==== Front Heliyon Heliyon Heliyon 2405-8440 Elsevier S2405-8440(20)32549-4 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05706 e05706 Review Article Recent updates on COVID-19: A holistic review Jakhmola Shweta a1 Indari Omkar a1 Kashyap Dharmendra a Varshney Nidhi a Rani Annu a Sonkar Charu a Baral Budhadev a Chatterjee Sayantani a Das Ayan a Kumar Rajesh b Jha Hem Chandra hemcjha@iiti.ac.in a∗ a Discipline of Biosciences and Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Indore, India b Discipline of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology, Indore, India ∗ Corresponding author. hemcjha@iiti.ac.in 1 Equal contributors. 11 12 2020 12 2020 11 12 2020 6 12 e0570622 7 2020 21 9 2020 4 12 2020 © 2020 The Authors 2020 This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Coronaviruses are large positive-sense RNA viruses with spike-like peplomers on their surface. The Coronaviridae family's strains infect different animals and are popularly associated with several outbreaks, namely SARS and MERS epidemic. COVID-19 is one such recent outbreak caused by SARS-CoV-2 identified first in Wuhan, China. COVID-19 was declared a pandemic by WHO on 11th March 2020. Our review provides information covering various facets of the disease starting from its origin, transmission, mutations in the virus to pathophysiological changes in the host upon infection followed by diagnostics and possible therapeutics available to tackle the situation. We have highlighted the zoonotic origin of SARS-CoV-2, known to share 96.2% nucleotide similarity with bat coronavirus. Notably, several mutations in SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, nucleocapsid protein, PLpro, and ORF3a are reported across the globe. These mutations could alter the usual receptor binding function, fusion process with the host cell, virus replication, and the virus's assembly. Therefore, studying these mutations could help understand the virus's virulence properties and design suitable therapeutics. Moreover, the aggravated immune response to COVID-19 can be fatal. Hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases are comorbidities substantially associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. The review article discusses these aspects, stating the importance of various comorbidities in disease outcomes. Furthermore, medications' unavailability compels the clinicians to opt for atypical drugs like remdesivir, chloroquine, etc. The current diagnostics of COVID-19 include qRT-PCR, CT scan, serological tests, etc. We have described these aspects to expose the information to the scientific community and to accelerate the research. Microbiology; Virology; Viruses; Epidemiology; Vaccines; Health Disparity; Diagnostics; SARS-CoV-2; Mutations; Comorbidities; signalling; Diagnostics; Vaccination; spike protein. Keywords Microbiology Virology Viruses Epidemiology Vaccines Health disparity Diagnostics SARS-CoV-2 Mutations Comorbidities Signalling Vaccination Spike protein ==== Body 1 A brief introduction of coronaviruses and associated pandemics In Latin, coronavirus (CoV) refers to "halo" or "crown" viruses as these have spike-like projections on its surface [1, 2]. The genome size of the virus ranges from 26 to 32 × 103 bp and consists of multiple open reading frames (ORFs) (from 6 to 11). The first ORF constituting 67% of the whole virus genome is responsible for 16 non-structural proteins (nsps). The other necessary proteins are encoded by the remaining ORFs [3]. The four main structural proteins of the virus include the spike surface glycoprotein (S), envelope (E), membrane (M), and nucleocapsid (N). The S protein establishes the essential host cell tropism [4]. Further speaking of the first infectious CoV, the virus was isolated from birds with bronchitis in the 1930s [5]. CoVs comprises four genera: Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and Delta CoV. The first two genera of CoVs are known to infect humans, while the latter two predominantly infect birds [6]. In the 1960s, the first human coronavirus (HCoV) from the cultures of patients with a common cold was obtained [7]. Apart from the newly recognized severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), six other HCoVs have been identified, namely HCoV-NL63 and HCoV-229E, which belong to the genus Alpha CoV [8], HCoV-HKU1, HCoV-OC43, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), and SARS-CoV which are categorized as Beta CoVs [8]. CoVs are responsible for almost 30% of common colds, and often the individuals are infected with these viruses in their lifetime [9]. CoV infections display a seasonal pattern with an increased number of cases during winter and early spring [10]. Occasionally, the virus can infect other animals, apart from its natural host, and undergo mutations resulting in a more evolved virus capable of affecting a broader and distinct population. CoVs were mainly highlighted after the 2003 SARS pandemic followed by the MERS epidemic in 2012, and now the very recent SARS-CoV-2 outbreak [11]. The 2002–2003 SARS pandemic affected almost 8,096 and claimed 774 lives of four continents before its containment [12]. The SARS CoV resembled the bat CoV, its natural host [13]. However, the virus was investigated to spread to humans by handling and consuming palm civets, raccoon dogs, and Chinese ferret badgers sold and slaughtered at the wet markets of China [13]. The virus infected individuals with severe pulmonary syndrome and showed a mortality rate of 10% [14]. Furthermore, the SARS-CoV S protein receptor-binding domain (RBD) binds to the host receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme2 (ACE2) [15] with CD209L as a substituting receptor [16]. After SARS-CoV, another highly pathogenic CoV outbreak was the MERS-CoV pandemic [17] that mostly affected the Arabian Peninsula [18]. MERS-CoV lasted for seven years, even after its spread in the confined areas. To date, almost 2500 cases of MERS have been confirmed with a mortality rate of ~35% [19]. It is more closely associated with bat CoVs than that of other HCoVs [20]. For entry, MERS-CoV uses dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4, also known as CD26) as a receptor [21, 22]. To date, no vaccination or particular treatment is functional for MERS-CoV; however, a recent candidate DNA vaccine developed from MERS-CoV S protein subunit 1 (S1) is under study [23]. MERS-CoV has shown recurrence in the human population by direct or indirect contact with infected primary reservoirs, which are the dromedary camels [24]. The severe pathogenic ability of SARS viruses to cross-species and undergo high mutation rates has resulted in the emergence of a new virus, i.e., SARS-CoV-2. The virus originated in the Wuhan province of China, and the disease, coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), has become an emerging global health emergency since 11th March 2020 [25]. The virus affected a considerable population within a short period indicating its rapid potential to spread. The virus's ability to infect humans was reported due to the evolution of RBD towards ACE2 receptors expressed on various human cells [21]. The virus is known to reach and infect different organs like the brain, kidney, liver, gastrointestinal system, etc. thereby causing multiple organs failure [26, 27, 28]. Symptoms of COVID-19 that resemble SARS and MERS include fever, cough, and shortness of breath [29]. Furthermore, SARS-CoV usually infects the young population, and MERS-CoV affects people aged above 50 years. However, SARS-CoV-2 is mostly known to cause severe manifestations in middle-aged and older people [30, 31]. Collectively, our review aims to provide information on SARS-CoV-2 evolution, associated comorbidities, and its influence on infected individuals at the molecular and pathophysiological levels. Briefly, we also highlight the probable vaccine candidates from varied organizations in different phases of clinical trials. In addition, a glimpse into the diagnostics, along with possible interventions adapted to date to contain the virus, is presented. The information about various facets of SARS-CoV-2 infection is scattered in numerous types of reports. A comprehensive presentation of updated information is therefore necessary. The information here will enable us to understand SARS-CoV-2 from different angles and aid in the research of COVID-19. 2 Zoonotic origin of SARS-CoV-2 Tracing back the tracks of history and early epidemiological studies, it has become evident that HCoV infections have zoonotic origins [32]. The intermediate host, to which the virus is recently introduced, can amicably serve as a zoonotic source with the capability to transfer the infection to humans at a full scale. The intermediate host provides the virus with the necessary conditions to amplify and replicate transiently [33]. Besides, the virus can come to a dead-end situation if its sustenance is supported within the intermediate host or evolve itself according to the host, making it its natural reservoir host. What needs to be investigated regarding SARS-CoV-2 is if the virus acclimatizes to humans and can transmit without its intermediate host. Therefore, identifying the animal source can provide us with preventive human disease interventions. Phylogenetic studies have shown bats and rodents as the reservoir of most alpha- and beta-CoVs evident [34]. For long, the CoVs are known to cross the barrier of species specificity and enter the human population like MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2 [35]. Homology studies have demonstrated 96.2% nucleotide similarity between the SARS-CoV-2 and RaTG13, a bat CoV obtained from Rhinolophus Affinis [36]. Based on similar reviews, another conclusion was drawn that bats cannot serve as intermediate reservoir hosts for SARS-CoV-2 until an almost identical CoV is acquired from bats. The spread of the virus has to be from some of the wild animals dealt at the Huanan seafood wholesale. The site accounts for the initial cases of COVID-19 and seems suitable for an animal to human transmission [37]. Further, the metagenomic studies hint towards pangolins (Manis javanica) as a plausible intermediate host capable of harboring beta-CoVs related to SARS-CoV-2 [38]. Jaimes et al. performed S protein-based phylogenetic analysis of pangolin-CoVs from Malayan pangolins brought into China from Guangxi and Guangdong Province, SARS-CoV-2, BatCoV-RaTG13, and other beta coronaviruses [39]. Also, a detailed similarity analysis of different betacoronavirus involved 148 human SARS-CoV-2 sequences, six pangolin CoVs (PcoV_GX_P5L, P2V, P4L, P1E, P5E, and MP789), and two bat CoVs namely RaTG13 (from Rhinolophus affinis) and RmYN02 (from R. malayanus) [40]. The CoV (MP789 CoV) derived from these small endangered mammals share nucleotide homology, up to 85–92%, with the SARS-CoV-2 [38,40]. Surprisingly, despite the higher sequence homology of SARS-CoV-2 with RaTG13 (96.3%), the SARS-CoV-2 RBD shares 97.4% amino acid sequence similarity with RBD of Guangdong pangolin CoV [38]. Supporting the link between the pangolins and SARS-CoV-2, others report the presence of similar viral fragments from diseased pangolins lung samples [41]. Although no direct evidence exists that defines pangolins as the origin of SARS-CoV-2. Theories also suggest the chances of a highly occurring event in CoVs called recombination between the above two species in a third animal species [42]. Several earlier examples demonstrate the ability of the CoVs to be able to transmit from domestic animals to humans; for instance, the HCoV-OC43 pandemic around 1890 was recorded after the virus jumped from domestic livestock to humans [43]. Bats are apt agents for interspecies virus dispersal because of many reasons like their ability to be in close social densely packed colonies, longevity, and ability to fly, which in turn allows them to cover and spread the pathogen to wider areas [44]. Usually, bats transmit the microorganisms through intermediate hosts, mostly when the intermediate host consumes the partially digested bat food, which serves as a potential source of infection [44]. These placental mammals provide suitable body temperature, allowing replication of viruses sensitive to increased temperatures [45]. Bats have long been known to serve as reservoirs of various microorganisms, especially RNA viruses, implicated in several human diseases. It is noteworthy to mention that more than 200 viruses are associated with bats, including SARS and MERS coronaviruses, as well as Ebola and Marburg viruses [45]. CoVs being RNA viruses, have an immense potential to introduce mutation during replicating its genome, with ~10−4 average substitutions per site in a year [46]. The mutation rates give the viruses the ability for interspecies co-evolution. Further, the virus family has a proofreading exoribonuclease, elimination of which can result in an even higher mutation rate [47]. Nevertheless, the mutation rate is approximately a million times more in the CoVs rather than their hosts [48]. However, the rate of variation in SARS-CoV-2 is relatively lower to SARS-CoV, therefore making it more adaptable to humans [49]. The CoVs have an ample number of RNA fragments (ORFs), and the viruses often switch the templates during replication. Notably, it is known that new CoVs could generate homologous recombination of full length and subgenomic RNAs [50]. An example of this is natural recombination between HCoV-HKU1 and HCoV-OC43 [51]. Additionally, the host plays a crucial role in the interspecies spread of the virus. In other words, a host may be suitable for infection by one virus, with just a difference of a few amino acids substitution in its protein. A cryo-electron microscopy study demonstrates that a difference of 30% in between the S protein of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV is responsible for 20 fold higher affinity of the SARS-CoV-2 S protein with ACE2 receptors expressed by the human cells [52]. Therefore, these variations could be responsible for establishing a CoV in humans upon transmission from their natural reservoir host. Nonetheless, the HCoVs frequently possess factors that subvert the host restriction factors for successful interspecies transmission. 3 Mutations in SARS-CoV-2 proteins from various isolates around the world The potency of viruses to adapt to new hosts and niches is based on their ability to generate beneficial genomic diversity in short periods [53]. Nucleotides substitutions have been determined as one of the critical mechanisms of viral development [54]. These substitutions not only alter the genome of the virus but also get mirrored into the subsequent proteome. The changes in protein sequences can cause anomalies in their structure and function, giving the virus new tools to adapt and survive. As mentioned previously, the RNA viruses have a huge potential to mutate. Likewise, SARS-CoV-2, during its spread in the different populations in varied subcontinental areas, has undergone distinct mutations, whereas very few mutations have been observed at the geographical level [55, 56, 57]. This further adds up to the challenges in fundamental research regarding SARS-CoV-2 as well as in vaccine and drug development (Figure 1).Figure 1 Overview of various aspects associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection: Origin, transmission, risk factors within a population, host response, diagnostics, and respective future directions. SARS-CoV-2 has a zoonotic origin. It might have travelled to humans from bat through an intermediate host like a pangolin. During further spread among the human population, it has undergone many mutations. Additionally, individuals with comorbidities may be susceptible to infection or disease severity. Viral entry inside the cell with subsequent molecular signaling and pathophysiological changes within the host is needed to be understood for better diagnosis and therapeutic targets. However, various diagnostics tools have made detection of infection easier. In the near future, the current pandemic demands more viral mutation studies, the development of better diagnostic tools, accelerated research for vaccine development, drug repurposing, and further amendments in the treatment of patients with comorbidities. Figure 1 We have briefly reviewed several mutations reported in various SARS-CoV-2 proteins from different sub-continental areas. The open-reading frames (ORFs) in the SARS-CoV-2 genome are similar to those of all β-coronaviruses [58, 59, 60]. ORF1a/b encodes various essential accessory proteins like proteases, helicase, etc. The S, E, M, and the N proteins are encoded by their distinct ORFs. Some other ORFs like ORF3a, ORF6a, ORFF7a, and ORF8a, are involved in different putative functions such as inhibition of interferon-β (IFN-β), DNA synthesis, etc. as summarized in a report [61]. Nonetheless, the function of ORF9b and ORF10a is yet to be explored [59, 61]. In a report addressing mutations in different ORFs, the ORFs of E protein, M glycoprotein, ORF6, ORF7b, and ORF10 were found to be conserved while several mutations were observed in ORF1a, ORF1b, ORF3a, ORF7a, ORF8, as well as in N and S protein ORF [62]. Another study on Indian isolates observed that the 5′terminal containing the genes for the ORF1ab, S, ORF3a, and E are more prone to mutations than 3′terminal, and are key drivers for virus diversity [56]. It is noteworthy that most of the worldwide reported mutations were from the S protein ORF [63, 64, 65]. The S protein mutations alter the receptor binding affinity, interaction, and amalgamation of viral covering with host cell membranes, thereby amending virus-host interaction. One of S protein mutations reported was D614G, which lies at the S1/S2 subunit junction [63]. The mutation is reported in the isolates from Chile, Egypt, Germany, India, and the USA (Table 1). D614G mutation in S protein along with other mutations, result in significantly more infectious virus particles and provide fitness advantages [57, 66]. Moreover, pseudoviruses with alone D614G mutations have shown increased infectious titers compared to the non-mutated forms [67, 68]. Other observed S protein mutations include R407I, A930V, and G1124V from Indian isolates and Q57H and V367 from French isolates [63, 64, 65]. These mutations could alter the infectivity, host-dependent modifications, replication cycle, evolutionary adaptation, species recognition, host receptor affinity, and pathophysiology of the disease [55, 65, 66, 67]. L84S, G392D, and G251V were also reported from the USA, German and Brazilian isolates, respectively [63]. Additionally, some of the mutations such as A475V, L452R, V483A, and F490L in RBD of S protein make SARS-CoV-2 resistant against neutralizing antibodies and are less infectious [66]. RBD mutation enhances the virus's binding affinity with the ACE2 receptor; hence, it promotes the replication and infectivity of the virus [56].Table 1 Comprehensive view of various mutations in SARS-CoV-2 proteins (S protein, N protein, PLpro and ORF3a) among different country-wise isolates. Table 1Countries Mutations S protein N protein RdRp PLPro ORF3a Q 57 H L 84 S G 251 V V 367 F G 392 D R 407 I D 614 G A 930 V G 1124 V S 194 L R 203 K G 204 R P 323 L A 225 V G 5214 S Brazil + Chile + + + + + + Egypt + + France + + Germany + + India + + + + + + + USA + + + REF a) a) a) b) a) c) a) c) d) b) e) f) e) e) g) [References: a) [63]; b) [64]; c) [76]; d) [69] e) [70]; f) [71]; g) [75]]. N protein is yet another critical protein playing structural as well as non-structural roles [68]. This protein also has strong immunogenicity [68]. Two reported mutations, R203K and G204R, have been found in isolates from Chile and India, which trigger the viral capsid formation [69, 70, 71]. In addition, S197L mutation in N protein is reported in isolates from Chile and the USA [64]. These mutations could modulate the interaction, the protein functionality, and the structural integrity for better organization in viral assembly [69, 72]. Furthermore, the viral RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) plays a vital viral genome replication task. P323L mutation is reported in the isolates from Chile and India [70]. This mutation's significance needs to be investigated and could provide insights into the SARS-CoV-2 evolution and the role of this enzyme in the current mutation rate. Mutations are also reported in the papain-like protease (PLpro), an enzyme that performs the cleavage of replicase polyprotein at conserved sites. This step is necessary for the development of functional replication assembly [73]. The A225V mutation in this protein was found in isolates from Chile [74]. Additionally, ORF3a is an accessory protein of SARS-CoV-2 and is known to induce pro-apoptotic activity [74]. The G5214S mutation is observed in ORF3a of the isolates from Egypt [75]. However, the contribution of each of these mutations in terms of SARS-CoV-2 evolution, virulence, and transmission needs to be investigated further. 4 Comorbidities and its alliance with SARS-CoV-2 Emanating data speculates elevated association and fierce mortality rate in COVID-19 patients with comorbidities [77]. We have briefed about some of the COVID-19 associated comorbidities. 4.1 Diabetes and hypertension: an inevitable risk factor for COVID-19 The involvement of hypertension and diabetes in COVID-19 patients is not surprising, given the elevating myriad of both of these chronic diseases globally [78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83]. Diabetes and hypertension are interrelated; reports suggest that hypertension is twice as common in diabetic patients as in non-diabetics [84, 85]. This overlap generally causes ischemic cerebrovascular disease, retinopathy, diabetic nephropathy, and sexual dysfunction [80]. Diabetes alone can lead to severe cardiovascular diseases and an increase in vascular smooth muscle cells [85]. Various meta-analyses and other independent studies have revealed hypertension and diabetes to be among the most prevalent comorbidities associated with COVID-19 [86,87,88,89]. Recently we have analyzed the data of hospitalized and deceased COVID-19 patients from various countries with comorbidities like diabetes, hypertension, heart diseases, immunocompromised and neurological diseases. The report suggests that comorbidities particularly, diabetes, hypertension, and heart diseases, are widely related to deaths in COVID-19 patients [77]. Reports indicate that out of the total COVID-19 patients with at least one comorbidity, 28–30% had hypertension, and 12–19% had diabetes [90, 91]. Moreover, diabetic COVID-19 patients exhibit an increased risk of thrombotic complications [92]. Reports suggest the association of type 2 and type 1 diabetes with COVID-19 [93]. SARS-CoV-2 infection can trigger severe metabolic complications in individuals with pre-diabetic conditions and influence diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperosmolarity. Also, it could lead to the onset of diabetes [93, 94]. Insulin resistance in diabetic patients leads to sodium retention, stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system, and the renin-angiotensin system [95, 96]. However, as the ACE2 has a protective role in blood pressure, its deficiency causes hypertension [97, 98, 99]. Diabetes and hypertension patients are prescribed with ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) [100]. Upon use of ACEIs or ARBs, to compensate ACE inhibition, ACE2 overexpression is facilitated, hence increasing patients' vulnerability [101, 102]. ACE2 can also be elevated by thiazolidinediones and ibuprofen [100]. Few studies recommend that due to the finite availability of serine protease TMPRSS2, increased ACE2 expression does not result in more viral entry. TMPRSS2 inhibitor camostat mesylate has been demonstrated to obstruct SARS-CoV-2 entry [88, 103]. 4.2 Cardiovascular diseases: a scary association with SARS-CoV-2 infection Cardiac conditions like arrhythmia, cardiomyopathy, and coronary heart disease are significant cardiovascular comorbidities seen in severe COVID-19 cases [104]. Earlier reports have demonstrated the presence of the virus in heart autopsy samples. In the case of heart tissue, SARS-CoV-2 receptors are highly expressed [105]. Moreover, in mice, the virus led to ACE2 dependent myocardial infections [106]. The SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 show similarities in their S protein, more specifically in the RBD domain. Hence it has been hypothesized that SARS-CoV-2 could infect cardiac tissue and aid in the severity of the disease [107]. Another potent HCoV, MERS-CoV, has also been associated with acute myocarditis and heart failure [108]. SARS-CoV-2 shares similar pathogenicity as MERS-CoV; therefore, SARS-CoV-2 can increase the disease complexity in the patients. Furthermore, SARS-CoV-2 infection injures the myocardium, which is determined by an increase in levels of myocardial biomarkers like creatine kinase (CK), creatine kinase MB isoenzyme (CK-MB), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) [107, 109, 110]. The specific biomarker with high-sensitivity is cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI). However, the biomarkers do not always alter in the same pattern [110]. According to a study among 187 COVID-19 patients, 27.8% exhibited myocardial injury, demonstrated by elevation of troponin (TnT) levels. The study suggested patients with underlying cardiovascular diseases and escalation of TnT levels had the highest mortality (69.44%) [111]. Plasma TnT levels were positively correlated with plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels, showing possible myocardial injury association with inflammatory pathogenesis during the disease progression [111]. Importantly, severe COVID-19 patients with cardiovascular problems have difficulty in gas exchange and might lead to hypoxemia [112]. Thus, the virus infection triggers an exaggerated immune response by releasing interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-6, IL-10, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF), interferon-γ (IFN-γ), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), macrophage inflammatory protein-1-alpha (MIP-1-α), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) mediators. It leads to cytokine storms and contributes to myocardial tissue inflammation, ultimately leading to heart dysfunction [113]. The excessive release of pro-inflammatory cytokines further triggers a reduction in coronary blood flow, decreases in oxygen supply, destabilization of coronary plaque, and micro-thrombogenesis [114]. Also it has been known that ACEIs/ARBs upregulated ACE2 which can make cardiac tissue more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection [115]. It leads to an increase in severity in cardiovascular patients. 4.3 Does SARS-CoV-2 infections in immunosuppressive conditions worsen the outcome? An immunocompromised state, co-pathogen, and host factors are correlated with increased risk for respiratory diseases [116]. The widespread COVID-19 has put forward a stringent situation to work on the treatment of critically ill patients [117]. According to a study, the chance of acquiring HCoV-infection in immunocompromised patients compared to healthy controls was twice as likely [118]. However, a report of SARS-CoV infection in AIDS patients suggests mild SARS infection because highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) might have benefited in fighting viral factors [119]. In such cases, the symptoms of SARS-CoV infection in the AIDS patient may not be noticed, and hence the patient may serve as a carrier in spreading the virus. Additionally, an animal model study performed on Syrian golden hamsters regarding immunocompromised state and SARS-CoV infection, little clinical illness, and no mortality were observed after virus infection [120]. According to an Italian report on patients with chronic arthritis treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), the patients do not seem to be at increased risk of respiratory or life-threatening complications from SARS-CoV-2 compared to the general population [121]. Few reports suggest that the most recently approved antirheumatic drugs prove to be strong allies in the fight against COVID-19 as they can precisely target the critical steps of the immune response that became dysregulated during the disorder. Due to this fact, the SARS-related lung damage can be caused more by an exaggerated immune response than the virus itself [122]. Respiratory infections may be present in solid organ transplant (SOT) patients that are under continual immunosuppression. After the treatment with a minimized immunosuppressant dose, these patients recovered successfully [123, 124]. A recent study from Italy correlated the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 in patients undergoing doctoral investigation of SOT, cirrhosis, autoimmune liver disease, chemotherapy for hepatoblastoma [125]. Even after being positive for SARS-CoV-2, the patients did not develop acute lung pathology of SARS. A study from Spain regarding COVID-19 in kidney transplant patients and another from China related to heart transplant patients suggest that there could be an atypical presentation of symptoms (fever, diarrhea, fatigue) instead of typical SARS symptoms [126, 127]. These reports indicate the importance of careful monitoring and vigilant follow up of the patients with SOT during the COVID-19 outbreak [128]. Immunocompromised individuals have a similar threat of COVID-19 as that of others. Whereas, the outcome variations can depends upon an individual's immune status. A vigilant follow up for any symptoms is needed as there could be atypical symptoms representation. The immunosuppressive drug regime has to be adjusted as per the case based on the patient's clinical condition, age, gender, and previous history. 5 Lungs pathophysiology: the drive of SARS-CoV-2 inside the body SARS-CoV-2 fabricates the complexities of the respiratory tract [129]. SARS-CoV-2 could transmit among people through respiratory droplets and contact routes [130]. Droplet transmission occurs when a person comes in close contact (~1 m) with an infected patient. During this, a healthy individual's mouth, nose, and eyes get exposed to potentially infective respiratory droplets [131]. Infection feasibility [132] also gets transmitted through fomites in the close environment of an infected person [133, 134]. The virus further attacks an individual's exposed part's epithelial lining, gaining entry in the host tissue. Once in the cell, it hijacks the cellular machinery producing multiple copies. Further, it could reach the lungs through the respiratory tract [134]. Additionally, in the lungs, the virus triggers morphological as well as biochemical alterations. Post SARS-CoV-2 infection, the histopathological changes in different body organs, including lungs, kidneys, gastrointestinal tract, liver, heart, skin, and brain, are observed [135]. The lung biopsy examination of COVID-19 patients shows dispersed alveolar damage, patches of hemorrhagic necrosis, alveolitis with atrophy, intra-alveolar fibrinous exudate, loose interstitial fibrosis [135, 136]. There is diffuse alveolar damage (DAD), vascular congestion with occasional inflammatory cells, damaged pneumocytes with focal sloughing and formation of syncytial giant cells, etc. Additional findings include intra-alveolar hemorrhages, type II pneumocyte hyperplasia, fibrinoid necrosis of the small vasculature, and abundant intra-alveolar neutrophil infiltration to bronchopneumonia [135]. Most of the histopathological findings are similar to those described in SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. The radiological findings include bilateral and peripheral ground glass-like opacification in COVID-19, also observed in MERS-CoV infection [137, 138]. As the SARS-CoV-2 disease progresses, ground-glass opacification decreases, and consolidation with mixed patterns and subsequent resolution of air space changes is observed [137]. In contrast, intra-alveolar plugs have been observed in both SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 infections, whereas multinucleated pneumocytes disperse alveolar damage, tissue plug formation demonstrated in SARS-CoV infection [138, 139]. Hence, the radiological findings have few limitations like the formation of multinuclear pneumocytes are not only found in the case of SARS infection, but also seen in the case of other viral diseases like Paramyxoviridae family viruses, measles, mumps, RSV, parainfluenza viruses, and metapneumovirus, etc. [140]. The damage of lung tissues in COVID-19 patients might be an outcome of inflammatory responses like cytokines/chemokine storm [26, 141]. The pro-inflammatory mediator's level increases over anti-inflammatory, which results in changes in the biochemical territory of lung tissues [142]. The SARS-CoV-2 infection possibly stimulates the release of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IFN-γ, interferon-inducible protein-10 (IP-10), and MCP1 (a pro-inflammatory cytokine) by triggering activation of T-helper-1 (Th1) cell responses [141]. In the case of SARS-CoV patients, lung damage gets deteriorated with an increasing amount of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-12, IFN-γ, IP-10, and MCP1 whereas, in MERS-CoV infection, IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-15, and IL-17 set off inflammation in the lungs [49, 143]. The interferon-α/β (IFN-α/β), chemokine (C–C motif) ligand 5 (CCL5) genes also get activated in these viral infections [144]. Additionally, a few factors which deteriorate the respiratory system, like asthma, smoking where lungs already have prior exposure to inflammatory reactions, might be more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection [145]. In asthma, the lungs' epithelial lining triggers an antiviral response that relies on the prompt induction of cytokines, mostly type I/III- interferons (IFNs), and the type-2 cytokines like IL-13, IL-4, IL-5, IL-9, etc. These cytokines ultimately weaken the epithelium barrier and commence pro-inflammatory reactions [121, 144, 145]. Interestingly, few reports have observed that smoking upregulates the ACE2 level in airways epithelium [146, 147]. Smoking not only accelerates phosphorylation of microtubule-associated protein kinase (MAPK) while also the production of specific cytokines, such as type I and III IFNs, IL-1β, IL-18, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8, and the "alarmin" IL-33, which lead to the inflammation in lungs [148, 149]. Apart from ACE2, SARS-CoV-2 takes entry inside the cells by using receptors like CD147 and targets key signaling molecules like nuclear factor kappa light chain enhancer of activated B cells (NK-kB), interferon regulatory factors (IRFs), IRF-3, and IRF-7, which ultimately create pathophysiological conditions in the lungs [150]. Further, we have discussed these factors in greater detail in the molecular signaling part. 6 Molecular signaling involved in the development of pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection SARS-CoV-2 S protein is primed by cellular serine protease TMPRSS2 and invades host cells using ACE2 receptors (Figure 2) [103]. S proteins are a trimeric class of proteins with two subunits, namely S1 and S2. S1 facilitates the attachment, and S2 is responsible for the fusion of viral protein to the host receptor [151]. S1 and S2 together have 22 N-glycosylation sites (presence of 14–16 glycans) and four O-glycosylation sites, and these sites are primarily responsible for host priming, antibody recognition, steric hindrance, innate and adaptive responses [152]. S1 subunit contains two domains N-terminal domain (NTD) and the C-terminal domain, the RBD. RBD contains highly sialylated glycans at N234 and N282, which determine viral attachment with ACE2 host receptors [153]. O-glycans are suggested to form a mucin-like domain known to shield the virus from immune invasion [154].Figure 2 Illustration of molecular signaling involved in SARS-CoV-2 infection. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is detected via ACE2 with the help of TMPRSS2 protease and initiates phagocytosis into the cell. TLRs, RLRs, and cGAS detect viral RNA in the endosomal and cytosolic compartments. TLR7/8 activates type 1 Interferon genes (IFN α/β) via IRF3 and IRF7 dimerization. The RLRs cytosolic receptors detect dsRNA, which is converted from ssRNA by the action of RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) after hijacking the host ribosomal machinery. Further, RLRs trigger NF-κB as well as IRF3-IRF7 dimer formation after binding of the CARDs domain of RLR to MAVS in mitochondria. The cGAS-STING also detects the dsRNA followed by induction of IRF3-IRF7 dimer formation, which increases IFNα/β gene expression. This IFNα/β activates the cytokines via the JAK-STAT pathway in an autocrine and paracrine manner. Additionally, the same IRFs and NF-κB pathway get activated by the herpes viruses as well as bacteria like E. coli, P.aeruginosa, and Clostridium sp. Figure 2 The pattern recognition family (PRR), which recognizes RNA, includes Toll-like receptors like the TLR 3, 7, and 8. TLR3 discriminately recognizes viruses with double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), either genome or virus replication intermediates, whereas TLR7 and 8 recognize ssRNA [155]. The cytosolic receptors for viral RNA recognition include cyclic GMP-AMP Synthase-Stimulator of interferon genes (cGAS-STING) and family of RIG-I (retinoic acid-inducible gene I)-like receptors (RLRs) and melanoma differentiation factor 5 (MDA5). The RLRs have caspase activation and recruitment domain (CARDs) and inhibitory helicase domain (Figure 2) [156]. After attaching RIG-I to the 5′ PPP end of RNA, the inhibitory helicase domain of CARDs gets removed, and it propagates to the interior of dsRNA after hydrolyzing an ATP molecule [155]. RIG-I is further activated via polyubiquitination and triggers RIG-I receptor tetramerization. RIG-1 then binds with mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS) to set off activation of interferon regulatory factors (IRF) and NF-κB (Figure 2) [155]. NF-κB not only targets regulatory genes of inflammatory cytokines and cell survival, proliferation, and several cell surface proteins [155]. Further, the Janus Kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription protein (JAK-STAT) pathway is activated by IFN-α/β [157]. Activation of the JAK-STAT pathway contributes to inflammation by secreting interferon-stimulated genes (ISG), 2′-5′-oligoadenylate synthetase (OAS), and IRF-7 [157,158]. Moreover, TLR7/8 detects ssRNA in the endosome and recruits a few factors like TRAF, ultimately activating interferon genes (Figure 2) [155]. Even the DNA viruses, like human papillomavirus (HPV), Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV), Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), and Merkel cell polyomavirus induce TLR9 detected type I interferon (IFN) secretion [159]. These viruses also activate several PRR families like RLRs, cGAS-STING, and PYHIN protein culminating in the NF-κB pathway like SARS CoV [160, 161]. Additionally, several bacteria like Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), Escherichia coli (E. coli) (gram-negative), and Clostridium sp. (gram-positive), are detected by TLR4 and TLR1/2/6 respectively [162, 163]. Also, these bacteria activate the same inflammatory cytokines/chemokines pathways [164]. Hence, SARS-CoV-2 possibly triggers inflammation in the lungs via NF-κB and IRFs, while these factors also get activated in several other bacterial and viral infections. 7 Possible and in-use diagnostics to detect SARS-CoV-2 infection: an urgent requirement The first stepping stone to combat is to find effective diagnosis methods. We have provided an overview of various diagnostic techniques that are useful in the case of SARS-CoV-2 detection. 7.1 Molecular biology-based methods Currently, quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) is favored over conventional reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) for the detection of CoV as it is a way more sensitive technique (Table 2) [165]. Additionally, an advanced variant of PCR, the digital droplet PCR (ddPCR), has an edge over qRT-PCR. The ddPCR division of reaction mixture into tens of thousands of nanodroplets improves detection dynamics and accuracy [166].Table 2 Overview of various diagnostic techniques for detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Table 2Diagnostic Tests Sample Target Advantages Limitations Ref. Molecular methods Real time-reverse transcriptase PCR Throat swab Viral genetic material • LoD∗: 3.6–3.9 copies /reaction • Detection probability: 95%. • Requires bulky instrumentation and expensive prerequisites • Approximate assay reaction time: 120 min • Sample-to-result time: almost 4 h [165] [177] Digital droplet PCR Throat swab Viral genetic material • Detection range: 10 to 5 x 104 copies/reaction • Sensitivity: 94% • LoD∗: 10 copies/test • Expensive • Need experts to perform the test [166] CRISPR-Cas12 based method Nasal and oro-pharyngeal swab Viral genetic material • Analytical LoD: 10 copies/ul input • Portable • Approximate sample-to-result assay time: 45 min. • Qualitative output • Expensive • Need expert to perform [167] Serological test ELISA Blood Virus specific Antibody • Sensitivity: 74.3–77.1% • Accuracy: 97.3% • Can identify multiple pathogens at a single time • Primary disease diagnosis is not possible as 30–50% of positive rate observed at 0–10 d.p.o∗∗ • Invasive . [178] IgM-IgG combined detection Blood Virus specific antibody • Sensitivity: 88.6% • Specificity: 90.63% • Minimize the chances of false positive test • Time consuming • Labour intensive • Invasive method [107] Radiological tests Chest CT Lung scan Lungs morphological and patho-physiological changes • Non-invasive • Less labour-intensive process • Identification of ground-glass opacification and consolidation with interlobular septum thickening as well as paving pattern • Not-specific the infection type • Huge and non-portable machines required for examination. • Involves exposure to radiations • Need experts to decipher the scans [179] [180] (∗LoD = Limit of detection, ∗∗d.p.o = days post infection). Also, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) based detection methods can be used for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. Here, simultaneous, reverse transcription with isothermal loop-mediated amplification is carried out, followed by cas-12 screening for RNA extracted from patient samples [167]. Furthermore, CRISPR-based specific high-sensitivity enzymatic reporter unlocking (SHERLOCK) method, combined with isothermal loop-mediated amplification [168], can be a promising SARS-CoV-2 detection technique [169]. It includes cas-12/cas-13 mediated detection via fluorescence and colorimetric readouts (Table 2) [170]. However, CRISPR based SHERLOCK technology developed for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 remains to be verified and tested using clinical samples. 7.2 Serological test Also, with rapid IgG/IgM detection through immunoassay, Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) can be used as a detection method of SARS-CoV-2 infection (Table 2) [107, 171, 172]. The nucleocapsid and spike protein-based ELISA can be used for SARS-CoV-2 detection [40]. 7.3 Chest computed axial tomography (CT) and clinical methods Being a non-invasive, time saving, and less labor-intensive process, chest CT is the most favored diagnostic method [173]. Also, liver function tests could indicate SARS-CoV-2 infection as altered liver function is observed in COVID-19 patients [174]. This includes changed levels of different liver enzymes, a predominance of monocytes in sputum, high level of activated prothrombin, bilirubin, troponin, decrease in pro-albumin, and albumin [175, 176]. By balancing the pros and cons of the methods, more economical and optimal options can be obtained. 8 Drugs and vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 Researchers and pharma industries are working relentlessly for the development of new drugs and vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Further, considering the urgency and time taken to develop new drugs or vaccines, different regulatory bodies have relaxed the norms for development and trials [181]. WHO has also launched a "Solidarity" clinical trial for COVID-19 treatments, to reduce the time taken by randomized clinical trials by 80% [182]. Moreover, several studies are going on for repurposing of the existing drugs against COVID-19, including the Solidarity trial, which involves antiviral drugs like Remdesivir, Lopinavir, Ritonavir, anti-malarial drugs like Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine and drugs used in the treatment of multiple sclerosis, i.e., IFNβ-1a [183]. Furthermore, medications like Baricitinib [184], Galidesivir [185, 186], Ribavirin [187, 188], Azithromycin, a common antibiotic [189] are some of the drugs which are repurposed for the COVID-19 treatment. With some studies supporting the effectiveness of these drugs and some disagreeing with it, these drugs need to be used cautiously and subjected to detailed research. Preventing a disease is always better than treating it. Different companies and research groups have already taken the initiative to develop vaccines against COVID-19. Moreover, they are in various development phases, from preclinical stages to clinical trials; some of the promising vaccines already in the clinical phase are listed in Table 3. Further, about 150 vaccine candidates are in different stages of pre-clinical phase [190].Table 3 Vaccine candidates from different organizations, which are in various phases of clinical trials. Table 3Type Organization Constituents Phase of develop-ment Whole Virus Vaccines Wuhan Institute of Biological Products/Sinopharm Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 3 Beijing Institute of Biological Products/Sinopharm Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 3 Sinovac Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 + alum 3 Institute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 2 Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems, Rep of Kazakhstan Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 1/2 Bharat Biotech Whole virion inactivated 1/2 Nucleic acid vaccines BioNTech/Fosun Pharma/Pfizer 3 LNP-mRNAs 3 Inovio Pharmaceuticals/International Vaccine Institute DNA plasmid vaccine with electroporation 1/2 Moderna/NIAID LNP encapsulated mRNA 1 Genexine Consortium DNA Vaccine (GX-19) 1/2 Cadila Healthcare Limited DNA plasmid vaccine 1/2 Osaka University/AnGes/Takara Bio DNA plasmid vaccine + Adjuvant 1/2 Imperial College London LNP-nCoVsaRNA 1 Curevac mRNA 2 People's Liberation Army (PLA) Academy of Military Sciences/Walvax Biotech mRNA 1 Arcturus/Duke-NUS mRNA 1/2 Non-replicating viral vector University of Oxford/AstraZeneca ChAdOx1-S 3 CanSino Biological Inc./Beijing Institute of Biotechnology Adenovirus Type 5 Vector 2 Gamaleya Research Institute Adeno-based 3 Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies Ad26COVS1 3 ReiThera/LEUKOCARE/Univercells Replication defective Simian Adenovirus (GRAd) encoding S 1 Institute of Biotechnology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, PLA of China Ad5-nCoV 1 Replicating viral vector Institute Pasteur/Themis/Univ. of Pittsburg CVR/Merck Sharp & Dohme Measles-vector based 1 Beijing Wantai Biological Pharmacy/Xiamen University Intranasal flu-based-RBD 1 Protein Subunit Novavax Full length recombinant SARS CoV-2 glycoprotein nanoparticle vaccine adjuvanted with Matrix M 2b Clover Biopharmaceuticals Inc./GSK/Dynavax Native like Trimeric subunit Spike Protein vaccine 1 Anhui Zhifei Longcom Biopharmaceutical/Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Adjuvanted recombinant protein (RBD Dimer) 2 Vaxine Pty Ltd/Medytox Recombinant S protein with Advax™ adjuvant 1 University of Queensland/CSL/Seqirus Molecular clamp stabilized Spike protein with MF59 adjuvant 1 Medigen Vaccine Biologics Corporation/NIAID/Dynavax S–2P protein + CpG 1018 1 Instituto Finlay de Vacunas, Cuba RBD + Adjuvant 1 FBRI SRC VB VECTOR, Rospotrebnadzor, Koltsovo Peptide 1 West China Hospital, Sichuan University RBD (baculovirus production expressed in Sf9 cells) 1 University Hospital Tuebingen SARS-CoV-2 HLA-DR peptides 1 COVAXX S1-RBD-protein 1 Sanofi Pasteur/GSK S protein (baculovirus production) 2 Kentucky Bioprocessing, Inc RBD based 2 VLP Medicago Inc./Université Laval Plant-derived VLP 1 (Adapted from- WHO Draft landscape of COVID-19 candidate vaccines – 22nd Sept 2020, with modifications). 9 Future directions in COVID-19 research The previous epidemics like plague, smallpox, cholera, ebola, SARS, and many others have extended the horizon of human knowledge on pathogenic infectious diseases and compelled us to acquire new weapons for fighting and eradicate these. The current COVID-19 pandemic needs to be addressed rapidly but with patience. Moreover, in the fight against this deadly disease, past experiences and acquired knowledge about SARS-CoV-2 to date will help shape the future of diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Diagnosis or prognosis is the gateway to fighting any disease; the degree of success largely depends on the correct and on-time diagnosis. Various molecular, biophysical, immunological, and biochemical diagnostic methods are used for the detection of the SARS-CoV-2 infection [170, 191]. Moreover, qRT-PCR is the most trusted and immune or antibody-based detection is useful for large scale screening [165]. Additionally, a CT scan is more effective in predicting disease severity [173]. One of the crucial aspects to be taken care of during the treatment of COVID-19 is the associated comorbidities. As people suffering from heart diseases, hypertension, and diabetes may be negatively impacted by ACEIs and ARB inhibitors for COVID-19 treatment. Furthermore, drugs like chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, remdesivir, and tocilizumab recommended for SARS-CoV-2 infection, can cause irregularities in the arteries, kidney, liver, and nervous system [192]. Hence people, who have one or more comorbidities or have immunosuppressed conditions should be treated with caution, else can cause more fatality [193]. In the current situation, drug repurposing is one of the safest options to be considered and implemented to treat the pandemic. Moreover, as these drugs are short term majors, new drugs and vaccines need to be developed for avoiding future consequences. However, the standard development process should be followed with different vaccines as a better alternative or as a backup if the current one is entirely or partially ineffective. For the time being, as an alternative to vaccines or nonspecific drugs, plasma infusion therapy can be used as in other diseases [194]. Also, in this respect, plants can serve as sources of various antiviral substances like plant lectins, which are proven to be effective against Human Immunodeficiency Virus [195]. Various in-silico studies have suggested that plants' active compounds such as withaferin A, withanolide D, quercetin, epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), and hypericin have the potential to inhibit the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infection [196, 197]. The effect of withanone on TMPRSS2 expression in MCF7 cells is examined and found to remarkably downregulated TMPRSS2 mRNA in treated cells. This predicts the dual action of withanone to block SARS-CoV-2 entry into the host cells [192]. Interestingly, EGCG is under phase-2 clinical trial for COVID-19 disease [198]. Also, as these viruses have a zoonotic origin, consumption of meat from close relative animals should be avoided. The government should take measures to prevent selling multiple meat varieties together to minimize the chances of cross-species virus transmission. Additionally, the viruses that can be virulent and causes such an epidemic needs to be studied in detail to avoid this kind of devastating situation in the future. 10 Conclusion and limitations SARS-CoV-2 has an immense potential to infect millions across the globe. The virus can undergo mutations in several of its proteins, like the S protein, N protein, PLpro, and ORF3a, making it more or less suitable or virulent to humans. Additionally, many computational and phylogenetic analyses have been done to explain the mutation in these proteins and their relativity to various human pathogenic viruses. This, in turn, could shed light on the virus's ability to bind to host surfaces, manipulate host cell functions, etc. However, in vitro and in vivo experimental studies establishing these facts remain to be conducted. Numerous clinical reports suggest the association of various comorbidities like diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, and related immunocompromised situations to COVID-19. However, no particular treatment against COVID-19 is available, keeping in view the patient's comorbid condition. Certain pathophysiological changes in the lungs and the alterations at the cellular and molecular level post-SARS-CoV-2 infection are also reported. A clear distinction of these pathologies exclusive to COVID-19 does not exist; most of these pathologies are similar to those induced by viruses like SARS or MERS. Furthermore, experimental analysis corroborating the speculations and findings of virus-mediated host cell responses initiated by signaling molecules, like NF-κB, IRFs remains a subject of investigation. Finally, a continuous upgrade in the diagnostic system is necessary for better diagnosis and prognosis of the disease to reduce the rate of mortality. Rigorous research regarding SARS-CoV-2 induced COVID-19 is an urgent need of the hour. Conclusively, addressing the above limitations requires prior information on various aspects of COVID-19, covered in our review article. Our review will help the scientific community by providing necessary information about different aspects of the current pandemic on a single platter. Declarations Author contribution statement All authors listed have significantly contributed to the development and the writing of this article. Funding statement This work was supported by 10.13039/501100001332 Council for Scientific and Industrial Research grant no 37(1693)/17/EMR-II, Department of Science and Technology as Ramanujan fellowship grant no. SB/S2/RJN-132/20/5. We are thankful to The Ministry of Human Resource, Department of Biotechnology, University Grants Commission, and DST-inspire for fellowship to Shweta Jakhmola, Omkar Indari, Budhadev Baral and Nidhi Varshney respectively and CSIR for a scholarship to Charu Sonkar, Dharmendra Kashyap, and Annu Rani in the form of research stipend. Data availability statement Data included in article. Competing interest statement The authors declare no conflict of interest. Additional information No additional information is available for this paper. Acknowledgements We appreciate our lab colleagues for insightful discussions and advice. We gratefully acknowledge the Indian Institute of Technology Indore for providing facilities and support. ==== Refs References 1 Siddell S. Wege H. ter Meulen V. The structure and replication of coronaviruses Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology 1982 Springer Berlin, Heidelberg 131 163 2 Tyrrell D.A.J. Almeida J.D. Berry D.M. Cunningham C.H. Hamre D. Hofstad M.S. Mallucci L. McIntosh K. Coronaviruses Nature 220 1968 650 3 Cui J. Li F. Shi Z.-L. Origin and evolution of pathogenic coronaviruses Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17 2018 181 192 4 Hulswit R.J.G. de Haan C.A.M. Bosch B.-J. Coronavirus spike protein and tropism changes Adv. Virus Res. 96 2016 29 57 27712627 5 Cavanagh D. Coronaviruses in poultry and other birds Avian Pathol. 34 2005 439 448 16537157 6 Miłek J. Blicharz-Domańska K. Coronaviruses in avian species - review with focus on epidemiology and diagnosis in wild birds J. Vet. Res. 62 2018 249 255 30584600 7 Tyrrell D.A. Bynoe M.L. Cultivation of viruses from a high proportion of patients with colds Lancet 1 1966 76 77 4158999 8 de Groot R.J. Baker S.C. Baric R.S. Brown C.S. Drosten C. Enjuanes L. Fouchier R.A.M. Galiano M. Gorbalenya A.E. Memish Z.A. Perlman S. Poon L.L.M. Snijder E.J. Stephens G.M. Woo P.C.Y. Zaki A.M. Zambon M. Ziebuhr J. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV): announcement of the Coronavirus Study Group J. Virol. 87 2013 7790 7792 23678167 9 Mesel-Lemoine M. Millet J. Vidalain P.-O. Law H. Vabret A. Lorin V. Escriou N. Albert M.L. Nal B. Tangy F. A human coronavirus responsible for the common cold massively kills dendritic cells but not monocytes J. Virol. 86 2012 7577 7587 22553325 10 Aldridge R.W. Lewer D. Beale S. Johnson A.M. Zambon M. Hayward A.C. Fragaszy E. 1Flu Watch Group Seasonality and immunity to laboratory-confirmed seasonal coronaviruses (HCoV-NL63, HCoV-OC43, and HCoV-229E): results from the Flu Watch cohort study Wellcome Open Res. 5 2020 52 11 Su S. Wong G. Shi W. Liu J. Lai A.C.K. Zhou J. Liu W. Bi Y. Gao G.F. Epidemiology, genetic recombination, and pathogenesis of coronaviruses Trends Microbiol. 24 2016 490 502 27012512 12 SARS Frequently Asked Questions 2019 CDC https://www.cdc.gov/sars/about/faq.html (accessed April 21, 2020) 13 Weiss S.R. Navas-Martin S. Coronavirus pathogenesis and the emerging pathogen severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 69 2005 635 664 16339739 14 Cheng V.C.C. Lau S.K.P. Woo P.C.Y. Yuen K.Y. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus as an agent of emerging and reemerging infection Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 20 2007 660 694 17934078 15 Wu K. Peng G. Wilken M. Geraghty R.J. Li F. Mechanisms of host receptor adaptation by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus J. Biol. Chem. 287 2012 8904 8911 22291007 16 Jeffers S.A. Tusell S.M. Gillim-Ross L. Hemmila E.M. Achenbach J.E. Babcock G.J. Thomas W.D. Thackray L.B. Young M.D. Mason R.J. Ambrosino D.M. Wentworth D.E. DeMartini J.C. Holmes K.V. CD209L (L-SIGN) is a receptor for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101 2004 15748 15753 15496474 17 Zaki A.M. van Boheemen S. Bestebroer T.M. Osterhaus A.D.M.E. Fouchier R.A.M. Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi arabia N. Engl. J. Med. 367 2012 1814 1820 23075143 18 Ramadan N. Shaib H. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV): a review Germs 9 2019 35 42 31119115 19 WHO MERS Summary Report July 2019 Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/326126/WHO-MERS-RA-19.1-eng.pdf?ua=1 20 Banerjee A. Kulcsar K. Misra V. Frieman M. Mossman K. Bats and coronaviruses Viruses 11 2019 41 21 Raj V.S. Mou H. Smits S.L. Dekkers D.H.W. Müller M.A. Dijkman R. Muth D. Demmers J.A.A. Zaki A. Fouchier R.A.M. Thiel V. Drosten C. Rottier P.J.M. Osterhaus A.D.M.E. Bosch B.J. Haagmans B.L. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 is a functional receptor for the emerging human coronavirus-EMC Nature 495 2013 251 254 23486063 22 Lee P.-I. Hsueh P.-R. Emerging threats from zoonotic coronaviruses-from SARS and MERS to 2019-nCoV J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 53 2020 365 367 32035811 23 Excler J.-L. Delvecchio C.J. Wiley R.E. Williams M. Yoon I.-K. Modjarrad K. Boujelal M. Moorthy V.S. Hersi A.S. Kim J.H. Toward Developing a Preventive MERS-CoV Vaccine—Report from a Workshop Organized by the Saudi Arabia Ministry of Health and the International Vaccine Institute, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, November 14–15, 2015 - Volume 22, Number 8—August 2016 - Emerging Infectious Diseases Journal - CDC 2020 24 Conzade R. Grant R. Malik M.R. Elkholy A. Elhakim M. Samhouri D. Ben Embarek P.K. Van Kerkhove M.D. Reported direct and indirect contact with dromedary camels among laboratory-confirmed MERS-CoV cases Viruses 10 2018 425 25 WHO Announces COVID-19 Outbreak a Pandemic 2020 Available online: http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/health-emergencies/coronavirus-covid-19/news/news/2020/3/who-announces-covid-19-outbreak-a-pandemic 26 Jakhmola S. Indari O. Chatterjee S. Jha H.C. SARS-CoV-2 an underestimated pathogen of the nervous system SN Compreh. Clin. Med. 2020 27 Schaefer I.-M. Padera R.F. Solomon I.H. Kanjilal S. Hammer M.M. Hornick J.L. Sholl L.M. In situ detection of SARS-CoV-2 in lungs and airways of patients with COVID-19 Mod. Pathol. 2020 1 11 31659277 28 Mao R. Qiu Y. He J.-S. Tan J.-Y. Li X.-H. Liang J. Shen J. Zhu L.-R. Chen Y. Iacucci M. Ng S.C. Ghosh S. Chen M.-H. Manifestations and prognosis of gastrointestinal and liver involvement in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 5 2020 667 678 32405603 29 Ye Z.-W. Yuan S. Yuen K.-S. Fung S.-Y. Chan C.-P. Jin D.-Y. Zoonotic origins of human coronaviruses Int. J. Biol. Sci. 16 2020 1686 1697 32226286 30 Liu S. Chan T.-C. Chu Y.-T. Wu J.T.-S. Geng X. Zhao N. Cheng W. Chen E. King C.-C. Comparative epidemiology of human infections with Middle East respiratory syndrome and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronaviruses among healthcare personnel PloS One 11 2016 e0149988 31 CDC Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) 2020 Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/groups-at-higher-risk.html 32 Hu B. Ge X. Wang L.-F. Shi Z. Bat origin of human coronaviruses Virol. J. 12 2015 221 26689940 33 Li X. Zai J. Zhao Q. Nie Q. Li Y. Foley B.T. Chaillon A. Evolutionary history, potential intermediate animal host, and cross-species analyses of SARS-CoV-2 J. Med. Virol. 92 2020 602 611 32104911 34 Hu B. Ge X. Wang L.-F. Shi Z. Bat origin of human coronaviruses Virol. J. 12 2015 221 26689940 35 Lu G. Wang Q. Gao G.F. Bat-to-human: spike features determining “host jump” of coronaviruses SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and beyond Trends Microbiol. 23 2015 468 478 26206723 36 Zhou P. Yang X.-L. Wang X.-G. Hu B. Zhang L. Zhang W. Si H.-R. Zhu Y. Li B. Huang C.-L. Chen H.-D. Chen J. Luo Y. Guo H. Jiang R.-D. Liu M.-Q. Chen Y. Shen X.-R. Wang X. Zheng X.-S. Zhao K. Chen Q.-J. Deng F. Liu L.-L. Yan B. Zhan F.-X. Wang Y.-Y. Xiao G.-F. Shi Z.-L. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin Nature 579 2020 270 273 32015507 37 Wuhan City Health Committee (WCHC) Wuhan Municipal Health and Health Commission's Briefing on the Current Pneumonia Epidemic Situation in Our City 2019 [updated 31 December 2019, 14 January 2020]. Available online: http://wjw.wuhan.gov.cn/front/web/showDetail/2019123108989 (accessed on May 11, 2020) 38 Zhang T. Wu Q. Zhang Z. Probable pangolin origin of SARS-CoV-2 associated with the COVID-19 outbreak Curr. Biol. 30 2020 1346 1351.e2 32197085 39 Jaimes J.A. André N.M. Chappie J.S. Millet J.K. Whittaker G.R. Phylogenetic analysis and structural modeling of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein reveals an evolutionary distinct and proteolytically sensitive activation loop J. Mol. Biol. 432 2020 3309 3325 32320687 40 Flores-Alanis A. Sandner-Miranda L. Delgado G. Cravioto A. Morales-Espinosa R. The receptor binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is the result of an ancestral recombination between the bat-CoV RaTG13 and the pangolin-CoV MP789 BMC Res. Notes 13 2020 1 6 31898526 41 Liu P. Chen W. Chen J.-P. Viral metagenomics revealed sendai virus and coronavirus infection of malayan pangolins (Manis javanica) Viruses 11 2019 979 42 Graham R.L. Baric R.S. Recombination, reservoirs, and the modular spike: mechanisms of coronavirus cross-species transmission J. Virol. 84 2010 3134 3146 19906932 43 Vijgen L. Keyaerts E. Moës E. Thoelen I. Wollants E. Lemey P. Vandamme A.-M. Van Ranst M. Complete genomic sequence of human coronavirus OC43: molecular clock analysis suggests a relatively recent zoonotic coronavirus transmission event J. Virol. 79 2005 1595 1604 15650185 44 Moratelli R. Calisher C.H. Bats and zoonotic viruses: can we confidently link bats with emerging deadly viruses? Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 110 2015 1 22 45 Allocati N. Petrucci A.G. Di Giovanni P. Masulli M. Di Ilio C. De Laurenzi V. Bat–man disease transmission: zoonotic pathogens from wildlife reservoirs to human populations Cell Death Disc. 2 2016 46 Sánchez C.M. Gebauer F. Suñé C. Mendez A. Dopazo J. Enjuanes L. Genetic evolution and tropism of transmissible gastroenteritis coronaviruses Virology 190 1992 92 105 1326823 47 Menachery V.D. Graham R.L. Baric R.S. Jumping species-a mechanism for coronavirus persistence and survival Curr. Opin. Virol. 23 2017 1 7 28214731 48 Duffy S. Why are RNA virus mutation rates so damn high? PLoS Biol. 16 2018 e3000003 49 Huang C. Wang Y. Li X. Ren L. Zhao J. Hu Y. Zhang L. Fan G. Xu J. Gu X. Cheng Z. Yu T. Xia J. Wei Y. Wu W. Xie X. Yin W. Li H. Liu M. Xiao Y. Gao H. Guo L. Xie J. Wang G. Jiang R. Gao Z. Jin Q. Wang J. Cao B. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China Lancet 395 2020 497 506 31986264 50 Lai M.M.C. Cavanagh D. The Molecular Biology of Coronaviruses 1997 Elsevier 1 100 51 Lau S.K.P. Lee P. Tsang A.K.L. Yip C.C.Y. Tse H. Lee R.A. So L.-Y. Lau Y.-L. Chan K.-H. Woo P.C.Y. Yuen K.-Y. Molecular epidemiology of human coronavirus OC43 reveals evolution of different genotypes over time and recent emergence of a novel genotype due to natural recombination J. Virol. 85 2011 11325 11337 21849456 52 Wrapp D. Wang N. Corbett K.S. Goldsmith J.A. Hsieh C.-L. Abiona O. Graham B.S. McLellan J.S. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation Science 367 2020 1260 1263 32075877 53 Sanjuán R. Domingo-Calap P. Mechanisms of viral mutation Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 73 2016 4433 4448 27392606 54 Lauring A.S. Andino R. Quasispecies theory and the behavior of RNA viruses PLoS Pathog. 6 2010 e1001005 55 Bajaj A. Purohit H.J. Understanding SARS-CoV-2: genetic diversity, transmission and cure in human Indian J. Microbiol. 60 2020 1 4 32089568 56 Sheikh J.A. Singh J. Singh H. Jamal S. Khubaib M. Kohli S. Dobrindt U. Rahman S.A. Ehtesham N.Z. Hasnain S.E. Emerging genetic diversity among clinical isolates of SARS-CoV-2: lessons for today Infect. Genet. Evol. 84 2020 104330 32335334 57 Korber B. Fischer W.M. Gnanakaran S. Yoon H. Theiler J. Abfalterer W. Hengartner N. Giorgi E.E. Bhattacharya T. Foley B. Hastie K.M. Parker M.D. Partridge D.G. Evans C.M. Freeman T.M. de Silva T.I. Tracking changes in SARS-CoV-2 spike: evidence that D614G increases infectivity of the COVID-19 virus Cell 182 2020 812 827.e19 32697968 58 Chan J.F.-W. Kok K.-H. Zhu Z. Chu H. To K.K.-W. Yuan S. Yuen K.-Y. Genomic characterization of the 2019 novel human-pathogenic coronavirus isolated from a patient with atypical pneumonia after visiting Wuhan Emerg. Microb. Infect. 9 2020 221 236 59 Wu F. Zhao S. Yu B. Chen Y.-M. Wang W. Song Z.-G. Hu Y. Tao Z.-W. Tian J.-H. Pei Y.-Y. Yuan M.-L. Zhang Y.-L. Dai F.-H. Liu Y. Wang Q.-M. Zheng J.-J. Xu L. Holmes E.C. Zhang Y.-Z. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China Nature 579 2020 265 269 32015508 60 Singh K.K. Chaubey G. Chen J.Y. Suravajhala P. Decoding SARS-CoV-2 hijacking of host mitochondria in COVID-19 pathogenesis Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 319 2020 C258 C267 32510973 61 Kim D.-K. Knapp J.J. Kuang D. Chawla A. Cassonnet P. Lee H. Sheykhkarimli D. Samavarchi-Tehrani P. Abdouni H. Rayhan A. Li R. Pogoutse O. Coyaud É. van der Werf S. Demeret C. Gingras A.-C. Taipale M. Raught B. Jacob Y. Roth F.P. A comprehensive, flexible collection of SARS-CoV-2 coding regions G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics 10 2020 3399 3402 32763951 62 Singh H. Singh J. Khubaib M. Jamal S. Sheikh J.A. Kohli S. Hasnain S.E. Rahman S.A. Mapping the genomic landscape & diversity of COVID-19 based on >3950 clinical isolates of SARS-CoV-2: likely origin & transmission dynamics of isolates sequenced in India Indian J. Med. Res. 151 2020 474 478 32474554 63 Koyama T. Platt D. Parida L. Variant analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes Bull. World Health Organ. 98 2020 495 504 32742035 64 Phan T. Genetic diversity and evolution of SARS-CoV-2 Infect. Genet. Evol. 81 2020 104260 32092483 65 Sakamoto S. Putalun W. Vimolmangkang S. Phoolcharoen W. Shoyama Y. Tanaka H. Morimoto S. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the quantitative/qualitative analysis of plant secondary metabolites J. Nat. Med. 72 2018 32 42 29164507 66 Li Q. Wu J. Nie J. Zhang L. Hao H. Liu S. Zhao C. Zhang Q. Liu H. Nie L. Qin H. Wang M. Lu Q. Li X. Sun Q. Liu J. Zhang L. Li X. Huang W. Wang Y. The impact of mutations in SARS-CoV-2 spike on viral infectivity and antigenicity Cell 182 2020 1284 1294.e9 32730807 67 Kim J.-S. Jang J.-H. Kim J.-M. Chung Y.-S. Yoo C.-K. Han M.-G. Genome-wide identification and characterization of point mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 genome Osong Publ. Health Res. Perspect. 11 2020 101 111 68 Dutta N.K. Mazumdar K. Gordy J.T. The nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV-2: a target for vaccine development J. Virol. 94 2020 e00647-20 32546606 69 Maitra A. Sarkar M.C. Raheja H. Biswas N.K. Chakraborti S. Singh A.K. Ghosh S. Sarkar S. Patra S. Mondal R.K. Ghosh T. Chatterjee A. Banu H. Majumdar A. Chinnaswamy S. Srinivasan N. Dutta S. Das S. Mutations in SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA identified in Eastern India: possible implications for the ongoing outbreak in India and impact on viral structure and host susceptibility J. Biosci. 45 2020 76 32515358 70 Castillo A.E. Parra B. Tapia P. Acevedo A. Lagos J. Andrade W. Arata L. Leal G. Barra G. Tambley C. Tognarelli J. Bustos P. Ulloa S. Fasce R. Fernández J. Phylogenetic analysis of the first four SARS-CoV-2 cases in Chile J. Med. Virol. 92 2020 1562 1566 32222995 71 Coppée F. Lechien J.R. Declèves A.-E. Tafforeau L. Saussez S. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2: virus mutations in specific European populations New Microb. New Infect. 36 2020 100696 72 Wang R. Hozumi Y. Yin C. Wei G.-W. Decoding SARS-CoV-2 transmission and evolution and ramifications for COVID-19 diagnosis, vaccine, and medicine J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2020 acs.jcim.0c00501 73 Barretto N. Jukneliene D. Ratia K. Chen Z. Mesecar A.D. Baker S.C. The papain-like protease of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus has deubiquitinating activity J. Virol. 79 2005 15189 15198 16306590 74 Ren Y. Shu T. Wu D. Mu J. Wang C. Huang M. Han Y. Zhang X.-Y. Zhou W. Qiu Y. Zhou X. The ORF3a protein of SARS-CoV-2 induces apoptosis in cells Cell. Mol. Immunol. 17 2020 881 883 32555321 75 Kandeil A. Mostafa A. El-Shesheny R. Shehata M. Roshdy W.H. Ahmed S.S. Gomaa M. El Taweel A. Kayed A.E. Mahmoud S.H. Moatasim Y. Kutkat O. Kamel M.N. Mahrous N. El Sayes M. El Guindy N.M. Naguib A. Ali M.A. Coding-complete genome sequences of two SARS-CoV-2 isolates from Egypt Microbiol Resour. Announc. 9 2020 e00489-20 32467284 76 Saha P. Banerjee A.K. Tripathi P.P. Srivastava A.K. Ray U. A virus that has gone viral: amino acid mutation in S protein of Indian isolate of Coronavirus COVID-19 might impact receptor binding, and thus, infectivity Biosci. Rep. 40 2020 BSR20201312 77 Jakhmola S. Indari O. Baral B. Kashyap D. Varshney N. Das A. Chatterjee S. Jha H.C. Comorbidity assessment is essential during COVID-19 treatment Front. Physiol. 11 2020 78 Hypertension available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hypertension 79 Diabetes available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/diabetes 80 Maddaloni E. Buzzetti R. Covid-19 and diabetes mellitus: unveiling the interaction of two pandemics Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 2020 e33213321 81 Mills K.T. Bundy J.D. Kelly T.N. Reed J.E. Kearney P.M. Reynolds K. Chen J. He J. Global disparities of hypertension prevalence and control: a systematic analysis of population-based studies from 90 countries Circulation 134 2016 441 450 27502908 82 Schiffrin E.L. Flack J.M. Ito S. Muntner P. Webb R.C. Hypertension and COVID-19 Am. J. Hypertens. 33 2020 373 374 32251498 83 You W.-P. Henneberg M. Type 1 diabetes prevalence increasing globally and regionally: the role of natural selection and life expectancy at birth BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 4 2016 e000161 84 Govindarajan G. Sowers J.R. Stump C.S. Hypertension and diabetes mellitus Radcliffe Cardiol. 2 2006 1 7 85 Petrie J.R. Guzik T.J. Touyz R.M. Diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease: clinical insights and vascular mechanisms Can. J. Cardiol. 34 2018 575 584 29459239 86 Wang B. Li R. Lu Z. Huang Y. Does comorbidity increase the risk of patients with COVID-19: evidence from meta-analysis Aging 12 2020 6049 6057 32267833 87 Yang J. Zheng Y. Gou X. Pu K. Chen Z. Guo Q. Ji R. Wang H. Wang Y. Zhou Y. Prevalence of comorbidities and its effects in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis Int. J. Infect. Dis. 94 2020 91 95 32173574 88 Singh A.K. Gupta R. Misra A. Comorbidities in COVID-19: outcomes in hypertensive cohort and controversies with renin angiotensin system blockers Diabetes Metab. Syndr. 14 2020 283 287 32283499 89 Guan W.-J. Liang W.-H. Zhao Y. Liang H.-R. Chen Z.-S. Li Y.-M. Liu X.-Q. Chen R.-C. Tang C.-L. Wang T. Ou C.-Q. Li L. Chen P.-Y. Sang L. Wang W. Li J.-F. Li C.-C. Ou L.-M. Cheng B. Xiong S. Ni Z.-Y. Xiang J. Hu Y. Liu L. Shan H. Lei C.-L. Peng Y.-X. Wei L. Liu Y. Hu Y.-H. Peng P. Wang J.-M. Liu J.-Y. Chen Z. Li G. Zheng Z.-J. Qiu S.-Q. Luo J. Ye C.-J. Zhu S.-Y. Cheng L.-L. Ye F. Li S.-Y. Zheng J.-P. Zhang N.-F. Zhong N.-S. He J.-X. China medical treatment expert group for COVID-19, comorbidity and its impact on 1590 patients with COVID-19 in China: a nationwide analysis Eur. Respir. J. 55 2020 200547 90 Zhang J.-J. Dong X. Cao Y.-Y. Yuan Y.-D. Yang Y.-B. Yan Y.-Q. Akdis C.A. Gao Y.-D. Clinical characteristics of 140 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan, China Allergy 75 2020 1730 1741 32077115 91 Wu C. Chen X. Cai Y. ’an Xia J. Zhou X. Xu S. Huang H. Zhang L. Zhou X. Du C. Zhang Y. Song J. Wang S. Chao Y. Yang Z. Xu J. Zhou X. Chen D. Xiong W. Xu L. Zhou F. Jiang J. Bai C. Zheng J. Song Y. Risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in wuhan, China JAMA Intern. Med. 180 2020 934 943 32167524 92 Yan Y. Yang Y. Wang F. Ren H. Zhang S. Shi X. Yu X. Dong K. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with severe covid-19 with diabetes BMJ Open Diab. Res. Care 8 2020 e001343 93 Apicella M. Campopiano M.C. Mantuano M. Mazoni L. Coppelli A. Del Prato S. COVID-19 in people with diabetes: understanding the reasons for worse outcomes Lancet Diab.Endocrinol. 8 2020 782 792 94 Rubino F. Amiel S.A. Zimmet P. Alberti G. Bornstein S. Eckel R.H. Mingrone G. Boehm B. Cooper M.E. Chai Z. Del Prato S. Ji L. Hopkins D. Herman W.H. Khunti K. Mbanya J.-C. Renard E. New-onset diabetes in covid-19 N. Engl. J. Med. 383 2020 789 790 32530585 95 Ormazabal V. Nair S. Elfeky O. Aguayo C. Salomon C. Zuñiga F.A. Association between insulin resistance and the development of cardiovascular disease Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 17 2018 122 30170598 96 Burrell L.M. Johnston C.I. Tikellis C. Cooper M.E. ACE2, a new regulator of the renin-angiotensin system Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 15 2004 166 169 15109615 97 Yagil Y. Yagil C. Hypothesis: ACE2 modulates blood pressure in the mammalian organism Hypertension 41 2003 871 873 12654716 98 Gurley S.B. Allred A. Le T.H. Griffiths R. Mao L. Philip N. Haystead T.A. Donoghue M. Breitbart R.E. Acton S.L. Rockman H.A. Coffman T.M. Altered blood pressure responses and normal cardiac phenotype in ACE2-null mice J. Clin. Invest. 116 2006 2218 2225 16878172 99 Tikellis C. Pickering R. Tsorotes D. Du X.-J. Kiriazis H. Nguyen-Huu T.-P. Head G.A. Cooper M.E. Thomas M.C. Interaction of diabetes and ACE2 in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease in experimental diabetes Clin. Sci. . 123 2012 519 529 100 Fang L. Karakiulakis G. Roth M. Are patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus at increased risk for COVID-19 infection? Lancet Respir. Med. 8 2020 e21 32171062 101 Furuhashi M. Moniwa N. Mita T. Fuseya T. Ishimura S. Ohno K. Shibata S. Tanaka M. Watanabe Y. Akasaka H. Ohnishi H. Yoshida H. Takizawa H. Saitoh S. Ura N. Shimamoto K. Miura T. Urinary angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in hypertensive patients may be increased by olmesartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker Am. J. Hypertens. 28 2015 15 21 24842388 102 Ferrario C.M. Jessup J. Chappell M.C. Averill D.B. Brosnihan K.B. Tallant E.A. Diz D.I. Gallagher P.E. Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin II receptor blockers on cardiac angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 Circulation 111 2005 2605 2610 15897343 103 Hoffmann M. Kleine-Weber H. Schroeder S. Krüger N. Herrler T. Erichsen S. Schiergens T.S. Herrler G. Wu N.-H. Nitsche A. Müller M.A. Drosten C. Pöhlmann S. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor Cell 181 2020 271 280.e8 32142651 104 Babapoor-Farrokhran S. Gill D. Walker J. Rasekhi R.T. Bozorgnia B. Amanullah A. Myocardial injury and COVID-19: possible mechanisms Life Sci. 253 2020 117723 32360126 105 Turner A.J. Hiscox J.A. Hooper N.M. ACE2: from vasopeptidase to SARS virus receptor Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 25 2004 291 294 15165741 106 Oudit G.Y. Kassiri Z. Jiang C. Liu P.P. Poutanen S.M. Penninger J.M. Butany J. SARS-coronavirus modulation of myocardial ACE2 expression and inflammation in patients with SARS Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 39 2009 618 625 19453650 107 Li Z. Yi Y. Luo X. Xiong N. Liu Y. Li S. Sun R. Wang Y. Hu B. Chen W. Zhang Y. Wang J. Huang B. Lin Y. Yang J. Cai W. Wang X. Cheng J. Chen Z. Sun K. Pan W. Zhan Z. Chen L. Ye F. Development and clinical application of a rapid IgM-IgG combined antibody test for SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosis J. Med. Virol. 2020 108 Alhogbani T. Acute myocarditis associated with novel Middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus Ann. Saudi Med. 36 2016 78 80 26922692 109 Thygesen K. Alpert J.S. Jaffe A.S. Chaitman B.R. Bax J.J. Morrow D.A. White H.D. The executive group on behalf of the joint European society of cardiology (ESC)/American college of cardiology (ACC)/American heart association (AHA)/World heart federation (WHF) task force for the universal definition of myocardial infarction, fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018) Circulation 138 2018 305 338 30012703 110 Buja L.M. Zehr B. Lelenwa L. Ogechukwu E. Zhao B. Dasgupta A. Barth R.F. Clinicopathological complexity in the application of the universal definition of myocardial infarction Cardiovasc. Pathol. 44 2020 107153 31760238 111 Guo T. Fan Y. Chen M. Wu X. Zhang L. He T. Wang H. Wan J. Wang X. Lu Z. Cardiovascular implications of fatal outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) JAMA Cardiol. 5 2020 811 818 32219356 112 Zheng Y.-Y. Ma Y.-T. Zhang J.-Y. Xie X. COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 17 2020 259 260 32139904 113 Zhu H. Rhee J.-W. Cheng P. Waliany S. Chang A. Witteles R.M. Maecker H. Davis M.M. Nguyen P.K. Wu S.M. Cardiovascular complications in patients with COVID-19: consequences of viral toxicities and host immune response Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 22 2020 32 32318865 114 Huang C. Wang Y. Li X. Ren L. Zhao J. Hu Y. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China Lancet 395 2020 497 506 31986264 115 Guo J. Huang Z. Lin L. Lv J. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and cardiovascular disease: a viewpoint on the potential influence of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers on onset and severity of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection J. Am. Heart Assoc. 9 2020 e016219 116 Ogimi C. Englund J.A. Bradford M.C. Qin X. Boeckh M. Waghmare A. Characteristics and outcomes of coronavirus infection in children: the role of viral factors and an immunocompromised state J. Pediatric Infect. Dis. Soc. 8 2019 21 28 29447395 117 Russell B. Moss C. George G. Santaolalla A. Cope A. Papa S. Van Hemelrijck M. Associations between immune-suppressive and stimulating drugs and novel COVID-19-a systematic review of current evidence Ecancermedical. Sci. 14 2020 1022 118 Gerna G. Campanini G. Rovida F. Percivalle E. Sarasini A. Marchi A. Baldanti F. Genetic variability of human coronavirus OC43-, 229E-, and NL63-like strains and their association with lower respiratory tract infections of hospitalized infants and immunocompromised patients J. Med. Virol. 78 2006 938 949 16721849 119 Wong A.T.Y. Tsang O.T.Y. Wong M.Y.F. Lim W.L. Zheng B.J. Lee S.S. Lai S.T. Yuen K.Y. Choi K.W. Tso E.Y.K. Chau T.N. Tong W.L. Chiu M.C. Yu W.C. PMH SARS Study Group Coronavirus infection in an AIDS patient AIDS 18 2004 829 830 15075525 120 Schaecher S.R. Stabenow J. Oberle C. Schriewer J. Buller R.M. Sagartz J.E. Pekosz A. An immunosuppressed Syrian golden hamster model for SARS-CoV infection Virology 380 2008 312 321 18760437 121 Monti S. Balduzzi S. Delvino P. Bellis E. Quadrelli V.S. Montecucco C. Clinical course of COVID-19 in a series of patients with chronic arthritis treated with immunosuppressive targeted therapies Ann. Rheum. Dis. 79 2020 667 668 32241793 122 Sarzi-Puttini P. Giorgi V. Sirotti S. Marotto D. Ardizzone S. Rizzardini G. Antinori S. Galli M. COVID-19, cytokines and immunosuppression: what can we learn from severe acute respiratory syndrome? Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 38 2020 337 342 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32202240 32202240 123 Duncan M.D. Wilkes D.S. Transplant-related immunosuppression: a review of immunosuppression and pulmonary infections Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2 2005 449 455 16322599 124 López V. Vázquez T. Alonso-Titos J. Cabello M. Alonso A. Beneyto I. Crespo M. Díaz-Corte C. Franco A. González-Roncero F. Gutiérrez E. Guirado L. Jiménez C. Jironda C. Lauzurica R. Llorente S. Mazuecos A. Paul J. Rodríguez-Benot A. Ruiz J.C. Sánchez-Fructuoso A. Sola E. Torregrosa V. Zárraga S. Hernández D. Recommendations on management of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus pandemic (Covid-19) in kidney transplant patients Nefrología (English Edition) 40 2020 265 271 125 D’Antiga L. Coronaviruses and immunosuppressed patients: the facts during the third epidemic Liver Transplant. 26 2020 832 834 126 Guillen E. Pineiro G.J. Revuelta I. Rodriguez D. Bodro M. Moreno A. Campistol J.M. Diekmann F. Ventura-Aguiar P. Case report of COVID-19 in a kidney transplant recipient: does immunosuppression alter the clinical presentation? Am. J. Transplant. 20 2020 1875 1878 32198834 127 Clerkin K.J. Fried J.A. Raikhelkar J. Sayer G. Griffin J.M. Masoumi A. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and cardiovascular disease Circulation 141 2020 1648 1655 32200663 128 Zhu L. Xu X. Ma K. Yang J. Guan H. Chen S. Chen Z. Chen G. Successful recovery of COVID-19 pneumonia in a renal transplant recipient with long-term immunosuppression Am. J. Transplant. 20 2020 1859 1863 32181990 129 Shi H. Han X. Jiang N. Cao Y. Alwalid O. Gu J. Fan Y. Zheng C. Radiological findings from 81 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study Lancet Infect. Dis. 20 2020 425 434 32105637 130 Modes of transmission of virus causing COVID-19: implications for IPC precaution recommendations Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/commentaries/detail/modes-of-transmission-of-virus-causing-covid-19-implications-for-ipc-precaution-recommendation (accessed May 11, 2020) 131 Standard Precautions 2020 Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/oralhealth/infectioncontrol/summary-infection-prevention-practices/standard-precautions.html (accessed May 11, 2020) 132 Kutter J.S. Spronken M.I. Fraaij P.L. Fouchier R.A.M. Herfst S. Transmission routes of respiratory viruses among humans Curr. Opin. Virol. 28 2018 142 151 29452994 133 Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: implications for infection prevention precautions Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/commentaries/detail/transmission-of-sars-cov-2-implications-for-infection-prevention-precautions 2020 134 Ong S.W.X. Tan Y.K. Chia P.Y. Lee T.H. Ng O.T. Wong M.S.Y. Marimuthu K. Air, surface environmental, and personal protective equipment contamination by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) from a symptomatic patient JAMA 323 2020 1610 1612 32129805 135 Deshmukh V. Motwani R. Kumar A. Kumari C. Raza K. Histopathological observations in COVID-19: a systematic review J. Clin. Pathol. 2020 136 Zhang H. Zhou P. Wei Y. Yue H. Wang Y. Hu M. Zhang S. Cao T. Yang C. Li M. Guo G. Chen X. Chen Y. Lei M. Liu H. Zhao J. Peng P. Wang C.-Y. Du R. Histopathologic changes and SARS-CoV-2 immunostaining in the lung of a patient with COVID-19 Ann. Intern. Med. 172 2020 629 632 32163542 137 Bernheim A. Mei X. Huang M. Yang Y. Fayad Z.A. Zhang N. Diao K. Lin B. Zhu X. Li K. Chest CT findings in coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19): relationship to duration of infection Radiology 295 2020 200463 32077789 138 Das K.M. Lee E.Y. Singh R. Enani M.A. Al Dossari K. Van Gorkom K. Larsson S.G. Langer R.D. Follow-up chest radiographic findings in patients with MERS-CoV after recovery Indian J. Radiol. Imag. 27 2017 342 349 139 Tse G.M.-K. To K.-F. Chan P.K.-S. Lo A.W.I. Ng K.-C. Wu A. Lee N. Wong H.-C. Mak S.-M. Chan K.-F. Hui D.S.C. Sung J.J.-Y. Ng H.-K. Pulmonary pathological features in coronavirus associated severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) J. Clin. Pathol. 57 2004 260 265 14990596 140 Cheung O.Y. Chan J.W.M. Ng C.K. Koo C.K. The spectrum of pathological changes in severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) Histopathology 45 2004 119 124 15279629 141 Ye Q. Wang B. Mao J. The pathogenesis and treatment of the `Cytokine Storm’ in COVID-19 J. Infect. 80 2020 607 613 32283152 142 Sun X. Hou T. Cheung E. Iu T.N.-T. Tam V.W.-H. Chu I.M.-T. Tsang M.S.-M. Chan P.K.-S. Lam C.W.-K. Wong C.-K. Anti-inflammatory mechanisms of the novel cytokine interleukin-38 in allergic asthma Cell. Mol. Immunol. 17 2019 631 646 31645649 143 Mahallawi W.H. Khabour O.F. Zhang Q. Makhdoum H.M. Suliman B.A. MERS-CoV infection in humans is associated with a pro-inflammatory Th1 and Th17 cytokine profile Cytokine 104 2018 8 13 29414327 144 Gilles S. Blume C. Wimmer M. Damialis A. Meulenbroek L. Gökkaya M. Bergougnan C. Eisenbart S. Sundell N. Lindh M. Andersson L.-M. Dahl Å. Chaker A. Kolek F. Wagner S. Neumann A.U. Akdis C.A. Garssen J. Westin J. Van’t Land B. Davies D.E. Traidl-Hoffmann C. Pollen exposure weakens innate defense against respiratory viruses Allergy 75 2020 576 587 31512243 145 McErlean P. Greiman A. Favoreto S. Jr. Avila P.C. Viral diversity in asthma Immunol. Allergy Clin. 30 2010 481 495 146 Brake S.J. Barnsley K. Lu W. McAlinden K.D. Eapen M.S. Sohal S.S. Smoking upregulates angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 receptor: a potential adhesion site for novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) J. Clin. Med. Res. 9 2020 841 147 Seys L.J.M. Widagdo W. Verhamme F.M. Kleinjan A. Janssens W. Joos G.F. Bracke K.R. Haagmans B.L. Brusselle G.G. DPP4, the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus receptor, is upregulated in lungs of smokers and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients Clin. Infect. Dis. 66 2018 45 53 29020176 148 Birrell M.A. Wong S. Catley M.C. Belvisi M.G. Impact of tobacco-smoke on key signaling pathways in the innate immune response in lung macrophages J. Cell. Physiol. 214 2008 27 37 17541958 149 Guo X.-Z.J. Thomas P.G. New fronts emerge in the influenza cytokine storm Semin. Immunopathol. 39 2017 541 550 28555383 150 Mogensen T.H. Paludan S.R. Molecular pathways in virus-induced cytokine production Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 65 2001 131 150 11238989 151 Walls A.C. Park Y.-J. Tortorici M.A. Wall A. McGuire A.T. Veesler D. Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein Cell 181 2020 281 292.e6 32155444 152 Andersen K.G. Rambaut A. Lipkin W.I. Holmes E.C. Garry R.F. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 Nat. Med. 26 2020 450 452 32284615 153 Shang J. Wan Y. Liu C. Yount B. Gully K. Yang Y. Auerbach A. Peng G. Baric R. Li F. Structure of mouse coronavirus spike protein complexed with receptor reveals mechanism for viral entry PLoS Pathog. 16 2020 e1008392 154 Tortorici M.A. Walls A.C. Lang Y. Wang C. Li Z. Koerhuis D. Boons G.-J. Bosch B.-J. Rey F.A. de Groot R.J. Veesler D. Structural basis for human coronavirus attachment to sialic acid receptors Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 26 2019 481 489 31160783 155 Schmitz M.L. Kracht M. Saul V.V. The intricate interplay between RNA viruses and NF-κB Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1843 2014 2754 2764 25116307 156 Zhao X. Chu H. Wong B.H.-Y. Chiu M.C. Wang D. Li C. Liu X. Yang D. Poon V.K.-M. Cai J. Chan J.F.-W. To K.K.-W. Zhou J. Yuen K.-Y. Activation of C-type lectin receptor and (RIG)-I-like receptors contributes to proinflammatory response in Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus-infected macrophages J. Infect. Dis. 221 2020 647 659 31562757 157 Barrat F.J. Crow M.K. Ivashkiv L.B. Interferon target-gene expression and epigenomic signatures in health and disease Nat. Immunol. 20 2019 1574 1583 31745335 158 Ivashkiv L.B. Donlin L.T. Regulation of type I interferon responses Nat. Rev. Immunol. 14 2014 36 49 24362405 159 Di Paolo N.C. Recognition of human oncogenic viruses by host pattern-recognition receptors Front. Immunol. 5 2014 353 25101093 160 Ma Z. Ni G. Damania B. Innate sensing of DNA virus genomes Annu. Rev. Virol. 5 2018 341 362 30265633 161 Massa D. Baran M. Bengoechea J.A. Bowie A.G. PYHIN1 regulates pro-inflammatory cytokine induction rather than innate immune DNA sensing in airway epithelial cells J. Biol. Chem. 295 2020 4438 4450 32102850 162 Hou A. Tin M.Q. Tong L. Toll-like receptor 2-mediated NF-kappa B pathway activation in ocular surface epithelial cells Eye Vis. (Lond). 4 2017 17 28706958 163 Coon T.A. McKelvey A.C. Lear T. Rajbhandari S. Dunn S.R. Connelly W. Zhao J.Y. Han S. Liu Y. Weathington N.M. McVerry B.J. Zhang Y. Chen B.B. The proinflammatory role of HECTD2 in innate immunity and experimental lung injury Sci. Transl. Med. 7 2015 295ra109–295ra109 164 Nguyen M.T. Götz F. Lipoproteins of gram-positive bacteria: key players in the immune response and virulence Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 80 2016 891 903 27512100 165 Corman V.M. Landt O. Kaiser M. Molenkamp R. Meijer A. Chu D.K. Bleicker T. Brünink S. Schneider J. Schmidt M.L. Mulders D.G. Haagmans B.L. van der Veer B. van den Brink S. Wijsman L. Goderski G. Romette J.-L. Ellis J. Zambon M. Peiris M. Goossens H. Reusken C. Koopmans M.P. Drosten C. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR Euro Surveill. 25 2020 2000045 166 Yu F. Yan L. Wang N. Yang S. Wang L. Tang Y. Gao G. Wang S. Ma C. Xie R. Wang F. Tan C. Zhu L. Guo Y. Zhang F. Quantitative detection and viral load analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in infected patients Clin. Infect. Dis. 71 2020 793 798 32221523 167 Broughton J.P. Deng X. Yu G. Fasching C.L. Servellita V. Singh J. Miao X. Streithorst J.A. Granados A. Sotomayor-Gonzalez A. Zorn K. Gopez A. Hsu E. Gu W. Miller S. Pan C.-Y. Guevara H. Wadford D.A. Chen J.S. Chiu C.Y. CRISPR-Cas12-based detection of SARS-CoV-2 Nat. Biotechnol. 38 2020 870 874 32300245 168 Kellner M.J. Koob J.G. Gootenberg J.S. Abudayyeh O.O. Zhang F. SHERLOCK: nucleic acid detection with CRISPR nucleases Nat. Protoc. 14 2019 2986 3012 31548639 169 Myhrvold C. Freije C.A. Gootenberg J.S. Abudayyeh O.O. Metsky H.C. Durbin A.F. Kellner M.J. Tan A.L. Paul L.M. Parham L.A. Garcia K.F. Barnes K.G. Chak B. Mondini A. Nogueira M.L. Isern S. Michael S.F. Lorenzana I. Yozwiak N.L. MacInnis B.L. Bosch I. Gehrke L. Zhang F. Sabeti P.C. Field-deployable viral diagnostics using CRISPR-Cas13 Science 360 2018 444 448 29700266 170 Yan Y. Chang L. Wang L. Laboratory testing of SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2 (2019-nCoV): current status, challenges, and countermeasures Rev. Med. Virol. 30 2020 e2106 171 Chen Y. Chan K.-H. Kang Y. Chen H. Luk H.K.H. Poon R.W.S. Chan J.F.W. Yuen K.-Y. Xia N. Lau S.K.P. Woo P.C.Y. A sensitive and specific antigen detection assay for Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus Emerg. Microb. Infect. 4 2015 e26 172 Lau S.K.P. Woo P.C.Y. Wong B.H.L. Tsoi H.-W. Woo G.K.S. Poon R.W.S. Chan K.-H. Wei W.I. Peiris J.S.M. Yuen K.-Y. Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus nucleocapsid protein in sars patients by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay J. Clin. Microbiol. 42 2004 2884 2889 15243033 173 Fang Y. Zhang H. Xie J. Lin M. Ying L. Pang P. Ji W. Sensitivity of chest CT for COVID-19: comparison to RT-PCR Radiology 296 2020 E115 E117 32073353 174 Cai Q. Huang D. Yu H. Zhu Z. Xia Z. Su Y. Li Z. Zhou G. Gou J. Qu J. Sun Y. Liu Y. He Q. Chen J. Liu L. Xu L. Characteristics of liver tests in COVID-19 patients J. Hepatol. 2020 175 Fan Z. Chen L. Li J. Cheng X. Yang J. Tian C. Zhang Y. Huang S. Liu Z. Cheng J. Clinical features of COVID-19-related liver functional abnormality Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 18 2020 1561 1566 32283325 176 Bangash M.N. Patel J. Parekh D. COVID-19 and the liver: little cause for concern Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 5 2020 529 530 32203680 177 Pfefferle S. Reucher S. Nörz D. Lütgehetmann M. Evaluation of a quantitative RT-PCR assay for the detection of the emerging coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 using a high throughput system Euro Surveill. 25 2020 2000152 178 Liu W. Liu L. Kou G. Zheng Y. Ding Y. Ni W. Wang Q. Tan L. Wu W. Tang S. Xiong Z. Zheng S. Evaluation of nucleocapsid and spike protein-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for detecting antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 J. Clin. Microbiol. 58 2020 e00461-20 32229605 179 Pan F. Ye T. Sun P. Gui S. Liang B. Li L. Zheng D. Wang J. Hesketh R.L. Yang L. Zheng C. Time course of lung changes at chest CT during recovery from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Radiology 295 2020 715 721 32053470 180 Franquet T. Imaging of pulmonary viral pneumonia Radiology 260 2011 18 39 21697307 181 Office of the Commissioner, Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Issues New Policy to Help Expedite Availability of Diagnostics 2020 Available online: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-issues-new-policy-help-expedite-availability-diagnostics (accessed September 24, 2020) 182 “Solidarity” clinical trial for COVID-19 treatments Available online: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/global-research-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov/solidarity-clinical-trial-for-covid-19-treatments (accessed September 24, 2020) 183 D’Alessandro S. Scaccabarozzi D. Signorini L. Perego F. Ilboudo D.P. Ferrante P. Delbue S. The use of antimalarial drugs against viral infection Microorganisms 8 2020 184 Al-Salama Z.T. Scott L.J. Baricitinib: a review in rheumatoid arthritis Drugs 78 2018 761 772 29687421 185 Bugert J.J. Hucke F. Zanetta P. Bassetto M. Brancale A. Antivirals in medical biodefense Virus Genes 56 2020 150 167 32076918 186 Taylor R. Kotian P. Warren T. Panchal R. Bavari S. Julander J. Dobo S. Rose A. El-Kattan Y. Taubenheim B. Babu Y. Sheridan W.P. BCX4430 - a broad-spectrum antiviral adenosine nucleoside analog under development for the treatment of Ebola virus disease J. Infect. Public Health 9 2016 220 226 27095300 187 Turner T.L. Kopp B.T. Paul G. Landgrave L.C. Hayes D. Jr. Thompson R. Respiratory syncytial virus: current and emerging treatment options Clinicoecon. Outcomes Res. 6 2014 217 225 24812523 188 Marcelin J.R. Wilson J.W. Razonable R.R. Mayo Clinic Hematology/Oncology and Transplant Infectious Diseases Services, Oral ribavirin therapy for respiratory syncytial virus infections in moderately to severely immunocompromised patients Transpl. Infect. Dis. 16 2014 242 250 24621016 189 Kelleni M.T. Nitazoxanide/azithromycin combination for COVID-19: a suggested new protocol for early management Pharmacol. Res. 157 2020 104874 32360581 190 Draft landscape of COVID-19 candidate vaccines Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/draft-landscape-of-covid-19-candidate-vaccines 191 Speers D.J. Clinical applications of molecular biology for infectious diseases Clin. Biochem. Rev. 27 2006 39 51 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16886046 16886046 192 Teixeira R.A. Martinelli Filho M. Benvenuti L.A. Costa R. Pedrosa A.A. Nishióka S.A.D. Cardiac damage from chronic use of chloroquine: a case report and review of the literature Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 79 2002 85 88 12163948 193 CDC Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) 2020 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/groups-at-higher-risk.html (accessed May 11, 2020) 194 Duan K. Liu B. Li C. Zhang H. Yu T. Qu J. Zhou M. Chen L. Meng S. Hu Y. Peng C. Yuan M. Huang J. Wang Z. Yu J. Gao X. Wang D. Yu X. Li L. Zhang J. Wu X. Li B. Xu Y. Chen W. Peng Y. Hu Y. Lin L. Liu X. Huang S. Zhou Z. Zhang L. Wang Y. Zhang Z. Deng K. Xia Z. Gong Q. Zhang W. Zheng X. Liu Y. Yang H. Zhou D. Yu D. Hou J. Shi Z. Chen S. Chen Z. Zhang X. Yang X. Effectiveness of convalescent plasma therapy in severe COVID-19 patients Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 117 2020 9490 9496 32253318 195 Keyaerts E. Vijgen L. Pannecouque C. Van Damme E. Peumans W. Egberink H. Balzarini J. Van Ranst M. Plant lectins are potent inhibitors of coronaviruses by interfering with two targets in the viral replication cycle Antivir. Res. 75 2007 179 187 17428553 196 Kumar V. Dhanjal J.K. Kaul S.C. Wadhwa R. Sundar D. Withanone and caffeic acid phenethyl ester are predicted to interact with main protease (M) of SARS-CoV-2 and inhibit its activity J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2020 1 13 197 Kumar V. Dhanjal J.K. Bhargava P. Kaul A. Wang J. Zhang H. Kaul S.C. Wadhwa R. Sundar D. Withanone and Withaferin-A are predicted to interact with transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) and block entry of SARS-CoV-2 into cells J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2020 1 13 198 Previfenon® as Chemoprophylaxis of COVID-19 in Health Workers - Full Text View - ClinicalTrials.Gov 2020 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04446065