==== Front
Cureus
Cureus
2168-8184
Cureus
2168-8184 Cureus Palo Alto (CA) 

10.7759/cureus.11979
Pain Management
Urology
A Review of the Management of Chronic Scrotal Pain
Muacevic Alexander  Adler John R  Moubasher Amr 12 Waqar Muhammad 1 Raison Nicholas 3 Brunckhorst Oliver 3 Ahmed Kamran 13 
1 
Urology, King's College Hospital, London, GBR 

2 
Dermatology and Andrology, Assiut University, Assiut, EGY 

3 
Urology, MRC Centre for Transplantation, Guy's Hospital Campus, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, GBR 

Amr Moubasher amr.moubasher1@nhs.net
8 12 2020 
12 2020 
12 12 e119798 12 2020 Copyright © 2020, Moubasher et al.2020Moubasher et al.This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.This article is available from https://www.cureus.com/articles/46510-a-review-of-the-management-of-chronic-scrotal-painChronic scrotal pain (CSP) is a common and poorly understood medical condition that significantly affects individuals’ quality of life. Many patients seek evaluation and management of their symptoms from multiple physicians. Our review aims to address diagnostic modalities, clinical evaluation, and surgical and non-surgical management.

We conducted a computerised detailed search of the PubMed, Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases for reports pertaining to CSP using the Medical Subject Headings keywords ‘chronic scrotal pain’, ‘testicular pain’ and ‘orchialgia’, and we included in the review those that fulfilled the inclusion (adult male with CSP presenting with the criteria of CSP ) and exclusion (extra-scrotal pain) criteria.

After the direct causes of CSP were identified by reviewing the clinical evaluations (history taking and examination are mandatory) and the diagnostic evaluations (urine analysis is crucial and ultrasound can be helpful), the most-used medical and non-surgical treatments for CSP were tricyclic antidepressants (success rate of up to 66.6%) and spermatic block (success rate of more than 90%), and the most-used surgical procedure was microsurgical denervation of the spermatic cord (success rate of up to 70%).

The evidence currently available remains rare and of low quality, making it difficult to strongly recommend individual treatment options. However, multimodal treatment modalities using physical therapy and psychotherapy may help patients and provide useful tools for coping with this condition. There are also useful non-surgical and surgical options for CSP that depend on the patient’s state, the severity of the complaint and what options have already been tried.

scrotal paintesticular painorchialgiaclinical evaluationdiagnostic modalitiesmedical treatmentsurgical treatmentThe content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.
==== Body
Introduction and background
Scrotal pain, in both its acute and chronic forms, is a diagnostic challenge that must be carefully evaluated using a full patient history and physical examination. However, a complete examination may be precluded by pain, the dependent nature of the scrotum, and the oedema and skin changes accompanying many scrotal pathologies. The physical examination must also include a careful evaluation of the abdomen and inguinal region and a genital examination to assess possible herniation [1]. Knowledge of the patient’s age, sexual history, and the duration, severity and onset (gradual vs. sudden) of the pain is necessary to focus the clinician’s attention on the correct diagnostic path.

Chronic scrotal pain (CSP) is defined as at least three months of chronic or intermittent scrotal content pain of a severity that interferes with daily activities and prompts the patient to seek medical advice [2]. CSP may originate from the testicle, epididymis, para-testicular structures and/or the spermatic cord. The aetiology of the pain is unknown in up to 50% of patients [3]. The recognisable and reversible causes of CSP include varicocele, epididymitis, spermatocele, tumour, infection and torsion. This condition has been referred to by many names, including chronic orchialgia, testicular pain syndrome, testalgia, chronic scrotal content pain, post-vasectomy orchialgia, post-vasectomy pain syndrome (PVPS), congestive epididymitis and chronic testicular pain. To date, there are no definitive data on the incidence and prevalence of this condition in the general population. Several studies have provided estimates of the prevalence of the condition in patients, with frequencies ranging from 0.4% to 4.75% in specific groups of men [4].

Multiple algorithms for diagnosing and treating CSP have been proposed, but none have been validated [5,6] because it is a difficult condition to manage, and varied practices exist with reference to it. Therefore, our review aimed to:

1) Overview current approaches to the clinical evaluation of CSP.

2) Overview currently used diagnostic modalities.

3) Discuss the efficacy of non-surgical management options for CSP.

4) Review the current options for surgical management of CSP.

Review
Method

We conducted a computerised bibliographic search of the PubMed, Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases for all reports pertaining to CSP using the Medical Subject Headings keywords ‘chronic scrotal pain’, ‘testicular pain’ and ‘orchialgia’. The search found 292 studies related to CSP, 339 related to chronic testicular pain and 22 related to chronic orchialgia. Because all 653 studies met the criteria for inclusion, all were included in the review. The inclusion criteria included adult males having CSP and presenting with the criteria for CSP, and the exclusion criteria included extra-scrotal pain.

Results

Clinical Evaluation

Most of the reviewed publications agreed regarding the points for taking histories and making examinations. One Turkish study involved men who had presented to outpatient urology clinics [7,8]. Questionnaires had been used to diagnose 4.75% of these men as having CSP. Another study surveyed urologists in Switzerland, who reported that 2.5% of consultations with male patients were due to CSP [9,10]. Still, another study from Israel had assessed all young men presenting for military service and had found that 0.8% of them had been examined by a physician for CSP [11]. Although these studies suggest that CSP is a common condition, further studies are needed to confirm the true incidence and prevalence of the condition in the general population. Certain groups of men have a higher incidence of CSP: (1) post-vasectomy pain affects from 1% to 15% of men after their procedures [12,13], (2) an estimated 10% of men with varicocele experience CSP related to that condition [14] and (3) CSP has been reported in as many as 3% to 6% of patients after repair of inguinal hernia [15].

CSP significantly affects one’s quality of life. The condition can significantly limit daily activities and adversely affect occupational and social functioning. History points crucial to diagnosis include pain location, subjective description (sharp, dull, burning), timing (onset, duration, constant vs. intermittent), radiation to surrounding structures and severity (we used a Likert-type visual analogue pain scale that ranges from 0 to 10). Other questions to ask include: Are there precipitating factors such as activity or positional changes (ambulation or prolonged sitting)? Does the pain change with urination, defecation or ejaculation? Is there scrotal swelling or a mass? The answers to these questions reveal information that is vitally important to concluding the differential diagnosis [5].

Prior abdominal or pelvic surgeries, including inguinal hernia repair, varicocelectomy and surgery for undescended testicle, and prior spinal or orthopaedic surgeries provide answers regarding the presence of anatomic contributions to CSP. The content of a detailed social history also informs diagnosis and treatment. For instance, a history of sexual abuse has been associated with increased rates of chronic pelvic pain in adulthood and may affect subsequent approaches to physical examination and adjunctive testing [16]. Up to 40% of patients who have CSP complain of depressive symptoms, and many feel socially isolated [17,18]. CSP patients often complain of anxiety related to concerns about testicular cancer. Early assessment of these concerns helps to create a partnership between the provider and patient [19]. The medical history should include prior sexually transmitted diseases, childhood urologic conditions, back and spinal pathologies and any underlying psychological conditions including anxiety and depression [20].

A complete physical examination of the abdomen and genitalia is mandatory, and clear communication during this examination is imperative. A visual inspection of the scrotum and inguinal region will reveal any scars from prior surgeries or traumas. Swelling may include a solid mass, hydrocele or varicocele. Careful palpation of the testicles, epididymis, vas deferens and spermatic cord enables comparison of focal and more-diffuse tenderness. In cases of prior vasectomy, fullness or overt swelling of the epididymis and testicle and pain over the sperm granuloma are often visualised. Importantly, a digital rectal examination (DRE) that includes careful palpation of the entire rectal vault, prostate and pelvic floor musculature should be performed routinely, as it can significantly alter treatment recommendations. Positive focal or diffuse tenderness involving the prostate or pelvic floor musculature as well as a generalised increase in anal/rectal tone suggest precipitating pelvic floor tension myalgia or chronic prostatitis [6].

Diagnostic Modalities

As mentioned, most of the publications reviewed agree on the points regarding taking histories and conducting examinations. In addition, adjunctive testing supplements these histories and physical examinations. The initial evaluation should include urinalysis with microscopy to exclude haematuria or pyuria, both of which can be seen in cases of infectious aetiologies or referred pain from urolithiasis. If microscopic haematuria is identified, further workup includes cross-sectional imaging of the abdomen/pelvis and possibly cystoscopy [7]. Scrotal ultrasonography identifies structural causes within the scrotum, including tumours, cysts or subclinical varicocele, and is recommended in most circumstances. Imaging of the spine or hips is indicated if symptoms suggest any underlying involvement of the musculoskeletal system. In the case of new-onset varicocele, particularly on the right side, cross-sectional imaging of the abdomen and pelvis must be considered to rule out a retroperitoneal or abdominal process [8].

Non-surgical management

Medical Treatment

The treatment of CSP suffers from a lack of evidence-based references. Although clinical data exist, most reports in the literature regarding treatment consist of case series without control groups [21,22]. Conservative management is helpful after ruling out any underlying structural cause (i.e., scrotal mass, varicocele or inguinal hernia) or a source of referred pain (i.e., ureteral calculus, hip or labrum disease or spinal pathology) [23].

If a urinary tract or other genital infection is present, it should be treated accordingly. Antimicrobial therapies for epididymitis are dependent on age and other risk factors [24,25]. According to the literature, fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole are the antibiotics most used, and these are the initial non-surgical treatments for these patients [26,27]. The second most commonly mentioned option for idiopathic CSP is non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which are appealing given their ability to address pain and inflammation [28,29]. On occasion, this may be the only therapy necessary.

The most used non-surgical options for idiopathic CSP are tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), anticonvulsants and spermatic cord blocks (SCBs). TCAs have a success rate of 66.6% for idiopathic testicular pain, and anticonvulsants have an improvement rate of 61.5% [30,31].

TCAs act by inhibiting the reuptake of norepinephrine and serotonin in the brain. They also inhibit sodium channel blockers and L-type calcium channels, and this is thought to be the cause of their analgesic effect: they modulate first-order neuron synapses with second-order ones in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord [28,29]. Tertiary amines (amitriptyline and clomipramine) have been reported as more effective for neuropathic pain than secondary amines (desipramine and nortriptyline) [30,31]. However, tertiary amines are also accompanied by more sedation and postural hypotension [32,33]. A TCA may take two to three weeks from initiation of therapy to have an effect. It is crucial to taper patients off TCAs [32,33].

In one case, after a month of unsuccessful TCA therapy, it was agreed to add an anticonvulsant, as they have been shown to influence neuropathic pain. Due to the obvious side effects inherent in older-generation anticonvulsants, the two most important anticonvulsants now used for neuropathic pain are gabapentin and pregabalin [34,35]. Pharmacological therapy is considered to have failed if pain persists after pregabalin has been administered for four weeks.

Furthermore, SCB with local anaesthetic agents and with or without steroids can be used to disrupt the afferent pain pathway to relieve CSP. SCB can be used both diagnostically and therapeutically. However, studies have demonstrated that this technique rarely provides long-term relief and often lasts only for the duration of the local anaesthetic. The block is injected by isolating the spermatic cord at the inguinal‒scrotal junction. Then, a 27-gauge needle is used to puncture the spermatic cord at the level of the pubic tubercle. One published recommendation is to use 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine hydrochloride for the initial cord block. Most patients experience >90% relief of pain temporarily [19]. Another recommendation is to treat every two weeks until there have been four to five blocks that used 9 mL of 0.75% bupivacaine hydrochloride combined with 1 mL (10 mg) of triamcinolone acetonide. If this treatment does not alleviate pain, repeating the treatment is not recommended [36].

Physical Therapy, Psychotherapy and Other Non-Surgical Options

Up to 10% of patients who present with CSP are found to have musculoskeletal pain localised to areas that may include the conjoint tendon, the adductor tendon and the pelvic floor. These patients may benefit from physical therapies, including myofascial trigger-point release, perineal/pelvic-floor massage or other physiotherapies targeted to these areas, including antibiotics and NSAIDs, as management options [33].

It is well-established that CSP significantly affects one’s quality of life. Also, given the extreme psychological toll associated with chronic pain, there should be a low threshold for involving a mental health professional in the patient’s care plan [22]. Referral to a mental health specialist is indicated if (1) the patient endorses a significant psychiatric response to ongoing pain, (2) the pain affects non-medical aspects of life (relationships, employment, legal issues) or (3) the pain is accompanied by anxiety, depression or significant mental illness [34,35]. Other non-surgical techniques include pulsed radiofrequency of the spermatic cord and the genital branch of the genitofemoral nerve for PVPS if the patient receives temporary relief from an SCB. Acupuncture is rarely mentioned, being reported only in some small non-randomised trials [2,16]. Finally, the least mentioned non-surgical techniques are transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) and vibratory stimulation [16]. Tables 1-4 analyse medical, psychotherapy, physical, SCB, radiofrequency and other non-surgical options of treatment in the last five years.

Table 1 Medical treatment
NSAID, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug; TCA, tricyclic antidepressant; Y, yes


Publications
	
Management
	

Antibiotics
	
NSAID
	
TCA
	

Gordhan and Sadeghi-Nejad, 2015 [1]
	
Y
	
Y
	
Y
	

Tan and Levine, 2017 [2]
	
Y
	
Y
	
Y
	

Calixte et al., 2017 [36]
	
 
	
Y
	
Y
	

Calixte et al., 2017 [37]
	
Y
	
Y
	
Y
	

Tatem and Kovac, 2017 [5]
	
Y
	
Y
	
Y
	

Wu and Jarvi, 2018 [18]
	
 
	
 
	
Y
	

Wu and Jarvi, 2018 [32]
	
Y
	
Y
	
Y
	

Levine and Abdelsayed, 2018 [33]
	
Y
	
Y
	
Y
	

Jarvi et al., 2018 [34]
	
Y
	
Y
	
Y
	

Ziegelmann et al., 2019 [19]
	
Y
	
Y
	
Y
	
Table 2 Anticonvulsant and psychotherapy management
Y, yes


Publications
	
Management
	

Anticonvulsants
	
Psychotherapy
	

Gordhan and Sadeghi-Nejad, 2015 [1]
	
Y
	
Y
	

Tan and Levine, 2017 [2]
	
Y
	
Y
	

Agarwal and Sy, 2017 [35]
	
Y
	
 
	

Calixte et al., 2017 [36]
	
Y
	
 
	

Tatem and Kovac, 2017 [5]
	
Y
	
 
	

WU and Jarvi, 2018 [18]
	
Y
	
Y
	

Wu and Jarvi, 2018 [32]
	
Y
	
Y
	

Levine and Abdelsayed, 2018 [33]
	
Y
	
 
	

Jarvi et al., 2018 [34]
	
Y
	
Y
	

Ziegelmann et al., 2019 [19]
	
Y
	
Y
	
Table 3 Physical therapy, SCB and radiofrequency management
GFN, genitofemoral nerve; SC, spermatic cord; SCB, spermatic cord block; Y, yes


Publications
	
Management
	

Pelvic floor physical therapy
	
SCB
	
Radiofrequency of SC and GFN
	

Gordhan and Sadeghi-Nejad, 2015 [1]
	
 
	
 
	
Y
	

Tan and Levine, 2017 [2]
	
Y
	
Y
	
Y
	

Calixte et al., 2017 [36]
	
 
	
Y
	
Y
	

Calixte et al., 2017 [37]
	
 
	
Y
	
 
	

Tatem and Kovac, 2017 [5]
	
Y
	
Y
	
 
	

Wu and Jarvi, 2018 [18]
	
Y
	
Y
	
 
	

Wu and Jarvi, 2018 [32]
	
Y
	
Y
	
 
	

Levine and Abdelsayed, 2018 [33]
	
Y
	
Y
	
 
	

Jarvi et al., 2018 [34]
	
Y
	
Y
	
 
	

Ziegelmann et al., 2019 [19]
	
Y
	
Y
	
Y
	
Table 4 Other options of non-surgical management
ENS, transcutaneous electrical stimulation; Y, yes


Publications
	
Management
	

TENS
	
Vibratory stimulation
	
Acupuncture
	

Tan and Levine, 2017 [2]
	
 
	
 
	
Y
	

Khandwala et al., 2017 [38]
	
 
	
Y
	
 
	

Jarvi et al., 2018 [34]
	
 
	
 
	
Y
	

Ziegelmann et al., 2019 [19]
	
Y
	
Y
	
Y
	
Surgical management

Microsurgical Denervation of the Spermatic Cord

Microsurgical denervation of the spermatic cord (MDSC) is a minimally invasive surgical procedure used to manage CSP after the failure of conservative treatments [36,37]. Multiple retrospective studies have examined the use of MDSC for CSP. The success rates for this procedure range from 71% to 96% [34]. Benson et al. conducted a retrospective review of 74 patients who underwent MDSC and found that a positive response to SCB (≥ 50% reduction in pain) predicted pain resolution in 75% of the patients, suggesting that the response to preoperative SCB can predict the success of MDSC [38,39].The risks of the procedure, including persistent pain, persistent numbness, infection, bleeding, testicular atrophy, infertility and hydrocele formation, need to be discussed with the patient as part of informed consent. Given that this procedure involves significant potential complications, it should be performed only in dedicated centres that have expertise in MDSC.

Shiraishi et al. have recommended that high-inguinal MDSC is effective and safe (retaining testicular function) for CSP that is refractory to medical management. They found that the high-inguinal approach is easier than the sub-inguinal approach (used most often) because the former involves fewer divisions of veins and a larger diameter of the spermatic artery [40].

Chaudhari et al. have stated that idiopathic chronic orchialgia remains a difficult condition to manage. If surgery is considered, MDSC should be considered as the first surgical approach to stopping pain while sparing the testicle [41].

The MDSC procedure is a reasonably successful, durable and valuable approach for PVPS, especially when the pain involves multiple structures in the scrotum (testis, epididymis, spermatic cord) [42]. Ultrasound-guided targeted cryoablation (UTC) of the peri-spermatic cord is a safe potential treatment option for salvage management of persistent CSP in patients who have failed MDSC [43].

Surgical treatment includes various modalities; MDSC is an important and minimally invasive surgical procedure for managing CSP after the failure of conservative treatments [36]. It has been noted that MDSC has a superior success rate of not less than 70% [2]. Table 5 analyses the MDSC, UTC and laparoscopic denervation as surgical treatment options in the last five years.

Table 5 MDSC, UTC and LD
LD, laparoscopic denervation; MDSC, microsurgical targeted denervation of the spermatic cord; UTC, ultrasound-guided cryoablation; Y, yes

Publications	Surgical management	
MDSC	UTC (after MDSC)	LD	
Gordhan and Sadeghi-Nejad, 2015 [1]	Y	 	Y	
Tan and Levine, 2017 [2]	Y	 	Y	
Calixte et al., 2017 [36]	Y	Y	 	
Calixte et al., 2017 [37]	Y	Y	 	
Wu and Jarvi, 2018 [32]	Y	 	 	
Tan et al., 2018 [42]	Y	 	 	
Levine and Abdelsayed, 2018 [33]	Y	 	 	
Jarvi et al., 2018 [34]	Y	 	 	
Calixte et al., 2019 [43]	 	Y	 	
Ziegelmann et al., 2019 [19]	Y	 	 	
Shiraishi et al., 2019 [40]	Y	 	 	
Chaudhari et al., 2019 [41]	Y	 	 	
Vasectomy Reversal, Epididymectomy and Orchidectomy

Vasectomy reversal, epididymectomy and orchidectomy (inguinal approach) are frequently recommended surgical treatments for CSP. The reported success rates of vasectomy reversal range from 34% to 59%, and the rate for epididymectomy ranges from 50 to 92%, with better results reported if a structural abnormality (cyst, granuloma or mass) was noted in the epididymis on examination or ultrasound (US). Orchidectomy can be a treatment of last resort for CSP and has an average success rate of 55.6% [2]. Lowe has concluded that inguinal orchiectomy with high ligation appears to provide the best result for resolving scrotal pain, possibly related to its ability to address the sensory components from the ilioinguinal and genitofemoral nerves [44].

Other Surgical Treatment Options

An increasingly used surgical treatment is Botox injection [34,37] because the botulinum-A toxin has been shown to modulate the release of neuropeptides (substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide) that inhibit neurogenic inflammation and chronic pain [35]. However, a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial by Dockray et al. found no superiority of onabotulinumtoxinA plus a local anaesthetic compared to a local anaesthetic alone for the control of SCP pain. Interestingly, our open label onabotulinumtoxinA trial noted significant pain improvement, suggesting a potential placebo effect [45].

Other, rarely mentioned, surgical treatments for CSP that need more research include laparoscopic denervation [1,2], robotic denervation [46], resection of the genitofemoral nerve [2], sperm granuloma resection [16], AmnioFix® injection [36,37], spinal cord stimulation [36], scrotoscopy using the novel autoclave [47] and microsurgical sub-inguinal cremaster muscle release (MSCMR), which has been shown to be an effective option that has a relatively low rate of complications in cases of chronic orchialgia that has been clearly identified as secondary to testicular retraction due to a hyperactive cremaster muscle reflex and in which all other aetiologies of orchialgia have been ruled out [48]. Table 6 analyses vasectomy reversal, epididymectomy and orchidectomy in the last five years’ publications. Figure 1 shows a flow chart of recommended CSP management.

Table 6 Vasectomy reversal, epididymectomy and orchidectomy
Y, yes


Publications
	
Surgical management
	

Vasectomy reversal
	
Epididymectomy
	
Orchidectomy
	

Gordhan and Sadeghi-Nejad, 2015 [1]
	
Y
	
Y
	
Y
	

Tan and Levine, 2017 [2]
	
Y
	
Y
	
Y
	

Tatem and Kovac, 2017 [5]
	
Y
	
 
	
Y
	

Calixte et al., 2017 [36]
	
Y
	
Y
	
Y
	

Calixte et al., 2017 [37]
	
Y
	
 
	
Y
	

Lowe, 2017 [44]
	
 
	
 
	
Y
	

Wu and Jarvi, 2018 [32]
	
Y
	
Y
	
Y
	

Levine and Abdelsayed, 2018 [33]
	
Y
	
Y
	
Y
	

Jarvi et al., 2018 [34]
	
Y
	
Y
	
Y
	

Ziegelmann et al., 2019 [19]
	
Y
	
Y
	
Y
	
Figure 1 Flow chart suggesting the management strategy of CSP
CSP, chronic scrotal pain

Conclusions
CSP remains a topic on which the available evidence is sparse and of low quality, making it difficult to strongly recommend individual treatment options. However, it is recommended to review each case in detail, which includes taking detailed histories, especially medical and social ones, conducting examinations, of which abdominal and DRE ones are the most crucial, and employing diagnostic modalities (urinalysis is crucial and US is helpful). Treatment options include medical treatment, physical therapy and psychotherapy, all of which may help patients and provide useful tools for coping with this condition. Depending on the patient’s state, the severity of the complaint and what options have already been tried, there are also useful surgical options for CSP, with MDSC being the one most recommended.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
==== Refs
References
1 Scrotal pain: evaluation and management Korean J Urol Gordhan GG  Sadeghi-Nejad H   3 11 2015 
2 What can we do for chronic scrotal content pain? World J Mens Health Tan WP  Levine LA   146 155 35 2017 29282906 
3 Evaluation and management of chronic scrotal content pain Curr Urol Rep Levine LA  Hoeh MP   36 16 2015 25903802 
4 Testicular pain following vasectomy: a review of post-vasectomy pain syndrome J Androl Christiansen CG  Sandlow JI   293 298 24 2003 12721203 
5 Chronic scrotal pain and microsurgical spermatic cord denervation: tricks of the trade Transl Androl Urol Tatem A  Kovac JR   30 36 6 2017 
6 Physical therapy for chronic scrotal content pain with associated pelvic floor pain on digital rectal exam Can J Urol Farrell MR  Dugan SA  Levine LA   8546 8550 23 2016 http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27995849/ 27995849 
7 Guideline of guidelines: asymptomatic microscopic haematuria BJU Int Linder BJ  Bass EJ  Mostafid H  Boorjian SA   176 183 121 2018 28921833 
8 Right-sided varicocele as a presentation of right renal tumours Br J Urol Hanna GB  Byrne D  Townell N   798 799 75 1995 7613843 
9 Chronic orchialgia and associated diseases Curr Urol Ciftci H  Savas M  Yeni E  Verit A  Topal U   67 70 4 2010 
10 Chronic scrotal pain syndrome: management among urologists in Switzerland Eur Urol Strebel RT  Leippold T  Luginbuehl T  Muentener M  Praz V  Hauri D   812 816 47 2005 15925078 
11 Chronic scrotal pain in young adults BMC Res Notes Rottenstreich M  Glick Y  Gofrit ON   1 5 10 2017 28057050 
12 Post-vasectomy pain syndrome: clinical features and treatment options Can J Urol Morley C  Rogers A  Zaslau S   6160 6164 19 2012 22512957 
13 The incidence of chronic scrotal pain after vasectomy: a prospective audit BJU Int Leslie TA  Illing RO  Cranston DW  Guillebaud J   1330 1333 100 2007 17850378 
14 Outcomes of varicocele ligation done for pain J Urol Peterson AC  Lance RS  Ruiz HE   1565 1567 159 1998 9554356 
15 Persistent post-herniorrhaphy pain following inguinal hernia repair: a cross-sectional study of prevalence, pain characteristics, and effects on quality of life Int J Surg Ergönenç T  Beyaz SG  Özocak H  Palabıyık O  Altıntoprak F   126 132 46 2017 28890413 
16 Quality of life in men with chronic scrotal pain Can J Pain Aljumaily A  Wu C  Al-Khazraji H  Gordon A  Lau S  Jarvi KA   106 111 1 2017 
17 Psychological factors in men with genital pain Cleve Clin J Med Schover LR   697 700 57 1990 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2257677/ 2257677 
18 Chronic scrotal pain Curr Urol Rep Wu C  Jarvi K   59 19 2018 29855742 
19 Evaluation and management of chronic scrotal content pain—a common yet poorly understood condition Rev Urol Ziegelmann MJ  Farrell MR  Levine LA   74 84 21 2019 http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31768134/ 31768134 
20 The association of abuse and symptoms suggestive of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: results from the Boston Area Community Health survey J Gen Intern Med Hu JC  Link CL  McNaughton-Collins M  Barry MJ  McKinlay JB   1532 1537 22 2007 17763912 
21 Interdisciplinary pain management is beneficial for refractory orchialgia in children J Pediatr Urol Ching CB  Hays SR  Luckett TR    0 123 11 2015 
22 Longitudinal associations between depression, anxiety, pain, and pain related disability in chronic pain patients Psychosom Med Lerman SF  Rudich Z  Brill S  Shalev H  Shahar G   333 341 77 2015 25849129 
23 Chronic bacterial prostatitis and chronic pelvic pain syndrome BMJ Clin Evid Bowen DK  Dielubanza E  Schaeffer AJ   1802 2015 2015 http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26313612/ 
24 Epididymitis Clin Infect Dis Taylor SN   770 773 61 2015 
25 The 2016 European guideline on the management of epididymo-orchitis Int J STD AIDS Street EJ  Justice ED  Kopa Z    744 749 28 2017 28632112 
26 Chronic scrotal pain syndrome (CSPS): the widespread use of antibiotics is not justified Andrology Strebel RT  Schmidt C  Beatrice J  Sulser T   155 159 1 2013 23258645 
27 Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in chronic pain: implications of new data for clinical practice J Pain Res Ho KY  Gwee KA  Cheng YK  Yoon KH  Hee HT  Omar AR   1937 1948 11 2018 30288088 
28 Management of neuropathic pain: translating mechanistic advances and evidence-based research into clinical practice Clin J Pain Gallagher RM   2 8 22 2006 
29 Antidepressant pharmacotherapy: considerations for the pain clinician Pain Pract Jackson KC II  St Onge EL   135 143 3 2003 17163912 
30 Pain, pain, go away: antidepressants and pain management Psychiatry (Edgmont) Sansone RA  Sansone LA   16 19 5 2008 http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19724772/ 
31 Chronic orchialgia: consider gabapentin or nortriptyline before considering surgery Int J Urol Sinclair AM  Miller B  Lee LK   622 625 14 2007 17645606 
32 Management of chronic scrotal content pain Can Urol Assoc J Wu C  Jarvi K   164 166 12 2018 
33 Chronic scrotal content pain: a diagnostic and treatment dilemma J Sex Med Levine LA  Abdelsayed GA   1212 1215 15 2018 30126799 
34 Canadian Urological Association best practice report on chronic scrotal pain Can Urol Assoc J Jarvi KA  Wu C  Nickel JC  Domes T  Grantmyre J  Zini A   161 172 12 2018 29485040 
35 Gabapentenoids in pain management in urological chronic pelvic pain syndrome: gabapentin or pregabalin? Neurourol Urodyn Agarwal MM  Sy ME   2028 2033 36 2017 Nov 28185319 
36 Chronic testicular and groin pain: pathway to relief Curr Urol Rep Calixte N  Brahmbhatt J  Parekattil S   83 18 2017 28866773 
37 Genital pain: algorithm for management Transl Androl Urol Calixte N  Brahmbhatt J  Parekattil S   252 257 6 2017 28540232 
38 Evaluation of external vibratory stimulation as a treatment for chronic scrotal pain in adult men: a single centre open label pilot study Scand J Pain Khandwala YS  Serrano F  Eisenberg ML   403 407 17 2017 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29126848/ 29126848 
39 Does a positive response to spermatic cord block predict response to microdenervation of the spermatic cord for chronic scrotal content pain? J Sex Med Benson JS  Abern MR  Larsen S  Levine LA   876 882 10 2013 23016953 
40 High inguinal microsurgical denervation of the spermatic cord for chronic scrotal content pain: a novel approach for adult and pediatric patients Urology Shiraishi K  Tabara M  Matsuyama H   144 149 131 2019 31136771 
41 Microsurgical denervation of spermatic cord for chronic idiopathic orchialgia: long-term results from an institutional experience World J Mens Health Chaudhari R  Sharma S  Khant S  Raval K   78 84 37 2019 30209898 
42 Microdenervation of the spermatic cord for post-vasectomy pain syndrome BJU Int Tan WP  Tsambarlis PN  Levine LA   667 673 121 2018 29352521 
43 Salvage ultrasound-guided targeted cryoablation of the peri-spermatic cord for persistent chronic scrotal content pain after microsurgical denervation of the spermatic cord Urology Calixte N  Kartal IG  Tojuola B    181 185 130 2019 31063763 
44 Extirpative surgery for chronic orchialgia: is there a role? Transl Androl Urol Lowe G   2 6 2017 28217445 
45 A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial shows that onabotulinum toxin a nerve blocks do not provide improved pain control in men with chronic scrotal Pain J Urol Dockray J  Aljumaily A  Lau S    767 772 203 2020 31738115 
46 Targeted robotic assisted microsurgical denervation of the spermatic cord for the treatment of chronic orchialgia or groin pain: a single centre, large series review J Urol Calixte N  Tojuola B  Kartal I    1015 1022 199 2018 29079446 
47 How to treat chronic idiopathic testicular pain? scrotoscopy with a novel percutaneous endoscopy equipment Biomed Res Int Lei J  Luo C  Su X  Wang X   9808152 2018 2018 30327783 
48 Microsurgical sub-inguinal cremaster muscle release for chronic orchialgia secondary to hyperactive cremaster muscle reflex in adults Andrologia Kavoussi PK   13493 52 2020