==== Front Med Sci MonitMed. Sci. MonitMedical Science MonitorMedical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research1234-10101643-3750International Scientific Literature, Inc. 3007498210.12659/MSM.909401909401Clinical ResearchAssessment of the Cerebral Hemodynamic Benefits of Carotid Artery Stenting for Patients with Preoperative Hemodynamic Impairment Using Cerebral Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) and Carbon Dioxide Inhalation Chen Da-Wei 1BCDEF*Zheng Jin 2BCEF*Shi Jin 1AGYin Yang-Wei 1EGSong Chen 1DFYang Fen 1CZhang Ying-Qian 1DMa Lu-Na 3B 1 Department of Neurology, Air Force General Hospital of the Chinese Peoples’ Liberation Army, Beijing, P.R. China 2 Department of Neurology, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P.R. China 3 Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Center, Air Force General Hospital of the Chinese Peoples’ Liberation Army, Beijing, P.R. ChinaCorresponding Author: Jin Shi, e-mail: shijin_dr9@126.comA Study Design B Data Collection C Statistical Analysis D Data Interpretation E Manuscript Preparation F Literature Search G Funds Collection * Da-Wei Chen and Jin Zheng contributed equally to this paper 2018 03 8 2018 24 5398 5404 07 2 2018 18 4 2018 © Med Sci Monit, 20182018This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of carotid artery angioplasty and carotid artery stenting (CAS) on cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) in patients with preoperative cerebrovascular hemodynamic impairment. Material/Methods Seventeen patients with unilateral severe internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis and ipsilateral CVR impairment underwent CAS. CBF and CVR were measured by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with inhalation of carbon dioxide (CO2) one week before and three months after CAS. Sixty-eight ROIs in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory were analyzed in 17 patients. Results Before CAS, CVR was impaired in all ROIs. CBF was impaired in 16 ROIs (23.5%). The percentage of ROIs with impaired CBF was significantly increased in patients with ≥90% carotid artery stenosis (p=0.047) without collateral flow through the circle of Willis (p=0.005). CAS significantly increased CVR in ROIs with a normal preoperative CBF and impaired CVR, indicating mild hemodynamic impairment (0.9±6.7% vs. 4.9±8.6%) (p=0.014). CAS significantly increased CBF in ROIs with preoperative impaired CBF and impaired CVR, indicating severe hemodynamic impairment (79.1±7.5% vs. 86.7±10.0%) (p<0.001). Following CAS, ROIs with normal CBF and impaired CVR had a significantly increased percentage of improved CVR (p=0.047); ROIs with impaired CBF and impaired CVR had a significantly increased percentage of improved CBF (p=0.027). Conclusions The severity of preoperative hemodynamic impairment, which is related to the degree of carotid artery stenosis and cerebral collateral flow, may influence hemodynamic benefits by CAS. MeSH Keywords Carbon DioxideCarotid StenosisCerebrovascular Circulation ==== Body Background Carotid artery stenosis is an important cause of ischemic stroke [1]. The predominant pathophysiological mechanism for ischemia usually follows a thromboembolic event, but narrowing of the lumen of the carotid artery and its intracerebral branches can also result in cerebral hypoperfusion and may even potentiate the effects of distal embolization [2]. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR), which represent the change of CBF in response to vasoactive stimulation, are two important intracranial hemodynamic parameters [2,3]. Previously published studies have shown that resting CBF and CVR may predict future ischemic stroke in patients with carotid artery stenosis or occlusion [4–10]. Direct surgical revascularization techniques, such as carotid endarterectomy, have been shown to increase cerebral blood flow in ipsilateral cerebral territories or hemispheres for the patients with carotid artery stenosis [11]. During the last decades, driven by advancements in interventional technology and the accumulation of procedural expertise, carotid angioplasty and carotid artery stenting (CAS) have become therapeutic alternatives to carotid endarterectomy and can reduce mortality from carotid artery stenosis and stroke [12,13]. However, the intracranial changes in CBF and CVR that follow CAS are still unclear. Several factors, including the degree of vascular stenosis [14,15], tandem stenosis [16], the presence of unilateral or bilateral lesions [17,18], the degree of cerebral collateral circulation [19,20], symptomatic presentation [21], and preoperative cerebral hemodynamic impairment [22–25], may influence the benefits to CBF and CVR following CAS. Because preoperative cerebral hemodynamic status is associated with the degree of vascular stenosis [23,26,27], cerebral collateral circulation [2,28], and symptomatic presentation [4–10], we hypothesize that preoperative intracranial hemodynamic impairment might be the most important factor for CAS to benefit the CBF and CVR. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of CAS on CBF and CVR in patients with preoperative cerebrovascular hemodynamic impairment. In this study, patients were selected with unilateral severe internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis and ipsilateral CVR who underwent stenting, and measured the intracranial resting CBF and CVR in the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with inhalation of carbon dioxide (CO2) before and after CAS, using a previously described model [29]. Material and Methods Patients included in the study Patients who underwent carotid artery stenting (CAS) at the General Hospital of the Air Force of the Chinese Peoples’ Liberation Army, Beijing, China between October 2014 and December 2015 were invited to participate in this study. Patients provided written informed consent to participate in the study, which was approved by the Institutional Review Committee of the General Hospital of the Air Force of the Chinese Peoples’ Liberation Army, China. Eligibility criteria included the following: unilateral, severe (70–99%) stenosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA); the occurrence of transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) or moderately disabling ischemic stroke, as defined by the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≤3, attributable to ICA stenosis within the previous three months; no or ≤15 mm infarction in the territory of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) and cerebellum on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); preoperative impairment of cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) in the ipsilateral MCA territory. Study exclusion criteria included the following: occlusion of the ICA; stenosis (≥50%) or occlusion of other major cerebral arteries; ICA stenosis caused by diseases other than atherosclerosis, such as autoimmune disorders, and vasculitis; contraindications for CAS, such as allergy to iodine contrast agents; a previous endovascular stent, carotid artery endarterectomy, or extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass surgery; an embryonic posterior cerebral artery; severe cardiac, pulmonary, or renal disease; contraindications for single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and carbon dioxide (CO2) inhalation. Patient clinical assessment Patient demographic details, including age and gender, were recorded. Vascular risk factors, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and smoking were recorded. The degree of stenosis of the ICA and cerebral collateral flow through the Circle of Willis were assessed by digital subtraction angiography (DSA), according to the method of North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators (NASCET), and the degree of stenosis was divided into low-grade severe stenosis (LGSS) of <90% and high-grade severe stenosis (HGSS) of ≥90% [15]. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) measurements Resting and CO2-challenged ethylcysteinate dimer (99mTC-ECD) (China Institute of Atomic Energy, China) SPECT brain scans were carried out in a dark and quiet environment using a two-day protocol, according to the method in our previously published study [29]. On the first day, the resting brain perfusion examination was performed with an intravenous injection of 925 MBq of 99mTC-ECD into the antecubital vein. The images were obtained using the Infinia Hawkeye SPECT scanner (General Electric Company, USA) after one hour. The images were taken at every 6° during rotation of 360° and at a rate of 35 seconds per frame. The data were acquired on a 128×128 matrix. On the second day, CO2-challenged brain perfusion examination was carried out in a dark and quiet environment by inhalation of 5% CO2 and 95% O2 (carbogen). Patients wore a face mask with a one-way valve, which was connected to a 2-L steel 10-KPa carbogen bottle. The pressure of end-tidal CO2 (Pet CO2) was measured and hypercapnia (Pet CO2=50 mmHg) was maintained for 60 seconds before intravenous infusion of 99mTC-ECD. SPECT brain scans were performed one week before CAS and three months (mean, 89±7 days) after CAS. All the complications associated with the procedures in this model, including restenosis (≥30% stenosis in the stents) were recorded during follow-up. Selection of the region of interest (ROI) and data analysis Selection of the region of interest (ROI) and data analysis was performed, as previously described [30]. The NeuroMatch Software package (GE Medical Systems, Segami Corporation, Columbia, MD, USA) was used to select the ROIs. Four imaging slices of cerebral hemisphere were selected on the orbitomeatal line (OML) +55 mm, +58 mm, +61 mm, and +64 mm. Six pairs of sphenoid mirrored ROIs over the cortical gray matter were drawn at each slice of the cerebral hemisphere (Figure 1). Four middle ROIs corresponding to the ipsilateral MCA territory of stenosis of the ICA stenosis were selected, and the mean value of the four slices in each ROI was calculated for data analysis. However, mirrored ROIs were also drawn in one slice of the cerebellar hemisphere (OML + 15 mm) for normalization of cerebral hemodynamic parameters. The ratio of radioactive counting obtained from the ROI on the cerebral hemisphere to those from the ROI on the ipsilateral cerebellar hemisphere was calculated automatically by computer analysis for the cerebral hemodynamic normalization. Assessment of cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) In contrast with CBF and CVR in the whole middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory, CBF and CVR in each ROI was considered to be regional CBF (rCBF) and regional CVR (rCVR) [14,17]. rCBF was defined by normalization of cerebral radioactive counting. The impaired rCBF was defined as rCBFstenosis/rCBFmirror ≤90%. Normal rCBF was defined as rCBFstenosis/rCBFmirror >90%. The rCVR was evaluated by the following formula: rCVR (%)=[(rCBFCO2-challenged–rCBFbasal)/rCBFbasal] ×100%. The impaired rCVR was defined as ≤10%, and normal rCVR was defined as >10%. Patients with CVR impairment were defined as patients whose four ROIs in the ipsilateral MCA territory all had impaired rCVR. The improvement in rCBF following CAS was defined as rCBFafter CAS >rCBFbefore CAS. The improvement in rCVR following CAS was defined as rCVRafter CAS >rCVRbefore CAS. Statistical analysis Continuous variables were presented as the mean and standard deviation (SD). Categorical variables were reported as the percentage of patients in the subgroup. The paired t-test and the Student’s t-test were used for comparisons of continuous variables. The chi-squared (χ2) test was used for the comparisons of categorical variables. The statistical significance was defined as p<0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 16.0 software (IBM, Amon, New York, USA). Results Seventeen patients were included in the study and underwent and performed single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) brain scans before and after carotid artery stenting (CAS). The clinical characteristics of the patients included in the study are shown in Table 1. All 17 patients obtained the procedural success from CAS, and there were no complications during the peri-operative period or follow-up. There were a total of 17×4=68 regions of interest (ROIs) for data analysis. Before CAS, the regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) (rCBF) and regional cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) (rCVR) in the ROIs were 87.2±10.3% (range, 66.0–114.8%) and −0.7±6.4% (range, −16.0–9.0%), respectively. The rCVR was impaired in all the ROIs, but the rCBF was impaired in only 16 ROIs (23.5%). There were increased percentages of ROIs with impaired rCBF in the patients with high-grade severe stenosis (HGSS) (≥90%) and no collateral flow through the Circle of Willis (Table 2). After CAS, the rCBF was 89.5±9.2% (range, 69.8–106.3%), which was significantly increased when compared with the rCBF before CAS (p=0.017). We further divided the whole sample into two groups, according to the preoperative hemodynamic status: the ROIs with a normal rCBF and impaired rCVR and the ROIs with impaired rCBF and impaired rCVR. However, rCBF after CAS was significantly increased when compared with before CAS only in the ROIs with impaired rCBF and impaired rCVR (79.1±7.5% vs. 86.7±10.0%) (p<0.001). A higher percentage of the ROIs with preoperative impaired rCBF and impaired rCVR showed improvement in the rCBF after CAS compared with the ROIs with preoperative normal rCBF and impaired rCVR (81.3% vs. 50%) (p=0.027) (Figure 2). After CAS, the rCVR was 2.4±8.0% (range, −15.0–24.0%), which was significantly increased compared with the rCVR before CAS (p=0.017). After stratification by preoperative hemodynamic status, the rCVR after CAS was significantly increased compared with that before CAS only in the ROIs with normal rCBF and impaired rCVR (0.9±6.7% vs. 4.9±8.6%) (p=0.014). A higher percentage of the ROIs with preoperative normal rCBF and impaired rCVR showed improvement in rCVR after CAS compared with the ROIs with preoperative impaired rCBF and impaired rCVR (59.6% vs. 31.3%) (p=0.047) (Figure 2). Discussion In this study, single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) brain scans with inhalation of carbon dioxide (CO2) were used to assess the cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) in regions of interest (ROI) (rCBF and rCVR) before and after carotid artery stenting (CAS) in patients with unilateral severe internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis and ipsilateral CVR impairment. The findings were that rCBF was impaired only in the partial ROIs, and rCVR was impaired in all the ROIs. The patients with high-grade severe stenosis (HGSS) of ≥90% and without collateral flow through Circle of Willis had a significantly increased percentage of the ROIs with impaired rCBF. CAS preferentially improved the rCVR in the ROIs with preoperative normal rCBF and impaired rCVR and improved the rCBF in the ROIs with preoperative impaired rCBF and impaired rCVR (Figure 1). SPECT is the most readily available nuclear medicine technique for the assessment of cerebral hemodynamics [3]. Previously published studies have demonstrated that brain SPECT in conjunction with an acetazolamide challenge was a useful method to evaluate CVR in patients with vaso-occlusive disease [5,31]. However, because acetazolamide is associated with adverse effects, such as headache, nausea, dizziness, tinnitus, numbness of the extremities, and Stevens–Johnson syndrome [32], in this study brain SPECT with CO2 inhalation was used to measure CVR. In a previously published study by our group, this approach was shown to be a reliable and useful model the assessment of CVR [29], and CO2 inhalation has previously been shown to be both safe and tolerable [27]. When chronic arterial stenosis causes a progressive decrease in cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), CVR decline occurs in the early stage of cerebral hemodynamic impairment and CBF decline occurs in the late stage of cerebral hemodynamic impairment [2,31]. Therefore, our study showed two kinds of cerebral hemodynamic status in the ROIs of the ipsilateral MCA territory: mild impairment (normal rCBF and impaired rCVR) and severe impairment (impaired rCBF and impaired rCVR). There were more ROIs of severe hemodynamic impairment in the patients with HGSS and without collateral flow through the Circle of Willis. This result supports the view that cerebral hemodynamics are determined not only by the degree of severity of carotid artery stenosis [23,26,27], but also by the cerebral collateral circulation [2,19,28]. Previously published studies have shown that CAS could improve cerebral hemodynamic parameters by increasing the carotid artery lumen diameter and providing improved cerebral vascular perfusion [16,33,34]. However, some recent studies have shown that this improvement was often obtained only in patients with preoperative hemodynamic impairment, especially patients with preoperative CVR decline [14,15,22,23,25]. Our study also found that CAS increased the rCBF and rCVR in the ROIs in patients with preoperative rCVR impairment. Also, Goode et al. reported that carotid endarterectomy was able to provide the most benefit to patients with impaired preoperative CVR [24]. Therefore, preoperative hemodynamic impairment is an important and basic condition for hemodynamic benefit from CAS. The findings of the present study further demonstrated that the severity of preoperative cerebral hemodynamic impairment determined the models of hemodynamic benefit by CAS. CAS preferentially improved the rCVR in the mildly hemodynamic impaired ROIs (normal rCBF and impaired rCVR) and improved the rCBF in the severely hemodynamic impaired ROIs (impaired rCBF and impaired rCVR). These results can be explained by the following mechanisms. In the mildly hemodynamic impaired ROIs, CAS might improve the CVR by preventing vasodilatation, and CAS benefits CBF little because CBF is not compromised at baseline [19]. In the severely hemodynamic impaired ROIs, the extreme vasodilation with the exhaustion of CVR due to chronic cerebral ischemia distal to the critical carotid artery stenosis can impact the elasticity and stiffness of the cerebral arterial system, and lead to the loss of normal vasoconstriction and the impairment of cerebrovascular autoregulation [22,25]. Therefore, CAS might increase the CBF through revascularization and the increase of CPP but not recover CVR in these ROIs. This view is supported by the findings of Oshida et al. who showed that preoperative exhausted CVR (with impaired rCBF) was associated with an increased risk of cerebral hyperperfusion, which greatly increased the ipsilateral CBF following the revascularization of carotid artery stenosis [35]. Although the findings of the present study support this phenomenon, it is not possible to exclude the fact that, in the long term, vasoconstriction and cerebrovascular autoregulatory mechanisms might recover following CAS, as has been shown by some previous studies [23,36]. This study had several limitations. First, the number of subjects included in this study was small, but this may not negate the importance of the study findings. In this study, we divided the territory of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) into four ROIs, which ensured that there were more ROIs corresponding to the detailed brain regions analyzed, and which, we believed, strengthened the statistical power of the analysis of the study findings. The study also excluded some conditions, which could confuse the cerebral hemodynamic benefits resulting from CAS, such as preoperative normal cerebral hemodynamics, bilateral carotid stenoses, and tandem stenosis, these exclusions might support the study findings. However, further studies with a larger patient sample size will be needed in future to confirm the findings of this study. The second main limitation of this study was that a relative value was used, that of normalized radioactive counting obtained in the ROIs of the MCA territory compared with the ipsilateral cerebellar hemispheres, instead of quantitative analysis. However, a recent study proposed that the use of this form of relative value might be a more sensitive biomarker than an absolute value in clinical applications as it minimizes inter-subject variations [37]. Conclusions The findings of this study support that the preoperative hemodynamic status not only determines whether or not patients obtain cerebral hemodynamic benefit from carotid artery stenting (CAS) but has also described a model that demonstrates the clinical benefits of CAS. CAS might be a preferred treatment option to improve cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) in patients with mild preoperative hemodynamic impairment, and to improve cerebral blood flow (CBF) in patients with severe hemodynamic impairment. Future studies should continue to be undertaken to evaluate cerebrovascular hemodynamic parameters before treatment with CAS. Acknowledgments The authors thank the Center of Endovascular Therapy and Department of Nuclear Medicine of the Air Force General Hospital of the Chinese Peoples’ Liberation Army. Conflict of interest None. Source of support: This work was supported by the Air Force Logistic Scientific Research Project (No. BKJ09J019) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number: NSFC 81500356) Figure 1 The effect of the different preoperative hemodynamic impairment on the model of the region of interest (ROI) cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and cerebrovascular reactivity (rCVR) improvement following carotid artery stenting (CAS). (A–D) Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images show that the regions of interest (ROIs) (8–11) with normal cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and impaired cerebrovascular reactivity (rCVR) before treatment showed improved rCVR and unimproved rCBF after carotid artery stenting (CAS). (A) Baseline, before CAS, shows that that 8–11 ROIs have normal rCBF (equal tracer uptake compared to mirror). (B) The carbon dioxide (CO2) challenge before CAS, shows that these ROIs have impaired rCVR, with decreased tracer uptake compared with A. after CO2 inhibition. (C) Baseline, after CAS, shows that the normal rCBF was unchanged by CAS, with tracer uptake similar to A. (D) The CO2 challenge after CAS shows that the impaired rCVR improved after CAS, with increased tracer uptake compared to B, after CO2 inhibition. (E–H) SPECT images show that the ROIs (8–11) with impaired rCBF and impaired rCVR before treatment showed improvement of the rCBF but not the rCVR following CAS. (E) Baseline, before CAS, shows that 8–11 ROIs show impaired rCBF, with decreased tracer uptake compared to mirror. (F) The CO2 challenge before CAS shows that the ROIs show impaired rCVR, with decreased tracer uptake compared to E, after CO2 inhibition. (G) Baseline, after CAS, shows that the impaired rCBF improved by CAS, with increased tracer uptake compared to E. (H) The CO2 challenge after CAS shows that the impaired rCVR was unchanged after CAS, with the tracer uptake still decreased and similar to F, after CO2 inhibition. Figure 2 Comparison of the percentage improvement of the postoperative region of interest (ROI) cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and cerebrovascular reactivity (rCVR) following carotid artery stenting (CAS) between the different preoperative hemodynamic status groups. A higher percentage of regions of interest (ROIs) with preoperative impaired cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and impaired cerebrovascular reactivity (rCVR) show improvement in rCBF following carotid artery stenting (CAS), and a higher percentage of ROIs with preoperative normal rCBF and impaired rCVR show improvement in rCVR following CAS. Table 1 Characteristics of patients with carotid stenosis. Characteristics Value Age (years) 67.4±7.9 (49–78) Gender (male) 11 (64.7%) Hypertention(yes) 12 (70.6%) Diabetes mellitus(yes) 11 (64.7%) Hyperlipemia(yes) 12 (70.6%) Smoking(yes) 7 (41.2%) Stenosis location  Left side 10 (58.8%)  Right side 7 (41.2%) Preoperative stenosis degree (%) 85.7±9.8 (70–97) Stenosis severity classifications  <90% 9 (52.9%)  ≥90% 8 (47.1%) Collateral flow through CoW  None 11 (64.7%)  Though AcomA only 2 (11.8%)  Though PcomA only 4 (23.5%) Clinic symptoms  Transient ischemic attack 6 (35.3%)  Cerebral infarction 11 (64.7%) Postoperative stenosis degree (%) 6.2±5.2 (0–15) CoW – Circle of Willis; AcomA – anterior communicating atery; PcomA – posterior communicating atery. Categorical variables are presented as number (percentage) and continuous variables are presented as means ± standard deviation (Range). Table 2 Association of rCBF impairment in ROIs of ipsilateral MCA with stenosis severity and cerebral collateral flow in patients of carotid stenosis. Characteristics Normal rCBF (52 ROIs) Impaired rCBF (16 ROIs) p Stenosis severity classifications  <90% 86.1% 13.9% 0.047  ≥90% 34.4% 65.6% Collateral flow through CoW  None 65.9% 34.1% 0.005  Though AcomA/PcomA 95.8% 4.2% rCBF – regional cerebral blood flow; ROIs – region of interests; MCA – middle cerebral artery; CoW – circle of Willis; AcomA – Anterior communicating atery; PcomA – Posterior communicating atery. ==== Refs References 1 Go AS Mozaffarian D Roger VL American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2014 update: A report from the American Heart Association Circulation 2014 129 e28 292 24352519 2 Schroeder T Hemodynamic significance of internal carotid artery disease Acta Neurol Scand 1988 77 353 72 3046224 3 Vagal AS Leach JL Fernandez-Ulloa M The acetazolamide challenge: Techniques and applications in the evaluation of chronic cerebral ischemia Am J Neuroradiol 2009 30 876 84 19246526 4 Zhang W Yin Y Zhang Y Influence of cerebrovascular reactivity on outcome of the patients with ≥50% symptomatic unilateral middle cerebral artery stenosis Int J Neurosci 2018 128 1 42 47 28724339 5 Kuroda S Houkin K Kamiyama H Long-term prognosis of medically treated patients with internal carotid or middle cerebral artery occlusion: Can acetazolamide test predict it? Stroke 2001 32 2110 16 11546904 6 Kataoka H Miyamoto S Ogasawara K Results of prospective cohort study on symptomatic cerebrovascular occlusive disease showing mild hemodynamic compromise [japanese extracranial-intracranial bypass trial (JET)-2 study Neurol Med Chir 2015 55 460 68 7 Reinhard M Schwarzer G Briel M Cerebrovascular reactivity predicts stroke in high-grade carotid artery disease Neurology 2014 83 1424 31 25217057 8 Gupta A Chazen JL Hartman M Cerebrovascular reserve and stroke risk in patients with carotid stenosis or occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis Stroke 2012 43 2884 91 23091119 9 King A Serena J Bornstein NM Does impaired cerebrovascular reactivity predict stroke risk in asymptomatic carotid stenosis? A prospective substudy of the asymptomatic carotid emboli study Stroke 2011 42 1550 55 21527764 10 Liu M Zhou L Cerebrovascular reserve may be a more accurate predictor of stroke than degree of or MCA stenosis Med Sci Monit 2014 20 2082 87 25351338 11 Wang T Wang X He Y Decreased 13 N-labeled ammonia uptake in the ipsilateral and contralateral hemispheres following carotid endarterectomy Mol Med Rep 2015 12 6598 604 26351875 12 Yadav JS Wholey MH Kuntz RE Stenting and angioplasty with protection in patients at high risk for endarterectomy investigators. protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients N Engl J Med 2004 351 1493 501 15470212 13 CAVATAS Investigators Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): A randomised trial Lancet 2001 357 1729 37 11403808 14 Abe A Ueda T Ueda M Symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis treated by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty: Improvement of cerebrovascular reserves Interv Neuroradiol 2012 18 213 20 22681739 15 Huang L Cao W Ge L Intracranial blood flow changes in patients with high-grade severe carotid artery stenosis after stenting World Neurosurg 2017 104 863 68 28465268 16 Fan X Zhu H Chen X The impact of carotid angioplasty and stenting on the cerebrovascular reactivity Cerebrovasc Dis 2012 34 13 17 22738876 17 Kataoka T Hyogo T Hayase K Cerebral blood flow change before and after carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) in cases with contralateral carotid artery occlusion Interv Neuroradiol 2006 12 201 4 20569632 18 Abe A Ueda T Ueda M Recovery of cerebrovascular reserves after stenting for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis Interv Neuroradiol 2010 16 420 28 21162772 19 Shakur SF Amin-Hanjani S Bednarski C Intracranial blood flow changes after extracranial carotid artery stenting Neurosurgery 2015 76 330 36 25599202 20 Ko NU Achrol AS Chopra M Cerebral blood flow changes after endovascular treatment of cerebrovascular stenoses Am J Neuroradiol 2005 26 538 42 15760862 21 Merckel LG Van der Heijden J Jongen LM Effect of stenting on cerebral CT perfusion in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with carotid artery stenosis Am J Neuroradiol 2012 33 280 85 22158931 22 Sfyroeras G Karkos CD Liasidis C The impact of carotid stenting on the hemodynamic parameters and cerebrovascular reactivity of the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery J Vasc Surg 2006 44 1016 22 17098536 23 Oka F Ishihara H Kato S Cerebral hemodynamic benefits after carotid artery stenting in patients with near occlusion J Vasc Surg 2013 58 1512 17 23891492 24 Goode SD Altaf N Auer DP Carotid endarterectomy improves cerebrovascular reserve capacity preferentially in patients with preoperative impairment as indicated by asymmetric BOLD response to hypercapnia Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009 38 546 51 19744868 25 Chang TY Liu HL Lee TH Change in cerebral perfusion after carotid angioplasty with stenting is related to cerebral vasoreactivity: A study using dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR imaging and functional MR imaging with a breath-holding paradigm Am J Neuroradiol 2009 30 1330 36 19474124 26 Tomura N Otani T Koga M Correlation between severity of carotid stenosis and vascular reserve measured by acetazolamide brain perfusion single photon emission computed tomography J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2013 22 166 70 21903415 27 Yang F Shi W Shi J Assessment of cerebrovascular reserve in unilateral middle cerebral artery stenosis using perfusion CT and CO2 inhalation tests Int J Neurosci 2016 127 320 25 27619639 28 Shakur SF Hrbac T Alaraj A Effects of extracranial carotid stenosis on intracranial blood flow Stroke 2014 45 3427 29 25228258 29 Xiaoxiao D Jin S Luna M Evaluation of cerebrovascular reserve in patients with unilateral middle cerebral artery stenosis Chinese Journal of Neuromedicine 2014 13 188 90 [in Chinese] 30 Kim HJ Kim TW Ryu SY Acetazolamide-challenged perfusion magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of cerebrovascular reserve capacity in patients with symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis: Comparison with technetium-99m-hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime single-photon emission computed tomography Clin Imaging 2011 35 413 20 22040783 31 Kuroda S Kamiyama H Abe H Acetazolamide test in detecting reduced cerebral perfusion reserve and predicting long-term prognosis in patients with internal carotid artery occlusion Neurosurgery 1993 32 912 19 8327091 32 Matsumoto Y Ogasawara K Saito H Detection of misery perfusion in the cerebral hemisphere with chronic unilateral major cerebral artery steno-occlusive disease using crossed cerebellar hypoperfusion: Comparison of brain SPECT and PET imaging Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2013 40 1573 81 23740375 33 Sánchez-Arjona MB Sanz-Fernández G Franco-Macías E Cerebral hemodynamic changes after carotid angioplasty and stenting Am J Neuroradiol 2007 28 640 44 17416813 34 Reinhard M Roth M Müller T Effect of carotid endarterectomy or stenting on impairment of dynamic cerebral autoregulation Stroke 2004 35 1381 87 15087557 35 Oshida S Ogasawara K Saura H Does preoperative measurement of cerebral blood flow with acetazolamide challenge in addition to preoperative measurement of cerebral blood flow at the resting state increase the predictive accuracy of development of cerebral hyperperfusion after carotid endarterectomy? Results from 500 cases with brain perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography study Neurol Med Chir 2015 55 141 48 36 Oka F Ishihara H Kato S Cerebral hemodynamic benefits after contralateral carotid artery stenting in patients with internal carotid artery occlusion Am J Neuroradiol 2013 34 616 21 22918426 37 Yezhuvath US Lewis-Amezcua K Varghese R On the assessment of cerebrovascular reactivity using hypercapnia BOLD MRI NMR Biomed 2009 22 779 86 19388006