==== Front Int J Environ Res Public Health Int J Environ Res Public Health ijerph International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 1661-7827 1660-4601 MDPI 33276664 10.3390/ijerph17238980 ijerph-17-08980 Article Serum Gamma Glutamyltransferase Is Associated with 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Status in Elderly Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1867-1326Danikiewicz Aleksander 1† https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3880-5325Hudzik Bartosz 23† Nowak Justyna 2* Kowalska Joanna 1 Zieleń-Zynek Iwona 1 Szkodzinski Janusz 3 Naung Tun Han 4 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8670-8581Zubelewicz-Szkodzinska Barbara 1 1 Department of Nutrition Related Prevention, Faculty of Health Sciences in Bytom, Medical University of Silesia, 41-900 Bytom, Poland; adanikiewicz@sum.edu.pl (A.D.); jk.kwlsk@gmail.com (J.K.); izielen.zynek@gmail.com (I.Z.-Z.); bzubelewicz-szkodzinska@sum.edu.pl (B.Z.-S.) 2 Department of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Faculty of Health Sciences in Bytom, Medical University of Silesia, 41-900 Bytom, Poland; bartekh@mp.pl 3 Third Department of Cardiology, Silesian Center for Heart Disease, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland; janszkod@poczta.onet.pl 4 Research and Clinical Working Groups, European Society of Cardiology, 06-903 Sophia Antipolis, France; annasxhan@gmail.com * Correspondence: justyna.nowak@sum.edu.pl; Tel.: +48-323976537† Both authors have made equal contribution to the paper. 02 12 2020 12 2020 17 23 898019 10 2020 01 12 2020 © 2020 by the authors.2020Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Background: No previous study has investigated the association between gamma glutamyltransferase (GGT) and vitamin D in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). We investigated the cross-sectional associations between vitamin D status as assessed by serum 25(OH)D and GGT. Methods: 169 patients were enrolled. Study population was divided into three groups: 1: 25(OH)D < 10 ng/mL (n = 59); 2: 25(OH)D 10–20 ng/mL (n = 82), and 3: 25(OH)D > 20 ng/mL (n = 28). Based on a cut-off GGT value identified in ROC analysis, we also divided the study population to compare the following groups: GGT ≤19 (n = 66) and GGT >19 (n = 103). Results: GGT activity was the highest in vitamin D severely deficient patients and the lowest in vitamin D insufficient patients. GGT was inversely correlated with 25(OH)D concentrations (R = −0.23; p = 0.002). The receiver operating characteristics curve identified the discrimination threshold of GGT of >19 U/L in predicting vitamin D deficiency. Higher leukocyte and neutrophil counts and lower 25(OH)D concentration were found in patients with GGT > 19 U/L. Conclusions: We identified an interaction between declining 25(OH)D levels and rising GGT levels with increasing age, which resulted in an unfavorable 25(OH)D-to-GGT ratio in stable CAD patients. These results suggest that these changes might further contribute to a high cardiovascular risk in the elderly. gamma glutamyltransferasevitamin D25(OH)Dcoronary artery disease ==== Body 1. Introduction Inflammation is a hallmark feature of atherogenesis. Experimental studies demonstrated the importance of innate immunity and the network of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and growth factors in the formation and progression of atherosclerotic lesions within the arterial wall. This, in turn, results in systemic milieu that facilitate atherothrombotic events [1]. The generation of excess reactive oxygen species resulting from oxidative stress emerged as a critical element in the common pathway, leading to vascular injury and subsequently to atherosclerosis [2]. Reduced glutathione (GSH) is a small water-soluble tripeptide present in small quantities and one of the most important non-protein antioxidants in human cells. GSH protects by both directly scavenging oxidants and serving as the reductant for GSH-dependent antioxidant enzymes, such as glutathione peroxidase and glutathione reductase [3]. Attenuated GSH concentrations were implicated in the development of subclinical atherosclerosis [4]. Gamma glutamyltransferase (GGT) is a ubiquitous cell surface enzyme that cleaves extracellular glutathione (GSH). It increases the availability of amino acids, primarily cysteine, for intracellular GSH synthesis and has a pivotal role in maintaining GSH homeostasis and defense against oxidative stress. Measurement of serum GGT activity is widely used for the diagnosis of liver and obstructive biliary diseases and as an indicator of alcohol consumption [5]. Epidemiological studies suggest an association between GGT and coronary artery disease (CAD), a wide variety of cardiometabolic risk factors, e.g., hyperlipidemia, hypertension, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, systemic inflammation, and oxidative stress among others [5,6,7]. Studies demonstrated the presence of catalytically active GGT in atherosclerotic plaques and a correlation between GGT activity and indices of plaque instability, thereby suggesting direct involvement in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and related clinical events via promotion of pro-oxidant reactions by the enzyme [5,8,9]. Low and very low levels of vitamin D are very common in society worldwide [10]. Actually, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels best indicate body vitamin D status, as they both manifest the dietary intake and cutaneous synthesis of vitamin D [11]. Its main function is to regulate bone metabolism and mineral homeostasis. Notwithstanding, many observational studies showed the association between vitamin D deficiency and risk of various cardiovascular disease (e.g., CAD, myocardial infarction, hypertension, heart failure, among others), but the biological mechanism of the causality remains to be elucidated [12,13,14,15]. Whilst many studies have been carried out on the association between liver conditions and vitamin D [16], no previous study has investigated the association between vitamin D status and GGT in patients with stable CAD. Given the paucity of evidence on the link between vitamin D status and GGT, we sought to obtain data which may help to address these research gaps. Therefore, we investigated the cross-sectional associations between vitamin D status as assessed by serum 25(OH)D and GGT. 2. Materials and Methods The study was approved by the bioethics board at the Medical University of Silesia. It conforms to the Declaration of Helsinki. Seventy-eight patients with stable CAD were enrolled in an out-patient cardiology clinic. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria were previously published [17]. Stable CAD was defined as a history of documented myocardial infarction, prior coronary revascularization, chest pain with documented myocardial ischemia. Exclusion criteria included, among others, history of acute coronary syndrome within 12 months prior to enrollment or previous percutaneous and/or surgical revascularization within 12 months prior to enrollment, use of vitamin D/multivitamin/calcium supplements within 12 months prior to enrollment, cancer, chronic kidney disease—stage 3 or higher, uncontrolled thyroid dysfunction, liver dysfunction (including viral hepatitis, cholestatic jaundice with bilirubin concentration >1.5 mg/dL and/or alkaline phosphatase over the upper limit of normal; alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) over the upper limit of normal), calcium metabolic disorders, hormone replacement therapy, coexisting autoimmune disorders, acute infectious disease, chronic inflammatory disease, glucocorticoids and/or androgens therapy, and lack of patient consent to participate [17]. Arterial hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus were evaluated based on previous diagnosis according to medical records made according to the available guidelines [18,19,20]. Given seasonal variations in serum 25(OH)D concentrations, all blood samples were collected in the spring season. Venous blood samples were collected between 8–9 AM and separated by centrifugation at 4 °C, 1800× g for 15 min. Samples were then stored at −80 °C until further analysis. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) measurements were carried out using a commercial kit—Architect (Abbott Diagnostics, Lake Forest, IL, USA) 25OH Vitamin D chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) in duplicate. Assay range was determined as 3.4–156.0 ng/mL. Measurements for each patient were made with the same kit to avoid inter-kit variability. The intra-assay coefficient of variation (% CV) was 2.7%, the inter-assay % CV was 3.5%. Precision error was <8% [17]. The test was standardized according to the Reference Measurement Procedure of the US National Institute of Standards and Technology. Serum 25(OH)D concentrations below 10 ng/mL were regarded as severe deficiency, those between 10–20 ng/mL were regarded as deficiency, and concentrations between 20–30 ng/mL were classified as insufficiency [21]. Serum GGT was measured through an enzymatic colorimetric assay using a COBAS INTEGRA 400 plus analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). The minimum detectable threshold was 3 U/L and the measurement range was 3–1200 U/L. The intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) was 1.5% and the inter-assay CV was 1.4%. The normal values considered for GGT were: 10–50 U/L in men and 10–38 U/L in women [22]. In total, 169 patients with stable CAD were enrolled. Based on serum 25(OH)D status, the study population wad divided into three groups [23]: group 1—25(OH)D concentration of less than 10 ng/mL (n = 59), group 2—25(OH)D concentration of 10–20 ng/mL (n = 82), and group 3—25(OH)D concentration of more than 20 ng/mL (n = 28). Based on a cut-off GGT value identified in the ROC analysis, we also divided the study population to compare the following groups: GGT ≤ 19 (n = 66) and GGT >19 (n = 103). 3. Statistical Analysis Quantitative data are presented as medians and interquartile ranges (lower and upper quartiles) as most of the data (all but two) had a distribution other than normal. Qualitative data are presented as frequencies. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to determine whether a random sample was normally distributed. Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA was used to test the differences between the three groups. The Chi-square test with Yates’ correction and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare categorical variables. Quantitative variables in the GGT ≤ 19 vs. GGT >19 analysis were compared using U Mann–Whitney test. The relationship between vitamin D and GGT was evaluated by Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the ability of GGT to predict 25(OH)D deficiency (defined as 25(OH)D concentration less than 20 ng/mL). Multivariate logistic regression models were chosen to evaluate the associations between GGT and 25[OH]D deficiency/insufficiency. Model 1 was adjusted for known risk factors linked to 25[OH]D deficiency/insufficiency (age, sex, weight, and waist circumference). Model 2 was further adjusted for variables with significant differences between the three groups (age, sex, weight, waist circumference, serum albumin, neutrophil count, ALT, and serum bilirubin). 4. Results Baseline and clinical characteristics were similar irrespective of vitamin D status (Table 1). GGT activity was the highest in the vitamin D severely deficient patients and the lowest in the vitamin D insufficient patients. Other laboratory results were similar (Table 2), except for albumin and neutrophil count, which were the highest in Group 3, and GGT, which was the lowest in Group 3. GGT was inversely correlated with 25(OH)D concentrations (R = −0.23; p = 0.002). Moreover, GGT was inversely correlated with HDL cholesterol and lymphocyte count and positively correlated with white blood count and neutrophil count (Table 3). The receiver operating characteristics curve identified the discrimination threshold of GGT of more than 19 U/L in predicting vitamin D deficiency (Table 4). This cut-off had a high positive predictive value (PPV 88%). Subanalysis of the study population based on this cut-off showed higher leukocyte and neutrophil counts and lower 25(OH)D concentration in patients with GGT in the upper range of normal (Table 5). In addition, the rate of more severe forms of vitamin D deficiency was more prevalent in patients with GGT greater than 19 U/L. With advancing age, a significant increase in GGT levels and decline in 25(OH)D levels were observed (Figure 1). Further analysis demonstrated a significant decline in the 25(OD)-to-GGT ratio (Figure 2). GTT proved to be associated with the risk of 25[OH]D deficiency/insufficiency in unadjusted and adjusted models (Table 6). 5. Discussion We have set out to determine the association between vitamin D and GGT in patients with stable CAD. There are five key findings of our study. First and foremost, GGT activity differs across the whole spectrum of vitamin D status (insufficiency, moderate deficiency, and severe deficiency), being the highest in the severely deficient patients and the lowest in insufficient patients. Second, there was a weak negative correlation between 25(OH)D and GGT. Moreover, GGT showed a negative correlation with HDL cholesterol and lymphocyte count and a positive correlation with white blood count and neutrophil count. In addition, GGT demonstrated a weak value in predicting vitamin D deficiency. Finally, more patients with GGT in the upper normal range had more severe forms of vitamin D deficiency. Many studies implicate GGT as a potential biochemical marker for preclinical atherosclerosis. It was detected in atheromatous plaques of carotid and coronary arteries, triggering the oxidation of low-density lipoproteins (LDLs) [24]. GGT serves as a major source of intracellular support for the precursors of GSH, which is an important antioxidant [25]. Studies show that the elevated serum GGT activity can be a biomarker of increased oxidative stress in humans [26,27], which was shown to play a pivotal role in atherogenesis [24,26,27,28,29]. Demircan et al. reported that GGT levels were higher in patients with CAD than in the control group (38.7 ± 30.9 U/L versus 27.5 ± 17.5 U/L, p = 0.025) [30]. However, the serum GGT activity did not discriminate between the patients with 1-, 2-, and 3-vessel CAD. Notwithstanding, patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) had higher GGT activity compared to patients with stable CAD [30]. Regardless of the GGT pathogenetic considerations, GGT also displays prognostic value. Emdin et al. reported that serum GGT activity was related to cardiovascular mortality and nonfatal MI in patients with CAD and previous MI. They found that the prognostic value of GGT for cardiovascular mortality and nonfatal MI was present in patients with a history of MI [31]. Akpek et al. studied 425 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and found that the in-hospital rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) increased with GGT tertiles. More importantly, they demonstrated in multivariate analysis that serum GGT activity was an independent predictor of in-hospital MACE (odds ratio (OR) 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01–1.33; p < 0.001) [32]. These results agree with those of others who confirmed the prognostic value of GGT in long-term follow-up [33,34]. In terms of vitamin D, its deficiency and insufficiency are common worldwide [10]. It has been attributed to greater sun protection, minimal outdoor sun exposure, and rise in the rate of overweight and obesity in the general population. In fact, all but one patient in the study population had vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency (25(OH)D concentration below 30 ng/mL). Moreover, 59 patients (34.9%) presented with severe vitamin D deficiency (25(OH)D concentration below 10 ng/mL), 82 patients (48.5%) presented with moderate vitamin D deficiency (25(OH)D concentration between 10–20 ng/mL), and 27 patients presented with vitamin D insufficiency (25(OH)D concentration between 20–30 ng/mL). In vitro experiments and animal studies demonstrated the expression of vitamin D receptors in endothelial cells, vascular smooth muscle, and cardiomyocytes. It was directly implicated in endothelium-mediated vasodilation, anticoagulant activity, and inhibition of the inflammatory response. Indirectly, it may favor the reduction of blood pressure, myocardial hypertrophy, and ventricular arrhythmias [35]. Vitamin D deficiency was linked to many cardiovascular conditions including, but not limited to, atherosclerosis, coronary artery disease, and myocardial infarction [36]. However, currently available evidence does not support cardiovascular benefits or disadvantages of vitamin D supplementation with the commonly used doses [37,38]. On the subject of vitamin D and GGT, we did not find any prior study addressing the link between GGT and vitamin D in stable CAD patients. The most interesting observation to emerge from our data comparison was the interaction between declining 25(OH)D levels and rising GGT levels with increasing age, which resulted in an unfavorable 25(OH)D-to-GGT ratio. We demonstrated an association between GGT and 25(OH)D deficiency/insufficiency both in unadjusted and adjusted models in elderly patients with stable CAD. Taken together, these results suggest that these changes might further contribute to a high cardiovascular risk in the elderly. The only evidence available on the link between vitamin D and GGT comes from non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Barchetta et al. demonstrated that NAFLD patients have low 25(OH)D concentrations and elevated GGT activity (or in the upper range of normal limit) [39]. Moreover, they indicated that low 25(OH)D levels were associated with the presence of NAFLD independently of metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and insulin-resistance profile. He et al. examined the link between serum (25(OH)D) levels and serum liver enzymes in 24 229 US adults in a cross-sectional study. Their findings suggest a potential adverse effect of low 25(OH)D levels on human liver function (GGT OR 1.52 95%CI 1.32–1.75 p < 0.001) [40]. However, results from trials evaluating the effects of oral vitamin D supplementation on liver damage and liver enzymes (including GGT) in NAFLD are still inconsistent [41,42]. Nadreppor et al. examined the association between 25(OH)D and GGT, ALT, and alkaline phosphatase in 120 drug-naive individuals with no history of liver disease [43]. In addition, the effect of vitamin D supplementation (100,000 loading dose of cholecalciferol followed by 4000IU daily for 16 weeks) on hepatic enzymes was evaluated. They reported that 25(OH)D concentrations were not related to hepatic enzymes in drug-naive adults with no history of liver disease, and vitamin D supplementation had no effect on the serum levels of hepatic enzymes in vitamin D-deficient and overweight or obese, otherwise healthy individuals. Conversely, others noted a significant reduction in serum alkaline phosphatase and GGT with vitamin D and calcitriol supplementation from baseline levels [44]. Dabbaghmanesh et al. examined the role of vitamin D supplementation for the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) [44]. In total, 106 NAFLD patients were randomized to receive calcitriol, vitamin D3, or placebo pearls for 12 weeks. Significant reductions in serum alkaline phosphatase and GGT were observed with vitamin D and calcitriol supplementation from baseline levels; however, no beneficial effect was noted when comparing vitamin D, calcitriol, and placebo groups at the end of the study. Available data support the hypothesis of the potential benefits of vitamin D supplementation in selected populations of NAFLD patients, such as those with shorter disease duration and mild to moderate liver damage [45]. In contrast to some studies, we found an inverse correlation between GGT and 25(OH)D (R = −0.23 p = 0.002). More interestingly, GGT had a significant moderate value in predicting vitamin D deficiency (AUC = 0.69) and severe vitamin D deficiency (AUC 0.63). A possible explanation for the association between GGT and vitamin D might be the inflammatory process. Accumulating evidence reveals that NAFLD as well as vitamin D deficiency are strongly related to inflammation. Cytokines and adipokines play a pivotal role in inflammatory processes [46,47,48,49]. In addition, these inflammatory mediators regulate various functions including metabolic energy balance, inflammation, and immune response. All of these actions may facilitate endothelial dysfunction, atherogenesis, and the progression of atherosclerosis [1]. Consistent with the literature, our research found significant, but relatively weak, positive correlations between GGT and leukocyte count and neutrophil count, and a relatively weak inverse correlation between GGT and lymphocyte count. High leukocytes, neutrophils, and GGT together with low lymphocytes and vitamin D could be a hallmark feature of the inflammatory and immune reactions in patients with stable CAD. 6. Conclusions In summary, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study assessing the association between GGT and vitamin D in stable CAD. Our study has identified a link between GGT and vitamin D in stable CAD patients. There is an inverse correlation between GGT and 25(OH)D. Moreover, serum GGT activity shows a weak to moderate positive correlation with leukocyte and neutrophil count and a weak, inverse correlation between GGT and lymphocyte count and HDL cholesterol. We identified an interaction between declining 25(OH)D levels and rising GGT levels with increasing age, which resulted in an unfavorable 25(OH)D-to-GGT ratio in stable CAD patients. Taken together, these changes might further contribute to a high cardiovascular risk in the elderly, although further large-scale studies are warranted to corroborate the causality relationship. Limitations Our study needs to be viewed in light of its limitations. Given the cross-sectional study design, the analyses do not provide information about the possible causality of vitamin D deficiency and elevated GGT. The observational nature of the study cannot exclude a possible effect of any unmeasured factors on the observed associations. In addition, there is a seasonal change in 25(OH)D concentration; however, we avoided this problem by enrolling all patients in the spring season. Lower 25(OH)D concentrations during the winter season arise from less sun exposure and lower amounts of UV-B radiation reaching the skin, resulting in lower cutaneous vitamin D3 synthesis. More importantly, despite these limitations, we applied a strict set of exclusion criteria to obtain a homogenous population with respect to conditions and medical therapy that may have influenced GGT values and 25(OH)D concentrations; however, we did not screen for NAFLD. Finally, the relatively small number of patients enrolled might have rendered some differences insignificant. Further large-scale prospective cohort studies are warranted in the field of vitamin D and GGT. Intervention trials with vitamin D supplementation could perhaps provide more evidence on the causality of 25(OH)D and GGT levels. Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Author Contributions Conceptualization, B.H. and B.Z.S.; Methodology, J.N., I.Z.-Z., J.K., J.S., A.D., H.N.T.; Software, B.H.; Validation, B.H. and B.Z.S.; Formal Analysis, B.H., J.N., and B.Z.S.; Investigation, J.N., I.Z.-Z., J.K., J.S., A.D., H.N.T.; Resources, B.H., J.N., and B.Z.-S.; Data Curation, J.N., I.Z.-Z., J.K., J.S., A.D., H.N.T.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, B.H. and B.Z.-S.; Writing—Review and Editing, B.H. and B.Z.-S.; Visualization, B.H. and B.Z.-S.; Supervision, B.H. and B.Z.-S.; Project Administration, B.H. and B.Z.-S.; Funding Acquisition, B.H. and B.Z.-S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding Grant by the Medical University of Silesia (KNW-1-079/K/9/Z). Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. Figure 1 Age range-dependent changes in 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OHD)) and gamma glutamyltransfarase (GGT) levels. Figure 2 Age range-dependent changes in the 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OHD)) to gamma glutamyltransfarase (GGT) ratio. ijerph-17-08980-t001_Table 1Table 1 Baseline clinical characteristics. Values are presented as medians (interquartile range) or n (percent). Group 1 25(OH)D < 10 ng/mL n = 59 Group 2 25(OH)D 10–20 ng/mL n = 82 Group 3 25(OH)D > 20 ng/mL n = 28 p Age, years 77 (68–85) 76 (67–87) 75 (70–80) 0.1 Sex, men n (%) 13 (22.0) 35 (42.7) 10 (35.7) 0.0001 Arterial hypertension n (%) 42 (71.2) 69 (84.1) 24 (86.0) 0.6 Hyperlipidemia n (%) 37 (63.0) 48 (58.5) 16 (57.1) 0.8 Diabetes mellitus n (%) 16 (27.1) 23 (28.0) 11 (63.3) 0.4 Prior myocardial infarction n (%) 3 (5.1) 15 (18.3) 8 (39.2) 0.5 BMI 25 (23–28) 29 (24–31) 27 (24–30) 0.1 BMI—body mass index. ijerph-17-08980-t002_Table 2Table 2 Laboratory findings. Values are presented as medians (interquartile range). Group 1 25(OH)D < 10 ng/mL n = 59 Group 2 25(OH)D 10–20 ng/mL n = 82 Group 3 25(OH)D > 20 ng/mL n = 28 p Leucocytes (103/mm3) 6.4 (4.8–8.6) 6.8 (5.5–8.4) 6.1 (4.7–6.7) 0.1 Erythrocytes (106/mm3) 4.1 (3.8–4.6) 4.3 (3.9–4.5) 4.1 (3.9–4.3) 0.5 Lymphocytes (103/mm3) 2.0 (1.5–3.0) 2.3 (2.0–3.1) 2.0 (1.9–2.4) 0.7 Neutrophils (103/mm3) 4.0 (2.6–5.3) 3.8 (3.0–4.8) 2.7 (2.2–3.9) 0.04 Hemoglobin (g/dL) 12.6 (12.1–13.8) 12.7 (11.7–13.4) 12.4 (11.3–13.1) 0.2 Hematocrit (%) 38 (36–42) 39 (36–41) 38 (37–39) 0.3 Platelets (103/mm3) 220 (173–262) 205 (168–248) 225 (204–277) 0.1 Total cholesterol (mmol/L) 4.3 (3.8–5.5) 4.4 (3.5–5.3) 4.3 (3.7–5.1) 0.7 HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) 1.5 (1.0–1.9) 1.5 (1.2–1.7) 1.2 (1.1–1.3) 0.1 LDL cholesterol (mmol/L) 2.3 (1.3–3.6) 2.6 (1.7–3.3) 2.5 (1.8–3.2) 0.8 Triglycerides (mmol/L) 1.0 (0.9–1.4) 1.1 (0.9–1.4) 1.1 (0.9–1.9) 0.8 Serum creatinine (μmol/L) 70 (60–90) 76 (66–100) 75 (66–88) 0.1 Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (U/L) 18 (15–20) 18 (16–26) 16 (14–19) 0.1 Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (U/L) 16 (10–22) 15 (11–20) 13 (11–17) 0.4 Bilirubin (mmol/L) 12.3 (9.5–18.1) 9.7 (8.4–12.0) 10.1 (8.2–13.5) 0.08 GGT (U/L) 27 (23–42) 20 (17–40) 16 (11–25) 0.04 Total protein (g/L) 60.9 (57.2–62.5) 64.5 (56.0–67.3) 62.1 (58.0–64.7) 0.07 Albumin (mg/mL) 36 (32–38) 37 (31–39) 42 (38–46) 0.04 25(OH)D (ng/mL) 8.4 (7.1–9.3) 13.4 (12.1–15.8) 23.4 (21.3–25.2) <0.001 25(OH)D—25-hyroxyvitamin D; GGT—gamma glutamyltransferase; HDL—high-density lipoprotein; LDL—low-density lipoprotein. ijerph-17-08980-t003_Table 3Table 3 Correlations between gamma glutamyltranferase and clinical features and laboratory results. Gamma Glutamyltransferase Spearman R p Weight 0.20 0.008 Waist-to-hip ratio 0.20 0.008 Waist-to-height ratio 0.15 0.04 25(OH)D −0.23 0.002 HDL cholesterol −0.24 0.002 Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 0.26 0.0005 Bilirubin 0.25 0.0002 Hemoglobin 0.20 0.01 Leukocytes 0.23 0.003 Neutrophils 0.22 0.004 Lymphocytes −0.15 0.05 ijerph-17-08980-t004_Table 4Table 4 Receiver operating characteristics curves identifying the discrimination thresholds of gamma glutamyltransferase for vitamin D deficiency and severe vitamin D deficiency. Cut-Off AUC 95% CI Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV p Vitamin D Deficiency GGT >19 0.69 0.53–0.77 63% 64% 88% 28% 0.04 Severe Vitamin D Deficiency GGT >21 0.63 0.51–0.74 81% 56% 41% 86% 0.04 AUC—area under the curve; PPV—positive predictive value; NPV—negative predictive value; GGT—gamma glutamyltransferase. ijerph-17-08980-t005_Table 5Table 5 Clinical and laboratory features based on GGT status. Values are presented as medians (interquartile range) or n (percent). GGT ≤ 19 (n = 66) GGT > 19 (n = 103) p Age, years 77 (65–85) 77 (68–82) 0.6 Sex, men n (%) 23 (34.8) 35 (34.0) 0.9 Systemic hypertension n (%) 51 (77.2) 84 (81.5) 0.7 Hyperlipidemia n (%) 40 (60.6) 61 (59.2) 0.5 Diabetes mellitus n (%) 17 (25.7) 33 (32.0) 0.2 Prior myocardial infarction n (%) 10 (15.2) 16 (15.5) 0.9 BMI 26 (23–30) 27 (24–31) 0.4 Leucocytes (103/mm3) 5.7 (5.1–7.0) 7.0 (5.6–8.9) 0.01 Erythrocytes (106/mm3) 4.2 (3.9–4.4) 4.2 (3.9–4.7) 0.6 Lymphocytes (103/mm3) 2.1 (1.9–2.6) 2.2 (1.8–3.0) 0.4 Neutrophils (103/mm3) 3.1 (2.5–4.6) 4.0 (2.9–5.5) 0.01 Hemoglobin (g/dL) 12.4 (11.6–13.1) 12.7 (12.0–13.8) 0.2 Hematocrit (%) 38 (36–40) 39 (37–42) 0.2 Platelets (103/mm3) 216 (190–253) 209 (160–279) 0.2 Total cholesterol (mmol/L) 4.4 (3.5–5.4) 4.4 (3.7–5.4) 0.7 HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) 1.5 (1.2–1.7) 1.3 (1.0–1.8) 0.1 LDL cholesterol (mmol/L) 2.5 (1.7–3.4) 2.5 (1.6–3.2) 0.7 Triglycerides (mmol/L) 1.0 (0.9–1.4) 1.1 (1.0–1.6) 0.7 Serum creatinine (μmol/L) 73 (65–91) 75 (62–92) 0.7 Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (U/L) 18 (16–20) 18 (15–23) 0.8 Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (U/L) 14 (11–16) 17 (11–22) 0.02 Bilirubin (mmol/L) 9.9 (8.2–11.1) 10.90 (8.4–19.2) 0.02 Total protein (g/L) 60.5 (57.3–64.0) 60.9 (58.0–68.4) 0.7 Albumin (mg/mL) 34 (33–38) 34 (31–38) 0.2 25(OH)D (ng/mL) 13.8 (11.0 –21.0) 10.9 (8.4–15.2) 0.0001 • Vitamin D insufficiency (25(OH)D 20–30 ng/mL) n (%) 10 (15.2) 18 (17.1) • Moderate vitamin D deficiency (25(OH)D 10–20 ng/mL) 38 (57.7) 44 (42.7) 0.0002 • Severe vitamin D deficiency (25(OH)D < 10 ng/mL) n (%) 18 (27.1) 41 (39.8) ijerph-17-08980-t006_Table 6Table 6 GGT and the risk of 25[OH]D deficiency/insufficiency. 25[OH]D Serum Level < 30 ng/mL, Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Intervals), p-Value Unadjusted Model 1 Model 2 1.07 (1.02–1.11) 1.06 (1.02–1.12) 1.05 (1.01–1.11) 0.004 0.01 0.04 Model 1, adjusted for age, sex, weight, waist circumference Model 2 adjusted for age, sex, weight, waist circumference, serum albumin, neutrophil count, ALT, serum bilirubin ALT—Alanine aminotransferase, GGT—gamma glutamyltransferase ==== Refs References 1. Libby P. Inflammation in atherosclerosis Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2012 32 2045 2051 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.179705 22895665 2. Kattoor A.J. Pothineni N.V.K. Palagiri D. Mehta J.L. Oxidative Stress in Atherosclerosis Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2017 19 42 10.1007/s11883-017-0678-6 28921056 3. Lonn M.E. Dennis J.M. Stocker R. Actions of “antioxidants” in the protection against atherosclerosis Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2012 53 863 884 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.05.027 22664312 4. Schutte R. Schutte A.E. Huisman H.W. van Rooyen J.M. Malan N.T. Péter S. Fourie C.M.T. van der Westhuizen F.H. Louw R. Botha C.A. Blood glutathione and subclinical atherosclerosis in African men: The SABPA Study Am. J. Hypertens. 2009 22 1154 1159 10.1038/ajh.2009.158 19730419 5. Ndrepepa G. Colleran R. Kastrati A. Gamma-glutamyl transferase and the risk of atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease Clin. Chim. Acta 2018 476 130 138 10.1016/j.cca.2017.11.026 29175647 6. Mao Y. Qi X. Xu W. Song H. Xu M. Ma W. Zhou L. Serum gamma-glutamyl transferase: A novel biomarker for coronary artery disease Med. Sci. Monit. 2014 20 706 710 24780890 7. Sheikh M. Tajdini M. Shafiee A. Anvari M.S. Jalali A. Poorhosseini H. Amirzadegan A. Association of serum gamma-glutamyltransferase and premature coronary artery disease Neth. Heart J. 2017 25 439 445 10.1007/s12471-017-0964-5 28205118 8. Celik O. Cakmak H.A. Satilmis S. Gungor B. Akin F. Ozturk D. Yalcin A.A. Ayca B. Erturk M. Atasoy M.M. The relationship between gamma-glutamyl transferase levels and coronary plaque burdens and plaque structures in young adults with coronary atherosclerosis Clin. Cardiol. 2014 37 552 557 25197023 9. Pucci A. Franzini M. Matteucci M. Ceragioli S. Marconi M. Ferrari M. Passino C. Basolo F. Emdin M. Paolicchi A. b-Gamma-glutamyltransferase activity in human vulnerable carotid plaques Atherosclerosis 2014 237 307 313 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.09.028 25299965 10. Holick M.F. The vitamin D deficiency pandemic: Approaches for diagnosis, treatment and prevention Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2017 18 153 165 10.1007/s11154-017-9424-1 28516265 11. Pike J.W. Christakos S. Biology and Mechanisms of Action of the Vitamin D Hormone Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. N. Am. 2017 46 815 843 10.1016/j.ecl.2017.07.001 29080638 12. Siasos G. Tousoulis D. Oikonomou E. Maniatis K. Kioufis S. Kokkou E. Miliou A. Zaromitidou M. Kassi E. Stefenadis C. Vitamin D serum levels are associated with cardiovascular outcome in coronary artery disease Int. J. Cardiol. 2013 168 4445 4447 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.06.151 23896541 13. Tousoulis D. Vitamin D deficiency and cardiovascular disease: Fact or fiction? Hell. J. Cardiol. 2018 59 69 71 10.1016/j.hjc.2018.06.014 14. Lavie C.J. Lee J.H. Milani R.V. Vitamin D and cardiovascular disease will it live up to its hype? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011 58 1547 1556 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.07.008 21958881 15. O’Keefe J.H. Lavie C.J. Holick M.F. Vitamin D supplementation for cardiovascular disease prevention JAMA 2011 306 1546 1547 10.1001/jama.2011.1465 21990296 16. Elangovan H. Chahal S. Gunton J.E. Vitamin D in liver disease: Current evidence and potential directions Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2017 4 907 916 10.1016/j.bbadis.2017.01.001 17. Korzonek-Szlacheta I. Hudzik B. Nowak J. Szkodziński J. Nowak J. Gąsior M. Zubelewicz-Szkodzińska B. Mean platelet volume is associated with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in patients with stable coronary artery disease Heart Vessel. 2018 33 1275 1281 10.1007/s00380-018-1182-9 18. Williams B. Mancia G. Spiering W. Rosei E.A. Azizi M. Burnier M. Clement D.L. Coca A. de Simone G. Dominiczak A. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension Eur. Heart J. 2018 39 3021 3104 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339 30165516 19. Mach F. Baigent C. Catapano A.L. Koskinas K.C. Casula M. Badimon L. Chapman M.J. De Backer G.G. Delgado V. Ference B.A. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: Lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk Eur. Heart J. 2020 41 111 188 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455 31504418 20. Cosentino F. Grant P.J. Aboyans V. Bailey C.J. Ceriello A. Delgatdo V. Federici M. Filippatos G. Grobbee D.E. Hansen T.B. 2019 ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD Eur. Heart J. 2020 41 255 323 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz486 31497854 21. Boettger S.F. Angersbach B. Klimek C.N. Wanderley A.L.M. Shaibekov A. Sieske L. Wang B. Zuchowski M. Wirth R. Pourhassan M. Prevalence and predictors of vitamin D-deficiency in frail older hospitalized patients BMC Geriatr. 2018 18 219 10.1186/s12877-018-0919-8 30236071 22. Spoto B. Mattace-Raso F. Sijbrands E.J. D’Arrigo G. Tripepi G. Volpato S. Bandinelli S. Ferrucci L. Zoccali C. Oxidized LDL, Gamma-Glutamyltransferase and Adverse Outcomes in Older Adults J. Am. Geriatr Soc. 2017 65 e77 e82 10.1111/jgs.14566 28422277 23. Cumhur Cure M. Cure E. Yuce S. Yazici T. Karakoyun I. Efe H. Mean platelet volume and vitamin D level Ann. Lab. Med. 2014 34 98 103 10.3343/alm.2014.34.2.98 24624344 24. Paolicchi A. Emdin M. Ghliozeni E. Ciancia E. Passino C. Popoff G. Pompella A. Images in cardiovascular medicine. Human atherosclerotic plaques contain gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase enzyme activity Circulation 2004 109 1440 10.1161/01.CIR.0000120558.41356.E6 15037540 25. Whitfield J.B. Gamma glutamyl transferase Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2001 38 263 355 10.1080/20014091084227 11563810 26. Bo S. Gambino R. Durazzo M. Guidi S. Tiozzo E. Ghione F. Gentile L. Cassader M. Pagano G.F. Associations between gamma-glutamyl transferase, metabolic abnormalities and inflammation in healthy subjects from a population-based cohort: A possible implication for oxidative stress World J. Gastroenterol. 2005 11 7109 7117 10.3748/wjg.v11.i45.7109 16437656 27. Emdin M. Pompella A. Paolicchi A. Gamma-glutamyltransferase, atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular disease: Triggering oxidative stress within the plaque Circulation 2005 112 2078 2080 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.571919 16203922 28. Wannamethee G. Ebrahim S. Shaper A.G. Gamma-glutamyltransferase: Determinants and association with mortality from ischemic heart disease and all causes Am. J. Epidemiol. 1995 142 699 708 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117699 7572939 29. Karp D.R. Shimooku K. Lipsky P.E. Expression of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase protects ramos B cells from oxidation-induced cell death J. Biol. Chem. 2001 276 3798 3804 10.1074/jbc.M008484200 11080500 30. Demircan S. Yazici M. Durna K. Kilicaslan F. Demir S. Pinar M. Gulel O. The importance of gamma-glutamyltransferase activity in patients with coronary artery disease Clin. Cardiol. 2009 32 220 225 10.1002/clc.20345 19353699 31. Emdin M. Passino C. Michelassi C. Titta F. L’abbate A. Donato L. Pompella A. Paolicchi A. Prognostic value of serum gamma-glutamyl transferase activity after myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J. 2001 22 1802 1807 10.1053/euhj.2001.2807 11549302 32. Akpek M. Elcik D. Kalay N. Yarlioglues M. Dogdu O. Sahin O. Ardic I. Oguzhan A. Ergin A. Kaya M.K. The prognostic value of serum gamma glutamyl transferase activity on admission in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI Angiology 2012 63 579 585 10.1177/0003319711431880 22210739 33. Dogan A. Icli A. Aksoy F. Varol E. Erdogan D. Ozaydin M. Kocyigit S. Gamma-glutamyltransferase in acute coronary syndrome patients without ST elevation and its association with stenotic lesion and cardiac events Coron. Artery Dis. 2012 23 39 44 10.1097/MCA.0b013e32834e4ed0 22107801 34. Huang Y. Luo J. Liu X. Wu Y. Yang Y. Li W. Lv W. Hu Y. Gamma-Glutamyltransferase and Risk of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Young Chinese Patients: A Case-Control Study Dis. Markers 2018 2018 2429160 10.1155/2018/2429160 30245751 35. Carvalho L.S. Sposito A.C. Vitamin D for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: Are we ready for that? Atherosclerosis 2015 241 729 740 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.06.034 26135478 36. Pilz S. Verheyen N. Grubler M.R. Tomaschitz A. Marz W. Vitamin D and cardiovascular disease prevention Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2016 13 404 417 10.1038/nrcardio.2016.73 27150190 37. Manson J.E. Cook N.R. Lee I.M. Christen W. Bassuk S.S. Mora S. Gibson H. Gordon D. Copeland T. D’Agostino D. Vitamin D Supplements and Prevention of Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease N. Engl. J. Med. 2019 380 33 44 10.1056/NEJMoa1809944 30415629 38. Scragg R. Stewart A.W. Waayer D. Lawes C.M.M. Toop L. Sluyter J. Murphy J. Khaw K.T. Camargo C.A. Jr. Effect of Monthly High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation on Cardiovascular Disease in the Vitamin D Assessment Study: A Randomized Clinical Trial JAMA Cardiol. 2017 2 608 616 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.0175 28384800 39. Barchetta I. Angelico F. Del Ben M. Baroni M.G. Pozzilli P. Morini S. Cavallo M.G. Strong association between non alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and low 25(OH) vitamin D levels in an adult population with normal serum liver enzymes BMC Med. 2011 9 85 10.1186/1741-7015-9-85 21749681 40. He X. Xu C. Lu Z.H. Fang X.Z. Tan J. Song Y. Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels are associated with liver injury markers in the US adult population Public Health Nutr. 2020 23 2915 2922 10.1017/S1368980020000348 32576302 41. Barchetta I. Cimini F.A. Cavallo M.G. Vitamin D Supplementation and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Present and Future Nutrients 2017 9 1015 10.3390/nu9091015 42. Barchetta I. Del Ben M. Angelico F. Martino M.D. Fraioli A. Torre G.L. Saulle R. Perri L. Morini S. Tiberti C. No effects of oral vitamin D supplementation on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial BMC Med. 2016 14 92 10.1186/s12916-016-0638-y 27353492 43. Naderpoor N. Mousa A. de Courten M. Scradd R. de Courten B. The relationship between 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration and liver enzymes in overweight or obese adults: Cross-sectional and interventional outcomes J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2018 177 193 199 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2017.09.009 28899715 44. Dabbaghmanesh M.H. Danafar F. Eshraghian A. Omrani G.R. Vitamin D supplementation for the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A randomized double blind placebo controlled trial Diabetes Metab. Syndr. 2018 12 513 517 10.1016/j.dsx.2018.03.006 29588137 45. Barchetta I. Cimini F.A. Cavallo M.G. Vitamin D and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD): An Update Nutrients 2020 12 3302 10.3390/nu12113302 46. Asrih M. Jornayvaz F.R. Inflammation as a potential link between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and insulin resistance J. Endocrinol. 2013 218 R25 R36 10.1530/JOE-13-0201 23833274 47. Braunersreuther V. Viviani G.L. Mach F. Montecucco F. Role of cytokines and chemokines in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease World J. Gastroenterol. 2012 18 727 735 10.3748/wjg.v18.i8.727 22371632 48. Cannell J.J. Grant W.B. Holick M.F. Vitamin D and inflammation Dermatoendocrinology 2014 6 e983401 10.4161/19381980.2014.983401 49. Mangin M. Sinha R. Fincher K. Inflammation and vitamin D: The infection connection Inflamm. Res. 2014 63 803 819 10.1007/s00011-014-0755-z 25048990