==== Front
Ecol Evol
Ecol Evol
10.1002/(ISSN)2045-7758
ECE3
Ecology and Evolution
2045-7758 John Wiley and Sons Inc. Hoboken 

10.1002/ece3.6891
ECE36891
Corrigendum
Corrigendum
CORRIGENDUM
03 12 2020 
12 2020 
03 12 2020 
10 23 10.1002/ece3.v10.2313571 13571
© 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.10.1002/ece3.6225 source-schema-version-number2.0cover-dateDecember 2020details-of-publishers-convertorConverter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.9.5 mode:remove_FC converted:03.12.2020

CORRIGENDUM
. Ecol Evol 
2020 ;10 :13571 –13571
. 10.1002/ece3.6891
==== Body
In our paper, “Accounting for space and uncertainty in real‐time location system‐derived contact networks” (Ecol & Evol 10(11):4702–4715), we presented a procedure for updating spatial threshold definitions to identify proximity‐based contacts from real‐time location data while accounting for real‐time location system accuracy. This is a simulation‐based procedure whereby researchers generate a distribution of n inter‐point distances between in‐contact point pairs, and choose an appropriate contact distance threshold that ensures a desired percentage of true positives are represented in generated contact networks. In our paper, we incorrectly state at the end of paragraph 3 in Section 2.2.3 that a spatial threshold based on the upper 99% CI for an expected‐distance distribution “likely captures ≥99% of contacts, as previously defined.” This is an erroneous statement because the CI describes the probability that the mean of the expected‐distance distribution falls within CI bounds. Thus, the statement should read that a spatial threshold based on the upper 99% CI for an expected‐distance distribution “likely captures the majority of true contacts, as previously described.” If researchers want to capture ≥99% of true contacts, any updated spatial threshold should take the value of the distribution maximum, or the mean + 3 standard deviations. Researchers should note, however, that maximizing the true positive rate for contact identification may greatly inflate the false positive rate as well.
==== Refs
REFERENCE


Farthing 
TS 
, 
Dawson 
DE 
, 
Sanderson 
MW 
, & 
Lanzas 
C 
. Accounting for space and uncertainty in real‐time location system‐derived contact networks
. EcolEvol . 2020 ;10 :4702 –4715
. 10.1002/ece3.6225