==== Front Heliyon Heliyon Heliyon 2405-8440 Elsevier S2405-8440(20)32457-9 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05614 e05614 Review Article Photo enhanced degradation of polyfluoroalkyl and perfluoroalkyl substances Olatunde Olalekan C. ab Kuvarega Alex T. c Onwudiwe Damian C. Damian.Onwudiwe@nwu.ac.zaab∗ a Material Science Innovation and Modelling (MaSIM) Research Focus Area, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, North-West University, Mafikeng Campus, Private Bag X2046, Mmabatho 2735, South Africa b Department of Chemistry, School of Physical and Chemical Sciences, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, North-West University, Mafikeng Campus, Private Bag X2046, Mmabatho 2735, South Africa c Nanotechnology and Water Sustainability Research Unit, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of South Africa, Florida 1709, South Africa ∗ Corresponding author. Damian.Onwudiwe@nwu.ac.za 01 12 2020 12 2020 01 12 2020 6 12 e0561428 7 2020 26 9 2020 24 11 2020 © 2020 The Author(s)2020This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).The increase in the presence of highly recalcitrant poly- and per- fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the environment, plant tissues and animals continues to pose serious health concerns. Several treatment methods such as physical, biological and chemical processes have been explored to deal with these compounds. Current trends have shown that the destructive treatment processes, which offer degradation and mineralization of PFASs, are the most desirable process among researchers and policy makers. This article, therefore, reviews the degradation and defluorination processes, their efficiencies and the degradation mechanism of photon-based processes. It shows that high degradation and defluorination efficiency of PFASs could be achieved by photon driven processes such as photolysis, photochemical, photocatalysis and photoreduction. The efficiency of these processes is greatly influenced by the nature of light and the reactive radical generated in the system. The limitation of these processes, however, include the long reaction time required and the use of anoxic reaction conditions, which are not obtainable at ambient conditions. Photodegradation; Perfluorinated Compounds; Photolysis; Defluorination; Photoreduction. Keywords PhotodegradationPerfluorinated compoundsPhotolysisDefluorinationPhotoreduction ==== Body 1 Introduction Polyfluoroalkyl and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are class of highly fluorinated aliphatic substances. They contain one or more carbon atoms in which the hydrogen atoms present in their non-fluorinated analogues, from which they have been supposedly derived, have been replaced by fluorine atoms, in such a way that they contain the perfluoroalkyl moiety CnF2n+1– [1]. The public health attention on PFAS is due to their persistence, capacity for long range transport in the environment, potential bioaccumulation and adverse effect on living organisms [2, 3]. The source of PFAS could either be direct or indirect, and their release into the environment occurs throughout their life cycle (i.e. production, distribution, use, and disposal of consumer products) [4]. While direct sources are the releases from the life cycle of PFAS products, indirect sources are transformation products of precursor substances and impurities from consumer products [1]. The various exposure pathways for PFAS include drinking water, food-contact materials, foods, airborne dust, air, breast milk etc (Figure 1) [5].Figure 1 Exposure pathways to PFAS. Reproduced with permission from Sunderland et al. [6]. Copyright (2020) Springer Nature. Figure 1 Studies on the toxicological effects of PFAS exposure using laboratory animals as model showed the potential health effects to include: tumour induction, immunotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, endocrine disruption, developmental toxicity and neurotoxicity [7]. In humans, PFAS have been reported to bioaccumulate in the blood even at trace level of exposure and correlations between exposure to PFAS and disease parameters immunotoxicity have been demonstrated experimentally [8, 9]. These concern over the potential environmental and toxicological effects of PFAS have led to environmental agency such as the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) to enter into agreements with some leading global companies in order to reduce the emission and product content of perfluoro octanoic acid (PFOA) and related chemicals up to 95% by 2010 and aim at their complete elimination by 2015 [10]. In line with this also, in May, 2020, Demark published an executive order which prohibits the use of PFAS chemicals in food contact paper, board materials and items [11]. PFAS are widely distributed in marine, ground, surface and drinking waters at concentration levels of pg/L to μg/L. Close proximity of an aquatic system to industrial sources could increase the concentration of PFASs by several order of magnitude [12]. In some wastewater, the level of PFASs could be in the range of mg/L to g/L. For example, the concentration of perfluorooctanoate sulfonate in wastewater from one of the electronics manufacturing companies was found to be 1,650 mg/L, which was 10 billion times more than the concentration level in the open oceans [13]. The distribution of PFAS in the environment is influenced by their physicochemical properties which include carbon chain length, solubility in water, volatility and headgroup functionality [14]. The physicochemical properties of some commonly studied PFAS are shown in Table 1. Short-chain PFAS have been proposed as safer substitutes for long-chain PFAS due to their shorter half-lives in human, however little research is available on their toxic effects based on persistence, exposure and retention [15]. Two long chain PFAS that have been studied extensively in remediation studies are perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS).Table 1 Physicochemical properties of some PFASs. Table 1Group Name Molecular formula Molecular weight (g/mol) Solubilitya (g/L) PKaa Ref. Perfluoroalkyl sulfonic acids (PFSA) Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS) C4HF9SO3 300.1 46.2 0.1 [16, 17] Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS) C6HF13SO3 400.1 0.13 0.14 Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) C8H17SO3 500.1 0.57 -3.3 Perfluoroalkyl carboxylate (PFCA) Perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA) C4HF7O2 214.0 1.5 - Perfluorohexaonic acid (PFHxA) C6HF11O2 314.1 0.1 -0.16 Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) C8HF15O2 414.0 3.4 -0.2 a Obtained from PubChem Compound Summary for CID 67734, Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid 2020 [Available from: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Perfluorohexanesulfonic-acid [18]. In the last two decades, studies have focused on the removal of PFAS from water, and the results have shown that PFASs are posing serious risk to water resources and challenging traditional practices such as environmental discharges and recycling. Because typical wastewater treatment systems are unable to remove PFASs, they can serve as sinks for them and act as conduits for accessing the environment through effluent discharge and biosolid applications [19]. A study to investigate PFASs concentration and removal in three wastewater treatment systems, showed the level in influent, effluent and dry weight sludge to be 19.6–232 ng/L, 15.5–234 ng/L and 31.5–49.1 ng/g dry weight respectively. While PFASs were not eliminated effectively by the conventional activated sludge system, membrane bio-reactor and Unitank could achieved 50% removal of long chain perfluorocarboxylic acids (PFCAs) [20]. Despite the huge challenge posed by PFAS to water resource management and the potential adverse health implications, their use has continued to grow due to their economic importance evidenced by their application in a wide range of industrial, commercial and residential applications such as stain repellents, paints and coatings, polishes and surfactants in paper, metal plating, textile and household articles [21, 22, 23]. It has, therefore, become important to develop processes with sufficient capability to deal with PFAS in water and also up-scale the processes as a matter of global emergency [24]. Remediation processes employed in the removal of contaminants from water could be broadly classified as either destructive or non-destructive as shown in Table 2 [25]. Non-destructive processes usually involve the physical transfer of contaminants from an aqueous phase to a solid phase. It comprises of physical removal processes such as adsorption and membrane filtration [26, 27, 28]. Although, high removal efficiency of PFAS have been achieved with non-destructive techniques, the waste generated by these processes such as spent adsorbent and membranes are usually employed as landfills. This give rise to the possibility of re-contamination as these contaminants could leach back into the environment. These waste streams therefore, require further processing which could lead to a further increase in the process cost.Table 2 Comparison of remediation methods for the removal of PFAS. Table 2Class Types Mechanism Main component Advantage(s) Disadvantage(s) Ref. Non-Destructive techniques Adsorption Electrostatic interaction between the polar groups on adsorbents and charged functional groups on PFAS or hydrophobic interaction between apolar adsorbents and non-polar tail of PFAS. Adsorbent Use of low-cost adsorbent materials and low energy demand. Lack of sorbents with molecular specificity and affinity for PFAS. This process is also significantly influence by background water chemistry. Frequent regeneration of PFAS laden adsorbent is required due to fast breakthrough and disposal of PFAS concentrate is also a major challenge. [42, 43] Membrane technology Removal based on charge and size exclusion or by sorption Membrane High removal efficiency for both short and long chain PFAS. Minimal fouling High energy demand and lack of selectivity. Waste streams that require further processing are generated [44, 45] Destructive techniques Oxidative degradation Electrochemical process Degradation of PFAS based on the generation of reactive oxygen species •OH by splitting of water or by direct anodic oxidation Anode electrode e.g. B-doped diamonds, Ti/SnO2-Sb Rapid reaction rate, high oxidation efficiency and ease of automation. Toxic chlorine gas, HF, bromate, adsorbable organic halides and perchlorate are generated in the process. Potential generation of hazardous materials by the cavitation process. Large scale application is limited by several factors such as poor heat dissipation, transducer corrosion, required operation frequency and energy consumption. Rate of degradation is slow and thus usually require long reaction time and process efficiency is greatly influence by process parameters such as pH and presence of natural organic matters. Large chemical dosage may affect the cost effectiveness of the process Feasibility for treating large volume of contaminated water is less practical due to limited light penetration, high energy cost and difficulty in catalyst recycling and reuse. [41, 46] Sonochemical process Degradation is achieved by reactive species such as •OH, H atom, O atom and eaq− generated by acoustic cavitation process along with high temperatures and pressures Transducer and amplifier It's a highly clean, safe and energy saving process. No secondary pollution is caused. [38, 47, 48] Chemical/Photochemical processes Reactive chemical species such as •OH, O2•−, HO2− and SO4•− are generated from oxidants like H2O2 and S2O82−. The generation of the reactive species could be enhanced by the use of photon energy for photochemical processes. Light source and oxidant. Mild reaction conditions, ease of automation and relatively cost-effective processes. [36, 49] Photocatalytic process Charge carriers generated from semiconductor photocatalyst when irradiated with light of appropriate energy reacts with oxidants to produce reactive radicals. Light source and catalyst Easy of incorporation with other technologies and no generation of secondary waste stream. [50] Photolysis Degradation is accomplished by the absorption of UV radiation <200 nm. Other radical species like eaq− could also be generated in the process Radiation source. It is a green process with no addition of chemicals required. Defluorination is generally low in photolytic process and processes depends on the absorptivity of the pollutant in the radiation range. [51, 52, 53] Radiolytic process Reactive radicals such as •OH, •H and eaq− are obtained by water radiolysis, which then degrades dissolved pollutants. Radiation source The process may be a considered a green technology because it does not involve the use of any chemical. High efficiency in OH and eaq− generation. Radiation generation technology are widely available. High cost, limited knowledge about safety and continuous emission of rays sometimes result in permanent decrease in activity with time [54] Reductive degradation Reduction processes Activation of sulphite, dithionite, ferrocyanide and aqueous iodide, by energy sources like ultrasound, electron beam or UV generates highly reactive, and nonselective reducing species such as H-, SO3− and eaq− Energy source and reductant Effective degradation of a wide range of PFAS The need for pH adjustment and anoxic system conditions makes system operation, design and maintenance complex. Potential formation of undesirable degradation byproducts are also a main concern [55] Destructive remediation processes involve the degradation of contaminants to less toxic, and biodegradable products. For PFAS degradation, the process follows the cleavage of the C-F bond. This is achieved by the use of reactive radicals which are generated either via sonochemical, electrochemical, or photon-based processes [29, 30, 31, 32]. The photon-based processes are preferred to other processes, because they could be carried out at ambient temperature and pressure, and the process could be conducted in very simple reaction systems [33, 34, 35]. Depending on the components, a photon-based process can be classified either as photolysis, photochemical reaction or photocatalysis. In addition, based on the dominant reactive radical species generated, photon degradation process could either take place via oxidation or reduction [36, 37, 38]. Processes that occur via oxidation are referred to as advanced oxidation processes (AOP), while processes that occur via reduction are referred to advanced reduction processes (ARP). These two processes are at the fore front for PFAS degradation. There are several reviews that have been written on the degradation of PFAS in water [38, 39, 40, 41], however, this review will focus mainly on photon-based degradation processes and also explore a comparative analysis of the different photon-based processes. The aim of this review is to therefore, critically access the level of efficiency that have been attained in the degradation of PFAS through the use of photon energy in both AOP and ARP processes. Particular interest will be on the types of light sources, oxidants and catalysts used. The mechanism of the degradation process will also be explored in order to have an understanding of the route to degradation product generation. A comparative analysis of the different photon-based processes will also be explored. 2 Classifications and properties of PFASs A large group of industrial chemicals comprising of over 4700 chemicals are categorized as PFAS [56]. These chemicals could be further divided into three different classes: perfluoroalkyl substances, polyfluoroalkyl substances and fluorinated polymers. The perfluoroalkyl class is comprised of substances such as: perfluoroalkyl sulfonates (PFSAs), perfluoroalkyl carboxylates (PFCAs), perfluoroalkyl phosphonates (PFPAs), perfluoroalkyl sulfonamides (FASAs) etc. The main distinguishing structural characteristics of perfluoroalkyl substances is that they possess fully fluorinated alkyl chain unlike polyfluoroalkyl substances, which are only partially fluorinated as shown in Figure 2. Compounds grouped under the polyfluoroalkyl substances class include polyfluoroalkyl phosphoric acid esters (PAPs), fluorotelomer carboxylates (FTCA), fluorotelomer sulphonates (FTSAs) etc. The fluorinated polymers are a wide variety of chemicals that are further subdivided into: fluoropolymers, side-chain fluorinated polymers and perfluoropolyesters [57].Figure 2 Structural formula of some perfluoro and polyfluoroalkyl substances. Figure 2 PFASs can also be classified based on their carbon length carbon chain length. as either long-chain or short chain. PFCAs with eight carbons or more and PFSAs with six carbons or more are classified as “long-chain” [1]. PFASs possess some important structural properties such as long carbon chain length, functional groups and hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity, which influence their distribution and persistence in the environment. Due to the high electronegativity and the small atomic size of fluorine, a highly polar C-F bond with large bond energy is formed in PFASs as shown in Figure 3 [4]. This strong bond coupled with the presence of three nonbonding electron pairs on each fluorine atom and the effective shielding of the carbon atoms by fluorine confer relative stability on PFAS. Therefore, PFAS are resistant to many degradation processes involving acids, bases, reductants, oxidants, microbes, photolytic and metabolic process and they are also non-flammable [4, 58].Figure 3 Interatomic and intermolecular interactions in perfluoroalkyl carboxylate. Figure 3 3 Advanced oxidation processes for PFAS degradation 3.1 Photolysis Photolysis involves the direct use of photon for the degradation process. It usually employs ultraviolet (UV) radiations as most chromophores absorbs in this region. The UV light employed in photolysis can be classified into three wavelength ranges: UVA (315–400 nm), UVB (280–315 nm) and UVC (100–289 nm). Generally, wavelengths below 200 nm are referred to as vacuum UV (VUV) [59]. Due to the strong C-F bond, photolysis usually shows low efficiency for most PFAS degradation [52]. However, few studies have shown that effective photolysis of PFOA can be achieved by VUV light because the compound shows strong absorption in this region [51]. Giri et al. [60] reported the photolysis of PFOA, with 184 nm VUV light source and initial PFOA concentration of 2.42 × 10−6 mol/L. The degradation efficiency of the process reached 87.3% after 3 h, while 20.5% defluorination was achieved. The degradation and defluorination rate for the process were 0.82 and 0.143 h−1 respectively. Chen et al. [51], also reported a 61.7% degradation efficiency and 17.1% mineralization of 41.4 mg/L of PFOA after 2 h, using a 185 nm VUV light. The effect of combined UV and VUV wavelength (185 nm + 254 nm) on the photodegradation of PFOA has been investigated by Giri et al. [52]. The degradation process was significantly improved by combining the UV wavelength with VUV light, with complete degradation of 0.5 mg/L achieved after 4 h, while 254 nm UV light only achieved approximately 33% degradation. Kinetic studies on the process showed that the first-order rate constant for the combined wavelength process was 4.0 folds of the rate constant obtained for the single wavelength process. The percentage defluorination achieved by the combined wavelength process after 4 h was approximately 16%, while only 0.7% defluorination was recorded for the single wavelength process. Evaluation of the effect of five process parameters: UV wavelength, dissolved oxygen, pH, PFOA concentration and water quality on efficiency of PFOA degradation was reported by Giri et al. [60]. While the nature of light source influences the rate of ROS generation, the pH influences the speciation of PFOA in solution which could also affect the efficiency of degradation. The water quality is a measure of parameters such as total alkalinity, dissolved oxygen, total dissolved solid etc, and often leads to the generation of several radical species or interact with radical species generated in the system. Dissolved oxygen may influence the activity of ROS and PFOA initial concentration also could influence the efficiency of the process by its light absorption capacity. The authors observed that PFOA photolysis was not significantly influenced by the initial concentration of the compound, though, a reduction in defluorination efficiency was observed with increase in the initial concentration of PFOA. The impact of pH on the degradation system also showed a negligible small effect on the degradation process. Dissolved oxygen negatively impacted the degradation efficiency of the process, but relatively better mineralization was achieved at low temperature values. The highest impact on efficiency was recorded by the effect of water quality, with organic constituents and bicarbonates, drastically reducing the photo-mineralization efficiency of the process [60]. 3.2 Photochemical processes Photochemical photon-based processes involve the combination of a light source with an oxidant, which undergoes photolysis to generate reactive radical species that attacks contaminants leading to their degradation. When the radical generated in the process is an oxygenated specie, the process is referred to as reactive oxygen species (ROS) based process. Oxidants employed in ROS processes include hydrogen peroxide, (UV/H2O2), persulfate (UV/S2O82−), ozone (UV/O3) and peroxymonosulfate (UV/HSO5−). A process that generates chlorinated species are called reactive chlorine (RCS) based processes (UV/Cl2). Recently, reactive nitrogen specie (RNS) based processes have been explored for the degradation of contaminants. Photochemical processes that produces •OH alone are not effective for PFAS degradation; and this is because perfluorinated compounds do not possess preferred reactive sites for reaction with the radical. Due to the lower dissociation energy of the F-OH bond compared to C-F bond, fluorine abstraction is not thermodynamically favoured [61]. Also, electron transfer reaction is hindered due to the reduction of the electron density of the ionic head group by perfluorination [62]. It is therefore, important for •OH to be coupled with other radicals such as eaq−, which can interact with PFAS to form intermediates that are capable of undergoing addition reaction with •OH [63]. To improve the efficiency of photochemical degradation of PFAS, a number of other oxidants have been explored such as persulfate, ozone and chlorine. (1) S2O82−+hv→2SO4•− (2) SO4•−+H2O→SO42−+O•H+H+ A number of reports have shown that persulfate is an effective oxidant in the degradation of PFAS [64, 65, 66]. In this process, degradation is achieved by SO4•− and O•H generated by the activation of persulfate either by heat, light or chemical activation [65]. In a photochemical degradation system, the reactive radical generation is by Eqs. (1) and (2) [67]. SO4•− is a very reactive radical with a redox potential of 2.6–3.1 eV. Its comparative stability and pH independent activity, makes it reactive with a wide range of pollutants [67]. It also react with electron-rich moieties via various reaction routes such as hydrogen abstraction, electron exchange and direct oxygen transfer [68]. Hori et al. [69] reported the complete degradation of 1.35 mM PFOA by 50 mM S2O82− irradiated with a 200 W xenon-mercury lamp for 4 h. Studies have confirmed that the pH of the system in a UV/persulfate changes due to the generation of proton during persulfate activation [70]. This change in pH plays a vital role in radical distribution and the efficiency of the process (Figure 4) [71]. The UV/persulfate process is more favourable under acidic condition due to enhanced SO4•− generation. Under basic conditions the SO4•− reacts with -OH to generate •OH, which is ineffective in PFAS degradation [72].Figure 4 pH variation in a UV/persulfate process (a) pH variation with time for different initial concentration of PFOA. Reproduced with permission from Qian et al. [72]. Copyright (2016), American Chemical Society (b) pH variation with time for different initial system pH reproduced from Yang et al. [68] under the creative common attrition licence. Figure 4 Apart from persulfate, other oxidants like periodate, ferric ion, sodium hydrogen carbonate and coexisting ferric ion and oxalate have also been explored for PFAS photodegradation [73, 74, 75, 76]. The main drawbacks of the persulfate process are the large molar excess of the oxidant needed over the starting concentration of pollutant and the relatively long treatment time required by the process [12]. Most PFAS photochemical degradation process are influence by process parameters such as oxidant concentration, process atmosphere, and the presence of other ions in the system. Figure 5 shows the variation of photodegradation and defluorination efficiency of a ferric ion mediated decomposition of PFOA with process parameters.Figure 5 Effects of process parameters on the degradation and defluorination efficiency. (A) Effect of Fe3+ on degradation (i) and defluorination (ii) of PFOA in the presence of oxalic acid (B) Effect of initial Fe3+ on the degradation (i) and defluorination of PFOA (ii) (C) Effect of reaction atmosphere on the degradation and defluorination of PFOA in Fe3+(i) and Fe3+/oxalic acid (ii) Reproduced with permission from Wang et al. [74, 75]. Copyright (2008) Elsevier and Copyright (2016) Springer Nature. Figure 5 3.3 Photocatalytic processes In a photocatalytic system, three components are involved: the light source, catalyst and oxidant. The use of a catalyst makes this process admirable because it allows for the principles of catalysis to be explored in the degradation of contaminants. Photocatalysis is the most explored process for the degradation of PFAS, because the development of novel semiconductor catalytic materials has continued to be a major research focus for several decades. One unique property of the photocatalytic process is that the catalyst undergoes a cyclic reaction and is, thus, regenerated at the end of the catalytic cycle. This allows for the reusability of the catalyst. The catalyst could either be in the same phase with the reaction system, in which case they are referred to as a homogeneous catalyst; or it could be in a different phase from the system, referred to as a heterogeneous catalyst. Homogeneous photocatalytic degradation of PFAS is based on the photo-Fenton process, which involves the generation of •OH through the Fenton reaction between Fe2+ and H2O2 (Eqs. (3) and (4)) [77]. (3) Fe2++H2O2→Fe3++O•H+OH− (4) Fe3++H2O2→Fe2++HO2•+H+ So far, the report by Tang et al. [78] on the degradation of PFOA via the photo-Fenton process, in which over 90% degradation and 53.2% defluorination was achieved after 5 h using an initial concentration of 20.0 μmol/L, seems the only significant study. The generation of •OH and the reaction between PFOA and Fe3+ to form electron transfer complex were considered as the driving force behind the degradation process. Two degradation stages were identified: stage 1 involved the generation of reactive radical species mainly •OH by the decomposition of H2O2 in the first 1 h of the reaction. This resulted in about 90% PFOA removal and a defluorination ratio of 35.8%. During the second stage of the process, degradation is driven by the activity of Fe3+ under UV irradiation which results in further degradation and increased defluorination to 53.2%. However, question have risen on the claim that the degradation was driven by the •OH generated by the process, since there are many studies that have confirmed its unsuitability for PFAS degradation. The missing gap in this study is the inability of the authors to ascertain the PFOA excitation process in the photo-Fenton process. With recent studies showing the possibility of charge transfer between PFOA and Fe(III) to form a PFOA-Fe(III) complex, it is possible that this reaction occurred prior to the activity of •OH in the reaction system [74, 75, 79]. For heterogeneous photocatalytic processes, a semiconductor material is activated by light radiation which is used in charge carrier generation. This then triggers a series of oxidation-reduction reactions. A wide range of semiconductors have been explored as photocatalysts for degradation of contaminants in wastewater, which include oxides (Bi2WO3, Ga2O3, SnO2, Ag3PO4, TiO2, and In2O3) [80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85], sulphides (Ga2S3, CuS, and ZnS) [86, 87, 88] and nitrides (C3N4, and g-C3N5). Recently, semiconductor materials with band gaps capable of absorption in the visible range has allowed for the potential application of solar light for photocatalytic processes. Some of these semiconductors include: BiOBr [89], Ag/Bi2MoO6 [90] and Bi2WO6 [91]. The major semiconductors that have been extensively explored as photocatalysts for the degradation of PFAS are TiO2, In2O3 and Ga2O3 [92, 93, 94]. Other photocatalytic materials such as BiOCl and ZnO have also been explored for PFAS degradation [95, 96]. Photocatalytic degradation of PFAS is based on the generation of negatively charged electron (e−) and positively charged hole (h+) pairs, when light of appropriate energy (equal to or greater than the catalyst's band gap) is absorbed by the catalyst. These charge carriers then migrate to the surface of the catalyst to react with adsorbed molecules. Other reactive radical species such as •OH and O2.−, are generated by the reaction of the electron-hole pair with adsorbed H2O and O2 (Eqs. (5), (6), (7), and (8); SP represents the semiconductor photocatalyst) [97]. Another merit of this systems is that dissolved oxygen present in the system serves as the oxidant, therefore no external oxidant is often required by the system. (5) SP→hvSP(e−+h+) (6) SPsurf(h+)+H2Oads→SPsurf+O•Hads+H+ (7) SPsurf(h+)+HO−→SPSurf+O•Hads (8) SP(e−)+O2→SP+O2•− However, for PFAS degradation, the reaction of h+ with dissolved oxygen is not desirable. This is because •OH is not effective in PFAS degradation, while h+ is an effective oxidant for the degradation process. The nature of the catalyst's band gap is very important in the efficiency of the photocatalytic process as too narrow or too wide band gap will render the catalyst ineffective [98]. Figure 6 shows how the efficiency of the process correlates with the e−-h+ pair and the catalyst's properties. Photocatalysts with too narrow band gaps generate large quantities of e−-h+ pairs, but the oxidizing-reduction ability of the pair is weak. When the band gap is too wide, then only a few e−-h+ pair is generated since e− transition from the valence band to the conduction band is minimized, even though the e−-h+ pair generated have high oxidation-reduction potential. This accounts for the continual quest for the development of catalysts with suitable band structure for PFAS degradation.Figure 6 Correlation between process efficiency and the e−-h+ pair properties. Reproduced with permission from Xu et al. [98]. Copyright (2017) Elsevier. Figure 6 TiO2-based photocatalyst that have been explored for PFAS degradation have shown up to 100% degradation, depending on the properties of the catalyst such as band gap and surface area; and also process parameters such as light source, light intensity, catalyst dosage, pH and initial PFAS concentration [98]. Although, pristine TiO2 showed a very low degradation efficiency of 15% due to high e−-h+ pair recombination, its efficiency could be enhanced by the incorporation of hole scavengers like oxalic acid and perchlorate acid into the system [99, 100]. Degradation of 24 μM PFOA using TiO2 in the presence of oxalic acid, achieved 86.7% degradation and 16.5% defluorination under nitrogen environment after 180 min compared to 12.4% degradation and <1% degradation achieved in the absence of oxalic acid. Not only was the hole scavenging activity of oxalic acid significant in the reaction, but its generation of CO2•− also influenced the degradation efficiency. The reaction rate constant was 11.6 times higher than what was obtained for the process carried out in the presence of HClO4 [99]. Modification of TiO2 with transition and noble metals (e.g Pd, Pt, Pb, Cu), carbon-based materials (e.g. carbon nanotubes) and polymers have also resulted in significant improvement in the degradation efficiency in the range of 45–100% [101, 102]. Chen et al. [101] reported the degradation of 50 mg/L of PFOA by Fe- and Cu- modified TiO2. The degradation efficiency of the Fe-TiO2 and Cu-TiO2 reached 69 and 91% respectively after 12 h under UV light. The defluorination efficiency also reached 9 and 19% efficiency for Fe-TiO2 and Cu-TiO2 respectively. This was a significant improvement in efficiency when compared to 14% degradation and negligible defluorination recorded for pristine TiO2. Although, no significant alteration in the band gap of TiO2 was observed in the doped materials, the enhanced activity was suggested to be due to reduction in the e−-h+ pair recombination process due to the possible trapping of the photogenerated electrons by vacancies in the doped catalysts. The rate constant for the degradation process was 0.0015 and 0.0031 min−1 for Fe- and Cu-TiO2 respectively. Surface modification of TiO2 catalyst induced by F− was studied by Sansotera et al. [103] during the degradation of PFOA at concentration range above and below the critical micelle concentration (CMC). After 2 and 4 h of activity, a relatively constant fluorine concentration of 25.1 and 23.9% respectively was observed to be present on the catalyst surface. The interaction of fluorine with the catalyst resulted in morphological variation in TiO2, leading to reduced activity. This effect has been attributed to the stabilization of F− around Ti4+, charge carrier mobility limitation and the formation of titanium hydroxyfluoride species [104]. In2O3-based photocatalysts are another class of materials that have been explored for PFAS degradation. Unlike TiO2, pristine In2O3 exhibits a high and fast degradation efficiency towards PFAS with degradation efficiency of 75–100% reported within 1 h by varying the morphology of In2O3 [105, 106, 107]. The outstanding catalytic performance of In2O3 have been attributed to the presence of high oxygen vacancy defects in its structure, which inhibits charge carrier recombination [108, 109]. The effect of morphology on the catalytic activity of In2O3 was studied by Li et al. [107]. This was carried out by evaluating the activities of In2O3 microspheres, nanoplates and nanocubes on the degradation of PFAS under UV light. Complete degradation of PFOA was achieved by the three In2O3 nanostructures after 20, 40 and 120 min for microsphere, nanoplates and nanocubes respectively. Evaluation of TiO2 activity in the same system only showed 28.5% degradation after 180 min. The rate constant for the degradation were 7.9, 4.5, 1.8 and 0.1 h−1 respectively for microspheres, nanoplates, nanocubes and TiO2 respectively. BiOCl nanosheet is another photocatalyst whose oxygen vacancies has been correlated with high defluorination efficiency which reached 59.3% after 3 h for degradation of 20 μmol/L of PFOA [95]. The photocatalytic activity of a material on the degradation of PFAS is influence by several environmental parameters such as the pH of the solution, catalyst dosage, presence of natural organic matter, reaction atmosphere and presence of inorganic ions in the system. Zhang et al. [110] confirmed that the degradation of PFAS is higher at low pH values and in the presence of low amount of sulphate and chloride. The degradation efficiency of a photocatalytic process is also influenced by the light source employed [111]. Evaluation of photodegradation efficiency of 50 mg/L by UV light (185 nm and 254 nm) and visible light (400–800 nm), showed that while complete degradation was achieved within 60 min under UV light radiation, the process required 120 min under visible light radiation. The activity of some reported advanced oxidation processes for PFAS degradation are shown in Table 3. The degradation efficiency for PFOA in the photooxidation processes ranged from 9-100%, while reported efficiency for PFOS is the range 12–95%. The defluorination efficiency range was 0.0–95.6% and 47.5–58.2% for PFOA and PFOS respectively. The addition of oxidants or semiconductor photocatalysts generally lead to an increase in the efficiency of degradation when compared to the direct photolytic processes.Table 3 Advanced oxidation processes for the degradation of PFAS. Table 3PFAS Process Light source Process parameters Degradation efficiency (%) De-fluorination efficiency (%) Kinetics Process overview Ref PFOA UV Low-pressure Hg UV light (23W); Wavelength = 185 & 254 nm; intensity = 62–69 mW/cm2 |PFOA| = 0.004 mg/L; 9 - 1.5 × 10−5 h−1 The positive impact of IO4− to the UV process was due to the generation of IO3• which initiate the oxidation of PFOA, while under VUV, the eaq− scavenges the IO4−, thus reducing reactive radical generation. [73] UV/NaIO4 70 17 1.6 × 10−4 h−1 VUV |NaIO4| = 0.5 mM Time = 120 min 87 25 3.0 × 10−4 h−1 VUV/NaIO4 60 13 2.0 × 10−4 h−1 PFOA UV/TiO2 400W UV lamp; Wavelength = 254 nm |PFOA| = 50 mg/L; |Catalyst| = 0.5 g/L 18.3 0.0 1.5 × 10−3 h−1 Pb-doped TiO2 exhibited high degradation and defluorination efficiency due to the production of traps to capture photo-induced e− or h+ [92] UV/Pb-TiO2 Time = 12 h; pH = 5 99.9 22.4 5.1 × 10−1 h−1 PFOA VUV Low-pressure Hg UV light (12W); Wavelength = 185 & 254 nm |PFOA| = 0.01 mg/L; |Fe3+| = 36 μM 80 20.0 2.0 × 10−5 h−1 The presence of Fe3+ catalyzed the activation of PFOA under VUV radiation, leading to improved defluorination efficiency [112] VUV/Fe3+ Time = 4 h; pH = 5 51.2 5.0 × 10−5 h−1 PFOA UV medium-pressure Hg UV light (150W); Wavelength = 200–600 nm |PFOA| = 0.1 mg/L; |Catalyst | = 0.1 g/L 24 - - The photodegradation activity of TiO2 was enhanced by incorporating rGO, which reduces electron/hole recombination by capturing photogenerated electrons [113] UV/TiO2 58 - - UV/TiO2-rGO Time = 12 h; pH = 3.8 93 20 0.16 h−1 PFOS UV Low-pressure Hg UV light (23 W); Wavelength = 254 nm |PFOS| = 0.01 mg/L; |Fe3+| = 100 μM 12 - 1.3 × 10−3 h−1 The addition of Fe3+ increased the reaction rate by almost 50 times. This was due to the formation of a Fe3+-PFOS complex, which is excited and photolyzed by UV light [114] UV/Fe3+ Time = 48 h; pH = 3.6 98 58.2 7.0 × 10−2 h−1 PFOA UV/NO3− Low-pressure Hg UV light (18 W); Wavelength = 254 nm |PFOA| = 5 mg/L; |NO3−| = 100 mM 23.7 - 0.03 h−1 Irradiation of UV light with 254 nm yields peroxynitrous acid from nitrate, which decomposes reversibly to form NO2• and O•H. The isopropanol scavenges the O•H, resulting in increased NO2• formation [115] |Pr-OH| = 0.012 ppm UV/NO3−/Propanol Time = 11 h; pH = 6.3 100 95.6 0.27 h−1 PFOA UV/TiO2 high-pressure Hg UV light (125 W); Wavelength = 254 nm; intensity = 5.3 mW/cm2 |PFOA| = 60 mg/L |M-TiO2| = 0.5 g/L 31.1 3.3 0.06 h−1 The noble metal doped TiO2 exhibited improved efficiency by acting as electron sinks. Metals with larger work function (Pt and Pd) showed higher activity because of their efficiency in capturing of electrons [102] UV/Ag-TiO2 57.7 8.1 0.13 h−1 UV/Pd-TiO2 Time = 7 h; pH = 3.0 94.2 25.9 0.44 h−1 UV/Pt-TiO2 100 34.8 0.73 h−1 PFOA UV/BiOI high-pressure Hg UV light (300W); Wavelength = 400–600 nm |PFOA| = 20 mg/L |Cat| = 12 mg/L 66 - 8.0 × 10−5 h−1 The enlarged surface area of the Br-doped BiOI, resulted in enhanced UV-light absorption and increased electron-hole separation. [33] UV/BiOBr Time = 2 h; pH = 3.0 96 -a 3.3 × 10−4 h−1 PFOA UV/In2O3 Low-pressure Hg UV light (15 W); Wavelength = 254 nm |PFOA| = 30 mg/L |Cat| = 0.05 g/L 87 29.7 - The study on the effect of compositing In2O3 with graphene and the effect of calcination temperature on the activity of the catalyst showed that improved activity was obtained when the catalyst was calcined at 400 °C [116] UV/In2O3-G100 29 12.9 - UV/In2O3-G350 Time = 3 h; 87 37.7 - UV/In2O3-G400 100 60.9 - PFOA UV high-pressure Hg UV light (400 W); Wavelength = 254 nm; intensity = 5.3 mW/cm2 |PFOA| = 50 mg/L |Cat| = 40 mM 52.1 38.3 - Under UV irradiation CO3•− by the reaction of •OH with HCO3−. The CO3•− oxidize the perfluorinated carboxyl anions to form perfluorinated alkyl radicals. [76] Time = 12 h UV/NaHCO3 pH = 8.8 100 82.3 0.37 h−1 PFOA UV-A/Fe-zeolites Hg UV-A light (4 W); Wavelength = 254 nm; Photon flux = 4.47 × 10−6 mol/s−1 |PFOA| = 0.02 mg/L, |Cat| = 1 g/L Time = 24 h 100 38 0.38 h−1 PFOA is adsorbed by the catalyst and forms PFOA-Fe3+ complex. Under irradiation the PFOA is oxidized through a ligand-to-metal charge transfer process [117] pH = 5.5 PFOA UV/β-Ga2O3 Low-pressure Hg UV light (18 W); Wavelength = 254 nm |PFOA| = 0.05 mg/L |Cat| = 1.8 g/L Time = 2 h 70 30 0.44 h−1 A novel catalyst was developed with high activity for PFOA degradation. Activity was related primarily to the surface charge of the material and its charge carriers favorable redox potentials. Catalytic activity was not inhibited at low concentration nor in the presence of NOMs [118] UV/BiPO4 Light intensity = 2.17 × 10−5 Es.L−1,S−1 pH = 5.5 72 39 0.40 h−1 UV/BOHP 100 63 6.0 h−1 PFOA UV/Pb-BiFeO-rGO Low-pressure Hg UV light (5 W); Wavelength = 254 nm |PFOA| = 50 mg/L |Cat| = 100 mg/L Time = 8 h 70 37.6 0.08 h−1 The effect of the amount of rGO on the photocatalytic activity showed that optimum amount of rGO was 0.5 w%, which gave the highest activity for PFOA degradation [119] pH = 2.0 PFOA Vis/FeO-CS Solar simulator; Light intensity = 100 mW/cm2 |PFOA| = 0.3 mg/L |Cat| = 1.0 g/L Time = 4 h 95.2 57.2 - The prepared catalyst showed high adsorption properties, which facilitated the degradation of PFOA through direct electron extraction under light irradiation from PFOA [120] pH = 7.0 1H, 1H, 2H, 2H PFOS(6:2FTS) UV/Fe3+ Low-pressure mercury lamp (23 W) Wavelength = 254 nm |PFOS| = 10 mg/L, |Fe3+ | = 100 μmol/L, 95 48.4 1.56 h−1 Degradation of PFOS was achieved by either the attack of ⋅OH on 6:2FTS, resulting in C-C bond cleavage or the cleavage of C-S bond in the Fe(III)-6:2FTS complexes through ligand-to-metal charge transfer when irradiated with light [121] Time 3 h pH = 3.0, PFOS UV/Fe3+ Low pressure mercury lamps (23 W), Wavelength = 254 nm (UV) |PFOS| = 0.01 mg/L 85.3 47.5 3.2 × 10−2 h−1 While the degradation efficiency of the UV process was greatly inhibited by the presence of organic matter, the VUV showed no significant change in efficiency in the presence of organic matter [122] |Fe3+| = 100 μM Time = 24 h pH = 3.0 a HP = H3PW12O40.6H2O, BOHP = Bi3O(OH)(PO4)2; CS = carbon sphere. 4 Advanced reduction processes for PFAS degradation Advanced reduction process (ARP) is a new class of degradation process that combines activation methods (UV light, electron beam, microwave and ultrasound) and reducing agents (sulphite, sulphide, ferrous iron and dithionite) to generate highly reactive reducing radicals [123]. The main reducing radicals generated are eaq− and H• alongside other radicals such as SO3•− and SO2•−, depending on the activation methods and the type of solutes present in the system [55]. The efficiency of this process is mostly ascribed to the hydrated electron, which is a strong reducing agent, with strong negative reduction potential of -2.9 V. Hydrated electrons have proven to be a fast and effective reducing agent for PFAS degradation. The most explored activation/reducing agent combination for PFAS degradation are the UV/KI and UV/SO3•− system. In the UV/sulphite system, eaq− , SO3•− and H• are the generated radicals as shown in Eqs. (9) and (10). The SO3•− generated is converted to S2O62−, SO42− and H+ (Eqs. (11) and (12)), so it makes no significant contribution to the system [124, 125]. (9) SO32−+hv→eaq−+SO3•− (10) HSO3−+hv→H•+SO3•− (11) SO3•−+SO3•−→S2O62− (12) SO3•−+SO3•−+H2O→SO32−+SO42−+2H+ Gu et al. [126] reported the use of a high photon flux (9.93 × 10−8 E/cm2.s) with sulphite in the decomposition of 32 μM PFOS. A high degradation efficiency of 98% and reaction rate of 0.118 min−1 were achieved within 30 min. The rapid and high degradation was due to high eaq− generation induced by the high photon flux. In addition, the process tolerated high concentration of nitrate and other inorganic solutes with scavenging effect on eaq−. The importance of the photon flux in the system was further confirmed by reducing the intensity of the incidence light by 70%. This resulted in a significant reduction in the reaction rate constant to 0.020 min−1. In another study conducted under VUV light and with sulphite ions, about 97.3% degradation of 37.2 μM PFOS was achieved within 4 h, and a high defluorination efficiency of 75.4% was recorded. The reaction rate constant was 0.87 h−1, which was about 8 and 2-folds the reaction rate for VUV and UV/sulphite processes. With VUV/sulphite process, a high degradation efficiency was still achieved even at both weak acidic and alkaline pH [127]. The UV/I− is another ARP process that has been explored in the degradation of PFAS. The eaq− generation occurs via “charge-transfer-to-solvent states”, with a quantum yield of 0.286 on a femtosecond scale. Figure 7, shows a schematic representation of possible reaction routes to the formation eaq− in the UV/KI system.Figure 7 Iodide photocycle in the UV/KI process. Reproduced with permission from Park et al. [128]. Copyright (2011) Royal Society of Chemistry. Figure 7 Qu et al. [129] studied the effect of the initial pH of the system on the degradation efficiency of UV/I− on PFOA. The report showed that the process degradation and defluorination efficiencies depended strongly on the solution pH. Evaluating the system within the pH range of 5–10, it was observed that the reaction rate at pH 10, was 49 times more than the rate observed at pH 5. The toxicity of the generated intermediates was also reduced at high pH, because lower concentration of short-chain PFCAs was reached within a short reaction time. Reductive degradation of six perfluoroalkyl compounds including perfluorooctanoate (PFOA), perfluorohexanoate (PFHA), perfluorobutanoate (PFBA), perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHS) and perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS) was studied using the UV/KI [128]. Their degradation was found to be dependent on the perfluorocarbon chain length, iodide concentration, headgroup and the initial concentration. The process was also independent on the pH as no significant change in kinetics was observed between the pH 2–12 in contrast to other reported studies [128, 129]. In a similar study, Park et al. [130] evaluated the effect of ionic headgroup and chain length on three perfluoroalkyl carboxylates (PFBA, PFHA and PFOA) and three PFSAs (PFHS, PFBS and PFOS) by the UV/KI process. The study showed that, for the perfluoroalkysulfonate with -SO3- headgroup, the reduction kinetics and extent of defluorination increased with increase in chain length, while the chain length had no significant influence on both kinetics and extent of reduction for the PFCAs. The extent of reactions, which was measured as the fraction of flourine ion produced to initial PFC, were 1.2, 1.9, 1.6, 2.5, 5.9, and 9.2 for PFBA, PFHA, PFOA, PFBS, PFHS and PFOS respectively, showing that the PFCs with sulfonate headgroups were easily degraded compared to the ones with the carboxylate head groups. Recently, in order to circumvent the potential generation of undesirable by-products such as polyiodide, iodate (from the UV/I− process) [131] and the introduction of sulphite, which is known for its toxicity on the reproductive and peripheral organs [132], attempts have been made to explore catalyst-free processes or the use of hole scavenging species in advanced reduction process. For example, Lyu et al. [53] reported that increased amount of eaq− could be generated via photolysis by increasing the pH and temperature of the system, and by adding ROS scavengers such as t-BuOH. The catalyst free process achieved a degradation efficiency higher than 70% and a high reaction rate constant of 2.78 h−1 and 0.058 h−1 was attained at pH 7.0 and 90 °C for PFOA and PFOS degradation respectively. Figure 8, shows the correlation plots between the efficiency (degradation and defluorination) and process parameters for UV/ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid process (EDTA), with the EDTA acting as ROS scavengers. The study showed that direct photolysis only achieved 15.97 and 4.99% degradation and defluorination efficiency, which was increased to 20.97 and 9.99% when the pH of the system was adjusted to 10. The introduction of EDTA into the system at pH 10 resulted into improved degradation and defluorination efficiencies of 78.08 and 51.19% respectively. The removal of oxidizing species from the system resulted into a significant increase in the efficiency of the reductive process. Both the degradation and defluorination efficiencies were strongly influenced by the pH of the system, while the influence of the systems atmosphere showed no substantial influence on the process as shown in Figure 8b and c. The degradation of some PFAS by the ARP are presented in Table 4. The table shows that degradation efficiency ranging from 40-100% was achieved for PFOA, while PFOS degradation efficiency ranged between 46.2 and 97.9%. The defluorination efficiency was in the range 5–80.9% for PFOA, and 30–100% was recorded for PFOS. The degradation efficiency of PFAS is also significantly influenced by the nature of light source employed in the study. From the studies, UV light proved to be the most effective light source for photoreductive degradation of PFAS.Figure 8 Effect of process parameters on the degradation and defluorination efficiency of PFOS by UV/EDTA (A) Variation of degradation (i) and defluorination (ii) efficiency with time under different conditions (B) Effect of pH on degradation (i) and defluorination (ii) efficiency (C) Effect of air on degradation (i) and defluorination (ii) efficiencies (d) reaction kinetics of UV/EDTA process and Toxicity study (ii) of degradation products. Reproduced with permission from Gu et al. [132]. Copyright (2020) Elsevier. Figure 8Table 4 Advanced reduction processes for the degradation of perfluoro alkyl substances. Table 4Pollutant Process Light source Process parameters Degradation efficiency Defluorination efficiency Kinetics Process overview Ref. PFOA UV/KI Low-pressure Hg UV light (15 W; Wavelength = 254 nm; Photon flux = 9.9 × 10−6 mol L−1 min−1) |PFOA| = 0.008 mg/L; |KI| = 0.60 mmol/L; Temperature = 293–313 K; Ionic strength = 2.5–20 mmol/L; pH = 9; Time = 6 h 100 47.7–80.9% 3.2 × 10−1 – 1.5 h−1 Effect of temperature and ionic strength on the degradation of PFOA was studied. The efficiency showed positive correlation with both temperature and ionic strength [133] PFOS VUV VUV:Low pressure Hg lamp (10 W; wavelength = 254 nm and 185 nm) |PFOS| = 0.2 mg/L; |SO3•−| = 0.60 mmol/L; pH = 10; Time = 4 h 46.2% 30% 1.2 × 10−1 h−1 The effect of light source in UV/sulphite and VUV/sulphite process showed the VUV/sulphite showed higher degradation efficiency due to the increased amount of generated reactive species [134] UV/SO3•− 85.8% 64.6% 4.8 × 10−1 h−1 VUV/SO3•− UV: low pressure Hg lamp (11W; wavelength: 254 nm) 97.3% 68.5% 8.7 × 10−1 h−1 PFOS UV/NTA Low-pressure Hg UV light (14 W; Wavelength = 254 nm; Photon flux = 9.9 × 10−6 mol L−1 min−1) |PFOS| = 0.005 mg/L; |NTA| = 2 mM; pH = 10; Time = 10 h 85.4% 46.8 2.7 × 10−1 h−1 The UV/NTA process showed high efficiency as NTA not only act as photosensitizer to induce water photodissociation and photoionization but act as •OH scavenger, thus reducing its recombination with hydrated electron [135] PFOA Vis/IAA/HDTMA-Montmorillonite Low-pressure Hg UV light (36 W; Wavelength = 254 nm; Photon flux = 4.5 mW cm−2) |PFOA| = 10 mg/L; |IAA| = 1 mM; |clay mineral| = 2.2 g/L pH = 3; Time = 5 h 100% 90% (within 10 h of reaction) - The formation of hydrated electrons was promoted by the stabilizing effect of the montmorillonite clay on the indole radical cation generated by photolysis. The hydrated electrons interact with adsorbed PFOA molecules in the interlayer of the clay. [136] PFOS UV/KI UV/KI/HA Low-pressure Hg UV light (14 W; Wavelength = 254 nm; Photon flux = 4.5 mW cm−2) |PFOS| = 0.02 mg/L; |KI| = 0.3 mM; |HA| = 1 mg/L pH = 10; Time = 2 h 73.9% 44.4% 0.96 h−1 Enhanced degradation of PFOS was achieved in the presence of humic acid due to the increased generation of hydrated electrons; improved electron transfer due to certain HA functionalities; absorption of UV photons by HA to produce hydrated electrons [137] 97.9% 77.0% 1.1 h−1 PFOS UV/EDTA Low-pressure Hg UV light (14 W; Wavelength = 254 nm; Photon flux = 4.5 mW cm−2) |PFOS| = 0.005 mg/L; |EDTA| = 2.0 mM; |HA| = 1 mg/L pH = 10; Time = 10 h 78.08% 51.19% 1.13 × 10−1 h−1 EDTA acted primarily as OH radical scavenger. This scavenging activity allowed for the degradation of PFOS over a wide range of pH and in the presence of oxygen. Higher degradation and defluorination efficiency were also achieved for long chain PFOS. [132] Linear PFOS VUV Low-pressure Hg UV light (23 W; Wavelength = 185 nm; Photon flux = 1.8 mW cm−2) |PFOS| = 10 mg/L; pH = 12.5; Time = 3 h (72 h was used for linear PFOS) 70 100 1.7 × 10−2 h−1 Reductive degradation of linear and branch was carried out under anoxic conditions. The degradation efficiencies showed that branched PFOS are easily degraded than linear PFOS. The active radical in the system was confirmed to be hydrated electrons [138] Branch-PFOS 91 96.2 1.3 × 10−3 h−1 PFOA UVC/KI Low-pressure Hg UV light (20 W for UVC and 110 W for VUV); Wavelength = 185 nm (UVC) and 185 + 254 nm (VUV); Photon flux = 1.8 mW cm−2 |PFOA| = 10 mg/L; |KI| = 0.3 mmol/L pH = 5.5; Time = 3 h 40 ~5 22.2 × 10−2 h−1 The effect of light source on the photoreductive degradation of PFOA was evaluated. The low efficiency of the UVC/KI system was attributed to the photons of the system being solely used for KI reduction, which eliminates the possibility of direct photolysis of PFOA [139] VUV/KI 82 ~10 50.4 × 10−2 h−1 5 Degradation products and pathways 5.1 Advanced oxidation processes In order to understand the photodegradation process of PFAS and improve on the process, it is important to evaluate the by-products obtained in the system and also explore the pathway to these products. Monitoring of by-products are also important in order to evaluate the change in toxicity achieved by the process. The oxidative degradation of PFAS has been reported to follow a pattern involving, firstly electron transfer, which could be initiated by SO4•−, h+ or •OH in photo-enhanced processes to give either radical species (PFASs•) or anionic radical (PFASs• –) [68, 78, 100]. This is followed by C-CO2H bond cleavage in PFCAs (decarboxylation) or C-SO3H bond cleavage in PFSAs (desulfonation) yielding unstable perfluoroalkyl radicals (CnF2n+1)• [65, 140]. In photolytic processes, the direct cleavage of the C-CO2H and C-SO3H is achieved by the absorption of light usually in the VUV range [51]. The unstable perfluoroalkyl radical can either react with water to form a thermally unstable alcohol CnF2n+1OH [141, 142] or react with molecular oxygen generated in the system to yield perfluoroperoxy radical, which then undergoes a two-stage combination reaction with another perfluoroperoxy radical to yield the perfluorinated alcohol [143]. The choice of the route to the formation of the unstable alcohol species is reportedly dependent on the type of system employed and the pH of the reaction system [144, 145, 146]. The obtained alcohol then undergoes hydrogen fluoride elimination to form Cn-1F2n-1COF, followed by CF2 elimination via hydrolysis to yield a shorter chain PFAS (Cn-1F2n-1COOH). This short chain PFAS then undergoes, repeatedly, the chain reactions leading to CF2 elimination till complete mineralization is achieved [147]. This mechanism is referred to as the decarboxylation-hydroxylation-elimination-hydrolysis (DHEH) pathway and it is the most probable pathway for explaining the degradation and defluorination of PFAS. The decomposition mechanism of PFCAs by heterogeneous photocatalysis reported by Panchangam et al. [100] is shown in Figure 9. The formation of the unstable alcohol specie was proposed to be through the reaction of perfluoroalkyl radical with water due to the prevailing acidic condition of the reaction system. The cycle of ionization, electron transfer, decarboxylation and oxidation of perfluoroalkyl radical continues, until the number of decarboxylation cycles (n′) becomes equal to the number of –(CF2)- chain group (n) in the target pollutant. That is, complete mineralization is achieved, otherwise short chain perfluoroalkyl compounds are formed in the reaction system. Some of the short chain PFCAs identified in the degradation of perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA) in the study include perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA), perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA), perfluoropentanoic acid (PFPeA) and perfluoropanoic acid (PFPA).Figure 9 Photodegradation of PFOA by TiO2 photocatalysis. Reprinted with permission from Panchangan et al.) [100]. Copyright (2009) Elsevier. Figure 9 For the defluorination process, which is very significant in achieving by-products with lower toxicity than the parent molecule, different pathways including, H/F exchange, hydrolysis, HF elimination triggering decarboxylation and dissociation of terminal functional group have been reported [148]. Yang et al. [68] reported in their study of the defluorination mechanism of PFOS in the UV/sulphite process, that the initial attack of SO4•− on the PFOS molecule was the oxidation of the C-S bond, since the C-F cannot be easily oxidized by the radical (Figure 10). The unstable C8F17• formed reacts with H2O, producing C8F17OH, which then undergoes HF elimination to produce C8F15COF. Short chain perfluorocarboxylic acids such as PFHpA, PFHxA, PEPA and PFBA were produced by the hydrolysis reaction between C8F17COF and water, which forms short chain PFOA.Figure 10 Photodegradation mechanism of PFOA degradation by UV/S2O8- process. Reproduced from Yang et al. [68] under the creative common attribution licence. Figure 10 For iron based photochemical processes, two simultaneous initiation pathways were proposed by Liu et al. [79] for the degradation of PFOA. In the first pathway, when irradiated with UV light, electron transfer occurs between PFOA and Fe(III) to yield an unstable radical C7F15COO• and Fe(II) via a PFOA-Fe(III) complex intermediate, which undergoes photolysis to give PFAS• and Fe2+ on absorbing light energy. Simultaneously, under UV light radiation, Fe(III) reacts with H2O to form •OH, which oxidizes PFOA to also form C7F15COO•. The unstable radical then undergoes the DHEH pathway to give shorter chain PFOA as shown in Figure 11.Figure 11 Reaction pathway for Iron-mediated degradation of PFAS under UV light radiation. Reproduced with permission from Liu and Xiu [79]. Copyright (2013) Elsevier. Figure 11 In a study to evaluate the effect of oxygen on the degradation mechanism of PFOA, Sansotera et al. [149] established that apart from the stepwise degradation of PFOA by the elimination of CF2, another oxidation mechanism involving β-scission elimination of COF2 was involved in the degradation process as shown in Figure 12. The study also reported that while the stepwise CF2 elimination mechanism dominates in O2-deficient system, the β-scissions mechanism is dominant in O2-rich systems. In the β-scissions mechanism PFCAs are not generated as intermediates in the system.Figure 12 Effect of oxygen on the degradation pathway of PFOA. Green reaction intermediates are prevalent in oxygen rich systems, while the blue coloured paths are prevalent in oxygen deficient systems. Adapted with permission from Sansotera et al. [149]. Copyright (2015) Elsevier. Figure 12 5.2 Advanced reduction processes The reductive degradation of PFAS are based mainly on hydrated electrons, due to their strong reducing power. Unlike oxidative degradation, ARPs are initiated by the cleavage of the α-C-F bond by the hydrated electrons because the reduction potential of the C-F bond (E˚ < -2.7 V) is lower than that of hydrated electron (E˚ = -2.9 V), which makes reduction relatively easier [130, 150]. This α-carbon attack continues step wisely to produce defluorinated carboxylic acids as shown in Figure 13 [150]. Different routes have been proposed for the hydrated electron's attack on the PFAS molecule.Figure 13 Photodegradation mechanism of PFOA. Reprinted with permission from Song et al. [151]. Copyright (2013) Elsevier. Figure 13 The reductive degradation of PFASs is influenced by some factors, such as chemical characteristics of the C-F bond, stability of anion radical, redox potential, ionic head group, __(CF2)n __ chain length, electron density and the strength of electron donating reagent [130, 152, 153, 154]. Bentel et al. [155] proposed two pathways for the reaction between hydrated electrons and PFCAs (CnF2n+1COO−). The first pathway involves sequential H/F exchange at the α-position, which yields Cn-1F2n-1CH2COO−, with the possibility of additional C-F bond cleavage at middle positions for long chain PFCAs. The second pathway yielded shorter chain PFCAs through decarboxylation mechanism to produce unstable perfluorinated alcohol, which subsequently undergoes HF elimination to form acyl fluoride. The acyl fluoride then undergoes hydrolysis, leading to fluoride ion elimination to form shorter chain PFCA (Cn-1F2n-1COO−). Two reaction pathways for the degradation of PFOA (Figure 14), which include nucleophilic attack of hydrated electrons leading to reductive cleavage of C-F bonds, yielding defluorinated intermediates has also been proposed by Qu et al. [142]. Simultaneously, direct photolysis of C-C bonds occurred, resulting in the cleavage of the C-COOH bond, which yielded perfluoroalkyl group intermediates.Figure 14 Mechanism of reductive degradation of PFOA. Reprinted wih permission from Qu et al. [142]. Copyright (2010) Elsevier. Figure 14 Recently, Huang et al. [156], proposed for the first time a hydrodefluorination mechanism to PFOA degradation by a SiC/graphene catalyst (Figure 15). The mechanism was based on the replacement of fluorine atoms by H atoms by nucleophilic substitution through Si-H/C-F redistribution. Si-H bonds were generated by UV light excitation, and the hydrogen atom exchanged for F atoms in the α-position to yield CnF2nHCOOH. The CnF2nHCOOH then went through a carbene (CH2) elimination under UV irradiation to form Cn-1F2n-1COOH. Also, perfluoralkyl radical C7F•15 was formed by the reaction between photogenerated ecb− with PFOA, which could then either undergo the HF elimination process or undergo the hydrodefluorination reaction.Figure 15 Mechanism of degradation of PFOA via the hydrodefluorination mechanism. Reprinted with permission from Huang et al. [156]. Copyright (2016) American Chemical society. Figure 15 6 Comparative analysis of photon enhanced processes The comparative analysis of the photon-based processes for the degradation of PFAS in terms of their stage of development, relative cost, PFOA and PFOS removal efficiencies, materials and energy consumption is presented in Table 4. 6.1 Stage of development The development stage of a treatment technology is based on the extent of application of the technology in different settings. The Environmental protection agency (EPA) [157] have established five categories of developmental stages for water treatment technologies: research, emerging, innovative, established, and adaptive use. Technologies that are currently in their developmental stage and have only been tested at bench scale are categorized as research, while technology that have undergone pilot or demonstration scale testing or have been implemented at full scale for less than 1 year are categorized as emerging. Innovative and established technologies are processes that have been implemented at full scale for less than five years and more than five years respectively. Adaptive use technologies are processes that have been established for years but have undergone modification which may have led to an emerging technology or may be adapted to achieve an alternative treatment objective. Table 5 shows the developmental stages of the photo enhanced process discussed in this review. Based on the mentioned criteria photolysis, photochemical and photocatalytic processes are classified as emerging technologies, while advanced reduction processes are still at the research stage based on the availability of pilot scale reports for each process [62, 158, 159].Table 5 Comparative analysis of photon-based processes with other destructive technologies for PFAS degradation. Table 5Technology Development Stage Energy (KWh/m3) Relative cost ($) Removal efficiency (%) Average time required to 90% degradation (min) AOP Photolysis Emerging 99.2 13.89 82 216 Photochemical Research 863.8 120.93 99 460 Photocatalysis Emerging 2106 294.84 89 705 ARP Research 166.1 23.25 91.4 408 6.2 Energy consumption In choosing between UV-based processes, one of the major factors to be considered is the energy consumption of the process [160]. The energy consumed in a process is measured by the electrical energy per order (EEO), which is defined as the electrical energy (KW/h) required to achieve 90% degradation of contaminants in 1 m3 stream. The EEO could be obtained via the mathematical equation: 13 EEO=P×t×1000V×60×logcicf Where P represents the systems power rating (in KW), t is the time required to achieve 90% degradation (in minutes), V is the volume of contaminant solution, the initial and final concentration of the contaminants are represented by Ci and Cf respectively [161]. The time required to achieve 90% degradation can be obtained from the reaction rate constant K (in mins) using the equation: 14 t0.9=2.3035851k Using Eqs. (13) and (14), the energy consumption for the photolytic, photochemical, photocatalytic and photoreduction processes was calculated and are shown in Table 5 and it is observed that photolysis is the least energy consuming process, while photocatalytic process is the most energy consuming process. When compared to the energy consumption of other processes for PFAS degradation as presented by Nzeribe et al. [162], the energy consumption of photolysis compares favourably with that of plasma technology which was reported to have the lowest energy consumption when matched with activated persulfate, electrochemical oxidation and ultrasound technologies. The average cost of a photo-enhanced process can be obtained by summing the average energy cost with the cost of the chemicals employed in the system. The energy cost for each system was obtained by multiplying the energy consumption of each process with the average energy cost worldwide, which in 2019 was $0.14 per kilowatt hour [163] (https://www.globalpetrolprices.com/electricity_prices). As shown by Nzeribe et al. [162], the contribution of chemical cost to the overall cost of most degradation processes was relatively insignificant, when compared to the energy cost. Also, for comprehensive cost analysis of this processes, there is the need for appropriate estimation of the cost of the materials required for reactors for the process. For instance, photochemical and advanced reduction degradation process, may require reactors made from corrosion resistant materials, which may also increase the overall cost of the degradation process. 6.3 Degradation efficiency and reaction time In terms of efficiency, based on the average efficiencies reported by research explored in this review it can be observed that photochemical process had the highest process efficiency, followed by the advanced reduction process. These two technologies have achieved efficiencies greater than 90%. While photocatalysis and photolysis have average efficiencies of 89 and 82% respectively. However, in terms of the average time required to achieve 90% degradation, photolysis showed the lowest required time of 216 min, followed by advanced reduction process which required 408 min. Photochemical and photocatalytic processes both required an average time of 460 and 705 min respectively for 90% degradation to be achieved. Though photochemical degradation process showed the highest degradation efficiency among photon-based processes, when compared to other technologies such as electrochemical oxidation and activated persulphate, it showed the lowest degradation efficiency as presented by Nzeribe et al. [162]. 7 Conclusion Although, several technologies have been explored for the degradation of PFASs in the environment and wastewater in particular, this review has focussed on the treatment methods that employed photon energy in the degradation process. Studied reports have shown that persulfate and iron based photochemical process are the most effective advanced oxidation processes. The effectiveness has been ascribed to the stability and reactivity of SO4•− and the ability of Fe3+ to complex with PFOA, which decomposes under UV-light. Among the semiconductor photocatalysts that have been explored, In2O3 showed the highest activity even under ambient reaction conditions. Advanced photoreduction processes, which are very recent technologies have also shown interesting efficiency in the degradation of PFAS. The study of the mechanism of degradation showed step-wise chain reduction as the primary degradation route. While initiation of the degradation process is by C-CO2H or C-SO2H cleavage in AOPs, direct cleavage of the C-F bond is the initial stage in ARPs. In terms of cost and time required for PFAS degradation, comparative analysis showed that direct photolysis is an economically feasible process. However, the efficiency of the process is lower when compared to those of other processes. In terms of degradation efficiency, photochemical processes had the highest value, but the process is not potentially favoured for scale-up process. Despite the interesting results reported for degradation of PFAS by photo enhanced processes, the need for highly efficient materials at ambient reaction conditions still remain to be explored. In addition, there is the need to reduce the time needed in achieving significant degradation of PFAS by these processes. Declarations Author contribution statement All authors listed have significantly contributed to the development and the writing of this article. Funding statement The study was supported by the 10.13039/501100001321National Research Foundation (UID 109333 and UID 116338). Data availability statement No data was used for the research described in the article. Declaration of interests statement The authors declare no conflict of interest. Additional information No additional information is available for this paper. ==== Refs References 1 Buck R.C. Franklin J. Berger U. Conder J.M. Cousins I.T. De Voogt P. Jensen A.A. Kannan K. Mabury S.A. Van Leeuwen S.P. Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the environment: terminology, classification, and origins Integrated Environ. Assess. Manag. 7 2011 513 541 2 Giesy J.P. Kannan K. Global distribution of perfluorooctane sulfonate in wildlife Environ. Sci. Technol. 35 2001 1339 1342 11348064 3 Shoeib M. Harner T. Vlahos P. Perfluorinated chemicals in the arctic atmosphere Environ. Sci. Technol. 40 2006 7577 7583 17256497 4 Ding G. Peijnenburg W.J.G.M. Physicochemical properties and aquatic toxicity of poly- and perfluorinated compounds Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43 2013 598 678 5 D'hollander W. De Voogt P. De Coen W. Bervoets L. Perfluorinated substances in human food and other sources of human exposure Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 208 2010 179 215 20811865 6 Sunderland E.M. Hu X.C. Dassuncao C. Tokranov A.K. Wagner C.C. Allen J.G. A review of the pathways of human exposure to poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) and present understanding of health effects J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 29 2019 131 147 30470793 7 Lau C. Perfluorinated Compounds: an Overview. Toxicological Effects of Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Mol. Integr. Toxicol. 2015 1 21 8 Grandjean P. Clapp R. Perfluorinated alkyl substances: emerging insights into health risks, NEW SOLUTIONS J. Environ. Occupat. Health Pol. 25 2015 147 163 9 Dewitt J.C. Peden-Adams M.M. Keller J.M. Germolec D.R. Immunotoxicity of perfluorinated compounds: recent developments Toxicol. Pathol. 40 2011 300 311 22109712 10 Qu Y. Zhang C. Li F. Bo X. Liu G. Zhou Q. Equilibrium and kinetics study on the adsorption of perfluorooctanoic acid from aqueous solution onto powdered activated carbon J. Hazard Mater. 169 2009 146 152 19395160 11 Safeguards. Order no. 681 of may 25, 2020 on food contact materials and penal code for violation of related EU acts Food DMoEa 2020 Danish Ministry of Environment and Food Geneva 1 Switzerland 12 Rayne S. Forest K. Perfluoroalkyl sulfonic and carboxylic acids: a critical review of physicochemical properties, levels and patterns in waters and wastewaters, and treatment methods J. Environ. Sci. Health Tox Hazard Subst. Environ. Eng. 44 2009 1145 1199 13 Tang C.Y. Fu Q.S. Robertson A.P. Criddle C.S. Leckie J.O. Use of reverse osmosis membranes to remove perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) from semiconductor wastewater Environ. Sci. Technol. 40 2006 7343 7349 17180987 14 Wang W. Rhodes G. Ge J. Yu X. Li H. Uptake and accumulation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in plants Chemosphere 261 2020 127584 32717507 15 Reade A. Quinn T. Schreiber J.S. PFAS Drinking water 2019: scientific and policy assessment for addressing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in drinking water 2019 Council NRD New York 1 102 16 Milinovic J. Lacorte S. Vidal M. Rigol A. Sorption behaviour of perfluoroalkyl substances in soils Sci. Total Environ. 511 2015 63 71 25531590 17 Deng S. Zhang Q. Nie Y. Wei H. Wang B. Huang J. Yu G. Xing B. Sorption mechanisms of perfluorinated compounds on carbon nanotubes Environ. Pollut. 168 2012 138 144 22610037 18 N.C.F.B. Information PubChem Compound Summary for CID 67734 Perfluorohexanesulfonic Acid 2020 Available from: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Perfluorohexanesulfonic-acid 19 Becker A.M. Gerstmann S. Frank H. Perfluorooctane surfactants in waste waters, the major source of river pollution Chemosphere 72 2008 115 121 18291438 20 Pan C.G. Liu Y.S. Ying G.G. Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in wastewater treatment plants and drinking water treatment plants: removal efficiency and exposure risk Water Res. 106 2016 562 570 27776305 21 Paul A.G. Jones K.C. Sweetman A.J. A first global production, emission, and environmental inventory for perfluorooctane sulfonate Environ. Sci. Technol. 43 2009 386 392 19238969 22 Prevedouros K. Cousins I.T. Buck R.C. Korzeniowski S.H. Sources, fate and transport of perfluorocarboxylates Environ. Sci. Technol. 40 2006 32 44 16433330 23 Renner R. The long and the short of perfluorinated replacements Environ. Sci. Technol. 40 2006 12 13 16433328 24 Garcia-Segura S. Garrido J.A. Rodriguez R.M. Cabot P.L. Centellas F. Arias C. Brillas E. Mineralization of flumequine in acidic medium by electro-Fenton and photoelectro-Fenton processes Water Res. 46 2012 2067 2076 22348999 25 Saleh N.B. Khalid A. Tian Y. Ayres C. Sabaraya I.V. Pietari J. Hanigan D. Chowdhury I. Apul O.G. Removal of poly- and per-fluoroalkyl substances from aqueous systems by nano-enabled water treatment strategies Environ. Sci. J. Integr. Environ. Res.: Water Res. Technol. 5 2019 198 208 26 Rahman M.F. Peldszus S. Anderson W.B. Behaviour and fate of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in drinking water treatment: a review Water Res. 50 2014 318 340 24216232 27 Soriano A. Gorri D. Urtiaga A. Efficient treatment of perfluorohexanoic acid by nanofiltration followed by electrochemical degradation of the NF concentrate Water Res. 112 2017 147 156 28157603 28 Yu J. He C. Liu X. Wu J. Hu Y. Zhang Y. Removal of perfluorinated compounds by membrane bioreactor with powdered activated carbon (PAC): adsorption onto sludge and PAC Desalination 334 2014 23 28 29 Chaplin B.P. Critical review of electrochemical advanced oxidation processes for water treatment applications Environ. Sci. Process Impacts 16 2014 1182 1203 24549240 30 Fernandez N.A. Rodriguez-Freire L. Keswani M. Sierra-Alvarez R. Effect of chemical structure on the sonochemical degradation of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) Environ. Sci. J. Integr. Environ. Res.: Water Res. Technol. 2 2016 975 983 31 Gole V.L. Fishgold A. Sierra-Alvarez R. Deymier P. Keswani M. Treatment of perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) using a large-scale sonochemical reactor Separ. Purif. Technol. 194 2018 104 110 32 Gomez-Ruiz B. Gómez-Lavín S. Diban N. Boiteux V. Colin A. Dauchy X. Urtiaga A. Efficient electrochemical degradation of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) from the effluents of an industrial wastewater treatment plant Chem. Eng. J. 322 2017 196 204 33 Li T. Wang C. Wang T. Zhu L. Highly efficient photocatalytic degradation toward perfluorooctanoic acid by bromine doped BiOI with high exposure of (001) facet Appl. Catal. B Environ. 268 2020 34 Xu T. Zhu Y. Duan J. Xia Y. Tong T. Zhang L. Zhao D. Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of perfluorooctanoic acid using carbon-modified bismuth phosphate composite: effectiveness, material synergy and roles of carbon Chem. Eng. J. 395 2020 124991 35 Tenorio R. Liu J. Xiao X. Maizel A. Higgins C.P. Schaefer C.E. Strathmann T.J. Destruction of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) with UV-sulfite photoreductive treatment Environ. Sci. Technol. 54 2020 6957 6967 32343565 36 Wang S. Yang Q. Chen F. Sun J. Luo K. Yao F. Wang X. Wang D. Li X. Zeng G. Photocatalytic degradation of perfluorooctanoic acid and perfluorooctane sulfonate in water: a critical review Chem. Eng. J. 328 2017 927 942 37 Trojanowicz M. Bojanowska-Czajka A. Bartosiewicz I. Kulisa K. Advanced Oxidation/Reduction Processes treatment for aqueous perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) – a review of recent advances Chem. Eng. J. 336 2018 170 199 38 Merino N. Qu Y. Deeb R.A. Hawley E.L. Hoffmann M.R. Mahendra S. Degradation and removal methods for perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances in water Environ. Eng. Sci. 33 2016 615 649 39 Arvaniti O.S. Stasinakis A.S. Review on the occurrence, fate and removal of perfluorinated compounds during wastewater treatment Sci. Total Environ. 524–525 2015 81 92 40 Vecitis C.D. Park H. Cheng J. Mader B.T. Hoffmann M.R. Treatment technologies for aqueous perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. China 3 2009 129 151 41 Ahmed M.B. Alam M.M. Zhou J.L. Xu B. Johir M.a.H. Karmakar A.K. Rahman M.S. Hossen J. Hasan A.T.M.K. Moni M.A. Advanced treatment technologies efficacies and mechanism of per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances removal from water Process Saf. Environ. Protect. 136 2020 1 14 42 Meng P. Deng S. Lu X. Du Z. Wang B. Huang J. Wang Y. Yu G. Xing B. Role of air bubbles overlooked in the adsorption of perfluorooctanesulfonate on hydrophobic carbonaceous adsorbents Environ. Sci. Technol. 48 2014 13785 13792 25365738 43 Gagliano E. Sgroi M. Falciglia P.P. Vagliasindi F.G.A. Roccaro P. Removal of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from water by adsorption: role of PFAS chain length, effect of organic matter and challenges in adsorbent regeneration Water Res. 171 2020 115381 31923761 44 Murray C.C. Vatankhah H. Mcdonough C.A. Nickerson A. Hedtke T.T. Cath T.Y. Higgins C.P. Bellona C.L. Removal of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances using super-fine powder activated carbon and ceramic membrane filtration J. Hazard Mater. 366 2019 160 168 30522083 45 Crone B.C. Speth T.F. Wahman D.G. Smith S.J. Abulikemu G. Kleiner E.J. Pressman J.G. Occurrence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in source water and their treatment in drinking water Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49 2019 2359 2396 32831535 46 Trautmann A.M. Schell H. Schmidt K.R. Mangold K.-M. Tiehm A. Electrochemical degradation of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in groundwater Water Sci. Technol. 71 2015 1569 1575 26442500 47 Cao H. Zhang W. Wang C. Liang Y. Sonochemical degradation of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances – a review Ultrason. Sonochem. 69 2020 105245 32702636 48 James Wood R. Sidnell T. Ross I. Mcdonough J. Lee J. Bussemaker M.J. Ultrasonic degradation of perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) correlated with sonochemical and sonoluminescence characterisation Ultrason. Sonochem. 68 2020 105196 32593965 49 Mitchell S.M. Ahmad M. Teel A.L. Watts R.J. Degradation of perfluorooctanoic acid by reactive species generated through catalyzed H2 O2 propagation reactions Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 1 2013 117 121 50 Li F. Wei Z. He K. Blaney L. Cheng X. Xu T. Liu W. Zhao D. A concentrate-and-destroy technique for degradation of perfluorooctanoic acid in water using a new adsorptive photocatalyst Water Res. 185 2020 116219 32731078 51 Chen J. Zhang P.-Y. Liu J. Photodegradation of perfluorooctanoic acid by 185 nm vacuum ultraviolet light J. Environ. Sci. 19 2007 387 390 52 Giri R.R. Ozaki H. Morigaki T. Taniguchi S. Takanami R. UV photolysis of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in dilute aqueous solution Water Sci. Technol. 63 2011 276 282 21252431 53 Lyu X.J. Li W.W. Lam P.K. Yu H.Q. Insights into perfluorooctane sulfonate photodegradation in a catalyst-free aqueous solution Sci. Rep. 5 2015 9353 25879866 54 Trojanowicz M. Bartosiewicz I. Bojanowska-Czajka A. Szreder T. Bobrowski K. Nałęcz-Jawecki G. Męczyńska-Wielgosz S. Nichipor H. Application of ionizing radiation in decomposition of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) in aqueous solutions Chem. Eng. J. 379 2020 55 Cui J. Gao P. Deng Y. Destruction of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) with advanced reduction processes (ARPs): a critical review Environ. Sci. Technol. 54 2020 3752 3766 32162904 56 OECD. Toward a new comprehensive global database of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (pfass): summary report on updating the OECD 2007 list of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs). In: DEVELOPMENT OFECA, editor. OECD Environment, Health and Safety Publications Series on Risk Management. Paris2018. 57 Ahrens L. Bundschuh M. Fate and effects of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances in the aquatic environment: a review Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 33 2014 1921 1929 24924660 58 Giesy J.P. Kannan K. Perfluorochemical surfactants in the environment Environ. Sci. Technol. 36 2002 146A 152A 11827047 59 Matafonova G. Batoev V. Recent advances in application of UV light-emitting diodes for degrading organic pollutants in water through advanced oxidation processes: a review Water Res. 132 2018 177 189 29331640 60 Giri R.R. Ozaki H. Okada T. Taniguchi S. Takanami R. Factors influencing UV photodecomposition of perfluorooctanoic acid in water Chem. Eng. J. 180 2012 197 203 61 Olsen G.W. Mair D.C. Church T.R. Ellefson M.E. Reagen W.K. Boyd T.M. Herron R.M. Medhdizadehkashi Z. Nobiletti J.B. Rios J.A. Butenhoff J.L. Zobel L.R. Decline in perfluorooctanesulfonate and other polyfluoroalkyl chemicals in American Red Cross adult blood donors, 2000-2006 Environ. Sci. Technol. 42 2008 4989 4995 18678038 62 Dai X. Xie Z. Dorian B. Gray S. J. Zhang. Comparative study of PFAS treatment by UV, UV/ozone, and fractionations with air and ozonated air Environ. Sci. J. Integr. Environ. Res.: Water Res. Technol. 5 2019 1897 1907 63 Zhang Z. Chen J.J. Lyu X.J. Yin H. Sheng G.P. Complete mineralization of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) by γ-irradiation in aqueous solution Sci. Rep. 4 2014 7418 25492109 64 Lutze H.V. Brekenfeld J. Naumov S. Von Sonntag C. Schmidt T.C. Degradation of perfluorinated compounds by sulfate radicals - new mechanistic aspects and economical considerations Water Res. 129 2018 509 519 29247911 65 Yin P. Hu Z. Song X. Liu J. Lin N. Activated persulfate oxidation of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in groundwater under acidic conditions Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 13 2016 66 Lee Y. Lo S. Kuo J. Hsieh C. Decomposition of perfluorooctanoic acid by microwaveactivated persulfate: effects of temperature, pH, and chloride ions Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 6 2012 17 25 67 Matzek L.W. Carter K.E. Activated persulfate for organic chemical degradation: a review Chemosphere 151 2016 178 188 26938680 68 Yang S. Cheng J. Sun J. Hu Y. Liang X. Defluorination of aqueous perfluorooctanesulfonate by activated persulfate oxidation PloS One 8 2013 e74877 69 Hori H. Yamamoto A. Hayakawa E. Taniyasu S. Yamashita N. Kutsuna S. Kiatagawa H. Arakawa R. Efficient decomposition of environmentally persistent perfluorocarboxylic acids by use of persulfate as a photochemical oxidant Environ. Sci. Technol. 39 2005 2383 2388 15871280 70 Criquet J. Karpel Vel Leitner N. Electron beam irradiation of aqueous solution of persulfate ions Chem. Eng. J. 169 2011 258 262 71 Xie P. Ma J. Liu W. Zou J. Yue S. Li X. Wiesner M.R. Fang J. Removal of 2-MIB and geosmin using UV/persulfate: contributions of hydroxyl and sulfate radicals Water Res. 69 2015 223 233 25486622 72 Qian Y. Guo X. Zhang Y. Peng Y. Sun P. Huang C.H. Niu J. Zhou X. Crittenden J.C. Perfluorooctanoic acid degradation using UV-persulfate process: modeling of the degradation and chlorate formation Environ. Sci. Technol. 50 2016 772 781 26686982 73 Cao M.H. Wang B.B. Yu H.S. Wang L.L. Yuan S.H. Chen J. Photochemical decomposition of perfluorooctanoic acid in aqueous periodate with VUV and UV light irradiation J. Hazard Mater. 179 2010 1143 1146 20403659 74 Wang Y. Zhang P. Enhanced photochemical decomposition of environmentally persistent perfluorooctanoate by coexisting ferric ion and oxalate Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 23 2016 9660 9668 26846242 75 Wang Y. Zhang P. Pan G. Chen H. Ferric ion mediated photochemical decomposition of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) by 254nm UV light J. Hazard Mater. 160 2008 181 186 18400382 76 Phan Thi L.-A. Do H.-T. Lee Y.-C. Lo S.-L. Photochemical decomposition of perfluorooctanoic acids in aqueous carbonate solution with UV irradiation Chem. Eng. J. 221 2013 258 263 77 Zhu Y. Zhu R. Xi Y. Zhu J. Zhu G. He H. Strategies for enhancing the heterogeneous Fenton catalytic reactivity: a review Appl. Catal. B Environ. 255 2019 117739 78 Tang H. Xiang Q. Lei M. Yan J. Zhu L. Zou J. Efficient degradation of perfluorooctanoic acid by UV–Fenton process Chem. Eng. J. 184 2012 156 162 79 Liu D. Xiu Z. Liu F. Wu G. Adamson D. Newell C. Vikesland P. Tsai A.L. Alvarez P.J. Perfluorooctanoic acid degradation in the presence of Fe(III) under natural sunlight J. Hazard Mater. 262 2013 456 463 24076481 80 Dumrongrojthanath P. Thongtem T. Phuruangrat A. Thongtem S. Hydrothermal synthesis of Bi2 WO6 hierarchical flowers with their photonic and photocatalytic properties Superlattice. Microst. 54 2013 71 77 81 Li D. Huang J. Li R. Chen P. Chen D. Cai M. Liu H. Feng Y. Lv W. Liu G. Synthesis of a carbon dots modified g-C3 N4 /SnO2 Z-scheme photocatalyst with superior photocatalytic activity for PPCPs degradation under visible light irradiation J. Hazard Mater. 401 2021 123257 32659572 82 Wang J. Yu X. Fu X. Zhu Y. Zhang Y. Accelerating carrier separation of Ag3 PO4 via synergetic effect of PANI and rGO for enhanced photocatalytic performance towards ciprofloxacin Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 121 2021 105329 83 Tolosana-Moranchel A. Pecharromán C. Faraldos M. Bahamonde A. Strong effect of light scattering by distribution of TiO2 particle aggregates on photocatalytic efficiency in aqueous suspensions Chem. Eng. J. 403 2021 126186 84 Ishaq F.E.A. Ahmed I.E.-S. Moamen S.R. Synthesis of an optical catalyst for cracking contaminating dyes in the wastewater of factories using indium oxide in nanometer and usage in agriculture Pol. J. Chem. Technol. 21 2019 98 105 85 Ryou H. Yoo T.H. Yoon Y. Lee I.G. Shin M. Cho J. Cho B.J. Hwang W.S. Hydrothermal synthesis and photocatalytic property of Sn-doped β-Ga2 O3 nanostructure ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 9 2020 045009 86 Ajibade P.A. Sikakane B.M. Botha N.L. Oluwalana A.E. Omondi B. Synthesis and crystal structures of bis(dibenzyl dithiocarbamato)Cu(II) and Ag(I) complexes: precursors for Cu1.8 S and Ag2 S nano-photocatalysts J. Mol. Struct. 1221 2020 128791 87 Serrà A. Philippe L. Simple and scalable fabrication of hairy ZnO@ZnS core@shell Cu cables for continuous sunlight-driven photocatalytic water remediation Chem. Eng. J. 401 2020 126164 88 Qi Y. Fan Y. Liu T. Zheng X. Flower-like hierarchical ZnS-Ga2 S3 heterojunction for the adsorption-photo-reduction of Cr(VI) Chemosphere 261 2020 127824 32755757 89 Intaphong P. Phuruangrat A. Karthik K. Dumrongrojthanath P. Thongtem T. Thongtem S. Effect of pH on phase, morphology and photocatalytic properties of BiOBr synthesized by hydrothermal method J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 30 2020 714 721 90 Phuruangrat A. Keereesaensuk P.-O. Karthik K. Dumrongrojthanath P. Ekthammathat N. Thongtem S. Thongtem T. Synthesis of Ag/Bi2 MoO6 nanocomposites using NaBH4 as reducing agent for enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalysis of rhodamine B J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 30 2020 322 329 91 Phuruangrat A. Keereesaensuk P.-O. Karthik K. Dumrongrojthanath P. Ekthammathat N. Thongtem S. Thongtem T. Synthesis and characterization Ag nanoparticles supported on Bi2 WO6 nanoplates for enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine B J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 30 2020 1033 1040 92 Chen M.-J. Lo S.-L. Lee Y.-C. Kuo J. Wu C.-H. Decomposition of perfluorooctanoic acid by ultraviolet light irradiation with Pb-modified titanium dioxide J. Hazard Mater. 303 2016 111 118 26513570 93 Li X. Zhang P. Jin L. Shao T. Li Z. Cao J. Efficient photocatalytic decomposition of perfluorooctanoic acid by indium oxide and its mechanism Environ. Sci. Technol. 46 2012 5528 5534 22489882 94 Zhao B. Li X. Yang L. Wang F. Li J. Xia W. Li W. Zhou L. Zhao C. ß-Ga2 O3 nanorod synthesis with a one-step microwave irradiation hydrothermal method and its efficient photocatalytic degradation for perfluorooctanoic acid Photochem. Photobiol. 91 2015 42 47 25376103 95 Song Z. Dong X. Wang N. Zhu L. Luo Z. Fang J. Xiong C. Efficient photocatalytic defluorination of perfluorooctanoic acid over BiOCl nanosheets via a hole direct oxidation mechanism Chem. Eng. J. 317 2017 925 934 96 Ong C.B. Mohammad A.W. Ng L.Y. Mahmoudi E. Azizkhani S. Hayati Hairom N.H. Solar photocatalytic and surface enhancement of ZnO/rGO nanocomposite: degradation of perfluorooctanoic acid and dye Process Saf. Environ. Protect. 112 2017 298 307 97 Ahmed S.N. Haider W. Heterogeneous photocatalysis and its potential applications in water and wastewater treatment: a review Nanotechnology 29 2018 342001 29786601 98 Xu B. Ahmed M.B. Zhou J.L. Altaee A. Wu M. Xu G. Photocatalytic removal of perfluoroalkyl substances from water and wastewater: mechanism, kinetics and controlling factors Chemosphere 189 2017 717 729 28972910 99 Wang Y. Zhang P. Photocatalytic decomposition of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) by TiO2 in the presence of oxalic acid J. Hazard Mater. 192 2011 1869 1875 21803489 100 Panchangam S.C. Lin A.Y. Shaik K.L. Lin C.F. Decomposition of perfluorocarboxylic acids (PFCAs) by heterogeneous photocatalysis in acidic aqueous medium Chemosphere 77 2009 242 248 19665756 101 Chen M.J. Lo S.L. Lee Y.C. Huang C.C. Photocatalytic decomposition of perfluorooctanoic acid by transition-metal modified titanium dioxide J. Hazard Mater. 288 2015 168 175 25704293 102 Li M. Yu Z. Liu Q. Sun L. Huang W. Photocatalytic decomposition of perfluorooctanoic acid by noble metallic nanoparticles modified TiO 2 Chem. Eng. J. 286 2016 232 238 103 Sansotera M. Persico F. Pirola C. Navarrini W. Di Michele A. Bianchi C.L. Decomposition of perfluorooctanoic acid photocatalyzed by titanium dioxide: chemical modification of the catalyst surface induced by fluoride ions Appl. Catal. B Environ. 148–149 2014 29 35 104 Khoa Le T. Flahaut D. Foix D. Blanc S. Hung Nguyen H.K. Xuan Huynh T.K. Martinez H. Study of surface fluorination of photocatalytic TiO2 by thermal shock method J. Solid State Chem. 187 2012 300 308 105 Li Z. Zhang P. Li J. Shao T. Wang J. Jin L. Synthesis of In2 O3 porous nanoplates for photocatalytic decomposition of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) Catal. Commun. 43 2014 42 46 106 Li Z. Zhang P. Shao T. In2O3 nanoporous nanosphere X. Li. A highly efficient photocatalyst for decomposition of perfluorooctanoic acid Appl. Catal. B Environ. 125 2012 350 357 107 Li Z. Zhang P. Shao T. Wang J. Jin L. Li X. Different nanostructured In(2)O(3) for photocatalytic decomposition of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) J. Hazard Mater. 260 2013 40 46 23742955 108 Gan J. Lu X. Wu J. Xie S. Zhai T. Yu M. Zhang Z. Mao Y. Wang S.C.I. Shen Y. Tong Y. Oxygen vacancies promoting photoelectrochemical performance of In2 O3 nanocubes Sci. Rep. 3 2013 1021 23293740 109 Lei F. Sun Y. Liu K. Gao S. Liang L. Pan B. Xie Y. Oxygen vacancies confined in ultrathin indium oxide porous sheets for promoted visible-light water splitting J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 2014 6826 6829 24773473 110 Zhang W. Efstathiadis H. Li L. Liang Y. Environmental factors affecting degradation of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) by In2 O3 nanoparticles J. Environ. Sci. (China) 93 2020 48 56 32446459 111 Xu B. Zhou J.L. Altaee A. Ahmed M.B. Johir M.a.H. Ren J. Li X. Improved photocatalysis of perfluorooctanoic acid in water and wastewater by Ga2 O3 /UV system assisted by peroxymonosulfate Chemosphere 239 2020 124722 31494318 112 Cheng J.-H. Liang X.-Y. Yang S.-W. Hu Y.-Y. Photochemical defluorination of aqueous perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) by VUV/Fe3+ system Chem. Eng. J. 239 2014 242 249 113 Gomez-Ruiz B. Ribao P. Diban N. Rivero M.J. Ortiz I. Urtiaga A. Photocatalytic degradation and mineralization of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) using a composite TiO2 -rGO catalyst J. Hazard Mater. 344 2018 950 957 29197229 114 Jin L. Zhang P. Shao T. Zhao S. Ferric ion mediated photodecomposition of aqueous perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) under UV irradiation and its mechanism J. Hazard Mater. 271 2014 9 15 24583810 115 Li A. Zhang Z. Li P. Cai L. Zhang L. Gong J. Nitrogen dioxide radicals mediated mineralization of perfluorooctanoic acid in aqueous nitrate solution with UV irradiation Chemosphere 188 2017 367 374 28888862 116 Li Z. Zhang P. Li J. Shao T. Jin L. Synthesis of In2 O3 -graphene composites and their photocatalytic performance towards perfluorooctanoic acid decomposition J. Photochem. Photobiol. Chem. 271 2013 111 116 117 Qian L. Georgi A. Gonzalez-Olmos R. Kopinke F.-D. Degradation of perfluorooctanoic acid adsorbed on Fe-zeolites with molecular oxygen as oxidant under UV-A irradiation Appl. Catal. B Environ. 278 2020 118 Sahu S.P. Qanbarzadeh M. Ateia M. Torkzadeh H. Maroli A.S. Cates E.L. Rapid degradation and mineralization of perfluorooctanoic acid by a new petitjeanite Bi3 O(OH)(PO4 )2 microparticle ultraviolet photocatalyst Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 5 2018 533 538 119 Shang E. Li Y. Niu J. Li S. Zhang G. Wang X. Photocatalytic degradation of perfluorooctanoic acid over Pb-BiFeO3 /rGO catalyst: kinetics and mechanism Chemosphere 211 2018 34 43 30071434 120 Xu T. Ji H. Gu Y. Tong T. Xia Y. Zhang L. Zhao D. Enhanced adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of perfluorooctanoic acid in water using iron (hydr)oxides/carbon sphere composite Chem. Eng. J. 388 2020 121 Jin L. Jiang C. Zhang P. Photochemical decomposition of 1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorooctane sulfonate (6:2FTS) induced by ferric ions J. Environ. Sci. 51 2017 120 127 122 Jin L. Zhang P. Shao T. Factors influencing the ferric ion-mediated photochemical decomposition of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) in water J. Adv. Oxid. Technol. 18 2015 147 154 123 Vellanki B.P. Batchelor B. Abdel-Wahab A. Advanced reduction processes: a new class of treatment processes Environ. Eng. Sci. 30 2013 264 271 23840160 124 Yu X. Cabooter D. Dewil R. Efficiency and mechanism of diclofenac degradation by sulfite/UV advanced reduction processes (ARPs) Sci. Total Environ. 688 2019 65 74 31229829 125 Xiao Q. Wang T. Yu S. Yi P. Li L. Influence of UV lamp, sulfur(IV) concentration, and pH on bromate degradation in UV/sulfite systems: mechanisms and applications Water Res. 111 2017 288 296 28104516 126 Gu Y. Dong W. Luo C. Liu T. Efficient reductive decomposition of perfluorooctanesulfonate in a high photon flux UV/sulfite system Environ. Sci. Technol. 50 2016 10554 10561 27607769 127 Gu Y. Liu T. Wang H. Han H. Dong W. Hydrated electron based decomposition of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) in the VUV/sulfite system Sci. Total Environ. 607–608 2017 541 548 128 Park H. Vecitis C.D. Cheng J. Dalleska N.F. Mader B.T. Hoffmann M.R. Reductive degradation of perfluoroalkyl compounds with aquated electrons generated from iodide photolysis at 254 nm Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 10 2011 1945 1953 22025132 129 Qu Y. Zhang C.J. Chen P. Zhou Q. Zhang W.X. Effect of initial solution pH on photo-induced reductive decomposition of perfluorooctanoic acid Chemosphere 107 2014 218 223 24439837 130 Park H. Vecitis C.D. Cheng J. Choi W. Mader B.T. Hoffmann M.R. Reductive defluorination of aqueous perfluorinated alkyl surfactants: effects of ionic headgroup and chain length J. Phys. Chem. 113 2009 690 696 131 Bürgi H. Schaffner T. Seiler J.P. The toxicology of iodate: a review of the literature Thyroid 11 2001 449 456 11396703 132 Gu P. Zhang C. Sun Z. Zhang H. Zhou Q. Lin S. Rong J. Hoffmann M.R. Enhanced photoreductive degradation of perfluorooctanesulfonate by UV irradiation in the presence of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid Chem. Eng. J. 379 2020 133 Zhang C. Qu Y. Zhao X. Zhou Q. Photoinduced reductive decomposition of perflurooctanoic acid in water: effect of temperature and ionic strength CLEAN – Soil Air Water 43 2015 223 228 134 Gu Y. Liu T. Wang H. Han H. Dong W. Hydrated electron based decomposition of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) in the VUV/sulfite system Sci. Total Environ. 607–608 2017 541 548 135 Sun Z. Zhang C. Xing L. Zhou Q. Dong W. Hoffmann M.R. UV/Nitrilotriacetic acid process as a novel strategy for efficient photoreductive degradation of perfluorooctanesulfonate Environ. Sci. Technol. 52 2018 2953 2962 29397704 136 Tian H. Gao J. Li H. Boyd S.A. Gu C. Complete defluorination of perfluorinated compounds by hydrated electrons generated from 3-Indole-acetic-acid in organomodified montmorillonite Sci. Rep. 6 2016 32949 27608658 137 Sun Z. Zhang C. Chen P. Zhou Q. Hoffmann M.R. Impact of humic acid on the photoreductive degradation of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) by UV/Iodide process Water Res. 127 2017 50 58 29031799 138 Jin L. Zhang P. Photochemical decomposition of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) in an anoxic alkaline solution by 185nm vacuum ultraviolet Chem. Eng. J. 280 2015 241 247 139 Giri R.R. Ozaki H. Guo X. Takanami R. Taniguchi S. Oxidative–reductive photodecomposition of perfluorooctanoic acid in water Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 11 2014 1277 1284 140 Lee Y. Lo S. Kuo J. Hsieh C. Decomposition of perfluorooctanoic acid by microwave-activated persulfate: effects of temperature, pH, and chloride ions Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 6 2012 17 25 141 Lee Y. Lo S. Kuo J. Lin Y. Persulfate oxidation of perfluorooctanoic acid under the temperatures of 20–40 C Chem. Eng. J. 198 2012 27 32 142 Qu Y. Zhang C. Li F. Chen J. Zhou Q. Photo-reductive deffuorination of perffuorooctanoic acid in water Water Res. 44 2010 2939 2947 20227745 143 Zhuo Q. Luo M. Guo Q. Yu G. Deng S. Xu Z. Yang B. Liang X. Electrochemical oxidation of environmentally persistent perfluorooctane sulfonate by a novel lead dioxide anode Electrochim. Acta 213 2016 358 367 144 Panchangam S.C. Lin A.Y.C. Tsai J.H. Lin C.F. Sonication-assisted photocatalytic decomposition of perffuorooctanoic acid Chemosphere 75 2009 654 660 19201007 145 Huang J. Wang X. Pan Z. Li X. Ling Y. Li L. Efficient degradation of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) by photocatalytic ozonation Chem. Eng. J. 296 2016 329 334 146 Wang L. Jiang X.Z. Liu Y.J. Degradation of bisphenol A and formation of hydrogen peroxide induced by glow discharge plasma in aqueous solutions J. Hazard Mater. 154 2008 1106 1114 18082947 147 Niu J. Li Y. Shang E. Xu Z. Liu J. Electrochemical oxidation of perfluorinated compounds in water Chemosphere 146 2016 526 538 26745381 148 Ahmed M.B. Alam M.M. Zhou J.L. Xu B. Johir M.a.H. Karmakar A.K. Rahman M.S. Hossen J. Hasan A.T.M.K. Moni M.A. Advanced treatment technologies efficacies and mechanism of per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances removal from water Process Saf. Environ. Protect. 136 2020 1 14 149 Sansotera M. Persico F. Rizzi V. Panzeri W. Pirola C. Bianchi C.L. Mele A. Navarrini W. The effect of oxygen in the photocatalytic oxidation pathways of perfluorooctanoic acid J. Fluor. Chem. 179 2015 159 168 150 Song Z. Tang H. Wang N. Zhu L. Reductive defluorination of perfluorooctanoic acid by hydrated electrons in a sulfite-mediated UV photochemical system J. Hazard Mater. 262 2013 332 338 24056245 151 Song Z. Tang H. Wang N. Zhu L. Reductive defluorination of perfluorooctanoic acid by hydrated electrons in a sulfite-mediated UV photochemical system J. Hazard Mater. 262 2013 332 338 24056245 152 Szajdzinska-Pietek E. Gebicki J.L. Pulse radiolytic investigation of perfluorinated surfactants in aqueous solutions Res. Chem. Intermed. 26 2000 897 912 153 Chen X. Lemal D. Functionalization of saturated fluorocarbons with and without light J. Fluor. Chem. 127 2006 1158 1167 154 Huang L. Dong W. Hou H. Investigation of the reactivity of hydrated electron toward perfluorinated carboxylates by laser flash photolysis Chem. Phys. Lett. 436 2007 124 128 155 Bentel M.J. Yu Y. Xu L. Li Z. Wong B.M. Men Y. J. Liu. Defluorination of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) with hydrated electrons: structural dependence and implications to PFAS remediation and management Environ. Sci. Technol. 53 2019 3718 3728 30874441 156 Huang D. Yin L. Niu J. Photoinduced hydrodefluorination mechanisms of perfluorooctanoic acid by the SiC/graphene catalyst Environ. Sci. Technol. 50 2016 5857 5863 27128100 157 EPA Agency USEP Emerging technologies of wastewater treatment and in-plant wet weather management 2013 EPA Washington, D. C. 1 188 158 Cates E.L. Pilot Scale Assessment of a Deployable Photocatalytic Treatment System Modified with BiPO4 Catalyst Particles for PFAS Destruction in Investigation-Derived Wastewaters 2020 Clemson University 159 Franke V. Schäfers M.D. Joos Lindberg J. Ahrens L. Removal of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) from tap water using heterogeneously catalyzed ozonation Environ. Sci. J. Integr. Environ. Res.: Water Res. Technol. 5 2019 1887 1896 160 Olatunde O.C. Kuvarega A.T. Onwudiwe D.C. Photo enhanced degradation of contaminants of emerging concern in waste water Emerg. Contamin. 6 2020 283 302 161 Azarpira H. Abtahi M. Sadani M. Rezaei S. Atafar Z. Mohseni S.M. Sarkhosh M. Shanbedi M. Alidadi H. Fakhri Y.J.J.O.P. Chemistry P.A. Photo-catalytic degradation of Trichlorophenol with UV/sulfite/ZnO process, simultaneous usage of homogeneous reductive and heterogeneous oxidative agents generator as a new approach of Advanced Oxidation/Reduction Processes (AO/RPs) 374 2019 43 51 162 Nzeribe N. Crimi M. Thagard S.M. Holsen T.M. Physico-chemical processes for the treatment of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): a review blossom Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49 2019 866 915 163 E.P.A. Globalpetrolprices.com Available from: https://www.globalpetrolprices.com/electricity_prices/ 2020