==== Front Bioengineering (Basel) Bioengineering (Basel) bioengineering Bioengineering 2306-5354 MDPI 33276472 10.3390/bioengineering7040155 bioengineering-07-00155 Review Three Decades of Research on Recombinant Collagens: Reinventing the Wheel or Developing New Biomedical Products? https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9153-1912Fertala Andrzej Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Curtis Building, Room 501, 1015 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA; axf116@jefferson.edu; Tel.: +1-215-503-0113 02 12 2020 12 2020 7 4 15520 10 2020 23 11 2020 © 2020 by the author.2020Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Collagens provide the building blocks for diverse tissues and organs. Furthermore, these proteins act as signaling molecules that control cell behavior during organ development, growth, and repair. Their long half-life, mechanical strength, ability to assemble into fibrils and networks, biocompatibility, and abundance from readily available discarded animal tissues make collagens an attractive material in biomedicine, drug and food industries, and cosmetic products. About three decades ago, pioneering experiments led to recombinant human collagens’ expression, thereby initiating studies on the potential use of these proteins as substitutes for the animal-derived collagens. Since then, scientists have utilized various systems to produce native-like recombinant collagens and their fragments. They also tested these collagens as materials to repair tissues, deliver drugs, and serve as therapeutics. Although many tests demonstrated that recombinant collagens perform as well as their native counterparts, the recombinant collagen technology has not yet been adopted by the biomedical, pharmaceutical, or food industry. This paper highlights recent technologies to produce and utilize recombinant collagens, and it contemplates their prospects and limitations. recombinant collagengelatinbiomaterialstissue engineering ==== Body 1. Introduction Proteins, including insulin, various growth factors, enzymes, vaccines, and antibodies serve as irreplaceable therapeutics to prevent and treat diverse diseases. Moreover, proteins are used as vital research and diagnostic tools [1]. While in the past, proteins utilized in medicine and research had to be isolated from natural sources, such as animal tissues, plants, bacteria, and marine organisms, to name a few, today, their recombinant forms are also available [2,3]. The ability to produce the recombinant variants of native proteins provides therapeutics of high purity, batch-to-batch consistency, biocompatibility, low immunogenicity, and ample supply. Technologies to produce recombinant proteins are often the only sustainable source of therapeutic proteins (e.g., humanized monoclonal antibodies), and generating recombinant proteins can cost less than isolating proteins from natural sources. Thus, the design and production of recombinant proteins for biomedical applications and research are crucial biotechnology areas today [1]. Unlike therapeutic recombinant growth factors, protein hormones, enzymes, soluble receptors, and therapeutic antibodies, which are biologically active at relatively low concentrations, collagens naturally aggregate into massive insoluble structures. As a result, collagen-based products require large amounts of collagen material. However, the production of recombinant collagen variants is challenging due to the complex structure of collagens, whose intracellular biosynthesis depends on collagen-specific chaperones and modifying enzymes. The need for distinct types of collagens that form tissue-specific structures, including fibrils, networks, transmembrane structures, and others, exacerbates this challenge. 2. Collagens: The Cornerstones of Tissue Architecture Like other recombinant proteins produced to substitute for their native counterparts, recombinant collagens must have crucial physicochemical characteristics that match those seen in collagens that build healthy tissues [4]. The following paragraphs highlight the crucial features of collagens needed for these proteins’ mechanical and biological functions. 2.1. Biosynthesis of Triple-Helical Collagen Molecules The family of collagenous proteins includes about 28 diverse members [5]. Despite their heterogeneity, various collagen types share a few common characteristics that distinguish them from other proteins. First, unlike the globular proteins, individual collagen molecules are shaped as extended rod-like structures. Second, each collagen molecule consists of three collagen α-chains folded into the triple-helical structure; depending on the collagen type, the triple helices may comprise identical chains (homotrimers) or different chains (heterotrimers). Third, regardless of the collagen type, each collagen α-chain consists of the Gly-X-Y motif repeats. Any amino acid residue may occupy the X and the Y positions of the Gly-X-Y triplets. However, the Gly residues at every third position are mandatory to allow the folding of the α-chains into a compact triple-helical conformation. While in the fibril-forming collagens, including types I, II, and III, the Gly-X-Y triplets form uninterrupted repeats, in other collagen types, including types IV, VII, and IX, stretches of amino acid sequences without the Gly-X-Y pattern interrupt the Gly-X-Y repeats. Those intervening sequences form flexible hinges that are needed for the specific functions of the collagen types that harbor them [5]. The formation of collagen triple helices starts with the nascent collagen α-chains encoded by specific genes. Before the α-chains fold into the triple-helical conformation, they undergo posttranslational modifications. While prolyl-4-hydroxylase (P4H) hydroxylases proline residues present at the -Y- position of the Gly-X-Y triplets, lysyl hydroxylase (LH) hydroxylases many lysine residues present at the -Y- positions. Following hydroxylation, some of the hydroxylysine residues are glycosylated. The hydroxylation of proline and lysine residues is obligatory, and aberrations of this process alter the formation of stable triple helices and fibrils. Poorly formed collagen triple helices accumulate inside cells, causing unfolded protein response, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and apoptosis [6]. Besides P4H and LH, the biosynthesis of functional collagen molecules may require the participation of other modifying enzymes, including prolyl-3-hydroxylase (P3H). Furthermore, the proper folding of stable collagens depends on protein chaperones that control the intracellular folding of collagen triple helices. A group of crucial chaperones includes heat shock protein 47 (HSP47), heat shock 70 kDa-related luminal binding protein (BiP), and the β subunit of P4H (PDI, also referred to as disulfide isomerase) [5]. Figure 1 presents crucial players in the biosynthesis of collagen molecules and their assembly into fibrils. Following biosynthesis and posttranslational modifications, specific collagen α-chains aggregate to form the triple-helical structure. Although one cell may produce many collagen types, a complex chain selection mechanism ensures that a specific collagen type contains only a defined α-chain set. For instance, dermal fibroblasts produce collagen I, collagen III, collagen IV, collagen VII, and some additional collagen types. Among these collagens, collagen I and collagen IV are heterotrimers comprising α1(I)2/α2(I) chains (collagen I) and α1(IV)2/α2(IV) chains (collagen IV). In contrast, homotrimeric collagen III comprises α1(III)3 chains, and homotrimeric collagen VII comprises α1(VII)3 chains [5]. 2.2. Diverse Architectures of Collagen-Rich Matrices The biosynthesis of procollagen molecules and their secretion into the extracellular space is the starting point in the assembly of complex architectures that define connective tissue. Although various collagen types share similar triple-helical conformations, they form various supramolecular assemblies, including cylindrical fibrils and net-like structures [5]. These assemblies interact with each other to form 3D architectures able to perform unique tissue-specific functions. Examples of these architectures include fibrils organized into parallel bundles of fibers that form ligaments and tendons; orthogonal lamellae formed by uniform-diameter fibrils that build transparent corneas; collagen II-based fibrils that form articular cartilage; and thin collagen III-based filaments that form many reticular connective tissues. Additionally, the sheet-like structure of basement membranes comprises collagen IV molecules that interact via globular ends. Some basement membranes also comprise anchoring fibrils containing collagen VII molecules that maintain the structural integrity of many tissues and organs, including skin, esophagus, and elements of the eye [5]. The formation of initial patterns of those architectures occurs during embryonic development. Although mechanisms that drive the spatial organization of the collagenous structures may involve cells and mechanical cues, the amino acid sequences of the collagen chains themselves store the essential information about the assembly of collagen molecules into fibrils and networks [7,8,9,10]. 2.3. Self-Assembly of Collagens: Paradigms of Collagen I Fibrils, Collagen VII Anchoring Fibrils, and Collagen IV Networks Procollagens in which the globular propeptides flank the triple-helical domain are precursors of collagen molecules. For instance, the N-terminal and the C-terminal propeptides flank the triple helical regions of the fibrillar collagen types I, II, and III. Similarly, the non-collagenous (NC) NC1 and NC2 propeptides flank the collagen VII triple helix [5]. Studies demonstrated that these globular propeptides have numerous functions, including collagen chain selection, folding of triple helices, and secretion of procollagen molecules. Besides, propeptides significantly increase collagen molecules’ solubility, thereby preventing their premature aggregation into insoluble complexes [11]. Following secretion of the fibril-forming procollagens into the extracellular space, procollagen N proteinase and procollagen C proteinase cleave the propeptides. The cleavage exposes the very ends of collagen molecules, called telopeptides, that mediate the collagen–collagen binding interactions. These site-specific interactions aggregate the collagen molecules into the fibrils that build connective tissues [12,13]. A precise, D-periodic alignment of individual collagen molecules that build the fibrils enables covalent cross-linking between some lysine and hydroxylysine residues in adjoining collagen molecules. Lysyl oxidases (LOX) catalyze the formation of these cross-links. The cross-links strengthen the fibrils, allowing connective tissues to function correctly [14]. The basement membrane networks’ assembly depends on binding interactions between the NC1 domains of collagen IV [10,15]. Similarly, the formation of anchoring fibrils within the dermal basement membrane depends on the dimerization of the NC2 domains of collagen VII molecules. Here, procollagen C proteinase first cleaves these domains, which then dimerize in the anti-parallel fashion. Subsequently, the formation of intermolecular disulfide bonds stabilizes the collagen VII–collagen VII dimers that bundle together to form the anchoring fibrils [16]. Many mutations have been observed to destabilize the collagen triple helices, prevent their self-assembly, or weaken collagen-rich architectures’ structure, indicating that proper amino acid sequences are crucial for collagens to function correctly. For instance, mutations in collagen I cause osteogenesis imperfecta, a brittle bone disease, which alters bone mineralization and limits skeletal growth. Similarly, mutations in collagen IV weaken the basement membranes of kidneys, causing Alport syndrome. Mutations in collagen VII cause epidermolysis bullosa, a blistering disease whose pathomechanisms involve aberrations of the anchoring fibrils [17]. The above examples indicate that when collagen sequences change, the collagen may lose its vital functions. Consequently, genetic approaches to engineering recombinant collagen variants must preserve crucial features of these proteins to allow them to function when used in biomedical applications. 2.4. Collagens as Signaling Molecules In addition to the structural functions, collagens play crucial roles as signaling molecules. Studies on mechanisms of binding interactions between collagen molecules and cells demonstrated that triple-helical regions include distinct domains, usually formed by only a few amino acid residues that interact specifically with collagen-specific cell receptors. These receptors include integrins, discoidin domain receptors (DDRs), glycoprotein VI (GPVI), or leukocyte-associated immunoglobulin-like receptor 1 (LAIR-1) (Figure 2). They not only recognize defined collagen sites, but some of them (e.g., GPVI) require incorporation of collagen I and collagen III molecules into fibrils. Although some of the collagen-specific receptors may also bind to the linear (i.e., not triple-helical) peptides corresponding to the native binding sites, the binding interactions are usually weak and may not trigger tissue-specific cell responses. As indicated earlier, the self-assembly of collagen molecules arranged in a D-staggered fashion drives the formation of fibrils. Orderly aggregation creates novel physicochemical qualities of the fibrils’ surface that arise from the clustering of the amino acid residues belonging to the interacting collagen molecules. These novel qualities, including topography, charge, or hydrophobic properties, create fibril-specific markers recognized by cellular receptors (Figure 3). Moreover, these fibril-specific markers provide unique binding sites for various macromolecules, including proteoglycans, glycosaminoglycans, growth factors, and others, thereby arranging them in the tissue-specific fashion [18]. 3. Practical Utilization of Collagens 3.1. Applications of Collagens Because of their roles as biological scaffolds, collagens are attractive materials for fabricating products for tissue engineering, wound healing, and drug delivery [20,21]. Furthermore, vaccines and other pharmaceutical products utilize gelatins, which are denatured forms of collagens, as stabilizers [22,23]. The polymeric nature of gelatin and its ability to bind various therapeutic compounds renders this collagen product an attractive carrier in many pharmaceutical applications. Moreover, gelatin is also applied as a gelling agent in food products [24,25,26,27,28]. At present, animal tissues, notably bovine hides, are the primary source of collagen material for most applications. Other sources include porcine and fish tissues. The main form of collagen used for these applications is collagen I [29,30,31,32]. 3.2. Potential Limitations of Collagens Isolated from the Natural Sources Despite the wide use of products manufactured from natural collagens, concerns exist about their side effects [33,34,35]. In the past, a possibility of transmitting bovine spongiform encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, was a particularly worrisome concern [36]. However, eliminating bovine neurological tissues as a potential source of collagen material, and utilizing bovine spongiform encephalopathy-free cattle as the sole source of collagen material, reduced these concerns significantly. Furthermore, future utilization of genetically engineered cattle lacking prion protein would offer a safe source of collagen-based materials [37]. Other concerns about using the animal-derived collagen products are associated with their potential antigenicity, defined as the ability to interact with secreted antibodies, and immunogenicity, defined as the ability to induce the immune response. While the amino acid sequences of the triple-helical regions of collagen molecules from animals and humans share significant similarities, substantial differences characterize their telopeptide regions. Consequently, telopeptides are responsible for the majority of collagen antigenicity. Meanwhile, researchers suggested that cryptic epitopes, generated by enzymatic degradation or denaturation of triple helices of the collagen-based materials, may also interact with antibodies [38]. Scientists believe that primary exposure to exogenous collagen is dietary and about 2% to 4% of the total population has an inherent immunity, i.e., allergy, to bovine collagen I [39,40,41,42]. When compared with the 10% to 15% of the population sensitive to nickel or 6% to 17% of the population sensitive to latex, the sensitivity rate to bovine collagen I is relatively low [43,44,45]. Because of the large body of data for the use of collagen-based products, most notably the injectable collagen material used for soft tissue augmentation, we know that 2% to 4% of patients show hypersensitivity to the injected material. This percentage is consistent with the overall preexisting sensitivity to collagen (see above) observed in the general population. In fewer than 3% of cases, patients develop adverse reactions to foreign collagen materials, including granuloma and localized inflammation. These reactions, however, usually subside within a few months and never last longer than a year [38]. Although researchers have pointed to collagen telopeptides as the most probable regions causing immune responses in human patients, the evidence is not clear. As discussed by Lynn et al., no documented differences exist between human responses to products manufactured from collagens that include telopeptides and those without them [38]. Evidence so far suggests that biomedical products manufactured using animal-derived collagens do not present any significant danger to the human recipients [46]. However, some concerns still exist about the potential negative impacts of non-collagenous molecules that co-purify with animal-derived collagen. Furthermore, some controversies exist about a potential induction of autoimmunity in humans by products containing collagen II [47]. Although most collagen-based products mainly include collagen I and collagen III, future applications, e.g., cartilage engineering, may require collagen II-based materials. This possibility will require further studies to clarify the potential for collagen II-associated autoimmunity. 4. Recombinant Collagens The application of recombinant human collagens in research and medicine, as well as drug, food, and cosmetic industries, offers an attractive alternative to the use of the animal-derived collagen materials. Despite the overall safety of the animal collagens, the human collagens offer ultimate biocompatibility and safety. Moreover, technologies to produce recombinant collagens would potentially provide quantities of less abundant collagen types that would be impossible to isolate from tissues [24,48]. Furthermore, technologies to produce recombinant collagens may be utilized to produce unique collagenous proteins that correspond to those from other animal groups, including avian and marine species. To address the need for human collagens, about three decades ago, researchers initiated studies on producing these proteins using recombinant DNA technology. Initially, mammalian cells were used to express full-length collagens or their fragments [49,50,51,52,53]. Subsequently, other expression systems were employed to produce collagen types, collagen fragments, and modified collagen variants [54]. 4.1. Prerequisites for Engineering Mammalian Recombinant Collagens As noted, a few crucial characteristics define native mammalian collagens’ ability to serve as structural and cell signaling molecules. These characteristics include thermostable triple-helical conformation with the correct composition of type-specific α-chains, proper posttranslational modifications of the chains, correct processing of propeptides, and the ability to form the supramolecular assemblies. Because these characteristics largely depend on the presence of a set of collagen-modifying enzymes, it is critical to select expression systems in which these enzymes are active. In contrast, collagen-like proteins found in some bacteria and cocoons of a group of hymenopteran insects do not require hydroxyproline residues to maintain stability. This characteristic makes them potentially attractive substitutes for mammalian collagens in some biomedical applications [55,56]. 4.2. Collagen Expression Systems The first systems for producing recombinant collagens utilized mammalian cells that expressed native collagen-modifying enzymes. Procollagens produced in these cells, including procollagen I and procollagen II, had normal thermostability, and their proline and lysine residues were correctly hydroxylated. Moreover, these proteins were glycosylated and processed by procollagen N proteinase and C proteinase [53]. With proper modifications and enzymatic processing, these native-like recombinant collagens assembled into well-organized fibrils [57]. The relatively low yield and potentially high cost of the collagen-based products is a crucial limitation of mammalian cell-based expression systems in collagen production for biomedical, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical applications. To circumvent this problem, scientists tested systems compatible with industrial-scale production. These systems relied on yeast, insect cells, and bacteria. Furthermore, researchers investigated plants, including tobacco, barley, and corn, as potential collagen-producing factories. Experiments with animals demonstrated the feasibility of producing collagens in the mammary glands of transgenic mice and eggs of transgenic chickens [58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65]. Scientists also used recombinant and chemical methods to synthesize short collagen-derived peptides for research and tissue repair applications. In one example, a synthetic 15-mer peptide derived from the α1(I) chain serves as an ingredient in a material for bone repair [66,67]. Although chemical synthesis is an attractive method to produce collagen fragments, these fragments lack crucial collagen characteristics, including triple-helical conformation, modifications of proline and lysine residues, and resistance to enzymatic degradation. Employing a biological system for the production of recombinant collagen-derived peptides may provide an attractive analog for their synthetic counterparts [68,69]. Initially, a common challenge for the large-scale production systems was the lack of native enzymes needed to produce stable collagen molecules. To circumvent this problem, scientists co-expressed the collagen-coding genes with those that encode subunits of P4H. Overall, this approach was successful, and the recombinant collagens co-expressed with P4H are triple-helical and thermostable [70,71]. It is likely that other crucial enzymes, including prolyl-3-hydroxylase, will also have to be considered to ensure full functionality of recombinant collagens. Moreover, future expression systems should take into account the need for glycosylation of recombinant collagens. As hydroxylysine residues are the main sites of collagen glycosylation, co-expression of lysyl hydroxylases may help in the production of recombinant collagen variants with properties closely resembling those of their native counterparts. Although the literature describes many expression systems, those employed today for the large-scale production of collagen I rely on yeasts and plants [58,71,72,73]. For instance, FibroGen, Inc. (San Francisco, CA, USA) manufactures recombinant collagens in yeast cells, while CollPlant Ltd. (Rehovot, Israel) employs tobacco plants as collagen-producing factories. According to published literature, these companies mainly focus on collagen I and collagen III for manufacturing biomedical products, including artificial corneas, injectable constructs, and wound-dressing materials [74,75,76]. They use proteolytic enzymes to extract collagens from the hosts’ crude materials [77]. While the enzymatic digestion removes the bulk of contaminating proteins, it also destroys procollagen propeptides and telopeptides. Because of the lack of intact telopeptides, the recombinant collagens isolated with current technologies are not able to form proper fibrillar assemblies similar to those seen in native tissues [12,13,78]. While the lack of telopeptides should not present significant problems for using enzymatically processed collagens to produce gelatin, gels containing non-denatured collagen molecules, and unorganized fibrillar matrices, the presence of telopeptides is critical for the formation of native-like structures intended to mimic the biological and mechanical functions of collagens. This notion is particularly important considering that in native fibrils, the C-terminal telopeptides and nearby domains form significant matrix–matrix and cell–matrix interaction regions [18,79]. For instance, recent research indicates that the tyrosine cluster present in the C-terminal telopeptides plays a significant role in the interaction of collagen fibrils with the human osteoclast-associated receptor (OSCAR) that plays an important role in the modulation of matrix remodeling and in antigen recognition [80,81,82]. Table 1 summarizes crucial expression systems for the production of recombinant collagen variants. 4.3. Recombinant Collagen Variants The successful expression of recombinant collagens opened an opportunity to produce not only native-like collagen constructs but also customized variants with modified sequences (Figure 4). Both groups of collagen constructs offer potentially attractive collagen-based materials for use in basic research and the commercial sector. The basic research area focuses on understanding the biological roles and the structure–function relation of various collagen types and their defined domains. The main interest of the commercial sector includes the production of bulk amounts of collagen materials for use in biomedicine and pharmaceutical, food, and cosmetic industries. Although the commercial sector focuses primarily on native-like recombinant collagens, in the future, variants with customized characteristics, including thermostability and the ability to interact with specific ligands, may offer significant advantages over their native-like counterparts. Technologies to produce recombinant collagens for both research and commercial purposes have evolved significantly over the last three decades. Initially, the main focus was on engineering and expressing DNA constructs encoding the native-like human collagens, most notably collagen I. The initial challenges of expressing stable human collagen I molecules with the correct 2:1 ratio of the α1(I) and the α2(I) chains were solved so that human recombinant collagen types, both heterotrimeric and homotrimeric, can now be readily produced [73,93]. Similarly, Pihlajamaa et al. reported a successful expression of heterotrimeric collagen IX with the expected chain composition [97]. Studies on the mechanisms of binding interactions of collagens with cells demonstrated that triple-helical regions include distinct domains, usually formed by only a few amino acid residues, that interact specifically with collagen-specific cell receptors, including integrins, DDRs, GPVI, or LAIR-1 (Figure 2). These receptors not only recognize defined collagen sites, but some of them (e.g., GPVI) require collagen I and collagen III molecules in their fibrillar form. Although some of the collagen-specific receptors may also bind to the linear peptides (i.e., not triple-helical) corresponding to the native binding sites, the binding interactions are usually weak and may not trigger tissue-specific cell responses [98]. Because of those site-specific binding interactions that control many processes, including cell attachment, migration, and proliferation, scientists developed a concept of producing biologically active collagen fragments instead of the full-length native-like collagen molecules. The premise for this concept is that expressing or synthesizing short active collagen fragments would provide useful biomaterials with tissue-specific cell signaling properties [99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109]. The need for the triple-helical structure of the cell signaling domains and the fact that they are present in vivo in the context of fibrils, however, make the usefulness of the above concept uncertain. Although the scientific literature describes testing the utilities of many collagen-derived recombinant fragments to serve as biomaterials for tissue engineering and wound-healing applications, thus far, these constructs have provided useful experimental tools but have not been applied clinically. In one example, however, a linear, i.e., non-triple helical, peptide, called P-15, is utilized as an ingredient in a bone graft material (i-FACTOR, CeraPedics Inc., Westminster, CO, USA) [110,111]. The P-15 peptide is derived from the collagen I site characterized by a relatively low content of the triple helix-stabilizing hydroxyproline residues [112]. Considering that this peptide does not include any known sites for binding cell receptors, mechanisms of its claimed biological activity remain unknown. Consequently, not knowing its mechanism of action, it is difficult to fully comprehend the benefits of using P-15-containing materials to promote bone tissue repair. Similarly, a commercial product, referred to as recombinant collagen peptide (RCP, Cellnest; Fujifilm), that includes the Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) peptide, has been used in various experiments to promote the regeneration of tissues, including skeletal, pancreatic, vascular, and others [69,113,114,115]. Although the RGD sequence is a part of the binding sites of many integrins, it is not considered the canonical binding site for the collagen-specific integrins α1β1 and α2β1. Moreover, the RGD sequence is not collagen specific. Indeed, it is present in many proteins, including fibronectin, vitronectin, fibrinogen, thrombospondin, entactin, and many other macromolecules. Therefore, due to the lack of a collagenous character, the RGD-based materials should not be classified as collagen mimics. Nevertheless, the RGD peptides must be presented in the form of organized clusters to show optimal cell-binding properties [116,117,118]. This need for organization of the RGD motifs makes the engineering of useful ECM architectures a challenging problem. In addition to collagen-derived peptides with random conformations, researchers produce short collagen fragments with the triple-helical structure (Figure 4). Because short collagen triple helices are usually unstable and unfold at body temperature, scientists developed various techniques to stabilize them. In one example, they flanked collagen-derived sequences of interest with those corresponding to the triple helix-stabilizing Gly-Pro-Pro repeats [119,120,121]. Alternatively, hybridizing the peptides of interest with stabilizing sequences may maintain their triple-helical structures [122]. Moreover, scientists linked the collagen-derived sequences to the foldon domain’s fragments from bacteriophage T4 fibritin [123,124]. As the foldon region has a natural ability to form trimers, its presence stabilizes the triple helices formed by the assembly of short collagen peptides (Figure 4). Furthermore, researchers have explored the possibility of producing relatively short collagen-like fragments fused with bacteria-derived triple-helical peptides. Unlike mammalian collagens, the bacterial collagen-like triple helices remain stable at high temperatures, despite the absence of hydroxyproline residues [55]. Scientists demonstrated that these bacterial collagens are safe and interact with some integrins [125]. Because of their stability, biocompatibility, and potential large-scale production, scientists believe that bacterial collagens hold promise for some biomedical applications (Figure 4) [91,126,127,128]. Although non-native sequences stabilize short collagen fragments, their presence may complicate the clinical approval of these constructs. One approach to circumvent this problem is to engineer the normal-length collagen-like constructs, comprising tandem repeats of selected native domains (Figure 4) [109]. Studies demonstrated that linking short domains into molecules whose length matches native collagens does not alter their ability to form triple-helical structures. However, some of these constructs have low thermostability, which renders them unusable in tissue engineering approaches [107]. Moreover, while some of these constructs retain the ability to aggregate into fibrillar structures, others cannot form proper fibrils [78]. Even though novel tandem-repeat variants have been used as research tools for mapping binding domains for the collagen-specific receptor, defining regions that drive fibrillogenesis, and as delivery vehicles for therapeutic cells, they have not yet been applied clinically [78,106,108,129]. Despite potential problems with the stability of some collagen constructs and the ability to form fibrils, they may still be used to form useful materials. For instance, introducing random chemical crosslinking stabilizes collagen constructs so that they can function at body temperature. Furthermore, to enable the formation of fibrillar structures, researchers use various techniques, including electrospinning and magnetic alignment of collagen molecules [130,131]. 4.4. Proposed Biomedical Applications of Recombinant Collagen Constructs Although this paper does not intend to provide exhaustive details for all published concepts on utilizing recombinant collagen constructs, it presents distinct categories of tested applications, including tissue repair and engineering, drug delivery, and protein replacement therapies (Table 2). Recent literature indicates that scientists have tested the potential of recombinant collagens and their fragments as scaffolds and fillers in tissue engineering and repair approaches. It is worth noting that those tests aimed at defining the fundamental utilities of recombinant collagens in simple experimental models, with only a relatively few transitioning toward more relevant animal-based studies or clinical applications. Researchers fabricated the scaffolds as porous sponges, fibrils, and membranes in 3D configurations to better support cell attachment and growth. Advances in the fabrication of scaffolds, electrospinning methods to align fibrils, and 3D printing technology have opened new possibilities to create organized scaffolds as well as tissue-like bioprinted constructs that include cells [113,130,132,133]. Because of the gelling properties of collagen constructs, they may be used to make injectable liquid materials that solidify at body temperature. This property allows the creation of scaffolds with proper shapes directly at the injury sites. Furthermore, the gels offer drug-delivery and cell-delivery vehicles that shield their cargo and release it in a controlled way. In one example, Confalonieri et al. employed a commercially available recombinant collagen peptide containing the RGD sequence as a material to form microspheres to support the growth of mesenchymal stromal cells [115]. Similarly, scientists proposed recombinant collagen-based hydrogels to regenerate damaged heart tissue [75]. Although recombinant collagens are not widely utilized for clinical, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical applications, and because they are used primarily in research applications performed in vitro, in cell culture conditions, and in animals, some companies started to introduce products fabricated from those proteins. In one notable example, the full-length collagen I expressed in tobacco plants is utilized in clinically applied products CE marked and approved for sale in Europe and Israel. These products (CollPlant Ltd.) include a flowable gel construct (VergenixFG) for wound dressing and a material for the treatment of tendinopathy (VergenixSTR) [95,96,134]. Moreover, recombinant gelatin was once considered promising for use in pharmaceutical formulations, including vaccines and drug-delivery capsules, but it has not yet found its way into the market. According to the summary list of vaccines licensed for use in the USA, hydrolyzed gelatin of the porcine origin serves as the stabilizer in most vaccine formulations [135]. 5. Recombinant Collagens for Protein Replacement Therapies Recombinant collagens could potentially be used in a protein replacement therapy in patients who suffer from genetic disorders due to mutations in collagen genes (Table 3). Although these disorders are very heterogeneous with no clear genotype–phenotype relationship, most are characterized by a decrease in a collagen type affected by a mutation [17]. Thus far, tests of the utility of the collagen replacement therapies have focused on diseases that affect basement membranes of the skin and kidney. In the first case, researchers targeted collagen VII, and in the second case, they targeted collagen IV [157,158,159,160]. While most collagen mutations are single amino acid substitutions that allow mutant collagen chain production, some mutations create premature stop codons that entirely prevent biosynthesis. For instance, in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB), a form of blistering skin disease, collagen VII may be absent. The lack of collagen VII in the basement membranes, where this protein plays a pivotal mechanical role, causes severe skin fragility and blistering of the esophagus and the eye surface. Furthermore, the progressive nature of RDEB leads to excessive skin damage, scarring, contractures, and fusion of the fingers, and RDEB patients may also develop squamous cell carcinoma [161]. Despite some experimental approaches to treat RDEB, there are no therapies to cure this disorder. To date, researchers have tested the following methods to introduce normal collagen VII into diseased tissues: (i) protein replacement therapies by delivery of the COL7A1 gene that encodes normal collagen VII chains, and (ii) direct delivery of recombinant collagen VII protein [162]. Considering the direct delivery of collagen VII, scientists produced the recombinant form of this protein and then injected it directly into collagen VII-null mice. When Remington et al. injected recombinant collagen VII into the skin of collagen VII-deficient mice, they observed site-specific accumulation of this protein in the area of the dermal basement membrane zone and the formation of collagen VII assemblies, namely the anchoring fibrils [158]. Despite injecting collagen VII into the mice lacking this protein, the authors did not observe the formation of anti-collagen VII antibodies. In another study, recombinant collagen VII was injected into the bloodstream of the collagen VII-null mice and observed that, as in the case of the intradermal injection, the exogenous recombinant collagen VII accumulated in proper tissue locations, including the dermal–epidermal junction, tongue, and esophagus [157]. Despite these promising preliminary results in mice, the direct delivery of recombinant collagen VII has not moved from bench to bed, such as to improve the structural integrity of tissues among patients with RDEB. The reasons for this lack of progress in protein replacement therapy for RDEB are not clear. However, it seems that the direct delivery of collagen VII into cavities of connective tissues is challenging. One of the potential problems might be a large Stokes radius of collagen VII, one of the largest known proteins in the human body, present in solution. Thus, it is unlikely that collagen VII, or other collagen types, could readily diffuse to the target tissue sites. This problem is amplified by the fact that a high-affinity collagen VII–collagen VII binding interaction promotes unwanted aggregation [84]. Furthermore, before self-assembly into functional anchoring fibrils, the procollagen C proteinase must cleave collagen VII [84]. In brief, procollagen C proteinase has to cleave a portion of the C-terminal propeptide before processed molecules can form anti-parallel dimers stabilized by the disulfide bonds. Subsequently, the dimers must bundle together and arrange into the anchoring fibrils that interlace with the dermal and epidermal matrices. It is unlikely that these intricate processes occur efficiently with exogenous collagen VII delivered by transdermal or intravenous injections. Recent research by Supp et al. supports this notion: utilizing relevant models, the authors demonstrated that for the anchoring fibrils to form and function correctly within the dermal–epidermal junction, both epidermal keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts must produce collagen VII [163]. An additional potential limitation of the direct delivery of collagen VII is its half-life. As demonstrated by Khül et al., the collagen VII half-life is about one month, which means this protein would have to be injected frequently in large quantities to have any meaningful positive, long-term effects [164]. Furthermore, it is unclear what effect the intravenous injection of collagen VII has on platelet aggregation. Although experiments in vivo demonstrated that this collagen type does not aggregate platelets as strongly as fibril-forming collagens, it can still activate them. Thus, we cannot exclude a possibility that collagen VII in the bloodstream will not trigger clot formation [165]. Due to the concerns presented above for direct collagen VII delivery, clinical application of protein replacement therapies for other collagen types may be subject to similar problems. For instance, scientists have considered collagen IV delivery, via local or systemic routes, to treat Alport syndrome caused by genetic aberrations of collagen IV [159]. However, scientists have not yet determined the efficacy of this approach thus far, and concerns persist regarding aggregation, diffusion, and potential activation of platelets. Choosing the potential treatment time is an additional consideration for using replacement therapies to treat disorders caused by a mutation in collagen genes. As collagens are needed to form templates of tissues from early embryonic development, it is unclear whether the post-natal delivery of a therapeutic recombinant collagen type would restore and maintain functional target tissue. As demonstrated in a mouse model of spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia caused by a mutation in collagen II, only early embryonic interventions led to normal skeletal tissues. In contrast, late embryonic and post-natal interventions did not improve these tissues in any significant way [166,167]. Ultimately, clinical trials are needed, such as those planned by Phoenix Tissue Repair, Inc. to determine the safety and efficacy of protein replacement therapy to treat RDEB patients harboring collagen VII mutations [168]. If successful, these trials may open a possibility for using replacement therapy for diseases caused by mutations in other collagen types. Table 3 highlights experimental replacement therapies that utilize recombinant collagens. 6. Constraints on Implementing Recombinant Collagen Technology in Clinical Applications Despite developing technologies to design and produce recombinant collagens with native structures and collagen-derived constructs, these proteins have not so far succeeded in the clinical marketplace. Although it is beyond the scope of this review to analyze the specific reason for this situation, possible causes include the following points:There is no clear consensus on a system for large-scale recombinant collagen production that would be accepted by the regulatory agencies responsible for approving biologics for commercial clinical use. The production systems encompass different organisms, including bacteria, mammalian cells, insect cells, yeast, transgenic animals, and transgenic plants. There is no consensus on the most relevant form of recombinant collagens needed in the market. While some studies consider production and application of the native-like collagens, others propose to manufacture and use collagen-derived synthetic linear peptides, triple-helical fragments, and genetically engineered collagen-inspired constructs. For instance, it is not clear whether recombinant gelatin will be manufactured from the full-length recombinant collagens or selected recombinant fragments. Because of the wide span of potential biomedical applications of recombinant collagens, ranging from drug delivery, tissue engineering, wound healing, and protein replacement therapies, there is no identifiable leading product that could attract the attention of the market. Many different collagen types are needed for medical applications in distinct tissues and organs, amplifying this problem. Although some concerns about the safety of animal-derived collagen materials exist, pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and food industries continue to use them. Furthermore, because these materials are readily available from tissues of isolated animal herds, they are likely less expensive than recombinant collagens whose production requires advanced technologies. Even with a few companies’ early interest in producing and delivering large amounts of recombinant collagens and gelatins, no commercial products are widely available on the market. This situation may indicate that the market’s needs differed from companies’ expectations about recombinant collagens’ commercial potential. Tissue engineering is a crucial proposed use for recombinant collagen variants. Despite the promising preclinical results of many tissue-engineered medical products, only a few have had success in the clinic thus far [169]. Consequently, it is likely that the primary potential beneficiary of recombinant collagen technology, i.e., the tissue engineering industry, does not clamor for novel recombinant collagen-based materials in any significant way. Considering these factors, it is likely that technologies to produce and implement recombinant collagen-based products face an uphill battle in finding a permanent place in the market. Meanwhile, animal-derived collagens will most likely continue to provide the bulk of material needed for biomedical, pharmaceutical, food, and cosmetic industries. Recombinant collagens, however, will expand their role as a valuable research tool needed to study not only the family of collagenous proteins but also on the extracellular matrix as a whole. Acknowledgments The author thanks Jennifer Fisher Wilson for providing editorial feedback. Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Funding This research received no external funding. Conflicts of Interest The author declares no conflict of interest. Figure 1 A schematic of intracellular and extracellular molecules and processes that control the formation of collagen fibrils. (A) Biosynthesis and post-translational modifications of individual procollagen α-chains; during this process, selected proline and lysine residues are hydroxylated. (B) The interaction of procollagen chains with protein chaperones that control the folding of triple helices. (C,D) The selection of procollagen chains and nucleation of triple helices. (E) Translocation and secretion of procollagen molecules into the extracellular space. (F) Cleavage of the N propeptide by PNP and C propeptides by PCP. (G,H) Assembly of collagen molecules into fibrils and formation of covalent cross-links (X). Symbols: P; proline residues, K; lysine residues, P4H; prolyl 4-hydroxylase, LH; lysyl hydroxylase, P3H1; prolyl 3-hydroxylase, CRTAP; cartilage-associated protein, CyB; cyclophilin B, HSP47; heat shock protein 47, PDI; disulfide isomerase, FKPB65; immunophilin, PNP; procollagen N proteinase, PCP; procollagen C proteinase. Figure 2 Sites of binding of collagen-specific receptors in collagen I (C-I) and collagen III (C-III). Red arrows; integrin-binding sites, black arrows; discoidin domain receptor (DDR)-binding sites, green arrows; glycoprotein VI (GPVI)-binding sites, blue arrows; leukocyte-associated immunoglobulin-like receptor 1 (LAIR1)-binding sites. Figure 3 A schematic explaining the formation of the fibril-specific features formed due to aggregation of individual collagen molecules. The schematic illustrates the formation of the hydrophobic cluster (indicated by the black line (|) across the fibril in (A–C)). (A) A banding pattern of a positively stained collagen fibril. Defined bands (a, b, c, d, and e) are indicated. Please note that the hydrophobic cluster is located between c2 and d bands. Gaps (gp), overlaps (ov), and D-period (Dp) regions are visible. (B,C) Detailed representation of the gap and overlap zones with the hydrophobic cluster indicated as a black line (|). Additionally, MMP1 cleavage site present in the D4 period is indicated. (D) A hydrophobicity plots of overlapping D-periods (C,E) [19]. The highlighted zone indicates the unique lipid-binding (LB) region studied here and characterized by poor content of hydroxyproline residues (HpP). This zone corresponds to the region indicated by the black line (|) in (A–C). Figure 4 A schematic representation of recombinant collagen constructs studied by various research groups. NT; a native collagen molecule in which regions that correspond to the consecutive D-periods are indicated with different colors, -D1, -D2, -D3, and -D4; truncated collagen constructs in which specific D-periods were omitted, mD1, mD2, mD3, and mD4; collagen constructs comprising tandem repeats of specific D-periods, ST; a short collagen fragment stabilized by flanking it with stabilizing triple-helical peptides, F; a short collagen fragment stabilized by foldon domains, BC; a short collagen fragment stabilized by a fragment derived from bacterial collagen, CP; a recombinant or a synthetic linear peptide derived from collagen. bioengineering-07-00155-t001_Table 1Table 1 A summary of the expression systems for production of recombinant collagens. Expression System Examples of Collagen Constructs Requirement for Co-Expression of P4H (N = No, Y = Yes) Industrial-Scale Production (N = No, Y = Yes) Commercial Evaluation (N = No, Y = Yes) References Mammalian cells (HT1080, CHO, HEK293, NIH3T3) Native-like human procollagens, including procollagen I, procollagen II, collagen VI, procollagen VII. Fragments of procollagens, including mini-collagen II, mini-collagen I homotrimer, mini-collagen VII, C-terminal propeptides of procollagen III, and fragments of collagen IV N N N [4,50,53,83,84,85,86,87,88] Insect cells Native-like collagens including collagen I, collagen II, collagen III, collagen IX, collagen N N N [89,90] Mammary glands of transgenic mice Collagen I homotrimer N N N [62] Escherichia coli Human-derived mini-collagen III, collagen fragments, including C propeptide of collagen XVIII, and fragments of collagen I Y N N [61] Escherichia coli Collagen fragments stabilized by bacterial collagen-like sequences N N N [91,92] Yeast cells Native-like human collagen I, collagen III, gelatin Y Y Y [28,60,72,93] Transgenic plants Native-like human collagen I Y Y Y [59,77,94,95,96] bioengineering-07-00155-t002_Table 2Table 2 Examples of recombinant collagen-based constructs and their potential applications in tissue repair and engineering. Collagen Construct Expression System Proposed Application Experimental Tests Applied Products (N = No, Y = Yes) References Full-length native-like collagen II, collagen VII Mammalian cells HT1080, CHO Cartilage engineering, protein replacement in patients harboring mutations in collagen VII, research tool In vitro, mouse N [88,105] Truncated and modified collagen II variants, truncated collagen VII Mammalian cells HT1080, HEK293 Cartilage engineering, research tool In vitro, mouse N [16,83,109] Full-length native-like human collagen I, collagen III Yeasts Fabrication of scaffolds and hydrogels to repair damaged tissues Mouse N [75] Hemostatic materials Rabbit N [136] Implants to regenerate cornea Human N [137,138] Modified collagen III Yeasts Materials with increased thermostability In vitro N [139] Materials with customized collagen III sequences for support of stem cells In vitro N [129] Collagen III constructs containing integrin-binding sites from collagen I and laminin Yeasts Scaffolds to support neural progenitor cells In vitro N [129] Non-triple helical collagen I fragment Yeasts Scaffolds for tissue regeneration In vitro N [99] Scaffolds for transplantation of pancreatic islets Mouse N [140] Grafting material for bone regeneration In vitro N [115,141,142,143,144] Native-like collagen II Yeasts Hydrogel to support chondrogenesis of mesenchymal stromal cells In vitro N [145,146] Collagen I fragment fused with (Pro-Gly-Pro)9 peptides Yeasts Gelatin mimetic In vitro N [31] Full-length human collagen III Bacteria NA In vitro N [70] Collagen III fragments fused with bacteria-derived collagen-like proteins Bacteria Inhibitors of DDR signaling In vitro N [147] Tandem repeats of the (GAPGAPGSQGAPGLQ) fragment Bacteria Material to deliver BMP-2 for bone repair Mouse N [148] Tandem repeats of (GPP) fragment Fabrication of biocompatible surfaces In vitro N [149] Fragment of turtle-derived collagen Bacteria Antioxidant material In vitro N [150] Collagen III-derived fragments Bacteria Treatment of vaginal atrophy Rat N [151] Full-length native-like human collagen I Tobacco Wound dressing materials Y [134] Matrices for ovarian grafting Mouse N [152] Scaffolds for bone and skin repair In vitro N [153,154] Electro-spun fibrils for tendon-repair materials In vitro N [155] Injectable material combined with platelet-rich plasma for treatment of lateral epicondylar tendinopathy Human Y [76] Short collagen-derived linear peptides Bacteria, yeast (recombinant technology) and chemical synthesis Osteogenic material In vitro, human Y [68,69,110,115,156] bioengineering-07-00155-t003_Table 3Table 3 Experimental protein replacement therapies with the use of recombinant collagens. Disease Collagen Target Experimental Model Clinical Tests Applied Clinically References Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa Collagen VII Intradermal or intravenous delivery of recombinant collagen VII into mice Y N [168] Alport syndrome Collagen IV Systemic delivery N N [159,160] ==== Refs References 1. Kesik-Brodacka M. Progress in biopharmaceutical development Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2018 65 306 322 10.1002/bab.1617 28972297 2. Choi S.M. Chaudhry P. Zo S.M. Han S.S. Advances in protein-based materials: From origin to novel biomaterials Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2018 1078 161 210 30357624 3. Girotti A. Orbanic D. Ibanez-Fonseca A. Gonzalez-Obeso C. Rodriguez-Cabello J.C. Recombinant technology in the development of materials and systems for soft-tissue repair Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2015 4 2423 2455 10.1002/adhm.201500152 26172311 4. Brodsky B. Ramshaw J.A.M. Bioengineered collagens Fibrous Proteins: Structures and Mechanisms. Subcellular Biochemistry Parry D.A.D. Squire J.M. Springer International Publishing Cham, Switzerland 2017 Volume 82 601 629 5. Ricard-Blum S. The collagen family Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011 3 a004978 10.1101/cshperspect.a004978 21421911 6. Hintze V. Steplewski A. Ito H. Jensen D.A. Rodeck U. Fertala A. Cells expressing partially unfolded R789C/p.R989C type II procollagen mutant associated with spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia undergo apoptosis Hum. Mutat. 2008 29 841 851 10.1002/humu.20736 18383211 7. Silver F.H. Freeman J.W. Seehra G.P. Collagen self-assembly and the development of tendon mechanical properties J. Biomech. 2003 36 1529 1553 10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00135-0 14499302 8. Prockop D.J. Fertala A. The collagen fibril: The almost crystalline structure J. Struct. Biol. 1998 122 111 118 10.1006/jsbi.1998.3976 9724611 9. Silver D. Miller J. Harrison R. Prockop D.J. Helical model of nucleation and propagation to account for the growth of type I collagen fibrils from symmetrical pointed tips: A special example of self-assembly of rod-like monomers Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992 89 9860 9864 10.1073/pnas.89.20.9860 1409713 10. Sundaramoorthy M. Meiyappan M. Todd P. Hudson B.G. Crystal structure of NC1 domains. Structural basis for type IV collagen assembly in basement membranes J. Biol. Chem. 2002 277 31142 31153 10.1074/jbc.M201740200 11970952 11. Kadler K.E. Hojima Y. Prockop D.J. Assembly of collagen fibrils de novo by cleavage of the type I pC-collagen with procollagen C-proteinase. Assay of critical concentration demonstrates that collagen self-assembly is a classical example of an entropy-driven process J. Biol. Chem. 1987 262 15696 15701 3316206 12. Shayegan M. Altindal T. Kiefl E. Forde N.R. Intact telopeptides enhance interactions between collagens Biophys. J. 2016 111 2404 2416 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.10.039 27926842 13. Prockop D.J. Fertala A. Inhibition of the self-assembly of collagen I into fibrils with synthetic peptides. Demonstration that assembly is driven by specific binding sites on the monomers J. Biol. Chem. 1998 273 15598 15604 10.1074/jbc.273.25.15598 9624151 14. Chen W. Yang A. Jia J. Popov Y.V. Schuppan D. You H. Lysyl oxidase (LOX) family members: Rationale and their potential as therapeutic targets for liver fibrosis Hepatology 2020 72 729 741 10.1002/hep.31236 32176358 15. Khoshnoodi J. Sigmundsson K. Cartailler J.P. Bondar O. Sundaramoorthy M. Hudson B.G. Mechanism of chain selection in the assembly of collagen IV: A prominent role for the α2 chain J. Biol. Chem. 2006 281 6058 6069 10.1074/jbc.M506555200 16373348 16. Colombo M. Brittingham R.J. Klement J.F. Majsterek I. Birk D.E. Uitto J. Fertala A. Procollagen VII self-assembly depends on site-specific interactions and is promoted by cleavage of the NC2 domain with procollagen C-proteinase Biochemistry 2003 42 11434 11442 10.1021/bi034925d 14516194 17. Royce P.M. Steinmann B. Connective Tissue and Its Heritable Disorders: Molecular, Genetic, and Medical Aspects 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons Hoboken, NJ, USA 2002 1201 18. Sweeney S.M. Orgel J.P. Fertala A. McAuliffe J.D. Turner K.R. Di Lullo G.A. Chen S. Antipova O. Perumal S. Ala-Kokko L. Candidate cell and matrix interaction domains on the collagen fibril, the predominant protein of vertebrates J. Biol. Chem. 2008 283 21187 21197 10.1074/jbc.M709319200 18487200 19. Kyte J. Doolittle R.F. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein J. Mol. Biol. 1982 157 105 132 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90515-0 7108955 20. Lin K. Zhang D. Macedo M.H. Cui W. Sarmento B. Shen G. Advanced Collagen-Based Biomaterials for Regenerative Biomedicine Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019 29 10.1002/adfm.201804943 21. Sorushanova A. Delgado L.M. Wu Z. Shologu N. Kshirsagar A. Raghunath R. Mullen A.M. Bayon Y. Pandit A. Raghunath M. The collagen suprafamily: From biosynthesis to advanced biomaterial development Adv. Mater. 2019 31 10.1002/adma.201801651 22. Bogdanovic J. Halsey N.A. Wood R.A. Hamilton R.G. Bovine and porcine gelatin sensitivity in children sensitized to milk and meat J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2009 124 1108 1110 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.06.021 19665767 23. Cardoso F.M.C. Petrovajova D. Hornakova T. Viral vaccine stabilizers: Status and trends Acta Virol. 2017 61 231 239 10.4149/av_2017_301 28854787 24. Olsen D. Yang C. Bodo M. Chang R. Leigh S. Baez J. Carmichael D. Perala M. Hamalainen E.R. Jarvinen M. Recombinant collagen and gelatin for drug delivery Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2003 55 1547 1567 10.1016/j.addr.2003.08.008 14623401 25. Brey Gil V.S. Brey Gil C.S. Goulart G.A.C. Oréfice R.L. Multi-drug hybrid delivery systems with distinct release profiles based on gelatin/collagen containing vesicles derived from block copolymers Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019 139 967 974 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.08.056 31401279 26. Yu J. Lai T.-C. Tsai W.-B. Fabrication of gelatin- and collagen-based hydrogels for controlled drug release Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2016 4 10.3389/conf.FBIOE.2016.01.00321 27. Liu D. Nikoo M. Boran G. Zhou P. Regenstein J.M. Collagen and gelatin Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2015 6 527 557 10.1146/annurev-food-031414-111800 25884286 28. Avila Rodriguez M.I. Rodriguez Barroso L.G. Sanchez M.L. Collagen: A review on its sources and potential cosmetic applications J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2018 17 20 26 10.1111/jocd.12450 29144022 29. Senadheera T.R.L. Dave D. Shahidi F. Sea cucumber derived type I collagen: A comprehensive review Mar. Drugs 2020 18 471 10.3390/md18090471 30. Sionkowska A. Adamiak K. Musial K. Gadomska M. Collagen based materials in cosmetic applications: A review Materials 2020 13 4217 10.3390/ma13194217 31. Davison-Kotler E. Marshall W.S. García-Gareta E. Sources of collagen for biomaterials in skin wound healing Bioengineering 2019 6 56 10.3390/bioengineering6030056 32. Carvalho A.M. Marques A.P. Silva T.J.Q.L.H. Reis R.L. Evaluation of the potential of collagen from codfish skin as a biomaterial for biomedical applications Mar. Drugs 2018 16 495 10.3390/md16120495 33. Mullins R.J. Richards C. Walker T. Allergic reactions to oral, surgical and topical bovine collagen: Anaphylactic risk for surgeons Aust. N. Z. J. Ophthalmol. 1996 24 257 260 10.1111/j.1442-9071.1996.tb01589.x 8913129 34. Keefe J. Wauk L. Chu S. DeLustro F. Clinical use of injectable bovine collagen: A decade of experience Clin. Mater. 1992 9 155 162 10.1016/0267-6605(92)90095-B 10171198 35. García-Domingo M.I. Alijotas-Reig J. Cisteró-Bahima A. Tresserra F. Enrique E. Disseminated and recurrent sarcoid-like granulomatous panniculitis due to bovine collagen injection J. Investig. Allergol. Clin. Immunol. 2000 10 107 109 36. Collinge J. Prion diseases of humans and animals: Their causes and molecular basis Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2001 24 519 550 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.519 11283320 37. Richt J.A. Kasinathan P. Hamir A.N. Castilla J. Sathiyaseelan T. Vargas F. Sathiyaseelan J. Wu H. Matsushita H. Koster J. Production of cattle lacking prion protein Nat. Biotechnol. 2007 25 132 138 10.1038/nbt1271 17195841 38. Lynn A.K. Yannas I.V. Bonfield W. Antigenicity and immunogenicity of collagen J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B 2004 71 343 354 10.1002/jbm.b.30096 39. Charriere G. Bejot M. Schnitzler L. Ville G. Hartmann D.J. Reactions to a bovine collagen implant. Clinical and immunologic study in 705 patients J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1989 21 1203 1208 10.1016/S0190-9622(89)70330-3 2584456 40. Eaglstein W.H. Alvarez O.M. Auletta M. Leffel D. Rogers G.S. Zitelli J.A. Norris J.E.C. Thomas I. Irondo M. Fewkes J. Acute excisional wounds treated with a tissue-engineered skin (Apligraf) Dermatol. Surg. 1999 25 195 201 10.1046/j.1524-4725.1999.08186.x 10193966 41. Requena L. Requena C. Christensen L. Zimmermann U.S. Kutzner H. Cerroni L. Adverse reactions to injectable soft tissue fillers J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2011 64 1 34 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.02.064 21167403 42. Zeng W. Osterman M. Stern P.J. Inflammatory reactions to xenogenic nerve wraps: A report of three cases J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2019 9 e0302 10.2106/JBJS.CC.18.00302 43. Budinger L. Hertl M. Immunologic mechanisms in hypersensitivity reactions to metal ions: An overview Allergy 2000 55 108 115 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2000.00107.x 10726725 44. Flier M. Burg C. Pos O. Plassche-Boers E. Bruynzeel D.P. Garotta G. Scheper R.J. In vitro studies in nickel allergy: Diagnostic value of a dual parameter analysis J. Investig. Dermatol. 1987 88 362 368 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12469023 3549912 45. Meyer K.K. Beezhold D.H. Latex allergy: How safe are your gloves? Bull. Am. Coll. Surg. 1997 82 72 46. Giordano P. Sileri P. Buntzen S. Stuto A. Nunoo-Mensah J. Lenisa L. Singh B. Thorlacius-Ussing O. Griffiths B. Ziyaie D. Final results of a European, multi-centre, prospective, observational study of Permacol™ collagen paste injection for the treatment of anal fistula Colorectal. Dis. 2018 20 243 251 10.1111/codi.13715 28493393 47. Miyoshi M. Liu S. Collagen-induced arthritis models Methods Mol. Biol. 2018 1868 3 7 30244448 48. Fertala A. Shah M. Hoffman R. Arnold W.V. Designing recombinant collagens for biomedical applications Curr. Tissue Eng. 2016 5 73 84 10.2174/2211542005666160616124053 49. Schnieke A. Dziadek M. Bateman J. Mascara T. Harbers K. Gelinas R. Jaenisch R. Introduction of the human pro α1(I) collagen gene into pro α1(I)-deficient Mov-13 mouse cells leads to formation of functional mouse-human hybrid type I collagen Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1987 84 764 768 10.1073/pnas.84.3.764 3468512 50. Olsen A.S. Geddis A.E. Prockop D.J. High levels of expression of a minigene version of the human pro α1 (I) collagen gene in stably transfected mouse fibroblasts. Effects of deleting putative regulatory sequences in the first intron J. Biol. Chem. 1991 266 1117 1121 1702430 51. Specks U. Mayer U. Nischt R. Spissinger T. Mann K. Timpl R. Engel J. Chu M.L. Structure of recombinant N-terminal globule of type VI collagen α3 chain and its binding to heparin and hyaluronan EMBO J. 1992 11 4281 4290 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05527.x 1425570 52. Mazzorana M. Gruffat H. Sergeant A. Rest M. Mechanisms of collagen trimer formation. Construction and expression of a recombinant minigene in HeLa cells reveals a direct effect of prolyl hydroxylation on chain assembly of type XII collagen J. Biol. Chem. 1993 268 3029 3032 8428977 53. Fertala A. Sieron A.L. Ganguly A. Li S.W. Ala-Kokko L. Anumula K.R. Prockop D.J. Synthesis of recombinant human procollagen II in a stably transfected tumour cell line (HT1080) Biochem. J. 1994 298 31 37 10.1042/bj2980031 8129728 54. Bulleid N.J. John D.C. Kadler K.E. Recombinant expression systems for the production of collagen Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2000 28 350 353 10.1042/bst0280350 10961917 55. Lukomski S. Nakashima K. Abdi I. Cipriano V.J. Ireland R.M. Reid S.D. Adams G.G. Musser J.M. Identification and characterization of the scl gene encoding a group A Streptococcus extracellular protein virulence factor with similarity to human collagen Infect. Immun. 2000 68 6542 6553 10.1128/IAI.68.12.6542-6553.2000 11083763 56. Sutherland T.D. Peng Y.Y. Trueman H.E. Weisman S. Okada S. Walker A.A. Sriskantha A. White J.F. Huson M.G. Werkmeister J.A. A new class of animal collagen masquerading as an insect silk Sci. Rep. 2013 3 2864 10.1038/srep02864 24091725 57. Fertala A. Sieron A.L. Hojima Y. Ganguly A. Prockop D.J. Self-assembly into fibrils of collagen II by enzymic cleavage of recombinant procollagen II. Lag period, critical concentration, and morphology of fibrils differ from collagen I J. Biol. Chem. 1994 269 11584 11589 8157691 58. Ruggiero F. Exposito J.Y. Bournat P. Gruber V. Perret S. Comte J. Olagnier B. Garrone R. Theisen M. Triple helix assembly and processing of human collagen produced in transgenic tobacco plants FEBS Lett. 2000 469 132 136 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)01259-X 10708770 59. Xu X. Gan Q. Clough R.C. Pappu K.M. Howard J.A. Baez J.A. Wang K. Hydroxylation of recombinant human collagen type I α1 in transgenic maize co-expressed with a recombinant human prolyl 4-hydroxylase BMC Biotechnol. 2011 11 69 10.1186/1472-6750-11-69 21702901 60. Gellermann P. Schneider-Barthold C. Bolten S.N. Overfelt E. Scheper T. Pepelanova I. Production of a recombinant non-hydroxylated gelatin mimetic in Pichia pastoris for biomedical applications J. Funct. Biomater. 2019 10 39 10.3390/jfb10030039 61. Rutschmann C. Baumann S. Cabalzar J. Luther K.B. Hennet T. Recombinant expression of hydroxylated human collagen in Escherichia coli Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014 98 4445 4455 10.1007/s00253-013-5447-z 24362857 62. John D.C. Watson R. Kind A.J. Scott A.R. Kadler K.E. Bulleid N.J. Expression of an engineered form of recombinant procollagen in mouse milk Nat. Biotechnol. 1999 17 385 389 10.1038/7945 10207889 63. Berg R.A. Human Recombinant Collagen in the Milk of Transgenic Animals Application Number 183,648 United States Patent US 5,667,839 16 9 1997 64. Harvey A.J. Rapp J.C. Method of Using a Transgenic Chicken to Produce Exogenous Proteins in Its Eggs Application Number 15/181,987 United States Patent US 10,182,561 22 1 2019 65. Brodsky B. Ramshaw J.A. Bioengineered collagens Subcell. Biochem. 2017 82 601 629 28101874 66. Jacobsen M.K. Andresen A.D.K. Jespersen A.B. Støttrup C. Carreon L.Y. Overgaard S. Andersen M. Randomized double blind clinical trial of ABM/P-15 versus allograft in noninstrumented lumbar fusion surgery Spine J. 2020 20 677 684 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.01.009 32001384 67. Mohanram Y. Zhang J. Tsiridis E. Yang X.B. Comparing bone tissue engineering efficacy of HDPSCs, HBMSCs on 3D biomimetic ABM-P-15 scaffolds in vitro and in vivo Cytotechnology 2020 72 715 730 10.1007/s10616-020-00414-7 32820463 68. Weber S.C. Herz A.H. Method for Recombinant Yeast Expression and Isolation of Water-Soluble Collagen-Type Polypeptides Application Number 383,748 United States Patent US 5,710,252 20 1 1998 69. Mashiko T. Takada H. Wu S.H. Kanayama K. Feng J. Tashiro K. Asahi R. Sunaga A. Hoshi K. Kurisaki A. Therapeutic effects of a recombinant human collagen peptide bioscaffold with human adipose-derived stem cells on impaired wound healing after radiotherapy J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2018 12 1186 1194 10.1002/term.2647 29377539 70. Shi J. Ma X. Gao Y. Fan D. Zhu C. Mi Y. Xue W. Hydroxylation of human type III collagen α chain by recombinant coexpression with a viral prolyl 4-hydroxylase in Escherichia coli Protein J. 2017 36 322 331 10.1007/s10930-017-9723-0 28589291 71. Vuorela A. Myllyharju J. Nissi R. Pihlajaniemi T. Kivirikko K.I. Assembly of human prolyl 4-hydroxylase and type III collagen in the yeast Pichia pastoris : Formation of a stable enzyme tetramer requires coexpression with collagen and assembly of a stable collagen requires coexpression with prolyl 4-hydroxylase EMBO J. 1997 16 6702 6712 10.1093/emboj/16.22.6702 9362485 72. Baez J. Olsen D. Polarek J.W. Recombinant microbial systems for the production of human collagen and gelatin Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005 69 245 252 10.1007/s00253-005-0180-x 16240115 73. Stein H. Wilensky M. Tsafrir Y. Rosenthal M. Amir R. Avraham T. Ofir K. Dgany O. Yayon A. Shoseyov O. Production of bioactive, post-translationally modified, heterotrimeric, human recombinant type-I collagen in transgenic tobacco Biomacromolecules 2009 10 2640 2645 10.1021/bm900571b 19678700 74. McTiernan C.D. Simpson F.C. Haagdorens M. Samarawickrama C. Hunter D. Buznyk O. Fagerholm P. Ljunggren M.K. Lewis P. Pintelon I. LiQD Cornea: Pro-regeneration collagen mimetics as patches and alternatives to corneal transplantation Sci. Adv. 2020 6 10.1126/sciadv.aba2187 75. McLaughlin S. McNeill B. Podrebarac J. Hosoyama K. Sedlakova V. Cron G. Smyth D. Seymour R. Goel K. Liang W. Injectable human recombinant collagen matrices limit adverse remodeling and improve cardiac function after myocardial infarction Nat. Commun. 2019 10 4866 10.1038/s41467-019-12748-8 31653830 76. Farkash U. Avisar E. Volk I. Slevin O. Shohat N. El Haj M. Dolev E. Ashraf E. Luria S. First clinical experience with a new injectable recombinant human collagen scaffold combined with autologous platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of lateral epicondylar tendinopathy (tennis elbow) J. Shoulder Elbow. Surg. 2019 28 503 509 10.1016/j.jse.2018.09.007 30487054 77. Ritala A. Wahlstrom E.H. Holkeri H. Hafren A. Makelainen K. Baez J. Makinen K. Nuutila A.M. Production of a recombinant industrial protein using barley cell cultures Protein Expr. Purif. 2008 59 274 281 10.1016/j.pep.2008.02.013 18406168 78. Steplewski A. Hintze V. Fertala A. Molecular basis of organization of collagen fibrils J. Struct. Biol. 2007 157 297 307 10.1016/j.jsb.2006.10.009 17126032 79. Perumal S. Antipova O. Orgel J.P. Collagen fibril architecture, domain organization, and triple-helical conformation govern its proteolysis Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008 105 2824 2829 10.1073/pnas.0710588105 18287018 80. Haywood J. Qi J. Chen C.C. Lu G. Liu Y. Yan J. Shi Y. Gao G.F. Structural basis of collagen recognition by human osteoclast-associated receptor and design of osteoclastogenesis inhibitors Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016 113 1038 1043 10.1073/pnas.1522572113 26744311 81. Boraschi-Diaz I. Wang J. Mort J.S. Komarova S.V. Collagen type I as a ligand for receptor-mediated signaling Front. Phys. 2017 5 10.3389/fphy.2017.00012 82. Zhu J. Madhurapantula R.S. Kalyanasundaram A. Sabharwal T. Antipova O. Bishnoi S.W. Orgel J. Ultrastructural location and interactions of the immunoglobulin receptor binding sequence within fibrillar type I collagen Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020 21 4166 10.3390/ijms21114166 83. Brittingham R. Colombo M. Ito H. Steplewski A. Birk D.E. Uitto J. Fertala A. Single amino acid substitutions in procollagen vii affect early stages of assembly of anchoring fibrils J. Biol. Chem. 2005 280 191 198 10.1074/jbc.M406210200 15509587 84. Brittingham R. Uitto J. Fertala A. High-affinity binding of the NC1 domain of collagen VII to laminin 5 and collagen IV Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006 343 692 699 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.03.034 16563355 85. Geddis A.E. Prockop D.J. Expression of human COL1A1 gene in stably transfected HT1080 cells: The production of a thermostable homotrimer of type I collagen in a recombinant system Matrix 1993 13 399 405 10.1016/S0934-8832(11)80045-4 8246835 86. Arnold W.V. Bachinger H.P. Sieron A. Fertala A. Mechling D. Prockop D.J. Circular dichroism analysis of novel recombinant type II procollagens Matrix Biol. 1996 15 153 10.1016/S0945-053X(96)90010-4 87. Colombatti A. Mucignat M.T. Bonaldo P. Secretion and matrix assembly of recombinant type VI collagen J. Biol. Chem. 1995 270 13105 13111 10.1074/jbc.270.22.13105 7768905 88. Marinkovich M.P. Lane A.T. Rajadas J. Production and Delivery of a Stable Collagen Application Number 14/112,444 26 5 2015 89. Myllyharju J. Lamberg A. Notbohm H. Fietzek P.P. Pihlajaniemi T. Kivirikko K.I. Expression of wild-type and modified proα chains of human type I procollagen in insect cells leads to the formation of stable [α1(I)]2α2(I) collagen heterotrimers and [α1(I)]3 homotrimers but not [α2(I)]3 homotrimers J. Biol. Chem. 1997 272 21824 21830 10.1074/jbc.272.35.21824 9268313 90. Lamberg A. Helaakoski T. Myllyharju J. Peltonen S. Notbohm H. Pihlajaniemi T. Kivirikko K.I. Characterization of human type III collagen expressed in a baculovirus system. Production of a protein with a stable triple helix requires coexpression with the two types of recombinant prolyl 4-hydroxylase subunit J. Biol. Chem. 1996 271 11988 11995 10.1074/jbc.271.20.11988 8662631 91. Peng Y.Y. Yoshizumi A. Danon S.J. Glattauer V. Prokopenko O. Mirochnitchenko O. Yu Z. Inouye M. Werkmeister J.A. Brodsky B. A Streptococcus pyogenes derived collagen-like protein as a non-cytotoxic and non-immunogenic cross-linkable biomaterial Biomaterials 2010 31 2755 2761 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.12.040 20056274 92. Ramshaw J.A. Werkmeister J.A. Dumsday G.J. Bioengineered collagens: Emerging directions for biomedical materials Bioengineered 2014 5 227 233 10.4161/bioe.28791 24717980 93. Nokelainen M. Tu H. Vuorela A. Notbohm H. Kivirikko K.I. Myllyharju J. High-level production of human type I collagen in the yeast Pichia Pastoris Yeast 2001 18 797 806 10.1002/yea.730 11427962 94. Zhang C. Baez J. Pappu K.M. Glatz C.E. Purification and characterization of a transgenic corn grain-derived recombinant collagen type I α1 Biotechnol. Prog. 2009 25 1660 1668 19637392 95. Shoseyov O. Posen Y. Grynspan F. Human collagen produced in plants: More than just another molecule Bioengineered 2014 5 49 52 10.4161/bioe.26002 23941988 96. Shilo S. Roth S. Amzel T. Harel-Adar T. Tamir E. Grynspan F. Shoseyov O. Cutaneous wound healing after treatment with plant-derived human recombinant collagen flowable gel Tissue Eng. Part A 2013 19 1519 1526 10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0345 23259631 97. Pihlajamaa T. Perala M. Vuoristo M.M. Nokelainen M. Bodo M. Schulthess T. Vuorio E. Timpl R. Engel J. Ala-Kokko L. Characterization of recombinant human type IX collagen. Association of α chains into homotrimeric and heterotrimeric molecules J. Biol. Chem. 1999 274 22464 22468 10.1074/jbc.274.32.22464 10428821 98. Xu H. Raynal N. Stathopoulos S. Myllyharju J. Farndale R.W. Leitinger B. Collagen binding specificity of the discoidin domain receptors: Binding sites on collagens II and III and molecular determinants for collagen IV recognition by DDR1 Matrix Biol. 2011 30 16 26 10.1016/j.matbio.2010.10.004 21044884 99. He Y. Hou Z. Wang J. Wang Z. Li X. Liu J. Yang X. Liang Q. Zhao J. Assessment of biological properties of recombinant collagen-hyaluronic acid composite scaffolds Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020 149 1275 1284 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.023 32035148 100. Tytgat L. Markovic M. Qazi T.H. Vagenende M. Bray F. Martins J.C. Rolando C. Thienpont H. Ottevaere H. Ovsianikov A. Photo-crosslinkable recombinant collagen mimics for tissue engineering applications J. Mater. Chem. B 2019 7 3100 3108 10.1039/C8TB03308K 31441462 101. An B. Lin Y.S. Brodsky B. Collagen interactions: Drug design and delivery Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2016 97 69 84 10.1016/j.addr.2015.11.013 26631222 102. An B. Abbonante V. Yigit S. Balduini A. Kaplan D.L. Brodsky B. Definition of the native and denatured type II collagen binding site for fibronectin using a recombinant collagen system J. Biol. Chem. 2014 289 4941 4951 10.1074/jbc.M113.530808 24375478 103. Sutherland T.D. Huson M.G. Rapson T.D. Rational design of new materials using recombinant structural proteins: Current state and future challenges J. Struct. Biol. 2018 201 76 83 10.1016/j.jsb.2017.10.012 29097186 104. Arnold W.V. Fertala A. Sieron A.L. Hattori H. Mechling D. Bachinger H.P. Prockop D.J. Recombinant procollagen II: Deletion of D period segments identifies sequences that are required for helix stabilization and generates a temperature-sensitive N-proteinase cleavage site J. Biol. Chem. 1998 273 31822 31828 10.1074/jbc.273.48.31822 9822649 105. Fertala A. Han W.B. Ko F.K. Mapping critical sites in collagen II for rational design of gene- engineered proteins for cell-supporting materials J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2001 57 48 58 10.1002/1097-4636(200110)57:1<48::AID-JBM1140>3.0.CO;2-S 11416848 106. Sieron A.L. Louneva N. Fertala A. Site-specific interaction of bone morphogenetic protein 2 with procollagen II Cytokine 2002 18 214 221 10.1006/cyto.2002.1035 12126644 107. Majsterek I. McAdams E. Adachi E. Dhume S.T. Fertala A. Prospects and limitations of the rational engineering of fibrillar collagens Protein Sci. 2003 12 2063 2072 10.1110/ps.0385103 12931004 108. Leitinger B. Steplewski A. Fertala A. The D2 period of collagen II contains a specific binding site for the human discoidin domain receptor, DDR2 J. Mol. Biol. 2004 344 993 1003 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.09.089 15544808 109. Ito H. Steplewski A. Alabyeva T. Fertala A. Testing the utility of rationally engineered recombinant collagen-like proteins for applications in tissue engineering J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2006 76 551 560 10.1002/jbm.a.30551 110. Arnold P.M. Sasso R.C. Janssen M.E. Fehlings M.G. Heary R.F. Vaccaro A.R. Kopjar B. i-Factor™ bone graft vs autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 2-year follow-up of the randomized single-blinded food and drug administration investigational device exemption study Neurosurgery 2018 83 377 384 10.1093/neuros/nyx432 28945914 111. Axelsen M.G. Overgaard S. Jespersen S.M. Ding M. Comparison of synthetic bone graft ABM/P-15 and allograft on uninstrumented posterior lumbar spine fusion in sheep J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2019 14 2 10.1186/s13018-018-1042-4 30606209 112. Bhatnagar R.S. Qian J.J. Wedrychowska A. Sadeghi M. Wu Y.M. Smith N. Design of biomimetic habitats for tissue engineering with P-15, a synthetic peptide analogue of collagen Tissue Eng. 1999 5 53 65 10.1089/ten.1999.5.53 10207189 113. Umeyama R. Yamawaki T. Liu D. Kanazawa S. Takato T. Hoshi K. Hikita A. Optimization of culture duration of bone marrow cells before transplantation with a β-tricalcium phosphate/recombinant collagen peptide hybrid scaffold Regen. Ther. 2020 14 284 295 10.1016/j.reth.2020.04.005 32462057 114. Nakamura K. CellSaic, a cell aggregate-like technology using recombinant peptide pieces for MSC transplantation Curr. Stem. Cell Res. Ther. 2019 14 52 56 10.2174/1574888X13666180912125157 30207243 115. Confalonieri D. La Marca M. van Dongen E. Walles H. Ehlicke F. An injectable recombinant collagen I peptide-based macroporous microcarrier allows superior expansion of C2C12 and human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells and supports deposition of mineralized matrix Tissue Eng. Part A 2017 23 946 957 10.1089/ten.tea.2016.0436 28437178 116. Karimi F. McKenzie T.G. O’Connor A.J. Qiao G.G. Heath D.E. Nano-scale clustering of integrin-binding ligands regulates endothelial cell adhesion, migration, and endothelialization rate: Novel materials for small diameter vascular graft applications J. Mater. Chem. B 2017 5 5942 5953 10.1039/C7TB01298E 32264351 117. Kapp T.G. Rechenmacher F. Neubauer S. Maltsev O.V. Cavalcanti-Adam E.A. Zarka R. Reuning U. Notni J. Wester H.J. Mas-Moruno C. A Comprehensive Evaluation of the activity and selectivity profile of ligands for RGD-binding integrins Sci. Rep. 2017 7 39805 10.1038/srep39805 28074920 118. Dong X. Yu Y. Wang Q. Xi Y. Liu Y. Interaction mechanism and clustering among RGD peptides and integrins Mol. Inform. 2017 36 10.1002/minf.201600069 28004516 119. Persikov A.V. Ramshaw J.A. Kirkpatrick A. Brodsky B. Triple-helix propensity of hydroxyproline and fluoroproline: Comparison of host-guest and repeating tripeptide collagen models J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003 125 11500 11501 10.1021/ja036673+ 13129344 120. Brodsky B. Thiagarajan G. Madhan B. Kar K. Triple-helical peptides: An approach to collagen conformation, stability, and self-association Biopolymers 2008 89 345 353 10.1002/bip.20958 18275087 121. Kubyshkin V. Stabilization of the triple helix in collagen mimicking peptides Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019 17 8031 8047 10.1039/C9OB01646E 31464337 122. Delsuc N. Uchinomiya S. Ojida A. Hamachi I. A host-guest system based on collagen-like triple-helix hybridization Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 2017 53 6856 6859 10.1039/C7CC03055J 28604910 123. Setina C.M. Haase J.P. Glatz C.E. Process integration for recovery of recombinant collagen type I α1 from corn seed Biotechnol. Prog. 2016 32 98 107 10.1002/btpr.2191 26518757 124. Du C. Wang M. Liu J. Pan M. Cai Y. Yao J. Improvement of thermostability of recombinant collagen-like protein by incorporating a foldon sequence Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008 79 195 202 10.1007/s00253-008-1427-0 18379779 125. Humtsoe J.O. Kim J.K. Xu Y. Keene D.R. Hook M. Lukomski S. Wary K.K. A streptococcal collagen-like protein interacts with the α2β1 integrin and induces intracellular signaling J. Biol. Chem. 2005 280 13848 13857 10.1074/jbc.M410605200 15647274 126. An B. Kaplan D.L. Brodsky B. Engineered recombinant bacterial collagen as an alternative collagen-based biomaterial for tissue engineering Front. Chem. 2014 2 40 10.3389/fchem.2014.00040 25003103 127. Yoshizumi A. Yu Z. Silva T. Thiagarajan G. Ramshaw J.A. Inouye M. Brodsky B. Self-association of streptococcus pyogenes collagen-like constructs into higher order structures Protein Sci. 2009 18 1241 1251 10.1002/pro.134 19472339 128. Yu Z. An B. Ramshaw J.A. Brodsky B. Bacterial collagen-like proteins that form triple-helical structures J. Struct. Biol. 2014 186 451 461 10.1016/j.jsb.2014.01.003 24434612 129. Que R.A. Arulmoli J. Da Silva N.A. Flanagan L.A. Wang S.W. Recombinant collagen scaffolds as substrates for human neural stem/progenitor cells J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2018 106 1363 1372 10.1002/jbm.a.36343 130. Deng A. Yang Y. Du S. Yang S. Electrospinning of in situ crosslinked recombinant human collagen peptide/chitosan nanofibers for wound healing Biomater. Sci. 2018 6 2197 2208 10.1039/C8BM00492G 30003209 131. Builles N. Janin-Manificat H. Malbouyres M. Justin V. Rovere M.R. Pellegrini G. Torbet J. Hulmes D.J. Burillon C. Damour O. Use of magnetically oriented orthogonal collagen scaffolds for hemi-corneal reconstruction and regeneration Biomaterials 2010 31 8313 8322 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.066 20708260 132. Tytgat L. Dobos A. Markovic M. Van Damme L. Van Hoorick J. Bray F. Thienpont H. Ottevaere H. Dubruel P. Ovsianikov A. High-resolution 3D bioprinting of photo-cross-linkable recombinant collagen to serve tissue engineering applications Biomacromolecules 2020 21 3997 4007 10.1021/acs.biomac.0c00386 32841006 133. Hu K. Hu M. Xiao Y. Cui Y. Yan J. Yang G. Zhang F. Lin G. Yi H. Han L. Preparation recombination human-like collagen/fibroin scaffold and promoting the cell compatibility with osteoblasts J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2020 10.1002/jbm.a.37027 134. Wiser I. Tamir E. Kaufman H. Keren E. Avshalom S. Klein D. Heller L. Shapira E. A novel recombinant human collagen-based flowable matrix for chronic lower limb wound management: First results of a clinical trial Wounds 2019 31 103 107 30802209 135. IVS. Excipients in Vaccines Available online: http://www.vaccinesafety.edu/components-Excipients.htm (accessed on 4 September 2020) 136. Yang C. Hillas P. Tang J. Balan J. Notbohm H. Polarek J. Development of a recombinant human collagen-type III based hemostat J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2004 69 18 24 10.1002/jbm.b.20030 137. Fagerholm P. Lagali N.S. Ong J.A. Merrett K. Jackson W.B. Polarek J.W. Suuronen E.J. Liu Y. Brunette I. Griffith M. Stable corneal regeneration four years after implantation of a cell-free recombinant human collagen scaffold Biomaterials 2014 35 2420 2427 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.079 24374070 138. Fagerholm P. Lagali N.S. Merrett K. Jackson W.B. Munger R. Liu Y. Polarek J.W. Soderqvist M. Griffith M. A biosynthetic alternative to human donor tissue for inducing corneal regeneration: 24-month follow-up of a phase 1 clinical study Sci. Transl. Med. 2010 2 46ra61 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001022 139. Que R. Mohraz A. Da Silva N.A. Wang S.W. Expanding functionality of recombinant human collagen through engineered non-native cysteines Biomacromolecules 2014 15 3540 3549 10.1021/bm500735d 25144412 140. Uematsu S.S. Inagaki A. Nakamura Y. Imura T. Igarashi Y. Fathi I. Miyagi S. Ohuchi N. Satomi S. Goto M. The optimization of the prevascularization procedures for improving subcutaneous islet engraftment Transplantation 2018 102 387 395 10.1097/TP.0000000000001970 29019814 141. Tsukioka T. Hiratsuka T. Nakamura M. Watanabe T. Kitamura Y. Isobe K. Okudera T. Okudera H. Azuma A. Uematsu K. An on-site preparable, novel bone-grafting complex consisting of human platelet-rich fibrin and porous particles made of a recombinant collagen-like protein J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2019 107 1420 1430 10.1002/jbm.b.34234 142. Ramirez-Rodriguez G.B. Montesi M. Panseri S. Sprio S. Tampieri A. Sandri M. Biomineralized recombinant collagen-based scaffold mimicking native bone enhances mesenchymal stem cell interaction and differentiation Tissue Eng. Part A 2017 23 1423 1435 10.1089/ten.tea.2017.0028 28637399 143. Pawelec K.M. Confalonieri D. Ehlicke F. van Boxtel H.A. Walles H. Kluijtmans S. Osteogenesis and mineralization of mesenchymal stem cells in collagen type I-based recombinant peptide scaffolds J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2017 105 1856 1866 10.1002/jbm.a.36049 144. Ramirez-Rodriguez G.B. Delgado-Lopez J.M. Iafisco M. Montesi M. Sandri M. Sprio S. Tampieri A. Biomimetic mineralization of recombinant collagen type I derived protein to obtain hybrid matrices for bone regeneration J. Struct. Biol. 2016 196 138 146 10.1016/j.jsb.2016.06.025 27374321 145. Muhonen V. Narcisi R. Nystedt J. Korhonen M. van Osch G.J. Kiviranta I. Recombinant human type II collagen hydrogel provides a xeno-free 3D micro-environment for chondrogenesis of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2017 11 843 854 10.1002/term.1983 25643647 146. Ilamaran M. Janeena A. Valappil S. Ramudu K.N. Shanmugam G. Niraikulam A. A self-assembly and higher order structure forming triple helical protein as a novel biomaterial for cell proliferation Biomater. Sci. 2019 7 2191 2199 10.1039/C9BM00186G 30900708 147. An B. Abbonante V. Xu H. Gavriilidou D. Yoshizumi A. Bihan D. Farndale R.W. Kaplan D.L. Balduini A. Leitinger B. Recombinant collagen engineered to bind to discoidin domain receptor functions as a receptor inhibitor J. Biol. Chem. 2016 291 4343 4355 10.1074/jbc.M115.674507 26702058 148. Chen Z. Zhang Z. Ma X. Duan Z. Hui J. Zhu C. Zhang D. Fan D. Shang L. Chen F. Newly designed human-like collagen to maximize sensitive release of BMP-2 for remarkable repairing of bone defects Biomolecules 2019 9 450 10.3390/biom9090450 149. Golser A.V. Röber M. Börner H.G. Scheibel T. Engineered collagen: A redox switchable framework for tunable assembly and fabrication of biocompatible surfaces ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2017 4 2106 2114 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00583 150. Xu R. Li D. Peng J. Fang J. Zhang L. Liu L. Cloning, expression and antioxidant activity of a novel collagen from Pelodiscus sinensis World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016 32 100 10.1007/s11274-016-2057-9 27116966 151. You S. Liu S. Dong X. Li H. Zhu Y. Hu L. Intravaginal administration of human type III collagen-derived biomaterial with high cell-adhesion activity to treat vaginal atrophy in rats ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2020 6 1977 1988 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01649 152. Abir R. Stav D. Taieb Y. Gabbay-Benziv R. Kirshner M. Ben-Haroush A. Freud E. Ash S. Yaniv I. Herman-Edelstein M. Novel extra cellular-like matrices to improve human ovarian grafting J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2020 37 2105 2117 10.1007/s10815-020-01832-4 32710268 153. Rumian Ł. Wolf-Brandstetter C. Rößler S. Reczyńska K. Tiainen H. Haugen H.J. Scharnweber D. Pamuła E. Sodium alendronate loaded poly(l-lactide- co -glycolide) microparticles immobilized on ceramic scaffolds for local treatment of bone defects Regen. Biomater. 2020 7 293 302 10.1093/rb/rbaa012 32523731 154. Willard J.J. Drexler J.W. Das A. Roy S. Shilo S. Shoseyov O. Powell H.M. Plant-derived human collagen scaffolds for skin tissue engineering Tissue Eng. Part A 2013 19 1507 1518 10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0338 23298216 155. Yaari A. Schilt Y. Tamburu C. Raviv U. Shoseyov O. Wet spinning and drawing of human recombinant collagen ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2016 2 349 360 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b00461 156. Ding M. Andreasen C.M. Dencker M.L. Jensen A.E. Theilgaard N. Overgaard S. Efficacy of a small cell-binding peptide coated hydroxyapatite substitute on bone formation and implant fixation in sheep J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2015 103 1357 1365 10.1002/jbm.a.35281 157. Hou Y. Guey L.T. Wu T. Gao R. Cogan J. Wang X. Hong E. Vivian Ning W. Keene D. Liu N. Intravenously administered recombinant human type VII collagen derived from chinese hamster ovary cells reverses the disease phenotype in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa mice J. Investig. Dermatol. 2015 135 3060 3067 10.1038/jid.2015.291 26203639 158. Remington J. Wang X. Hou Y. Zhou H. Burnett J. Muirhead T. Uitto J. Keene D.R. Woodley D.T. Chen M. Injection of recombinant human type VII collagen corrects the disease phenotype in a murine model of dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa Mol. Ther. 2009 17 26 33 10.1038/mt.2008.234 19018253 159. Hodges B.L. Barnes T.M. Reilly P.R. Kowtoniuk W.E. Collagen IV replacement Application Number 15/328,215 2018 26 7 160. Hudson B.G. Cummings C.F. Pedchenko V. Brown K. Vanacore R. Recombinant Collagen IV Surrogates and Uses Thereof Application Number 15/329,900 2018 1 3 161. Bardhan A. Bruckner-Tuderman L. Chapple I.L.C. Fine J.D. Harper N. Has C. Magin T.M. Marinkovich M.P. Marshall J.F. McGrath J.A. Epidermolysis bullosa Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2020 6 78 10.1038/s41572-020-0210-0 32973163 162. Has C. South A. Uitto J. Molecular therapeutics in development for epidermolysis bullosa: Update 2020 Mol. Diagn. Ther. 2020 24 299 309 10.1007/s40291-020-00466-7 32328988 163. Supp D.M. Hahn J.M. Combs K.A. McFarland K.L. Schwentker A. Boissy R.E. Boyce S.T. Powell H.M. Lucky A.W. Collagen VII expression is required in both keratinocytes and fibroblasts for anchoring fibril formation in bilayer engineered skin substitutes Cell Transpl. 2019 28 1242 1256 10.1177/0963689719857657 164. Kuhl T. Mezger M. Hausser I. Guey L.T. Handgretinger R. Bruckner-Tuderman L. Nystrom A. Collagen VII Half-Life at the dermal-epidermal junction zone: Implications for mechanisms and therapy of genodermatoses J. Investig. Dermatol. 2016 136 1116 1123 10.1016/j.jid.2016.02.002 26899947 165. Saelman E.U. Nieuwenhuis H.K. Hese K.M. de Groot P.G. Heijnen H.F. Sage E.H. Williams S. McKeown L. Gralnick H.R. Sixma J.J. Platelet adhesion to collagen types I through VIII under conditions of stasis and flow is mediated by GPIa/IIa (α2 β1-integrin) Blood 1994 83 1244 1250 10.1182/blood.V83.5.1244.1244 8118028 166. Arita M. Fertala J. Hou C. Kostas J. Steplewski A. Fertala A. Prospects and limitations of improving skeletal growth in a mouse model of spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia caused by R992C (p.R1192C) substitution in collagen II PLoS ONE 2017 12 e0172068 10.1371/journal.pone.0172068 28182776 167. Arita M. Fertala J. Hou C. Steplewski A. Fertala A. Mechanisms of aberrant organization of growth plates in conditional transgenic mouse model of spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia associated with the R992C substitution in collagen II Am. J. Pathol. 2015 185 214 229 10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.09.003 25451152 168. A Phase 1/2 Trial of PTR-01 in Adult Patients with Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa (RDEB) Available online: https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT03752905 (accessed on 20 October 2020) 169. O’Donnell B.T. Ives C.J. Mohiuddin O.A. Bunnell B.A. Beyond the present constraints that prevent a wide spread of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine approaches Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019 7 95 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00095 31134194