==== Front Int J Appl Basic Med ResInt J Appl Basic Med ResIJABMRInternational Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research2229-516X2248-9606Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd India 30123747IJABMR-8-16910.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_171_18Original ArticleOral Health-related Quality of Life among Patients after Complete Denture Rehabilitation: A 12-month Follow-up Study Kaushik Kiran Dhawan Pankaj 1Tandan Piyush 1Jain Meena 2Department of Prosthodontics, Manav Rachna Dental College, Faridabad, Haryana, India1 Department of Prosthodontics, Manav Rachna Dental College and Hospital, Faridabad, Haryana, India2 Department of Public Health Dentistry, Manav Rachna Dental College and Hospital, Faridabad, Haryana, IndiaAddress for correspondence: Dr. Meena Jain, 205, Bharti Apartments, Sector 21C, Faridabad, Haryana, India. E-mail: drmeenabansal@gmail.comJul-Sep 2018 8 3 169 173 26 2 2018 15 5 2018 Copyright: © 2018 International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research2018This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.Introduction: Complete edentulism is an eventual oral health outcome and results from the combined pathology of dental caries, periodontal disease, or faulty method of rehabilitation due to reduced cost. Complete edentulism has a significant concern and leads to reduced quality of life (QoL) along with impact on general health. However, it has been observed that due to wider and better oral health services globally, edentulism rate is decreasing every decade. Edentulism is directly related to masticatory and nutritional problems, and some authors regard it as a good mortality indicator. Methodology: The sample population consisted of 100 individuals comprising 63 males and 37 females who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Geriatric oral health assessment index (GOHAI) was administered by a single investigator at baseline (preinsertion) and also 6 and 12 months postdenture insertion. Sociodemographic data, including age and gender, were also collected. Results: It was observed that the overall oral health-related QoL (OHRQoL) scores of the sample improved significantly at 6 and 12 months postinsertion (P < 0.001) when compared to baseline scores. When GOHAI scores were compared individually for males and females (pre- and post-insertion), it was observed that there was statistically significant improvement in OHRQoL (male – pre = 25.02 ± 1.34 and post-12 months = 8.84 ± 1.26, P < 0.001, female – pre = 25.19 ± 0.88 and post-12 months = 9.05 ± 1.20, P < 0.001) postinsertion of denture in both the groups. Conclusion: OHRQoL in patients improved after complete denture rehabilitation. There was an upward shift in score for each item in GOHAI from preinsertion to 6 and 12 months postinsertion of dentures, reflecting improvement in OHRQoL of the sample. Keywords: Dental prosthesisgeriatric dentistryoral healthspecial care ==== Body Introduction Old age is an unavoidable biological phenomenon. A substantial increase in lifespan is a result of better and advanced medical care, efficient public health actions, and improved social conditions.[12] According to the WHO, the number of people aged 65 years or older is estimated to grow from 524 million in 2010 to 1.5 billion by 2050.[3] However, such a trend is also accompanied by new disease patterns in the form of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) along with their huge social and economic cost.[345] Global burden of oral disease is one of the most common NCDs. Their impact is huge in terms of pain, suffering, impairment of functions, disability, and ultimately reduced quality of life (QoL). Complete edentulism is an eventual oral health outcome and results from the combined pathology of dental caries, periodontal disease, or faulty method of rehabilitation due to reduced cost. Edentulism increases by 4% per 10 years in young adults, and it is >10% per decade in individuals aged >70 years. However, it has been observed that due to wider and better oral health services globally, edentulism rate is decreasing every decade.[67] Edentulism is directly related to masticatory and nutritional problems, and some authors regard it as a good mortality indicator.[8] Complete edentulism has a significant concern and leads to reduced QoL along with impact on general health (lower intake of fruit and vegetables and low nutrient diet).[910] Overwhelming evidence shows the negative effect of edentulism on oral health-related QoL (OHRQoL) in the form of functional, psychological, and social impairment, thus affecting day-to-day life. Elderly with loss of teeth have low self-esteem, decline in psychosocial well-being, low participation in social activities, and thus suffer isolation.[510111213] OHRQoL is a multidimensional complex of interrelated domains and has been regarded as health priority.[14] OHRQoL has implications for dental clinical practice and can play a vital role in clinical decision-making and complement to clinical outcomes. Assessment of OHRQoL allows shift from traditional medical/dental criteria to assessment that focus on person's social and environmental factors.[15] Oral rehabilitation had been associated with a positive effect on OHRQoL.[16] Monitoring changes in response to treatment is one of the major uses of QoL measure in clinical practice.[17] Cohen and Jago have been credited with the introduction of the term “sociodental indicators,” and gradually, there was a rise of tools for the assessment of OHRQoL in multiple settings and populations.[18] GOHAI is a self-reported oral health assessment index used in the elderly population.[19] It measures patient-centered definition of health which diverges from disease-centered epidemiological measures of health. GOHAI was initially developed by Atchinson and Dolan in 1990, which was further used in North America in the geriatric population. GOHAI is stable, widely used, and validated in multiple languages[20212223] including Hindi.[2425] Thus, the aim of the present study was to assess and compare the effect of complete denture insertion on OHRQoL at three points of time, i.e., preinsertion and 6 and 12 months postinsertion using a prevalidated Hindi GOHAI questionnaire. Methodology The present longitudinal follow-up study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital from May 2016 to August 2017. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Review Board before the commencement of the study, and informed consent was taken from all eligible participants. A nonprobability sampling method was used. All patients reporting to the Outpatient Department of Prosthodontics during the period of May–July 2016 were screened for eligibility criteria. Initially, 128 patients were eligible for the study, but the final sample comprised a total of 100 participants (loss due to incomplete treatment, not willing to participate in 12-month follow-up, etc.). Patients were excluded if they had any systemic disease which could affect the treatment outcome, psychological disorders, temporomandibular joint disorder, partial dentulous condition, old denture wearer, and single complete denture. The complete denture fabrication was performed using conventional techniques although minor case-based modifications in the technique and materials were done. It was made sure that all the dentures were processed in the same laboratory and using compression molding technique with standard laboratory procedures. OHRQoL was assessed using the Hindi version of geriatric oral health assessment index (GOHAI)[24] It includes a total of 12 items which assessed the dimensions of physical functions, psychosocial functions, and pain or discomfort. As 12th item, assess sensitivity of teeth, it was considered irrelevant and thus excluded from the instrument, and finally, 11-item GOHAI was used.[1126] GOHAI was administered by a single investigator on the six-point Likert scale with options, namely “always – 5,” “very often – 4,” “often – 3,” “sometimes – 2,” “seldom – 1,” and “never – 0.” Thus, the scores ranged from 0 to 55. The scores were reversed for three items, viz., item 3: swallow comfortably; item 5: eat anything without feeling discomfort; and item 7: happy with the looks. In the current study, a lower score was associated with a more positive oral health. GOHAI was administered by a single investigator at baseline (preinsertion) and also 6 months and 12 months postdenture insertion. Sociodemographic data, including age and gender, were collected. Statistical analysis Data were analyzed using SPSS 21.0 (Statistical Package for social sciences, IBM Corporation). Pre- and post-insertion results were compared and analyzed using paired t-test and repeated measures ANOVA. Results The sample population consisted of 100 individuals comprising 63 males and 37 females. Mean age of the sample was 62.5 ± 8.8 (minimum = 40, maximum = 85) years in which 45 were <60 years of age and 55 were >60 years of age. A one-way repeated measure ANOVA was used to compare the effect of complete denture insertion on OHRQoL (using GOHAI) in edentulous patients at preinsertion and 6 and 12 months postinsertion [Table 1]. Table 1 Descriptive statistics of the general oral health assessment index score at preinsertion and 6 months and 12 months postinsertion of the denture (n=100) Mauchly's test of sphericity indicated that the assumption of sphericity had been violated, χ2 = 13.03, P < 0.001, and therefore, a Huynh–Feldt correction was used which showed a significant effect of time on GOHAI score; F (1.77, 175.6) = 4513.70. Three paired samples t-tests were used to make post hoc comparisons between conditions. Pairwise comparisons using Bonferroni's showed that there was significant difference between preinsertion/6-month postinsertion, preinsertion/12-month postinsertion, and 6-month postinsertion/12-month postinsertion (P = 0.000) [Table 2]. Table 2 Pair-wise comparisons and post hoc tests using the Bonferroni correction When GOHAI scores were compared individually for males and females (pre- and postinsertion), it was observed that there was statistically significant improvement in OHRQoL (male – pre = 25.02 ± 1.34 and post-12 months = 8.84 ± 1.26, P < 0.001, female – pre = 25.19 ± 0.88 and post-12 months = 9.05 ± 1.20, P < 0.001) postinsertion of denture in both the groups [Table 3]. Table 3 Comparison of preinsertion and 12 months postinsertion general oral health assessment index scores with respect to age and gender Along with this, a statistically significant difference was observed for <60 and 60 years of age groups with respect to GOHAI scores, when pre- and post-scores were compared for both the age groups (<60 years: pre – 24.98 ± 0.98 and 12-month post – 8.82 ± 1.28, P < 0.001 and >60 years: pre – 28.16 ± 1.34 and 12-month post – 9.00 ± 1.20, P < 0.001) [Table 3]. No significant difference was obtained when GOHAI scores were compared for gender and age. The sample population (n = 100) showed statistically significant (P < 0.001) improvement in GOHAI score when preinsertion (25.08 ± 1.186) and 12-month postinsertion (8.92 ± 1.236) scores were compared [Table 4]. The change in score for each item of GOHAI at preinsertion and 6 and 12 months postinsertion is summarized in Table 5. Table 4 Pre and post-value of GOHAI score for the sample (n=100) Table 5 Change in general oral health assessment index score before and after insertion of dentures Discussion Patients' satisfaction with dental treatment depends on its physical, mental, and emotional status. The profession of dentistry has seen a proliferation of various instruments and scales seeking to assess the OHQoL or simply the QoL of patients with various oral conditions.[27] Older people perceive oral health equally important to life quality in a variety of ways,[28] and recent meta-analysis suggests strong evidence that tooth loss is associated with impairment of OHRQoL.[12] According to a critical appraisal done to evaluate various tools to assess OHRQoL in elderly, GOHAI was among the most popular tools in terms of studies researched and applications from different authors other than the original authors.[29] GOHAI has been used in the Indian context to compare the clinical outcomes and treatments to OHRQoL[252630313233] and also validated in Hindi.[2425] Thus, the present study focused on 12-month long follow-up of patients with complete denture rehabilitation. It was observed that the overall OHRQoL scores of the sample improved significantly at 6 and 12 months postinsertion (P < 0.001) when compared to baseline scores. Shigli and Hebbal published pilot results and observed a similar improvement in OHRQoL at 1-month postinsertion of complete denture.[26] Dable et al. also reported a significant change in GOHAI score and better OHRQoL in a 6-month follow-up postinsertion of dentures.[11] The study by Karmacharya et al. conducted in Lucknow, India, also showed improvement in OHRQoL in complete denture patients from baseline to 1st and 3rd month postdenture insertion.[33] Majority of the studies in India have evaluated the OHRQoL within a shorter period of follow-up as compared to the present study which followed up patients for 12 months. A study from Turkey reported that dental rehabilitation resulted in significant improvement in GOHAI scores and better OHRQoL 3 months after dental rehabilitation among geriatric patients.[34] Veyrune et al. conducted a study using GOHAI on 26 patients who received new prostheses. However, no statistical significant difference was observed in GOHAI scores when values for initial assessment was compared with six weeks post-insertion of denture. However, GOHAI score improved after 12 weeks after the participants received their new dentures.[35] A study by Koshino et al. also showed similar results after dental or denture rehabilitation.[36] Mean GOHAI score in the present study was 25.08 ± 1.18, which was comparable to another study done by Agarwal et al. (30.176 ± 0.88) in Northern India.[32] No significant difference was observed between mean GOHAI scores between gender and age groups, which was in accordance with a study done by Marya et al.[31] The QoL for the elderly has been assessed in various settings, but only a few studies in India report a long-term assessment after oral rehabilitation. Although the current study focused on 12-month follow-up with respect to OHRQoL after rehabilitation, it had its own limitations. First, a convenience sample was taken for the study; however, it may be noted that the study was primarily concerned about the comparison of preinsertion and postinsertion improvement in OHRQoL. Second, it has also been concluded that GOHAI mainly assesses functional limitations of an individual. Third, the participants of the present study were from low socioeconomic status because the institution where the present study was conducted provides dental treatment free or at highly subsidized charges. Conclusion The present study showed a statistical significant difference in pre- and post-GOHAI score and thus further substantiated that oral rehabilitation improves OHRQoL among elderly. Therefore, routine assessment with GOHAI may serve as a complementary and surrogate measure to clinical examination, thus enabling a clinician for comprehensive assessment including clinical outcomes and individual's perception of oral health. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest. Acknowledgment We would like to thank the Department of Prosthodontics, Manav Rachna Dental College, Faridabad, for providing support in terms of setting and materials for the study. We would also thank the participants for their support and cooperation during the study. ==== Refs References 1 Lindsay GB Merrill RM Hedin RJ The contribution of public health and improved social conditions to increased life expectancy: An analysis of public awareness J Community Med Health Educ 2014 4 311 2 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Ten great public health achievements – United States, 1900-1999 MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1999 48 241 3 10220250 3 Global Health and Aging, WHO Last accessed on 2018 Feb 10 Available from: http://www.who.int/ageing/publications/global_health.pdf 4 Cao X A call for global research on non-communicable diseases Lancet 2015 385 e5 6 25631069 5 Tyrovolas S Koyanagi A Panagiotakos DB Haro JM Kassebaum NJ Chrepa V Population prevalence of edentulism and its association with depression and self-rated health Sci Rep 2016 6 37083 27853193 6 Kassebaum NJ Bernabé E Dahiya M Bhandari B Murray CJ Marcenes W Global burden of severe tooth loss: A Systematic review and meta-analysis J Dent Res 2014 93 20S 8S 24947899 7 Rose GA The diagnosis of ischaemic heart pain and intermittent claudication in field surveys Bull World Health Organ 1962 27 645 58 13974778 8 Gil-Montoya JA de Mello AL Barrios R Gonzalez-Moles MA Bravo M Oral health in the elderly patient and its impact on general well-being: A nonsystematic review Clin Interv Aging 2015 10 461 7 25709420 9 Petersen PE Kandelman D Arpin S Ogawa H Global oral health of older people – Call for public health action Community Dent Health 2010 27 257 67 21313969 10 Emami E de Souza RF Kabawat M Feine JS The impact of edentulism on oral and general health Int J Dent 2013 2013 498305 11 Dable RA Nazirkar GS Singh SB Wasnik PB Assessment of oral health related quality of life among completely edentulous patients in Western India by using GOHAI J Clin Diagn Res 2013 7 2063 7 24179944 12 Gerritsen AE Allen PF Witter DJ Bronkhorst EM Creugers NH Tooth loss and oral health-related quality of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis Health Qual Life Outcomes 2010 8 126 21050499 13 Griffin SO Jones JA Brunson D Griffin PM Bailey WD Burden of oral disease among older adults and implications for public health priorities Am J Public Health 2012 102 411 8 22390504 14 Department of Health and Human Services. Oral Health in America: A Report of the Surgeon General US Department of Health and Human Services and National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research 2000 Rockville, MD National Institutes of Health 15 Sischo L Broder HL Oral health-related quality of life: What, why, how, and future implications J Dent Res 2011 90 1264 70 21422477 16 Hultin M Davidson T Gynther G Helgesson G Jemt T Lekholm U Oral rehabilitation of tooth loss: A systematic review of quantitative studies of OHRQoL Int J Prosthodont 2012 25 543 52 23101034 17 Bennadi D Reddy CV Oral health related quality of life J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2013 3 1 6 24478972 18 Cohen LK Jago JD Toward the formulation of sociodental indicators Int J Health Serv 1976 6 681 98 971976 19 Atchison KA Dolan TA Development of the geriatric oral health assessment index J Dent Educ 1990 54 680 7 2229624 20 Murariu A Hanganu C Bobu L Evaluation of the reliability of the geriatric oral health assessment index (GOHAI) in institutionalized elderly in Romania: A pilot study OHDMBSC 2010 9 11 5 21 Niesten D Witter D Bronkhorst E Creugers N Validation of a Dutch version of the geriatric oral health assessment index (GOHAI-NL) in care-dependent and care-independent older people BMC Geriatr 2016 16 53 26928080 22 Othman WN Muttalib KA Bakri R Doss JG Jaafar N Salleh NC Validation of the geriatric oral health assessment index (GOHAI) in the Malay language J Public Health Dent 2006 66 199 204 16913247 23 Tubert-Jeannin S Riordan PJ Morel-Papernot A Porcheray S Saby-Collet S Validation of an oral health quality of life index (GOHAI) in France Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003 31 275 84 12846850 24 Mathur VP Jain V Pillai RS Kalra S Translation and validation of Hindi version of geriatric oral health assessment index Gerodontology 2016 33 89 96 24325659 25 Jain R Dupare R Chitguppi R Basavaraj P Assessment of validity and reliability of Hindi version of geriatric oral health assessment index (GOHAI) in Indian population Indian J Public Health 2015 59 272 8 26584166 26 Shigli K Hebbal M Assessment of changes in oral health-related quality of life among patients with complete denture before and 1 month post-insertion using geriatric oral health assessment index Gerodontology 2010 27 167 73 19572920 27 Locker D Allen F What do measures of 'oral health-related quality of life' measure? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2007 35 401 11 18039281 28 McGrath C Bedi R The importance of oral health to older people's quality of life Gerodontology 1999 16 59 63 10687509 29 Hebling E Pereira AC Oral health-related quality of life: A critical appraisal of assessment tools used in elderly people Gerodontology 2007 24 151 61 17696892 30 Kshetrimayum N Reddy CV Siddhana S Manjunath M Rudraswamy S Sulavai S Oral health-related quality of life and nutritional status of institutionalized elderly population aged 60 years and above in Mysore City, India Gerodontology 2013 30 119 25 22364560 31 Marya CM Baiju CS Nagpal R Rekhi A Periodontal status and oral health related quality of life in rural elderly population of Faridabad: A pilot study Indian J Gerontol 2013 27 397 407 32 Agarwal R Gupta VK Malhotra S Oral health related quality of life among elderly in North India Indian J Gerontol 2014 28 1 2 33 Karmacharya P Saha S Kumari M Comparison of chewing ability, oral health-related quality of life, and nutritional status before and after the insertion of complete denture among edentulous patients in Lucknow J Indian Assoc Public Health Dent 2017 15 145 34 İlhan B Çal E Dündar N Güneri P Daǧhan Ş Oral health-related quality of life among institutionalized patients after dental rehabilitation Geriatr Gerontol Int 2015 15 1151 7 25407591 35 Veyrune JL Tubert-Jeannin S Dutheil C Riordan PJ Impact of new prostheses on the oral health related quality of life of edentulous patients Gerodontology 2005 22 3 9 36 Koshino H Hirai T Ishijima T Tsukagoshi H Ishigami T Tanaka Y Quality of life and masticatory function in denture wearers J Oral Rehabil 2006 33 323 9 16629889