==== Front Int J OncolInt. J. OncolIJOInternational Journal of Oncology1019-64391791-2423D.A. Spandidos 10.3892/ijo.2018.4481ijo-53-03-1001ArticlesEffects of a checkpoint kinase inhibitor, AZD7762, on tumor suppression and bone remodeling Wang Luqi 12Wang Yue 12Chen Andy 2Jalali Aydin 2Liu Shengzhi 12Guo Yunxia 12Na Sungsoo 2Nakshatri Harikrishna 3Li Bai-Yan 1Yokota Hiroki 12 1 Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150081, P.R. China 2 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 3 Department of Surgery, Simon Cancer Research Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USACorrespondence to: Dr Hiroki Yokota, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, 723 West Michigan Street, SL220, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA, E-mail: hyokota@iupui.eduDr Ban-Yan Li, Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Harbin Medical University, 157 Baojian Road, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150081, P.R. China, E-mail: liby@ems.hrbmu.edu.cn9 2018 13 7 2018 13 7 2018 53 3 1001 1012 22 2 2018 14 6 2018 Copyright: © Wang et al.2018This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.Chemotherapy for suppressing tumor growth and metastasis tends to induce various effects on other organs. Using AZD7762, an inhibitor of checkpoint kinase (Chk) 1 and 2, the present study examined its effect on mammary tumor cells in addition to bone cells (osteoclasts, osteoblasts and osteocytes), using monolayer cell cultures and three-dimensional (3D) cell spheroids. The results revealed that AZD7762 blocked the proliferation of 4T1.2 mammary tumor cells and suppressed the development of RAW264.7 pre-osteoclast cells by downregulating nuclear factor of activated T cells cytoplasmic 1. AZD7762 also promoted the mineralization of MC3T3 osteoblast-like cells and 3D bio-printed bone constructs of MLO-A5 osteocyte spheroids. While a Chk1 inhibitor, PD407824, suppressed the proliferation of tumor cells and the differentiation of pre-osteoclasts, its effect on gene expression in osteoblasts was markedly different compared with AZD7762. Western blotting indicated that the stimulating effect of AZD7762 on osteoblast development was associated with the inhibition of Chk2 and the downregulation of cellular tumor antigen p53. The results of the present study indicated that in addition to acting as a tumor suppressor, AZD7762 may prevent bone loss by inhibiting osteoclastogenesis and stimulating osteoblast mineralization. checkpoint kinase inhibitormammary tumorosteoclastsosteoblasts ==== Body Introduction Checkpoint kinases (Chks) are serine/threonine kinases that serve a critical role in cell cycle control, DNA damage responses and cell survival (1). Chks have two subtypes, Chk1 and Chk2, and they are highly conserved from yeast to humans (2). The upregulation of Chks induces cell cycle arrest, while their inhibition in the presence of DNA damage induces abnormal DNA replication, followed by cell death (3). For cancer treatment, inhibitors of Chks are used as chemotherapeutic agents, in many cases with DNA damaging agents (4–6). However, it has been reported that Chk inhibition alone may lead to apoptosis in tumor cells through mutation and/or regulation of cellular tumor antigen p53 (p53) and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1 (p21) tumor suppressor genes (7). While Chk inhibitors may require delivery to tumor cells, they are able to potentially induce varying responses in other organs. The present study evaluated the effect of AZD7762, a Chk1 and Chk2 inhibitor, on three types of bone cells: Bone-resorbing osteoclasts, bone-forming osteoblasts, and osteocytes. Breast cancer accounts for 25% of all cancer cases in women, and advanced breast cancer metastasizes to distant organs, most commonly bone (8). Thus, to treat breast cancer and protect bones from metastasis, the desired function of chemotherapeutic agents is the inhibition of tumor proliferation and osteoclast development. It is also beneficial if the stimulation of osteoblast development is induced. Employing an inhibitor of Chk1 and Chk2, AZD7762 (362 Da), in addition to using PD407824 (328 Da) as a control Chk1 inhibitor, the present study examined their effects on mammary tumor cells, osteoclasts and osteoblasts/osteocytes. AZD7762 is a potent inhibitor of Chk1 and Chk2 that potentiates antitumor activity in xenograft models in a dose-dependent manner when simultaneously administered with DNA-damaging agents (9). PD407824 is a selective inhibitor of Chk1 (10), and its inhibitory effect on tumor growth and bone resorption was recently reported in connection to the regulation of stress in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (11). Chk1 is a primary gatekeeper of cell division at multiple cell cycle checkpoints, including the S, G2/M and M phases. Chk2 prevents uncontrolled rapid cell division, and inherited mutations in Chk2 are reported to be associated with breast cancer (12,13). The present study investigated the common effects of AZD7762 and PD407824 as Chk1 inhibitors, in addition to the differential effects of Chk2 inhibition. It was previously reported that the elevated phosphorylation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor-α (eIF2α) reduces the proliferation of tumor cells and suppresses the differentiation of osteoclasts (14,15). Phosphorylation of eIF2α is regulated by phosphatases, including protein phosphatase 1, in addition to four known kinases, including protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK). PERK is activated by stress in the ER (16). Using thapsigargin, an inducer of ER stress, the present study evaluated the role of PERK and eIF2α in response to AZD7762. In the present study, the possible multiple roles of AZD7762 in the suppression of tumor growth, inhibition of osteoclast development and stimulation of osteoblast development were investigated. Three bone cell lines were employed [RAW264.7 pre-osteoclast cells (17), MC3T3 osteoblast-like cells (18), and MLO-A5 osteocyte-like cells (19)], together with 4T1.2 mammary tumor cells. The 4T1.2 cell line was isolated from metastasized bone, and represents a breast cancer model of efficient metastasis to bone (20). The responses to AZD7762 and PD407824 were examined in monolayer cell cultures, three-dimensional (3D) spheroids (21), and 3D bio-printed bone constructs (22). While PD407824 is able to inhibit tumor growth and osteoclastogenesis, its ability to promote osteoblast development is limited (11). It has been reported that inhibition of Chk2, and not Chk1, downregulates p53 expression (23). Since p53 is involved in osteoblast development (24), it was hypothesized that besides inhibitory effects on tumor cells and osteoclasts, AZD7762 may have more potent effects on osteoblastogenesis than PD407824 by a p53-dependent pathway. Materials and methods Cell culture 4T1.2 mouse mammary tumor cells (obtained from Dr R. Anderson at Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Melbourne, Australia), MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells [American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Manassas, VA, USA (25)], and MCF-7 human breast cancer cells (26) were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY, USA). RAW264.7 pre-osteoclast cells (ATCC), MC3T3 osteoblast-like cells (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), and MLO-A5 osteocyte-like cells (obtained from Dr L. Bonewald at Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA) were grown in α minimum essential medium (MEM; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific. Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Bone marrow-derived cells, obtained by flushing the tibia and femur from one female 10-week old BALB/c mouse and separating with low-density gradient centrifugation (27), were cultured in αMEM with 10 ng/ml macrophage colony-stimulating factor (PeproTech, Inc., Rocky Hill, NJ, USA) for 2 days, and the surface-attached cells were used as osteoclast precursors. The experimental procedures using animals were approved by the Indiana University Animal Care and Use Committee and were in compliance with the Guiding Principles in the Care and Use of Animals endorsed by the American Physiological Society (28). The culture media contained 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Atlanta Biologicals, Flowery Branch, GA, USA) and antibiotics (50 U/ml penicillin and 50 µg/ml streptomycin; Life Technologies; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). MLO-A5 cells were grown with 5% FBS and 5% bovine calf serum. Cells were maintained at 37°C and 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator, and treated with AZD7762 (0.1–10 µM), PD407824 (0.1–20 µM), or thapsigargin (1 µM; Tocris Bioscience, Bristol, UK). Cellular proliferation was evaluated using an MTT assay (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA), according to the manufacturer's protocol. The relative cell proliferation was determined as a ratio of the absorbance at 570 nm of each sample and control, as measured using a plate reader. To quantify 3D spheroid cell viability, the CellTiter-Glo 3D Cell Viability Assay (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) was used, according to the manufacturer's protocol, measuring luminescence with a plate reader. 3D spheroid assay and 3D bio-printing To induce spheroid formation, ~5,000 cells were cultured in a U-bottom low-adhesion 96-well plate (S-Bio, Hudson, NH, USA). MLO-A5 osteocyte spheroids were bio-printed onto a needle array using a Regenova 3D Bioprinter (Cyfuse Biomedical K.K., Tokyo, Japan) (22) to generate bone constructs mineralized in osteogenic medium (70 µM ascorbic acid and 5 mM β-glycerophosphate) (27). Each construct contained 18 osteocyte spheroids (3×3×2 configuration). Motility assay To evaluate motility in a monolayer culture, a wound healing scratch motility assay was performed as described previously (29). In brief, cells were plated in 12-well plates and, the following day, scratching was performed using a plastic tip. The areas newly occupied with cells in the scratched zone were determined 24 h post-scratching using images obtained using a microscope (magnification, ×40; Nikon Eclipse TS100, Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), which were scanned using Adobe Photoshop (CS2; Adobe Systems, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) and quantified with Image J v1.51p (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). Osteoclast differentiation assay and pit formation assay Using RAW264.7 pre-osteoclast cells, an osteoclast differentiation assay was conducted in 24-well plates with 30 ng/ml receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL) in the presence and absence of 0.1–2 µM AZD7762 and PD407824. For bone marrow-derived cells, cells were cultured in 10 ng/ml macrophage colony stimulating factor (M-CSF; Peprotech, Inc., Rocky Hill, NJ, USA) for 2 days prior to the addition of RANKL (27). During the 5-day experiments, the culture medium was replaced once on day 3. Adherent cells were fixed with a citrate, acetone and formaldehyde solution for 30 sec at room temperature and stained for 20 min at 37°C with a tartrate resistant acid phosphate (TRAP)-staining kit, according to the manufacturer's protocol (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA). TRAP-positive multinucleated cells (>3 nuclei) were identified as mature osteoclasts (30). A pit formation assay was conducted similarly using 24-well culture plates coated with hydroxyapatite (31). After 6 days, cells were removed with 5% sodium hypochlorite for 5 min at room temperature, and images of the wells were captured with a phase-contrast inverted microscope at ×40 magnification. Using ImageJ, the areas of the wells no longer coated with hydroxyapatite were measured, and the pit area fraction was calculated by normalizing to the total image area. Alizarin red staining MC3T3 cells were seeded on 24-well tissue-culture plates at 6.5×104 cells/well. Upon becoming fully confluent, osteogenic medium (70 µM ascorbic acid and 5 mM β-glycerophosphate) was added, with 0–0.5 µM AZD7762, and the cells were cultured for 5 weeks, changing the media every other day. The effect of AZD7762 on mineralization was evaluated by staining at room temperature for 3 min with 1% Alizarin Red S solution (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) and imaged at ×40 magnification with an inverted microscope. Alizarin red staining was quantified by measuring the image grey-scale values using ImageJ. Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and RNA interference Total RNA was extracted using an RNeasy Plus mini kit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) and RT was conducted (37°C for 2 h; 85°C for 5 min) with a high-capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). RT-qPCR was performed using Power SYBR green PCR master mix kits (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) with the PCR primers listed in Table I. RNA interference was conducted using small interfering (si)RNA specific to PERK (cat. no. 100334), Chk1 (cat. no. 160184) and Chk2 (cat. no. 78549; Life Technologies; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). A negative siRNA (Silencer Select #1; Life Technologies; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was used as a nonspecific negative control. Cells were transiently transfected with siRNA (130 pmol per 6-cm dish) using Lipofectamine® RNAiMAX (Life Technologies; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) in Opti-MEM I medium. The medium was replaced with regular culture medium after 24 h, and the silencing efficiency was measured by immunoblotting 48 h post-transfection. Western blot analysis Cells were lysed in a radioimmuno-precipitation assay buffer with protease inhibitors (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA) and phosphatase inhibitors (Calbiochem; Merck KGaA). Following measuring of the protein concentration using a Bicinchoninic Acid Protein Assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), ~10 µg isolated proteins/lane were fractionated using 10–15% SDS gels and electrotransferred to polyvinylidene difluo-ride membranes (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Membranes were blocked in 2% blotting-grade blocker (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature or overnight at 4°C. Antibodies against alkaline phosphate (cat. no. sc-28904; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), cathepsin K (cat. no. sc-48353; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), PERK (cat. no. sc-13073; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), nuclear factor of activated T cells cytoplasmic 1 (NFATc1; cat. no. sc-7294; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), Chk1 (cat. no. 2360; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA), phosphorylated (p)-Chk1 (cat. no. 90178; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), Chk2 (cat. no. 2662; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), eIF2α (cat. no. 9722; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), p-eIF2α (cat. no. 9721; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), microtubule-associated proteins 1A/1B light chain (LC)3A/B II (cat. no. 4108; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), caspase 3 (cat. no. 9662; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), cleaved caspase 3 (cat. no. 9661; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), p38 (cat. no. 9212; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), p-p38 (cat. no. 9211; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), p-PERK (cat. no. 3179; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), p53 (cat. no. MA5-12557; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), p-Chk2 (cat. no. SAB4504366; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), and β-actin (cat. no. A5441; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) were used. Primary antibodies were incubated for 1 h at room temperature or overnight at 4°C at a 1:1,000 dilution, except Chk2, p-Chk2, p-PERK (all 1:500), p53 (1:200) and β-actin (1:10,000), while anti-rabbit (cat. no. 7074; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) and anti-mouse (cat. no. 7076; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) secondary antibodies were incubated for 45 min at room temperature at a 1:2,000 dilution. Protein expression levels were assayed using a SuperSignal west femto maximum sensitivity substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) imaging To evaluate the potential role of GTPases in cellular motility, the activity of RhoA GTPase was determined by FRET imaging. In response to 2 µM AZD7762 and PD407824, energy transfer was measured in a RhoA-specific cyan fluorescent protein (CFP)-yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) biosensor (32). The filter sets (Semrock; IDEX Health & Science, LLC, Rochester, NY, USA) were chosen for CFP excitation at 438±24 nm (center wavelength ± bandwidth), CFP emission at 483±32 nm and YFP emission at 542±27 nm. Using a fluorescence microscope (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) time-lapse images were acquired at an interval of 5 min. The emission ratio of YFP/CFP for individual cells was computed to determining the activity levels using NIS-Elements software v3.2 (Nikon Corporation). Micro-computed tomography (CT) imaging Micro-CT was performed using Skyscan 1172 (Bruker-MicroCT, Kontich, Belgium) (33). The printed bone constructs were wrapped in Parafilm to maintain hydration and placed in a plastic tube. Scans were performed at pixel size 6 µm. Using manufacturer-provided software, the images were reconstructed (nRecon v1.6.9.18), rotated (DataViewer v1.5.0), and the bone mineral density of the mineralized bone construct was determined by calculating the mean attenuation coefficient and calibrated to two hydroxyapatite phantoms of known density (CTAn v1.11.4.2). Statistical analysis The data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation of three to four replicates. One-way analysis of variance was employed to examine the statistical significance among groups, and Fisher's protected least significant difference was conducted as a post hoc test to evaluate the pairwise comparisons using R 3.4.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. Results Inhibitory effects of AZD7762 on 4T1.2 mammary tumor cells The present study first examined the effects of AZD7762, an inhibitor of Chk1 and Chk2, on the proliferation and migration of 4T1.2 mammary tumor cells. As the representative images of 4T1.2 cells illustrate, in response to 1 µM AZD7762, the cells underwent apoptosis (blebbing and cell shrinkage) and autophagy (increase in vacuole-like structures in the cytoplasm and membrane expansion), and the relative proliferation of the tumor cells was significantly reduced in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1A and B). Western blot analysis revealed that p-eIF2α was elevated in addition to cleaved caspase 3 (apoptosis marker) and LC3A/B II (autophagy marker) (Fig. 1C and D), while the expression levels of p-Chk1 and p-Chk2 were reduced. The scratch assay for examining cellular motility demonstrated that the healing of the wound area was decreased by 0.5 and 1 µM AZD7762 (Fig. 1E and F), indicating that AZD7762 reduces the motility of tumor cells. Notably, the wound area was also enlarged as a result of AZD7762-driven cell death. Since tumor growth may differ according to the culture conditions, the present study subsequently examined the effects of AZD7762 on 3D spheroids solely composed of 4T1.2 cells (Fig. 1G). Initially, the spheroids were irregularly shaped with a rough surface. They gradually compacted, forming a necrotic core at the center and a quiescent shell around the core with a proliferating surface. In response to 0.5 to 10 µM AZD7762, the spheroids significantly altered in appearance. While the spheroids exhibited extended quiescent zones at the lower concentrations (0.5 and 1 µM AZD7762), it increased the necrotic core at the higher concentrations (5 and 10 µM AZD7762). AZD7762 reduced the cross-sectional area of the tumor spheroids and decreased 3D cell viability (Fig. 1H and I). To evaluate its effect on other types of breast cancer, the present study also examined the responses of two human breast cancer cell lines, MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7, to AZD7762. MDA-MB-231 cells are estrogen receptor-negative, while MCF-7 cells are estrogen receptor-positive. The results revealed that AZD7762 inhibited the proliferation of the two cell lines, as measured by MTT assay, in a monolayer cell culture, and decreased the sizes of the 3D tumor spheroids, although 4T1.2 and MDA-MB-231 cells were more sensitive to AZD7762 compared with MCF-7 cells (Fig. 2). Inhibitory effects of AZD7762 on RAW264.7 pre-osteoclast cells Osteoclasts serve a pivotal role in bone homeostasis. Using RAW264.7 pre-osteoclast cells and osteoclast precursors from bone marrow-derived cells, the present study evaluated the effect of AZD7762 on the proliferation and differentiation of osteoclasts. Treatment with AZD7762 significantly reduced the proliferation of RAW264.7 cells and primary osteoclast precursors (Fig. 3A and B). The half-maximal inhibitory concentration for AZD7762 in bone marrow-derived osteoclasts was estimated as 0.54 µM by fitting an exponential curve to the MTT results (data not shown). In RAW cells, AZD7762 also downregulated NFATc1, a master transcription factor for osteoclastogenesis, in addition to cathepsin K, a marker of bone resorption (Fig. 3C). It was additionally observed that the expression level of p-eIF2α was elevated, together with cleaved caspase 3, in RAW cells (Fig. 3C and D). In primary osteoclast precursors, AZD7762 suppressed the RANKL-driven upregulation of NFATc1 and elevated cleaved caspase 3 expression (Fig. 3E). As demonstrated by TRAP staining for identifying multi-nucleated osteoclasts, AZD7762 significantly reduced the number of multi-nucleated TRAP-positive osteoclast cells in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3F and G). Furthermore, AZD7762 decreased the 3D cell viability of RAW264.7 spheroids in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3H). Consistent with the inhibitory effect of AZD7762 on RAW264.7 cultured cells, AZD7762 at 0.5, 1, 5 and 10 µM decreased the cross-sectional area of RAW264.7 spheroids at 24–72 h (Fig. 3I). Finally, osteoclast activity measured by a pit formation assay was reduced by 0.5 and 1 µM AZD7762 (Fig. 3J). Development of MC3T3 osteoblast-like cells in response to AZD7762 The present study additionally examined the effect of AZD7762 on osteoblast activity. AZD7762 reduced the relative proliferation of MC3T3 osteoblast-like cells in response to 0.1, 0.5, 1 and 2 µM, although the degree of reduction was smaller compared with RAW264.7 pre-osteoclast cells (Fig. 4A). AZD7762 increased the mRNA levels of osteogenesis-associated genes, including osterix, osteocalcin (OCN), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) at 24 and 48 h (Fig. 4B and C); it also elevated the protein expression levels of p-eIF2α, p-p38 and ALP (Fig. 4D and E). Comparison of the effect of AZD7762 and PD407824 on tumor cells In order to evaluate any differential effects of Chk1 and Chk2 inhibition, PD407824, a selective inhibitor of Chk1, was used. The responses to PD407824 were largely similar to those to AZD7762. PD407824 at 0.1, 0.5 and 2 µM reduced the relative proliferation of 4T1.2 cells (Fig. 5A), and the expression level of p-eIF2α was elevated in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5B). Furthermore, the scratch assay with 4T1.2 mammary tumor cells revealed that PD407824 suppressed cell motility by inhibiting the healing of the wounded area (Fig. 5C). To evaluate the potential mechanism of p-eIF2α upregulation, the expression of p-PERK, a kinase induced by stress to the (ER), was evaluated. First, thapsigargin, an ER stress inducer, elevated p-eIF2α and p-PERK expression after 3 h of incubation (Fig. 5D). Second, partial silencing of PERK by RNA interference downregulated p-eIF2α (Fig. 5E), and PD407824 and AZD7762 elevated the expression level of p-PERK (Fig. 5F). Collectively, these data indicated that the elevation of p-eIF2α may be induced by p-PERK, an eIF2α selective kinase. Effects of PD407824 on osteoclasts and osteoblasts In addition to its effect on tumor cells, PD407824 affects RAW264.7 pre-osteoclasts similarly to AZD7762. PD407824 at 0.1, 0.5 and 2 µM reduced the relative proliferation of RAW264.7 cells (Fig. 5G). In MC3T3 cells, PD407824 at 0.1 and 0.5 µM did not significantly alter the relative cell proliferation, although a higher dosage of 2 µM decreased the number of MC3T3 cells (Fig. 5H). The RANKL-driven differentiation of RAW264.7 cells was also suppressed by 0.1, 0.5 and 2 µM PD407824 in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 6A and B). Mineralization of MC3T3 and MLO-A5 cells by AZD7762 A major difference between AZD7762 and PD407824 was their effects on genes involved in bone formation. While AZD7762 elevated the mRNA expression levels of osterix and ALP, PD407824 at 2 µM reduced their expression levels (Fig. 6C). Furthermore, the effect of PD407824 on the protein expression levels of p53, p-p38, and ALP was not notable (Fig. 6D). To evaluate the potential involvement of RhoA GTPase in the regulation of cellular motility with Chk1 inhibitors, its activity level was evaluated using a RhoA GTPase FRET biosensor. In response to 2 µM AZD7762 and PD407824, significant reductions in RhoA activity were observed after 60 min (Fig. 6E). The present study demonstrated that AZD7762 serves an inhibitory role in bone-resorbing osteoclasts. To examine its role in bone-forming osteoblasts, Alizarin red staining was performed using MC3T3 cells. The results demonstrated that in response to 0.05, 0.1 and 0.5 µM AZD7762 for 5 weeks, staining intensity was elevated in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 6F and G). It was also observed that AZD7762 decreased the expression of p53 (Fig. 6H). Furthermore, 3D bone constructs with MLO-A5 osteocyte-like cell spheroids were bio-printed, and X-ray imaging was conducted after a 2-week incubation in osteogenic medium. The results revealed that bone mineral density was elevated in response to 0.05 and 0.1 µM AZD7762 (Fig. 7A–C). To evaluate the mediators of the differential effects of AZD7762 and PD407824 on p53 expression, partial silencing of Chk1 and Chk2 was conducted via siRNA in MC3T3 cells. Following silencing of Chk2, the AZD7762-mediated upregulation of ALP and downregulation of p53 were muted. However, the same alterations were not observed in Chk1-silenced cells (Fig. 7D). A proposed regulatory mechanism for AZD7762 is illustrated in Fig. 8, in which Chk1 and Chk2 are inhibited by AZD7762, as opposed to only Chk1 inhibition by PD407824. Discussion The present study demonstrated that the Chk1 and Chk2 inhibitor AZD7762 suppressed tumor cell proliferation, inhibited osteoclast activity and stimulated osteoblast mineralization. Treatment with AZD7762 decreased the proliferation and spheroid formation of three different breast cancer cell lines (4T1.2, MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7). The 4T1.2 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines are metastatic and estrogen receptor-negative, while MCF-7 cells are non-metastatic and estrogen receptor-positive. Treatment with AZD7762 decreased the size and 3D cell viability of 4T1.2 spheroids in a dose-dependent manner. The inhibitory effect of AZD7762 was associated with the elevated protein expression of an apoptotic marker (caspase 3) and an autophagic marker (LC3A/BII). Of note, the role of autophagy is complex, and it is currently considered to function in tumor suppression and as a protective cell survival mechanism (34). AZD7762 and PD407824 suppressed the 2D motility of 4T1.2 cells in the wound healing assay, although the apparent reduction of motility was also due to cell death. The reduction in RhoA GTPase activity by AZD7762 and PD407824 was consistent with their inactivation of cellular motility. The inhibitory effects of these two agents were evident without simultaneous application of DNA damaging agents. It has been reported that the effect of Chk inhibition on tumor growth may be dependent on the expression of and mutations in p53 and/or p21 (7). It was previously identified that inhibitors of eIF2α de-phosphorylation (salubrinal and guanabenz) may suppress tumor proliferation and osteoclast differentiation (14,15). In the present study, p-eIF2α was upregulated by AZD7762 and PD407824. Due to the observed upregulation of p-PERK, one possibility is that Chk1 and Chk2 inhibitors induce stress to the ER and elevate p-PERK and p-eIF2α expression. It is also possible that other kinases or phosphatases may be involved in the regulation of p-eIF2α. Similar to its effects on tumor cells, AZD7762 also inhibited the proliferation of RAW264.7 pre-osteoclast cells in monolayer cultures and in 3D spheroids. Staining of TRAP-positive multi-nucleated osteoclasts and measuring the resorbed mineral area demonstrated that RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation and activity was inhibited by treatment with AZD7762 in a dose-dependent manner. Treatment with AZD7762 also decreased the protein expression of NFATc1, a master transcription factor of osteoclastogenesis, and cathepsin K, a protease involved in bone resorption, while increasing the phosphorylation of eIF2α and the expression of cleaved caspase 3. PD407824 also decreased osteoclast differentiation. Metastatic tumor cells that invade the bone may accelerate osteoclast-driven bone resorption, triggering a dangerous cycle (35). These results demonstrated that targeting Chk signaling may provide a way to slow tumor growth and metastasis-associated bone degradation. While the effects of AZD7762 and PD407824 on tumor cells and osteoclast cells were similar, their effects on osteoblasts diverged. AZD7762 upregulated the mRNA expression levels of bone the formation markers osterix and ALP, while PD407824 downregulated their mRNA expression levels. Furthermore, AZD7762 elevated the protein expression level of p-p38 and reduced that of p53, and PD407824 did not significantly alter the levels of p-p38 or p53. RNA interference of Chk1 and Chk2 in osteoblasts suggested that this difference may have been caused by the inhibitory effect of AZD7762 on Chk2, thereby downregulating p53 (23), a negative regulator of osterix (24). Therefore, targeting Chk2 may be a way to attenuate bone degradation caused by metastasis. However, p53 is also a tumor suppressor (36), and the p53-dependent effects of the inhibitory effect ofAZD7762 on tumor growth and bone remodeling via Chk2 require further study. A previous study indicated the complexity of the action of p53 as a crucial tumor suppressor, in addition to as a modulator of stem cell maintenance, invasion and metastasis (37). While the present results revealed a novel role for AZD7762 in bone remodeling and bone metastasis, the present study has certain limitations. The experiments herein employed mouse and human cell lines (11), and gene expression was primarily examined using monolayer cell cultures. Although clinical trials of AZD7762 are not going forward due to unpredictable cardiac toxicity, inhibition of Chk remains an important therapeutic target (38). Future work may aim to identify other Chk inhibitors that exhibit similar effects to AZD7762, and test their efficacy in a mouse model of bone metastasis. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that Chk1/2 inhibitors may be used to suppress tumor proliferation and to prevent bone loss via inhibition of osteoclastogenesis and stimulation of osteoblastogenesis. Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Ms. T. Truong Vo for technical support. Funding The present study was supported in part by funds from the breast cancer advocacy group 100 Voices of Hope. Availability of data and materials The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Author contributions SN, HN, BYL and HY were involved in the conception of the study and the experimental design. LW, YW, AC, AJ, SL and YG were involved in data collection and interpretation. AC, BYL and HY drafted the manuscript. Ethics approval and consent to participate Experimental procedures involving animals were approved by the Indiana University Animal Care and Use Committee in compliance with the Guiding Principles in the Care and Use of Animals endorsed by the American Physiological Society. Patient consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Figure 1 Inhibitory effects of AZD7762 on 4T1.2 mammary tumor cells. (A) Representative images of 4T1.2 cells in response to 1 µM AZD7762 for 24 h. The arrow and arrow heads indicate apoptotic and autophagic cells, respectively, assessed according to cellular morphology. (B) Relative proliferation of 4T1.2 cells in response to 0.5, 1, 2 and 5 µM AZD7762. (C) Upregulation of p-eIF2α, and downregulation of p-Chk1 and p-Chk2. (D) Upregulation of cleaved caspase 3 (apoptosis marker) and LC3A/B II (autophagy marker). (E) Scratch assay and (F) wound area in response to 0.5 and 1 µM AZD7762. (G) 3D tumor spheroids in response to 5 and 10 µM AZD7762. (H) Cross-sectional area and (I) cell viability of 3D tumor spheroids in response to AZD7762. *P<0.05; **P<0.01 vs. CN. CN, control; AZD, AZD7762; 3D, three-dimensional; eIF2α, eukaryotic translation initiation factor-α; p, phosphorylated; Chk, checkpoint kinase inhibitor, casp, caspase; LC3A/B II, microtubule-associated proteins 1A/1B light chain 3A/B II. Figure 2 Inhibitory effects of AZD7762 on MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 breast cancer cells. (A) Relative proliferation of MDA-MB-231 cells in response to AZD7762 on days 1–3. (B) Dose-dependent shrinkage of MDA-MB-231 tumor spheroids by AZD7762. (C) Relative proliferation of MCF-7 cells in response to AZD7762 on days 1–3. (D) Dose-dependent shrinkage of MCF-7 tumor spheroids by AZD7762. **P<0.01 vs. CN. CN, control; AZD, AZD7762. Figure 3 Inhibitory effects of AZD7762 on RAW264.7 pre-osteoclast cells and osteoclast precursors from bone marrow-derived cells. Relative proliferation of (A) RAW264.7 cells and (B) osteoclast precursors from bone marrow-derived cells in response to 0.5 and 1 µM AZD7762 on days 1, 2 and 3, respectively. (C) Downregulation of NFATc1 and Cat K, and upregulation of p-eIF2α in RAW cells. (D) Upregulation of cleaved caspase 3 in RAW cells. (E) Downregulation of NFATc1 and upregulation of cleaved caspase 3 in osteoclast precursors from bone marrow-derived cells. (F) Visualization and (G) quantification of the reduction in the number of multi-nucleated TRAP-positive osteoclast cells in response to 0.5 and 1 µM AZD7762. (H) Dose-dependent reduction in 3D cell viability in RAW264.7 spheroids. (I) RAW264.7 spheroids in response to 0.5, 1, 5 and 10 µM AZD7762 for 24, 48 and 72 h. (J) Reduction of osteoclast activity by 0.5 and 1 µM AZD7762. **P<0.01 vs. CN. CN, control; AZD, AZD7762; Cat K, cathepsin K; casp, caspase; eIF2α, eukaryotic translation initiation factor-α; RANKL, receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand; 3D, three-dimensional; NFATc1, nuclear factor of activated T cells cytoplasmic 1; LC3A/B II, microtubule-associated proteins 1A/1B light chain 3A/B II. Figure 4 Responses of MC3T3 osteoblast-like cells to AZD7762. (A) Relative proliferation of MC3T3 cells in response to 0.1, 0.5, 1, and 2 µM AZD7762 on days 1, 2, and 3. Increase in the mRNA expression levels of osterix, OCN, and ALP in response to 0.1, 0.5, and 2 µM AZD7762 at (B) 24 h and (C) 48 h. (D) Elevation of p-eIF2α, (E) p-p38 and ALP in response to 0.1, 0.5, 1, and 2 µM AZD7762. *P<0.05; **P<0.01 vs. CN. CN, control; AZD, AZD7762; OCN, osteocalcin; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; p, phosphorylated; eIF2α, eukaryotic translation initiation factor-α. Figure 5 Effects of PD407824 and AZD7762 on 4T1.2 tumor cells, RAW264.7 pre-osteoclast cells and MC3T3 osteoblast-like cells. (A) Relative proliferation of 4T1.2 cells in response to 0.1, 0.5, and 2 µM PD407824 on day 2. (B) Upregulation of p-eIF2α by PD407824. (C) Scratch assay of 4T1.2 cells in response to 0.1, 0.5, and 2 µM PD407824. (D) Elevation of p-eIF2α and p-PERK by Tg. (E) Downregulation of p-eIF2α by PERK siRNA. (F) Upregulation of p-PERK by PD407824 and AZD7762. Relative proliferation of (G) RAW264.7 cells and (H) MC3T3 cells, respectively, in response to 0.1, 0.5, and 2 µM PD407824 on day 2. **P<0.01 vs. CN. CN, control; AZD, AZD7762; p, phosphorylated; eIF2α, eukaryotic translation initiation factor-α; PERK, protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase; Tg, thapsigargin; siRNA, small interfering RNA; PD, PD407824. Figure 6 Effects of PD407824 and AZD7762 on RAW264.7 pre-osteoclast cells and MC3T3 osteoblast-like cells. (A) Suppression of RANKL-driven differentiation of RAW264.7 cells by 0.1, 0.5, and 2 µM PD407824, as demonstrated by (B) the numbers of TRAP-positive multinucleated cells. (C) Alterations in the mRNA expression levels of osterix, OCN and ALP by 0.1, 0.5, and 2 µM PD407824. (D) No significant alterations were observed in the protein expression levels of p53, p-p38 and ALP in response to 0.1 to 2 µM PD407824. (E) Reduction in RhoA activity in MC3T3 cells in response to 2 µM AZD7762 and PD407824. (F) Alizarin red staining of mineralized MC3T3 cells in response to 0.05, 0.1, and 0.5 µM AZD7762 for 5 weeks. (G) Dose-dependent intensity of alizarin red staining by AZD7762. (H) Downregulation of p53 by AZD7762. *P<0.05; **P<0.01 vs. CN. CN, control; AZD, AZD7762; PD, PD407824; OCN, osteocalcin; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; TRAP, tartrate resistant acid phosphate; p, phosphorylated; p53, cellular tumor antigen p53. Figure 7 Mineralization of MC3T3 osteoblast-like cells and MLO-A5 osteocyte-like cells by AZD7762. (A) Optical and (B) microCT-derived X-ray images of mineralized spheroids from MLO-A5 osteocyte-like cells in response to 0.05 and 0.1 µM AZD7762 for 2 weeks. (C) BMD of MLO-A5 spheroid constructs derived using microCT volumetric reconstruction. (D) Modulation of the response to PD407824 and AZD7762 by Chk1 and Chk2 siRNA in the protein level of ALP and p53. **P<0.01 vs. 0 µM AZD. CN, control; AZD, AZD7762; PD, PD407824; BMD, bone mineral density; CT, computed tomography; Chk, checkpoint kinase; siRNA, small interfering RNA; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; p53, cellular tumor antigen; NC, negative control. Figure 8 Schematic representation of the regulatory mechanism of AZD7762 via Chk1 and Chk2 signaling. AZD7762 and PD407824 inhibit Chk1 to suppress tumor proliferation and osteoclast development. AZD7762, and not PD407824, inhibits Chk2 to stimulate osteoblast development through p53 signaling. Chk, checkpoint kinase; NFATc1, nuclear factor of activated T cells cytoplasmic 1; p-eIF2α, phosphorylated eukaryotic translation initiation factor-α; p53, cellular tumor antigen p53. Table I Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction primers used in the present study. Target Forward primer Reverse primer ALP 5′-CTGACTGACCCTTCGCTCTC-3′ 5′-GGTCAATCCTGCCTCCTTCC-3′ OCN 5′-CCGGGAGCAGTGTGAGCTTA-3′ 5′-AGGCGGTCTTCAAGCCATACT-3′ Osterix 5′-CCCTTCTCAAGCACCAATGG-3′ 5′-AGGGTGGGTAGTCATTTGCATAG-3′ GAPDH 5′-TGCACCACCAACTGCTTAG-3′ 5′-GGATGCAGGGATGATGTTC-3′ ALP, alkaline phosphatase; OCN, osteocalcin. ==== Refs References 1 Smits VA Gillespie DA DNA damage control: Regulation and functions of checkpoint kinase 1 FEBS J 282 3681 3692 2015 10.1111/febs.13387 26216057 2 Sanchez Y Wong C Thoma RS Richman R Wu Z Piwnica-Worms H Elledge SJ Conservation of the Chk1 checkpoint pathway in mammals: Linkage of DNA damage to Cdk regulation through Cdc25 Science 277 1497 1501 1997 10.1126/science.277.5331.1497 9278511 3 Narayanaswamy PB Tkachuk S Haller H Dumler I Kiyan Y CHK1 and RAD51 activation after DNA damage is regulated via urokinase receptor/TLR4 signaling Cell Death Dis 7 e2383 2016 10.1038/cddis.2016.291 27685627 4 McNeely S Beckmann R Bence Lin AK CHEK again: Revisiting the development of CHK1 inhibitors for cancer therapy Pharmacol Ther 142 1 10 2014 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.10.005 24140082 5 Kuo C-Y Zupkó I Chang F-R Hunyadi A Wu C-C Weng T-S Wang H-C Dietary flavonoid derivatives enhance chemotherapeutic effect by inhibiting the DNA damage response pathway Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 311 99 105 2016 10.1016/j.taap.2016.09.019 27664008 6 Massey AJ Stokes S Browne H Foloppe N Fiumana A Scrace S Fallowfield M Bedford S Webb P Baker L Identification of novel, in vivo active Chk1 inhibitors utilizing structure guided drug design Oncotarget 6 35797 35812 2015 10.18632/oncotarget.5929 26437226 7 Origanti S Cai SR Munir AZ White LS Piwnica-Worms H Synthetic lethality of Chk1 inhibition combined with p53 and/or p21 loss during a DNA damage response in normal and tumor cells Oncogene 32 577 588 2013 10.1038/onc.2012.84 22430210 8 Gokulnath M Swetha R Thejaswini G Shilpa P Selvamurugan N Transforming growth factor-β1 regulation of ATF-3, c-Jun and JunB proteins for activation of matrix metal-loproteinase-13 gene in human breast cancer cells Int J Biol Macromol 94 370 377 2017 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.10.026 27751807 9 Zabludoff SD Deng C Grondine MR Sheehy AM Ashwell S Caleb BL Green S Haye HR Horn CL Janetka JW AZD7762, a novel checkpoint kinase inhibitor, drives checkpoint abrogation and potentiates DNA-targeted therapies Mol Cancer Ther 7 2955 2966 2008 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-0492 18790776 10 Azorsa DO Gonzales IM Basu GD Choudhary A Arora S Bisanz KM Kiefer JA Henderson MC Trent JM Von Hoff DD Synthetic lethal RNAi screening identifies sensitizing targets for gemcitabine therapy in pancreatic cancer J Transl Med 7 43 2009 10.1186/1479-5876-7-43 19519883 11 Liu S Liu Y Minami K Chen A Wan Q Yin Y Gan L Xu A Matsuura N Koizumi M Inhibiting checkpoint kinase 1 protects bone from bone resorption by mammary tumor in a mouse model Oncotarget 9 9364 9378 2018 10.18632/oncotarget.24286 29507695 12 Zannini L Delia D Buscemi G CHK2 kinase in the DNA damage response and beyond J Mol Cell Biol 6 442 457 2014 10.1093/jmcb/mju045 25404613 13 Wu X Webster SR Chen J Characterization of tumor-associated Chk2 mutations J Biol Chem 276 2971 2974 2001 10.1074/jbc.M009727200 11053450 14 Hamamura K Minami K Tanjung N Wan Q Koizumi M Matsuura N Na S Yokota H Attenuation of malignant phenotypes of breast cancer cells through eIF2α-mediated downregulation of Rac1 signaling Int J Oncol 44 1980 1988 2014 10.3892/ijo.2014.2366 24691491 15 Hamamura K Tanjung N Yokota H Suppression of osteoclastogenesis through phosphorylation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 alpha J Bone Miner Metab 31 618 628 2013 10.1007/s00774-013-0450-0 23536193 16 Liu Z Lv Y Zhao N Guan G Wang J Protein kinase R-like ER kinase and its role in endoplasmic reticulum stress-decided cell fate Cell Death Dis 6 e1822 2015 10.1038/cddis.2015.183 26225772 17 Raschke WC Baird S Ralph P Nakoinz I Functional macrophage cell lines transformed by Abelson leukemia virus Cell 15 261 267 1978 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90101-0 212198 18 Wang D Christensen K Chawla K Xiao G Krebsbach PH Franceschi RT Isolation and characterization of MC3T3-E1 preosteoblast subclones with distinct in vitro and in vivo differentiation/mineralization potential J Bone Miner Res 14 893 903 1999 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.6.893 10352097 19 Kato Y Boskey A Spevak L Dallas M Hori M Bonewald LF Establishment of an osteoid preosteocyte-like cell MLO-A5 that spontaneously mineralizes in culture J Bone Miner Res 16 1622 1633 2001 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.9.1622 11547831 20 Lelekakis M Moseley JM Martin TJ Hards D Williams E Ho P Lowen D Javni J Miller FR Slavin J A novel orthotopic model of breast cancer metastasis to bone Clin Exp Metastasis 17 163 170 1999 10.1023/A:1006689719505 10411109 21 Chen A Wang L Li B-Y Sherman J Ryu JE Hamamura K Liu Y Nakshatri H Yokota H Reduction in migratory phenotype in a metastasized breast cancer cell line via down-regulation of S100A4 and GRM3 Sci Rep 7 3459 2017 10.1038/s41598-017-03811-9 28615627 22 Moldovan NI Hibino N Nakayama K Principles of the Kenzan method for robotic cell spheroid-based three-dimensional bioprinting Tissue Eng Part B Rev 23 237 244 2017 10.1089/ten.teb.2016.0322 27917703 23 Hirao A Kong YY Matsuoka S Wakeham A Ruland J Yoshida H Liu D Elledge SJ Mak TW DNA damage-induced activation of p53 by the checkpoint kinase Chk2 Science 287 1824 1827 2000 10.1126/science.287.5459.1824 10710310 24 Wang X Kua H-Y Hu Y Guo K Zeng Q Wu Q Ng HH Karsenty G de Crombrugghe B Yeh J p53 functions as a negative regulator of osteoblastogenesis, osteoblast-dependent osteoclastogenesis, and bone remodeling J Cell Biol 172 115 125 2006 10.1083/jcb.200507106 16380437 25 Cailleau R Young R Olivé M Reeves WJ Jr Breast tumor cell lines from pleural effusions J Natl Cancer Inst 53 661 674 1974 10.1093/jnci/53.3.661 4412247 26 Soule HD Vazguez J Long A Albert S Brennan M A human cell line from a pleural effusion derived from a breast carcinoma J Natl Cancer Inst 51 1409 1416 1973 10.1093/jnci/51.5.1409 4357757 27 Yokota H Hamamura K Chen A Dodge TR Tanjung N Abedinpoor A Zhang P Effects of salubrinal on development of osteoclasts and osteoblasts from bone marrow-derived cells BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14 197 2013 10.1186/1471-2474-14-197 23816340 28 National Research Council (US) Committee Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals 8th edition National Academies Press Washington, DC 2011 29 Ascione F Vasaturo A Caserta S D'Esposito V Formisano P Guido S Comparison between fibroblast wound healing and cell random migration assays in vitro Exp Cell Res 347 123 132 2016 10.1016/j.yexcr.2016.07.015 27475838 30 Zhang J Zhu L Peng B Effect of BioAggregate on osteoclast differentiation and inflammatory bone resorption in vivo Int Endod J 48 1077 1085 2015 10.1111/iej.12405 25358857 31 Miyazaki T Miyauchi S Anada T Imaizumi H Suzuki O Evaluation of osteoclastic resorption activity using calcium phosphate coating combined with labeled polyanion Anal Biochem 410 7 12 2011 10.1016/j.ab.2010.11.014 21078287 32 Hamamura K Swarnkar G Tanjung N Cho E Li J Na S Yokota H RhoA-mediated signaling in mechanotransduction of osteoblasts Connect Tissue Res 53 398 406 2012 10.3109/03008207.2012.671398 22420753 33 Wei W Clockaerts S Bastiaansen-Jenniskens YM Gierman LM Botter SM Bierma-Zeinstra SM Weinans H Verhaar JA Kloppenburg M Zuurmond AM Statins and fibrates do not affect development of spontaneous cartilage damage in STR/Ort mice Osteoarthritis Cartilage 22 293 301 2014 10.1016/j.joca.2013.11.009 24280247 34 Dalby KN Tekedereli I Lopez-Berestein G Ozpolat B Targeting the prodeath and prosurvival functions of autophagy as novel therapeutic strategies in cancer Autophagy 6 322 329 2010 10.4161/auto.6.3.11625 20224296 35 Clezardin P Teti A Bone metastasis: Pathogenesis and therapeutic implications Clin Exp Metastasis 24 599 608 2007 10.1007/s10585-007-9112-8 18008175 36 Vogelstein B Lane D Levine AJ Surfing the p53 network Nature 408 307 310 2000 10.1038/35042675 11099028 37 Bieging KT Mello SS Attardi LD Unravelling mechanisms of p53-mediated tumour suppression Nat Rev Cancer 14 359 370 2014 10.1038/nrc3711 24739573 38 Sausville E Lorusso P Carducci M Carter J Quinn MF Malburg L Azad N Cosgrove D Knight R Barker P Phase I dose-escalation study of AZD7762, a checkpoint kinase inhibitor, in combination with gemcitabine in US patients with advanced solid tumors Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 73 539 549 2014 10.1007/s00280-014-2380-5 24448638