==== Front Biomed Res Int Biomed Res Int BMRI BioMed Research International 2314-6133 2314-6141 Hindawi 10.1155/2020/7947342 Research Article The Effect of Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Synbiotics on CD4 Counts in HIV-Infected Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6436-029XFu Yuan-Sheng 1 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0154-7190Chu Qin-Shu 1 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2282-361XAshuro Akililu Alemu 1 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3663-4035Di Dong-Sheng 1 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0312-5576Zhang Qi 1 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8853-0556Liu Xue-Mei 2 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8748-8082Fan Yin-Guang fanyinguang@163.com 1 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, Anhui 230032, China 2Liuzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 1 Tanzhongxi Road, Liuzhou, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 545000, China Academic Editor: Washington L. C. dos Santos 2020 26 11 2020 2020 79473427 7 2020 23 10 2020 13 11 2020 Copyright © 2020 Yuan-Sheng Fu et al.2020This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.Background Probiotics as a potential adjuvant therapy may improve the restoration of the intestinal CD4+ T-cell population in HIV-infected patients, whereas findings from clinical trials are inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to quantify the effects of probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic supplementation on CD4 counts in HIV-infected patients. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for relevant articles published up to March 20, 2020. Two authors independently performed the study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Data were pooled by using the random effects model, and weighted mean difference (WMD) was considered the summary effect size. Publication bias was evaluated by a funnel plot and Egger's test. Results The search strategy identified 1712 citations. After screening, a total of 16 RCTs with 19 trials were included in the meta-analysis. Pooling of the extracted data indicated no significant difference between the probiotics/prebiotics/synbiotics and placebo groups on CD4 counts (WMD = 3.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) -24.72 to 32.45, P = 0.791). In subgroup analysis, a significant increase in CD4 counts was found in the study with high risk of bias (WMD = 188, 95% CI 108.74 to 227.26, P ≤ 0.001). Egger's test showed no evidence of significant publication bias (P = 0.936). Conclusions In summary, the evidence for the efficacy of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics in improving HIV-infected patients' CD4 counts as presented in currently published RCTs is insufficient. Therefore, further comprehensive studies are needed to reveal the exact effect of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on CD4+ cell counts. Chinese National Center for AIDS/STD Control and PreventionK2020043Anhui Medical Universityxj201526 ==== Body 1. Introduction Individuals living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are characterized by progressive CD4+ T-cell depletion and immunodeficiency [1]. HIV infection alters gut microbial ecology [2], and a huge gastrointestinal (GI) pathology is observed even during primary infection. HIV enteropathy includes pronounced gut-associated CD4+ T-cell loss and an impaired gastrointestinal (GI) epithelial barrier [3–5]. These detrimental changes presumably result in microbial translocation and a loss of gut homeostasis [1, 6, 7], which in turn leads to chronic immune activation and disease progression [8, 9]. In addition, the efficacy of antiretroviral treatment in the GI tract seems to be poor, resulting in insufficient reconstitution of CD4+ T cells and incomplete viral suppression [10–12]. In view of the key role of decreasing bacterial translocation and proinflammatory cytokine production in the maintenance of gut homeostasis, new therapies aimed at restoring the integrity of the epithelial and gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) through oral prebiotics, probiotics, or synbiotics, as well as improving chronic immune activation, are promising new strategies to alleviate disease progression of HIV patients. Probiotics are defined as “live microorganisms which, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host” [13] and have an effect on the immunological response. They mainly stimulate the secretion of polymeric IgA, avoid the overgrowth and translocation of bacteria, and promote the development of regulatory T (Treg) cells through the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines [14–17]. Related to probiotics are prebiotics, indigestible food ingredients, generally oligosaccharides, that improve host health by selectively stimulating the growth of beneficial bacteria in the colon, such as Bifidobacteria and Lactobacilli [18, 19]. Prebiotics can increase the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), thereby reducing inflammation [20]. A study in mice also showed that prebiotics had an immunostimulatory effect on the induced site [21]. Synbiotics are products that combine prebiotics and probiotics, with a potentially synergistic action. Given the evidence of the beneficial effects of probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic consumption during the course of different viral infections and noninfectious diseases [22–25], a growing body of studies try to prove that the use of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics may be able to help preserve the immune function of HIV patients and consequently prevent the depletion of CD4+ T cells. However, the results are inconsistent across different studies [26–29]. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of available RCTs to evaluate the effect of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on CD4 counts in HIV patients. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Search Strategy This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Cochrane Handbook [30] and was reported in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement [31]. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies published before March 20, 2020. Studies were searched using the following search terms: (Probiotic OR Prebiotic OR Synbiotic OR Lactobacillus OR Bifidobacterium OR Saccharomyces OR “Streptococcus thermophiles” OR “fermented milk” OR “Escherichia coli”) AND (HIV/AIDS OR HIV OR AIDS OR “Human Immunodeficiency Virus” OR “Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome”) AND (Random OR Randomized OR “Randomized controlled trial” OR “controlled clinical trial” OR “randomized studies”). No restrictions were placed on the language and date. In addition, the references of the included articles were also screened to find other relevant publications. 2.2. Study Selection Studies were included with the following criteria: (1) RCTs with parallel or cross-over design, (2) studies conducted in HIV-1-infected adults over 18 years of age, (3) intervention using probiotics, prebiotics, or synbiotics, (4) comparison with placebo or control groups, and (5) CD4 counts as a primary or secondary outcome. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) nonrandomized clinical trials; (2) uncontrolled studies; (3) studies conducted in children or pregnant women; (4) letters, conference abstracts, case reports, reviews, or observational studies; or (5) studies not clearly reporting CD4 counts before or after the intervention. All studies were independently assessed by two authors, and any disagreement was resolved by a third researcher. 2.3. Data Extraction and Quality Assessment The following data were extracted: first author's name, year of publication, study design, country of study, sample size, age and gender of participants, details of interventions (including strain, dosage, and duration of intervention), intake of antiretroviral drugs or not, and the main results on the interested outcomes. For the missing data, the authors were contacted through e-mails to get relevant data. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated by using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool [32]. The following domains were assessed: random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, blinding of outcome assessment, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and other bias. The risk of bias for each domain was judged as low, high, or unclear according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. Any disagreements during the processes of data extraction and quality assessment were resolved by discussion. When consensus was not reached, a third investigator worked as an arbitrator. 2.4. Data Synthesis and Analysis The mean difference (MD) and standard deviation (SD) of CD4 counts between the probiotics/prebiotics/synbiotics and control groups were used to estimate the pooled effects. For the trials that provided more than one interval results, the last intervention results were included in the analysis. And weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was considered the summary effect size. Heterogeneity was assessed by Cochran's Q test and I-square (I2) statistic, and heterogeneity with an I2 value > 50% or P < 0.1 was considered significant [33]. To account for heterogeneity between articles, a random effects model was applied in this meta-analysis. The subgroup analysis was also carried out according to the type of intervention, intake of antiretroviral drugs or not, duration of intervention, income of the country, and risk of bias assessment. Furthermore, a funnel plot and Egger's linear regression were used to evaluate the potential publication bias. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata software version 14.0 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA) and RevMan version 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). A two-tailed P < 0.05 was considered to be significant. 3. Results A total of 1712 relevant articles were identified by searching the initial online databases. After duplicates were removed, the remaining 1247 studies were screened by title and abstract, 1182 of which were excluded, as they did not meet the eligibility criteria. The full text of the remaining 65 records was retrieved, and 16 studies (19 trials) that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis [2, 26–29, 34–44]. The process of study selection and reasons for exclusion are presented in Figure 1. 3.1. Characteristics of the Included Studies The majority of the studies were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials except one [40] randomized, nonblinded, placebo-controlled trial; one [42] randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial; and one [39] randomized, double-blind, cross-over placebo-controlled trial. These studies were published from 1998 to 2020, with sample sizes ranging from 10 to 340 individuals. The duration of intervention varied from 15 days to 52 weeks. Twelve trials administered probiotics [2, 26, 28, 34–36, 38–40, 42–44], while four trials administered prebiotics [27, 29, 44] and three trials administered synbiotics [37, 41, 44]. All of the included clinical trials were with two-arm parallel design except two studies [29, 44] which were with three-arm and four-arm parallel design. The three-arm and four-arm parallel design studies were considered two and three trials. The characteristics of the enrolled studies are summarized in Table 1. 3.2. Risk of Bias Assessment The risk of bias of the included studies is presented in Figure 2. Among the 19 trials, seven [26, 28, 29, 34, 37, 38] were judged to have a low risk of bias; eleven [2, 27, 35, 36, 39, 41-44] were categorized as having unclear risk and one [40] as having high risk of bias. All the included trials achieved adequate random sequence generation and blinding of outcome assessment. Seven [2, 27, 39–43] studies provided no description of allocation concealment procedure, and six [27, 36, 41, 44] studies were rated to have unclear risk of selective reporting bias. Attrition bias was found in one study [35] due to loss of participants during the study period. All of the trials except for one [40] had a high risk of bias in blindness of participants and key study personnel. 3.3. Meta-Analysis: Main Results In total, 16 RCTs with 19 treatment arms were included in the meta-analysis. Due to the relatively high heterogeneity among the included studies (I2 = 55.7%, P = 0.002), a random effects model was selected for quantitative synthesis. Overall, the pooled results indicated no significant difference after probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic supplementation in comparison with the placebo controls on CD4 counts (WMD = 3.86, 95% CI: –24.72 to 32.45, P = 0.791). The forest plot of the meta-analysis is shown in Figure 3. 3.4. Subgroup Analysis Because of the existence of heterogeneity, subgroup analysis was conducted based on the type of intervention (probiotics vs. prebiotics vs. synbiotics), duration of intervention (<30 vs. ≥30 days), intake of antiretroviral drugs or not (yes vs. no), income of country (high vs. low and middle), and risk of bias assessment (low vs. unclear vs. high). The result of subgroup analysis for trials with high risk of bias showed a significant increase in the CD4 counts compared to that with low and unclear risk of bias (WMD = 188; 95% CI, 108.74, 227.26; P ≤ 0.001). However, the other subgroup analysis revealed that none of the subgroups achieved statistical significance. A summary of the results of subgroup analysis is shown in Table 2. 3.5. Sensitivity Analysis and Publication Bias Sensitivity analysis was carried out by removing studies one by one to test the reliability of the results of meta-analysis. The results in Figure 4 showed that no matter which study was omitted, the overall statistical significance does not change. In addition, excluding these studies that provide more than one interval results does not change the significance of the findings (WMD = 4.28, 95% CI: –30.88 to 39.44, P = 0.81). Publication bias was assessed by a funnel plot and the result of Egger's test. Visual inspection of the funnel plot showed that RCTs are symmetrically scattered around the null vertical line, suggesting no bias (Figure 5). Egger's regression intercept test confirmed that there was no significant publication bias (P = 0.936). 4. Discussion In this study, we reviewed and performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effect of probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic supplementation on CD4 counts in HIV-infected patients. The results of our meta-analysis show that these interventions did not cause any significant change on the CD4 counts. In subgroup analysis, a significant increase in CD4 counts was found in studies with high risk of bias. However, subgroup analysis based on the type of intervention, intake of antiretroviral drugs or not, duration of intervention, and the income of the country of the included studies revealed no significant findings. Egger's test showed that the potential risk of publication bias is low, and sensitivity analysis supports the reliability of the results. These findings are counterintuitive because they appear to be inconsistent with some previous studies [17, 27, 45]. HIV infection dramatically alters the intestinal environment, leading to significant changes in the structural and functional characteristics of the intestinal tract, including microbial translocation and gut inflammation [46–49]. Probiotics, by inhibiting pathogenic bacteria and toxin production, promote gut homeostasis [50]. Therefore, it is expected that probiotic, prebiotic, or synbiotic administration may increase CD4 counts by modulating the gut microbial ecology of HIV patients. However, our study found no significant difference between probiotics/prebiotics/synbiotics and placebo groups in improving CD4 counts. One possible explanation is that in our meta-analysis, the absolute CD4+ T cell was reported as a predictor of immune status and disease progression and to be used in quantitative synthesis; however, the CD4+ percentage of total T cells as a strong independent predictor of immune status and disease progression [51] may be a more appropriate indicator for comparison. In addition, probiotics are not pharmaceutical substances. Probiotics can be administered as single strains or combination compounds, but different strains produce varied effects and how the single strains interact when coadministered was unclear. Moreover, the dose-response curves of most strains have not been described [52]. In summary, the heterogeneity of probiotic application and the limitations in medicine have hampered the scientific quality of clinical research on probiotics. Though the interesting outcome in this review is CD4 counts, several included studies [28, 29, 36, 38, 39, 41] also reported related results, namely, gut inflammation and microbial translocation levels, both of them were known to be associated with the progression and prognosis of HIV infection [8–10]. It should be mentioned that many of the trials reported only an improvement in one or two markers of inflammation, while there was no significant difference in the rest of the analysis. Similarly, very few of the studies [2, 26, 28, 37, 41, 43] have evaluated the level of immune markers such as CD8 counts and the CD4/CD8 ratio, which has been considered a prognostic parameter of non-AIDS morbidity [53, 54]. In summary, since the specific mechanism of probiotics in the gut repair is not clear, tracking these outcomes with CD4 counts may yield new and interesting findings, which may provide a broader perspective on the therapeutic potential of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics in HIV patients. Subgroup analysis revealed that risk of bias assessment may be the source of heterogeneity. However, other subgroup analysis failed to explain the heterogeneity between studies. Also, it should be mentioned that the effects of prebiotic, probiotic, and synbiotic intervention on CD4 counts were statistically significant in trials with high risk of bias. Since only one study was included in the subgroup with high risk of bias and the quality of the study was relatively low due to the failure of blind implementation, the results were hampered with uncertainty. Our results are different from previously published systematic reviews [55, 56]. Of note, two of the included studies reported improvement of CD4 counts among those receiving probiotic supplements [38, 42]; however, after analysis according to the data inclusion criteria of our meta-analysis, the result showed no significant difference. In addition, compared to previous reviews, our analysis specifically focused on RCTs and adult patients (≥18 years), and we performed a more comprehensive analysis on available evidences that may potentially be involved in the efficacy of probiotic administration on CD4 counts in HIV-infected patients. Our meta-analysis also included the updated references that have not been analyzed in other meta-analysis [26, 27, 37, 43, 57]. These reasons may cause our findings to be inconsistent with other reviews. This meta-analysis has some limitations. First, most of the included trials had relatively small sample sizes, which may lead to an underestimation of the intervention effect; therefore, large-scale trials are warranted. Second, heterogeneity exists between studies in regard to applied probiotic strain(s) and dosage. Therefore, future studies with more high-quality trials are recommended to determine the ideal number and combination of species or strains and their ideal dose for use in probiotic supplements. Third, different formations of administration (yogurt, milk, and capsule) were used in the included trials. Though in vitro analysis of the activity of the probiotics from yogurt or capsules did not differ [34], there may be discrepancies in the survival and colonization of probiotic strains in the intestinal tract. 5. Conclusion In summary, the results of this meta-analysis suggest that the evidence for the efficacy of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics in improving HIV-infected patients' CD4 counts from current RCTs is insufficient. The promotion of these interventions for the benefit of HIV-infected patients in clinical subjects should be implemented only when more valid evidence in this area is obtained. Future clinical studies with a well design and large sample size are needed to further elucidate probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics' mechanisms of action, safety profile, and clinical potential, in both support immune system reconstitution and longer-term health outcomes on HIV-infected patients. Acknowledgments This study was supported by Grants for Scientific Research of BSKY (xj201526) from Anhui Medical University and the program of technical support for Liuzhou City (K2020043) authorized by the Chinese National Center for AIDS/STD Control and Prevention. Data Availability The data is available upon request. Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. Authors' Contributions Y.S.F., Q.S.C., and Y.G.F. designed the study. Y.S.F., Q.S.C., and X.M.L. searched databases and performed the selection of studies. Y.S.F., A.A.A., and Q.Z. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. Y.G.F. and D.S.D. critically evaluated the review and commented on it. The final version was confirmed by all the authors for submission. Yuan-Sheng Fu and Qin-Shu Chu contributed equally to this work. Supplementary Materials Supplementary materials Detailed search strategy. Figure Legends Click here for additional data file. Figure 1 Flowchart of study selection. Figure 2 Risk of bias and its summary for the included trials. Figure 3 Forest plot of the effect of probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic supplementation on CD4 counts. The square in the figure represents the effect of the study, and the size of the square represents the weight of the study. The horizontal line represents the confidence interval of the effect value. The diamond in the figure represents the pooled effect. WMD: weighted mean difference; CI: confidence interval. Figure 4 Sensitivity analysis of probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic supplementation on CD4 counts. Figure 5 Funnel plot to test the publication bias in the included studies. Table 1 Characteristics of the included randomized controlled trials. Study (year) Study design Country Sample size Age (years) Sex Duration ARV Intervention (strain and daily dose) Main outcome measures Wolf et al. (1998) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial USA 35 23 to 50 M (95%) 21 d Not on ARV Lactobacillus reuteri (1010 cfu/day) Serum chemistry, hematology, immune profile, urinalysis, physical examination Heiser et al. (2004) Randomized, controlled trial USA 35 42.6 ± 7.4 M (100%) 12 wk All on ARV Acidophilus and Bifidobacteria (1.2 g/d) and soluble fiber (Proctor & Gamble, Cincinnati, 11 g/d) Diarrhea, CD4 count, HIV RNA Anukam et al. (2008) Randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial Nigeria 23 18 to 44 F (100%) 15 d Not on ARV Probiotic yogurt containing Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14 (2.5 × 109 cfu/day) Hematologic profiles, CD4 count, QoL Gori et al. (2011a) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Italy 31 38.3 ± 9.5 M (66%) 12 wk ARV naive Short chain galactooligosaccharides/long-chain fructooligosaccharides/pectin hydrolysate-derived acidic oligosaccharides (15 g/d) Gut microbiota composition, immunological markers, LPS, sCD14, NK cell activity Gori et al. (2011b) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Italy 33 38.3 ± 9.5 M (76%) 12 wk ARV naive Short-chain galactooligosaccharides/long-chain fructooligosaccharides/pectin hydrolysate-derived acidic oligosaccharides (30 g/d) Gut microbiota composition, immunological markers, LPS, sCD14, NK cell activity Hummelen et al. (2011) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Tanzania 53 NA F (100%) 25 wk Not on ARV Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14 (2 × 109 cfu/day) CD4 count, immune markers (IgG, IgE, IFN-γ, and IL-10) Hummelen et al. (2011) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Tanzania 111 NA F (86%) 4 wk ARV naive Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 (12.5 × 1010 cfu/day) and micronutrients CD4 count, hematology indicators Hemsworth et al. (2012) Randomized, double-blind, cross-over controlled trial Canada 42 47.6 ± 9.3 M (75%) 30 d All on ARV Yogurt containing micronutrients and Lactobacillus rhamnosus CAN-1 (minutes 109 cfu/mL) Immunologic parameters, nutritional and biochemical parameters Schunter et al. (2012) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial USA 27 47.5 M (100%) 4 wk All on ARV A synbiotic consists of 4 strains of probiotic bacteria (1010 each) plus 4 nondigestible, fermentable dietary fibers (2.5 g each) Bacterial translocation, CD4+ T-cells, CD8+ T-cells, CRP, sCD14 Gonzalez-Hernandez et al. (2012a) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Mexico 10 18 to 65 M (90%) 16 wk ARV naive Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 plus Bifidobacterium lactis Bi-07 at 109 cfu/mL Safety, QoL, CD4 count, cytokine level Gonzalez-Hernandez et al. (2012b) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Mexico 10 18 to 65 M (90%) 16 wk ARV naive 10 g fructooligosaccharides (FOS) Safety, QoL, CD4 count, cytokine level Gonzalez-Hernandez et al. (2012c) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Mexico 10 18 to 65 M (100%) 16 wk ARV naive (Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 plus Bifidobacterium lactis Bi-07 at 109 cfu/mL)+10 g FOS Safety, QoL, CD4 count, cytokine level Cahn et al. (2013) Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial Italy, Netherlands, UK, Thailand, US, Brazil, Argentina, Australia 340 39.6 M (82%) 52 wk Not on ARV Oligosaccharides (short-chain GOS, long-chain FOS, and pectin-derived AOS) and micronutrients CD4 count, plasma viral load, safety, and tolerability Yang et al. (2014) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial USA 17 49.6 ± 8.7 M (94%) 90 d All on ARV Bacillus coagulans GBI-30, 6086 (2 × 109 cfu/day) CD4 count, CD4 percentage, proinflammatory blood biomarkers Stiksrud et al. (2015) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Norway, Sweden 24 50.8 M (67%) 8 wk All on ARV Fermented skimmed milk supplemented with Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (108 cfu/mL), Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. Lactis B-12 (108 cfu/mL), and Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5 (107 cfu/mL) CD4 count,CD4/CD8 ratio, soluble inflammation markers, D-dimer, LPS, sCD14 Villar-Garcia et al. (2015) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Spain 44 47.5 M (84%) 12 wk All on ARV Saccharomyces boulardii (2 capsules 3 times a day or 6 × 107 living bacteria) Microbial translocation and inflammation markers, immunological and clinical data Adriana et al. (2016) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial USA 73 51 M (86%) 22 wk All on ARV Probiotic Visbiome Extra Strength sCD14, IL-6, CD4 count, CD4/CD8 ratio, sCD163 Serrano-Villar et al. (2019) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Spain 59 38 M (92%) 48 wk ARV naive PMT25341 (a mixture of prebiotics, probiotics, oligonutrients, essential amino acids, omega-3 fatty acids) CD4 count, CD4/CD8 ratio, markers of T-cell activation, bacterial translocation, inflammation Tenore et al. (2020) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Brazil 48 44.5 M (90%) 12 wk All on ARV Lactobacillus casei Shirota CD4 count, CD4/CD8 ratio, levels of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell activation, sCD14 NA: not available; ARV: antiretroviral; F: female; M: male; d: day; wk: week; NK: natural killer; LPS: lipopolysaccharide; IFN-γ: interferon-γ; QoL: quality of life; IL-10: interleukin-10; CRP: C-reactive protein. Table 2 Summary of subgroup analysis. Subgroup No. of trials WMD 95% CI P Weight I 2 (%) P for heterogeneity P for subgroup difference Intervention type 0.60  Probiotics 12 4.23 (-33.02, 41.47) 0.824 65.80 61.6 0.003  Prebiotics 4 -13.80 (-87.87, 60.28) 0.715 24.30 72.2 0.013  Synbiotics 3 34.67 (-30.38, 99.72) 0.296 10.17 0.0 0.866 Duration 0.91  <30 days 4 1.44 (-43.81, 46.68) 0.950 18.46 0.0 0.992  ≥30 days 15 4.57 (-30.48, 39.62) 0.798 81.54 65.5 ≤0.001 Intake of ARV 0.83  Yes 9 6.94 (-40.38, 54.26) 0.774 52.25 72.3 ≤0.001  No 10 0.81 (-32.18, 33.79) 0.962 47.45 23.7 0.225 Income of country 0.83  High 4 -1.33 (-44.16, 41.50) 0.952 68.62 72.1 ≤0.001  Low and middle 15 4.37 (-24.52, 33.26) 0.767 31.38 0.0 0.979 Risk of bias assessment ≤0.001  Low 7 -29.01 (-65.70, 7.69) 0.121 41.70 38.7 0.134  Unclear 11 9.82 (-12.97, 32.60) 0.399 52.16 0.0 0.800  High 1 188 (108.74, 227.26) ≤0.001 6.14 NA NA WMD: weighted mean difference; CI: confidence interval; NA: not available; ARV: antiretroviral. ==== Refs 1 Mellors J. W. Muñoz A. Giorgi J. V. Plasma viral load and CD4+ lymphocytes as prognostic markers of HIV-1 infection Annals of Internal Medicine 1997 126 12 946 954 10.7326/0003-4819-126-12-199706150-00003 2-s2.0-1842296349 9182471 2 Wolf B. W. Wheeler K. B. Ataya D. G. Garleb K. A. Safety and tolerance of Lactobacillus reuteri supplementation to a population infected with the human immunodeficiency virus Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association 1998 36 12 1085 1094 10.1016/S0278-6915(98)00090-8 2-s2.0-0032442239 9862651 3 Brenchley J. M. Schacker T. W. Ruff L. E. CD4+ T cell depletion during all stages of HIV disease occurs predominantly in the gastrointestinal tract The Journal of Experimental Medicine 2004 200 6 749 759 10.1084/jem.20040874 2-s2.0-4644342929 15365096 4 Mehandru S. Poles M. A. Tenner-Racz K. Primary HIV-1 infection is associated with preferential depletion of CD4+ T lymphocytes from effector sites in the gastrointestinal tract The Journal of Experimental Medicine 2004 200 6 761 770 10.1084/jem.20041196 2-s2.0-4644289983 15365095 5 Nazli A. Chan O. Dobson-Belaire W. N. Exposure to HIV-1 directly impairs mucosal epithelial barrier integrity allowing microbial translocation PLoS Pathogens 2010 6 4 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000852 6 Brenchley J. M. Price D. A. Schacker T. W. Microbial translocation is a cause of systemic immune activation in chronic HIV infection Nature Medicine 2006 12 12 1365 1371 10.1038/nm1511 2-s2.0-33845532053 17115046 7 Gori A. Tincati C. Rizzardini G. Early impairment of gut function and gut flora supporting a role for alteration of gastrointestinal mucosa in human immunodeficiency virus pathogenesis Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2008 46 2 757 758 10.1128/JCM.01729-07 2-s2.0-38949134533 18094140 8 Marchetti G. Cozzi-Lepri A. Merlini E. Microbial translocation predicts disease progression of HIV-infected antiretroviral-naive patients with high CD4+ cell count AIDS 2011 25 11 1385 1394 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283471d10 2-s2.0-85027956964 21505312 9 Reus S. Portilla J. Sánchez-Payá J. Low-Level HIV Viremia Is Associated With Microbial Translocation and Inflammation JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 2013 62 2 129 134 10.1097/qai.0b013e3182745ab0 2-s2.0-84872875758 23018379 10 Marchetti G. Bellistrì G. M. Borghi E. Microbial translocation is associated with sustained failure in CD4+ T-cell reconstitution in HIV-infected patients on long-term highly active antiretroviral therapy AIDS 2008 22 15 2035 2038 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283112d29 2-s2.0-53549129725 18784466 11 Massanella M. Negredo E. Pérez-Álvarez N. CD4 T-cell hyperactivation and susceptibility to cell death determine poor CD4 T-cell recovery during suppressive HAART AIDS 2010 24 7 959 968 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328337b957 2-s2.0-77950947891 20177358 12 Merlini E. Bai F. Bellistrì G. M. Tincati C. d'Arminio Monforte A. Marchetti G. Evidence for polymicrobic flora translocating in peripheral blood of HIV-infected patients with poor immune response to antiretroviral therapy PLoS One 2011 6 4 10.1371/journal.pone.0018580 2-s2.0-79954536349 21494598 13 Hill C. Guarner F. Reid G. Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic Gastroenterology & hepatology 2014 11 8 506 514 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66 2-s2.0-84905675648 24912386 14 Senok A. C. Ismaeel A. Y. Botta G. A. Probiotics: facts and myths Clinical Microbiology and Infection : The Official Publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 2005 11 12 958 966 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01228.x 2-s2.0-28644441328 16307549 15 Parvez S. Malik K. A. Ah Kang S. Kim H. Y. Probiotics and their fermented food products are beneficial for health Journal of Applied Microbiology 2006 100 6 1171 1185 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02963.x 2-s2.0-33646695914 16696665 16 Sartor R. B. Microbial influences in inflammatory bowel diseases Gastroenterology 2008 134 2 577 594 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.11.059 2-s2.0-38649115342 18242222 17 Trois L. Cardoso E. M. Miura E. Use of probiotics in HIV-infected children: a randomized double-blind controlled study Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 2008 54 1 19 24 10.1093/tropej/fmm066 2-s2.0-39049147662 17878180 18 Gibson G. R. Roberfroid M. B. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics The Journal of Nutrition 1995 125 6 1401 1412 10.1093/jn/125.6.1401 7782892 19 Gibson G. R. Hutkins R. Sanders M. E. Expert consensus document: the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of prebiotics Gastroenterology & hepatology 2017 14 8 491 502 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.75 2-s2.0-85027283029 28611480 20 Felizardo R. J. F. Watanabe I. K. M. Dardi P. Rossoni L. V. Câmara N. O. S. The interplay among gut microbiota, hypertension and kidney diseases: the role of short-chain fatty acids Pharmacological Research 2019 141 366 377 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.01.019 2-s2.0-85060097276 30639376 21 Manhart N. Spittler A. Bergmeister H. Mittlböck M. Roth E. Influence of fructooligosaccharides on Peyer's patch lymphocyte numbers in healthy and endotoxemic mice Nutrition 2003 19 7-8 657 660 10.1016/S0899-9007(03)00059-5 2-s2.0-0037707573 12831954 22 Xia X. Chen J. Xia J. Role of probiotics in the treatment of minimal hepatic encephalopathy in patients with HBV-induced liver cirrhosis The Journal of International Medical Research 2018 46 9 3596 3604 10.1177/0300060518776064 2-s2.0-85052801085 29806520 23 Sarkar S. R. Banerjee S. Gut microbiota in neurodegenerative disorders Journal of Neuroimmunology 2019 328 98 104 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2019.01.004 2-s2.0-85059904946 30658292 24 Palma E. Recine N. Domenici L. Giorgini M. Pierangeli A. Panici P. B. Long-term Lactobacillus rhamnosus BMX 54 application to restore a balanced vaginal ecosystem: a promising solution against HPV-infection BMC Infectious Diseases 2018 18 1 p. 13 10.1186/s12879-017-2938-z 2-s2.0-85051092783 29304768 25 Sarin S. K. Pande A. Schnabl B. Microbiome as a therapeutic target in alcohol-related liver disease Journal of Hepatology 2019 70 2 260 272 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.10.019 2-s2.0-85058417389 30658727 26 de Barros Tenore S. Avelino-Silva V. I. Costa P. R. Immune effects of Lactobacillus casei Shirota in treated HIV-infected patients with poor CD4+ T-cell recovery AIDS 2020 34 3 381 389 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002420 31714353 27 Cahn P. Ruxrungtham K. Gazzard B. The immunomodulatory nutritional intervention NR100157 reduced CD4+ T-cell decline and immune activation: a 1-year multicenter randomized controlled double-blind trial in HIV-infected persons not receiving antiretroviral therapy (the BITE study) Clinical Infectious Diseases : An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2013 57 1 139 146 10.1093/cid/cit171 2-s2.0-84878875269 23511299 28 Stiksrud B. Nowak P. Nwosu F. C. Reduced Levels of D-dimer and Changes in Gut Microbiota Composition After Probiotic Intervention in HIV-Infected Individuals on Stable ART JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 2015 70 4 329 337 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000784 2-s2.0-84945897500 26258571 29 Gori A. Rizzardini G. van't Land B. Specific prebiotics modulate gut microbiota and immune activation in HAART-naive HIV-infected adults: results of the "COPA" pilot randomized trial Mucosal Immunology 2011 4 5 554 563 10.1038/mi.2011.15 2-s2.0-84860390171 21525866 30 Fellow J. P. H. S. S. V. Deeks J. J. Selecting Studies and Collecting Data 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 31 Moher D. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement Annals of Internal Medicine 2009 151 4 264 9, W64 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 2-s2.0-69149107165 19622511 32 Higgins J. P. T. Altman D. G. Gotzsche P. C. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials BMJ 2011 343 oct18 2 p. d5928 10.1136/bmj.d5928 2-s2.0-84859001212 22008217 33 Higgins J. P. T. Thompson S. G. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis Statistics in Medicine 2002 21 11 1539 1558 10.1002/sim.1186 2-s2.0-0037098199 12111919 34 Hummelen R. Changalucha J. Butamanya N. L. Effect of 25 weeks probiotic supplementation on immune function of HIV patients Gut Microbes 2014 2 2 80 85 10.4161/gmic.2.2.15787 35 Hummelen R. Hemsworth J. Changalucha J. Effect of micronutrient and probiotic fortified yogurt on immune-function of anti-retroviral therapy naive HIV patients Nutrients 2011 3 10 897 909 10.3390/nu3100897 2-s2.0-80055006971 22254084 36 Villar-García J. Hernández J. J. Güerri-Fernández R. Effect of Probiotics (Saccharomyces boulardii) on Microbial Translocation and Inflammation in HIV-Treated Patients JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 2015 68 3 256 263 10.1097/qai.0000000000000468 2-s2.0-84923642248 25469528 37 Serrano-Villar S. de Lagarde M. Vázquez-Castellanos J. Effects of immunonutrition in advanced human immunodeficiency virus disease: a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial (Promaltia Study) Clinical Infectious Diseases : An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2019 68 1 120 130 10.1093/cid/ciy414 2-s2.0-85056586425 29788075 38 Yang O. O. Kelesidis T. Cordova R. Khanlou H. Immunomodulation of antiretroviral drug-suppressed chronic HIV-1 infection in an oral probiotic double-blind placebo-controlled trial AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses 2014 30 10 988 995 10.1089/aid.2014.0181 2-s2.0-84907507106 25127924 39 Hemsworth J. C. Hekmat S. Reid G. Micronutrient supplemented probiotic yogurt for HIV-infected adults taking HAART in London, Canada Gut Microbes 2014 3 5 414 419 10.4161/gmic.21248 2-s2.0-85046982180 40 Heiser C. R. Ernst J. A. Barrett J. T. French N. Schutz M. Dube M. P. Probiotics, Soluble Fiber, and L-Glutamine (GLN) Reduce Nelfinavir (NFV)or Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/r)-related Diarrhea Journal of the International Association of Physicians in AIDS Care 2016 3 4 121 129 10.1177/154510970400300403 2-s2.0-15744373328 41 Schunter M. Chu H. Hayes T. L. Randomized pilot trial of a synbiotic dietary supplement in chronic HIV-1 infection BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012 12 1 10.1186/1472-6882-12-84 2-s2.0-84863002605 42 Anukam K. C. Osazuwa E. O. Osadolor H. B. Bruce A. W. Reid G. Yogurt containing probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and L. reuteri RC-14 helps resolve moderate diarrhea and increases CD4 count in HIV/AIDS patients Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology 2008 42 3 239 243 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31802c7465 2-s2.0-39749172415 18223503 43 Andrade A. Overton E. T. Effects of the probiotic Visbiome Extra Strength on gut microbiome & immune activation markers 2016 https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02706717 44 González-Hernández L. A. Jave-Suarez L. F. Fafutis-Morris M. Synbiotic therapy decreases microbial translocation and inflammation and improves immunological status in HIV-infected patients: a double-blind randomized controlled pilot trial Nutrition Journal 2012 11 1 10.1186/1475-2891-11-90 2-s2.0-84867897414 45 Irvine S. L. Hummelen R. Hekmat S. W. N. Looman C. Habbema J. D. F. Reid G. Probiotic yogurt consumption is associated with an increase of CD4 count among people living with HIV/AIDS Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology 2010 44 9 e201 e205 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181d8fba8 2-s2.0-77957607349 20463586 46 Mahy M. Stover J. Stanecki K. Stoneburner R. Tassie J. M. Estimating the impact of antiretroviral therapy: regional and global estimates of life-years gained among adults Sexually transmitted infections 2010 86 Suppl 2 ii67 ii71 10.1136/sti.2010.046060 21106518 47 Salas J. T. Chang T. L. Microbiome in human immunodeficiency virus infection Clinics in Laboratory Medicine 2014 34 4 733 745 10.1016/j.cll.2014.08.005 2-s2.0-84923860698 25439273 48 Dagenais-Lussier X. Mouna A. Routy J. P. Current topics in HIV-1 pathogenesis: the emergence of deregulated immuno-metabolism in HIV-infected subjects Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews 2015 26 6 603 613 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2015.09.001 2-s2.0-84949098455 26409789 49 Ponte R. Mehraj V. Ghali P. Couëdel-Courteille A. Cheynier R. Routy J. P. Reversing gut damage in HIV infection: using non-human primate models to instruct clinical research eBioMedicine 2016 4 40 49 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.01.028 2-s2.0-84957092023 26981570 50 Cunningham-Rundles S. Ahrné S. Johann-Liang R. Effect of probiotic bacteria on microbial host defense, growth, and immune function in human immunodeficiency virus type-1 infection Nutrients 2011 3 12 1042 1070 10.3390/nu3121042 2-s2.0-84455208831 22292110 51 Moore D. M. Hogg R. S. Yip B. Craib K. Wood E. Montaner J. S. G. CD4 percentage is an independent predictor of survival in patients starting antiretroviral therapy with absolute CD4 cell counts between 200 and 350 cells/μ L HIV Medicine 2006 7 6 383 388 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2006.00397.x 2-s2.0-33746430907 16903983 52 Ouwehand A. C. A review of dose-responses of probiotics in human studies Beneficial Microbes 2017 8 2 143 151 10.3920/BM2016.0140 2-s2.0-85018288530 28008787 53 Castilho J. L. Shepherd B. E. Koethe J. CD4+/CD8+ ratio, age, and risk of serious noncommunicable diseases in HIV-infected adults on antiretroviral therapy AIDS 2016 30 6 899 908 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001005 2-s2.0-84960449114 26959354 54 Serrano-Villar S. Sainz T. Lee S. A. HIV-infected individuals with low CD4/CD8 ratio despite effective antiretroviral therapy exhibit altered T cell subsets, heightened CD8+ T cell activation, and increased risk of non-AIDS morbidity and mortality PLoS Pathogens 2014 10 5 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004078 2-s2.0-84901686066 24831517 55 Miller H. Ferris R. Phelps B. R. The effect of probiotics on CD4 counts among people living with HIV: a systematic review Beneficial Microbes 2016 7 3 345 351 10.3920/BM2015.0163 2-s2.0-84971672861 27013461 56 Carter G. M. Esmaeili A. Shah H. Probiotics in human immunodeficiency virus infection: a systematic review and evidence synthesis of benefits and risks Open forum infectious diseases 2016 3 4 10.1093/ofid/ofw164 2-s2.0-84996538572 27747250 57 Hemsworth J. C. Hekmat S. Reid G. Micronutrient supplemented probiotic yogurt for HIV-infected adults taking HAART in London, Canad Gut Microbes 2014 3 5 414 419