==== Front Sci Rep Sci Rep Scientific Reports 2045-2322 Nature Publishing Group UK London 78468 10.1038/s41598-020-78468-y Article Fe(II)-activated persulfate oxidation to degrade iopamidol in water: parameters optimization and degradation paths Dong Zijun 1 Chen Guanhan 2 Li Mu 2 Sun Feiyun sun_fy@hit.edu.cn 2 Jiang Chengchun 1 Bharti Bandna 2 1 grid.464445.30000 0004 1790 3863School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Shenzhen Polytechnic, Shenzhen, 518055 China 2 grid.19373.3f0000 0001 0193 3564School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518055 China 9 12 2020 9 12 2020 2020 10 2154829 4 2020 21 10 2020 © The Author(s) 2020Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.Iodinated contrast media (ICM), which was widely used in medical imaging and was difficult to remove by conventional wastewater treatment methods, attained much attention due to its potential environmental impacts. Herein, iopamidol (IPM), one typical compound of ICM, was found to be rapidly degraded by ferrous activated persulfate oxidation (Fe(II)/PS) as compared with PS or Fe(II) alone. With a persulfate concentration of 1 mmol L−1, n(Fe(II))/n(PS) of 1:10, and a pH of 3.0, 78% IPM was degraded within 60 min, with a degradation rate of 0.1266 min−1. It was demonstrated that IPM degradation and deiodination were favored by a high temperature, while affected positively by acidic and neutral conditions. Radical quenching experiments and Electron Paramagnetic Resonace (EPR) spectra showed that the combined effects of SO4−· and ·OH contributed dominantly to degrade IPM, while the ·OH played an essential role during the degradation reaction. Through the Discrete Fourier Transform quantum chemical calculation, the possible reaction pathways for the oxidation of IPM by ·OH are as follows: IPM-TP651-TP667-TP541-TP557, IPM-TP651-TP525-TP557, IPM-TP705-TP631-TP661, and IPM-TP705-TP735. The obtained results showed that IPM could be degraded effectively by Fe(II)/PS system, giving a promising technique for IPM removal from water. Subject terms Chemical engineeringEnvironmental chemistryShenzhen Science and Technology Funding ProjectJSGG2017041401900541Dong Zijun http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003453Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province2017A030313285http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001809National Natural Science Foundation of China5167818351408149Li Mu Jiang Chengchun issue-copyright-statement© The Author(s) 2020 ==== Body Introduction Iodinated X-ray contrast media (ICM) has been widely used at medical centres and hospitals as an intravascular pharamaceutical to enhance the imaging of human organs, blood vessels and tissues1. Although ICM is non-toxic to human bodies, it is the source of total adsorbable organic iodine (AOI) in an aqueous environment that can act as a precursors to highly toxic iodinated disinfection by-products (I-DBPs)2. Creation of harmful I-DBPs is a progressing concern for the utilities of water. Generally, I-DBPs are considered to be more genotoxic and cytotoxic as comapared to their brominated and chlorinated additives3,4. ICM is frequently detected in aquatic systems, for instance, in China the total concentration of ICM was found to be between 102 to 252 ng L−1 in Huangpu River and 88.7 to 131 ng L−1 in Taihu Lake5. Specifically, iopamidol (IPM), a typical ICM compound, was found in water resources with a concentration of about 1900 ng L−1 in Japan6. The growing IPM concentration has been traced in surface water, ground water, hospitals, treated wastewater effluents and domestic wastewater. As the IPM is one of the major contributor to I-DBPs formation7, and chlorination of I− could quickly form HOI/I2, which was react with natural organic matters to form I-DBPs8. The odour and taste problems in drinking water were caused by I-DBPs. Therfore, removal of IPM form the aquatic system have attained much attention. Various types of physical, chemical and biochemical techniques have been reported for the removal of IPM. From an economic and efficiency viewpoint and the biological recalcitrance of IPM9, researchers mainly focused on adopting physicochemical methods, rather than using single-stage physical, chemical or biochemical methods to degrade IPM in water. For example, Kong et al. studied the degradation of IPM by using UV/chlorine, by comparing with UV or chlorine alone10, and they found that in contrast to chemical processes, biochemical methods have limited pollutants removal efficiency. For instance, it took over 20 days to achieve more than 95% of IPM degradation by using anaerobic process11. Recent reports on IPM removal and degradation by several treatment techniques were summarized in Table 1. It was found that both Fe(VI) oxidation and UV/chlorine process had a relative high IPM degradation rate among these processes, although which were limited by their higher cost and potential production of DBPs. Interestingly, persulfate (PS) or peroxymonosulfate (PMS) based processes have the high rate constant and removal rate to deal with IPM among these processes as shown in Table 1. PS was used to generate sulfate radicals (SO4−·) by either homogeneous or heterogeneous advanced oxidation process (AOPs). Being relatively stable at a room temperature, PS can be activated by several means, such as heat12, transition metals14,15, to generate SO4-−·. However, some PS based technology, such as PS/ZVA system13, PS/UV-A process16, have its own drawbacks, such as precise pH condition, and not eco-friendly, e.g. in the CuO/PMS system14. On the other hand, sometimes additional complexion agents were required that would increase the activation efficiency, such as PS/Fe(III)/GA system, but sidewise they may also increase the operational cost. Therefore, it is necessary to develop an economical technology that could degrade IPM under a neutral and mild conditions.Table 1 IPM main treatment process (2016–2018). Process IPM concentration (μM) Treatment condition parameters IPM degradation efficiency (%) Rate Constant Ref CuO/PMSa system 2.6 Temp = 25 ± 2 °C; pH = 7.0; [PMS] = 100.0 mg L−1; CuO dose = 0.2 g L−1 100 (in 15 min) 0.218 min−1 14 Fe(VI) oxidation 10 Temp = 25 °C; pH = 7.0 [Fe(VI)] = 0.5 mM  > 80 (in 60 min) 55.8 ± 3.5 M−1 s−1 17 Chlorine 5 Temp = 25 ± 1 ℃; pH = 7.0 [Cl2] = 200 μM – (1.66 ± 0.09) × 10–3 M−1 s−1 18 UV 2 Temp = 23 ± 1 °C; pH = 7.0  < 10 (in 30 min) 0.0336 min−1 10 UV/chlorine 2 Temp = 23 ± 1 °C; pH = 7.0; chlorine dosage = 200 μM Light source: 0.13 mW cm−2 – 0.3456 min−1 10 Photocatalytic treatment processes using TiO2 25.7 TiO2 Dosage = 1000 mg L−1 Light source: 40 W, λ < 360 nm 100 (in 16 h) – 19 PSb/UV-A process 2.6 [PS] = 0.5 mM; pH = 11; Light source: UV-A, 7.6 W m−2 100 (in 60 min) 0.1535 ± 0.0037 min−1 16 PS/ZVAc system 2.6 pH = 3; ZVA = 1 g/L; PS = 0.5 mM; 55 (in 60 min) – 13 PS/Fe(III)/GAd system 20 [PS] = 0.2 mM; [Fe(III)] = 10 μM; [GA] = 10 μM; pH = 7.0; T = 25 °C 70 (in 60 min) 0.048 min−1 20 ZnO-based materials and enzymes hybrid systems 12.9 Photocatalyst (SMA-Ce-ZnO-plus SBP) dosage = 1 g L−1; Light source: 40w, λ < 360 nm; solution: 5 mL, pH = 5.4 70 (in 24 h) 1.2 × 10−3 min−1 15 Anaerobic transformation 2.6 Oxygen-free Rhine water (25 mL) was added to 10 g of anaerobic sediment taken from a sulfate-reducing zone of a polishing pond  < 5 (in 60 min) – 11 Solar Photocatalytic Degradation with Bi(0)-Doped Bismuth Oxyhalide Thin Films 0.13 Catalysis = 3%Bi-doped BiOCl0.875Br0.125 films Light source: 500 W  m−2 280–950 nm 55 (in 60 min) – 9 ZVA activated persulfate 2.6 ZVA = 1 g L−1; PS = 0.50 Mm; pH = 3; T = 25 °C 52 (in 60 min) – 21 Photocatalytic treatment with Ce-doped ZnO 25.7 [Ce-doped ZnO] = 1000 mg /L; λ = 290–400 nm (Intensity = 24 ± 1 W·m−2); Temp = 26 °C 100 (in 30 min) 0.12 min−1 22 Electrochemical treatment with BDDe electrodes 19.3–32.2 Na2SO4 = 2 mS/cm; 0.31 mA/cm2; Temp = 20 °C  > 90 (in 16 h) 1.2 × 10–3 min−1 23 a. PMS = Peroxymonosulfate. b. PS = Persulfate. c. ZVA = Zero-valent Aluminum. d. GA = Gallic acid. e. BDD = Boron-doped diamond (BDD) electrodes. Among these activators, transition metal Fe(II) shows high activity to initiate PS decomposition, as it could be injected directly in subsurface that promotes in-situ oxidation24. Especially, owning to its merits, e.g. non-toxic, environmental friendly and relatively low cost, Fe(II) is deemed as one of the most promising activators25. Zhu et al. established a kinetic model to describe the iohexol degradation in the Fe(II) activated PS system, and they found that the rate constant of iohexol reacting with sulfate radical was (1.83 ± 0.10) × 109 26. Bu et al. proposed a mathematical model on Fe(II)- activated PS oxidation of atrazine (ATZ), and they observed that only small amount of ·OH were produced while SO4−· attributed a certain level to ATZ degradation in Fe(II)/PS system27. However, to the best of our knowledge, the investigation on IPM degradation by Fe(II)/PS are rarely reported, up to now. In the present study, Fe(II)/PS oxidation was employed to degrade IPM, and the influence of operational condition parameters on the IPM treatment efficiency was examined to obtain the optimized IPM removal condition parameters. Meanwhile, the IPM degradation pathway was also examined computationally. The obtained results will be very useful for IPM degradation and removal in water and wastewater. Materials and methods Experimental setup and design All chemicals used in this study were analytical grade. Iopamiol hydrate (IPM, 98%) was purchased from Meilun (China), and sodium persulfate (Na2S2O8, 99%) was purchased from Aladdin (China). Ferrous sulfate heptahydrate (FeSO4⋅7H2O, 99.0–101.0%) and sodium carbonate anhydrous (Na2CO3) was purchased from XILONG Chemical CO., LTD. China and Tianjin Mao Tai Chemical Reagent Factory, respectively. Tertiary butyl alcohol (TBA) was purchased from Damao Chemical Reagent Factory, and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) grade methanol (MeOH, ≥ 99.9%) was supplied by Merck KGaA. The experiment was performed in a 250 mL reagent bottle with a working volume of 100 mL, which was installed in an electro-thermal shaking chamber (Shanghai Bluepard Instrument, Co. Ltd., China). During the experiment, 10 μM IPM was first prepared with distilled water (Shanghai Hitech Instruments Co., LTD, China). Pre-determined amount of ferrous sulfate solution was added to the reagent bottle. The initial pH was adjusted with 0.1 M sulfate acid and 0.1 M sodium hydroxide solution, and its temperature was kept at a constant value throughout the reaction. Afterwards, a certain amount of PS (0.1 M) was added. With the progression of reaction, 0.5 mL mixture in the bottle was accurately sampled at selected time intervals (0, 5, 10, 30 and 60 min). Afterwards, the reaction was quenched intermediately by using sufficient volume of methanol, which is an effective scavenger to quench SO4−· and ·OH to stop oxidation reactions. Besides, Iodide ((I−) and iodate (IO3−) were analyzed after treatment. The effect of Fe(II) activated PS oxidation process parameters on IPM degradation was investigated by comparison with a blank experiment. Three parallel experiments were carried out, respectively, by adding 1 mM PS, 0.1 mM Fe(II), and Fe(II)/PS, after that all of them were added and reacted at a pH of 3 at 25 °C. Analytical procedures The concentration of IPM in the solution was determined with an Alliance 2695 Series high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system equipped with a C18 column (5 μm, 4.6 × 20 mm) at a UV wavelength of 242 nm. The column temperature was maintained at 35 °C, and the mobile phase was a mixture of methanol/water (60/40, v/v) with a flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1. The injection volume was kept at 100 μL. Iodide (I-) and iodate (IO3−) were determined by ion chromatography (IC, Thermo Dionex ICS-1500). The sample quenched by sodium sulfite were filtered by BOND ELUTE C18 to remove any organic matters, and then were injected into IC equipped with a IonPacAS9-HC column (250 mm × 4 mm). The mobile phase was 9 mM sodium carbonate and run at a flow of 1 mL min−1. Computational methods The chemical calculations are performed in the framework of Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) using Gaussian 09 package according to the previous report28. The computational accuracy, feasibility and economical computational time were considered when choosing the computational levels and basis sets. The geometrical parameters were optimized at B3LYP level with a standard of 6-31G* basis set. Regarding basis set, iodine was defined to fifth cycle element, making the calculations computationally intensive. The use of relativistic effective core potentials is necessary to make the calculations tractable while obtaining accurate theoretical single point energies. Specially, B3LYP /SDD was used for I atom, and the 6-31G* basis set was used for other elements. Results and discussion IPM degradation by Fe(II)/PS oxidation The degradation efficiency of IPM by Fe(II) , PS and Fe(II)/PS process, was carried out, and it was observed that IPM could be degrade with an obviously higher rate by Fe(II)/PS system, in contrast to Fe(II) or PS (Fig. 1a). As one kind of recalcitrant contaminant, IPM cannot be effectively degraded by sole PS or sole Fe(II), because both of them had a low oxidation ability without activation, and no more than 5% IPM was found to be removed. On the other hand, a rapid degradation of IPM in the combined system of Fe(II) and PS (Fe(II)/PS) was clearly observed, during which over 60% IPM could be degraded. These results revealed the effectiveness of Fe(II)/PS system for the removal of IPM in water. The IPM degradation profile by Fe(II)/PS system included apparently two stages, i.e. a fast IPM concentration decreasing stage followed by a slow rate, which could be well described by a model accounted for the two distinct kinetic regimes (Eq. 1)29,30 with R2 of 0.994, as follow: 1 CC0=1-tρ+σt Figure 1 (a) IPM Degradation efficiency by PS alone, Fe(II) alone and Fe(II)/PS, respectively, and (b) the loss of iodine by Fe(II)/PS system under an experimental condition of a initial IPM concentration of 10 μM, a initial pH value of 3.0, at 25 °C, Fe(II) concentration of 0.1 mM and a PS concentration of 1 mM. where C and C0 is the substrate concentration at time t and 0, respectively. ρ and σ are characteristic kinetic constant, while 1/ρ corresponds to the initial reaction rate (i.e. at t = 0), and 1/σ corresponds to the maximum conversion rate that can be achieved at the end of the reaction. The first sharp IPM degradation was probably due to Fe(II), activating a large amount of radicals to oxidize IPM with a high efficiency (Eq. 2). Afterwards, the slow IPM degradation rate might be related with the low radical concentrations after the Fe(II) activation31. As shown in Eqs. 3–5, the co-existence of Fe(II) and O2 can lead to the generation of ·OH, which could oxidize organics effectively32. Meanwhile, the presence of O2 in this system should not be ignored. 2 Fe2++ S2O82-→Fe3++ SO4·-+ SO42- 3 Fe2++ O2→Fe3++ O2·-(pH < 7) 4 Fe2++ O2·-+ 2H+→Fe3++ H2O2 5 Fe2++H2O2→Fe3++·OH + OH- Within the IMP degradation in Fe(II)/PS system, the concentration of the produced products i.e. iodate (IO3−) and iodide (I−) were simultaneously determined (Fig. 1b), which was consistent with the IPM removal profiles. IO3− concentration in the bulk displayed a significant increasing trend during the reaction, while only a few amount of I− was detected. Because of the quick oxidation of I− into IO3− (Fig. 1b), the IO3− concentration in the bulk increased gradually from 0 to 7.3 μM, along with the continuous decreasing of IPM concentration, which indicates the occurrence of deiodination. Optimization of reaction condition parameters in Fe(II)/PS system Effects of initial PS and Fe(II)/PS mole ratio The effect of initial PS concentration (0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0 mM and 2.0 mM) on IPM degradation efficiency was carried out under a fixed Fe(II)/PS ratio, with initial pH of 3.0 at 25 °C. As the concentration of PS was increased from 0.01 mM to 1 mM, the IPM initial reaction rate was also increased from 0.0055 min−1 to 0.0903 min−1 (Fig. 2a), which was corresponded to the increased concentration of IO3− from 1.3 μM to 7.32 μM (Fig. 2b). However, with further increased concentration of PS over 2 mM resulted in a slight improvent of degradation rate constant, as well as a similar trend was observed in the profile of the change of IO3− concentration. The reason for this phenomenon might be due to the excess of PS which can acts as a scavenger of oxidative radicals in Fe(II)/PS system, as described in Eq. 633,34. 6 S2O82-+ SO4·-→SO42-+ S2O8·-k=5.5×105molL-1 Figure 2 (a) Effect of PS concentration on IPM degradation efficiency, (b) the iodine amount that was removed, under an experimental condition of initial IPM concentration of 10 μM, a initial pH value of 3.0, at 25 °C and a Fe(II)/PS of 1:10, (c) Effect of Fe(II)/PS mole ratio on IPM degradation efficiency and (d) the iodine amount that was removed, under an experiment condition of a initial IPM concentration of 10 μM, a initial pH value of 3.0, at 25 °C and a PS concentration of 1 mM. In Fe(II)/PS system, Fe(II) plays a role of an activator for the activation of PS to generate sulfate radicals, which is an important factor that controlled the overall oxidizing ability 35. Under a constant PS dosage of 1 mM, as showed in Fig. 2c, the rate constant for degrading IPM was improved significantly, when the initial Fe(II)/PS mole ratio increased from 1/50 to 2/1. The generated IO3− concentration was positively correlated with the Fe(II)/PS mole ratios, which reached to the maximum of 8.54 μM when the Fe(II)/PS mole ratio increased to 1/10 (Fig. 2d). However, this IO3− concentration began to decline once the Fe(II)/PS mole ratio increased up to 2/1, which revealed the presence of extra excessive Fe(II) preferentially reacted with SO4−· via Eq. 7. Once the SO4−· reached to a high concentration, it would be self-quenched (Eq. 8)36, to cause a decrease in the removal efficiency of IPM (Fig. 2d). 7 Fe2++SO4·-→+Fe3++SO42-k=4.6×109molL-1 8 SO4·-+SO4·-→S2O82-k=8.9×108molL-1 Effects of initial pH and reaction temperature In all Fe based AOPs, pH is an important factor affecting the effectiveness of activation of oxidants by Fe(II) and/or Fe(III)37. Herein, the IPM degradation rate by activated PS was investigated at pH 3.0, 5.0, 7.0, 9.0 and 11.0, respectively, by comparing its resulted IPM degradation efficiency and IO3− generation (Fig. 3). It was observed that the IPM initial reaction rate reached the maximum of 0.0903 min−1 with the initial pH of 3.0. With the increased pH value from 3.0 to 11.0, the rate constant decreased gradually from 0.0903 min−1 to 0.0493 min−1, ,which was corresponds to the reduction of IO3− from 7.32 μM (pH = 3.0) to 3.89 μM (pH = 11.0) (Fig. 3a,b). It has been reported that PS is easily decomposed to produce SO42− in an alkaline solution. As shown in Eq. 9, ·OH would be generated whose oxidation–reduction potential is lower than SO4−38. However, sulfate and hydroxyl radicals were slightly influenced by the variation of the initial pH38,39. Hence, the main reason was the formation of an Fe2+ complex at pH > 4.0 that would be expected to hinder the reaction of Fe2+ with PS39 Hence, the oxidizing ability of the system was decreased, corresponding to a low IPM removal efficiency. 9 SO4·-+OH-→·OH+SO42- Figure 3 (a) Effect of initial solution pH on IPM degradation efficiency, (b) the iodine amount that was removed under an experimental condition of an initial IPM concentration of 10 μM, a PS concentration of 1 mM, at 25 °C and a Fe(II)/PS of 1:10, (c) Effect of reaction temperature on IPM degradation efficiency, and (d) the iodine amount that was removed, under an experiment condition of an initial IPM of 10 μM, a PS of 1 mM, a Fe(II)/PS of 1:10, and an initial pH of 3.0. Besides, the variation of pH during the reaction was shown in Fig. S1, which displayed a slightly decreasing trend during IPM degradation reaction when the initial pH was 3.0. The pH level dropped significantly at the very beginning stage of the reaction, and then remained at a stable level after 5 min reaction, when the initial pH was kept above 3.0. This decreasing pH trend with the IPM degradation might be related closely to the continuous production of H+ in the reaction (Eq. 10)40. 10 SO4·-+H2O→·OH + H++ SO42- The impact of reaction temperature, i.e. 25, 30, 40 and 45 °C, on IPM degradation rate and subsequent formation of IO3− was also evaluated, under a PS dose of 1 mM, an n(Fe(II))/n(PS) ratio of 1:10 and an initial pH of 3.0. As shown in Fig. 3c, the IPM initial reaction rate was increased from 0.0903 min−1 to 0.1266 min−1, when the temperature increased from 25 to 45 °C, during which the generated IO3− (Fig. 3d) increased from 7.32 to 10.27 μM. An elevated temperature promotes the degradation and deiodination of IPM, which was mainly caused by the generation of more sulfate radicals. At higher temperature condition, PS would be thermally activated to produce more SO4−·. Moreover, the reaction of Fe(II) to activate PS is an endothermic reaction, and high reaction temperature is beneficial to this reaction, and thus to enhance the degradation and deiodination rates of IPM. Moreover, the degradation of IPM in Fe(II)/PS system may be affected by inorganic ions and natural organic matter (NOM). Therefore, further studies on the environmental impacts would be paid more attention in future. For instance, Zhu et. al found that iohexol degradation would be promoted by the low concentration of chloride ion while inhibited by high concentration, and iohexol degradation was slightly inhibited by NOM26. In another study, Bu et. al found that ATZ degradation performed well at low initial ATZ and NOM concentrations27. Identification of ROS Radical quenching experiments for the IPM degradation over the 3 samples under a pH of 3.0 were conducted to explore the catalytic mechanism during Fe(II)/PS system. Generally, it was thought that the active species SO4−· and ·OH were the possible main active oxidant species in Fe(II)/PS oxidation process27,39. During the reaction, methanol (MeOH) was employed as the scavengers of SO4−· and OH·, while t-butanol (TBA) was applied as the inhibitor of ·OH41,42. Figure 4a demonstrated the quenching experiments of active species under varied dosages of inhibitors (([MeOH] or [TBA])/[PS] was kept at 0, 50, and 500, respectively). Without any radical scavenger dosage, the IPM degradation efficiency was around 69%. In comparison, this removal efficiency decreased to 46% and 55%, when the MeOH doasges was 50 times and 500 times higher than PS concentration, respectively. Corresponding to the addition of TBA, the degradation efficiency of IPM was declined to 34% and 41%, respectively, suggesting that the ·OH was the dominant radical in the degradation of IPM.Figure 4 (a) IPM degradation efficiency with different inhibitors, and (b) EPR spectra of DMPO-OH· and DMPO-SO4· The EPR spin-trap technique was also carried out to unveil the reactive species in Fe(II)/PS process for IPM degradation, where 5, 5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (DMPO) was used as a spin-trapping agent to capture SO4−· and ·OH. As depicted in Fig. 4b, there was rather insignificant EPR signals with Fe(II) alone or PS alone, indicating rare absence of SO4−· and ·OH generation. Upon the PS and Fe(II) dosage to form Fe(II)/PS oxidation process, four characteristic peaks, including aN = aH = 14.9 G for DMPO-OH· adducts, and the characteristic peaks (aN = 13.9 G, aH = 10 G, aH = 1.48 G, aH = 0.78 G) for DMPO-SO4−· adduct were found in the EPR spectrum, whose intensity ratio was around 1:2:2:143. In addition, the DMPO- SO4−· adduct showed weak signals than the DMPO-OH· adduct, which were in accordance with the radical trapping experiments. IPM degradation products and reaction paths Based on DFT quantum chemistry calculation, the degradation of IPM products and pathways in Fe(II)/PS system were analyzed. The chemical calculation is mainly based on the DFT model under Gaussian 09 where the calculation method and basis set are set for computer precision and flexibility, and comprehensive consideration of time-consuming calculations. The main types of IPM and ·OH radical reactions are presented in Fig. 5. Accordingly, iodine on the IPM phenyl ring would firstly be removed to produce TP651 (Eq. 11). Secondly, at this position, a hydrogen atom would be replaced by a hydroxyl group to induce hydroxylation and to produce TP667 (Eq. 12). Afterwards, the iodine at another position on the benzene ring of TP667 was removed to produce TP541 (Eq. 13), and the hydroxylation reaction occurred at the position where iodine was removed by TP541, where one hydrogen atom could be replaced by a hydroxyl group to form TP557 (Eq. 14). On the other hand, TP651 may also directly be removed iodine to produce TP525 (Eq. 15), whose benzene ring would then be hydroxylated to remove two iodines, and meanwhile the hydrogen atom could be replaced by a hydroxyl group to produce TP557 (Eq. 16). Therefore, it is reasonable to think that the IPM branch underwent a deacetylation reaction path with the action of ·OH.Figure 5 Possible degradation pathways of IPM by Fe(II)/PS system. In addition, there is another possible IPM degradation path, during which the acetyl group would be deacetylated to produce TP705 (Eq. 17). Then, the branch of TP705 would be cleaved under the action of ·OH to produce TP631 (Eq. 18), which afterwards could be oxidized by ·OH to produce TP661 (Eq. 19). Apart from the abovementioned paths, TP705 could also directly undergo amine oxidation path under the oxidation of ·OH, to produce TP735 (Eq. 20). 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Conclusion IPM, a typical non-ionic ICM compound, was effectively degraded by using sulfate activated PS oxidation (Fe(II)/PS) system. The effect of PS concentration, Fe(II)/PS mole ratio, initial pH, and operation temperature, on the IPM removal rate, as well as on the loss of iodine, were comprehensively investigated. The optimum degradation condition parameters were as follows: the 10 mmol L−1 PS concentration, 1:10 n(Fe(II))/n(PS), 3.0 pH and 45 °C temperature. The PS concentration increased from 10 to 1 mM which could enhance the IPM degradation and deiodination rates. Compared to alkaline conditions, acidic and neutral conditions were favorable for IPM degradation. The combination of SO4−· and ·OH contributed to the effectiveness of IPM removal. Through DFT quantum chemical calculations, the possible reaction path of IPM degradation was mainly included hydroxylation, deiodination, deacetylation, and amine oxidation, and finally all of the iodine removed was transformed into IO3−. Herein, this IPM initiate reaction rate of 0.1266 min−1 is quite higher in contrast to those listed in Table 1, under the relatively mild reaction condition. Fe(II) /PS system for IPM degradation in this study showed an excellent performance, compared to anaerobic process, PS/Fe(III) or UV system. Meanwhile, Fe(II)/PS system had a high economic feasibility, as it could degrade IPM without any additional complexion agents or expensive catalysts dosage, such as gallic acid, Fe(VI) or zero-valent aluminum. Moreover, Fe(II)/PS system possessed the advantage of sustainable, which did not need any hazardous materials and could not result in any secondary pollution. Therefore, it is reasonable to realize that, the PS/Fe(II) system reported in this study provided a sustainable approach for the practical treatment of refractory pollutants, and further studies should be carried out to evaluate its environmental impacts and stability. Data availability All data or models generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. Supplementary information Supplementary Figures. Publisher's note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. These authors contributed equally: Zijun Dong and Guanhan Chen. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at10.1038/s41598-020-78468-y. Acknowledgement This research was supported by the grant Project supported by Guangdong Natural Science Foundation No. 2017A030313285, from the Shenzhen Science and Technology Funding Project (Grant Number JSGG2017041401900541), from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Numbers 51678183, 51408149). Author contributions Z.D. designed the research concept; C.J. collected data; M.L. performed the DFT computations; G.C. analyzed output data, prepared all figures, and wrote the main manuscript text; F.S. reviewed and edited the manuscript; B.B. edited the manuscript; Z.D. and F.S. supervised the project. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. ==== Refs References 1. Pérez S Barceló D Fate and occurrence of X-ray contrast media in the environment Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2007 387 1235 1246 10.1007/s00216-006-0953-9 17180339 2. Jeong CH The impact of iodinated X-ray contrast agents on formation and toxicity of disinfection by-products in drinking water J. Environ. Sci. 2017 58 173 182 10.1016/j.jes.2017.03.032 3. Plewa MJ Chemical and biological characterization of newly discovered iodoacid drinking water disinfection byproducts Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004 38 4713 4722 10.1021/es049971v 15487777 4. Richardson SD Plewa MJ Wagner ED Schoeny R DeMarini DM Occurrence, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity of regulated and emerging disinfection by-products in drinking water: A review and roadmap for research Mutation Res./Rev. Mutation Res. 2007 636 178 242 10.1016/j.mrrev.2007.09.001 5. Xu Z Li X Hu X Yin D Distribution and relevance of iodinated X-ray contrast media and iodinated trihalomethanes in an aquatic environment Chemosphere 2017 184 253 260 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.05.048 28601007 6. Simazaki D Occurrence of selected pharmaceuticals at drinking water purification plants in Japan and implications for human health Water Res. 2015 76 187 200 10.1016/j.watres.2015.02.059 25835589 7. Duirk SE Formation of toxic iodinated disinfection by-products from compounds used in medical imaging Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011 45 6845 6854 10.1021/es200983f 21761849 8. Dong H Deiodination of iopamidol by zero valent iron (ZVI) enhances formation of iodinated disinfection by-products during chloramination Water Res. 2018 129 319 326 10.1016/j.watres.2017.11.032 29161662 9. Anirban D Solar photocatalytic degradation of trace organic pollutants in water by Bi(0)-doped Bismuth oxyhalide thin films ACS Omega 2018 3 10858 10865 10.1021/acsomega.8b00759 31459198 10. Kong X Jiang J Ma J Yang Y Pang S Comparative investigation of X-ray contrast medium degradation by UV/chlorine and UV/H2O2 Chemosphere 2018 193 655 663 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.11.064 29172156 11. Redeker M Wick A Meermann B Ternes TA Anaerobic transformation of the iodinated X-ray contrast medium iopromide, its aerobic transformation products, and transfer to further iodinated X-ray contrast media Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018 52 8309 8320 10.1021/acs.est.8b01140 29998733 12. Pan X Yan L Qu R Wang Z Degradation of the UV-filter benzophenone-3 in aqueous solution using persulfate activated by heat, metal ions and light Chemosphere 2018 196 95 104 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.152 29291519 13. Arslan-Alaton I Olmez-Hanci T Korkmaz G Sahin C Removal of iopamidol, an iodinated X-ray contrast medium, by zero-valent aluminum-activated H2 O2 and S2 O8 2− Chem. Eng. J. 2017 318 64 75 10.1016/j.cej.2016.05.021 14. Hu J Dong H Qu J Qiang Z Enhanced degradation of iopamidol by peroxymonosulfate catalyzed by two pipe corrosion products (CuO and δ-MnO2 ) Water Res. 2017 112 1 8 10.1016/j.watres.2017.01.025 28110150 15. Sarro M ZnO-based materials and enzymes hybrid systems as highly efficient catalysts for recalcitrant pollutants abatement Chem. Eng. J. 2018 334 2530 2538 10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.146 16. Arslan-Alaton I Kolba O Olmez-Hanci T Removal of an X-ray contrast chemical from tertiary treated wastewater: Investigation of persulfate-mediated photochemical treatment systems Catal. Today 2018 313 134 141 10.1016/j.cattod.2017.11.002 17. Dong H Oxidation of iopamidol with ferrate (Fe(VI)): Kinetics and formation of toxic iodinated disinfection by-products Water Res. 2018 130 200 207 10.1016/j.watres.2017.12.003 29223090 18. Tian F-X Chlor(am)ination of iopamidol: kinetics, pathways and disinfection by-products formation Chemosphere 2017 184 489 497 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.06.012 28618281 19. Fabbri D Iodinated X-ray contrast agents: Photoinduced transformation and monitoring in surface water Sci. Total Environ. 2016 572 340 351 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.003 27509072 20. Dong H Qiang Z Hu J Sans C Accelerated degradation of iopamidol in iron activated persulfate systems: Roles of complexing agents Chem. Eng. J. 2017 316 288 295 10.1016/j.cej.2017.01.099 21. Olmez-Hanci T Enhanced degradation of micropollutants by zero-valent aluminum activated persulfate: assessment of toxicity and genotoxic activity Water Sci. Technol. 2017 76 3195 3204 10.2166/wst.2017.489 29235998 22. Paganini MC Beyond TiO2 : cerium-doped zinc oxide as a new photocatalyst for the photodegradation of persistent pollutants ChemistrySelect 2016 1 3377 3383 10.1002/slct.201600645 23. Schneider, A.-L. et al. Electrochemical oxidation of iodinated X-ray contrast media by boron-doped diamond electrodes. dwt91, 268–272 (2017). 24. Liu H Oxidation of benzene by persulfate in the presence of Fe(III)- and Mn(IV)-containing oxides: stoichiometric efficiency and transformation products Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016 50 890 898 10.1021/acs.est.5b04815 26687229 25. Rastogi A Al-Abed SR Dionysiou DD Effect of inorganic, synthetic and naturally occurring chelating agents on Fe(II) mediated advanced oxidation of chlorophenols Water Res. 2009 43 684 694 10.1016/j.watres.2008.10.045 19038413 26. Zhu J-P Modelling of iohexol degradation in a Fe(II)-activated persulfate system Chem. Eng. J. 2019 367 86 93 10.1016/j.cej.2019.02.120 27. Bu L Shi Z Zhou S Modeling of Fe(II)-activated persulfate oxidation using atrazine as a target contaminant Sep. Purif. Technol. 2016 169 59 65 10.1016/j.seppur.2016.05.037 28. Shang W Degradation of diatrizoate in water by Fe(II)-activated persulfate oxidation Chem. Eng. J. 2019 361 1333 1344 10.1016/j.cej.2018.12.139 29. Frontistis Z Fast degradation of estrogen hormones in environmental matrices by photo-Fenton oxidation under simulated solar radiation Chem. Eng. J. 2011 178 175 182 10.1016/j.cej.2011.10.041 30. Chan KH Chu W Modeling the reaction kinetics of Fenton’s process on the removal of atrazine Chemosphere 2003 51 305 311 10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00812-3 12604082 31. Rodriguez S Vasquez L Costa D Romero A Santos A Oxidation of Orange G by persulfate activated by Fe(II), Fe(III) and zero valent iron (ZVI) Chemosphere 2014 101 86 92 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.12.037 24439838 32. Ding W Co-oxidation of As(III) and Fe(II) by oxygen through complexation between As(III) and Fe(II)/Fe(III) species Water Res. 2018 143 599 607 10.1016/j.watres.2018.06.072 30025352 33. Hori H Efficient decomposition of environmentally persistent perfluorocarboxylic acids by use of persulfate as a photochemical oxidant Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005 39 2383 2388 10.1021/es0484754 15871280 34. Gao Y Gao N Deng Y Yang Y Ma Y Ultraviolet (UV) light-activated persulfate oxidation of sulfamethazine in water Chem. Eng. J. 2012 195–196 248 253 10.1016/j.cej.2012.04.084 35. Rao YF Qu L Yang H Chu W Degradation of carbamazepine by Fe(II)-activated persulfate process J. Hazard. Mater. 2014 268 23 32 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.01.010 24462988 36. Xu X-R Li X-Z Degradation of azo dye Orange G in aqueous solutions by persulfate with ferrous ion Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010 72 105 111 10.1016/j.seppur.2010.01.012 37. Jiang C Pang S Ouyang F Ma J Jiang J A new insight into Fenton and Fenton-like processes for water treatment J. Hazard. Mater. 2010 174 813 817 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.125 19853996 38. Xie P Removal of 2-MIB and geosmin using UV/persulfate: contributions of hydroxyl and sulfate radicals Water Res. 2015 69 223 233 10.1016/j.watres.2014.11.029 25486622 39. Wang S Removal of acetaminophen in the Fe2+/persulfate system: kinetic model and degradation pathways Chem. Eng. J. 2019 358 1091 1100 10.1016/j.cej.2018.09.145 40. Zhou L Ferrous-activated persulfate oxidation of arsenic(III) and diuron in aquatic system J. Hazard. Mater. 2013 263 422 430 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.09.056 24220194 41. Anipsitakis GP Dionysiou DD Radical generation by the interaction of transition metals with common oxidants Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004 38 3705 3712 10.1021/es035121o 15296324 42. Antoniou MG de la Cruz AA Dionysiou DD Degradation of microcystin-LR using sulfate radicals generated through photolysis, thermolysis and e− transfer mechanisms Appl. Catal. B 2010 96 290 298 10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.02.013 43. Chen L strong enhancement on fenton oxidation by addition of hydroxylamine to accelerate the ferric and ferrous iron cycles Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011 45 3925 3930 10.1021/es2002748 21469678