==== Front Int J OncolInt. J. OncolIJOInternational Journal of Oncology1019-64391791-2423D.A. Spandidos 3006685210.3892/ijo.2018.4512ijo-53-04-1469ArticlesUpregulation of PD-L1 expression by resveratrol and piceatannol in breast and colorectal cancer cells occurs via HDAC3/p300-mediated NF-κB signaling Lucas Justin 12Hsieh Tze-Chen 1Halicka H. Dorota 3Darzynkiewicz Zbigniew 3Wu Joseph M. 1 1 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595 2 Oncology Research Unit, Pfizer, Pearl River, NY 10965 3 Brander Cancer Research Institute, Department of Pathology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595, USACorrespondence to: Dr Joseph M. Wu, Room 147, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, New York Medical College, 15 Dana Road, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA, E-mail: joseph_wu@nymc.edu10 2018 01 8 2018 01 8 2018 53 4 1469 1480 15 3 2018 05 6 2018 Copyright: © Lucas et al.2018This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expressed in cancer cells interacting with its receptor programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) expressed in immune cells represents a regulatory axis linked to the suppression and evasion of host immune functions. The blockade of PD-1/PD-L1 interaction using monoclonal antibodies has emerged as an effective therapy for several solid tumors; however, durable response has been observed in a subset of patients with PD-L1-positive tumors. Thus, the understanding of the mechanisms responsible for the expression of PD-L1 in tumor cells may help to improve the response to PD-L1 blockade therapies. In this study, we investigated whether resveratrol, a grape-derived stilbenoid with immunoregulatory activity, modulates the expression of PD-L1 in breast and colorectal cancer cells. The surface expression of PD-L1 was determined by flow cytometry in cancer cells treated with resveratrol and/or piceatannol. Each stilbenoid alone induced PD-L1 and when used in combination, elicited a synergistic upregulation of PD-L1 in some cell lines. The induction of PD-L1 by the combined use of stilbenoids was most pronounced in the Cal51 triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and SW620 colon cancer cells. The observed induction of PD-L1 was transcriptionally mediated by nuclear factor (NF)-κB, as shown by NF-κB reporter assays, the nuclear accumulation of the p65 subunit of NF-κB, inhibition by the IKK inhibitor, BMS-345541, and histone the modification inhibitors, resminostat, entinostat or anacardic acid. Combined treatment with resveratrol and piceatannol also decreased tumor cell survival as indicated by the upregulation of the DNA damaging marker, γH2AX, the cleavage of caspase 3, the downregulation of the survival markers, p38-MAPK/c-Myc, and G1-to-S cell cycle arrest. programmed cell death ligand 1resveratrolpiceatannolnuclear factor-κBimmunotherapy ==== Body Introduction Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a functional ligand of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) (1). The binding of tumor cell PD-L1 to immune T-cell PD-1 inhibits T-cell activation and attenuates T-cell-mediated immunosuppression (2–4). This results in the evasion of host antitumor immunity, potentially reducing the efficacy of anticancer therapies and resulting in a poor clinical outcome (2,5,6). To counter the escape from the host immune surveillance system by tumor cells, blockade strategies using monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to prevent the binding of PD-L1 to PD-1 have been developed (7-12). The clinical efficacy of this approach has been demonstrated in certain cancer types, including melanoma (13-16), non-small-cell lung cancer (17-19) and renal carcinoma (20). Blockade therapy differs from tumoricidal chemotherapy in that its antitumorigenic effects involve boosting host immunity concomitant with the modulation of the expression/activity of the repertoire of cytotoxic T-cell and T-regulatory cells (21–24). Although success in anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy has made it possible to achieve tumor eradication and disease remission/cure, outstanding challenges remain. Only 31% of patients with advanced melanoma treated intravenously with anti-PD-1 drugs (nivolumab) have exhibited objective tumor regression (14). Likewise, the same therapeutic regimen has shown response rates ranging from 25% in renal cancer (20), to 19% in non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (17) and to 20% in squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (18), respectively. Moreover, a positive therapeutic response typically occurs in patients with PD-L1-positive tumors (13,25). Since the expression of PD-L1 in cancer cells may affect the patient response to immune blockade therapy, it is of interest to identify agents capable of modulating the expression of PD-L1. In this study, we focused on resveratrol, a stilbenoid present abundantly in red wine, red grape skin and peanuts (26,27). Interest in resveratrol stems largely from the report in 1997 by Jang et al, showing that the molecule prevents the development of pre-neoplastic lesions in carcinogen-exposed mammary glands, and the inhibition of initiation and promotion of skin cancer in a mouse model (28). Since then, numerous studies have demonstrated its broad-spectrum beneficial health effects, including, anti-inflammatory (29,30) and anticancer activities (26). Several mechanisms (31,32) and target proteins for the biological and pharmacological activities of resveratrol have been identified and characterized (33–42). Resveratrol has also been reported to exert immunomodulatory effects, as illustrated by the induction of interferon (IFN)-γ expression in CD8+ T-cells both ex vivo and in vivo (43), and the inhibition of the proliferation of CD4+ T-cells (43,44). Craveiro et al (45) recently demonstrated that low-dose resveratrol (20 μM) activates human CD4+ cells and induces DNA damage response, while high-dose resveratrol (100 μM) induces G1 phase cell cycle arrest, suggesting that resveratrol may act on host immune cell types in a dose-dependent manner. The chemopreventive activity of resveratrol was first demonstrated using skin and breast cancer models (28), and recent clinical trials support the use of resveratrol in colorectal cancer (46,47). Thus, in this study, we selected breast and colorectal cancer cell lines to examine the regulatory effects of resveratrol and its biotransformed product, piceatannol, on the expression of PD-L1. The results revealed that both dietary stilbenoids, alone or in combination, copiously increased the expression level of PD-L1 in some breast and colorectal cancer cells via HDAC3/p300-mediated nuclear factor (NF)-κB signaling. In addition, both stilbenoids exerted cytotoxic effects on the tumor cells. Materials and methods Reagents Resveratrol, piceatannol, resminostat, entinostat, mocetinostat, vorinostat, curcumin, garcinol, anacardic acid and Tip60i were purchased from Selleckchem (Houston, TX, USA). MB-3 and BMS-345541 were purchased from MilliporeSigma (Burlington, MA, USA). Pterostilbene and myricetin were from LKT Laboratories (St. Paul, MN, USA) and trimethoxy-resveratrol (trans-3,5,4′-trimethoxystilbene) was from Cayman Chemical Co. (Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Stock solutions of the chemicals were prepared based on the information provided by the manufacturer and maintained at −20°C. The antibodies for human PD-L1 (E1L3N, 13684), p38 MAPK (D13E1, 8690), NF-κB p65 (D14E12, 8242), γH2AX (20E3, 9718), cleaved caspase 3 (D3E9, 9579), IRF-1 (D5E4, 8478) and rabbit IgG isotype monoclonal antibody (DA1E, 5742) conjugated to PE were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA). c-Myc antibody (9E10, sc-40) was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Fetal bovine serum, RPMI-1640, DMEM, streptomycin and penicillin were from Gibco/Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). All other chemicals and solvents were of analytical grade. Cell culture and treatment Human BT549 (breast cancer), BT474 (invasive ductal carcinoma), SKBR3 (breast cancer), HCT116 (colon cancer), SW480 (colon cancer), HT29 (recto-sigmoid adenocarcinoma) and SW620 (colon cancer) cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD, USA). Human Cal51 (breast cancer) cells were from the Leibniz Institute DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (Braunschweig, Germany). The cells were maintained in RPMI-1640 or DMEM culture media supplemented with penicillin, streptomycin and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum according to the manufacturer's instructions. The cells were split once a week and the media were changed every 3-4 days. In all experiments described in this study, parent/parental or DMSO treated cells all refer to untreated, control cells. For treated cells, the conditions (dose and treatment duration) and whether any reagents were used together at specific doses were as indicated in the figure legends. Immunohistochemistry Paraffin-embedded SW620 colon cancer cells were immunohistochemically stained to evaluate the protein expression of PD-L1, c-Myc, p38 MAPK, γH2AX and cleaved caspase 3. Following deparaffinization and rehydration, sections of SW620 cells were prepared. The slides were heated in the Retriever 2000 pressure cooker (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA) in Borg buffer pH 9.5 (Biocare Medical, Concord, CA, USA) and cooled to room temperature. Endogenous peroxidase activity was inactivated with Peroxidazed 1 (Biocare Medical) for 10 min. Non-specific protein interactions were blocked for 10 min with Background Punisher (Biocare Medical). The sections were incubated with the primary antibodies, indicated above, at a dilution of 1/200 for 1 h, washed in TBS and incubated with SignalStain Boost IHC Detection Reagent (Cell Signaling Technology) for 30 min. Following washes in TBS, immunoreactivity was visualized by development with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB+, Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA) for 5 min. Immunostained sections were briefly counterstained with CAT hematoxylin, washed in tap water, dehydrated in a graded alcohol series, cleared in xylene and coverslipped with Permount mounting medium (Fisher Scientific Co. L.L.C., Pittsburgh, PA, USA). Flow cytometric analysis for the surface expression of PD-L1 The cells were harvested and fixed in 4% parafor-maldehyde for 10 min. The cells were then rinsed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) before a 30-min staining was performed to prepare the samples for flow cytometry using a rabbit anti-human PD-L1 monoclonal antibody (E1L3N) conjugated to phycoerythrin (PE). As controls, cell samples were also stained for 30 min using rabbit IgG isotype monoclonal antibody (DA1E) conjugated to PE. Following labeling with antibody, the cells were rinsed twice with PBS and re-suspended with PBS. The data shown as the geometric means from n=3-4 independent experiments were acquired on a DB LSR Fortessa X-20, and analyzed with FlowJo version 10 software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). PD-L1 mRNA analyses using the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) database The basal PD-L1 mRNA expression levels shown in Fig. 2B, presented as transcript per million (TPM) were obtained from a public Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE, https://portals.broadinstitute.org/ccle/home) database for cancer cell lines tested. NF-κB reporter assay The A549-Dual cells purchased from InvivoGen (San Diego, CA, USA) were used. These are derivatives of the A549 human lung carcinoma cells containing the stable integration of two inducible reporter constructs. The constructs allow for the co-expression of a secreted embryonic alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) reporter gene under the control of the IFN-β minimal promoter fused 5 five NF-κB binding sites, and, a Lucia luciferase gene encoding a secreted luciferase whose transcription is driven by an ISG54 promoter fused to 5 IFN-stimulated response elements. The cells were treated for the specified amount of time (8, 24 and 48 h) with resveratrol or piceatannol, each at 100 μM or combined, each at 50 μM (referred to as combo-100) to yield a concentration of 100 μM and the secreted alkaline phosphatase and Lucia luciferase in the supernatant of the control and treated cells were detected using the Quanti-Blue reagent from InvivoGen. The results were scored by the fluorescence intensity on a Perkin Elmer EnSpire set at a wavelength of 650 nm (PerkinElmer Inc., Shelton, CT, USA). To determine the role of NF-κB in mediating the induction of PD-L1, the IKK inhibitor, BMS-345541, was administered for 24 h in vitro prior to exposure to the combination of piceatannol and resveratrol, each at 50 μM to yield a concentration of 100 μM, for a further 48 h. BMS-345541 was added at increasing concentrations (1, 4 and 8 μM), while the dose of the combination was kept constant. Cell cycle/apoptosis analysis The cells were harvested and washed with PBS then re-suspended in cold 1% formaldehyde in PBS solution for 15 min at 4°C. The cells were washed twice in PBS and re-suspended in ice-cold 70% ethanol and stored at −20°C for 2 h prior to analysis. Prior to fluorescence measurement the cells were stained with 4′,6-diamidine-2′-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI). The intensity of blue fluorescence emission of DAPI stained DNA, excited with the UV laser (355 nm) was measured, recorded and analyzed on a MoFlo flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter Life Sciences, Indianapolis IN, USA) using Kaluza fluorescence intensity analysis software (48). Experiments were repeated and representative data are presented. Statistical analysis All data are presented as the mean ± the standard error of the mean. A Student's t-test or two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction were performed to determine statistical significance between frequencies or mean fluorescence intensities of assessed cell populations using GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software). Statistical significance of results was as indicated in each figure. Results PD-L1 expression is increased by dietary stilbenoids, resveratrol and/or piceatannol in breast and colorectal cancer cells We first assessed any alterations in PD-L1 levels using the Cal51 breast cancer and HCT116 colon cancer cells treated with stilbenoids, specifically, resveratrol, piceatannol, pterostilbene and 3,5,4′-trimethoxystilbene, for comparison with the flavonoid, myricetin (the chemical structures of the compounds are shown in Fig. 1A). The surface expression of PD-L1 in the control (DMSO-treated, also referred to as parent/parental cells) and treated Cal51 and HCT116 cells was assayed by flow cytometry. Resveratrol significantly increased the expression of PD-L1 in the Cal51 cells, while treatment with piceatannol resulted in a marked increase in the PD-L1 level in HCT116 cells (Fig. 1B). To determine whether the upregulation of PD-L1 by resveratrol and piceatannol was broadly or uniquely observed in specific breast or colon cancer cell lines, we assayed any alterations in PD-L1 expression using a panel of breast (Cal51, BT549, BT474 and SKBR3) and colorectal (HCT116, SW480, HT29 and SW620) cancer cell lines. In addition, we also determined whether the synergistic upregulation of PD-L1 may result from treatment with the two stilbenoids. The differential increase in PD-L1 expression induced by resveratrol or piceatannol was observed in 2/4 breast and 3/4 colorectal cancer cell lines treated with either of the stilbenoids as a single agent (Fig. 2A). The combination of resveratrol and piceatannol acted synergistically; 50 μM each of resveratrol and piceatannol combined and referred to as 'combo-100' resulted in significantly greater induction of PD-L1 expression; specifically, ≥4.5-fold in the Cal51 and ≥3.5-fold in the SW620 cells than 50 μM of either stilbenoid added alone (Fig. 2A). Gene expression analyses frequently reveal that the relative abundance of mRNA is only weakly or even inversely associated with the level of protein expression (49–51). Thus, in this study, to determine whether the differential expression level of endogenous PD-L1 mRNA might contribute to the observed induction of PD-L1 by resveratrol and piceatannol in these two cell lines, relative to the panel of the other studied cell lines with the same cancer type grouping, the basal PD-L1 mRNA expression levels, shown as TPM were obtained from a public Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE, https://portals.broadinstitute.org/ccle/home) database for cancer cell lines tested. In the breast cancer cell lines, the endogenous level of PD-L1 mRNA ranked as follows: Cal51 ≤ BT474 < SKBR3 ≤ BT549 (Fig. 2B); however, the induction of PD-L1 by co-treatment with resveratrol and piceatannol yielded the opposite result: Cal51 (~7-fold) ≥ BT474 (~ 4-fold) > SKBR3 (~2-fold) ≥ BT549 (~2-fold) (Fig. 2A). A similar trend was also observed in the colorectal cancer cells; namely, the endogenous PD-L1 mRNA ranking was as follows: SW620 ≤ HCT116 < HT29 ≤ SW480 (Fig. 2B), whereas the relative induction of PD-L1 decreased from high to low as follows: SW620 (~4-fold) > HCT116 (~3-fold) > SW480 (~3-fold) > HT29 (~1.5-fold) (Fig. 2A). These results suggest that tumors with a low endogenous mRNA level of PD-L1 are more likely to be affected by resveratrol and/or piceatannol, alone or in combination. NF-κB mediates the upregulation of PD-L1 induced by resveratrol and/or piceatannol IFN-γ is known to induce PD-L1 expression by upregulating its transcription through the activation of interferon regulatory transcription factor (IRF-1) (52,53). Thus, in this study, we investigated whether the same mechanism may contribute to the resveratrol-and/or piceatannol-mediated induction of PD-L1 expression. The results of immunohistochemistry revealed no change in IRF-1 expression in the SW620 cells treated for 48 h with 'combo-100' compared to the control (data not shown). Since the NF-κB consensus sequence is also present in the PD-L1 gene promoter (52,53), and NF-κB plays a major role in the transcription of PD-L1 by IFN-γ (54-56), in this study, we examined whether the induction of PD-L1 by resveratrol and/or piceatannol was due to the activation of NF-κB. The A549 cells co-expressing the SEAP reporter gene and Lucia luciferase gene were used to investigate the association between NF-κB activity and the PD-L1 expression levels following treatment with the two stilbenoids, alone or combination. In this dual reporter assay, the secreted SEAP and Lucia luciferase in the culture supernatant were separately measured to provide a quantitative readout of the transcriptional impact of NF-κB and the IFN signaling pathways. The time-dependent (≥24 h) and synergistic induction of NF-κB expression induced by piceatannol alone and by combined treatment with resveratrol was observed (Fig. 3A). In response to stimuli, the inhibitory protein IκB is degraded, which leads to the release/translocation of heterodimer p65/p50 from the cytoplasm to the nucleus (57,58). Therefore, the activation of NF-κB by the combined stilbenoids was examined in the SW620 cells by immunohistochemistry to analyze changes in the localization of p65; 48 h of exposure to 'combo-100' resulted in an increase in the translocation and nuclear accumulation of p65, as shown in Fig. 3B (inset). The small molecule, BMS-345541, is an IKK kinase inhibitor (59) that prevents IκB phosphorylation, to effectively suppress the translocation of NF-κB into the nucleus for participation in transcriptional activation of NF-κB-responsive genes (57,58). Thus, in this study, we then examined whether the stilbenoid-induced PD-L1 expression can be blocked by BMS-345541. In SW620 cells, the induction of PD-L1 by 'combo-100' was inhibited by 48% with 1 μM BMS-345541 (Fig. 3C). Furthermore, a dose-dependent inhibition was observed with the 1, 4 and 8 μM of IKK inhibitor concentration range (Fig. 3C). These results, showing that the inhibition of IKK significantly decreased PD-L1 expression in SW620 cells suggest that NF-κB activation is involved in the induction of PD-L1 expression by resveratrol or piceatannol either alone, or in combination. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) and histone acetyltransferase inhibitors (HATis) modulate the induction of PD-L1 expression induced by the combination of resveratrol and piceatannol The expression of PD-L1 can be regulated via histone acetylation/deacetylation (60,61) and resveratrol is an activator of HDAC (62). To investigate whether the induction of PD-L1 by the combination of resveratrol and piceatannol is blocked by inhibitors of HDAC or HAT, HDACis (vorinostat, mocetinostat, resminostat and entinostat) and HATis (curcumin, garcinol, anacardic acid, MB-3 and Tip60i) were used to assess their effects on the modulation of PD-L1 by the combined use of the stilbenoids. The cells were pre-treated for 48 h with individual HDACis/HATis alone or in combination with 60 μM of either of the stilbenoids, followed by the flow cytometric analysis of PD-L1 expression. The addition of HDACis or HATis alone did not affect PD-L1 expression compared to the untreated controls (Fig. 4). When the SW620 cells were pre-treated with histone modification inhibitors, the ability of the stilbenoids to induce PD-L1 was markedly reduced by two HDACis (5 μM of resminostat and entinostat) and also by the HATi, anacardic acid (1 μM) (Fig. 5). These results demonstrated that histone modification inhibitors can suppress the induction of PD-L1 expression by stilbenoids. The data are consistent with the interpretation that the upregulation of PD-L1 by stilbenoids involves transcriptional control. Induction of apoptotic and cell cycle changes by the combined use of resveratrol and piceatannol The upregulation of PD-L1 may allow cancers to evade the host immune system and acquire resistance to anticancer drugs. Having demonstrated that the upregulation of PD-L1 expression by stilbenoids in the SW620 colon cancer cells, we then investigated whether stilbenoids affect the survival status of cells by analyzing two biomarkers related to apoptosis, namely, the expression of the DNA damage indicator γH2AX, and that of cleaved caspase 3. In addition, markers associated with cell survival, p38-MAPK and c-Myc, were also assessed using immunohistochemistry. Treatment of the SW620 cells for 48 h with 'combo-100' resveratrol and piceatannol increased the expression of γH2AX and that of cleaved caspase 3, and downregulated the p38-MAPK and c-Myc levels (Fig. 6A). The induction of γH2AX is characteristic of DNA fragmentation and damage during apoptosis, and thus supports the interpretation that exposure to resveratrol and/or piceatannol causes DNA damage and apoptosis via the activation of caspase 3. We then assessed whether treatment with the stilbenoids altered cell cycle distribution by flow cytometric analysis. An increase in the percentage of cells in the S phase of the cell cycle, from 19 to ~30%, a distinct reduction in the proportion of G1 phase cells (from 66 to ~30%), and a marked decrease in the percentage of G2M phase cells, from 12 to ~3% were observed. There was also an increase in the percentage of cells with fractional DNA content ('sub-G1 cells'), an indication of apoptosis from 2.85% in the control cells to 31.84, 35.08 and 36.55% in the cells treated with 50 μM resveratrol, 50 μM piceatannol or 50 μM of these two compounds for 48 h, respectively (Fig. 6B). We also examined and determined that low-dose (10 μM) resveratrol and/or piceatannol did not induce PD-L1 expression, whereas the analysis of cell cycle phase distribution changes using Cal51 and SW620 cell cultures treated for 48 h revealed an apparent increase in the proportion of S-phase cells concomitant with the reduction of G2M-phase cells in cultures treated with resveratrol alone, and to an even greater extent following treatment with both stilbenoids (Fig. 7). In addition, the combination of resveratrol and piceatannol induced apoptosis in both cell types to a much greater degree than each of them alone, as demonstrated by an increase in the percentage of cells with fractional DNA content ('sub-G1 cells'), an indication of apoptosis (compare Fig. 7A with Fig. 7B–D) (48,63,64). Taken together, our findings indicate that stilbenoids not only increase PD-L1 expression, but may also induce DNA damage, leading to increased cell death in tumor cells, such as SW620 colon cancer cells. Discussion An association has been observed between a decrease in T-cell proliferation and an increase in apoptosis and tumor immune evasion, with an increase in the expression of T-cell inhibitory protein PD-L1 on cancer cells (2,3), providing the impetus for understanding the control of PD-L1 expression using cancer cells as a model. In this study, we examined the hypothesis that dietary stilbenoids may act as modulators of PD-L1 expression in tumor cells. We focused on the effects of resveratrol, a grape-derived polyphenol that has shown chemopreventive effects in various cancer types (33–42), and its hydroxylated derivative, piceatannol. Questions raised and addressed in this study included whether: i) Structurally-modified stilbenoids have the same ability to modulate PD-L1 expression; ii) the effects of stilbenoids on PD-L1 expression can apply to different cancer types; iii) signaling pathways that control the stilbenoid-induced PD-L1 expression are effected; and iv) histone modification inhibitors (HDACis and HATis) block stilbenoid-induced PD-L1 expression. Stilbenoids in general exert beneficial effects on human health (65). It has been reported that the 4′-hydroxy group of resveratrol is essential for its bioactivity (66). In this study, we used breast and colorectal cancer cells to compare the modulatory effects of stilbenoids on PD-L1 expression, namely, piceatannol (3′,4′,3,5-trans-trihydroxystilbene), 3,5,4′-trimethoxystilbene, and pterostilbene (3,5-dimethoxy-4′-hydroxy-E-stilbene), with resveratrol (3,5,4′-trans-trihydroxystilbene) and myricetin, a naturally occurring flavonoid present in abundance in edible foods (67). The results presented in Figs. 1 and 2 demonstrate that the hydroxyl, but not methoxy groups on stilbenoids are important for the induction of PD-L1. However, no increase in PD-L1 expression was evident in the cells treated with myricetin (3,5,7-trihydroxy-2-(3,4,5-trihydroxyphenyl)-4-chromenone), a flavonoid that contains 6 hydroxyl groups (Fig. 1). These results suggest that the 3,5-dihydroxy-trans-stilbene structure is required for the induction of PD-L1 in the cells used. The expression level PD-L1 of was significantly increased in the breast and colon cancer cells treated with resveratrol and piceatannol, both as a single agent and when used in combination (Figs. 1 and 2). Moreover, PD-L1 expression was synergistically upregulated 4.5-fold in the Cal51 breast cancer and ≥3.5-fold in the SW620 colon cancer cells by the combined use of resveratrol and piceatannol (Fig. 2A). Of note, both cancer cells express low basal levels of PD-L1 mRNA expression (Fig. 2B). Since, as noted, a positive response and improved clinical outcome to anti-PD-L1 blockade therapy are best observed in patients with PD-L1-positive tumors (presumably reflecting a high expression of PD-L1), we surmise that agents capable of upregulating PD-L1 expression in tumor cells expressing low PD-L1 can sensitize such cancer cells for an improved response to PD-L1 blockade. As a corollary, we also hypothesized that the combined use of resveratrol and piceatannol co-administered with anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy may exhibit clinical benefits in cancer patients with no-or- low-PD-L1 tumors. Whether the efficacy to PD-L1 blockade may be enhanced by the combined intake of resveratrol and/or piceatannol, concomitantly or sequentially, remains to be verified. This study also provides evidence showing that the resvera-trol- and piceatannol-mediated upregulation of PD-L1 requires the activation of NF-κB (Fig. 3). In the SW620 cells, we showed that the induction of PD-L1 expression induced by resveratrol/piceatannol was attenuated by the IKK inhibitor, BMS 345541 (Fig. 3C). It has been previously demonstrated that the duration and function of nuclear NF-κB is regulated by reversible acetylation/deacetylation (68), and that NF-κB transcriptional response is controlled by the HDAC3-mediated deacetylation of RelA acting as an intranuclear molecular switch for turning 'on-off' the NF-κB response (68); we therefore examined whether histone modification inhibitors affect the resveratrol/ piceatannol-mediated transcriptional control of PD-L1. Our findings revealed that two HDACis (e.g., resminostat and entinostat) and one HATi, anacardic acid, effectively blocked the induction of PD-L1 expression by resveratrol/piceatannol (Fig. 5). Both resminostat and entinostat are HDAC3 inhibitors, thus lending support that the HDAC3-mediated NF-κB response plays a role in resveratrol/piceatannol-induced PD-L1 expression. The suppression of PD-L1 induction by resveratrol using anacardic acid is in accordance with the described effect of anacardic acid as a HATi for p300 and p300/CBP and data reporting that resveratrol is a p300 activator (69,70). These results indicate that the expression of PD-L1 is regulated by the mechanism of histone acetylation/deacetylation and that resveratrol/piceatannol induces PD-L1 expression through HDAC3/p300-mediated NF-κB control. It should be mentioned that the upregulation of PD-L1 by resveratrol or piceatannol occur at doses not achievable physiologically and may exceed pharmacologically relevant concentrations (26,71). Conceivably, the effective dose could also be modulated by factors present locally at the site of responsive cells/tumors (e.g., different hormones, cytokines, products of cell metabolism or variable oxygen tension) and thus may additionally affect sensitivity of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint to these compounds, perhaps amplifying their potential anticancer effect. It should also be noted that the doses used in the present experiments were based on titration studies (data not shown), and that the effectiveness of single or combined agents on the induction of PD-L1 in each cell line is above IC50. It would be of interest to determine what might account for the variations observed in dosage dependence in different cell lines. Since the induction of PD-L1 expression by resveratrol and piceatannol are mediated through the NF-κB signaling pathway; the different dose-dependent responses and the upregulation of PD-L1 by resveratrol and piceatannol may be due to the variation in the endogenous level of NF-κB components, vis-à-vis, NF-κB1 (p105), NF-κB2 (p65), CHUK (IKK-α), IKBKB (IKK-β) and IKBKG (IKK-γ), in each of the cell lines tested. In RNA-seq analyses, we found that Cal51 and SW620, both with a low endogenous level of PD-L1 expression, expressed high levels NF-κB2 (p65) and CHUK (IKK-α) compared to cancer cell lines from same anatomical origin showing high PD-L1 expression (data not shown). Thus, it is tempting to propose that response in the induction of PD-L1 by stilbenoids in different cell lines from identical cancer types may be attributed to the level of expression of NF-κB2 (p65) and CHUK (IKK-α). Currently, experiments are underway to further test and confirm our hypothesis. Another result of note in this study is that the SW620 cells exposed to a high dose of both stilbenoids were partially restricted in cell cycle transition in the G2/M phase and display evidence of apoptosis (Fig. 6). Furthermore, the accumulation of cells in the S phase of the cell cycle may also be associated with an increase in their expression of PD-L1. This suggests that resveratrol and piceatannol affect cancer cells by a dual mechanism: i) The induction of PD-L1 that sensitizes tumor cells for recognition by anti-PD-L1 antibodies; an effect that could diminish cancer cell evasion from immune surveillance; and ii) the direct induction of cell cycle arrest, increase in DNA damage and cancer cell destruction via induction of apoptosis. Since cancer patients expressing tumors positive for PD-L1, a negative T-cell regulatory molecule, demonstrate efficacy to anti-PD-L1 blockade therapy with an improved clinical outcome, one might surmise that low PD-L1-expressing tumors may be sensitized and may display an improved responsiveness to PD-L1 blockade therapy using dietary agents. The cell culture experiments used in this study may be considered as a model for testing whether the sensitivity and responsiveness of tumor cells to PD-L1 targeted therapy can be augmented by priming with or co-exposure to stilbenoids, such as resveratrol and/or piceatannol. The hypothesis raised is as follows: The upregulation of membrane-associated PD-L1 in low PD-L1-expressing tumor cells is a 'find-me' approach for targeting by immune checkpoint inhibitors to potentially improve the effi-cacy of anti-PD-L1 blockade therapy via stilbenoids. Indeed, we believe that the elevation of PD-L1 expression, as we have demonstrated in this study using pharmacological doses of the stilbenoids, resveratrol and piceatannol, may underlie the unresolved challenge in that the positive response to immune checkpoint blockade therapy in 19-31% of treated individuals is a limited to number of clinical indications, typically in patients whose tumors express elevated-PD-L1, which we stated explicitly in the Introduction. Thus, while on teleological grounds, the upregulation of PD-L1 by polyphenols in cancer could promote disease progression, we offer the consideration that the observed stilbenoid-induced PD-L1 increase be viewed from the hypothesis that agents capable of upregulating PD-L1 expression in tumor cells could sensitize cancer cells for an improved clinical response to PD-L1 immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Testing these aspects would constitute a novel approach to confirm our hypothesis. These possibilities are under further investigative considerations in our laboratory. Studies are also planned to explore whether stilbenoids may impact host immune response, for example, by affecting PD-1 expression in PD-1-expressing Jurkat T-cells. Funding This study was supported in part by the Robert A. Welke Cancer Research Foundation (to HDH and ZD). Availability of data and materials The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Authors' contributions JL performed experiments and analyzed the data (cell culture analysis, immunohistochemistry, flow cytometric analysis, NF-κB reporter assay and statistical analysis) and edited the manuscript. TCH interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. HDH collected and analyzed/interpreted the data (cell cycle and apoptosis analyses). ZD interpreted the data and wrote the section of cell cycle and apoptosis analyses and edited the manuscript. JMW interpreted the data, and wrote and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable. Patient consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Acknowledgments The authors acknowledge that the RNA-seq data presented in Fig. 2B were obtained from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) database (https://portals.broadinstitute.org/ccle/home). Figure 1 Effects of dietary polyphenols on programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in human breast and colon cancer cells. (A) Chemical structure of each of the polyphenols tested. (B) The Cal51 human breast cancer cell line and HCT116 colon cancer cell line, were cultured in vitro and treated with increasing concentrations of 5 polyphenols for 48 h, respectively, namely resveratrol (Res), piceatannol (Pic), pterostilbene (PTS), trimethylstilbene (TriMRes) and myricetin. Following treatment, the cells were harvested and stained for the surface expression of PD-L1 by flow cytometry. The geometric mean of mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of phytoerythrin (PE) area was used as the readout of PD-L1. The levels of PD-L1 were converted to a bar graph to represent the respective changes in PD-L1 expression following treatment. The parental condition (also referred to as DMSO-treated, or control cells). Statistical difference reflects the comparison of treated samples to the parental condition. The data shown were from n=3 independent experiments. *P<0.05. Figure 2 Effects of resveratrol and piceatannol on programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in human breast and colon cancer cells. (A) A panel of 4 breast (Cal51, BT549, BT474 and SKBR3) and colorectal (HCT116, SW480, HT29 and SW620) cancer cell lines were incubated with increasing concentrations of resveratrol or piceatannol, as single agents or in combination for 48 h. Following treatment, the cells were harvested and stained and quantified for PD-L1-PE surface expression by flow cytometry. The induction of PD-L1 expression was based on comparison to a DMSO-treated sample (control used throughout all experiments), and to isotype control staining. The geometric mean of MFI of PE area was used as the PD-L1 readout. The levels of PD-L1 from n=3 experiments were converted to a bar graph to represent the respective changes in PD-L1 expression following treatment. The parental condition represents the untreated control. The statistical difference reflects comparison of treated samples to parental condition. (B) RNA-seq analysis of constitutive mRNA expression of PD-L1 in panel of breast and colon cancer cells. Basal PD-L1 mRNA levels, shown as transcript per million (TPM) were obtained from a public Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) database and ranked from low to high according to the relative TPM expression by most of the breast and colon cancer cell lines tested in (A) https://portals.broadinstitute.org/ccle/home. The asterisks apply to comparisons made among treated samples: *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. In addition, the 'x' symbol refers to comparisons made between the untreated, control sample with the treated sample: xP<0.05 (treated vs. control). Figure 3 Control of nuclear factor (NF)-κB-mediated programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression by resveratrol and piceatannol. (A) A549 dual reporter cells were used to assay the activation of NF-κB following treatment with resveratrol or piceatannol, each at 100 μM or combined, each at 50 μM (referred to as combo-100) to yield a concentration of 100 μM. Resveratrol as a single agent resulted in an optimal early time activation of NF-κB, while piceatannol alone decreased NF-κB signaling at 8 h and followed by a progressive increases at 24 and 48 h, respectively. When used in combination, the two stilbenoids led to a marked increase in NF-κB signaling over the tested duration of 48 h. The parental condition represents the untreated control. The data shown are from 1 experiment. (B) Immunohistochemistry of the subcellular localization of NF-κB p65 subunit in SW620 colon cancer cells treated with a combination of piceatannol and resveratrol, each at 50 μM to yield a concentration of 100 μM vs. the untreated cells. The analysis showed that p65 translocated from the cytoplasm to the nucleus by the combined use of the stilbenoids, indicating the activation of NF-κB signaling. Images were captured at ×20 magnification and cropped to show the field of cells representative of the effect of treatment. The results are representative of 5 sections from 1 experiment. We did not quantify the percentage of cells in which translocation occurred in these samples. The parental condition represents the control. The image in the inset represents a high magnification image of the cells in the field of view. (C) BMS-345541, an inhibitor of IKK, was administered for 24 h in vitro prior to exposure to the combination of piceatannol and resveratrol, each at 50 μM to yield a concentration of 100 μM, for a further 48 h. BMS-345541 was added at increasing concentrations (1, 4 and 8 μM) while the dose of the combination was kept constant. Following treatment, the cells were harvested and stained for PD-L1 expression by flow cytometry. The geometric mean of the mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of the phytoerythrin (PE) area was used as the readout for PD-L1 expression. The parental condition represents the untreated control. The results are representative of 3 experiments. Figure 4 Effects of histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) and histone acetyltransferase inhibitors (HATis) on the induction of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. (A) The SW620 colon cancer cell line was treated in vitro with different classes of HDACis at various concentrations for 72 h. Following treatment, the cells were harvested and stained for PD-L1 expression by flow cytometry. The results were quantified using the geometric mean of the mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of the phytoerythrin (PE) area as the readout for the expression of PD-L1. (B) The same cancer cell line, SW620, was treated with a known class of HATis listed, for 72 h and PD-L1 expression was analyzed and quantified. 'Combo' indicates treatment with both resveratrol and piceatannol each at 60 μM for 48 h. The parental condition represents the untreated control. The data shown are from 1 experiment. Figure 5 Effects of histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) and histone acetyltransferase inhibitors (HATis) on the induction of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression by a combination of resveratrol and piceatannol. (A) The SW620 colon cancer cell line was treated in vitro with increasing concentrations of HDACis for 24 h prior to exposure to a combination of resveratrol and piceatannol, each at 60 μM, for an additional 48 h. Following treatment, the cells were harvested and stained for PD-L1 expression by flow cytometry. The geometric mean of the mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of the phytoerythrin (PE) area was used as the readout for PD-L1 expression. The high dose of entinostat and resminostat significantly reduced expression of PD-L1. (B) The SW620 cells were treated with listed HATis, for 24 h prior to exposure to the combined treatment as described in Fig. 3A. The analysis and quantification of PD-L1 were identical to those shown in Fig. 3A. 'Combo' indicates treatment with both resveratrol and piceatannol each at 60 μM for 48 h. The parental condition represents the untreated control. Figure 6 Effects of resveratrol and/or piceatannol on the cell survival and cell cycle status. (A) Immunohistochemical staining of SW620 parental cells, top row, and cells treated with the combination of resveratrol and piceatannol, each at a concentration of 50 μM, are shown on the bottom row. Cells from both conditions were stained with antibodies against γH2AX, cleaved caspase 3, p38 MAPK and c-Myc, as described in the Materials and methods. Images were captured at ×20 magnification and cropped to show the field of cells representative of the effect of treatment. (B) Flow cytometric analysis of the changes on cell cycle status and apoptotic index of SW620 cells. The percentage of cells in particular phases of the cell cycle identified by their DNA content is indicated. The data are shown from a single representative experiment. Figure 7 Flow cytometric analysis of the changes in cell cycle status and the apoptotic index of Cal51 and SW620 cells. (A) Untreated cells. (B) Cells treated with 10 μM resveratrol, 48 h. (C) Cells treated with 10 μM piceatannol, 48 h. (D) Cells treated with 10 μM of resveratrol plus 10 μM piceatannol, 48 h. The percentage of apoptotic cells (Ap) identified by fractional DNA content, sub-G1 cells is shown in each panel (thick arrows). The percentage of cells in particular phases of the cell cycle identified by their DNA content, are as shown by the thin arrows in the top panel (Ca151 cells) and the bottom panel (SW620 cells). The data shown are representative of two experiments. ==== Refs References 1 Okazaki T Honjo T PD-1 and PD-1 ligands: From discovery to clinical application Int Immunol 19 813 824 2007 10.1093/intimm/dxm057 17606980 2 Dong H Strome SE Salomao DR Tamura H Hirano F Flies DB Roche PC Lu J Zhu G Tamada K Tumor-associated B7-H1 promotes T-cell apoptosis: A potential mechanism of immune evasion Nat Med 8 793 800 2002 10.1038/nm730 12091876 3 Hanahan D Weinberg RA Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation Cell 144 646 674 2011 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013 21376230 4 Yamazaki T Akiba H Iwai H Matsuda H Aoki M Tanno Y Shin T Tsuchiya H Pardoll DM Okumura K Expression of programmed death 1 ligands by murine T cells and APC J Immunol 169 5538 5545 2002 10.4049/jimmunol.169.10.5538 12421930 5 Hino R Kabashima K Kato Y Yagi H Nakamura M Honjo T Okazaki T Tokura Y Tumor cell expression of programmed cell death-1 ligand 1 is a prognostic factor for malignant melanoma Cancer 116 1757 1766 2010 10.1002/cncr.24899 20143437 6 Liu J Hamrouni A Wolowiec D Coiteux V Kuliczkowski K Hetuin D Saudemont A Quesnel B Plasma cells from multiple myeloma patients express B7-H1 (PD-L1) and increase expression after stimulation with IFN-{gamma} and TLR ligands via a MyD88-, TRAF6-, and MEK-dependent pathway Blood 110 296 304 2007 10.1182/blood-2006-10-051482 17363736 7 Akbay EA Koyama S Carretero J Altabef A Tchaicha JH Christensen CL Mikse OR Cherniack AD Beauchamp EM Pugh TJ Activation of the PD-1 pathway contributes to immune escape in EGFR-driven lung tumors Cancer Discov 3 1355 1363 2013 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0310 24078774 8 Lyford-Pike S Peng S Young GD Taube JM Westra WH Akpeng B Bruno TC Richmon JD Wang H Bishop JA Evidence for a role of the PD-1:PD-L1 pathway in immune resistance of HPV-associated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma Cancer Res 73 1733 1741 2013 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2384 23288508 9 Mittal D Gubin MM Schreiber RD Smyth MJ New insights into cancer immunoediting and its three component phases–elimination, equilibrium and escape Curr Opin Immunol 27 16 25 2014 10.1016/j.coi.2014.01.004 24531241 10 He J Hu Y Hu M Li B Development of PD-1/PD-L1 Pathway in Tumor Immune Microenvironment and Treatment for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Sci Rep 5 13110 2015 10.1038/srep13110 26279307 11 Noh H Hu J Wang X Xia X Satelli A Li S Immune checkpoint regulator PD-L1 expression on tumor cells by contacting CD11b positive bone marrow derived stromal cells. Cel Commun Signal 13 14 2015 10.1186/s12964-015-0093-y 12 Kim JM Chen DS Immune escape to PD-L1/PD-1 blockade: Seven steps to success (or failure) Ann Oncol 27 1492 1504 2016 10.1093/annonc/mdw217 27207108 13 Topalian SL Hodi FS Brahmer JR Gettinger SN Smith DC McDermott DF Powderly JD Carvajal RD Sosman JA Atkins MB Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer N Engl J Med 366 2443 2454 2012 10.1056/NEJMoa1200690 22658127 14 Topalian SL Sznol M McDermott DF Kluger HM Carvajal RD Sharfman WH Brahmer JR Lawrence DP Atkins MB Powderly JD Survival, durable tumor remission, and long-term safety in patients with advanced melanoma receiving nivolumab J Clin Oncol 32 1020 1030 2014 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.0105 24590637 15 Hamid O Robert C Daud A Hodi FS Hwu WJ Kefford R Wolchok JD Hersey P Joseph RW Weber JS Safety and tumor responses with lambrolizumab (anti-PD-1) in melanoma N Engl J Med 369 134 144 2013 10.1056/NEJMoa1305133 23724846 16 Gadiot J Hooijkaas AI Kaiser AD van Tinteren H van Boven H Blank C Overall survival and PD-L1 expression in metastasized malignant melanoma Cancer 117 2192 2201 2011 10.1002/cncr.25747 21523733 17 Borghaei H Paz-Ares L Horn L Spigel DR Steins M Ready NE Chow LQ Vokes EE Felip E Holgado E Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous von-small-cell lung cancer N Engl J Med 373 1627 1639 2015 10.1056/NEJMoa1507643 26412456 18 Brahmer J Reckamp KL Baas P Crinò L Eberhardt WE Poddubskaya E Antonia S Pluzanski A Vokes EE Holgado E Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced squamous-cell non-small-cell lung cancer N Engl J Med 373 123 135 2015 10.1056/NEJMoa1504627 26028407 19 Herbst RS Baas P Kim DW Felip E Pérez-Gracia JL Han JY Molina J Kim JH Arvis CD Ahn MJ Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): A randomised controlled trial Lancet 387 1540 1550 2016 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01281-7 26712084 20 Motzer RJ Escudier B McDermott DF George S Hammers HJ Srinivas S Tykodi SS Sosman JA Procopio G Plimack ER CheckMate 025 investigators: Nivolumab versus everolimus in advanced renal-cell carcinoma N Engl J Med 373 1803 1813 2015 10.1056/NEJMoa1510665 26406148 21 Chen L Flies DB Molecular mechanisms of T cell co-stimulation and co-inhibition Nat Rev Immunol 13 227 242 2013 10.1038/nri3405 23470321 22 Yang Y Cancer immunotherapy: Harnessing the immune system to battle cancer J Clin Invest 125 3335 3337 2015 10.1172/JCI83871 26325031 23 Chen L Han X Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy of human cancer: Past, present, and future J Clin Invest 125 3384 3391 2015 10.1172/JCI80011 26325035 24 Zou W Wolchok JD Chen L PD-L1 (B7-H1) and PD-1 pathway blockade for cancer therapy: Mechanisms, response biomarkers, and combinations Sci Transl Med 8 328rv4 2016 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad7118 26936508 25 Ansell SM Lesokhin AM Borrello I Halwani A Scott EC Gutierrez M Schuster SJ Millenson MM Cattry D Freeman GJ PD-1 blockade with nivolumab in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma N Engl J Med 372 311 319 2015 10.1056/NEJMoa1411087 25482239 26 Hsieh TC Wu JM Resveratrol: Biological and pharmaceutical properties as anticancer molecule Biofactors 36 360 369 2010 10.1002/biof.105 20623546 27 Saud SM Li W Morris NL Matter MS Colburn NH Kim YS Young MR Resveratrol prevents tumorigenesis in mouse model of Kras activated sporadic colorectal cancer by suppressing oncogenic Kras expression Carcinogenesis 35 2778 2786 2014 10.1093/carcin/bgu209 25280562 28 Jang M Cai L Udeani GO Slowing KV Thomas CF Beecher CW Fong HH Farnsworth NR Kinghorn AD Mehta RG Cancer chemopreventive activity of resveratrol, a natural product derived from grapes Science 275 218 220 1997 10.1126/science.275.5297.218 8985016 29 Rahman I Biswas SK Kirkham PA Regulation of inflammation and redox signaling by dietary polyphenols Biochem Pharmacol 72 1439 1452 2006 10.1016/j.bcp.2006.07.004 16920072 30 Dvorakova M Landa P Anti-inflammatory activity of natural stilbenoids: A review Pharmacol Res 124 126 145 2017 10.1016/j.phrs.2017.08.002 28803136 31 Park EJ Pezzuto JM The pharmacology of resveratrol in animals and humans Biochim Biophys Acta 1852 1071 1113 2015 10.1016/j.bbadis.2015.01.014 25652123 32 Britton RG Kovoor C Brown K Direct molecular targets of resveratrol: Identifying key interactions to unlock complex mechanisms Ann N Y Acad Sci 1348 124 133 2015 10.1111/nyas.12796 26099829 33 Harikumar KB Aggarwal BB Resveratrol: A multitargeted agent for age-associated chronic diseases Cell Cycle 7 1020 1035 2008 10.4161/cc.7.8.5740 18414053 34 Tennen RI Michishita-Kioi E Chua KF Finding a target for resveratrol Cell 148 387 389 2012 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.032 22304906 35 Zykova TA Zhu F Zhai X Ma WY Ermakova SP Lee KW Bode AM Dong Z Resveratrol directly targets COX-2 to inhibit carcinogenesis Mol Carcinog 47 797 805 2008 10.1002/mc.20437 18381589 36 Ito Y Mitani T Harada N Isayama A Tanimori S Takenaka S Nakano Y Inui H Yamaji R Identification of carbonyl reductase 1 as a resveratrol-binding protein by affinity chromatography using 4′-amino-3,5-dihydroxy-trans-stilbene J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) 59 358 364 2013 10.3177/jnsv.59.358 24064738 37 Buryanovskyy L Fu Y Boyd M Ma Y Hsieh TC Wu JM Zhang Z Crystal structure of quinone reductase 2 in complex with resveratrol Biochemistry 43 11417 11426 2004 10.1021/bi049162o 15350128 38 Hsieh TC Wang Z Deng H Wu JM Identification of glutathione sulfotransferase-pi (GSTP1) as a new resveratrol targeting protein (RTP) and studies of resveratrol-responsive protein changes by resveratrol affinity chromatography Anticancer Res 28A 29 36 2008 39 Wang Z Hsieh TC Zhang Z Ma Y Wu JM Identification and purification of resveratrol targeting proteins using immobilized resveratrol affinity chromatography Biochem Biophys Res Commun 323 743 749 2004 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.08.174 15381063 40 Athar M Back JH Kopelovich L Bickers DR Kim AL Multiple molecular targets of resveratrol: Anti-carcinogenic mechanisms Arch Biochem Biophys 486 95 102 2009 10.1016/j.abb.2009.01.018 19514131 41 Hsieh TC Lin CY Bennett DJ Wu E Wu JM Biochemical and cellular evidence demonstrating AKT-1 as a binding partner for resveratrol targeting protein NQO2 PLoS One 9 e101070 2014 10.1371/journal.pone.0101070 24968355 42 Calleri E Pochetti G Dossou KSS Laghezza A Montanari R Capelli D Prada E Loiodice F Massolini G Bernier M Resveratrol and its metabolites bind to PPARs ChemBioChem 15 1154 1160 2014 10.1002/cbic.201300754 24796862 43 Yang Y Paik JH Cho D Cho JA Kim CW Resveratrol induces the suppression of tumor-derived CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells Int Immunopharmacol 8 542 547 2008 10.1016/j.intimp.2007.12.006 18328445 44 Zou T Yang Y Xia F Huang A Gao X Fang D Xiong S Zhang J Resveratrol inhibits CD4+ T cell activation by enhancing the expression and activity of Sirt1 PLoS One 8 e75139 2013 10.1371/journal.pone.0075139 24073240 45 Craveiro M Cretenet G Mongellaz C Matias MI Caron O de Lima MCP Zimmermann VS Solary E Dardalhon V Dulić V Resveratrol stimulates the metabolic reprogramming of human CD4+ T cells to enhance effector function Sci Signal 10 10 2017 10.1126/scisignal.aal3024 46 Patel KR Scott E Brown VA Gescher AJ Steward WP Brown K Clinical trials of resveratrol Ann N Y Acad Sci 1215 161 169 2011 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05853.x 21261655 47 Patel KR Brown VA Jones DJ Britton RG Hemingway D Miller AS West KP Booth TD Perloff M Crowell JA Clinical pharmacology of resveratrol and its metabolites in colorectal cancer patients Cancer Res 70 7392 7399 2010 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2027 20841478 48 Darzynkiewicz Z Bruno S Del Bino G Gorczyca W Hotz MA Lassota P Traganos F Features of apoptotic cells measured by flow cytometry Cytometry 13 795 808 1992 10.1002/cyto.990130802 1333943 49 Maier T Güell M Serrano L Correlation of mRNA and protein in complex biological samples FEBS Lett 583 3966 3973 2009 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.10.036 19850042 50 Vogel C Marcotte EM Insights into the regulation of protein abundance from proteomic and transcriptomic analyses Nat Rev Genet 13 227 232 2012 10.1038/nrg3185 22411467 51 Liu Y Beyer A Aebersold R On the dependency of cellular protein levels on mRNA abundance Cell 165 535 550 2016 10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.014 27104977 52 Ritprajak P Azuma M Intrinsic and extrinsic control of expression of the immunoregulatory molecule PD-L1 in epithelial cells and squamous cell carcinoma Oral Oncol 51 221 228 2015 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.11.014 25500094 53 Lee SJ Jang BC Lee SW Yang YI Suh SI Park YM Oh S Shin JG Yao S Chen L Interferon regulatory factor-1 is prerequisite to the constitutive expression and IFN-gamma-induced upregulation of B7-H1 (CD274) FEBS Lett 580 755 762 2006 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.12.093 16413538 54 Chen J Feng Y Lu L Wang H Dai L Li Y Zhang P Interferon-γ-induced PD-L1 surface expression on human oral squamous carcinoma via PKD2 signal pathway Immunobiology 217 385 393 2012 10.1016/j.imbio.2011.10.016 22204817 55 Abiko K Matsumura N Hamanishi J Horikawa N Murakami R Yamaguchi K Yoshioka Y Baba T Konishi I Mandai M IFN-γ from lymphocytes induces PD-L1 expression and promotes progression of ovarian cancer Br J Cancer 112 1501 1509 2015 10.1038/bjc.2015.101 25867264 56 Mandai M Hamanishi J Abiko K Matsumura N Baba T Konishi I Dual faces of IFNγ in cancer progression: A role of PD-L1 induction in the determination of pro- and antitumor immunity Clin Cancer Res 22 2329 2334 2016 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0224 27016309 57 Goto K Chiba Y Misawa M IL-13 induces translocation of NF-kappaB in cultured human bronchial smooth muscle cells Cytokine 46 96 99 2009 10.1016/j.cyto.2008.12.021 19231232 58 Hideshima H Yoshida Y Ikeda H Hide M Iwasaki A Anderson KC Hideshima T IKKβ inhibitor in combination with bortezomib induces cytotoxicity in breast cancer cells Int J Oncol 44 1171 1176 2014 10.3892/ijo.2014.2273 24481412 59 Burke JR Pattoli MA Gregor KR Brassil PJ MacMaster JF McIntyre KW Yang X Iotzova VS Clarke W Strnad J BMS-345541 is a highly selective inhibitor of I kappa B kinase that binds at an allosteric site of the enzyme and blocks NF-kappa B-dependent transcription in mice J Biol Chem 278 1450 1456 2003 10.1074/jbc.M209677200 12403772 60 Kroesen M Gielen P Brok IC Armandari I Hoogerbrugge PM Adema GJ HDAC inhibitors and immunotherapy; a double edged sword Oncotarget 5 6558 6572 2014 10.18632/oncotarget.2289 25115382 61 Woods DM Sodré AL Villagra A Sarnaik A Sotomayor EM Weber J HDAC inhibition upregulates PD-1 ligands in melanoma and augments immunotherapy with PD-1 blockade Cancer Immunol Res 3 1375 1385 2015 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-15-0077-T 26297712 62 Howitz KT Bitterman KJ Cohen HY Lamming DW Lavu S Wood JG Zipkin RE Chung P Kisielewski A Zhang LL Small molecule activators of sirtuins extend Saccharomyces cerevisiae lifespan Nature 425 191 196 2003 10.1038/nature01960 12939617 63 Kajstura M Halicka HD Pryjma J Darzynkiewicz Z Discontinuous fragmentation of nuclear DNA during apoptosis revealed by discrete 'sub-G1' peaks on DNA content histograms Cytometry A 71 125 131 2007 10.1002/cyto.a.20357 17252584 64 Darzynkiewicz Z Halicka HD Zhao H Analysis of cellular DNA content by flow and laser scanning cytometry Adv Exp Med Biol 676 137 147 2010 10.1007/978-1-4419-6199-0_9 20687474 65 Akinwumi BC Bordun KM Anderson HD Biological activities of stilbenoids Int J Mol Sci 19 19 2018 10.3390/ijms19030792 66 Matsuoka A Takeshita K Furuta A Ozaki M Fukuhara K Miyata N The 4′-hydroxy group is responsible for the in vitro cytogenetic activity of resveratrol Mutat Res 521 29 35 2002 10.1016/S1383-5718(02)00211-5 12438001 67 Semwal DK Semwal RB Combrinck S Viljoen A Myricetin: A dietary molecule with diverse biological activities Nutrients 8 90 2016 10.3390/nu8020090 26891321 68 Chen Lf Fischle W Verdin E Greene WC Duration of nuclear NF-kappaB action regulated by reversible acetylation Science 293 1653 1657 2001 10.1126/science.1062374 11533489 69 Shakibaei M Buhrmann C Mobasheri A Resveratrol-mediated SIRT-1 interactions with p300 modulate receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand (RANKL) activation of NF-kappaB signaling and inhibit osteoclastogenesis in bone-derived cells J Biol Chem 286 11492 11505 2011 10.1074/jbc.M110.198713 21239502 70 Zeng Z Cheng S Chen H Li Q Hu Y Wang Q Zhu X Wang J Activation and overexpression of Sirt1 attenuates lung fibrosis via P300 Biochem Biophys Res Commun 486 1021 1026 2017 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.03.155 28365154 71 Gescher AJ Steward WP Relationship between mechanisms, bioavailibility, and preclinical chemopreventive efficacy of resveratrol: A conundrum Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12 953 957 2003 14578128