==== Front Discov Nano Discov Nano Discover Nano 2731-9229 Springer US New York 37392317 3868 10.1186/s11671-023-03868-8 Review Influence of phase-separated structural morphologies on the piezo and triboelectric properties of polymer composites Yempally Swathi 1 Kacem Eya 2 Ponnamma Deepalekshmi deepalekshmi@qu.edu.qa 2 1 grid.412603.2 0000 0004 0634 1084 Center for Advanced Materials, Qatar University, P O Box 2713, Doha, Qatar 2 grid.412603.2 0000 0004 0634 1084 Materials Science and Technology Program, Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Physics, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, 2713 Doha, Qatar 1 7 2023 1 7 2023 12 2023 18 1 932 4 2023 20 6 2023 © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Simplified and flexible fabrication methods, high output performance, and extreme flexibility of polymer-based nanocomposites represent versatile designs in self-powering devices for wearable electronics, sensors, and smart societies. Examples include polyvinylidene fluoride and its copolymers-based piezoelectric nanogenerators, green and recyclable triboelectric nanogenerators, etc. Advanced functionalities, multi-functional properties, and the extensive lifetime required for nanogenerators inspire researchers to focus on structural modifications of the polymeric materials, to fully exploit their performances. Phase separation is a physicochemical process in which polymeric phases rearrange, resulting in specific structures and properties, that ultimately influence mechanical, electronic, and other functional properties. This article will study the phase separation strategies used to modify the polymeric base, both physically and chemically, to generate the maximum electric power upon mechanical and frictional deformation. The effect of interfacial modification on the efficiency of the nanogenerators, chemical and mechanical stability, structural integrity, durable performance, and morphological appearance will be extensively covered in this review. Moreover, piezo- and triboelectric power generation have numerous challenges, such as poor resistance to mechanical deformation, reduced cyclic performance stability, and a high cost of production. These often depend on the method of developing the nanogenerators, and phase separation provides a unique advantage in reducing them. The current review provides a one-stop solution to understand and disseminate the phase separation process, types and mechanisms, advantages, and role in improving the piezoelectric and triboelectric performances of the nanogenerators. Keywords Nanogenerators Phase separation Frictional Mechanical Deformation issue-copyright-statement© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023 ==== Body pmcIntroduction and background survey Wearable and portable electronics, wireless transport systems, and Internet of things (IoT) technology are demanding sustainable power generation methodologies [1–3]. Smart societies, including cloud computing and artificial intelligence, utilize such energy generators and sensors for real-time monitoring of remote or short-range data [2, 3]. Wearable electronic technology realizes intelligence and acts as the best interface for human–machine interaction, but it needs proper power supplies for constant and stable performance [4]. The miniaturization of electronic devices, portability, and wearable healthcare monitoring systems gained significance in research after the year 2000 [5–7]. More than 15,000 research papers dealing with wearable electronics and around 2000 publications for the year 2022 underline the significance of these topics. Mechanical power harvesting methods such as piezo- and tribotools often connect with wearable electronics and smart society for continuous power supply [8, 9]. Moreover, these power generation strategies are renewable and do not involve any environmental concerns. Piezoelectric nanogenerators, or PENGs, generate electrical energy from the difference in surface potential of a crystalline material with non-central symmetry when an external mechanical force deforms it [10], whereas the triboelectric nanogenerators, or TENGs, generate electrical energy by coupling triboelectrification and electrostatic induction in materials [4]. Extensive studies demonstrate the piezoelectric power generation performances of piezoelectric ceramics [11], inorganic oxides (ZnO [12, 13], BaTiO3 [14], SrTiO3 [15], and tellurium [16]), hybrid composites, and organic–inorganic hybrid materials (surface modification by sol–gel reaction, chemical bonding, electrostatic adsorption, and nanocoating) [17, 18]. In order to understand the mechanism of piezoelectricity in polymer nanocomposites and the various materials used for fabricating PENGs, the review of Mishra et al. [19] is helpful. Our research group has done extensive research on the piezoelectric properties of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) [20, 21] and its copolymer, polyvinylidene fluoride hexafluoropropylene (PVDF-HFP) [22, 23]. Depending on the synthesis method and the nature of the nanofillers used, the piezoelectric nanocomposites showed different rates of performance. For instance, a maximum piezoelectric output voltage of 12 V and a current density of 1.9 µA cm−2 for the PVDF-HFP/cellulose nanocrystal (2 wt%) and PVDF-HFP/Fe-doped ZnO (2 wt%) double-layer composite spun fibers were 60 times higher when compared to the neat polymer [12]. However, with Co-doped ZnO of the same concentration, single-layer fibers of PVDF-HFP only produced 2.8 V [24]. At the same time, for silver nanoparticle-loaded PVDF spun fibers, an output voltage in the range of 0.6–2 V was observed when the concentration changed from 0.2 to 0.4% [20]. On the other hand, the voltage was relatively low when fabrication methods other than electrospinning were used. Though ZnO was doped with nickel before embedding in the PVDF-HFP, the layer-by-layer deposition method generated a maximum voltage of only 1.2 V that too at a 0.5 wt% nanomaterial concentration [25]. It was also observed that γ-irradiation significantly improved the β-phase nucleation and thus the piezoelectric output voltage for PVDF films [12]. In this case, the crystallinity was 48.1% for the casted films of PVDF containing Fe-doped ZnO, with a maximum output voltage of 2.4 V. It is clear from all these reports that the crystallinity and β-phase nucleation are greatly influenced by the morphological deformations happening within the polymer because of the nature and type of nanofiller, their concentration, type of fabrication, and processing conditions. Similarly, studies on TENGs are also advancing, with variable output performance coming from the multilayer structure, fabrication methods, and post-fabrication modifications. A very recent study by Choi and co-workers [26] reports polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-based carbon black (CB) composites as TENGs, demonstrating excellent charge storage ability, design flexibility, and material selection diversity. Optimized CB content gave twice the enhancement in long-term output performance with an output current of 320 μA. Ferroelectric composite interfacial layers are developed by Cao et al. [27] by doping nylon with polymethyl methacrylate (positive triboelectricity) and by compositing PVDF-TrFE with ZrO2 nanoparticles (negative triboelectricity). After polarizing in a specific direction, a high frictional surface charge density of 220 μC/m2 was achieved with respective open-circuit voltage, output power density, and short-circuit current density of ~ 500 V, ~ 42 mW cm−2 and ~ 500 μA cm−2. A recent review article published by Walden’s research group [28] focuses on the various types of TENGs and their different working mechanisms, including separation and sliding modes of operation. They classified the TENGs based on their triboelectric nature as tribonegative polymer material-based (PTFE, fluorinated ethylene propylene, PVDF, PDMS, polyimide, PET, and grafted polymeric layers) and tribopositive polymer material-based (nylon, cellulose, silk, thermoplastic polyurethane, polyvinyl alcohol, melamine formaldehyde, peptides, etc.). This review highlighted the significance of structural and morphological features in triboelectric power generation, such as tilting-sensitive TENGs [29], pendulum-inspired TENGs [30], whirling-folded TENGs [31], bionic stretchable TENGs [32], ball-shell-structured TENGs [33], and lawn-structured TENGs [34]. It is well understood that the structural topographies influence the electric power generation in all triboelectric power generation systems [29] and so polymers are always modified to attain specific structural and morphological identities. Structural induction of nanomaterials and non-solvents to align the –CH2 and –CF2 units in PVDF and thus enhance the efficiency of PENG was done during the phase separation process [34]. The phase separation happens according to the ternary phase diagram and Flory–Huggins [35] theory, by which at a point of demixing, evaporation, and condensation due to the solvent and non-solvent of the polymer will induce the phases to separate. In addition to incorporating phase separation as an additional method for electrospinning [35], the process can be coupled with the normal casting method as well. Depending on the nature and mechanism, phase separation process is classified in to several types, such as vapor induced, non-solvent induced, and thermal induced. 3D porous PVDF-HFP/Fe3O4 nanocomposites were fabricated by Shen’s research group using the scalable and template-free, non-solvent-induced phase separation (NIPS) method [36]. They could achieve highly durable piezoelectric power generation with a power density of 5.3 μW/cm3 and a piezoelectric d33 coefficient of 48.6 pC/N by modulating nanoparticle migration and liquid–liquid mixing. Yan and co-workers [4] used the same process of phase separation in a coagulation bath (NIPS) as a post-fabrication method to develop tribo-electronegative and tribo-electropositive pairs using PTFE/PVDF/EVOH composites for a possible smart garment. With a power density of 2.45 W/m2, the developed TENG harvests frictional energy between the clothes triggered by human motions. A very recent study [37] demonstrated the phase separation nanocoating method of covering the BaTiO3 with PVDF-TrFE particles, in which the 1-octanol non-solvent induces the phase separation. Such coated BaTiO3 was thereafter casted into the polymer films to develop TENGs with a high output voltage of 59.5 V. The vapor-induced phase separation (VIPS) process to manufacture self-matched configurations of PENG/TENG using recombinant spider silk and PET/PVDF reports another innovative concept of inducing higher triboelectric output from PENG’s piezoelectric effect [38]. Phase separation helps in the dipole alignment within the polymer chains, which adds to the enhanced energy harvesting properties. In addition, recent reports also discuss the advantages of phase separation of fluorine-rich polymer, poly(2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorostyrene) (PPFS), from sulfur copolymer TENGs [39], concave-honeycomb GO-PLA with convex-PDMS phase-separated antagonistic friction surfaces [40] for bio-TENGs, and sausage-like strings of PVDF nanodomains [41]. Based on all these studies, it is well established that phase separation acts as an alternative method to generate or modify polymer nanocomposites for both piezo- and triboelectric power generation. In this review, we will collectively assemble all the phase separation strategies used for PENG and TENG development, emphasizing their mechanism, role in morphological changes, and contribution to characteristic performance. The correlative aspects of the phase separation process on the structural variations and alignment of various phases will be discussed in detail, along with the nature of nanofillers, concentration, and other processing parameters. A critical discussion of the published articles on PENGs and TENGs as well as the combined nanogenerator will help the reader understand the phase separation process in polymers and its tuning in modulating specific properties. An effort like this is rarely found in the literature, and thus, we believe the scope of this review is relevant in recent times. Phase separation—types and mechanism Phase separation occurs as two or more distinct phase formations in a single homogenous mixture when solubility parameters are affected. It is a type of phase transition in which molecules that have a tendency to adhere together split off into different compartments, territories, or bodies [42]. In polymers (both natural and synthetic), the phase separation process is initiated by dissolution in a suitable solvent to produce a polymer gel and thereafter evaporating it by typical solvent extraction strategies. One of the phases goes with the solvent, leaving the other rich polymeric phase, mainly due to physical incompatibility. The concentrations of molecules that tend to adhere together influence the phase separation. The driving forces for phase separation and the durations of non-covalent cross-links that develop among molecules are determined by the intensities of contacts and the number (valence) of contacting points. The combined impacts of networks of connections among molecules with the required high valence of contact points will aid in the organization of these molecules into discrete regions marked by a physical contact with the surrounding milieu—the phase boundary. Figure 1 represents the general phase separation process happening in a typical polymer system. Phase separation has much significance in different applications; for instance, in scaffold fabrication, phase separation regulates the shape by tuning the concentration, porogen type, polymer type, and freezing temperature. More clearly, biomedical applications such as tissue engineering needs well-defined pore structure and diameters. Phase separation can tune the porous structure formation, by changing the concentration of the polymer solution, type of the polymer, etc. In addition, the conditions involved in the phase separation methods like temperature (heating or freezing), solvent/non-solvent ratio, vapor pressure, etc.Fig. 1 Schematic representation of a typical phase separation process Specifically, the crystalline structure of PVDF-based polymers can be explained based on different electrochemical phases present in them, such as α-phase, β-phase, γ-phase, and δ-phase. The α-phase consists of PVDF chains in trans-gauche twist conformation (TGTG′), whereas the β-phase contains all-trans planar zigzag conformation (TTTT). The γ-phase and δ-phase, respectively, include (TTTGTTTG′) intermediate α- and β-conformation and a polar form of α-phase. Out of all these phases, the most common observed are α and β. Since the α-phase has a trans-gauche conformation (TGTG'), it cannot be polarized when subjected to an electric field, whereas in the all-trans β-phase (TTTT), the majority of fluorine atoms are separated from hydrogen atoms and thus have a dipole moment perpendicular to the polymer chain. The third type of chain orientation is the γ-phase, which is a transitional structure between the α and β phases and thus has a smaller dipole moment than the β-phase. This is due to its structure, which adopts a trans-gauche conformation with a higher trans fraction (TTTGTTTG'), whereas β and γ phases are polarizable. Interestingly, the piezoelectric property of PVDF and its copolymers mainly depends on the β-phase (as it is uniform in alignment); however, the monomer orientation is expensive and needs either mechanical stretching or high-voltage application [43]. In PVDF, different kinds of phase separation happen depending on the amount and nature of the phases present. Figure 2 schematically demonstrates five different kinds of phase separation processes happening within the PVDF-based polymers, such as thermal-induced, non-solvent-induced, vapor-induced, polymerization-induced, and bi-solvent-induced processes. The subsequent sections demonstrate the scope and mechanism of each process explaining the scheme (Fig. 2) in detail.Fig. 2 Types of phase separation. a Thermal-induced phase separation (TIPS); b VIPS and PVDF/[BMIM]BF4 phase diagram [44]. Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported License; c NIPS, types and parameters influencing [42]; d Morphologies derived from PIPS. Etchable polymer (yellow) dissolved in a monomer/cross-linker (light blue) medium and RAFT copolymerization generates block polymer structure with controlled chain growth (dark blue), expanding chains are additionally cross-linked in situ, Microphase separation and cross-linking stopping the emerging bi-continuous structure, and Removal of etchable polymer, resulting in percolating nanopores [45]; e Bi-solvent-induced phase separation (BIPS) Thermal-induced phase separation (TIPS) In general, the TIPS relies on temperature changes, and [46] the crucial step is the dissolution of the polymer in the solvent with a high boiling point above the crystallization temperature [47], as represented in Fig. 2a. It has the following stages [48].Mixing the low molecular weight polymer in a high boiling point liquid (diluent or latent solvent) to form a homogenous solution. (Liquid does not cause significant dissolution or swelling of the polymer at room temperature.) Pouring the heated polymer solution into specific molds and shaping on a cold surface. Solidification of polymers induces phase separation. Generating the microporous structure by removing the diluent trapped in the polymer matrix during phase separation and solidification (by solvent extraction). Post-treatment processes such as stretching improve the desired separation properties of the TIPS membranes. When the phase separation happens highly porous scaffold structure can be developed. The advantages of TIPS include low defect formation, a wide range of solvent selection, and higher reproducibility [49]. However, the process can be monitored for uniform heating, and thermal stability of polymers. Vapor-induced phase separation process (VIPS) VIPS uses water vapor as the non-solvent phase to induce phase separation by mixing with polymer solution and through condensation [50]. The phase diagram of VIPS included in Fig. 2b illustrates DMF, a high boiling solvent, as an example. During the polymer processing, water vapor from humidified air, completely miscible with DMF, diffuses into the film. Since DMF evaporates at a slower rate than water, PVDF phase separation occurs in the presence of non-solvent water [44]. The mechanism of VIPS can be either nucleation and growth [51] (metastable region) or spinodal decomposition (SD) [52] (unstable region), depending upon the location of phase separation composition on the thermodynamic phase diagram. Several studies investigated the impacts of dissolving temperature (Td), vapor temperature (Tv), and exposure time during VIPS on the structures and mechanical characteristics of semi-crystalline PVDF. Td and Tv of PVDF have tremendous influence on its structures, as higher values of them enhance phase separation [53]. During polymer composite fabrication, the slower non-solvent intake rate would lead VIPS to prefer polymer crystallization (S–L demixing) over L–L demixing because the former would result in a longer stay of the cast film in the crystallization region without being affected by the latter [54]. A bi-continuous structure of PVDF membrane was created when the dissolving temperature was 32 °C, the modulus was 1.2 MPa, and the crystallinity 60%, according to Li et al. [11]. Peng et al. [12] also observed gradual deformation of the surface of the membrane from a dense to a bi-continuous structure when the vapor temperature increased from 27 to 75 °C at 100% vapor humidity. Good knowledge about the solubility of the polymers and solvent parameters is required to select the vapor required for the phase separation process. Though the process is comparatively faster, it causes fast vaporization of solvents that can leave irregular pore structures. However, this can be tuned by controlling the vaporization speed. Non-solvent-induced phase separation process (NIPS) NIPS involves casting a homogeneous polymer solution on the substrate and then immersing it in a coagulation bath. The diffusion kinetics and mass transfer rate determine the morphology of the phase-separated PVDF [13]. During NIPS, depending on the kind of polymer and the precipitation circumstances used, diffusional exchange between solvent and non-solvent causes the solution to enter a thermodynamically unstable state, resulting in phase separation, either via liquid–liquid (L–L) or solid–liquid (S–L) demixing [55]. For example, Cui et al. investigated the phase diagram of PVDF/[BMIM]BF4 at various PVDF concentrations. During 10–50 wt% polymer concentration, L–L phase separation predominates when the temperature of the casting solution declines, and S–L phase separation predominates when the temperature of the casting solution is lower than the crystallization temperature. When the polymer concentration is 20%, the arrow in Fig. 2c depicts the cooling course of the casting solution. A homogeneous casting solution enters the restricted L–L phase separation region when it cools to the cloud point at a high temperature. When the temperature falls below the crystallization temperature [15], the system enters the S–L phase separation region. However, in NIPS, desired morphology and good performance for the polymers require complicated control of the solvent exchange rate by simultaneously varying the dope composition, additives, coagulation medium, quenching bath temperature, and evaporation time [15]. Moreover, the thickness of the polymer film can negatively influence the efficiency of phase separation. In fact, the non-solvent thermally induced phase separation (N-TIPS) method has also been developed to address the drawbacks of TIPS and NIPS methods. Polymerization-induced phase separation process (PIPS) Phase separation in a multicomponent mixture caused by the polymerization of one or more components is known as polymerization-induced phase separation (PIPS) [54, 56]. One or more components become mutually immiscible when the molecular weight of the reactive component increases, resulting in spontaneous phase separation. Thermally induced polymerization or photopolymerization can both cause PIPS [57–59]. The process is triggered by SD, which frequently leads to the creation of co-continuous phases [60]. SD is a phase separation process in which heat transfer instability causes homogeneous blends to separate into more than one phase. The procedure is extensively utilized in thermoelectric, solid-state lighting, polymer electrolytes, composites, membrane construction, and surface pattern forms to regulate the morphology of polymer blends [61]. PIPS is also employed in the preparation of polymer dispersed liquid crystals (PDLCs). This involves the combination of monomers and liquid crystals (LC) to induce polymerization, followed by the two stage splitting of phases. In this case, the matrix phase contains the majority of the polymer, and the other LC phase contains the majority of the LC and the unreacted monomer. In fact, the LC phase appears as discrete droplets in the matrix phase. The cross-links in the matrix, or the vitrification of the matrix in the case of linear polymerization, prevent these droplets from coalescing [62]. In PIPS, various polymer morphologies (Fig. 2d) can be produced by changing the concentrations of modifier, molecular weights of polymers, and curing conditions [63]. However, the process is longer and involves complex polymerization steps. Bi-solvent-induced phase separation process BIPS involves solvents of different polarities, and the polymer is dissolvable in one of them, as in NIPS. For example, Mishra et al. described the bi-solvent phase separation of the δ-phase in PVDF by forming the interface between the solvent (acetone) and a non-solvent (water: methanol) [23]. As shown in Fig. 2e, the nanoparticles of δ-phase separate from the solvent at the interface of the good solvent and the non-solvent (represented by a rectangular section in Fig. 2e). The δ-phase nanoparticles separate from the solvent as a precipitate at the bottom of the tube. BIPS is relatively fast and simple process and can be adopted for different polymers. But for the PVDF-based polymers this method is less widely used because of the specific requirements of phases, related to piezoelectric properties. Since the β-phase is the prominent phase contributing to the piezoelectric properties in PVDF polymers, strategies to separate this phase are more demanded. In general, phase separation is also influenced by the presence of nanoadditives within the polymers. In composites, nanomaterials cause structural reinforcing, by interconnection throughout. This restricts the free polymer chain movement during phase separation. Therefore, nanocomposites must be thoroughly studied for their nanomaterial properties, particle–solvent interaction, particle polarity, and particle–polymer interactions before deciding the type of phase separation. Phase separation in piezoelectric nanogenerators In the crystalline structure of CH2CF2 chains of PVDF, β-phase is made of huge, translucent sheets that are stretched and poled (Fig. 3). When the sheet is held up to the light, the stretch direction is the direction in which most of the carbon chains run and is visible to the human eye. The poled direction “p” points to the sheet’s top or bottom. The net positively charged hydrogen atoms and the net negatively charged fluorine atoms end up on opposing sides of the sheet. This results in a pole direction, as indicated by the arrow in Fig. 3b [64]. When the electricity is applied across the sheets, either they expand along the stretch direction or contract in thickness, depending on the field direction. The effects of interaction between the positively charged hydrogen atoms on the negative side of the electric field and negatively charged fluorine atoms with the positive side of electric field determine the contraction in PVDF sheets (Fig. 3c).Fig. 3 Schematic representation of piezoelectric effect in PVDF due to β-phase. a Dipoles with charge separation created within β-phase. b Stretched sheet, with the electric field facing in the opposite direction as the poled direction. c Reduced sheet length, and the electric field is equal to the poled direction [64]. Reprinted under creative common license The majority of the research is currently focused on improving the β-phase content by the addition of different inorganic ceramic materials, such as graphene oxide (GO) and ZnO, and thus enhancing the piezoelectric output voltage. Out of the various fabrication methods of nanocomposites, electrospinning technology is versatile for β-phase formation and advanced applications [64]. Though electrospinning immediately aligns the dipoles in PVDF, facilitating good output voltage, it is a high-cost process due to the required high voltage and is time-consuming. Recently, phase-separated (NIPS) PVDF/graphene composite was coated on commercially available fabric by Xie and co-workers for motion sensing and speech monitoring purposes [34]. With 0.5 wt% graphene, the electroactive phases (β/γ) became 87%, increasing the material’s piezoelectric characteristics. As the input intensity was raised from 0.05 to 0.45 N, the voltage signal grew linearly from 3 to 18 V with a sensitivity of 34 V/N. With a force of 2 N, the PENG produced a high voltage of nearly 60 V, while the detecting threshold was discovered to be 0.6 mN [34]. Similarly, BaTiO3@PVDF-TrFE(TrFE = trifluoroethylene) nanocomposites were also fabricated using NIPS to enhance β-phase within the PVDF. The resulting nanocomposites possess effective orientation and an excellent output voltage of 59.5 V, with an output current of 6.5 uA at 100 N [37]. The piezoelectric responses for BaTiO3@PVDF-TrFE nanocomposite were higher than the BaTiO3 nanoparticles, and PVDF-TRFE matrix. In addition, with NIPS, pure PVDF-TrFE and BaTiO3 nanocomposite films produced 2 times and 4.8 times higher voltages, respectively. The authors exploited the flexible nature of BaTiO3@PVDF-TrFE to design PENG both in 2D thin film and 3D spring shapes [37]. Jella et al. fabricated MAPbI3/PVDF composite films with spin coating; the mechanism of power generation of the nanocomposite is illustrated in Fig. 4. In the early stages, there are no charges on the electrode surface, and a force applied creates the piezoelectric potential in the crystalline region. MAPbI3 generates macroscopic dipoles, accumulating charges of the opposite polarity at the MAPbI3/PVDF composite’s interface and surface [65]. However, an agglomeration is observed in the morphology analysis, and larger gaps were formed, especially on 40–50 vol% MAPbI3, proving this. This is explained based on the phase separation happening within. The spin-coated samples are pre-annealed, and during this time, a liquid–solid phase separation happens due to the rapid crystallization of MAPbI3.Fig. 4 Mechanism of power generation in MAPbI3-PVDF nanocomposite-based PENGs [65]. Copyright 2018. Reprinted with permission from Elsevier Ye and co-workers fabricated the PENG, comprising of P(VDF-TrFE) and boron nitride nanotubes (BNNTs). The micro-structured P(VDF-TrFE)/0.3 wt% BNNT, when exposed to 0.4 MPa pressure, exhibited an output voltage of 22 V and a sensitivity of 55 V/MPa, which are 11-fold higher than those of pristine P(VDF-TrFE) film. Synergistic effects from strong piezoelectric BNNTs and a strain confinement effect of the nanocomposite microstructure are credited for the substantial improvement in performance [66]. Several PENGs based on nanocomposite films with varied mass fractions of BNNTs were prepared to examine the effect of BNNT concentration on PENG output performances. The output voltage of PENGs is shown in Fig. 5a, b for varied BNNT concentrations ranging from 0 to 0.5 wt% percent. As the number of BNNTs grows from 0 to 0.3 wt%, the output voltages climb from 1.0 to 2.6 V. Following that, when the concentration increases from 0.3 to 0.5 wt%, the output voltages steadily fall from 2.6 to 1.7 V. The authors claim that P(VDF-TrFE)/BNNTs composites can be effectively used in human body protection from cosmic radiation and also as biomechanical energy harvesting devices.Fig. 5 a, b With varying BNNT concentrations, the output voltage of a P(VDF-TrFE)/BNNTs nanocomposite film-based nanogenerator [66]. Copyright 2019. Reprinted with permission from Elsevier Very recently, Ban et al. [67] fabricated a CsPbI3@PVDF composite by making use of temperature-assisted curing for the spin-coated composite. The particular fabrication strategy separates the filler phase and forms the long-term stabilized black γ-phase of CsPbI3. This phase of the CsPbI3-based PVDF composite performed two times better than the yellow phase of the CsPbI3-based composite. A layer-by-layer stacking process was used to adjust the thickness of the composite film. The output voltage of a five-layer black-γ-phase CsPbI3@PVDF composite PENG was 26 V, with a current density of μA/cm2. The output power can be up to 25 watts. In addition, the PENG can be used to charge capacitors via a bridge rectifier and has demonstrated long life in tests with over 14,000 cycles. These results show that inorganic perovskites can be used to build and develop high-performance PENG [67]. However, the phase formation in PVDF and the interfacial interactions between CsPbI3 and PVDF are not mentioned in this research. It can be further extended to deeply investigate the phase behavior of PVDF. Modern society is hugely dependent on portable electronic devices that can convert mechanical signals into electrical signals in practice for real-time biomedical monitoring and human motion sensing. Piezoelectric sensors [68, 69] of PVDF respond more accurately to external forces than typical resistance-based test system sensors, in a self-powering mode of operation. Mandal and co-workers reported δ-PVDF nanoparticle fabrication using the BIPS method and their outstanding open-circuit voltage capacity and power density. These δ-PVDF nanoparticles were used as biosensors for the real-time monitoring of arterial pulse signals without the necessity of an external power source [70]. Phase-separated PVDF/graphene composite coated on fabric found specific usage in wearable piezoelectric sensors. The sensor possessed a sensitivity of 34 VN−1, which is superior to other sensors reported so far. Moreover, it had a low detecting threshold (0.6 mN) that could be exploited to distinguish voices and detect human body motion [34]. As shown in Fig. 6, when the stress is applied to the front side of PVDF/graphene/polyester, the sensor generates corresponding voltage signals. When the piezoelectric sensor is overturned and hits its rear side, the voltages are also reversed. Due to the alignment of PVDF’s –CH2–/–CF2– dipoles, the greatest voltage on the rear side was practically identical to that on the front side, demonstrating indirect dipole reversibility [71].Fig. 6 a Piezoelectric sensor for health monitoring. b PVDF/graphene/polystyrene piezoelectric sensor [34]. Copyright 2018. Reprinted with permission from Elsevier Biocompatibility and healing of bone-related diseases by PVDF PENGs were illustrated by Gong and co-workers [72]. They fabricated a nanocomposite scaffold by doping Ca–P–Si into PVDF by the phase separation hydration (PSH) method. They identified the PSH method as producing a better piezoelectric scaffold than that of raw bone (3 pC/N vs. 0.7 pC/N). In addition, the scaffold was structurally compatible (7 MPa) with cancellous bone and had sufficient porosity (45%) to allow osteoblast infiltration and bone growth. The constructed CPS-PVDF scaffold was biocompatible with osteoblast cells and stimulated osteoblast re-differentiation, as revealed by in vitro biocompatibility tests. GO nanosheets are introduced to PVDF by NIPS to increase the hydrophilicity, water absorption, water flux, and mechanical properties of the scaffolds. Increasing the concentration of GO to 3 wt% significantly increased the tensile modulus and strength of the PVDF scaffold from 8.1 1.4 and 0.8 0.2 MPa to 17.0 3.7 and 1.4 0.4 MPa, respectively. GO nanosheets also improved the phase fraction, piezoelectricity, and electrical conductivity of all nanocomposite scaffolds. The phase-separated composite promoted cell proliferation more effectively than PVDF scaffolds, depending on the GO content. The phase-separated PVDF-GO scaffold with its four internal longitudinally aligned channels easily transforms into a nerve guidance tube [73]. Based on Karan’s work [74], electrode–composite–electrode stacks using carbon tape as an electrode were also developed [73]. As shown in Fig. 7, piezo-responses for the PVDF-GO scaffolds were recorded by repeatedly applying mechanical energy to the top sample surface with finger tapping (Fig. 7a). Upon tapping, electric charge distributes on PVDF-GO scaffolds, resulting in an electrical potential shift between the two electrodes and an open-circuit voltage with positive and negative amplitudes. GO concentration (0.5 wt%) increased the open-circuit voltage (1.4-fold) and decreased the electrical conductivity (1.7-fold), since it influences β-phase formation. However, higher concentrations negatively influence the piezoelectric properties. In fact, the NIPS enhances the adhesion, spreading, and proliferation of composite cells and further improves the β-phase [73]. Comprehensive data for the phase-separated PENGs are provided in Table 1.Fig. 7 a Representation of piezoelectricity measurement by PVDF-GO scaffolds with various GO contents. b 0 wt% (PVDF), c 0.5 wt% (P-0.5GO), d 1 wt% (P-1GO), e 3 wt% (P-3GO), and f 5 wt% (P-5GO) (P-5GO) [73]. Copyright 2019. Reprinted with permission from Elsevier Table 1 Phase-separated composites for piezoelectric applications Polymer Filler Phase separation Output voltage Output current density Power density Advantages References PMMA/PVDF-TrFE BaTiO3 β-phase/electrospinning 12.6 V 1.30 A 4025 W High compatibility, Young’s modulus, and strong stress transmission at the interface [59] PET/PVDF Graphene VIPS 300 V 72 A 4016 mWm−2 High stability and durability [38] PVDF/TrFEE BaTiO3 NIPS 59.5 V 6.5 µA 4.25 W Flexible as 2D thin film and 3D spring [37] PVDF KNN β-phase/electrospinning 1.9 V – – Lead-free PENG, unique energy harvesting [75] PVDF Alo-rGO VIPS 36 V 0.8 µA 36 mWm−2 High stability and durability [71] PVDF CsPbI3 γ-phase 26 V – 25 W Capacitor charging via bridge rectifier and durable over 14,000 cycles [67] PVDF Ca-P-Si β and γ phases – – – Biocompatible and used in healing bone diseases [72] rGO-PEI/PVDF-HFP rGO β phases 2 V 100 nA Bio-friendly drug delivery devices [76] PVDF/PANI rGO β crystalline phases 10.60 V – – High voltage [77] PVDF Graphene αTo F(β) phase separation 7.9 V 4.45 µm – High power, light LEDs for 30 s [78] PVDF CdS/rGO 4 V – – [79] PVDF ZnO α–β phase separation 0.354 V Enhanced electron transfer to the film top [80] PVDF rGO-Ag β and γ phases 18 V 1.05 µA 28 Wm−3 Flexible, lightweight, low cost, no external cooling required [81] Macroporous P(VDF-TrFE)/NaY zeolite membranes with a filler content up to 32 wt% were introduced as a suitable platform to release ibuprofen [82]. The porous microstructure of the composite as illustrated in Fig. 8 is described by a liquid/liquid spinodal breakdown followed by polymer crystallization, and it has a significant impact on the membranes’ absorption capability. The ibuprofen was encapsulated inside the pores using a physical deposition process, and the NaY zeolite was immobilized on the surface of the pores of polymer P(VDF-TrFE) during the polymer crystallization process and solvent extraction. The polymer composite membranes with zeolite content of 16 and 32 wt% were used to monitor the release of ibuprofen, and both membranes exhibit good mechanical performance, with a large initial release followed by stabilization, and the membrane with a 32% NaY release has more than double the ibuprofen level of the one with 16%. The formation of such interconnected pores during liquid–liquid phase separation was previously reported for PVDF-TrFE by Ferreira et al. [83]. They explained it using the PVDF-TrFE/DMF phase diagram, which demonstrated the initial volume fraction at different temperatures. In spinodal liquid–liquid phase separation conditions (volume fraction and temperature), a homogeneous and well-organized porous structure forms with spherical interconnected pores and pore walls with adhered spherical polymer crystals. Such porous architecture has numerous applications, including filtration, drug delivery, scaffolds, etc., other than the piezoelectric nanogenerators.Fig. 8 SEM images of PVDF-TrFE and its composite with different zeolite contents (a–c). Porosity and pore size as a function of filler content (d) [83]. Copyright 2015. Reprinted with permission from Elsevier Phase separation in triboelectric nanogenerators The triboelectric effect is defined as contact-induced electrification through friction when a material becomes electrically charged after it is contacted with another different material [84]. Upon contact between two different materials, charges, electrons, ions or molecules, jump from one material to the other to equalize their electrochemical potential. When these materials separate, some of the bonded atoms tend to keep extra electrons; however, there is a tendency for some to give them away, which may produce a triboelectric charge on surfaces [85]. The ability to gain or lose electrons depends on the material’s polarity and the morphology of the surface. The sign of the charges carried by the materials depends only on their relative polarity in comparison with the material with which they are in contact. The triboelectric effect has been used for a long time for various applications, such as Van de Graaff generators invented in 1929 and the Wimshurst machine in 1880. These two machines use the accumulated static charges. Nowadays, the world is following the miniaturization trend, and TENGs are considered one of the advanced technologies for sustainable power generation and advanced applications like sensors, robotics, and artificial intelligence [86]. However, its performance depends on the surface charges created and different modifications, in addition to the mode of operation, indicating the need to explore more of this powerful technology. Phase separation modifies the surface features of polymer nanocomposites and improves triboelectric power generation. NIPS was used as a post-fabrication modification method for the thermoplastic EVOH nanofiber membranes by Yan et al. to maintain the nanostructure without changing its crystal form and to enhance the tribo-electronegativity [4]. When modification is done by the PTFE/PVDF mixture, PTFE has the strongest tendency to gain electrons, opening up the prospect of improving output performance. Figure 9 shows the surface morphologies of the fibers before and after modification, along with their output performances. Smooth, thin, and porous EVOH fibers give 4.3 V (Fig. 9b) and 1.7 μA (Fig. 9e) upon triboelectric test; however, PVDF secondary nanosheet formation on the EVOH improves the voltage. Respective output voltage and current of 104.5 V and 23.6 μA are produced by the PVDF double-layer coating (Fig. 9c, f) facilitated by NIPS. When PTFE is included in the coating, again by phase separation, the output voltage and current become 145.5 V (Fig. 9d) and 30.04 μA (Fig. 9g), respectively. This can be attributed to the porous structure and increased contact area within the PTFE due to the phase separation process.Fig. 9 a Schematic representation of the post-fabrication modification of PVDF and PTFE nanofiber surfaces and the corresponding FE-SEM images. b Voltage output and e short-circuit current for the smooth EVOH nanofiber membrane/Al foil triboelectric pair, c Voltage output and f short-circuit current by the triboelectrically coupled EVOH nanofiber membrane with two layers of PVDF and Al foil, d Voltage output and g short-circuit current by EVOH nanofiber membrane coated with two layers of PTFE/PVDF composite (PTFE: PVDF = 3:12) and Al foil [4]. Copyright 2019. Reprinted with permission from Elsevier When the PTFE/PVDF composite is coupled with the EVOH nanofiber as the triboelectric pair, respective voltage and current of 170.5 V (Fig. 10b) and 37.4 μA (Fig. 10c) are obtained. The mechanism represented in Fig. 10a shows the charge transfer happening in the two layers with a considerable difference in electron affinity. Upon pressing and subsequent release, a potential difference is created between the layers. According to Fig. 10d, the transferred charge generated is 53.7 nC, and further investigation is carried out by connecting the TENG with known resistors. With load, the output voltage increased (Fig. 10e), reaching a maximum instantaneous power density of 2.45 W/m2 (Fig. 10f) at 5 MΩ. The researchers could make a sequence of letters (lighted) “MSE” when the external loads were replaced by green LEDs and upon repeated finger tapping on TENGs [4]. The prototype of the power supply diagram is shown in Fig. 10g.Fig. 10 a Working principle of TENGs in one compression and release cycle. b Open-circuit voltage, c short-circuit current, and d corresponding transferred charges. Dependence of e output voltage and current and f instantaneous power density on different load resistances. g Prototype power-supply diagram by the TENG with a rectifier circuit [4]. Copyright 2019. Reprinted with permission from Elsevier Bui et al. created a convex-patterned PDMS film for a high-power TENG device using a PMMA mold by evaporation-induced phase separation [87]. Methanol and water were used in this work as the primary and secondary non-solvents in a quaternary solution, respectively. Controlled spinodal breakdown of the quaternary solution is credited as being the mechanism for the formation of the nanosponge PMMA, as shown in Fig. 11. THF has a higher evaporation rate than the combination of methanol and water, which causes an increment in the amount of non-solvent in the solution when the solution is exposed to air. Spinodal decomposition has then been divided into a polymer-rich phase and a non-solvent-rich phase as a result of the gradual enrichment of non-solvent. By aggregating polymers in the polymer-rich phase during phase separation, the polymer matrix can be created, whereas the non-solvent-rich phase develops holes when liquids evaporate. It should be emphasized that the method used to carry out the phase separation, wherein thermodynamic instability and precipitation kinetics are important considerations, determines the resultant porous structure [87]. As the highly porous nano-PMMA sponge generated inside the Cu-mesh holes is lower than the Cu-mesh surface, the strong metal mesh can effectively protect the nanosponge from external impact. The NP@Cu-mesh TENG’s modest drop in output voltage may, however, be due to a partial breakdown of the polymer film because PMMA fragments may have adhered to the PDMS surface, which would have reduced performance through screening [87].Fig. 11 Nanosponge surface morphologies prepared with various polymer concentrations (a–c). d–e The effect of NP@Cu-mesh hybrid porosity on the performance of nest-inspired TENGs [87]. Copyright 2020. Reprinted with permission from Elsevier Chen et al. combined the dynamic of hierarchical hydrogen bonding with phase separation-like structure to strengthen the fracture energy and toughness of poly(dimethyl siloxane) PDMS for high-performing TENGs. A typical conductive layer of hydrophilic polymer is sandwiched between the PDMS layers [87]. Due to the phase separation-like structure, the composite achieves great strength, toughness, and stretchability, in addition to triboelectric power generation. Furthermore, Choi et al. illustrated the phase separation of fluorine-rich surfaces based on the difference in their surface energy deprived of the toxic fluorine gas. This process helped to synthesize an extremely negative polymer material for its subsequent application in a TENG [88], as demonstrated in Fig. 12. A diminished edge effect is the cause of the large-scale TENG’s better power density. It is well known that as TENG device size increases, the edge impact of CS-mode TENGs decreases. These findings showed that the large-scale, toxic-gas-free synthesis of very negative triboelectric polymers is made possible by the phase separation of fluorine-rich polymers from sulfur polymer matrices at air interfaces [88]. An overview of the phase-separated TENGs reported so far in the literature is tabulated in Table 2.Fig. 12 Triboelectric performance of a corona-treated TENG based on a 7.5 wt% PPFS blend. a Open-circuit voltage and b closed-circuit current c Power density as a function of external load resistance; TENG of 12.5 cm2 size. d Open-circuit voltage and e Closed-circuit current and f Corona discharge power density g Illumination of 400 series-connected blue LEDs (3.3 V/ea), scale bar shows 2 cm and h Long-term voltage measurements from a large-scale TENG of 81.1 cm2 size after corona discharge on 7.5 wt% PPFS blend [39]. Copyright 2022. Reprinted with permission from Elsevier Table 2 Phase-separated composites for triboelectric applications Polymer Filler Phase separation Triboelectric voltage output (V) Output current Power density References PVDF EVOH nanofibers NIPS 145.5 30.04 μA 2.45 W/m2 [4] PPFS DIB TIPS 362.8 6.6 μA 259.7 mW/m2 [38] PLA GO NIPS 170 56 μA 3.25 mW/4cm2 [39] PVDF ZnSnO3 Phase inversion 520 2.7 mA 520 V/2.7 mA m2 [89] P-PDMS D-CNF Solvent evaporation induced 60.6 7.7 μA 2.33 W/m2 [36] Phase-separated composites for dual applications A few studies are also reported in which the developed nanogenerator shows dual performance. This means the nanogenerator works both on frequency-dependent mechanical vibration and through contact electrification. Such triboelectric/piezoelectric (TE/PE) nanogenerators, or TPNGs, demonstrate highly efficient collection and conversion of different types of mechanical energies, such as body movement. This can sometimes due to the thin-film structure of its active layers in both TENGs and PENGs, which permits easy integration into preferred configurations for specific applications [38]. Since PENGs require larger mechanical strain and TENGs need a high surface area, innovative structural designs are necessary to design a TPNG that can produce triboelectricity and piezoelectricity at once. Though these nanogenerators are distinguished by a direct energy superposition, they suffer from various disadvantages in functionalization, wearability, and output properties [39]. Huang et al. [38] created a TPNG using an environmentally friendly VIPS from graphene-reinforced PVDF using a self-matching approach. They used spider silk to increase the potential difference with PET/PVDF-graphene and make electron loss easier. Electrons in the specific protein molecular orbits of spider silk transfer to PET empty orbits, proportionally depending on the difference in potential well depths of the two materials. At the same time, the PVDF can change the surface electron potential of contact materials upon mechanical vibration. Figure 13 schematically illustrates the VIPS process for obtaining the nanogenerator. The method is safe, energy-saving, and pollutant-free and is applied to spin-coated PET/PVDF layers. During this process, the PVDF polarizes in the direction from the substrate to humid air (the gray line), and the 0.25 wt% graphene introduced influences the external voltage.Fig. 13 Schematic representation of TPNG model of VIPS PVDF (gray dashed box) and regenerated spider silk protein (blue dashed box) [38]. Copyright 2020. Reprinted with permission from Wiley Figure 14 further explains the voltage-generating mechanism of the PE/TE NG. Out of the various crystalline phases of PVDF: trans-gauche–trans-gauche (TGTG′) α-phase, all-trans (TTT) planar zigzag β-phase and T3GT3G′ γ-phase, the latter two are mainly contributing to piezoelectricity, and a proper optimization (Fig. 14a) generates better functioning of PET. The advantage of VIPS in enhancing the β/γ phase is clear from the FTIR spectra provided in Fig. 14b. The influence of graphene and VIPS on polarizing PVDF is also clear from the XRD provided in the same figure. With 0.25 wt% of graphene, the crystalline β-phase became the highest (82%), and the α-phase became the least (4–5%) (Fig. 14c). As expected, the VIPS produces porous nodular, bi-phase, and cellular morphologies along with the dense pore-less ball structure (Fig. 14d) corresponding to the ternary phase diagram for PVDF/DMF/water (Fig. 14e). The higher the porosity, the larger the compressibility, deformation at identical pressure, and the mechanical energy transformation (Fig. 14f).Fig. 14 a 3D model of various PVDF configurations and their effect on PET surface potential differences. (Color depth corresponds to PET modified intensity.). b FTIR spectra (1) and XRD results (2) for raw powder (black curve), natural-evaporated PVDF membranes (red curve), phase-separated PVDF film (blue curve), and graphene doped PVDF film (pink curve). c Deconvoluted XRD; phase contents with different graphene doping ratios d SEM images of phase-separated PVDF film morphologies (I: nodular; II: bi-phases; III: cellular; and IV: dense structures). e Isothermal ternary phase diagram of PVDF/DMF/H2O f porosity of I-IV structures and the voltage signals associated [38]. Copyright 2020. Reprinted with permission from Wiley Using the NIPS method, Chung et al. [90] created a TPNG with a triangulated cylinder origami-based structure, as represented in Fig. 15. The triangulated cylindrical structure consists of a vertical contact separation TENG on its surface, a rotational TENG on the top substrate, and a PENG on the inner hinge. Figure 15a shows the device connected to a rectifier circuit and the corresponding output voltage (120 V) and current (90 μA). With 6 HZ of vibration, the nanogenerator charged a 22 μF commercial capacitor, powered 60 LEDs, and continuously worked for 48 h. In addition to the power harvesting devices, the TPNGs with high-voltage output and exceptional mechanical flexibility work for a variety of implantable devices, such as monitoring heart, chest, stomach, and bladder signals and detecting stresses brought on by arm, hand, knee, and foot activity [13].Fig. 15 a The rectifier circuit connected to the vertical TENG, rotational TENG, and PENG generator. b Open-circuit voltage and c closed-circuit current output. d In a single compression, the nanogenerator charged a 22 F capacitor and powers 60 LEDs [90]. Reprinted with creative common license This review ends with the discussion of a very recent study by Lee et al. [91] for generating porous PVDF structures by VIPS. The mass fraction, vapor temperature, and exposure time are optimized to achieve ultrathin porous morphology with the least nanoparticle (methylammonium lead tribromide single crystals, or MAPbBr3 SCs) aggregation. Through charge creation and accumulation, the PVDF NCs film employed in the HNG effectively harvests energy, as shown in Fig. 16. The very high tribo/piezoelectric coupling efficiency caused by the presence of the MAPbBr3 SCs in the porous PVDF is clearly demonstrated by the output voltage comparison. When compared, the hybrid NG facilitated 256 V, almost 3.87 times higher than the PENG. In addition, the power density of the hybrid NG (16.17 mW/cm2) was 200 times higher at a load of 10 MΩ. However, the MAPbBr3 SCs were used in 25 wt%, which was higher for a composite, than expected.Fig. 16 MAPbBr3 SCs-PVDF-based a PENG and b hybrid nanogenerator and the corresponding output voltages with 14, 25, 33 wt% MAPbBr3 c comparison of voltages d Expanded views of the PENG and hybrid generator output voltage waveforms based on 25 wt% MAPbBr3 during one cycle. e PENG and f hybrid generator output voltages and current densities. g Power density comparison as a function of external load resistance. h Commercial blue LEDs lit with electrical energy generated by a PENG (left) and HNG (right) [91]. Copyright 2022. Reprinted with permission from Elsevier Studies prove the high performance of hybrid nanogenerators by combining the TENG and PENG for powering numerous devices. The biomedical, sensing, and robotics applications [92, 93] of such hybrid nanogenerators need further studies and developments, which are mentioned in the following section. Conclusions and future prospects The current study comprehensively reviews the type and mechanism of phase separation processes in polymers and their influence on power generation. Piezoelectric and triboelectric nanogenerators are analyzed for their structural and morphological appearance, polarization behavior, conditions of phase separation, and nature of reinforcement. Phase separation improves the amount of electroactive phases in typical polymers and precisely filters the phase ratios responsible for the piezoelectric mechanism. It also controls the interfacial interactions and maintains high-level porosity for charge distribution, transfer, and electrification. The positive and negative charge centers in the material separate upon a given mechanical stress for a PENG and a frictional sliding force for the TENG to develop a potential difference in the functional layers. This property is further enhanced by the presence of reinforcements or nanoparticles of high electron mobility, good compatibility with the polymer, a wide bandgap, stronger electromechanical coupling, a large aspect ratio, and good dispersibility. Such phase-separated nanocomposites self-polarize and present outstanding output voltages. Developed composites and devices find numerous applications by integrating into wearable and implantable sensors for self-powered gesture detectors, in vivo cardiac monitors, artificial muscles, e-skins, and soft robotics. The superior performance of the PENGs, TENGs, and hybrid nanogenerators provides green and human-friendly approach to scavenging energy from the environment in the current and future Internet of things (IoT) era. The unique structure allows interlayer potential accumulation and rapid stress release for ultrafast response time, excellent sensitivity, durability, and mechanical stability. Piezoelectronic and triboelectronic wearable sensors are used for human motion monitoring, physiological signal monitoring, and personalized health monitoring in bionic robotics and biomedicine. For all these applications, phase separation ensures lightweight, high flexibility, and high-voltage electrical properties. Figure 17 summarizes the advantages of phase separation and the futuristic applications related to this topic.Fig. 17 Summary of phase separation and the current/upcoming applications using phase-separated composites Despite the significant application potential of PENG, TENG, and the hybrid varieties of nanogenerators, a few challenges exist both in the nanogenerator functionalities and in the phase separation process for development, which in fact hinder the commercial scale-up of the products.The phase-separated functional layer formation needs optimization for numerous conditions. Depending on the nature of phase separation, the composition of the solvent, temperature of processing, vapor exposure, time required, thickness of coating, etc., need accurate optimization. This can make the prerequisites lengthy. PENG functionality typically depends on the dipole alignment happening in the molecular structure, which is often done by poling or electrospinning. However, for the phase separation process, this happens through the polarization of phases. This leaves the risk of non-uniformities in the dipole alignment, which can decrease the output performance. Phase separation leaves porous structures that sometimes cause connecting channels for electron transfer. Depending on the particles used for reinforcement, the composite layers can form interconnected conducting networks, which is not feasible for the nanogenerator’s performance. Durability issues can occur due to repeated mechanical vibrations, ultra sound, and the contact electrification process. The chances are enhanced for porous, thin, and mechanically unstable phase-separated structures. It is highly desirable to strengthen the individual layers through additional reinforcement strategies. Crystallinity, thermal and mechanical properties, and structural significance of the composites are often addressed when studying the PENGs and TENGs. In addition to these physical properties, it is desirable to explore chemical functionalities that could be helpful in designing multi-functional applications. A sustainable future depends on artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and robotics, and the PE and TE NGs are very optimistic about smart society 5.0. Therefore, theoretical studies and simulation (molecular dynamics, density functional theory, etc.) research are highly required for advanced applications. While the TE/PE nanogenerators are developing, there is still plenty of scope for plenty of research and development, which could possibly lead to advanced and multi-functional soft materials. It can be envisioned that these materials will find exciting applications in a sustainable future society. Author contributions All authors significantly contributed to the study concept of the review. The first draft of the article was written by SY and EK. The design of the article and subsequent revisions were done by DP. Funding This work was supported by the Qatar University Internal Grant under QUCG-CAS-23/24-238. The statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the authors. Declarations Competing interests The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. ==== Refs References 1. Ding W Wang AC Wu C Guo H Wang ZL Human–machine interfacing enabled by triboelectric nanogenerators and tribotronics Adv Mater Technol 2019 4 1 1800487 10.1002/admt.201800487 2. Pu X An S Tang Q Guo H Hu C Wearable triboelectric sensors for biomedical monitoring and human–machine interface iScience 2021 24 1 102027 10.1016/j.isci.2020.102027 33521595 3. Heo JS Eom J Kim YH Park SK Recent progress of textile-based wearable electronics: a comprehensive review of materials, devices, and applications Small 2018 14 3 1703034 10.1002/smll.201703034 4. Yan S Song W Lu J Wang J Zheng Y Xiao R Post-fabrication modifications of thermoplastic polymeric nanofiber membranes with electroactive polymers for triboelectric nanogenerators Nano Energy 2019 59 697 704 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.03.021 5. Lymberis A Research and development of smart wearable health applications: the challenge ahead Stud Health Technol Inform 2004 108 155 161 15718642 6. Viseu A Social dimensions of wearable computers: an overview Technoetic Arts 2003 1 1 77 82 10.1386/tear.1.1.77/0 7. Meoli D May-Plumlee T Interactive electronic textile development J Text Appar Technol Mangag 2002 2 2 12 8. Xiong J Cui P Chen X Wang J Parida K Lin MF Lee PS Skin-touch-actuated textile-based triboelectric nanogenerator with black phosphorus for durable biomechanical energy harvesting Nat Commun 2018 9 1 4280 10.1038/s41467-018-06759-0 30323200 9. Zhang L Gui J Wu Z Li R Wang Y Gong Z Zhao X Sun C Guo S Enhanced performance of piezoelectric nanogenerator based on aligned nanofibers and three-dimensional interdigital electrodes Nano Energy 2019 65 103924 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.103924 10. Li J Zhao C Xia K Liu X Li D Han J Enhanced piezoelectric output of the PVDF-TrFE/ZnO flexible piezoelectric nanogenerator by surface modification Appl Surf Sci 2019 463 626 634 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.266 11. Janas VF Safari A Overview of fine-scale piezoelectric ceramic/polymer composite processing J Am Ceram Soc 1995 78 11 2945 2955 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb09068.x 12. Parangusan H Ponnamma D AlMaadeed MA Investigation on the effect of γ-irradiation on the dielectric and piezoelectric properties of stretchable PVDF/Fe–ZnO nanocomposites for self-powering devices Soft Matter 2018 14 43 8803 8813 10.1039/C8SM01655K 30345447 13. Ponnamma D Parangusan H Tanvir A AlMa’adeed MA Smart and robust electrospun fabrics of piezoelectric polymer nanocomposite for self-powering electronic textiles Mater Des 2019 184 108176 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108176 14. Ponnamma D Al-Maadeed MA Influence of BaTiO3/white graphene filler synergy on the energy harvesting performance of a piezoelectric polymer nanocomposite Sustain Energy Fuels 2019 3 3 774 785 10.1039/C8SE00519B 15. Ponnamma D Erturk A Parangusan H Deshmukh K Ahamed MB Al-Maadeed MA Stretchable quaternary phasic PVDF-HFP nanocomposite films containing graphene-titania-SrTiO3 for mechanical energy harvesting Emerg Mater 2018 1 1 55 65 10.1007/s42247-018-0007-z 16. Lee TI Lee S Lee E Sohn S Lee Y Lee S Moon G Kim D Kim YS Myoung JM Wang ZL High-power density piezoelectric energy harvesting using radially strained ultrathin trigonal tellurium nanowire assembly Adv Mater 2013 25 21 2920 2925 10.1002/adma.201300657 23616287 17. Qiao Y Islam MdS Wang L Yan Y Zhang J Benicewicz BC Ploehn HJ Tang C Thiophene polymer-grafted barium titanate nanoparticles toward nanodielectric composites Chem Mater 2014 26 18 5319 5326 10.1021/cm502341n 18. Bouharras FE Raihane M Silly G Totee C Ameduri B Core–shell structured poly(vinylidene fluoride)-grafted-BaTiO3 nanocomposites prepared via reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization of VDF for high energy storage capacitors Polym Chem 2019 10 7 891 904 10.1039/C8PY01706A 19. Mishra S Unnikrishnan L Nayak SK Mohanty S Advances in piezoelectric polymer composites for energy harvesting applications: a systematic review Macromol Mater Eng 2019 304 1 1800463 10.1002/mame.201800463 20. Issa AA Al-Maadeed MA Luyt AS Ponnamma D Hassan MK Physico-mechanical, dielectric, and piezoelectric properties of PVDF electrospun mats containing silver nanoparticles C 2017 3 4 30 21. AlAhzm AM Alejli MO Ponnamma D Elgawady Y Al-Maadeed MAA Piezoelectric properties of zinc oxide/iron oxide filled polyvinylidene fluoride nanocomposite fibers J Mater Sci Mater Electron 2021 32 11 14610 14622 10.1007/s10854-021-06020-3 22. Bhadra J Ponnamma D Alkareem A Parangusan H Ahmad Z Al-Thani N Daifalla AKE Al-Sanari NA Mohamed R Development of a piezoelectric nanogenerator based on mesoporous silica/zinc oxide hybrid nanocomposite fibres Int J Energy Res 2022 46 6 8503 8515 10.1002/er.7734 23. Ponnamma D Aljarod O Parangusan H Al-Maadeed MAA Reduction in piezoelectric voltage generation for the cerium doped nickel ferrite nanoparticles filled PVDF-HFP nanocomposites Results Phys 2019 13 102130 10.1016/j.rinp.2019.02.066 24. Parangusan H Ponnamma D Al-Maadeed MAA Stretchable electrospun PVDF-HFP/Co-ZnO nanofibers as piezoelectric nanogenerators Sci Rep 2018 8 1 754 10.1038/s41598-017-19082-3 29335498 25. Parangusan H Ponnamma D AlMaadeed MAA Flexible tri-layer piezoelectric nanogenerator based on PVDF-HFP/Ni-doped ZnO nanocomposites RSC Adv 2017 7 79 50156 50165 10.1039/C7RA10223B 26. Choi JH Ra Y Cho S La M Park SJ Choi D Electrical charge storage effect in carbon based polymer composite for long-term performance enhancement of the triboelectric nanogenerator Compos Sci Technol 2021 207 108680 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108680 27. Cao VA Lee S Kim M Alam MM Park P Nah J Output power density enhancement of triboelectric nanogenerators via ferroelectric polymer composite interfacial layers Nano Energy 2020 67 104300 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104300 28. Walden R Aazem I Babu A Pillai SC Textile-triboelectric nanogenerators (T-TENGs) for wearable energy harvesting devices Chem Eng J 2023 1 451 138741 10.1016/j.cej.2022.138741 29. Zhong W Xu L Wang H An J Wang ZL Tilting-sensitive triboelectric nanogenerators for energy harvesting from unstable/fluctuating surfaces Adv Func Mater 2019 29 45 1905319 10.1002/adfm.201905319 30. Lin Z Zhang B Guo H Wu Z Zou H Yang J Wang ZL Super-robust and frequency-multiplied triboelectric nanogenerator for efficient harvesting water and wind energy Nano Energy 2019 64 103908 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.103908 31. An J Wang ZM Jiang T Liang X Wang ZL Whirling-folded triboelectric nanogenerator with high average power for water wave energy harvesting Adv Func Mater 2019 29 39 1904867 10.1002/adfm.201904867 32. Zou Y Tan P Shi B Ouyang H Jiang D Liu Z Li H Yu M Wang C Qu X Zhao L Fan Y Wang ZL Li Z A Bionic stretchable nanogenerator for underwater sensing and energy harvesting Nat Commun 2019 10 1 2695 10.1038/s41467-019-10433-4 31217422 33. Xu L Jiang T Lin P Shao JJ He C Zhong W Chen XY Wang ZL Coupled triboelectric nanogenerator networks for efficient water wave energy harvesting ACS Nano 2018 12 2 1849 1858 10.1021/acsnano.7b08674 29328629 34. Huang T Yang S He P Sun J Zhang S Li D Meng Y Zhou J Tang H Liang J Ding G Xie X Phase-separation-induced pvdf/graphene coating on fabrics toward flexible piezoelectric sensors ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2018 10 36 30732 30740 10.1021/acsami.8b10552 30124290 35. Abolhasani MM Naebe M Shirvanimoghaddam K Fashandi H Khayyam H Joordens M Pipertzis A Anwar S Berger R Floudas G Michels J Asadi K Thermodynamic approach to tailor porosity in piezoelectric polymer fibers for application in nanogenerators Nano Energy 2019 62 594 600 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.05.044 36. Li H Lian W Cheng T Zhang W Lu B Tan K Liu C Shen C Highly tunable piezoelectricity of flexible nanogenerators based on 3D porously architectured membranes for versatile energy harvesting and self-powered multistimulus sensing ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2021 9 50 17128 17141 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c06374 37. Cho Y Jeong J Choi M Baek G Park S Choi H Ahn S Cha S Kim T Kang D-S Bae J Park J-J BaTiO3@PVDF-TrFE nanocomposites with efficient orientation prepared via phase separation nano-coating method for piezoelectric performance improvement and application to 3D-PENG Chem Eng J 2022 427 131030 10.1016/j.cej.2021.131030 38. Huang T Zhang Y He P Wang G Xia X Ding G Tao TH “Self-matched” tribo/piezoelectric nanogenerators using vapor-induced phase-separated poly(vinylidene fluoride) and recombinant spider silk Adv Mater 2020 32 10 1907336 10.1002/adma.201907336 39. Choi J Won S Yoon HJ Lee JH Jang HW Jeon J Kim AY Park SH Youk JH Lee M Wie JJ Toxic gas-free synthesis of extremely negative triboelectric sulfur copolymer blends via phase separation of fluorine-rich polymers Nano Energy 2022 92 106761 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106761 40. Le TH Mai UKG Huynh DP Nguyen HT Luu AT Bui V-T Surfactant-free GO-PLA nanocomposite with honeycomb patterned surface for high power antagonistic bio-triboelectric nanogenerator J Sci Adv Mater Dev 2022 7 1 100392 41. Soleymani H Noormohammadi M Kashi MA Amiri MH Michels JJ Asadi K Abolhasani MM Self-poled sausage-like PVDF nanowires produced by confined phase inversion as novel piezoelectric nanogenerators Adv Mater Interfaces 2021 8 5 2001734 10.1002/admi.202001734 42. Cardoso VF Botelho G Lanceros-Méndez S Nonsolvent induced phase separation preparation of poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-chlorotrifluoroethylene) membranes with tailored morphology, piezoelectric phase content and mechanical properties Mater Des 2015 25 88 390 397 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.018 43. Kalimuldina G Turdakyn N Abay I Medeubayev A Nurpeissova A Adair D Bakenov Z A review of piezoelectric PVDF film by electrospinning and its applications Sensors 2020 20 18 5214 10.3390/s20185214 32932744 44. Li M Katsouras I Piliego C Glasser G Lieberwirth I Blom PW de Leeuw DM Controlling the microstructure of poly(vinylidene-fluoride) (PVDF) thin films for microelectronics J Mater Chem C 2013 1 46 7695 7702 10.1039/c3tc31774a 45. Seo M Hillmyer MA Reticulated nanoporous polymers by controlled polymerization-induced microphase separation Science 2012 336 6087 1422 1425 10.1126/science.1221383 22700925 46. Li D Krantz WB Greenberg AR Sani RL Membrane formation via thermally induced phase separation (TIPS): model development and validation J Membr Sci 2006 279 1 50 60 47. Kim JF Kim JH Lee YM Drioli E Thermally induced phase separation and electrospinning methods for emerging membrane applications: a review AIChE J 2016 62 2 461 490 10.1002/aic.15076 48. Lloyd DR Kinzer KE Tseng HS Microporous membrane formation via thermally induced phase separation. I. Solid–liquid phase separation J Membr Sci 1990 52 3 239 261 10.1016/S0376-7388(00)85130-3 49. Kim JF Jung JT Wang HH Lee SY Moore T Sanguineti A Drioli E Lee YM Microporous PVDF membranes via thermally induced phase separation (TIPS) and stretching methods J Membr Sci 2016 509 94 104 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.02.050 50. Lifshitz IM Slyozov VV The kinetics of precipitation from supersaturated solid solutions J Phys Chem Solids 1961 19 1 35 50 10.1016/0022-3697(61)90054-3 51. Cahn JW Phase separation by spinodal decomposition in isotropic systems J Chem Phys 1965 42 1 93 99 10.1063/1.1695731 52. Zhao Q Xie R Luo F Faraj Y Liu Z Ju X-J Wang W Chu L-Y Preparation of high strength poly(vinylidene fluoride) porous membranes with cellular structure via vapor-induced phase separation J Membr Sci 2018 549 151 164 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.10.068 53. Young T-H Cheng L-P Lin D-J Fane L Chuang W-Y Mechanisms of PVDF membrane formation by immersion-precipitation in soft (1-octanol) and harsh (water) nonsolvents Polymer 1999 40 19 5315 5323 10.1016/S0032-3861(98)00747-2 54. Nephew JB Nihei TC Carter SA Reaction-induced phase separation dynamics: a polymer in a liquid crystal solvent Phys Rev Lett 1998 80 15 3276 3279 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3276 55. Srinivasarao M Collings D Philips A Patel S Three-dimensionally ordered array of air bubbles in a polymer film Science 2001 292 5514 79 83 10.1126/science.1057887 11292866 56. Kim JY Cho CH Palffy-Muhoray P Kyu T Polymerization-induced phase separation in a liquid-crystal-polymer mixture Phys Rev Lett 1993 71 14 2232 2235 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.2232 10054621 57. Amundson K van Blaaderen A Wiltzius P Morphology and electro-optic properties of polymer-dispersed liquid-crystal films Phys Rev E 1997 55 2 1646 1654 10.1103/PhysRevE.55.1646 58. Nwabunma D Chiu H-W Kyu T Theoretical investigation on dynamics of photopolymerization-induced phase separation and morphology development in nematic liquid crystal/polymer mixtures J Chem Phys 2000 113 15 6429 6436 10.1063/1.1309537 59. Tran-Cong-Miyata Q Nakanishi H Phase separation of polymer mixtures driven by photochemical reactions: current status and perspectives Polym Int 2017 66 2 213 222 10.1002/pi.5243 60. Tran-Cong-Miyata Q Nishigami S Ito T Komatsu S Norisuye T Controlling the morphology of polymer blends using periodic irradiation Nature Mater 2004 3 7 448 451 10.1038/nmat1150 15184893 61. Karim A Slawecki TM Kumar SK Douglas JF Satija SK Han CC Russell TP Liu Y Overney R Sokolov J Rafailovich MH Phase-separation-induced surface patterns in thin polymer blend films Macromolecules 1998 31 3 857 862 10.1021/ma970687g 62. Boots HMJ Kloosterboer JG Serbutoviez C Touwslager FJ Polymerization-induced phase separation. 1. Conversion-phase diagrams Macromolecules 1996 29 24 7683 7689 10.1021/ma960292h 63. Borrajo J Riccardi CC Williams RJJ Siddiqi HM Dumon M Pascault JP Thermodynamic analysis of reaction-induced phase separation in epoxy-based polymer dispersed liquid crystals (PDLC) Polymer 1998 39 4 845 853 10.1016/S0032-3861(97)00276-0 64. Bera B Sarkar MD Piezoelectricity in PVDF and PVDF based piezoelectric nanogenerator: a concept IOSR J Appl Phys 2017 9 3 95 99 10.9790/4861-0903019599 65. Jella V Ippili S Eom J-H Choi J Yoon S-G Enhanced output performance of a flexible piezoelectric energy harvester based on stable MAPbI3-PVDF composite films Nano Energy 2018 53 46 56 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.08.033 66. Ye S Cheng C Chen X Chen X Shao J Zhang J Hu H Tian H Li X Ma L Jia W High-performance piezoelectric nanogenerator based on microstructured P(VDF-TrFE)/BNNTs composite for energy harvesting and radiation protection in space Nano Energy 2019 60 701 714 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.03.096 67. Zhu W Khan AA Rana MM Gautheron-Bernard R Tanguy NR Yan N Turban P Ababou-Girard S Ban D Poly(vinylidene fluoride)-stabilized black γ-phase CsPbI3 perovskite for high-performance piezoelectric nanogenerators ACS Omega 2022 7 12 10559 10567 10.1021/acsomega.2c00091 35382301 68. Zhu J Huang X Song W Physical and chemical sensors on the basis of laser-induced graphene: mechanisms, applications, and perspectives ACS Nano 2021 15 12 18708 18741 10.1021/acsnano.1c05806 34881870 69. He Z Rault F Lewandowski M Mohsenzadeh E Salaün F Electrospun PVDF nanofibers for piezoelectric applications: a review of the influence of electrospinning parameters on the β phase and crystallinity enhancement Polymers 2021 13 2 174 10.3390/polym13020174 33418962 70. Mishra HK Gupta V Roy K Babu A Kumar A Mandal D Revisiting of Δ−PVDF nanoparticles via phase separation with giant piezoelectric response for the realization of self-powered biomedical sensors Nano Energy 2022 95 107052 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107052 71. Karan SK Bera R Paria S Das AK Maiti S Maitra A Khatua BB An approach to design highly durable piezoelectric nanogenerator based on self-poled PVDF/AlO-RGO flexible nanocomposite with high power density and energy conversion efficiency Adv Energy Mater 2016 6 20 1601016 10.1002/aenm.201601016 72. Gong T Li T Meng L Chen Y Wu T Zhou J Lu G Wang Z Fabrication of piezoelectric Ca–P–Si-doped PVDF scaffold by phase-separation-hydration: material characterization, in vitro biocompatibility and osteoblast redifferentiation Ceram Int 2022 48 5 6461 6469 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.11.190 73. Abzan N Kharaziha M Labbaf S Development of three-dimensional piezoelectric polyvinylidene fluoride-graphene oxide scaffold by non-solvent induced phase separation method for nerve tissue engineering Mater Des 2019 167 107636 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107636 74. Karan SK Mandal D Khatua BB Self-powered flexible Fe-doped RGO/PVDF nanocomposite: an excellent material for a piezoelectric energy harvester Nanoscale 2015 7 24 10655 10666 10.1039/C5NR02067K 26030744 75. Teka A Bairagi S Shahadat M Joshi M Ziauddin Ahammad SK Wazed Ali S Poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF)/potassium sodium niobate (KNN)–based nanofibrous web: a unique nanogenerator for renewable energy harvesting and investigating the role of KNN nanostructures Polym Adv Technol 2018 29 9 2537 2544 10.1002/pat.4365 76. Zhang Y Ma Z Zhang Y Li B Feng M Zhao Y An Q Biofriendly molecular and protein release substrate with integrated piezoelectric motivation and anti-oxidative stress capabilities Nanoscale 2021 13 18 8481 8489 10.1039/D1NR01676H 33908572 77. Ünsal ÖF Altın Y Çelik Bedeloğlu A Poly(vinylidene fluoride) nanofiber-based piezoelectric nanogenerators using reduced graphene oxide/polyaniline J Appl Polym Sci 2020 137 13 48517 10.1002/app.48517 78. Abolhasani MM Shirvanimoghaddam K Naebe M PVDF/graphene composite nanofibers with enhanced piezoelectric performance for development of robust nanogenerators Compos Sci Technol 2017 138 49 56 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.11.017 79. CdS decorated rGO containing PVDF electrospun fiber based piezoelectric nanogenerator for mechanical energy harvesting application: AIP conference proceedings: vol 1942, No 1. 10.1063/1.5028756. Accessed 10 Oct 2022. 80. Fu Y Cheng Y Chen C Li D Zhang W Study on preparation process and enhanced piezoelectric performance of pine-needle-like ZnO@ PVDF composite nanofibers Polym Test 2022 108 107513 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107513 81. Pusty M Sinha L Shirage PM A flexible self-poled piezoelectric nanogenerator based on a RGO–Ag/PVDF nanocomposite New J Chem 2019 43 1 284 294 10.1039/C8NJ04751K 82. Ferreira A Silva J Sencadas V Ribelles JLG Lanceros-Méndez S Poly[(vinylidene fluoride)-co-trifluoroethylene] membranes obtained by isothermal crystallization from solution Macromol Mater Eng 2010 295 6 523 528 10.1002/mame.201000020 83. Salazar H Lima AC Lopes AC Botelho G Lanceros-Mendez S Poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene)/NAY zeolite hybrid membranes as a drug release platform applied to ibuprofen release Colloids Surf A 2015 469 93 99 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.12.064 84. Wang ZL Lin L Chen J Niu S Zi Y Wang ZL Lin L Chen J Niu S Zi Y Triboelectric nanogenerator: single-electrode mode Triboelectric nanogenerators. Green energy and technology 2016 Cham Springer 91 107 85. Wang N Liu Y Ye E Li Z Wang D Control methods and applications of interface contact electrification of triboelectric nanogenerators: a review Mater Res Lett 2022 10 3 97 123 10.1080/21663831.2022.2026513 86. Luo J Wang Z Xu L Wang AC Han K Jiang T Lai Q Bai Y Tang W Fan FR Wang ZL Flexible and durable wood-based triboelectric nanogenerators for self-powered sensing in athletic big data analytics Nat Commun 2019 10 1 5147 10.1038/s41467-019-13166-6 31772189 87. Bui V-T Oh J-H Kim J-N Zhou Q Huynh DP Oh I-K Nest-inspired nanosponge-Cu woven mesh hybrid for ultrastable and high-power triboelectric nanogenerator Nano Energy 2020 71 104561 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104561 88. Chen H Koh JJ Liu M Li P Fan X Liu S Yeo JC Tan Y Tee BC He C Super tough and self-healable poly(dimethylsiloxane) elastomer via hydrogen bonding association and its applications as triboelectric nanogenerators ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2020 12 28 31975 31983 10.1021/acsami.0c08213 32536151 89. Soin N Zhao P Prashanthi K Chen J Ding P Zhou E Shah T Ray SC Tsonos C Thundat T High performance triboelectric nanogenerators based on phase-inversion piezoelectric membranes of poly(vinylidene fluoride)-zinc stannate (PVDF-ZnSnO3) and polyamide-6 (PA6) Nano Energy 2016 30 470 480 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.10.040 90. Chung J Song M Chung SH Choi W Lee S Lin ZH Hong J Lee S Triangulated cylinder origami-based piezoelectric/triboelectric hybrid generator to harvest coupled axial and rotational motion Research 2021 2021 1 9 10.34133/2021/7248579 91. Lee YH Kim DH Kim Y Shabbir I Li M Yoo KH Kim TW Significant enhancement of the output voltage of piezoelectric/triboelectric hybrid nanogenerators based on MAPbBr 3 single crystals embedded into a porous PVDF matrix Nano Energy 2022 102 107676 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107676 92. Bui VT Huynh ND Chau NM Kim W Kim H Oh IK Choi D High-temperature operatable triboelectric nanogenerator using microdome-patterned polyimide for self-powered sensors Nano Energy 2022 1 101 107612 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107612 93. Bui VT Chau NM Huynh DP Huynh ND Choi D Nhat DH Honeycomb-patterned polyimide-based triboelectric nanogenerator with excellent thermal stability and enhanced electrification performance ACS Appl Energy Mater 2022 5 8 9791 9800 10.1021/acsaem.2c01469