==== Front J Adv ResJ Adv ResJournal of Advanced Research2090-12322090-1224Elsevier S2090-1232(18)30065-110.1016/j.jare.2018.05.010ArticleUreases: Historical aspects, catalytic, and non-catalytic properties – A review Kappaun Karine ab1Piovesan Angela Regina ac1Carlini Celia Regina celia.carlini@pucrs.brab⁎2Ligabue-Braun Rodrigo c2a Brain Institute (InsCer), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Avenida Ipiranga 6690, Prédio 63, Porto Alegre, RS CEP 90610-000, Brazilb Graduate Program in Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazilc Graduate Program in Cellular and Molecular Biology, Center of Biotechnology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil⁎ Corresponding author. celia.carlini@pucrs.br1 These authors contributed equally to this work. 2 These authors share the senior authorship. 28 5 2018 9 2018 28 5 2018 13 3 17 7 3 2018 22 5 2018 24 5 2018 © 2018 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Cairo University.2018This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).Graphical abstract Urease (urea amidohydrolase, EC 3.5.1.5) is a nickel-containing enzyme produced by plants, fungi, and bacteria that catalyzes the hydrolysis of urea into ammonia and carbamate. Urease is of historical importance in Biochemistry as it was the first enzyme ever to be crystallized (1926). Finding nickel in urease’s active site (1975) was the first indication of a biological role for this metal. In this review, historical and structural features, kinetics aspects, activation of the metallocenter and inhibitors of the urea hydrolyzing activity of ureases are discussed. The review also deals with the non-enzymatic biological properties, whose discovery 40 years ago started a new chapter in the study of ureases. Well recognized as virulence factors due to the production of ammonia and alkalinization in diseases by urease-positive microorganisms, ureases have pro-inflammatory, endocytosis-inducing and neurotoxic activities that do not require ureolysis. Particularly relevant in plants, ureases exert insecticidal and fungitoxic effects. Data on the jack bean urease and on jaburetox, a recombinant urease-derived peptide, have indicated that interactions with cell membrane lipids may be the basis of the non-enzymatic biological properties of ureases. Altogether, with this review we wanted to invite the readers to take a second look at ureases, very versatile proteins that happen also to catalyze the breakdown of urea into ammonia and carbamate. Keywords Virulence factorUrea hydrolysisUreolytic microorganismsMultifunctional proteinsPlant defenseUrease ==== Body History and molecular features of ureases Ureases (urea amidohydrolase, EC 3.5.1.5) are ubiquitous metalloenzymes, produced by plants, fungi and bacteria, but not by animals. The most proficient enzymes known to date, ureases catalyze the hydrolysis of urea into ammonia and carbamate (which then decomposes into another ammonia molecule and carbon dioxide), accelerating the rate of this reaction by a factor of at least 1014 when compared to the urea decomposition by elimination reaction [1], [2], [3], [4]. Computational modeling of urease proficiency led to the proposal of a value up to 1032 times the theoretical rate of uncatalyzed urea hydrolysis [5]. However, one can argue that, in solution, this value is not realistic due to limits imposed by the diffusion of the substrate in water. Urea, the natural substrate of ureases, was first isolated from human urine by Rouelle in 1773 and about a half century later, Wöhler achieved the synthesis of urea, the first organic molecule to be obtained from inorganic ones [6]. The first ureolytic microorganism, Micrococcus ureae, was isolated by van Tiehem in 1864, and the first enzyme with ureolytic activity was isolated from putrid urine by Musculus in 1874. The name “urease” was proposed in 1890 by Miquel [4]. Urease contributed two historical landmarks in Biochemistry. First, the crystallization of urease isolated from jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis) seeds by James B. Sumner, in 1926, demonstrated the proteinaceous nature of enzymes [7], a discovery laureated with the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1946. Second, the biological significance of nickel was recognized in 1975, after studies of Zerner’s group revealing the presence of nickel ions in the active site of the jack bean urease (JBU), obligatory for its catalytic activity [8]. The identification of a plant toxin as a urease in 2001 can be considered as a third breakthrough involving ureases, as it led to the discovery of non-catalytic properties of these enzymes [9]. This finding widened our knowledge on the array of functions performed by these proteins, besides their role in nitrogen metabolism [10]. Ureases are members of the superfamily of amidohydrolases and phosphotriesterases, which display catalytically active metal(s) in their active sites. With a few exceptions reported [11], [12], ureases carry two Ni2+ ions in their active sites [4], [13]. Ureases from different sources share about 55% identity in their primary sequences suggesting divergence from a common ancestral protein. X-ray crystallography studies revealed that plant and bacterial ureases share a common basic “trimeric” structure [4], [14]. The number of polypeptide chains that form the “monomer” or functional unit varies according to the source of urease. For plant and fungal ureases this functional unit is a single polypeptide chain (α). The functional unit of bacterial ureases is formed by two subunits (α and β, so far found only in the genus Helicobacter) or three (α, β and γ) types of polypeptide chains. The most abundant structure of plant ureases is a dimer of trimers (α3)2 although a few dimeric/trimeric/tetrameric plant and also fungi ureases have been described. Bacterial ureases are trimers ([αβ γ]3) while Helicobacter pylori’s urease has been crystalized as a tetramer of trimers of dimers ([αβ]3)4 (reviewed in [10], [14]). The amino acid sequences of smaller subunits of prokaryotic ureases are collinear to the corresponding region in the single chain of eukaryotic ureases [4]. Fig. 1 illustrates the structural features of ureases.Fig. 1 Urease structural conservation. A functional unit can be formed by a heterotrimer (as in Sporosarcina pasteurii, PDB ID 2UBP), a heterodimer (as in Helicobacter pylori, PDB ID 1E9Z) or by a single unit (as in Canavalia ensiformis, PDB ID 3LA4). These functional units (or monomers) form larger complexes, such as trimers, hexamers or dodecamers. The primitive state of these proteins – single- or three-chained – is one of the unanswered questions regarding ureases. Using phylogenetic inference and two algorithms applied to three different datasets, a 3-to-1 transition in the number of urease’s subunits was observed, implying a three-chained ancestral urease from which all the present enzymes derived. In that scenario, the two-chained ureases in the genus Helicobacter are not evolutionary intermediates of the eukaryotic single-chained ureases [15]. Table 1 presents an updated list of ureases for which molecular and kinetics characteristics are known.Table 1 Biochemical and structural data on selected ureases of plants, bacteria and fungi. Source Isoform GenBank identifier Native Mr Oligomeric state Number of residues – Mr subunit(s)a pI km for urea (mM) Optimal pH 3D structure (PDB ID) Refs PLANTS Arabidopsis thaliana AT1G67550 838 aa [16] Canavalia ensiformis JBU M65260.1 540 kDa ɑ6 840 aa 90.8 kDa 5.0–5.1 2.9–3.6 7.0–7.5 3LA4 [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23] Canavalia ensiformis CNTX 180 kDa ɑ2 n.a. 95 kDa n.a. 2–3 n.a. n.a. [9] Cajanus cajan JN107804.1 540 kDa- ɑ6 840 aa 90 kDa n.a. 3.0 7.3 4G7E [24], [25] Glycine max Embryo-specific AY230157 ɑ6 840 aa 93.5 kDa n.a. 0.2–0.6 7.0 n.a. [26], [27] Glycine max Ubiquitous AY276866 345 kDa α3 837 aa n.a. 0.8 5.25 8.75 n.a. [26], [28], [29] Gossypium hirsutum ɑ6 98.3 kDa n.a. 0.12–0.15 8.0 n.a. [30] Morus alba AB479106.1 175 kDa ɑ2 90.5 kDa n.a. 0.16 9.0 n.a. [31] FUNGI Aspergillus nidulans 540 kDa ɑ6 840 aa 90 kDa n.a. 1.33 8.5 n.a. [32] Aspergillus niger XM_001388748.2 540 kDa ɑ6 837 aa 90 kDa n.a. 3.0 8.0 n.a. [33] Cryptococcus gattii CPC735_069440 180 kDa ɑ2 840 aa 90 kDa n.a. 2.0 8.0 n.a. [34], [35] Cryptococcus neoformans CNAG_05540 ɑ2 832 aa 90 kDa n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. [36] Coccidioides posadasii CPC735_069440 540 kDa- ɑ6 840 aa 90 kDa n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. [37] Coccidioides immitis U81509 ɑ4 839 aa 91.5 kDa 5.5 4.1 8.0 n.a. [38] Schizosaccharomyces pombe α2 835 aa 91.2 kDa n.a. 1.03 8.2 n.a. [39] BACTERIA Aerobacter aerogenes PRL-R3 n.a. 2.8 7.5 n.a. [40] Arthrobacter oxydans 242 kDa 4.3–4.7 12.5 7.6 n.a. [41] Brevibacterium ammoniagenes 200 kDa (ɑβγ)3 α 67 kDa 4.1 32 7.0 n.a. [42] Brucella suis Two operons (ɑβγ)3 5 5.6 7.0 n.a. [43], [44] Helicobacter pylori M60398 1.06 MDa ([ɑβ]3)4 β 238 aa 30 kDa α 569 aa 62 kDa 5.9 0.2–0.8 8.0–8.2 1E9Z [45], [46], [47], [48] Klebsiella aerogenes M36068 (ɑβγ)3 γ 100 aa 11.1 kDa β 106 aa 11.7 kDa α 567 aa 60.3 kDa n.a. 2.8 7.75 1FWJ [49], [50] Morganella morganii 590 kDa (αβγ)3 63 kDa 15 kDa 6 kDa 0.7 [51], [52] Providencia stuartii 230 kDa (γ2β2α)2 γ 9 kDa β 10 kDa α 73 5.4 9.3 n.a. n.a. [53] Proteus mirabilis M31834 252 kDa (ɑβγ)3 γ 100 aa 11 kDa β 109 aa 12.2 kDa α 567 aa 61 kDa 5.2–5.9 13 7.5 n.a. [52], [54] Selenomonas ruminantium 360 kDa n.a. n.a. 2.2 8.0 [55] Sporosarcina pasteurii KR133628 260 kDa (ɑβγ)3 γ 101 aa 11.1 kDa β 122 aa 14 kDa α 570 aa 61.4 kDa 4.6 17.3 8.0 4CEU [56], [57] Staphylococcus leei 480 kDa [(γβα)5 γ 12 kDa β 21 kDa α 65 kDa n.a. 1.66 n.a. n.a. [58] Staphylococcus saprophyticus 427 kDa (γβα)4 γ 13.9 kDa β 20.4 kDa α 72.4 kDa 4.7 9.5 6.0–7.0 n.a. [59] Staphylococcus xylosus X74600 300 kDa (ɑβγ)3 γ 16.3 kDa β 17.8 kDa α 64 kDa 4–5 n.a. 7.2 n.a. [60] Ureaplasma ureolyticum L40490 274 kDa (ɑβγ)3 γ 102 aa 11.2 kDa β 121 aa 13.6 kDa α 614 aa 66.6 kDa 5.0–5.2; 4.6 2.5 6.9–7.5 n.a. [61], [62], [63] a Regardless of the names given to urease’s subunits in the initial or original reports, here the subunits were designated according to their homologous protein domains. n.a., not available Activation and catalytic properties of ureases The active site of ureases consists, besides the two nickel atoms, of one carbamylated lysine, four histidines and one aspartate residue. The crystal structures of bacterial ureases from Klebsiella aerogenes [50] and Sporosarcina (former Bacillus) pasteurii [56] first revealed the architecture of the enzymes’ active site. These two ureases have nearly superimposable active sites, very similar to those of other ureases characterized afterwards, implying that this architecture is representative of all ureases. In the active site, the carbamylated lysine bridges the two nickel atoms, with Ni(1) further coordinated by two histidines and Ni(2) by the other two histidines and by an aspartate residue. Additionally, a hydroxide ion bridges the two Ni atoms, which along with other three terminal water molecules (W1, W2, W3), forms an H-bonded water tetrahedral cluster in the active site (Fig. 2) [4], [14], [2].Fig. 2 Catalytic mechanism of ureases. Structure-based urease catalytic mechanism of the enzymatic hydrolysis of urea. The Sporosarcina pasteurii urease residue-numbering scheme is used. Please refer to the text for a stepwise description of the mechanism. Note that Ni(1) and Ni(2) are labeled Ni1 and Ni2 in this figure. Reproduced from Mazzei et al. [14] under permission from the Royal Chemical Society. Besides the amino acid residues that compose the active site itself other residues, including a conserved cysteine, form the “mobile flap”, which works as a gate for the substrate. This flap is composed by a helix-turn-helix motif and is responsible for substrate influx and product efflux in ureases, especially via motion control of a conserved histidine residue [2]. In the catalysis, amino acid residues of the mobile flap participate in the substrate binding, mainly through H bonds, thereby stabilizing the catalytic transition state and accelerating the reaction [2], [4], [14]. The mechanism for urea hydrolysis catalyzed by urease (Fig. 2) has been a hotly debated subject (see [64], [65]). Currently, it seems to be an agreement on the mechanism, strongly supported by studies with urease inhibitors [14], [66], [67], [68]. After taking the place of water molecules W1-W3 (Fig. 2A) in the urease active site, urea binds to Ni(1) ion through the carbonyl oxygen, making the urea carbon more electrophilic and, thus, more susceptible to nucleophilic attack (Fig. 2B). Then urea binds to Ni(2), through one of its amino nitrogen atoms, establishing a bidentate bond with urease (Fig. 2C). This bond is believed to facilitate the water nucleophilic attack on the carbonyl carbon resulting in a tetrahedral intermediate (Fig. 2D), from which NH3 and carbamate are released (Fig. 2E). The main controversy point was that while Benini et al., 1999 [65] proposed that the nucleophilic attack is performed by the bridging hydroxide which provides protons to the NH3 group, Karplus et al., 1997 [64] argued that it is a His residue from the active site mobile flap that acts as a general acid for this protonation. As an alternative, Karplus et al., 1997 [64] also considered the monodentate binding of urea to Ni(1) with Ni(2) providing the water molecule as a nucleophile for the carbonyl carbon of urea. In addition to these two hypothesis, Estiu and Merz, 2007, based on simplified computer models for the active site, proposed that hydrolysis and elimination could occur competitively in ureases, in which a “protein-assisted elimination” would be favored [69]. To achieve full ureolytic activity, the active site of ureases needs prior insertion of nickel ions and also carbamylation of its lysine residue. In bacteria, four accessory proteins (UreD, UreF, UreG, and UreE) are involved in the assembly of urease’s active metallocenter. For reviews on this topic see [13], [70], [71], [72], [73]. In bacteria, the urease genes UreA, UreB, and UreC encoding the enzyme’s subunits are grouped with genes for the accessory proteins UreD, UreE, UreF, and UreG. In the case of K. aerogenes, these genes are organized in an UreDABCEFG operon. Knockout and complementation studies of each accessory protein separately have shown that, UreE as an exception, UreD, UreF and UreG are crucial for the production of a fully activated “mature” urease [70], [74], [75]. The traditional model for urease activation starts with UreD, the first protein that binds to the apo-urease oligomer, and serves as a scaffold for the formation of the activation complex. Then UreF binds (UreABC–UreD)3, and acts as a GTPase-activating protein, since its binding to (UreABC–UreDF)3 correlates to the GTPase activity when further binding of UreG completes the activation complex. UreG, the first intrinsically disordered enzyme to be described [76], [77], acts as a GTPase delivering energy for the urease maturation process. As GTP is hydrolyzed, the nickel-binding chaperone UreE delivers the metal ions to the (UreABC–UreDFG)3 oligomer [76], [77]. This model has been further refined with the increasing amount of structural information on individual urease accessory proteins [14]. In this new activation proposal, Ni2+-bound UreE binds apo-UreG, facilitating GTP uptake by UreG (presence of Mg2+ ions is required), with Ni2+ ions being translocated from UreE to UreG. Then, the (UreDF)2 complex competes with UreE for the Ni2+-UreG to form the supercomplex apo-urease/Ni2+-(UreDFG)2. In the final step, KHCO3/NH4HCO3 catalyzes GTP hydrolysis by UreG, thus completing urease activation. All urease accessory proteins are taken as metallochaperones that bind and/or transport nickel ions while driving the apo-urease into its fully active conformation. In plants and fungi, the functions of the bacterial UreG and UreE chaperones appear to be combined in a single UreG protein, which carries a histidine-rich domain with metal binding properties in its N-terminal segment [78], [79]. The reason why eukaryotes lack UreE is still unknown [79]. The role of each accessory protein in the activation process has been a research hot topic in the last decade and there are some questions yet to be answered, mostly on the sequence of events and oligomerization state of each protein in the activation complex. The description at low resolution by small-angle X-ray scattering of the K. aerogenes (UreABC–UreD)3 and (UreABC–UreDF)3 oligomers started to uncover what the activation complex looks like [80]. Computational studies provided models of the activation complex [81]. The crystal structure of H. pylori’s UreD-UreF-UreG complex revealed the presence of tunnels that span the entire length of both UreF and UreD, through which the delivery of nickel ions from UreG to the apo-urease could possibly occur [73], [82]. Ureases inhibitors Studies on urease’s inhibitors have been carried out both to provide molecular insights on how the catalytic site machinery works as well as searching for effective inhibitors to counterbalance urease’s catalyzed urea hydrolysis in a number of situations [83], [84]. Urease inhibitors are a topic of intense investigation. The substrate urea, urea analogues and ammonium ions (products of urea hydrolysis), are weak inhibitors of urease [4]. Searching the Web-of-Sciences database (March 6th, 2018) for articles with “urease” in the title retrieved 4509 documents, 920 were found using “urease” and “inhibit∗” of which 413 were published since 2010. Please refer to the next section, “Biological roles of ureases”, for more information on the importance of ammonia release by ureases. An extensive and detailed review on the different classes of urease inhibitors can be found in [14]. Other articles on this special issue of Journal of Advanced Research deal in more details with urease inhibitors. Sulfur compounds Thiols, particularly β-mercaptoethanol, are of historic importance as urease inhibitors that, back in 1980, provided to B. Zerner’s group crucial information on the active site of JBU [85]. Thiolate anions (R-S-) inhibit ureases in a competitive manner. X-ray analysis of S. (B.) pasteurii urease complexed with β-mercaptoethanol (PDB code 1UBP) revealed its thiolate anion bridging the two Ni2+ ions in the active site and the hydroxy group further chelating the metallocenter [56]. Sulfite also acts as competitive pH-dependent inhibitor of urease [86]. Hydroxamic acids Acetohydroxamic acid, the most studied derivative of this group of metal-binding compounds, acts as a urease slow-binding competitive inhibitor. It has been found interacting with the two nickel ions in the active sites of S.(B.) pasteurii (PDB code 4UBP), H. pylori (PDB code 1E9Y) and a mutated form of K. aerogenes (PDB code 1FWE) ureases [86]. So far, acetohydroxamic acid is the only urease inhibitor with therapeutic application to treat hyperammonemia in cirrhosis of H. pylori positive-patients [87] and it has been used to reduce urinary stones and treat urinary infections due to P. mirabilis infections [84], [88]. However, this compound induces severe side effects, including teratogenesis, psychoneurological and muscular symptoms [89], which limit its use and caused its withdraw from the general market [84]. Phosphorous compounds Amide and esters of phosphoric/thiophosphoric acids Studies on phosphorus-based compounds as urease inhibitors started in the 1970s after the observation that some organophosphate-based insecticides inhibit soil urease [4], [90]. In 1980, Dixon et al. described that phophoramidate inhibited JBU through its binding to the two nickels in the enzyme’s active site [65], [85]. Derivatives of phosphoric and thiophosphoric acid are potent inhibitors of urease [4]. A great number of derivatives have been developed and patented for potential application in infections by urease-producing pathogenic microorganisms [83] and in agriculture to avoid hydrolysis of urea used as fertilizer [84]. For all the derivatives of this class of inhibitors, the initial enzymatic hydrolysis of the molecule generates diamidophosphate, which is believed to be the actual urease inhibitor [14]. The main issue involving organophosphate inhibitors of urease is related to their low stability in acidic pH. To overcome this problem non-hydrolysable aminophosphinic acids have been developed [91], [92]. Phosphate Phosphate is a pH-dependent urease competitive inhibitor in the pH range 5.0–8.0, but negligible at pH higher than 7.5–8.0 [23], [93]. X-ray diffraction structural data on phosphate-inhibited S.(B.) pasteurii urease inhibited with phosphate elucidated that the binding mode involves the formation of four coordinated bonds with both Ni ions in the enzyme’s molecule [93]. It is a weak inhibitor compared to its amides (phosphoramidates) that rank among the most active urease inhibitors. Fluoride The mode of inhibitory action of fluoride, explored mostly using S.(B.) pasteurii urease, was described as a pH-sensitive mixed inhibition, which varies from a weak competitive mode in acidic medium to a stronger uncompetitive mechanism in alkaline conditions [57]. Five crystal structures of the enzyme in its fluoride-inhibited state were analyzed to establish that one fluoride ion binds to Ni(1) of the active site, while the nickel bridging hydroxide is replaced by another fluoride ion [57] Quinones Ubiquitous in the nature, quinones have bactericidal and antifungal activities, and participate of biologically relevant redox mechanisms. Quinones were described as urease inhibitors in the 1970s in studies of Bremner’s group, pointing to 1,4-benzoquinone as a promising inhibitor of soil urease [94]. More recently, Krajewska’s group reported on the kinetics of the inhibition of JBU by quinones, demonstrating a general slow-binding concentration-dependent mechanism indicative of a covalent modification of the conserved cysteine residue in the mobile flap of the active site. In addition to the covalent modification, quinones might inhibit urease through arylation and oxidation of its thiol groups [95]. Polyphenols Catechol, the simplest molecule with a polyphenol scaffold, was shown to inhibit soil urease by Bremner and Douglas early in 1970s [94]. Plants are rich sources of polyphenolic compounds with antioxidant and bactericidal properties, generally regarded as beneficial for human health. For instance, polyphenols present in the green tea and other herbal beverages inhibited H. pylori urease (HPU) in vitro and reduced infection by H. pylori in Mongolian gerbils [96], [97]. The mechanism of inhibition of urease by catechol is not yet fully understood. Current hypothesis are that inhibition by catechols could be due to a time dependent oxidation to ortho-benzoquinone which acts as the actual inhibitor by modifying protein’s functional groups [98], [99], and/or that polyphenols can coordinate with transition metals forming catechol–metal complexes, inactivating urease’s metallocenter [100]. Other urease inhibitors Although in most cases detailed structural data are not available, other classes of urease inhibitors are known, including boron-containing acids, citrates, and heavy metals. For a review on these topics see [4], [14]. Heavy metals such as Hg, Ag, and Cu are slow reacting inhibitors of ureases [101], [102]. Bismuth (Bi3+) was shown to inactivate HPU by interacting with the cysteine residue of the mobile flap [103]. Due to the bactericidal activity, bismuth compounds have been widely used to treat gastric ulcers associated to H. pylori infection [104], [105]. Biological roles of ureases that require ureolytic activity Urease activity enables microorganisms to use urea as their sole nitrogen source. Urease synthesis may be constitutive or synthesized as a stress-related response of bacteria to counteract low environmental pH [106]. Ureolytic activity of the human gut microbiota hydrolyzes up to 30% of all urea produced in our bodies [107]. Microbial ureases are important also in dental health [108]. The production of alkali subsequent to salivary urea cleavage by oral microbiota urease was shown to inhibit dental cavities and plaque formation [109]. In ruminants, animal-derived urea is cleaved by bacterial ureases in the forestomach, releasing ammonia as nitrogen source for the rumen microbiota, which in turn serves as biomass to feed the animals [110], [111]. Pathogenesis of many clinical conditions in humans and other animals are related directly to the ureolytic activity of bacterial or fungal enzymes [112], [113]. Some examples are as follows. Proteus mirabilis is the most common organism that causes urinary stones in humans, due to urine alkalization promoted by its urease, contributing to the pathogenesis of pyelonephritis and catheter encrustation. Precipitation of urinary salts in the alkalinized urine results in struvite and carbonate apatite crystallization [114]. The bacterium H. pylori colonizes the stomach mucosa of half of the world’s population, significantly increasing the risk of gastric ulcers and cancer [113], [115], [116]. HPU, which constitutes about 10% of the total cell protein, enables bacterial survival in the stomach by neutralizing the acidic medium [117]. Ureolytic organisms in the digestive or urinary tract potentially contribute to hepatic encephalopathy and coma resulting in hyperammonemia and brain intoxication [118]. Reduction of the ureolytic bacteria load and the use of acetohydroxamic acid as a urease inhibitor are considered therapeutic approaches under these conditions [119], [120], [121]. Other pathogens also produce urease to acquire acid resistance and enable colonization, among which are Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli [122], Yersinia enterocolitica [123], K. pneumoniae [124], Brucella abortus [125], and Haemophilus influenza [126]. Fungal ureases are involved in the pathogenesis of human cryptococcosis by Cryptococcus neoformans [127], [128], and Cryptococcus gattii [35], and of coccidiodomycosis (San Joaquin Valley fever) by Coccidioides immitis and C. posadasii [37]. However, the role of microbial ureases as virulence factors has a still largely ignored contribution of non-enzymatic properties of these proteins, a subject that will be covered in the following section. Urease is ubiquitous in plants and can be found in all vegetal tissues [129], [130]. Nitrogen is a limiting element for plant growth, second only to carbon. Worldwide used as a soil fertilizer, urea is a relevant N source for plants, and dedicated urea transporters actively import this compound from the soil [131]. Urea hydrolysis to release ammonia and carbon dioxide is the main physiological role attributed to ureases in plants [130], [132]. Urease is abundant in the soil, both in living bacteria and as extracellular urease, bound to clays and humic substances [133], [134]. Ureolysis by cell-free ureases alkalinizes the soil inducing calcium carbonate precipitation and affecting the availability of minerals [135], [136]. In addition to that, high levels of soil urease reduce the efficiency of urea fertilization leading to loss of ammonia into the atmosphere and ammonia-induced phytotoxicity [90], [137]. The search for urease inhibitors with agricultural applicability to optimize urea fertilization is an intense field of investigation. These topics are broadly covered in other articles of this thematic issue of the Journal of Advanced Research. Biological properties of ureases independent of ureolysis Table 2 lists the biological properties of ureases found not to require ureolysis, either because urea is not available or its concentration is negligible, or the study employed ureases that were enzymatically incompetent (either with blocked active sites or in the inactive, nickel-deprived, apo-urease form).Table 2 Ureolysis-independent biological properties of selected ureases and urease-derived peptides. Ureases and derived-peptide Entomotoxic properties Antifungal activity Mammal neurotoxicity Exocytosis in platelets Eicosanoid signaling Chemotactic activity PLANTS CNTX ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ JBU ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ eSBU ✓ ✓ n.d. ✓ n.d. ✓ uSBU** ✓ ✓ n.d. ✓ n.d. n.d. GHU n.d. ✓ n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. PPU ✓ ✓ n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. BACTERIA SPU ✗ n.d. ✗ ✓ ✓ n.d. HPU** ✗ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ PMU**# ✓ ✓ n.d. ✓ n.d. n.d. UREASE-DERIVED PEPTIDES JBTX** ✓ ✓ ✗ ✗ ✓ n.d. SYTX**# ✓ ✓ ✗ n.d. n.d. n.d. CNTX, canatoxin (C. ensiformis); JBU, jackbean urease (C. ensiformis); eSBU, embryo-specific soybean urease (G. max); uSBU, ubiquitous soybean urease; GHU, Gossypium hirsutum (cotton) urease; PPU, pipeon pig urease (C. cajan); SPU, S. pasteurii urease; HPU, H. pylori urease; PMU, P. mirabilis urease; BJU, B. japonicum urease; JBTX, jaburetox; SYTX, soyuretox. ✓ presence of biological activity; ✗ absence of biological activity; ** Recombinant protein; n.d. not determined; # unpublished result. Ureases play a role in cell-to-cell or organism-to-organism communication. Arginases with lectin properties from the lichens Evernia prunastri and Xanthoria parietina were shown to bind to a glycosylated urease in the cell wall of the homologous algae. The polygalactosylated urease is produced only in the season when the algal cells divide assuring recognition of the phycobiont by its fungal partner in the mutualistic association of these lichens [138], [139]. Ureases were evaluated for a role in soybean nodulation by the diazotrophic bacterium Bradyrhizobium japonicum [140]. Soybean and jack bean ureases were characterized as chemotactic factors recognized by the bacterial cells in vitro. Independent of the urease status of the nodulating bacteria, urease-deficient mutant soybean plants had fewer but larger nodules when compared to the wild-type plant. Leghemoglobin production in wild-type plants was higher and peaked earlier than in urease-deficient plants, indicating a less efficient process of nitrogen fixation. Inhibition of urease activity in wild-type plants did not reproduce the results seen in mutated plants. These data made clear that soybean urease(s), but not the bacterial enzyme, participate(s) somehow of the plant-diazotrophic bacteria symbiosis. This role of the soybean urease does not require ureolysis and is relevant for biological nitrogen fixation by the plant [140]. Among microbial ureases that play a role as virulence factors, much attention is given to HPU because of its crucial role in the pathogenesis of gastric diseases. Production of urease proved to be essential to allow stomach colonization by H. pylori, however studies carried out in the early 1990s have shown that neutralization of gastric acidity is not the only function of the protein [141], [142]. Following the steps of our previous observations made on ureases from jack bean (C. ensiformis) and from S.(B.) pasteurii (reviewed in [10] – see next sections), we have reported several other biological properties of the purified recombinant HPU, observed in the 10−6–10−8 M range of protein concentration. These properties include induction of lipoxygenase-dependent activation and aggregation of rabbit [143] and human platelets [144]; induction of lipoxygenase-dependent chemotaxis and ROS production in human neutrophils [145]; delaying apoptosis in human neutrophils [145] and in gastric epithelial cells [146]; increase of the lipoxygenase content in neutrophils [145]; induction in platelets of the production of lipoxygenase-derived eicosanoids [143]; promotion of angiogenesis in human umbilical endothelial cells and in the chicken embryo chorioallantoic membrane model [146]; and induction of processing of pre-mRNA encoding pro-inflammatory cytokines in human platelets [144]. Most of these effects are also displayed by an enzyme-inhibited HPU, while some are induced by one of its isolated subunits alone [144], indicating that these biological effects do not require urea hydrolysis. Other groups also reported biological roles of HPU that are carried out by one of its subunits, implying absence of ureolysis. HPU’s subunit B was shown to bind to Th17 lymphocytes [147] and to CD74 on gastric epithelial cells thereby eliciting production of IL-8 [148]. HPU’s subunit A contains a nuclear localization signal (sequence 21KKRKEK26), and it was found in the nuclei of COS-7 cells [149], [150] and AGS gastric epithelial cells, inducing alterations in the cells’ morphology [150]. Altogether these non-enzymatic biological effects of HPU point out to a relevant contribution (yet mostly ignored) of this protein to the inflammatory process that underlies the gastric diseases caused by H. pylori. Because HPU activates non-gastric cells such as platelets, neutrophils, endothelial cells, among others, it may contribute as well to the pathogenesis of extragastric illnesses, in particular cardiovascular diseases. Probably none of the future urease inhibitors that are being conceived or are presently under development will have any use to counteract HPU’s pro-inflammatory effects or other unwanted contributions of this protein that are not due to its ureolytic activity. Thus, there is an urgent need to understand the structural basis of the non-enzymatic biological properties of HPU, and of other microbial ureases with relevant roles as virulence factors, aiming the design of drugs that could specifically block these other activities. Such new urease inhibitors could be used alone or together with ureolysis inhibitors, to target all the noxious effect of ureases involved in pathogenesis. Neurotoxicity of ureases The discovery of the non-enzymatic properties of ureases is closely related to the study of their neurotoxicity, both in rodents and in insects. Canatoxin (CNTX) is an isoform of C. ensiformis urease, first isolated from the plant seeds as a neurotoxic protein causing convulsions and death of rats and mice, with an LD50 ∼ 2 mg/kg, given by intraperitoneal route [151]. Two decades after the isolation of CNTX, it became evident that the neurotoxic protein is actually an isoform of the most abundant urease (JBU) found in the same seeds [9]. Canatoxin is a non-covalent dimer of ∼95 kDa subunits with one zinc and one nickel atom per subunit [9], [12] what probably explains its lower ureolytic activity. CNTX and JBU differ in one order of magnitude in their sensitivity to the irreversible inhibitor p-hydroxy-mercurybenzoate (pHMB), an oxidant of thiol groups [9] and in their metal-binding affinities [152]. Studies on CNTX have indicated that its primary mechanism of action at the cellular level is to induce exocytosis, triggering a signaling pathway that characteristically involves eicosanoids derived from the lipoxygenases pathway (reviewed in [10]). This biological property of CNTX was reported in a number of mammalian models, both in vivo and in vitro, among which are blood platelets and rat brain synaptosomes. The aggregating activity of CNTX in rabbit, rat, guinea pig or human platelets occurs in the nanomolar range [153]. CNTX-activated platelets recruit a lipoxygenase-mediated pathway that leads to influx of external Ca2+ through opening of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels and without release of intracellular [Ca2+] pools. The increased cytoplasmic [Ca2+] triggers exocytosis of platelet granules that contain ADP, which in turn induces the aggregation response [153], [154]. Later the ability to induce platelet aggregation was reported for JBU [9], the embryo-specific [155] and the ubiquitous [156] isoforms of soybean ureases, B.(S.) pasteurii urease [155], [157], and HPU [143], thus it is a property common to one-, two-, and three-chained ureases. The observations that pHMB-treated CNTX, in which the ureolytic activity is irreversibly blocked, was still lethal to mice and still able to promote platelet aggregation set the ground for the discovery of the non-enzymatic biological properties of ureases [9]. In the following two decades, a lot more of ureolysis-unrelated effects were described for C. ensiformis ureases as well as for ureases from other sources (reviewed in [10]). The exocytosis inducing effect of CNTX was later characterized in rat brain synaptosomes, which responded dose-dependently to the neurotoxin by releasing neurotransmitter vesicles previously loaded with radiolabeled serotonin or dopamine. At 500 nM CNTX, the amount of neurotransmitter released from the synaptosomes was similar to that obtained by depolarization with 50 mM KCl [158]. The ability of CNTX to promote secretion in synaptosomes correlates with the neurotoxicity it induces in vivo in mice and rats. The medullar origin of CNTX-induced seizures and other CNS-related effects were described in rodents [159]. More recent data have shown that JBU (10–100 nM) induces Ca2+ events in cultured rat hippocampal neurons, an effect also observed for HPU (Piovesan, A.R., unpublished results). In patch clamp experiments, it was observed that JBU increases the frequency of spontaneous firing action potentials in cultured rat hippocampus neurons, rising the amplitude of sodium currents, and apparently not affecting potassium currents. A higher frequency of spontaneous excitatory post synaptic currents was also seen, consistent with a seizure-like activity (Dal Belo, C. A., unpublished data). Studies using microPET (Positron Emission Tomography) indicated an increase of ∼30% in the uptake of 18Fluor-desoxy-glucose in the brain of CNTX-treated anaesthetized rats, particularly affecting the hippocampus, a typical finding for seizure-inducing drugs (De Almeida, C.G.M., unpublished results). Similar to our observations, JBU had been previously reported to be lethal and to produce seizures in mice and rabbits after intravenous administration [160]. Likewise, purified HPU was shown to kill mice upon intraperitoneal injection, producing hypothermia, convulsions and death [161]. In both studies, the neurotoxicity of the ureases was attributed to the high levels of ammonia found in the animal’s blood. Although hyperammonemia probably contributes to the neurotoxic effects induced by CNTX in mice and rats, surely it does not tell the whole story, considering that pHMB-treated CNTX still caused neurotoxic symptoms and seizures leading to death of the animals [9]. Contributions of ureases to plant defense against predators and pathogens The first description of the insecticidal effect of a urease was published in 1997 showing that ingestion of CNTX killed insects [162]. The susceptibility of the insects to CNTX’s lethal effect depended on the type of their digestive enzymes. Insects with acidic midguts and cathepsin-like proteinases, like the cowpea weaver Callosobruchus maculatus (Bruchidae) and the kissing bug Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera), were susceptible to CNTX while insects with alkaline midguts and trypsin-like enzymes were not. These data were interpreted as evidence for the need of proteolytic activation of CNTX that, once ingested, is hydrolyzed by insect cathepsin-like enzyme(s) releasing an internal peptide(s) with insecticidal activity. In fact preventing CNTX hydrolysis by adding a cathepsin B inhibitor simultaneously with the toxin in the insects’ diet protected them against the lethal effect [162]. In the following years we described that JBU/CNTX and the embryo specific soybean urease were insecticidal against the hemipterans Nezara viridula [163], Dysdercus peruvianus [155], [164], Oncopeltus fasciatus [165], and K. Ponnuraj’s group in India reported the insecticidal effect of the pigeon pea urease (Cajanus cajan) against Callosobruchus chinensis [25]. The proteolytic activation of CNTX by insect cathepsin-like enzymes was further investigated. Insecticidal peptides were isolated from CNTX’s fragments after digestion with C. maculatus enzymes [166]. The most active peptide, pepcanatox, with a molecular mass of ∼10 kDa had its N-terminal sequence determined and, based on this information, a recombinant peptide named jaburetox was obtained by heterologous expression in E. coli [167]. Cathepsin D-like enzymes from D. peruvianus midgut that were able to perform hydrolysis of CNTX/JBU and release the insecticidal peptide were characterized [164], [168], [169]. A similar study was performed with JBU and the milkweed bug Oncopeltus fasciatus, identifying a cathepsin L that hydrolyzed the urease to release a ∼10 kDa entomotoxic peptide [165]. The recombinant peptide jaburetox was cloned using as template the cDNA of JBURE-II, a third isoform of urease found in C. ensiformis [170], [171]. Based on jaburetox’s sequence, a recombinant insecticidal peptide called soyuretox was produced [172] having as template the cDNA of the ubiquitous soybean urease which, like the embryo-specific urease, also kills R. prolixus [156]. Interestingly, the region that encompasses the jaburetox/soyuretox sequence, comprising about 90 amino acid residues, displays a lower similarity when compared to that of the complete sequence of different ureases, suggesting less evolutionary pressure to conserve this entomotoxic “domain” of plant ureases [15], [167]. But the proteolytic release of entomotoxic peptides does not tell the whole story of urease’s entomotoxicity. Evidences showing that the entire urease molecule is entomotoxic per se started to add up with studies on the anti-diuretic effect of C. ensiformis ureases. In Carlini et al., [162], we showed that CNTX produced an important anti-diuretic effect in R. prolixus that peaked about 4 h after the insects received the “meal” containing the toxin, disappearing after 24 h. However, the hydrolysis of CNTX in the insect midgut was not detected before 18 h, suggesting that the anti-diuretic effect was produced by the entire protein. Later, JBU and the jaburetox peptide were shown to cause anti-diuresis in R. prolixus’ isolated Malpighian tubules in the concentration range of 10−10 and 10−15 M, respectively [173]. Surprisingly, although both molecules induced antidiuretic effects, JBU and jaburetox triggered different signaling pathways leading to antidiuresis [173]. In the following years other papers were published by our group describing a list of entomotoxic effects of JBU, some of which are not shared with jaburetox, such as alteration in water transport and of the contractility in the crop of R. prolixus [174]. Similar to the data indicating recruitment by ureases of eicosanoid-mediated pathways in mammalian systems (reviewed in [10]), JBU effects in insects required a phospholipase A2 type XII [175] and prostaglandins [176]. JBU and jaburetox targeted the immune system of R. prolixus, inducing an eicosanoid-dependent aggregation of hemocytes and alterations in cell morphology [176], [177] that render the insect more susceptible to entomopathogenic bacteria [177]. Both JBU and jaburetox are neurotoxic to insects from different orders. Jaburetox was immunolocalized in the brain of Triatoma infestans (Hemiptera) and neurotoxic symptoms preceded death of the insects injected with the peptide [178]. JBU-induced effects were studied in the cockroach Nauphoeta cinerea (Blatodea) revealing that both, the central and the peripheral nervous systems are targeted by the urease, with alterations of the cholinergic, octopaminergic and GABAergic pathways as part of its entomotoxic mode of action [179]. The effects of JBU were also investigated on neuromuscular junctions of Locusta migratoria (Orthoptera) and of Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera), and the resulting data pointed to interference of JBU on neurotransmitter release, probably by disruption of the calcium machinery in the pre-synaptic region of insect neurons [180]. Previous studies with B.(S.) pasteurii urease suggested lack of insecticidal properties for microbial ureases, which was attributed to the absence of part of jaburetox’s sequence in those proteins [155]. However, later reports on insecticidal activity of ureases of bacteria from Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus genera [181], Yersinia pseudotuberculosis [182] and P. mirabilis (Broll, V. et al., unpublished results) indicated that bacterial ureases are indeed entomotoxic and insecticidal, in agreement to the fact that ureases contain other entomotoxic domains besides the sequence corresponding to jaburetox. Ureases are toxic against filamentous fungi and yeasts [183]. The fungitoxic activity of CNTX was the first reported showing that the protein at 2% concentration caused growth inhibition of the phytopathogenic filamentous fungi Macrophomina phaseolina, Colletotrichum gloesporioides and Sclerotium rolfsii [184]. Becker-Ritt et al., 2007, reported that JBU and the soybean embryo-specific ureases inhibited growth and/or spore germination of seven other species of filamentous fungi at sub-micromolar concentrations and caused damage to cell wall, even after blockage of their ureolytic active sites. In this same study, the two-chained HPU also inhibited fungal growth although with less efficiency [185]. The native ureases of cotton seeds (G. hirsutum) [30] and of pigeon pea [25], and the recombinant non-ureolytic apoureases, JBURE-IIb [171] and a ubiquitous soybean urease fused to glutathione transferase [156], were also shown to be detrimental to filamentous fungi. In Postal et al., 2012, JBU was tested in the 10−6–10−7 M range against different yeast species and caused inhibition of proliferation and of glucose metabolism, morphological alterations with pseudohyphae formation, and cell membrane permeabilization, eventually leading to cell death [186]. Jaburetox induced similar effects against the yeasts but at one to two orders of magnitude higher doses. Studies with peptides from a papain-hydrolyzed JBU indicated the presence of other fungitoxic domains in the protein, besides jaburetox [186]. Soyuretox, a peptide derived from the soybean ubiquitous urease, is also fungitoxic in the same concentration range as observed for jaburetox [172]. Detached leaves of “urease-null” soybean transgenic plants, due to co-suppression of ureases genes, and infected with uredospores of the Asian rust fungus Phakopsora pachyrhizi developed more lesions and pustules when compared to leaves of wild plants with normal levels of ureases, suggesting a protective role of ureases against fungal diseases in the wild plants [187]. Interestingly, a non-catalytical urease was identified in the soybean genome. This urease lacks critical features of the enzyme’s active site, but it is expressed in various plant tissues [188], reinforcing the multifunctional characteristics of the protein, especially when related to plant defense. It is tempting to predict that more of these non-catalytical ureases will be found as more plant genomes are decoded. Altogether these data suggests that urease-overexpressing plants or transgenic plants jaburetox/soyuretox may represent alternatives to achieve resistance to insect herbivory and/or fungal disease in agriculture. In this context it is important to mention that ureases can be generally regarded as biosafe proteins, which are present in relatively large quantities in most edible plants and are particularly abundant in seeds of legumes and in fruits such as tomatoes, melon, and watermelon, that are eaten in raw state [129], [132]. Although more studies are needed to ascertain the biosafety of urease-derived peptides, no acute toxicity was detected for jaburetox given in high doses either injected or by oral route to mice and neonate rats [167]. Preliminary data obtained for soyuretox in the zebrafish (Danio rerio) model indicated toxicity only in the highest tested doses (Kappaun, K. et al., unpublished results). Structural aspects of jaburetox Models of the tridimensional structure of jaburetox [167], [189] indicated the existence in the C-terminal half of the peptide of a prominent β-hairpin motif, a feature that could be related to a pore-forming activity eventually leading its neurotoxicity. A β-hairpin in the region of JBU corresponding to jaburetox was found in its crystallographic structure [22]. Aiming to carry out structure versus activity studies on jaburetox, three mutants corresponding to truncated versions of the peptide were obtained: Jbtx Δ−β, which lacked the β-hairpin motif (residues 61–74 deleted); Jbtx N-ter (residues 1–44), corresponding to the N-terminal half; and Jbtx C-ter (residues 45–93), corresponding to the C-terminal half of jaburetox [190]. In insect bioassays, the Jbtx Δ−β peptide kept the entomotoxic properties of the whole peptide, clearly indicating that the β-hairpin motif is not required for the insecticidal effect. On the other hand, while Jbtx N-ter remained entomotoxic, the Jbtx C-ter peptide, which contains the β-hairpin motif, was less active or inactive when tested on two different insect models. The data support the conclusion that the N-terminal half of jaburetox carries its most important entomotoxic domain [190]. Molecular dynamics studies employing long simulations of jaburetox in aqueous medium suggested that the peptide becomes largely unstructured after 500 ns, more accentuated in its N-terminal domain, while the initial structure observed for its moiety in JBU’s crystals is completely lost [190]. Subsequently light scattering, circular dichroism and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy studies of jaburetox in solution determined that it is an intrinsically disordered polypeptide [191]. Regions of jaburetox which exhibited tendency to form one small alpha-helix close to the N terminus, and two turn-like motifs, in the central portion and close to the C terminus, respectively, were predicted as sites of potential interaction with other proteins or lipids, suggesting that upon such interactions structural changes could be triggered to drive the peptide into a biologically active conformation [191]. The solution structure of soyuretox was determined using the same methodologies and revealed its intrinsically disordered nature, although with more secondary structure elements when compared to jaburetox (Kappaun, K. et al., unpublished results). Interaction of ureases and urease-derived peptides with lipids and membranes The interaction of jaburetox with lipid membranes was first reported by Barros et al., 2009 [189]. In this study, jaburetox was shown to cause leakage of carboxyfluorescein entrapped inside large unilamellar vesicles, without lysis of the liposomes. The leakage was greater in vesicles composed by acidic lipids and depended on the state of aggregation of jaburetox. Molecular dynamics applied to jaburetox suggested that its β-hairpin motif could anchor at polar/non-polar interfaces [189]. However, as mentioned earlier, even if the β-hairpin does interact with insect membranes, it is not essential for the entomotoxic properties of jaburetox. Moreover all three truncated versions of jaburetox developed by Martinelli et al., 2014, disrupted liposomes, revealing the presence of more than one lipid interacting domain in the peptide [190]. In another study, JBU, jaburetox and its mutated peptides were tested for an ion channel forming activity in planar lipid bilayers [192]. All proteins formed well resolved, highly cation-selective channels exhibiting two conducting states (7–18 pS and 32–79 pS, respectively). Urease (20 nM) and Jbtx N-ter (1 μM) were more active at negative potentials, while the channels formed by the other peptides were not voltage-dependent. This study was the first direct demonstration of the capacity of C. ensiformis urease and jaburetox to permeabilize membranes through an ion channel-based mechanism, which may be the basis of their diverse biological activities. Molecular models of JBU showed that the moiety corresponding to jaburetox is well exposed at the protein’s surface, from where it can probably “enforce” the interaction of the entire urease with lipid bilayers, a hypothesis formulated to explain why the polypeptides share many, although not identical, biological properties [192]. To elucidate whether an interaction with lipids could induce conformational changes in the intrinsically disordered molecule of jaburetox, the structural behavior of the peptide was probed using nuclear magnetic resonance and circular dichroism spectroscopies when in contact with membranes models [193]. The interaction of jaburetox with SDS micelles increased its content of secondary and tertiary structure elements. When exposed to large unilamellar vesicles and bicelles prepared with phospholipids, conformational changes were observed mostly in N-terminal regions, but without significant acquisition of secondary structure motifs. Fluorescence microscopy was used to demonstrate that the lipid vesicles could displace the interaction of jaburetox with lipid-rich membranes of the cockroach nervous chord. These data suggested that contacts of the N-terminal moiety of jaburetox with membrane phospholipids lead to its anchorage to cell membranes and promote conformation changes of jaburetox into a more ordered structure that could facilitate its interaction with membrane-bound target proteins [193]. Further studies aiming to elucidate the mechanism of interaction of JBU and jaburetox with lipid membranes were carried out using multilamellar liposomes with a lipid composition simulating that of human platelets, subjected to dynamic light scattering and small angle X-rays scattering (SAXS) analyses [194]. Results were obtained indicating that both JBU and jaburetox are able to insert themselves into the lipid bilayers, reducing the hydrodynamic radius of the vesicles, altering the lamellar repeat distance, the number of lamellae, and decreasing the membrane’s fluidity. The interaction of jaburetox affected the vesicle’s internal bilayers and caused more drastic effect on the multilamellar organization of the liposomes than did JBU. In the same study, the interaction of JBU with giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs) made of fluorescent phospholipids showed that JBU caused membrane perturbation with formation of tethers. The data reinforced the idea that JBU can interact with multilamellar liposomes, probably by inserting its jaburetox “domain” into the vesicle’s external membrane [194]. Conclusions and future perspectives While the history of research on urease as an enzyme is almost 150 years old, dating back to the 1870s, the knowledge that ureases perform other biological roles unrelated to ureolysis is considerably younger, not 50 years yet. An unbiased view of these molecules as more than enzymes is needed to allow discovery of yet unsuspected biological properties of ureases. Finding ureases in sources little explored so far, deciphering the structural characterization of a broad range of ureases including non-ureolytic proteins, and to investigate a potential synergy between catalytic and non-catalytic properties of ureases, are only a few of the open fields in the study of these enzymes. There are many proposed technological application of ureases [195], [196], [197], [198], [199], [200] all of which explore exclusively the enzyme’s catalytic activity. There are though certainly much more to be explored with these proteins, starting with the biotechnological use of ureases (and of urease-derived peptides) as transgenes to protect crops against insect herbivory and disease-causing fungi, or as ecofriendly insecticides to control insect borne diseases. The comprehension of ureases as virulence factors not only as an ammonia-producing and alkalinizing agent but acting in a much more complex way, endowed of exocytosis-inducing and pro-inflammatory activities, and recruiting the participation of eicosanoids, may show the way to finding new pharmacological approaches to many pathologies. Finally, with this review, apart from historical and structural aspects of ureases, we wanted to encourage the readers to take a second look at ureases, very versatile proteins that happen also to catalyze the breakdown of urea into ammonia and carbamate. Conflict of interest The authors have declared no conflict of interest. Compliance with Ethics Requirements This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects. Karine Kappaun is currently a PhD candidate at Laboratory of Neurotoxins at Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS). She has a bachelor degree in Pharmacy at Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (2011) and Master degree in Cellular and Molecular Biology (2014), in the same University. During her graduate program she studied the properties and structural properties of the urease-derived peptides jaburetox and soyuretox, having been abroad at Universitá di Bologna at Bologna, Itália (2015–2016). Nowadays, she is focused on the understanding the neurotoxic effects of ureases in zebrafish. Angela Regina Piovesan is presently a postdoctoral fellow of the Biotechnology Center, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) and also works at Laboratory of Neurotoxins of the Brain Institute, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, both located in Porto Alegre, Brazil. She has a bachelor degree in Biology and experience on biochemical characterization of proteins and enzymes. Nowadays, she is involved in the study of neurotoxic effects of ureases applying several approaches, such as neuronal calcium images and electrophysiological recordings. Besides that, she also manages some undergraduate students in their laboratory tasks. Célia Regina Carlini is presently a senior researcher at the Brain Institute, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, and full professor (retired) of the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, both in Porto Alegre, Brazil. She is member of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences, Biological Section since 2009, and a scholar productivity fellow (level 1A) of the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), since 2003. Her lines of research are focused on isolation, physicochemical characterization, structure versus activity relationships and elucidation of mechanisms of action of natural neurotoxins. Rodrigo Ligabue-Braun is currently a research assistant at the Biotechnology Center of Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul UFRGS), Brazil. Employing a wide range of computational approaches, his research topics are chiefly focused on neglected toxins, moonlighting properties of proteins, and the effect of unstructured or metastable regions of polypeptides on the structure-function paradigm. His work on venomous mammals has attracted readers both from the toxinology community and the general public alike. Aside from research, Dr. Ligabue-Braun has published chapters of textbooks in Brazil and also coordinated science outreach programs aiming low-income students from local communities. Acknowledgements CRC acknowledges the Brazilian agencies, mainly CNPq and CAPES, for having supported her research activities for the last 40 years, and also to the students and many collaborators, in Brazil and abroad, that joined her at some point of the journey unraveling the ureolysis-independent biological properties of ureases. KK, ARP and RL-B were recipientes of fellowships from CAPES (Coordenadoria de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior), Brasília, Brazil. Peer review under responsibility of Cairo University. ==== Refs References 1 Real-Guerra R. Staniscuaski F. Carlini C.R. Soybean urease: over a hundred years of knowledge Board J.E. A comprehensive survey of international soybean research – genetics, physiology, agronomy and nitrogen relationships 2013 Intech Rijeka, Croatia 317 339 2 Maroney M.J. Ciurli S. Nonredox nickel enzymes Chem Rev 114 8 2014 4206 4228 24369791 3 Mobley H.L.T. Hausinger R.P. Microbial ureases – significance, regulation, and molecular characterization Microbiol Rev 53 1 1989 85 108 2651866 4 Krajewska B. Ureases I. Functional, catalytic and kinetic properties: a review J Mol Catal B-Enzym 59 1–3 2009 9 21 5 Callahan B.P. Yuan Y. Wolfenden R. The burden borne by urease J Am Chem Soc 127 31 2005 10828 10829 16076178 6 Wöhler F. Ueber künstliche Bildung des Harnstoffs Ann Phys-Berlin 12 1828 253 256 7 Sumner J.B. The isolation and crystallization of the enzyme urease J Biol Chem 69 1926 435 441 8 Dixon N.E. Gazzola T.C. Blakeley R.L. Zermer B. Letter: Jack bean urease (EC 3.5.1.5). A metalloenzyme. A simple biological role for nickel? J Am Chem Soc 97 14 1975 4131 4133 1159216 9 Follmer C. Barcellos G.B. Zingali R.B. Machado O.L.T. Alves E.W. Barja-Fidalgo C. Canatoxin, a toxic protein from jack beans (Canavalia ensiformis ), is a variant form of urease (EC 3.5.1.5): biological effects of urease independent of its ureolytic activity Biochem J 360 2001 217 224 11696010 10 Carlini C.R. Ligabue-Braun R. Ureases as multifunctional toxic proteins: a review Toxicon 110 2016 90 109 26690979 11 Carter E.L. Tronrud D.E. Taber S.R. Karplus P.A. Hausinger R.P. Iron-containing urease in a pathogenic bacterium P Natl Acad Sci USA 108 32 2011 13095 13099 12 Follmer C. Carlini C.R. Yoneama M.L. Dias J.F. PIXE analysis of urease isoenzymes isolated from Canavalia ensiformis (jack bean) seeds Nucl Instrum Meth B 189 2002 482 486 13 Zambelli B. Musiani F. Benini S. Ciurli S. Chemistry of Ni(2+) in urease: sensing, trafficking, and catalysis Acc Chem Res 44 7 2011 520 530 21542631 14 Mazzei L, Musiani F, Ciurli S. Urease. In: Zamble DB, Rowinska-Zyrek M, Kozlowski H, editors. The Biological Chemistry of Nickel, Roy Soc Ch; 2017, 60–97. 15 Ligabue-Braun R. Andreis F.C. Verli H. Carlini C.R. 3-to-1: unraveling structural transitions in ureases Naturwissenschaften 100 5 2013 459 467 23619940 16 Yata V.K. Thapa A. Mattaparthi V.S. Structural insight into the binding interactions of modeled structure of Arabidopsis thaliana urease with urea: an in silico study J Biomol Struct Dyn 33 4 2015 845 851 24738549 17 Sumner J.B. Hand D.B. The isoelectric point of crystalline urease1 J Am Chem Soc 51 4 1929 1255 1260 18 Blakeley R.L. Webb E.C. Zerner B. Jack bean urease (EC 3.5. 1.5). A new purification and reliable rate assay Biochemistry 8 5 1969 1984 1990 4977580 19 Dixon N.E. Riddles P.W. Gazzola C. Blakeley R.L. Zerner B. Jack bean urease (EC 3.5. 1.5). V. On the mechanism of action of urease on urea, formamide, acetamide, N-methylurea, and related compounds Can J Biochem 58 12 1980 1335 1344 6788353 20 Krajewska B. Zaborska W. Leszko M. Brzozka Z. Inhibition of jack bean urease by a mixture of boric acid and phosphate buffer pH 6.96 Pol J Chem 73 2 1999 359 366 21 Schmidt E. The inactivation of urease J Biol Chem 78 1 1928 53 61 22 Balasubramanian A. Ponnuraj K. Crystal structure of the first plant urease from jack bean: 83 years of journey from its first crystal to molecular structure J Mol Biol 400 3 2010 274 283 20471401 23 Krajewska B. Zaborska W. The effect of phosphate buffer in the range of pH 5.80-8.07 on jack bean urease activity J Mol Catal B-Enzym 6 1–2 1999 75 81 24 Das N. Kayastha A.M. Srivastava P.K. Purification and characterization of urease from dehusked pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) seeds Phytochemistry 61 5 2002 513 521 12409017 25 Balasubramanian A. Durairajpandian V. Elumalai S. Mathivanan N. Munirajan A.K. Ponnuraj K. Structural and functional studies on urease from pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan ) Int J Biol Macromol 58 2013 301 309 23624166 26 Polacco J.C. Havir E.A. Comparisons of soybean urease isolated from seed and tissue culture J Biol Chem 254 5 1979 1707 1715 105010 27 Torisky R.S. Polacco J.C. Soybean roots retain the seed urease isozyme synthesized during embryo development Plant Physiol 94 2 1990 681 689 16667765 28 Kerr P. Blevins D. Rapp B. Randall D. Soybean leaf urease: comparison with seed urease Physiol Plantarum 57 3 1983 339 345 29 Polacco J.C. Krueger R.W. Winkler R.G. Structure and possible ureide degrading function of the ubiquitous urease of soybean Plant Physiol 79 3 1985 794 800 16664493 30 Menegassi A. Wassermann G.E. Olivera-Severo D. Becker-Ritt A.B. Martinelli A.H. Feder V. Urease from cotton (Gossypium hirsutum ) seeds: isolation, physicochemical characterization, and antifungal properties of the protein J Agr Food Chem 56 12 2008 4399 4405 18494485 31 Hirayama C. Sugimura M. Saito H. Nakamura M. Purification and properties of urease from the leaf of mulberry, Morus alba Phytochemistry 53 3 2000 325 330 10703052 32 Creaser E.H. Porter R.L. The purification of urease from Aspergillus nidulans Int J Biochem 17 12 1985 1339 1341 3912228 33 Smith P.T. King A.D. Jr Goodman N. Isolation and characterization of urease from Aspergillus niger Microbiology 139 5 1993 957 962 34 Feder V. Purificação e caracterização de uma urease de Cryptococcus gattii 2008 Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil 35 Feder V. Kmetzsch L. Staats C.C. Vidal-Figueiredo N. Ligabue-Braun R. Carlini C.R. Cryptococcus gattii urease as a virulence factor and the relevance of enzymatic activity in cryptococcosis pathogenesis FEBS J 282 8 2015 1406 1418 25675897 36 Cox G.M. Mukherjee J. Cole G.T. Casadevall A. Perfect J.R. Urease as a virulence factor in experimental cryptococcosis Infect Immun 68 2 2000 443 448 10639402 37 Mirbod-Donovan F. Schaller R. Hung C.Y. Xue J.M. Reichard U. Cole G.T. Urease produced by Coccidioides posadasii contributes to the virulence of this respiratory pathogen Infect Immun 74 1 2006 504 515 16369007 38 Mirbod F. Schaller R. Cole G. Purification and characterization of urease isolated from the pathogenic fungus Coccidioides immitis Med Mycol 40 1 2002 35 44 11860012 39 Lubbers M.W. Rodriguez S.B. Honey N.K. Thornton R.J. Purification and characterization of urease from Schizosaccharomyces pombe Can J Microbiol 42 2 1996 132 140 8742356 40 Kamel M.Y. Hamed R.R. Aerobacter aerogenes PRL-R3 urease. Purification and properties Acta Biol Med Ger 34 6 1975 971 979 879 41 Schneider J. Kaltwasser H. Urease from Arthrobacter oxydans , a nickel-containing enzyme Arch Microbiol 139 4 1984 355 360 42 Nakano H. Takenishi S. Watanabe Y. Purification and properties of urease from Brevibacterium ammoniagenes Agr Biol Chem Tokyo 48 6 1984 1495 1502 43 Bandara A.B. Contreras A. Contreras-Rodriguez A. Martins A.M. Dobrean V. Poff-Reichow S. Brucella suis urease encoded by ure1 but not ure2 is necessary for intestinal infection of BALB/c mice BMC Microbiol 7 2007 57 17578575 44 Contreras-Rodriguez A. Quiroz-Limon J. Martins A.M. Peralta H. Avila-Calderon E. Sriranganathan N. Enzymatic, immunological and phylogenetic characterization of Brucella suis urease BMC Microbiol 8 2008 45 Dunn B.E. Campbell G.P. Perez-Perez G.I. Blaser M.J. Purification and characterization of urease from Helicobacter pylori J Biol Chem 265 16 1990 9464 9469 2188975 46 Mobley H. Cortesia M. Rosenthal L. Jones B. Characterization of urease from Campylobacter pylori J Clin Microbiol 26 5 1988 831 836 3384908 47 Evans D.J. Jr Evans D.G. Kirkpatrick S.S. Graham D.Y. Characterization of the Helicobacter pylori urease and purification of its subunits Microb Pathogenesis 10 1 1991 15 26 48 Ha N.-C. Oh J.S. Sung J.Y. Cha K.A. Lee M.H. Oh B.-H. Supramolecular assembly and acid resistance of Helicobacter pylori urease Nat Struct Biol 8 2001 505 509 11373617 49 Todd M.J. Hausinger R.P. Purification and characterization of the nickel-containing multicomponent urease from Klebsiella aerogenes J Biol Chem 262 13 1987 5963 5967 3553184 50 Jabri E. Carr M.B. Hausinger R.P. Karplus P.A. The crystal structure of urease from Klebsiella aerogenes Science 268 5213 1995 998 1004 7754395 51 Hu L.T. Nicholson E.B. Jones B.D. Lynch M.J. Mobley H.L. Morganella morganii urease: purification, characterization, and isolation of gene sequences J Bacteriol 172 6 1990 3073 3080 2345135 52 Jones B.D. Mobley H.L. Genetic and biochemical diversity of ureases of Proteus, Providencia, and Morganella species isolated from urinary tract infection Infect Immun 55 9 1987 2198 2203 3623698 53 Mulrooney S.B. Lynch M.J. Mobley H.L.T. Hausinger R.P. Purification, characterization, and genetic organization of recombinant Providencia-stuartii urease expressed by Escherichia-coli J Bacteriol 170 5 1988 2202 2207 2834333 54 Jones B.D. Mobley H.L. Proteus mirabilis urease: genetic organization, regulation, and expression of structural genes J Bacteriol 170 8 1988 3342 3349 2841283 55 Hausinger R.P. Purification of a nickel-containing urease from the rumen anaerobe Selenomonas ruminantium J Biol Chem 261 17 1986 7866 7870 3711113 56 Benini S. Rypniewski W.R. Wilson K.S. Ciurli S. Mangani S. The complex of Bacillus pasteurii urease with beta-mercaptoethanol from X-ray data at 1.65-A resolution J Biol Inorg Chem 3 1998 268 273 57 Benini S. Cianci M. Mazzei L. Ciurli S. Fluoride inhibition of Sporosarcina pasteurii urease: structure and thermodynamics J Biol Inorg Chem 19 8 2014 1243 1261 25113581 58 Jin M. Rosario W. Watler E. Calhoun D.H. Development of a large-scale HPLC-based purification for the urease from Staphylococcus leei and determination of subunit structure Protein Expr Purif 34 1 2004 111 117 14766306 59 Schäfer U.K. Kaltwasser H. Urease from Staphylococcus saprophyticus : purification, characterization and comparison to Staphylococcus xylosus urease Arch Microbiol 161 5 1994 393 399 8042901 60 Christians S. Jose J. Schäfer U. Kaltwasser H. Purification and subunit determination of the nickel-dependent Staphylococcus xylosus urease FEMS Microbiol Lett 80 2–3 1991 271 275 61 Eng H. Robertson J. Stemke G. Properties of urease from Ureaplasma urealyticum : kinetics, molecular weight, and demonstration of multiple enzyme isoelectric point forms Can J Microbiol 32 6 1986 487 493 3730958 62 Thirkell D. Myles A.D. Precious B.L. Frost J.S. Woodall J.C. Burdon M.G. The urease of Ureaplasma urealyticum J Gen Microbiol 135 Pt 2 1989 315 323 2482331 63 Neyrolles O. Ferris S. Behbahani N. Montagnier L. Blanchard A. Organization of Ureaplasma urealyticum urease gene cluster and expression in a suppressor strain of Escherichia coli J Bacteriol 178 3 1996 647 655 8550495 64 Karplus P.A. Pearson M.A. Hausinger R.P. 70 years of crystalline urease: what have we learned? Acc Chem Res 30 8 1997 330 337 65 Benini S. Rypniewski W.R. Wilson K.S. Miletti S. Ciurli S. Mangani S. A new proposal for urease mechanism based on the crystal structures of the native and inhibited enzyme from Bacillus pasteurii : why urea hydrolysis costs two nickels Structure 7 2 1999 205 216 10368287 66 Benini S. Kosikowska P. Cianci M. Mazzei L. Vara A.G. Berlicki L. The crystal structure of Sporosarcina pasteurii urease in a complex with citrate provides new hints for inhibitor design J Biol Inorg Chem 18 3 2013 391 399 23412551 67 Krajewska B. van Eldik R. Brindell M. Temperature- and pressure-dependent stopped-flow kinetic studies of jack bean urease. Implications for the catalytic mechanism J Biol Inorg Chem 17 7 2012 1123 1134 22890689 68 Krajewska B. A combined temperature-pH study of urease kinetics, Assigning pKa values to ionizable groups of the active site involved in the catalytic reaction J Mol Catal B-Enzym 124 2016 70 76 69 Estiu G. Merz K.M. Jr. Competitive hydrolytic and elimination mechanisms in the urease catalyzed decomposition of urea J Phys Chem B 111 34 2007 10263 10274 17676790 70 Carter E.L. Flugga N. Boer J.L. Mulrooney S.B. Hausinger R.P. Interplay of metal ions and urease Metallomics 1 3 2009 207 221 20046957 71 Farrugia M.A. Macomber L. Hausinger R.P. Biosynthesis of the urease metallocenter J Biol Chem 288 19 2013 13178 13185 23539618 72 Ge R.G. Wang D.X. Hao M.C. Sun X.S. Nickel trafficking system responsible for urease maturation in Helicobacter pylori World J Gastroentero 19 45 2013 8211 8218 73 Musiani F. Gioia D. Masetti M. Falchi F. Cavalli A. Recanatini M. Protein tunnels: the case of urease accessory proteins J Chem Theory Comput 13 5 2017 2322 2331 28379694 74 Lee M.H. Mulrooney S.B. Renner M.J. Markowicz Y. Hausinger R.P. Klebsiella aerogenes urease gene cluster: sequence of ureD and demonstration that four accessory genes (ureD, ureE, ureF, and ureG) are involved in nickel metallocenter biosynthesis J Bacteriol 174 13 1992 4324 4330 1624427 75 Mulrooney S.B. Ward S.K. Hausinger R.P. Purification and properties of the Klebsiella aerogenes UreE metal-binding domain, a functional metallochaperone of urease J Bacteriol 187 10 2005 3581 3585 15866948 76 Zambelli B. Stola M. Musiani F. De Vriendt K. Samyn B. Devreese B. UreG, a chaperone in the urease assembly process, is an intrinsically unstructured GTPase that specifically binds Zn2+ J Biol Chem 280 6 2005 4684 4695 15542602 77 Palombo M. Bonucci A. Etienne E. Ciurli S. Uversky V.N. Guigliarelli B. The relationship between folding and activity in UreG, an intrinsically disordered enzyme Sci Rep-UK 7 1 2017 5977 78 Real-Guerra R. Staniscuaski F. Zambelli B. Musiani F. Ciurli S. Carlini C.R. Biochemical and structural studies on native and recombinant Glycine max UreG: a detailed characterization of a plant urease accessory protein Plant Mol Biol 78 4–5 2012 461 475 22271305 79 Polacco J.C. Mazzafera P. Tezotto T. Opinion – nickel and urease in plants: still many knowledge gaps Plant Sci 199 2013 79 90 23265321 80 Quiroz-Valenzuela S. Sukuru S.C. Hausinger R.P. Kuhn L.A. Heller W.T. The structure of urease activation complexes examined by flexibility analysis, mutagenesis, and small-angle X-ray scattering Arch Biochem Biophys 480 1 2008 51 57 18823937 81 Ligabue-Braun R. Real-Guerra R. Carlini C.R. Verli H. Evidence-based docking of the urease activation complex J Biomol Struct Dyn 31 8 2013 854 861 22962938 82 Farrugia M.A. Wang B. Feig M. Hausinger R.P. Mutational and computational evidence that a nickel-transfer tunnel in ured is used for activation of Klebsiella aerogenes urease Biochemistry 54 41 2015 6392 6401 26401965 83 Follmer C. Ureases as a target for the treatment of gastric and urinary infections J Clin Pathol 63 5 2010 424 430 20418234 84 Kosikowska P. Berlicki L. Urease inhibitors as potential drugs for gastric and urinary tract infections: a patent review Expert Opin Ther Pat 21 6 2011 945 957 21457123 85 Dixon N.E. Blakeley R.L. Zerner B. Jack bean urease (EC 3.5.1.5). III. The involvement of active-site nickel ion in inhibition by beta-mercaptoethanol, phosphoramidate, and fluoride Can J Biochem 58 6 1980 481 488 7272836 86 Mazzei L. Cianci M. Benini S. Bertini L. Musiani F. Ciurli S. Kinetic and structural studies reveal a unique binding mode of sulfite to the nickel center in urease J Inorg Biochem 154 2016 42 49 26580226 87 Zullo A. Rinaldi V. Hassan C. Folino S. Winn S. Pinto G. Helicobacter pylori and plasma ammonia levels in cirrhotics: role of urease inhibition by acetohydroxamic acid Ital J Gastroenterol 30 4 1998 405 409 88 Burne R.A. Chen Y.Y.M. Bacterial ureases in infectious diseases Microbes Infect 2 5 2000 533 542 10865198 89 Griffith D.P. Gleeson M.J. Lee H. Longuet R. Deman E. Earle N. Randomized, double-blind trial of Lithostat (acetohydroxamic acid) in the palliative treatment of infection-induced urinary calculi Eur Urol 20 3 1991 243 247 1726639 90 Bremner J.M. Krogmeier M.J. Evidence that the adverse effect of urea fertilizer on seed-germination in soil is due to ammonia formed through hydrolysis of urea by soil urease P Natl Acad Sci USA 86 21 1989 8185 8188 91 Vassiliou S. Grabowiecka A. Kosikowska P. Yiotakis A. Kafarski P. Berlicki L. Design, synthesis and activity of phosphorus containing peptides as inhibitors of bacterial ureases J Pept Sci 51 18 2008 5736 5744 92 Vassiliou S. Kosikowska P. Grabowiecka A. Yiotakis A. Kafarski P. Berlicki L. Computer-aided optimization of phosphinic inhibitors of bacterial ureases J Med Chem 53 15 2010 5597 5606 20684601 93 Benini S. Rypniewski W.R. Wilson K.S. Ciurli S. Mangani S. Structure-based rationalization of urease inhibition by phosphate: novel insights into the enzyme mechanism J Biol Inorg Chem 6 8 2001 778 790 11713685 94 Bremner J.M. Douglas L.A. Inhibition of urease activity in soils Soil Biol Biochem 3 1971 297 307 95 Krajewska B. Zaborska W. Double mode of inhibition-inducing interactions of 1,4-naphthoquinone with urease: arylation versus oxidation of enzyme thiols Bioorgan Med Chem 15 12 2007 4144 4151 96 Matsubara S. Shibata H. Ishikawa F. Yokokura T. Takahashi M. Sugimura T. Suppression of Helicobacter pylori -induced gastritis by green tea extract in Mongolian gerbils Biochem Bioph Res Co 310 3 2003 715 719 97 Pastene E. Parada V. Avello M. Ruiz A. Garcia A. Catechin-based procyanidins from Peumus boldus Mol. aqueous extract inhibit Helicobacter pylori urease and adherence to adenocarcinoma gastric cells Phytother Res 28 11 2014 1637 1645 24853276 98 Li G. Zhang H. Sader F. Vadhavkar N. Njus D. Oxidation of 4-methylcatechol: implications for the oxidation of catecholamines Biochemistry 46 23 2007 6978 6983 17503772 99 Kot M. Zaborska W. Irreversible inhibition of jack bean urease by pyrocatechol J Enzym Inhib Med Ch 18 2008 413 417 100 Mazzei L. Cianci M. Musiani F. Lente G. Palombo M. Ciurli S. Inactivation of urease by catechol: kinetics and structure J Inorg Biochem 166 2017 182 189 27888701 101 Follmer C. Carlini C. Effect of chemical modification of histidines on the copper-induced oligomerization of jack bean urease (EC 3.5.1.5) Arch Biochem Biophys 435 1 2005 15 20 15680902 102 Krajewska B. Mono- (Ag, Hg) and di- (Cu, Hg) valent metal ions effects on the activity of jack bean urease. Probing the modes of metal binding to the enzyme J Enzym Inhib Med Ch 23 4 2008 535 542 103 Zhang L. Mulrooney S.B. Leung A.F. Zeng Y. Ko B.B. Hausinger R.P. Inhibition of urease by bismuth(III): implications for the mechanism of action of bismuth drugs Biometals 19 5 2006 503 511 16937256 104 Berstad A. Olafsson S. Tefera S. Berstad K. Hundal O. Bergseth M. Bismuth therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection. A review of five years experience at a university hospital in Norway J Physiol Pharmacol 47 1 1996 31 49 8777305 105 Pacifico L. Osborn J.F. Anania C. Vaira D. Olivero E. Chiesa C. Review article: bismuth-based therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication in children Aliment Pharm Ther 35 9 2012 1010 1026 106 Cotter P.D. Hill C. Surviving the acid test: responses of gram-positive bacteria to low pH Microbiol Mol Biol R 67 3 2003 429 453 107 Mora D. Arioli S. Microbial urease in health and disease PLoS Pathog 10 12 2014 e1004472 25501953 108 Burne R.A. Zeng L. Ahn S.J. Palmer S.R. Liu Y. Lefebure T. Progress dissecting the oral microbiome in caries and health Adv Dent Res 24 2 2012 77 80 22899685 109 Liu Y.L. Nascimento M. Burne R.A. Progress toward understanding the contribution of alkali generation in dental biofilms to inhibition of dental caries Int J Oral Sci 4 3 2012 135 140 22996271 110 Javorsky P. Rybosova E. Havassy I. Horsky K. Kmet V. Urease activity of adherent bacteria and rumen fluid bacteria Physiol Bohemoslov 36 1 1987 75 81 2954172 111 Laukova A. Koniarova I. Survey of urease activity in ruminal bacteria isolated from domestic and wild ruminants Microbios 84 338 1995 7 11 8569526 112 Konieczna I. Zarnowiec P. Kwinkowski M. Kolesinska B. Fraczyk J. Kaminski Z. Bacterial urease and its role in long-lasting human diseases Curr Protein Pept Sc 13 8 2012 789 806 23305365 113 Rutherford J.C. The emerging role of urease as a general microbial virulence factor PLoS Pathog 10 5 2014 1 3 114 Mobley H.L.T. Island M.D. Hausinger R.P. Molecular biology of microbial ureases Microbiol Rev 59 3 1995 451 480 7565414 115 Fischbach W. Helicobacter pylori Internist 50 8 2009 979 986 19609771 116 Diaconu S. Predescu A. Moldoveanu A. Pop C.S. Fierbinteanu-Braticevici C. Helicobacter pylori infection: old and new J Med Life 10 2 2017 112 117 28616085 117 Mobley H.L. Hu L.T. Foxall P.A. Helicobacter pylori urease: properties and role in pathogenesis Scand J Gastroentero 187 1991 39 46 118 Auron A. Brophy P.D. Hyperammonemia in review: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment Pediatr Nephrol 27 2 2012 207 222 21431427 119 Fishbein W.N. Carbone P.P. Hochstein H.D. Acetohydroxamate: bacterial urease inhibitor with therapeutic potential in hyperammonaemic states Nature 208 5005 1965 46 48 5886683 120 Summerskill W.H. Thorsell F. Feinberg J.H. Aldrete J.S. Effects of urease inhibition in hyperammonemia: clinical and experimental studies with acetohydroxamic acid Gastroenterology 54 1 1968 20 26 5635434 121 Haberle J. Clinical practice: the management of hyperammonemia Eur J Pediatr 170 1 2011 21 34 21165747 122 Steyert S.R. Kaper J.B. Contribution of urease to colonization by Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli Infect Immun 80 8 2012 2589 2600 22665380 123 de Koning-Ward T.F. Ward A.C. Hartland E.L. Robins-Browne R.M. The urease complex gene of Yersinia enterocolitica and its role in virulence Contrib Microbiol Immunol 13 1995 262 263 8833849 124 Maroncle N. Rich C. Forestier C. The role of Klebsiella pneumoniae urease in intestinal colonization and resistance to gastrointestinal stress Res Microbiol 157 2 2006 184 193 16139482 125 Sangari F.J. Seoane A. Rodriguez M.C. Aguero J. Garcia Lobo J.M. Characterization of the urease operon of Brucella abortus and assessment of its role in virulence of the bacterium Infect Immun 75 2 2007 774 780 17101645 126 Murphy T.F. Brauer A.L. Expression of urease by Haemophilus influenzae during human respiratory tract infection and role in survival in an acid environment BMC Microbiol 11 2011 183 21843372 127 Olszewski M.A. Noverr M.C. Chen G.H. Toews G.B. Cox G.M. Perfect J.R. Urease expression by Cryptococcus neoformans promotes microvascular sequestration, thereby enhancing central nervous system invasion Am J Pathol 164 5 2004 1761 1771 15111322 128 Shi M. Li S.S. Zheng C. Jones G.J. Kim K.S. Zhou H. Real-time imaging of trapping and urease-dependent transmigration of Cryptococcus neoformans in mouse brain J Clin Invest 120 5 2010 1683 1693 20424328 129 Sirko A. Brodzik R. Plant ureases: roles and regulation Acta Biochim Pol 47 4 2000 1189 1195 11996109 130 Witte C.P. Urea metabolism in plants Plant Sci 180 3 2011 431 438 21421389 131 Liu L.H. Ludewig U. Frommer W.B. von Wiren N. AtDUR3 encodes a new type of high-affinity urea/H+ symporter in Arabidopsis Plant Cell 15 3 2003 790 800 12615950 132 Follmer C. Insights into the role and structure of plant ureases Phytochemistry 69 1 2008 18 28 17706733 133 Kumar V. Wagenet R.J. Urease activity and kinetics of urea transformation in soils Soil Sci 137 4 1984 263 269 134 Ciurli S. Marzadori C. Benini S. Deiana S. Gessa C. Urease from the soil bacterium Bacillus pasteurii : immobilization on Ca-polygalacturonate Soil Biol Biochem 28 6 1996 811 817 135 Bachmeier K.L. Williams A.E. Warmington J.R. Bang S.S. Urease activity in microbiologically-induced calcite precipitation J Biotechnol 93 2 2002 171 181 11738724 136 Sondi I. Salopek-Sondi B. Influence of the primary structure of enzymes on the formation of CaCO2 polymorphs: a comparison of plant (Canavalia ensiformis ) and bacterial (Bacillus pasteurii ) ureases Langmuir 21 19 2005 8876 8882 16142973 137 Krogmeier M.J. McCarty G.W. Bremner J.M. Phytotoxicity of foliar-applied urea P Natl Acad Sci USA 86 21 1989 8189 8191 138 Sacristan M. Millanes A.M. Legaz M.E. Vicente C. A lichen lectin specifically binds to the alpha-1,4-polygalactoside moiety of urease located in the cell wall of homologous algae Plant Signal Behav 1 1 2006 23 27 19521472 139 Millanes A.M. Fontaniella B. Garcia M.L. Solas M.T. Vicente C. Legaz M.E. Cytochemical location of urease in the cell wall of two different lichen phycobionts Tissue Cell 36 6 2004 373 377 15533452 140 Medeiros-Silva M. Franck W.L. Borba M.P. Pizzato S.B. Strodtman K.N. Emerich D.W. Soybean ureases, but not that of Bradyrhizobium japonicum , are involved in the process of soybean root nodulation J Agr Food Chem 62 16 2014 3517 3524 24716625 141 Eaton K.A. Brooks C.L. Morgan D.R. Krakowka S. Essential role of urease in pathogenesis of gastritis induced by Helicobacter pylori in gnotobiotic piglets Infect Immun 59 7 1991 2470 2475 2050411 142 Tsuda M. Karita M. Mizote T. Morshed M.G. Okita K. Nakazawa T. Essential role of Helicobacter pylori urease in gastric colonization: definite proof using a urease-negative mutant constructed by gene replacement Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 6 Suppl 1 1994 S49 S52 7735935 143 Wassermann G.E. Olivera-Severo D. Uberti A.F. Carlini C.R. Helicobacter pylori urease activates blood platelets through a lipoxygenase-mediated pathway J Cell Mol Med 14 7 2010 2025 2034 19754669 144 Scopel-Guerra A. Olivera-Severo D. Staniscuaski F. Uberti A.F. Callai-Silva N. Jaeger N. The impact of Helicobacter pylori urease upon platelets and consequent contributions to inflammation Front Microbiol 8 (Dec 12) 2017 2447 29312166 145 Uberti A.F. Olivera-Severo D. Wassermann G.E. Scopel-Guerra A. Moraes J.A. Barcellos-de-Souza P. Pro-inflammatory properties and neutrophil activation by Helicobacter pylori urease Toxicon 69 2013 240 249 23466444 146 Olivera-Severo D. Uberti A.F. Marques M.S. Pinto M.T. Gomez-Lazaro M. Figueiredo C. A new role for Helicobacter pylori urease: contributions to angiogenesis Front Microbiol 8 2017 1883 29021786 147 Zhang J.Y. Liu T. Guo H. Liu X.F. Zhuang Y. Yu S. Induction of a Th17 cell response by Helicobacter pylori urease subunit B Immunobiology 216 7 2011 803 810 21269729 148 Beswick E.J. Pinchuk I.V. Minch K. Suarez G. Sierra J.C. Yamaoka Y. The Helicobacter pylori urease B subunit binds to CD74 on gastric epithelial cells and induces NF-kappaB activation and interleukin-8 production Infect Immun 74 2 2006 1148 1155 16428763 149 Lee J.H. Jun S.H. Baik S.C. Kim D.R. Park J.Y. Lee Y.S. Prediction and screening of nuclear targeting proteins with nuclear localization signals in Helicobacter pylori J Microbiol Meth 91 3 2012 490 496 150 Lee J.H. Jun S.H. Kim J.M. Baik S.C. Lee J.C. Morphological changes in human gastric epithelial cells induced by nuclear targeting of Helicobacter pylori urease subunit A J Microbiol 53 6 2015 406 414 26025173 151 Carlini C.R. Guimaraes J.A. Isolation and characterization of a toxic protein from Canavalia ensiformis (jack bean) seeds, distinct from concanavalin A Toxicon 19 5 1981 667 675 7302956 152 Follmer C. Wassermann G.E. Carlini C.R. Separation of jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis ) urease isoforms by immobilized metal affinity chromatography and characterization of insecticidal properties unrelated to ureolytic activity Plant Sci 167 2 2004 241 246 153 Carlini C.R. Guimaraes J.A. Ribeiro J.M. Platelet release reaction and aggregation induced by canatoxin, a convulsant protein: evidence for the involvement of the platelet lipoxygenase pathway Br J Pharmacol 84 2 1985 551 560 3919794 154 Ghazaleh F.A. Francischetti I.M. Gombarovits M.E. Carlini C.R. Stimulation of calcium influx and platelet activation by canatoxin: methoxyverapamil inhibition and downregulation by cGMP Arch Biochem Biophys 339 2 1997 362 367 9056269 155 Follmer C. Real-Guerra R. Wasserman G.E. Olivera-Severo D. Carlini C.R. Jackbean, soybean and Bacillus pasteurii ureases – biological effects unrelated to ureolytic activity Eur J Biochem 271 7 2004 1357 1363 15030486 156 Martinelli A.H. Lopes F.C. Broll V. Defferrari M.S. Ligabue-Braun R. Kappaun K. Soybean ubiquitous urease with purification facilitator: an addition to the moonlighting studies toolbox Process Biochem 53 2017 245 258 157 Olivera-Severo D. Wassermann G.E. Carlini C.R. Bacillus pasteurii urease shares with plant ureases the ability to induce aggregation of blood platelets Arch Biochem Biophys 452 2 2006 149 155 16839515 158 Barja-Fidalgo C. Guimaraes J.A. Carlini C.R. Lipoxygenase-mediated secretory effect of canatoxin the toxic protein from Canavalia ensiformis seeds Toxicon 29 4–5 1991 453 459 1907411 159 Carlini C.R. Gomes C. Guimaraes J.A. Markus R.P. Sato H. Trolin G. Central nervous effects of the convulsant protein canatoxin Acta Pharmacol Tox (Copenh) 54 3 1984 161 166 160 Tauber H. Kleiner I.S. Studies on crystalline urease. III. The toxicity of crystalline urease J Biol Chem 92 1931 177 185 161 Baik S.C. Kang H.L. Seo J.H. Park E.S. Rhee K.H. Cho M.J. Helicobacter pylori urease induces mouse death J Bacteriol Virol 35 2005 175 181 162 Carlini C.R. Oliveira A.E. Azambuja P. Xavier-Filho J. Wells M.A. Biological effects of canatoxin in different insect models: evidence for a proteolytic activation of the toxin by insect cathepsinlike enzymes J Econ Entomol 90 2 1997 340 348 9145031 163 Carlini C.R. Grossi-de-Sa M.F. Plant toxic proteins with insecticidal properties. A review on their potentialities as bioinsecticides Toxicon 40 11 2002 1515 1539 12419503 164 Staniscuaski F. Ferreira-Dasilva C.T. Mulinari F. Pires-Alves M. Carlini C.R. Insecticidal effects of canatoxin on the cotton stainer bug Dysdercus peruvianus (Hemiptera: Pyrrhocoridae) Toxicon 45 6 2005 753 760 15804524 165 Defferrari M. Demartini D. Marcelino T. Pinto P. Carlini C. Insecticidal effect of Canavalia ensiformis major urease on nymphs of the milkweed bug Oncopeltus fasciatus and characterization of digestive peptidases Insect Biochem Molec 41 6 2011 388 399 166 Ferreira-DaSilva C.T. Gombarovits M.E. Masuda H. Oliveira C.M. Carlini C.R. Proteolytic activation of canatoxin, a plant toxic protein, by insect cathepsin-like enzymes Arch Insect Biochem 44 4 2000 161 171 167 Mulinari F. Staniscuaski F. Berthodo-Vargas L.R. Postal M. OliveiraNeto O.B. Ridgen D.J. Jaburetox-2Ec: an insecticidal peptide derived from an isoform of urease form the Canavalia ensiformis plant Peptides 28 2007 2042 2050 17875343 168 Piovesan A.R. Staniscuaski F. Marco-Salvadori J. Real-Guerra R. Defferrari M.S. Carlini C.R. Stage-specific gut proteinases of the cotton stainer bug Dysdercus peruvianus : role in the release of entomotoxic peptides from Canavalia ensiformis urease Insect Biochem Molec 38 11 2008 1023 1032 169 Real-Guerra R. Carlini C.R. Staniscuaski F. Role of lysine and acidic amino acid residues on the insecticidal activity of Jackbean urease Toxicon 71 2013 76 83 23726854 170 Pires-Alves M. Grossi-de-Sa M.F. Barcellos G.B. Carlini C.R. Moraes M.G. Characterization and expression of a novel member (JBURE-II) of the urease gene family from jackbean [Canavalia ensiformis (L.) DC] Plant Cell Physiol 44 2 2003 139 145 12610216 171 Mulinari F. Becker-Ritt A.B. Demartini D.R. Ligabue-Braun R. Staniscuaski F. Verli H. Characterization of JBURE-IIb isoform of Canavalia ensiformis (L.) DC urease (L.) DC] BBA-Proteins Proteom 1814 12 2011 1758 1768 172 Kappaun K. Clonagem e expressão heteróloga da urease da bactéria diazotrófica Azospirillum brasilense FP2 e do peptídeo soyuretox, derivado da urease ubíqua da soja (Glycine max ) 2014 Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil 173 Staniscuaski F. Brugge V.T. Carlini C.R. Orchard I. In vitro effect of Canavalia ensiformis urease and the derived peptide Jaburetox-2Ec on Rhodnius prolixus Malpighian tubules J Insect Physiol 55 3 2009 255 263 19121321 174 Staniscuaski F. Brugge V.T. Carlini C.R. Orchard I. Jack bean urease alters serotonin-induced effects on Rhodnius prolixus anterior midgut J Insect Physiol 56 9 2010 1078 1086 20223243 175 Defferrari M. Lee D. Fernandes C. Orchard I. Carlini C. A phospholipase A(2) gene is linked to Jack bean urease toxicity in the Chagas' disease vector Rhodnius prolixus BBA-Gen Subjects 1840 1 2014 396 405 176 Defferrari M.S. da Silva R. Orchard I. Carlini C.R. Jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis ) urease induces eicosanoid-modulated hemocyte aggregation in the Chagas' disease vector Rhodnius prolixus Toxicon 82 2014 18 25 24561121 177 Fruttero L.L. Moyetta N.R. Uberti A.F. Grahl M.V. Lopes F.C. Broll V. Humoral and cellular immune responses induced by the urease-derived peptide Jaburetox in the model organism Rhodnius prolixus Parasite Vectors 9 1 2016 412 178 Galvani G.L. Fruttero L.L. Coronel M.F. Nowicki S. Demartini D.R. Defferrari M.S. Effect of the urease-derived peptide Jaburetox on the central nervous system of Triatoma infestans (Insecta: Heteroptera) BBA-Gen Subjects 1850 2 2015 255 262 179 Carrazoni T. de Avila Heberle M. Perin A.P. Zanatta A.P. Rodrigues P.V. Dos Santos F.D. Central and peripheral neurotoxicity induced by the Jack Bean Urease (JBU) in Nauphoeta cinerea cockroaches Toxicology 368–369 2016 162 171 180 Carrazoni T. Nguyen C. Maciel L.F. Delgado-Cañedo A. Stewart B.A. Lange A.B. Jack bean urease modulates neurotransmitter release at insect neuromuscular junctions Pestic Biochem Phys 146 2018 63 70 181 Salvadori J.D. Defferrari M.S. Ligabue-Braun R. Lau E.Y. Salvadori J.R. Carlini C.R. Characterization of entomopathogenic nematodes and symbiotic bacteria active against Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and contribution of bacterial urease to the insecticidal effect Biol Control 63 3 2012 253 263 182 Chouikha I. Hinnebusch B.J. Silencing urease: a key evolutionary step that facilitated the adaptation of Yersinia pestis to the flea-borne transmission route P Natl Acad Sci USA 111 52 2014 18709 18714 183 Becker-Ritt A.B. Carlini C.R. Fungitoxic and insecticidal plant polypeptides Biopolymers 98 4 2012 367 384 23193601 184 Oliveira A.E.A. Gomes V.M. Sales M.P. Fernandes K.V.S. Carlini C.R. Xavier-Filho J. The toxicity of jack bean [Canavalia ensiformis (L.) DC.] canatoxin to plant pathogenic fungi Rev Bras Biol 59 1999 59 62 185 Becker-Ritt A.B. Martinelli A.H. Mitidieri S. Feder V. Wassermann G.E. Santi L. Antifungal activity of plant and bacterial ureases Toxicon 50 7 2007 971 983 17825863 186 Postal M. Martinelli A.H. Becker-Ritt A.B. Ligabue-Braun R. Demartini D.R. Ribeiro S.F. Antifungal properties of Canavalia ensiformis urease and derived peptides Peptides 38 1 2012 22 32 22922160 187 Wiebke-Strohm B. Pasquali G. Margis-Pinheiro M. Bencke M. Bucker-Neto L. Becker-Ritt A.B. Ubiquitous urease affects soybean susceptibility to fungi Plant Mol Biol 79 1–2 2012 75 87 22382992 188 Wiebke-Strohm B. Ligabue-Braun R. Rechenmacher C. De Oliveira-Busatto L.A. Carlini C.R. Bodanese-Zanettini M.H. Structural and transcriptional characterization of a novel member of the soybean urease gene family Plant Physiol Bioch 101 2016 96 104 189 Barros P.R. Stassen H. Freitas M.S. Carlini C.R. Nascimento M.A.C. Follmer C. Membrane-disruptive properties of the bioinsecticide Jaburetox-2Ec: implications to the mechanism of the action of insecticidal peptides derived from ureases BBA-Proteins Proteom 1794 12 2009 1848 1854 190 Martinelli A.H. Kappaun K. Ligabue-Braun R. Defferrari M.S. Piovesan A.R. Staniscuaski F. Structure-function studies on jaburetox, a recombinant insecticidal peptide derived from jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis ) urease BBA-Gen Subjects 1840 3 2014 935 944 191 Lopes F.C. Dobrovolska O. Real-Guerra R. Broll V. Zambelli B. Musiani F. Pliable natural biocide: Jaburetox is an intrinsically disordered insecticidal and fungicidal polypeptide derived from jack bean urease FEBS J 282 6 2015 1043 1064 25605001 192 Piovesan A.R. Martinelli A.H.S. Ligabue-Braun R. Schwartz J.L. Carlini C.R. Canavalia ensiformis urease, Jaburetox and derived peptides form ion channels in planar lipid bilayers Arch Biochem Biophys 547 2014 6 17 24583269 193 Broll V. Martinelli A.H.S. Lopes F.C. Fruttero L.L. Zambelli B. Salladini E. Structural analysis of the interaction between Jaburetox, an intrinsically disordered protein, and membrane models Colloid Surface B 159 2017 849 860 194 Michelleto Y.M.S. Moro C.F. Lopes F.C. Ligabue-Braun R. Martinelli A.H.S. Marques C.M. Interaction of jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis ) urease and a derived peptide with lipid vesicles Colloid Surface B 145 2016 576 585 195 Qin Y. Cabral J.M.S. Review properties and applications of urease Biocatal Biotransfor 20 1 2002 1 14 196 Krajewska B. Ureases. II. Properties and their customizing by enzyme immobilizations: a review J Mol Catal B-Enzym 59 1–3 2009 22 40 197 Zhang Q. Tang X. Hou F. Yang J. Xie Z. Cheng Z. Fluorimetric urease inhibition assay on a multilayer microfluidic chip with immunoaffinity immobilized enzyme reactors Anal Biochem 441 1 2013 51 57 23792035 198 Turkcan C, Uygun DA, Akgol S, Denizli A. Reactive red 120 and NI(II) derived poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) nanoparticles for urease adsorption, J Appl Polym Sci131(2), 39757. 199 Ramesh R. Aarthy M. Gowthaman M.K. Gabrovska K. Godjevargova T. Kamini N.R. Screening and production of a potent extracellular Arthrobacter creatinolyticus urease for determination of heavy metal ions J Basic Microb 54 4 2014 285 295 200 Talat M. Singh A.K. Srivastava O.N. Optimization of process variables by central composite design for the immobilization of urease enzyme on functionalized gold nanoparticles for various applications Bioproc Biosyst Eng 34 6 2011 647 657