==== Front Sci Rep Sci Rep Scientific Reports 2045-2322 Nature Publishing Group UK London 78400 10.1038/s41598-020-78400-4 Article Impact of bleeding during dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease Tung Ying-Chang 12 See Lai-Chu 345 Chang Shu-Hao 3 Liu Jia-Rou 3 Kuo Chi-Tai 12 Chang Chi-Jen chijenformosa@gmail.com 12 1 grid.454211.70000 0004 1756 999XCardiovascular Department, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 5, Fusing St., Gueishan Dist., Taoyuan City, 33305 Taiwan, ROC 2 grid.145695.aCollege of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, ROC 3 grid.145695.aDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, ROC 4 grid.145695.aBiostatistics Core Laboratory, Molecular Medicine Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, ROC 5 grid.454211.70000 0004 1756 999XDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan, ROC 7 12 2020 7 12 2020 2020 10 2134529 3 2020 10 11 2020 © The Author(s) 2020Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.This nationwide retrospective cohort study used the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan to compare the impact of bleeding on clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) versus chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). Between July 2007 and December 2010, patients with AMI (n = 15,391) and CCS (n = 19,724) who received dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary stenting were identified from the database. AMI was associated with increased risks of MI (AMI vs. CCS: 0.38 vs. 0.16 per 100 patient-months; p < 0.01), all-cause death (0.49 vs. 0.32 per 100 patient-months; p < 0.01), and BARC type 3 bleeding (0.22 vs. 0.13 per 100 patient-months; p < 0.01) at 1 year compared with CCS, while the risk of BARC type 2 bleeding was marginally higher in the CCS patients than in the AMI patients (1.32 vs. 1.4 per 100 person-months; p = 0.06). Bleeding was an independent predictor of MI, stroke, and all-cause death in this East Asian population, regardless of the initial presentation. Among the patients with bleeding, AMI was associated with a higher risk of ischemic events at 1 year after bleeding compared with CCS (MI: 0.34 vs. 0.25 per 100 patient-months; p = 0.06; ischemic stroke: 0.22 vs. 0.13 per 100 patient-months; p = 0.02). The 1-year mortality after bleeding was comparable between the two groups after propensity score weighting. In conclusion, bleeding conferred an increased risk of adverse outcomes in East Asian patients with AMI and CCS. Subject terms CardiologyMedical researchissue-copyright-statement© The Author(s) 2020 ==== Body Introduction Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor has long been recommended as the cornerstone of pharmacologic treatment in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) after they have received coronary stenting1–3. Advances in antiplatelet therapy have improved clinical outcomes of patients with coronary artery disease through the reduction of ischemic and thrombotic events, with the tradeoff of increased risk of bleeding. Depending on the definitions used, major bleeding rates within 30 days of contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) range between 0.7 and 1.1% in elective procedures4,5, 0.6% and 4.7% in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)5–7, and 0.9% and 8.9% in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)5,6,8,9. Major bleeding complications have been well recognized as independently associated with short- and long-term mortality and major adverse cardiac events across the entire spectrum of CAD4,10–12. East Asian populations exhibit relatively high platelet reactivity in response to clopidogrel treatment, but this relatively high on-treatment platelet reactivity does not appear to increase the risk of ischemic events, a phenomenon commonly referred to as the “East Asian paradox”13,14. Therefore, differences in patient characteristics and risk profiles may preclude the generalizability of findings regarding antiplatelet therapy from studies that mainly enroll patients from Western countries. Thus far, the incidence and prognostic impact of bleeding in East Asian populations have rarely been addressed. Data are also limited regarding the differences in the effects of bleeding on subsequent outcomes in patients with AMI versus CCS. In the present study, we used the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) of Taiwan to estimate the incidence rates of clinical events (bleeding, MI, stroke, and all-cause mortality) in patients with AMI and CCS who had received DAPT after coronary stenting. The effects of bleeding on subsequent clinical events (MI, stroke, and death) were compared between the two disease groups. Methods Data source We used Taiwan’s NHIRD to conduct this nationwide retrospective cohort study. The National Health Insurance (NHI) Program is a compulsory health insurance program that currently covers approximately 99% of the population in Taiwan15. To protect patient privacy, the identification numbers of patients and names of health care providers and medical institutions in the NHIRD have been encrypted. The NHIRD contains claims data regarding the use of all medical facilities in Taiwan and provides patient-level data on diagnoses, demographic information, dates of outpatient visits and hospitalization, prescription drugs, and the use of medical procedures. Studies have validated the accuracy of the NHIRD with regard to the diagnoses of MI and stroke as well as mortality associated with these events16–18. The study design was in accordance of the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chang Gung Medical Foundation (No. 104-2932B). The requirement for informed consent was waived since the identification information in the NHIRD has been encrypted to ensure privacy. Study population Patients who were admitted for AMI or CCS and received DAPT after coronary stenting from July 1, 2007 to December 31, 2010 were eligible for this study. The exclusion criteria were the patients who did not undergo coronary stenting (n = 25,954) or did not receive DAPT after stenting (n = 5285), who received DAPT before the index hospitalization (n = 11,605) or required concomitant oral anticoagulation (n = 3976), who had prior bleeding (n = 3081), who were hospitalized for > 30 days (n = 449), who were younger than 18 years (n = 2), and those with missing data on sex (n = 138) or with unreasonable death records (n = 3). The study period predated the introduction of ticagrelor and prasugrel in Taiwan. Therefore, the DAPT regimen in this study was aspirin and clopidogrel. International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis codes were used for identification of AMI (410.x) and CCS (412.x, 413.x, and 414.x). Figure 1 is a flowchart of patient enrollment. A total of 35,115 patients who were admitted for coronary stenting and received DAPT for the first time were analyzed in this study.Figure 1 Patient enrollment. AMI, acute myocardial infarction; CAD, coronary artery disease; CCS, chronic coronary syndrome; DAPT, dual antiplatelet therapy. Study design We used a dynamic cohort with two study groups, AMI (n = 15,391) and CCS (n = 19,724), to address two aims. First, to compare the incidence rates of clinical events during DAPT after PCI in patients with AMI versus CCS, we defined the date of PCI as the index date. All patients were followed for 1 year, until DAPT was discontinued, or the occurrence of clinical endpoints (bleeding, MI, stroke, and all-cause death), whichever came first. Another aim of this study was to examine the impact of bleeding on subsequent outcomes in patients with AMI versus CCS. Patients who had bleeding complications during DAPT were identified from the database and were followed from the date of bleeding for another 1 year or until the occurrence of clinical endpoints (MI, stroke, or all-cause death), whichever came first. Study outcomes First, we compared the patients with AMI and patients with CCS for the clinical endpoints of bleeding, MI, stroke, and all-cause death during DAPT after coronary stenting. Bleeding endpoints were defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 2, 3, and 5 bleeding19. BARC type 3 bleeding was defined as bleeding that requires blood transfusion or intravenous vasoactive agents, cardiac tamponade, intracranial hemorrhage, or intraocular bleeding. BARC type 5 bleeding was defined as bleeding being the principal diagnosis of admission with mortality within 7 days. BARC type 2 bleeding was defined as bleeding that requires medical intervention or evaluation but does not fit the criteria for type 3 or type 5 bleeding. The bleeding events were further categorized based on the sites of bleeding, including gastrointestinal, genitourologic, neurologic, airway, and other or nonspecific bleeding. The clinical endpoints of bleeding, MI, stroke, and all-cause death were calculated as independent events (i.e., the calculation of each of these events was independent from the others), whereas the subtypes of stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic) and bleeding (BARC types 2, 3 and 5) were calculated as first events (i.e., only the first occurring subtype of stroke or bleeding was calculated). The impacts of bleeding on subsequent MI, stroke, and all-cause death were compared between the two disease groups. Statistical analysis Propensity score weighting was used to ensure a balance between the AMI and CCS groups20,21. An absolute standardized mean difference of less than 0.1 was considered negligible between the two groups22. Comparisons of bleeding, MI, stroke, and death between patients with AMI and CCS were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained for each event using the CCS group as the referent group. The independent association between any bleeding (BARC type 2, 3 or 5) and MI, stroke, and death was examined using bleeding as a time-dependent covariate in the Cox proportional hazards model. Because some clinical events occurred more than once during follow-up, we used the Prentice, Williams, and Peterson model (PWP) model to account for recurrent events in multivariate survival data23. To evaluate the impact of bleeding during DAPT on subsequent MI, stroke, and death, we further identified patients with bleeding complications in the AMI and CCS groups, and performed outcome analysis using propensity score weighting and the Cox proportional hazards model. A p value of < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Results Patient characteristics Table 1 lists the baseline characteristics of the patients with AMI and CCS. Before propensity score weighting, the AMI patients were younger, more often male, with a higher rate of hyperlipidemia, more frequently prescribed angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and statins, more frequently treated with unfractionated heparin, enoxaparin, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors during hospitalization, and required periprocedural implantation of intra-aortic balloon pump. In comparison, the CCS patients were older; had higher rates of underlying diseases including diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, end-stage renal disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic liver disease, previous stroke, and anemia; and were more commonly prescribed angiotensin receptor blockers. There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to the rate of thrombocytopenia and the use of proton-pump inhibitors, H2 blockers, steroids, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The duration of DAPT was 297.5 days in the AMI group and 306.8 days in the CCS group. After propensity score weighting, there was no significant difference between the two study groups in terms of demographics, comorbidities, medications, inhospital management, and the duration of DAPT.Table 1 Demographics and clinical characteristics of patients with AMI and CCS who had received DAPT after coronary stenting. Before propensity score weighting After propensity score weighting AMI (n = 15,391) CCS (n = 19,724) SMD AMI (n = 14,840.13) CCS (n = 19,534.12) SMD n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) Age, years 62.57 (13.49) 65.53 (11.64) − 0.235 63.57 (13.11) 64.71 (12.17) − 0.091 ≤ 75 12,216 (79.37%) 15,284 (77.49%) − 0.046 11,533.24 (77.72%) 15,246.51 (78.05%) 0.008 > 75 3175 (20.63%) 4440 (22.51%) 3306.89 (22.28%) 4287.61 (21.95%) Sex 0.181 0.020 Female 3053 (19.84%) 5419 (27.47%) 3470.18 (23.38%) 4731.77 (24.22%) Male 12,338 (80.16%) 14,305 (72.53%) 11,369.95 (76.62%) 14,802.35 (75.78%) Comorbidities Diabetes mellitus 6290 (40.87%) 9463 (47.98%) − 0.143 6714.59 (45.25%) 8763.32 (44.86%) 0.008 Hypertension 11,017 (71.58%) 16,725 (84.8%) − 0.324 11,683.69 (78.73%) 15,499.73 (79.35%) − 0.015 Atrial fibrillation 534 (3.47%) 1032 (5.23%) − 0.087 651.40 (4.39%) 870.30 (4.46%) − 0.003 Congestive heart failure 3462 (22.49%) 4359 (22.1%) 0.01 3350.88 (22.58%) 4362.76 (22.33%) 0.006 Chronic kidney disease 2101 (13.65%) 3644 (18.47%) − 0.132 2461.30 (16.59%) 3213.61 (16.45%) 0.004 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 2317 (15.05%) 3961 (20.08%) − 0.132 2583.77 (17.41%) 3490.28 (17.87%) − 0.012 Chronic liver disease 1565 (10.17%) 2814 (14.27%) − 0.125 1803.22 (12.15%) 2428.64 (12.43%) − 0.009 Previous stroke 1208 (7.85%) 2139 (10.84%) − 0.103 1441.40 (9.71%) 1861.74 (9.53%) 0.006 Hyperlipidemia 12,478 (81.07%) 15,104 (76.58%) 0.11 11,663.27 (78.59%) 15,344.93 (78.55%) 0.001 End stage renal disease 544 (3.53%) 1236 (6.27%) − 0.127 751.60 (5.06%) 996.66 (5.1%) − 0.002 Anemia 976 (6.34%) 1780 (9.02%) − 0.101 1160.03 (7.82%) 1544.39 (7.91%) − 0.003 Thrombocytopenia 35 (0.23%) 79 (0.4%) − 0.031 34.82 (0.23%) 62.17 (0.32%) − 0.016 Medications ACE inhibitor 12,274 (79.75%) 10,077 (51.09%) 0.632 9639.79 (64.96%) 12,427.27 (63.62%) 0.028 ARB 8400 (54.58%) 11,871 (60.19%) − 0.114 8573.42 (57.77%) 11,248.13 (57.58%) 0.004 Beta-blocker 12,921 (83.95%) 16,015 (81.2%) 0.073 12,269.00 (82.67%) 16,128.31 (82.56%) 0.003 Statin 12,160 (79.01%) 14,124 (71.61%) 0.172 11,184.26 (75.36%) 14,621.62 (74.85%) 0.012 PPI 2995 (19.46%) 4382 (22.22%) − 0.068 3128.26 (21.08%) 4051.41 (20.74%) 0.008 H2 blocker 1947 (12.65%) 2618 (13.27%) − 0.019 1880.15 (12.67%) 2495.47 (12.77%) − 0.003 Steroid 623 (4.05%) 912 (4.62%) − 0.028 634.58 (4.28%) 843.39 (4.32%) − 0.002 NSAID 2148 (13.96%) 2832 (14.36%) − 0.012 2050.05 (13.81%) 2710.02 (13.87%) − 0.002 Inhospital management Unfractionated heparin 12,753 (82.86%) 13,109 (66.46%) 0.384 11,166.28 (75.24%) 14,436.46 (73.9%) 0.031 Enoxaparin 5063 (32.9%) 5322 (26.98%) 0.129 4462.38 (30.07%) 5800.74 (29.7%) 0.008 GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor 4196 (27.26%) 649 (3.29%) 0.707 2128.62 (14.34%) 2689.98 (13.77%) 0.017 IABP 1503 (9.77%) 229 (1.16%) 0.386 763.29 (5.14%) 1006.55 (5.15%) < 0.001 Duration of DAPT 297.54 (99.46) 306.77 (83.17) − 0.101 302.95 (89.22) 302.53 (90.55) 0.005 ACE angiotensin-converting enzyme, AMI acute myocardial infarction, ARB angiotensin II receptor blocker, CCS chronic coronary syndrome, DAPT dual antiplatelet therapy, GP glycoprotein, IABP intra-aortic balloon pump, NSAID nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, PPI proton-pump inhibitor, SMD standardized mean difference. One-year outcomes of AMI versus CCS Figure 2 and Supplemental Table 1 present the 1-year outcomes after propensity score weighting for the AMI and CCS patients who were treated with DAPT after coronary stenting. After weighting, the incidence rate of BARC type 3 bleeding was higher in the AMI patients than in the CCS patients (0.22 vs. 0.13 per 100 person-months; hazard ratio [HR] 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39–1.93; p < 0.01), while the incidence rate of BARC type 2 bleeding was numerically in the CCS patients than in the AMI patients, despite the lack of statistical significance (1.32 vs. 1.4 per 100 person-months; HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.89–1.0; p = 0.06). The risk of BARC type 5 bleeding was comparable between the two groups at 1 year after the index procedure (0.03 vs. 0.02 per 100 person-months; HR 1.21; 95% CI 0.78–1.86; p = 0.4).Figure 2 Cumulative incidence rates of clinical outcomes in patients with AMI versus CCS who had received DAPT after coronary stenting (after propensity score weighting). AMI, acute myocardial infarction; BARC, Bleeding Academic Research Consortium; CCS, chronic coronary syndrome. The AMI patients had significantly higher incidence rates of all-cause death (0.49 vs. 0.32 per 100 person-months; HR 1.55; 95% CI 1.39–1.73; p < 0.01) and postdischarge MI (0.38 vs. 0.16 per 100 person-months; HR 2.33; 95% CI 2.03–2.68; p < 0.01) compared with the CCS patients. The incidence rates of overall stroke (0.17 vs. 0.16 per 100 patient-months; HR 1.06; 95% CI 0.9–1.25; p = 0.49) and ischemic (0.15 vs. 0.15 per 100 person-months; HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.88–1.25; p = 0.6) and hemorrhagic subtypes of stroke (0.01 vs. 0.01 per 100 person-months; HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.45–1.54; p = 0.56) were comparable between the two groups. Supplemental Figure 1 illustrates the temporal changes in the incidence rates of bleeding, MI, stroke, and death in the two groups. Among the patients with AMI, bleeding, death, and recurrent MI occurred most frequently in the first month after the index PCI. The excess bleeding risk in the AMI patients compared with the CCS patients occurred mainly in the first month of DAPT after PCI. Beyond this period, AMI was not associated with a higher risk of bleeding compared with CCS. Bleeding sites in AMI and CCS The temporal changes in the incidence rates of bleeding from various sites were similar to those of overall bleeding and other adverse events (Supplemental Figure 2). The risk of bleeding from each of the sources was highest in the first month after PCI. The majority of bleeding in both groups occurred in the gastrointestinal tract, followed by genitourologic bleeding. The detailed sources of gastrointestinal tract bleeding are illustrated in Supplemental Figure 3. Bleeding as an independent predictor of clinical events To evaluate whether bleeding was an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in patients who received DAPT after PCI, bleeding was added to the Cox proportional hazards model as a time-covariate risk factor (Table 2). After propensity score weighting, bleeding was independently associated with MI, stroke, and all-cause death, with respective HRs of 1.71 (95% CI 1.41–2.06), 2.29 (95% CI 1.95–2.69), and 1.28 (95% CI 1.21–1.36), each with a p value of < 0.01. The results of the PWP model were consistent with Cox regression.Table 2 Hazard ratios for clinical events in patients with AMI versus CCS where bleeding is treated as a time-dependent covariate. Cox Conditional risk set model HR (95% CI) p-value HR (95% CI) p-value Myocardial infarction Before PSW  Group 2.44 (1.54–3.88) < 0.001 2.46 (1.55–3.92) < 0.001  Bleeding 1.79 (1.47–2.18)  < 0.001 1.8 (1.44–2.25)  < 0.001 After PSW  Group 2.04 (1.34–3.12) < 0.001 2.08 (1.14–3.78) 0.017  Bleeding 1.71 (1.41–2.06) < 0.001 1.71 (1.33–2.18) < 0.001 Stroke Before PSW  Group 0.71 (0.47–1.07) 0.099 0.68 (0.45–1.03) 0.072  Bleeding 2.2 (1.87–2.6) < 0.001 2.18 (1.77–2.69) < 0.001 After PSW  Group 1.0 (0.67–1.48) < 0.998 0.95 (0.59–1.53) 0.83  Bleeding 2.29 (1.95–2.69) < 0.001 2.26 (1.84–2.77) < 0.001 All-cause death Before PSW  Group 3.89 (3.43–4.4) < 0.001 3.98 (3.51–4.51) < 0.001  Bleeding 1.3 (1.23–1.38) < 0.001 1.34 (1.23–1.45) < 0.001 After PSW  Group 1.55 (1.39–1.72) < 0.001 1.58 (1.32–1.9) < 0.001 Bleeding 1.28 (1.21–1.36) < 0.001 1.31 (1.19–1.45) < 0.001 AMI acute myocardial infarction, CCS chronic coronary syndrome, CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio, PSW propensity score weighting. Impact of bleeding on subsequent outcomes at 1 year The characteristics of patients with bleeding in both groups (AMI: n = 2089; CCS: n = 2980) are listed in Supplemental Table 2. After the occurrence of bleeding, 44.7% of the AMI patients and 36.5% of the CCS patients continued DAPT; 48.6% of the AMI patients and 59.4% of the CCS patients received single antiplatelet therapy; 6.7% of the AMI patients and 4.1% of the CCS patients discontinued antiplatelet therapy. Propensity score weighting was performed for the two subgroups to compare subsequent outcomes at 1 year after the index bleeding. Before propensity score weighting, the AMI patients with bleeding had a higher risk of recurrent MI and death and a marginally higher risk of ischemic stroke than the CCS patient with bleeding (Supplemental Table 3). After weighting, bleeding was associated with a higher risk of stroke (0.29 vs. 0.17 per 100 patient-months; HR 1.7; 95% CI 1.17–2.48; p = 0.01), particularly ischemic stroke (0.22 vs. 0.13 per 100 patient-months; HR 1.71; 95% CI 1.11–2.63; p = 0.02), and a trend toward a higher risk of MI (0.34 vs. 0.25 per 100 patient-months; HR 1.38; 95% CI 0.99–1.91; p = 0.06) in the AMI group than in the CCS group (Table 3). All-cause death at 1 year after the index bleeding was comparable between the two groups after propensity score weighting (1.1 vs. 1.04 per 100 patient-month; HR 1.06; 95% CI 0.89–1.26; p = 0.52).Table 3 Clinical outcomes at 1 year after bleeding in patients with AMI versus CCS (after propensity score weighting). AMI CCS Hazard ratio (95% CI) p value n Incidence rate (per 100 person-month) n Incidence rate (per 100 person-month) Patients with any bleeding (AMI: n = 1899.01; CCS: n = 2819.12) Myocardial infarction 68.56 0.34 (0.26–0.42) 74.58 0.25(0.19–0.3) 1.38 (0.99–1.91) 0.056 Stroke 57.81 0.29 (0.21–0.36) 51 0.17(0.12–0.21) 1.7 (1.17–2.48) 0.006  Ischemic stroke 43.82 0.22 (0.15–0.28) 38.52 0.13(0.09–0.17) 1.71 (1.11–2.63) 0.015  Hemorrhagic stroke 8.03 0.04 (0.02–0.08) 7.64 0.03(0.01–0.05) 1.57 (0.58–4.23) 0.372 All-cause death 222.8 1.1 (0.95–1.24) 313.87 1.04(0.92–1.15) 1.06 (0.89–1.26) 0.523 AMI acute myocardial infarction, CCS chronic coronary syndrome, CI confidence interval. Discussion This nationwide retrospective cohort study provides the following key findings: (1) AMI was associated with increased risks of MI, all-cause death, and BARC type 3 bleeding at 1 year compared with CCS; (2) bleeding was an independent predictor of MI, stroke, and all-cause death in East Asian patients who received DAPT after coronary stenting; (3) among the patients with bleeding, AMI was associated with a higher risk of ischemic events at 1 year after bleeding, while the mortality risk was comparable between AMI and CCS after propensity score weighting. Studies on the association between post-PCI bleeding and clinical outcomes have used randomized controlled trials and registry studies of acute coronary syndrome or PCI to compare the risk of death or MI in patients with and without bleeding. However, AMI and CCS are at either end of the spectrum of coronary heart disease, differing in disease acuity, management, and risk profiles of bleeding. We hypothesized that the types, severity, and prognostic relevance of bleeding may differ between AMI and CCS. Recently, both the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) and the Japanese Circulation Society proposed a list of clinical variables to define patients at high bleeding risk (HBR)24,25. Compared with the AMI patients, the CCS patients had higher prevalence of the HBR criteria that were applicable in this database study. Although the overall bleeding risk at 1 year was comparable between AMI and CCS, the temporal changes in the incidence rates of BARC type 2 and type 3 differed between the two groups. AMI was associated with a rapid surge in the rates of BARC type 2 and type 3 bleeding in the acute phase, with the cumulative incidence curves separating from those for CCS by 1 month. The use of antithrombotic agents and mechanical circulatory supports as well as clinical factors that were not captured in this study, such as hemodynamic status, white blood cell count, and a potentially higher prevalence of femoral access for urgent PCI, may have contributed to the excessive bleeding risk in the AMI patients in the acute setting26–28. While the majority of BARC type 3 bleeding occurred early after the index PCI, the steady increase in BARC type 2 bleeding may reflect chronic bleeding that occurred during maintenance treatment with DAPT. At 1 year, the cumulative incidence rate of BARC type 2 was numerically higher in the CCS patients than in the AMI patients, despite the lack of statistical difference after propensity score weighting. This finding may suggest different bleeding risk profiles of the two groups, as reflected by higher prevalence of the ARC-HBR criteria and other comorbid conditions in the CCS patients than in the AMI patients. The source of bleeding in East Asian patients after PCI has not been thoroughly addressed in the literature. In this study, the majority of bleeding originated from the gastrointestinal tract, followed by genitourologic bleeding. This pattern was similar to the findings of studies performed in Western populations29,30. Characterization of the sources and timing of bleeding may facilitate the development of strategies to reduce these complications and thereby improve patient outcomes. Consistent with previous studies, bleeding was an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in this East Asian populations, regardless of the initial clinical presentation. One explanation for the causal relationship between bleeding and mortality is that the risk factors of bleeding often overlap with the predictors of ischemic events12. Bleeding acting as an indicator of increased ischemic risk may therefore contribute to subsequent mortality. Other possible mechanisms include hemodynamic effect of severe hemorrhage, intracranial bleeding with massive effect, disparity between oxygen supply and demand, blood transfusion, and discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy12,31. Scant data exist regarding the comparative outcomes after bleeding in patients with AMI versus CCS. In this study, bleeding confers a greater hazard for subsequent ischemic events in the AMI patients than in the CCS patients. It is conceivable that myocardium already compromised by acute infarction may be particularly vulnerable to imbalanced oxygen supply and demand following bleeding complications. Furthermore, AMI is associated with a heightened state of inflammation, platelet activation and thrombosis, compared with a chronic inflammatory response in patients with CCS32–34. Withholding antiplatelet therapy after bleeding may result in activation of platelets and the coagulation cascade, leading to a higher risk of stent thrombosis and other ischemic events in patients with AMI versus CCS35,36. Ischemic stroke is a rare but serious complication after AMI, with a decreasing incidence over the past years due to the use of aspirin, P2Y12 inhibitors, and statins37,38. The leading cause of ischemic stroke following AMI is cardiac embolism, caused by mural thrombus in akinetic segments of the left ventricle or due to new onset atrial fibrillation38. The incidence of stroke after MI is highest in the acute phase but remains elevated thereafter39. Therefore, discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy to minimize bleeding may confer a higher risk of ischemic stroke in patients with AMI than in those with CCS. Previous studies have revealed a temporal relationship between bleeding and mortality7,40 and an increased hazard of morality with higher BARC grades41,42. In this study, bleeding occurred earlier and often in a more severe form (BARC type 3) in the AMI patients than in the CCS patients. Therefore, 1-year mortality after bleeding was higher in the AMI patients than in the CCS patients before propensity score weighting. After adjusting for the clinical variables, however, there was no significant difference in the 1-year mortality after bleeding between the two groups. AMI and CCS differ remarkably with respect to underlying pathophysiology, disease acuity, and inhospital management. Antithrombotic therapy is the cornerstone of pharmacologic management in AMI. The use of antithrombotic agents, particularly glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (26.2% vs. 3.0%), and intra-aortic balloon pump (9.0% vs. 1.1%) were much higher in the AMI patients than in the CCS patients. Both antithrombotic therapy and mechanical circulatory supports have been documented to increase major bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndrome43,44. Therefore, balancing the difference in these variables between the two groups may have also attenuated the difference in the prognostic impact of bleeding on patients with AMI versus CCS. This retrospective database analysis has several inherent limitations. First, Taiwan’s NHIRD does not provide data on vital signs, laboratory tests, echocardiographic parameters, and procedural or angiographic details of PCI. Not all the ARC-HBR criteria were applicable in our analysis. Due to the lack of causes of death, we could not determine the mechanistic link between bleeding and mortality, nor could we investigate how the unmeasured variables may have affected the results. Second, this study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of bleeding during DAPT. To eliminate confounding caused by different antithrombotic regimens, we excluded the patients who received oral anticoagulation or those who did not receive DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel. The study period predates the introduction of ticagrelor and prasugrel in Taiwan. The efficacy and safety of these novel P2Y12 inhibitors in East Asian patients remain to be investigated. Third, the ICD-9-CM codes do not contain the diagnosis of vascular access site bleeding. The incidence rate and the clinical impact of access site bleeding could not be estimated in our study. Forth, unlike MI, stroke, and death, bleeding has not been validated in the NHIRD of Taiwan. However, insurance claims for each health care encounter were all reviewed and inspected by medical reimbursement specialists. The possibility of incorrect coding should be low. To avoid repeat calculations, we excluded the patients with previous bleeding at enrollment and only the first bleeding was analyzed during follow-up. Therefore, the real incidence of bleeding may be underestimated in our study cohort. Finally, our results may not be generalized to patients who receive CABG for AMI or CCS nor to Western populations. In conclusion, bleeding was an independent predictor of MI, stroke, and death in East Asian patients who were on DAPT after PCI. AMI was associated with an increased risk of BARC type 3 bleeding compared with CCS. While bleeding conferred a higher risk of ischemic events in patients with AMI than in patients with CCS, 1-year mortality after bleeding was comparable between the two groups. Supplementary information Supplementary Figure 1. Supplementary Figure 2. Supplementary Figure 3. Supplementary Tables. Supplementary Figure Legends. Publisher's note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Supplementary information is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-78400-4. Acknowledgements This study was supported by Grants CMRPG3E1011, CMRPG3E1051, and CMRPG3J0621 from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan. Author contributions Y.C. Tung and C.J. Chang conceived and designed the study. L.C. See, S.H. Chang and J.R. Liu performed experiments and analyzed the results. C.T. Kuo and C.J. Chang supervised the entire process. All authors reviewed the manuscript. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. ==== Refs References 1. Amsterdam EA 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes Circulation 2014 64 e139 e228 2. Windecker S 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) Eur. Heart J. 2014 35 2541 2619 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278 25173339 3. O'Gara PT 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2013 61 e78 e140 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.019 23256914 4. Mehran R Impact of bleeding on mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention: results from a patient-level pooled analysis of the REPLACE-2 (Randomized Evaluation of PCI Linking Angiomax to Reduced Clinical Events), ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy), and HORIZONS-AMI (harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction) trials JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2011 4 654 664 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.02.011 21700252 5. Subherwal S Temporal trends in and factors associated with bleeding complications among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2012 59 1861 1869 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.045 22595404 6. Mehta SR Effects of radial versus femoral artery access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2012 60 2490 2499 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.050 23103036 7. Mehran R Associations of major bleeding and myocardial infarction with the incidence and timing of mortality in patients presenting with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a risk model from the ACUITY trial Eur. Heart J. 2009 30 1457 1466 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp110 19351691 8. Stone GW Bivalirudin during primary PCI in acute myocardial infarction N. Engl. J. Med. 2008 358 2218 2230 10.1056/NEJMoa0708191 18499566 9. Giugliano RP Relations between bleeding and outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the ExTRACT-TIMI 25 trial Eur. Heart J. 2010 31 2103 2110 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq100 20413397 10. Kinnaird TD Incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications of bleeding and blood transfusion following percutaneous coronary interventions Am. J. Cardiol. 2003 92 930 935 10.1016/S0002-9149(03)00972-X 14556868 11. Ndrepepa G Periprocedural bleeding and 1-year outcome after percutaneous coronary interventions: appropriateness of including bleeding as a component of a quadruple end point J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008 51 690 697 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.10.040 18279731 12. Steg PG Bleeding in acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary interventions: position paper by the Working Group on Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology Eur. Heart J. 2011 32 1854 1864 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr204 21715717 13. Jeong Y-H “East asian paradox”: challenge for the current antiplatelet strategy of “one-guideline-fits-all races” in acute coronary syndrome Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 2014 16 485 10.1007/s11886-014-0485-4 24668607 14. Levine GN World heart federation expert consensus statement on antiplatelet therapy in East Asian patients with ACS or undergoing PCI Glob. Heart 2014 9 457 467 10.1016/j.gheart.2014.08.001 25592800 15. Libby P Mechanisms of acute coronary syndromes and their implications for therapy N. Engl. J. Med. 2013 368 2004 2013 10.1056/NEJMra1216063 23697515 16. Cheng C-L Validation of acute myocardial infarction cases in the national health insurance research database in taiwan J. Epidemiol. 2014 24 500 507 10.2188/jea.JE20140076 25174915 17. Cheng CL Kao YHY Lin SJ Lee CH Lai ML Validation of the National Health Insurance Research Database with ischemic stroke cases in Taiwan Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 2011 20 236 242 10.1002/pds.2087 21351304 18. Cheng C-L Chien H-C Lee C-H Lin S-J Yang Y-HK Validity of in-hospital mortality data among patients with acute myocardial infarction or stroke in National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan Int. J. Cardiol. 2015 201 96 101 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.07.075 26292275 19. Mehran R Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials Circulation 2011 123 2736 2747 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.009449 21670242 20. Rosenbaum PR Rubin DB The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects Biometrika 1983 70 41 55 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 21. Rosenbaum PR Rubin DB Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1984 79 516 524 10.1080/01621459.1984.10478078 22. Austin PC The use of propensity score methods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments Stat. Med. 2014 33 1242 1258 10.1002/sim.5984 24122911 23. Amorim LD Cai J Modelling recurrent events: a tutorial for analysis in epidemiology Int J. Epidemiol. 2015 44 324 333 10.1093/ije/dyu222 25501468 24. Urban P Defining high bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention Circulation 2019 140 240 261 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040167 31116032 25. Nakamura M JCS 2020 guideline focused update on antithrombotic therapy in patients with coronary artery disease Circ. J. 2020 84 831 865 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-1109 32173684 26. Mehran R A risk score to predict bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndromes J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010 55 2556 2566 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.076 20513595 27. Subherwal S Baseline risk of major bleeding in non–ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction: the CRUSADE (Can Rapid risk stratification of unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA guidelines) bleeding score Circulation 2009 119 1873 1882 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.828541 19332461 28. Mathews R In-hospital major bleeding during ST-elevation and non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction care: derivation and validation of a model from the ACTION Registry-GWTG Am. J. Cardiol. 2011 107 1136 1143 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.12.009 21324428 29. Ko DT Incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications of hospitalization for late bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention for patients older than 65 years Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2010 3 140 147 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.928721 20332382 30. Valle JA Postdischarge bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention and subsequent mortality and myocardial infarction: insights from the HMO research network-stent registry Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2016 9 e003519 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003519 27301394 31. Doyle BJ Rihal CS Gastineau DA Holmes DR Bleeding, blood transfusion, and increased mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention: implications for contemporary practice J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009 53 2019 2027 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.12.073 19477350 32. Frangogiannis NG Smith CW Entman ML The inflammatory response in myocardial infarction Cardiovasc. Res. 2002 53 31 47 10.1016/S0008-6363(01)00434-5 11744011 33. Yan W Immune cell repertoire and their mediators in patients with acute myocardial infarction or stable angina pectoris Int. J. Med. Sci. 2017 14 181 10.7150/ijms.17119 28260995 34. Tataru M-C C-reactive protein and the severity of atherosclerosis in myocardial infarction patients with stable angina pectoris Eur. Heart J. 2000 21 1000 1008 10.1053/euhj.1999.1981 10901512 35. Collet J Impact of prior use or recent withdrawal of oral antiplatelet agents on acute coronary syndromes Circulation 2004 110 2361 2367 10.1161/01.CIR.0000145171.89690.B4 15477397 36. Sung JJ Continuation of low-dose aspirin therapy in peptic ulcer bleeding: a randomized trial Ann. Int. Med. 2010 152 1 9 10.7326/0003-4819-152-1-201001050-00179 19949136 37. Jernberg T Cardiovascular risk in post-myocardial infarction patients: nationwide real world data demonstrate the importance of a long-term perspective Eur. Heart J. 2015 36 1163 1170 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu505 25586123 38. Kajermo U Ulvenstam A Modica A Jernberg T Mooe T Incidence, trends, and predictors of ischemic stroke 30 days after an acute myocardial infarction Stroke 2014 45 1324 1330 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001963 24692479 39. Witt BJ A community-based study of stroke incidence after myocardial infarction Ann. Int. Med. 2005 143 785 792 10.7326/0003-4819-143-11-200512060-00006 16330789 40. Brener SJ The impact of timing of ischemic and hemorrhagic events on mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention: the ADAPT-DES study JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2016 9 1450 1457 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.04.037 27372190 41. Vranckx P Validation of BARC bleeding criteria in patients with acute coronary syndromes: the TRACER trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016 67 2135 2144 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.02.056 27151345 42. Kikkert WJ The prognostic value of bleeding academic research consortium (BARC)-defined bleeding complications in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a comparison with the TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction), GUSTO (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries), and ISTH (International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis) bleeding classifications J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014 63 1866 1875 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.069 24657697 43. Alexander KP Excess dosing of antiplatelet and antithrombin agents in the treatment of non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes JAMA 2005 294 3108 3116 10.1001/jama.294.24.3108 16380591 44. Moscucci M Predictors of major bleeding in acute coronary syndromes: the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) Eur. Heart J. 2003 24 1815 1823 10.1016/S0195-668X(03)00485-8 14563340