==== Front Ann Saudi MedAnn Saudi MedAnnals of Saudi Medicine0256-49470975-4466King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2287162210.5144/0256-4947.2012.517asm-5-517Original ArticleChanges in the pattern of hospital intravenous antimicrobial use in Saudi Arabia, 2006–2008 Al-Tawfiq Jaffar A. From the Saudi Aramco Medical Services Organization, Dhahran, Saudi ArabiaCorrespondence: Dr. Jaffar A. Al-Tawfiq, Saudi Aramco, PO Box 76, Dhahran 31911, Saudi Arabia, jaffar.tawfiq@aramco.comSep-Oct 2012 32 5 517 520 Copyright © 2012, Annals of Saudi Medicine2012This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Hospitals should measure antimicrobial use based on the WHO’s recommended metric, the defined daily dose (DDD). There is no data on antimicrobial usage based on DDD in Saudi Arabia. Thus, this study evaluates the trend in antimicrobial consumption based on this concept. DESIGN AND SETTING Observational study in a general hospital in Saudi Arabia from 2006–2008. METHODS We analyzed the use of intravenous systemic antibacterial agents (group J01 of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical [ATC] classification and the classes of this group) that were administered to hospitalized patients by reviewing the data obtained from the pharmacy records. Antimicrobial consumption was calculated as the number of DDD per 100 bed-days. RESULTS Of the total parenteral antibiotics, ciprofloxacin was the most commonly used intravenous antibiotic (67.6%), followed by ceftriaxone (6%), cefazolin (5%), and imipenem-enzyme inhibitor (4.3%). The DDD per 100 patient-days usage of intravenous antimicrobial agents was as follows: J01MA02 ciprofloxacin (parenteral) 82.643, J01DD04 ceftriaxone 7.447, J01DB02 cefazolin 6.166, J01DH51 imipenem-enzyme inhibitor 5.234, J01MA12 levofloxacin 3.188, and J01XA01 vancomycin 2.97. Intravenous ciprofloxacin usage increased from 3.55 to 82.643 DDD/100 patient days. CONCLUSION The study showed that the most commonly used intravenous systemic antimicrobial agent was ciprofloxacin. Thus, strategies are needed to specifically target these agents for prescribing improvement. ==== Body It is well known that antimicrobial resistance parallels the consumption of antimicrobial therapy. In developing countries, antimicrobial resistance is high and rising.1,2 Unique antibiotic resistance problems such as pan-resistant Acinetobacter baumanii are thought to be of particular concern in the Middle East.3 In addition, the Middle East is the intersection between developed and developing countries and thus the region is exposed to resistant bacteria.2 Many studies have addressed the issue of antimicrobial resistance in Saudi Arabia. Resistance rates are variable depending on the organism and the geographic area of the study. In addition, many factors contribute to the development of resistance throughout the world and specifically in the Middle East, including Saudi Arabia.2 These factors include inappropriate prescriptions, which were found to range between 24% and 80% for patients attending community hospitals.4,5 However, there are no data on antimicrobial usage based on the concept of the defined daily dose (DDD) in Saudi Arabia. Thus, we took this study to evaluate antimicrobial use in a hospital in Saudi Arabia based on this concept. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the data on intravenous systemic antimicrobials dispensed in Saudi Aramco Medical Services Organization (SAMSO), Saudi Arabia, for a 3-year period from 2006 to 2008. SAMSO provides medical care for Saudi Aramco employees and their dependents (spouses, children and parents). Approximately 370 000 individuals are eligible for medical care at SAMSO. The main hospital has 380 beds with five intensive care units (cardiac, medical, surgical, pediatric, and neonatal). On average there are a total of 36 426 admissions annually with an average length of stay of 5.3 days.6 Information on the annual usage of intravenous systemic antimicrobial agents was obtained from the pharmacy register of the annual medication utilization from 2006 to 2008. The pharmacy keeps records and information about all dispensed medications on a monthly and yearly basis. The information and data included the numbers of drugs dispensed by form, type, and route of administration. Data on antibiotics were determined through the number of packages and doses from the hospitals’ pharmacy database for each year. Intravenous systemic antimicrobial agents are equivalent to group J01 of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology.7 To estimate antibiotic usage, the total numbers of grams of each antibiotic used were summed for each year, and were divided by the WHO-assigned DDD, thus, estimating the number of days of antibiotic therapy (g/day). DDDs were expressed per 100 patient-days to control the differences of hospital census.8 DDDs/100 patient-days=(annual consumption of antibacterial [g]×100) divided by (DDD [g/d]×total hospitalization days). Other studies report consumption as DDDs per 1000 patient-days.9 The calculation of DDDs/100 patient-days was done using ABC-Calc “Antibiotic Consumption Calculator,” version 3.1 (2006).10 The change in antibiotic usage was compared between 2006 and 2008, and was expressed as a percentage and for this change a P values <.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS During the study period from 2006 to 2008, the total parenteral antibiotics, ciprofloxacin was the most commonly used intravenous antibiotic (67.6%), followed by ceftriaxone (6%), cefazolin (5%) and imipenem-enzyme inhibitor (4.3%). Table 1 shows the annual usage of intravenous systemic antimicrobial agents as DDD per 100 patient-days was as follows: J01MA02 ciprofloxacin 82.643 J01DD04 ceftriaxone 7.447 J01DB02 cefazolin 6.166 J01DH51 imipenem-enzyme inhibitor 5.234 J01MA12 levofloxacin 3.188 J01XA01 vancomycin 2.97. Intravenous ciprofloxacin usage increased from 3.55 to 82.643 DDD/100 patient days (Figure 1). This increase did not reach statistical significance but a linear trend was observed with R2=0.8768. Although vancomycin usage doubled (Figure 1), the actual DDD per 100 patient-days was only 3 in 2008 compared to 1.4 in 2006 (Table 1). Parenteral azithromycin use decreased from 0.378 to 0.159 DDD/100 patient-days in 2006 and 2008, respectively (P=.34). Parenteral levofloxacin use increased from 0.588 to 3.188 DDD/100 patient-days in 2006 and 2008, respectively (P=.19). DISCUSSION Fluoroquinolone resistance is an emerging problem in many countries including Saudi Arabia. Hospital-acquired isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae showed 23% ciprofloxacin resistance11 and Escherichia coli showed a rate of 46% resistance.12 This resistance could be partially explained by increasing the use of fluoroquinolones, not only in the hospital, but also in the community. Thus, the findings in this study of a significant usage of intravenous ciprofloxacin should direct efforts to optimize the usage of this medication. Although the P value was not significant, a linear trend was observed with R2=0.8768. Thus, the finding is indicative of a preferential increase in the use of ciprofloxacin during the study period. In a Danish study, a significant increase in the total consumption of oral ciprofloxacin was linked to the introduction of generic ciprofloxacin, and this in turn correlated with ciprofloxacin resistance in urinary isolates of E coli.13 One reason for increased usage of intravenous antimicrobial therapy may be related to the practice of the use of combination therapy for hospitalized patients. The main carbapenem being used was an imipenem-enzyme inhibitor and the rate of utilization was higher than the reported rate from other studies.14 The finding in our study is consistent with those from other countries.15 Vancomycin utilization remains relatively low at about 1.4–2.9 DDD/100 patient-days. This rate falls within the 10% to 50% of the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) data16 and is close to the mean utilization of vancomycin of 1.9/100 bed-days in a study from 29 public hospitals and private clinics in Chile.17 This finding may explain the low prevalence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) in Saudi Arabia. In a study of 4276 patients from a tertiary care referral hospital, VRE was identified in only six (0.14%) patients.18 Our study has a few limitations. First, we included only intravenous antimicrobial therapy in the results, which was related to the fact that the data could not be separated for outpatient and inpatient for oral antimicrobial agents. Second, the data represented one hospital in the Saudi Arabia and thus may not be a representative of the whole country. Third, similar to what was noted previously,19 the data included children and adults; however, DDD are only defined for adults by the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. Fourth, the actual usage of all (intravenous and oral) systemic antimicrobials could not be calculated in this study. To allow for comparison with benchmarking data such as the NHSN16 it is important to have specific unit antimicrobial consumption data.20 Such data would be more informative if it had been correlated to the resistance pattern in each unit.9,21 Despite these limitations, the study is the first from Saudi Arabia to shed light on antimicrobial utilization using the DDD concept. The discrepancy in antimicrobial utilization between different hospitals is a reflection of different policies at diverse institutions. In future studies, it is important to include education and an antimicrobial stewardship program to particularly control the use of quinolones. In addition, we need to assess antibiotic indication, duration, and to include oral antimicrobial therapy in the inpatient as well as the outpatient setting. Acknowledgments The author acknowledges the use of Saudi Aramco Medical Services Organization (SAMSO) facilities for the data and study. Opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and not necessarily of SAMSO. SAMSO did not fund the study. The study was approved according to our institute requirement (Number 11-1904). Figure 1 Percent change in defined daily dose/100 patient-days for the top intravenous antimicrobials in 2006 compared to 2008. Table 1 Consumption of parenteral antimicrobials as a total and by Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical group in a hospital in Saudi Arabia, 2006–2008. DDD per 100 bed-days % change 2008 vs. 2006 P 2006 2007 2008 J01CA01 ampicillin parenteral 0.85 1.485 1.19 40.0 .64 J01CE01 benzylpenicillin parenteral 0.826 0.933 0.928 12.3 .36 J01CF04 oxacillin (parenteral) 0.404 1.193 0.93 130.2 .54 J01CR02 amoxicillin and enzyme inhibitor (parenteral) 0.113 0.203 0.108 −4.4 .97 J01CR03 ticarcillin and enzyme inhibitor 0.604 1.424 1.329 120.0 .40 J01CR05 pipracillin and enzyme inhibitor 0.064 0.025 0.202 215.6 .46 J01DB02 cefazolin 3.942 6.432 6.166 56.4 .39 J01DC01 cefoxitin (parenteral) 0.957 1.696 1.353 41.4 .64 J01DC02 cefuroxime (parenteral) 0.67 1.319 1.194 78.2 .45 J01DD01 cefotaxime 0.067 0.065 0.174 159.7 .34 J01DD04 ceftriaxone 7.274 8.363 7.447 2.4 .90 J01DD09 ceftazidime 1.1 3.086 1.259 14.5 .95 J01DE01 cefepime 0.149 0.151 0.827 455.0 .33 J01DF01 aztreonam 0.012 0.062 0.055 358.3 .416 J01DH02 meropenem 0.161 0.096 0.492 205.6 .43 J01DH51 imipenem and enzyme inhibitor 3.93 4.901 5.234 33.2 .17 J01EE01 trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (parenteral) 0.049 0.03 0.563 1049.0 .35 J01FA01 erythromycin (parenteral) 0.07 0.137 0.091 30.0 .80 J01FA10 azithromycin (parenteral) 0.378 0.155 0.159 −57.9 .34 J01FF01 clindamycin (parenteral) 0.384 0.407 0.559 45.6 .25 J01GB03 gentamicin (parenteral) 0.965 1.846 2.107 118.3 .19 J01GB06 amikacin 0.195 0.463 0.325 66.7 .67 J01MA02 ciprofloxacin (parenteral) 3.55 68.77 82.643 2228.0 .23 J01MA12 levofloxacin (parenteral) 0.588 2.491 3.188 442.2 .19 J01XA01 vancomycin (parenteral) 1.422 2.536 2.97 108.9 .23 J01XB02 polymyxin B (parenteral) 0.428 0.74 0.7 63.6 .20 J01XD01 metronidazole (parenteral) 0.009 0.017 0.018 100.0 .23 ==== Refs REFERENCES 1 Okeke IN Laxminarayan R Bhutta ZA Duse AG Jenkins P O’Brien TF Pablos-Mendez A Klugman KP Antimicrobial in developing countries. Part I: recent trends and current status Lancet Infect Dis 2005 5 481 93 16048717 2 Al-Tawfiq JA Stephens G Memish ZA Inappropriate antimicrobial use and potential solutions: a Middle Eastern perspective Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2010 7 8 7 765 74 20586562 3 Scott P Deye G Srinivasan A Murray C Moran K Hulten E Fishbain J Craft D Riddell S Lindler L Mancuso J Milstrey E Bautista CT Patel J Ewell A Hamilton T Gaddy C Tenney M Christopher G Petersen K Endy T Petruccelli B An outbreak of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex infection in the US military health care system associated with military operations in Iraq Clin Infect Dis 2007 44 12 1577 84 17516401 4 Bilal NE Gedebou M Al-Ghamdi S Endemic nosocomial infections and misuse of antibiotics in a maternity hospital in Saudi Arabia APMIS 2002 110 2 140 7 12064869 5 Al-Ghamdi S Gedebou M Bilal NE Nosocomial infections and misuse of antibiotics in a provincial community hospital, Saudi Arabia J Hosp Infect 2002 50 2 115 21 11846538 6 Al-Tawfiq JA Distribution and epidemiology of Candida species causing fungemia at a Saudi Arabian hospital, 1996–2004 Int J Infect Dis 2007 5 11 3 239 44 16859945 7 WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology ACT index with DDDs 2001 WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodolog y Oslo, Norway 8 World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology ATC Index with DDDs Oslo, Norway WHO 2004 Available at: http://www.whocc.no/atcddd/ Accessed 24 Oct 2009 9 Fridkin SK Steward CD Edwards JR Pryor ER McGowan JE Jr Archibald LK Gaynes RP Tenover FC Surveillance of antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance in United States hospitals: project ICARE phase 2 Clin Infect Dis 1999 29 245 52 10476720 10 ABC Calc - Antibiotic consumption calculator. Version 3.1 2006 available at: http://www.escmid.org/research_projects/study_groups/esgap/abc_calc/ Last accessed Jan 2009 11 Al-Tawfiq JA Antony A Antimicrobial resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Saudi Arabian hospital: results of a 6-year surveillance study, 1998–2003 J Infect Chemother 2007 8 13 4 230 4 17721686 12 Al-Tawfiq JA Increasing antibiotic resistance among isolates of Escherichia coli recovered from inpatients and outpatients in a Saudi Arabian hospital Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006 7 27 7 748 53 16807852 13 Jensen US Muller A Brandt CT Frimodt-Møller N Hammerum AM Monnet DL DANRES study group Effect of generics on price and consumption of ciprofloxacin in primary healthcare: the relationship to increasing resistance J Antimicrob Chemother 2010 6 65 6 1286 91 20363806 14 Pešić G Jović Z Vasić K Application of the ATC/DDD Methodology to Compare Antibiotic Utilization in two university Hospital Surgical Departments Med Biol 2005 12 3 174 178 15 Zarb P Ansari F Muller A Vankerckhoven V Davey PG Goossens H Drug Utilization 75% (DU75%) in 17 European Hospitals (2000–2005): Results from the ESAC-2 Hospital Care Sub Project Curr Clin Pharmacol 2011 2 1 6 1 62 70 21235461 16 National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004 Am J Infect Control 2004 12 32 8 470 85 15573054 17 Fica CA Cabello MA Juliet LC Prado DP Bavestrello FL Intravenous antimicrobial use among different hospital in Chile during 2005 Rev Chilena Infectol 2008 12 25 6 419 27 19194604 18 Qadri SM Postle AG Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) as normal flora of the intestine in patients at a tertiary care hospital Ann Saudi Med 1996 11 16 6 625 8 17429236 19 Müller-Pebody B Muscat M Pelle B Klein BM Brandt CT Monnet DL Increase and change in pattern of hospital antimicrobial use, Denmark, 1997–2001 J Antimicrob Chemother 2004 12 54 6 1122 6 15537692 20 Edwards JR Peterson KD Mu Y Banerjee S Allen-Bridson K Morrell G Dudeck MA Pollock DA Horan TC National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) report: data summary for 2006 through 2008, issued December 2009 Am J Infect Control 2009 12 37 10 783 805 20004811 21 White RL Friedrich LV Mihm LB Bosso JA Assessment of the relationship between antimicrobial usage and susceptibility: differences between the hospital and specific patient-care areas Clin Infect Dis 2000 31 1 16 23 10913390