==== Front J Korean Med SciJ. Korean Med. SciJKMSJournal of Korean Medical Science1011-89341598-6357The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e203Original ArticlePsychiatry & PsychologyShort- and Long-term Effects of Case Management on Suicide Prevention among Individuals with Previous Suicide Attempts: a Survival Analysis https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4313-7467Kim Hyeonjae https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5370-005XPark Jangho https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1367-5704Kweon Kukju https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9790-2155Ahn Joonho Department of Psychiatry, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea.Address for Correspondence: Jangho Park, MD, PhD. Department of Psychiatry, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 877 Bangeojinsunhwando-ro, Dong-gu, Ulsan 44033, Republic of Korea. drpark98@naver.com15 6 2018 06 8 2018 33 32 e20324 2 2018 08 5 2018 © 2018 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.2018The Korean Academy of Medical SciencesThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.Background This study examined the long-term preventive effects of a case management service on suicide reattempts, and clarified the factors related to suicide reattempts. Methods We reviewed the medical records of suicide attempters who visited the emergency department of Ulsan University Hospital from August 28, 2013 to July 31, 2017. A 4-week case management service was provided to consenting participants, either face-to-face or by telephone. Using survival analysis, we analyzed differences in the time to the next emergency department visit for a suicide attempt according to whether participants completed the case management service. We also assessed which characteristics of participants were associated with suicide reattempts. Results We found no overall difference in time to suicide reattempt between case-managed participants and controls over the entire observation period (median period: 19 months). However, in the first 24 weeks after the initial suicide attempt, the case-managed group showed a longer time to reattempt than did the control group (log-rank test = 4.243; P = 0.039). A higher risk of reattempt was found among participants with the medical benefit type of health insurance compared to those with national health insurance (hazard ratio [HR], 5.134; P < 0.001) and among participants aged 20–39 compared to those aged ≥ 60 (HR, 3.502; P = 0.05). Conclusion Case management had only short-term benefits (within 24 weeks of initial suicide attempt). Risk factors for suicide reattempts were having a medical benefit health insurance and being aged 20–39 years. Graphical Abstract Case ManagementHealth InsuranceSocioeconomic FactorsSuicide ==== Body INTRODUCTION Suicide is a major cause of death.1 According to a report by the World Health Organization, suicide is the 15th leading cause of death globally, with about 804,000 people dying from suicide worldwide in 2012.2 In the United States, the suicide rate has increased steadily, showing an increase of about 2% each year between 2006 and 2014.3 In addition, Olfson et al.4 reported that the suicide attempt rate in adults increased from 0.62% to 0.79% when comparing a 2004–2005 sample of 34,629 individuals with a 2012–2013 sample of 34,712 individuals in the United States, respectively. Among the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, Korea has the highest suicide rate and has maintained this position for more than 10 years, since 2003.5 The factors related with suicide are complex and diverse. In previous studies, various demographic and clinical characteristics, such as gender, marital status, unemployment, low income, retirement, and cancer diagnosis, were mentioned as potential factors.67 Studies on the factors associated with suicide reattempts have also implicated socioeconomic factors such as unemployment and low educational level, as well as clinical factors such as a psychiatric diagnosis.89 However, Bertolote10 mentioned in his study that suicide is intrinsically influenced by sociocultural factors, implying the possibility of differences in related factors according to the location of the empirical investigation. Recent reviews have suggested that additional studies are needed on this front, because the designs, sample sizes, and target groups of past studies have substantially differed, making comparison of their study results difficult.8 Previous suicide attempters are more likely to complete suicide than are members of the general population.11 According to previous studies, a past suicide attempt is a powerful risk factor of a reattempt,1213 and the risk of completed suicide ranges from 16% within 1 year to 23% within 4 years after a suicide attempt.14 Suicide reattempts are closely related to completed suicide1516; in fact, one study has even reported that individuals who complete suicide and those who have made serious suicide attempts are overlapping populations.16 Among the various methods of preventing suicide, there is more convincing evidence for the benefits of indicative prevention targeting individuals with a high risk of suicide than selective prevention targeting those with a moderate risk.1017 Accordingly, suicide attempters should be a target of indicated prevention, given their high suicide risk.1017 Case management for suicide attempters has been studied as a possible suicide prevention method. Case management is the coordination of community services by a professional or team to provide people the mental health care that is customized accordingly to an individual's social needs or health and aid them to their recovery.18 However, its reported effectiveness has varied substantially according to the study,19 which, according to a recent review, necessitates further research because it remains difficult to recommend case management as an effective suicide prevention method.20 Several studies attempted to confirm the short-term effects of case management (i.e., less than 1 year) by examining indirect indices such as improvement in psychiatric symptoms, psychiatric outpatient visits, and quality of life after case management was provided to people who have previously attempted suicide.212223 While these studies did find that these indirect indices improved following case management, they did not assess changes in suicide reattempts.2223 Furthermore, studies need to examine the effect of case management over the long-term period in order to truly assess its effectiveness. Therefore, in this study, we identified the long-term preventive effect of a case management service on suicide reattempts among patients visiting the emergency department for a suicide attempt. Moreover, we investigated the other factors associated with suicide reattempts, besides their taking part in a case management service. We hypothesized that the case management service would have long-term preventive effects on suicide reattempts, and that certain demographic and clinical characteristics of people with a previous suicide attempt would be related with a higher risk of suicide reattempt. METHODS Study participants Participants were individuals visiting the emergency department of Ulsan University Hospital from August 28, 2013 to July 31, 2017 for a suicide attempt. Among 917 attempters, 73 died due to the attempt, and thus were excluded from the study. Therefore, 844 individuals who attempted suicide were enrolled in the study. Participants were divided into the “case-managed group” who completed the case management service for 4 weeks and a “control group” who did not consent to the service or received the service for less than 4 weeks. Demographic and clinical characteristics The demographic and clinical characteristics, which were extracted from participants' medical records, were as follows: age, sex, education level, marital status, occupation, type of health insurance, suicide attempt method, psychiatric diagnosis, whether participants were admitted for a medical or surgical treatment due to the suicide attempt including general ward and intensive care unit entry, whether the participants were admitted to psychiatric department, and whether they had a cancer diagnosis. Age was categorized as < 20, 20–39, 40–59, and ≥ 60 years. The type of health insurance was classified as national health insurance, medical benefit and others (including insurance for industrial accident compensation, insurance for foreigners, and other types of insurance). Education level was divided into ≤ 6, 7–9, 10–12, 12–15, and ≥ 16 years, while marital status was classified into single, married, and others. The cancer diagnosis was made according to whether they had any code between C00 and C97 on the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10), which indicate the presence of a malignant tumor. Case management service The case management service was provided for 4 weeks to suicide attempters who visited the emergency department. The case managers were certified social workers employed at the hospital. When suicide attempters visited to the emergency department, case managers performed an initial interview and asked for their consent to participate in the case management service. Case management was then provided on a weekly basis face-to-face or via telephone interviews. Following completion of case management, suicide attempters are referred to a regional mental health center for continuous management. During case management, the case managers evaluated participants' safety and various issues related to suicide (i.e., suicide ideation and intent, and accessibility of fatal suicide methods). The general condition of suicide attempters, such as their psychiatric symptoms (e.g., depressed mood), was also examined through an interview. Case managers further evaluated participants' compliance with psychiatric outpatient treatment, encouraged their motivation for treatment, and discussed solutions to the problems faced by the suicide attempters. Outcome The main outcome variable was the time to revisit the emergency room due to a suicide reattempt (i.e., time to reattempt), which we compared between the case-managed and control groups. We also examined age, sex, education level, marital status, occupation, type of health insurance, suicide attempt method, psychiatric diagnosis, admission for medical or surgical treatment due to suicide attempt (including general ward and intensive care unit entry), admission to psychiatric department, and cancer diagnosis as possible factors related to suicide reattempts. Statistical analysis Descriptive statistics were used to identify the distributions of demographic and clinical characteristics among participants, while the χ2 test was used to compare these characteristics between the case-managed and control group. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare the groups in terms of the time to suicide reattempt. To assess the point prevalence of suicide reattempts throughout the 4-year observation period (median period: 19 months, interquartile range: 10–31 months), we evaluated the proportion of participants who experienced a suicide reattempt at various assessment points: namely, 6 months (24 weeks) and 1 year (48 weeks) after the suicide attempt, which was based on the procedure of previous studies.15242526 We also examined the time to reattempt for both these periods. The event of interest in this survival analysis was a suicide reattempt after their initial visit to the emergency department for a suicide attempt. If the patient died during the observation period for any other reason, the observation ended at the date of death. The death date was confirmed by checking medical records, death certificates, and postmortem examination certificates. If these records or certificates could not be found in the electronic medical records of Ulsan University Hospital, we checked the expiration for participants' health insurance, and the observation ended at the expiration date. To analyze factors related to suicide reattempts, we used the Cox proportional hazard model. In addition to demographic and clinical characteristics, completion of case management was included as an independent variable in the model. We first performed a univariate analysis using this model, and the multivariate analysis was conducted including only the variables with P values of less than 0.2 in the univariate analysis (although completion of case management was included in the multivariate analysis regardless of its P value). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistics 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Ethics statement The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Ulsan University Hospital (IRB No. 2017-10-006). Informed consent was not required for this retrospective study using anonymized data. RESULTS Among the 844 suicide attempters enrolled in the study, 182 (21.6%) were formed the case-managed group and 662 (78.4%) the control group. The mean age of participants was 42.8 ± 17.1 years, and 386 (45.7%) out of the 844 were male. When comparing the demographic characteristics of the case-managed and control groups, we found that the proportion of participants aged 20–39 years was higher in the control group than in the case-managed group (case-managed group, 29.1%; control group, 38.5%; P = 0.021). None of the other demographic characteristics differed between two groups (Table 1). Table 1 Demographic characteristics of participants classified by groups Demographic characteristics Control group (n = 662) Case-managed group (n = 182) P valuea Age, yr 0.021 < 20 49 (7.4) 22 (12.1) 20–39 255 (38.5) 53 (29.1) 40–59 246 (37.2) 81 (44.5) ≥ 60 112 (16.9) 26 (14.3) Sex 0.295 Male 309 (46.7) 77 (42.3) Female 353 (53.3) 105 (57.7) Education level, yr 0.607 ≤ 6 7 (1.1) 4 (2.2) 7–9 34 (5.1) 12 (6.6) 10–12 42 (6.3) 11 (6.0) 13–15 93 (14.0) 26 (14.3) ≥ 16 47 (7.1) 8 (4.4) Missing data 439 (66.3) 121 (66.5) Marital status 0.144 Single 265 (40.0) 83 (45.6) Married 148 (22.4) 41 (22.5) Others 88 (13.3) 28 (15.4) Missing data 161 (24.3) 30 (16.5) Occupation 0.075 Unemployed 111 (16.8) 36 (19.8) Housewives 71 (10.7) 21 (11.5) Sales and service workers 52 (7.9) 11 (6.0) Students 39 (5.9) 8 (4.4) Professionals and technicians 31 (4.7) 7 (3.8) Skilled manual workers 19 (2.9) 5 (2.7) Unskilled manual workers 14 (2.1) 11 (6.0) Clerical workers 14 (2.1) 7 (3.8) Agricultural and fishery workers 8 (1.2) 4 (2.2) Armed forces occupations 3 (0.5) 1 (0.5) Managers 1 (0.2) 0 (0.0) Others 25 (3.8) 13 (7.1) Missing data 274 (41.4) 58 (31.9) Type of health insurance 0.870 National health insurance 565 (85.3) 155 (85.2) Medical benefit 52 (7.9) 16 (8.8) Others 45 (6.8) 11 (6.0) Values are presented as numbers of participants (%). aP value by χ2 test. The most prevalent suicide attempt method was drug overdose (44.3%, n = 374), followed by pesticide ingestion, stabbing, asphyxia, gas inhalation, jumping, chemical ingestion, and vehicle-based methods. The psychiatric diagnoses represented in our sample included depressive disorder (44.4%, n = 375), adjustment disorder (7.1%, n = 60), and bipolar disorder (5.6%, n = 47). Among all participants, 33.9% (n = 286) were not evaluated for a psychiatric diagnosis. Two hundred four (24.2%) suicide attempters had been admitted for medical or surgical treatment including general ward and intensive care unit entry, while 90 had psychiatric department admission (10.7%). Comparing clinical characteristics between two groups, we found that the proportion of participants with depressive disorder (case-managed group, 51.1%; control group, 42.6%; P = 0.008) and adjustment disorder (case-managed group, 11.5%; control group, 5.9%; P = 0.008) was higher in the case-managed group than in the control group. There was no significant difference in other clinical characteristics between two groups (Table 2). Table 2 Clinical characteristics of participants classified by groups Clinical characteristics Control group (n = 662) Case-managed group (n = 182) P valuea Suicide attempt method 0.674 Drug overdose 286 (43.2) 88 (48.4) Stabbing 103 (15.6) 19 (10.4) Pesticide ingestion 98 (14.8) 29 (15.9) Asphyxia 59 (8.9) 14 (7.7) Gas inhalation 46 (6.9) 15 (8.2) Jumping 28 (4.2) 5 (2.7) Chemical ingestion 9 (1.4) 2 (1.1) Vehicle-based methods 2 (0.3) 0 (0.0) Others 31 (4.7) 10 (5.5) Psychiatric diagnosis 0.008 Depressive disorder 282 (42.6) 93 (51.1) Adjustment disorder 39 (5.9) 21 (11.5) Bipolar disorder 39 (5.9) 8 (4.4) Anxiety disorder 23 (3.5) 3 (1.6) Schizophrenia 10 (1.5) 4 (2.2) Substance use disorder 5 (0.8) 5 (2.7) Personality disorder 5 (0.8) 0 (0.0) Somatic symptom disorder 2 (0.3) 0 (0.0) Neurocognitive disorder 2 (0.3) 0 (0.0) Neurodevelopmental disorder 1 (0.2) 0 (0.0) Others 15 (2.3) 1 (0.5) Not evaluated 239 (36.1) 47 (25.8) Admission for medical and surgical treatment 0.171 Not admitted 509 (76.9) 131 (72.0) Admitted 153 (23.1) 51 (28.0) Admission to psychiatric department 0.666 Not admitted 593 (89.6) 161 (88.5) Admitted 69 (10.4) 21 (11.5) Cancer diagnosis 0.436 No cancer diagnosis 640 (96.7) 178 (97.8) Cancer diagnosis 22 (3.3) 4 (2.2) Values are presented as numbers of participants (%). aP value by χ 2 test. The prevalence of suicide reattempt was 3.4% (n = 29) during the total observation period, 1.8% (n = 15) during the first 24 weeks, and 2.6% (n = 22) during the first 48 weeks after the initial attempt. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that there was no significant difference in time to reattempt between the case-managed and control groups (χ2 = 2.094; P = 0.148) (Fig. 1). However, when limiting the observation period to only 24 weeks, the survival analysis revealed that the case-managed group had a longer time to reattempt than did the control group (log-rank test = 4.243; P = 0.039). For the observation period of 48 weeks, there was no difference between two groups. In the control group, 6 participants within 1 month of the initial attempt, and 7 participants within 2 months reattempted suicide, comprising 23.1% and 26.9% of the total number of reattempts in this group, respectively. In case-managed group, on the other hand, no participant reattempted suicide within 2 months of the initial attempt. Fig. 1 The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showing time to suicide reattempt of case-managed group and control group. The result of the univariate analysis of the Cox proportional hazard model revealed that the medical benefit type of health insurance was associated with a higher risk of suicide reattempt than was the national health insurance type (hazard ratio [HR], 4.666; P < 0.001). Age, completion of case management, and cancer diagnosis also showed P values of less than 0.2, and thus were included in the multivariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, the medical benefit type of health insurance was associated with a significantly higher risk of suicide reattempt than was the national health insurance type (HR, 5.134; P < 0.001). Moreover, participants aged 20–39 years had a significantly higher risk of suicide reattempt than did participants aged 60 years or older (HR, 3.502; P = 0.05). Cancer diagnosis and completion of case management were not significantly associated with the risk of suicide reattempt (Table 3). Table 3 Multivariate analysis of possible factors related to suicide reattempt using Cox proportional hazard model Variables Suicide reattempt HR P value Age (reference: ≥ 60) < 20 1.616 0.604 20–39 3.502 0.050 40–59 1.096 0.895 Type of health insurance (reference: national health insurance) Medical benefit 5.134 < 0.001 Othersa NAb NAb Case-managed (reference: control) 0.478 0.231 Cancer diagnosis (reference: no cancer diagnosis) 2.952 0.179 HR = hazard ratio, NA = not applicable. aOthers include insurance for industrial accident compensation, insurance for foreigners, and other types of insurance; bThese values could not be estimated owing to 0 events of suicide reattempt. DISCUSSION No significant difference was found in the time to reattempt over the entire observation period (median period = 19 months) between participants who completed case management and those who did not. However, in the 24 weeks after the suicide attempt, suicide attempters who completed the case management service showed a longer time to reattempt than did those who did not complete it, thus confirming the short-term effect of case management service. We also found that the risk of suicide reattempt was higher among those with the medical benefit insurance type and who were aged 20–39 years. This study did not find support for a long-term preventive effect of case management on suicide reattempts, which was in contrast to our hypothesis. One study conducted in Norway similarly did not observe a significant effect of case management on preventing suicide over a 5-year observation periods.27 On the other hand, Cebria et al.28 confirmed that case management did have an effect at 1 year after an initial suicide attempt, but also mentioned the need for additional studies to confirm this long-term effect. Although we found no long-term preventive effect on suicide, our study nevertheless has the strength of continuing the observation for more than 1 year. As far as we know, the observation period of this study was the longest among studies on this topic conducted in Asia. As noted above, the time to suicide reattempt in the first 24 weeks after the initial suicide attempt was significantly longer in the case-managed group, which suggests that case management is effective only for a certain period. Previous studies providing regular letters to suicide attempters also reported temporary effects.29 Goldney30 suggested that the intervention period for preventing suicide must be relatively lengthy because suicide attempters tend to have a chronic history of suicide; accordingly, time-limited interventions would be ineffective because they might only have a transient effect on preventing suicide. In addition, Tidemalm et al.31 indicated that high-risk individuals such as patients with mood disorders or schizophrenia should have at least 2 years of follow-up care after a suicide attempt. Both these studies emphasized that the effect of case management is time-limited for suicide attempters, meaning that a sufficiently lengthy period of case management is required. The period of case management in previous studies varied from 2 months to 5 years,222728 but it is difficult to compare the effects of these different interventions because the study design and specific content of the management differed according to the study. Therefore, further studies are needed to evaluate the duration of the effect according to the period of case management, which could help in establishing an appropriate management period. The content of the case management service in our study, as in previous studies,2428 included evaluation of the safety of the suicide attempters, assessment of their psychiatric symptoms and treatment compliance, and discussion of the solutions to the problems that they were facing. Several studies have suggested that case management is useful for encouraging psychiatric treatment among suicide attempters212428 and providing them with some measure of social support.2025 Furthermore, studies providing case management via letters, telephone calls, and face-to-face visits suggested that the effectiveness of case management is in part based on the feeling of connectedness to others that it induces.152932 It is possible, therefore, that the case management service in the present study played a similar role for suicide attempters. In our study, the risk of suicide reattempt was higher when participants had the medical benefit type of health insurance, compared to national health insurance. This finding is consistent with the study of Lee et al.33, which reported that individuals receiving medical benefit insurance in Korea had a higher risk of suicide. Since the type of health insurance directly reflects an individual's socioeconomic status,33 our findings appear to suggest a relation between socioeconomic status and suicide reattempts. In fact, according to a 2013 review study, suicide reattempts were more related to specific socioeconomic factors, such as a high unemployment rate and low educational level, than was the initial suicide attempt.19 Although we could not find specific factors related to the suicide reattempt because of the limited data, the results still correspond well with those of earlier studies9 supporting an association between a risk of suicidal reattempt and low socioeconomic status. We also observed that the risk of suicide reattempt was higher among participants aged 20–39 years than among those aged 60 years and older. Jeon et al.34 similarly reported that the risk of suicide reattempt was high among young adults aged 18–29 years, which is similar to our result. In another study conducted in Korea, suicide ideation among participants in their late 20s and 30s was found to be the result of economic problems such as unemployment.35 Olfson et al.4 similarly reported that the increased prevalence of suicide attempts among individuals between the ages of 21 and 34 years in the United States related to the high unemployment rate and economic stress. These two studies indicate that suicide among young adults can be explained by socioeconomic stress. It should be noted, however, that a recent review reported that the majority of studies have not found an association between age and suicide reattempts.8 Thus, we cannot suggest a definitive relation between them based on our results. Furthermore, inferring the cause of the observed relationship is difficult. Therefore, additional studies are needed to ascertain the relationship between age and suicide reattempt, and also suggest the cause by evaluating the characteristics of age group with high risk. We observed no association between a diagnosis of cancer and suicide reattempts. In contrast to our results, previous studies reported that the suicide rate or risk of suicide attempt was higher among individuals with a cancer diagnosis.36 The conflicting results might be explained by the fact that other studies have noted that the risk of suicide is highest within the first year after a cancer diagnosis, after which it is difficult to find an independent association between suicide and cancer diagnosis.7 In this study, we had no information on the time elapsed from the cancer diagnosis to the initial suicide attempt, as the cancer diagnosis was made merely by the presence of an ICD-10 code in their medical record. Therefore, it is possible that some subjects reattempted suicide 1 year or more after the cancer diagnosis, which might have made the relationship non-significant. We observed no increased risk of suicide reattempts according to marital status or method of suicide attempt. Previous studies have reported that divorced, unmarried, or bereaved individuals had a higher risk of suicide reattempts,3437 and that drug intoxication was related with a higher risk of suicide reattempt than were other suicide methods.38 This discrepancy might be explained by our dependence on self-reported information. Some participants did not reveal their marital status at the initial interview, which might have biased the analysis. For the findings concerning suicide attempt method, the disagreement between our result and previous reports might be attributable to the low statistical validity due to the small number of subjects who reattempted suicide in each category of suicide method. The present study has several limitations. First, because the study was limited to a local university hospital, generalization of the results is limited. Second, since we classified the groups based on whether participants completed 4 weeks of the service or not, participants could not be randomized. Third, this study was a retrospective cohort study, which might have limited our obtaining accurate information from the medical records. Specifically, some of the demographic and clinical characteristics might have been biased due to missing data. Finally, it is possible that some participants who reattempted suicide did not visit the same hospital as for their previous attempt. An earlier study in Japan identified several risk factors of suicide reattempts, and noted the possibility that suicide attempters might visit other hospitals.38 However, the authors of that study also noted that their sample was from a specific area of the country in which there was no other hospital nearby that can deal with both psychiatric and medical problems, suggesting that the likelihood of participants visiting other hospitals is low. As the hospital of this study is also the only general hospital of its surrounding region capable of performing both medical and psychiatric care, it is unlikely that participants visited other hospitals. In conclusion, a 4-week case management service was found to have a temporary effect on risk of suicide reattempt in the first 24 weeks after the initial suicide attempt, although it did not delay the time to suicide reattempt over the total observation period. Because case management appears to have a temporary effect, in future studies, the appropriate length of case management must be identified by assessing differences in preventive effects according to the duration of case management. We also found that the medical benefit type of health insurance and being aged 20–39 years were related to a higher risk of suicide reattempts, which indicates the need for further studies and intensive management of these population groups. Our study results can serve as basic data useful for preparing suicide prevention policies involving case management. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We sincerely thank staff of medical information and biostatistics department of Ulsan University Hospital for helping with statistical analysis. Disclosure: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose. Author Contributions: Conceptualization: Park J. Data curation: Park J, Kim H, Ahn J. Formal analysis: Kim H, Park J. Investigation: Kim H, Kweon K. Methodology: Kim H, Park J. Writing - original draft: Kim H, Park J. Writing - review & editing: Park J, Kim H, Ahn J, Kweon K. ==== Refs 1 Rudd MD Goulding JM Carlisle CJ Stigma and suicide warning signs Arch Suicide Res 2013 17 3 313 318 23889579 2 World Health Organization Preventing Suicide: a Global Imperative Geneva World Health Organization 2014 3 Curtin SC Warner M Hedegaard H Increase in suicide in the United States, 1999-2014 NCHS Data Brief 2016 241 1 8 4 Olfson M Blanco C Wall M Liu SM Saha TD Pickering RP National trends in suicide attempts among adults in the United States JAMA Psychiatry 2017 74 11 1095 1103 28903161 5 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development OECD health statistics 2017 Updated 2017 Accessed February 11, 2018 http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=HEALTH_STAT 6 Qin P Agerbo E Mortensen PB Suicide risk in relation to socioeconomic, demographic, psychiatric, and familial factors: a national register-based study of all suicides in Denmark, 1981-1997 Am J Psychiatry 2003 160 4 765 772 12668367 7 Lu D Fall K Sparén P Ye W Adami HO Valdimarsdóttir U Suicide and suicide attempt after a cancer diagnosis among young individuals Ann Oncol 2013 24 12 3112 3117 24169626 8 Mendez-Bustos P de Leon-Martinez V Miret M Baca-Garcia E Lopez-Castroman J Suicide reattempters: a systematic review Harv Rev Psychiatry 2013 21 6 281 295 24201820 9 Osváth P Kelemen G Erdös MB Vörös V Fekete S The main factors of repetition: review of some results of the Pecs Center in the WHO/EURO multicentre study on suicidal behaviour Crisis 2003 24 4 151 154 15509139 10 Bertolote JM Suicide prevention: at what level does it work? World Psychiatry 2004 3 3 147 151 16633479 11 Suominen K Isometsä E Suokas J Haukka J Achte K Lönnqvist J Completed suicide after a suicide attempt: a 37-year follow-up study Am J Psychiatry 2004 161 3 562 563 14992984 12 Hawton K Bergen H Cooper J Turnbull P Waters K Ness J Suicide following self-harm: findings from the multicentre study of self-harm in England, 2000–2012 J Affect Disord 2015 175 147 151 25617686 13 Kuo CJ Gunnell D Chen CC Yip PS Chen YY Suicide and non-suicide mortality after self-harm in Taipei City, Taiwan Br J Psychiatry 2012 200 5 405 411 22403088 14 Owens D Horrocks J House A Fatal and non-fatal repetition of self-harm. Systematic review Br J Psychiatry 2002 181 193 199 12204922 15 Carter GL Clover K Whyte IM Dawson AH D'Este C Postcards from the EDge project: randomised controlled trial of an intervention using postcards to reduce repetition of hospital treated deliberate self poisoning BMJ 2005 331 7520 805 16183654 16 Beautrais AL Suicides and serious suicide attempts: two populations or one? Psychol Med 2001 31 5 837 845 11459381 17 Institute of Medicine Committee on Prevention of Mental Disorders Reducing Risks for Mental Disorders: Frontiers for Preventive Intervention Research Washington, D.C. National Academies Press 1994 18 Ivezić SS Muzinić L Filipac V Case management - a pillar of community psychiatry Psychiatr Danub 2010 22 1 28 33 20305587 19 Mann JJ Apter A Bertolote J Beautrais A Currier D Haas A Suicide prevention strategies: a systematic review JAMA 2005 294 16 2064 2074 16249421 20 Milner AJ Carter G Pirkis J Robinson J Spittal MJ Letters, green cards, telephone calls and postcards: systematic and meta-analytic review of brief contact interventions for reducing self-harm, suicide attempts and suicide Br J Psychiatry 2015 206 3 184 190 25733570 21 Lizardi D Stanley B Treatment engagement: a neglected aspect in the psychiatric care of suicidal patients Psychiatr Serv 2010 61 12 1183 1191 21123401 22 Asarnow JR Baraff LJ Berk M Grob CS Devich-Navarro M Suddath R An emergency department intervention for linking pediatric suicidal patients to follow-up mental health treatment Psychiatr Serv 2011 62 11 1303 1309 22211209 23 De Leo D Heller T Intensive case management in suicide attempters following discharge from psychiatric care Aust J Prim Health 2007 13 3 49 58 24 Chen WJ Chen CC Ho CK Lee MB Lin GG Chou FH Community-based case management for the prevention of suicide reattempts in Kaohsiung, Taiwan Community Ment Health J 2012 48 6 786 791 22302211 25 Vaiva G Walter M Al Arab AS Courtet P Bellivier F Demarty AL ALGOS: the development of a randomized controlled trial testing a case management algorithm designed to reduce suicide risk among suicide attempters BMC Psychiatry 2011 11 1 21194496 26 Hvid M Wang AG Preventing repetition of attempted suicide--I. Feasibility (acceptability, adherence, and effectiveness) of a Baerum-model like aftercare Nord J Psychiatry 2009 63 2 148 153 19016074 27 Johannessen HA Dieserud G De Leo D Claussen B Zahl PH Chain of care for patients who have attempted suicide: a follow-up study from Baerum, Norway BMC Public Health 2011 11 81 21294876 28 Cebrià AI Parra I Pàmias M Escayola A García-Parés G Puntí J Effectiveness of a telephone management programme for patients discharged from an emergency department after a suicide attempt: controlled study in a Spanish population J Affect Disord 2013 147 1-3 269 276 23219058 29 Motto JA Bostrom AG A randomized controlled trial of postcrisis suicide prevention Psychiatr Serv 2001 52 6 828 833 11376235 30 Goldney RD Suicide prevention is possible: a review of recent studies Arch Suicide Res 1998 4 4 329 339 31 Tidemalm D Langstrom N Lichtenstein P Runeson B Risk of suicide after suicide attempt according to coexisting psychiatric disorder: Swedish cohort study with long term follow-up BMJ 2008 337 a2205 19018040 32 Fleischmann A Bertolote JM Wasserman D De Leo D Bolhari J Botega NJ Effectiveness of brief intervention and contact for suicide attempters: a randomized controlled trial in five countries Bull World Health Organ 2008 86 9 703 709 18797646 33 Lee SU Oh IH Jeon HJ Roh S Suicide rates across income levels: retrospective cohort data on 1 million participants collected between 2003 and 2013 in South Korea J Epidemiol 2017 27 6 258 264 28314637 34 Jeon HJ Lee JY Lee YM Hong JP Won SH Cho SJ Lifetime prevalence and correlates of suicidal ideation, plan, and single and multiple attempts in a Korean nationwide study J Nerv Ment Dis 2010 198 9 643 646 20823725 35 Ra CK Lee H Employment transitions and suicide ideation among Echo generation Health Policy Manag 2013 23 4 369 375 36 Anguiano L Mayer DK Piven ML Rosenstein D A literature review of suicide in cancer patients Cancer Nurs 2012 35 4 E14 E26 21946906 37 Corcoran P Nagar A Suicide and marital status in Northern Ireland Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2010 45 8 795 800 19763365 38 Sawa M Koishikawa H Osaki Y Risk factors of a suicide reattempt by seasonality and the method of a previous suicide attempt: a cohort study in a Japanese primary care hospital Suicide Life Threat Behav 2017 47 6 688 695 28030756