==== Front Molecules Molecules molecules Molecules 1420-3049 MDPI 33255641 10.3390/molecules25235520 molecules-25-05520 Review Multifunctional Opioid-Derived Hybrids in Neuropathic Pain: Preclinical Evidence, Ideas and Challenges https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8467-9193Starnowska-Sokół Joanna 12 Przewłocka Barbara 1* Plech Tomasz Academic Editor Andres-Mach Marta Academic Editor 1 Department of Pain Pharmacology, Maj Institute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 31-343 Krakow, Poland; joanna.starnowska@uj.edu.pl 2 Department of Pharmacobiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 30-688 Krakow, Poland * Correspondence: barbara.przewlocka@gmail.com; Tel./Fax: +48-12-6623398 25 11 2020 12 2020 25 23 552029 10 2020 23 11 2020 © 2020 by the authors.2020Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).When the first- and second-line therapeutics used to treat neuropathic pain (NP) fail to induce efficient analgesia—which is estimated to relate to more than half of the patients—opioid drugs are prescribed. Still, the pathological changes following the nerve tissue injury, i.a. pronociceptive neuropeptide systems activation, oppose the analgesic effects of opiates, enforcing the use of relatively high therapeutic doses in order to obtain satisfying pain relief. In parallel, the repeated use of opioid agonists is associated with burdensome adverse effects due to compensatory mechanisms that arise thereafter. Rational design of hybrid drugs, in which opioid ligands are combined with other pharmacophores that block the antiopioid action of pronociceptive systems, delivers the opportunity to ameliorate the NP-oriented opioid treatment via addressing neuropathological mechanisms shared both by NP and repeated exposition to opioids. Therewith, the new dually acting drugs, tailored for the specificity of NP, can gain in efficacy under nerve injury conditions and have an improved safety profile as compared to selective opioid agonists. The current review presents the latest ideas on opioid-comprising hybrid drugs designed to treat painful neuropathy, with focus on their biological action, as well as limitations and challenges related to this therapeutic approach. neuropathic painopioidshybrid compoundsbifunctional designed ligandsnerve injury ==== Body 1. Introduction 1.1. Neuropathic Pain (NP) Differs from Physiological Nociception When a noxious stimulus—let it be mechanical impact, excessive heat/cold, or exposure to harmful chemicals—is perceived, an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience arises. This universal sensation, known as pain, alerts the individual to potential or actual tissue damage and helps modify behavior to avoid the danger in the future; hence it bears vital evolutionary functions [1]. As opposed to physiological nociception, chronic pain with a neuropathic component (i.e., associated with a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system [2]) is marked by a low correlation between observable injury and nociceptive responses, lasts beyond tissue healing time, and, as such, serves no evolutionary purpose, while exerting a profound negative impact on the quality of life [3]. Worse still, complex alterations in neural processing following the nerve tissue injury make this type of pain less responsive to conventional treatments than acute and inflammatory pain [4,5]. 1.2. The Efficacy of Currently Available Neuropathic Pain Therapies is Limited It is assessed that more than half of the neuropathic pain patients do not experience satisfying pharmacotherapy-induced pain relief even to a moderate extent [6,7]. First-line pharmacotherapy of NP includes gabapentoids, tricyclic antidepressants, and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors. When the response to these drugs is poor, lidocaine plasters, capsaicine patches and dually acting µ-opioid peptide (MOP) receptor agonists that concurrently inhibit the reuptake of serotonin and/or norepinephrine (tramadol, tapentadol) are to be used as a second-line therapy. Combinations of first-line medications are also recommended at this stage of treatment [8,9]. Opioid drugs (morphine, oxycodone) are prescribed only as the third-line therapy, as they carry the risk of several negative adverse effects when administered in higher doses exacted by neuropathic pain severity. Importantly, physicians report that not all NP patients respond to exogenous opioids equally, and that some of the patients require high doses of synthetic opiates to achieve optimum analgesia, which further enhances the risk of the side effects occurrence [10]. The most common adverse events in opioid therapy include troublesome gastrointestinal motility disturbances and sedation. Besides, the repeated use of opioids—inevitable in chronic pain conditions—is associated with the development of physical dependence and tolerance to the analgesic effect of the initial dose, while overdosing can lead to life-threatening respiratory depression [5,11]. Still, opioids can efficiently alleviate moderate to severe pain of neuropathic origin [12,13], and are used in the clinical practice: patients with NP are significantly more likely to receive opioids than those suffering from chronic pain without neuropathic component [14] due to the limited efficacy of other drugs; it is estimated that less than 35% of NP patients actually benefit from nonopioid treatments [15]. Having this in mind, it is a vital task to make use of the analgesic properties of opioids in NP treatment while minimizing unwanted side effects. Currently available strategies to avoid adverse events related with the long-term therapy (tolerance development, opioid-induced hyperlagesia) involve opioid rotation and the use of adjuvant analgesics [16]. Alternatively, new structures aiming at opioid receptors are designed to make these pharmaceutics better adjusted to the specificity of neuropathic pain mechanisms (which, in turn, could allow to obtain maximal analgesia at the lowest opiate dose possible) and long-term therapy. The successful outcome of new drugs development draws upon the comprehensive understanding of neuropathic pain mechanisms on molecular and systemic level. 1.3. Neuropathic Pain Mechanisms Negatively Influence the Opioid-Induced Analgesia The opioid system, with its three seven-transmembrane-spanning (7TM) G-protein coupled (Gαi–Gαo) µ-, δ- and κ-opioid peptide (MOP, DOP and KOP, respectively) receptors as well as their analgesia-inducing endogenous ligands (β-endorphin, met- and leu-enkephalins, dynorphins), is intrinsically linked to pain processing in mammals, next to the profound role it plays in mood regulation, reward and addiction. Opioid receptors are present both in peripheral tissues and the central nervous system CNS, inhibiting pain transmission at different levels of the ascending and descending pain pathways [1,17]. The opioid receptors are besides expressed in immune cells (lymphocytes, granulocytes, monocytes, macrophages) that can as well release opioid peptides ameliorating pain under pathological conditions [18]. As mentioned earlier, the response to opioid treatment differs among NP patients [10]. Individual differences in opioid responsiveness may be partially explained with genetic polymorphisms on the MOP-encoding Oprm1 gene, as well as on vast families of pharmacokinetics-influencing genes encoding the enzymes that determine the opioid metabolism, basically cytochrome P450 family and the uridine diphosphoglucuronysyltransferases [19]. However, the poor responsiveness to opioids under neuropathic pain conditions is greatly dependent on the specific pathological changes that steadily afflict the nervous system after nerve tissue injury. Endogenous opioid system serves an adaptive role for the organism by inducing analgesia when noxious environmental stimuli occur, as the ability to temporarily ignore the pain of the injury heightens the chances of surviving a dangerous event [20]. This state is reflected in animal NP models by the increased level of endogenous opioids in pain-facilitating spinal and brain areas, where the opioid peptides can induce their inhibitory effects [21,22]. Nevertheless, as the environmentally produced analgesia must be timely suppressed to help modify the behavior once the danger ceases, continued opioid signaling activated in the presence of nerve tissue trauma initiates the homeostatic compensatory mechanisms that eventually counteract the inhibitory effects of opioid activation [23]. Such a duality is observed within the opioid system itself: for example, an injury to a nerve induces the upregulated expression of an endogenous peptide, dynorphin A(1–17), which can exert neuroinhibitory (antinociceptive) opioid effects, but can as well potentiate allodynia via N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors [24] or be cleaved into a nonopioid proteolytic fragment (2–17) that activates excitatory bradykinin receptors and thus promotes pronociceptive effects [25,26,27]. What is more, the elevated expression of an opioid prohormone proopiomelanocortin (POMC) gives rise to the intensified synthesis of antinociceptive endorphins, but also yields alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH) that promotes allodynia (pronociceptive effect) through its agonist action on melanocortin type 4 (MC4) receptors [28]. In parallel, agonist-induced stimulation of opioid receptors leads to their phosphorylation and reduced coupling to G proteins, hence decreasing their functionality [29]. This results in epigenetic silencing of Oprm1 and a subsequent downregulation of opioid mRNA and proteins in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and spinal cord, as demonstrated in numerous rodent and primate NP models [30,31,32,33,34]. In human NP patients that suffer either from central or peripheral neuropathic pain, decreases in opioid receptor binding are observed in supraspinal regions: posterior midbrain, medial thalamus and the insular, temporal and prefrontal cortices [35,36]. The reduced supraspinal opioid receptor availability is in all likelihood a direct result of chronic pain itself (and not, for example, pre-existing individual differences), as similar decreased supraspinal MOP receptor expression is observed in animal models of NP [21,37]. The effect is accompanied by altered efficacy of G-protein stimulation within opioid-sensitive CNS structures, and altered expression of DOP and KOP receptor mRNAs, which suggests that neuropathy recruits and modifies several opioidergic circuits [38]. It is besides recognized that centrally expressed MOP receptors are more susceptible to downregulation after nerve tissue lesions [32,33,39] than the MOPs expressed on peripheral afferents. Coherently, central NP, resulting from lesions to brain and/or spinal cord, is considered to be less responsive to opioids than C, Aβ, and Aδ afferent fibers affecting peripheral injury-induced NP [40]. Apart from MOP receptor downregulation, nerve injury decreases their coupling to the voltage-gated Ca2+ (CaV) channels in primary afferent terminals, the process most likely mediated by a Src family kinase [41]. This in turn, uniquely for neuropathic pain, impairs the ability of MOP receptors to inhibit the release of pronociceptive neuropeptides, such as substance P [42]. To counteract endogenous opioids release-induced analgesia as to adaptively restore the nociceptive transmission balance, some neuronal hyperexcitability-promoting receptors are centrally upregulated under NP conditions, contributing to painful sensations. In rodent models of NP, neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor activated by substance P, as well as antiopioid cholecystokinin (CCK) receptor, are upregulated in the spinal cord [43] and injured nerve [44]. The serotonin 2A (5-HT(2A), N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and mGlu1 (metabotropic) glutamate receptors augment the C-fiber evoked potentials and facilitate spinal nociception [45]. In addition, the upregulation of mGlu1 receptor contributes to the chronification of neuropathic pain as it underlies the increased the excitability of anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) layer 2/3 neurons, important for pain processing [46]. Other neuroplastic changes observed in painful neuropathy states involve the upregulation of bradykinin B1 and B2 receptors in the injured nerve, contributing to sensory nociceptive changes resulting in hyperalgesia [47]. 1.4. Neuropathic Pain and Repeated Opioid Treatment Share Neuropathological Consequences Remarkably, chronic opioid exposure is followed by spinal neuroplastic changes that overlap with the biochemical effects caused by nerve tissue injury, as both phenomena are associated with the activation of opioid receptors, induced either by exogenous opiates or the enhanced release of endogenous opioid peptides. As a consequence, repeated spinal delivery of a MOP receptor agonist, obviously relieving pain in acute administration, leads to the paradoxical development of allodynia and hyperalgesia, the painful sensations that are observed as well in the post-nerve-injury state. The commonality of these phenomena is reflected by the similar changes on the tissue level, which include opioid receptors downregulation in the CNS [48] and on the periphery [49] accompanied by the increased expression of pronociceptive neurotransmitters, such as CCK, calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) and substance P [50]. Similar increase is observed in case of glial activation which leads to neuroinflammation [51] and in the secretion of endogenous opioid peptides from leukocytes and macrophages via activation of leukocyte opioid receptors [52]. Besides, both conditions result in NMDA receptor activation and a subsequent initiation of intracellular cascades involving the increased activity of protein kinase C (PKC) and nitric oxide (NO)-activated poly(ADP-ribose) synthetase (PARS), contributing to behavioral manifestations of neuroplastic changes [53]. Having all the above listed evidence in mind, a question arises whether it is possible to eliminate or reduce the side effects of the opioid treatment while simultaneously addressing the opioid system-related pathological changes that are associated with neuropathic pain state, provided that certain alterations are common for the two conditions. This prerequisite can be met through designing drugs characterized by neuropathy-tailored hybrid structures, where the analgesic effect induced by the opioid pharmacophore is enhanced thanks to the simultaneous blocking of a rationally selected pronociceptive system, otherwise pathologically activated in NP (Scheme 1). 2. Targeting the Opioid System Extensive research has been conducted to determine how the affinity to different opioid receptors influences the analgesia and other effects produced by exogenous opioid ligands, and if the desired therapeutic effects can be enhanced by multimodal targeting at the opioid receptors. Traditionally, MOP receptor activation is recognized to induce antinociception, and all clinically useful opioid analgesics are MOP receptor agonists [16]. On the other hand, high-affinity/high-selectivity MOP receptor agonists are burdened with pronounced side effects [54]. In this context, the multitargeting on opioid receptors is aimed to improve the drug’s tolerability and safety profile [55]. 2.1. DOP Receptor Activation Alleviates the Neuroinflammatory Effects Induced by MOP Receptor Agonists Results obtained in basic studies show that simultaneous activation of MOP and DOP receptors with bivalent agonist ligands delivers potent analgesia in experimental neuropathies [56,57] with strongly reduced dependence and tolerance development on the course of repeated administration [58]. The effect is explained by a reduced release of proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, provided by the repeated activation of DOP receptor [59] which in parallel promotes defense mechanisms acting against neuropathy-induced oxidative stress [60]. The increased glial-derived proinflammatory cytokine production is observed both in nerve injury and morphine tolerance states [51], so bifunctional MOP/DOP receptor agonist ligands can provide dual benefits as compared to single-target MOP receptor agonists, the latter expected to exacerbate gliosis and neuroinflammation that are already present in NP. Promising results have been obtained for biphalin, a dimeric enkephalin analogue that induces analgesia in NP via activating MOP and DOP receptors, while diminishing the expression of pronociceptive neuroinflammatory mediators released by activated microglia in vitro [61,62]. On the other hand, mixed MOP receptor agonist/DOP receptor antagonist nonpeptide ligands have low potential to induce tolerance and physical dependence [63,64], but their analgesic potency, superior to morphine, is demonstrated mainly in acute and chronic pain without neuropathic component [55]. 2.2. Dual MOP/KOP Agonism in the Peripheral Nervous System (PNS) Attenuates Mechanical Hypersensitivity Symptoms Compounds displaying intrinsic efficacy at KOP receptors are found useful in specific subtypes of painful sensations in peripheral neuropathies: for example, in a mouse model of peripheral neuropathy induced by sciatic nerve ligation, a subcutaneous administration of KOP receptor agonist U-50,488H, but not morphine, alleviated dynamic allodynia, i.e., hypersensitivity to normally innocuous stimulus of gently stroking the affected skin with a cotton bud [65]. Such an observation is promising from the clinical perspective, as mechanical hypersensitivity is more common in NP patients than thermal hyperalgesias are [66], and dynamic mechanical allodynia interferes extensively with everyday life activities—it may be evoked merely by clothes touching the skin [67]. In the brain, KOP receptor activation opposes some MOP-mediated effects, such as tolerance and abuse liability-related reward processes [68], but it brings adverse events (dysphoria, sedation, diuresis) by itself, and contributes to the aversive aspects of ongoing pain [69]. On the other hand, peripheral KOP signaling provides some desirable effects in the nerve injury state, as it inhibits neuroinflammation and thus indirectly reduces nociceptor sensitization induced otherwise by inflammatory factors [70]. Activation of the peripheral KOP and MOP receptors with multifunctional ligands leads to efficient antinociception in peripheral painful neuropathies, while the side effects typical for MOP receptor activation are reduced [71]. Hence, recent drug development focuses on peripherally restricted KOP receptor agonists [72], and this approach appears useful also in the case of mixed MOP/KOP receptor agonists. 3. Rational Design of Hybrid Drugs Once the pharmacokinetic profile of the opioid ligand aiming to treat neuropathic pain is tuned, another active pharmacophore can be added to the compound’s structure to provide further therapeutic benefits. Here is where the rational design of a hybrid drug begins (see Scheme 1). 3.1. Dually Acting Hybrid Molecules Overcome the Limitations of Polypharmacy The idea of hybrid drugs is underpinned by the general theory that biological systems are characterized by network structure, i.e., they are comprised of pathways and nods that influence each other to a different extent. As a consequence, the functioning of a biological system is supposed to be critically dependent on a few highly connected hubs, the disturbance of which results in a disease [73]. As abstract as it seems in the view of complexity of neuropathic pain mechanisms, it is actually observed that a combination therapy using two monofunctional agents may offer greater pain relief to the patients, as some drug sets provide synergistic effects [6]. Coherently, clinical polypharmacy for neuropathic pain is widespread, although the limited number of methodologically rigorous studies precludes the objective identification of a specific combination that would be superior to the others in terms of safety and efficacy [74]. Hybrid molecules are designed to overcome the limitations of polypharmacy, such as side effects overlap, poorly predictable distribution of distinct molecules in the tissue (the uneven distribution might hamper the desired effects), unwanted and/or unpredictable pharmacodynamic interactions, different pharmacokinetic profiles of the drugs delivered that preclude their additive or synergistic action, et cetera [75]. These benefits cannot be provided by drug cocktails or so-called multicomponent drugs (comprising two separate pharmacologically active agents packed into a single tablet) [76]. Instead, two overlapping pharmacophores, or separate moieties connected with a chemical linker, are composed into a single molecule that is able to aim at least two distinct molecular targets, as the pharmacophores act at their respective separate receptor monomers. In corresponding sections we specify that the discussed receptors, selected as hybrid compound targets, colocalize with opioid receptors in pain pathway structures, the latter implicating mutual interactions. As forming dimers and heteromers by opioid receptors and other GTP-binding protein (G protein)-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in vivo remains a controversial topic, and synthesizing a hybrid molecule that binds to a receptor dimer poses some technical difficulties (e.g., related to linker’s length and flexibility), designing a hybrid molecule that binds to only one receptor (targeted by one of its pharmacophores) at a time remains the most common approach. However, as such a molecule presents the affinity to at least two receptors, it is able to activate both types of receptors present in a tissue in a simultaneous manner, thus maximizing the biological effect. This pharmacodynamic characteristics of a hybrid compound helps avoid the scenario of hampered effect caused by uneven tissue distribution that could arise in case of two separate pharmacophores administered in a physical mixture. 3.2. Hybrid Drugs Can Bring Specific Therapeutic Benefits in the Context of Neuropathic Pain Complexity Apart from the technical gains listed above, the designed multiple ligands approach can bring further benefits that are specific for neuropathic pain. The complexity of NP as a pathology, let alone the multiplicity of its etiologies, encourages the search for multitarget therapeutic approaches to fight the symptoms efficiently. The molecular hybridization is a strategy that allows to improve therapeutic outcomes of NP treatment thanks to dual action that is meant to modify the activity of at least two pain processing-related systems at once. This way, each stimulation of an inhibitory (analgesia-producing) system is accompanied by a simultaneous blockade of a rationally chosen system that is known to counteract the inhibitory effects provided by the analgesic system under nerve tissue injury conditions. As the pain-promoting factors are blocked, the analgesic effects elicited by the antinociceptive pharmacophore can become more pronounced. The simultaneousness of reaching two distinct targets is crucial here, as it determines the final outcome of pain signal processing. Designed multiple ligands are hoped to be the optional way of adjusting opioid agonists to make them better suited for neuropathic pain specifics, as the mechanisms of their reduced effectiveness and adverse effects observed in NP therapy are continuously better understood. Consequently, specific molecular targets can be rationally selected to apply the principle of modern hybrid synthesis to improve the opioid profile in a multiple administration model under nerve injury conditions. The following chapters discuss the systemic targets of hybrid molecules that are currently considered to be potentially useful in NP therapy. The general construction of a hybrid molecule designed to treat neuropathic pain is depicted on Scheme 2. 4. Neuropathy-Involved Systems as Targets of Hybrid Drugs 4.1. Opioid-Related Systems 4.1.1. Melanocortin and the Melanocortin Type 4 (MC4) Receptor Melanocortin receptors are five closely related seven-transmembrane GPCRs that are engaged in a vast variety of physiological processes, with key functions including pigmentation (MC1 receptor), steroidogenesis (MC2), energy homeostasis (MC3, MC4), immune reaction (MC5) and many more [77,78]. Their activity is regulated by peptide hormones (melanocyte stimulating hormones: α-, β- and, γ-MSH, and a larger peptide adrenocorticotropin—ACTH), derived by post-translational processing of an opioid prohormone named proopiomelanocortin (POMC) [79]. POMC belongs to the opioid gene family and incorporates both opioid and melanocortin core sequence, being able to be processed to an opioid peptide beta-endorphin and MC receptor-activating α-MSH [80]. It is of note that patients with chronic neuropathic pain have low levels of beta-endorphin in the CSF [81], while the level of POMC remains unchanged as compared to healthy individuals [82], which indicates that the processing of POMC can be altered in nerve injury state to produce pain-promoting effects. Nevertheless, the problem requires further studies to elucidate which factors, if any, are potentially able to influence the POMC-processing mechanisms. Melanocortin System Exerts Tonic Pronociceptive Activity in Nerve Injury States The expression of MC receptors is tissue-specific, and two of the five subtypes, MC3 and MC4 receptors, are the most abundant subtypes in the CNS and thus referred to as ‘neural’ melanocortin receptors [83]. Still, the involvement in pain regulation appears to be the function of the MC4 receptor exclusively, as its neuroanatomical distribution encompasses pain-processing regions of the peripheral and central nervous system. Coherently, many lines of experimental evidence point to the role of MC4 receptor in painful nerve injury states. There is evidence that MC4 receptor exerts tonic pronociceptive activity in painful nerve injury states, as blocking the receptor with exogenous antagonists alleviates pain-like behavior in rodent models of neuropathic pain [84,85] and reduces the markers of spinal neuroinflammation [86]. Other facts prove its influence on the functioning of the opioid system: blocking the MOP receptor increases the proallodynic effects induced by the activation of MC4 receptor [87], while selective MC4 receptor antagonists enhance the analgesic effectiveness of morphine [88] and prevent the development of morphine tolerance [89]. MOP/DOP Receptor Agonist-MC4 Receptor Antagonist Hybrids Provide Long-Lasting Analgesic Action in Preclinical NP Studies All of these observations, as well as the overlapping distribution of MC4 receptor and opioid receptors in the pain-processing regions of CNS [90], inspired the development of opioid-MC4 receptor hybrid drugs. A significant contribution in this field was made by the group of Hruby, through their extensive research on the design of selective MC receptor ligands that resulted in the synthesis of SHU9119, an MC3 and MC4 receptor antagonist [91]. The finding preceded the development of the opioid (OP)-MC4 receptor bifunctional compounds [92] (however, their biological activity has not been determined) as well as trivalent opioid-melanocortin-cholecystokinin (CCK) ligands binding to the MOP, DOP, CCK1/2, and MC4 receptors [93]. SHU9119 was utilized to synthesize MOP/DOP-MC4 receptor binding hybrids with linkers of different length and rigidity. The preclinical tests in rodent models of NP performed by our group allowed to select the compounds characterized by the best analgesic profile under nerve injury conditions. Further authorial modifications to the compounds’ structures, based on the preclinical evidence obtained, gave rise to the series of bifunctional ligands uniquely designed to treat neuropathic pain [94,95]. The basic studies on mice and rats subjected to sciatic nerve injury (CCI model) revealed that the linker type prominently influences the compound’s properties in vivo, determining the intensity and duration of the final analgesic effect. All in all, the most effective OP-MC4 receptor hybrids occurred to reverse hypersensitivity-like behavior of CCI-subjected mice in i.t. doses about hundred times lower than individual pharmacophores. The effect provided by single-target parent compounds, as well as their physical mix, was less pronounced and relatively short-lasting (Scheme 3) [94,95]. The unique property of the OP-MC4 receptor hybrid, as compared to other ideas of bivalent compounds proposed for neuropathic pain treatment, is that its analgesic functions result from the modulation of a single nociception-related system, as the hybrid simultaneously enhances and suppresses the effects of different products derived from the same prohormone. 4.1.2. Nociceptin and the Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ (NOP) Receptor A seven transmembrane-spanning GPCR, nociceptin/orphanin FQ (NOP) receptor is actually a member of the opioid receptors family and commonly classified as the fourth opioid receptor, as it is characterized by close homology to MOP, DOP and KOP receptors. After NOP receptor cloning, its endogenous ligand was unknown, and on this basis NOP was referred to as an ‘orphan’ receptor. Once identified independently by two groups, the endogenous heptadecapeptide resembling dynorphin A9–17 and presenting selectivity to NOP receptor was named ‘orphanin FQ’ (the two capital letters referring to the first and last amino acid in its sequence) by Reinscheid and colleagues [96] while Meunier et al. emphasized the pronociceptive properties of the peptide [97]. Eventually, a name, ‘nociceptin/orphanin FQ’ (N/OFQ), was coined. Despite its high structural homology to opioid receptors, NOP receptor is insensitive to nonselective opioid receptor antagonist, naloxone, and it is not activated by endogenous opioid peptides [17]. The last piece of information allows to infer that the NOP system will not be affected by the same neuroplastic changes that can negatively influence the sensitivity of other opioid receptors to exogenous ligands, namely: resulting from the sustained endogenous opioids release that directly follows a nerve injury. This fact alone makes the NOP receptor an interesting target for hybrid drugs with opioid component designed to treat neuropathic pain. Still, further evidence makes NOP an attractive drug target in NP. Nociceptin System Induces Bimodal Effects on Pain Transmission As mentioned above, early experiments with nociceptin showed that its supraspinal (i.c.v.) administration lowers the pain threshold in naive mice. However, later on, it was revealed that NOP receptor activation can bring either pronociceptive or analgesic effects, depending on the pain modality, ligand dosing, administration route, or animal species [98]. Nociceptin itself is able to induce spinal analgesia in nanomolar intrathecal doses, but, paradoxically, it lowers the pain threshold in naive mice when administered in lower, femtomolar doses, possibly by enhancing the pronociceptive substance P release [99]. Although NOP receptor agonists are able to exert spinal inhibitory effects in acute pain models [100], they appear to be the most effective as analgesics under nerve injury conditions [101,102] which suggests that the NOP system undergoes some neuroplastic changes as a consequence of nerve tissue injury. Intrathecal coadministration of nociceptin and morphine provides synergistic antihyperalgesic effects in rats [101] and nonhuman primates [103] but morphine antinociception can be potentiated by NOP receptor antagonists as well [104]. All in all, in the last decades it became clear that the nociceptin system can influence the pain transmission in a dual manner, and that both agonists and antagonists of the NOP receptor can modulate opioid analgesia. These observations inspired the development of mixed MOP/NOP receptors targeting hybrid drugs, as well as multivalent ligands possessing affinity to all four (NOP included) opioid receptors. MOP/NOP Receptors Targeting Hybrid Drugs are Safer than Selective Opioids Preclinical studies with hybrid molecules targeting the NOP and other opioid receptors have been bringing promising results in the last few years. It is known that a clinically useful drug, buprenorphine, is a potent opioid analgesic acting as an agonist on the NOP, MOP and DOP receptors, while being an antagonist at the KOP receptor [105]. Still, the analgesic action of buprenorphine is apparently mediated primarily by the MOP receptor [106]. Hence, novel molecules with different intrinsic efficacy to the NOP (both agonists and antagonists are developed), as well as varying affinity to the three classical opioid receptors, are tested in animal models of acute, inflammatory and neuropathic pain. In particular, mixed MOP and NOP receptor agonist molecules are developed to obtain pharmacological agents displaying the highest potency and longest-lasting action in vivo [107]. In animal studies it is demonstrated that bifunctional MOP/NOP receptor agents alleviate nerve-injury induced hypersensitivity more efficiently than selective MOP or NOP receptor agonists, and produce long-lasting antinociception after spinal and systemic delivery in rodents and nonhuman primates [106,108]. Hybrid agents with partial agonist activity at MOP and NOP receptors are reported to display even wider therapeutic window than full MOP/NOP agonists, which allows to obtain a satisfying analgesic effect with lesser risk of adverse events. Coherently, bifunctional MOP/NOP receptors partial agonists are demonstrated to induce potent long-lasting analgesia without compromising physiological functions, such as cardiovascular activities and respiration, and not to produce physical dependence as they lack reinforcing effects. In addition, their repeated use is not associated with the development of opioid-induced hyperalgesia [104,109] which sums up to an outstanding safety profile. On the other hand, peptide-based mixed opioid agonist/NOP antagonist molecules alleviate painful neuropathy symptoms in far lower intrathecal doses (thousandths of a nanomole) than single opioid or NOP-targeting units, which also proves the utility of such hybrid drugs as potential as therapeutics in neuropathic pain states [110,111]. The promising results in basic studies led to the development of a new pharmacologic agent. Cebranopadol or GRT-6005 (trans-6′-fluoro-4′,9′-dihydro-N,N-dimethyl-4-phenyl-spiro[cyclohexane-1,1′(3′H)-pyrano [3,4-b]indol]-4-amine) is a small molecule activating nociceptin and opioid receptors dually, exhibiting a strong potency in rodent models of neuropathic pain [112,113]. It is currently undergoing clinical trials with the aim to treat painful diabetic neuropathy. Cebranopadol is a full agonist at the MOP and NOP receptors. Will the partial agonist MOP/NOP bifunctional ligands be the next novel analgesics developed for neuropathic pain patients? 4.2. Non-Opioid Systems 4.2.1. Cholecystokinin (CCK) and the Cholecystokinin Type 2 (CCK2) Receptor CCK is a peptide present in the CNS in the regions involved in pain modulation, i.a. periaqueductal grey matter (PAG), belonging to the descending pain inhibitory pathway, rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM) modulating the spinal nociceptive transmission, and dorsal (sensory) root ganglia and spinal cord. Described at first as a gut hormone, it started to be associated with pain processing as soon as it was discovered in the CNS by Vanderhaeghen et al. [114]. It was then observed that opioid and CCK peptides, as well as their receptors, present the overlapping anatomical distribution in spinal and supraspinal regions of the CNS. Early behavioral experiments showed that systemical or perispinal injection of CCK attenuates morphine-induced analgesia [115], while the CCK-receptor antagonist, proglumide, potentiates the analgesic effects of morphine, as well as prevents the development of tolerance to these effects [116]. At present it is known that RVM neurons co-expressing MOP and cholecystokinin type 2 (CCK2) receptor facilitate pain and—together with CCK interneurons in the deep dorsal horn—contribute to the maintenance of tactile allodynia in chronic painful neuropathy [117,118]. These findings are indicative of the antiopioid action of the CCK system. Activating the Opioid Receptors along with Blocking the CCK Receptor Provides Synergistic Analgesic Effects The antiopioid activity of the CCK receptor was further confirmed in studies utilizing targeted mutagenesis involving CCK receptor knock-out mice, and testing different specific antagonists of CCK receptors [119,120]. Importantly, co-administration of CCK antagonist and morphine provides synergistic, and not only additive, analgesic effects in a rat model of neuropathic pain [121]—the synergy creates an opportunity to lower the effective dose of an opioid agonist to avoid opioid-related side effects while obtaining robust analgesia. In the light of these findings, chimeric bifunctional opioid agonist/CCK receptor antagonist compounds were designed for the treatment of neuropathic pain [122]. The hybrids from this group revealed a promising analgesic profile with reduced side effects when tested in the spinal nerve ligation model of neuropathic pain [123]. 4.2.2. Substance P (SP) and the Neurokinin 1 (NK1) Receptor Neuropeptide SP is one of the three products of Tac gene processing, next to neurokinin A and B. The three peptides constitute the tachykinin family and are broadly distributed in the organism, participating in vital physiological functions, such as immune, gastrointestinal and respiratory-related processes. There are three known subtypes of tachykinin receptors and SP can bind to all three of them, but it activates neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor preferentially. 11-amino acid SP is synthesized in dorsal root ganglia and released from primary afferent fibers as a result of noxious input to transmit nociceptive signals to spinal and brainstem second-order neurons [124,125] contributes to central sensitization in neuropathic pain states: it is known to be overly released in injured nerves [44] and to sensitize spinal neurons to input [126]. Coherently, it was observed that blocking the spinal NK1 receptor delays the onset of neuropathic pain [127]. In parallel, SP mediates neurogenic inflammatory responses via mast-cell-specific receptors, enhancing the release of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines [128] that can further exacerbate neuropathic pain symptoms and oppose opioid analgesic action [129]. NK1 Receptor Blockade might Reduce Certain Opioid Use-Related Side Effects The selective antagonism on NK1 receptors clearly modulates hypersensitivity-related behavior in animals subjected to nerve injury, alleviating most of the observable symptoms of such hypersensitivity [130], but it can bring broader benefits in terms of opioid treatment, as the receptor is involved in a handful of processes that can be disturbed by the repeated opioid use. Therefore, blocking the NK1 receptor is expected to prevent or attenuate some opioid-related adverse events. Rewarding properties of opioids are a serious burden that can enhance the risk of misuse and opioid addiction. Importantly, NK1 receptor-containing neurons in the amygdala mediate acute opioid reward [131]. Besides, NK1 receptor appears to play a critical role in the motivational properties of opioids, modulating negative emotional states, such as anxiety, that are often associated with opiate withdrawal once the addiction establishes. NK1 receptor antagonists are shown to reduce opioid self-administration behavior and stress-induced drug seeking in rats [132], and as such might contribute to the improved safety profile of an opioid agonist once it is fused with an NK1 receptor antagonist to form a hybrid drug. As opioid receptors are abundant in the gastrointestinal tract, some common and burdensome adverse events of opiate treatment result from the inhibitory effects that exogenous opioids exert on the gastrointestinal functions. Due to decreased gastric emptying that opiate therapy might cause, about 20–30% of opioid-treated patients experience nausea or vomiting. In this context, the antiemetic properties of NK1 receptor antagonists may come in useful [133]. When it comes to the experimental evidence, analgesic doses of newly designed hybrids: opioid agonist-NK1 receptor antagonists are reported to actually produce less opioid-related adverse events, like constipation [134], sedation [135,136], reward liability [135] or quick development of tolerance to the antihyperalgesic effect [134,135] observed typically in monofunctional opioid agonists. No cross-tolerance effect with morphine observed after repeated use of opioid-neurokinin 1 (OP-NK1) receptor hybrid is another promising result, as it indicates that OP-NK1 receptor hybrids are applicable for treatments involving opioid rotation [137]. 4.3. Emerging Directions New ideas on the hybrid drugs designed for neuropathic pain treatment are continuously emerging. The following chapter presents some of the latest findings in the field, as well as current challenges that await the solution. 4.3.1. Dynorphin/Bradykinin and the KOP/Bradykinin (B1/2) Receptors The kinin system widely contributes to the sensory changes associated with neuropathic pain states; next to the already discussed NK1 receptor actions, kinin B1 (injury-induced) and B2 (constitutively expressed) receptors [138] play a vital role herein—importantly, in the course of interaction with the opioid system [139]. Opioid Neuropeptide Dynorphin Exerts Antiopioid Effects via B1/2 Receptors It has already been mentioned that dynorphin, an inhibitory opioid neuropeptide derived from the precursor prodynorphin, is paradoxically able to promote pain and hypersensitivity via non-opioid mechanisms [140]. It was shown that pathological elevations of dynorphin may activate spinal B1/2 receptors to mediate and maintain neuropathic hyperalgesia [141]. The elevations in the spinal dynorphin content are seen not only in neuropathy, but also in conditions of opioid-induced pain states [142]. In parallel, the studies on rodent models of neuropathic pain reveal that the expression of the excitatory bradykinin receptors is enhanced in the CNS and PNS in painful neuropathy states [143]; therefore, once the its release is elevated, dynorphin can exert pronounced antiopioid effects through binding to bradykinin receptors, and the effects may be counteracted with B1 and B2 antagonists to alleviate the hypersensitivity [27,47]. In the view of these findings, blocking the bradykinin receptors appears as a rational strategy to potentiate the opioid-induced analgesia, otherwise hampered by the excitatory, bradykinin receptors-mediated actions of dynorphin. Recently, Deekonda et al. proposed the design and synthesis of novel multifunctional ligands, where opioid enkephalin analogues were conjugated to Hoe 140, a ligand acting as a B2 receptor antagonist when tested in Guinea pig ileum. However, the group reported that the novel compounds show weak binding affinity for rat B2 receptors [144]. Hence, the idea of developing the OP-bradykinin receptor targeting hybrid compound still remains open. 4.3.2. Neurotensin and the Neurotensin (NTS) Receptor Broadly distributed in the CNS, two main neurotensin (NTS1/2) receptors (GPCRs classified into two subtypes: high-affinity NTS1 and low-affinity NTS2 receptors) modulate nociception, pathological pain and stress-induced antinociception, exerting mostly inhibitory effects on neural transmission when activated [145]. The role of two additional neurotensin-binding non-GPCR receptors, Sortillin/NTS3 and sorLA/LR1 1, is less understood up to date. Neurotensin itself is a tridecapeptide involved in physio- and pathological processes of the CNS and gastrointestinal tract [146], exerting bipolar effects on pain transduction: facilitatory in low picomolar doses and inhibitory in higher nanomolar doses, which was shown by Smith et al. using i.c.v. microinjections in the rat [147]. Experimental evidence show that neurotensin is coreleased with SP in the rat spinal cord once nerve injury-induced allodynia is developed, probably balancing the excitatory effects of SP by inhibition of nociceptors [148]. OP-NT Receptor Hybrid is yet to be Tested in Neuropathic Pain Assay The important characteristics of NTS1 and NTS2 receptor in the context of hybrid drug design is that they mediate analgesic actions via opioid-independent mechanisms [149]. As a result, BBB-crossing analogues of neurotensin used as analgesics possess favorable side effect profile devoid of some opioid-related adverse events [150], while tolerance to their analgesic effect does not develop on the course of repeated administration [151]. Coadministration of a brain-penetrant neurotensin analogue with morphine resulted in an additive analgesic effect in an inflammatory pain assay, but the effective dose of morphine could be kept low this way, thus allowing to reduce adverse events [152]. Promisingly, analgesic synergy of morphine and NTS2-selective agonist has been observed in a formalin-induced persistent pain model [153]. In neuropathic pain assays, NTS2 receptor agonists attenuate not only hypersensitivity-related behavioral responses triggered experimentally during the test procedure, but also reverse postural deficits acquired as a result of nerve damage, unlike morphine [154]. These experimental data imply that neurotensin analogues can reinforce the analgesic action of opioids in a complementary manner, providing some unique additional benefits in the dual treatment. Up to date, improved (as compared to a physical mixture of parent structures) analgesia/side effect ratio of an endomorphin-2/neurotensin combining (OP-NT) hybrid drug was demonstrated in rodent assays of acute pain [155]. The properties of precursory OP-NT hybrid compounds in neuropathic pain assays are yet to be tested. 4.3.3. Glutamate and the Metabotropic Glutamate 5 (mGlu5) Receptor Glutamate is the most abundant excitatory neurotransmitter in the nervous system, physiologically released i.a. by sensory afferents in the spinal cord’s dorsal horn. Nerve injury is followed by the excessive release of glutamate from primary afferents and spinal interneurons, which leads to the nociception-promoting plastic changes and consecutive hyperexcitability of both lesioned and intact nerve fibers located in their close neighborhood. The glutamate-driven hypersensitivity manifests itself in evoked and spontaneous painful sensations typical for chronic neuropathic pain [156]. To counteract the heightened excitability caused by the rise in extracellular glutamate, antagonists of metabotropic glutamate receptors can be utilized, with mGlu5 receptor antagonists shown to be analgesically effective in many neuropathic pain assays [157]; in particular, 2-Methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)pyridine hydrochloride (MPEP) has been widely tested in diverse neuropathic pain models, with promising results [158,159]. Next to its hypersensitivity-attenuating properties in NP assays, MPEP was shown to potentiate the analgesic effects of acutely administered morphine, while preventing the development of tolerance on the course of repeated morphine administration [160]. Developing a ligand acting dually at opioid and mGluR5 receptors constitutes a relevant continuation on these studies. Certain Controversies on the Actions of OP-mGlu5 Hybrid Need to be Elucidated A molecule that combines oxymorphamine (MOP agonist) and MPEP (mGlu5 receptor antagonist), MMG22, showing an exceptional analgesic potency in mouse inflammatory pain assay, was designed and synthesized by Akgün and colleagues [161]. The group hypothesized that the bivalent compound acts through MOP/mGlu5 receptors heteromers. However, this interpretation was later on questioned on the basis of the results of detailed experiments, though confirming the synergistic interactions of the two pharmacophores in neuropathic pain model [162]. The most recent study examined the adverse events potentially associated with MMG22 systemic administration, and showed a superior safety profile of dually acting MMG22 as compared to traditional opiate treatment [163]. The results reveal themselves as more than promising; on the other hand, Vincent and colleagues point out that only the blockade of intracellular mGlu5 receptor (mostly located on nuclear membranes) exerts the most pronounced molecular and systemic effects in the context of neuropathic pain-driven behavior [164]. 5. Limitations and Challenges of the Hybrid Drugs Approach The ultimate goal of pharmacological research is to translate a given new drug candidate into an effective therapy in the clinic. Although promising and increasingly successful thanks to the implementation of innovative in silico tools, the rational multitarget drug design approach is not devoid of tricky points. Selecting pharmacological targets that can bring desirable therapeutic outcomes when modulated simultaneously, as well as choosing high-quality basic (‘parent’) moieties to be incorporated into a hybrid molecule, is just the very first step of the process. Importantly here, all the biological characteristics of chosen targets should be carefully analyzed, to ensure that the antiopioid action of a selected system, meant to be counteracted by a novel hybrid, actually results from activating the respective pain-promoting receptors(and not from other mechanisms). For example, bradykinin receptors, targeted by dynorphins, are proposed as an adjuvant target of opioid-derived hybrid compounds, but there is evidence that pathological effects of dynorphins observed in vivo result from their ability to form pores in cell membranes [165]. Relevant experimental validation, e.g., using specific receptor antagonists, should then precede the hybrid compound design and synthesis. While designing a multifunctional drug, once the target combinations are validated, the compound must be optimized in terms of structure-activity relationships so that its desirable drug-like properties could be retained in the combined molecule. It must not be ruled out that given pharmacophores would not be characterized by the same affinity and efficacy to their target receptors once welded together, not excluding that their activity at the receptor site is eventually opposite to the starting pharmacodynamics profile (e.g., an agonist retains its affinity to the receptor but loses its efficacy and becomes an antagonist). To start with, a careful in vitro analysis revealing the pharmacological characteristics of a newly synthesized hybrid particle, with the target receptor binding affinity and efficacy remaining the crucial parameters, is of great importance. The linker (i.e., spacer that connects two ligands) type is also a factor that influences the pharmacological activity of a hybrid drug to a great extent, as it contributes to the stability of the molecule. Experimental studies show that the linker’s length and rigidity may greatly enhance the analgesic potency and longevity of the therapeutic effect provided by a given compound, likely by decreasing its susceptibility to enzymatic degradation [161]. The next important quality of a hybrid drug, and a considerable limitation of the multifunctional compounds approach, is the size of the designed particle which eventually determines its bioavailability and possible routes of administration, as big molecules will not be able to effectively penetrate into the CNS. The translational aspect remains perhaps one of the greatest challenges related to the drug development process. Preclinical studies provide vast amount of detailed data on synergistic analgesic effects of distinct ligands, demonstrated in numerous animal models of pain and hypersensitivity. Nevertheless, the evergreen question is whether the promising results obtained in animal models of neuropathic pain would bring comparable benefits in human subjects. Some strong candidates to boost opioid effectiveness backed up by substantial basis of preclinical data did not provide similar satisfying results in patients. For example, CCK2 receptor antagonist L-365,260 failed to augment the analgesic effect of morphine when applied as a co-treatment in human subjects with chronic neuropathic pain [166]. Similarly, NK1 receptor antagonists tested in clinical studies did not present analgesic properties comparable to those observed in rodent models [167]. To explain the discrepancies, it is pointed out that the drug-induced modulation of behavioral responses at a level detectable in animal tests is not equal to analgesia [168] and interpreting it as such should be considered a fallacy. Differences between species, not excluding the most subtle variations in genome organization and regulation [169], are another possible answer to the same question, and studies in nonhuman primates seem superior to rodent models in this context—still, most pain assays are excluded from testing on primates [170]. Besides, there are numerous factors to be considered when interpreting the results of preclinical studies, starting from the most general variables, such as sex and age of the animals, to the detailed specifics of a chosen pain assay that may highly influence the final results [171]. The immanent quality of behavioral tests is that they measure specific symptoms of neuropathy, and each of the symptoms (e.g., mechanical allodynia or thermal hyperalgesia) results from distinct systemic and molecular mechanisms. Only detailed studies reveal that, for example, SP participates in heat hyperalgesia, but it does not contribute to cold hypersensitivity or mechanical allodynia arising from nerve injury [172]. This, at least in part, can pose an answer on the question why blocking the NK1 receptor is not a versatile pharmacological tool to alleviate neuropathic pain symptoms. 6. Summary Opioid agonists in their prolonged action, although providing analgesia, steadily induce molecular and systemic changes that can exacerbate painful sensations in neuropathy and eventually outbalance the initial analgesic effects provided by opioid receptors activation. In parallel, opioid agonists in equivalent doses tend to be less effective in NP than in acute or inflammatory pain due to the specific antiopioid pain-promoting mechanisms that typically follow nerve tissue injury. The occurrence of these phenomena is inevitable unless the undesired effects, both resulting from the nerve tissue injury and the prolonged treatment with opioid analgesics, are pharmacologically silenced from the very beginning of the therapy. The continuously better understanding of the common features of neuropathic pain and opioid exposure creates a worthwhile opportunity to escape the additive antiopioid effects of the nerve injury and opiate treatment. As outlined in the present review, hybrid drugs approach creates some promising perspectives in this challenging attempt, as the multifunctional structures allow to enhance and prolong the opioid analgesia thanks to the simultaneous modulation of unwanted pronociceptive effects, exerted otherwise by a given neuropathy-activated system. What is more, some hybrid molecules might provide new beneficial quality as compared to the effects of their parental compounds; the prolonged analgesic action that grows up in time, observed in the case of a selected opioid agonist-MC4 receptor antagonist hybrid (see Scheme 3) exemplifies this phenomenon. The choice of the ancillary moiety to be incorporated into an opioid-derived hybrid compound remains a vitally important task, which once accomplished, while being backed up by well-grounded, high-quality experimental evidence delivers the possibility of designing an efficient and safe analgesic dedicated for neuropathic pain treatment. Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Funding This study was financially supported by the National Science Centre, Poland, grant OPUS 2018/29/B/NZ7/00082, and statutory funds from the Maj Institute of Pharmacology at the Polish Academy of Sciences. Conflicts of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Abbreviations 5-HT(2A) serotonin 2A (receptor) ACC anterior cingulate cortex ACTH adrenocorticotropin alpha-MSH alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone BBB blood-brain barrier CaV voltage-gated Ca2+ channels CCI chronic constriction injury CCK cholecystokinin CGRP calcitonin gene-related peptide CNS central nervous system DOP δ-opioid peptide (receptor) DRG dorsal root ganglia GPCR GTP-binding protein (G protein)-coupled receptor KOP κ-opioid peptide (receptor) MC4 melanocortin type 4 (receptor) mGlu1 metabotropic glutamate 1 (receptor) MOP μ-opioid peptide (receptor) MPEP 2-Methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)pyridine hydrochloride MSH melanocyte stimulating hormone N/OFQ nociceptin/orphanin FQ NK1 neurokinin-1 (receptor) NMDA N-methyl-D-aspartate NO nitric oxide NOP nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide (receptor) NP neuropathic pain NTS1/2 neurotensin subtype 1/2 (receptor) OP opioid pharmacophore PAG periaqueductal grey matter PARS poly(ADP-ribose) synthetase PKC protein kinase C PNS peripheral nervous system POMC proopiomelanocortin RVM rostral ventromedial medulla SNL sciatic nerve ligation Schemes molecules-25-05520-sch001_Scheme 1Scheme 1 Rationale for the use of hybrid in the treatment of neuropathic pain (NP). Neuropathic pain and chronic opioid treatment share pathological consequences; this indicates common mechanisms that underlie both conditions (A). The pathological alterations involve the enhanced activation of pronociceptive factors that eventually enforce dose escalation in the analgesic opiate treatment (B). Hybrid molecule consists of an opioid ligand and a subsidiary pharmacophore that allows to diminish the unwanted antiopioid effects of pronociceptive factors from the very beginning of the therapy, making lower doses of opioids analgesically effective (C). This way, the hybrid approach provides certain benefits in the context of neuropathic pain therapy (D). molecules-25-05520-sch002_Scheme 2Scheme 2 General structure of a hybrid molecule designed to treat neuropathic pain. The review discusses early preclinical evidence on the properties of opioid-comprising hybrid molecules designed to treat NP, with the focus on their biological effects. Each compound of interest contains a pharmacophore aiming at the opioid system—the influence of its characteristics on the biological effects of a given compound are discussed in Section 2. The adjuvant pharmacophore is aimed to modulate the action of a selected pronociceptive system: either related to the opioid system (Section 4.1.) or of non-opioid nature (Section 4.2). Some new candidates are besides proposed to constitute the adjuvant pharmacophore (Section 4.3). molecules-25-05520-sch003_Scheme 3Scheme 3 Intensity and duration of analgesia provided by a hybrid compound vs. separate pharmacophores and a drug mixture. The four graphs illustrate the antiallodynic effect (shown in a percentage of maximal possible effect; 100% = maximal analgesia) provided in a mouse chronic constriction injury (CCI) model by separate constituents (pharmacophores), physical mixture of two pharmacophores, and an opioid agonist–melanocortin type 4 (MC4) receptor antagonist hybrid compound. All compounds were administered intrathecally in an equivalent dose of 0.05 nM, and the hypersensitivity threshold was measured 30 and 90 min after injection [95]. ==== Refs References 1. Sneddon L.U. Comparative physiology of nociception and pain Physiology 2018 33 63 73 10.1152/physiol.00022.2017 29212893 2. Scholz J. Finnerup N.B. Attal N. Aziz Q. Baron R. Bennett M.I. Benoliel R. Cohen M. Cruccu G. Davis K.D. The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: Chronic neuropathic pain Pain 2019 160 53 59 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001365 30586071 3. Smith B.H. Torrance N. Epidemiology of neuropathic pain and its impact on quality of life Curr. Pain Headache Rep. 2012 16 191 198 10.1007/s11916-012-0256-0 22395856 4. Holden J.E. Pizzi J.A. The challenge of chronic pain Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2003 55 935 948 10.1016/S0169-409X(03)00097-8 12935938 5. Zilliox L.A. Neuropathic Pain Contin. Lifelong Learn. Neurol. 2017 23 512 532 10.1212/CON.0000000000000462 28375916 6. Jackson K.C. Pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain Pain Pract. 2006 6 27 33 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2006.00055.x 17309706 7. Finnerup N.B. Attal N. Haroutounian S. McNicol E. Baron R. Dworkin R.H. Gilron I. Haanpää M. Hansson P. Jensen T.S. Pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis Lancet Neurol. 2015 14 162 173 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70251-0 25575710 8. Bates D. Carsten Schultheis B. Hanes M.C. Jolly S.M. Chakravarthy K.V. Deer T.R. Levy R.M. Hunter C.W. A Comprehensive Algorithm for Management of Neuropathic Pain Pain Med. 2019 20 S2 S12 10.1093/pm/pnz075 9. Attal N. Pharmacological treatments of neuropathic pain: The latest recommendations Rev. Neurol. 2019 175 46 50 10.1016/j.neurol.2018.08.005 30318260 10. Smith H.S. Variations in Opioid Responsiveness Pain Physician 2008 11 237 248 18354715 11. Benyamin R. Trescot A. Datta S. Buenaventura R. Adllaka R. Sehgal N. Glaser S. Vallejo R. Opioid complications and side effects Pain Physician 2008 11 S105 S120 18443635 12. Smith H.S. Opioids and neuropathic pain Pain Physician 2012 15 ES93 ES110 10.1016/j.bbadis.2010.07.024 22786465 13. Sommer C. Klose P. Welsch P. Petzke F. Häuser W. Opioids for chronic non-cancer neuropathic pain. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, tolerability and safety in randomized placebo-controlled studies of at least 4 weeks duration Eur. J. Pain 2020 24 3 18 10.1002/ejp.1494 31705717 14. Stompór M. Grodzicki T. Stompór T. Wordliczek J. Dubiel M. Kurowska I. Prevalence of chronic pain, particularly with neuropathic component, and its effect on overall functioning of elderly patients Med. Sci. Monit. 2019 25 2695 2701 10.12659/MSM.911260 31018630 15. Alles S.R.A. Smith P.A. Etiology and pharmacology of neuropathic pain Pharmacol. Rev. 2018 70 315 347 10.1124/pr.117.014399 29500312 16. Khan M.I.A. Walsh D. Brito-Dellan N. Opioid and adjuvant analgesics: Compared and contrasted Am. J. Hosp. Palliat. Med. 2011 28 378 383 10.1177/1049909111410298 17. Dietis N. Rowbotham D.J. Lambert D.G. Opioid receptor subtypes: Fact or artifact? Br. J. Anaesth. 2011 107 8 18 10.1093/bja/aer115 21613279 18. Machelska H. Celik M. Opioid Receptors in Immune and Glial Cells—Implications for Pain Control Front. Immunol. 2020 11 300 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00300 32194554 19. Owusu Obeng A. Hamadeh I. Smith M. Review of Opioid Pharmacogenetics and Considerations for Pain Management Pharmacother. J. Hum. Pharmacol. Drug Ther. 2017 37 1105 1121 10.1002/phar.1986 20. Ferdousi M. Finn D.P. Stress-induced modulation of pain: Role of the endogenous opioid system Prog. Brain Res. 2018 239 121 177 9780444641670 30314566 21. Costa A.R. Carvalho P. Flik G. Wilson S.P. Reguenga C. Martins I. Tavares I. Neuropathic pain induced alterations in the opioidergic modulation of a descending pain facilitatory area of the brain Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2019 13 287 10.3389/fncel.2019.00287 31316354 22. Bán E.G. Brassai A. Vizi E.S. The role of the endogenous neurotransmitters associated with neuropathic pain and in the opioid crisis: The innate pain-relieving system Brain Res. Bull. 2020 155 129 136 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2019.12.001 31816407 23. Wiertelak E.P. Maier S.F. Watkins L.R. Cholecystokinin antianalgesia: Safety cues abolish morphine analgesia Science 1992 256 830 833 10.1126/science.1589765 1589765 24. Obara I. Mika J. Schäfer M.K. Przewlocka B. Antagonists of the j-opioid receptor enhance allodynia in rats and mice after sciatic nerve ligation Br. J. Pharmacol. 2003 140 538 546 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705427 12970097 25. Lai J. Luo M.-C. Chen Q. Ma S. Gardell L.R. Ossipov M.H. Porreca F. Dynorphin A activates bradykinin receptors to maintain neuropathic pain Nat. Neurosci. 2006 9 1534 1540 10.1038/nn1804 17115041 26. Lee Y.S. Hall S.M. Ramos-Colon C. Remesic M. Rankin D. Vanderah T.W. Porreca F. Lai J. Hruby V.J. Blockade of non-opioid excitatory effects of spinal Dynorphin A at bradykinin receptors Recept. Clin. Investig. 2015 2 517 10.14800/rci.517 27. Bannister K. Lee Y.S. Goncalves L. Porreca F. Lai J. Dickenson A.H. Neuropathic plasticity in the opioid and non-opioid actions of dynorphin A fragments and their interactions with bradykinin B2 receptors on neuronal activity in the rat spinal cord Neuropharmacology 2014 85 375 383 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2014.06.005 24937046 28. Starowicz K. Przewłocki R. Przewłocka B. Evidence for the involvement of MC4 receptors in the central mechanisms of opioid antinociception Int. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2005 2 9 10 29. Petraschka M. Li S. Gilbert T.L. Westenbroek R.E. Bruchas M.R. Schreiber S. Lowe J. Low M.J. Pintar J.E. Chavkin C. The absence of endogenous β-endorphin selectively blocks phosphorylation and desensitization of mu opioid receptors following partial sciatic nerve ligation Neuroscience 2007 146 1795 1807 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.03.029 17467916 30. Mika J. Popiolek-Barczyk K. Rojewska E. Makuch W. Starowicz K. Przewlocka B. Delta-Opioid Receptor Analgesia Is Independent of Microglial Activation in a Rat Model of Neuropathic Pain PLoS ONE 2014 9 e104420 10.1371/journal.pone.0104420 25105291 31. Lee C.Y. Perez F.M. Wang W. Guan X. Zhao X. Fisher J.L. Guan Y. Sweitzer S.M. Raja S.N. Tao Y.X. Dynamic temporal and spatial regulation of mu opioid receptor expression in primary afferent neurons following spinal nerve injury Eur. J. Pain 2011 15 669 675 10.1016/j.ejpain.2010.11.018 21310637 32. Obara I. Parkitna J.R. Korostynski M. Makuch W. Kaminska D. Przewlocka B. Przewlocki R. Local peripheral opioid effects and expression of opioid genes in the spinal cord and dorsal root ganglia in neuropathic and inflammatory pain Pain 2009 141 283 291 10.1016/j.pain.2008.12.006 19147290 33. Zhang X. Bao L. Shi T.J. Ju G. Elde R. Hökfelt T. Downregulation of μ-opioid receptors in rat and monkey dorsal root ganglion neurons and spinal cord after peripheral axotomy Neuroscience 1997 82 223 240 10.1016/S0306-4522(97)00240-6 34. Kohno T. Ji R.-R. Ito N. Allchorne A.J. Befort K. Karchewski L.A. Woolf C.J. Peripheral axonal injury results in reduced μ opioid receptor pre- and post-synaptic action in the spinal cord Pain 2005 117 77 87 10.1016/j.pain.2005.05.035 16098668 35. Maarrawi J. Peyron R. Mertens P. Costes N. Magnin M. Sindou M. Laurent B. Garcia-Larrea L. Differential brain opioid receptor availability in central and peripheral neuropathic pain Pain 2007 127 183 194 10.1016/j.pain.2006.10.013 17137714 36. Jones A.K.P. Watabe H. Cunningham V.J. Jones T. Cerebral decreases in opioid receptor binding in patients with central neuropathic pain measured by [11C]diprenorphine binding and PET Eur. J. Pain 2004 8 479 485 10.1016/j.ejpain.2003.11.017 15324779 37. Rojewska E. Wawrzczak-Bargiela A. Szucs E. Benyhe S. Starnowska J. Mika J. Przewlocki R. Przewlocka B. Alterations in the Activity of Spinal and Thalamic Opioid Systems in a Mice Neuropathic Pain Model Neuroscience 2018 390 293 302 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.08.013 30176322 38. Llorca-Torralba M. Pilar-Cuéllar F. da Silva Borges G. Mico J.A. Berrocoso E. Opioid receptors mRNAs expression and opioids agonist-dependent G-protein activation in the rat brain following neuropathy Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2020 99 109857 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2019.109857 39. Thompson S.J. Pitcher M.H. Stone L.S. Tarum F. Niu G. Chen X. Kiesewetter D.O. Schweinhardt P. Bushnell M.C. Chronic neuropathic pain reduces opioid receptor availability with associated anhedonia in rat Pain 2018 159 1856 1866 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001282 29794614 40. Schembri E. Are Opioids Effective in Relieving Neuropathic Pain? SN Compr. Clin. Med. 2019 1 30 46 10.1007/s42399-018-0009-4 41. Zhang G. Chen W. Marvizón J.C.G. Src family kinases mediate the inhibition of substance P release in the rat spinal cord by μ-opioid receptors and GABA(B) receptors, but not α2 adrenergic receptors Eur. J. Neurosci. 2010 32 963 973 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07335.x 20726886 42. Chen W. McRoberts J.A. Marvizón J.C.G. Mu-Opioid receptor inhibition of substance P release from primary afferents disappears in neuropathic pain but not inflammatory pain Neuroscience 2014 267 67 82 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.02.023 24583035 43. Bras J.M.A. Laporte A.M. Benoliel J.J. Bourgoin S. Mauborgne A. Hamon M. Cesselin F. Pohl M. Effects of peripheral axotomy on cholecystokinin neurotransmission in the rat spinal cord J. Neurochem. 1999 72 858 867 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1999.720858.x 9930763 44. Chen Y.W. Tzeng J.I. Huang P.C. Hung C.H. Shao D.Z. Wang J.J. Therapeutic Ultrasound Suppresses Neuropathic Pain and Upregulation of Substance P and Neurokinin-1 Receptor in Rats after Peripheral Nerve Injury Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2015 41 143 150 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.07.022 25438854 45. Aira Z. Buesa I. Gallego M. del Caño G.G. Mendiable N. Mingo J. Rada D. Bilbao J. Zimmermann M. Azkue J.J. Time-dependent cross talk between spinal serotonin 5-HT2A receptor and mGluR1 subserves spinal hyperexcitability and neuropathic pain after nerve injury J. Neurosci. 2012 32 13568 13581 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1364-12.2012 23015446 46. Gao S.H. Wen H.Z. Shen L.L. Zhao Y.D. Ruan H.Z. Activation of mGluR1 contributes to neuronal hyperexcitability in the rat anterior cingulate cortex via inhibition of HCN channels Neuropharmacology 2016 105 361 377 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2016.01.036 26829470 47. Luiz A.P. Schroeder S.D. Rae G.A. Calixto J.B. Chichorro J.G. Contribution and interaction of kinin receptors and dynorphin A in a model of trigeminal neuropathic pain in mice Neuroscience 2015 300 189 200 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.05.015 25982562 48. Vanderah T.W. Gardell L.R. Burgess S.E. Ibrahim M. Dogrul A. Zhong C.-M. Zhang E.-T. Malan T.P.J. Ossipov M.H. Lai J. Dynorphin Promotes Abnormal Pain and Spinal Opioid Antinociceptive Tolerance J. Neurosci. 2000 20 7074 7079 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-18-07074.2000 10995854 49. Bai X. Wang C. Zhang X. Feng Y. Zhang X. The role of testosterone in mu-opioid receptor expression in the trigeminal ganglia of opioid-tolerant rats Neurosci. Lett. 2020 723 134868 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.134868 32109552 50. Ossipov M.H. Lai J. King T. Vanderah T.W. Porreca F. Underlying mechanisms of pronociceptive consequences of prolonged morphine exposure Biopolymers 2005 80 319 324 10.1002/bip.20254 15795927 51. Mika J. Zychowska M. Popiolek-Barczyk K. Rojewska E. Przewlocka B. Importance of glial activation in neuropathic pain Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2013 716 106 119 10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.01.072 23500198 52. Plein L.M. Rittner H.L. Opioids and the immune system—Friend or foe Br. J. Pharmacol. 2018 175 2717 2725 10.1111/bph.13750 28213891 53. Mao J. Mayer D.J. Spinal cord neuroplasticity following repeated opioid exposure and its relation to pathological pain Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 2001 933 175 184 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb05823.x 12000019 54. Azzam A.A.H. McDonald J. Lambert D.G. Hot topics in opioid pharmacology: Mixed and biased opioids Br. J. Anaesth. 2019 122 e136 e145 10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.006 31010646 55. Dietis N. Guerrini R. Calo G. Salvadori S. Rowbotham D.J. Lambert D.G. Simultaneous targeting of multiple opioid receptors: A strategy to improve side-effect profile Br. J. Anaesth. 2009 103 38 49 10.1093/bja/aep129 19474215 56. Vicario N. Pasquinucci L. Spitale F.M. Chiechio S. Turnaturi R. Caraci F. Tibullo D. Avola R. Gulino R. Parenti R. Simultaneous Activation of Mu and Delta Opioid Receptors Reduces Allodynia and Astrocytic Connexin 43 in an Animal Model of Neuropathic Pain Mol. Neurobiol. 2019 56 7338 7354 10.1007/s12035-019-1607-1 31030416 57. Podolsky A.T. Sandweiss A. Hu J. Bilsky E.J. Cain J.P. Kumirov V.K. Lee Y.S. Hruby V.J. Vardanyan R.S. Vanderah T.W. Novel fentanyl-based dual μ/δ-opioid agonists for the treatment of acute and chronic pain Life Sci. 2013 93 1010 1016 10.1016/j.lfs.2013.09.016 24084045 58. Lei W. Vekariya R.H. Ananthan S. Streicher J.M. A Novel Mu-Delta Opioid Agonist Demonstrates Enhanced Efficacy With Reduced Tolerance and Dependence in Mouse Neuropathic Pain Models J. Pain 2020 21 146 160 10.1016/j.jpain.2019.05.017 31201990 59. Vicario N. Parenti R. Aricò G. Turnaturi R. Scoto G.M. Chiechio S. Parenti C. Repeated activation of delta opioid receptors counteracts nerve injury-induced TNF-α upregulation in the sciatic nerve of rats with neuropathic pain Mol. Pain 2016 12 174480691666794 10.1177/1744806916667949 60. Polo S. Díaz A.F. Gallardo N. Leánez S. Balboni G. Pol O. Treatment with the delta opioid agonist UFP-512 alleviates chronic inflammatory and neuropathic pain: Mechanisms implicated Front. Pharmacol. 2019 10 283 10.3389/fphar.2019.00283 30971925 61. Lesniak A. Bochynska-Czyz M. Sacharczuk M. Benhye S. Misicka A. Bujalska-Zadrozny M. Lipkowski A.W. Biphalin preferentially recruits peripheral opioid receptors to facilitate analgesia in a mouse model of cancer pain-A comparison with morphine Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2016 89 39 49 10.1016/j.ejps.2016.04.014 27094782 62. Popiolek-Barczyk K. Piotrowska A. Makuch W. Mika J. Biphalin, a Dimeric Enkephalin, Alleviates LPS-Induced Activation in Rat Primary Microglial Cultures in Opioid Receptor-Dependent and Receptor-Independent Manners Neural Plast. 2017 2017 3829472 10.1155/2017/3829472 28573049 63. Parenti C. Turnaturi R. Aricò G. Marrazzo A. Prezzavento O. Ronsisvalle S. Scoto G.M. Ronsisvalle G. Pasquinucci L. Antinociceptive profile of LP1, a non-peptide multitarget opioid ligand Life Sci. 2012 90 957 961 10.1016/j.lfs.2012.04.041 22580287 64. Vekariya R.H. Lei W. Ray A. Saini S.K. Zhang S. Molnar G. Barlow D. Karlage K.L. Bilsky E.J. Houseknecht K.L. Synthesis and Structure-Activity Relationships of 5′-Aryl-14-alkoxypyridomorphinans: Identification of a μ Opioid Receptor Agonist/δOpioid Receptor Antagonist Ligand with Systemic Antinociceptive Activity and Diminished Opioid Side Effects J. Med. Chem. 2020 63 7663 7694 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00503 32530286 65. Sounvoravong S. Takahashi M. Nakashima M.N. Nakashima K. Disability of Development of Tolerance to Morphine and U-50,488H, A Selective κ-Opioid Receptor Agonist, in Neuropathic Pain Model Mice J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2004 94 305 312 10.1254/jphs.94.305 15037816 66. Maier C. Baron R. Tölle T.R. Binder A. Birbaumer N. Birklein F. Gierthmühlen J. Flor H. Geber C. Huge V. Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): Somatosensory abnormalities in 1236 patients with different neuropathic pain syndromes Pain 2010 150 439 450 10.1016/j.pain.2010.05.002 20627413 67. Landerholml Å.H. Hansson P.T. Mechanisms of dynamic mechanical allodynia and dysesthesia in patients with peripheral and central neuropathic pain Eur. J. Pain 2011 15 498 503 10.1016/j.ejpain.2010.10.003 21094619 68. Pan Z. μ-opposing actions of the κ-opioid receptor Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 1998 19 94 98 10.1016/S0165-6147(98)01169-9 9584625 69. Navratilova E. Ji G. Phelps C. Qu C. Hein M. Yakhnitsa V. Neugebauer V. Porreca F. Kappa opioid signaling in the central nucleus of the amygdala promotes disinhibition and aversiveness of chronic neuropathic pain Pain 2019 160 824 832 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001458 30681985 70. Snyder L.M. Chiang M.C. Loeza-Alcocer E. Omori Y. Hachisuka J. Sheahan T.D. Gale J.R. Adelman P.C. Sypek E.I. Fulton S.A. Kappa Opioid Receptor Distribution and Function in Primary Afferents Neuron 2018 99 1274 1288.e6 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.044 30236284 71. Xu B. Zhang M. Shi X. Zhang R. Chen D. Chen Y. Wang Z. Qiu Y. Zhang T. Xu K. The multifunctional peptide DN-9 produced peripherally acting antinociception in inflammatory and neuropathic pain via μ- and κ-opioid receptors Br. J. Pharmacol. 2020 177 93 109 10.1111/bph.14848 31444977 72. Albert-Vartanian A. Boyd M.R. Hall A.L. Morgado S.J. Nguyen E. Nguyen V.P.H. Patel S.P. Russo L.J. Shao A.J. Raffa R.B. Will peripherally restricted kappa-opioid receptor agonists (pKORAs) relieve pain with less opioid adverse effects and abuse potential? J. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 2016 41 371 382 10.1111/jcpt.12404 27245498 73. Hopkins A.L. Network pharmacology: The next paradigm in drug discovery Nat. Chem. Biol. 2008 4 682 690 10.1038/nchembio.118 18936753 74. Chaparro L.E. Wiffen P.J. Moore R.A. Gilron I. Combination pharmacotherapy for the treatment of neuropathic pain in adults Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012 7 CD008943 10.1002/14651858.CD008943.pub2 75. de Oliveira Pedrosa M. Duarte da Cruz R.M. de Oliveira Viana J. de Moura R.O. Ishiki H.M. Barbosa Filho J.M. Diniz M.F. Scotti M.T. Scotti L. Bezerra Mendonca F.J. Hybrid Compounds as Direct Multitarget Ligands: A Review Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2017 17 1044 1079 10.2174/1568026616666160927160620 27697048 76. Schiller P.W. Bi- or multifunctional opioid peptide drugs Life Sci. 2010 86 598 603 10.1016/j.lfs.2009.02.025 19285088 77. Xu Y. Guan X. Zhou R. Gong R. Melanocortin 5 receptor signaling pathway in health and disease Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2020 77 3831 3840 10.1007/s00018-020-03511-0 32248247 78. Novoselova T.V. Chan L.F. Clark A.J.L. Pathophysiology of melanocortin receptors and their accessory proteins Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018 32 93 106 10.1016/j.beem.2018.02.002 29678289 79. Gantz I. Fong T.M. The melanocortin system Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2003 284 E468 E474 10.1152/ajpendo.00434.2002 12556347 80. Rocha A. Godino-Gimeno A. Cerdá-Reverter J.M. Evolution of proopiomelanocortin Vitam. Horm. 2019 111 1 16 9780128188583 31421696 81. Bäckryd E. Ghafouri B. Larsson B. Gerdle B. Do low levels of beta-endorphin in the cerebrospinal fluid indicate defective top-down inhibition in patients with chronic neuropathic pain? A cross-sectional, comparative study Pain Med. 2014 15 111 119 10.1111/pme.12248 24118997 82. Tsigos C. Gibson S. Crosby S.R. White A. Young R.J. Cerebrospinal fluid levels of β endorphin in painful and painless diabetic polyneuropathy J. Diabetes Complications 1995 9 92 96 10.1016/1056-8727(94)00024-I 7599354 83. Mountjoy K.G. Distribution and function of melanocortin receptors within the brain Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2010 681 29 48 21222258 84. Vrinten D.H. Gispen W.H. Groen G.J. Adan R.A. Antagonism of the melanocortin system reduces cold and mechanical allodynia in mononeuropathic rats J. Neurosci. 2000 20 8131 8137 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-21-08131.2000 11050135 85. Starowicz K. Mousa S.A. Obara I. Chocyk A. Przewłocki R. Wedzony K. Machelska H. Przewłocka B. Peripheral antinociceptive effects of MC4 receptor antagonists in a rat model of neuropathic pain-a biochemical and behavioral study Pharmacol. Reports 2009 61 1086 1095 10.1016/S1734-1140(09)70171-9 86. Zhao Y. Xin Y. Chu H. MC4R Is Involved in Neuropathic Pain by Regulating JNK Signaling Pathway After Chronic Constriction Injury Front. Neurosci. 2019 13 919 10.3389/fnins.2019.00919 31551683 87. Starowicz K. Przewlocki R. Gispen W.H. Przewlocka B. Modulation of melanocortin-induced changes in spinal nociception by mu-opioid receptor agonist and antagonist in neuropathic rats Neuroreport 2002 13 2447 2452 10.1097/00001756-200212200-00015 12499847 88. Ercil N.E. Galici R. Kesterson R.A. HS014, a selective melanocortin-4 (MC4) receptor antagonist, modulates the behavioral effects of morphine in mice Psychopharmacology 2005 180 279 285 10.1007/s00213-005-2166-x 15719225 89. Starowicz K. Obara I. Przewłocki R. Przewlocka B. Inhibition of morphine tolerance by spinal melanocortin receptor blockade Pain 2005 117 401 411 10.1016/j.pain.2005.07.003 16153779 90. Song Y.T. Liu T.T. Feng L. Zhang T. Xiang H. bing Melanocortin-4 receptor expression in the cuneiform nucleus is involved in modulation of opioidergic signaling J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technolog. Med. Sci. 2015 35 662 665 10.1007/s11596-015-1486-2 26489618 91. Hruby V.J. Lu D. Sharma S.D. Castrucci A.L. Kesterson R.A. al-Obeidi F.A. Hadley M.E. Cone R.D. Cyclic lactam alpha-melanotropin analogues of Ac-Nle4-cyclo[Asp5, D-Phe7,Lys10] alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone-(4-10)-NH2 with bulky aromatic amino acids at position 7 show high antagonist potency and selectivity at specific melanocortin receptors J. Med. Chem. 1995 38 3454 3461 10.1021/jm00018a005 7658432 92. Kulkarni V.V. Lee Y.S. Salibay C. Davis P. Ma S.-W. Porreca F. Hruby V.J. Novel analogues of bifunctional ligands for opioid and melanocortin 4 receptor Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2009 611 195 196 19400157 93. Lee Y.S. Fernandes S. Kulkarani V. Mayorov A. Davis P. Ma S.W. Brown K. Gillies R.J. Lai J. Porreca F. Design and synthesis of trivalent ligands targeting opioid, cholecystokinin, and melanocortin receptors for the treatment of pain Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2010 20 4080 4084 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.05.078 20547453 94. Piotrowska A. Starnowska-Sokół J. Makuch W. Mika J. Witkowska E. Tymecka D. Ignaczak A. Wilenska B. Misicka A. Przewłocka B. Novel bifunctional hybrid compounds designed to enhance the effects of opioids and antagonize the pronociceptive effects of non-opioid peptides as potent analgesics in a rat model of neuropathic pain Pain 2020 in press 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002045 95. Starnowska-Sokół J. Piotrowska A. Bogacka J. Makuch W. Mika J. Witkowska E. Godlewska M. Osiejuk J. Gątarz S. Misicka A. Novel hybrid compounds, opioid agonist + melanocortin 4 receptor antagonist, as efficient analgesics in mouse chronic constriction injury model of neuropathic pain Neuropharmacology 2020 178 108232 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2020.108232 32750445 96. Reinscheid R.K. Nothacker H.P. Bourson A. Ardati A. Henningsen R.A. Bunzow J.R. Grandy D.K. Langen H. Monsma F.J. Jr. Civell O. Orphanin FQ: A Neuropeptide That Activates an Opioidlike G Protein-Coupled Receptor Science 1995 270 792 794 10.1126/science.270.5237.792 7481766 97. Meunier J.C. Mollereau C. Toll L. Suaudeau C. Moisand C. Alvinerie P. Butour J.L. Guillemot J.C. Ferrara P. Monsarrat B. Isolation and structure of the endogenous agonist of opioid receptor-like ORL1receptor Nature 1995 377 532 535 10.1038/377532a0 7566152 98. Kiguchi N. Ding H. Ko M.-C. Central N/OFQ-NOP Receptor System in Pain Modulation Adv. Pharmacol. 2016 75 217 243 10.1016/bs.apha.2015.10.001 26920014 99. Sakurada T. Katsuyama S. Sakurada S. Inoue M. Tan-No K. Kisara K. Sakurada C. Ueda H. Sasaki J. Nociceptin-induced scratching, biting and licking in mice: Involvement of spinal NK1 receptors Br. J. Pharmacol. 1999 127 1712 1718 10.1038/sj.bjp.0702698 10455330 100. Xu X.J. Hao J.X. Wiesenfeld-Hallin Z. Nociceptin or antinociceptin: Potent spinal antinociceptive effect of orphanin FQ/nociceptin in the rat Neuroreport 1996 7 2092 2094 8930965 101. Courteix C. Coudoré-Civiale M.A. Privat A.M. Pélissier T. Eschalier A. Fialip J. Evidence for an exclusive antinociceptive effect of nociceptin/orphanin FQ, an endogenous ligand for the ORL1 receptor, in two animal models of neuropathic pain Pain 2004 110 236 245 10.1016/j.pain.2004.03.037 15275773 102. Obara I. Przewlocki R. Przewlocka B. Spinal and local peripheral antiallodynic activity of Ro64-6198 in neuropathic pain in the rat Pain 2005 116 17 25 10.1016/j.pain.2005.03.012 15927383 103. Hu E. Calò G. Guerrini R. Ko M.C. Long-lasting antinociceptive spinal effects in primates of the novel nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptor agonist UFP-112 Pain 2010 148 107 113 10.1016/j.pain.2009.10.026 19945794 104. Khroyan T.V. Polgar W.E. Orduna J. Montenegro J. Jiang F. Zaveri N.T. Toll L. Differential effects of nociceptin/orphanin FQ (NOP) receptor agonists in acute versus chronic pain: Studies with bifunctional NOP/μ receptor agonists in the sciatic nerve ligation chronic pain model in mice J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2011 339 687 693 10.1124/jpet.111.184663 21859931 105. Butler S. Buprenorphine-Clinically useful but often misunderstood Scand. J. Pain 2013 4 148 152 10.1016/j.sjpain.2013.05.004 29913911 106. Sukhtankar D.D. Zaveri N.T. Husbands S.M. Ko M.-C. Effects of spinally administered bifunctional nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide receptor/μ-opioid receptor ligands in mouse models of neuropathic and inflammatory pain J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2013 346 11 22 10.1124/jpet.113.203984 23652222 107. Cerlesi M.C. Ding H. Bird M.F. Kiguchi N. Ferrari F. Malfacini D. Rizzi A. Ruzza C. Lambert D.G. Ko M.C. Pharmacological studies on the NOP and opioid receptor agonist PWT2-[Dmt1]N/OFQ(1-13) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2017 794 115 126 10.1016/j.ejphar.2016.11.026 27871910 108. Ding H. Czoty P.W. Kiguchi N. Cami-Kobeci G. Sukhtankar D.D. Nader M.A. Husbands S.M. Ko M.C. A novel orvinol analog, BU08028, as a safe opioid analgesic without abuse liability in primates Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016 113 E5511 E5518 10.1073/pnas.1605295113 27573832 109. Ding H. Kiguchi N. Yasuda D. Daga P.R. Polgar W.E. Lu J.J. Czoty P.W. Kishioka S. Zaveri N.T. Ko M.C. A bifunctional nociceptin and mu opioid receptor agonist is analgesic without opioid side effects in nonhuman primates Sci. Transl. Med. 2018 10 3483 10.1126/scitranslmed.aar3483 110. Guillemyn K. Starnowska J. Lagard C. Dyniewicz J. Rojewska E. Mika J. Chung N.N. Utard V. Kosson P. Lipkowski A.W. Bifunctional Peptide-Based Opioid Agonist-Nociceptin Antagonist Ligands for Dual Treatment of Acute and Neuropathic Pain J. Med. Chem. 2016 59 3777 3792 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01976 27035422 111. Lagard C. Chevillard L. Guillemyn K. Risède P. Laplanche J.-L. Spetea M. Ballet S. Mégarbane B. Bifunctional peptide-based opioid agonist/nociceptin antagonist ligand for dual treatment of nociceptive and neuropathic pain Pain 2017 158 505 515 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000790 28135212 112. Schunk S. Linz K. Hinze C. Frormann S. Oberbörsch S. Sundermann B. Zemolka S. Englberger W. Germann T. Christoph T. Discovery of a Potent Analgesic NOP and Opioid Receptor Agonist: Cebranopadol ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2014 5 857 862 10.1021/ml500117c 25147603 113. Sałat K. Furgała A. Sałat R. Evaluation of cebranopadol, a dually acting nociceptin/orphanin FQ and opioid receptor agonist in mouse models of acute, tonic, and chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain Inflammopharmacology 2018 26 361 374 10.1007/s10787-017-0405-5 29071457 114. McRoberts J.W. Cholecystokinin and Pain Anesth. Prog. 1986 33 87 2872841 115. Faris P.L. Komisaruk B.R. Watkins L.R. Mayer D.J. Evidence for the neuropeptide cholecystokinin as an antagonist of opiate analgesia Science 1983 219 310 312 10.1126/science.6294831 6294831 116. Zetler G. Antagonism of cholecystokinin-like peptides by opioid peptides, morphine or tetrodotoxin Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1979 60 67 77 10.1016/0014-2999(79)90053-0 520418 117. Zhang W. Gardell S. Zhang D. Xie J.Y. Agnes R.S. Badghisi H. Hruby V.J. Rance N. Ossipov M.H. Vanderah T.W. Neuropathic pain is maintained by brainstem neurons co-expressing opioid and cholecystokinin receptors Brain 2009 132 778 787 10.1093/brain/awn330 19050032 118. Kovelowski C.J. Ossipov M.H. Sun H. Lai J. Malan T.P. Porreca F. Supraspinal cholecystokinin may drive tonic descending facilitation mechanisms to maintain neuropathic pain in the rat Pain 2000 87 265 273 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00290-6 10963906 119. Veraksitš A. Rünkorg K. Kurrikoff K. Raud S. Abramov U. Matsui T. Bourin M. Kõks S. Vasar E. Altered pain sensitivity and morphine-induced anti-nociception in mice lacking CCK2 receptors Psychopharmacology 2003 166 168 175 10.1007/s00213-002-1333-6 12545332 120. Roques B.P. Noble F. Association of enkephalin catabolism inhibitors and CCK-B antagonists: A potential use in the management of pain and opioid addiction Neurochem. Res. 1996 21 1397 1410 10.1007/BF02532381 8947930 121. Kim J. Kim Y. Hahm S.C. Yoon Y.W. Effect of the combination of CI-988 and morphine on neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury in rats Korean J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2015 19 125 130 10.4196/kjpp.2015.19.2.125 25729274 122. Agnes R.S. Lee Y.S. Davis P. Ma S.W. Badghisi H. Porreca F. Lai J. Hruby V.J. Structure-activity relationships of bifunctional peptides based on overlapping pharmacophores at opioid and cholecystokinin receptors J. Med. Chem. 2006 49 2868 2875 10.1021/jm050921q 16686530 123. Hanlon K.E. Herman D.S. Agnes R.S. Largent-Milnes T.M. Kumarasinghe I.R. Ma S.W. Guo W. Lee Y.-S. Ossipov M.H. Hruby V.J. Novel peptide ligands with dual acting pharmacophores designed for the pathophysiology of neuropathic pain Brain Res. 2011 1395 1 11 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.04.024 21550594 124. Cao Y.Q. Mantyh P.W. Carlson E.J. Gillespie A.M. Epstein C.J. Basbaum A.I. Primary afferent tachykinins are required to experience moderate to intense pain Nature 1998 392 390 394 10.1038/32897 9537322 125. Steinhoff M.S. von Mentzer B. Geppetti P. Pothoulakis C. Bunnett N.W. Tachykinins and their receptors: Contributions to physiological control and the mechanisms of disease Physiol. Rev. 2014 94 265 301 10.1152/physrev.00031.2013 24382888 126. Snijdelaar D.G. Dirksen R. Slappendel R. Crul B.J.P. Substance P Eur. J. Pain 2000 4 121 135 10.1053/eujp.2000.0171 10957694 127. Lee S.E. Kim J.-H. Involvement of substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide in development and maintenance of neuropathic pain from spinal nerve injury model of rat Neurosci. Res. 2007 58 245 249 10.1016/j.neures.2007.03.004 17428562 128. Green D.P. Limjunyawong N. Gour N. Pundir P. Dong X. A Mast-Cell-Specific Receptor Mediates Neurogenic Inflammation and Pain Neuron 2019 101 412 420.e3 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.01.012 30686732 129. Hutchinson M.R. Coats B.D. Lewis S.S. Zhang Y. Sprunger D.B. Rezvani N. Baker E.M. Jekich B.M. Wieseler J.L. Somogyi A. Proinflammatory cytokines oppose opioid-induced acute and chronic analgesia Brain. Behav. Immun. 2008 22 1178 1189 10.1016/j.bbi.2008.05.004 18599265 130. Cahill C.M. Coderre T.J. Attenuation of hyperalgesia in a rat model of neuropathic pain after intrathecal pre- or post-treatment with a neurokinin-1 antagonist Pain 2002 95 277 285 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00410-9 11839427 131. Gadd C.A. Murtra P. De Felipe C. Hunt S.P. Neurokinin-1 receptor-expressing neurons in the amygdala modulate morphine reward and anxiety behaviors in the mouse J. Neurosci. 2003 23 8271 8280 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-23-08271.2003 12967989 132. Sandweiss A.J. McIntosh M.I. Moutal A. Davidson-Knapp R. Hu J. Giri A.K. Yamamoto T. Hruby V.J. Khanna R. Largent-Milnes T.M. Genetic and pharmacological antagonism of NK1 receptor prevents opiate abuse potential Mol. Psychiatry 2018 23 1745 1755 10.1038/mp.2017.102 28485408 133. Saito R. Takano Y. Kamiya H.O. Roles of substance P and NK1 receptor in the brainstem in the development of emesis J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2003 91 87 94 10.1254/jphs.91.87 12686752 134. Wtorek K. Adamska-Bartłomiejczyk A. Piekielna-Ciesielska J. Ferrari F. Ruzza C. Kluczyk A. Piasecka-Zelga J. Calo’ G. Janecka A. Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of hybrids targeting opioid and neurokinin receptors Molecules 2019 24 4460 10.3390/molecules24244460 31817441 135. Largent-Milnes T.M. Brookshire S.W. Skinner D.P. Hanlon K.E. Giuvelis D. Yamamoto T. Davis P. Campos C.R. Nair P. Deekonda S. Building a better analgesic: Multifunctional compounds that address injury-induced pathology to enhance analgesic efficacy while eliminating unwanted side effects J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2013 347 7 19 10.1124/jpet.113.205245 23860305 136. Starnowska J. Costante R. Guillemyn K. Popiolek-Barczyk K. Chung N.N. Lemieux C. Keresztes A. Van Duppen J. Mollica A. Streicher J.M. Analgesic properties of opioid/NK1 multitarget ligands with distinct in vitro profiles in naive and chronic constriction injury (CCI)-mice ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2017 8 2315 2324 10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00226 28699350 137. Betti C. Starnowska J. Mika J. Dyniewicz J. Frankiewicz L. Novoa A. Bochynska M. Keresztes A. Kosson P. Makuch W. Dual Alleviation of Acute and Neuropathic Pain by Fused Opioid Agonist-Neurokinin 1 Antagonist Peptidomimetics ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2015 6 1209 1214 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.5b00359 26713106 138. Rashid M.H. Inoue M. Bakoshi S. Ueda H. Increased expression of vanilloid receptor 1 on myelinated primary afferent neurons contributes to the antihyperalgesic effect of capsaicin cream in diabetic neuropathic pain in mice J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2003 306 709 717 10.1124/jpet.103.050948 12724350 139. Cayla C. Labuz D. MacHelska H. Bader M. Schäfer M. Stein C. Impaired nociception and peripheral opioid antinociception in mice lacking both kinin b1 and b2 receptors Anesthesiology 2012 116 448 457 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318242b2ea 22273860 140. Wang Z. Gardell L.R. Ossipov M.H. Vanderah T.W. Brennan M.B. Hochgeschwender U. Hruby V.J. Malan T.P.J. Lai J. Porreca F. Pronociceptive Actions of Dynorphin Maintain Chronic Neuropathic Pain J. Neurosci. 2001 21 1779 1786 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-05-01779.2001 11222667 141. Lai J. Luo M.C. Chen Q. Porreca F. Pronociceptive actions of dynorphin via bradykinin receptors Neurosci. Lett. 2008 437 175 179 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.03.088 18450375 142. Gardell L.R. Wang R. Burgess S.E. Ossipov M.H. Vanderah T.W. Malan T.P. Lai J. Porreca F. Sustained morphine exposure induces a spinal dynorphin-dependent enhancement of excitatory transmitter release from primary afferent fibers J. Neurosci. 2002 22 6747 6755 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-15-06747.2002 12151554 143. Levy D. Zochodne D.W. Increased mRNA expression of the B1 and B2 bradykinin receptors and antinociceptive effects of their antagonists in an animal model of neuropathic pain Pain 2000 86 265 271 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00256-6 10812256 144. Deekonda S. Rankin D. Davis P. Lai J. Porreca F. Hruby V.J. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of multifunctional ligands targeting opioid and bradykinin 2 receptors Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2015 25 4148 4152 10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.08.014 145. Feng Y.-P. Wang J. Dong Y.-L. Wang Y.-Y. Li Y.-Q. The Roles of Neurotensin and its Analogues in Pain Curr. Pharm. Des. 2014 21 840 848 10.2174/1381612820666141027124915 25345606 146. Kleczkowska P. Lipkowski A.W. Neurotensin and neurotensin receptors: Characteristic, structure-activity relationship and pain modulation-A review Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2013 716 54 60 10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.03.004 23500196 147. Smith D.J. Hawranko A.A. Monroe P.J. Gully D. Urban M.O. Craig C.R. Smith J.P. Smith D.L. Dose-dependent pain-facilitatory and -inhibitory actions of neurotensin are revealed by SR 48692, a nonpeptide neurotensin antagonist: Influence on the antinociceptive effect of morphine J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1997 282 899 908 9262357 148. Vachon P. Massé R. Gibbs B.F. Substance P and neurotensin are upregulated in the lumbar spinal cord of animals with neurpathic pain Can. J. Vet. Res. 2004 68 86 92 15188951 149. Lafrance M. Roussy G. Belleville K. Maeno H. Beaudet N. Wada K. Sarret P. Involvement of NTS2 receptors in stress-induced analgesia Neuroscience 2010 166 639 652 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.12.042 20035838 150. Eiselt E. Gonzalez S. Martin C. Chartier M. Betti C. Longpré J.M. Cavelier F. Tourwé D. Gendron L. Ballet S. Neurotensin Analogues Containing Cyclic Surrogates of Tyrosine at Position 11 Improve NTS2 Selectivity Leading to Analgesia without Hypotension and Hypothermia ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2019 10 4535 4544 10.1021/acschemneuro.9b00390 31589400 151. Hughes F.M. Shaner B.E. May L.A. Zotian L. Brower J.O. Woods R.J. Cash M. Morrow D. Massa F. Mazella J. Identification and functional characterization of a stable, centrally active derivative of the neurotensin (8-13) fragment as a potential first-in-class analgesic J. Med. Chem. 2010 53 4623 4632 10.1021/jm100092s 20481538 152. Eiselt E. Côté J. Longpré J.M. Blais V. Sarret P. Gendron L. The combination of opioid and neurotensin receptor agonists improves their analgesic/adverse effect ratio Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2019 848 80 87 10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.01.048 30707956 153. Boules M. Johnston H. Tozy J. Smith K. Li Z. Richelson E. Analgesic synergy of neurotensin receptor subtype 2 agonist NT79 and morphine Behav. Pharmacol. 2011 22 573 581 10.1097/FBP.0b013e3283474a3a 21691202 154. Tétreault P. Beaudet N. Perron A. Belleville K. René A. Cavelier F. Martinez J. Stroh T. Jacobi A.M. Rose S.D. Spinal NTS2 receptor activation reverses signs of neuropathic pain FASEB J. 2013 27 3741 3752 10.1096/fj.12-225540 23756650 155. Kleczkowska P. Hermans E. Kosson P. Kowalczyk A. Lesniak A. Pawlik K. Bojnik E. Benyhe S. Nowicka B. Bujalska-Zadrozny M. Antinociceptive effect induced by a combination of opioid and neurotensin moieties vs. their hybrid peptide [Ile9]PK20 in an acute pain treatment in rodents Brain Res. 2016 1648 172 180 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.07.039 27473894 156. Inquimbert P. Bartels K. Babaniyi O.B. Barrett L.B. Tegeder I. Scholz J. Peripheral nerve injury produces a sustained shift in the balance between glutamate release and uptake in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord Pain 2012 153 2422 2431 10.1016/j.pain.2012.08.011 23021150 157. Pereira V. Goudet C. Emerging trends in pain modulation by metabotropic glutamate receptors Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2019 11 464 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00464 30662395 158. Li J.Q. Chen S.R. Chen H. Cai Y.Q. Pan H.L. Regulation of increased glutamatergic input to spinal dorsal horn neurons by mGluR5 in diabetic neuropathic pain J. Neurochem. 2010 112 162 172 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06437.x 19840219 159. Ghelardini C. Menicacci C. Cerretani D. Bianchi E. Spinal administration of mGluR5 antagonist prevents the onset of bortezomib induced neuropathic pain in rat Neuropharmacology 2014 86 294 300 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2014.08.004 25128849 160. Osikowicz M. Mika J. Makuch W. Przewlocka B. Glutamate receptor ligands attenuate allodynia and hyperalgesia and potentiate morphine effects in a mouse model of neuropathic pain Pain 2008 139 117 126 10.1016/j.pain.2008.03.017 18442882 161. Akgün E. Javed M.I. Lunzer M.M. Smeester B.A. Beitz A.J. Portoghese P.S. Ligands that interact with putative MOR-mGluR5 heteromer in mice with inflammatory pain produce potent antinociception Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013 110 11595 11599 10.1073/pnas.1305461110 23798416 162. Peterson C.D. Kitto K.F. Akgün E. Lunzer M.M. Riedl M.S. Vulchanova L. Wilcox G.L. Portoghese P.S. Fairbanks C.A. Bivalent ligand that activates mu opioid receptor and antagonizes mGluR5 receptor reduces neuropathic pain in mice Pain 2017 158 2431 2441 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001050 28891868 163. Speltz R. Lunzer M.M. Shueb S.S. Akgün E. Reed R. Kalyuzhny A. Portoghese P.S. Simone D.A. The bivalent ligand, MMG22, reduces neuropathic pain after nerve injury without the side effects of traditional opioids Pain 2020 161 2041 2057 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001902 32345918 164. Vincent K. Cornea V.M. Jong Y.J.I. Laferriere A. Kumar N. Mickeviciute A. Fung J.S.T. Bandegi P. Ribeiro-Da-Silva A. O’Malley K.L. Intracellular mGluR5 plays a critical role in neuropathic pain Nat. Commun. 2016 7 10604 10.1038/ncomms10604 26837579 165. Maximyuk O. Khmyz V. Lindskog C.J. Vukojević V. Ivanova T. Bazov I. Hauser K.F. Bakalkin G. Krishtal O. Plasma membrane poration by opioid neuropeptides: A possible mechanism of pathological signal transduction Cell Death Dis. 2015 6 e1683 10.1038/cddis.2015.39 25766322 166. McCleane G.J. A randomised, double blind, placebo controlled crossover study of the cholecystokinin 2 antagonist L-365,260 as an adjunct to strong opioids in chronic human neuropathic pain Neurosci. Lett. 2003 338 151 154 10.1016/S0304-3940(02)01388-5 12566175 167. Sindrup S.H. Graf A. Sfikas N. The NK1-receptor antagonist TKA731 in painful diabetic neuropathy: A randomised, controlled trial Eur. J. Pain 2006 10 567 571 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.08.001 16199188 168. Hill R. NK1 (substance P) receptor antagonists-Why are they not analgesic in humans? Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2000 21 244 246 10.1016/S0165-6147(00)01502-9 10871891 169. Wall R.J. Shani M. Are animal models as good as we think? Theriogenology 2008 69 2 9 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.09.030 17988725 170. Jaggi A.S. Jain V. Singh N. Animal models of neuropathic pain Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 2011 25 1 28 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2009.00801.x 171. Mogil J.S. Animal models of pain: Progress and challenges Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2009 10 283 294 10.1038/nrn2606 19259101 172. Teodoro F.C. Tronco Júnior M.F. Zampronio A.R. Martini A.C. Rae G.A. Chichorro J.G. Peripheral substance P and neurokinin-1 receptors have a role in inflammatory and neuropathic orofacial pain models Neuropeptides 2013 47 199 206 10.1016/j.npep.2012.10.005 23177733