24 Gy, 3 fr tumor growth Baba et al., 2020 [117] BALB/c 6 weeks CT26.WT mouses colon carcinoma right and left flank 12 Gy, 3 fr tumor growth Zhang et al., 2020 [118] ==== Refs References 1. Francken A.B. Accortt N.A. Shaw H.M. Wiener M. Soong S.J. Hoekstra H.J. Thompson J.F. Prognosis and determinants of outcome following locoregional or distant recurrence in patients with cutaneous melanoma Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2008 15 1476 1484 10.1245/s10434-007-9717-9 18196345 2. Barth A. Wanek L.A. Morton D.L. Prognostic factors in 1521 melanoma patients with distant metastases J. Am. Coll Surg. 1995 181 193 201 7670677 3. Olbryt M. Rajczykowski M. Widłak W. Biological Factors behind Melanoma Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020 21 4071 10.3390/ijms21114071 32517213 4. Walle T. Martinez Monge R. Cerwenka A. Ajona D. Melero I. Lecanda F. Radiation effects on antitumor immune responses: Current perspectives and challenges Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 2018 18 1758834017742575 10.1177/1758834017742575 29383033 5. Chicas-Sett R. Zafra-Martin J. Morales-Orue I. Castilla-Martinez J. Berenguer-Frances M.A. Gonzalez-Rodriguez E. Rodriguez-Abreu D. Couñago F. Immunoradiotherapy as An Effective Therapeutic Strategy in Lung Cancer: From Palliative Care to Curative Intent Cancers 2020 12 2178 10.3390/cancers12082178 6. Rogers S.J. Puric E. Eberle B. Datta N.R. Bodis S.B. Radiotherapy for Melanoma: More than DNA Damage Dermatol. Res. Pract. 2019 2019 9435389 10.1155/2019/9435389 31073304 7. Walshaw R.C. Honeychurch J. Illidge T.M. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy and immunotherapy combinations: Turning the future into systemic therapy? Br. J. Radiol. 2016 89 20160472 10.1259/bjr.20160472 27556933 8. Schoenfeld J.D. Mahadevan A. Floyd S.R. Dyer M.A. Catalano P.J. Alexander B.M. McDermott D.F. Kaplan I.D. Ipilmumab and cranial radiation in metastatic melanoma patients: A case series and review J. Immunother. Cancer. 2015 3 50 10.1186/s40425-015-0095-8 26672895 9. Seyedin S.N. Schoenhals J.E. Lee D.A. Cortez M.A. Wang X. Niknam S. Tang C. Hong D.S. Naing A. Sharma P. Strategies for combining immunotherapy with radiation for anticancer therapy Immunotherapy 2015 7 967 980 10.2217/imt.15.65 26310908 10. Vacchelli E. Vitale I. Tartour E. Eggermont A. Sautès-Fridman C. Galon J. Zitvogel L. Kroemer G. Galluzzi L. Trial Watch: Anticancer radioimmunotherapy Oncoimmunology. 2013 2 e25595 10.4161/onci.25595 24319634 11. Connell P.P. Hellman S. Advances in radiotherapy and implications for the next century: A historical perspective Cancer Res. 2009 69 383 392 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6871 19147546 12. Baskar R. Lee K.A. Yeo R. Yeoh K.-W. Cancer and radiation therapy: Current advances and future directions Int. J. Med. Sci. 2012 9 193 199 10.7150/ijms.3635 22408567 13. Wani S.Q. Dar I.A. Khan T. Lone M.M. Afroz F. Radiation Therapy and its Effects beyond the Primary Target: An Abscopal Effect Cureus 2019 19 11 10.7759/cureus.4100 31057994 14. Mothersill C. Seymour C. Radiation-induced bystander effects: Past history and future directions Radiat. Res. 2001 155 759 767 10.1667/0033-7587(2001)155[0759:RIBEPH]2.0.CO;2 11352757 15. Prise K.M. O’Sullivan J.M. Radiation-induced bystander signalling in cancer therapy Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2009 9 351 360 10.1038/nrc2603 19377507 16. Mothersill C. Seymour C. Medium from irradiated human epithelial cells but not human fibroblasts reduces the clonogenic survival of unirradiated cells Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 1997 71 421 427 9154145 17. Finger P.T. Radiation therapy for choroidal melanoma Surv. Ophthalmol. 1997 42 215 232 10.1016/S0039-6257(97)00088-X 9406368 18. Nag S. Quivey J.M. Earle J.D. Followill D. Fontanesi J. Finger P.T. American Brachytherapy Society. The American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for brachytherapy of uveal melanomas Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2003 56 544 555 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00006-3 12738332 19. Scaringi C. Agolli L. Minniti G. Technical Advances in Radiation Therapy for Brain Tumors Anticancer. Res. 2018 38 6041 6045 10.21873/anticanres.12954 30396918 20. Podder T.K. Fredman E.T. Ellis R.J. Advances in Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer Treatment Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2018 1096 31 47 21. Paunesku T. Woloschak G.E. Future Directions of Intraoperative Radiation Therapy: A Brief Review Front. Oncol. 2017 7 300 10.3389/fonc.2017.00300 29312882 22. Kolesnick R. Fuks Z. Radiation and ceramide-induced apoptosis Oncogene 2003 22 5897 5906 10.1038/sj.onc.1206702 12947396 23. Ahmad S.S. Duke S. Jena R. Williams M.V. Burnet N.G. Advances in radiotherapy BMJ 2012 345 e7765 10.1136/bmj.e7765 23212681 24. Shuff J.H. Siker M.L. Daly M.D. Schultz C.J. Role of radiation therapy in cutaneous melanoma Clin. Plast. Surg. 2010 37 147 160 10.1016/j.cps.2009.07.007 19914465 25. Fenig E. Eidelevich E. Njuguna E. Katz A. Gutman H. Sulkes A. Schechter J. Role of radiation therapy in the management of cutaneous malignant melanoma Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 1999 22 184 186 10.1097/00000421-199904000-00017 10199457 26. Mole R.H. Whole body irradiation; radiobiology or medicine? Br. J. Radiol. 1953 26 234 241 10.1259/0007-1285-26-305-234 13042090 27. Palata O. Hradilova Podzimkova N. Nedvedova E. Umprecht A. Sadilkova L. Palova Jelinkova L. Spisek R. Adkins I. Radiotherapy in Combination With Cytokine Treatment Front. Oncol. 2019 9 367 10.3389/fonc.2019.00367 31179236 28. Krysko D.V. Garg A.D. Kaczmarek A. Krysko O. Agostinis P. Vandenabeele P. Immunogenic cell death and DAMPs in cancer therapy Nat. Rev. Cancer 2012 12 860 875 10.1038/nrc3380 23151605 29. Golden E.B. Frances D. Pellicciotta I. Demaria S. Helen Barcellos-Hoff M. Formenti S.C. Radiation fosters dose-dependent and chemotherapy-induced immunogenic cell death Oncoimmunology 2014 3 e28518 10.4161/onci.28518 25071979 30. Ko A. Kanehisa A. Martins I. Senovilla L. Chargari C. Dugue D. Mariño G. Kepp O. Michaud M. Perfettini J.L. Autophagy inhibition radiosensitizes in vitro, yet reduces radioresponses in vivo due to deficient immunogenic signalling Cell Death Differ. 2014 21 92 99 10.1038/cdd.2013.124 24037090 31. Gameiro S.R. Jammeh M.L. Wattenberg M.M. Tsang K.Y. Ferrone S. Hodge J.W. Radiation-induced immunogenic modulation of tumor enhances antigen processing and calreticulin exposure, resulting in enhanced T-cell killing Oncotarget 2014 5 403 416 10.18632/oncotarget.1719 24480782 32. Obeid M. Tesniere A. Ghiringhelli F. Fimia G.M. Apetoh L. Perfettini J.L. Castedo M. Mignot G. Panaretakis T. Casares N. Calreticulin exposure dictates the immunogenicity of cancer cell death Nat. Med. 2007 13 54 61 10.1038/nm1523 17187072 33. Elliott M.R. Chekeni F.B. Trampont P.C. Lazarowski E.R. Kadl A. Walk S.F. Park D. Woodson R.I. Ostankovich M. Sharma P. Nucleotides released by apoptotic cells act as a find-me signal to promote phagocytic clearance Nature 2009 461 282 286 10.1038/nature08296 19741708 34. Apetoh L. Ghiringhelli F. Tesniere A. Obeid M. Ortiz C. Criollo A. Mignot G. Maiuri M.C. Ullrich E. Saulnier P. Toll-like receptor 4-dependent contribution of the immune system to anticancer chemotherapy and radiotherapy Nat. Med. 2007 13 1050 1059 10.1038/nm1622 17704786 35. Burnette B.C. Liang H. Lee Y. Chlewicki L. Khodarev N.N. Weichselbaum R.R. Fu Y.X. Auh S.L. The efficacy of radiotherapy relies upon induction of type i interferon-dependent innate and adaptive immunity Cancer Res. 2011 71 2488 2496 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2820 21300764 36. Lugade A.A. Sorensen E.W. Gerber S.A. Moran J.P. Frelinger J.G. Lord E.M. Radiation-induced IFN-gamma production within the tumor microenvironment influences antitumor immunity J. Immunol. 2008 180 3132 3139 10.4049/jimmunol.180.5.3132 18292536 37. Lim J.Y. Gerber S.A. Murphy S.P. Lord E.M. Type I interferons induced by radiation therapy mediate recruitment and effector function of CD8(+) T cells Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2014 63 259 271 10.1007/s00262-013-1506-7 24357146 38. Deng L. Liang H. Xu M. Yang X. Burnette B. Arina A. Li X.D. Mauceri H. Beckett M. Darga T. STING-Dependent Cytosolic DNA Sensing Promotes Radiation-Induced Type I Interferon-Dependent Antitumor Immunity in Immunogenic Tumors Immunity 2014 41 843 852 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.10.019 25517616 39. Reits E.A. Hodge J.W. Herberts C.A. Groothuis T.A. Chakraborty M. Wansley E.K. Camphausen K. Luiten R.M. de Ru A.H. Neijssen J. Radiation modulates the peptide repertoire, enhances MHC class I expression, and induces successful antitumor immunotherapy J. Exp. Med. 2006 203 1259 1271 10.1084/jem.20052494 16636135 40. Garnett C.T. Palena C. Chakraborty M. Tsang K.Y. Schlom J. Hodge J.W. Sublethal irradiation of human tumor cells modulates phenotype resulting in enhanced killing by cytotoxic T lymphocytes Cancer Res. 2005 64 7985 7994 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1525 41. Gasser S. Orsulic S. Brown E.J. Raulet D.H. The DNA damage pathway regulates innate immune system ligands of the NKG2D receptor Nature 2005 436 1186 1190 10.1038/nature03884 15995699 42. Xu X. Rao G.S. Groh V. Spies T. Gattuso P. Kaufman H.L. Plate J. Prinz R.A. Major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain A/B (MICA/B) expression in tumor tissue and serum of pancreatic cancer: Role of uric acid accumulation in gemcitabine-induced MICA/B expression BMC Cancer 2011 11 194 10.1186/1471-2407-11-194 21605422 43. Bedel R. Thiery-Vuillemin A. Grandclement C. Balland J. Remy-Martin J.P. Kantelip B. Pallandre J.R. Pivot X. Ferrand C. Tiberghien P. Novel role for STAT3 in transcriptional regulation of NK immune cell targeting receptor MICA on cancer cells Cancer Res. 2011 71 1615 1626 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4540 21257710 44. Steinle A. Li P. Morris D.L. Groh V. Lanier L.L. Strong R.K. Spies T. Interactions of human NKG2D with its ligands MICA, MICB, and homologs of the mouse RAE-1 protein family Immunogenetics 2001 53 279 287 10.1007/s002510100325 11491531 45. Ames E. Canter R.J. Grossenbacher S.K. Mac S. Smith R.C. Monjazeb A.M. Chen M. Murphy W.J. Enhanced targeting of stem-like solid tumor cells with radiation and natural killer cells Oncoimmunology 2015 4 e1036212 10.1080/2162402X.2015.1036212 26405602 46. Suzuki Y. Mimura K. Yoshimoto Y. Watanabe M. Ohkubo Y. Izawa S. Murata K. Fujii H. Nakano T. Kono K. Immunogenic tumor cell death induced by chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma Cancer Res. 2012 72 3967 3976 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-0851 22700877 47. Gong X. Li X. Jiang T. Xie H. Zhu Z. Zhou F. Zhou C. Combined Radiotherapy and Anti-PD-L1 Antibody Synergistically Enhances Antitumor Effect in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer J. Thorac. Oncol. 2017 12 1085 1097 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.04.014 28478231 48. Derer A. Spiljar M. Bäumler M. Hecht M. Fietkau R. Frey B. Gaipl U.S. Chemoradiation Increases PD-L1 Expression in Certain Melanoma and Glioblastoma Cells Front. Immunol. 2016 7 610 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00610 28066420 49. Sato H. Niimi A. Yasuhara T. Permata T. Hagiwara Y. Isono M. Nuryadi E. Sekine R. Oike T. Kakoti S. DNA double-strand break repair pathway regulates PD-L1 expression in cancer cells Nat. Commun. 2017 8 1751 10.1038/s41467-017-01883-9 29170499 50. Sato H. Jeggo P.A. Shibata A. Regulation of programmed death-ligand 1 expression in response to DNA damage in cancer cells: Implications for precision medicine Cancer Sci. 2019 110 3415 3423 10.1111/cas.14197 31513320 51. Verbrugge I. Hagekyriakou J. Sharp L.L. Galli M. West A. McLaughlin N.M. Duret H. Yagita H. Johnstone R.W. Smyth M.J. Radiotherapy increases the permissiveness of established mammary tumors to rejection by immunomodulatory antibodies Cancer Res. 2012 72 3163 3174 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-0210 22570253 52. Deng L. Liang H. Burnette B. Beckett M. Darga T. Weichselbaum R.R. Fu Y.X. Irradiation and anti-PD-L1 treatment synergistically promote antitumor immunity in mice J. Clin. Investig. 2014 124 687 695 10.1172/JCI67313 24382348 53. Chen M.F. Chen P.T. Chen W.C. Lu M.S. Lin P.Y. Lee K.D. The role of PD-L1 in the radiation response and prognosis for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma related to IL-6 and T-cell immunosuppression Oncotarget 2016 7 7913 7924 10.18632/oncotarget.6861 26761210 54. Barker H.E. Paget J.T.E. Khan A.A. Harrington K.J. The tumour microenvironment after radiotherapy: Mechanisms of resistance and recurrence Nat. Rev. Cancer 2015 15 409 425 10.1038/nrc3958 26105538 55. Vanpouille-Box C. Diamond J.M. Pilones K.A. Zavadil J. Babb J.S. Formenti S.C. Barcellos-Hoff M.H. Demaria S. TGFβ Is a Master Regulator of Radiation Therapy-Induced Antitumor Immunity Cancer Res. 2015 75 2232 2242 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3511 25858148 56. Xu J. Escamilla J. Mok S. David J. Priceman S. West B. Bollag G. McBride W. Wu L. CSF1R signaling blockade stanches tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells and improves the efficacy of radiotherapy in prostate cancer Cancer Res. 2013 73 2782 2794 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-3981 23418320 57. Matsuoka Y. Nakayama H. Yoshida R. Hirosue A. Nagata M. Tanaka T. Kawahara K. Sakata J. Arita H. Nakashima H. IL-6 controls resistance to radiation by suppressing oxidative stress via the Nrf2-antioxidant pathway in oral squamous cell carcinoma Br. J. Cancer 2016 115 1234 1244 10.1038/bjc.2016.327 27736845 58. Klug F. Prakash H. Huber P.E. Seibel T. Bender N. Halama N. Pfirschke C. Voss R.H. Timke C. Umansky L. Low-dose irradiation programs macrophage differentiation to an iNOS⁺/M1 phenotype that orchestrates effective T cell immunotherapy Cancer Cell. 2013 24 589 602 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.09.014 24209604 59. Vanpouille-Box C. Alard A. Aryankalayil M.J. Sarfraz Y. Diamond J.M. Schneider R.J. Inghirami G. Coleman C.N. Formenti S.C. Demaria S. DNA exonuclease Trex1 regulates radiotherapy-induced tumour immunogenicity Nat. Commun. 2017 8 15618 10.1038/ncomms15618 28598415 60. Matsumura S. Wang B. Kawashima N. Braunstein S. Badura M. Cameron T.O. Babb J.S. Schneider R.J. Formenti S.C. Dustin M.L. Radiation-induced CXCL16 release by breast cancer cells attracts effector T cells J. Immunol. 2008 181 3099 3107 10.4049/jimmunol.181.5.3099 18713980 61. Kozin S.V. Kamoun W.S. Huang Y. Dawson M.R. Jain R.K. Duda D.G. Recruitment of myeloid but not endothelial precursor cells facilitates tumor regrowth after local irradiation Cancer Res. 2010 70 5679 5685 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4446 20631066 62. Kioi M. Vogel H. Schultz G. Hoffman R.M. Harsh G.R. Brown J.M. Inhibition of vasculogenesis, but not angiogenesis, prevents the recurrence of glioblastoma after irradiation in mice J. Clin. Investig. 2010 120 694 705 10.1172/JCI40283 20179352 63. Ehlers G. Fridman M. Abscopal effect of radiation in papillary adenocarcinoma Br. J. Radiol. 1973 46 220 222 10.1259/0007-1285-46-543-220 4706791 64. Antoniades J. Brady L.W. Lightfoot D.A. Lymphangiographic demonstration of the abscopal effect in patients with malignant lymphomas Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1977 2 141 147 10.1016/0360-3016(77)90020-7 403163 65. Rees G.J. Abscopal regression in lymphoma: A mechanism in common with total body irradiation? Clin. Radiol. 1981 32 475 480 10.1016/S0009-9260(81)80310-8 7249526 66. Ohba K. Omagari K. Nakamura T. Ikuno N. Saeki S. Matsuo I. Kinoshita H. Masuda J. Hazama H. Sakamoto I. Abscopal regression of hepatocellular carcinoma after radiotherapy for bone metastasis Gut 1998 43 575 577 10.1136/gut.43.4.575 9824589 67. Wersäll P.J. Blomgren H. Pisa P. Lax I. Kälkner K.M. Svedman C. Regression of non-irradiated metastases after extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma Acta Oncol. 2006 45 493 497 10.1080/02841860600604611 16760190 68. Takaya M. Niibe Y. Tsunoda S. Jobo T. Imai M. Kotani S. Unno N. Hayakawa K. Abscopal effect of radiation on toruliform para-aortic lymph node metastases of advanced uterine cervical carcinoma--a case report Anticancer Res. 2007 27 499 503 17348433 69. Lakshmanagowda P.B. Viswanath L. Thimmaiah N. Dasappa L. Supe S.S. Kallur P. Abscopal effect in a patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia during radiation therapy: A case report Cases J. 2009 2 204 10.1186/1757-1626-2-204 19946448 70. Okuma K. Yamashita H. Niibe Y. Hayakawa K. Nakagawa K. Abscopal effect of radiation on lung metastases of hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report J. Med. Case Rep. 2011 5 111 10.1186/1752-1947-5-111 21418591 71. Cotter S.E. Dunn G.P. Collins K.M. Sahni D. Zukotynski K.A. Hansen J.L. O’Farrell D.A. Ng A.K. Devlin P.M. Wang L.C. Abscopal effect in a patient with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma following radiation therapy: Potential role of induced antitumor immunity Arch. Dermatol. 2011 147 870 872 10.1001/archdermatol.2011.176 21768497 72. Tubin S. Casamassima F. Menichelli C. Pastore G. Fanelli A. Crisci R. A case report on metastatic thyroid carcinoma: Radiation-induced bystander or abscopal effect? J. Cancer Sci. Ther. 2012 4 408 411 10.4172/1948-5956.1000175 73. Ishiyama H. Teh B.S. Ren H. Chiang S. Tann A. Blanco A.I. Paulino A.C. Amato R. Spontaneous regression of thoracic metastases while progression of brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic body radiotherapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Abscopal effect prevented by the blood-brain barrier? Clin. Genitourin. Cancer 2012 10 196 198 10.1016/j.clgc.2012.01.004 22409865 74. Postow M.A. Callahan M.K. Barker C.A. Yamada Y. Yuan J. Kitano S. Mu Z. Rasalan T. Adamow M. Ritter E. Immunologic correlates of the abscopal effect in a patient with melanoma N. Engl. J. Med. 2012 366 925 931 10.1056/NEJMoa1112824 22397654 75. Siva S. Callahan J. MacManus M.P. Martin O. Hicks R.J. Ball D.L. Abscopal [corrected] effects after conventional and stereotactic lung irradiation of non-small-cell lung cancer J. Thorac. Oncol. 2013 8 e71 e72 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318292c55a 23857404 76. Golden E.B. Demaria S. Schiff P.B. Chachoua A. Formenti S.C. An abscopal response to radiation and ipilimumab in a patient with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer Cancer Immunol. Res. 2013 1 365 372 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-0115 24563870 77. Stamell E.F. Wolchok J.D. Gnjatic S. Lee N.Y. Brownell I. The abscopal effect associated with a systemic anti-melanoma immune response Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2013 85 293 295 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.03.017 22560555 78. Thallinger C. Prager G. Ringl H. Zielinski C. Abscopal-Effekt in der Therapie des malignen Melanoms [Abscopal effect in the treatment of malignant melanoma] Hautarzt 2015 66 545 548 10.1007/s00105-014-3567-8 25576145 79. Joe M.B. Lum J.J. Watson P.H. Tonseth R.P. McGhie J.P. Truong P.T. Radiation generates an abscopal response and complete resolution of metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal: A case report J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2017 8 E84 E89 10.21037/jgo.2017.06.15 29299375 80. Sperduto W. King D.M. Watanabe Y. Lou E. Sperduto P.W. Case Report of Extended Survival and Quality of Life in a Melanoma Patient with Multiple Brain Metastases and Review of Literature Cureus 2017 9 e1947 10.7759/cureus.1947 29487766 81. Van Gysen K. Kneebone A. Eade T. Guminski A. Hruby G. Advanced Renal Cell Cancer and Low-Dose Palliative Radiation Treatment: A Case of a Substantial and Sustained Treatment Response Case Rep. Oncol. 2018 11 756 762 10.1159/000493913 30627089 82. Bruton Joe M. Truong P.T. Abscopal Effect after Palliative Radiation Therapy for Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus Cureus 2018 10 e3089 10.7759/cureus.3089 30333943 83. Chantharasamee J. Treetipsatit J. Metastatic Melanoma of Uncertain Primary with 5-Year Durable Response after Conventional Therapy: A Case Report with Literature Review Case Rep. Oncol. Med. 2018 2018 7289896 10.1155/2018/7289896 29955408 84. Xu M.J. Wu S. Daud A.I. Yu S.S. Yom S.S. In-field and abscopal response after short-course radiation therapy in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma progressing on PD-1 checkpoint blockade: A case series J. Immunother. Cancer 2018 6 43 10.1186/s40425-018-0352-8 29848371 85. Tsui J.M. Mihalcioiu C. Cury F.L. Abscopal Effect in a Stage IV Melanoma Patient who Progressed on Pembrolizumab Cureus 2018 10 e2238 10.7759/cureus.2238 29719740 86. Bonilla C.E. Esguerra J. Mendoza Díaz S. Álvarez A. Morales R.L. Abscopal Effect After Palliative Radiotherapy in a Patient with a Gastric Adenocarcinoma Disseminated to Retroperitoneal Space: Case Report from a Latin American Reference Center and Review of the Literature Cureus 2019 11 e6235 10.7759/cureus.6235 31890434 87. Brenneman R.J. Sharifai N. Fischer-Valuck B. Hassanzadeh C. Guzelian J. Chrisinger J. Michalski J.M. Oppelt P. Baumann B.C. Abscopal Effect Following Proton Beam Radiotherapy in a Patient With Inoperable Metastatic Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Front. Oncol. 2019 9 922 10.3389/fonc.2019.00922 31616634 88. Shinde A. Novak J. Freeman M.L. Glaser S. Amini A. Induction of the Abscopal Effect with Immunotherapy and Palliative Radiation in Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature Cureus 2019 11 e4201 10.7759/cureus.4201 31114720 89. Abbas W. Goel V. Verma A. Gupta V.G. Rao R.R. Harnessing the Immunomodulatory Effects of Radiation in Urinary Bladder Cancer Cureus 2019 11 e4108 10.7759/cureus.4108 31058002 90. Barsky A.R. Cengel K.A. Katz S.I. Sterman D.H. Simone C.B. 2nd First-ever Abscopal Effect after Palliative Radiotherapy and Immuno-gene Therapy for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Cureus 2019 11 e4102 10.7759/cureus.4102 31057996 91. Kim J.O. Kim C.A. Abscopal Resolution of a Hepatic Metastasis in a Patient with Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma Following Radical Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy to a Synchronous Early Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Cureus 2019 11 e4082 10.7759/cureus.4082 31019860 92. Yaguchi D. Ichikawa M. Ito M. Okamoto S. Kimura H. Watanabe K. Dramatic response to nivolumab after local radiotherapy in pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma with rapid progressive post-surgical recurrence Thorac. Cancer. 2019 10 1263 1266 10.1111/1759-7714.13029 30860657 93. D’Andrea M.A. Reddy G.K. Extracranial systemic antitumor response through the abscopal effect induced by brain radiation in a patient with metastatic melanoma Radiat. Oncol. J. 2019 37 302 308 10.3857/roj.2019.00437 31918469 94. Matsushita Y. Nakamura K. Furuse H. Ichinohe K. Miyake H. Marked response to nivolumab combined with external radiation therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Report of two cases Int. Cancer. Conf. J. 2018 8 29 32 10.1007/s13691-018-0349-7 31149543 95. Moran A. Azghadi S. Maverakis E.M. Christensen S. Dyer B.A. Combined Immune Checkpoint Blockade and Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Can Stimulate Response to Immunotherapy in Metastatic Melanoma: A Case Report Cureus 2019 11 e4038 10.7759/cureus.4038 31011500 96. Sohal R.J. Sohal S. Wazir A. Benjamin S. Mucosal Melanoma: A Rare Entity and Review of the Literature Cureus 2020 12 e9483 10.7759/cureus.9483 32766017 97. Ellerin B.E. Demandante C. Martins J.T. Pure abscopal effect of radiotherapy in a salivary gland carcinoma: Case report, literature review, and a search for new approaches Cancer Radiother. 2020 24 226 246 10.1016/j.canrad.2020.01.001 32192840 98. Hori K. Hirohashi Y. Aoyagi T. Taniguchi N. Murakumo M. Miyata H. Torigoe T. Abe T. Shinohara N. Morita K. Abscopal effect following nivolumab induction in a patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma-unique pathological features of the primary specimen: A case report Exp. Ther. Med. 2020 19 1903 1907 10.3892/etm.2020.8423 32104247 99. Ku G.Y. Yuan J. Page D.B. Schroeder S.E. Panageas K.S. Carvajal R.D. Chapman P.B. Schwartz G.K. Allison J.P. Wolchok J.D. Single-institution experience with ipilimumab in advanced melanoma patients in the compassionate use setting: Lymphocyte count after 2 doses correlates with survival Cancer 2010 116 1767 1775 10.1002/cncr.24951 20143434 100. Callahan M.K. Wolchok J.D. Allison J.P. Anti-CTLA-4 antibody therapy: Immune monitoring during clinical development of a novel immunotherapy Semin. Oncol. 2010 37 473 484 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2010.09.001 21074063 101. Delyon J. Mateus C. Lefeuvre D. Lanoy E. Zitvogel L. Chaput N. Roy S. Eggermont A.M. Routier E. Robert C. Experience in daily practice with ipilimumab for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma: An early increase in lymphocyte and eosinophil counts is associated with improved survival Ann. Oncol. 2013 24 1697 1703 10.1093/annonc/mdt027 23439861 102. Jungbluth A.A. Chen Y.T. Stockert E. Busam K.J. Kolb D. Iversen K. Coplan K. Williamson B. Altorki N. Old L.J. Immunohistochemical analysis of NY-ESO-1 antigen expression in normal and malignant human tissues Int. J. Cancer 2001 92 856 860 10.1002/ijc.1282 11351307 103. Carthon B.C. Wolchok J.D. Yuan J. Kamat A. Ng Tang D.S. Sun J. Ku G. Troncoso P. Logothetis C.J. Allison J.P. Preoperative CTLA-4 blockade: Tolerability and immune monitoring in the setting of a presurgical clinical trial Clin. Cancer Res. 2010 16 2861 2871 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0569 20460488 104. Hodge J.W. Sharp H.J. Gameiro S.R. Abscopal regression of antigen disparate tumors by antigen cascade after systemic tumor vaccination in combination with local tumor radiation Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 2012 27 12 22 10.1089/cbr.2012.1202 22283603 105. Camphausen K. Moses M.A. Ménard C. Sproull M. Beecken W.D. Folkman J. O’Reilly M.S. Radiation abscopal antitumor effect is mediated through p53 Cancer Res. 2003 63 1990 1993 12702593 106. Blanquicett C. Saif M.W. Buchsbaum D.J. Eloubeidi M. Vickers S.M. Chhieng D.C. Carpenter M.D. Sellers J.C. Russo S. Diasio R.B. Antitumor efficacy of capecitabine and celecoxib in irradiated and lead-shielded, contralateral human BxPC-3 pancreatic cancer xenografts: Clinical implications of abscopal effects Clin. Cancer Res. 2005 11 8773 8781 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0627 16361565 107. Dewan M.Z. Galloway A.E. Kawashima N. Dewyngaert J.K. Babb J.S. Formenti S.C. Demaria S. Fractionated but not single-dose radiotherapy induces an immune-mediated abscopal effect when combined with anti-CTLA-4 antibody Clin. Cancer Res. 2009 15 5379 5388 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0265 19706802 108. Yasuda K. Nirei T. Tsuno N.H. Nagawa H. Kitayama J. Intratumoral injection of interleukin-2 augments the local and abscopal effects of radiotherapy in murine rectal cancer Cancer Sci. 2011 102 1257 1263 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.01940.x 21443690 109. Strigari L. Mancuso M. Ubertini V. Soriani A. Giardullo P. Benassi M. D’Alessio D. Leonardi S. Soddu S. Bossi G. Abscopal effect of radiation therapy: Interplay between radiation dose and p53 status Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2014 90 248 255 10.3109/09553002.2014.874608 24350918 110. Aravindan S. Natarajan M. Ramraj S.K. Pandian V. Khan F.H. Herman T.S. Aravindan N. Abscopal effect of low-LET γ-radiation mediated through Rel protein signal transduction in a mouse model of nontargeted radiation response Cancer Gene Ther. 2014 21 54 59 10.1038/cgt.2013.72 24357814 111. Xia L. Wu H. Qian W. Irradiation enhanced the effects of PD-1 blockade in brain metastatic osteosarcoma J. Bone Oncol. 2018 12 61 64 10.1016/j.jbo.2018.05.002 29992089 112. Markovsky E. Budhu S. Samstein R.M. Li H. Russell J. Zhang Z. Drill E. Bodden C. Chen Q. Powell S.N. An Antitumor Immune Response Is Evoked by Partial-Volume Single-Dose Radiation in 2 Murine Models Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2019 103 697 708 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.10.009 30342090 113. Pfannenstiel L.W. McNeilly C. Xiang C. Kang K. Diaz-Montero C.M. Yu J.S. Gastman B.R. Combination PD-1 blockade and irradiation of brain metastasis induces an effective abscopal effect in melanoma Oncoimmunology 2018 8 e1507669 10.1080/2162402X.2018.1507669 30546944 114. Dudzinski S.O. Cameron B.D. Wang J. Rathmell J.C. Giorgio T.D. Kirschner A.N. Combination immunotherapy and radiotherapy causes an abscopal treatment response in a mouse model of castration resistant prostate cancer J. Immunother. Cancer 2019 7 218 10.1186/s40425-019-0704-z 31412954 115. Vijayakumar G. Palese P. Goff P.H. Oncolytic Newcastle disease virus expressing a checkpoint inhibitor as a radioenhancing agent for murine melanoma EBioMedicine 2019 49 96 105 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.10.032 31676387 116. Kikuchi R. Sukhbaatar A. Sakamoto M. Mori S. Kodama T. A model system for studying superselective radiotherapy of lymph node metastasis in mice with swollen lymph nodes Clin. Transl. Radiat. Oncol. 2019 20 53 57 10.1016/j.ctro.2019.05.002 31886422 117. Baba K. Nomura M. Ohashi S. Hiratsuka T. Nakai Y. Saito T. Kondo Y. Fukuyama K. Kikuchi O. Yamada A. Experimental model for the irradiation-mediated abscopal effect and factors influencing this effect Am. J. Cancer Res. 2020 10 440 453 32195019 118. Zhang P. Darmon A. Marill J. Mohamed Anesary N. Paris S. Zhang P. Darmon A. Marill J. Mohamed Anesary N. Paris S. Radiotherapy-Activated Hafnium Oxide Nanoparticles Produce Abscopal Effect in a Mouse Colorectal Cancer Model Int. J. Nanomed. 2020 15 3843 3850 10.2147/IJN.S250490 119. Antohe M. Nedelcu R.I. Nichita L. Popp C.G. Cioplea M. Brinzea A. Hodorogea A. Calinescu A. Balaban M. Ion D.A. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes: The regulator of melanoma evolution Oncol. Lett. 2019 17 4155 4161 10.3892/ol.2019.9940 30944610 120. Gata V.A. Lisencu C.I. Vlad C.I. Piciu D. Irimie A. Achimas-Cadariu P. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes as a prognostic factor in malignant melanoma. Review of the literature J. BUON 2017 22 592 598 28730761 121. Ugurel S. Rohmel J. Ascierto P.A. Flaherty K.T. Grob J.J. Hauschild A. Larkin J. Long G.V. Lorigan P. McArthur G.A. Survival of patients with advanced metastatic melanoma: The impact of novel therapies-update 2017 Eur. J. Cancer. 2017 83 247 257 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.06.028 28756137 122. Da L.J. Teng Y.J. Wang N. Zaguirre K. Liu Y.T. Qi Y.L. Song F.X. Organ-Specific Immune-Related Adverse Events Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Monotherapy Versus Combination Therapy in Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Front. Pharm. 2020 10 1671 10.3389/fphar.2019.01671 32082164 123. Rodríguez-Ruiz M.E. Vanpouille-Box C. Melero I. Formenti S.C. Demaria S. Immunological Mechanisms Responsible for Radiation-Induced Abscopal Effect Trends Immunol. 2018 39 644 655 10.1016/j.it.2018.06.001 30001871 124. Brix N. Tiefenthaller A. Anders H. Belka C. Lauber K. Abscopal, immunological effects of radiotherapy: Narrowing the gap between clinical and preclinical experiences Immunol. Rev. 2017 280 249 279 10.1111/imr.12573 29027221 125. Twyman-Saint Victor C. Rech A.J. Maity A. Rengan R. Pauken K.E. Stelekati E. Benci J.L. Xu B. Dada H. Odorizzi P.M. Radiation and dual checkpoint blockade activate non-redundant immune mechanisms in cancer Nature 2015 520 373 377 10.1038/nature14292 25754329 126. Simbawa E. Al-Johani N. Al-Tuwairqi S. Modeling the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Oncolytic Viruses and Radiotherapy as a Treatment for Cancer Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2020 2020 3642654 10.1155/2020/3642654 32411281 127. Thomas S. Kuncheria L. Roulstone V. Kyula J.N. Mansfield D. Bommareddy P.K. Smith H. Kaufman H.L. Harrington K.J. Coffin R.S. Development of a new fusion-enhanced oncolytic immunotherapy platform based on herpes simplex virus type 1 J. Immunother. Cancer 2019 7 214 10.1186/s40425-019-0682-1 31399043 128. Werthmöller N. Frey B. Rückert M. Lotter M. Fietkau R. Gaipl U.S. Combination of ionising radiation with hyperthermia increases the immunogenic potential of B16-F10 melanoma cells in vitro and in vivo Int. J. Hyperther. 2016 32 23 30 10.3109/02656736.2015.1106011 129. Zhang H. Wang P. Wang X. Shi L. Fan Z. Zhang G. Yang D. Bahavar C.F. Zhou F. Chen W.R. Antitumor Effects of DC Vaccine With ALA-PDT-Induced Immunogenic Apoptotic Cells for Skin Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Mice Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2018 17 1533033818785275 10.1177/1533033818785275 30025490 130. Cammarata F.P. Forte G.I. Broggi G. Bravatà V. Minafra L. Pisciotta P. Calvaruso M. Tringali R. Tomasello B. Torrisi F. Molecular Investigation on a Triple Negative Breast Cancer Xenograft Model Exposed to Proton Beams Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020 21 6337 10.3390/ijms21176337 131. Huang Y. Dong Y. Zhao J. Zhang L. Kong L. Lu J.J. Comparison of the effects of photon, proton and carbon-ion radiation on the ecto-calreticulin exposure in various tumor cell lines Ann. Transl. Med. 2019 7 542 10.21037/atm.2019.09.128 31807524 132. Takahashi J. Misawa M. Murakami M. Mori T. Nomura K. Iwahashi H. 5-Aminolevulinic acid enhances cancer radiotherapy in a mouse tumor model Springerplus 2013 2 602 10.1186/2193-1801-2-602 24324921 133. Yamamoto J. Ogura S. Shimajiri S. Nakano Y. Akiba D. Kitagawa T. Ueta K. Tanaka T. Nishizawa S. 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced protoporphyrin IX with multi-dose ionizing irradiation enhances host antitumor response and strongly inhibits tumor growth in experimental glioma in vivo Mol. Med. Rep. 2015 11 1813 1819 10.3892/mmr.2014.2991 25420581 134. Takahashi J. Murakami M. Mori T. Iwahashi H. Verification of radiodynamic therapy by medical linear accelerator using a mouse melanoma tumor model Sci. Rep. 2018 8 2728 10.1038/s41598-018-21152-z 29426920 135. Marconi R. Strolin S. Bossi G. Strigari L. A meta-analysis of the abscopal effect in preclinical models: Is the biologically effective dose a relevant physical trigger? PLoS ONE 2017 12 e0171559 10.1371/journal.pone.0171559 28222111