==== Front Cancer Cell Int Cancer Cell Int Cancer Cell International 1475-2867 BioMed Central London 1676 10.1186/s12935-020-01676-z Primary Research Peritumoral plasmacytoid dendritic cells predict a poor prognosis for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after curative resection Hu Zhi-Qiang huzhiqiang924@sina.com 12 Zhou Zheng-Jun zhouzhengjun1221@126.com 12 Luo Chu-Bin drluocb@163.com 12 Xin Hao-Yang hyxin12@fudan.edu.cn 12 Li Jia 845538331@qq.com 12 Yu Song-Yang 19145635119@163.com 12 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8526-5221Zhou Shao-Lai zhoushaolai99@sina.com 12 1 grid.8547.e0000 0001 0125 2443Liver Surgery Department, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 136 Yi Xue Yuan Road, Shanghai, 200032 China 2 grid.419897.a0000 0004 0369 313XKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai, 200032 China 4 12 2020 4 12 2020 2020 20 58219 8 2020 24 11 2020 © The Author(s) 2020Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.Background Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) are present in various primary and metastatic human neoplasms; however, their clinical significance in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is not clear. Methods To evaluate pDCs’ distributions in and around tumors as well as their potential function and predictive value for prognosis in patients undergoing curative resection, we performed immunohistochemistry to examine the expression of pDC marker BDCA2, and CD3, CD4, CD8 and Foxp3 in intratumoral and peritumoral tissues from 359 patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and compared with prognostic and clinicopathologic factors. Results Results showed that patients with high numbers of BDCA2+ pDCs in peritumoral tissues were more likely to have elevated levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and gamma-glutamyl transferase, larger and more tumors, advanced tumor-node-metastasis staging, more vascular/bile duct invasion, and lymphatic metastasis in association with greater chance of recurrence and shorter overall survival. Peritumoral tissues with larger numbers of pDCs also showed increased Foxp3+ regulatory T cell infiltration, both of which were found to be independent factors for predicting time to recurrence and overall survival. By contrast, patient outcomes were not associated with the presence of intratumoral pDCs. Conclusions Peritumoral pDC infiltration may indicate an immune tolerogenic peritumor microenvironment and can be used to predict a poor prognosis for patients undergoing curative resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12935-020-01676-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Keywords Plasmacytoid dendritic cellsIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinomaTreg cellsPrognosisRecurrencehttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001809National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNo. 81972708No. 81773069Zhou Zheng-Jun Zhou Shao-Lai National Key R&D Program of ChinaNo. 2018YFA0109400Zhou Zheng-Jun http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100013105Shanghai Rising-Star Program18QA1401200Zhou Shao-Lai Municipal Human Resources Development Program for Outstanding Young Talents in Medical and Health Sciences in Shanghai2018YQ14Zhou Shao-Lai issue-copyright-statement© The Author(s) 2020 ==== Body Introduction Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is one of most common types of cancer in the liver, second only to hepatocellular carcinoma, and the incidence of ICC continues to increase worldwide [1, 2]. Curative resection for ICC relies on early detection, such as by clinical screenings with advanced diagnostic techniques. Nevertheless, the high rate of ICC recurrence shortens the long-term survival of patients [3, 4]. To better predict recurrence in patients after curative resection and enable more effective treatments, the molecular mechanisms contributing to disease recurrence and progression need to be elucidated. The types and densities of immune and nonimmune stromal cells as well as their locations within the tumor microenvironment have been identified as prognostic factors for several types of cancer [5–7]. Of note, ICC typically exhibits a prominent stromal reaction involving tissue-associated macrophages, tumor-associated neutrophils, and various types of T lymphocytes [8]. Immune/stromal cells are increasingly implicated in controlling invasive tumor growth and metastasis, resistance to chemotherapies and targeted agent therapies, and immunosuppression in patients with ICC [9]. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), which generate large amounts of type I interferon, represent a first line of defense against infection [10]. There is evidence that pDCs regulate T cell-mediated adaptive and innate immunity and thus likely contribute to cancer immunity [11, 12]. pDCs are responsible for creating an immunosuppressive microenvironment in a variety of tumors [13]. For example, the immune tolerance induced by pDCs is crucial for the progression of ovarian cancers, and high numbers of pDCs in breast tumors are associated with dissemination and relapse [14, 15]. Notably, the growth of tumors and their metastasis to bone tissues are suppressed when pDCs are depleted [16]. pDCs also influence the progression of multiple myeloma by promoting the survival and growth of tumors and contributing to chemotaxis and drug resistance [17]. Although pDCs have been observed in various tumor types, their distribution within these tumors and their potential interactions with other cells are largely unexplored [13]. To address this, we characterized the distribution of pDCs in ICC and determined if they can be associated with patient outcomes. Furthermore, we investigated the potential mechanism (s) by which pDCs regulate the immune microenvironment in ICC tumors. Materials and methods Patients This study included 359 patients with ICC that underwent curative resection at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, between 2009 and 2013. Patients were excluded from the analysis if they had palliative surgery or prior intervention (such as transhepatic artery embolization and chemo- or radiotherapy). Patients who developed another type of primary malignancy or inflammatory disease during the follow-up were also excluded. Informed consent was obtained from all participants, and the study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Zhongshan Hospital. Detailed information is provided in Table 1.Table 1 Clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n = 359) Characteristics Number (%) Age, year (≤ 50 versus > 50) 74/285 (20.6/79.4) Sex (female versus male) 153/206 (42.6/57.4) HBsAg (negative versus positive) 252/107 (70.2/29.8) AFP, ng/ml (≤ 20 versus > 20) 317/42 (88.3/11.7) CA199 (≤ 36 versus > 36) 149/210 (41.5/58.5) GGT,U/L (≤ 54 versus > 54) 172/187 (47.9/52.1) Liver cirrhosis (no versus yes) 273/86 (76.0/24.0) Tumor size, cm (≤ 5 versus > 5) 159/200 (44.3/55.7) Tumor number (single versus multiple) 258/101 (71.9/28.1) Microvascular/bile duct invasion (no versus yes) 282/77 (78.6/21.4) Lymphatic metastasis (no versus yes) 306/53 (85.2/14.8) Tumor encapsulation (complete versus none) 62/297 (17.3/82.7) Tumor differentiation (I + II versus III + IV) 181/178 (50.4/49.6) TNM stage (I versus II + III + IV) 182/177 (50.7/49.3) AFP alpha-fetoprotein, GGT gamma glutamyl transferase, CA 19-9 carbohydrate antigen 19-9, TNM tumor-node-metastasis Diagnostic criteria Diagnoses from histopathology were in accordance with World Health Organization criteria. Tumor differentiation was graded according to Edmondson and Steiner [18], and tumor staging was determined via tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) grading according to the 2017 guidelines of the International Union Against Cancer. Liver functioning was assessed via Child–Pugh scoring [19]. Clinical outcomes Patients were monitored after the procedure as described previously [20]. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from the surgery until death or the final follow-up, when data from surviving patients were censored, in December of 2018. Time to recurrence (TTR) was defined as the time from the surgery until intrahepatic recurrence or extrahepatic metastasis was diagnosed [21]. Immunohistochemical analyses Immunohistochemistry was performed on tissue microarrays comprising two 2-mm-diameter biopsy samples (spots) of 359 intratumoral and 322 peritumoral tissues. The absence of necrotic or hemorrhagic damage was confirmed by hematoxylin and eosin staining. After antigen retrieval, tissue sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C with the following antibodies: anti-human blood dendritic cell antigen 2 (anti-BDCA2) (1:200; Abnova), anti-CD3 (clone F7.2.38) and anti-CD8 (clone C8/144B) (1:50; DakoCytomation), anti-CD4 (clone EPR6855) (1:100; Epitomics), and Foxp3 (clone 236A/E7) (1:100, Abcam). The sections were then incubated for 30 min at 37 °C with horseradish-peroxidase secondary antibodies from the EnVision Detection kit (GK500705, Gene Tech, China) and visualized by reacting with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine after avidin–biotin-mediated amplification, as described previously [22]. Mayer’s hematoxylin was used for counterstaining. Omission of the primary antibody served as a negative control. The numbers of immunopositive cells in each tissue spot were quantified by three investigators blinded to the sample identification and expressed as mean number (± standard deviation) of cells/spot of the triplicate results. In subsequent analyses, the medians were used as the cutoff values unless specified otherwise. Thus, for BDCA + pDCs, those with ≤ 28 cells/spot were assigned to the pDCslow group, and those with > 28 cells/spot were assigned to the pDCshigh group. For Foxp3 + T regulatory (Treg) cells, those with ≤ 7 cells/spot were assigned to the Tregslow group, and those with > 7 cells/spot were assigned to the Tregshigh group. Statistical analysis Differences in the numbers of immunopositive cells between groups were assessed with unpaired-sample t tests. To evaluate associations between immunohistochemistry results and clinical characteristics, Chi square and Fisher’s exact tests were performed. Correlations were evaluated by means of Spearman’s rho coefficients. OS and cumulative recurrence rates were analyzed with the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed via Cox proportional hazards regression. All analyses were performed with SPSS 16.0 statistical software. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Peritumoral pDC abundance in ICC patients correlates with clinicopathologic features BDCA2-immunopositive pDCs were more abundant in peritumoral tissue than in intratumoral areas (48.3 ± 55.4 cells/spot vs. 39.3 ± 62.8 cells/spot, respectively; p < 0.05) (Fig. 1a, b). The number of peritumoral pDCs was significantly positively correlated with carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and gamma-glutamyl transferase levels (p = 0.025 and p = 0.01, respectively), tumor size (p = 0.007), tumor number (p = 0.043), degrees of vascular/bile duct invasion and lymphatic metastasis (p = 0.045 and p = 0.018, respectively), and TNM stage (p = 0.002) (Table 2). By contrast, sex was the only clinical characteristic that correlated with the number of pDCs in intratumoral tissues.Fig. 1 pDC distribution in biopsy samples and the association with ICC prognosis. a Representative ICC tumor samples showing BDCA2+ pDCs in tumoral and peritumoral tissues. Scale bar, 100 μm. b pDCs were more abundant in peritumoral tissues than in intratumoral areas. c Prognostic value of pDCs in tumoral and peritumoral tissues of ICC patients Table 2 Correlation between intratumoral and peritumoral plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) and clinicopathologic characteristics in ICC (n = 359 for intratumoral tissues, 322 for peritumoral tissues) Clinicopathological indexes Intratumoral pDCs Peritumoral pDCs Low High P Low High P Age (year)  ≤ 50 32 42 0.242 32 36 0.625  > 50 145 140 128 126 Sex  Female 85 68 0.041 75 61 0.094  Male 92 114 85 101 HBsAg  Negative 124 128 0.955 110 116 0.576   Positive 53 54 50 46 CA199  ≤ 36 78 71 0.331 78 59 0.025  > 36 99 111 82 103 AFP (ng/ml)  ≤ 20 157 160 0.816 145 141 0.307  > 20 20 22 15 21 GGT (U/L)  ≤ 54 80 92 0.310 89 67 0.010  > 54 97 90 71 95 Liver cirrhosis  No 138 135 0.400 120 127 0.471  Yes 39 47 40 35 Tumor size (cm)  ≤ 5 74 85 0.351 84 61 0.007  > 5 103 97 76 101 Tumor number  Single 130 128 0.511 122 107 0.043  Multiple 47 54 38 55 Vascular/bile duct invasion  Absence 132 150 0.070 134 121 0.045  Present 45 32 26 41 Lymphatic metastasis  No 152 154 0.736 145 132 0.018  Yes 25 28 15 30 Tumor encapsulation  Complete 37 25 0.072 32 23 0.167  None 140 157 128 139 Tumor differentiation  I + II 93 88 0.427 90 79 0.179  III + IV 84 94 70 83 TNM stage  I 90 92 0.955 97 70 0.002  II + III + IV + IV 87 90 63 92 The italic numerals indicate P value < 0.05 AFP alpha-fetoprotein, GGT gamma glutamyl transferase, CA 19-9 carbohydrate antigen 19-9, TNM tumor-node-metastasis Chi square tests for all analyses Peritumoral pDC accumulation in ICC patients is a predictor of poor prognosis At the time of the final follow-up examination, 68.2% (245/359) of the patients had died, and 49.6% (178/359) had experienced recurrence. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year rates were 65.7%, 42.3%, and 33.8%, respectively, for OS and 34.8%, 51.6%, and 58.7% for cumulative recurrence. We next classified patients according to the number of peritumoral pDCs: those with ≤ 28 cells/spot were assigned to the pDCslow group, and those with > 28 cells/spot were assigned to the pDCshigh group. Patients in the pDCslow group had significantly higher 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates than those in the pDCshigh group (75.9% versus 59.6%, 56.4% versus 32.4%, and 46.4% versus 24.9%, respectively) (Fig. 1c). Patients in the pDCshigh group also showed higher cumulative recurrence rates at 1, 3, and 5 years than those in the pDCslow group (41.0% versus 29.0%, 64.7% versus 38.4%, and 69.5% versus 48.2%, respectively) (Fig. 1c). Additionally, peritumoral pDCs were associated with OS and cumulative recurrence rates in patients with early-stage (TNM stage I) ICC (n = 182) and normal carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels (≤ 36 ng/ml, n = 149) (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Of note, OS and cumulative recurrence rates were not associated with the number of intratumoral pDCs (Fig. 1c). In the univariate analysis, prolonged TTR and OS were associated with a lower number of peritumoral pDCs in addition to various clinicopathologic factors (Table 3). The multivariate analysis revealed that the abundance of peritumoral pDCs, along with tumor number, lymphatic metastasis, and tumor encapsulation, was an independent factor for OS (p = 0.002, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.55) and TTR (p =0.01, HR = 1.54) (Table 3).Table 3 Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors in ICC (n = 359) Variable TTR OS HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P Univariate analysis  Age, year (≤ 50 versus > 50) 0.89 (0.63–1.28) 0.551 1.29 (0.94–1.78) 0.116  Sex (female versus male) 1.04 (0.77–1.39) 0.809 1.07 (0.83–1.38) 0.583  HBsAg (negative versus positive) 1.09 (0.80–1.50) 0.577 0.72 (0.54–0.96) 0.025  AFP, ng/ml (≤ 20 versus > 20) 1.17 (0.76–1.79) 0.483 0.84 (0.56–1.26) 0.396  CA199 (≤ 36 versus > 36) 1.19 (0.88–1.60) 0.258 1.90 (1.46–2.48) 0  GGT,U/L (≤ 54 versus > 54) 1.35 (1.00–1.81) 0.05 1.92 (1.48–2.48) 0  Liver cirrhosis (no versus yes) 1.16 (0.83–1.62) 0.396 0.83 (0.61–1.12) 0.226  Tumor size, cm (≤ 5 versus > 5) 1.38 (1.02–1.86) 0.035 1.65 (1.28–2.14) 0  Tumor number (single versus multiple) 2.48 (1.81–3.40) 0 2.66 (2.03–3.47) 0  Microvascular/bile duct invasion (no versus yes) 1.02 (0.70–1.48) 0.937 1.48 (1.10–1.97) 0.009  Lymphatic metastasis (no versus yes) 2.23 (1.52–3.28) 0 2.70 (1.96–3.72) 0  Tumor encapsulation (complete versus none) 1.91 (1.20–3.04) 0.006 1.46 (1.01–2.11) 0.042  Tumor differentiation (I + II versus III + IV) 1.10 (0.82–1.48) 0.519 1.43 (1.11–1.84) 0.005  TNM stage (I versus II + III + IV) 1.92 (1.42–2.59) 0 2.78 (2.14–3.61) 0  Intra-pDCs (low versus high) 1.16 (0.87–1.56) 0.314 1.18 (0.91–1.51) 0.208  Peri-pDCs (low versus high) 1.77 (1.29–2.44) 0 1.87 (1.42–2.46) 0  Peri-Tregs (low versus high) 1.63 (1.19–2.24) 0.003 1.53 (1.17–2.01) 0  Peri-pDCs and Tregs (both low vs. both high) 2.22 (1.49–3.31) 0 2.17 (1.55–3.03) 0 Multivariate analysis  HBsAg (negative versus positive) NA NA 0.70 (0.51–0.97) 0.033  CA199 (≤ 36 versus > 36) NA NA 1.35 (1.01–1.82) 0.045  GGT, U/L (≤ 54 versus > 54) NA NA 1.65 (1.24–2.21) 0.001  Tumor size, cm (≤ 5 versus > 5) 1.05 (0.75–1.46) 0.786 1.13 (0.84–1.51) 0.435  Tumor number (single versus multiple) 1.94 (1.36–2.77) 0 2.12 (1.57–2.86) 0  Microvascular/bile duct invasion (no versus yes) NA NA 1.28 (0.91–1.79) 0.153  Lymphatic metastasis (no versus yes) 1.72 (1.12–2.64) 0.014 2.09 (1.45–3.00) 0  Tumor encapsulation (complete versus none) 1.96 (1.18–3.25) 0.009 1.58 (1.04–2.42) 0.034  Tumor differentiation (I + II versus III + IV) NA NA 1.32 (1.00–1.74) 0.051  Peri-pDCs (low versus high) 1.54 (1.11–2.14) 0.01 1.55 (1.17–2.05) 0.002  Peri-Tregs (low versus high) 1.59 (1.16–2.20) 0.004 1.34 (1.02–1.77) 0.036  Peri-pDCs and Tregs (both low vs. both high) 1.96 (1.30–2.94) 0.001 1.74 (1.23–2.47) 0.002 The italic numerals indicate P value < 0.05 Cox proportional hazards regression model AFP alpha-fetoprotein, GGT gamma glutamyl transferase, CA 19-9 carbohydrate antigen 19-9, TNM tumor-node-metastasis, HR hazard ratio, CI confidential interval pDC accumulation is associated with Treg abundance in peritumoral tissues To examine the association between pDCs and T cell-mediated immune responses, T lymphocytes in peritumoral tissues were immunostained (Fig. 2a). The number of Foxp3+ Tregs was significantly positively correlated with the number of peritumoral pDCs (p < 0.001, R = 0.291) (Fig. 2b). However, the numbers of CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ lymphocytes were not correlated (Additional file 2: Table S1).Fig. 2 Correlation between peritumoral pDC and Treg abundance. a High and low infiltration of peritumoral pDCs and Tregs. Scale bar, 100 μm. b Scatterplots showing significant positive correlations between BDCA2+ pDCs and Tregs in peritumoral tissues Combination of peritumoral pDC and Treg abundance for predicting ICC patient outcomes As the numbers of pDCs and Tregs were correlated, we evaluated the prognostic value of these factors combined. We compared the prognoses of ICC patients categorized into three groups according to peritumoral cell abundance: pDCslow/Tregslow, pDCslow/Tregshigh or pDCshigh/Tregslow, and pDCshigh/Tregshigh. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates for the patients in the pDCshigh/Tregshigh group were 60.2%, 29.1%, and 21.3%, respectively, which were significantly lower than for those in the pDCslow/Tregslow group (74.9%, 56.8%, and 50.8%, respectively) (Fig. 3a–c). Similarly, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative recurrence rates for patients in the pDCshigh/Tregshigh group (42.4%, 67.6%, and 73.0%, respectively) were significantly higher than for those in the pDCslow/Tregslow group (26.3%, 35.8%, and 43.5%, respectively).Fig. 3 Prognostic values of peritumoral pDC and Treg accumulation in ICC patients. Prognostic value of pDCs (a), Tregs (b), and pDCs plus Tregs (c) in peritumoral tissues of ICC patients Discussion Immune cell abundance is linked to the prognoses of patients with various cancers [6, 23]. Here, we identified peritumoral pDCs as a novel factor for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with ICC. Specifically, a high abundance of pDCs in tissues surrounding the tumor was associated with a shorter OS and greater chance for recurrence. Therefore, pDCs should be examined in biopsy samples taken from patients undergoing curative resection for ICC to identify those at risk for recurrence and reduced survival. pDCs are phenotypically distinguishable from other dendritic cells [11] and have been detected by immunohistochemical analyses of frozen samples from many types of cancers [13]. In the present study, we utilized a large clinical cohort for which clinical characteristics were known, enabling an investigation of the association between immunohistopathology and prognosis. Moreover, we identified pDCs by using a highly specific and sensitive monoclonal antibody against BDCA2, a member of the C-type lectin family of transmembrane glycoproteins [13, 24, 25], rather than an anti-CD123 antibody, which labels several other cell types [13]. This enabled us to precisely quantify pDCs and assess their clinical significance. We also identified colocalization of BDCA2 and CD123 on most cell surfaces (Additional file 3: Figure S2), which further suggested that BDCA2 is specific to TA-pDCs in HCC. We found that the infiltration of large numbers of pDCs into peritumoral tissues correlated with tumor size and number, vascular/bile duct invasion, lymphatic metastasis, and TNM stage. More importantly, we found that this infiltration is a predictor of TTR and OS, highlighting the importance of the peritumoral microenvironment in ICC progression. High rates of recurrence or metastasis result in unsatisfactory long-term survival of ICC patients after curative resection [3]. The peritumoral liver tissues were the major target organ of ICC metastasis or recurrence, which was also be classified as intrahepatic recurrence. This peritumoral liver tissue is also reportedly useful for examining intrahepatic recurrence by assessing mechanisms related to immune responses and inflammation [26, 27]. These findings support the “seed and soil” hypothesis of Paget, in which the “seeds” of metastasis can only grow in favorable soil, which includes the target microenvironment [28, 29]. The rate-limiting steps of metastasis or recurrence are tumor cell survival, extravasation, and establishment in the target organ. Consistent with the importance of this microenvironment, we found that the presence of peritumoral pDCs was an independent predicator of ICC prognosis, whereas the presence of intratumor PDCs was not. Together, this demonstrates the prognostic value of the peritumoral microenvironment in metastasizing target organs. As peri/intratumoral dendritic cells can present tumor-associated antigens to naive T cells, they are thought to trigger an antitumor immune response [30]. Although pDCs synthesize interferon, they do not produce enough to kill cancerous cells due to a lack of appropriate stimuli in the tumor microenvironment or to active suppression [13]. Nevertheless, pDCs stimulate the differentiation and expansion of Tregs in vitro and induce Tregs in the periphery in vivo [31, 32]. pDCs have been reported to be capable of directly activating mature Tregs through expression of the enzyme indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO). This activation is MHC restricted, requires an intact amino acid-responsive GCN2 pathway in the Tregs, and can be prevented by CTLA4 blockade [33, 34]. Some other reports have also suggested that ICOSL is expressed by pDCs and can interact with ICOS expressed on naïve CD4+ T cells to induce their differentiation into IL-10-producing Tregs [35, 36]. In addition, impaired IFN-α production by pDCs was also shown to be involved in promoting regulatory T cell expansion [37]. However, tumor-infiltrating Tregs may contribute to immune tolerance, as they are associated with the invasiveness and prognosis of most cancer types [6, 38]. Consistent with this, the numbers of pDCs and Tregs in tissues surrounding ICC tumors were correlated with each other and with patient prognosis. By contrast, the accumulation of pDCs within the tumors was not significantly correlated with the numbers of Tregs or prognosis, suggesting that the immunotolerant peritumoral microenvironment is the crucial factor determining ICC outcome. Although the high recurrence rate of ICC necessitates the ability to predict recurrence, biomarkers for ICC recurrence are lacking. The identification of recurrence predictors could be particularly beneficial to predict and prevent recurrence in early-stage ICC patients who experience relapse unexpectedly just after curative resection. These patients may have a better outcome if recurrence can be predicted early and prevented. Here, we showed that peritumoral pDC levels, may have prognostic ability in identifying these patients. Recurrence is more likely in early-stage or normal CA19-9 ICC patients with high levels of peritumoral pDCs, careful monitoring of such patients is advised. Conclusions We show that peritumoral accumulation of pDCs is a novel predictor of prognosis in patients with ICC undergoing curative resection, which may indicate an immune tolerogenic peritumor microenvironment induced by Foxp3+ regulatory T cell infiltration. Future studies investigating therapeutic strategies targeting the anti-immune tolerogenic responses may provide better treatments for patients with ICC. Supplementary information Additional file 1: Figure S1 Prognostic value of peritumoral pDC in patients with early-stage (TNM stage I) ICC (n = 182) or normal carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels (≤ 36 ng/ml, n = 149). Additional file 2: Table S1. Numbers of peritumoral CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells in ICC cohort and their correlations with pDCs (n=322 for peritumoral tissues). Additional file 3: Figure S2 Fluorescence microscopy showed colocalization of BDCA2 and CD123 expression on cell surface. Abbreviations pDCsPlasmacytoid dendritic cells ICCIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma TNMTumor-node-metastasis OSOverall survival TTRTime to recurrence Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Zhi-Qiang Hu and Zheng-Jun Zhou contributed equally to this work Supplementary information Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s12935-020-01676-z. Acknowledgements Not applicable. Authors’ contributions ZQH and ZJZ performed the experiments; SLZ and ZQH analyzed the data; HYX, CBL, JL and SYY provided the samples; SLZ and ZQH wrote the paper; SLZ obtained funding and designed the research. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Funding This study was jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81972708; No. 81773069; No. 82072681, No. 82003082), the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2018YFA0109400), Shanghai Rising-Star Program (18QA1401200) and Municipal Human Resources Development Program for Outstanding Young Talents in Medical and Health Sciences in Shanghai (2018YQ14). Availability of data and materials The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article. Ethics approval and consent to participate This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Zhongshan Hospital. Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests The authors disclose no conflicts. ==== Refs References 1. Siegel R Ma J Zou Z Jemal A Cancer statistics, 2014 CA Cancer J Clin 2014 64 1 9 29 24399786 2. Blechacz B Gores GJ Cholangiocarcinoma: advances in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment Hepatology 2008 48 1 308 321 18536057 3. Rizvi S Gores GJ Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of cholangiocarcinoma Gastroenterology 2013 145 6 1215 1229 24140396 4. Mavros MN, Economopoulos KP, Alexiou VG, Pawlik TM: Treatment and Prognosis for Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Surg 2014. 5. Galon J Costes A Sanchez-Cabo F Kirilovsky A Mlecnik B Lagorce-Pages C Tosolini M Camus M Berger A Wind P Type, density, and location of immune cells within human colorectal tumors predict clinical outcome Science 2006 313 5795 1960 1964 17008531 6. Fridman WH Pages F Sautes-Fridman C Galon J The immune contexture in human tumours: impact on clinical outcome Nat Rev Cancer 2012 12 4 298 306 22419253 7. Zhou SL Yin D Hu ZQ Luo CB Zhou ZJ Xin HY Yang XR Shi YH Wang Z Huang XW A Positive Feedback Loop Between Cancer Stem-Like Cells and Tumor-Associated Neutrophils Controls Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progression Hepatology 2019 70 4 1214 1230 30933361 8. Sirica AE, Gores GJ, Groopman JD, Selaru FM, Strazzabosco M, Wang XW, Zhu AX: Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Continuing Challenges and Translational Advances. Hepatology 2018. 9. Sirica AE Gores GJ Desmoplastic stroma and cholangiocarcinoma: clinical implications and therapeutic targeting Hepatology 2014 59 6 2397 2402 24123296 10. Swiecki M Colonna M Unraveling the functions of plasmacytoid dendritic cells during viral infections, autoimmunity, and tolerance Immunol Rev 2010 234 1 142 162 20193017 11. Lande R Gilliet M Plasmacytoid dendritic cells: key players in the initiation and regulation of immune responses Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010 1183 89 103 20146710 12. Swiecki M Colonna M The multifaceted biology of plasmacytoid dendritic cells Nat Rev Immunol 2015 15 8 471 485 26160613 13. Vermi W Soncini M Melocchi L Sozzani S Facchetti F Plasmacytoid dendritic cells and cancer J Leukoc Biol 2011 90 4 681 690 21730085 14. Treilleux I Blay JY Bendriss-Vermare N Ray-Coquard I Bachelot T Guastalla JP Bremond A Goddard S Pin JJ Barthelemy-Dubois C Dendritic cell infiltration and prognosis of early stage breast cancer Clin Cancer Res 2004 10 22 7466 7474 15569976 15. Labidi-Galy SI Sisirak V Meeus P Gobert M Treilleux I Bajard A Combes JD Faget J Mithieux F Cassignol A Quantitative and functional alterations of plasmacytoid dendritic cells contribute to immune tolerance in ovarian cancer Cancer Res 2011 71 16 5423 5434 21697280 16. Sawant A Hensel JA Chanda D Harris BA Siegal GP Maheshwari A Ponnazhagan S Depletion of plasmacytoid dendritic cells inhibits tumor growth and prevents bone metastasis of breast cancer cells J Immunol 2012 189 9 4258 4265 23018462 17. Chauhan D Singh AV Brahmandam M Carrasco R Bandi M Hideshima T Bianchi G Podar K Tai YT Mitsiades C Functional interaction of plasmacytoid dendritic cells with multiple myeloma cells: a therapeutic target Cancer Cell 2009 16 4 309 323 19800576 18. Wittekind C Pitfalls in the classification of liver tumors Pathologe 2006 27 4 289 293 16736177 19. Heimbach JK Kulik LM Finn RS Sirlin CB Abecassis MM Roberts LR Zhu AX Murad MH Marrero JA AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma Hepatology 2018 67 1 358 380 28130846 20. Zhou SL, Zhou ZJ, Hu ZQ, Huang XW, Wang Z, Chen EB, Fan J, Cao Y, Dai Z, Zhou J: Tumor-Associated Neutrophils Recruit Macrophages and T-Regulatory Cells to Promote Progression of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Resistance to Sorafenib. Gastroenterology 2016, 150 (7):1646-1658 e1617. 21. Zhou SL Hu ZQ Zhou ZJ Dai Z Wang Z Cao Y Fan J Huang XW Zhou J miR-28-5p-IL-34-macrophage feedback loop modulates hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis Hepatology 2016 63 5 1560 1575 26754294 22. Zhou SL Zhou ZJ Hu ZQ Li X Huang XW Wang Z Fan J Dai Z Zhou J CXCR2/CXCL5 axis contributes to epithelial-mesenchymal transition of HCC cells through activating PI3K/Akt/GSK-3beta/Snail signaling Cancer Lett 2015 358 2 124 135 25462858 23. Grivennikov SI Greten FR Karin M Immunity, inflammation, and cancer Cell 2010 140 6 883 899 20303878 24. Boiocchi L Lonardi S Vermi W Fisogni S Facchetti F BDCA-2 (CD303): a highly specific marker for normal and neoplastic plasmacytoid dendritic cells Blood 2013 122 2 296 297 23847189 25. Dzionek A Sohma Y Nagafune J Cella M Colonna M Facchetti F Gunther G Johnston I Lanzavecchia A Nagasaka T BDCA-2, a novel plasmacytoid dendritic cell-specific type II C-type lectin, mediates antigen capture and is a potent inhibitor of interferon alpha/beta induction J Exp Med 2001 194 12 1823 1834 11748283 26. Hoshida Y Villanueva A Kobayashi M Peix J Chiang DY Camargo A Gupta S Moore J Wrobel MJ Lerner J Gene expression in fixed tissues and outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma N Engl J Med 2008 359 19 1995 2004 18923165 27. Budhu A Forgues M Ye QH Jia HL He P Zanetti KA Kammula US Chen Y Qin LX Tang ZY Prediction of venous metastases, recurrence, and prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma based on a unique immune response signature of the liver microenvironment Cancer Cell 2006 10 2 99 111 16904609 28. Nguyen DX Bos PD Massague J Metastasis: from dissemination to organ-specific colonization Nat Rev Cancer 2009 9 4 274 284 19308067 29. Quail DF Joyce JA Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis Nat Med 2013 19 11 1423 1437 24202395 30. Lin A Schildknecht A Nguyen LT Ohashi PS Dendritic cells integrate signals from the tumor microenvironment to modulate immunity and tumor growth Immunol Lett 2010 127 2 77 84 19778555 31. Matta BM Castellaneta A Thomson AW Tolerogenic plasmacytoid DC Eur J Immunol 2010 40 10 2667 2676 20821731 32. Demoulin S Herfs M Delvenne P Hubert P Tumor microenvironment converts plasmacytoid dendritic cells into immunosuppressive/tolerogenic cells: insight into the molecular mechanisms J Leukoc Biol 2013 93 3 343 352 23136258 33. Gerlini G Di Gennaro P Mariotti G Urso C Chiarugi A Pimpinelli N Borgognoni L Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase + cells correspond to the BDCA2 + plasmacytoid dendritic cells in human melanoma sentinel nodes J Invest Dermatol 2010 130 3 898 901 19829303 34. Sharma MD Baban B Chandler P Hou DY Singh N Yagita H Azuma M Blazar BR Mellor AL Munn DH Plasmacytoid dendritic cells from mouse tumor-draining lymph nodes directly activate mature Tregs via indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase J Clin Invest 2007 117 9 2570 2582 17710230 35. Ito T Yang M Wang YH Lande R Gregorio J Perng OA Qin XF Liu YJ Gilliet M Plasmacytoid dendritic cells prime IL-10-producing T regulatory cells by inducible costimulator ligand J Exp Med 2007 204 1 105 115 17200410 36. Conrad C Gregorio J Wang YH Ito T Meller S Hanabuchi S Anderson S Atkinson N Ramirez PT Liu YJ Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells Promote Immunosuppression in Ovarian Cancer via ICOS Costimulation of Foxp3 + T-Regulatory Cells Cancer Res 2012 72 20 5240 5249 22850422 37. Sisirak V Faget J Gobert M Goutagny N Vey N Treilleux I Renaudineau S Poyet G Labidi-Galy SI Goddard-Leon S Impaired IFN-alpha Production by Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells Favors Regulatory T-cell Expansion That May Contribute to Breast Cancer Progression Cancer Res 2012 72 20 5188 5197 22836755 38. Fridman WH Zitvogel L Sautes-Fridman C Kroemer G The immune contexture in cancer prognosis and treatment Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2017 14 12 717 734 28741618