==== Front Ann Saudi MedAnn Saudi MedAnnals of Saudi Medicine0256-49470975-4466King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2270561110.5144/0256-4947.2012.397asm-4-397Original ArticleHealth-related quality of life of Saudi hepatitis B and C patients Abdo Ayman A. From the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, RiyadhCorrespondence: Dr. Ayman A. Abdo, College of Medicine, King Saud University, PO Box 2925(59), Riyadh 11461, Saudi Arabia, T: +966-1-4671215, F: +966-1-4671217, aabdo@ksu.edu.saJul-Aug 2012 32 4 397 403 Copyright © 2012, Annals of Saudi Medicine2012This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Although usually asymptomatic, many chronic hepatitis C patients have extrahepatic manifestations and impaired health-related quality of life (HRQOL), while hepatitis B virus (HBV) patients have normal or nearly normal HRQOL. The aim of this study was to investigate HRQOL in Saudi patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) in comparison with patients infected with HBV in an effort to document the prevalence of and find factors associated with reduced HRQOL in these patients. DESIGN AND SETTING A prospective study that enrolled patients attending a tertiary care referral hepatology clinic in Riyadh from the period of February to July 2008. PATIENTS AND METHODS Consecutive patients who had a confirmed diagnosis of hepatitis C or hepatitis B were asked to fill out the SF-36 questionnaire. Information on epidemiological, educational, economic, and social parameters was collected. All clinical, laboratory, and available histological data were recorded. RESULTS Two hundred and twenty patients (107 with hepatitis B and 113 with hepatitis C) satisfied the inclusion criteria and participated in this study. Overall, 45% were men, and the average age was 41.6 (18.1) years. Patients with HCV had significantly lower scores in “physical functioning,” “role limitations due to physical functioning,” “social functioning,” and “bodily pain.” No significant differences in other parameters were observed. Various epidemiological and laboratory parameters were correlated with different HRQOL domains. CONCLUSIONS Saudi hepatitis C patients showed significantly lower HRQOL scores in various domains compared to hepatitis B patients. ==== Body Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) has recently become an important outcome in clinical research.1 In addition to clinical and economic data, it has proven helpful in managing patients better and providing information to health care decision makers. Although it is hard to accurately define “quality of life,”, the term “health-related quality of life” focuses on self-perceived health and the general well-being domains of physical functioning, somatic sensations, physiological status, social interactions, functional capacity, and sense of well-being as influenced by health status.2 Although the majority of chronic hepatitis C patients are asymptomatic, many extrahepatic manifestations, such as fatigue, anorexia, myalgia, arthralgia, irritability and headaches, can lead to impaired HRQOL.3 On the other hand, there have been few studies on hepatitis B patients, and those that have been done suggest a normal or nearly normal HRQOL in patients infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV).4–6 This has led to the assumption that in addition to the virus, many other factors are probably associated with the poor quality of life of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV), including a number of physical and psychological factors.7,8 Viral hepatitis is an important medical problem in Saudi Arabia. Although important research has been performed in relation to this problem in terms of epidemiological prevalence, natural history, and antiviral therapy, no study has addressed the HRQOL issues in these patients. The aim of this study was to investigate HRQOL in Saudi patients infected with HCV in comparison with patients infected with HBV in an effort to document the prevalence of and find factors associated with reduced HRQOL in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Consecutive patients attending the hepatology clinic at King Khalid University Hospital in Riyadh between February and July 2008 were approached for participation in this study. Inclusion criteria were age above 18 and a positive anti-HCV antibody test with confirmation by HCV RNA polymerase chain reaction or positive hepatitis B surface antigen. Exclusion criteria were inability to give informed consent, clinical evidence of decompensated liver cirrhosis (ascites, history of hepatic encephalopathy, or history of variceal bleeding), a history of intravenous drug use, current alcohol or drug abuse, concomitant significant medical illness (such as chronic renal failure, heart failure, or chronic lung disease), well-known diagnosed significant psychiatric illness, and current use of antiviral therapy. The study was explained to all patients, and each signed an informed consent form. The SF-36 questionnaire was fully explained to each patient, and then the forms were filled out by patients themselves. The previously validated Arabic version of the SF-36 questionnaire was used. Patients were also asked to fill out a questionnaire that contained additional personal information on marital status, number of family members, educational level, average income, and living conditions. The patients’ charts were accessed, and other general medical information was recorded. The study was approved by the institutional review board of the College of Medicine at King Saud University. Data was entered into an MS Excel spreadsheet. Individual HRQOL items were re-coded, summed, and transformed according to the standardized formula. Descriptive statistics were summarized as a mean score and standard deviation (SD) and median (range) as appropriate. The chi-square test was used to examine relations between categorical variables. Comparison of continuous variables was done using the t test or the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test for skewed data. The correlation between continuous variables was evaluated by calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient (r), with skewed data being logarithmically transformed first. The backward stepwise multiple linear regression was used to assess predictors of SF-36 parameters. Variables were retained in the final models if they were significantly associated with the SF-36 parameter being tested. A P value of .05 was considered as statistically significant. All analyses were performed with Stata Version 10 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA). RESULTS Two hundred and twenty patients (107 with hepatitis B and 113 with hepatitis C) satisfied the inclusion criteria and participated in this study. Overall, 45% were men, and the mean (standard deviation) of age was 41.6 (18.1) years (Demographic characteristics are shown in Table 1). There was a significant difference between HBV- and HCV-infected patients in terms of age (patients with HBV were significantly older, P<.0001) and level of education (P=.002). No significant differences were observed between HBV- and HCV-infected patients in terms of other medical characteristics (summarized in Table 2). Only 27% of the study population had undergone a liver biopsy. Among these, the majority had grades 0 to 2 (62.3%) and stages 0 to 2 (57.5%). More patients infected with HCV than with HBV underwent a liver biopsy. More patients in the HCV group than in the HBV group had stage 3 or 4 fibrosis, though this did not reach statistical significance. Patients with HCV also had significantly higher alanine aminotransferase (ALT, P=.0005), aspartate aminotransferase (AST, P=.0003), and alkaline phosphotase (ALP, P=.03) levels. Albumin, international normalized ratio (INR), and bilirubin did not show significant differences (Table 2). When patients with HCV and HBV were compared in terms of the SF-36 results, patients with HCV had significantly lower scores in physical functioning (PF), role limitations due to physical functioning (RP), social functioning (SF), and bodily pain (BP) (Table 3). No significant differences were observed in other parameters: role limitations due to emotional problems (RE), energy/fatigue (E/F), emotional well-being (EW), and general health (GH). Several demographic factors were studied to see if there were any correlations with SF-36 scores. Age was associated with reduced SF-36 scores in the following domains: PF (P=.0002), RP (P=.0002), E/F (P=.02), and BP (P=.001). Female gender was associated with a low score in the following areas: PF (P=.001), RP (P=.0009), E/F (P=.001), and BP (P=.004). Increasing level of education was associated with higher scores in PF (P<.0001), RP (P<.0001), E/F (P=.0004), and BP (P=.0009). Employment was associated with a higher score in PF (P=.03) only. There were no associations with marital status, number of children, or income. Various laboratory parameters weere studied to determine if they correlated with SF-36 scores (Tables 4 and 5). Overall, albumin correlated with PF (r=0.24, P=.0004), RP (r=0.20, P=.003), E/F (r=0.18, P=.008), EW (r=0.14, P=.04), SF (r=0.14, P=.04), BP (r=0.22, P=.001), and GH (r=0.17, P=.01). LogAST correlated with E/F (r=–0.19, P=.005), SF (r=–0.22, P=.001), BP (r=–0.25, P=.0003), and GH (r=–0.19, P=.006). Bilirubin only correlated with SF (r=–0.14, P=.04). In HCV patients, albumin correlated with E/F (r=0.21, P=.03), and EW (r=0.21, P=.03), whereas INR correlated with SF (r=–0.21, P=.03) and GH (r=–0.20, P=.03), and logAST correlated with E/F (r=–0.24, P=.01) and EW (r=–0.24, P=.01) (Table 4). In patients with HBV, albumin correlated with PF (r=0.32, P=.0006), RP (r=0.24, P=.01), SF (r=0.19, P=.04), BP (r=0.30, P=.002), and GH (r=0.21, P=.03), whereas INR correlated with SF (r=–0.23, P=.02) and GH (r=–0.19, P=.04), and logAST correlated with SF (r=–0.24, P=.02), BP (r=–0.31, P=.001), and GH (r=–0.29, P=.003) (Table 5). In multivariate analyses, several factors predicted different SF-36 domains, as summarized in Table 6. LogAST was the most common independent variable negatively associated with several SF-36 parameters including PF, RP, E/F, SF and GH in patients with HBV and EF in patients with HCV. Education and female gender were the next most common predictors of SF-36 parameters. In general, high school graduates were more likely to report lower SF-36 scores particularly in the domain of PF, RP, E/F, and BP in HCV patients and PF, RP and EW in patients with HBV. Only in patients with HBV did female gender appear to be a strong negative predictive factor of SF-36 parameters such as PF, RP, RE, E/F and EW. DISCUSSION Many studies have shown that HCV may compromise HRQOL.9 For example, in 642 HCV-infected patients studied before and after treatment with interferon-based antiviral therapy, there was a significant reduction in HRQOL at presentation in patients with HCV compared with healthy controls in the presence or absence of cirrhosis.10 In another study by the International Hepatitis Interventional Therapy Group, Ware et al reported that 5 out of 8 SF-36 domains, physical functioning, role-physical, general health, vitality, and social functioning, were significantly reduced in patients with HCV compared with matched population controls.11 However, it is important to note that not all studies on patients with HCV have shown these results. In one study, American blood donors who had been found by chance to have HCV (who seemed to have a high incidence of fatigue [61%] and headache [54%]) in a previous study were re-examined in comparison to normal healthy blood donors without HCV. The fatigue rate in the non-HCV group was as high as 70%, suggesting no difference between the two groups.12 The situation is less clear in terms of HBV, as only a few studies were available on HRQOL in this group of patients. In a study from Britain, 72 unselected, sequential patients with chronic HCV infection were compared with 30 sequential patients with chronic HBV infection with hepatitis B e antigen positivity.4 All of the SF-36 scores were markedly reduced in patients with chronic HCV infection, whereas in patients with chronic HBV infection, no significant reductions in the SF-36 scores were observed except in the variables of “mental health” and “general health perception.” When the two groups (HCV and HBV) were compared directly, patients with HCV had more impairment in social functioning, physical limitations, and energy and fatigue parameters compared to patients with HBV. Similar results were found in another study where patients with HCV were compared with patients with HBV and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) as well as healthy controls.5 Both patients with HCV and PBC had significantly lower HRQOL scores, whereas patients with HBV had similar HRQOL scores as healthy controls. This has been confirmed in a more recent study from Asia, in which HRQOL scores in HBV inactive carriers were found to be similar to those of healthy controls, but slightly higher than in patients with active HBV infection.6 Although the above studies suggest that chronic HCV, but not HBV appears to directly compromise HRQOL, multiple factors related to personality, upbringing, and ethnic background may affect the frequency of reporting of HRQOL parameters. This has led to different prevalence rates of reduced HRQOL scores when HCV-infected patients have been studied in different ethnic backgrounds. For example, in a study by a Japanese group, no characteristic subjective symptoms in patients with HCV compared to healthy controls were found, except for a lower aggression score.13 This was confirmed by another study from Japan.14 Similarly, in an interesting study from Egypt, where patients were tested for HRQOL before knowing their HCV status, 146 HCV-positive patients had similar scores, compared to 1140 uninfected controls from the same rural area.15 This interesting result has been explained by a possibly lower morbidity among Egyptian HCV-infected patients, by a higher morbidity among uninfected controls, or by the effect of not knowing the diagnosis at the time of testing. This variation in the published studies and the likely effects of non-viral factors in HRQOL in viral hepatitis patients have led us to study the changes in HRQOL in Saudi Arabian patients. Unlike the majority of patients in the Western countries, most patients infected with HCV in Saudi Arabia are not intravenous drug users and have been infected through blood transfusion or unknown causes mostly thought to be iatrogenic. In the current study, significant differences were observed between Saudi patients with HCV and HBV in 4 out of 8 domains of the SF-36 questionnaire. When laboratory parameters showed significant correlations with SF-36 domains, most of these laboratory parameters were related to liver function (albumin, INR, and AST), suggesting that active liver disease or perhaps significant fibrosis was more likely affecting the HRQOL domain score rather than the virus itself. Although the stage and grade of inflammation of liver biopsy did not confirm this assumption, it has to be remembered that only 27% of the study population had had a liver biopsy. The results from our multivariate analysis show that the AST level is associated with the quality of life in patients with HCV, further supporting that active disease has an impact on the quality of life in these patients. The general trend of patients with lower educational status reporting lower scores could be because these patients have limited understanding of HCV and HBV, which may in turn lead to poorer disease management. As Saudi Arabia has an equal-access health care system, it is unlikely that inadequate access to health care is a reason for this disparity. Like any other study, this study has some strengths and suffers from some limitations. In terms of strengths, to our knowledge, it is the first to study HRQOL in viral hepatitis patients in Saudi Arabia and is among only a few in the Arab world. It is also among the few studies worldwide that have compared patients with HCV and HBV directly. Similarly, it is one of few studies to correlate HRQOL measures with biochemical parameters. One limitation of this study is that the SF-36 scores were not compared to expected Saudi Arabian norms, as such data have not been produced. Both HCV and HBV groups served as controls for one another. Second, the percentage of patients who had had a liver biopsy in this study was low, making us unable to clearly understand the positive correlation between the reduced HRQOL scores and the levels of albumin, INR, and AST. Although none of these patients had clinical evidence of decompensated liver disease, some did have histologically (subclinical) advanced fibrosis, which might have affected their HRQOL. Third, all patients included in this study were patients who were seen in a tertiary care center, which may not represent the majority of the HCV patient pool.16 This fact is important, as knowledge of the diagnosis and the psychological stress related to medical care may significantly influence HRQOL. Two interesting studies examined patients presenting with chronic fatigue syndrome and assessed their HCV status retrospectively to avoid the psychological effects of knowing about the HCV infection.17,18 Neither study reported an association between HCV status and chronic fatigue. Similarly, in the aforementioned study in rural Egypt, patients who were not aware of their viral status also showed no significant reduction in HRQOL compared to the general population.15 Fourth, we used only one HRQOL instrument. Although SF-36 is the most reliable and widely used tool, it can be argued that a more sensitive tool would have been needed to detect very subtle changes, especially in patients with HBV. In conclusion, our sample of Saudi hepatitis C patients show significantly lower HRQOL scores in various domains compared to hepatitis B patients. Acknowledgments The author would like to thank Mrs. Safiyya Ali for the help with the statistical analyses. Table 1 Demographics of the study population. Total (N=220) HCV patients (n=113) HBV patients (n=107) P Age 41.6 (18.1) 45.7 (18.6) 37.3 (16.6) .0005 Gender  Male 100 (45.5) 36 (31.9) 64 (59.8) <.0001  Female 120 (54.6) 77 (68.1) 43 (40.2) Marital status .45  Married 203 (92.3) 104 (82.0) 99 (92.5)  Single 12 (5.5) 5 (4.4) 7 (6.5)  Divorced 2 (0.9) 2 (1.8) 0  Widowed 3 (1.4) 2 (18) 1 (0.9) Children  No 162 (73.6) 78 (69.0) 84 (78.5) .11  Yes 90 (26.4) 35 (31.0) 23 (21.5) Level of education  No high school 123 (55.9) 75 (66.4) 48 (44.9) .002  High school 41 (18.6) 19 (16.8) 22 (20.6)  College 48 (21.8) 14 (12.4) 34 (31.8)  Postgraduate 8 (3.6) 5 (4.4) 3 (2.8) Employment status  Unemployed 185 (84.1) 98 (86.7) 87 (81.3) .54  Temporarily unemployed 2 (0.9) 1 (0.9) 1 (0.9)  Employed 33 (15.0) 14 (12.4) 19 (17.8) Personal yearly income ($)  <20 000 177 (80.5) 90 (79.7) 87 (81.3) .26  20 000–50 000 24 (10.9) 15 (13.3) 9 (8.4)  50 000–80 000 15 (6.8) 5 (4.4) 10 (9.4)  >80 000 4 (1.8) 3 (2.7) 1 (0.9) HCV: Hepatitis C virus; HBV: hepatitis B virus. Values expressed as mean (standard deviation) or frequency (percentage). Table 2 Medical characteristics of the study population. Total (N=220) HCV patients (n=113) HBV patients (n=107) P History of previous treatment  No 213 (96.8) 111 (98.2) 102 (95.3) .22  Yes 7 (3.2) 2 (1.8) 5 (4.7) Other medical illness  No 203 (92.3) 102 (90.3) 101 (94.4) .25  Yes 17 (7.7) 11 (9.7) 6 (5.6) History of psychiatric illness  No 214 (97.3) 111 (98.2) 103 (96.3) .37  Yes 6 (2.7) 2 (1.8) 4 (3.7) Liver biopsy  No 157 (71.4) 71 (62.8) 86 (80.4) .004  Yes 63 (28.6) 42 (37.2) 21 (19.6) Grade  0 0 0 0 .18  1 13 (21.3) 6 (14.6) 7 (35.0)  2 25 (41.0) 17 (41.5) 8 (40.0)  3 19 (31.2) 14 (34.2) 5 (25.0)  4 4 (6.6) 4 (9.8) 0 Stage  0 2 (3.3) 1 (2.4) 1 (5.0) .18  1 14 (23.0) 6 (14.6) 8 (40.0)  2 19 (31.2) 13 (31.7) 6 (30.0)  3 21 (34.4) 17 (41.5) 4 (20.0)  4 5 (8.2) 4 (9.8) 1 (5.0) ALT (U/L) 60 (17–459) 83 (15–784) 50 (17–460) .005 AST (U/L) 35 (11–257) 47 (11–197) 29.5 (11–257) .0003 ALP (U/L) 98.5 (42–550) 103 (44–550) 90 (42–260) .03 Albumin 37.3 (7.0) 37.1 (7.1) 37.6 (6.9) .63 INR 1.1 (0.2) 1.1 (0.2) 1.2 (0.3) .07 Bilirubin 10 (0.7–121) 10 (3–65) 10 (0.7–121) .74 HCV: Hepatitis C virus; HBV: hepatitis B virus; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; ALP: alkaline phosphotase; INR: international normalized ratio. Values expressed as median (range) or mean (standard deviation) or frequency (percentage) otherwise. Table 3 SF-36 scores by hepatitis status. Total (N = 220) HCV patients (n=113) HBV patients (n=107) P Physical functioning 66.8 (28.7) 60.0 (28.7) 73.8 (27.2) .0003 Role limitations because of physical functioning 58.6 (41.7) 50.0 (40.8) 67.8 (40.9) .002 Role limitations because of emotional problems 62.1 (42.7) 63.4 (42.0) 60.7 (43.6) .64 Energy/Fatigue 55.4 (20.6) 52.8 (21.7) 58.1 (19.2) .06 Emotional well-being 68.1 (19.4) 68.8 (20.2) 67.4 (18.6) .59 Social functioning 78.3 (26.5) 74.1 (28.9) 82.7 (23.0) .02 Bodily pain 71.9 (29.1) 67.1 (30.7) 76.9 (26.5) .01 General health 60.5 (19.2) 59.6 (20.1) 61.4 (18.3) .49 Values expressed as mean (standard deviation). Table 4 Relationship between SF-36 scores and laboratory results in HCV patients (expressed as the Pearson r). Log ALT Log AST Log ALP Albumin INR Log bilirubin Physical functioning −0.00 (.99) −0.071 (.47) −0.03 (.79) 0.16 (.09) 0.03 (.79) 0.13 (.18) Role limitations because of physical functioning 0.09 (.32) −0.03 (.76) −0.11 (.23) 0.16 (.09) 0.02 (.80) 0.10 (.30) Role limitations because of emotional problems 0.09 (.36) −0.03 (.79) −0.09 (.37) 0.10 (.28) −0.09 (.37) 0.11 (.23) Energy/Fatigue −0.13 (.17) −0.24 (.01) −0.18 (.06) 0.21 (.03) −0.02 (.86) −0.03 (.74) Emotional well being −0.13 (.17) −0.24 (.01) −0.18 (.06) 0.21 (.03) −0.02 (.86) −0.03 (.74) Social functioning −0.08 (.37) −0.15 (.11) −0.07 (.45) 0.09 (.35) −0.21 (.03) −0.14 (.14) Bodily pain −0.02 (.81) −0.14 (.16) −0.18 (.05) 0.15 (.12) −0.05 (.61) 0.007 (.94) General health −0.03 (.75) −0.09 (.34 −0.03 (.75) 0.13 (.18) −0.20 (.03) 0.002 (.98) ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; ALP: alkaline phosphotase; INR: international normalized ratio. Table 5 Relationship between SF-36 scores and laboratory results in HBV patients (expressed as Pearson r). Log ALT Log AST Log ALP Albumin INR Log bilirubin Physical functioning 0.06 (.56) −0.08 (.41) −0.11 (.25) 0.32 (.0006) −0.02 (.85) 0.04 (.67) Role limitations because of physical functioning 0.02 (.81) −0.12 (.24) −0.12 (.20) 0.24 (.01) −0.05 (.61) −0.10 (.31) Role limitations because of emotional problems 0.06 (.54) 0.02 (.83) −0.08 (.43) 0.12 (.21) −0.05 (.62) −0.007 (.94) Energy/Fatigue 0.003 (.98) −0.10 (.33) −0.15 (.12) 0.14 (.15) −0.06 (.51) −0.05 (.59) Emotional well-being 0.14 (.14) 0.06 (.52) −0.04 (.65) 0.19 (.05) 0.04 (.70) 0.20 (.04) Social functioning −0.08 (.42) −0.24 (.02) −0.19 (.05) 0.19 (.04) −0.23 (.02)a −0.17 (.08) Bodily pain −0.09 (.36) −0.31 (.001) −0.20 (.04) 0.30 (.002) −0.18 (.06) −0.18 (.06) General health −0.04 (.67) −0.29 (.003) −0.22 (.02) 0.21 (.03) −0.19 (.04) −0.25 (.01) HBV: Hepatitis B virus; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; ALP: alkaline phosphotase; INR: international normalized ratio Table 6 SF-36 scores and multivariate analysis. HCV patients HBV patients SF-36 score Regression coefficient (CI) P Regression coefficient (CI) P Physical functioning Gender (female) −21.0 (−30.5, −11.5) <.0001 High school 10.3 (−3.8, 24.3) 0.15 High school 4.3 (−7.7, 16.3) .48 College 19.5 (3.5, 35.5) 0.02 College 18.1 (7.7, 28.4) .001 Postgraduate 32.5 (7.2, 57.8) 0.01 Postgraduate 27.1 (−0.003, 54.1) .05 Log AST −7.5 (−14.5, −0.6) .03 Role limitations because of physical functioning Gender (female) −25.1 (−40.6, −9.7) .02 High school 9.6 (−10.4, 29.8) 0.35 High school 8.0 (−10.4, 29.8) .42 College 30.2 (7.4, 53.0) 0.01 College 22.8 (7.4, 53.0) .009 Postgraduate 37 (0.8, 73.2) 0.04 Postgraduate 40.7 (0.8, 73.2) .07 Log AST −12.6 (−23.9, −1.3) .03 Role limitations because of emotional problems - - Gender (female) −18.6 (−35.4, −1.9) .03 Energy/Fatigue High school 7.4 (−3.3, 18.1) 0.17 College 13.4 (1.3, 25.4) 0.03 Gender (female) −14.2 (−21.3, −7.1) <.0001 Postgraduate 12.7 (−6.3, 31.8) 0.19 Log AST −5.2 (−10.5, 0.03) .04 Log AST −8.0 (−14.3, −1.8) 0.01 Emotional well-being - - Gender (female) −13.1 (−19.8, −6.4) <.0001 High school 2.7 (−6.0, 11.4) .54 College 8.5 (0.88, 16.1) .03 Postgraduate 26.4 (6.7, 46.0) .009 Social functioning INR −10.9 (−20.5, −1.3) 0.03 Log AST −7.9 (−14.3, 1.5) .02 Bodily pain High school 18.2 (3.2, 33.3) 0.02 College 21.5 (4.4, 38.6) 0.01 Albumin 1.2 (0.5, 1.9) .002 Postgraduate 21.0 (−6.0, 48.1) 0.13 General health INR −7.3 (−14.0, −0.54) 0.04 Log ALT 10.4 (2.9, 17.9) .007 Log AST −16.0 (−23.7, −8.3) <.0001 CI: Confidence interval; HCV: Hepatitis C virus; HBV: Hepatitis B virus; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; ==== Refs REFERENCES 1 Testa M Simonson D Assessment of quality of life outcomes N Engl J Med 1996 334 835 480 AUTHOR: Is this page range correct 8596551 2 Diener E Suh E Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators Soc Indicators Res 1997 40 189 216 3 Hoofnagle JH Hepatitis C. Clinical spectrum of disease Hepatology 1997 26 S15 20 4 Foster GR Goldin RD Thomas HC Chronic hepatitis C virus infection causes a significant reduction in quality of life in the absence of cirrhosis Hepatology 1998 27 209 12 9425939 5 Bondini S Kallman J Dan A Younoszai Z Ramsey L Nader F Health-related quality of life in patients with chronic hepatitis B Liver Int 2007 27 1119 25 17845541 6 Ong S Mak B Aung M Li SC Lim SG Health-related quality of life in chronic hepatitis B patients Hepatology 2008 47 1108 17 18318043 7 Younossi Z Guyatt G Quality of life assessment in chronic liver disease Am J Gastroenterol 1998 93 1037 41 9672326 8 Abdo A Hepatitis C and poor quality of life: Is it the virus or the patient? Saudi J Gastroenterol 2008 4 109 3 9 Foster GR Hepatitis C virus infection: Quality of life and side effects of treatment J Hepatol 1999 31 Suppl 1 250 4 10622597 10 Bonkovsky HL Wooley JM Reduction of health-related quality of life in chronic hepatitis C and improvement with interferon therapy. The Consensus Interferon Study Group Hepatology 1999 29 264 70 9862876 11 Ware JE Jr Bayliss MS Mannocchia M Davis GL Health related quality of life in chronic hepatitis C: Impact of disease and treatment response. The Interventional Therapy Group Hepatology 1999 30 550 5 10421667 12 Shakil AO Conry-Cantilena C Alter HJ Hayashi P Kleiner DE Tedeschi V Volunteer blood donors with antibody to hepatitis C virus: Clinical, biochemical, virologic, and histologic features. The Hepatitis C Study Group Ann Intern Med 1995 123 330 7 7542854 13 Iwasaki M Kanda D Toyoda M Yuasa K Hashimoto Y Takagi H Absence of specific symptoms in chronic hepatitis C J Gastroenterol 2002 37 709 16 12375144 14 Fukuhara S Hino K Tomita E Yuasa S Okushin H Health-related QOL in patients with chronic liver disease type-C (in Japanese with English abstract) Acta Hepatol Jpn 1997 38 587 95 15 Schwarzinger M Dewedar S Rekacewicz C AbdElaziz K Fontanet A Carrat F Chronic hepatitis C virus infection: Does it really impact health related quality of life? A study in rural Egypt Hepatology 2004 40 1434 41 15565610 16 Koff R Impaired health-Related Quality of life in chronic hepatitis C: The how, but not the why Hepatology 1999 AUTHOR: Kindly provide volume no and page number 17 Dale JK Di Bisceglie AM Hoofnagle JH Straus SE Chronic fatigue syndrome: Lack of association with hepatitis C virus infection J Med Virol 1991 34 119 21 1653818 18 Mawle AC Nisenbaum R Dobbins JG Gary HE Jr Stawart JA Reyes M Seroepidemiology of chronic fatigue syndrome: A case control study Clin Infect Dis 1995 21 1386 9 8749620