==== Front Int J NanomedicineInt J NanomedicineInternational Journal of NanomedicineInternational Journal of Nanomedicine1176-91141178-2013Dove Medical Press 10.2147/IJN.S165359ijn-13-4361Original ResearchReduction-sensitive CD44 receptor-targeted hyaluronic acid derivative micelles for doxorubicin delivery Yang Yishun 1Zhao Yuan 2Lan Jinshuai 1Kang Yanan 3Zhang Tong 1Ding Yue 1Zhang Xinyu 1Lu Lu 3 1 Experiment Centre of Teaching and Learning, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China, zhangtdmj@hotmail.com; dingyue-2001@hotmail.com 2 Experiment Centre for Science and Technology, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China 3 School of Chinese Materia Medica, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaCorrespondence: Tong Zhang; Yue Ding, Experiment Centre of Teaching and Learning, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 1200 Cailun Road, Pudong New District, Shanghai 201203, China, Tel +86 21 5132 2318; +86 21 5132 2325, Email zhangtdmj@hotmail.com; dingyue-2001@hotmail.com2018 26 7 2018 13 4361 4378 © 2018 Yang et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited2018The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.Introduction A reduction-sensitive CD44-positive tumor-targetable drug delivery system for doxorubicin (DOX) delivery was developed based on hyaluronic acid (HA)-grafted polymers. Materials and methods HA was conjugated with folic acid (FA) via a reduction-sensitive disulfide linkage to form an amphiphilic polymer (HA-ss-FA). The chemical structure of HA-ss-FA was analyzed by ultraviolet spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The molecular weight of HA-ss-FA was determined by high-performance gel permeation chromatography. Blank HA-ss-FA micelles and DOX-loaded micelles were prepared and characterized. The reduction responsibility, cellular uptake, and in vivo biodistribution of HA-ss-FA micelles were investigated. Results DOX-loaded micelles were of high encapsulation efficiency (88.09%), high drug-loading content (22.70%), appropriate mean diameter (100–120 nm), narrow size distribution, and negative zeta potential (−6.7 to −31.5 mV). The DOX release from the micelles was significantly enhanced in reduction environment compared to normal environment. The result of in vitro cytotoxicity assay indicated that the blank micelles were of low toxicity and good biocompatibility and the cell viabilities were >100% with the concentration of HA-ss-FA from 18.75 to 600.00 μg/mL. Cellular uptake and in vivo biodistribution studies showed that DOX-loaded micelles were tumor-targetable and could significantly enhance cellular uptake by CD44 receptor-mediated endocytosis, and the cellular uptake of DOX in CD44-positve A549 cells was 1.6-fold more than that in CD44-negative L02 cells. In vivo biodistribution of HA-ss-FA micelles showed that micelles were of good in vivo tumor targetability and the fluorescence of indocyanine green (ICG)-loaded micelles was 4- to 6.6-fold stronger than free ICG within 6 h in HCCLM3 tumor-bearing nude mice. Conclusion HA-ss-FA is a promising nanocarrier with excellent biocompatibility, tumor targetability, and controlled drug release capability for delivery of chemotherapy drugs in cancer therapy. Keywords hyaluronic acidCD44 receptor targetingredox responsivefolic acidmicellesdoxorubicin ==== Body Introduction In recent years, nanoparticles have been attracting increasing attention in cancer therapy and cancer diagnosis.1 For cancer treatment, the nanoparticles are widely used as carriers for delivery of antitumor drugs and show advantages in improving the solubility of cancer agents,2 enhancing permeability and retention (EPR) effect,3 increasing blood circulation,4 and providing targeting strategies.5 Doxorubicin (DOX) is an effective broad spectrum chemotherapeutic agent in treating a variety of cancers, such as breast cancer, lung cancer, ovarian cancer, and liver cancer. However, it is known that DOX and other similar anthracycline derivatives have cardiotoxicity, which can be fatal in extreme cases.6,7 And, there are other side effects of DOX, such as DNA damage and reactive oxygen species overproduction.8 Therefore, the clinical application and therapeutic index of DOX and other anthracycline derivatives are largely limited by their severe adverse effects.9,10 A method to minimize the side effects is by drug targeting. By loading DOX in a delivery system that selectively binds with cellular receptors overexpressed by the cancerous cells,11 the delivery of DOX to the tumor region can be enhanced, the accumulation of DOX in the heart can be reduced, and the specificity of DOX can be improved. Among all these nanocarriers, the amphiphilic polymers including a hydrophobic core and a hydrophilic shell are excellent candidates for carrying hydrophobic drugs.12 Some of the amphiphilic polymers formed micelles in aqueous solution. The micelles encapsulate hydrophobic drugs and increase their solubility in water. Furthermore, special functions can be attached to these polymers, including linking the targeting group for target delivery and using environmentally responsive cross-linking agents for site-specific delivery.1,13–15 Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a naturally occurring linear glycosaminoglycan that has many desirable properties for nanomedicine, such as biodegradability, biocompatibility, nontoxicity, and nonimmunogenicity.11 It contains several chemical groups such as hydroxy and carboxy to which other components can be conjugated. In particular, the interaction between HA and CD44 receptor, which is overexpressed in many types of tumor cells’ surface, makes it a promising molecule for application in a receptor-mediated targeting strategy.16 Many studies have reported the application of HA as an active tumor-targeting ligand,17–20 and it has been applied as a hydrophilic shell to nanodrug delivery systems, such as micelles.21 Folic acid (FA) is a prominent targeting molecule capable of specific interaction with FA receptor, which is also over-expressed in many kinds of tumor cells.13,22–24 Despite there being many studies about nanoparticles that use HA and FA as targeting ligands to gain dual-CD44 and FA receptor-targeting ability in tumor delivery systems, other hydrophobic cores such as octadecyl were used in these reports.25–28 Most of the hydrophobic cores in these reports were long-chain polymers. FA is widely used as a target ligand in nanoparticles including micelles, liposome, and others.29 Generally, the hydrophobic core of these nanoparticles was long-chain polymer, so FA was in the part of the micelles’ or liposome’s shell for targeting purposes such as linking to the hydrophilic chain of these polymers. The inevitable use of long-chain polymers in the dual-targeting micelles and FA receptor-targeting micelles may cause problems in clinical application due to the poor biocompatibility and bioabsorbability of these polymers. As a kind of B vitamin, FA is absorbable and nontoxic to the human body. However, as FA has low solubility in water (0.01 mg/mL at 25°C), it can be used as a hydrophobic core of amphiphilic polymers, avoiding the use of other hydrophobic substances. It was reported that polymers synthesized by conjugating HA with small molecules such as deoxycholic acid (a hydrophobic substance) can form stable micelles.30,31 In this study, a CD44 receptor-targeted strategy was developed based on the self-assembly HA derivative to deliver DOX in cancer therapy (Figure 1). To synthesize HA-ss-FA conjugate, cystamine (CYS) which contains a reduction-sensitive disulfide bond was used as a cross-linking agent to link HA and FA. Reduction-sensitive micelles loading DOX were prepared and characterized. The encapsulation efficiency (EE) and the loading ability of DOX-loaded micelles were evaluated. The DOX release of DOX-loaded micelles in reduction environment was investigated. CD44 receptor-overexpressed human hepatocellular carcinoma HCCLM3 cells32 and human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells4,16,33 were used to investigate the antitumor cytotoxicity in vitro and cellular uptake of the micelles. The antitumor effects of DOX-loaded micelles were evaluated by CellTiter 96® AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay ((3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)- 2H-tetrazolium) [MTS] assay). The cellular uptake of DOX was determined using the confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Furthermore, the biodistribution of the micelles was studied in HCCLM3 tumor-bearing nude mice. The results showed that HA-ss-FA was a promising nanocarrier for the delivery of anticancer drugs to CD44 receptor-overexpressed tumors. Materials and methods Materials Sodium hyaluronate (molecular weight [Mw] 21 kDa) was purchased from Bloomage Freda Biopharm Co., Ltd. (Jinan, China). The 1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC), N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS), and 2-(N-morpholino) ethanesulfonic acid (MES) were purchased from Yuanye Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC), CYS dihydrochloride, reduced glutathione (GSH), and 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS) were purchased from Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). DOX hydrochloride (DOX⋅HCl) was purchased from Meilun Biotech Co., Ltd. (Dalian, China). N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) and dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) were purchased from Energy Chemical Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The 4′,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) was purchased from Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology (Shanghai, China). Indocyanine green (ICG) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St Louis, MO, USA). CellTiter 96® Aqueous One Solution Reagent (MTS) was purchased from Promega Corporation (Fitchburg, WI, USA). Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) was purchased from Hyclone Laboratories, Inc. (Logan, UT, USA). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was purchased from Biological Industries (Beit Haemek, Israel). CD44 mouse monoclonal antibody (mAb) was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) antimouse IgG antibody was purchased from BioLegend, Inc. (San Diego, CA, USA). Triethylamine (TEA), FA, and other reagents were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Synthesis of HA–CYS A total of 400 mg of sodium hyaluronate was dissolved in 10 mL of MES buffer (0.1 M, pH 6.5). A total of 570 mg of EDC and 340 mg of NHS was added, and the reaction solution was stirred at 37°C for 15 min. Then, 340 mg of CYS was added and the reaction was allowed to proceed at 37°C for 2–12 h. The resulting solution was dialyzed (molecular weight cut off [MWCO] 3,500 Da) against NaCl solution (0.1 M) for 2 days and against distilled water for another 2 days, followed by lyophilization to obtain HA–CYS.34,35 The structure of the product was verified by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy in D2O (AVANCE 600 MHz; BrukerOptik GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany) and Fourier transform infrared (FITR) spectroscopy (Nicolet iS10; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Degree of amine substitution To determine the degree of substitution (DS) of CYS in HA–CYS, free primary amino groups in CYS were quantified by the TNBS method.36 The TNBS reagent reacts specifically with primary amino groups to form colored trinitrophenyl-amino acid derivatives.37 The TNBS reagent consisted of 0.1% (w/v) TNBS in water. l-Glycine (in the concentration range from 0.1 to 5.0 mM) was used to construct a standard curve. A total of 200 μL of sample solutions or standard solutions were added to the tubes. A total of 2 mL of sodium carbonate solution (4%) and 1 mL of TNBS reagent were then added to each tube, followed by mixing and incubating at 50°C for 1 h in the dark. After incubation, the reaction was cooled at room temperature and stopped by the addition of 0.5 N HCl (2 mL) to each tube. Samples were then sonicated for 10 min. Absorbance at 410 nm was measured using a UV–visible spectrophotometer (UV, 8454; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The concentration of HA was determined by the cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide method as described by Chen and Wang.38 DS of CYS(%)Concentration of free primary=amino groups(mM)Concentration of HA(mM)×100(1) Synthesis and characterization of HA-ss-FA HA-ss-FA was synthesized in two steps (Figure 2). First, 0.1 g of FA was dissolved in 4 mL of anhydrous DMSO and 30 mg of NHS, 52 mg of DCC, and 40 μL of TEA were added. The mixture was stirred in the dark overnight. The precipitate generated during the reaction was removed by filtration. Then, 0.8 mL of filtrate was added to 44 mg of HA–CYS (DS =6.53, 17.37, or 45.36) suspension in 7 mL of DMF. The reaction proceeded at room temperature for 24 h in the dark. The product was purified by dialysis against 5% NaHCO3 for 2 days and against distilled water for another 2 days to remove the impurities, followed by lyophilization. DS of FA in HA-ss-FA was determined by UV at the absorbance wavelength of 285 nm. The chemical structure of the product was analyzed by UV, FTIR, and 1H NMR in D2O. The Mw of HA-ss-FA (DS of FA =7.49%) was measured by high-performance gel permeation chromatography (GPC) using HA as the standard. The assay was carried out after injecting 20 μL of sample to an Agilent 1260 HPLC System (Agilent Technologies) with a refractive index detector and a Shodex OHpak SB-804 HQ column (10 μm, 8.0 mm ×300 mm; Shodex, Tokyo, Japan). The column temperature was 40°C, and the mobile phase was 0.05 M Na2SO4 at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min.39 In addition, to verify the reduction sensitivity of HA-ss-FA, 15 mg of HA-ss-FA was incubated with 20 mM GSH solution for 20 h. The resulting solution was dialyzed (MWCO 3,500 Da) against distilled water for 2 days and then filtered to remove the precipitate and lyophilized. The product (HA-ss-FA/GSH) was analyzed by UV and FTIR. Determination of critical micelle concentration (CMC) CMC of HA-ss-FA micelles was determined using pyrene as a fluorescence probe. Pyrene in acetone was added to a tube and evaporated at 40°C. HA-ss-FA solutions with different concentrations, varying from 0.001 to 0.500 mg/mL, were added and equilibrated for 12 h in the dark. The final concentration of pyrene was 6×10−7 M. The pyrene fluorescence spectra were measured using a fluorescence spectrophotometer (Cary Eclipse; Agilent Technologies) with the excitation wavelength of 335 nm and emission wavelength from 350 to 550 nm. Preparation and characterization of HA-ss-FA micelles Blank micelles were prepared by dissolving HA-ss-FA conjugate (1–10 mg/mL) in distilled water and then sonicating using a probe sonicator at 100 W in an ice bath for 10 min. DOX-loaded micelles were prepared by a dialysis method.30,40 DOX·HCl (10 mg/mL) was dissolved in DMSO with three equivalent molar ratio of TEA and stirred in the dark overnight to obtain hydrophobic DOX (free base form DOX). HA-ss-FA conjugate (1–6 mg/mL) or HA (6 mg/mL, as a negative control) was dissolved in distilled water, and the above DOX solution was added at the weight ratio of HA-ss-FA:DOX =3:1 or HA:DOX =3:1. The mixtures were sonicated using a probe sonicator at 100 W in an ice bath for 10 min and then stirred in the dark for 4 h. The solution was dialyzed against distilled water for 6 h to remove DMSO and unreacted TEA, followed by centrifugation for 10 min at 3,500 rpm to remove the sediment (hydrophobic DOX). After diluting 20 times with double distilled water, the particle size, polydispersity index (PDI), and zeta potential of the micelles were determined using a particle size and zeta potential analyzer (Zetasizer Nano ZS90; Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK). The morphology of blank and DOX-loaded micelles was observed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM; JEM 2100; JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). The samples were prepared by dripping the solutions onto mesh copper grids with carbon film, then staining with 1% phosphotungstic acid, and drying in vacuum for 30 min. To measure EE and drug loading (DL) content, DOX-loaded micelles were diluted with DMSO and sonicated to destroy the micellar structures. The content of DOX was determined using the UV–Vis spectrophotometer with the wavelength of 480 nm. EE(%)=Weight of loaded DOXWeight of provided DOX×100(2) DL(%)=Weight of loaded DOXWeight of DOX-loaded micelles×100(3) The kinetic stability of DOX-loaded micelles was investigated.41 Briefly, the micelles (1 mg/mL) were incubated with PBS (pH 7.4) or PBS containing 10% FBS and placed in a shaking incubator at 37°C (50 rpm). The size of the micelles was monitored at 0, 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h by a particle size and zeta potential analyzer. In vitro reduction-triggered release of DOX from micelles The release of DOX from DOX-loaded micelles was studied by a dialysis method in PBS (10 mM, pH 7.4) with or without 20 mM GSH.41–43 Briefly, 1 mL of DOX-loaded micelles (at a DOX concentration of 20 μg/mL) was transferred to a dialysis bag (MWCO 3,500 Da; Spectrum Laboratories Inc., Milpitas, CA, USA) and then dialyzed against 40 mL of release medium in a tube. The tubes were placed in a shaking incubator at 37°C (100 rpm). A total of 5 mL of media was taken out, and an equivalent volume of fresh media was added at predetermined time intervals. The amount of released DOX was determined using a fluorescence spectrophotometer with the excitation wavelength of 480 nm and the emission wavelength of 560 nm. Cell culture HCCLM3 human liver cancer cells were obtained from Cold Spring Biotech Corp. (Taipei, China) as a gift;44 the cells used were approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (approval protocol number: 201804002). A549 human lung carcinoma cells were purchased from Cell Bank of Type Culture Collection of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). L02 human hepatic cells were purchased from China Center for Type Culture Collection (Wuhan, China). The cells were cultured in DMEM with high glucose, supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/mL of penicillin, and 100 mg/mL of streptomycin. The cells were maintained at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. The culture medium was changed every 2 days. Detection of CD44 receptor expression on HCCLM3 and A549 cells HCCLM3 and A549 cells were harvested and washed twice with PBS. A total of 106 cells were added in each tube, resuspended in 100 μL of diluted CD44 mouse mAb (prepared in PBS with 0.5% bovine serum albumin at the recommended dilution), and incubated for 2 h at room temperature. Then, the cells were washed with PBS three times and resuspended in 100 μL of diluted FITC antimouse immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody (prepared in PBS at recommended dilution). After incubation for 30 min in the dark, the cells were washed with PBS three times, resuspended in 0.5 mL of PBS, and analyzed on a flow cytometer (FACSCalibur; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). The data were analyzed using the FlowJo software V10 (Tree Star, Ashland, OR, USA). In vitro cytotoxicity tests Cytotoxicity of blank micelles and DOX-loaded micelles in HCCLM3 and A549 cells was evaluated by MTS assay. The cells were plated in a 96-well plate (8,000 cells/well) and incubated at 37°C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2 overnight. Then, the cell culture media was replaced with fresh media containing blank micelles, DOX·HCl, or DOX-loaded micelles with different concentrations and incubated for 48 h. The media was replaced by the mixture of 100 μL of fresh media and 20 μL of MTS. After incubating for 1 h, the absorbance was determined at 490 nm by a microplate reader (Eon; BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA). All experiments were repeated in triplicate. The cell viability was estimated, and IC50 values were calculated using the GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Cellular uptake CLSM was used to study cellular uptake and intracellular release behaviors of DOX-loaded micelles in HCCLM3 cells (CD44 receptor expressing positive cell line), A549 cells (CD44 receptor expressing positive cell line), and L02 cells (CD44 receptor expressing negative cell line, as negative control cells). Briefly, the cells were seeded at a density of 2×104 per well in glass bottom cell culture dishes (NEST Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Wuxi, China) and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. Then, 100 μL of DOX·HCl or DOX-loaded micelles (at a final DOX concentration of 10 μM) was added and incubated for 4 or 24 h. As inhibition experiments (negative control), free HA (5 mg/mL) or 1 μL of CD44 antibody was added with DOX-loaded micelles (at a final DOX concentration of 10 μM) and incubated for 4 or 24 h. The cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS (pH 7.4) and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min, followed by washing with PBS three times. The cell nuclei were stained with 100 μL of DAPI (1 μg/mL) for 5 min and washed with PBS four times. The fluorescence images were captured by a laser scanning confocal microscope (TCS SP2; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). The fluorescence intensity of DOX in cells was analyzed by the LAS AF software (Leica Microsystems). In vivo biodistribution test Male BALB/c nude mice (Slac Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China), weighing 18–20 g, were quarantined in specific pathogen free animal laboratory with controlled humidity and temperature. All experiments adhered to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals45 and were approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (approval protocol number: 201803001). To investigate the in vivo distribution of HA-ss-FA micelles, the near-infrared fluorescent dye was used to prepare ICG-loaded micelles. HCCLM3 cells (4×106 per mouse) were subcutaneously injected into the right back of the mice. When the tumor size reached 800–900 mm3, the mice were intravenously injected with free ICG and HA-ss-FA/ICG (at a concentration of 50 μg/mL). The in vivo fluorescent images were captured at 1, 3, 6, and 24 h using an in vivo imaging system (IVIS Lumina Series III; PerkinElmer Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) with the excitation and emission wavelengths of 780 and 800 nm, respectively. The mice were sacrificed 24 h after injection. The tumors and organs including heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney were collected to capture fluorescent images. Statistical analyses The experimental data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Differences between groups were analyzed by Student’s t-test or ANOVA. Differences were considered statistically significant when the P-values were <0.05. Results and discussion Synthesis and characterization of HA-ss-FA conjugate HA-ss-FA conjugate was synthesized via a reduction-sensitive disulfide bond. CYS which contains a disulphide bond was used as a cross-linker. First, HA–CYS was synthesized by conjugating amine groups of CYS with carboxyl groups of HA in the presence of coupling agents EDC and NHS. According to the response surface methodology developed by Santhanam et al,35 HA–CYS with different DS of CYS was synthesized by adjusting the reaction time. The DS of CYS in HA–CYS was determined by detecting free primary amino groups in CYS (TNBS method).36 The DS of CYS was 6.53, 17.37, and 45.36% when reacted for 2, 6, and 12 h, respectively. As expected, the DS of CYS increased with the reaction time at 2–12 h. Secondly, FA was conjugated with HA–CYS via amide bond. The HA–CYS with different DSs of CYS was used to synthesize HA-ss-FA, and the results of FA’s DS are shown in Table 1. As the other conditions did not change, the DS of FA (3.15%–17.43%) increased with the DS of CYS (6.53%–45.36%), which indicated that FA was conjugated with HA via the CYS. The chemical structure of HA-ss-FA was characterized by UV, 1H NMR, and FTIR. UV spectra of HA, FA, and HA-ss-FA are shown in Figure 3A. There was no absorption peak of HA and an absorption peak of FA at 288 nm from 250 to 900 nm. HA-ss-FA showed an absorption peak at 285 nm. Compared to FA, the absorption peak of HA-ss-FA was slightly violet shifted (3 nm) due to the conjugation of amino in the HA–CYS molecules with carboxide in the FA molecules. The result indicated that FA had been conjugated with HA–CYS. And the DS of FA was determined by UV at 285 nm. 1H NMR spectrum (Figure 4) of HA-ss-FA showed clear signals attributable to CYS at 3.00–2.71 ppm, and the characteristic proton peaks of FA appeared at 6.81, 7.65, 7.92, and 8.75 ppm. The characteristic proton peaks of HA were at 4.27–3.34 ppm, which were identical with a previous report.46 The detailed analysis of HA-ss-FA 1H NMR spectrum is tabulated in Table S1. FTIR spectrum is shown in Figure 5. The characteristic peaks of HA–CYS can be ascribed to 3,270 cm−1 for O−H stretching vibrations, 2,886 cm−1 for C−H stretching vibrations, 1,031 cm−1 for C−O stretching vibrations, and 1,333 cm−1 for C−H deformation vibration. And, there were obvious characteristic peaks of FA at 832 cm−1 (Ar–H deformation vibration of the aromatic ring) and 1,603–1,507 cm−1 (C=C skeletal vibration of the aromatic ring). Compared to the FTIR spectrum of FA, C=C skeletal vibration of the aromatic ring of HA-ss-FA FTIR spectrum moved from 1,694–1,605 to 1,603–1,507 cm−1. The detailed analysis of HA-ss-FA FTIR spectrum is tabulated in Table S2. The FTIR spectrum was in accordance with a previous report.47 The result suggested the successful conjugation of FA with HA. By combining with the result of UV, FTIR, and 1H NMR spectra, the synthesis of HA-ss-FA was confirmed.47 Furthermore, the molecular weight of HA-ss-FA was determined by GPC (Figure 3B), the calculated number average molecular weight (Mn) was 24,217 Da (Mw/Mn=1.61). The Mw of HA-ss-FA was close to the original HA (21 kDa). Compared with HA, increasing of the Mw of HA-ss-FA suggested that the conjugation of CYS (17.37%) and FA (7.49%) was successful. In addition, the reduction sensitivity of HA-ss-FA was verified. As the disulfide linkage of HA-ss-FA was supposed to be broken by GSH, HA-ss-FA was incubated with 20 mM GSH and the product was analyzed by UV and FTIR. The spectra of the product (HA-ss-FA/GSH) are shown in Figure 3A. UV spectrum (Figure 3A) showed that after treating with GSH, the absorption peak of HA-ss-FA disappeared at 285 nm and the UV spectrum of HA-ss-FA/GSH was similar to the UV spectrum of HA. This result demonstrated that the HA-ss-FA was cleaved by GSH via the disulfide linkage and FA was removed as a precipitate. To further confirm the degradation of HA-ss-FA by GSH, the product (HA-ss-FA/GSH) was analyzed by FTIR. As shown in Figure 5, the FTIR spectrum of HA-ss-FA/GSH showed the clearly characteristic peaks of HA–CYS at 1,608, 1,560, 1,375, 1,039 cm−1 (Table S2). However, the benzene ring characteristic peaks of FA no longer existed at 1,507 and 832 cm−1. The result verified that HA-ss-FA was degraded by GSH via the disulfide linkage, which indicated that HA-ss-FA was redox sensitive. Preparation and characterization of HA-ss-FA micelles DOX-loaded micelles with different DSs of FA in HA-ss-FA were prepared and characterized. As shown in Table 1, the size of these micelles ranged from 128.4 to 422.9 nm within the DS of FA from 3.15 to 11.19%. The physicochemical properties, EE, and DL of these micelles are listed in Table 1. The mean diameter of DOX-loaded micelles was apparently influenced by the DS of FA, and the valley value (122.2 nm) appeared when the DS of FA was 7.49%. The size and PDI of HA-ss-FA1 (DS of FA =3.15%) were the largest, probably because the hydrophobic strength was weaker with less micellar core. As the hydrophobic strength became much stronger with more micellar core, the EE and DL increased with the DS of FA. Similar results were reported by Liu et al.27 The PDI changed insignificantly (0.224–0.268) with the DS of FA from 7.49 to 17.43%; both HA-ss-FA2 (DS of FA =7.49%) and HA-ss-FA3 (DS of FA =17.43%) had narrow size distribution. Besides, the zeta potential was obviously affected by the DS of FA and the value increased from −51.5 to −28.3. The zeta potential of the micelles was negative because of the carboxylic acid moieties (COO−) in HA, which are present on the surface of the micellar particles.48 The reason for HA-ss FA becoming less negatively charged was because the more negatively charged carboxyl group of HA was replaced by CYS and FA. However, the particle size of HA-ss-FA3 was much larger than HA-ss-FA2, probably because the larger Mw of HA-ss-FA leads to larger size. It has been reported that nanoparticles are more likely to escape filtration by liver and spleen and enhance the EPR effect, but the probability of entrapment within liver and spleen increased when the size of nanoparticles was >150 nm.49,50 Moreover, neutral and slightly negatively charged nanoparticles have longer circulation lifetimes and less clearance by the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) than positively charged nanoparticles.51,52 For overall consideration, HA-ss-FA2 seemed to be more suitable for tumor-targeting delivery owing to its appropriate particle size. Blank micelles with different concentrations were prepared and characterized. The mean diameter (Figure 6A), PDI, and zeta potential of HA-ss-FA micelles were measured and are listed in Table 2. The mean diameter of blank micelles was from 125.4 to 231.7 nm, which varied with the concentration of HA-ss-FA conjugate. Although the size of the micelles was the smallest (125.4 nm) at 1 mg/mL, the PDI was the largest, which indicated that the size distribution was wide at 1 mg/mL. The size of the micelles was 231.7 nm at 10 mg/mL, which was too large and not suitable for tumor-targeting delivery. The size, PDI, and zeta potential of the micelles were 127.4 nm, 0.237, and −30.0 mV at 6 mg/mL, and were of narrow size distribution and appropriate size for tumor-targeting delivery. The negative zeta potential of the micelles (−30.0 mV at 6 mg/mL) could provide a repelling force between particles and increase the stability of the micelles.53,54 DOX-loaded micelles with different concentrations were prepared and characterized. As shown in Table 3, the particle size of DOX-loaded micelles was 112.7–103.7 nm (Figure 6C), which was smaller than blank micelles. This was probably because the encapsulated hydrophobic drug increased the hydrophobic interaction between DOX and FA groups in HA-ss-FA; thus, the micelle core became more hydrophobic and the micelles shrunk.55,56 The particle size of DOX-loaded micelles changed slightly with the concentration of HA-ss-FA conjugate, and the zeta potential was negative from −6.7 to −31.5 mV. The EE and DL ranged from 46.30 to 88.09 and 13.25 to 22.70% when the concentration of HA-ss-FA increased from 1 to 6 mg/mL. When the HA-ss-FA concentration was 6 mg/mL, DOX was encapsulated into the hydrophobic core of the micelles with high efficiency (the EE and DL were 88.09 and 22.70%, respectively). Because HA is negatively charged54 and may associate with the positively charged DOX, a control experiment that used HA (6 mg/mL) associated with DOX (HA/DOX) following the same steps as the preparation of DOX-loaded micelles, was performed. The DL of DOX in HA/DOX was only 0.68%, which was far less than for HA-ss-FA/DOX. The result indicated that the electrostatic interactions between HA and DOX were not strong enough to bind DOX to HA or HA-ss-FA. Therefore, DOX was encapsulated in the micelles rather than associated with HA by electrostatic interactions. HA-ss-FA conjugate was self-assembled, and micelles were formed in aqueous conditions. The CMC of the HA-ss-FA was 0.036 mg/mL by fluorescence spectra using pyrene as a fluorescence probe (Figure 7A). The low CMC value indicates that the micelles form at a low concentration, which ensured that the micelles can retain their original morphology under highly diluted conditions.20,57 Furthermore, the kinetic stability of DOX-loaded micelles was investigated.41 The result (Figure 7B) showed that the size changes in the micelles in PBS (range from 130 to 192 nm) and PBS containing 10% FBS (range from 124 to 177 nm) were not significant within 48 h. The result suggested that the micelles were stable in physiological environment.41 Moreover, there was no significant difference between PBS and PBS containing 10% FBS, which indicated that the micelles were stable in the presence of FBS. The particle morphology of blank and DOX-loaded micelles was observed by TEM (Figure 6B and D). The TEM micrograph demonstrated that the micelles were near spherical in shape. The size was smaller than that determined by DLS. The reason was probably due to the different states of micelles in these two determinations. The TEM samples were dried, and the micelles may shrink during drying.58 In vitro reduction-triggered drug release of DOX The release of DOX from DOX-loaded micelles was investigated in PBS (pH 7.4) at 37°C with or without 20 mM GSH, simulating the biological environment inside the tumor cells.59 The result is shown in Figure 7C; DOX release from the micelles in the presence of 20 mM GSH was faster than in the absence of GSH due to the fracture of the disulfide bond in HA-ss-FA molecules in the reductive environment, and the released amount of DOX in PBS with 20 mM GSH was 1.4-fold more than in PBS without GSH, at 27 h. The result suggested that the HA-ss-FA micelles were reduction sensitive and would release rapidly in tumor cells. CD44 receptor expression on HCCLM3 and A549 cells The CD44 receptor expression on HCCLM3 and A549 cells was determined by a flow cytometer. As shown in Figure 8, both HCCLM3 and A549 cells expressed CD44 receptor and the CD44 receptor expression proportion of HCCLM3 and A549 cells was 71.5 and 89.8%, respectively. The result indicated that HCCLM3 and A549 cells were appropriate cell lines to study CD44 receptor-targeting delivery effect of nanoparticles. And, the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of HCCLM3 and A549 cells was 917 and 362, respectively, which suggested that the expression level of CD44 receptors on the surface of A549 cells was much higher (~2.5-fold higher) than for HCCLM3 cells. In vitro cytotoxicity tests The in vitro cytotoxicity of blank micelles and DOX-loaded micelles on HCCLM3 and A549 cells was evaluated by MTS assay. As shown in Figure 9A and C, the result showed that blank micelles with the concentration of 18.75–600.00 μg/mL, which was much larger than the dose of drug-loaded micelles, were nontoxic (the cell viabilities were >100%) against HCCLM3 and A549 cells. This indicated that HA-ss-FA was of excellent biocompatibility and good biological safety. As shown in Figure 9B and D, the antitumor effect of DOX·HCl and DOX-loaded micelles was dependent on the drug concentration. However, the result showed that the DOX-loaded micelles had weaker cell inhibition efficacy compared to DOX·HCl. The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of DOX·HCl were 2.29 and 0.53 μM against HCCLM3 and A549 cells, while the IC50 values of HA-ss-FA/DOX micelles (DOX-loaded micelles) were 4.24 and 1.31 μM against HCCLM3 and A549 cells, respectively. This was probably because DOX·HCl was water soluble and could be transported into cells quickly by a passive-diffusion mechanism, whereas the drug-loaded micelles were internalized via endocytosis effect, which delayed the drug release of DOX in the micelles. Similar results were reported previously.60,61 In contrast, when the concentration of DOX reached 5–10 μM, DOX-loaded micelles showed stronger inhibition efficacy than DOX·HCl, which was probably because the passive diffusion speed of DOX·HCl was restricted at a high concentration owing to saturation, whereas the endocytosis speed of the micelles was not affected by high concentration. Cellular uptake of DOX-loaded micelles The uptake and intracellular release of DOX·HCl and DOX-loaded micelles in HCCLM3 cells were studied using CLSM. The cells were incubated with DOX·HCl and HA-ss-FA/DOX for 4 or 24 h. In addition, the cells were incubated with an excess amount of HA and DOX-loaded micelles as a negative control (HA-ss-FA/DOX + HA group, an inhibition test) to confirm the CD44 receptor-mediated endocytosis of the micelles, according to a previous report.58 HA-ss-FA/DOX + HA group showed the weakest DOX fluorescence among the three groups. This indicated that the micelles were endocytosed by HCCLM3 cells via CD44 receptor-mediated endocytosis. Interestingly, as shown in Figure 10A, there was no significant difference between cells incubated with DOX·HCl and DOX-loaded micelles for 4 h. However, after 24 h incubation, DOX fluorescence was stronger in the cells of the DOX-loaded micelles group than in the DOX·HCl group (Figure 10B). This was probably because DOX·HCl diffused into the cells through passive diffusion without a release process and DOX-loaded micelles were internalized by the cells via a CD44 receptor-mediated endocytosis mechanism with a reduction-triggered release process,62 which delayed the release of DOX in the first 4 h. The result demonstrated that the micelles effectively enhanced the cellular uptake of DOX-loaded micelles within 24 h. The fluorescent intensity of DOX in HCCLM3 cells was calculated by the LAS AF software. As shown in Figure 10C, compared with DOX·HCl, the uptake of HA-ss-FA/DOX increased 15.81% after 24 h incubation (P<0.05). To confirm the CD44 receptor-mediated endocytosis of HA-ss-FA micelles, we investigated the cellular uptake of DOX-loaded micelles in A549 cells and L02 cells (negative control); the results are shown in Figure 11. Interestingly, after incubating with DOX·HCl or HA-ss-FA/DOX for 4 h, the DOX fluorescence of the HA-ss-FA/DOX group in A549 cells was the strongest, even stronger (1.3-fold stronger) than DOX·HCl group (P<0.001), which was different from the cellular uptake test result of HCCLM3 cells. As the CD44 expression level of A549 cells was much higher than HCCLM3 (~2.5-fold higher), it seems reasonable that the cellular uptake of A549 cells was higher than HCCLM3 cells. HA-ss-FA/DOX with CD44 antibody was incubated with A549 for 4 h and observed by CLSM as a negative control (inhibition experiment); the DOX fluorescence was significantly weaker (2.1-fold weaker) than HA-ss-FA/DOX without CD44 antibody (P<0.001), as expected. This result indicated that HA-ss-FA/DOX was internalized by the cells via a CD44 receptor-mediated endocytosis. Similar to the inhibition experiment of HA-ss-FA/DOX with HA in HCCLM3 cells, the DOX fluorescence of DOX·HCl was stronger than HA-ss-FA/DOX with CD44 antibody in A549 cells due to the delayed release of DOX from DOX-loaded micelles within 4 h. Furthermore, CD44 receptor expression negative L02 cells were incubated with HA-ss-FA/DOX for 4 h as a negative control and the DOX fluorescence of HA-ss-FA/DOX in L02 cells was obviously weaker (1.6-fold weaker) than that in A549 cells (P<0.001). These results demonstrated that the cellular uptake of HA-ss-FA/DOX was mediated by CD44 receptor in CD44 highly expressing cells owing to the CD44-targeting ability of HA. In vivo biodistribution To evaluate the biodistribution of HA-ss-FA micelles in vivo, ICG was loaded in HA-ss-FA micelles and injected intravenously to HCCLM3 tumor-bearing nude mice. The EE and DL were 70.01 and 10.46%, respectively. The fluorescence images (Figure 12A) showed obvious accumulation of ICG in the tumor region 1 h postinjection and the fluorescence of ICG-loaded micelles was 4- to 6.6-fold stronger than free ICG within 6 h. In addition, the ICG fluorescence in the tumor region still existed in the mice injected with ICG-loaded micelles 24 h postinjection, whereas there was no ICG fluorescence in the mice injected with free ICG. The result demonstrated that the micelles can improve HCCLM3 tumor-targeting ability of ICG in vivo. The biodistribution of the micelles in organs was observed ex vivo. As shown in Figure 12B, the micelles were distributed mainly in tumor, kidney, and liver 24 h postinjection. Considerable accumulation of the micelles was found in liver. It is reported that HA hepatic clearance is mediated by the HARE receptor in liver sinusoidal endothelial cells, so HA and its derivatives located mostly in the liver.63 There was obvious accumulation in kidney, too. Since urinary excretion is a route to eliminate the smaller Mw HA (~25 kDa),64 the distribution of the micelles in the kidney seemed reasonable. The result was in accordance with previous reports.57,65,66 The most accumulation of free ICG was in the liver, kidney, and tumor 24 h postinjection, due to the liver-specific distribution of ICG and the uptake of particulates by the reticuloendothelial system.67,68 Conclusion In this study, we designed a reduction-sensitive CD44-positive tumor-targeted drug delivery system for DOX delivery. HA-ss-FA conjugate was synthesized and characterized. The mean diameter of blank and HA-ss-FA/DOX micelles waŝ100–120 nm, the PDI was <0.3, and the zeta potential was negative. The DOX-loaded micelles were of high EE (88.09%) and DL (22.70%). HA-ss-FA had excellent bio-compatibility and no obvious cytotoxicity. HA-ss-FA/DOX micelles showed an increased release of DOX in reduction environment. Moreover, the micelles could enhance the cellular uptake of DOX in CD44 receptor-positive HCCLM3 cells and A549 cells and improved the tumor-targetability of DOX in HCCLM3 tumor-bearing nude mice. In summary, this reduction-sensitive delivery system is a potential strategy for CD44 receptor-targeted cancer therapy. Supplementary materials Table S1 1H NMR data of HA-ss-FA conjugate Number δH (ppm) HA CYS FA 1 4.27–4.32 – – 2 3.34 – – 3 3.58 – – 4 3.74 – – 5 3.70 – – 6 4.55 – – 7 3.82 – – 8 3.71 – – 9 3.51 – – 10 3.47 – – 11 proR 3.68 – – 11 proS 3.90 – – a 2.01 – – b – 3.00 – c – 2.85 – d – – 8.75 e – – 7.92 f – – 7.65 g – – 6.81 Note: “–” indicates no data. Abbreviations: CYS, cystamine; FA, folic acid; HA, hyaluronic acid; NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance. Table S2 FTIR data of HA-ss-FA conjugate cm−1 Proposed assignments HA FA 3,270 (s) ν(O–H) H bonded ν(O–H) H bonded 2,887 (m) ν(C–H) – 1,603 (s) νas(C–O)[COOH] νas(C–O)[COOH] bonded 1,451 (m) νs(C–O)[COOH] – 1,402–1,300 (m) δ(C–H)[CH2] δ(C–H)[CH2] 1,031 (s) ν(C–OH) – 1,507 (sh) – C–C stretch (in-ring) aromatics 832 (sh) – Ar–H Note: “–” indicates no data. Abbreviations: Ar–H, aromatic hydrogen; FA, folic acid; FTIR, Fourier transform infrared; HA, hyaluronic acid; s, strong; m, medium, sh, sharp. Acknowledgments This study was supported by the programs of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81403175), Xinglin Young Talent Program from Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Project from Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning (20134Y053 and M20170396), Youth Talent Sail Plan from Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology (14YF1411300), and Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Shanghai (B201703). Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work. Figure 1 Illustration of HA-ss-FA/DOX micelles self-assembled from HA-ss-FA conjugate for CD44-targeted delivery of DOX into tumor cells. Abbreviations: FA, folic acid; GSH, glutathione; HA, hyaluronic acid; DOX, doxorubicin. Figure 2 Synthesis pathway of HA-ss-FA conjugate. Abbreviations: CYS, cystamine; DCC, dicyclohexylcarbodiimide; EDC, 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride; FA, folic acid; HA, hyaluronic acid; NHS, N-hydroxysuccinimide. Figure 3 Characteristics of HA-ss-FA conjugate. Notes: (A) UV–visible spectra of HA, FA, HA-ss-FA, and HA-ss-FA/GSH. (B) Differential relative molecular mass distribution plot of HA-ss-FA conjugate by high-performance gel permeation chromatography. HA-ss-FA/GSH, the lyophilized product of HA-ss-FA after treatment with GSH. Abbreviations: CYS, cystamine; FA, folic acid; HA, hyaluronic acid; GSH, glutathione; Mw, molecular weight; UV, ultraviolet. Figure 4 1H NMR spectrum of HA-ss-FA conjugates in deuterium oxide (600 MHz). Note:ãg represent the characteristic proton peaks and the corresponding atomic numbers in HA-ss-FA. Abbreviations: FA, folic acid; HA, hyaluronic acid; NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance. Figure 5 FTIR spectrum of (A) FA, (B) HA, (C) HA–CYS, (D) HA-ss-FA conjugate, and (E) the lyophilized product of HA-ss-FA after incubation with 20 mM GSH solution for 20 h. Note: HA-ss-FA/GSH, the lyophilized product of HA-ss-FA after treatment with GSH. Abbreviations: CYS, cystamine; FA, folic acid; FTIR, Fourier transform infrared; GSH, glutathione; HA, hyaluronic acid. Figure 6 Size distribution and TEM micrograph of HA-ss-FA micelles. Notes: Size distribution of (A) HA-ss-FA micelles and (C) HA-ss-FA/DOX micelles by DLS. The concentration of HA-ss-FA conjugate was 6 mg/mL. TEM micrograph of (B) HA-ss-FA micelles and (D) HA-ss-FA/DOX micelles. Abbreviations: DLS, dynamic light scattering; DOX, doxorubicin; FA, folic acid; HA, hyaluronic acid; TEM, transmission electron microscopy. Figure 7 Characteristics of HA-ss-FA micelles. Notes: (A) Determination of CMC of HA-ss-FA micelles using pyrene as a fluorescence probe. Intensity ratio (I372 nm/I382 nm) in the pyrene emission spectra is plotted versus concentration of HA-ss-FA conjugate. (B) Stability of HA-ss-FA/DOX micelles in PBS (pH 7.4) and PBS containing 10% FBS. (C) Reduction-triggered release of DOX from HA-ss-FA/DOX at 37°C in PBS (pH 7.4) and PBS containing 20 mM GSH for 96 h (mean ± SD, n=3). **P<0.01. Abbreviations: CMC, critical micelle concentration; DOX, doxorubicin; FA, folic acid; FBS, fetal bovine serum; GSH, glutathione; HA, hyaluronic acid; I, intensity; PBS, phosphate-buffered solution; SD, standard deviation. Figure 8 Detection of CD44 receptor expression on (A) HCCLM3 and (B) A549 cells. Abbreviation: FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate. Figure 9 In vitro cytotoxicity of blank micelles and DOX-loaded micelles on HCCLM3 and A549 cells. Notes: (A) HCCLM3 cells were incubated with HA-ss-FA micelles, (B) DOX·HCl and DOX-loaded micelles for 48 h (mean ± SD, n=3). (C) A549 cells were incubated with HA-ss-FA micelles, (D) DOX·HCl and DOX-loaded micelles for 48 h (mean ± SD, n=3). Abbreviations: DOX, doxorubicin; DOX·HCl, DOX hydrochloride; FA, folic acid; HA, hyaluronic acid; SD, standard deviation. Figure 10 Cellular uptake study of DOX·HCl and HA-ss-FA/DOX micelles in HCCLM3 cells using CLSM. Notes: CLSM images of HCCLM3 cells incubated with DOX·HCl, HA-ss-FA/DOX, and HA-ss-FA/DOX with free HA (5 mg/mL, inhibition experiment as a negative control) for (A) 4 and (B) 24 h. (C) Mean fluorescence intensity of DOX in HCCLM3 cells incubated with DOX·HCl, HA-ss-FA/DOX, and HA-ss-FA/DOX with free HA (5 mg/mL) for 4 and 24 h (mean ± SD, n=20). *P<0.05. **P<0.01. Abbreviations: CLSM, confocal laser scanning microscopy; DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; DOX, doxorubicin; DOX·HCl, DOX hydrochloride; FA, folic acid; HA, hyaluronic acid; SD, standard deviation. Figure 11 Cellular uptake study of DOX·HCl and HA-ss-FA/DOX micelles in A549 cells and L02 cells using CLSM. Notes: (A) CLSM images of A549 cells incubated with (I) DOX·HCl, (II) HA-ss-FA/DOX, and (III) HA-ss-FA/DOX with CD44 antibody (inhibition experiment as a negative control) for 4 h and (IV) L02 cells (CD44 receptor expression negative cell line, as a negative control) incubated with HA-ss-FA/DOX for 4 h. Magnification ×400. (B) Mean fluorescence intensity of DOX in A549 cells incubated with (I) DOX·HCl, (II) HA-ss-FA/DOX, and (III) HA-ss-FA/DOX with free CD44 antibody for 4 h, and (IV) L02 cells incubated with HA-ss-FA/DOX for 4 h (mean ± SD, n=20). ***P<0.001. Abbreviations: CLSM, confocal laser scanning microscopy; DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; DOX, doxorubicin; DOX·HCl, DOX hydrochloride; FA, folic acid; HA, hyaluronic acid; SD, standard deviation. Figure 12 In vivo biodistribution studies of HA-ss-FA micelles. Notes: (A) In vivo fluorescence images of HCCLM3 tumor-bearing nude mice at 1, 3, 6, and 24 h after tail vein injection of free ICG and HA-ss-FA/ICG micelles. (B) Ex vivo fluorescence images of tumor, heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney collected at 24 h after injection. The tumor regions are marked with blue circles. Abbreviations: FA, folic acid; HA, hyaluronic acid; ICG, indocyanine green. Table 1 Influence of DS of CYS and FA in HA-ss-FA on physicochemical properties of DOX-loaded micelles (mean ± SD, n=3) Sample DS of CYS (%) DS of FA (%) Mean diameter (nm) PDI Zeta potential (mV) EE (%) DL (%) HA-ss-FA1 6.53 3.15 422.9±11.6 0.370±0.031 −51.5±0.2 22.32±0.04 6.87±0.02 HA-ss-FA2 17.37 7.49 122.2±1.4 0.268±0.033 −31.5±0.7 49.25±0.56 14.01±0.16 HA-ss-FA3 45.36 17.43 259.6±3.90 0.224±0.029 −28.3±2.2 63.03±0.18 17.19±0.09 Notes: The concentration of HA-ss-FA micelles was 1 mg/mL. The DS of CYS in HA-ss-FA1,HA-ss-FA2, HA-ss-FA3 were 6.53, 17.37, and 45.36%, and the DS of FA in them were 3.15, 7.49, 17.43%, respectively. Abbreviations: CYS, cystamine; DL, drug loading; DOX, doxorubicin; DS, degree of substitution; EE, encapsulation efficiency; FA, folic acid; HA, hyaluronic acid; PDI, polydispersity index; SD, standard deviation. Table 2 Influence of HA-ss-FA concentration on the physico-chemical properties of blank micelles (mean ± SD, n=3) Concentration of HA-ss-FA (mg/mL) Mean diameter (nm) PDI Zeta potential (mV) 1 125.4±1.6 0.392±0.020 −11.2±1.5 6 127.4±7.3 0.237±0.050 −30.0±6.3 10 231.7±1.5 0.278±0.100 −44.5±2.6 Note: The DS of HA-ss-FA was 7.49%. Abbreviations: DS, degree of substitution; FA, folic acid; HA, hyaluronic acid; PDI, polydispersity index; SD, standard deviation. Table 3 Influence of HA-ss-FA concentration on the physicochemical properties of DOX-loaded micelles (mean ± SD, n=3) Concentration of HA-ss-FA (mg/mL) Mean diameter (nm) PDI Zeta potential (mV) EE (%) DL (%) 1 112.7±1.0 0.128±0.030 −31.5±1.2 46.30±1.61 13.25±0.40 3 118.8±3.8 0.161±0.010 −6.7±1.5 82.94±2.77 21.66±0.57 6 103.7±5.0 0.187±0.050 −18.9±1.3 88.09±2.54 22.70±0.51 Note: The DS of HA-ss-FA was 7.40%. Abbreviations: DL, drug loading; DOX, doxorubicin; DS, degree of substitution; EE, encapsulation efficiency; FA, folic acid; HA, hyaluronic acid; PDI, polydispersity index; SD, standard deviation. ==== Refs References 1 Chan WCW Khademhosseini A Parak W Weiss PS Cancer: nano-science and nanotechnology approaches ACS Nano 2017 11 5 4375 4376 28532157 2 Hou J Wang J Sun E Preparation and evaluation of icariside II-loaded binary mixed micelles using Solutol® HS15 and Pluronic F127 as carriers Drug Deliv 2016 23 9 3248 3256 26984338 3 Ojha T Pathak V Shi Y Pharmacological and physical vessel modulation strategies to improve EPR-mediated drug targeting to tumors Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2017 119 44 60 28697952 4 Pedrosa SS Pereira P Correia A Gama FM Targetability of hyaluronic acid nanogel to cancer cells: in vitro and in vivo studies Eur J Pharm Sci 2017 104 102 113 28385630 5 Guruprasath P Kim J Gunassekaran GR Interleukin-4 receptor-targeted delivery of Bcl-xL siRNA sensitizes tumors to chemotherapy and inhibits tumor growth Biomaterials 2017 142 101 111 28732245 6 Jain D Cardiotoxicity of doxorubicin and other anthracycline derivatives J Nucl Cardiol 2000 7 1 53 62 10698235 7 Shoukry HS Ammar HI Rashed LA Prophylactic supplementation of resveratrol is more effective than its therapeutic use against doxorubicin induced cardiotoxicity PLoS One 2017 12 7 e0181535 28727797 8 Li K Zhang Y Chen M Enhanced antitumor efficacy of doxorubicin-encapsulated halloysite nanotubes Int J Nanomedicine 2018 13 19 30 29296083 9 Thorn CF Oshiro C Marsh S Doxorubicin pathways: pharmaco-dynamics and adverse effects Pharmacogenet Genomics 2010 21 7 440 446 10 Ammar HI Saba S Ammar RI Elsayed LA Ghaly WB Dhingra S Erythropoietin protects against doxorubicin-induced heart failure Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2011 301 6 2413 2421 11 Shah K Crowder D Overmeyer J Maltese W Yun Y Hyaluronan drug delivery systems are promising for cancer therapy because of their selective attachment, enhanced uptake, and superior efficacy Biomed Eng Lett 2015 5 2 109 123 12 Kheiri Manjili H Ghasemi P Malvandi H Mousavi MS Attari E Danafar H Pharmacokinetics and in vivo delivery of curcumin by copolymeric mPEG-PCL micelles Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2017 116 17 30 27756682 13 Guan J Zhou ZQ Chen MH Folate-conjugated and pH-responsive polymeric micelles for target-cell-specific anticancer drug delivery Acta Biomater 2017 60 244 255 28713015 14 Liu Y Fu S Lin L Redox-sensitive Pluronic F127-tocopherol micelles: synthesis, characterization, and cytotoxicity evaluation Int J Nanomedicine 2017 12 2635 2644 28435248 15 Wu JZ Bremner DH Li HY Sun XZ Zhu LM Synthesis and evaluation of temperature- and glucose-sensitive nanoparticles based on phenylboronic acid and N-vinylcaprolactam for insulin delivery Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2016 69 1026 1035 27612799 16 Arpicco S Milla P Stella B Dosio F Hyaluronic acid conjugates as vectors for the active targeting of drugs, genes and nanocomposites in cancer treatment Molecules 2014 19 3 3193 3230 24642908 17 Tran TH Choi JY Ramasamy T Hyaluronic acid-coated solid lipid nanoparticles for targeted delivery of vorinostat to CD44 overexpressing cancer cells Carbohydr Polym 2014 114 407 415 25263908 18 Yan H Song J Jia X Zhang Z Hyaluronic acid-modified didecyldimethylammonium bromide/d-a-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol succinate mixed micelles for delivery of baohuoside I against non-small cell lung cancer: in vitro and in vivo evaluation Drug Deliv 2017 24 1 30 39 28155337 19 Wickens JM Alsaab HO Kesharwani P Recent advances in hyaluronic acid-decorated nanocarriers for targeted cancer therapy Drug Discov Today 2016 22 4 665 680 28017836 20 Han X Dong X Li J Free paclitaxel-loaded E-selectin binding peptide modified micelle self-assembled from hyaluronic acid-paclitaxel conjugate inhibit breast cancer metastasis in a murine model Int J Pharm 2017 528 1–2 33 46 28576551 21 Cho HJ Yoon HY Koo H Self-assembled nanoparticles based on hyaluronic acid-ceramide (HA-CE) and Pluronic® for tumor-targeted delivery of docetaxel Biomaterials 2011 32 29 7181 7190 21733572 22 Lehner R Liu K Wang X Hunziker P Efficient receptor mediated siRNA delivery in vitro by folic acid targeted pentablock copolymer-based micelleplexes Biomacromolecules 2017 18 8 2654 2662 28675926 23 Ramya AN Joseph MM Maniganda S Karunakaran V Sreelekha TT Maiti KK Emergence of gold-mesoporous silica hybrid nanotheranostics: Dox-encoded, folate targeted chemotherapy with modulation of SERS fingerprinting for apoptosis toward tumor eradication Small Epub 2017 7 3 13 31 24 Kaur A Jain K Mehra NK Jain NK Development and characterization of surface engineered PPI dendrimers for targeted drug delivery Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol 2016 45 3 414 425 27027686 25 Liu Y Sun J Lian H Cao W Wang Y He Z Folate and CD44 receptors dual-targeting hydrophobized hyaluronic acid paclitaxel-loaded polymeric micelles for overcoming multidrug resistance and improving tumor distribution J Pharm Sci 2014 103 5 1538 1547 24619562 26 Zhao H-X Yang C-X Yan X-P Fabrication and bioconjugation of BIII and CrIII co-doped ZnGa2O4 persistent luminescent nanoparticles for dual-targeted cancer bioimaging Nanoscale 2016 8 45 18987 18994 27808311 27 Liu Y Sun J Cao W Dual targeting folate-conjugated hyaluronic acid polymeric micelles for paclitaxel delivery Int J Pharm 2011 421 1 160 169 21945183 28 Zhao X Jia X Liu L Double-cross-linked hyaluronic acid nanoparticles with pH/reduction dual-responsive triggered release and pH-modulated fluorescence for folate-receptor-mediated targeting visualized chemotherapy Biomacromolecules 2016 17 4 1496 1505 27010934 29 Xiong XY Pan X Tao L Enhanced effect of folated pluronic F87-PLA/TPGS mixed micelles on targeted delivery of paclitaxel Int J Biol Macromol 2017 103 1011 1018 28552723 30 Deng B Xia M Qian J Calcium phosphate-reinforced reduction-sensitive hyaluronic acid micelles for delivering paclitaxel in cancer therapy Mol Pharm 2017 14 6 1938 1949 28481545 31 Dong X Liu C Preparation and characterization of self-assembled nano-particles of hyaluronic acid-deoxycholic acid conjugates J Nanomater 2010 2010 9 32 Zhu Z Hao X Yan M Cancer stem/progenitor cells are highly enriched in CD133+CD44+ population in hepatocellular carcinoma Int J Cancer 2010 126 9 2067 2078 19711346 33 Ganesh S Iyer AK Gattacceca F Morrissey DV Amiji MM In vivo biodistribution of siRNA and cisplatin administered using CD44-targeted hyaluronic acid nanoparticles J Control Release 2013 172 3 699 706 24161254 34 Oliveira AV Marcelo A Costa AM Silva GA Evaluation of cystamine-modified hyaluronic acid/chitosan polyplex as retinal gene vector Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2016 58 264 272 26478310 35 Santhanam S Liang J Baid R Ravi N Investigating thiol-modification on hyaluronan via carbodiimide chemistry using response surface methodology J Biomed Mater Res A 2015 103 7 2300 2308 25369214 36 Mulcahy EM Fargierlagrange M Mulvihill DM O’Mahony JA Characterisation of heat-induced protein aggregation in whey protein isolate and the influence of aggregation on the availability of amino groups as measured by the orthophthaldialdehyde (OPA) and trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid (TNBS) methods Food Chem 2017 229 66 74 28372228 37 Adler-Nissen J Determination of the degree of hydrolysis of food protein hydrolysates by trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid J Agric Food Chem 1979 27 6 1256 544653 38 Chen YH Wang Q Establishment of CTAB turbidimetric method to determine hyaluronic acid content in fermentation broth Carbohydr Polym 2009 78 1 178 181 39 Santoveña A Monzón C Delgado A Evora C Llabrés M Fariña JB Development of a standard method for in vitro evaluation of triamcinolone and BMP-2 diffusion mechanism from thermosensitive and biocompatible composite hyaluronic acid-pluronic hydrogels J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 2017 42 284 291 40 Zhong Y Zhang J Cheng R Reversibly crosslinked hyaluronic acid nanoparticles for active targeting and intelligent delivery of doxorubicin to drug resistant CD44+ human breast tumor xenografts J Control Release 2015 205 144 154 25596560 41 Kang Y Lu L Lan J Redox-responsive polymeric micelles formed by conjugating gambogic acid with bioreducible poly(amido amine)s for the co-delivery of docetaxel and MMP-9 shRNA Acta Biomater 2018 68 137 153 29288085 42 Sun C Li X Du X Wang T Redox-responsive micelles for triggered drug delivery and effective laryngopharyngeal cancer therapy Int J Biol Macromol 2018 112 65 73 29371149 43 Qin B Liu L Wu X mPEGylated solanesol micelles as redox-responsive nanocarriers with synergistic anticancer effect Acta Biomater 2017 64 211 222 28963017 44 Li Y Tian B Yang J Stepwise metastatic human hepatocellular carcinoma cell model system with multiple metastatic potentials established through consecutive in vivo selection and studies on metastatic characteristics J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2004 130 8 460 468 15146329 45 Council NR Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals Washington, DC The National Academies Press 1996 46 Welti D Rees DA Welsh EJ Solution conformation of glycosaminoglycans: assignment of the 300-MHz 1H-magnetic resonance spectra of chondroitin 4-sulphate, chondroitin 6-sulphate and hyaluronate, and investigation of an alkali-induced conformation change Eur J Biochem 1979 94 2 505 514 34518 47 Gilli R Kacuráková M Mathlouthi M Navarini L Paoletti S FTIR studies of sodium hyaluronate and its oligomers in the amorphous solid phase and in aqueous solution Carbohydr Res 1994 263 2 315 326 7805057 48 Saadat E Shakor N Gholami M Dorkoosh FA Hyaluronic acid based micelle for articular delivery of triamcinolone, preparation, in vitro and in vivo evaluation Int J Pharm 2015 489 1–2 218 225 25956051 49 Zheng S Jin Z Han J Preparation of HIFU-triggered tumor-targeted hyaluronic acid micelles for controlled drug release and enhanced cellular uptake Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2016 143 27 36 26998864 50 Blanco E Shen H Ferrari M Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery Nat Biotechnol 2015 33 9 941 26348965 51 Xiao K Li Y Luo J The effect of surface charge on in vivo biodistribution of PEG-oligocholic acid based micellar nanoparticles Biomaterials 2011 32 13 3435 3446 21295849 52 Alexis F Pridgen E Molnar LK Farokhzad OC Factors affecting the clearance and biodistribution of polymeric nanoparticles Mol Pharm 2008 5 4 505 515 18672949 53 Tian C Asghar S Xu Y The effect of the molecular weight of hyaluronic acid on the physicochemical characterization of hyaluronic acid-curcumin conjugates and in vitro evaluation in glioma cells Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2018 165 45 55 29453085 54 Dosio F Arpicco S Stella B Fattal E Hyaluronic acid for anticancer drug and nucleic acid delivery Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2016 97 204 236 26592477 55 Liu GY Li M Zhu CS Jin Q Zhang ZC Ji J Charge-conversional and pH-sensitive PEGylated polymeric micelles as efficient nanocarriers for drug delivery Macromol Biosci 2014 14 9 1280 1290 24866398 56 Liu H Wu S Yu J Reduction-sensitive micelles self-assembled from amphiphilic chondroitin sulfate A-deoxycholic acid conjugate for triggered release of doxorubicin Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2017 75 55 63 28415498 57 Li J Huo M Wang J Redox-sensitive micelles self-assembled from amphiphilic hyaluronic acid-deoxycholic acid conjugates for targeted intracellular delivery of paclitaxel Biomaterials 2012 33 7 2310 2320 22166223 58 Zhong Y Goltsche K Cheng L Hyaluronic acid-shelled acid-activatable paclitaxel prodrug micelles effectively target and treat CD44-overexpressing human breast tumor xenografts in vivo Biomaterials 2016 84 250 261 26851390 59 Zhu Y Zhang J Meng F cRGD-functionalized reduction-sensitive shell-sheddable biodegradable micelles mediate enhanced doxorubicin delivery to human glioma xenografts in vivo J Control Release 2016 233 29 38 27178807 60 Ke XY Lin NV Gao SJ Tong YW Hedrick JL Yang YY Co-delivery of thioridazine and doxorubicin using polymeric micelles for targeting both cancer cells and cancer stem cells Biomaterials 2014 35 3 1096 1108 24183698 61 Wang L Tian B Jing Z Coordinated pH/redox dual-sensitive and hepatoma-targeted multifunctional polymeric micelle system for stimuli-triggered doxorubicin release: synthesis, characterization and in vitro evaluation Int J Pharm 2016 501 1–2 221 235 26851356 62 Saneja A Nayak D Srinivas M Development and mechanistic insight into enhanced cytotoxic potential of hyaluronic acid conjugated nanoparticles in CD44 overexpressing cancer cells Eur J Pharm Sci 2017 97 79 91 27989859 63 Tripodo G Trapani A Torre ML Giammona G Trapani G Mandracchia D Hyaluronic acid and its derivatives in drug delivery and imaging: recent advances and challenges Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2015 97 pt B 400 416 26614559 64 Kuehl C Zhang T Kaminskas LM Hyaluronic acid molecular weight determines lung clearance and biodistribution after instillation Mol Pharm 2016 13 6 1904 1914 27157508 65 Thomas RG Moon M Lee S Jeong YY Paclitaxel loaded hyaluronic acid nanoparticles for targeted cancer therapy: in vitro and in vivo analysis Int J Biol Macromol 2015 72 510 518 25224289 66 Choi KY Min KH Na JH Self-assembled hyaluronic acid nanoparticles as a potential drug carrier for cancer therapy: synthesis, characterization, and in vivo biodistribution J Mater Chem 2009 19 24 4102 4107 67 Zheng M Yue C Ma Y Single-step assembly of DOX/ICG loaded lipid – polymer nanoparticles for highly effective chemo-photothermal combination therapy ACS Nano 2013 7 3 2056 2067 23413798 68 Zhang J Jin W Wang X Wang J Zhang X Zhang Q A novel octreotide modified lipid vesicle improved the anticancer efficacy of doxorubicin in somatostatin receptor 2 positive tumor models Mol Pharm 2010 7 4 1159 1168 20524673