==== Front Medicine (Baltimore)Medicine (Baltimore)MEDIMedicine0025-79741536-5964Wolters Kluwer Health 29979393MD-D-18-0244210.1097/MD.0000000000011269112693400Research ArticleSystematic Review and Meta-AnalysisPrognostic value of von Willebrand factor in patients with atrial fibrillation A meta-analysisZhong Cheng MM∗Xin Minghua MMHe Lang MMSun Guojian MMShen Farong MMLi. Yan Department of Cardiology, Zhejiang Greentown Cardiovascular Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.∗ Correspondence: Cheng Zhong, Doctor Department of Cardiology, Zhejiang Greentown Cardiovascular Hospital, No 409 Gudun Road, Xihu District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310012, China (e-mail: zhongchenghangzhou@126.com).7 2018 06 7 2018 97 27 e112695 4 2018 21 5 2018 Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.2018This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0Abstract Background: Studies on the prognostic role of von Willebrand factor (vWF) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are conflicting. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association of elevated circulating vWF level with adverse outcomes in patients with AF. Methods: PubMed and Embase were used to search literature through August 2017. Prospective observational studies that evaluated the association of elevated vWF level with major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and all-cause mortality in patients with AF were deemed eligible. The MACEs included death, stroke/transient ischemic attack, heart failure, myocardial infarction, and systemic/peripheral embolism. Results: A total of 6 studies were included this meta-analysis. Patients with AF with the highest vWF level were independently associated with greater risk of MACEs (risk ratio [RR] 2.20; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.61–3.01) and all-cause mortality (RR 1.63; 95% CI 1.39–1.91). Subgroup analysis showed that the prognostic role of higher vWF level was consistently observed in each defined subgroups. Conclusion: Patients with AF with elevated vWF level are independently associated with a higher risk of MACEs and all-cause mortality. However, more well-designed prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings. Keywords all-cause mortalityatrial fibrillationmajor adverse cardiac eventsmeta-analysisvon Willebrand factorOPEN-ACCESSTRUE ==== Body 1 Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia associated with increased global public health burden. The age-adjusted prevalence of AF was 596 per 100000 men and 373 per 100,000 women worldwide.[1] The estimated annual incidence of AF was 5.38 per 1000 person-years from Asian countries.[2] AF affects approximately 3.9 million Chinese populations aged over 60 years.[3] Patients with AF are at increased risk of morbidity due to stroke and thromboembolism.[4] These patients also have a high risk of all-cause mortality.[5] Therefore, identification of the prognostic biomarker is urgently needed in the care of patients with AF. Abnormal coagulation, endothelial function, and platelet activation have been implicated in AF.[6,7] Von Willebrand factor (vWF), a glycoprotein mainly synthesized in endothelial cells as a response to endothelial damage/dysfunction,[8] plays a key role in platelet adhesion/aggregation and thrombus formation.[9] A well-designed meta-analysis[10] has demonstrated significantly higher circulating level of vWF in patients with AF than in sinus rhythm population. Increased vWF level has been recognized as an independent predictor of AF in the general population.[11] However, the prognostic role of vWF in patients with AF remains controversial. Several studies[12–14] failed to demonstrate an association between elevated vWF level and adverse outcomes in patients with AF. Moreover, the strength of predictive value of vWF varied significantly across these studies. Currently, no previous meta-analysis has assessed the association of vWF level with adverse outcomes in patients with AF. The current meta-analysis sought to evaluate the predictive value of the vWF in patients with AF, in terms of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and all-cause mortality. 2 Materials and methods 2.1 Search strategy A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed and Embase databases from their inception to August 2017. Search keywords used to identify relevant articles were “von Willebrand Factor” OR “vWF” OR “hemostatic” AND “atrial fibrillation” AND “major adverse cardiac events” OR “mortality” OR “death”. In addition, we also reviewed the reference lists of relevant articles to identify any additional studies. No limitation was imposed on language in the literature search. All literature searches were performed by 2 independent authors. This meta-analysis was conducted according to the checklist of the Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology.[15] Ethical approval was not required because the present study reviewed the published studies. 2.2 Study selection Inclusion criteria were the following: prospective studies enrolling patients with AF; baseline circulating vWF level as exposure; outcome of interests were MACEs and all-cause mortality; and provided multivariate-adjusted risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for MACEs or all-cause mortality for the highest versus lowest category of vWF level. Exclusion criteria were studies provided risk estimate by continuous vWF level, and participants were not in the AF population. 2.3 Data extraction and quality assessment Using a standard data extraction form, 2 authors independently extracted the following data: author's surname, year of publication, country of origin, study design, sample size, gender, mean age or age range of participants, vWF cutoff value, definition of MACEs, number of adverse events, mean or median follow-up time, multivariate-adjusted risk estimate, and maximum adjusted covariates. Two authors independently assessed the study quality using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) for the cohort studies.[16] Total NOS score ranged from 0 to 9 stars. Studies achieving ≥7 stars were deemed as good quality. Any discrepancy in data extraction and quality assessment was resolved through discussion. 2.4 Statistical analyses Meta-analyses were conducted using a generic inverse variance approach with STATA Version 12.0 (Stata, College Station, TX). The pooled RR with 95% CI of MACEs or all-cause death was calculated for the highest versus the reference low category of vWF level. A pooled RR > 1 suggested a worse prognosis in patients with AF with increased vWF level. The presence of statistical heterogeneity across studies was tested using Cochran Q statistics and I2 statistics. For P < .10 values of the Cochran Q statistic or I2 statistic ≥ 50%, the assumption of heterogeneity was present and a random-effects model was selected. Subgroup analyses were planned for the length of follow-up, cutoff value of vWF, sample size, anticoagulated drugs, and form of AF. A leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was performed to examine the magnitude of influence of each study on pooled risk estimate. Begg rank correlation test and Egger regression test were used to detect publication bias. 3 Results 3.1 Search results and study characteristics A total of 175 articles were identified from the initial literature search. We removed 156 articles after abstracts or titles were scanned, leaving 19 potentially relevant articles for full-text evaluation. After applying our predefined inclusion criteria, 13 articles were further removed. Thus, 6 studies[12,13,17–20] were finally included in the meta-analysis (Fig. 1). Figure 1 Flowchart of studies selection process. Table 1 summarizes the baseline characteristics of the individual studies. All of these studies were published between 2003 and 2017. These studies were conducted in Germany,[12] Italy,[19] Spain,[20] Austria,[13] and United Kingdom.[17,18] A total of 4008 patients with AF were identified and analyzed. Individual study sample sizes varied from 269 to 1215, and the length of the follow-up ranged from 1.58 years to 7.0 years. Three studies[13,17,20] with 7 NOS stars were considered as good quality, and others[12,18,19] achieved 6 stars indicating moderate quality. Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies. 3.2 Major adverse cardiac events Six studies[12,13,17–20] reported the association of vWF level with MACEs. Meta-analysis showed that the pooled multivariate RR for MACEs was 2.20 (95% CI 1.61–3.01) for the highest versus the lowest category of vWF level in a random effect model (Fig. 2). A substantial heterogeneity between studies was observed (I2 = 66.9%; P = .010). There was no evidence of publication bias according to the results of Begg rank correlation test (P = 1.000) or Egger regression test (P = .924). A leave-one-out sensitivity analysis did not alter the statistical significance of the pooled risk estimate. A subgroup analysis showed that the association of the increased vWF level with MACEs was consistently observed in the length of follow-up, cutoff value of vWF, sample sizes, anticoagulated drugs, and form of AF subgroups (Table 2). Figure 2 Forest plots showing pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) of major adverse cardiac events for the highest versus the lowest category of von Willebrand factor level. Table 2 Subgroup analyses on major adverse cardiac events. 3.3 All-cause mortality Four studies[12,13,18,20] reported the association of vWF level with all-cause mortality. As shown in Figure 3, there was no evidence of significant heterogeneity (I2 = 28.7%; P = .024) across the included studies. Meta-analysis showed that the pooled multivariate RR for all-cause mortality was 1.63 (95% CI 1.39–1.91) for the highest versus lowest category of vWF level in a fixed-effect model. Figure 3 Forest plots showing pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) of all-cause mortality for the highest versus the lowest category of von Willebrand factor level. 4 Discussion This meta-analysis summarized the evidence to date regarding the association of elevated circulating vWF level with clinical adverse outcomes in patients with AF. The main findings of our meta-analysis indicated that patients with AF with elevated vWF level were significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality and MACEs. Determination of vWF level may contribute to risk stratification among patients with AF. In addition, the presence of increased vWF level may be incorporated into clinical scores for AF risk stratification and treatment strategies. This is the first meta-analysis that provided evidence for an independent association of elevated vWF level with all-cause mortality and MACEs in patients with AF. Previous meta-analysis[21] failed to show an association of higher vWF level with stroke event in patients with AF. Prognostic value of circulating vWF for the development of all-cause mortality and MACEs among patients with AF was demonstrated in our meta-analysis. Prognostic role of increased vWF level may be different in various subtype of AF. Subgroup analysis revealed that increased vWF level likely exhibited a stronger impact on MACEs in nonvalvular AF than any other form of AF. Our subgroup analysis also showed the association of increased vWF level with MACEs risk seemed to be stronger for longer follow-up. Also, vWF as a continuous variable was also predictive for all-cause mortality in patients with AF.[11] Endothelial damage/dysfunction and inflammation are important pathologic alteration in AF.[22] vWF itself plays a pathogenetic role in atherogenesis and regulates the balance between hemostasis and thrombosis.[23] The increased risk of all-cause death and MACEs in AF may be correlated with the presence of a prothrombotic or hypercoagulable condition. Therefore, vWF could be considered as a potential clinical biomarker. In line with these included studies, the significant and independent association of increased circulating vWF level with adverse outcomes was also reported in the general and other specific disease populations. vWF was an independent predictor of all-cause death in the population of community dwelling Japanese,[24] diabetic, and nondiabetic patients.[25] In patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease, vWF was independent predictors of future cardiovascular mortality.[26] Increased vWF level was predictive of adverse cardiovascular outcome and death during 1-year follow-up in acute coronary syndrome and stable angina pectoris patients.[27] Several limitations of the current meta-analysis need to be considered. First, the number of studies available for meta-analyzes was relatively small and substantial heterogeneity was present across studies in pooling MACEs (I2 = 70.0%; P = .005). The source of heterogeneity may be correlated with the type of AF, follow-up length, cutoff value of vWF, or different definition of MACEs. Second, included studies used different cutoff value of vWF to define higher vWF level and this meta-analysis could not determine the optimal cutoff value of vWF for predicting adverse outcomes. Third, circulating vWF level was only measured at baseline, and repeat measurements during follow-up of patients would improve diagnostic accuracy. Fourth, circulating vWF level is affected by several factors including vWF polymorphisms, systemic inflammation, blood type, and ADAMTS13 activity.[28] Lack of adjustment for these residual confounding factors in the statistical model could have slightly overestimated the risk estimate. Finally, the patients with AF analyzed in the current meta-analysis were predominantly elderly people, so generation of our findings to the younger patients should be with caution. 5 Conclusion Elevated vWF level at baseline is significantly associated with higher risk of MACEs and all-cause mortality in elderly patients with AF. This risk seems more pronounced in patients with nonvalvular AF. However, more well-designed prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings. Author contributions Conceptualization: Cheng Zhong. Data curation: Minghua Xin, Lang He. Formal analysis: Minghua Xin, Lang He. Investigation: Minghua Xin, Lang He. Methodology: Cheng Zhong, Minghua Xin. Project administration: Cheng Zhong. Resources: Minghua Xin. Software: Guojian Sun. Supervision: Cheng Zhong. Validation: Cheng Zhong. Writing – original draft: Guojian Sun. Writing – review & editing: Farong Shen. Abbreviations: AF = atrial fibrillation, CIs = confidence intervals, MACEs = major adverse cardiac events, NOS = Newcastle–Ottawa scale, RR = risk ratio, vWF = von Willebrand factor. The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose. ==== Refs References [1] Chugh SS Havmoeller R Narayanan K Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study . Circulation 2014 ;129 :837–47 .24345399 [2] Bai Y Wang YL Shantsila A The global burden of atrial fibrillation and stroke: a systematic review of the clinical epidemiology of atrial fibrillation in Asia . Chest 2017 ;152 :810–20 .28427968 [3] Zhou Z Hu D An epidemiological study on the prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the Chinese population of mainland China . J Epidemiol 2008 ;18 :209–16 .18776706 [4] Camm AJ European Heart Rhythm Association, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery . Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) . Eur Heart J 2010 ;31 :2369–429 .20802247 [5] Odutayo A Wong CX Hsiao AJ Atrial fibrillation and risks of cardiovascular disease, renal disease, and death: systematic review and meta-analysis . BMJ 2016 ;354 :i4482.27599725 [6] Vischer UM von Willebrand factor, endothelial dysfunction, and cardiovascular disease . J Thromb Haemost 2006 ;4 :1186–93 .16706957 [7] Watson T Shantsila E Lip GY Mechanisms of thrombogenesis in atrial fibrillation: Virchow's triad revisited . Lancet 2009 ;373 :155–66 .19135613 [8] Giblin JP Hewlett LJ Hannah MJ Basal secretion of von Willebrand factor from human endothelial cells . Blood 2008 ;112 :957–64 .18344423 [9] Lopez-Castaneda S Valencia-Hernandez I Arean C Von Willebrand factor: multimeric structure and functional activity in patients with atrial fibrillation with and without oral anticoagulation . Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2018 ;24 :647–54 .28618874 [10] Weymann A Sabashnikov A Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh S Predictive role of coagulation, fibrinolytic, and endothelial markers in patients with atrial fibrillation, stroke, and thromboembolism: a meta-analysis, meta-regression, and systematic review . Med Sci Monit Basic Res 2017 ;23 :97–140 .28360407 [11] Alonso A Tang W Agarwal SK Hemostatic markers are associated with the risk and prognosis of atrial fibrillation: the ARIC study . Int J Cardiol 2012 ;155 :217–22 .20965585 [12] Ehrlich JR Kaluzny M Baumann S Biomarkers of structural remodelling and endothelial dysfunction for prediction of cardiovascular events or death in patients with atrial fibrillation . Clin Res Cardiol 2011 ;100 :1029–36 .21725858 [13] Freynhofer MK Gruber SC Bruno V Prognostic value of plasma von Willebrand factor and its cleaving protease ADAMTS13 in patients with atrial fibrillation . International journal of cardiology 2013 ;168 :317–25 .23041092 [14] Heeringa J Conway DS van der Kuip DA A longitudinal population-based study of prothrombotic factors in elderly subjects with atrial fibrillation: the Rotterdam Study . J Thromb Haemost 2006 ;4 :1944–9 .16824187 [15] Stroup DF Berlin JA Morton SC Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group . JAMA 2000 ;283 :2008–12 .10789670 [16] Wells G Shea B O’Connell D The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality if nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses . Available at: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed October 1, 2017 . [17] Conway DS Pearce LA Chin BS Prognostic value of plasma von Willebrand factor and soluble P-selectin as indices of endothelial damage and platelet activation in 994 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation . Circulation 2003 ;107 :3141–5 .12796127 [18] Roldan V Marin F Muina B Plasma von Willebrand factor levels are an independent risk factor for adverse events including mortality and major bleeding in anticoagulated atrial fibrillation patients . J Am Coll Cardiol 2011 ;57 :2496–504 .21497043 [19] Krishnamoorthy S Khoo CW Lim HS Prognostic role of plasma von Willebrand factor and soluble E-selectin levels for future cardiovascular events in a ’real-world’ community cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation . Eur J Clin Invest 2013 ;43 :1032–8 .23961715 [20] Garcia-Fernández A Roldan V Rivera-Caravaca JM Does von Willebrand factor improve the predictive ability of current risk stratification scores in patients with atrial fibrillation? Sci Rep 2017 ;7 :41565.28134282 [21] Wu N Chen X Cai T Association of inflammatory and hemostatic markers with stroke and thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis . Can J Cardiol 2015 ;31 :278–86 .25746020 [22] Lip GY Blann A von Willebrand factor: a marker of endothelial dysfunction in vascular disorders? Cardiovasc Res 1997 ;34 :255–65 .9205537 [23] Luo GP Ni B Yang X von Willebrand factor: more than a regulator of hemostasis and thrombosis . Acta Haematol 2012 ;128 :158–69 .22890291 [24] Enomoto M Adachi H Fukami A Circulating inflammatory and hemostatic biomarkers are associated with all-cause death and cancer death in a population of community-dwelling Japanese: the Tanushimaru Study . Clin Med Insights Cardiol 2014 ;8 (Suppl 3) :43–8 . [25] Jager A van Hinsbergh VW Kostense PJ von Willebrand factor, C-reactive protein, and 5-year mortality in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects: the Hoorn Study . Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1999 ;19 :3071–8 .10591689 [26] Bickel C Rupprecht HJ Blankenberg S Relation of markers of inflammation (C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, von Willebrand factor, and leukocyte count) and statin therapy to long-term mortality in patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease . Am J Cardiol 2002 ;89 :901–8 .11950425 [27] Sonneveld MA Cheng JM Oemrawsingh RM Von Willebrand factor in relation to coronary plaque characteristics and cardiovascular outcome. Results of the ATHEROREMO-IVUS study . Thromb Haemost 2015 ;113 :577–84 .25472874 [28] Cortes GM Viveros Sandoval ME Arean Martinez CA Von Willebrand factor plasma levels variability in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation . J Atr Fibrillation 2014 ;7 :1124.27957129