==== Front Ann Saudi MedAnn Saudi MedAnnals of Saudi Medicine0256-49470975-4466King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2215664210.5144/0256-4947.2012.68asm-1-68ReviewHuman Stromal (Mesenchymal) Stem Cells: Basic Biology and Current Clinical Use for Tissue Regeneration Aldahmash Abdullah abZaher Walid abAl-Nbaheen May bKassem Moustapha ab a Stem Cell Unit, Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia b Endocrine Research (KMEB), Department of Endocrinology, Odense University Hospital & University of Southern Denmark, Odense, DenmarkCorrespondence: Professor Moustapha Kassem, Stem Cell Unit, Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia, mkassem@health.sdu.dkJan-Feb 2012 32 1 68 77 Copyright © 2012, Annals of Saudi Medicine2012This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.Human stromal (mesenchymal) stem cells (hMSC) represent a group of non-hematopoietic stem cells present in the bone marrow stroma and the stroma of other organs including subcutaneous adipose tissue, placenta, and muscles. They exhibit the characteristics of somatic stem cells of self-renewal and multi-lineage differentiation into mesoderm-type of cells, e.g., to osteoblasts, adipocytes, chondrocytes and possibly other cell types including hepatocytes and astrocytes. Due to their ease of culture and multipotentiality, hMSC are increasingly employed as a source for cells suitable for a number of clinical applications, e.g., non-healing bone fractures and defects and also non-skeletal degenerative diseases like heart failure. Currently, the numbers of clinical trials that employ MSC are increasing. However, several biological and biotechnological challenges need to be overcome to benefit from the full potential of hMSC. In this current review, we present some of the most important and recent advances in understanding of the biology of hMSC and their current and potential use in therapy. ==== Body Human bone marrow-derived stromal stem cells (hMSC) (also known as skeletal stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells) are a group of clonogenic cells that are present among the bone marrow stroma as well as the stroma of other organs. hMSC are capable of multilineage differentiation into mesoderm-type cells such as osteoblasts, adipocytes and chondrocytes1 and possibly, but still controversially, non-mesoderm type cells like neuronal cells or hepatocytes.2,3 Moreover, hMSC provide supportive stroma for growth and differentiation of hematopoeitic stem cells (HSC) and hematopoiesis.4 Recently, MSC has been employed in an increasing number of cell-based therapies for treating skeletal and non-skeletal chronic degenerative diseases. The aim of this review is to provide an update on the biology of hMSC and their current and potential uses in therapy. Biological characteristics of hMSC hMSC are fusiform, fibroblast-like cells that form colonies when cultured at a low density5–7 (Figure 1). hMSC exhibit characteristic surface markers being negative for hematopoietic cell markers: CD34−, CD45−, CD14− and positive for CD29+, CD73+, CD90+, CD105+, CD166+ and CD44+.8–10 Unfortunately, these markers are not specific for MSC and are expressed in a number of other mesodermal cells. Therefore, MSC are usually defined operationally as cells capable of ex vivo differentiation to osteoblastic, adipocytic and chondrocytic cells (i.e. multipotential) or forming bone and bone marrow organ— “an ossicle” upon transplantation subcutaneously in immune-deficient mice (Figure 2a).11 Traditionally, MSC have been isolated from bone marrow low-density mononuclear cell populations based on their selective adherence to plastic surfaces (Figure 1).7,12,13 hMSC have also been isolated using antibody-based cell selection employing a number of antibodies (e.g. Stro-1,14,15 CD146 (MCAM),16 CD200 and CD271).17, 18 Other MSC-like cells obtained from different tissues Populations with MSC-like phenotype have been isolated from different tissues including peripheral blood,19 umbilical cord blood,20 synovial membranes,21 adipose tissue,22 lung,23 fetal liver,24 dental pulp25,26 and deciduous teeth.27 In particular adipose tissue-derived MSC cultured from fat tissue aspirates obtained during liposuction procedures represent a good source for obtaining large number of hMSC.28 Tissue-specific MSC share some basic morphological and differentiation characteristics with bone marrow-derived MSC. However, these cells are not identical and differences have been reported in their “genetic signature” as determined by global analysis of their transcriptomes.29–31 From the laboratory to the clinic The emerging field of regenerative medicine holds promise for treating a variety of degenerative and age-related diseases, where no specific or effective treatment is currently available, by transplanting biologically competent mature cells and tissues or by stimulating tissue-resident stem cells. Stem cells in general and MSC in particular with their versatile growth and differentiation potential, are ideal candidates for use in regenerative medicine protocols and are currently making their way into clinical trials. However, successful use of MSC in therapy requires developing well-defined methods for MSC cell isolation, growth and differentiation. The following sections cover progress achieved in understanding the biology of MSC relevant for their clinical use. Isolation of hMSC prospectively based on specific criteria The current standard procedure for isolating hMSC based on plastic adherence to cell culture plates, results in heterogeneous cell cultures comprised of MSC and other tissue specific cells. Thus, there is a need for identifying surface markers that can be employed in isolating hMSC prospectively. We have employed several approaches to identify hMSC-specific markers. Using DNA microarray technology, we have identified a set of genes (a molecular signature) predictive for “stemness” phenotype as evaluated by in vivo criteria. 32 We have also employed state-of-the-art mass spectrometry-based proteomic methods to identify novel plasma membrane-associated protein makers.33 These global methods provide a large number of novel candidate marker genes and proteins that are currently being verified and tested for their usefulness in isolating homogenous populations of hMSC needed for clinical applications. Limited in vitro cell growth and replicative senescence of hMSC The clinical use of hMSC requires the availability of a large number of functionally competent cells with a stable phenotype and genotype. This is usually achieved by long-term ex vivo culturing of hMSC. However, hMSC, in contrast to embryonic stem cells or cancer cells, exhibit a limited capacity for ex vivo growth, a phenomenon known as “in vitro replicative senescence”.34 Also, the proliferative capacity of hMSC is dependent on donor age and thus compromises the ability to generate enough number of cells from elderly donors.34 Several approaches have been tried to improve ex vivo growth of hMSC using an enriched culture media with the addition of relevant growth factors, e.g. fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF-2).35 We have also demonstrated that genetic over-expression of human telomerase reverse transcriptase gene (hTERT) in hMSC increases their telomerase activity and abolishes replicative senescence phenotype.36 However, genetic manipulation of hMSC is not desirable for cells to be used in clinical transplantation and alternative methods for ex vivo enhancement of hMSC growth, e.g. use of small chemical molecules with proliferation-enhancing abilities or a enhancing cell growth by using a combination of growth factors represent alternative approaches that are being tested. Directing differentiation of MSC into specific lineages While the multi-potentiality of MSC is the basis for using the cells for generating differentiated cells for cell replacement therapy, protocols that direct the differentiation of hMSC into a specific lineage are still inefficient and require improvement. Several approaches have been employed to direct the differentiation of MSC to a particular lineage. For example, differentiation into bone-forming osteoblastic cells has been achieved as ex vivo treatment with a mixture of growth factors (e.g. bone morphogenetic protein [BMP] or transforming growth factor [TGF]-β) to enhance osteoblast differentiation.37,38 Development of “off-the-shelf” MSC for allogeneic transplantation Our current experience with autologus hMSC transplantation in clinical trials shows that it does not result in immunological problems. However, allogeneic hMSC transplantation is more clinically relevant since it allows the development of “off-the-shelf “ allogeneic cells ready for use in therapy. hMSC are hypoimmunogenic and thus allogeneic hMSC transplantation may be possible. hMSC express intermediate levels of HLA major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules, low levels of HLA class II antigens and no expression of co-stimulatory molecules e.g. CD40, CD40L, CD80 or CD86.39,40 Also, MSC have been reported to possess immunosuppressive properties in vitro as they inhibit T-cell alloreactivity induced in mixed lymphocyte cultures or by nonspecific factors.41,42 In addition, MSC inhibit the secretion of TNF-β and IL-10 secretion by dendritic cells and therefore directs the immune response toward more anti-inflammatory/tolerant phenotype.43 In vivo, the immunosuppressive effect of MSC has been shown by their ability to prolong histo-incompatible skin graft survival.44 These immunoregulatory characteristics are the basis of using hMSC in the treatment of graf-versus-host (GvH) disease. Is it safe to transplant hMSC? There are concerns that transplanted, culture-expanded hMSC may undergo spontaneous transformation and lead to cancer.45 The concept of the transformation potential of MSC is based mainly on extrapolations from studies performed on murine MSCs that exhibit spontaneous malignant transformation in long-term culture. However, spontaneous transformation of cultured hMSC has not been reported. Although Rubio et al46 reported that cultured adipose-tissue derived MSC from children exhibited spontaneous transformation in long-term culture, the results of this study were later shown to be false and caused by spurious contamination with an osteosarcoma cell line cultured simultaneously in the lab.47,48 Another area of concern is the possible role of administered hMSC in promoting growth of a latent tumor. Some studies have demonstrated that MSC can be recruited to the stroma of developing tumors when systemically infused in animal models for glioma, colon carcinoma, ovarian carcinoma, Karposi sarcoma, and melanoma.49 Conversely, the current clinical experience with hMSC transplantation, though limited, has been safe with an absence of cancer transformation. In conclusion, human MSC obtained from healthy individuals do not readily transform in culture and are safe for transplantation. However, further studies are needed to develop a set of safety criteria for predicting normal behavior of MSC employed in clinical programs. What is the mechanism of tissue repair achieved by hMSC? It has been thought that the therapeutic potential of hMSC is based on their ability to differentiate into a particular lineage cells that replace damaged cells and contribute to tissue regeneration. However, recent studies suggest that important therapeutic effects of MSC are mediated by their secreted factors (i.e. paracrine effects). 50,51 This mechanism may explain the intriguing observation of the presence of therapeutically-relevant effects after systemic or local transplantation of hMSC in a number of animal models of tissue injury (e.g. myocardial infarction, ischemic brain injury, in spite of the presence of low tissue engraftment). Several putative secreted factors with anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic and immune-modulatory effects are known to be produced by MSC.51–53 Identifying novel regeneration-promoting factors produced by MSC suitable for clinical use, is currently an active area of research in several laboratories. Clinical application of hMSC in tissue regeneration hMSC have been employed in an increasing number of clinical trials that range from individual case reports, patient series, and non-randomized as well as randomized clinical trials n skeletal and non-skeletal tissue regeneration. Tables 1 and 2 are a list of clinical trials in which hMSC have been employed. In the website of the National Institutes of Health, USA (http://clinicaltrials.gov), approximately 95 clinical trials are registered and covers a diverse indication (e.g. bone diseases, cardiovascular diseases and other rare pathologies such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Hurler syndrome and metachromatic leukodystrophy). Results from these clinical trials are expected to have a major impact on the treatment of several disease conditions (Figure 3). Use of hMSC for skeletal tissue regeneration and non-skeletal repair and regeneration hMSC possess the ability for osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation and thus can potentially be used in skeletal tissue regeneration. Several animal studies have demonstrated the efficacy of MSC in treatment of segmental bone defects in rat and sheep where autologous bone marrow–derived MSCs were expanded in culture, then injected directly at the site of injury or after loading onto synthetic or natural biomaterial (i.e. scaffold).54–56 Human clinical case reports have demonstrated the success of autologus MSC in the treatment of large bone defects in patients with defective fracture healing57–60 and cartilage defects.61–63 In a recent study of atrophic tibial diaphyseal nonunion fractures, percutaneous autologous bone marrow stem cells were injected into60 atrophic non-union fractures of the tibia and the investigators reported positive effects that were correlated with the number of implanted hMSC.64 Also, promising preliminary results for treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis have been reported.65,66 Table 1 summarizes some of clinical trials using hMSC for bone regeneration. A number of clinical trials where hMSC has been employed for enhancing non-skeletal repair and are summarized in Table 2 and Figure 3. Both autologous and allogeneic MSC have been employed. Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) disease GvHD is a potentially fatal disease that develops in the context of allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In a pilot study, MSC was employed to treat 9 patients (8 patients with steroid refractory acute GvHD and 1 patient with chronic GvHD) where hMSC obtained from a 2 HLA identical sibling, 5 haploidentical donor and 4 HLA-mismatched donors, and resulted in the clinical recovery in 6 of the 8 patients.67 The beneficial effects of autologous hMSC transplantation have been also observed in a phase II clinical trial of 55 children and adult patients with acute severe and steroid resistant GvHD. Infusion of MSC was safe, and resulted in higher survival rates in patients with complete response (54.5%) and significantly lower transplantation-related mortality in patients with partial or no response (45.5%).68 In a recent randomized clinical trial of 32 patients with grade II–IV GvHD that either received intravenous autologous MSC (2 or 8 million MSCs/kg) or standard therapy, 77% of patients exhibited complete response and no MSC infusion-related toxicities were observed.69 In addition to using BM-derived MSC, Fang et al. also reported some success using human adipose tissue-derived hMSC for treatment of steroid-refractory GvHD.70,71 Currently several phase II and III clinical trials are being conducted to confirm these encouraging initial results and to define the role of MSC transplantation as either the primary therapy or as adjuvant therapy. Heart diseases MSC transplantation for enhancing myocardial tissue regeneration following acute myocardial infarction or chronic ischemic heart failure is an important area of regenerative medicine and has been initiated based on the positive therapeutic effects of marrow-derived MSC demonstrated in preclinical animal models.72–75 For example, in a porcine myocardial infarction (MI) model, bone-marrow derived MSCs injected directly into the myocardium were found to efficiently engraft into the myocardium and to significantly reduce infarct size, wall thinning, and contractile dysfunction.72 In humans, a placebo-controlled clinical study of intra-coronary injection of autologous MSC in 69 patients with acute myocardial infarction where MSC was injured within 12 hours after the onset of symptoms. No side effects or toxicity were reported during the 6-month follow-up and beneficial effects of increased left ventricular ejection fraction and Left ventricular end diastolic volume, improved contractility and enhanced infarct viability were reported.76 In a recent study, Hera et al performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging (0.5, 1.6, and 5 million hMSC cells per kg) safety trial of intravenous allogeneic hMSCs conducted in 53 patients with anterior myocardial infarction with a follow up period of 6 months. No side effects of therapy were observed and global symptom score and ejection fraction (an estimated of left ventricular function) were significantly improved in the hMSC-treated group compared to controls.77 Results from these initial studies are encouraging and demonstrate the need for confirmation in larger randomized clinical trials. Neurological diseases Preclinical studies have demonstrated the importance of post-injury neurogenesis for clinical recovery in animal models of stroke and that local transplantation of MSCs enhanced this process.78–80 A recent study in rats has demonstrated the beneficial effects of administering allogenic MSC during the acute phase of ischemic stroke in improving neurological recovery and decreasing brain damage. The beneficial effects have been reported to be obtained regardless of the administration route (intravenous or intracarotid).78 Recently, the results of an open-label, observer blinded clinical trial in 52 patients with severe middle cerebral artery territory infarct have been reported. Patients were randomly allocated to receive intravenous autologous ex vivo cultured MSC (5×107 cells/patient) (MSC group) or standard therapy (control group) and both groups were followed for 5 years. The mortality rate in the MSC-treated group was lower and some improvement in the functional recovery in MSC-treated group was observed.81 The use of MSC in therapy has been reported in a few other neurological diseases. Multiple system atrophy (MSA) is a sporadic, progressive, adult-onset neurodegenerative disorder associated with varying degrees of symptoms of Parkinsonism, autonomic dysfunction, and cerebellar ataxia with no available drug treatment. Lee et al evaluated the feasibility and safety of therapy of autologous MSC infusion in 29 patients with MSA and reported that MSC transplantation delayed the progression of neurological deficits as well as significantly greater functional improvement in the MSC-treated patients and with no serious adverse effects related to MSC therapy.82 Renal diseases As mentioned above, the anti-inflammatory effects of transplanted MSC may offer a novel therapeutic strategy in acute and chronic kidney disease and also for treatment of renal allograft rejection.83 In pre-clinical studies, the beneficial effects of MSC infusion on repair of acute renal damage have been reported. In an acute renal failure (ARF) mouse model, injection of allogeneic BM-derived MSCs protected cisplatin-treated mice from renal function impairment and severe tubular injury. Donor cells were shown to localize within the tubular epithelial lining suggesting that MSC engrafted within the damaged kidney.84 Lange et al85 reported that in a rat ARF model, MSC-treated animals had both significantly better renal functions and lower injury scores. The specificity of MSC effects were studied by Togel et al86 in rats with ischemia-reperfusion-induced acute renal failure. The authors reported that intra-carotid artery administration of MSC after the onset of renal ischemia resulted in significantly improved renal functions compared with animals treated with fibroblasts. Also, preliminary results of a phase I clinical trial of autologous MSC in 5 patients with post operative acute kidney injury (AKI) have shown that administration of autologous MSC was safe and some beneficial effects as renal function was well preserved postoperatively and none of the patients required hemodialysis.87 Other diseases Systemic lupus erythromatosis (SLE) is a systemic multi-organ autoimmune disease that involves the cardiovascular system, joints and kidneys. The pathogenesis of SLE has been attributed to T cell deficiencies, polyclonal B-cell activation, macrophage dysfunction and environmental factors such as hormonal disturbances. 88 Also, defects in hematopoietic stem cells have been suggested as a pathological mechanism underlying SLE.89 The effects of allogeneic intravenous infusion of umbilical cord-derived MSC (1×106 cells/kg body weight) in 15 patients with SLE patients has been recently published and demonstrated safety, improvement of clinical symptoms and stabilization of inflammatory markers.90 Another inflammatory condition where MSC has been employed is Crohn disease. Results of a phase II randomized controlled trial in patients with Crohn disease-related perianal fistulas refractory to conventional therapies have been reported.91 Intravenous (2×107 cells) autologous adipose-tissue derived and expanded MSCs were given to 24 patients along with fibrin glue (FG) and the effects were compared to 25 control patients that received FG alone. The administration of MSC in combination with FG was not associated with any side effects and was associated higher rates of healing. MSC have been tried for treatment of recto-vaginal fistula in a recent case report.92 Uncontrolled and commercial stem cell therapy (stem cell tourism) The enthusiastic media coverage of recent developments in stem cell biology and the positive initial results of stem cell-based clinical trials, have created unrealistic public understanding of the nature of the available stem cell therapies. Many patients and their families think that it is possible to treat a large number of chronic degenerative diseases using stem cells. The situation became complicated due to the wide use of the internet as a source for medical information and the establishment of several commercial companies that offer uncontrolled stem cell therapies. These companies employ stem cells from a wide variety of sources, including embryonic stem cells, and they claim that stem cells can be employed to treat all diseases! These commercial companies usually provide therapy that is very expensive and without any proof for efficacy. As mentioned above, stem cell therapy for chronic degenerative conditions is experimental therapy and should not be provided outside clinical trials in academic institutions. Patients should be discouraged from receiving stem cell therapies from commercial companies. The International Stem Cell Research Society (ISCRS) has responded to the increasing demands for objective information and guidance regarding stem cell therapy by publishing a guide to patients and their families (please see: http://www.isscr.org/clinical_trans/patient_handbook.html). Conclusions and future perspectives The potential for MSC use in therapy is enormous and positive results have been obtained in preclinical animal models of human diseases and from phase I/II clinical trials with very promising preliminary results. We think that combining basic research studies identifying the mechanisms controlling of MSC cell proliferation and differentiation with well designed and controlled clinical trials, will bring major advances in realizing the potential of MSC-based therapy for treatment of chronic and degenerative diseases. Acknowledgment This manuscript was supported by grants from; King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (09-BIO740-20), and from the Lundbeck foundation, Denmark. Figure 1 Standard isolation procedure for bone marrow derived human stromal (mesenchymal) stem cells (MSC). The cells are established in cultures based on their characteristic plastic surface adherence ability. Figure 2 Multipotentiality of human stromal (mesenchymal) stem cells (MSC). Under proper conditions, MSCs can form (a) bone when implanted subcutaneously in immune deficient mouse coupled with hydroxyapatite/tricalicum phosphate (HA/TCP) as carrier, (b) cartilage when cells cultured in vitro as cell aggregates in presence of transforming growth factor B or (c) fat when treated in vitro with insulin, dexamethasone and rosiglitazone. Figure 3 Examples of ongoing or completed clinical trials using stromal stem cell. Data were collected from National Institute of Health (NIH), USA, clinical trials registery on (March 2011). Categorization was based on information provided in the trial summary. Table 1 Examples of published clinical trials using human stromal stem cell therapy in skeletal disorders. System Indication Sample size Cell type Study design Delivery route Outcome Ref Skeletal Bone Tibial non-union fracrure 20 Autologous bone marrow Prospective study Percutanous injection Clinical and radiological bone union following in 15 out of 20 patients 57 Large bone diaphysis defects (tibia, ulna, humerus) 4 Autologous MSC’s cultured and seeded on porous hydroxyapatite scaffold Case report Local implantation Complete fusion between the implant and the host bone occurred 5 to 7 months after surgery. In all patients at the last follow-up (6 to 7 years post surgery), a good integration of the implants was maintained 58 Atrophic tibial diaphysea non-union sites 60 Autologous bone marrow Prospective study Percutanous injection Bone unions were obtained in 53 patients after 6 months. 64 Steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head 3 Autologous MSC’s cultured with beta-tricalcium phosphate Case report Intrafemoral Osteonecrosis did not progress and early bone regeneration was observed. 65 Femoral head osteonecrosis 13 Autologous bone marrow Phase I clinical trialI ntrafemoral injection Significant reduction in pain and in joint symptoms within the bone-marrow-graft group At twenty-four months, five of the eight hips in the control group had deteriorated to stage III, whereas only one of the ten hips in the bone-marrowgraft group had progressed to this stage 66 Unicameral bone cysts 79 Bone marrow Clinical trial Intra cystic No clear differences in healing compared with steroid injection 93 Mandibular defect 1 Autologous bone marrow seeded on titanium mesh cage scaffold filled with bone mineral blocks and BMP 7 Case report Local implantation In-vivo skeletal scintigraphy showed bone remodelling and mineralisation inside the mandibular transplant both before and after transplantation. CT provided radiological evidence of new bone formation. 94 Cartilage Full-thickness articular cartilage defects in human patella 2 Autologous bone marrow stromal cells Case report Local implantation Evidence for promotion of repair of articular cartilage defects 61 Achondroplasia, congenital pseudarthrosis 3 Autologous MSC’s mixed with platelet rich plasma Case report Local injection Acceleration of bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis 62 Table 2 Examples of published clinical trials using human stromal stem cell therapy in non-skeletal disorders. System Indication Sample size Cell type Study design Delivery route Outcome Ref Non-Skeletal Cardiovascular Acute myocardial infarction 34\35 Allogenic MSCs Placebo controlled clinical trial Intracoronary Increased left ventricular ejection fraction and left ventricular end diastolic volume, improve contractility and enhanced infarct viability 76 Acute myocardial infarction 53 Allogenic MSCs (Prochymal) Double-blind, placebo-controlled Intravenous Significant improvement of ejection fraction in hMSC-treated group 77 Nephrology Acute kidney injury (post-operative) 15 Autologous MSCs Phase 1 Trial Intraarterial Renal function was well preserved postoperatively, and none of the patients required hemodialysis. 87 Gastro-intestinal Perianal fistulas (Crohn disease) 24\25 Allogenic adiposetissue MSCs Phase II Randomized controlled trial Intravenous AD-MSC induced higher rates of healing when used together with fibrin glue compared to fibrin glue alone 91 Neurology Multiple system atrophy 11\18 Autologous MSCs case-control study Intra-arterial × 1 Intravenous ×3 Delayed the progression of neurological deficits with achievement of functional improvement 82 Stroke 16\36 Autologous MSC Randomised, Placebo controlled Intravenous Improve recovery after stroke, improvements in the Barthel index and modified Rankin score 81 Multiple systems Steroid-resistant, severe, acute GvHD 55 Autologous MSCs phase II study Intravenous Better survival in patients with complete response (54.5%) 68 Acute GvHD 32 Allogenic MSCs Randomized clinical trial Intravenous 77% of patients fully responded, 17% partially responded 69 Lupus nephritis 16 Allogeneic umbilical cord MSCs Phase I clinical trial Intravenous Improved Systemic activity Index and renal function 95 Abbreviations: GvHD, Graft versus host disease. MSC’s, Mesenchymal Stem Cells. SLE, Systemic lupus erythromatosis ==== Refs REFERENCES 1 Bianco P Riminucci M Gronthos S Robey PG Bone marrow stromal stem cells: nature, biology, and potential applications Stem Cells 2001 19 3 180 192 11359943 2 Dezawa M Kanno H Hoshino M Specific induction of neuronal cells from bone marrow stromal cells and application for autologous transplantation J Clin Invest 2004 113 12 1701 1710 15199405 3 Luk JM Wang PP Lee CK Wang JH Fan ST Hepatic potential of bone marrow stromal cells: development of in vitro co-culture and intra-portal transplantation models J Immunol Methods 2005 305 1 39 47 16150456 4 Dexter TM Haemopoiesis in long-term bone marrow cultures. A review Acta Haematol 1979 62 5–6 299 305 121673 5 Owen M Marrow stromal stem cells J Cell Sci Suppl 1988 10 63 76 3077943 6 Friedenstein AJ Chailakhjan RK Lalykina KS The development of fibroblast colonies in monolayer cultures of guinea- pig bone marrow and spleen cells Cell Tissue Kinet 1970 3 4 393 403 5523063 7 Luria EA Panasyuk AF Friedenstein AY Fibroblast colony formation from monolayer cultures of blood cells Transfusion 1971 11 6 345 349 5136066 8 Abdallah BM Haack-Sorensen M Burns JS Maintenance of differentiation potential of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells immortalized by human telomerase reverse transcriptase gene despite [corrected] extensive proliferation Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005 326 3 527 538 15596132 9 Foster LJ Zeemann PA Li C Mann M Jensen ON Kassem M Differential expression profiling of membrane proteins by quantitative proteomics in a human mesenchymal stem cell line undergoing osteoblast differentiation Stem Cells 2005 23 9 1367 1377 16210410 10 Dominici M Le BK Mueller I Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement Cytotherapy 2006 8 4 315 317 16923606 11 Abdallah BM Ditzel N Kassem M Assessment of bone formation capacity using in vivo transplantation assays: procedure and tissue analysis Methods Mol Biol 2008 455 89 100 18463812 12 Kassem M Mosekilde L Eriksen EF 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 potentiates fluoride-stimulated collagen type I production in cultures of human bone marrow stromal osteoblast-like cells J Bone Miner Res 1993 8 12 1453 1458 8304046 13 Rickard DJ Kassem M Hefferan TE Sarkar G Spelsberg TC Riggs BL Isolation and characterization of osteoblast precursor cells from human bone marrow J Bone Miner Res 1996 11 3 312 324 8852942 14 Gronthos S Graves SE Ohta S Simmons PJ The STRO -1+ fraction of adult human bone marrow contains the osteogenic precursors Blood 1994 84 12 4164 4173 7994030 15 Stenderup K Justesen J Eriksen EF Rattan SI Kassem M Number and proliferative capacity of osteogenic stem cells are maintained during aging and in patients with osteoporosis J Bone Miner Res 2001 16 6 1120 1129 11393789 16 Sacchetti B Funari A Michienzi S Self-renewing osteoprogenitors in bone marrow sinusoids can organize a hematopoietic microenvironment Cell 2007 131 2 324 336 17956733 17 Delorme B Ringe J Gallay N Specific plasma membrane protein phenotype of culture-amplified and native human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells Blood 2007 18 Buhring HJ Battula VL Treml S Schewe B Kanz L Vogel W Novel markers for the prospective isolation of human MSC Ann N Y Acad Sci 2007 1106 262 271 17395729 19 Kuznetsov SA Mankani MH Gronthos S Satomura K Bianco P Robey PG Circulating skeletal stem cells J Cell Biol 2001 153 5 1133 1140 11381097 20 Rosada C Justesen J Melsvik D Ebbesen P Kassem M The human umbilical cord blood: a potential source for osteoblast progenitor cells Calcif Tissue Int 2003 72 2 135 142 12457262 21 De Bari C Dell’Accio F Tylzanowski P Luyten FP Multipotent mesenchymal stem cells from adult human synovial membrane Arthritis Rheum 2001 44 8 1928 1942 11508446 22 Gronthos S Franklin DM Leddy HA Robey PG Storms RW Gimble JM Surface protein characterization of human adipose tissue-derived stromal cells J Cell Physiol 2001 189 1 54 63 11573204 23 in ‘t Anker PS Noort WA Scherjon SA Mesenchymal stem cells in human second-trimester bone marrow, liver, lung, and spleen exhibit a similar immunophenotype but a heterogeneous multilineage differentiation potential Haematologica 2003 88 8 845 852 12935972 24 Campagnoli C Roberts IA Kumar S Bennett PR Bellantuono I Fisk NM Identification of mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells in human first-trimester fetal blood, liver, and bone marrow Blood 2001 98 8 2396 2402 11588036 25 Gronthos S Robey PG Boyde A Shi S Human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs): Characterization and developmental potential J Bone Miner Res 2001 16 S265 26 Otaki S Ueshima S Shiraishi K Mesenchymal progenitor cells in adult human dental pulp and their ability to form bone when transplanted into immunocompromised mice Cell Biol Int 2007 27 Miura M Gronthos S Zhao M SHED: Stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003 100 10 5807 5812 12716973 28 Lindroos B Suuronen R Miettinen S The Potential of Adipose Stem Cells in Regenerative Medicine Stem Cell Rev 2010 29 Djouad F Bony C Haupl T Transcriptional profiles discriminate bone marrow-derived and synovium-derived mesenchymal stem cells Arthritis Res Ther 2005 7 6 R1304 R1315 16277684 30 Wagner W Wein F Seckinger A Comparative characteristics of mesenchymal stem cells from human bone marrow, adipose tissue, and umbilical cord blood Exp Hematol 2005 33 11 1402 1416 16263424 31 Yamada Y Fujimoto A Ito A Yoshimi R Ueda M Cluster analysis and gene expression profiles: a cDNA microarray system-based comparison between human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs) and human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) for tissue engineering cell therapy Biomaterials 2006 27 20 3766 3781 16563496 32 Larsen KH Frederiksen CM Burns JS Abdallah BM Kassem M Identifying a molecular phenotype for bone marrow stromal cells with in vivo bone-forming capacity J Bone Miner Res 2010 25 4 796 808 19821776 33 Foster LJ Zeemann PA Li C Mann M Jensen ON Kassem M Differential expression profiling of membrane proteins by quantitative proteomics in a human mesenchymal stem cell line undergoing osteoblast differentiation Stem Cells 2005 23 9 1367 1377 16210410 34 Stenderup K Justesen J Clausen C Kassem M Aging is associated with decreased maximal life span and accelerated senescence of bone marrow stromal cells Bone 2003 33 6 919 926 14678851 35 Walsh S Jefferiss C Stewart K Jordan GR Screen J Beresford JN Expression of the developmental markers STRO -1 and alkaline phosphatase in cultures of human marrow stromal cells: regulation by fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-2 and relationship to the expression of FGF receptors 1–4 Bone 2000 27 2 185 195 10913910 36 Simonsen JL Rosada C Serakinci N Telomerase expression extends the proliferative life-span and maintains the osteogenic potential of human bone marrow stromal cells Nat Biotechnol 2002 20 6 592 596 12042863 37 Luu HH Song WX Luo X Distinct roles of bone morphogenetic proteins in osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells J Orthop Res 2007 25 5 665 677 17290432 38 Noel D Gazit D Bouquet C Short-term BMP-2 expression is sufficient for in vivo osteochondral differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells Stem Cells 2004 22 1 74 85 14688393 39 Le BK Tammik C Rosendahl K Zetterberg E Ringden O HL A expression and immunologic properties of differentiated and undifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells Exp Hematol 2003 31 10 890 896 14550804 40 Pittenger MF Mackay AM Beck SC Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells 6 Science 1999 284 5411 143 147 10102814 41 Di NM Carlo-Stella C Magni M Human bone marrow stromal cells suppress T-lymphocyte proliferation induced by cellular or nonspecific mitogenic stimuli Blood 2002 99 10 3838 3843 11986244 42 Krampera M Glennie S Dyson J Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells inhibit the response of naive and memory antigen-specific T cells to their cognate peptide Blood 2003 101 9 3722 3729 12506037 43 Aggarwal S Pittenger MF Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate allogeneic immune cell responses Blood 2005 105 4 1815 1822 15494428 44 Bartholomew A Sturgeon C Siatskas M Mesenchymal stem cells suppress lymphocyte proliferation in vitro and prolong skin graft survival in vivo Exp Hematol 2002 30 1 42 48 11823036 45 Lepperdinger G Brunauer R Jamnig A Laschober G Kassem M Controversial issue: is it safe to employ mesenchymal stem cells in cell-based therapies? Exp Gerontol 2008 43 11 1018 1023 18694815 46 Rubio D Garcia-Castro J Martin MC Spontaneous human adult stem cell transformation Cancer Res 2005 65 8 3035 3039 15833829 47 de la FR Bernad A Garcia-Castro J Martin MC Cigudosa JC Retraction: Spontaneous human adult stem cell transformation Cancer Res 2010 70 16 6682 20710046 48 Garcia S Bernad A Martin MC Cigudosa JC Garcia-Castro J de la FR Pitfalls in spontaneous in vitro transformation of human mesenchymal stem cells Exp Cell Res 2010 316 9 1648 1650 20171963 49 Lazennec G Jorgensen C Concise review: adult multipotent stromal cells and cancer: risk or benefit? Stem Cells 2008 26 6 1387 1394 18388305 50 Aggarwal S Pittenger MF Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate allogeneic immune cell responses Blood 2005 105 4 1815 1822 15494428 51 Ortiz LA Dutreil M Fattman C Interleukin 1 receptor antagonist mediates the antiinflammatory and antifibrotic effect of mesenchymal stem cells during lung injury Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007 104 26 11002 11007 17569781 52 Togel F Weiss K Yang Y Hu Z Zhang P Westenfelder C Vasculotropic, paracrine actions of infused mesenchymal stem cells are important to the recovery from acute kidney injury Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2007 292 5 F1626 F1635 17213465 53 Rose RA Jiang H Wang X Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells express cardiac-specific markers, retain the stromal phenotype, and do not become functional cardiomyocytes in vitro Stem Cells 2008 26 11 2884 2892 18687994 54 Kon E Muraglia A Corsi A Autologous bone marrow stromal cells loaded onto porous hydroxyapatite ceramic accelerate bone repair in critical-size defects of sheep long bones J Biomed Mater Res 2000 49 3 328 337 10602065 55 Petite H Viateau V Bensaid W Tissue-engineered bone regeneration Nat Biotechnol 2000 18 9 959 963 10973216 56 Viateau V Guillemin G Bousson V Long-bone critical-size defects treated with tissue-engineered grafts: a study on sheep J Orthop Res 2007 25 6 741 749 17318898 57 Goel A Sangwan SS Siwach RC Ali AM Percutaneous bone marrow grafting for the treatment of tibial non-union Injury 2005 36 1 203 206 15589942 58 Marcacci M Kon E Moukhachev V Stem cells associated with macroporous bioceramics for long bone repair: 6- to 7-year outcome of a pilot clinical study Tissue Eng 2007 13 5 947 955 17484701 59 Quarto R Mastrogiacomo M Cancedda R Repair of large bone defects with the use of autologous bone marrow stromal cells N Engl J Med 2001 344 5 385 386 11195802 60 Tilley S Bolland BJ Partridge K Taking tissue-engineering principles into theater: augmentation of impacted allograft with human bone marrow stromal cells Regen Med 2006 1 5 685 692 17465735 61 Wakitani S Mitsuoka T Nakamura N Toritsuka Y Nakamura Y Horibe S Autologous bone marrow stromal cell transplantation for repair of full-thickness articular cartilage defects in human patellae: two case reports Cell Transplant 2004 13 5 595 600 15565871 62 Kitoh H Kitakoji T Tsuchiya H Transplantation of marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and platelet-rich plasma during distraction osteogenesis--a preliminary result of three cases Bone 2004 35 4 892 898 15454096 63 Diduch DR Jordan LC Mierisch CM Balian G Marrow stromal cells embedded in alginate for repair of osteochondral defects Arthroscopy 2000 16 6 571 577 10976116 64 Hernigou P Poignard A Beaujean F Rouard H Percutaneous autologous bone-marrow grafting for nonunions. Influence of the number and concentration of progenitor cells J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005 87 7 1430 1437 15995108 65 Kawate K Yajima H Ohgushi H Tissue-engineered approach for the treatment of steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head: transplantation of autologous mesenchymal stem cells cultured with beta-tricalcium phosphate ceramics and free vascularized fibula Artif Organs 2006 30 12 960 962 17181837 66 Gangji V Hauzeur JP Treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head with implantation of autologous bone-marrow cells. Surgical technique J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005 87 Suppl 1(Pt 1) 106 112 15743852 67 Ringden O Uzunel M Rasmusson I Mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of therapy-resistant graft-versus-host disease Transplantation 2006 81 10 1390 1397 16732175 68 Le BK Frassoni F Ball L Mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of steroid-resistant, severe, acute graft-versus-host disease: a phase II study Lancet 2008 371 9624 1579 1586 18468541 69 Kebriaei P Isola L Bahceci E Adult human mesenchymal stem cells added to corticosteroid therapy for the treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2009 15 7 804 811 19539211 70 Fang B Song YP Liao LM Han Q Zhao RC Treatment of severe therapy-resistant acute graft-versus-host disease with human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells Bone Marrow Transplant 2006 38 5 389 390 16878145 71 Fang B Song Y Lin Q Human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells as salvage therapy for treatment of severe refractory acute graft-vs.-host disease in two children Pediatr Transplant 2007 11 7 814 817 17910665 72 Shake JG Gruber PJ Baumgartner WA Mesenchymal stem cell implantation in a swine myocardial infarct model: engraftment and functional effects Ann Thorac Surg 2002 73 6 1919 1925 12078791 73 varez-Dolado M Pardal R Garcia-Verdugo JM Fusion of bone-marrow-derived cells with Purkinje neurons, cardiomyocytes and hepatocytes Nature 2003 425 6961 968 973 14555960 74 Dai W Hale SL Martin BJ Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in post-infarcted rat myocardium: short- and long-term effects Circulation 2005 112 2 214 223 15998673 75 Noiseux N Gnecchi M Lopez-Ilasaca M Mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing Akt dramatically repair infarcted myocardium and improve cardiac function despite infrequent cellular fusion or differentiation Mol Ther 2006 14 6 840 850 16965940 76 Chen SL Fang WW Ye F Effect on left ventricular function of intracoronary transplantation of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell in patients with acute myocardial infarction Am J Cardiol 2004 94 1 92 95 15219514 77 Hare JM Traverse JH Henry TD A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study of intravenous adult human mesenchymal stem cells (prochymal) after acute myocardial infarction J Am Coll Cardiol 2009 54 24 2277 2286 19958962 78 Gutierrez-Fernandez M Rodriguez-Frutos B Alvarez-Grech J Functional recovery after hematic administration of allogenic mesenchymal stem cells in acute ischemic stroke in rats Neuroscience 2011 175 394 405 21144885 79 Pavlichenko N Sokolova I Vijde S Mesenchymal Mesenchymal stem cells transplantation could be beneficial for treatment of experimental ischemic stroke in rats Brain Res 2008 1233 203 213 18675258 80 Wakabayashi K Nagai A Sheikh AM Transplantation of human mesenchymal stem cells promotes functional improvement and increased expression of neurotrophic factors in a rat focal cerebral ischemia model J Neurosci Res 2010 88 5 1017 1025 19885863 81 Lee JS Hong JM Moon GJ Lee PH Ahn YH Bang OY A long-term follow-up study of intravenous autologous mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in patients with ischemic stroke Stem Cells 2010 28 6 1099 1106 20506226 82 Lee PH Kim JW Bang OY Ahn YH Joo IS Huh K Autologous mesenchymal stem cell therapy delays the progression of neurological deficits in patients with multiple system atrophy Clin Pharmacol Ther 2008 83 5 723 730 17898702 83 Salem HK Thiemermann C Mesenchymal stromal cells: current understanding and clinical status Stem Cells 2010 28 3 585 596 19967788 84 Morigi M Imberti B Zoja C Mesenchymal stem cells are renotropic, helping to repair the kidney and improve function in acute renal failure J Am Soc Nephrol 2004 15 7 1794 1804 15213267 85 Lange C Togel F Ittrich H Administered mesenchymal stem cells enhance recovery from ischemia/reperfusion-induced acute renal failure in rats Kidney Int 2005 68 4 1613 1617 16164638 86 Togel F Hu Z Weiss K Isaac J Lange C Westenfelder C Administered mesenchymal stem cells protect against ischemic acute renal failure through differentiation-independent mechanisms Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2005 289 1 F31 F42 15713913 87 Anna G John D Jean F Initial report on a phase I clinical trial: Prevention and treatment of post-operative Acute Kidney Injury with allogeneic Mesenchymal Stem Cells in patients who require on-pump cardiac surgery Cellular Therapy and Transplantation 2 24 12 2008 31 35 2008;1(2, 24 Dec 2008):31–35 88 Theofilopoulos AN Dixon FJ Murine models of systemic lupus erythematosus Adv Immunol 1985 37 269 390 3890479 89 Ikehara S Good RA Nakamura T Rationale for bone marrow transplantation in the treatment of autoimmune diseases Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1985 82 8 2483 2487 3887403 90 Zhang H Zeng X Sun L Allogenic bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells transplantation as a novel therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus Expert Opin Biol Ther 2010 10 5 701 709 20345339 91 Garcia-Olmo D Herreros D Pascual I Expanded adipose-derived stem cells for the treatment of complex perianal fistula: a phase II clinical trial Dis Colon Rectum 2009 52 1 79 86 19273960 92 Garcia-Olmo D Herreros D De-La-Quintana P Adipose-derived stem cells in Crohn’s rectovaginal fistula Case Report Med 2010 2010 961758 93 Chang CH Stanton RP Glutting J Unicameral bone cysts treated by injection of bone marrow or methylprednisolone J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002 84 3 407 412 12002502 94 Warnke PH Springer IN Wiltfang J Growth and transplantation of a custom vascularised bone graft in a man Lancet 2004 364 9436 766 770 15337402 95 Sun L Wang D Liang J Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in severe and refractory systemic lupus erythematosus Arthritis Rheum 2010 62 8 2467 2475 20506343