==== Front Mass Spectrom (Tokyo) Mass Spectrom (Tokyo) massspectrometry Mass Spectrometry 2187-137X 2186-5116 The Mass Spectrometry Society of Japan c/o International Academic Publishing Co. Ltd., 4-4-19 Takadanobaba, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-0075, Japan 10.5702/massspectrometry.A0092 Review Probe Electrospray Ionization (PESI) and Its Modified Versions: Dipping PESI (dPESI), Sheath-Flow PESI (sfPESI) and Adjustable sfPESI (ad-sfPESI) Hiraoka Kenzo *1 Ariyada Osamu 2 Usmanov Dilshadbek T. 1 Chen Lee C. 3 Ninomiya Satoshi 3 Yoshimura Kentaro 4 Takeda Sen 4 Yu Zhang 1 Mandal Mridul K. 1 Wada Hiroshi 5 Rankin-Turner Stephanie 16 Nonami Hiroshi 7 1 Clean Energy Research Center, University of Yamanashi, 4–3–11 Takeda, Kofu 400–8511, Japan 2 ARIOS INC., 3–2–20 Musashino, Akishima, Tokyo 196–0021, Japan 3 Graduate Faculty of Interdisciplinary Research, University of Yamanashi, 4–3–11 Takeda, Kofu 400–8511, Japan 4 Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimo-Kateau, Chuo, Yamanashi 409–3898, Japan 5 Kyushu Okinawa Agricultural Research Center, National Agricultural and Food Research Organization, 496 Izumi, Chikugo, Fukuoka 833–0041, Japan 6 Department of Chemistry, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, United Kingdom 7 Plant Biophysics/Biochemistry Research Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Ehime University, Matsuyama 790–8566, Japan * Correspondence to: Kenzo Hiraoka, Clean Energy Research Center, University of Yamanashi, 4–3–11 Takeda, Kofu 400–8511, Japan, e-mail: hiraoka@yamanashi.ac.jp 2020 4 12 2020 9 1 A009215 9 2020 21 10 2020 Copyright © 2020 Kenzo Hiraoka, Osamu Ariyada, Dilshadbek T. Usmanov, Lee C. Chen, Satoshi Ninomiya, Kentaro Yoshimura, Sen Takeda, Zhang Yu, Mridul K. Mandal, Hiroshi Wada, Stephanie Rankin-Turner, and Hiroshi Nonami.2020Kenzo Hiraoka, Osamu Ariyada, Dilshadbek T. Usmanov, Lee C. Chen, Satoshi Ninomiya, Kentaro Yoshimura, Sen Takeda, Zhang Yu, Mridul K. Mandal, Hiroshi Wada, Stephanie Rankin-Turner, and Hiroshi Nonami. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.In 2007, probe electrospray ionization/mass spectrometry (PESI/MS) was developed. In this technique, the needle is moved down along a vertical axis and the tip of the needle touched to the sample. After capturing the sample at the needle tip, the needle is then moved up and a high voltage is applied to the needle at the highest position to generate electrospray. Due to the discontinuous sampling followed by the generation of spontaneous electrospray, sequential and exhaustive electrospray takes place depending on the surface activity of the analytes. As modified versions of PESI, dipping PESI (dPESI), sheath-flow PESI (sfPESI) and adjustable sfPESI (ad-sfPESI) have been developed. These methods are complementary to each other and they can be applicable to surface and bulk analysis of various biological samples. In this article, the characteristics of these methods and their applications to real samples will be reviewed. probe electrospray ionization (PESI)point analysissurface analysisrobotic mass spectrometry ==== Body INTRODUCTION Electrospray ionization/mass spectrometry (ESI/MS) has become an indispensable tool for analysis in many fields.1,2) A variety of direct ionization methods have been developed based on ESI for the analysis of wet and dry samples. In 2001, Wachs and Henion developed a method for the direct sampling of liquid and solid samples.3) This device employed a free-standing liquid junction formed via continuous delivery of suitable solvent which carried the extracted analyte through a pneumatically assisted electrospray capillary in front of an atmospheric pressure ionization mass spectrometer; termed as liquid extraction surface analysis (LESA) mass spectrometry.4) In 2004, Cooks et al. developed desorption electrospray ionization (DESI), which is applicable to semi-dry and dry samples.5) In DESI, a pneumatically assisted high-velocity electrospray jet is continuously directed toward the sample surface. In 2010, Roach et al. developed nanoelectrospray DESI (nanoDESI), an ambient method for liquid-extraction surface-sampling mass spectrometry.6) This method also employed the liquid junction pioneered by Wachs and Henion.3) The analytes were extracted into a solvent formed between two capillaries and the dry sample surface. One capillary supplied solvent to create and maintain the liquid bridge, and the second capillary transported the dissolved analytes from the bridge to the mass spectrometer. A high voltage applied between the mass spectrometer inlet and the primary capillary created a self-aspirating nanoelectrospray. In 2012, Otsuka et al. developed scanning probe electrospray ionization (SPESI), which used a solvent transport capillary as the electrospray emitter.7,8) Solvent was supplied to the capillary to form a liquid bridge between the probe and the sample surface. By applying a high voltage (HV) to the capillary, an electrospray was generated from the tip of the capillary. Because the extraction of the analytes at the liquid bridge and ESI of the solution occurred around the probe tip, transportation of the sample solution through a secondary capillary for ESI was not necessary. In 2016, Ji et al. reported a ballpoint electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (BP-ESI-MS) technique.9) This combined a small ballpoint tip with a syringe pump for the direct loading and ionization of various samples in different phases including solution, semisolid, and solid. The rigid properties of the ballpoint tip allowed sampling by simply penetrating or scraping various surfaces. In 2015, Rao, Pan and Yang developed a miniaturized sampling and ionization device, single probe mass spectrometry (Single-probeMS), which used in-situ surface micro-extraction to achieve high detection sensitivity and spatial resolution mass spectrometry.10) The single-probe consisted of a dual-bore quartz probe, a fused silica capillary, and a nano-electrospray emitter. By positioning the single-probe tip above the sample surface, microextraction took place at the tip of the probe. The continuous flow of sampling solvent produced a consistent fresh liquid junction at the probe tip, allowing for constant extraction of analytes present on the surface. A spatial resolution of 8.5 μm was achieved in the analysis of biological tissues. For all the techniques described above, a liquid junction between the probe tip and the sample surface was achieved by using a “continuous” flow of solvent through the capillary. In 2007, a “discontinuous” sampling and electrospray ionization method, probe electrospray ionization (PESI), was developed.11) PESI is free from clogging problems and is suitable for direct analysis of various wet biological samples, including those with a high salt concentration.12) The great merit of the discontinuous sampling/electrospray is that the ion suppression effect was largely moderated in PESI because of the occurrence of sequential and exhaustive electrospray.13) Modified versions of PESI, dipping PESI (dPESI)14) sheath-flow PESI (sfPESI)15) and adjustable sfPESI (ad-sfPESI)16) were subsequently developed. In dPESI, the sample surface is pricked with a fine bare acupuncture needle and the sample is captured at the needle tip. After drying the sample, the needle tip is dipped into the pure solvent for ∼50 ms and the wetted needle moved upward. At the highest position of the needle, a HV is applied to the needle to generate electrospray. In sfPESI, an acupuncture needle is inserted into a fine plastic capillary with a protrusion of 0.1–0.2 mm out of the tip. Analytes are extracted by filling the capillary with solvent and softly touching the sample surface for a short time (50 ms∼a few s). By applying a HV to the acupuncture needle, mass spectra of analytes are obtained by “self-aspirating” electrospray. In ad-sfPESI, the sample surface is pricked with an acupuncture needle inserted in the sfPESI probe that protrudes from the terminus of the tip by 5 mm. The invasion depth of the needle into the sample is ∼1 mm. After sampling, the needle is retracted into the solvent-preloaded capillary with a protrusion length of 0.1–0.2 mm from the tip. A mass spectrum of the sample captured on the needle is then obtained as in the case of PESI and dPESI. The limitation of PESI, dPESI and ad-sfPESI is that they are difficult to apply to dry samples directly and some additional sample preparation is necessary. In contrast, sheath-flow PESI (sfPESI) is readily applicable to dry samples as well as liquid and wet samples.15) In this report, the advantages and disadvantages of PESI, dPESI, sfPESI and ad-sfPESI will be described for the practical applications of the methods. WHAT IS ELECTROSPRAY? The electrospray ionization (ESI) process is the action of electrolytic liquid dispersion into a fine aerosol, a phenomenon that takes place when a strong electric field is exerted on the liquid. Figure 1(a) shows the metal capillary with the application of a HV. The strong electric field E is generated at the tip of the metal capillary. To a first approximation, E is inversely proportional to the radius of the curvature. That is, the strongest E is generated at the capillary tip. The electric field E is proportional to the surface charge density σ as shown in Eq. (1). (1) Fig. 1. Evolution of electrospray. (a) Metal capillary with the application of a HV. (b) Excess charge Q transferred from the metal to the surface of the liquid. (c) Burst of the Taylor cone. (d) and (e) Elongation of the Taylor cone. (f) Spherical liquid after the loss of excess charge. When a liquid is supplied to the capillary (Fig. 1(b)), the excess charge Q induced on the metal tip is transferred to the surface of the liquid due to the electrochemical reactions taking place at the interface between the metal and the liquid. With the excess charge Q in the droplet increasing, the shape of the liquid becomes conical because of the Coulomb’s repulsive forces acting normal to the surface in the outward direction. On the other hand, to minimize the surface area of the liquid, the liquid surface tension acts normal to the surface as the inward force. At the Rayleigh limit (Fig. 1(b)), the outward and inward forces balance each other at all positions in the liquid and the whole angle of 99° is formed. The pressure Pγ originating from the surface tension of the liquid (inward pressure normal to the surface) is proportional to the product of the surface tension γ and inversely proportional to the curvature radius r. (2) The electrostatic pressure PE induced on the surface of the liquid by the excess charges is proportional to E2. (3) The critical voltage Vc for the formation of the Taylor cone with PE=Pγ is given by Eq. (4) where d is the distance between the needle tip and the counter electrode. (4) With further increase in a HV over the Rayleigh limit, PE becomes larger than Pγ and the Taylor cone elongates to the counter electrode.17) Figure 1(c) shows the burst of the Taylor cone right after the collapse of the Taylor cone. Due to the Coulomb explosion, numerous charged fine droplets are liberated from the tip of the Taylor cone. Accompanied with the explosion, the excess charges in the droplet at the tip decrease suddenly and the speed of the elongation of the Taylor cone slows down resulting in the formation of a long liquid column (Fig. 1(d)→(e)). The elongated liquid column is divided into much larger droplets (Fig. 1(f)) than those in Fig. 1(c). By the loss of excess charges, Pγ overwhelms PE and the meniscus of the liquid becomes spherical (Fig. 1(f)). As shown in Fig. 1, electrospray generates pulsed charged liquid droplets with a wide size distribution. The pulsation of electrospray is referred to as “electric sneezing.” The time necessary for one episode of electric sneezing (i.e., liberation of excess charge and the provision of charge to the sample solution by electrochemical reactions) was measured to be ∼100 s of μs.18,19) That is, electrospray is generated periodically with the frequency of a few kHz with the repetitive cycle of Pγ≶PE. Because the charged droplets are generated with the conditions of Pγ