==== Front Ann Saudi MedAnn Saudi MedAnnals of Saudi Medicine0256-49470975-4466King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2649771010.5144/0256-4947.2015.298asm-4-298Original ArticleCoronary artery calcium score in high-risk asymptomatic women in Saudi Arabia Fathala Ahmed aAlreshoodi Saleh aAl Rujaib Mashael abShoukri Mohamed cAl Sergani Hani dAl Buriki Jehad dAl Sugair Abdulaziz a a Department of Radiology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia b College of Medicine, AlFaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia c Department of Cell biology and National Biotechnology Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia d King Faisal Heart institute King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaCorrespondence: Ahmed Fathala MD, Department of Radiology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, MBC 28, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia, T: +966-11-4647272 ext 33812, ahm35799@hotmail.comJul-Aug 2015 35 4 298 302 Copyright © 2015, Annals of Saudi Medicine2015This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is indicated by calcium deposits in the coronary artery wall. Calcification is a component of atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease. Currently, there are no data on calcification in Saudi women at high risk of coronary artery disease. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and percentiles of CAC score in high-risk asymptotic women in Saudi Arabia with comparison of age-specific CAC percentiles derived from la arge population-based published study in the United States. DESIGN AND SETTING Retrospective analysis of CAC scores (CACS) at a single tertiary care center. METHODS Between January 2011 and April 2015, women referred for CAC screening because of the presence of one or more CAD risk factors were enrolled in the study. CT scans were interpreted by an experienced radiographic technologist, and confirmed by a radiologist. RESULTS The study sample consisted of 918 women, mean (SD) age of 55 (11) years. All patients were asymptomatic and referred by their primary care physician or cardiologist for CAC screening because presence of one or more CAD risks factors. CAD risk factors included diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, family history of CAD, and obesity. Baseline CAD risk factors were remarkably higher than in the US comparator group. CACS for 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles were calculated. The 75th and 90th CACS percentiles in Saudi women were significantly higher than the US percentiles. Age and diabetes are the most independent predictor of severity of CAC. LIMITATIONS A potential bias due to sample collection because data was from a single tertiary care center, the study was retrospective and the sample size was small. CONCLUSION There are significantly higher CACS percentiles in Saudi women compared with international data. Application of available published percentiles to a local population is not applicable and underestimates the severity of subclinical atherosclerosis. A large local population-based study is warranted to establish local CACS percentiles for a better understanding CAD screening, diagnosis, and treatment. ==== Body Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is indicated by calcium deposits in the coronary artery wall. Calcification is a component of atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease (CAD).1–5 CAC is quantified by either multidetector computed tomography (CT) or electron beam CT. Although there are several methods for calculating the CAC score, the Agatson method is most commonly used clinically.6–9 There is a strong relationship between the amount of CAC and coronary plaques.10,11 Moreover, it has been demonstrated that CAC can be used to predict risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) in both symptomatic12 and asymptomatic patients.13,14 Data on racial differences in CAC are conflicting. Some studies have reported a lower prevalence of CAC in African Americans,15 whereas others found no significant difference.16 The current CAC data in people of Arabic descent is limited. A small study by Dakik et al17 in a Lebanese population showed amounts of CAC equal to that in northern Americans despite a greater prevalence of CAD risk factors; however, these results have not been validated or reproduced by other studies in the region. Also, the sample size was small and was not compared with published data. Atherosclerotic disease, particularly CAD, is the leading cause of death worldwide and in Saudi Arabia in both men and women. The overall prevalence of CAD among women 45 years of age and older is 4.4%.18 Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and percentiles of CAC scores in high-risk asymptomatic women in Saudi Arabia by comparison of age specific CAC percentiles derived from a large population-based study in the US.19 PATIENTS AND METHODS Study population Between January 2011 and April 2015, women referred for CAC screening because of the presence of one or more CAD risk factors were enrolled in the study, which was conducted at King Faisal Specialist Hospital, a tertiary care center in Riyadh. CAD risk factors included a history of diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, a history of smoking or a family history of CAD. A family history of CAD was defined as a history of myocardial infarction in a parent, grandparent, or sibling, angioplasty, stent placement, or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at <65 years of age. A history of smoking was defined as a past or current use of cigarettes. Hypercholesterolemia was defined as a high cholesterol level of >200 mg/dL. Patients on current antihypertensive medication were considered hypertensive. A body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height (m) squared, and obesity was defined according the WHO criteria,20 as BMI >30 kg/m2. The study was approved by an internal review board of the hospital. CT scanning protocol Patients were scanned during a single breath-hold using a 64-slice Discovery CT750 HD scanner (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) with a customized protocol designed to minimize the administered radiation dose. All patients were scanned using a tube energy of 120 kVp in gated axial mode. The tube current was adjusted on the basis of the BMI to give adequate signal-to-noise ratio while minimizing the net current, using the empirically determined formula: tube current (mA)=11×BMI. The time of imaging during the cardiac cycle was adjusted on the basis of heart rate, imaging at 75% of the R-R interval for heart rate <75 beats/min, and at 50% of the R-R interval for heart rate >75 beats/min. The slice thickness was 2.5 mm, the gantry rotational period was 0.35 s, and the scan length was adjusted from the scout images to encompass the entire heart. The median radiation dose–length product was 42 mGy·cm, which, using a conversion factor of 0.014 mSv/mGy·cm, corresponds to a median effective radiation dose of 0.59 mSv.21 Calcium scan interpretation Foci of CAC were identified by both an experienced radiographic technologist, confirmed by a radiologist and scored using semiautomatic commercial software on an Advantage Workstation (GE Medical System, Waukesha, Wisconsin). The software calculated lesion-specific scores as the product of the area of each calcified focus and peak CT number (scored as 1 if 131 to 199 HU; 2 if 200 to 299 HU; 3 if 300 to 399 HU; and 4 if 400 HU or greater) according to the Agatson method6. These were summed across all lesions identified within left main, left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries to provide arterial-specific calcium scores, and across arteries to provide the total CAC score. Statistical analysis Frequencies, means and standard deviation (SD) were used to describe the baseline characteristics of the study sample. For comparison with published literature, subjects were divided according to age categories (<40, 40–44, 45–49, 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74 and >74 years old). Descriptive statistics were calculated for CACS and results were expressed as mean (SD) and percentiles (25th, 50th, 75th and 90th). Multiple linear regression was carried out with CACS as the dependent variable and baseline CAD risk factors as independent variables. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS 20.0) was used for all computations (SPSS, Inc.). A P value <.05 was considered significant. RESULTS The study sample consisted of 918 women, mean age 55 (11) years. All patients were asymptomatic and referred by their primary care physician or cardiologist for CAC screening because of the presence of one or more CAD risks factors. CAD risk factors included diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, a family history of CAD, and obesity. Baseline CAD risk factors are listed in Table 1. Table 2 provides the size of the study population, mean and standard deviation and CACS for 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles. Table 3 compares CACS percentiles between the US and Saudi Arabia. CACS percentiles for all Saudi women were significantly higher than US percentiles. Table 4 shows that age and diabetes were significantly associated with CACS by multivariate analysis. The CACS distribution based on age showed a strong relationship between age and severity of CACS (Figure 1). Figures 2 and 3 show CACS 50th and 90th percentiles in the US and Saudi Arabia. DISCUSSION The main finding of our study is the presence of strong association between conventional risk factors of CAD with CACS. The 75th and 90th percentiles were statistically higher for Saudi Arabia compared with the US. The greatest potential for CAC detection is as a marker for CAD prognosis in asymptomatic women, which goes beyond the prognostic information supplied by conventional CAD risk factors. A number of studies primarily composed of men reported that the presence of severity of CAC has independent and incremental value added to clinical and historical data in the estimation of death and non-fatal myocardial infarction.22 To our knowledge, our study is the first study investigating CAC in women in Saudi Arabia. In general, the role of CAC in CAD is not yet investigated in the region. A previous study in Saudi Arabia conducted by Fathala et al,23 indicated a strong association between severity of CAC and ischemic myocardial perfusion in women. Asymptomatic women with one or more CAD risk factors and moderate to severe CAC had more than 50% of ischemic myocardial perfusion. Comparing our results to a large population based study in the US,19 the CACS reported in our study were significantly higher compared with those in the US. There are several explanations for these findings, most importantly that our patients are considered at higher risk compared to published data. In our subjects, the prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and obesity is 42%, 62%, 54%, and 60%, respectively. Obviously, the prevalence of CAD risk factors in our patients is remarkably higher compared with North Americans. The prevalence of hypertension (26%)24 and diabetes (22%) are higher in Saudi Arabia.25 Generally, CAD is multifactorial and other etiologies could explain this major difference in CACS among the two groups. In addition to higher CAD risk factors, genetic factors have not been yet well characterized, and there are other environmental factors, life style factors, dietary habits, and lack of physical exercise. Using multivariate analysis, the age and presence of diabetes were the only predictors of severity of CAC. It is well known that conventional risk factors do correlate with CACS,26 even though CACS is superior to conventional risk factors in predicting outcome. Postmenopausal women (majority of our study population) are a striking example of the inability of conventional risk factors analysis to predict the presence or absence of atherosclerosis. A prior study showed no difference in any lipid parameters or in the Framingham risk score between post-menopausal women with and without calcified plaques.27 Most recently, a multicenter and multicountry registry showed that CT angiography provides incremental prognostic utility for prediction of mortality and nonfatal myocardial infarction for asymptomatic individuals with moderately high CACS, but not for lower or higher CACS.28 Study limitations Several factors may affect interpretation of the results of this study. First, the data was obtained from a single tertiary care center with a high prevalence of CAD risk factors; therefore, a potential bias due to sample collection might have had an adverse effect on the validity of the result. Secondly, questionnaire-based demographics was not obtained from the patients as the study was retrospective. Third, the study sample was relatively small compared with published data; a large sample study in the future is warranted to overcome this limitation. CONCLUSION This was the first population-based study of CACS in women in Saudi Arabia. CACS percentiles were significantly higher when compared with international data. The application of available published percentiles to a local population was not applicable and underestimates the severity of subclinical atherosclerosis. Convectional risk-factor analysis is not an optimum strategy to identify women at risk for CAD. CACS may have a major impact on CAD risk stratification, prevention, and treatment of CAD, a leading cause of death in females. A large local population-based study is warranted to establish local CACS percentiles for a better understanding CAD diagnosis, prevention and treatment. Figure 1 Coronary artery calcium score (CACS) by age group categories in years (1=<40; 2=40–44, 3=45–49, 4=50–54, 5=55–59, 6=60–64, 7=65–69, 8= 70–74, 9=>74). Figure 2 CACS 50th and 90th percentiles in the United States. Figure 3 CACS 50th and 90th percentiles in Saudi Arabia. Table 1 Baseline demographic characteristics of study population (n=918). Mean age (SD), years 55 (11) Diabetes mellitus (%) 42 Hypertension% 62 Smoking % 2 Family history of CAD (%) 5 Hypercholesterolemia (%) 54 BMI>30/m2 (%) 60 Table 2 Mean and SD of coronary artery calcium score per age group. Women Age (years) n CAC score Mean SD <40 71 4 21 40–44 65 14 64 45–49 138 24 65 50–54 167 27 200 55–59 169 64 237 60–64 129 97 240 65–69 87 171 308 70–74 50 283 450 >74 42 342 648 Table 3 Coronary artery calcium score percentiles by age. Age/years P 25 US P25 SA P50 US P50 SA P75 US P75 SA P90 US P90 SA <40 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 40–44 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 2 45–49 0 0 0 0 2 0 22 13 50–54 0 0 0 0 5 0 55 124 55–59 0 0 0 0 23 35 121 165 60–64 0 0 0 2 57 93 193 317 65–69 1 0 1 15 145 209 410 653 70–74 3 6 3 85 210 314 631 1035 >74 9 10 9 99 241 355 709 1046 SA: Saudi Arabia ==== Refs REFERENCES 1 Blankenhorn DH Stern D Calcification of the coronary arteries Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1959 81 772 7 2 Beadenkopf WG Daoud AS Love BM Calcification in the coronary arteries and its relationshio to arteriosclerosis and myocardial infarction Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1964 92 865 71 3 Warburton RK Tampas JP Soule AB Taylor HC 3rd Coronary artery calcification: Its relationship to coronary artery stenosis and myocardial infarction Radiology 1968 91 109 15 5654020 4 Frink RJ Achor RW Brown AL Jr Kincaid OW Brandenburg RO Significance of calcification of the coronary arteries Am J Cardiol 1970 26 241 7 5505449 5 Rifkin RD Parisi AF Folland E Coronary calcification in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease Am J Cardiol 1979 44 141 7 453039 6 Agatston AS Janowitz WR Hildner FJ Zusmer NR Viamonte M Jr Detrano R Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography J Am Coll Cardiol 1990 15 827 32 2407762 7 Becker CR Kleffel T Crispin A Knez A Young J Schoepf UJ Coronary artery calcium measurement: agreement of multirow detector and electron beam CT AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001 176 1295 8 11312197 8 Hoffmann U Brady TJ Muller J Cardiology patient page. Use of new imaging techniques to screen for coronary artery disease Circulation 2003 108 e50 3 12939244 9 Qian Z Anderson H Marvasty I Akram K Vazquez G Rinehart S Voros S Lesion- and vessel-specific coronary artery calcium scores are superior to whole-heart Agatston and volume scores in the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2010 4 391 9 21035423 10 Rumberger JA Simons DB Fitzpatrick LA Sheedy PF Schwartz RS Coronary artery calcium area by electron-beam computed tomography and coronary atherosclerotic plaque area. A histopathologic correlative study Circulation 1995 92 2157 62 7554196 11 Virmani R Kolodgie FD Burke AP Finn AV Gold HK Tulenko TN Atherosclerotic plaque progression and vulnerability to rupture: angiogenesis as a source of intraplaque hemorrhage Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2005 25 2054 61 16037567 12 Detrano R Hsiai T Wang S Puentes G Fallavollita J Shields P Prognostic value of coronary calcification and angiographic stenoses in patients undergoing coronary angiography J Am Coll Cardiol 1996 27 285 90 8557895 13 Arad Y Spadaro LA Goodman K Newstein D Guerci AD Prediction of coronary events with electron beam computed tomography J Am Coll Cardiol 2000 36 1253 60 11028480 14 Raggi P Callister TQ Cooil B He ZX Lippolis NJ Russo DJ Identification of patients at increased risk of first unheralded acute myocardial infarction by electron-beam computed tomography Circulation 2000 101 850 5 10694523 15 Newman AB Naydeck BL Whittle J Sutton-Tyrrell K Edmundowicz D Kuller LH Racial differences in coronary artery calcification in older adults Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2002 22 424 30 11884285 16 Khurana C Rosenbaum CG Howard BV Adams-Campbell LL Detrano RC Klouj A Hsia J Coronary artery calcification in black women and white women Am Heart J 2003 145 724 9 12679771 17 Dakik HA Skouri HN Mehio-Sibai A Sibai T Alam S Sawaya J Prevalence of coronary artery calcium among asymptomatic men and women in a developing country: comparison with the USA data Atherosclerosis 2005 183 141 5 15907855 18 Al-Nozha MM Arafah MR Al-Mazrou YY Al-Maatouq MA Khan NB Khalil MZ Coronary artery disease in Saudi Arabia Saudi Med J 2004 25 1165 71 15448760 19 Hoff JA Chomka EV Krainik AJ Daviglus M Rich S Kondos GT Age and gender distributions of coronary artery calcium detected by electron beam tomography in 35,246 adults Am J Cardiol 2001 87 1335 9 11397349 20 WHO Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic Report of a WHO consultation on obesity 6 1997 21 Halliburton SS Abbara S Chen MY Gentry R Mahesh M Raff GL SCCT guidelines on radiation dose and dose-optimization strategies in cardiovascular CT J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2011 5 198 224 21723512 22 Shaw LJ Raggi P Schisterman E Berman DS Callister TQ Prognostic value of cardiac risk factors and coronary artery calcium screening for all-cause mortality Radiology 2003 228 826 33 12869688 23 Fathala A Al Amer A Shukri M Abouzied MM Alsugair A The relationship between coronary artery calcification and myocardial perfusion in asymptomatic women Ann Saudi Med 2012 32 378 83 22705608 24 Al-Nozha MM Abdullah M Arafah MR Khalil MZ Khan NB Al-Mazrou YY Hypertension in Saudi Arabia Saudi Med J 2007 28 77 84 17206295 25 Al-Nozha MM Al-Maatouq MA Al-Mazrou YY Al-Harthi SS Arafah MR Khalil MZ Diabetes mellitus in Saudi Arabia Saudi Med J 2004 11 1603 10 26 Kuller LH Matthews KA Sutton-Tyrrell K Edmundowicz D Bunker CH Coronary and aortic calcification among women 8 years after menopause and their premenopausal risk factors: the healthy women study Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1999 19 2189 98 10479662 27 Hecht HS Superko HR Smith LK mccolgan BP Relation of coronary artery calcium identified by electron beam tomography to serum lipoprotein levels and implications for treatment Am J Cardiol 2001 87 406 12 11179523 28 Cho I Chang HJ ÓHartaigh B Shin S Sung JM Lin FY Incremental prognostic utility of coronary CT angiography for asymptomatic patients based upon extent and severity of coronary artery calcium: results from the coronary CT Angiography evaluation For Clinical Outcomes international Multicenter (CONFIRM) study Eur Heart J 2015 36 501 8 25205531