==== Front Beilstein J Org Chem Beilstein J Org Chem Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry 1860-5397 Beilstein-Institut Trakehner Str. 7-9, 60487 Frankfurt am Main, Germany 33335603 10.3762/bjoc.16.245 Full Research Paper Chemistry Organic Chemistry Construction of pillar[4]arene[1]quinone–1,10-dibromodecane pseudorotaxanes in solution and in the solid state Sheng Xinru https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9118-24571 Li Errui https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6638-12941 Huang Feihe https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3177-6744fhuang@zju.edu.cn12 Niemeyer Jochen Guest Editor 1 State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, Center for Chemistry of High-Performance & Novel Materials, Department of Chemistry, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, P. R. China 2 Green Catalysis Center and College of Chemistry, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, P. R. China 2020 2 12 2020 16 2954 2959 10.3762/bjoc.16.24518 9 2020 18 11 2020 Copyright © 2020, Sheng et al.2020Sheng et al.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0https://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc/terms/termsThis is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). Please note that the reuse, redistribution and reproduction in particular requires that the author(s) and source are credited and that individual graphics may be subject to special legal provisions. The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry terms and conditions: (https://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc/terms/terms)We report novel pseudorotaxanes based on the complexation between pillar[4]arene[1]quinone and 1,10-dibromodecane. The complexation is found to have a 1:1 host–guest complexation stoichiometry in chloroform but a 2:1 host–guest complexation stoichiometry in the solid state. From single crystal X-ray diffraction, the linear guest molecules thread into cyclic pillar[4]arene[1]quinone host molecules in the solid state, stabilized by CH∙∙∙π interactions and hydrogen bonds. The bromine atoms at the periphery of the guest molecule provide convenience for the further capping of the pseudorotaxanes to construct rotaxanes. host–guest chemistrypillar[4]arene[1]quinonespillararenespseudorotaxanessupramolecular chemistryWe acknowledge sincerely the financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China NSFC (22035006) and the fundamental research funds for the central universities.This article is part of the thematic issue "Molecular recognition" and is dedicated to the memory of Carsten Schmuck. ==== Body Introduction Relying on the research of basic science, supramolecular chemistry has become an important mean for constructing functional materials from the bottom up as well as an important way to create new substances with functions [1–5]. Through ingenious designs and the applications of molecular recognition and self-assembly strategies, many exquisite supramolecular architectures have been fabricated, including molecular switches, molecular logic gates, molecular machines, supramolecular polymers, etc. [6–11]. Pseudorotaxanes not only are used as the supramolecular precursors for the synthesis of rotaxanes and catenanes but also play an important role in the construction of supramolecular architectures and chemical topology [12–23]. Seeking new systems to produce pseudorotaxanes is currently considered a “hot topic” in supramolecular chemistry. As a new class of supramolecular macrocyclic hosts, pillararenes have received extensive attention in recent years due to their unique pillar structures and rich environmental responsiveness [24–29]. There are more and more reports on pillararenes complexing with different guest molecules to construct pseudorotaxanes [30–35]. Previously, our group first demonstrated that alkyl chains can be encapsulated in the pillar[5]arene cavity, forming [2]pseudorotaxanes driven by CH∙∙∙π interactions [36–37]. This discovery facilitated the preparation of threaded structures based on the pillar[5]arene–alkyl chain recognition motif. Benefiting from these results, various compounds with different substituents on the alkyl chains have been used to prepare pseudorotaxanes with pillar[5]arenes and have opened potential applications in different fields [38–43]. So far, fabricating pseudorotaxanes containing more than two components is still a difficult task. Herein, we report new pseudorotaxanes based on the pillar[4]arene[1]quinone H and 1,10-dibromodecane (G, Scheme 1). The pillar[4]arene[1]quinone H, which is composed of four 1,4-diethoxybenzene subunits and one benzoquinone subunit, was prepared by partial oxidation of perethylated pillar[5]arene according to previous reports [44–45]. We found that H and G can be used to build a [3]pseudorotaxane in the solid state but a [2]pseudorotaxane in solution. Scheme 1 Chemical structures and schematic representation of (a) the pillar[4]arene[1]quinone H; (b) 1,10-dibromodecane (G); and (c) schematic representation of the pseudorotaxanes based on H and G. Results and Discussion Host–guest complexation in the solid state Cocrystals of H and G were obtained by slow evaporation of the solution in methanol. The X-ray crystallography revealed that two host molecules complex one guest molecule, forming a [3]pseudorotaxane in the solid state (Figure 1). In the crystal structure, the alkyl chain of the guest is threaded through the cavities of two host molecules, which is stabilized by multiple CH∙∙∙π interactions and hydrogen bonds. Specifically, there are four hydrogen atoms on the guest molecule to form multiple CH∙∙∙π interactions with the 1,4-diethoxybenzene subunits of the host. In addition, the two bromine atoms at the periphery of the guest molecule are outside the host cavities and form moderate hydrogen bonds with the hydrogen atoms on the ethoxy groups. It is worth mentioning that we did not find any interaction of the benzoquinone subunit of the host with the guest molecule. Figure 1 Crystal structures of the [3]pseudorotaxane composed of H and G in the solid state. Color code: C, gray; Br, orange; O, red; and H, white. CH∙∙∙π distances (Å): 2.778, 2.886, 2.778, and 2.886; CH···Br distances (Å): 2.925 and 2.925. Host–guest complexation in solution In order to further study the host–guest binding properties of H and G, we explored the complexation in solution by 1H NMR spectroscopy. As depicted in Figure 2, after the addition of 1.0 equiv of G to a solution of H, all protons on G shifted upfield, which indicated the threading of the alkyl part of the guest into the electron-rich cavity of the host, confirming the complexation between H and G. Figure 2 1H NMR spectra (500 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K): (a) 6.00 mM G; (b) 3.00 mM G + 3.00 mM H; and (c) 6.00 mM H. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI–TOF MS) was conducted to investigate the complexation properties. However, no signal related to the complex but only peaks of H were found, implying weak host–guest interactions between H and G (Figures S3 and S4, Supporting Information File 1). A Job plot based on the proton NMR data was made to determine the complexation stoichiometry between H and G. The formation signified a 1:1 binding stoichiometry in chloroform-d at room temperature (Figures S5 and S6, Supporting Information File 1). Combined with the mass spectrometry results, we believed that the differences between the stoichiometric ratio of the complexation in the solid state and in solution could be owing to the competitive role of solvent molecules in the combination of H and G. The association constant (Ka) calculated by the nonlinear curve fitting method was 20.0 ± 2.4 M−1 (Figures S7 and S8, Supporting Information File 1), which agreed well with the inference above. To further explore the geometry of the complexation in solution, we performed a NOESY study (Figure 3). Only one correlative peak was observed between the protons H1 of H and Ha of G, which agreed with the formation of the complexation; the alkyl chains of G were encapsulated in the cavity of H. This further indicated that the interactions between H and G were weak. Figure 3 NOESY spectrum of a solution of H and G (500 MHz, chloroform-d, 298 K). UV–vis absorption properties of the complex in solution Based on the UV–vis properties of H, we wondered the influence of G on the optical properties of H, so an UV–vis spectroscopy experiment was carried out. We investigated the changes in the UV–vis absorption of the complex at different guest concentrations corresponding to 0.5 and 1 equiv. As shown in Figure 4, the concentration of G did not affect the absorption maximum. This also indicated that the interactions between H and G were weak. Figure 4 Normalized UV–vis spectra: H (black); H upon adding 0.5 equiv of G (red); and H upon adding 1 equiv of G (blue). [H] = 3.00 mM. Conclusion In summary, we constructed novel pseudorotaxanes based on a pillar[4]arene[1]quinone and 1,10-dibromodecane. Single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis showed an alkane molecule threaded into the cavities of two pillar[4]arene[1]quinone molecules, forming a [3]pseudorotaxane in the solid state. However, 1H NMR experiments revealed that the pillar[4]arene[1]quinone encapsulated the guest molecule with a 1:1 stoichiometry to form a [2]pseudorotaxane in solution. One possible reason may be that the interactions between H and G were weak and that there was a complexation competition with solvent molecules. Furthermore, the addition of G did not change the maximum UV–vis absorption wavelength of H. The bromine atoms at the periphery of the guest molecule provide convenience for the further capping of the pseudorotaxanes to construct rotaxanes, which will broaden the range of potential applications of pillararene derivatives for the manufacture of sophisticated supramolecular architectures and functional supramolecular systems. Supporting Information File 1 Materials and methods, characterizations of H and G, crystallographic data, and characterization studies on the complexation between H and G in solution. File 2 CIF file for the complex between H and G. ==== Refs 1 Sun Q-F Iwasa J Ogawa D Ishido Y Sato S Ozeki T Sei Y Yamaguchi K Fujita M Science 2010 328 1144 1147 10.1126/science.1188605 20430973 2 Aida T Meijer E W Stupp S I Science 2012 335 813 817 10.1126/science.1205962 22344437 3 Chifotides H T Dunbar K R Acc Chem Res 2013 46 894 906 10.1021/ar300251k 23477406 4 Mattia E Otto S Nat Nanotechnol 2015 10 111 119 10.1038/nnano.2014.337 25652169 5 Kaphan D M Levin M D Bergman R G Raymond K N Toste F D Science 2015 350 1235 1238 10.1126/science.aad3087 26785485 6 Zhang X Wang C Chem Soc Rev 2011 40 94 101 10.1039/b919678c 20890490 7 Mura S Nicolas J Couvreur P Nat Mater 2013 12 991 1003 10.1038/nmat3776 24150417 8 Wang X Han Y Liu Y Zou G Gao Z Wang F Angew Chem, Int Ed 2017 56 12466 12470 10.1002/anie.201704294 9 Han Y Tian Y Li Z Wang F Chem Soc Rev 2018 47 5165 5176 10.1039/c7cs00802c 29774915 10 Liu Y Zhao W Chen C-H Flood A H Science 2019 365 159 161 31123106 11 Zhang Z Cheng L Zhao J Wang L Liu K Yu W Yan X Angew Chem, Int Ed 2020 59 12139 12146 10.1002/anie.202004152 12 Niu Z Gibson H W Chem Rev 2009 109 6024 6046 10.1021/cr900002h 19670889 13 Niu Z Huang F Gibson H W J Am Chem Soc 2011 133 2836 2839 10.1021/ja110384v 21309571 14 Guo D-S Wang K Wang Y-X Liu Y J Am Chem Soc 2012 134 10244 10250 10.1021/ja303280r 22686862 15 Langton M J Beer P D Acc Chem Res 2014 47 1935 1949 10.1021/ar500012a 24708030 16 Qu D-H Wang Q-C Zhang Q-W Ma X Tian H Chem Rev 2015 115 7543 7588 10.1021/cr5006342 25697681 17 Li S-H Zhang H-Y Xu X Liu Y Nat Commun 2015 6 No. 7590 10.1038/ncomms8590 26126502 18 Eichstaedt K Jaramillo-Garcia J Leigh D A Marcos V Pisano S Singleton T A J Am Chem Soc 2017 139 9376 9381 10.1021/jacs.7b04955 28627882 19 De Bo G Dolphijn G McTernan C T Leigh D A J Am Chem Soc 2017 139 8455 8457 10.1021/jacs.7b05640 28621939 20 Wang Y Sun J Liu Z Nassar M S Botros Y Y Stoddart J F Chem Sci 2017 8 2562 2568 10.1039/c6sc05035b 28553488 21 Lewis J E M Beer P D Loeb S J Goldup S M Chem Soc Rev 2017 46 2577 2591 10.1039/c7cs00199a 28447678 22 Roberts D A Pilgrim B S Nitschke J R Chem Soc Rev 2018 47 626 644 10.1039/c6cs00907g 29142998 23 Li G Wang L Wu L Guo Z Zhao J Liu Y Bai R Yan X J Am Chem Soc 2020 142 14343 14349 10.1021/jacs.0c06416 32787257 24 Ogoshi T Kanai S Fujinami S Yamagishi T-a Nakamoto Y J Am Chem Soc 2008 130 5022 5023 10.1021/ja711260m 18357989 25 Cao D Kou Y Liang J Chen Z Wang L Meier H Angew Chem, Int Ed 2009 48 9721 9723 10.1002/anie.200904765 26 Xue M Yang Y Chi X Yan X Huang F Chem Rev 2015 115 7398 7501 10.1021/cr5005869 25734835 27 Ogoshi T Yamagishi T-a Nakamoto Y Chem Rev 2016 116 7937 8002 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00765 27337002 28 Han C Zhao D Li H Wang H Huang X Sun D ChemistrySelect 2018 3 11 14 10.1002/slct.201702793 29 Jie K Zhou Y Li E Huang F Acc Chem Res 2018 51 2064 2072 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00255 30011181 30 Si W Chen L Hu X-B Tang G Chen Z Hou J-L Li Z-T Angew Chem, Int Ed 2011 50 12564 12568 10.1002/anie.201106857 31 Chen Y Cao D Wang L He M Zhou L Schollmeyer D Meier H Chem – Eur J 2013 19 7064 7070 10.1002/chem.201204628 23568621 32 Xia B Xue M Chem Commun 2014 50 1021 1023 10.1039/c3cc48014c 33 Chen H Fan J Hu X Ma J Wang S Li J Yu Y Jia X Li C Chem Sci 2015 6 197 202 10.1039/c4sc02422b 28553468 34 Sun Y Fu W Chen C Wang J Yao Y Chem Commun 2017 53 3725 3728 10.1039/c7cc00291b 35 Du X-S Wang C-Y Jia Q Deng R Tian H-S Zhang H-Y Meguellati K Yang Y-W Chem Commun 2017 53 5326 5329 10.1039/c7cc02364b 36 Zhang Z Xia B Han C Yu Y Huang F Org Lett 2010 12 3285 3287 10.1021/ol100883k 20583777 37 Zhang Z Luo Y Chen J Dong S Yu Y Ma Z Huang F Angew Chem, Int Ed 2011 50 1397 1401 10.1002/anie.201006693 38 Ogoshi T Demachi K Kitajima K Yamagishi T-a Chem Commun 2011 47 7164 7166 10.1039/c1cc12333e 39 Hu X-B Chen Z Tang G Hou J-L Li Z-T J Am Chem Soc 2012 134 8384 8387 10.1021/ja302292c 22574988 40 Ni M Hu X-Y Jiang J Wang L Chem Commun 2014 50 1317 1319 10.1039/c3cc47823h 41 Sun C-L Xu J-F Chen Y-Z Niu L-Y Wu L-Z Tung C-H Yang Q-Z Chin Chem Lett 2015 26 843 846 10.1016/j.cclet.2015.05.030 42 Ma J Meng Q Hu X Li B Ma S Hu B Li J Jia X Li C Org Lett 2016 18 5740 5743 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b03005 27759397 43 Li B Meng Z Li Q Huang X Kang Z Dong H Chen J Sun J Dong Y Li J Chem Sci 2017 8 4458 4464 10.1039/c7sc01438d 28970876 44 Han C Zhang Z Yu G Huang F Chem Commun 2012 48 9876 9878 10.1039/c2cc35498e 45 Ogoshi T Yamafuji D Kotera D Aoki T Fujinami S Yamagishi T-a J Org Chem 2012 77 24 11146 11152 10.1021/jo302283n 23198965