==== Front World J GastroenterolWorld J. GastroenterolWJGWorld Journal of Gastroenterology1007-93272219-2840Baishideng Publishing Group Inc jWJG.v24.i29.pg330210.3748/wjg.v24.i29.3302Meta-AnalysisFourth-generation quinolones in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: A meta-analysis An Ying Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases of Jiangxi, Nanchang 330000, Jiangxi province, ChinaSchool of Pharmacy, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330000, Jiangxi province, ChinaWang Ya Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases of Jiangxi, Nanchang 330000, Jiangxi province, ChinaSchool of Pharmacy, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330000, Jiangxi province, ChinaWu Shuang Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases of Jiangxi, Nanchang 330000, Jiangxi province, ChinaWang You-Hua Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases of Jiangxi, Nanchang 330000, Jiangxi province, ChinaQian Xing Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases of Jiangxi, Nanchang 330000, Jiangxi province, ChinaLi Zhen Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330000, Jiangxi province, ChinaFu Ying-Jun School of Pharmacy, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330000, Jiangxi province, ChinaXie Yong Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases of Jiangxi, Nanchang 330000, Jiangxi province, China. xieyong_tfahoncu@163.comAuthor contributions: Fu YJ and Xie Y designed the research; An Y, Wang Y, and Wu S performed the research; Wang YH, Qian X, and Li Z contributed to analytic tools; An Y and Wang Y analyzed data; An Y and Wang Y wrote the paper. Supported by the Graduate Innovation Project of Nanchang University, No. CX2017213 and No. CX2017251; the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 81460115; and the Science and Technology Projects of Jiangxi Province, No. 2014BBG70019. Correspondence to: Yong Xie, MD, PhD, Professor, Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases of Jiangxi, Nanchang 330000, Jiangxi Province, China. xieyong_tfahoncu@163.com Telephone: +86-791-88692507 7 8 2018 7 8 2018 24 29 3302 3312 4 4 2018 12 5 2018 16 6 2018 ©The Author(s) 2018. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.2018This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.AIM To assess the efficacy and safety of fourth-generation quinolones for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. METHODS Major literature databases (PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched for relevant articles published prior to February 2018. We performed a meta-analysis of all randomized clinical trials that examined the efficacy of H. pylori eradication therapies and included fourth-generation quinolones in the experimental arm. Subgroup analyses by regions and different types of fourth-generation quinolones were also performed. RESULTS Ten studies including a total of 2198 patients were assessed. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials showed that the eradication rate of therapies containing non-fourth-generation quinolones was significantly lower than that of therapies containing fourth-generation quinolones by intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis [75.4% vs 81.8%; odds ratio (OR) = 0.661; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.447-0.977; P = 0.038]. This analysis also showed that the eradication rate of the therapies containing non-fourth-generation quinolones was inferior to that of therapies containing fourth-generation quinolones by per-protocol analysis (79.1% vs 84.7%; OR = 0.663; 95%CI: 0.433-1.016; P = 0.059). Moreover, the occurrence of side effects was significantly different between the control and experimental groups by ITT analysis (30.6% vs 19.5%; OR = 1.874; 95%CI: 1.120-3.137; P = 0.017). The sub-analyses also showed significant differences in moxifloxacin therapies vs other fourth-generation quinolone therapies (84.3% vs 71.9%) and in Asian vs European groups (76.7% vs 89.1%). CONCLUSION Therapies containing fourth-generation quinolones achieved a poor eradication rate in the treatment of H. pylori infection. Such regimens might be useful as a rescue treatment based on antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Different antibiotics should be chosen in different regions. Helicobacter pyloriFourth-generation quinolonesEradicationSystematic reviewMeta-analysis ==== Body Core tip: With the increase in the Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) resistance rate, eradication is becoming increasingly challenging. This is the first meta-analysis comprehensively focused on fourth-generation quinolones for the treatment of H. pylori infection. Additionally, we found that fourth-generation quinolones had a higher eradication rate (81.8%) and a lower rate of incidence of side effects (19.5%). These findings will provide a specific basis for the clinical use of fourth-generation quinolones for H. pylori eradication. INTRODUCTION Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of gastrointestinal diseases, such as gastritis, non-ulcer dyspepsia, peptic ulcer diseases, and gastric cancer[1]. H. pylori infection affects approximately 50% of the population worldwide[2]. Its prevalence is approximately 70% in developing nations and approximately 20%-30% in developed nations[3]. Eradication of H. pylori facilitates peptic ulcer healing, reduces ulcer relapse rates, and prevents gastric cancer[4]. In the past, the recommended treatment for eradicating H. pylori was 7 d of standard triple therapy (STT) consisting of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) with clarithromycin (CAM) and amoxicillin (AMPC)[5]. However, with the wide use of the STT regimen, the eradication rate of H. pylori has declined to unacceptable levels over the last decade (< 80%) due to high resistance to metronidazole and clarithromycin[6]. A recent study on H. pylori resistance to antimicrobial agents reported that clarithromycin resistance has rapidly increased in many countries over the past decade, with resistance rates of approximately 18% in Europe, 30% in Japan, 40% in Turkey, and 50% in China; limited data are available for the United States[7-10]. The prevalence of H. pylori resistance to metronidazole is 33% in Europe and 40% in the United States, with a high resistance rate (50%-80%) in developing countries[10]. To overcome these difficulties, there is a need to evaluate novel regimens and antibiotics to identify effective alternative treatment strategies. Levofloxacin-based therapy is recommended by the Maastricht IV[11] and Maastricht V Consensus Reports[12]. Nonetheless, according to studies, the resistance rate to levofloxacin is approximately 22.1% in Italy and 36.9% in China; a recent study surprisingly reported a resistance rate of 31.9% in the United States[13-15]. Jeong et al[16] reported that the eradication rate was 57.1% when levofloxacin was used. Fourth-generation quinolones, including moxifloxacin, sitafloxacin, gemifloxacin, and gatifloxacin, which have broad-spectrum antibacterial activity, are active against a variety of gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria[17]. Recent studies have shown that fourth-generation quinolones can increase drug penetration into bacterial cells, improve the strength of activity and have better bioavailability. This group of drugs inhibits the metabolism of bacterial cells by inhibiting DNA replication and therefore enhances antibacterial activity[18]. Furthermore, treatment with fourth-generation quinolones has achieved a high H. pylori eradication rate and has been recommended in some studies[19-22]. Nevertheless, Chung et al[23] reported that the eradication rate was not satisfactory when using fourth-generation quinolones. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of therapies containing fourth-generation quinolones, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available data. The primary outcome measures we assessed were eradication rates, side effects, and compliance of the therapies containing fourth-generation quinolones compared with those of therapies containing non-fourth-generation quinolones. Our outcomes will provide useful evidence for clinical practice[24]. MATERIALS AND METHODS Literature sources We searched the PubMed (to February 2018), EMBASE (to February 2018), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 2, 2018) databases. The following search terms were used for all databases: (“Helicobacter pylori” OR H. pylori) AND (Moxifloxacin OR Sitafloxacin OR Gemifloxacin OR Gatifloxacin); the search terms varied slightly among these databases. This meta-analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)[25]. Inclusion criteria Articles eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis met the following criteria: (1) randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted; (2) methods used for the diagnosis of H. pylori, including the urea breath test (UBT), the rapid urease test (RUT), bacterial culture, histology, and/or fecal antigen test; (3) eradication rate made available; (4) eradication testing with UBT and/or histology performed at least 4 wk after the completion of therapy; and (5) eradication regimens in the experimental arm included fourth-generation quinolones. Exclusion criteria Studies were excluded under the following circumstances: (1) eradication data could not be confirmed; (2) articles and abstracts were written in a language other than English; (3) fourth-generation quinolones were included in two treatment arms; and (4) the experimental group and the control group included more than one variable (for example, the comparison of triple therapy and quadruple therapy; antibiotics and duration were different in both groups). Data extraction Three authors (An Y, Wang Y, and Wu S) independently extracted data from the selected studies. Any disagreements were resolved by consensus. The extracted data included the following: the study design; number of enrolled patients in each treatment arm; diagnostic methods for confirming H. pylori infection before enrolling and re-checking strategies after completing the eradication study; publication time; name of the authors; location of the trial; drug regimens; duration of treatment; eradication rates by intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and per-protocol (PP) analysis; number of successful and failed eradications; and percentage of adverse effects. To avoid duplication of data, if a trial was repeatedly published by the same authors or institutions, only the most recently published or most informative study was included. Risk of bias The quality of RCTs with available full text was assessed using the risk of bias assessment tool developed by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions[26]. Two independent reviewers assessed the risk of bias through six domain-based evaluations, including selection bias (random sequence generation and allocation concealment), performance bias (blinding of participants and personnel), detection bias (blinding of outcome assessment), attrition bias (incomplete outcome data), reporting bias (selective outcome reporting), and other bias. Each indicator was scored by low risk of bias, unclear risk of bias, and high risk of bias. Any disagreement was discussed and decided by a third reviewer. We also employed a funnel plot and Egger’s test to assess the presence of publication bias. Statistical analysis The statistical analysis was performed using the meta-analysis software STATA12.0 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, United States). The primary outcomes of the meta-analysis were the H. pylori eradication rate and therapy-related side effects among the trials comparing the control and experimental groups based on ITT analysis. For each trial, we calculated the odds ratio (OR) for the primary measure. The ORs were presented with 95% confidence intervals (CIs); in addition, a P-value < 0.05 was considered significant. The degree of heterogeneity among the trial results was estimated using the χ2 statistic (P-value < 0.10 considered significant) and the I2 test (0%-25%, 25%-50%, 50%-75%, and > 75% represented insignificant, low, moderate, and high heterogeneity, respectively). If significant heterogeneity (P < 0.10 or I2 > 50%) was achieved, we employed the random effects model to combine the effect sizes of the included studies. When no significant heterogeneity was found, we used fixed effects to pool the data. Additionally, subgroup analyses were performed based on the location and different types of fourth-generation quinolones. RESULTS Description of the studies The bibliographical search yielded a total of 548 studies from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Among these articles, we excluded 144 due to duplication and 175 that were unrelated. We selected 229 potential studies for detailed assessment, among which 68 were excluded because there was no control group. We also excluded 67 review articles, comments, or letters. Thirty-three articles were excluded because of the inclusion of fourth-generation quinolones in two regimens, 14 articles were non-RCTs, 11 articles were excluded due to an inappropriate drug regimen, and 19 articles had data that could not be determined. Then, 17 articles were selected for further evaluation. Five articles were excluded because the data repeated those in other studies, one study did not state the methods for diagnosis of H. pylori, and one study was published in Japanese. Ultimately, 10 studies (two abstracts and eight full-text articles) met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis (Figure 1). These 10 studies[27-36] are summarized in Table 1 based on our meta-analysis. The quality assessment is reported in Table 2. Table 1 Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis Year-Author Location H. pylori infection initial diagnosis/re-checking Control group -Day Fourth-generation quinolone group-Day Eradication rate (ITT) (control group/fourth- generation quinolone group) Eradication rate (PP) (control group/fourth- generation quinolone group) Compliance Side effects 2017-Mansour Ghanaei, F Iran 14C-UBT or histology BPAC-10 BPAG-10 89% (81/91)/77% (70/91) 91% (81/90)/77.8% (70/90) 2015-Masoodi, M Iran 13C-UBT, RUT pathology test OBAC-10 OBAG-10 61.6% (37/60)/66.6% (40/60) 67.2% (37/55)/72.7% (40/55) 97.1%/98.3% 37/19 2014-Rakici, H Turkey pistology, stool antigen test LanAL-10 LanAM-10 89.4% (92/103)/87.8% (93/106) 92% (92/100)/91.8% (93/102) 96%/95.1% - 2013-Murakami, K Japan culture method, RUT, UBT LanAL-7 LanAS-7 43.1% (28/65)/70% (49/70) 43.7% (28/84)/72.1% (49/68) 98.4%/94.1% 11/11 2012-Zeng, Z China 14C-UBT EAC-7 EAM-7 78.9% (180/228)/79.4% (181/228) 82.9% (180/217)/84.2% (181/215) - - 2009-Lu, NH China 14C-UBT EAC-7 EAM-7 90.3% (28/31)/85.7% (24/28) - - - 2008-Kilic, ZM Turkey gastroscopy, histology, RUT, 13C-UBT RBCAC-14 EAC-14 RBCAM-14 76.7% (23/30)/66.7% (20/30) 76.7% (23/30)/66.7% (20/30) 100%/100% 11/13 EAM-14 63.3% (19/30)/53.3% (16/30) 63.3% (19/30)/53.3% (16/30) 100%/100% 17/21 2007-Bago, P Croatia RUT, histology, culture test, 13C-UBT LanMetC-7 LanAC-7 LanMetM-7 70.4% (50/71)/93.5% (58/62) 75.8% (50/66)/96.7% (58/60) - LanAM-7 78.2% (61/78)/86.4% (57/66) 80.2% (61/76)/90.5% 57/63) 2005-Kist, M Germany 13C-UBT EAC-7 ETC-7 EAM-7 72.5% (58/80)/87.5% (70/80) 78% (58/74)/89% (70/79) - - ETM-7 75% (60/80)/90% (72/80) 79% (60/76)/92% (72/78) 2005-Nista, EC Italy Histological examination, 13C-UBT ETC-7 EAC-7 ETM-7 75% (60/80)/90% (72/80) 78.9% (60/76)/92.3% (72/78) - 29/11 EAM-7 72.5% (58/80)/87.5% (70/80) 78.4% (58/74)/88.6% (70/79) 26/10 A: Amoxicillin; B: Bismuth; C: Clarithromycin; E: Esomeprazole G: Gemifloxacin; Lan: Lansoprazole; L: Levofloxacin; M: Moxifloxacin; Met: Metronidazole; O: Omeprazole; P: Pantoprazole; S: Sitafloxacin; RBC: Ranitidine bismuth citrate; -: Not reported. Figure 1 Flow diagram of the identified and selected trials. Table 2 Risk assessment of included studies Year-Author Random sequence generation (selection bias) Allocation concealment (selection bias) Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Selective reporting (reporting bias) Other bias 2017-Mansour Ghanaei, F L H H L L L L 2015-Masoodi, M L L L H L L L 2014-Rakici, H L H H H L U L 2013-Murakami, K L H L H L L L 2012-Zeng, Z U U U U L U U 2009-Lu, NH U U U U L U U 2008-Kilic, ZM L H H H L L U 2007-Bago, P L L L H L L L 2005-Kist, M H H H H L H L 2005- Nista, EC L H H H L L L L: Low risk of bias; H: High risk of bias; U: Unclear risk of bias. Efficacy of H. pylori eradication There were 10 studies with a total of 2198 patients in our meta-analysis; of these patients, 1107 received therapy without fourth-generation quinolone and 1091 received therapy with fourth-generation quinolone. The pooled eradication rates were 75.4% (835/1107) in the control group and 81.8% (892/1091) in the experimental group by ITT analysis. The pooled OR was 0.661 (95%CI: 0.447-0.977; P = 0.038) using the random effects model (I2 = 66.2%, P = 0.000; Figure 2). Figure 2 Forest plot of eradication rate of the therapies containing non-fourth-generation quinolones vs that of the therapies containing fourth-generation quinolones (intention-to-treat analysis). Moreover, the pooled eradication rates were 79.1% (835/1055) in the control group and 84.7% (892/1053) in the experimental group by PP analysis. The pooled OR was 0.663 (95%CI: 0.433-1.016; P = 0.059) using the random effects model (I2 = 64.4%, P = 0.000). The results of ITT showed that the eradication rates of therapies containing non-fourth-generation quinolones was significantly lower than those of therapies containing fourth-generation quinolones. Subgroup analyses Additional subgroup analyses for the meta-analysis were performed due to heterogeneity. We analyzed different types of fourth-generation quinolones, covering seven moxifloxacin trials and three other trials (including 1 sitafloxacin and 2 gemifloxacin). In the moxifloxacin subgroup, the pooled eradication rates were 77.3% (689/891) in the control group and 84.3% (733/870) in the experimental group (OR = 0.614, 95%CI: 0.403-0.935; P = 0.023; Figure 3) by ITT analysis, and the rates were 81.3% (689/847) in the control group and 87.3% (689/891) in the experimental group by PP analysis (OR = 0.614, 95%CI: 0.395-0.956; P = 0.031). In the other subgroup, the pooled eradication rates were 67.6% (146/216) in the control group and 71.9% (159/221) in the experimental group (OR = 0.846, 95%CI: 0.274-2.614; P = 0.772; Figure 3) by ITT analysis, and the rates were 70.2% (146/208) in the control group and 74.6% (159/213) in the experimental group by PP analysis (OR = 0.860, 95%CI: 0.239-3.091; P = 0.817). This subgroup analysis showed that the regimen with moxifloxacin achieved a higher eradication rate than the regimen without moxifloxacin. However, there was no significant difference in the eradication rate in the other subgroup. Figure 3 Forest plot of the sub-analysis according to types of fourth-generation quinolone (intention-to-treat analysis). We also conducted subgroup analysis by region (seven trials in Asia and three trials in Europe). In the Asian subgroup, the pooled eradication rates of the control group and the experimental group were 76.5% (488/638) and 76.7% (493/643), respectively, by ITT analysis (OR = 1.051; 95%CI: 0.671-1.646; P = 0.827; Figure 4) and 79.6% (488/613) and 80.0% (493/616), respectively, by PP analysis (OR = 1.072; 95%CI: 0.627-1.833; P = 0.800). In the European subgroup, the pooled eradication rates of the control group and the experimental group were 74.0% (347/469) and 89.1% (399/448), respectively, by ITT analysis (OR = 0.661; 95%CI: 0.447-0.977; P = 0.000; Figure 4) and 78.5% (347/442) vs 91.3% (399/437), respectively, by PP analysis (OR = 0.361; 95% CI: 0.240-0.544; P = 0.000). The results showed that therapies containing fourth-generation quinolones may not be advisable treatments for H. pylori infection in Asia. However, the use of fourth-generation quinolones in Europe can significantly improve the eradication rate. Figure 4 Forest plot of the sub-analysis according to region (intention-to-treat analysis). Side effects Of the 10 studies, four studies provided data regarding side effects. The results showed that common symptoms included nausea, diarrhea, black stool, and taste disturbance. The occurrence of total side effects in the control group was significantly higher than that in the experimental group by ITT analysis (30.6% vs 19.5%, OR = 1.874; 95%CI: 1.120-3.137; P = 0.017; Figure 5). Figure 5 Forest plot of the side effects of the therapies containing fourth-generation quinolones vs the therapies containing non-fourth-generation quinolones. Compliance Four studies included in the meta-analysis provided information about compliance. The results showed high compliance (> 95%), and there were no significant differences between the study groups. Risk of bias in publication Egger’s regression test suggested that there was no significant bias (P = 0.725) in the ITT analysis, while the funnel plot showed a slightly asymmetrical distribution (Figure 6). Figure 6 Funnel plot of the therapies containing non-fourth-generation quinolones vs the therapies containing fourth-generation quinolones (intention-to-treat analysis). DISCUSSION H. pylori infection is marked by a vast prevalence and strong association with various gastric diseases[37]. Therapeutic regimens range from STT to the present novel regimens, such as quadruple therapy with bismuth, sequential treatment, concomitant therapy, and hybrid therapy[38,39]. However, the treatment effects are still not ideal due to bacterial antibiotic resistance[40]. Thus, it is necessary to evaluate novel regimens or antibiotics[41]. With the resistance rate to the third-generation quinolone levofloxacin continuing to increase, resulting in a low eradication rate[16], therapies containing fourth-generation quinolones might be suitable for the treatment of H. pylori infection. This meta-analysis indicated that therapies containing fourth-generation quinolones had a higher clearance rate than other therapies by ITT and PP analyses. The mechanism of action of fourth-generation quinolones against H. pylori is to inhibit bacterial DNA gyrase, thus interfering with bacterial DNA replication[42]. These fourth-generation quinolones embed in the broken DNA chain and form complexes to inhibit nicking and closing activity, achieving a bactericidal effect[43]. However, according to Graham, who had given a report card to grade H. pylori therapy by ITT, the eradication rate is still poor (grade D, 81%-84%)[44]. This may be related to the low compliance of patients[27,33]. The choice of fourth-generation quinolones, the duration of treatment, and the difference in PPI also influenced the pooled eradication rates of therapies containing fourth-generation quinolones. The subgroup analyses of antibiotic species conducted in this study demonstrated that regimens containing moxifloxacin were superior to those not containing moxifloxacin (84.3% vs 71.9%). This finding might be consistent with a previous systematic review[45], but the eradication rate was still less than 85% by ITT analysis. The main reason was that the resistance rate of H. pylori to moxifloxacin was higher, even reaching up to 27.0% when analyzed by the E-test[31]. This phenomenon reminds us that it is best to conduct a susceptibility test to choose antibiotics reasonably. We also conducted subgroup analysis by region. The eradication rate of fourth-generation quinolone treatments in Europe was much higher than that in Asia (89.1% vs 76.7%). This difference may be due to the low utilization rate of antibiotics in Europe[8]. In Asia, the abuse of antibiotics is very common, which leads to a high drug resistance rate of H. pylori. According to a multiregion prospective 7-year study by Liu et al[46], the prevalence of H. pylori after moxifloxacin treatment was 17.2%. Resistance to moxifloxacin was reported to be similar to that of levofloxacin, ranging from 14.9% to 20.0% in Turkey[29]. The increasing antibiotic resistance rate makes the eradication of H. pylori more difficult. The rate of incidence of adverse events in the control groups was higher than that in the experimental groups. The pooled OR (1.874) indicated that the use of fourth-generation quinolones in the treatment of H. pylori infection can reduce the incidence of adverse reactions. This result indicates that therapies containing fourth-generation quinolones are safer. The main limitation of this meta-analysis is potential biases. On the one hand, the largest number of studies was conducted using moxifloxacin; only one study used sitafloxacin, and two used gemifloxacin. This selection had a certain effect on the pooled eradication rate and may also be a particularly important issue in the use of a single antibiotic to eradicate H. pylori for clinical treatment. On the other hand, all included studies were performed in Europe and Asia, with no studies conducted in Africa or America. Because H. pylori infection occurs worldwide, our results may not be appropriate for global generalization. These two factors lead to the bias of conclusion. In addition, most of the studies in our meta-analysis had problems with concealment of allocation and blinding, which caused the selection bias. The restrictions on the language of publication also imply other bias, and thus our meta-analysis may not reflect all the outcomes. Our analysis also implied other limitations. Most articles reporting a control arm were conducted using clarithromycin; our analysis is therefore especially lacking detailed data on levofloxacin. Two of the 10 included studies were abstracts, generating concerns regarding the data extraction and quality assessment of these studies and affecting the reliability of our results. In conclusion, this meta-analysis indicates that therapies containing fourth-generation quinolones can achieve a higher eradication rate of H. pylori infection, but the eradication rate remains poor. In the absence of other drug options or in cases of patient allergy to penicillin, such regimens might be considered as a rescue treatment based on antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Further investigation is necessary to draw more solid conclusions about the use of fourth-generation quinolones in the treatment of H. pylori infection. In addition, we will study more effective therapies for H. pylori infection if necessary. ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS Research background The resistance of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) to antibiotics is increasing and often leads to the failure of eradication treatment. Recent studies have reported that therapies containing fourth-generation quinolones remain effective against antibiotic-resistant H. pylori. However, the efficacy and safety of these therapies require further study. This is the first meta-analysis comparing the curative effect of fourth-generation quinolones with that of other therapies in regard to eradicating H. pylori. Research motivation In the Maastricht IV and Maastricht V Consensus Reports, levofloxacin-based therapy is recommended when the first treatment fails. Therapies containing fourth-generation quinolones are not mentioned. Our meta-analysis focused on eradication rates, side effects and compliance of therapies containing fourth-generation quinolones when compared with therapies using non-fourth-generation quinolones. Research objectives This meta-analysis aimed to clarify the effect of fourth-generation quinolones on the eradication of H. pylori infection and provide some evidence for clinical practice. Research methods The meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA criteria. We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. The outcome was to calculate the pooled eradication rate and therapy-related side effects among the trials, comparing the control and experimental groups. We calculated the odds ratio of each trial for the primary measure. The odds ratios were presented with 95% confidence intervals, and a P-value < 0.05 was considered significant. This methodology was also performed for subgroup analysis. Research results Available data from 10 studies showed that treatment with a fourth-generation quinolone could achieve a higher H. pylori eradication rate and decrease the side effects, but the eradication rate is less than acceptable. Fourth-generation quinolones can significantly improve the eradication rate in Europe but not in Asia. Research conclusions Quinolone resistance increases with age and duration of use. It is essential for practitioners to use quinolone antibiotics in the clinic reasonably. This study comprehensively analyzed the role of fourth-generation quinolone in the treatment of H. pylori infection. Our results suggested that fourth-generation quinolones are not ideal for eradication of H. pylori. Treatment based on antibiotic susceptibility testing might be more valid and obtain a higher rate of eradication of H. pylori infection, particularly in areas where resistance to antibiotics develops rapidly. Research perspectives According to reports that mutations at positions 87 and 91 of gyrA are the main cause of H. pylori resistance to fourth-generation quinolones, we will continue to pay attention to the resistance rate to fourth-generation quinolones globally. We will also focus on rapid genotyping methods, such as detecting gyrA mutations in H. pylori. Further studies of sitafloxacin, gemifloxacin, and gatifloxacin are imperative to draw more solid conclusions about the use of fourth-generation quinolones for the eradication of H. pylori infection. Manuscript source: Unsolicited manuscript Specialty type: Gastroenterology and hepatology Country of origin: China Peer-review report classification Grade A (Excellent): 0 Grade B (Very good): B Grade C (Good): C, C Grade D (Fair): 0 Grade E (Poor): 0 Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors deny any conflict of interest. PRISMA 2009 Checklist statement: The authors have read the PRISMA 2009 Checklist, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the PRISMA 2009 Checklist. Peer-review started: April 4, 2018 First decision: April 19, 2018 Article in press: June 16, 2018 P- Reviewer: Chmiela M, Slomiany BL, Tongtawee T S- Editor: Gong ZM L- Editor: Filipodia E- Editor: Huang Y ==== Refs 1 Liou JM Lin JT Chang CY Chen MJ Cheng TY Lee YC Chen CC Sheng WH Wang HP Wu MS Levofloxacin-based and clarithromycin-based triple therapies as first-line and second-line treatments for Helicobacter pylori infection: a randomised comparative trial with crossover design Gut 2010 59 572 578 20427390 2 Molina-Infante J Romano M Fernandez-Bermejo M Federico A Gravina AG Pozzati L Garcia-Abadia E Vinagre-Rodriguez G Martinez-Alcala C Hernandez-Alonso M Optimized nonbismuth quadruple therapies cure most patients with Helicobacter pylori infection in populations with high rates of antibiotic resistance. Gastroenterology 2013 145 121 128.e1 3 Song M Ang TL Second and third line treatment options for Helicobacter pylori eradication World J Gastroenterol 2014 20 1517 1528 24587627 4 Wang B Lv ZF Wang YH Wang H Liu XQ Xie Y Zhou XJ Standard triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection in China: a meta-analysis World J Gastroenterol 2014 20 14973 14985 25356059 5 Malfertheiner P Megraud F O’Morain C Bazzoli F El-Omar E Graham D Hunt R Rokkas T Vakil N Kuipers EJ Current concepts in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection: the Maastricht III Consensus Report Gut 2007 56 772 781 17170018 6 Molina-Infante J Pazos-Pacheco C Vinagre-Rodriguez G Perez-Gallardo B Dueñas-Sadornil C Hernandez-Alonso M Gonzalez-Garcia G Mateos-Rodriguez JM Fernandez-Bermejo M Gisbert JP Nonbismuth quadruple (concomitant) therapy: empirical and tailored efficacy versus standard triple therapy for clarithromycin-susceptible Helicobacter pylori and versus sequential therapy for clarithromycin-resistant strains Helicobacter 2012 17 269 276 22759326 7 Mitui M Patel A Leos NK Doern CD Park JY Novel Helicobacter pylori sequencing test identifies high rate of clarithromycin resistance J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2014 59 6 9 25222804 8 Megraud F, Coenen S, Versporten A, Kist M, Lopez-Brea M, Hirschl AM, Andersen LP, Goossens H, Glupczynski Y; Study Group participants Helicobacter pylori resistance to antibiotics in Europe and its relationship to antibiotic consumption Gut 2013 62 34 42 22580412 9 Horiki N Omata F Uemura M Suzuki S Ishii N Iizuka Y Fukuda K Fujita Y Katsurahara M Ito T Annual change of primary resistance to clarithromycin among Helicobacter pylori isolates from 1996 through 2008 in Japan Helicobacter 2009 14 86 90 19751432 10 Thung I Aramin H Vavinskaya V Gupta S Park JY Crowe SE Valasek MA Review article: the global emergence of Helicobacter pylori antibiotic resistance Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2016 43 514 533 26694080 11 Malfertheiner P Megraud F O’Morain CA Atherton J Axon AT Bazzoli F Gensini GF Gisbert JP Graham DY Rokkas T Management of Helicobacter pylori infection--the Maastricht IV/ Florence Consensus Report Gut 2012 61 646 664 22491499 12 Malfertheiner P Megraud F O’Morain CA Gisbert JP Kuipers EJ Axon AT Bazzoli F Gasbarrini A Atherton J Graham DY Management of Helicobacter pylori infection-the Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Report Gut 2017 66 6 30 27707777 13 Saracino IM Zullo A Holton J Castelli V Fiorini G Zaccaro C Ridola L Ricci C Gatta L Vaira D High prevalence of primary antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori isolates in Italy J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2012 21 363 365 23256118 14 Gao W Cheng H Hu F Li J Wang L Yang G Xu L Zheng X The evolution of Helicobacter pylori antibiotics resistance over 10 years in Beijing, China Helicobacter 2010 15 460 466 21083752 15 Shiota S Reddy R Alsarraj A El-Serag HB Graham DY Antibiotic Resistance of Helicobacter pylori Among Male United States Veterans Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015 13 1616 1624 25681693 16 Jeong MH Chung JW Lee SJ Ha M Jeong SH Na S Na BS Park SK Kim YJ Kwon KA [Comparison of rifabutin- and levofloxacin-based third-line rescue therapies for Helicobacter pylori] Korean J Gastroenterol 2012 59 401 406 22735872 17 Mah FS Fourth-generation fluoroquinolones: new topical agents in the war on ocular bacterial infections Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2004 15 316 320 15232471 18 Kłosińska-Szmurło E Grudzień M Betlejewska-Kielak K Pluciński F Biernacka J Mazurek AP Physicochemical properties of lomefloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin relevant to the biopharmaceutics classification system Acta Chim Slov 2014 61 827 834 25551723 19 Hirata Y Serizawa T Shichijo S Suzuki N Sakitani K Hayakawa Y Yamada A Koike K Efficacy of triple therapy with esomeprazole, amoxicillin, and sitafloxacin as a third-line Helicobacter pylori eradication regimen Int J Infect Dis 2016 51 66 69 27590563 20 Mahmoudi L Farshad S Seddigh M Mahmoudi P Ejtehadi F Niknam R High efficacy of gemifloxacin-containing therapy in Helicobacter Pylori eradication: A pilot empirical second-line rescue therapy Medicine (Baltimore) 2016 95 e4410 27759625 21 Sugimoto M Sahara S Ichikawa H Kagami T Uotani T Furuta T High Helicobacter pylori cure rate with sitafloxacin-based triple therapy Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2015 42 477 483 26075959 22 Gisbert JP Romano M Molina-Infante J Lucendo AJ Medina E Modolell I Rodríguez-Tellez M Gomez B Barrio J Perona M Two-week, high-dose proton pump inhibitor, moxifloxacin triple Helicobacter pylori therapy after failure of standard triple or non-bismuth quadruple treatments Dig Liver Dis 2015 47 108 113 25454706 23 Chung KH Dong HL Kim N Shin CM Jin HH Sang HL Lee D Hong SO Jin EH Su1696 Efficacy of Second-Line Treatment for Helicobacter pylori Infection: Moxifloxacin-Containing Triple Therapy vs . Bismuth-Containing Quadruple Therapy Gastroenterology 2012 142 S 483-S-484 24 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement PLoS Med 2009 6 e1000097 19621072 25 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement Int J Surg 2010 8 336 341 20171303 26 Higgins JP Green S Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration 2011 27 Mansour-Ghanaei F Pedarpour Z Shafaghi A Joukar F Clarithromycin versus Gemifloxacin in Quadruple Therapeutic Regimens for Helicobacter Pylori Infection Eradication Middle East J Dig Dis 2017 9 100 106 28638586 28 Masoodi M Talebi-Taher M Tabatabaie K Khaleghi S Faghihi AH Agah S Asadi R Clarithromycin vs . Gemifloxacin in Quadruple Therapy Regimens for Empiric Primary Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial Middle East J Dig Dis 2015 7 88 93 26106468 29 Rakici H Ayaz T Akdogan RA Bedir R Comparison of levofloxacin- and moxifloxacin-based triple therapies with standard treatment in eradication of Helicobacter pylori as first-line therapy Digestion 2014 90 261 264 25547786 30 Murakami K Furuta T Ando T Nakajima T Inui Y Oshima T Tomita T Mabe K Sasaki M Suganuma T Multi-center randomized controlled study to establish the standard third-line regimen for Helicobacter pylori eradication in Japan J Gastroenterol 2013 48 1128 1135 23307042 31 Zeng Z Lv N Hu F Si J Wu K Jiang B Liu W Zhang J Chen M Hu P Moxifloxacin-based triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: A multicenter randomized parallel-controlled study J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012 27 3 32 Lu NH Xie Y Zhu X Chen YX Ma JH He XX Eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with duodenal ulcers based on moxifloxacin triple therapy: a randomized controlled trial J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009 24 A15 A15 33 Kiliç ZM Köksal AS Cakal B Nadir I Ozin YO Kuran S Sahin B Moxifloxacine plus amoxicillin and ranitidine bismuth citrate or esomeprazole triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori infection Dig Dis Sci 2008 53 3133 3137 18465244 34 Bago P Vcev A Tomic M Rozankovic M Marusić M Bago J High eradication rate of H. pylori with moxifloxacin-based treatment: a randomized controlled trial Wien Klin Wochenschr 2007 119 372 378 17634896 35 Kist M How effective is moxifloxacin for the first-line treatment of patients with Helicobacter pylori infection? Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005 2 450 451 16224475 36 Nista EC Candelli M Zocco MA Cazzato IA Cremonini F Ojetti V Santoro M Finizio R Pignataro G Cammarota G Moxifloxacin-based strategies for first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005 21 1241 1247 15882245 37 Thamphiwatana S Gao W Obonyo M Zhang L In vivo treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection with liposomal linolenic acid reduces colonization and ameliorates inflammation Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014 111 17600 17605 25422427 38 Apostolopoulos P Koumoutsos I Ekmektzoglou K Dogantzis P Vlachou E Kalantzis C Tsibouris P Alexandrakis G Concomitant versus sequential therapy for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: a Greek randomized prospective study Scand J Gastroenterol 2016 51 145 151 26435055 39 Alhooei S Tirgar Fakheri H Hosseini V Maleki I Taghvaei T Valizadeh SM Bari Z A Comparison between Hybrid and Concomitant Regimens for Helicobacter Pylori Eradication: A Randomized Clinical Trial Middle East J Dig Dis 2016 8 219 225 27698972 40 Egan BJ Marzio L O’Connor H O’Morain C Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection Helicobacter 2008 13 Suppl 1 35 40 41 Kwon YH Kim N Lee JY Choi YJ Yoon K Nam RH Suh JH Lee JW Lee DH Comparison of the efficacy of culture-based tailored therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication with that of the traditional second-line rescue therapy in Korean patients: a prospective single tertiary center study Scand J Gastroenterol 2016 51 270 276 26452405 42 Moore RA Beckthold B Wong S Kureishi A Bryan LE Nucleotide sequence of the gyrA gene and characterization of ciprofloxacin-resistant mutants of Helicobacter pylori Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995 39 107 111 7695290 43 Lee JW Kim N Nam RH Park JH Kim JM Jung HC Song IS Mutations of Helicobacter pylori associated with fluoroquinolone resistance in Korea Helicobacter 2011 16 301 310 21762270 44 Graham DY Lee YC Wu MS Rational Helicobacter pylori therapy: evidence-based medicine rather than medicine-based evidence Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014 12 177 186.e3; Discussion e12-e13 23751282 45 Zhang G Zou J Liu F Bao Z Dong F Huang Y Yin S The efficacy of moxifloxacin-based triple therapy in treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials Braz J Med Biol Res 2013 46 607 613 23903685 46 Liu DS Wang YH Zeng ZR Zhang ZY Lu H Xu JM Du YQ Li Y Wang JB Xu SP Primary antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori in Chinese patients: a multiregion prospective 7-year study Clin Microbiol Infect 2018 24 780.e5 780.e8