==== Front Int Braz J Urol Int Braz J Urol ibju International Brazilian Journal of Urology : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology 1677-5538 1677-6119 Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 33047936 S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0614 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0614 Video Section Robotic radical nephrectomy and level II inferior vena cava thrombectomy: exploring the newer frontiers Ahluwalia Puneet 1 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4043-1975Tamhankar Ashwin 2 Gautam Gagan 1 1 Max Institute of Cancer Care Department of Urooncology and Surgical Oncology New Delhi India Department of Urooncology and Surgical Oncology, Max Institute of Cancer Care, New Delhi, India 2 Tata Memorial Hospital Department of Urooncology Mumbai India Department of Urooncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India Correspondence address: Ashwin Tamhankar, MD, Department of Urooncology and Surgical Oncology, Max Institute of Cancer Care, New Delhi, India. E-mail: ashwintamhankar@gmail.comCONFLICT OF INTEREST None declared. Available at:http://www.intbrazjurol.com.br/video-section/20190614_Ahluwalia_et_al 18 11 2020 Jan-Feb 2021 47 1 218 219 04 10 2019 24 5 2020 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.ABSTRACT Objective: Renal tumors involving the inferior vena cava (IVC) appear to be a limitation to the application of minimal invasive surgery. Objective is to describe our technique in a patient undergoing robot-assisted radical nephrectomy (RARN) with level II IVC thrombectomy. Materials and Methods: Our index case is a 46-years old gentleman presenting with hematuria with 9.6 x 6.7cm mass in upper and mid pole of right kidney with level II IVC thrombus with cephalad extent of three centimeters beyond renal ostium. Vascular control was obtained with complete cross-clamping of the IVC by robotic bulldog clamps. The tumor thrombus was retrieved along with the IVC cuff as it was seen adherent to the IVC wall. Results: Patient successfully underwent right robotic radical nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy without open conversion. Console time was 270 minutes with estimated blood loss of 300ml. No drain was placed and Foley's catheter was removed on POD 1. Patient was discharged on POD 3. Histopathology was suggestive of conventional clear cell carcinoma grade 3 with negative surgical margins. Follow-up at 6 months showed no evidence of recurrence. Conclusion: Robotic radical nephrectomy in the setting of IVC thrombus is feasible and can be performed safely in selected patients. Despite the complex and critical nature of these procedures, favorable outcomes and reproducibility can be expected with adequate robotic experience.