==== Front Medicine (Baltimore) Medicine (Baltimore) MEDI Medicine 0025-7974 1536-5964 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Hagerstown, MD MD-D-20-10371 10.1097/MD.0000000000023403 23403 7100 Research Article Study Protocol Clinical Trial Comparison between minimally invasive percutaneously and open pedicle screw fixation of thoracolumbar fracture Prospective comparative study protocolGui Qianhuan MD Su Xiaotao MD Lu Zhenghao MD http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5139-7840He Jun MD∗ Department of Spine Surgery, the Affiliated Nanhua Hospital of University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China. ∗ Correspondence: Jun He, Department of Spine Surgery, the Affiliated Nanhua Hospital of University of South China, Hengyang 421002, Hunan, China (e-mail: hejun6040@sina.com). 4 12 2020 04 12 2020 99 49 e2340321 10 2020 29 10 2020 Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.2020This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0Keywords minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw fixationprospectivestudy protocolthoracolumbar fractureScientific Research Project of Hunan Education Department18C0473Jun HeOPEN-ACCESSTRUECOUNTRYUNITED STATES ==== Body 1 Introduction Thoracolumbar fracture is familiar spinal injuries in the high-energy violence and traffic accidents, accounting for more than 50 percent of the total number of spinal fractures.[1–3] Despite some thoracolumbar fractures patients who do not have neurologic dysfunction respond well to conservative treatment, short-segment pedicle screw fixation has been proven to be a more effective approach to resort vertebral height, correct kyphosis and stabilize fractures.[4,5] In the past few years, minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (MIPPSF) as the alternative approach to treat the thoracolumbar fractures, aims to decrease the injury of soft tissue and perioperative complications. Originally used to treat degenerative spine diseases, the MIPPSF system have been demonstrated to be effective in decreasing blood loss and complications, avoiding muscle and tissue injury, and shortening the hospital stays and recovery times.[6–8] Although there are similar advantages in treating the thoracolumbar fractures, the evidence is mostly limited to low-energy and low-level observational studies. In addition, the lack of long-term efficacy of the MIPPSF in treating the thoracolumbar fractures further limits the available evidence for this technique.[9–13] Therefore, the purpose of our study is to compare the radiological and clinical results of thoracolumbar spine injury stabilized by standard open pedicle screw fixation (OPSF) and the MIPPSF system. We hypothesize that MIPPSF technique will lead to better clinical and radiological outcomes compared to OPSF technique. 2 Materials and methods 2.1 Study design and eligibility criteria This study is designed as a prospective non-randomized cohort study, which will be conducted at our own hospital between November 13, 2020 to November 14, 2021. This study has been granted through the institutional review committee of the Affiliated Nanhua Hospital of University of South China (with the number is NY7002). All the patients participating in the study will give the written informed consent. Afterwards, the scheme of our experiment has been registered with the Research Registry (researchregistry6140). Patients will be alternately included to both groups according to the following inclusion criteria: patients with single level thoracolumbar fracture (T11-L2); Patients who underwent surgery for less than a week after trauma; the absence of neurological deficits and no other significant injury. Patients with pedicle fracture, pathological fracture, severe bone loss, or prior spinal surgery owing to the trauma are excluded from our research. Patients who need the direct decompression of the spinal canal because of neurological deficits are also be excluded (Fig. 1). Figure 1 Flow diagram of the study. 2.2 Operation procedure MIPPSF is conducted via adopting a new type of percutaneous pedicle screw system independently developed and improved through our hospital, while OPSF adopts the traditional system of thoracolumbar pedicle screw. All the operations will be implemented via a same senior surgeon. After the general anesthesia, the patients receiving OPSF will be placed in a prone position. A conventional incision is utilized to expose fractured vertebra and its adjacent vertebrae. These vertebrae are fixed with pedicle screws, and then the appropriate distraction reduction is performed. No bone graft spinal fusion is implemented. The MIPPSF patient is anesthetized and then lies prone with the abdomen away from the operating table. Spinal fusion with bone graft is not performed. After the MIPPSF patient is anesthetized, the abdomen leaves the operating table and the patient lies in a prone position. Fractured vertebra is located with C-arm X-ray system. The fascia and skin are cut 1 cm outside the 2 pedicles projections, and then the trocar is inserted, with the trocar tip at 3 o ‘clock and 9 o ‘clock in the right pedicle, respectively. The core needles are removed and the wires are inserted. After the spinal canal is dilated and tapped with the thread tap, the novel independently improved pedicle screws are inserted, and then the titanium rods are inserted. The improved percutaneous pedicle screws possess various bending angles, which is conducive to automatic fracture reduction in the process of traction. Subsequently, while tightening the screw, the surgeon reverses the rotation of the outer nut at the end of the improved screw. Ultimately, C-arm X-ray is used to check the reduction again. The incision is cleaned and then closed, and then the drainage strip is placed. 2.3 Clinical and radiologic assessments The primary clinical outcome in our study is visual analog scale score, the other outcomes are low back outcome score, intraoperative bleeding, length of hospital stay, and complications. The Cobb angle and vertebral height ratio are detected via the imaging data before and after the fracture vertebra. The visual analog scale score, low back outcome score, complications, and radiologic outcomes will be measured at 3, 6, and 12 months. 2.4 Sample size calculation We estimate that when there are 30 participants in each group, our experiment will have more than 80 percent of the ability to determine the clinically significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of changes in the scores of pain assessed by visual analog scale score. This assumes that, on the basis of former literature, the mean difference in scores between groups is 20 mm, the combined standard deviation is 35 mm based on the preliminary data, and the alpha level is 5%. According to this estimate, a total of 66 patients will be required and a 10% drop-out allowance will be given. 2.5 Statistical analysis The software of SPSS v22.0 is utilized to implement the statistical analyses (IBM, Chicago, IL). The comparison of demographic characteristics between the 2 groups, follow-up time and clinical hip scores are carried out by descriptive statistics. The statistical analysis contained Fisher exact test for the categorical variables and Student t test for the continuous variables. All the values of probability were 2-tailed, and when the P value less then .05, it can be viewed as the statistically significant. 3 Discussion The major purpose of our study is to compare the radiological and clinical results of thoracolumbar spine injury stabilized by standard OPSF and the MIPPSF system. We hypothesize that MIPPSF technique will lead to better clinical and radiological outcomes compared to OPSF technique. The biggest limitations of this study is non-randomized design, because we cannot obtain the approval of the Ethics Committee for randomized research, so even if the 2 groups of patients are comparable, it may cause the biased choice of patients. The in-depth randomized studies in this direction may make the application of this procedure clearer. Author contributions Conceptualization: Qianhuan Gui, Jun He, Zhenghao Lu. Data curation: Qianhuan Gui, Xiaotao Su. Formal analysis: Qianhuan Gui, Xiaotao Su. Funding acquisition: Jun He. Investigation: Qianhuan Gui, Xiaotao Su. Methodology: Xiaotao Su, Jun He. Project administration: Jun He. Resources: Zhenghao Lu, Jun He. Software: Zhenghao Lu, Xiaotao Su. Supervision: Jun He. Validation: Qianhuan Gui, Zhenghao Lu. Visualization: Xiaotao Su, Zhenghao Lu. Writing – original draft: Qianhuan Gui. Writing – review & editing: Zhenghao Lu, Jun He. Abbreviations: MIPPSF = Minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, OPSF = open pedicle screw fixation. How to cite this article: Gui Q, Su X, Lu Z, He J. Comparison between minimally invasive percutaneously and open pedicle screw fixation of thoracolumbar fracture: prospective comparative study protocol. Medicine. 2020;99:49(e23403). This work was funded by Scientific Research Project of Hunan Education Department (18C0473). The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study. ==== Refs References [1] Wang X Yang R Sun H Different effects of intravenous, topical, and combined application of tranexamic acid on patients with thoracolumbar fracture . World Neurosurg 2019 ;127 :e1185 –9 .31004853 [2] Mohamadi A Googanian A Ahmadi A Comparison of surgical or nonsurgical treatment outcomes in patients with thoracolumbar fracture with score 4 of TLICS: a randomized, single-blind, and single-central clinical trial . Medicine (Baltimore) 2018 ;97 :e9842 .29419692 [3] Su Y Wang X Ren D A finite element study on posterior short segment fixation combined with unilateral fixation using pedicle screws for stable thoracolumbar fracture . Medicine (Baltimore) 2018 ;97 :e12046 .30142856 [4] Kanna RM Raja DC Shetty AP Thoracolumbar fracture dislocations without spinal cord injury: classification and principles of management . Global Spine J 2019 ;Nov 22;2192568219890568. doi: 10.1177/2192568219890568. Online ahead of print . [5] Wang W Duan K Ma M Tranexamic acid decreases visible and hidden blood loss without affecting prethrombotic state molecular markers in transforaminal thoracic interbody fusion for treatment of thoracolumbar fracture-dislocation . Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2018 ;43 :E734 –9 .29189568 [6] Kocis J Kelbl M Kocis T Percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation for treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures . Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2020 ;46 :147 –52 .30167741 [7] Phan K Rao PJ Mobbs RJ Percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation for treatment of thoracolumbar fractures: systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies . Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2015 ;135 :85 –92 .26051881 [8] Wang H Zhou Y Li C Comparison of open versus percutaneous pedicle screw fixation using the sextant system in the treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures . Clin Spine Surg 2017 ;30 :E239 –46 .28323706 [9] Yang P Chen K Zhang K Percutaneous short-segment pedicle instrumentation assisted with O-arm navigation in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures . J Orthop Translat 2019 ;21 :1 –7 .32042590 [10] Wang HW Li CQ Zhou Y Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation through the pedicle of fractured vertebra in the treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures using Sextant system: an analysis of 38 cases . Chin J Traumatol 2010 ;13 :137 –45 .20515590 [11] Fan Y Zhang J He X A Comparison of the mini-open Wiltse approach with pedicle screw fixation and the percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for neurologically intact thoracolumbar fractures . Med Sci Monit 2017 ;23 :5515 –21 .29151568 [12] Fu Z Zhang X Shi Y Comparison of surgical outcomes between short-segment open and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation techniques for thoracolumbar fractures . Med Sci Monit 2016 ;22 :3177 –85 .27602557 [13] Lee JK Jang JW Kim TW Percutaneous short-segment pedicle screw placement without fusion in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: is it effective?: comparative study with open short-segment pedicle screw fixation with posterolateral fusion . Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2013 ;155 :2305 –12 .24018981