==== Front Ann Saudi MedAnn Saudi MedAnnals of Saudi Medicine0256-49470975-4466King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 1756817210.5144/0256-4947.2007.183asm-3-183ReviewAbdominal Compartment Syndrome Sanda Robert B. From the Department of Surgery, Hail General Hospital, Hail, Saudi ArabiaCorrespondence: Robert B. Sanda, MBBS, FRCSI, Department of Surgery, Hail General Hospital, Hail 81451, Saudi Arabia. T: +9665 0617 4015, F: +9666 532 0536, robeesanda@yahoo.comMay-Jun 2007 27 3 183 190 Copyright © 2007, Annals of Saudi Medicine2007This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.The term abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) describes the clinical manifestations of the pathologic elevation of the intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). When the IAP exceeds 12 mm Hg it is referred to as intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) while ACS generally sets in at an IAP in excess of 20 mm Hg. This syndrome is most commonly observed in the setting of severe abdominal trauma and in the aftermath of major abdominal operations. ACS affects mainly the respiratory, cardiovascular, renal, gastrointestinal and the central nervous systems. Fundamental to the development of ACS are the obstruction of venous return to the heart via the inferior vena cava and the splinting of the diaphragm due to elevated IAP. Preventing ACS by the identification of patients at risk and early diagnosis is paramount to its successful management. To this end a high index of suspicion is sine qua non. The management of established ACS requires clinical astuteness and decisiveness with a readily available and generous team support. The purpose of this review is to enhance awareness among clinicians about a subtle condition with a devastating impact on morbidity and mortality if undiagnosed. ==== Body There are three important considerations to be made in attempting to understand the abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). Firstly, the abdomen is a conduit of major blood vessels of the body as they course to and from the organs that they supply or drain. Secondly, the peritoneal sac, the anterior abdominal wall and the retroperitoneal space are potential restraints that can passively transmit extrinsic pressure on the vessels and restrict circulation. And thirdly, the gut mucosal barrier, contained in the abdominal compartment, is the biological equivalent of a demilitarized zone between two opponents: the pathogenic commensals in the lumen and the reticuloendothelial system. The abdominal compartment normally sustains a pressure of about 5 mm Hg, but can be non-pathologically elevated in the obese.1 Many pathologic conditions can generate sustained pressures in excess of 12 mm Hg, a state referred to as intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH),1 producing sub-clinical organ dysfunctions (regarded here as prodromes) leading to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). Thus, ACS is seen as the end result of a sustained IAH.1–3 Historical Milestones Credit for the first recorded account of an abnormal increase in intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) goes to the French physician Etienne-Jules Marey4 in 1863. He published a paper titled “Physiologie Medicale de la Circulation du Sang” and noted that the effects that respiration produces on the thorax are inversely related to those in the abdomen. Wendt,4 in 1873, measured the IAP through the rectum and noted that the higher the IAP the less the secretion of urine. That was the first description of organ dysfunction directly attributable to elevated IAH. In rapid succession others championed our understanding of ACS. Oderbrecht4 in 1875 cannulated the urinary bladder and reported that the IAP is normally positive. In 1890 Heinricius4 reported that IAP between 27 to 46 cmH2O (19.8 to 33.8 mm Hg) was uniformly fatal to experimental animals and he attributed his observations to obstruction of ventilation, decreased end-diastolic volume and a low blood pressure. In the United States, in a luminous paper in 1911, Haven Emerson5 reported convincing experimental observations. He noted that the contraction of the diaphragm is the main contributor of IAP during inspiration; that hypnosis and muscle paralysis induced by anesthesia with the concomitant loss of muscle tone results in a decrease in IAP; that elevated IAP leads to an increase in peripheral vascular resistance; and that high IAP results in the death of the animal from cardiac failure long before asphyxiation develops. Sir Heneage Ogilvie6 in Britain in 1940 described the use of vaseline impregnated canvas or cotton sutured to the edge of the wound as a way of avoiding closing the abdomen under tension. In a similar endeavor, Gross7 in 1948 described the so-called staged abdominal repair (STAR) operative technique in the closure of the abdomen in the management of large omphaloceles. In 1951, Baggot,8 an anesthesiologist from Dublin, observed the detrimental effect of IAH on respiratory parameters and noted that forcing distended bowel back into the abdominal cavity of limited volume might kill the patient and he coined the term “acute tension pneumoperitoneum”. By 1969 some publications9,10 advocated leaving the abdomen open in children with omphalocele and gastroschisis. In 1972 it was observed11 that the application of the Military Anti-Shock Trousers (MAST) resulted in decreased cardiac output and depressed renal function. The most comprehensive description of ACS is credited to Kron et al.12 who in 1984 published their observation on IAH and for the first time advocated abdominal re-exploration and decompression as a life-saving intervention, whatever the cause. The first use of the term abdominal compartment syndrome was, however, by Robert Fietsam et al.13 Other papers14,15 rapidly appeared about this time, confirming earlier observations and defining this syndrome more clearly. Epidemiology The epidemiology of IAH and ACS are intrinsically tied to the level of awareness of these conditions among clinicians and on the population studied; for example, among a trauma population as compared to patients who have undergone damage control surgery. However, studies conducted as recently as in 2006 showed a lack of consensus regarding the definition, functional indications, or management of an open abdomen in the perceptions of Canadian trauma providers despite a high self-reported level of familiarity with ACS.16,17 In Australia,18 despite familiarity with the technique of intra-abdominal pressure monitoring and the signs of IAH, ICU registrars lacked sufficient understanding of the retroperitoneal causes of, and the threshold for intervention in ACS. And in the United Kingdom,19,20 it was observed that fewer patients are diagnosed with ACS in district hospitals than in teaching hospitals and that there was a variable threshold for the diagnosis of the condition as well as disparity in the number of patients who are decompressed suggesting a lack of agreement in the management of this condition. The point prevalence of IAH and ACS have been estimated at 50.5% and 8.2% from a six-country international European collaboration21 which showed (in a mixed ICU population) that non-survivors had a significantly higher mean IAP on admission than survivors and that independent predictors of mortality included age, APACHE II score, the type of ICU (odds ratio 2.5 medical vs. surgical) and the presence of liver dysfunction. Studies from Germany22 and the USA23 have reported mortality rates of around 60% from ACS in intensive care units. The World Society for the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (WSACS)24 is championing research in and promoting the awareness of this disorder. To standardize terms and definitions, it has just launched the most authoritative textbook25 on the subject at its recently concluded 3rd congress held in the city of Antwerp, Belgium from March 21–24, 2007. Etiology and Classification The WSACS has classified ACS into three categories: primary, secondary and tertiary (recurrent) types. Primary ACS is defined as “a condition associated with injury or disease in the abdomino-pelvic region that frequently requires early surgical or radiological intervention”. 1 Examples of etiologic factors here include severe blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma,26–28 ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm or a leak from an aneurismal repair,29–31 damage control surgery with packing of the liver,32,33 primary closure of the abdomen under tension,34 and pelvic fractures or extraperitoneal hemorrhage.35–37 Patients who undergo an initial trial of non-operative management for solid organ injuries and who subsequently develop ACS are included in the primary category. Secondary ACS is defined as due to “conditions that do not originate from the abdomino-pelvic region”.1 Examples of causes of secondary ACS include sepsis and capillary leak,38–40 severe acute pancreatitis (SAP),41,42 major thermal burns43–46 and other conditions requiring massive fluid resuscitation.47–49 Tertiary (recurrent) ACS “refers to the condition in which ACS redevelops following previous surgical or medical treatment of primary or secondary ACS”.1,50 Pathophysiology Gastrointestinal System Fundamental to the understanding of the pathophysiology of ACS is the understanding of the concept of abdominal perfusion pressure (APP) in much the same way as cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) is in relation to raised intracranial pressure. APP is the difference between the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and intraabdominal pressure (IAP) which is represented mathematically as: APP=MAP-IAP An APP of 50 mm Hg or higher is the optimum resuscitation goal in all critically ill patients.51 Splanchnic ischemia (the “first hit”) caused by hemorrhage is the initiating event52,53 leading to neutrophil priming, which promotes local and remote organ injury by several immune-mediated mechanisms54,55 that include free-radicals like superoxide, enzymes for membrane degradation like elastase, increased CD11b/CD18 expression for endothelial adhesion, elaboration of the chemo-attractant IL-8 to recruit more neutrophils and delayed apoptosis to sustain cytotoxicity.56 Decompressive laparotomy (DL) as the definitive treatment of ACS brings with it fresh problems (the second hit) to this pathophysiological conundrum. ACS relieved by DL allows a bolus of inflammatory agents to enter the systemic circulation and constitutes an ischaemia-reperfusion injury.57 Mesenteric lymphatic circulation has been implicated as the conduit for the systemic distribution of proinflammatory cytokines, metabolites of arachidonic acid,58 complement59 and bacterial translocation.60 This has been proposed as the mechanism for remote organ injury, capillary leak and endotoxemia in ACS (Figure 1).61–63 Cardiovascular System IAH affects the cardiovascular system by disturbing preload, myocardial contractility and afterload.64 Low preload may be due to absolute loss of intravascular volume or relative loss through the compression of the inferior vena cava (IVC) as it traverses the diaphragmatic hiatus. Pooling of blood in the pelvis and the lower extremities constitutes a loss and may be a factor in the pathogenesis of deep venous thrombosis.65 The increased intra-thoracic pressure increases pulmonary vascular resistance and decreases right ventricular preload compromising the ability of the thin-walled right ventricle (RV) to effect adequate right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) and a consequent decrease in left ventricular end-diastolic volume and diminished left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The resultant low cardiac output (CO) triggers a compensatory tachycardia and a consequent shortened cardiac cycle (at the expense of diastolic time) leading to impaired coronary blood flow. Thus, at the time the heart has to work the hardest, its own blood supply is impaired (Figure 1). The compensatory peripheral vascular resistance due to the low cardiac output together with the compressive effect of IAH on the aorta and its branches contribute towards the low APP. Respiratory System Raised IAP is transmitted across the diaphragm producing elevated intra-thoracic pressure, compressive atelectasis, increased alveolar dead space, reduced functional residual capacity, ventilation-perfusion mismatch and hypoxic bronchial artery vasoconstriction. By the same token, the splinting of the diaphragm leads to the need to use the accessory muscles of respiration in the presence of diminished chest wall compliance and so increases the work of breathing. In patients under mechanical ventilation, the decreased dynamic lung and chest wall compliances result in elevated peak inspiratory and plateau pressures in attempts by the ventilator to deliver preset tidal volumes (Figure 2).66 Central Nervous System The central venous pressure (CVP) in shock induced by ACS is often elevated due to the high intra-pleural pressure producing a functional obstruction of the jugular veins, resulting in a raised intracranial pressure (ICP). Therefore, the cerebral perfusion pressure is decreased in obedience to the Monroe-Kellie doctrine (Figure 2). The resultant cerebral hypoxia results in encephalopathy and affects vital regulatory centers in the brain, thereby disturbing homeostatic mechanisms. Joseph et al68 studied the effects of raising the IAP using pneumoperitoneum on ICP and CPP. They demonstrated that IAH increases ICP and concluded that laparoscopy would be harmful in patients with head injury. Subsequently, reports of the detrimental effects of pneumoperitoneum on ICP69 and the beneficial effects of DL on ICP70 appeared confirming the earlier assertions. It has, therefore, been proposed that the monitoring of IAP in patients with head trauma and abdominal trauma be routine.71,72 Renal System The effect of IAH on the renal system is multi-factorial and includes decreases in CO, renal perfusion pressure (RPP), glomerular filtration gradient (GFG), microcirculatory flow, direct compression of the renal cortex, and increased renal venous pressure (RVP).73 Of these, it appears that increased RVP plays the most significant role in the pathogenesis of IAH-induced renal failure (Figure 1).74 The reduction of RPP and the reduction in the GFG (the net force acting across the glomerulus) as well as the effects of the hormones vasopressin, reninangiotensin and aldosterone probably work in concert to produce renal failure in IAH. The Abdominal Wall IAH reduces the abdominal wall blood flow by the direct compressive effect. Blood flow to the rectus abdominis muscle is reduced by 60% at an IAP above 10 mm Hg. As collagen deposit and resistance to infection are directly proportional to tissue perfusion and oxygenation, elevated IAP adversely affects wound healing and leads to wound dehiscence.75 Diagnosis ACS has been described as the presence of a tensely distended abdomen, elevated intra-abdominal and peaked airway pressure, inadequate ventilation with hypoxia and hypercarbia, impaired renal function, and a documented improvement of these features after DL.76 While the virtues of clinical assessment cannot be debated, the detection of IAH by palpation of the abdomen has proved to be insensitive in differentiating IAPs of 10 from 20 mm Hg77 and serial measurement of the abdominal circumference did not show any correlation with the IAP.78 Therefore, the identification of patients at risk of developing IAH carries with it the responsibility for a deliberate and diligent monitoring of IAP, especially in patients that are comatosed or intubated. The abdominal CT scan has a role in identifying ACS in selected patients by the following subtle findings: Round-belly sign-Abdominal distention with an increased ratio of anteroposterior-to-transverse abdominal diameter (ratio >0.80; P <0.001); Collapse of the vena cava; Bowel wall thickening with enhancement; Bilateral inguinal herniation.79 In the 144 years since the publication of the findings of Etienne-Jules Marey,4 the techniques of IAP have gone through several modifications. A detailed description of each technique is beyond the scope of this article but those interested can find them in the WSACS textbook.80 The first method described to find clinical applicability was by Kron et al.12,81 This method entails instillation of 60 mL of saline through the bladder using an indwelling Foley’s catheter. The outlet is then clamped and through a wide-bore needle connected to a manometer or pressure transducer and the pressure is measured. This method has several drawbacks, which include the disruption of the otherwise closed drainage system of the bladder, thereby not safeguarding sterility. The other drawbacks are that the use of needles predisposed healthcare workers to needle-stick injuries and was time-consuming. Iberti et al15,82 introduced a modification that had some of the short-comings of the previous method with the advantage that it is simpler, less time-consuming and needed less manipulation. About a decade later, Cheatham and Safcsak83 introduced a modification that was revised by Malbrain84 which serves as the current standard for the intra-vesical technique. Using a three-way Foley’s catheter, investigators in Australia85 have shown that a continuous measurement of IAP is possible and of practical advantage in critically ill patients. Aside from the intra-vesical route, the same principle has been applied in measuring the IAP from catheters inserted into the stomach. A novel method using a fully automated system, the Air-Pouch System (or Spiegelberg System), measures IAP and gastric pH via a nasogastric tube.86 This system has been tested in an experimental setup with an excellent correlation (r2=0.99) with direct insufflator pressure.87 Clinical validation in ICU patients and during laparoscopic surgery has shown excellent correlation (r2= 0.96) with the standard intravesical method.88 There are on-going efforts to improve on the accuracy and reliability of the current techniques of IAP measurement using piezo-resistive techniques that are showing promising results.89 Other routes have been described for the measurement of IAP using the foregoing principle, but none of these have found widespread clinical use. These are the rectum,90 the uterus91 and the inferior vena cava (IVC).92 The problem with the rectal route is that residual faecal matter may block the catheter tip and give an erroneous reading and nursing staff have an aversion for this route. The uterine method has a distinct disadvantage in that it can only be used in females and may be resisted by virgins. The other disadvantage is that it carries the risk of introducing infection and cannot be used in patients with uterine bleeding. The IVC route employs the placement of a central venous catheter through either the SVC or through the femoral veins and is guided into place within the abdominal compartment. The disadvantage of the IVC route is the risk of catheter-related infections and the technical difficulty in the initial insertion. Management A subset of ACS can be prevented and to this end, there is no substitute for clinical astuteness, sound judgment and good operative technique. Early goal-directed therapy using the APP in critically-ill or traumatized patients during the resuscitation phase may avert the dangers of over-enthusiastic fluid resuscitation. Confining DCS to the shortest time possible to give opportunity to correct acidosis, hypothermia and coagulopathy—the so-called deadly triad of ACS—is appropriate. Gentle handling of tissue intra-operatively and the avoidance of primary closure of the abdomen under tension are the defining qualities and the hallmarks of good surgical handicraft. It is generally advocated that when the abdominal contents can be viewed protruding above the wound margin when looking across the table at the level of the anterior abdominal wall, temporary abdominal closure (TAC) is the option of choice.93,94 Burch et al95 proposed a four-category grading system for IAH as follows: Grade I 10–15 cm H2O (7.5–11 mm Hg); Grade II 15–25 cm H2O (11–18 mm Hg); Grade III 25–35 cm H2O (18–25 mm Hg); and Grade IV >35 cm H2O (>25 mm Hg). The authors advocated conservative management for grades I and II and DL for grades III and IV. At first glance, this is useful and practical but, in reality, many surgeons are skeptical about the whole concept of IAH and ACS and would not readily take a patient with, say severe pancreatitis with an IAP of 25 mm Hg, from the ICU to the OR for a DL. This is where the problem lies: the decision to subject a critically ill medical patient with hemodynamic instability (somebody else’s headache!) to the additional hazards of the trauma of surgery and general anaesthesia. On the contrary, many published papers show ample evidence that such intervention results in substantial benefit to the patient with improved survival and diminished morbidity.41,96–100 There are critically ill patients with IAH and ACS in whom a trial of conservative (medical) management would be appropriate. This may wholly, or in part, be due to four reasons: DL is associated with a less than perfect survival outcome (38–71%);101 the complications and the cost of management of patients with TAC may be prohibitively high; there are subsets of patients in whom DL may not be necessary; and consent for operation may have been withheld.102 The evidence for conservative management is limited by the lack of randomized studies. Therefore, a lot of what is published is based on limited experience and anecdotal reports. Massive distension of the abdomen by postoperative ileus or intra-abdominal pathology may contribute significantly to IAH for which correction of underlying etiologic factors like electrolyte imbalance or the use of prokinetic drugs like erythromycin, metoclopramide, neostigmine, insertion of nasogastric and rectal tubes or colonoscopic decompression may be accompanied by a reduction of IAP. Faecal impaction and intractable constipation may respond to suppositories, enemas or manual disimpaction. In patients under mechanical ventilation, the use of neuromuscular blockade may be a temporizing measure by paralyzing the muscles of the abdominal wall and considerably lowering the IAP. Diuretics and dialysis might help in removing excess interstitial fluid that has contributed to visceral edema in cases where massive fluid requirement for resuscitation led to IAH and ACS such as in burns and SAP. Tapping of a massive ascites may be rewarded with an immediate reduction in IAP, but it is also in these patients with liver failure that the coagulopathy may contraindicate DL.102 Where operative intervention is indicated in the treatment of ACS, the operative technique involves opening the abdomen, managing the open abdomen and closing it. The abdomen may be opened for damage-control surgery where the operation is abbreviated and focuses on life-threatening problems like bleeding or it may be planned to release tension in the abdomen such as will be caused by SAP. Prior to this procedure, however, serious complications of reperfusion injury must be anticipated and planned for. A ‘decompression cocktail’ made of one liter of normal saline, sodium bicarbonate and 50 g of mannitol is administered. This is aimed to increase the circulatory volume, to neutralize a large amount of acidic metabolites from the mesenteric vascular bed and to enhance diuresis to prevent acute tubular necrosis. This is then followed by a temporary abdominal closure which is aimed at ensuring the IAP is not raised by a primary fascial closure (PFC) and to permit easy access to the contents of the abdomen after resuscitation of the patient.103 Managing the open abdomen is froth with many problems that include sepsis and negative nitrogen balance from loss of fluid from the wound. Four methods TAC have been described: towel clip closure, Bogota bag closure, mesh closure, and vacuum-assisted wound closure.104 The towel clip closure method is the cheapest and easiest method and entails using a series of towel clips to hold the edge of the skin at distances 2 to 3 cm apart after hemorrhage has been controlled. The Bogota bag uses a split infusion bag sutured to the edge of the wound to cover the viscera. Mesh closure employs absorbable meshes on the fascial edges with the omentum, if present, interposed between the mesh and the bowels to minimize the risk of fistula formation. The vacuum-assisted technique involves placing a fenestrated non-adherent plastic sheet inside the abdomen extending bilaterally under the anterior abdominal wall followed by a layer of polyurethane sponge that is cut to size and sutured to the edge of the wound incorporating fenestrated tubes connected to vacuum. These are covered with a final air-tight adhesive film.105,106 Closure of the open abdomen is planned when edema has subsided and PFC is feasible. Gradual wound closure is attempted using interrupted transverse sutures on the superior and inferior edges of the incision.104 The technique of component separation107 is helpful to achieve PFC and involves the partial separation of the muscles of the anterior abdominal wall at the level of their aponeuroses on the abdominal recti in a vertical direction while preserving the neurovascular bundles. A new technique was reported from Sweden using vacuum-assisted closure and gradual shortening of non-absorbable meshes sutured to the wound edges with good results.107 The use of tissue expanders to aid in PFC is known as well as the use of pedicle or free latissimus dorsi flaps to reconstruct the abdominal wall.108 Finally, we must not forget the courageous, lone surgeon working in austere parts of the world without devices for vacuum-assisted wound closure or who may not be familiar with using them. The use of a skin only closure may be a safe and wise option in the aftermath of DCS under such circumstances. The incisional hernia thus created can be repaired at a later date and would amount to an acceptable trade-off for the patient to end up with a temporary disability (hernia) than to risk death by ACS. Figure 1 Pathophysiology of intra-abdominal hypertension on the cardiovascular (purple arrows), gastrointestinal (green arrows) and the renal (orange arrows) systems producing multisystem organ dysfunction in abdominal compartment syndrome. SIRS = systemic inflammatory response syndrome, GFG = glomerular filtration gradient, GFR = glomerular filtration rate, BF = blood flow. Figure 2 Pathophysiology of intra-abdominal hypertension on the respiratory (blue arrows) and the central nervous (orange arrows) systems producing multisystem organ dysfunction in abdominal compartment syndrome. CVP = central venous pressure, ICP = intra-cranial pressure, CPP = cerebral perfusion pressure, ARDS = adult respiratory distress syndrome. ==== Refs REFERENCES 1 Malbrain MLNG De Laet I Cheatham M Consensus Conference Definitions and Recommendations on intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (ACS) - the long road to the final publications, how did we get there? Acta Clinica Belgica 2007 62 supplement 1 44 59 2 Hunter JD Damani Z Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome Anaesthesia 2004 9 59 9 899 907 15310355 3 Moore AF Hargest R Martin M Delicata RJ Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome Br J Surg 2004 9 91 9 1102 10 15449260 4 Schein M Abdominal Compartment Syndrome: Historical Background Ivatury RR Cheatham ML Malbrain MLNG Sugrue M Abdominal Compartment Syndrome Landes Bioscience 2006 1 7 5 Emerson H Intra-Abdominal pressures Arch Intern Med 1911 7 754 784 6 Ogilvie WH The late complications of abdominal war wounds Lancet 1940 2 253 256 7 Gross RE A new method for surgical treatment of large omphaloceles Surgery 1948 24 277 292 18872858 8 Baggot MG Abdominal blow-out: a concept Current Research Anesthesia Analgesia 1951 30 295 8 9 Ravitch MM Omphalocle: secondary repair with the aid of pneumoperitoneum Arch Surg 1969 99 166 170 4240196 10 Allen RG Wrenn EL Jr Silo as a sac in the treatment of omphalocele and gastroschisis J Ped Surg 1969 4 3 8 11 Shenansky JH Gillenwater JY The renal hemodynamic and functional effects of external counterpressure Surg Gynecol Obstet 1972 134 253 258 5009571 12 Kron IL Harman PK Nolan SP The measurement of intra-abdominal pressures a criterion for abdominal re-exploration Ann Surg 1984 199 28 30 6691728 13 Fietsam R Jr Villalba M Glover JL Clark K Intra-abdominal compartment syndrome as a complication of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair Am Surg 1989 55 396 402 2729780 14 Cullen DJ Coyle JP Teplick R Long MC Cardiovascular, pulmonary, and renal effects of massively increased intra-abdominal pressure in critically ill patients Crit Care Med 1989 17 118 21 2914444 15 Iberti TJ Lieber CE Benjamin E Determination of intra-abdominal pressure using a transurethral bladder catheter: clinical validation of the technique Anesthesiology 1989 70 47 50 2912315 16 Karmali S Evans D Laupland KB Findlay C Ball CG Bergeron E To close or not to close, that is one of the questions? Perceptions of Trauma Association of Canada surgical members on the management of the open abdomen J Trauma 2006 2 60 2 287 93 16508484 17 Kirkpatrick AW Laupland KB Karmali S Bergeron E Stewart TC Findlay C Spill your guts! Perceptions of Trauma Association of Canada member surgeons regarding the open abdomen and the abdominal compartment syndrome J Trauma 2006 2 60 2 279 86 16508483 18 Nagappan R Ernest D Whitfield A Recognition and management of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome Crit Care Resusc 2005 12 7 4 298 302 16539585 19 Tiwari A Myint F Hamilton G Recognition and management of abdominal compartment syndrome in the United Kingdom Intensive Care Med 2006 6 32 6 906 9 16601965 20 Ravishankar N Hunter J Measurement of intra-abdominal pressure in intensive care units in the United Kingdom: a national postal questionnaire study Br J Anaesth 2005 6 94 6 763 6 15764629 21 Malbrain MLNG Chiumello D Pelosi P Wilmer A Brienza N Malcangi V Prevalence of intraabdominal hypertension in critically ill patients: a multicentre epidemiological study Intensive Care Med 2004 5 30 5 822 9 14758472 22 Schachtrupp A Jansen M Bertram P Kuhlen R Schumpelick V Abdominal compartment syndrome : Significance, diagnosis and treatment Anaesthetist 2006 6 55 6 660 667 23 Mcnelis J Soffer S Marini CP Jurkiewicz A Ritter G Simms HH Abdominal compartment syndrome in the surgical intensive care unit Am Surg 2002 1 68 1 18 23 12467311 24 http://www.wsacs.org 25 Ivatury RR Cheatham ML Malbrain MLNG Sugrue M Abdominal Compartment Syndrome Landes Bioscience 2006 26 Pleva L Sir M Mayzlik J Abdominal compartment syndrome in polytrauma Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2004 7 148 1 81 4 15523552 27 Flores-Alvarez E Avila-Cuevas GE de la Torres-Gonzalez JC Rivera-Barragan V Lopez-Rodriguez JL Reynoso-Talamantes D Early diagnosis and risk factors associated with abdominal compartment syndrome Cir Cir 2005 May-Jun 73 3 179 83 16091157 28 Chen RJ Fang JF Chen MF Intra-abdominal pressure monitoring as a guideline in the nonoperative management of blunt hepatic trauma J Trauma 2001 7 51 1 44 50 11468465 29 Rasmussen TE Hallett JW Jr Noel AA Jenkins G Bower TC Cherry KJ Jr Early abdominal closure with mesh reduces multiple organ failure after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: guidelines from a 10-year case-control study J Vasc Surg 2002 2 35 2 246 53 11854721 30 Mehta M Darling RC III Roddy SP Fecteau S Ozsvath KJ Kreienberg PB Factors associated with abdominal compartment syndrome complicating endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms J Vasc Surg 2005 12 42 6 1047 51 16376190 31 Djavani K Wanheinen A Bjorck M Intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome following surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006 6 31 6 581 4 16458547 32 Brasel KJ Weigelt JA Damage control in trauma surgery Curr Opin Crit Care 2000 8 6 4 276 280 11329512 33 Stagnitti F Mongardini M Schillaci F Ribaldi S Priore F Corona F Packing: current concepts of “life-saving” surgery G Chir 2003 Aug-Sep 24 8–9 315 22 14664191 34 Hut’an M Salapa M Vandriakova R Poticny V Rupture of the laparotomy incision and its suture using Ventrofilm Rozhl Chir 2001 3 80 3 124 7 11367611 35 O’Mara MS Semins H Hathaway D Caushaj PF Abdominal compartment syndrome as a consequence of rectus sheath hematoma Am Surg 2003 11 69 11 975 7 14627259 36 Davutoglu V Kervancioglu S Sezen Y Large rectus muscle hematoma with intraperitoneal bleeding and fatal abdominal compartment syndrome complicating anticoagulant therapy Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2005 1 11 1 109 11 15678282 37 Ernits M Mohan PS Fares LG 2nd Hardy H 3rd A retroperitoneal bleed induced by enoxaparin therapy Am Surg 2005 5 71 5 430 3 15986976 38 Holzheimer RG Gathof B Re-operation for complicated secondary peritonitis - how to identify patients at risk for persistent sepsis Eur J Med Res 2003 3 27 8 3 125 34 12730034 39 Sullivan KM Battey PM Miller JS McKinnon WM Skardasis GM Abdominal compartment syndrome after mesenteric revascularization J Vasc Surg 2001 9 34 3 559 61 11533612 40 Stagnitti F Calderale SM Priore F Ribaldi S Tiberi R Pascalis M Abdominal compartment syndrome: pathophysiologic and clinic remarks G Chir 2004 10 25 10 335 42 15756955 41 Tao J Wang C Chen L Yang Z Xu Y Xiong J Diagnosis and management of severe acute pancreatitis complicated with abdominal compartment syndrome J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci 2003 23 4 399 402 15015646 42 Alberti A Giannetto G Littori F DiMarco D Dattola P Dattola A Abdominal compartment syndrome in video laparoscopic surgery. Etiopathogenetic aspects, physiopathology and personal experience Chir Ital 1998 Mar-Aug 50 2–4 35 42 43 Oda J Yamashita K Inoue T Harunari N Ode Y Mega K Resuscitation fluid volume and abdominal compartment syndrome in patients with major burns Burns 2006 3 32 2 151 4 16451820 44 O’Mara MS Slater H Goldfarb IW Caushaj PF A prospective, randomized evaluation of intraabdominal pressures with crystalloid and colloid resuscitation in burn patients J Trauma 2005 5 58 5 1011 8 15920417 45 Oda J Ueyama M Yamashita K Inoue T Noborio M Ode Y Hypertonic lactated saline resuscitation reduces the risk of abdominal compartment syndrome in severely burned patients J Trauma 2006 1 60 1 64 71 16456437 46 Jensen AR Hughes WB Grewal H Secondary abdominal compartment syndrome in children with burns and trauma: a potentially lethal complication J Burn Care Res 2006 Mar-Apr 27 2 242 6 16566576 47 Rodas EB Malhotra AK Chhitwal R Aboutanos MB Duane TM Ivatury RR Hyperacute abdominal compartment syndrome: an unrecognized complication of massive intraoperative resuscitation for extra-abdominal injuries Am Surg 2005 11 71 11 977 81 16372618 48 Mayberry JC Welker KJ Goldman RK Mullins RJ Mechanism of acute ascites formation after trauma resuscitation Arch Surg 2003 7 138 7 773 6 12860760 49 Balogh Z McKinley BA Cocanour CS Kozar RA Valdivia A Sailors RM Supranormal trauma resuscitation causes more cases of abdominal compartment syndrome Arch Surg 2003 6 138 6 637 42 12799335 50 Desender L De Laet I Vermassen F De Waele J Tertiary Petitonitis and Tertiary ACS: a perfect match? Acta Clinica Belgica 2007 62 suppl 1 304 18229463 51 Cheatham ML Malbrain MLNG Abdominal Perfusion Pressure Ivatury RR Cheatham ML Malbrain MLNG Sugrue M Abdominal Compartment Syndrome Landes Bioscience 2006 69 81 52 Pastores SM Katz DP Kvetan V Splanchnic ischemia and gut mucosal injury in sepsis and the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome Am J Gastroenterol 1996 9 91 9 1697 710 8792684 53 Diebel LN Dulchavsky SA Brown WJ Splanchnic ischemia and bacterial translocation in the abdominal compartment syndrome J Trauma 1997 11 43 5 852 5 9390500 54 Botha AJ Moore FA Moore EE Postinjury neutrophil priming and activation: an early vulnerable window Surgery 1995 118 358 64 discussion 364–5 7638753 55 Biffl WL Moore EE Zallen G Neutrophils are primed for cytotoxicity and resist apoptosis in injured patients at risk for multiple organ failure Surgery 1999 126 46 42 8 56 Zallen G Moore EE Johnson JL Circulating postinjury neutrophils are primed for the release of proinflammatory cytokines J Trauma 1999 46 42 8 9932682 57 Bathe OF Chow AW Phang PT Splanchnic origin of cytokines in a porcine model of mesenteric ischemia-reperfusion injury Surgery 1998 123 79 88 9457227 58 Moore EE Mesenteric lymph: the critical bridge between dysfunctional gut and multiple organ failure Shock 1998 10 415 6 9872680 59 Riedemann NC Ward PA Complement in Ischemia Reperfusion Injury Am J Pathol 2003 162 363 7 12547694 60 Hassoun HT Kone BC Mercer DW Moody FG Weisbrodt NW Moore FA Post-injury multiple organ failure: the role of the gut Shock 2001 1 15 1 1 10 61 Zallen G Moore EE Johnson JL Pos-themorrhagic mesenteric lymph primes circulating neutrophils and provokes lung injury J Surg Res 1999 83 83 8 10329099 62 Gonzalez RJ Moore EE Ciesla DJ Post-hemorrhagic shock mesenteric lymph activates human pulmonary microvascular endothelium for in vitro neutrophil-mediated lung injury: the role of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 J Trauma 2003 54 219 23 12579043 63 Deitch EA Adams C Lu Q A time course study for the protective effect of mesenteric lymph duct ligation on hemorrhagic shock-induced pulmonary injury and the toxic effects of lymph from shocked rats on endothelial cell monolayer permeability Surgery 2001 129 39 47 11150032 64 Cheatham ML Malbrain MLNG Intraabdominal Hypertension and the Cardiovascular System Ivatury RR Cheatham ML Malbrain MLNG Sugrue M Abdominal Compartment Syndrome Landes Bioscience 2006 89 104 65 Barnes GE Laine GA Giam JY Cardiovascular responses to elevation of intra-abdominal pressure Am J Physiol 1985 248 R208 3918464 66 Cullen DJ Coyle JP Teplick R Cardiovascular, pulmonary, and renal effects of massively increased intraabdominal pressure in critically ill patients Crit Care Med 1989 17 2 118 21 2914444 67 Saggi B Sugerman HJ Ivatury RR Abdominal compartment syndrome J Trauma 1998 45 3 597 609 9751558 68 Joseph LG Este-McDonald JR Birkett DH Diagnostic laparoscopy increases intracranial pressure J Trauma 1994 36 6 815 8 8015003 69 Irgau I Koyfman Y Tikellis JI Elective intraoperative intracranial pressure monitoring during laparoscopic cholecystectomy Arch Surg 1995 130 9 1011 3 7661661 70 Bloomfield GL Dalton JM Sugerman HJ Treatment of increasing intracranial pressure secondary to the acute abdominal compartment syndrome in a patient with combined abdominal and head trauma J Trauma 1995 39 6 1168 70 7500414 71 Citerio G Berra L Intra-abdominal hypertension and the central nervous system Ivatury RR Cheatham ML Malbrain MLNG Sugrue M Abdominal Compartment Syndrome Landes Bioscience 2006 144 56 72 De Laet I Citerio G Malbrain MLNG The influence of intra-abdominal hypertension on the central nervous system: current insights and clinical recommendations, is it all in the head? Acta Clinica Belgica 2007 62 suppl 1 89 97 73 De Laet I Malbrain MLNG Jadoul JL Rogiers P Sugrue M Renal implications of increased intraabdominal pressure: are the kidneys the canary for abdominal hypertension? Acta Clinica Belgica 2007 62 suppl 1 119 30 74 Doty JM Saggi BH Sugerman HJ Blocher CR Pin R Fakhry I Effect of increased renal venous pressure on renal function J Trauma 1999 47 1000 3 10608524 75 Nathens AB Brenneman FD Boulanger BR The abdominal compartment syndrome Can J Surg 1997 4 254 76 Ivatury RR Diebel LN Potter JM Intraabdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome Surg Clin North Am 1997 77 4 783 800 9291981 77 Kirkpatrick AW Brenneman FD MacLean RF Is clinical examination an accurate indicator of raised intra-abdominal pressure in critically injured patients? Can J Surg 2000 43 3 207 11 10851415 78 Van Mieghem N Verbrugghe W Daelemans R Can abdominal perimeter be used as an accurate estimation of intra-abdominal pressure? Crit Care 2003 7 Suppl 2 P183 79 Pickhardt PJ Shimony JS Heiken JP Buchman TG Fisher AJ The abdominal compartment syndrome: CT findings AJR 1999 9 173 3 575 9 10470882 80 Malbrain MLNG Jones F Intra-abdominal Pressure Measurement Techniques Ivatury RR Cheatham ML Malbrain MLNG Sugrue M Abdominal Compartment Syndrome Landes Bioscience 2006 19 68 81 Kron IL A simple technique to accurately determine intra-abdominal pressure Crit Care Med 1989 17 7 714 5 2736945 82 Iberti TJ Kelly KM Gentili DR A simple technique to accurately determine intra-abdominal pressure Crit Care Med 1987 15 12 1140 2 3677766 83 Cheatham ML Safcsak K Intra-abdominal pressure: a revised method for measurement J Am Coll Surg 1998 186 5 594 5 9583702 84 Malbrain MLNG Different techniques to measure intra-abdominal pressure (IAP): time for a critical re-appraisal Intensive Care Med 2004 8 30 8 1692 15168013 85 Balogh Z Jones F D’Amours S Parr M Sugrue M Continuous intra-abdominal pressure measurement technique Am J Surg 2004 12 188 6 679 84 15619483 86 www.spiegelberg.de 87 Schachtrupp A Tons C Fackeldey V Evaluation of two novel methods for the direct and continuous measurement of the intra-abdominal pressure in a porcine model Intensive Care Med 2003 29 9 1605 8 12920511 88 Malbrain MLNG Validation of a novel fully automated continuous method to measure intraabdominal pressure Intensive Care Med 2003 29 suppl 1 S73 89 Schachtrupp A Henzler D Orfao S Schaefer W Schwab R Becker P Evaluation of a modified piezoresistive technique and a water-capsule technique for direct and continuous measurement of intra-abdominal pressure in a porcine model Crit Care Med 2006 3 34 3 745 50 16505660 90 Shafik A El-Sharkawy A Sharaf WM Direct measurement of intra-abdominal pressure in various conditions Eur J Surg 1997 163 12 883 7 9449439 91 Dowdle M Evaluating a new intra-uterine pressure catheter J Reprod Med 1997 42 506 13 9284013 92 Lee SL Anderson JT Kraut EJ A simplified approach to the diagnosis of elevated intraabdominal pressure J Trauma 2002 52 6 1169 72 12045648 93 Offner PJ de Souza AL Moore EE Biffl WL Franciose RJ Johnson JL Avoidance of abdominal compartment syndrome in damage-control laparotomy after trauma Arch Surg 2001 6 136 6 676 81 11387007 94 Miller RS Morris JA Jr Diaz JJ Jr Herring MB May AK Complications after 344 damage-control open celiotomies J Trauma 2005 12 59 6 1365 71 discussion 1371–4 16394910 95 Burch JM Moore EE Moore FA Franciose R The abdominal compartment syndrome Surg Clin North Am 1996 76 4 883 42 96 Tao HQ Zhang JX Zou SC Clinical characteristics and management of patients with early acute severe pancreatitis: experience from a medical center in China World J Gastroenterol 2004 10 919 21 15040047 97 Pupelis G Austrums E Snippe K Berzins M Clinical significance of increased intra-abdominal pressure in severe acute pancreatitis Acta Chir Belg 2002 102 71 4 12051093 98 Gecelter G Fahoum B Gardezi S Schein M Abdominal compartment syndrome in severe acute pancreatitis: an indication for a decompressive laparotomy? Dig Surg 2002 19 402 4 discussion 404–5 12435913 99 Leppaniemi A Kemppainen E Recent advances in the surgical management of necrotizing pancreatitis Curr Opin Crit Care 2005 11 349 52 16015114 100 Leppaniemi A Johansson K De Waele JJ Abdominal compartment syndrome and acute pancreatitis Acta Clin Belgica 2007 62 suppl 1 131 5 101 Decker G Abdominal compartment syndrome J Chir 2001 138 270 6 102 Parr MJA Olvera CI Medical management of abdominal compartment syndrome Ivatury RR Cheatham ML Malbrain MLNG Sugrue M Abdominal Compartment Syndrome Landes Bioscience 2006 232 239 103 Ivatury RR Kolkman KA Johansson K Management of open abdomen Acta Clin Belgica 2007 62 suppl 1 206 9 104 Balogh Z Moore FA Goettler CE Rotondo MF Schwab CW Kaplan MJ Surgical management of the abdominal compartment syndrome Ivatury RR Cheatham ML Malbrain MLNG Sugrue M Abdominal Compartment Syndrome Landes Bioscience 2006 266 96 105 Sugrue M D’Amours SK Kolkman KA Temporary abdominal closure Acta Clin Belgica 2007 62 suppl 1 210 4 106 Van As AB Navsaria P Numanoglu A Mc-Culloch M Modified sandwich vacuum pack technique for temporary closure of abdominal wounds: an African perspective Acta Clin Belgica 2007 62 suppl 1 215 9 107 Petersson U Acosta S Bjorck M Vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated traction: a novel combination of two techniques for closure of the open abdomen Acta Clin Belgica 2007 62 suppl 1 295 108 Libberecht K Colpaert SDM Van Hee R Jadoul JL De Clerq S Sonneville T New developments in abdominal wall reconstruction after abdominal compartment syndrome decompression Acta Clin Belgica 2007 62 suppl 1 220 4