==== Front PeerJ PeerJ PeerJ PeerJ 2167-8359 PeerJ Inc. San Diego, USA 15585 10.7717/peerj.15585 Anesthesiology and Pain Management Dentistry Drugs and Devices Gynecology and Obstetrics Women’s Health Physiology of pregnancy and oral local anesthesia considerations Zhou Xueer 12 Zhong Yunyu 12 Pan Zijian 12 Zhang Jiankang 123 http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1346-048X Pan Jian 123jianpancn@scu.edu.cn 1 State Key Laboratory of Oral Disease, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China 2 National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases and Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China 3 Chengdu Advanced Medical Science Center, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China Messina Giuseppe 29 6 2023 2023 11 e155852 2 2023 26 5 2023 © 2023 Zhou et al. 2023 Zhou et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. Background Safe and effective local anesthesia is a prerequisite for emergency oral surgeries and most dental treatments. Pregnancy is characterized by complex physiological changes, and increased sensitivity to pain. Pregnant women are particularly vulnerable to oral diseases, such as caries, gingivitis, pyogenic granuloma and third molar pericoronitis. Maternally administered drugs can affect the fetus through the placenta. Therefore, many physicians and patients are reluctant to provide or accept necessary local anesthesia, which leads to delays in the condition and adverse consequences. This review is intended to comprehensively discuss the instructions for local anesthesia in the oral treatment of pregnant patients. Methodology An in-depth search on Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed to review articles concerned with maternal and fetal physiology, local anesthetic pharmacology, and their applications for oral treatment. Results Standard oral local anesthesia is safe throughout the pregnancy. At present, 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine is considered to be the anesthetic agent that best balances safety and efficacy for pregnant women. Maternal and fetal considerations must be taken into account to accommodate the physiological and pharmacological changes in the gestation period. Semi-supine position, blood pressure monitoring, and reassurance are suggested for high-risk mothers to reduce the risk of transient changes in blood pressure, hypoxemia, and hypoglycemia. For patients with underlying diseases, such as eclampsia, hypertension, hypotension, and gestational diabetes, the physicians should use epinephrine cautiously and control the dose of anesthetic. New local anesthesia formulations and equipment, which contribute to minimizing injection pain and relieving the anxiety, have and are being developed but remain understudied. Conclusions Understanding the physiological and pharmacological changes during pregnancy is essential to ensure the safety and efficiency of local anesthesia. Optimal outcomes for the mother and fetus hinge on a robust understanding of the physiologic alterations and the appropriate selection of anesthetic drugs and approaches. Local anesthesia Physiology of pregnancy Oral treatments Research and Develop Program, West China Hospital of Stomatology Sichuan UniversityLCYJ 2019-1 Science and Technology Project of the Health Planning Committee of Sichuan21PJ062 Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province2022NSFSC1462 This work was supported by the project of the Research and Develop Program, West China Hospital of Stomatology Sichuan University (LCYJ 2019-1), the Science and Technology Project of the Health Planning Committee of Sichuan (21PJ062), and the Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (2022NSFSC1462). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. ==== Body pmcIntroduction Pregnancy is a particular period during which maintaining oral health is essential. Due to the existence of primary oral diseases and changes in the internal environment, the incidence of oral diseases increases during pregnancy (Cho et al., 2020; Choi et al., 2021; Mark, 2021). Although dental treatment during pregnancy has proven to be safe, due to lack of authoritative clinical consensus and guidelines (Lee & Shin, 2017; Manautou & Mayberry, 2023), many dentists are hesitant to provide dental therapy to pregnant women or even advise against any treatment during pregnancy (Lee et al., 2010). Furthermore, many pregnant women are afraid to seek dental treatment due to dental anxiety and neglect of the importance of oral health. Dental drills and anesthesia injections are the most likely factors for dental anxiety (Al Khamis et al., 2016; George et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2019; Rocha et al., 2018). The mother and the fetus are connected via the placenta, and oral health care is particularly important for both. Current clinical practice guidelines clearly state that it’s not only safe, but also necessary to provide dental treatment during pregnancy (educational, preventive and restorative actions) (AAPD, 2023; ADA, 2021; CDA, 2010; Health MDoP, 2016; Mark, 2021; OHRC, 2023; WHO, 2017). Any improvement in women’s oral health and health education can impact children’s health (Figuero, Han & Furuichi, 2020; Fomete et al., 2021; Raju & Berens, 2021). Leaving severe inflammation and pain untreated during pregnancy can result in a more harmful emergency that may lead to general anesthesia surgery, hospitalization, and premature delivery (Bobetsis et al., 2020; Cho et al., 2020; Favero et al., 2021; Fomete et al., 2021; Iqbal et al., 2022; Kapila, 2021). Local anesthesia is a prerequisite for most oral clinical treatments, which can relieve pain in dental procedures such as tooth extraction, fossa preparation, root canal treatment, abscess drainage, and minor oral surgery. Common crises in the oral clinic include syncope, hyperventilation, local anesthetic overdose, hypertension, hypoglycemia, and epileptic seizures, of which more than 50% are associated with local anesthesia injection (Smereka et al., 2019). Many local anesthetics and anesthesia methods are commonly used in the clinic, including 4% articaine and 3% mepivacaine infiltration anesthesia, 2% lidocaine, 0.5% bupivacaine, and 2% mepivacaine block anesthesia (Spivakovsky, 2019; St George et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2021). However, pregnancy causes many physiological changes, and maternally administered drugs can affect the fetus through the placenta. Therefore, the selection of anesthetics and anesthesia approaches should be deliberated for the perioperative and intraoperative management of pregnant patients. Herein, this article will comprehensively discuss the instructions for local anesthesia in the oral treatment of pregnant patients and clarify doubts of health professionals, in combination with the physiological changes during pregnancy, local anesthetics pharmacology, advanced materials and equipment, and the process of oral therapy. Survey methodology An in-depth search on Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed to review articles concerned with maternal and fetal physiology, local anesthetic pharmacology, and their applications for oral treatment. A broad range of keywords and phrases were searched, including “pregnancy”, “maternal”, “fetal”, “physiology”, “dental” and “oral”, “anesthesia”, “topical anesthesia”, “local anesthetic”, “epinephrine”, “lidocaine”, “efficacy”, “pediatric”, “pain”, “infection”, “buffer”, “warm”, and “equipment”, performed by crossing these descriptors using the Boolean operators “OR” and “AND”. In the process of summarizing the recommendations for the use of local anesthetics during pregnancy, we further reviewed relevant guidelines from various institutions. Gray literature (monographs, dissertations, theses, books, chapters, studies published in event proceedings) and studies without full text information were excluded. Additional references for possible inclusion were obtained through manual searching. A selection of titles was made, from which the abstracts were read and those that met the topic of the article were selected. A preliminary review of 546 studies was accomplished through electronic database searching, the majority of which were excluded after reviewing the title and abstract. The remaining 237 articles proceeded to the final full-text review and resulted in the inclusion of 182 studies. Physiology of pregnancy and anesthesia considerations Pregnancy is characterized by physiological alterations necessary for fetal growth, some of which may affect local anesthesia efficiency (Fig. 1). Specifically, systemic changes with respect to the cardiovascular, hematologic, respiratory, and nervous systems require careful monitoring. Gastrointestinal, renal, and endocrine alterations may interfere with the determination of anesthesia dose. 10.7717/peerj.15585/fig-1 Figure 1 Schematic illustration of physiological changes during pregnancy. Overview highlighting the major physiological changes in each system (inner ring) and the mechanisms behind them (outer ring). Cardiovascular and hematological alterations The cardiac output in pregnant patients can increase by 50% in early pregnancy, attributed to peripheral vasodilation, decreased systemic vascular resistance, and a 20% to 30% increase in heart rate (Aleksenko & Quaye, 2020; Yanamandra & Chandraharan, 2012). Pregnancy is associated with increased sympathetic activity, which may contribute to arrhythmias (Tamirisa et al., 2022). As the heart is pushed upward and rotated forward, echocardiography often shows ventricular enlargement and myocardial hypertrophy (Aleksenko & Quaye, 2020). Pre-existing cardiovascular conditions such as pre-eclampsia or eclampsia may also progress dramatically during pregnancy. During the second trimester, pregnant women are at higher risk of hypertension, clinically evident in 8% of pregnant patients (Barr et al., 2022), characterized by poorer oral health and a higher incidence of complications with local anesthesia (Mata et al., 2021). During dental treatment, fear and pain are the most common causes of high blood pressure. Although treatment of transient hypertension is not recommended in generally healthy patients, severe fluctuations in blood pressure should be avoided in pregnant patients, refraining from hypoxia caused by decreased cerebral and uterine perfusion (Papademetriou et al., 2021). If the pregnant woman’s intraoperative blood pressure suddenly increases, the physicians and dentists should stop the operation immediately, give oxygen in time and closely observe the patient’s systemic condition, eliminate the patient’s tension and anxiety, and consider whether to continue the treatment according to the patient’s recovery (Southerland et al., 2016). Hypotension usually occurs during the second and third trimesters. Hypotension will lead to reduced blood flow to the uterus and fetal perfusion and even lead to fetal hypoxia, so it is necessary to monitor and maintain maternal blood pressure and fluid volume carefully. When the patient is in the supine position, the fetus significantly compresses the inferior vena cava and aorta. As a result, the venous return of cardiac blood volume is impaired, which results in a 14% reduction in stroke output. Blood pressure and cardiac output are also decreased, resulting in oxygen deprivation to the brain and uterus, which may lead to supine hypotension syndrome. Supine hypotension syndrome occurs in approximately 10% of pregnant patients and is usually characterized by hypotension, syncope, and bradycardia (Massoth et al., 2022). The patient should be placed in a semi-supine position or told to lean 5° to 15° to the left (right hip elevation 10 to 12 cm) with a pad on the right lower back to move the uterus toward the aorta, which is less prone to collapse. In addition, sympathetic nerve blocks by local anesthesia may also lead to hypotension. Antihypertensive drugs such as calcium channel blockers, angiotensin II receptor antagonists, and alpha receptor blockers can aggravate the blood pressure reduction caused by local dental anesthesia (Ouchi & Jinnouchi, 2021). During pregnancy, there is an increasing number of white blood cells, red blood cells, and blood clotting factors except for XI and XII, which leads to a fivefold increased likelihood of thromboembolism such as deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (Alsheef et al., 2020; Guimicheva, Czuprynska & Arya, 2015). Compression of the inferior vena cava in a supine position also contributes to venous stasis and thrombosis and increases the risk of deep vein thrombosis. Respiratory alterations Progesterone can directly stimulate ventilation by increasing the sensitivity of the respiratory center to carbon dioxide, making gravid women require greater tidal volume to remove carbon dioxide (Costantine, 2014; Kohlhepp et al., 2018). Hyperventilation begins in the first trimester and may increase to 42% in the third trimester. Moreover, it has been reported that increased serum estrogen concentrations contribute to nasal capillary bleeding, which leads to nasal congestion and breathing difficulties (Costantine, 2014). Up to 50% of pregnant women complained of breathing difficulties at 19 weeks of gestation and up to 75% at 31 weeks (Lee et al., 2017; Tan & Tan, 2013). In addition to the increased oxygen demands, there are concomitant decreases in oxygen reserves. To compensate for the space taken up by the fetus, the diaphragm moves up, and the residual lung volume drops by up to 20%, especially in the supine position. The mother and fetus are prone to hypoxia due to a decrease in oxygen reserves. Research has demonstrated that moderate hypoxemia occurs in 25% of pregnant women in the supine position. Even short periods of apnea can rapidly lead to maternal hypoxemia and hypercapnea (Zhao, Wong & Stevenson, 2021). Therefore, it is necessary to adjust the ventilation pattern and position to avoid hypoxemia. Gastrointestinal alterations The main gastrointestinal changes during pregnancy are related to nausea, vomiting, and heartburn. Increased progesterone levels during pregnancy have been linked to decreased esophageal tone, delayed gastric emptying, and decreased bowel motility, which may lead to gastroesophageal reflux during pregnancy. A supine position can lead to decreased arterial partial oxygen pressure, increasing the risk of gastroesophageal reflux dyspepsia, which can cause aspiration of gastric contents (Costantine, 2014). Therefore, if the patient feels nauseous during the treatment, the operation should be stopped immediately, and the dental chair should be upright. Liver, renal and endocrine alterations The production of estrogen and progesterone increases during pregnancy and reaches a maximum during the third trimester. These hormonal changes can affect liver function. The decreased synthesis capacity of the liver results in decreased levels of albumin and alpha-1 acid glycoprotein, leading to an increase in the proportion of uncombined drugs (Lim, Mouyis & MacKillop, 2021). The medications should have their doses reduced accordingly to the increased distribution and enhanced drug action (Avram, 2020). Another typical change in pregnant women is an increased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) due to increased cardiac output (Bonnet, 2016; Habak & Griggs, 2022). As a result of the increased filtration capacity, the clearance of albumin, glucose, creatinine, and urea increased, as did the clearance of drugs. Drugs such as lidocaine, cleared by the kidneys, should have their doses adjusted to the clearance rates (Calimag-Loyola & Lerma, 2019; Uppal et al., 2022). In addition, about 45% of pregnant women develop gestational diabetes during pregnancy (Chiou et al., 2022; Schwartz, Nachum & Green, 2015). Epinephrine injected during local oral anesthesia can directly increase circulating glucose levels, especially in patients with poor glycemic control (Byakodi, Gurjar & Soni, 2017). Therefore, detailed preoperative inquiry and adding epinephrine with caution are necessary. The incidence of hypoglycemic syncope also increases during pregnancy. Glucose excretion increases in pregnant women due to increased GFR during pregnancy. In addition, estrogen and progesterone can increase the utilization of glucose. The pregnant woman’s increased metabolism and the fetus’s glucose uptake result in increased glucose requirements. Some pregnant women are also stressed when they feel pain or see dental instruments, which increases the secretion of gastric acid and pepsin in the digestive system and aggravates gastric peristalsis. Under the combined effect of the above factors, pregnant women have lower blood glucose and are susceptible to hypoglycemic syncope. Neuropsychological alterations Adequate and effective psychological counseling is essential for pregnant women before the clinical operation to reduce their fear of treatment. The sensitivity of nerve fibers to local anesthetics during pregnancy is higher than that during non-pregnancy, so the onset time of conduction block is earlier. In addition to the improved anesthesia effect, mental tension and anxiety will be aggravated during pregnancy (Jarvis et al., 2012). Increased fear and sensitivity to pain can lead to increased heart rate and blood pressure, which can affect the stability of the fetus and even cause epileptic seizures and abortion (Benson & Pack, 2020; Whelehan & Delanty, 2019). Seizures are accompanied by increased catecholamine production, followed by decreased blood flow to the placenta. Tissue acidosis and hypoxia are common findings in systemic seizures, which decrease the plasma protein binding rate of local anesthetic. Once local anesthetics enter the bloodstream, toxic effects on the central nervous system further increase. Oral health alterations Recent studies have shown an association between caries and pregnancy (Hu et al., 2022). Specifically, the need for carbohydrates during pregnancy often leads to hunger and increased eating times. Pregnant women inevitably experience vomiting and aggravated pharyngeal reflex, which brings more food residue. The stomach acid contained in this vomit also causes dental erosion. Acidic foods favored by pregnant women can also lower the pH of saliva. Changes in the composition of saliva can temporarily make teeth more prone to erosion and decay (Doucède et al., 2019). Moreover, increased estrogen levels in saliva lead to an increased desquamation rate of the oral mucosa, which increases bacterial proliferation and promotes tooth decay (Yousefi, Parvaie & Riahi, 2020). Pregnancy also weakens the immune system and affects and accelerates the progression of caries. Caries during pregnancy should be treated in time to avoid abortion and premature delivery caused by severe toothache. Approximately 60% to 75% of pregnant women have gingivitis, especially in the third trimester of pregnancy (Vigarios & Maret, 2020). Due to the increase in estrogen and progesterone levels, insulin sensitivity decreases, and sugar metabolism changes during pregnancy. As a result of the increased blood sugar and volume, the minute vessel expands, elasticity decreases, and blood capillary permeability increases. During pregnancy, the inflammatory response is highly activated, neutrophil function is suppressed, and the expression of inflammatory markers is increased (Choi et al., 2021; Mahapatra et al., 2021; Tettamanti, 2017). Along with the increase in inflammatory cells and exudate, the gums are often congested and swollen with hypertrophic inflammation during pregnancy (González-Jaranay et al., 2017; Vigarios & Maret, 2020). Supposing there is a large amount of plaque and calculus accumulation in this period, gingival inflammation will be heightened and finally form periodontal disease. Periodontal treatment is encouraged to alleviate suffering and reduce the risk of premature birth and other adverse reactions during pregnancy (Iheozor-Ejiofor et al., 2017; Iqbal et al., 2022). Another pathological gum state that occurs during pregnancy is pyogenic granuloma, with an incidence of about 3% to 10%. Lesions are similar to benign tumors caused by the growth of connective tissue in the gums and most often occur in areas of inflammation or chronic trauma in the gums (Sarwal & Lapumnuaypol, 2022; Silva de Araujo Figueiredo et al., 2017). Clinical cleaning and curettage are often used to remove local irritation in the affected area. Prompt surgical removal is required for large gingival tumors with persistent pain or infection (Guastella et al., 2017). Third molar pericoronitis can cause not only affliction but also fever and fascial space infection. Patients have difficulty eating, chewing, and swallowing and restricted mouth opening, which can cause infection of adjacent tissues and organs or interstitial space in severe cases. The treatment choices for mild symptoms are local irrigation to control symptoms or removal under close supervision. In the case of interstitial infection, abscess incision and drainage are recommended under anesthesia. Emergency oral treatment during pregnancy is often accompanied by local acute inflammation, which causes difficulty in anesthesia. Research has demonstrated that the success rate of lidocaine block anesthesia in patients with pulpitis is only 67%, much lower than that in normal teeth (Visconti, Tortamano & Buscariolo, 2016). Inflammation and bacteria can lead to increased expression of neuropeptides such as Substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptides, as well as the release of inflammatory mediators such as prostaglandin E2, prostaglandin F2α, and interleukin 1 and 6, leading to the excitement of pain receptor subtypes. Moreover, expression of the sodium channel increases in inflamed dental pulp, which results in the alteration of resting membrane potential, and the decreased excitability threshold of the teeth (Wang et al., 2021). Clinical manifestations include changes in neuronal plasticity, abnormal pain, and peripheral and central hyperalgesia (Drum et al., 2017). The acidic tissue environment of inflammation also makes it difficult for drugs to be converted into deionized forms of active free radicals, making it difficult for lidocaine molecules to cross nerve membranes, resulting in poor anesthesia effects (Yilmaz, Tunga & Ozyurek, 2018). Fetal considerations Most drugs given to pregnant women may affect the fetus after they are transferred across the placenta and enter the systemic circulation of the fetus. The effects of the transferred drug on the fetus depend on the type of drug and the general fetal conditions (Bouazza et al., 2019; Kolding, Eken & Uldbjerg, 2020; van Hove et al., 2022). Therefore, it is essential to understand the pharmacology of local anesthetic, the most commonly used drugs in dental treatment, for safe and effective dental treatment during pregnancy (Ouanounou & Haas, 2016). The severity of the effects of local anesthetic on the fetus depends on the dose, whether a vasoconstrictor is used, the metabolic rate of local anesthetic, the degree of protein binding, and pKa (acid dissociation constant). The degree of binding of local anesthetic to maternal protein has the most significant effect. Only unconjugated anesthetic molecules can be transferred across the placenta to the fetus (Pemathilaka, Reynolds & Hashemi, 2019). For the fetus, the potential risks associated with anesthesia are mainly fetal hypoxia, miscarriage or premature delivery, and to a lesser extent teratogenicity (Tolcher, Fisher & Clark, 2018; Vasco Ramirez & Valencia, 2020). Teratogenicity “No currently utilized anesthetic drugs have been found to have any teratogenic effects in humans when utilizing standard concentrations at any gestational age,” claims the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2017). Multiple clinical studies have demonstrated that oral local anesthesia and oral treatment during pregnancy does not increase the risk of fetal malformation within the maximum safe dose (Hagai et al., 2015; Michalowicz et al., 2008; Moore, 2016). Herein, dentists who are cautious and reluctant to use local anesthetics on pregnant women should change their views and believe that women can receive necessary dental treatment during pregnancy as long as the anesthetic is chosen correctly and the dosage is controlled. Hypoxia and asphyxia The most severe adverse fetal event of anesthesia during pregnancy is intrauterine asphyxia. Due to the lack of automatic regulation of placental perfusion and the complete dependence of fetal oxygenation on maternal oxygenation, any hemodynamic changes in the mother will directly affect uteroplacental perfusion. Prolonged or severe maternal hypotension, hypoxemia, and hypercapnia can result in decreased uterine placental blood flow and fetal ischemia (Lato et al., 2018). Injecting small amounts of local anesthetics into the head and neck region may also result in unfavorable effects that are comparable to systemic toxicity caused by inadvertent intravascular injections of higher dosages. Cardiovascular stimulation or depression, disorientation, seizures, and respiratory depression have been reported. These reactions could be the result of intra-arterial local anesthetic injections with retrograde cerebral circulatory flow (Johnson, Boscoe & Cabrera-Muffly, 2020). Epinephrine can reduce blood flow in the uterus and uterine contractile force proportionally to the dose when given intravenously (Hood, Dewan & James, 1986), further inducing fetal hypoxia (Badran et al., 2019; Ritchie et al., 2017). Although there have been no cases of oral local anesthetic causing fetal hypoxia, oral local anesthetic may do so in expectant mothers (Tomlin, 1974). Whilst under block anesthetic, patients should have their breathing and circulation closely monitored. Dose guidelines shouldn’t be surpassed. In anoxic fetuses, the binding of the local anesthetic to the protein is reduced compared to healthy fetuses, and lidocaine is retained due to tissue acidosis (Ralston & Shnider, 1978). Thus, fetal sensitivity to neurotoxicity and cardiovascular toxicity of local anesthetic increases. Therefore, extra attention should be given to maintaining maternal blood pressure and oxygenation. Aspiration should be done before to injecting the local anesthetic solution in order to prevent intravascular injection. The needle must be adjusted until aspiration produces no return of blood. For fetuses at high risk of asphyxia or in poor general condition, local anesthetic and epinephrine must be used with caution (Bonnet, 2016). Miscarriage and premature birth Sporadic spontaneous abortion occurs most often in the first trimester of pregnancy. Premature delivery is considered under 37 weeks (Purisch & Gyamfi-Bannerman, 2017). Although local anesthesia has no observed adverse impact on healthy fetuses, the risk is higher for pregnant women with medical conditions such as heart disease and pre-eclampsia. Pre-eclampsia is a pregnancy complication characterized by high blood pressure, proteinuria, and edema in 3–7% of pregnant women (Rana et al., 2019). On the one hand, there is a maternal syndrome characterized by endothelial cell activation, blood pressure disturbance, proteinuria, and edema; on the other hand, there is reduced intrauterine growth of the fetus (Phipps et al., 2016; Rana et al., 2019). Pre-eclampsia in pregnant women has reduced protein binding to local anesthetic. When placental perfusion is suddenly reduced, many free forms of local anesthetic can be transferred to the fetus, resulting in premature delivery. Therefore, the type and dosage of local anesthetic must be carefully considered for pregnant women with underlying health problems. The management of anesthesia in pregnant women should focus on the hemodynamic stability of the mother to avoid hypoxemia and alkalosis or acidosis (Ralston & Shnider, 1978). Abdominal pain during the procedure may indicate premature labor or miscarriage. If this occurs, dentists should stop the operation immediately and call the obstetrician for help (Vasco Ramirez & Valencia, 2020). Preoperative prophylaxis The timing of the operation Currently, it is not recommended to postpone dental treatment during pregnancy (educational, preventive, and restorative actions), while significant traumatic periodontal surgery should be avoided during pregnancy. The best time for dental treatment is between 14 and 20 weeks of pregnancy (OHRC, 2023). The fundamental reason for this approach is that pregnant women will experience considerable psychological and physiological changes that they have not fully adapted to during early pregnancy. In addition, many pregnant women experience severe morning sickness during the first trimester, which complicates clinical therapy (CDA, 2010). In the third trimester of pregnancy, the enlarged uterus makes it difficult to lie in the chair for a long time, which increases the difficulty of complex oral treatment. The supine position is more prone to inferior aortic vena cava compression and lead to postural hypotension, which needs to be alleviated by placing the pregnant woman in a semi-decumbent position and changing the position frequently. The recommendation for the second trimester is based on psychological and physical comfort and does not imply that oral therapy should be prohibited in the first and third trimesters. Prompt treatment of oral diseases and infections is beneficial to women at all stages of pregnancy. Pregnancy should not be a reason to delay treatment for oral emergencies at any point in pregnancy, as acute dental pain or infection can have serious adverse consequences for the pregnant woman and fetus (Kapila, 2021). Preoperative assessment of physical and psychological status The combination of fear of LA injection and oral therapy can cause severe psychological discomfort and sometimes potentially life-threatening conditions, such as vascular suppression syncope, hyperventilation, clonic convulsions, bronchospasm, angina pectoris, etc. (Armfield & Heaton, 2013). Physicians and dentists should inquire about medical history and pregnancy-related causes in detail, paying particular attention to any conditions that raise the patient’s blood pressure. Local anesthesia agents To determine the risks associated with drugs used during pregnancy, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA, 1979) classified drugs according to their risk level to the fetus (Table 1). Categories A and B are considered safe with no adverse effects on the fetus. Drugs in category C have been shown to have teratogenic risk in the animal fetus, but there is no adequate evidence in humans (Lee & Shin, 2017). Lidocaine and prilocaine are rated B by the FDA and are considered the safest local anesthetic for pregnant women. Because the concentration of prilocaine (4%) is higher than that of lidocaine (2%), resulting in more drugs being administered per injection, lidocaine is the preferred choice in the clinic. 10.7717/peerj.15585/table-1 Table 1 Summary of local anesthetics used in pregnant dental patients (FDA, 1979). Agent FDA category Using during pregnancy Articaine C Use with caution Bupivacaine C Use with caution Benzocaine C Use with caution Mepivacaine C Use with caution Lidocaine B Safe Prilocaine B Safe Another commonly used local anesthetic, articaine, is in category C (FDA, 2023). The combination of articaine hydrochloride and epinephrine has been proven to increase fetal mortality and skeletal variation in rabbits when administered subcutaneously at four times the maximum recommended dose (FDA). The FDA recommends that articaine hydrochloride and epinephrine should only be used during pregnancy if the potential benefits outweigh the potential risks to the fetus. Pharmacological characteristics of lidocaine After injection, lidocaine is buffered by body fluids and dissociated into an uncharged lipid-soluble base and a relatively lipid-insoluble cation in equilibrium. The base form penetrates the nerve membrane into the nerve axon. The amount of base type is closely related to the pKa of local anesthetic and the pH value of tissues, according to the Henderson–Hasselbalch equation, pH = pKa + log(base/acid). After entering the nerve membrane, the free base form is converted back to the cation form, binds to the sodium channel, reduces the membrane’s permeability to sodium ions, and induces a non-depolarized nerve block (Malamed, 2014). The liver metabolizes 90% of lidocaine, and 10% is excreted in its original form (FDA, 2021). Because lidocaine hydrochloride is metabolized quickly and can dilate blood vessels, most drugs are absorbed into the body quickly. This condition not only shortens the duration of anesthesia but also increases the risk of intoxication. Therefore, adrenaline is often added to lidocaine solutions to extend the duration and reduce the risk of poisoning (Ogawa et al., 2021). The epinephrine controversy FDA classifies epinephrine as Pregnancy Category C because it is teratogenic in rabbits, mice, and hamsters dosed during organogenesis. Epinephrine should be used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus (fetal anoxia, spontaneous abortion, or both) (FDA, 2022). Although epinephrine is injected outside the blood vessel, it has been shown to quickly enter the circulatory system after oral injection, with a peak occurring about 8 min after injection (Takahashi et al., 2005). Epinephrine is influential in various systemic diseases such as hyperthyroidism, glaucoma, and diabetes (FDA, 2022). Epinephrine, on the other hand, can significantly constrict blood vessels in the uterus and reduce blood flow to the placenta. In pregnant women with peripheral arterial obstructive and hypertensive vascular disease, epinephrine may exhibit a significant vasoconstriction response leading to ischemic injury or necrosis and must be used with caution. The increased risk may be even more significant in patients with severe cardiovascular disease or those taking medications that interact with epinephrine (FDA, 2022). Most current studies considered that using epinephrine for LA during pregnancy is safe as long as the potential risks of intravascular injection are minimized and safe injection doses and methods are guaranteed (Ilyas et al., 2020). Clinical studies have proven that low-dose epinephrine used in dentistry does not significantly affect arrhythmia incidence, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, or other indicators, even in patients with cardiovascular disease (Guimaraes et al., 2021; Tschopp et al., 2018). The improvement of the anesthesia effect with the addition of epinephrine is significant. One advantage is local vasoconstriction, resulting in a prolonged duration of anesthesia (Tschopp et al., 2018), reduced bleeding at the site of administration, and the increased concentration of local anesthetic in pulp tissue (Fujita & Sunada, 2021; Tanaka et al., 2016). The addition of epinephrine also delayed the absorption of the local anesthetic, resulting in a gradual increase in lidocaine levels in the blood with no peak and a peaceful transfer to the fetus with increased safety (Lee & Shin, 2017). The concentration of epinephrine added to 2% lidocaine is still controversial, and the dosage form of 1:80,000–1:200,000 epinephrine is more commonly used clinically (Singla et al., 2022). Higher concentrations, such as 1:50,000, do not provide faster onset or longer duration for local oral anesthesia (Dagher, Yared & Machtou, 1997; Wali et al., 2010). Although high epinephrine concentrations can help reduce bleeding at the site of local invasion, there is a greater risk of acute epinephrine reactions such as hypertension and tachycardia (Giovannitti, Rosenberg & Phero, 2013). According to currently limited studies, it is safer to inject 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine. Although the anesthesia effect is slightly lower than that of the injections of 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine, there is no significant difference (Aggarwal et al., 2020; Karm et al., 2017, 2018). To minimize the cardiovascular risks associated with epinephrine, clonidine, a hypertensive drug that can be used in pregnant women, may be an effective and safe alternative to epinephrine for LA during pregnancy. Multiple studies have shown that clonidine improves the success rate of lower alveolar nerve block anesthesia in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis (MacDonald et al., 2021; Shadmehr et al., 2017), reduces postoperative pain and analgesic use (Shadmehr et al., 2017, 2021), and, most importantly, reduces cardiovascular risk compared with epinephrine (Chowdhury, Singh & Shah, 2012; Jimson et al., 2015; Patil & Patil, 2012). Intraoperative prophylaxis Improved anesthesia techniques Discomfort and pain from LA injection may rapidly release large amounts of catecholamine, causing severe adverse reactions. Topical anesthesia before injection can eliminate or minimize pain caused by the needle, and undoubtedly add to the safety of LA in pregnant patients. Topical anesthesia and local cooling are commonly used to achieve surface tissue anesthesia in clinics (Maia et al., 2022; Patel et al., 2021). The commonly used topical anesthetics in the clinic include 8% lidocaine gel, 5% EMLA (2.5% lidocaine and 2.5% prilocaine) cream, and 20% benzocaine, among which only lidocaine and prilocaine are rated as B by the FDA and can be used during pregnancy. Moreover, precooling the injection site utilizing popsicle sticks, frozen cotton swabs, and ice packs is a simple, reliable, low-cost, and practical clinical method to reduce patient suffering (Amrollahi, Rastghalam & Faghihian, 2021). The analgesic effect is similar to that of 5% lidocaine gel, while the unpleasant taste of the gel is avoided (Hindocha et al., 2019). Vasoconstriction induced by precooling reduces tissue metabolism and the inflow of inflammatory mediators during needle penetration (Taylor et al., 2019). In addition, ice massage also stimulates A-δ fibers and activates inhibitory pain pathways, thereby delaying or eliminating pain signal transmission and raising pain thresholds (Anantharaj et al., 2020; Hameed et al., 2018; Jayasuriya, Weerapperuma & Amarasinghe, 2017; Lakshmanan & Ravindran, 2021). Local infiltrating anesthesia is the primary injection method for maxillary anesthesia because of its high success rate and low risk of injection into blood vessels (Sandilya et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2021). However, the mucosa of the palate is close to the periosteum, and there is an extensive neural network, so infiltration anesthesia in the palatal region is painful and irritating. Multiple studies have shown that although the efficacy of buccal infiltration anesthesia of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine for maxillary molar extraction is still controversial, it can provide similar effects to buccal-palatal infiltration anesthesia in other maxillary dental regions (Deshpande et al., 2020; Phyo et al., 2020; Rayati et al., 2021). The effect of 2% lidocaine infiltration on the mandible is not sufficiently stable. Although lidocaine infiltration anesthesia has been reported to be sufficient for the extraction of mandibular incisors and premolars (Ege & Demirkol, 2021; Jamil, Asmael & Al-Jarsha, 2020), anesthesia for mandibular molars has a lower success rate or needs to be combined with other injection methods (Gazal et al., 2020). Attention should also be paid to the location of the pinhole, and the injection point should be as close to the nerve foramen as possible (Wang et al., 2021). Nerve block anesthesia has incomparable advantages such as less anesthetic dosage, wider anesthesia range, and longer effective anesthesia time, and is especially suitable for a long time and a wide range of surgeries, such as mandibular third molar extraction. The downside is that the failure rate of inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia (IANB) is up to 20–47% in symptomatic patients with irreversible pulpitis (Crowley et al., 2018). If routine IANB fails, patients with irreversible pulpitis often need supplementary injections such as intra-osseous anesthesia (Yadav, 2015), periodontal injection (Gupta et al., 2022; Wadia, 2022), and infiltrative anesthesia (Gazal et al., 2020; Gupta et al., 2021, 2022) to achieve complete anesthesia. In addition to conventional nerve block anesthesia, Goe-Gates effectively improved the success of IANB by moving the injection point up to the neck of the condyle (Aggarwal, Singla & Kabi, 2010). At the same time, the positive rate of blood recovery can be reduced to approximately 2% (Sokhov, Rabinovich & Bogaevskaya, 2019). New local anesthesia formulations Topical anesthesia offers the possibility of painless dental anesthesia, but there are currently no commercially available formulations that eliminate the pain of local anesthesia injections (Hindocha et al., 2019). In order to enhance the permeability of lidocaine and improve the effectiveness of surface anesthesia, some materials, such as liposomes (Franz-Montan et al., 2015; Ribeiro et al., 2016), silica nanoparticles (Nafisi et al., 2018; Sato et al., 2019), and chitosan (Qi et al., 2021), have been gradually developed as lidocaine delivery systems. However, most lidocaine delivery systems focus on the transdermal route. Only a few studies have reported using the lidocaine liposome complex in the oral mucosa. Ribeiro et al. (2016) evaluated the package formulation of the most effective lipid carrier for delivering 2.5% lidocaine and 2.5% prilocaine based on a factored design data analysis program. The prepared eutectic mixture loaded with pectin and liposomes has the advantages of long drug release time, high permeability, and long anesthesia time. Subsequently, yellow collagen was combined with the lipid carrier mentioned above to improve the adhesion of oral mucosa (Ribeiro et al., 2018). Cordeiro Lima Fernandes et al. (2021) also prepared a kind of prilocaine-lidocaine lipid nanogel, which also had the advantages of small particle size, good dispersion, and adhesion to oral mucosa and could effectively prolong the anesthesia time. A clinical study has also demonstrated that the lidocaine-prilocaine liposome complex can provide adequate palatal mucosal topical anesthesia for maxillary molar extraction without mucosal discomfort, allowing the physician to obtain complete anesthesia for approximately 26 min without injection (Amorim et al., 2020). In addition to the combination with prilocaine, lidocaine oral mucosal patches can enhance surface anesthesia efficacy. Roh et al. (2016) developed an oral adhesive bilayer containing lidocaine that enabled 80% of lidocaine to be released within 1 min (p < 0.05), effectively permeate the mucosa (p < 0.05), and remain attached for at least 3 h. Microneedle patches applied to the oral mucosa before lidocaine injection are also reported to be effective in reducing the pain of injection (Daly et al., 2021). 3D printing has been used to create a customizable lidocaine-loaded patch that perfectly attaches to the tooth for more than 1 h while releasing lidocaine from the hydrogel (Ou et al., 2019). Injection dose Pregnant patients have a higher risk of suffering from local anesthesia intoxication due to complex physiological changes, making the control of anesthetic dose particularly crucial. Fortunately, clinical studies have shown that using local dental anesthesia during pregnancy does not increase the risk of fetal malformation at normal dental doses (Fisher et al., 2020; Hagai et al., 2015; Moore, 2016). Therefore, dentists who are cautious and reluctant to use local anesthesia on pregnant women should revise their views about dental treatment for pregnant women. Women can receive necessary dental treatment during pregnancy if they choose the proper anesthetic and control the dosage correctly. The American Dental Association Dental Treatment Guidelines state that dentists should use the lowest concentration and volume of anesthetic fluid that provides adequate anesthesia (2009). The maximum dosage of lidocaine may be calculated to be 4.5 mg/kg, and the total dose should be at most 300 mg. The dose of lidocaine in combination with epinephrine should not exceed 7 mg/kg, and the maximum total dose should not exceed 500 mg (FDA, 2021). Moreover, the maximum dosage of epinephrine when used with local anesthetic is less than 0.2 mg for healthy patients and less than 0.04 mg for patients with heart disease (FDA, 2022; Fleisher Lee et al., 2014). The maximal dose of lidocaine for local anesthetic is presented in Table 2 (FDA, 2021; Fleisher Lee et al., 2014). 10.7717/peerj.15585/table-2 Table 2 The maximum recommended doses of lidocaine (FDA, 2021; Fleisher Lee et al., 2014). Volume of cartridge Agents Concentration Maximum dosing Maximum number of cartridges Lidocaine (mg/cartridge) Epi (mg/cartridge) Lidocaine (mg) Lidocaine (mg/kg) Epi (mg) 50 kg patient 65 kg patient 80 kg patient 1.8 ml 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epi 36 0.018 500 7 0.2 9 11 11 2% lidocaine, 1:80,000 epi 36 0.0225 500 7 0.2 8 8 8 2% lidocaine, 1:50,001 epi 36 0.036 500 7 0.2 5 5 5 2% lidocaine, plain 36 – 300 4.5 – 6 8 8 5 ml 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epi 100 0.05 500 7 0.2 3 4 4 2% lidocaine, 1:80,000 epi 100 0.0625 500 7 0.2 3 3 3 2% lidocaine, 1:50,000 epi 100 0.1 500 7 0.2 2 2 2 2% lidocaine, plain 100 – 300 4.5 – 2 2 3 Note: Abbreviations: epi, epinephrine. How to minimize injection pain Buffering As described above, the molecular and dissociated lidocaine ratio is determined by the anesthetic’s pH and pKa and the tissue’s pH. The pH of most lidocaine preparations is reduced to 3–4 by hydrochloric acid because the charged form of the lidocaine molecule is more stable at low pH (Malamed, 2014). However, the acidification of lidocaine has increased the sting on injection and the onset of deep anesthesia, and reduced the anesthesia effect of numbing inflamed or infected teeth (Malamed, 2014; Yilmaz, Tunga & Ozyurek, 2018). Theoretically, the ability of anesthetic molecules to penetrate the nerve membrane depends on base concentration, which is enhanced when the increase in the number of bases at high pH allows more anesthetic to exist in their non-ionizing form. The active form of free radicals penetrating the nerve membrane into the inner part of the neuron is increased, thus shortening the onset time and reducing the pain of injection (Amorim et al., 2021; Arora, Degala & Dasukil, 2019). Additionally, when the sodium bicarbonate solution is mixed with lidocaine, the sodium bicarbonate interacts with hydrochloric acid in the anesthetic to produce water and carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide can enhance local anesthesia by directly inhibiting the nerve axons, increasing the concentration of lidocaine in the nerve stem, and changing the charge of local anesthesia in the nerve (Fig. 2) (Catchlove, 1972). 10.7717/peerj.15585/fig-2 Figure 2 Diagram depicting the applications and mechanisms of sodium bicarbonate buffering. Sodium bicarbonate buffering raises anesthesia pH, and the rapid formation of a mixture of charged and uncharged forms leads to more rapid drug diffusion and faster onset of nerve block, and makes injections more comfortable. Carbon dioxide as a byproduct may enhance anesthesia by directly inhibiting nerve conduction and by concentrating local anesthetic through ion retention. Multiple clinical trials have also supported the theory that sodium bicarbonate reduces the pain of injection and improves the anesthesia effect by buffering lidocaine (Kattan et al., 2019; Kurien, Goswami & Singh, 2018). Interestingly, a study of 96 patients with periapical infections requiring tooth extraction showed that a single injection of 0.5 ml 8.4% sodium bicarbonate significantly relieved pain after lidocaine anesthesia failed (p < 0.1) (Senthoor, Janani & Ravindran, 2020). However, there have also been clinical studies showing different results (Aulestia-Viera, Braga & Borsatti, 2018; Guo et al., 2018). Since the therapeutic use of sodium bicarbonate as an alkalizing agent for local anesthetic has not been approved, it should be used with caution. Warming The pKa value of local anesthetic will decrease with increasing temperature. Under the condition in constant pH, the decrease of pKa will increase the proportion of free radicals from drugs, and thus increase their passive diffusion in non-neural structures, helping to block the transmission of pain signals (Ince et al., 2021; Lim et al., 1992). In addition, increased temperature also increases the fluidity of the lipid membrane, allowing lidocaine to penetrate the membrane and reach effective concentrations for faster analgesia. The enhancement of the anesthesia effect may also be related to the transient receptor potential vanilloid (TRPV1) channel in trigeminal nerve tissue, which is activated in near-harmful temperature ranges (over 42 °C). Once activated, the widened membrane gap facilitates the infiltration of cations, thereby increasing the concentration of lidocaine molecules within the nerve cells (Binshtok et al., 2009; Caterina et al., 1997; Zhou et al., 2020). Clinical results have also demonstrated that the use of warmed lidocaine for inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia results in a faster onset of anesthesia (p = 0.004) and less pain (p < 0.001) in patients (Kurien, Goswami & Singh, 2018). Tirupathi & Rajasekhar (2020) included four studies from 2018 to 2020 to evaluate the subjective and observed pain reactions and found that heating the local anesthesia solution to body temperature (37 °C) before administration reduced discomfort during oral local anesthesia administration. Moreover, a significant source of injection pain is subcutaneous tissue expansion. Therefore, slow injection has a significant effect in reducing pain (Garret-Bernardin et al., 2017). When used for oral treatment under local anesthesia, lidocaine should be injected at less than 1 ml/min (FDA, 2021; Tangen et al., 2016). In addition, distracting methods such as kneading the patient’s cheeks have been proven to relieve pain during anesthesia injections (Birnie et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2020). Applicable syringes Currently, many innovative dental syringes, such as computer-controlled autoinjectors, are gradually being applied clinically to reduce the discomfort of standard local anesthesia. The vibration technique was first applied to reduce pain. The impression of “pain” from the pressure of the fluid entering the tissue is lessened when the brain activity is concentrated on the vibration (Nanitsos et al., 2009). Vibration and touch also stimulate inhibitory interneurons in the spinal cord, which transmit information to second-order neurons in the spinal cord via the A-δ and C fibers, and ultimately lead to pain elimination (Dickenson, 2002). Computer-aided devices, such as VibraJect, Dental Vibe, Accupal, and Wand, can significantly reduce pain at the injection site, relying on machine vibrations (Bilsin, Güngörmüş & Güngörmüş, 2020; Joshi et al., 2021; Midha et al., 2021; Salma et al., 2021). Intraosseous anesthesia is the injection directly into the cancellous bone near the tooth to be anesthetized. It can achieve deep anesthesia without numbness of the lip and cheek tissue and is mainly used in root canal practice. Intraosseous anesthesia can significantly enhance the effect of pulp anesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpitis and can be used for supplementary anesthesia after the failure of IANB alone (Dias-Junior et al., 2021; Kc, Bhattarai & Subedi, 2022; Zanjir et al., 2019). The continuous improvement of intraosseous anesthesia equipment is receiving increasing attention due to its good anesthesia effect, minimal invasiveness, simple operation, and easy control (Sovatdy et al., 2018). Conclusions Although pregnancy is a particular event characterized by systemic alterations, it is necessary and safe to treat oral diseases that require treatment. Local anesthetics remain the safest and most efficient agents in dentistry to relieve intraoperative and postoperative pain. Local anesthesia is safe for both mother and fetus as long as a safe anesthetic is chosen and detailed guidelines are followed. Emerging injection techniques and anesthetic formulations have proven effective in a more extensive age range. Nevertheless, pain is a multi-factorial problem. It is still necessary to evaluate the effect of the new technology on pregnant women before clinical promotion. Joint efforts should be made to develop an obstetrician-dental document, which is necessary to remove doubt, uncertainty, or unnecessary suffering. Additional Information and Declarations Competing Interests Author Contributions Data Availability The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Xueer Zhou conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft. Yunyu Zhong performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft. Zijian Pan performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft. Jiankang Zhang conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft. Jian Pan conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft. The following information was supplied regarding data availability: This is a literature review. ==== Refs References AAPD (2023) AAPD The reference manual of pediatric dentistry 2023 https://www.aapd.org/research/oral-health-policies--recommendations/oral-health-care-for-the-pregnant-adolescent 6 April 2023 ADA (2021) ADA Pregnancy 2021 https://www.ada.org/resources/research/science-and-research-institute/oral-health-topics/pregnancy 6 April 2023 Aggarwal, Singla & Kabi (2010) Aggarwal V Singla M Kabi D Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of Gow-Gates mandibular conduction anesthesia, Vazirani-Akinosi technique, buccal-plus-lingual infiltrations, and conventional inferior alveolar nerve anesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpitis Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology 2010 109 2 303 308 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.09.016 Aggarwal et al. (2020) Aggarwal V Singla M Saatchi M Hasija M Anaesthetic efficacy of 2% lidocaine with different concentrations of epinephrine (1:80,000 and 1:200,000) in intraligamentary injection after a failed primary inferior alveolar nerve block: a randomized double-blind study Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 2020 78 4 275 280 10.1080/00016357.2019.1700302 31821059 Al Khamis et al. (2016) Al Khamis S Asimakopoulou K Newton JT Daly B Oral health knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of pregnant kuwaiti women: a qualitative study JDR Clinical & Translational Research 2016 1 3 211 217 10.1177/2380084416665075 30931741 Aleksenko & Quaye (2020) Aleksenko L Quaye IK Pregnancy-induced cardiovascular pathologies: importance of structural components and lipids American Journal of the Medical Sciences 2020 360 5 447 466 10.1016/j.amjms.2020.05.014 32540145 Alsheef et al. (2020) Alsheef MA Alabbad AM Albassam RA Alarfaj RM Zaidi ARZ Al-Arfaj O Abu-Shaheen A Pregnancy and venous thromboembolism: risk factors, trends, management, and mortality BioMed Research International 2020 2020 2 4071892 10.1155/2020/4071892 32351991 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2017) American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee opinion No. 696: nonobstetric surgery during pregnancy Obstetrics and Gynecology 2017 129 4 777 778 10.1097/aog.0000000000002014 28333816 Amorim et al. (2021) Amorim KS Fontes VTS Gercina AC Groppo FC Souza LMA Buffered 2% articaine versus non-buffered 4% articaine in maxillary infiltration: randomized clinical trial Clinical Oral Investigations 2021 25 6 3527 3533 10.1007/s00784-020-03674-x 33151422 Amorim et al. (2020) Amorim KS Franz-Montan M Groppo FC Muniz BV Araújo JSM Santana JVF Dantas A de Paula E Souza LMA Palatal needle-free anesthesia for upper molars extraction. A randomized clinical trial Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery 2020 48 8 815 819 10.1016/j.jcms.2020.05.001 32536538 Amrollahi, Rastghalam & Faghihian (2021) Amrollahi N Rastghalam N Faghihian R Effect of pre-cooling on pain associated with dental injections in children: a systematic review Journal of Evidence Based Dental Practice 2021 21 3 101588 10.1016/j.jebdp.2021.101588 34479670 Anantharaj et al. (2020) Anantharaj A Sabu JM Ramakrishna S Jagdeesh RB Praveen P Shankarappa PR A comparative evaluation of pain perception following topical application of benzocaine gel, clove-papaya based anesthetic gel and precooling of the injection site before intraoral injections in children Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry 2020 38 2 184 189 10.4103/jisppd.Jisppd_153_18 32611866 Armfield & Heaton (2013) Armfield JM Heaton LJ Management of fear and anxiety in the dental clinic: a review Australian Dental Journal 2013 58 4 390 407 10.1111/adj.12118 24320894 Arora, Degala & Dasukil (2019) Arora G Degala S Dasukil S Efficacy of buffered local anaesthetics in head and neck infections British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2019 57 9 857 860 10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.06.021 31563483 Aulestia-Viera, Braga & Borsatti (2018) Aulestia-Viera PV Braga MM Borsatti MA The effect of adjusting the pH of local anaesthetics in dentistry: a systematic review and meta-analysis International Endodontic Journal 2018 51 8 862 876 10.1111/iej.12899 29377171 Avram (2020) Avram M Pharmacokinetic studies in pregnancy Seminars in Perinatology 2020 44 3 151227 10.1016/j.semperi.2020.151227 32093881 Badran et al. (2019) Badran M Abuyassin B Ayas N Laher I Intermittent hypoxia impairs uterine artery function in pregnant mice The Journal of Physiology 2019 597 10 2639 2650 10.1113/JP277775 31002746 Barr et al. (2022) Barr LC Liblik K Johri AM Smith GN Maternal cardiovascular function following a pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia American Journal of Perinatology 2022 39 10 1055 1064 10.1055/s-0040-1721694 33321533 Benson & Pack (2020) Benson R Pack A Epilepsy Handbook of Clinical Neurology 2020 172 21 155 167 10.1016/b978-0-444-64240-0.00009-x 32768086 Bilsin, Güngörmüş & Güngörmüş (2020) Bilsin E Güngörmüş Z Güngörmüş M The efficacy of external cooling and vibration on decreasing the pain of local anesthesia injections during dental treatment in children: a randomized controlled study Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing 2020 35 1 44 47 10.1016/j.jopan.2019.06.007 31564620 Binshtok et al. (2009) Binshtok AM Gerner P Oh SB Puopolo M Suzuki S Roberson DP Herbert T Wang CF Kim D Chung G Mitani AA Wang GK Bean BP Woolf CJ Coapplication of lidocaine and the permanently charged sodium channel blocker QX-314 produces a long-lasting nociceptive blockade in rodents Anesthesiology 2009 111 1 127 137 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a915e7 19512868 Birnie et al. (2018) Birnie KA Noel M Chambers CT Uman LS Parker JA Psychological interventions for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2018 10 10 Cd005179 10.1002/14651858.CD005179.pub4 30284240 Bobetsis et al. (2020) Bobetsis YA Graziani F Gürsoy M Madianos PN Periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes Periodontology 2000 2020 83 1 154 174 10.1111/prd.12294 32385871 Bonnet (2016) Bonnet M Sedation and anaesthesia for non-obstetric surgery Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine 2016 35 1 S35 S41 10.1016/j.accpm.2016.06.009 Bouazza et al. (2019) Bouazza N Foissac F Hirt D Urien S Benaboud S Lui G Treluyer JM Methodological approaches to evaluate fetal drug exposure Current Pharmaceutical Design 2019 25 5 496 504 10.2174/1381612825666190319102812 30892158 Byakodi, Gurjar & Soni (2017) Byakodi S Gurjar V Soni S Glucose levels and hemodynamic changes in patients submitted to routine dental extraction under local anesthesia with and without adrenaline The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 2017 18 1 57 59 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1989 28050987 Calimag-Loyola & Lerma (2019) Calimag-Loyola A Lerma E Renal complications during pregnancy: in the hypertension spectrum Disease-a-Month 2019 65 2 25 44 10.1016/j.disamonth.2018.03.001 29891230 Catchlove (1972) Catchlove R The influence of CO2 and pH on local anesthetic action Journal of Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics 1972 181 2 298 309 10.1097/00132586-197304000-00053 4537424 Caterina et al. (1997) Caterina MJ Schumacher MA Tominaga M Rosen TA Levine JD Julius D The capsaicin receptor: a heat-activated ion channel in the pain pathway Nature 1997 389 6653 816 824 10.1038/39807 9349813 CDA (2010) CDA Oral health during pregnancy and early childhood: evidence-based guidelines for health professionals Journal of the California Dental Association 2010 38 6 391–403, 405–340 10.1080/19424396.2010.12221803 20645626 Chen et al. (2020) Chen YJ Cheng SF Lee PC Lai CH Hou IC Chen CW Distraction using virtual reality for children during intravenous injections in an emergency department: a randomised trial Journal of Clinical Nursing 2020 29 3–4 503 510 10.1111/jocn.15088 31715039 Chiou et al. (2022) Chiou Y Hung C Yu C Chan T Liu M Risk factors for women with gestational diabetes mellitus developing type 2 diabetes and the impact on children’s health Journal of Clinical Nursing 2022 31 7–8 1005 1015 10.1111/jocn.15959 34240496 Cho et al. (2020) Cho GJ Kim SY Lee HC Kim HY Lee KM Han SW Oh MJ Association between dental caries and adverse pregnancy outcomes Scientific Reports 2020 10 1 5309 10.1038/s41598-020-62306-2 32210330 Choi et al. (2021) Choi S Choudhary A Ahern J Palmer N Barrow J Association between maternal periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes: an analysis of claims data Family Practice 2021 38 10 718 723 10.1093/fampra/cmab037 34173655 Chowdhury, Singh & Shah (2012) Chowdhury S Singh M Shah A Efficacy of lignocaine with clonidine and adrenaline in minor oral surgical procedure Contemporary Clinical Dentistry 2012 3 2 227 229 10.4103/0976-237X.96839 22919231 Cordeiro Lima Fernandes et al. (2021) Cordeiro Lima Fernandes P David de Moura L Freitas de Lima F Henrique Rodrigues da Silva G Isaias Carvalho Souza R de Paula E Lipid nanocapsules loaded with prilocaine and lidocaine and incorporated in gel for topical application International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2021 602 2 120675 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120675 33961954 Costantine (2014) Costantine MM Physiologic and pharmacokinetic changes in pregnancy Frontiers in Pharmacology 2014 5 198 65 10.3389/fphar.2014.00065 24772083 Crowley et al. (2018) Crowley C Drum M Reader A Nusstein J Fowler S Beck M Anesthetic efficacy of supine and upright positions for the inferior alveolar nerve block: a prospective, randomized study Journal of Endodontics 2018 44 2 202 205 10.1016/j.joen.2017.09.014 29208402 Dagher, Yared & Machtou (1997) Dagher FB Yared GM Machtou P An evaluation of 2% lidocaine with different concentrations of epinephrine for inferior alveolar nerve block Journal of Endodontics 1997 23 3 178 180 10.1016/s0099-2399(97)80271-3 9594760 Daly et al. (2021) Daly S Claydon NCA Newcombe RG Seong J Addy M West NX Randomised controlled trial of a microneedle patch with a topical anaesthetic for relieving the pain of dental injections Journal of Dentistry 2021 107 1985 103617 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103617 33636242 Deshpande et al. (2020) Deshpande N Jadhav A Bhola N Gupta M Anesthetic efficacy and safety of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride with 1:100,000 adrenaline and 4% articaine hydrochloride with 1:100,000 adrenaline as a single buccal injection in the extraction of maxillary premolars for orthodontic purposes Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2020 20 4 233 240 10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.4.233 32934989 Dias-Junior et al. (2021) Dias-Junior LCL Bezerra AP Schuldt DPV Kuntze MM de Luca Canto G da Fonseca Roberti Garcia L da Silveira Teixeira C Bortoluzzi EA Effectiveness of different anesthetic methods for mandibular posterior teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Clinical Oral Investigations 2021 25 12 6477 6500 10.1007/s00784-021-04145-7 34453595 Dickenson (2002) Dickenson AH Gate control theory of pain stands the test of time British Journal of Anaesthesia 2002 88 6 755 757 10.1093/bja/88.6.755 12173188 Doucède et al. (2019) Doucède G Dehaynin-Toulet E Kacet L Jollant B Tholliez S Deruelle P Subtil D Tooth and pregnancy, a public health issue La Presse Médicale 2019 48 10 1043 1050 10.1016/j.lpm.2019.09.020 31706894 Drum et al. (2017) Drum M Reader A Nusstein J Fowler S Successful pulpal anesthesia for symptomatic irreversible pulpitis Journal of the American Dental Association 2017 148 4 267 271 10.1016/j.adaj.2017.01.002 28190451 Ege & Demirkol (2021) Ege B Demirkol M Is the only buccal infiltration anesthesia enough for extraction of mandibular anterior incisors and premolar teeth? A split-mouth randomized clinical trial Clinical Oral Investigations 2021 25 5 3077 3085 10.1007/s00784-020-03628-3 33051814 Favero et al. (2021) Favero V Bacci C Volpato A Bandiera M Favero L Zanette G Pregnancy and dentistry: a literature review on risk management during dental surgical procedures Dentistry Journal 2021 9 4 46 10.3390/dj9040046 33921608 FDA (1979) FDA Prescription drug advertising: content and format for labeling of human prescription drugs Federal Register 1979 44 FDA (2021) FDA 2% LIDOCAINE HCI-2% lidocaine hci injection, solution 2021 https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/spl/data/bd960807-498a-3434-e053-2a95a90acdaa/bd960807-498a-3434-e053-2a95a90acdaa.xml 18 May 2022 FDA (2022) FDA Adrenalin® (Epinephrine injection, USP) 1mg/mL 1:1000 vial highlights of prescribing information 2022 https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/spl/data/a821cf82-b4da-0ee1-e053-2a95a90a2ab2/a821cf82-b4da-0ee1-e053-2a95a90a2ab2.xml FDA (2023) FDA ARTICAINE-articaine hydrochloride and epinephrine injection, solution 2023 4 June 2023 https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/spl/data/13158c3b-86a2-441a-b4d6-aaae2382d0ae/13158c3b-86a2-441a-b4d6-aaae2382d0ae.xml#S8.1 Figuero, Han & Furuichi (2020) Figuero E Han YW Furuichi Y Periodontal diseases and adverse pregnancy outcomes: mechanisms Periodontology 2000 2020 83 1 175 188 10.1111/prd.12295 32385886 Fisher et al. (2020) Fisher SC Siag K Howley MM Van Zutphen AR Reefhuis J Browne ML Maternal surgery and anesthesia during pregnancy and risk of birth defects in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997–2011 Birth Defects Research 2020 112 2 162 174 10.1002/bdr2.1616 31840947 Fleisher Lee et al. (2014) Fleisher Lee A Fleischmann Kirsten E Auerbach Andrew D Barnason Susan A Beckman Joshua A Bozkurt B Davila-Roman Victor G Gerhard-Herman Marie D Holly Thomas A Kane Garvan C Marine Joseph E Nelson MT Spencer Crystal C Thompson A Ting Henry H Uretsky Barry F Wijeysundera Duminda N 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2014 64 22 e77 e137 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.944 25091544 Fomete et al. (2021) Fomete B Agbara R Omeje KU Oguntayo AO Odontogenic cervicofacial infection in pregnancy: a need for oral care Journal of Family & Reproductive Health 2021 15 1 7 10.18502/jfrh.v15i1.6065 34429730 Franz-Montan et al. (2015) Franz-Montan M Baroni D Brunetto G Sobral VR da Silva CM Venâncio P Zago PW Cereda CM Volpato MC de Araújo DR de Paula E Groppo FC Liposomal lidocaine gel for topical use at the oral mucosa: characterization, in vitro assays and in vivo anesthetic efficacy in humans Journal of Liposome Research 2015 25 1 11 19 10.3109/08982104.2014.911315 24807821 Fujita & Sunada (2021) Fujita K Sunada K Effect of epinephrine on the distribution of ropivacaine and lidocaine using radioactive isotopes in rat maxilla and pulp Odontology 2021 109 1 168 173 10.1007/s10266-020-00536-6 32632541 Garret-Bernardin et al. (2017) Garret-Bernardin A Cantile T D’Antò V Galanakis A Fauxpoint G Ferrazzano GF De Rosa S Vallogini G Romeo U Galeotti A Pain experience and behavior management in pediatric dentistry: a comparison between traditional local anesthesia and the wand computerized delivery system Pain Research and Management 2017 2017 6 7941238 10.1155/2017/7941238 28293129 Gazal et al. (2020) Gazal G Bahabri R Alolayan AB Alkayyal M Al-Ghamdi R Salamah R How successful is supplemental intraseptal and buccal infiltration anaesthesia in the mandibular molars of patients undergoing root canal treatment or tooth extraction? Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Research 2020 11 1 e5 10.5037/jomr.2020.11105 George et al. (2018) George A Dahlen HG Blinkhorn A Ajwani S Bhole S Ellis S Yeo A Elcombe E Johnson M Evaluation of a midwifery initiated oral health-dental service program to improve oral health and birth outcomes for pregnant women: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial International Journal of Nursing Studies 2018 82 11 49 57 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.03.006 29605753 Giovannitti, Rosenberg & Phero (2013) Giovannitti JA Jr Rosenberg MB Phero JC Pharmacology of local anesthetics used in oral surgery Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America 2013 25 3 453 465 10.1016/j.coms.2013.03.003 23660127 González-Jaranay et al. (2017) González-Jaranay M Téllez L Roa-López A Gómez-Moreno G Moreu G Periodontal status during pregnancy and postpartum PLOS ONE 2017 12 5 e0178234 10.1371/journal.pone.0178234 28538740 Guastella et al. (2017) Guastella C Rinaldi V Di Pasquale D Coviello D Pignataro L Oral pyogenic granuloma gravidarum: a case report describing a large bleeding lingual lesion Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology: The Journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2017 37 4 537 538 10.1080/01443615.2016.1256957 28019137 Guimaraes et al. (2021) Guimaraes CC Lopes LC Bergamaschi CC Ramacciato JC Silva MT Araújo JO de Andrade NK Motta RHL Local anaesthetics combined with vasoconstrictors in patients with cardiovascular disease undergoing dental procedures: systematic review and meta-analysis BMJ Open 2021 11 7 e044357 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044357 Guimicheva, Czuprynska & Arya (2015) Guimicheva B Czuprynska J Arya R The prevention of pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism British Journal of Haematology 2015 168 2 163 174 10.1111/bjh.13159 25312482 Guo et al. (2018) Guo J Yin K Roges R Enciso R Efficacy of sodium bicarbonate buffered versus non-buffered lidocaine with epinephrine in inferior alveolar nerve block: a meta-analysis Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2018 18 3 129 142 10.17245/jdapm.2018.18.3.129 29984317 Gupta et al. (2021) Gupta A Sahai A Aggarwal V Mehta N Abraham D Jala S Singh A Anesthetic efficacy of primary and supplemental buccal/lingual infiltration in patients with irreversible pulpitis in human mandibular molars: a systematic review and meta-analysis Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2021 21 4 283 309 10.17245/jdapm.2021.21.4.283 34395897 Gupta et al. (2022) Gupta A Wadhwa J Aggarwal V Mehta N Abraham D Aneja K Singh A Anesthetic efficacy of supplemental intraligamentary injection in human mandibular teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2022 22 1 1 10 10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.1.1 35169615 Habak & Griggs (2022) Habak PJ Griggs JRP Urinary tract infection in pregnancy StatPearls 2022 Treasure Island (FL) StatPearls Publishing LLC Hagai et al. (2015) Hagai A Diav-Citrin O Shechtman S Ornoy A Pregnancy outcome after in utero exposure to local anesthetics as part of dental treatment: a prospective comparative cohort study Journal of the American Dental Association 2015 146 8 572 580 10.1016/j.adaj.2015.04.002 26227642 Hameed et al. (2018) Hameed NN Sargod SS Bhat SS Hegde SK Bava MM Effectiveness of precooling the injection site using tetrafluorethane on pain perception in children Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry 2018 36 3 296 300 10.4103/jisppd.Jisppd_222_17 30246753 Health MDoP (2016) Health MDoP Massachusetts oral health practice guidelines for pregnancy and early childhood 2016 https://files.hria.org/files/PP2837.pdf 6 April 2023 Hindocha et al. (2019) Hindocha N Manhem F Bäckryd E Bågesund M Ice versus lidocaine 5% gel for topical anaesthesia of oral mucosa—a randomized cross-over study BMC Anesthesiology 2019 19 1 227 10.1186/s12871-019-0902-8 31842771 Hood, Dewan & James (1986) Hood D Dewan D James F Maternal and fetal effects of epinephrine in gravid ewes Anesthesiology 1986 64 5 610 613 10.1097/00000542-198605000-00011 3963479 Hu et al. (2022) Hu W Wang Y Chen R Pan T Oral health status and literacy/knowledge amongst pregnant women in Shanghai International Dental Journal 2022 73 2 212 218 10.1016/j.identj.2022.06.005 35835596 Iheozor-Ejiofor et al. (2017) Iheozor-Ejiofor Z Middleton P Esposito M Glenny A Treating periodontal disease for preventing adverse birth outcomes in pregnant women Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017 6 6 CD005297 10.1002/14651858.CD005297.pub3 28605006 Ilyas et al. (2020) Ilyas AM Jennings JD Banner L Matzon JL Wide-awake surgery with local anesthesia and epinephrine is safe Orthopedics 2020 43 e529 e532 10.3928/01477447-20200827-03 32882049 Ince et al. (2021) Ince I Arı MA Dostbil A Yalcin EK Ozmen O Khan MZ Shimada T Aksoy M Tuncer K Does local anesthetic temperature affect the onset and duration of ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus nerve block?: a randomized clinical trial Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English Edition) 2021 71 4 376 380 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.02.044 Iqbal et al. (2022) Iqbal A Lakkappa L Chhabra P Kondreddy K Kumari S Raju BM Francis M Impact of chronic periodontitis on intrauterine growth of the fetus: an original research Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences 2022 14 5 S280 S282 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_731_21 36110623 Jamil, Asmael & Al-Jarsha (2020) Jamil FA Asmael HM Al-Jarsha MY The success of using 2% lidocaine in pain removal during extraction of mandibular premolars: a prospective clinical study BMC Oral Health 2020 20 1 239 10.1186/s12903-020-01228-x 32867733 Jarvis et al. (2012) Jarvis SS Shibata S Bivens TB Okada Y Casey BM Levine BD Fu Q Sympathetic activation during early pregnancy in humans The Journal of Physiology 2012 590 15 3535 3543 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.228262 22687610 Jayasuriya, Weerapperuma & Amarasinghe (2017) Jayasuriya NSS Weerapperuma ID Amarasinghe M The use of an iced cotton bud as an effective pre-cooling method for palatal anaesthesia: a technical note Singapore Dental Journal 2017 38 2 17 19 10.1016/j.sdj.2017.07.001 29229069 Jimson et al. (2015) Jimson S Ranjani SS Lenka S Jimson S Comparative effects of clonidine and adrenaline with lignocaine during maxillary infiltration anaesthesia for dental extraction Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 2015 9 Zc85 88 10.7860/jcdr/2015/11066.5968 Johnson, Boscoe & Cabrera-Muffly (2020) Johnson AP Boscoe E Cabrera-Muffly C Local blocks and regional anesthesia in the head and neck Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 2020 53 5 739 751 10.1016/j.otc.2020.05.004 32682528 Joshi et al. (2021) Joshi S Bhate K Kshirsagar K Pawar V Kakodkar P DentalVibe reduces pain during the administration of local anesthetic injection in comparison to 2% lignocaine gel: results from a clinical study Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2021 21 1 41 47 10.17245/jdapm.2021.21.1.41 33585683 Kapila (2021) Kapila Y Oral health’s inextricable connection to systemic health: special populations bring to bear multimodal relationships and factors connecting periodontal disease to systemic diseases and conditions Periodontology 2000 2021 87 1 11 16 10.1111/prd.12398 34463994 Karm et al. (2018) Karm MH Kim M Park FD Seo KS Kim HJ Comparative evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and hemostatic effect of 2% lidocaine with various concentrations of epinephrine Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2018 18 3 143 149 10.17245/jdapm.2018.18.3.143 29984318 Karm et al. (2017) Karm M Park F Kang M Kim H Kang J Kim S Kim Y Kim C Seo K Kwon K Kim C Lee J Hong S Lim M Nam S Cho J Comparison of the efficacy and safety of 2% lidocaine HCl with different epinephrine concentration for local anesthesia in participants undergoing surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover, phase IV trial Medicine 2017 96 21 e6753 10.1097/md.0000000000006753 28538371 Kattan et al. (2019) Kattan S Lee SM Hersh EV Karabucak B Do buffered local anesthetics provide more successful anesthesia than nonbuffered solutions in patients with pulpally involved teeth requiring dental therapy?: a systematic review Journal of the American Dental Association 2019 150 3 165 177 10.1016/j.adaj.2018.11.007 30803488 Kc, Bhattarai & Subedi (2022) Kc K Bhattarai BP Subedi S Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of intraosseous injection with conventional inferior alveolar nerve block in mandibular third molar surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology 2022 133 2 e33 e42 10.1016/j.oooo.2021.07.020 34511344 Kohlhepp et al. (2018) Kohlhepp LM Hollerich G Vo L Hofmann-Kiefer K Rehm M Louwen F Zacharowski K Weber CF Physiological changes during pregnancy Der Anaesthesist 2018 67 5 383 396 10.1007/s00101-018-0437-2 29654495 Kolding, Eken & Uldbjerg (2020) Kolding L Eken H Uldbjerg N Drug exposure during pregnancy and fetal cardiac function—a systematic review Journal of Perinatal Medicine 2020 48 3 199 208 10.1515/jpm-2019-0402 32069248 Kurien, Goswami & Singh (2018) Kurien RS Goswami M Singh S Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of warm, buffered and conventional 2% lignocaine for the success of inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in mandibular primary molars: a randomized controlled clinical trial Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects 2018 12 2 102 109 10.15171/joddd.2018.016 30087760 Lakshmanan & Ravindran (2021) Lakshmanan L Ravindran V Efficacy of cryotherapy application on the pain perception during intraoral injection: a randomized controlled trial International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry 2021 14 5 616 620 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2032 34934271 Lato et al. (2018) Lato K Bekes I Widschwendter P Friedl TWP Janni W Reister F Froeba G Friebe-Hoffmann U Hypotension due to spinal anesthesia influences fetal circulation in primary caesarean sections Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2018 297 3 667 674 10.1007/s00404-017-4641-0 29330635 Lee et al. (2017) Lee S Chien D Huang C Shih S Lee W Chang W Dyspnea in pregnancy Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 2017 56 4 432 436 10.1016/j.tjog.2017.04.035 28805596 Lee et al. (2010) Lee R Milgrom P Huebner C Conrad D Dentists’ perceptions of barriers to providing dental care to pregnant women Women’s Health Issues: Official Publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women’s Health 2010 20 5 359 365 10.1016/j.whi.2010.05.007 Lee & Shin (2017) Lee J Shin T Use of local anesthetics for dental treatment during pregnancy; safety for parturient Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2017 17 2 81 90 10.17245/jdapm.2017.17.2.81 28879335 Lim et al. (1992) Lim ET Chong KY Singh B Jong W Use of warm local anaesthetic solution for caudal blocks Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 1992 20 4 453 455 10.1177/0310057X9202000409 1463171 Lim, Mouyis & MacKillop (2021) Lim E Mouyis M MacKillop L Liver diseases in pregnancy Clinical Medicine 2021 21 5 e441 e445 10.7861/clinmed.2021-0497 34507927 Liu et al. (2019) Liu PP Wen W Yu KF Gao X Wong MCM Dental care-seeking and information acquisition during pregnancy: a qualitative study International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2019 16 14 2621 10.3390/ijerph16142621 31340485 MacDonald et al. (2021) MacDonald E Drum M Nusstein J Fowler S Beck M Reader A Anesthetic success using nitrous oxide and a combination of lidocaine/clonidine for the inferior alveolar nerve block and the effects on blood pressure and pulse in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study Journal of Endodontics 2021 47 4 558 565 10.1016/j.joen.2020.12.014 33387550 Mahapatra et al. (2021) Mahapatra A Nayak R Satpathy A Pati B Mohanty R Mohanty G Beura R Maternal periodontal status, oral inflammatory load, and systemic inflammation are associated with low infant birth weight Journal of Periodontology 2021 92 8 1107 1116 10.1002/jper.20-0266 33155287 Maia et al. (2022) Maia FPA Araujo Lemos CA de Souza Andrade ES de Morais SLD do Egito Vasconcelos BC Pellizzer EP Does the use of topical anesthetics reduce the perception of pain during needle puncture and anesthetic infiltration? Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2022 51 3 412 425 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.06.005 34391592 Malamed (2014) Malamed SF Handbook of local anesthesia-e-book 2014 Amsterdam Elsevier Health Sciences Manautou & Mayberry (2023) Manautou MA Mayberry ME Local anesthetics and pregnancy. A review of the evidence and why dentists should feel safe to treat pregnant people Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice 2023 23 2 101833 10.1016/j.jebdp.2023.101833 37201975 Mark (2021) Mark AM Pregnancy and oral health Journal of the American Dental Association 2021 152 3 252 10.1016/j.adaj.2020.12.009 33632413 Massoth et al. (2022) Massoth C Chappell D Kranke P Wenk M Supine hypotensive syndrome of pregnancy: a review of current knowledge European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2022 39 3 236 243 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001554 34231500 Mata et al. (2021) Mata K Nobre A Felix Silva P Oliezer R Fernandes C Amaral J Ramos J Constante Gabriel Del-Arco M Messora M Tanus-Santos J Gerlach R Salvador S A new mixed model of periodontitis-induced preeclampsia: a pilot study Journal of Periodontal Research 2021 56 4 726 734 10.1111/jre.12869 33686671 Michalowicz et al. (2008) Michalowicz BS Diangelis AJ Novak MJ Buchanan W Papapanou PN Mitchell DA Curran AE Lupo VR Ferguson JE Bofill J Examining the safety of dental treatment in pregnant women Journal of the American Dental Association 2008 139 6 685 695 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0250 18519992 Midha et al. (2021) Midha V Midha V Dua R Garewal R Kochhar AS Kochhar GK Auxiliary aids to alleviate pain and anxiety during local anesthesia administration: a comparative study International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry 2021 14 1 104 108 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1935 34326594 Moore (2016) Moore PA An increased rate for major birth anomalies was not found following dental treatment requiring local anesthesia during pregnancy Journal of Evidence Based Dental Practice 2016 16 1 75 76 10.1016/j.jebdp.2016.01.033 27132566 Nafisi et al. (2018) Nafisi S Samadi N Houshiar M Maibach HI Mesoporous silica nanoparticles for enhanced lidocaine skin delivery International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2018 550 1–2 325 332 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.08.004 30081227 Nanitsos et al. (2009) Nanitsos E Vartuli R Forte A Dennison PJ Peck CC The effect of vibration on pain during local anaesthesia injections Australian Dental Journal 2009 54 2 94 100 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2009.01100.x 19473149 Ogawa et al. (2021) Ogawa H Kusumoto J Nomura T Hashikawa K Terashi H Sakakibara S Wire myography for continuous estimation of the optimal concentration of topical lidocaine as a vasodilator in microsurgery Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery 2021 37 06 541 550 10.1055/s-0040-1722759 33517569 OHRC (2023) OHRC Oral health care during pregnancy: a national consensus statement 2023 https://www.mchoralhealth.org/materials/consensus_statement.php 6 April 2023 Ou et al. (2019) Ou YH Ou YH Gu J Kang L Personalized anesthetic patches for dental applications International Journal of Bioprinting 2019 5 203 10.18063/ijb.v5i2.1.203 32596543 Ouanounou & Haas (2016) Ouanounou A Haas D Drug therapy during pregnancy: implications for dental practice British Dental Journal 2016 220 8 413 417 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.299 27103292 Ouchi & Jinnouchi (2021) Ouchi K Jinnouchi A Calcium channel blockers, angiotensin II receptor antagonists and alpha-blockers accentuate blood pressure reducing caused by dental local anesthesia Clinical Oral Investigations 2021 25 8 4879 4886 10.1007/s00784-021-03795-x 33506427 Papademetriou et al. (2021) Papademetriou V Stavropoulos K Patoulias D Papadopoulos C Georgios K Toumpourleka M Sachinidis A Hypertension in pregnancy: unanswered questions Current Pharmaceutical Design 2021 27 36 3795 3803 10.2174/1381612827666210830091652 34459373 Patel et al. (2021) Patel D Lahiri B El-Patal MA-E Alazmah A Patel P Abokhlifa YH To compare and analyze the potency of two topical anesthetic gels in reducing inferior alveolar injection pain in children of 8–12 years: a double-blinded clinical trial Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences 2021 13 5 S646 S650 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_772_20 34447172 Patil & Patil (2012) Patil PM Patil SP Is clonidine an adequate alternative to epinephrine as a vasoconstrictor in patients with hypertension? Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2012 70 2 257 262 10.1016/j.joms.2011.07.011 21940091 Pemathilaka, Reynolds & Hashemi (2019) Pemathilaka RL Reynolds DE Hashemi NN Drug transport across the human placenta: review of placenta-on-a-chip and previous approaches Interface Focus 2019 9 5 20190031 10.1098/rsfs.2019.0031 31485316 Phipps et al. (2016) Phipps E Prasanna D Brima W Jim B Preeclampsia: updates in pathogenesis, definitions, and guidelines Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2016 11 6 1102 1113 10.2215/CJN.12081115 27094609 Phyo et al. (2020) Phyo HE Chaiyasamut T Kiattavorncharoen S Pairuchvej V Bhattarai BP Wongsirichat N Single buccal infiltration of high concentration lignocaine versus articaine in maxillary third molar surgery Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2020 20 4 203 212 10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.4.203 32934986 Purisch & Gyamfi-Bannerman (2017) Purisch SE Gyamfi-Bannerman C Epidemiology of preterm birth Seminars in Perinatology 2017 41 7 387 391 10.1053/j.semperi.2017.07.009 28865982 Qi et al. (2021) Qi Y Yao X Du X An S Local anesthetic lidocaine-encapsulated polymyxin-chitosan nanoparticles delivery for wound healing: in vitro and in vivo tissue regeneration Drug Delivery 2021 28 1 285 292 10.1080/10717544.2020.1870021 33501867 Raju & Berens (2021) Raju K Berens L Periodontology and pregnancy: an overview of biomedical and epidemiological evidence Periodontology 2000 2021 87 1 132 142 10.1111/prd.12394 34463990 Ralston & Shnider (1978) Ralston D Shnider S The fetal and neonatal effects of regional anesthesia in obstetrics Anesthesiology 1978 48 1 34 64 10.1097/00000542-197801000-00007 339784 Rana et al. (2019) Rana S Lemoine E Granger JP Karumanchi SA Preeclampsia: pathophysiology, challenges, and perspectives Circulation Research 2019 124 7 1094 1112 10.1161/circresaha.118.313276 30920918 Rayati et al. (2021) Rayati F Haeri M Norouziha A Jabbarian R Comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 and 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 buccal infiltration for single maxillary molar extraction: a double-blind, randomised, clinical trial British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2021 59 6 695 699 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.09.009 34053801 Ribeiro et al. (2016) Ribeiro LN Franz-Montan M Breitkreitz MC Alcântara AC Castro SR Guilherme VA Barbosa RM de Paula E Nanostructured lipid carriers as robust systems for topical lidocaine-prilocaine release in dentistry European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2016 93 Suppl 1 192 202 10.1016/j.ejps.2016.08.030 27543066 Ribeiro et al. (2018) Ribeiro LNM Franz-Montan M Breitkreitz MC Rodrigues da Silva GH de Castro SR Guilherme VA de Araújo DR de Paula E Nanohybrid hydrogels designed for transbuccal anesthesia International Journal of Nanomedicine 2018 13 6453 6463 10.2147/ijn.S180080 30410331 Ritchie et al. (2017) Ritchie HE Oakes DJ Kennedy D Polson JW Early gestational hypoxia and adverse developmental outcomes Birth Defects Research 2017 109 17 1358 1376 10.1002/bdr2.1136 29105381 Rocha et al. (2018) Rocha JS Arima LY Werneck RI Moysés SJ Baldani MH Determinants of dental care attendance during pregnancy: a systematic review Caries Research 2018 52 1–2 139 152 10.1159/000481407 29316548 Roh et al. (2016) Roh J Han M Kim KN Kim KM The in vitro and in vivo effects of a fast-dissolving mucoadhesive bi-layered strip as topical anesthetics Dental Materials Journal 2016 35 4 601 605 10.4012/dmj.2015-369 27477225 Salma et al. (2021) Salma RG Alsayeh A Maneea AB Alrassan F Almarshad A The effectiveness of electronic pulsed soft tissue vibration compared with topical anaesthesia in reducing the pain of injection of local anaesthetics in adults: a randomized controlled split-mouth clinical trial International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2021 50 3 407 415 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.07.010 32723512 Sandilya et al. (2019) Sandilya V Andrade NN Mathai PC Aggarwal N Sahu V Nerurkar S A randomized control trial comparing buccal infiltration of 4% articaine with buccal and palatal infiltration of 2% lignocaine for the extraction of maxillary premolar teeth Contemporary Clinical Dentistry 2019 10 2 284 288 10.4103/ccd.ccd_529_18 32308291 Sarwal & Lapumnuaypol (2022) Sarwal P Lapumnuaypol K Pyogenic granuloma StatPearls 2022 Treasure Island (FL) StatPearls Publishing LLC Sato et al. (2019) Sato Y Ikoma T Wakita R Fukayama H Interfacial interaction of anesthetic lidocaine and mesoporous silica nanoparticles in aqueous solutions and its release properties Journal of Materials Chemistry B 2019 7 44 7026 7032 10.1039/C9TB01999E 31638628 Schwartz, Nachum & Green (2015) Schwartz N Nachum Z Green M The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus recurrence--effect of ethnicity and parity: a metaanalysis American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2015 213 3 310 317 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.011 25757637 Senthoor, Janani & Ravindran (2020) Senthoor P Janani K Ravindran C A prospective, randomized double-blinded study to evaluate the efficacy of buffered local anesthetics in infected and inflamed pulp and periapical tissues Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery 2020 19 2 246 250 10.1007/s12663-019-01188-y 32346235 Shadmehr et al. (2017) Shadmehr E Aminozarbian MG Akhavan A Mahdavian P Davoudi A Anaesthetic efficacy of lidocaine/clonidine for inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis International Endodontic Journal 2017 50 6 531 539 10.1111/iej.12659 27176631 Shadmehr et al. (2021) Shadmehr E Sarmast ND Davoudi A Chung YJ Wang HH The additive effect of clonidine to lidocaine on postoperative pain management after root canal treatment on mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a prospective randomised double-blind clinical trial Journal of Conservative Dentistry 2021 24 1 24 28 10.4103/JCD.JCD_523_20 34475675 Silva de Araujo Figueiredo et al. (2017) Silva de Araujo Figueiredo C Gonçalves Carvalho Rosalem C Costa Cantanhede AL breu Fonseca Thomaz ÉB Fontoura Nogueira da Cruz MC Systemic alterations and their oral manifestations in pregnant women Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 2017 43 1 16 22 10.1111/jog.13150 28074549 Singla et al. (2022) Singla M Gugnani M Grewal MS Kumar U Aggarwal V Does the presence and amount of epinephrine in 2% lidocaine affect its anesthetic efficacy in the management of symptomatic maxillary molars with irreversible pulpitis? Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2022 22 1 39 47 10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.1.39 35169619 Smereka et al. (2019) Smereka J Aluchna M Aluchna A Puchalski M Wroblewski P Checinski I Leskiewicz M Szarpak L Medical emergencies in dental hygienists’ practice Medicine 2019 98 30 e16613 10.1097/md.0000000000016613 31348310 Sokhov, Rabinovich & Bogaevskaya (2019) Sokhov ST Rabinovich SA Bogaevskaya OY Comparative evaluation of P.M. Egorov and modified G. Gow-Gates mandibular block efficacy Stomatologiia 2019 98 5 46 49 10.17116/stomat20199805146 Southerland et al. (2016) Southerland JH Gill DG Gangula PR Halpern LR Cardona CY Mouton CP Dental management in patients with hypertension: challenges and solutions Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry 2016 8 111 120 10.2147/ccide.S99446 27799823 Sovatdy et al. (2018) Sovatdy S Vorakulpipat C Kiattavorncharoen S Saengsirinavin C Wongsirichat N Inferior alveolar nerve block by intraosseous injection with Quicksleeper® at the retromolar area in mandibular third molar surgery Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2018 18 6 339 347 10.17245/jdapm.2018.18.6.339 30637344 Spivakovsky (2019) Spivakovsky S Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia Evidence-Based Dentistry 2019 20 2 42 43 10.1038/s41432-019-0021-x 31253961 St George et al. (2018) St George G Morgan A Meechan J Moles DR Needleman I Ng YL Petrie A Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2018 7 10 Cd006487 10.1002/14651858.CD006487.pub2 29990391 Takahashi et al. (2005) Takahashi Y Nakano M Sano K Kanri T The effects of epinephrine in local anesthetics on plasma catecholamine and hemodynamic responses Odontology 2005 93 1 72 79 10.1007/s10266-005-0044-y 16170480 Tamirisa et al. (2022) Tamirisa KP Elkayam U Briller JE Mason PK Pillarisetti J Merchant FM Patel H Lakkireddy DR Russo AM Volgman AS Vaseghi M Arrhythmias in pregnancy JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology 2022 8 1 120 135 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.10.004 35057977 Tan & Tan (2013) Tan E Tan E Alterations in physiology and anatomy during pregnancy Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2013 27 6 791 802 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.08.001 24012425 Tanaka et al. (2016) Tanaka E Yoshida K Kawaai H Yamazaki S Lidocaine concentration in oral tissue by the addition of epinephrine Anesthesia Progress 2016 63 1 17 24 10.2344/15-00003R2.1 26866407 Tangen et al. (2016) Tangen LF Lundbom JS Skarsvåg TI Wågø KJ Ballo S Hjelseng T Finsen V The influence of injection speed on pain during injection of local anaesthetic Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery 2016 50 1 7 9 10.3109/2000656X.2015.1058269 26414074 Taylor et al. (2019) Taylor NAS Nykvist Å Powers N Caldwell JN Thermoeffector threshold plasticity: the impact of thermal pre-conditioning on sudomotor, cutaneous vasomotor and thermogenic thresholds Journal of Thermal Biology 2019 83 4 37 46 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2019.05.001 31331523 Tettamanti (2017) Tettamanti L Pregnancy and periodontal disease: does exist a two-way relationship? Oral & Implantology 2017 10 2 112 118 10.11138/orl/2017.10.2.112 29876036 Tirupathi & Rajasekhar (2020) Tirupathi SP Rajasekhar S Effect of warming local anesthesia solutions before intraoral administration in dentistry: a systematic review Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2020 20 4 187 194 10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.4.187 32934984 Tolcher, Fisher & Clark (2018) Tolcher MC Fisher WE Clark SL Nonobstetric surgery during pregnancy Obstetrics & Gynecology 2018 132 2 395 403 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002748 29995718 Tomlin (1974) Tomlin PJ Death in outpatient dental anaesthetic practice Anaesthesia 1974 29 5 551 570 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1974.tb00718.x 4433014 Tschopp et al. (2018) Tschopp C Tramèr M Schneider A Zaarour M Elia N Benefit and harm of adding epinephrine to a local anesthetic for neuraxial and locoregional anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analyses Anesthesia & Analgesia 2018 127 1 228 239 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003417 29782398 Uppal et al. (2022) Uppal NN Jhaveri M Hong S Shore-Lesserson L Jhaveri KD Izzedine H Local anesthetics for the Nephrologist Clinical Kidney Journal 2022 15 2 186 193 10.1093/ckj/sfab121 35145634 van Hove et al. (2022) van Hove H Mathiesen L Freriksen J Vähäkangas K Colbers A Brownbill P Greupink R Placental transfer and vascular effects of pharmaceutical drugs in the human placenta ex vivo: a review Placenta 2022 122 1 29 45 10.1016/j.placenta.2022.03.128 35397340 Vasco Ramirez & Valencia (2020) Vasco Ramirez M Valencia GC Anesthesia for nonobstetric surgery in pregnancy Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology 2020 63 2 351 363 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000532 32205791 Vigarios & Maret (2020) Vigarios E Maret D Pregnancy gingivitis QJM: an International Journal of Medicine 2020 113 10 760 761 10.1093/qjmed/hcaa027 32068874 Visconti, Tortamano & Buscariolo (2016) Visconti RP Tortamano IP Buscariolo IA Comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of mepivacaine and lidocaine in patients with irreversible pulpitis: a double-blind randomized clinical trial Journal of Endodontics 2016 42 9 1314 1319 10.1016/j.joen.2016.06.015 27475099 Wadia (2022) Wadia R Supplemental intraligamentary injections British Dental Journal 2022 232 6 387 10.1038/s41415-022-4101-5 Wali et al. (2010) Wali M Drum M Reader A Nusstein J Prospective, randomized single-blind study of the anesthetic efficacy of 1.8 and 3.6 milliliters of 2% lidocaine with 1:50,000 epinephrine for inferior alveolar nerve block Journal of Endodontics 2010 36 9 1459 1462 10.1016/j.joen.2010.05.012 20728709 Wang et al. (2021) Wang YH Wang DR Liu JY Pan J Local anesthesia in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a review of current opinion Journal of Dental Sciences 2021 16 4 1055 1065 10.1016/j.jds.2020.12.003 34484571 Whelehan & Delanty (2019) Whelehan A Delanty N Therapeutic strategies for treating epilepsy during pregnancy Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy 2019 20 3 323 332 10.1080/14656566.2018.1550073 30526135 WHO (2017) WHO WHO recommendations on maternal health 2017 https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/259268/WHO-MCA-17.10-eng.pdf;jsessionid=57C08E4FA77A7D864CBE8E59500D3590?sequence=1 6 April 2023 Yadav (2015) Yadav S Anesthetic success of supplemental infiltration in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis: a systematic review Journal of Conservative Dentistry 2015 18 182 186 10.4103/0972-0707.157238 26069400 Yanamandra & Chandraharan (2012) Yanamandra N Chandraharan E Chandraharan E Arulkumaran S Anatomical and physiological changes in pregnancyand their implications in clinical practice Obstetric and Intrapartum Emergencies: a Practical Guide to Management 2012 Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1 8 Yilmaz, Tunga & Ozyurek (2018) Yilmaz K Tunga U Ozyurek T Buccal infiltration versus inferior alveolar nerve block in mandibular 2(nd) premolars with irreversible pulpitis Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice 2018 21 473 477 29607860 Yousefi, Parvaie & Riahi (2020) Yousefi M Parvaie P Riahi S Salivary factors related to caries in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Journal of the American Dental Association 2020 151 8 576–588.e574 10.1016/j.aime.2020.04.021 32718487 Zanjir et al. (2019) Zanjir M Lighvan NL Yarascavitch C Beyene J Shah PS Azarpazhooh A Efficacy and safety of pulpal anesthesia strategies during endodontic treatment of permanent mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Journal of Endodontics 2019 45 12 1435–1464.e1410 10.1016/j.joen.2019.09.002 31601433 Zhao, Wong & Stevenson (2021) Zhao H Wong RJ Stevenson DK The impact of hypoxia in early pregnancy on placental cells International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2021 22 18 9675 10.3390/ijms22189675 34575844 Zhou et al. (2020) Zhou C Tang L Yin Q Yang L Gong D Kang Y Cao H Fan J Zhang Y Qian D Zhang Q Ke B Liu J Zhang W Yang J Novel compound LL-a produces long and nociceptive-selective regional anesthesia via TRPV1 channels in rodents sciatic nerve block model Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2020 45 6 412 418 10.1136/rapm-2019-101057 32284350