==== Front Ann Saudi MedAnn Saudi MedAnnals of Saudi Medicine0256-49470975-4466King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2526618010.5144/0256-4947.2014.211asm-3-211Original ArticleEffects of chronic pain on function, depression, and sleep among patients with traumatic spinal cord injury Avluk Ozlem Celik aGurcay Eda aGurcay Ahmet Gurhan bKaraahmet Ozgur Zeliha aTamkan Ugur aCakci Aytul a a Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Ministry of Health Ankara Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey b Department of Neurosurgery, Ministry of Health Ankara Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyCorrespondence: Dr. Eda Gurcay, Ministry of Health Ankara, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit, Education and Research Hospital, Ankara 06010, Turkey, T: +90-312-596-2000 ext. 2993, F: +90-312-318-6690, dredagurcay@gmail.comMay-Jun 2014 34 3 211 216 Copyright © 2014, Annals of Saudi Medicine2014This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The main objectives of this cross-sectional study were (1) to examine chronic pain using the Multidimensional Pain Inventory-Spinal Cord Injury (MPI-SCI) version and (2) to assess the relationship between chronic pain and functional status, depression, and sleep quality among patients with SCI. DESIGN AND SETTINGS This was a cross-sectional study of all eligible patients admitted to the Ministry of Health Ankara Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Education and Research Hospital Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Clinic between January 2007 and July 2010. METHODS Forty-four patients (33 male, 11 female) with traumatic SCI, aged ≥18 years, who had pain continuing for ≥6 months and were hospitalized in the physical therapy and rehabilitation clinic were included in this cross-sectional study. Chronic pain intensity, functional status, depression, and sleep quality were assessed according to the MPI-SCI, Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), and Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), respectively. RESULTS A positive correlation was observed between “Pain Severity” (one of the subscales of the MPI-SCI) and HAM-D (r=0.487, P=.001) and PSQI (r=0.312, P=.039). “Pain Severity” was significantly higher in the “impaired sleep” group (P<.05) than in the “normal sleep” group and in the “depression” group (P<.05) than in the “no depression” group. CONCLUSION We identified a strong interrelationship between SCI-related “Pain Severity” and both depression and sleep quality. Hence, a comprehensive pain examination and management strategies including psychosocial interventions should be given particular consideration to address the critical issue of chronic pain in individuals with SCI. ==== Body Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is generally a destructive disorder that negatively influences independence and lifestyle.1 Pain is a significant problem for many with traumatic SCI.2 Patients with SCI have described pain as the most difficult medical condition to deal with, more so than the loss of motor or sensory function.3 The exact percentage of the SCI population with chronic pain (reports vary from 26% to 96%, with one-third of pain rated as severe) remains unclear, as does the extent to which function and quality of life are affected by pain. As a result, SCI pain has become a favorite topic of study for physiatrists.4,5 In our country, the prevalence of pain after SCI was reported as 61%.6 The persistent nature of pain associated with SCI has been reported to frequently interfere with cognitive, emotional, and physical health and functioning, including sleep, which has been shown to reduce quality of life. It has also been demonstrated that chronic pain is associated with changes in mood, particularly with more depressive symptoms and more perceived stress.7,8 Patients with SCI may experience several types of pain simultaneously, including different mechanisms that complicate the clinical picture.9 Because pain in this patient population is heterogeneous and may present with more than 1 type, each pain should be evaluated separately and in as much detail as possible.10 Although a number of assessment instruments have been developed for chronic pain patients in general, they may not be appropriate for use with SCI patients because of some differences based on the injury and physical impairments that may influence the perception of pain.11 The West Haven Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI) is a comprehensive instrument designed to assess a range of self-reported behavioral and psychosocial factors associated with chronic pain syndromes.12 The MPI has been adapted to SCI and appears to be a reasonable instrument to evaluate the impact of pain in people with SCI and the response of their significant others (the person with whom the patient feels closest) to pain.11,13 The main objectives of this cross-sectional study were (1) to examine chronic pain multidimensionally using the MPI-SCI and (2) to assess the relationship between chronic pain and on functional status, depression, and sleep quality among patients with SCI. METHODS The sample for this cross-sectional study consisted of 44 patients with traumatic SCI, who were aged ≥18 years, had pain continuing for ≥6 months, and were hospitalized in the physical therapy and rehabilitation clinic. They were admitted to the clinic for further rehabilitation. Patients with head trauma and impaired mental functions that precluded their answering all the questions were excluded from the study. Study participation was totally voluntary and patients were informed about the nature of the study. The study was approved by the local institutional ethical committee. All procedures were in accordance with the Helsinki Declarations of 1975. A comprehensive clinical interview was applied consisting of demographic variables (age, age at SCI, gender, marital status) and etiology of SCI. A physical and neurological examination of all patients was carried out. Their neurological level and impairment severity, which was classified using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) classification system, were recorded. 14 For the pain definition, 6 months was used as the cutoff for indicating “chronic” pain. Patients completed Parts 1 to 2 of the MPI-SCI inventory for pain assessment. The MPI is a self-reported questionnaire based on the cognitive-behavioral perspective designed to assess the impact of and adaptation to chronic pain. It comprises 3 parts: part 1 (pain impact), part 2 (responses by significant others), and part 3 (common activities). The first and second parts measure cognitive, affective, social, and behavioral responses which include: pain severity, life interference, life control, affective distress, support, negative responses from others, solicitous responses from others, and distracting responses from others.11,13 Functional status was measured by the patients’ scores on the motor and cognitive components of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM).15,16 It has been widely used to assess the impact of SCI on an individual’s activities of daily living and function. The 18 items of the FIM are graded on a 7-point ordinal scale, with a maximum total score of 126. Each FIM item is scored on a scale from 1 (complete dependence) to 7 (independence). FIM was administered using the Turkish version17 based on the observation of the patients according to the protocol used in inpatient rehabilitation. For psychosocial status, a screening instrument— the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) —was applied by the clinic psychologist.18 The HAM-D is a standardized interview-based assessment examining the frequency and intensity of depressive symptoms, which yields a total score ranging from 0 to 52, with a high score indicating more frequent and severe symptoms. We defined the presence of a clinically meaningful level of depressive symptoms as a total score greater than 7, with 8 to 15 indicating mild, 16 to 28 indicating moderate, and ≥29 indicating severe depression. The Turkish validity and reliability study of this scale was done by Akdemir et al.19 Sleep problems occur frequently in individuals with SCI.20 The Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a self-reported tool to assess quality and patterns of sleep over the last month, which is widely accepted as both valid and reliable.21 The PSQI measures 7 subscales including: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbance, use of sleeping pills, and daytime dysfunction. Each subscale is rated from 0 (not in the past month) to 3 points (≥3 times per week). A global sleep quality score is then obtained by summing the 7 components (range, 0–21). A PSQI total score ≥5 indicates poor sleep quality. The Turkish validity and reliability study of this scale was done by Ağargün et al.22 Analyses were conducted using SPSS, version 11.5 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). The normality of the distribution of continuous variables was investigated by Shapiro-Wilk test. Descriptive statistics were demonstrated as mean, median, standard deviations, minimum and maximum values for continuous variables, and number of cases or percentage for nominal variables. Comparisons between the groups were performed with Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test for non-normally distributed variables, and with one-way ANOVA and t test for normally distributed variables. If there was a significant difference in the results, post hoc Tukey or multiple comparison tests were used to determine the conditions caused by this difference. Correlations were tested using a Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient for variables consistent with normal distribution or using a Spearman’s rho correlation coefficient for variables that appear to have non-normal distribution. A P value less than .05 was considered as statistically significant. RESULTS The mean age of patients and age at injury were 33.9 (12.7) years and 30.6 (11.6) years, respectively. Thirty-three (75%) patients were male and 11 (25%) were female. Twenty-three (52.3%) patients were married and 21 (47.7%) were single/divorced. The distribution of etiological factors of SCI included the following: motor vehicle accident (22, 50%), falls (10, 22.7%), gunshot wound (5, 11.4%), job accident (3, 6.8%), and others (4, 9.2%). Twenty-eight (63.6%) patients were paraplegic and 18 (36.4%) were tetraplegic. According to the ASIA classification system, 23 (52.3%) patients were A, 10 (22.7%) were B, 7 (15.9%) were C, and 4 (9.1%) were D; 23 (52.3%) were complete and 21 (47.7%) incomplete. Responses by significant others were listed as follows: wife/husband (19, 43.2%), mother (8, 18.2%), father (3, 6.8%), sister/brother (8, 18.2%), daughter/son (3, 6.8%), and others (3, 6.8%). While 40 (90.9%) patients indicated that they lived together with this significant other, 4 (9.1%) lived separately from their significant other. As the main target was to examine chronic pain multidimensionally in SCI patients, mean values for the subscales of the MPI-SCI are shown in Table 1. We also presented the mean values of FIM, HAM-D, and PSQI in Table 1. The correlations between the MPI-SCI subgroups and FIM, HAM-D, and PSQI are demonstrated in Table 2. There was a positive correlation between “Pain Severity” and HAM-D (r=0.487, P=.001) and PSQI (r=0.312, P=.039); “Affective Distress” and “Negative Responses” showed a negative correlation with FIM (r=−0.315, P=.037 and rho=−0.336, P=.019, respectively) (Table 2). Because the second objective was to determine the effects of chronic pain on depression and sleep quality, results for associations were given in Tables 3 and 4. While depression and sleep quality were categorized, FIM was only assessed for correlation analysis with the FIM total score. DISCUSSION In this study, chronic pain and its effects on functional status, depression, and sleep quality were assessed in patients with traumatic SCI. It was observed that “Pain Severity” was significantly higher in the “impaired sleep” and “moderate and severe depression” groups. The findings yielded a correlation between functional status and pain behaviors from others, such that being more functionally dependent was associated with affective distress and negative responses. SCI patients with pain may view their disability more negatively because of the additional negative impact of pain on their lives. Conversely, a more negative view of one’s disability may lead to increased anger and restlessness with concomitant increase in pain severity. Loubser and Donovan23 concluded that chronic pain imposes an additional handicap for a given degree of disability. While the depression ratio (including mild-moderate-severe depression) was found as approximately 90% in our study, Migliorini et al24 recorded it as 37% and Krause et al25 as 19% in SCI patients. Participants who acknowledged having chronic pain had more depressive symptoms, with a mean Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale score of 10.6 compared to the means of 9.2 and 8.7 reported for the general population. 7,26,27 Study patients having chronic pain with high rates of depression supported the relationship between pain severity and depression. Therefore, this association suggests that the long-term emotional distress experienced by these individuals is significantly influenced by the presence of pain. Pain severity was positively correlated with impaired sleep. Persistent and intense pains associated with SCI28,29 may profoundly affect the quality of an individual’s sleep.30 Consistent with previous SCI findings, 31,32 our participants reported frequent sleep interference to trouble falling asleep, taking medications to sleep, and waking up, at least sometimes, because of the pain. Jensen et al20 reported sleep disturbances more frequently in patients with SCI than in healthy people. Because the findings in this study yielded a relationship between pain severity and sleep, it highlights the need to examine this possibility more closely and for other interested investigators to study the effects of sleep treatments on health-related domains in individuals with SCI. Some limitations to our study are as follows: First, while the sample size of the patients with SCI was not necessarily small, a larger sample would increase confidence in the reliability of the results. Second, the study design was cross-sectional; therefore, the data reflect the respondents’ situation at a certain point in time. In conclusion, in spite of the above-mentioned limitations, this study provides important preliminary support for the utility of behavioral and cognitive-behavioral models in the assessment of chronic pain, which is a complex and serious issue in individuals with SCI. To our best notice, this is the first study displaying chronic pain’s impact multidimensionally on functionality, mood, and sleep quality among patients with SCI in our country. Findings emphasize the strong interrelationship between SCI-related pain severity and both depression and impaired sleep. Therefore, this study highlights the need to evaluate each individual with SCI in a comprehensive manner that includes identifying the psychological factors. Health care professionals should give their full attention not only to the clinical examination but also to a pain management strategy by including psychosocial interventions, as an integral part, to address the critical issue of chronic pain in individuals with SCI. Table 1 Mean values for the subscales of the MPI-SCI, FIM, HAM-D, and PSQI. Variables Values MPI-SCI subscales (mean[SD]) First part  LI 2.9(1.6)  S 4.5 (1.5)  LC 3.8 (1.1)  PS 4.2 (1.3)  AD 3.4 (1.3) Second part  DR 4.4 (1.4)  NR 1.9 (1.6)  SR 3.8 (1.0) FIM (mean[SD])  Motor 40.4 (18.8)  Cognitive 34.6 (2.2) Total 74.8 (19.4) HAM-D (mean[SD])  HAM-D n (%) 17.7 (8.0)  No depression 4 (9.1%)  Mild depression 17 (38.6%)  Moderate depression 19 (43.2%)  Severe depression 4 (9.1%) PSQI (mean[SD]) PSQI n (%) 7.2 (4.4)  Normal sleep 15 (34.1%)  Impaired sleep 29 (65.9%) MPI-SCI: Multidimensional pain inventory-spinal cord injury, FIM: functional independence measurement, HAM-D: Hamilton rating scale for depression, PSQI: Pittsburgh sleep quality index. LI: life interference, S: support, LC: life control, PS: pain severity, AD: affective distress, DR: distracting responses, NR: negative responses, SR: solicitous responses. Table 2 Correlation between MPI-SCI subgroups and FIM, HAM-D, and PSQI values. FIM HAM-D PSQI Correlation P Correlation P Correlation P LI r=0.000 .999 r=0.341 *.024 rho=0.165 .286 S rho=−0.166 .281 rho=0.055 .722 rho=0.110 .477 LC r=0.041 .794 r=−0.048 .758 rho=−0.193 .210 PS r=−0.077 .621 r=0.487 *.001 rho=0.312 *.039 AD r=−0.315 *.037 r=0.274 .072 rho=0.282 .064 DR rho=−0.011 .944 rho=−0.148 .338 rho=−0.116 .455 NR rho=−0.336 *.026 rho=0.192 .212 rho=0.206 .181 SR r=−0.229 .134 r=0.238 .119 rho=0.099 .521 MPI-SCI: Multidimensional pain inventory-spinal cord injury, FIM: functional independence measurement, HAM-D: Hamilton rating scale for depression, PSQI: Pittsburgh sleep quality index. LI: life interference, S: support, LC: life control, PS: pain severity, AD: affective distress, DR: distracting responses, NR: negative responses, SR: solicitous responses. * P: <.05 statistically significant, r: Pearson’s correlation coefficient, rho: Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Table 3 Mean scores of MPI-SCI domains among HAM-D groups. MPI-SCI No Depression+Mild depression (n=21) Moderate+Severe depression (n=23) P Mean (SD) Med (Min-Max) Mean (SD) Med (Min-Max) First part  LI 2.3 (1.4) 2.7 (0–4.4) 3.7 (1.7) 3.2 (0.4–5.7) .030a  S 4.5 (1.6) 5 (0–6) 4.6 (1.5) 5 (0–6) .840  LC 4.0 (1.2) 3.7 (1.6–6) 3.7 (1.0) 3.7 (1.6–6) .484  PS 3.7 (1.4) 3.7 (0.7–6) 4.6 (1.1) 4.7 (2.3–6) .019a  AD 2.9 (0.8) 3 (1.7–4.7) 3.9 (1.5) 4 (0–6) .020a Second part  DR 4.6 (1.3) 5 (1.7–6) 4.3 (1.4) 4.7 (0.5–6) .450  NR 1.5 (1.6) 0 (0–4.3) 2.2 (1.6) 2 (0–5) .193  SR 3.3 (1.1) 3 (1.4–5.6) 4.2 (0.8) 4.2 (2.8–6) .003a MPI-SCI: Multidimensional pain inventory-spinal cord injury, LI: life interference, S: support, LC: life control, PS: pain severity, AD: affective distress, DR: distracting responses, NR: negative responses, SR: solicitous responses, SD: standard deviation, Med: median, Min: minimum, Max: maximum. a P: <.05 statistically significant. Table 4 Mean scores of MPI-SCI domains among PSQI groups. MPI-SCI Normal sleep Impaired sleep P Mean (SD) Med (Min-Max) Mean (SD) Med (Min-Max) First part  LI 2.3 (1.6) 2.5 (0–4.9) 3.1 (1.5) 3.1 (0.4–5.7) .105  S 4.5 (1.5) 5 (0–6) 4.6 (1.5) 5 (0–6) .930  LC 4.0 (1.2) 4 (1.6–6) 3.7 (1.0) 3.7 (1.6–5.6) .325  PS 3.6 (1.4) 3.6 (0.7–6) 4.5 (1.2) 4.7 (2.3–6) .031a  AD 2.9 (1.3) 3 (0–6) 3.7 (1.3) 3.7 (1.3–6) .087 Second part  DR 4.6 (1.3) 4.7 (1.7–6) 4.3 (1.4) 5 (0.5–6) .358  NR 1.3 (1.6) 0 (0–5) 2.3 (1.6) 2.7 (0–5) .044a  SR 3.6 (1.4) 3.6 (1.4–6) 3.9 (0.8) 4 (1.8–6) .464 MPI-SCI: Multidimensional pain inventory-spinal cord injury, LI: life interference, S: support, LC: life control, PS: pain severity, AD: affective distress, DR: distracting responses, NR: negative responses, SR: solicitous responses, SD: standard deviation, Med: median, Min: minimum, Max: maximum. a P: <.05 statistically significant. ==== Refs REFERENCES 1 Middleton J Tran Y Craig A Relationship between quality of life and self-efficacy in persons with spinal cord injuries Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007 88 12 1643 1648 18047880 2 Dijkers MP Zanca JM Factors complicating treatment sessions in spinal cord injury rehabilitation: nature, frequency, and consequences Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013 4 94 4 Suppl S115 24 23465468 3 Ravenscroft A Ahmend YS Burnside IG Chronic pain after spinal cord injury. A patient survey Spinal Cord 2000 38 611 614 11093322 4 Dijkers M Bryce T Zanca J Prevalence of chronic pain after traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review J Rehabil Res Dev 2009 46 1 13 29 19533517 5 Dijkers M Comparing quantification of pain severity by verbal rating and numeric rating scales J Spinal Cord Med 2010 33 3 232 242 20737796 6 Demirel G Yılmaz H Gencosmanoglu B Kesiktas N Pain following spinal cord injury Spinal Cord 1998 36 1 25 28 9471134 7 Rintala D Loubser PG Castro J Hart KA Fuhrer MJ Chronic pain in a community-based sample of men with spinal cord injury: prevalence, severity, and relationship with impairment, disability, handicap, and subjective well-being Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998 79 604 614 9630137 8 McColl MA Aiken A McColl A Sakakibara B Smith K Primary care of people with spinal cord injury: scoping review Can Fam Physician 2012 58 11 1207 1216 23152456 9 Siddall PJ Taylor DA McClelland JM Rutkowski SB Cousins MJ Pain report and the relationship of pain to physical factors in the first 6 months following spinal cord injury Pain 1999 81 1–2 187 197 10353507 10 Felix ER Cruz-Almeida Y Widerström-Noga EG Chronic pain after spinal cord injury: what characteristics make some pains more disturbing than others? J Rehabil Res Dev 2007 44 5 703 715 17943682 11 Widerström-Noga EG Duncan R Felipe-Cuervo E Turk DC Assessment of the impact of pain and impairments associated with spinal cord injuries Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002 83 3 395 404 11887122 12 Kerns RD Turk DC Rudy TE The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI) Pain 1985 23 4 345 356 4088697 13 Widerström-Noga EG Cruz-Almeida Y Martinez-Arizala A Turk DC Internal consistency, stability, and validity of the spinal cord injury version of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006 87 4 5165 23 14 American Spinal Injury Association International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury Revised 2000 Atlanta, GA Reprinted 2008 15 Keith RA Granger CV Hamilton BB Sherwin FS The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation Adv Clin Rehabil 1987 1 6 18 3503663 16 Kidd D Stewart G Baldry J Johnson J Rossiter D Petruckevitch A Thompson AJ The Functional Independence Measure: a comparative validity and reliability study Disabil Rehabil 1995 17 10 14 7858276 17 Kucukdeveci AA Yavuzer G Elhan AH Sonel B Adaptation of the functional independence measure for use in Turkey Clin Rehabil 2001 15 311 318 11386402 18 Hamilton M A rating scale for depression J Neurol Neurosur Psychiatry 1960 23 56 62 19 Akdemir A Orsel S Dag I Hamilton Depresyon Derecelendirme Olçegi’nin geçerligi, güvenilirligi ve klinikte kullanımı Psikiyatri Psikoloji Psikofarmakoloji Derg 1996 4 251 259 20 Jensen MP Hirsh AT Molton IR Bamer AM Sleep problems in individuals with spinal cord injury: frequency and age effects Rehabil Psychol 2009 54 3 323 331 19702431 21 Buysse DJ Reynolds CF III Monk TH The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research Psychiatry Res 1989 28 193 213 2748771 22 Ağargün MY Kara H Anlar O Pittsburgh Uyku Kalitesi Indeksinin geçerligi ve güvenilirligi Türk Psikiyatri Derg 1996 7 107 115 23 Loubser PG Donovan WH Chronic pain associated with spinal cord injury Narayan RK Wilberger JE Povlishock JT Neurotrauma New York McGraw Hill 1996 1311 22 24 Migliorini C Tonge B Taleporos G Spinal cord injury and mental health Aust N Z J Psychiatr 2008 4 42 4 309 314 25 Krause JS Saunders LL Reed KS Coker J Zhai Y Johnson E Comparison of the Patient Health Questionnaire and the Older Adult Health and Mood Questionnaire for self-reported depressive symptoms after spinal cord injury Rehabil Psychol 2009 54 4 440 448 19929126 26 Radloff LS The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population Appl Psychol Meas 1977 1 385 401 27 Sayette RB Johnston DE Basic data on depressive symptomatology Washington (DC) Government Printing Office 1980 28 Warms CA Turner JA Marshall HM Cardenas DD Treatments for chronic pain associated with spinal cord injuries: many are tried, few are helpful Clin J Pain 2002 18 3 154 163 12048417 29 Widerström-Noga EG Turk DC Exacerbation of chronic pain following spinal cord injury J Neurotrauma 2004 21 10 1384 1395 15672629 30 Morin CM Gibson D Wade J Self-reported sleep and mood disturbance in chronic pain patients Clin J Pain 1998 14 4 311 314 9874009 31 Widerström-Noga EG Felipe-Cuervo E Yezierski RP Chronic pain after spinal cord injury: interference with sleep and daily activities Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001 82 11 1571 1577 11689978 32 Biering-Sorensen F Biering-Sorensen M Sleep disturbances in the spinal cord injured: an epidemiological questionnaire investigation, including a normal population Spinal Cord 2001 39 10 505 513 11641793