==== Front Ther Adv Neurol DisordTher Adv Neurol DisordTANsptanTherapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders1756-28561756-2864SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England 10.1177/175628641878932610.1177_1756286418789326ReviewImmunological and non-immunological effects of stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles on the ischaemic brain Doeppner Thorsten R. Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Goettingen, GermanyBähr Mathias Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Department of Neurology, Goettingen, GermanyGiebel Bernd Institute of Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germanyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0198-3152Hermann Dirk M. Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germanythorsten.doeppner@med.uni-goettingen.dedirk.hermann@uk-essen.de26 7 2018 2018 11 175628641878932623 4 2018 5 6 2018 © The Author(s), 20182018SAGE Publications Ltd unless otherwise noted. Manuscript content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons LicensesThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).Following the implementation of thrombolysis and endovascular recanalization strategies, stroke therapy has profoundly changed in recent years. In spite of these advancements, a considerable proportion of stroke patients still exhibit functional impairment in the long run, increasing the need for adjuvant therapies that promote neurological recovery. Stem cell therapies have initially attracted great interest in the stroke field, since there were hopes that transplanted cells may allow for the replacement of lost cells. After the recognition that transplanted cells integrate poorly into existing neural networks and that they induce brain remodelling in a paracrine way by secreting a heterogeneous group of nanovesicles, these extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been identified as key players that mediate restorative effects of stem and progenitor cells in ischaemic brain tissue. We herein review restorative effects of EVs in stroke models and discuss immunological and non-immunological mechanisms that may underlie recovery of function. strokeextracellular vesiclesneuroregenerationpost-stroke immune responsecover-dateJanuary-December 2018 ==== Body Introduction Research activity in the field of extracellular vesicles (EVs) has significantly increased within recent years. Once thought to be cell debris or artificial in vitro byproducts only, EVs have now been recognized as a means of intercellular communication processes.1,2 In spite of the significant progress made in the EV field, resulting in the formation of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles in 2011, fundamental issues with regard to EV enrichment, characterization and biological properties still have to be addressed. Yet, EVs have been recognized to not only be involved in physiological signalling cascades, but also to play a pivotal role under pathological conditions. The latter includes both pre-clinical and clinical studies on EVs as potential biomarkers for tumour formation and as therapeutic mediators against stroke and other diseases. Neuroprotection as observed after EV infusion in experimental stroke models is related to stem cell application in stroke. As a matter of fact, stem cell-induced neurological recovery after stroke is not a consequence of cell regeneration but due to paracrine mechanisms of grafted cells, among which stem cell-derived EVs are key mediators. EV administration upon stroke is associated with a plethora of mechanisms, affecting neuroprotection, neuroregeneration and immune response. We herein discuss some of these observations made after EV application in more detail with regard to both immunological and non-immunological aspects. We conclude this review by summarizing potential obstacles and pitfalls that need to be overcome in order to establish EVs as a future adjuvant stroke treatment. Current concepts of stroke treatment Stroke treatment has undergone profound progress during the last decades. Once a disease that did not allow for any causal therapeutic intervention, ischaemic stroke has become a treatable disease. Current treatment concepts of stroke are based on three columns: admission of the patient to stroke units; systemic thrombolysis; and endovascular treatment.3–7 The first stroke units, which were introduced in the 1990s, have significantly altered stroke therapy as it was recognized that patients treated on stroke units had better outcomes than patients not treated on stroke units.6 In addition, the establishment of recanalizing strategies has fundamentally changed stroke treatment. Several randomized clinical trials demonstrated the efficacy of tissue plasminogen activator-induced thrombolysis that improves stroke outcome when administered intravenously within 4.5 hours after symptom onset.8 More recently, thrombolysis has successfully been combined with endovascular recanalization therapies. Thus, patients receiving endovascular recanalization performed significantly better than patients not receiving endovascular recanalization, even when treated with intravenous thrombolytics before.3,4 Yet, the majority of patients still present functional neurological impairment in the long run, despite optimized recanalization therapy, which raises the need for adjunct stroke treatments that allow for promotion of neurological recovery. Since the benefit of recanalization strongly depends on the time interval until recanalization is initiated, acute neuroprotection therapies may have rather limited prospects in the future, because comparable benefits can be achieved simply by modest reductions in the delay until treatment is initiated. Indeed, all neuroprotection studies using a variety of pharmacological compounds have hitherto failed in clinical trials.9–11 Promoting neurological recovery post-stroke by stem cell transplantation Post-stroke brain remodelling involves a variety of different phenomena, including the de novo formation of neurons within stem cell niches like the subventricular zone of the lateral ventricles and the subgranular zone of the dentate gyrus.12–16 Although endogenous neurogenesis is stimulated upon induction of cerebral ischaemia,17,18 both survival and differentiation rates of newborn neural progenitor cells (NPCs) are limited.19–21 In order to benefit from endogenous neurogenesis in terms of stroke therapy, however, the complex and subtle mechanisms of neurogenesis have to be understood. Indeed, Notch signalling, among others, plays a critical role in this complex process.22 Activation of the Notch receptor induces expression of a set of various genes such as hairy and enhancer of split 3 (Hes3) and Sonic hedgehog (Shh), which in turn promote pro-survival signalling cascades involving Akt, STAT3 and mTOR. All of this helps enhance the resistance of endogenous NPCs within the stem cell niche. As such, therapeutic administration of Notch ligands is associated with increased post-stroke neurogenesis, yielding better neurological recovery in stroke mice. Likewise, interfering with other signalling cascades such as the ephrin pathway offers therapeutic options as well. Indeed, knockout of ephrin B3, which is known to play a pivotal role in the formation of axonal projections, results in enhanced levels of post-stroke neurogenesis in mice.23 In addition to the aforementioned experimental approaches, recent efforts were made to boost post-stroke neurogenesis by transplanting adult stem cells and/or progenitor cells from various tissue sources. Indeed, the transplantation of neural progenitor cells (NPCs) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were found to enhance neurological recovery in a variety of experimental stroke models via mechanisms that involved the promotion of endogenous neurogenesis.24–35 Although stem cell transplantation has profound effects on brain parenchymal remodelling, allowing for sustained neurological recovery in pre-clinical and some clinical studies,28,30,31,33,36–43 the grafted cells exhibit poor differentiation capacity and low survival rates in the long run.26 Together with the observation that a very low percentage of grafted cells at all reaches the brain after systemic – that is, intravenous – delivery, these findings show that the restorative effects of stem cell transplantation can hardly be explained by cell replacement, but involve indirect bystander actions. Subsequent studies suggest that soluble factors such as growth factors or cytokines secreted from grafted cells mediate stem cell actions by promoting long-term neuronal survival, neurogenesis and angiogenesis.44 Yet, it has been shown that a large number of mediators are not released into the extracellular space by exocytosis, but loaded on EVs that are released by the cells and convey stem cell actions from cell to cell.7,45,46 EVs: composition and characterization EVs form a heterogeneous group of vesicles that have recently been recognized as an additional means of intercellular signalling pathways under both physiological and pathological conditions.1,2 The most prominent representatives of the EVs are exosomes and microvesicles. Exosomes have average sizes of 70–150 nm and correspond to the intraluminal vesicles of multivesicular bodies (MVBs) being released to the extracellular environment upon fusion of the MVBs with the plasma membrane. Microvesicles arise by the outward budding of the plasma membrane and have an average size of 100–1000 nm. Although at the experimental level the different EV types cannot be discriminated yet, it can be considered that exosomes and microvesicles differ significantly regarding their molecular composition, which should depend on their precise origin.1,2,47,48 The molecular content of EVs is formed by proteins, such as cell adhesion molecules, integrins, intercellular signalling molecules and membrane-organizing proteins such as the flotillins and tetraspanins, by coding and non-coding RNAs like miRNAs and by several lipids. Depending on their surface structure, EVs may selectively interact with defined target cells.49,50 Depending on their cellular source, EVs fulfil a variety of biological functions, including pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory signalling.51–56 EVs induce beneficial effects in various disease models To date, EVs have been used in a variety of pre-clinical models in order to analyse their therapeutic effects under conditions related to cerebral ischaemia and other conditions. As a matter of fact, the application of EVs derived from MSCs and other stem cell-like sources has yielded significant protection in experimental models for myocardial infarction and kidney failure, and in models of non-ischaemic neurological diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease and myasthenia gravis.57–72 A more detailed review of these studies is beyond the scope of this paper. Compared with these other areas, the number of studies using EVs in pre-clinical stroke models is small. A literature search applying the terms (in different combinations) cerebral ischaemia/stroke and extracellular vesicles/exosomes yielded a total of 301 hits as of March 2018. The majority of these papers evaluated EVs as biomarkers. Omitting these latter publications, the number of papers published in the stroke/ischaemia field using EVs as therapeutics was fewer than 40 manuscripts, including review articles. Acute post-ischaemic neuroprotection by EVs via mechanisms unrelated to inflammation In rodents, reduction of brain injury associated with neurological recovery has been reported in a number of experimental settings.73–78 Some of these studied are summarized in Table 1. Chen and colleagues applied EVs obtained from adipose tissue derived MSCs in a rat model of focal cerebral ischaemia.75 The authors observed a significant effect on infarct volume in the acute stroke phase. The reduction of brain injury was long-lasting, yielding increased neurological recovery that persisted over four weeks. Interestingly, additive effects were observed when MSCs and EVs were simultaneously applied in animals, suggesting different signalling pathways underlying both stem cell-based and EV-based tissue protection. On the mechanistic level, blood–brain barrier (BBB) stabilization and inhibition of apoptotic signalling were held responsible for the neuroprotective actions of EVs. Evidence for neuroprotective effects of EVs that involved anti-apoptotic actions and improved synaptic transmission were obtained in oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) studies in vitro on neurons and astrocytes.79,80 In the immature mammalian brain – that is, in foetal or perinatal hypoxia-ischaemia – EV delivery inhibited caspase-3-dependent apoptotic cell death.81,82 Table 1. Administration of EVs in pre-clinical stroke models and their mode of action. In vitro/in vivo EV source/EV isolation Key results Reference In vivo (mice) MSCs/PEG Neurological recovery/increased angiogenesis and neurogenesis/reversal of peripheral post-ischaemic immunosuppression Doeppner and colleagues73 In vivo (rats) MSCs/UC Enhanced neurological recovery/angiogenesis and neurogenesis Xin and colleagues 74 In vivo (rats) Adipose derived MSCs/UC Reduction of infarct volume/increased neurological recovery Chen and colleagues 75 In vivo (rats) Adipose derived MSCs/miRCURY Increased functional recovery/neuroplasticity/white matter repair Otero-Ortega and colleagues83 In vivo (rats) MSCs/UC Enhanced neuroplasticity/increased neurological recovery Xin and colleagues 76 In vitro/ in vivo (rats) miR-133b-overexpressing MSCs/UC Secondary EV release by astrocytes/increased neural plasticity and neurological recovery Xin and colleagues109 In vivo (mice) Embryonic stem cells/UC Reduction of post-stroke inflammation/restoration of neurovascular unit Kalani and colleagues78 EV, extracellular vesicle; MSC, mesenchymal stem cell; PEG, polyethylene glycol; UC, ultracentrifugation. Post-acute EV delivery induces brain remodelling and plasticity Focusing on restorative actions in the post-acute stroke phase, Chopp and colleagues observed a significant reduction of neurological impairment that evolved over as long as four weeks after systemic delivery of MSC-derived EVs (MSC-EVs) in a model of transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) in rats.74 The authors attributed these effects to stimulation of post-stroke neurite remodelling as well as to stimulation of both angiogenesis and neurogenesis, all of which contribute to enhanced neurological recovery. In a head-to-head comparison, Doeppner and colleagues evaluated effects of bone marrow-derived MSCs and MSC-EVs that were administered systemically in the post-acute stroke phase, initiated 24 hours after transient MCAO in mice, demonstrating that EV delivery enhanced neurological recovery, and increased endogenous neurogenesis and angiogenesis in an almost identical way as MSCs.73 Post-stroke brain remodelling induced by EVs involves axonal sprouting, remyelination and oligodendrogenesis, as shown by Otero-Ortega and colleagues after transient MCAO in rats,83 and it also includes modulation of synaptic plasticity, as shown by Deng and colleagues in a model of global cerebral ischaemia in rats.84 Notably, acute neuroprotection by EVs is not observed in these latter studies due to the delayed timing of EV delivery.73 The mechanisms underlying stimulation of post-stroke brain remodelling and plasticity after EV delivery are still partly elusive, although recent studies suggest an involvement of non-coding miRNAs. In rats exposed to focal cerebral ischaemia, EVs obtained from miR-133b overexpressing MSCs induced enhanced neurological recovery associated with stronger neuroplasticity when compared with EVs obtained from naïve MSCs.77 In vitro experiments using OGD suggested that the enhanced efficacy of miR-133b containing EVs may be a consequence of secondary EV release from astrocytes.77 In another study, EVs harvested from MSCs transfected with an miR-17-92 cluster plasmid induced enhanced neurological recovery when compared to EVs derived from naïve MSCs.76 These studies suggest that miRNAs might be decisive elements mediating restorative actions of EVs. The loading of EVs with defined miRNAs is discussed to open novel ways for ex vivo manipulations of stem cells or EV harvests, allowing for the use of EVs as cargo carriers.85 Immunoregulatory effects of EVs under conditions unrelated to ischaemia The mammalian immune system ensures host responses to infection that endanger the integrity of the whole organism. The immune system comprises the innate and adaptive immune system.86–90 The former includes phagocytes, mast cells and natural killer (NK) cells, whereas the latter, which is also referred to as the acquired immune system, includes T and B lymphocytes. Other cells of the immune system, such as dendritic cells, form links between the innate and the adaptive immune system. Studies on autoimmune diseases and cancer suggest a role of immune responses in mediating EV actions. Depending on their cargo (e.g. miRNAs, proteins), EVs can differentially impact immune responses.52,91,92 Immune cells do release EVs containing immune signals, as shown for B lymphocytes, which shed EVs containing major histocompatibility (MHC) II molecules that in turn activate CD4+ T lymphocytes,51 or as shown for dendritic cells, which secrete EVs that bind toll-like receptors (TLR), leading to spreading immune cell activation to neighbouring dendritic cells.93 Notably, EVs obtained from synovial fibroblasts of patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis have been shown to express higher tumour necrosis factor (TNF) concentrations than controls not suffering from rheumatic arthritis.94 EVs contribute to autoimmunity via MHC II molecules, TLR substrates and pro-inflammatory cytokines. In contrast, EVs released from cancer cells have been shown to induce tumour angiogenesis95–97 and suppress activity of NK cells and T cells, resulting in immune escape of tumours and tumour growth. Tumour escape is mediated by a plethora of signal cascades, including NF-kB, TNF-α, STAT-3 and other pathways.92,98–102 The signals mediating angiogenesis still need to be characterized in further depth. Transmitting complex signals between tumour cells, immune cells and vasculature cells, EVs may give rise to the development of novel cancer therapies. Immunoregulatory effects of EVs under conditions of ischaemia Similar to autoimmunity and cancer, the modulation of immune signals also plays a pivotal role in responses to ischaemia. Deng and colleagues studied therapeutic effects of EVs which were obtained from human neurons, embryonic stem cells, NPCs or astrocytes on the survival of human embryonic stem cell-derived neurons that were exposed to OGD for 1 h.79 Interestingly, all types of EVs yielded significant neuroprotection, which was associated with the inhibition of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and of various pro-inflammatory signals such as COX-2, iNOS and TNF-α as well as apoptotic signals such as caspase-3 and Bax. On the contrary, Webb and colleagues did find differences between EVs derived from different cell sources.103 In the murine thromboembolic stroke model, the authors compared effects of neural stem cells (NSCs) with MSC-EVs, demonstrating that NSC-EVs were superior to MSC-EVs, leading to a modulation of post-stroke systemic immune response, neuroprotection and neurological recovery. The authors confirmed the efficacy of NSC-derived EVs in a model of porcine permanent focal cerebral ischaemia, where enhanced neurological recovery and improved white matter remodelling evaluated by fractional anisotropy were noted. Although EVs are able to cross the BBB under ischaemic conditions,104 EVs might differentially affect peripheral (i.e. in blood) and central (i.e. in brain) immune responses. In our own head-to-head comparison, we evaluated the effects of bone marrow-derived MSC-EVs in a model of transient intraluminal MCAO and compared their effects with effects of bone marrow-derived MSC.73 Delivery of MSC-EVs, which were administered at three time points −24 h, 72 h and 120 h after MCAO – induced sustained neuroprotection associated with neurological recovery that persisted after 28 days.73 While no effect on the peripheral or CNS immune response was noted early after EV delivery (i.e. at 48 h post-stroke), reversal of peripheral immunosuppression was noted by flow cytometry at 144 h post-stroke. When compared to sham-operated non-ischaemic mice, vehicle-treated ischaemic mice exhibited significant B lymphocyte, T lymphocyte, monocyte and NK cell reductions in peripheral blood. The delivery of MSC-EVs reversed these changes. EV delivery did not significantly influence post-ischaemic immune cell infiltration assessed by flow cytometry at this late time point. Whether the reversal of post-ischaemic immunosuppression contributes to neurological recovery remains to be shown. Similar observations (i.e. modulation of peripheral, but not CNS immune responses) were made by Hu and colleagues, who analysed the effects of MSC-EVs in a rat stroke model.105 In their study, MSC-EVs did not modulate cerebral neuroinflammation as evaluated by CD45+ leukocyte infiltration, but again attenuated peripheral immunosuppression seven days after stroke. Specifically, dendritic cells were elevated in the EV groups, suggesting a contribution of these cells for enhanced stroke outcome. Evaluating the role of anti-inflammatory actions in neuroprotective effects of embryonic stem cell-derived EVs, Kalani and colleagues loaded EVs with the herbal supplement curcumin and intranasally delivered these EVs to mice exposed to focal cerebral ischaemia.78 The delivery of curcumin-loaded EVs reduced infarct volume and decreased TNF-α levels in ischaemic brain tissue. EVs not loaded with curcumin were not examined in this study. Thus, the role of curcumin in the anti-inflammatory effects remains elusive. To enhance cerebral accumulation of systemically delivered EVs, Tian and colleagues conjugated the cyclic derivative of the RGD peptide c(RGDyK) to the surface of curcumin-loaded EVs followed by the intravenous infusion of these EVs in a mouse MCAO model.106 Significantly reduced brain injury was noted in this study, which was associated with decreased cerebral inflammation, namely reduced levels of TNF- α, IL-1β and IL-6. These data again illustrate the potential of EVs as cargo carriers for anti-inflammatory molecules. Whether curcumin mediated the anti-inflammatory effects of c(RGDyK)-conjugated EVs remained again unclear. EVs are abundantly released from stroke tissue and can be detected in peripheral blood, as suggested by Couch and colleagues, who evaluated EVs in blood samples of ischaemic stroke patients by mass spectrometry and compared the proteome patterns observed with EVs obtained from patients not suffering from a stroke.107 In blood samples of acute stroke patients collected within the first 24 h after stroke, the authors observed significantly elevated levels of acute-phase proteins such as C-reactive protein. Interestingly, EVs derived from stroke patients were significantly increased in number. When co-incubated with cultivated macrophages, EVs obtained from stroke patients induced pro-inflammatory responses, namely increased levels of TNF- α and IL-1β.107 Whether these pro-inflammatory actions contribute to ischaemic brain injury will have to be assessed. Conclusion and outlook In an evolving field, there is increasing evidence that EVs obtained from different stem and precursor cell sources potently induce post-ischaemic brain remodelling and plasticity, enabling functional neurological recovery. Thus, stem/progenitor cell-derived EVs are increasingly discussed as novel therapeutic agents in neurology. For now, neither a standardized protocol for raising stem/progenitor cells nor a standardized protocol for harvesting EVs from conditioned media exist. Recently, we compared different studies describing in vivo effects of MSC-EVs and realized that almost all groups use their own strategies to raise MSCs.55 A bundle of different cell culture media has been used. Some groups use formulated media, some serum-supplemented media, and other groups, including ours, use human platelet lysate-supplemented media. Some groups change their MSC expansion media to special EV-free/reduced harvesting media; others, including us, collect conditioned media during MSC expansion and accept the presence of non-metabolized media-derived vesicles in their MSC-EV products.55 While it may appear as an advantage to harvest MSC-EVs from specific EV-free/reduced harvesting media, it has to be considered that these media regularly do not support extensive MSC expansion that would be required to produce enough EVs for the clinical setting. Thus, in those strategies, media exchanges have to be performed from expansion to harvesting media, which will certainly affect the biology of the cells and the quality of the resulting EVs. Some groups raise their MSCs in hypoxic conditions, while others add pro-inflammatory cytokines to their MSC expansion media; both of these approaches seem to affect the EV quantity and very likely their quality as well.55 As different as the MSC expansion conditions are, the same holds for harvesting methods. Many groups use their own variants of differential centrifugation protocols; others use filtration-based protocols.55 We have used a PEG-based (polyethylene glycol) purification strategy.56 According to these variabilities, we expect that formulation and quality of the MSC-EV preparations to differ from group to group. As there are no standardized functional assays, and almost all groups use their own variation of certain functional readouts, published results can hardly be compared between the groups.55 The issue is furthermore complicated by the fact that MSCs provide a very heterogeneous cell entity and that even upon using identical protocols for MSC expansion and EV preparation, the quality of obtained EV samples seems to differ in donor-dependent ways.56 In the future, the ideal way to produce MSC-EV fractions for the clinical setting needs to be identified. Furthermore, despite the fact that almost all groups observe therapeutic effects of MSC-EVs in pre-clinical models, it remains an open question whether MSCs are the best EV source for the treatment of neurological diseases. Depending on the disease, EVs of other cell entities might exert different, eventually better therapeutic effects. Pre-clinical trials that compare different EV fractions side by side are mandatory to discriminate more and less effective EV production strategies for the treatment of given diseases. Furthermore, the mode of action should be identified. For now, we consider that stem/progenitor EVs execute restorative actions by mediating anti-inflammatory immune mechanisms.55 However, in addition to these beneficial actions of anti-inflammatory stem and precursor cell-derived EVs, potentially detrimental pro-inflammatory actions have recently been reported, which urgently need to be scrutinized. In view of the high expectations towards the clinical translation of EVs, unfavourable bystander actions need to be carefully evaluated before proof-of-concept studies in human patients may be considered. Furthermore, a number of regulatory-relevant issues have to be dealt with before EVs can be applied to humans.108 Funding: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest. ORCID iD: Dirk M. Hermann https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0198-3152 ==== Refs References 1 Yanez-Mo M Siljander PR Andreu Z et al Biological properties of extracellular vesicles and their physiological functions . J Extracell Vesicles 2015 ; 4 : 27066 .25979354 2 Ludwig AK Giebel B. Exosomes: small vesicles participating in intercellular communication . Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2012 ; 44 : 11 –15 .22024155 3 Campbell BC Mitchell PJ Kleinig TJ et al Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection . N Engl J Med 2015 ; 372 : 1009 –1018 .25671797 4 Goyal M Demchuk AM Menon BK et al Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke . N Engl J Med 2015 ; 372 : 1019 –1030 .25671798 5 The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group . Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke . N Engl J Med 1995 ; 333 : 1581 –1587 .7477192 6 Indredavik B Bakke F Solberg R et al Benefit of a stroke unit: a randomized controlled trial . Stroke 1991 ; 22 : 1026 –1031 .1866749 7 Doeppner TR Bahr M Hermann DM et al Concise review: extracellular vesicles overcoming limitations of cell therapies in ischemic stroke . Stem Cells Transl Med 2017 ; 6 : 2044 –2052 .28941317 8 Hacke W Kaste M Bluhmki E et al Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke . N Engl J Med 2008 ; 359 : 1317 –1329 .18815396 9 Weinberger JM. Evolving therapeutic approaches to treating acute ischemic stroke . J Neurol Sci 2006 ; 249 : 101 –109 .17005205 10 Durukan A Tatlisumak T. Acute ischemic stroke: overview of major experimental rodent models, pathophysiology, and therapy of focal cerebral ischemia . Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2007 ; 87 : 179 –197 .17521716 11 Ginsberg MD. Neuroprotection for ischemic stroke: past, present and future . Neuropharmacology 2008 ; 55 : 363 –389 .18308347 12 Sawada M Matsumoto M Sawamoto K. Vascular regulation of adult neurogenesis under physiological and pathological conditions . Front Neurosci 2014 ; 8 : 53 .24672424 13 Braun SM Jessberger S. Adult neurogenesis: mechanisms and functional significance . Development 2014 ; 141 : 1983 –1986 .24803647 14 Alvarez-Buylla A Garcia-Verdugo JM. Neurogenesis in adult subventricular zone . J Neurosci 2002 ; 22 : 629 –634 .11826091 15 Stolp HB Molnar Z. Neurogenic niches in the brain: help and hindrance of the barrier systems . Front Neurosci 2015 ; 9 : 20 .25691856 16 Yamashima T Tonchev AB Yukie M. Adult hippocampal neurogenesis in rodents and primates: endogenous, enhanced, and engrafted . Rev Neurosci 2007 ; 18 : 67 –82 .17405451 17 Yamashita T Ninomiya M Hernández Acosta P et al Subventricular zone-derived neuroblasts migrate and differentiate into mature neurons in the post-stroke adult striatum . J Neurosci 2006 ; 26 : 6627 –6636 .16775151 18 Arvidsson A Collin T Kirik D et al Neuronal replacement from endogenous precursors in the adult brain after stroke . Nat Med 2002 ; 8 : 963 –970 .12161747 19 Parent JM. Injury-induced neurogenesis in the adult mammalian brain . Neuroscientist 2003 ; 9 : 261 –272 .12934709 20 Doeppner TR Dietz GP El Aanbouri M et al TAT-Bcl-x(L) improves survival of neuronal precursor cells in the lesioned striatum after focal cerebral ischemia . Neurobiol Dis 2009 ; 34 : 87 –94 .19167500 21 Haas S Weidner N Winkler J. Adult stem cell therapy in stroke . Curr Opin Neurol 2005 ; 18 : 59 –64 .15655404 22 Androutsellis-Theotokis A Leker RR Soldner F et al Notch signalling regulates stem cell numbers in vitro and in vivo . Nature 2006 ; 442 : 823 –826 .16799564 23 Doeppner TR Bretschneider E Doehring M et al Enhancement of endogenous neurogenesis in ephrin-B3 deficient mice after transient focal cerebral ischemia . Acta Neuropathol 2011 ; 122 : 429 –442 .21779764 24 Zhang J Chopp M. Cell-based therapy for ischemic stroke . Expert Opin Biol Ther 2013 ; 13 : 1229 –1240 .23738646 25 Hermann DM Chopp M. Promoting brain remodelling and plasticity for stroke recovery: therapeutic promise and potential pitfalls of clinical translation . Lancet Neurol 2012 ; 11 : 369 –380 .22441198 26 Doeppner TR Ewert TA Tönges L et al Transduction of neural precursor cells with TAT-heat shock protein 70 chaperone: therapeutic potential against ischemic stroke after intrastriatal and systemic transplantation . Stem Cells 2012 ; 30 : 1297 –1310 .22593021 27 Cheng Q Zhang Z Zhang S et al Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells protect against ischemic brain injury in mouse by regulating peripheral immunoinflammation . Brain Res 2015 ; 1594 : 293 –304 .25449888 28 Leu S Lin YC Yuen CM et al Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells markedly attenuate brain infarct size and improve neurological function in rats . J Transl Med 2010 ; 8 : 63 .20584315 29 Du G Liu Y Dang M et al Comparison of administration routes for adipose-derived stem cells in the treatment of middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats . Acta Histochem 2014 ; 116 : 1075 –1084 .24962764 30 Komatsu K Honmou O Suzuki J et al Therapeutic time window of mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow after cerebral ischemia . Brain Res 2010 ; 1334 : 84 –92 .20382136 31 Kranz A Wagner DC Kamprad M et al Transplantation of placenta-derived mesenchymal stromal cells upon experimental stroke in rats . Brain Res 2010 ; 1315 : 128 –136 .20004649 32 Doeppner TR El Aanbouri M Dietz GP et al Transplantation of TAT-Bcl-xL-transduced neural precursor cells: long-term neuroprotection after stroke . Neurobiol Dis 2010 ; 40 : 265 –276 .20554038 33 Doeppner TR Kaltwasser B Teli MK et al Effects of acute versus post-acute systemic delivery of neural progenitor cells on neurological recovery and brain remodeling after focal cerebral ischemia in mice . Cell Death Dis 2014 ; 5 : e1386 .25144721 34 Doeppner TR Kaltwasser B Teli MK et al Post-stroke transplantation of adult subventricular zone derived neural progenitor cells: a comprehensive analysis of cell delivery routes and their underlying mechanisms . Exp Neurol 2015 ; 273 : 45 –56 .26253224 35 Chu K Kim M Park KI et al Human neural stem cells improve sensorimotor deficits in the adult rat brain with experimental focal ischemia . Brain Res 2004 ; 1016 : 145 –153 .15246850 36 Moniche F Gonzalez A Gonzalez-Marcos JR et al Intra-arterial bone marrow mononuclear cells in ischemic stroke: a pilot clinical trial . Stroke 2012 ; 43 : 2242 –2244 .22764211 37 Lee JS Hong JM Moon GJ et al A long-term follow-up study of intravenous autologous mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in patients with ischemic stroke . Stem Cells 2010 ; 28 : 1099 –1106 .20506226 38 Honmou O Houkin K Matsunaga T et al Intravenous administration of auto serum-expanded autologous mesenchymal stem cells in stroke . Brain 2011 ; 134 : 1790 –1807 .21493695 39 Bhasin A Srivastava MV Kumaran SS et al Autologous mesenchymal stem cells in chronic stroke . Cerebrovasc Dis Extra 2011 ; 1 : 93 –104 .22566987 40 Doeppner TR Kaltwasser B Bahr M et al Effects of neural progenitor cells on post-stroke neurological impairment: a detailed and comprehensive analysis of behavioral tests . Front Cell Neurosci 2014 ; 8 : 338 .25374509 41 Zheng W Honmou O Miyata K et al Therapeutic benefits of human mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow after global cerebral ischemia . Brain Res 2010 ; 1310 : 8 –16 .19913518 42 Bacigaluppi M Plucchino S Peruzzotti-Jametti L et al Delayed post-ischaemic neuroprotection following systemic neural stem cell transplantation involves multiple mechanisms . Brain 2009 ; 132 : 2239 –2251 .19617198 43 Bacigaluppi M Russo GL Peruzzotti-Jametti L et al Neural stem cell transplantation induces stroke recovery by upregulating glutamate transporter GLT-1 in astrocytes . J Neurosci 2016 ; 36 : 10529 –10544 .27733606 44 Doeppner TR Herz J Gorgens A et al Conditioned medium derived from neural progenitor cells induces long-term post-ischemic neuroprotection, sustained neurological recovery, neurogenesis, and angiogenesis . Mol Neurobiol 2017 ; 54 : 1531 –1540 .26860410 45 Manuel GE Johnson T Liu D. Therapeutic angiogenesis of exosomes for ischemic stroke . Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol 2017 ; 9 : 188 –191 (2017).29348795 46 Xin H Li Y Chopp M Exosomes/miRNAs as mediating cell-based therapy of stroke . Front Cell Neurosci 214 ; 8 : 377 . 47 Cossetti C Iraci N Mercer TR et al Extracellular vesicles from neural stem cells transfer IFN-gamma via Ifngr1 to activate Stat1 signaling in target cells . Mol Cell 2014 ; 56 : 193 –204 .25242146 48 Valadi H Ekstrom K Bossios A et al Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells . Nat Cell Biol 2007 ; 9 : 654 –659 .17486113 49 Hoshino A Costa-Silva B Shen TL et al Tumour exosome integrins determine organotropic metastasis . Nature 2015 ; 527 : 329 –335 .26524530 50 Rana S Zoller M. Exosome target cell selection and the importance of exosomal tetraspanins: a hypothesis . Biochem Soc Trans 2011 ; 39 : 559 –562 .21428939 51 Raposo G Nijman HW Stoorvogel W et al B lymphocytes secrete antigen-presenting vesicles . J Exp Med 1996 ; 183 : 1161 –1172 .8642258 52 Robbins PD Morelli AE. Regulation of immune responses by extracellular vesicles . Nat rev Immunol 2014 ; 14 : 195 –208 .24566916 53 Besse B Charrier M Lapierre V et al Dendritic cell-derived exosomes as maintenance immunotherapy after first line chemotherapy in NSCLC . Oncoimmunology 2016 ; 5 : e1071008 .27141373 54 Altevogt P Bretz NP Ridinger J et al Novel insights into exosome-induced, tumor-associated inflammation and immunomodulation . Semin Cancer Biol 2014 ; 28 : 51 –57 .24769223 55 Borger V Bremer M Ferrer-Tur R et al Mesenchymal stem/stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles and their potential as novel immunomodulatory therapeutic agents . Int J Mol Sci 2017 ; 18 : E1450 .28684664 56 Kordelas L Rebmann V Ludwig AK et al MSC-derived exosomes: a novel tool to treat therapy-refractory graft-versus-host disease . Leukemia 2014 ; 28 : 970 –973 .24445866 57 Bruno S Grange C Deregibus MC et al Mesenchymal stem cell-derived microvesicles protect against acute tubular injury . J Am Soc Nephrol 2009 ; 20 : 1053 –1067 .19389847 58 Lee M Ban JJ Kim KY et al Adipose-derived stem cell exosomes alleviate pathology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in vitro . Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2016 ; 479 : 434 –439 .27641665 59 Jarmalaviciute A Tunaitis V Pivoraite U et al Exosomes from dental pulp stem cells rescue human dopaminergic neurons from 6-hydroxy-dopamine-induced apoptosis . Cytotherapy 2015 ; 17 : 932 –939 .25981557 60 Li XL Li H Zhang M et al Exosomes derived from atorvastatin-modified bone marrow dendritic cells ameliorate experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis by up-regulated levels of IDO/Treg and partly dependent on FasL/Fas pathway . J Neuroinflammation 2016 ; 13 : 8 .26757900 61 Zhang Z Yang J Yan W et al Pretreatment of cardiac stem cells with exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells enhances myocardial repair . J Am Heart Assoc 2016 ; 5 : e002856 .26811168 62 Teng X Chen L Chen W et al Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes improve the microenvironment of infarcted myocardium contributing to angiogenesis and anti-inflammation . Cell Physiol Biochem 2015 ; 37 : 2415 –2424 .26646808 63 Zhao Y Sun X Cao W et al Exosomes derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells relieve acute myocardial ischemic injury . Stem Cells Int 2015 ; 2015 : 761643 .26106430 64 Wang Y Zhang L Li Y et al Exosomes/microvesicles from induced pluripotent stem cells deliver cardioprotective miRNAs and prevent cardiomyocyte apoptosis in the ischemic myocardium . Int J Cardiol 2015 ; 192 : 61 –69 .26000464 65 Khan M Nickoloff E Abramova T et al Embryonic stem cell-derived exosomes promote endogenous repair mechanisms and enhance cardiac function following myocardial infarction . Circ Res 2015 ; 117 : 52 –64 .25904597 66 Giricz Z Varga ZV Baranyai T et al Cardioprotection by remote ischemic preconditioning of the rat heart is mediated by extracellular vesicles . J Mol Cell Cardiol 2014 ; 68 : 75 –78 .24440457 67 Vicencio JM Yellon DM Sivaraman V et al Plasma exosomes protect the myocardium from ischemia-reperfusion injury . J Am Coll Cardiol 2015 ; 65 : 1525 –1536 .25881934 68 Yu B Kim HW Gong M et al Exosomes secreted from GATA-4 overexpressing mesenchymal stem cells serve as a reservoir of anti-apoptotic microRNAs for cardioprotection . Int J Cardiol 2015 ; 182 : 349 –360 .25590961 69 Bian S Zhang L Duan L et al Extracellular vesicles derived from human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells promote angiogenesis in a rat myocardial infarction model . J Mol Med 2014 ; 92 : 387 –397 .24337504 70 Arslan F Lai RC Smeets MB et al Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes increase ATP levels, decrease oxidative stress and activate PI3K/Akt pathway to enhance myocardial viability and prevent adverse remodeling after myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury . Stem Cell Res 2013 ; 10 : 301 –312 .23399448 71 Chen L Wang Y Pan Y et al Cardiac progenitor-derived exosomes protect ischemic myocardium from acute ischemia/reperfusion injury . Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2013 ; 431 : 566 –571 .23318173 72 Lai RC Arslan F Lee MM et al Exosome secreted by MSC reduces myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury . Stem Cell Res 2010 ; 4 : 214 –222 .20138817 73 Doeppner TR Herz J Görgens A et al Extracellular vesicles improve post-stroke neuroregeneration and prevent postischemic immunosuppression . Stem Cells Transl Med 2015 ; 4 : 1131 –1143 .26339036 74 Xin H Li Y Cui Y et al Systemic administration of exosomes released from mesenchymal stromal cells promote functional recovery and neurovascular plasticity after stroke in rats . J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2013 ; 33 : 1711 –1715 .23963371 75 Chen KH Chen CH Wallace CG et al Intravenous administration of xenogenic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADMSC) and ADMSC-derived exosomes markedly reduced brain infarct volume and preserved neurological function in rat after acute ischemic stroke . Oncotarget 2016 ; 7 : 74537 –74556 .27793019 76 Xin H Katakowski M Wang F et al MicroRNA cluster miR-17-92 cluster in exosomes enhance neuroplasticity and functional recovery after stroke in rats . Stroke 2017 ; 48 : 747 –753 .28232590 77 Xin H Wang F Li Y et al Secondary release of exosomes from astrocytes contributes to the increase in neural plasticity and improvement of functional recovery after stroke in rats treated with exosomes harvested from microRNA 133b-overexpressing multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells . Cell Transplant 2017 ; 26 : 243 –257 .27677799 78 Kalani A Chaturvedi P Kamat PK et al Curcumin-loaded embryonic stem cell exosomes restored neurovascular unit following ischemia-reperfusion injury . Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2016 ; 79 : 360 –369 .27594413 79 Deng M Xiao H Peng H et al Preservation of neuronal functions by exosomes derived from different human neural cell types under ischemic conditions . Eur J Neurosci 2018 ; 47 : 150 –157 .29178548 80 Pan Q He C Liu H et al Microvascular endothelial cells-derived microvesicles imply in ischemic stroke by modulating astrocyte and blood brain barrier function and cerebral blood flow . Mol Brain 2016 ; 9 : 63 .27267759 81 Joerger-Messerli MS Oppliger B Spinelli M et al Extracellular vesicles derived from Wharton’s jelly mesenchymal stem cells prevent and resolve programmed cell death mediated by perinatal hypoxia-ischemia in neuronal cells . Cell Transplant 2018 ; 27 : 168 –180 .29562785 82 Ophelders DR Wolfs TG Jellema RK et al Mesenchymal stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles protect the fetal brain after hypoxia-ischemia . Stem Cells Transl Med 2016 ; 5 : 754 –763 .27160705 83 Otero-Ortega L Laso-García F Gómez-de Frutos MD et al White matter repair after extracellular vesicles administration in an experimental animal model of subcortical stroke . Sci Rep 2017 ; 7 : 44433 .28300134 84 Deng M Xiao H Zhang H et al Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles ameliorates hippocampal synaptic impairment after transient global ischemia . Front Cell Neurosci 2017 ; 11 : 205 .28769765 85 El Andaloussi S Lakhal S Mager I et al Exosomes for targeted siRNA delivery across biological barriers . Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2013 ; 65 : 391 –397 .22921840 86 Flajnik MF. A cold-blooded view of adaptive immunity . Nat Rev Immunol 2018 ; 18 : 438 –453 .29556016 87 Hawksworth OA Coulthard LG Mantovani S et al Complement in stem cells and development . Semin Immunol 2018 ; 37 : 74 –84 .29525104 88 Miho E Yermanos A Weber CR et al Computational strategies for dissecting the high-dimensional complexity of adaptive immune repertoires . Front Immunol 2018 ; 9 : 224 .29515569 89 Medina KL. Overview of the immune system . Handb Clin Neurol 2016 ; 133 : 61 –76 .27112671 90 Chaplin DD. Overview of the immune response . J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010 ; 125 : S3 –23 .20176265 91 Anand PK. Exosomal membrane molecules are potent immune response modulators . Commun Integr Biol 2010 ; 3 : 405 –408 .21057626 92 Chalmin F Ladoire S Mignot G et al Membrane-associated Hsp72 from tumor-derived exosomes mediates STAT3-dependent immunosuppressive function of mouse and human myeloid-derived suppressor cells . J Clin Invest 2010 ; 120 : 457 –471 .20093776 93 Sobo-Vujanovic A Munich S Vujanovic NL. Dendritic-cell exosomes cross-present Toll-like receptor-ligands and activate bystander dendritic cells . Cell Immunol 2014 ; 289 : 119 –127 .24759079 94 Zhang HG Liu C Su K et al A membrane form of TNF-alpha presented by exosomes delays T cell activation-induced cell death . J Immunol 2006 ; 176 : 7385 –7393 .16751383 95 Yi H Ye J Yang XM et al High-grade ovarian cancer secreting effective exosomes in tumor angiogenesis . Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2015 ; 8 : 5062 –5070 .26191200 96 Gesierich S Berezovskiy I Ryschich E et al Systemic induction of the angiogenesis switch by the tetraspanin D6.1A/CO-029 . Cancer Res 2006 ; 66 : 7083 –7094 .16849554 97 Park JE Tan HS Datta A et al Hypoxic tumor cell modulates its microenvironment to enhance angiogenic and metastatic potential by secretion of proteins and exosomes . Mol Cell Proteomics 2010 ; 9 : 1085 –1099 .20124223 98 Szczepanski MJ Szajnik M Welsh A et al Blast-derived microvesicles in sera from patients with acute myeloid leukemia suppress natural killer cell function via membrane-associated transforming growth factor-beta1 . Haematologica 2011 ; 96 : 1302 –1309 .21606166 99 Wieckowski EU Visus C Szajnik M et al Tumor-derived microvesicles promote regulatory T cell expansion and induce apoptosis in tumor-reactive activated CD8+ T lymphocytes . J Immunol 2009 ; 183 : 3720 –3730 .19692638 100 Ashiru O Boutet P Fernández-Messina L et al Natural killer cell cytotoxicity is suppressed by exposure to the human NKG2D ligand MICA*008 that is shed by tumor cells in exosomes . Cancer Res 2010 ; 70 : 481 –489 .20068167 101 Filipazzi P Burdek M Villa A et al Recent advances on the role of tumor exosomes in immunosuppression and disease progression . Semin Cancer Biol 2012 ; 22 : 342 –349 .22369922 102 Yu S Liu C Su K et al Tumor exosomes inhibit differentiation of bone marrow dendritic cells . J Immunol 2007 ; 178 : 6867 –6875 .17513735 103 Webb RL Kaiser EE Scoville SL et al Human neural stem cell extracellular vesicles improve tissue and functional recovery in the murine thromboembolic stroke model . Transl Stroke Res . Epub ahead of print 28 December 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s12975-017-0599-2. 104 Chen CC Liu L Ma F et al Elucidation of exosome migration across the blood–brain barrier model in vitro . Cell Mol Bioeng 2016 ; 9 : 509 –529 .28392840 105 Hu B Chen S Zou M et al Effect of extracellular vesicles on neural functional recovery and immunologic suppression after rat cerebral apoplexy . Cell Physiol Biochem 2016 ; 40 : 155 –162 .27855369 106 Tian T Zhang HX He CP et al Surface functionalized exosomes as targeted drug delivery vehicles for cerebral ischemia therapy . Biomaterials 2018 ; 150 : 137 –149 .29040874 107 Couch Y Akbar N Davis S et al Inflammatory stroke extracellular vesicles induce macrophage activation . Stroke 2017 ; 48 : 2292 –2296 .28536169 108 Lener T Gimona M Aigner L et al Applying extracellular vesicles based therapeutics in clinical trials: an ISEV position paper . J Extracell Vesicles 2015 ; 4 : 30087 .26725829 109 Xin H Li Y Liu Z et al MiR-133b promotes neural plasticity and functional recovery after treatment of stroke with multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells in rats via transfer of exosome-enriched extracellular particles . Stem Cells 2013 ; 31 : 2737 –2746 .23630198