==== Front J Cancer Res Clin Oncol J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 0171-5216 1432-1335 Springer Berlin Heidelberg Berlin/Heidelberg 35932301 4233 10.1007/s00432-022-04233-5 Research How can counselling by family physicians on nutrition and physical activity be improved: trends from a survey in Germany Boesenecker S. J. sebastian.boesenecker@uni-jena.de 1 Mathies V. 2 Buentzel J. 3 Huebner J. 1 1 grid.275559.9 0000 0000 8517 6224 Clinic for Internal Medicine II, University Hospital, Bachstraße 18, 07743 Jena, Germany 2 grid.275559.9 0000 0000 8517 6224 University Tumor Center, University Hospital, Jena, Germany 3 Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology, Head Neck Surgery, Suedharz Klinikum, Nordhausen, Germany 6 8 2022 6 8 2022 2023 149 7 33353347 11 6 2022 19 7 2022 © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Purpose Cancer and its therapy causes severe symptoms, most of which are amendable to nutrition and physical activity (PA). Counselling on nutrition and PA empowers patients to take part more actively in their treatment. Many cancer patients are yet in need of information on these topics. In this study, we investigate the perception of family physicians (FP) on nutrition and PA in cancer patient care and assess barriers and steps to improve their involvement in counselling on these topics. Methods Based on qualitative content analysis of 5 semi-structured interviews with FP, a questionnaire was developed and completed by 61 German FP. Results Most of the FP acknowledged the importance of nutrition and PA during (91.4%) and after (100%) cancer therapy. While many participants were involved in cancer patient care, 65.6% of FP viewed themselves as primary reference person to address these topics. However, a third (32.8%) of FP were unfamiliar with information thereof. Some were unsatisfied regarding timely updates on their patient’s treatment course via discharge letters (25.0%) or phone calls (36.2%). FP would like to dedicate more consultation time addressing nutrition and PA than they currently do (p < 0.001). Conclusion Communication btween healthcare practitioners about mutual cancer patient’s treatment must be improved, e.g. utilising electronic communication to quicken correspondence. Acquisition of information on nutrition and PA in cancer patient care needs to be facilitated for FP, approachable by compiling reliable information and their sources. Involvement of FP in structured treatment programs could benefit cancer patient care. Trial registration number (May 7, 2021): 2021–2149-Bef. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-022-04233-5. Keywords Qualitative research Family practice Oncology Access to information Healthy lifestyle Universitätsklinikum Jena (8979)Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. issue-copyright-statement© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023 ==== Body pmcIntroduction For most people, a cancer diagnosis is an incisive life event. Not only does cancer pose a mortal threat, but also its treatment can cause psychological, social, and physical effects impairing quality of life (QoL) and subjective wellbeing (Artherholt and Fann 2012; Brown et al. 2012; Ferlay et al. 2015; Leduc et al. 2017; Lewandowska et al. 2020). Various cancer- and treatment-related symptoms affect the patient’s nutritional and physical status (Bower et al. 2009; Garabige et al. 2007; Lee et al. 2016; Martin et al. 2008). In this regard, malnutrition is reported to occur in up to 80% of cancer patients (Lim et al. 2012; Montoya et al. 2010; Wie et al. 2010). In turn, malnutrition leads to adverse consequences such as a poor survival, reduced functional status, and reduced QoL (Capuano et al. 2010; Datema et al. 2011; Jager-Wittenaar et al. 2011; Mouri et al. 2018; Norman et al. 2010; Pressoir et al. 2010) Similarly, weight loss commonly occurs in cancer patients and increases mortality while reducing QoL (Antoun et al. 2010; Argiles et al. 2014; Awad et al. 2012; Kimura et al. 2015). Additionally, more than 50% of cancer patients report symptoms which impact their nutrition, such as appetite, early satiety, dysphagia, xerostomia, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea (Deftereos et al. 2021; Trajkovic-Vidakovic et al. 2012). Further restraints include a reduced physical functioning, exercise intolerance, dyspnoea, and fatigue (Maddocks 2020; Trajkovic-Vidakovic et al. 2012). It has been shown that most of these symptoms among many others are amendable to supportive nutritional and physical activity (PA) interventions, which includes prescription of nutrients and exercise, but also counselling on these topics (Arends et al. 2017; Avancini et al. 2020; Brown et al. 2012, 2009; Bye et al. 2020; Cormie et al. 2017; Edvardsen et al. 2015; Hilfiker et al. 2018; Lee et al. 2016; Maddocks 2020; McTiernan et al. 2019; Mouri et al. 2018; Sarwer et al. 2009; Scott & Tharmalingam 2019; Uster et al. 2018). Since nutrition and PA are modifiable by the patient, they allow cancer patients to take part more actively in their cancer treatment. Many patients are motivated to do so, e.g. by searching for information or participating in exercise programs (Keinki et al. 2016; Maddocks et al. 2009; Maschke et al. 2017; van Veen et al. 2015). Various healthcare practitioners (HCP) participate in counselling and promoting nutrition and PA in cancer patients, such as oncologists, family physicians (FP) and other physicians, nurses, dietitians, and physical therapists (Dean et al. 2019; Halilova et al. 2019; Maschke et al. 2017; van den Berg et al. 2010; van Veen et al. 2020; van Veen et al. 2018). Yet, every second cancer patient is in need of information regarding beneficial lifestyle behaviour, and a high proportion is still malnutritioned or insufficient physically active (Deftereos et al. 2021; Erickson et al. 2018; Leach et al. 2015; Maschke et al. 2017; Philip et al. 2014; Pilotto et al. 2022; Zhou et al. 2022). To improve counselling on nutrition and PA, multilevel strategies involving different HCP, including the FP, have been suggested (AuYoung et al. 2016; Hübner et al. 2013). FP substantially contribute to cancer patient care by coordinating care, managing comorbidities, promotion of health and self-management, and scheduling follow-up visits (Jefford et al. 2020; Lang et al. 2017). Furthermore, patients view FP as reliable and preferred source of health information, and they put major trust in them (Harris et al. 2004; Hudon et al. 2013; Wattanapisit et al. 2018). This predestines FP to act as reference person on the first level of the multilevel strategy, conveying basic information on nutrition and PA in cancer patients, and coordinating referrals for individual counselling on the second level. In fact, FP already give advice on these topics in other diseases like diabetes mellitus and hypertension, which is grounded on similar fundamental principles (Bantle et al. 2008; Booth and Nowson 2010; Brauer et al. 2012; Castro et al. 2015; Harris et al. 2004; Rock et al. 2012; Sigal et al. 2018; Wattanapisit et al. 2018). However, data investigating FPs attitude and involvement in nutritional and PA counselling in cancer patient care are scarce (Pilotto et al. 2022; Waterland et al. 2020). In this study, we aim to gain insight on FPs perception of nutrition and PA in cancer patient care and assess barriers and steps to improve their counselling on these topics. Methods Declarations This study was approved by the Ethics Commission of the University Hospital of Jena (Reg.-Nr. 2021–2149-Bef). All participants gave informed written consent. Family physician interviews Study design and interview guide To explore what challenges FP face in conveying advice on nutrition and PA in cancer patients, we chose a qualitative phenomenological research approach. We conducted semi-structured interviews and categorized them using qualitative content analysis according to Mayring (Mayring 2015). The COREQ and SRQR guidelines were utilised to report on the findings (O'Brien et al. 2014; Tong et al. 2007). The interview questions and structure were designed by the corresponding author, who had no prior experience in qualitative research, to explore the perception of FP of nutrition and PA in cancer patients. The questions were revised by the supervising author, who has expertise in the fields oncology, nutrition, PA, and qualitative research. After each interview, the FP were asked to evaluate the interview questions regarding their validity. The interview questions are appended in Supplement A: Interview Questions. Recruitment of family physicians and data collection Physicians who currently practised family medicine in Germany were eligible to participate. Only FP who attended to at least one cancer patient per week were included. A purposive sampling technique was used to acquire participants. A FP in Paderborn and Jena, respectively, helped to obtain participants. A total of nine FP were contacted, seven via telephone and two face-to-face. Six of them practised in Paderborn, North Rhine-Westphalia, and three in Jena, Thuringia (Germany). Seven FP were interested in the study, two of them later withdrew their assent. Reasons for declining participation were not recorded. Over a period of 3 months from February to April 2021, five semi-structured interviews were conducted with FP by the corresponding author. During each interview, solely the interviewer and one FP were present. Four of the FP practised in Paderborn and one in Jena. One interview took place in the physician’s private practise, two at their respective homes, two more were carried out through phone. The interviews lasted on average 40 min. The participants received no monetary consideration. Supplement B: Flow Chart Family Physician Interviews summarises the development of the interview guideline and the recruitment of participants. Data preparation and analysis The interviews were recorded using a digital device. They were transcripted and anonymised with Microsoft Word (Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise). Using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise), the corresponding and supervising author performed qualitative content analysis according to Mayring (Mayring 2015), as seen in Supplement C: Flow Chart Interview Analysis. Family physician survey Questionnaire design A pilot questionnaire was developed by the corresponding author on basis of aforementioned semi-structured interviews to consolidate their results. The questionnaire was revised by the supervising author. The pilot version was tested once and adapted accordingly for length and comprehension among nine purposively sampled FP. Their demographics were similar to the sample population. Their answers are not included in the analysis. The final questionnaire consisted of 49 questions divided into 4 main sections:Demographic data including cancer patient consultations The topics nutrition and PA in cancer patient consultations Sources of information for FP on nutrition and PA in cancer care FP's perception of steps to improve a healthy lifestyle in cancer patients We primarily used closed questions with lists of possible answers in form of Likert scales. Semi-open questions offered the participants space to add and elaborate answers. Recruitment of family physicians and data collection German-speaking and currently practising FP were eligible to participate. Using a listing of FP from an online service of the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (KV), a cross-sectional convenience sample of 150 FP was drawn. Ninety-three (62.0%) were successfully contacted by phone, and 49 (32.7%) agreed to consider participation. Eighteen of these completed the questionnaires (response rate 12.0%). Additionally, one FP helped to distribute the questionnaire by word of mouth and e-mail. In this way, further 46 FP completed questionnaires. The questionnaire was accessible online via Soscisurvey from October 2021 to March 2022. Over the same period, print versions were passed on to aforementioned general practices. Participation was voluntary and anonymous. Reasons for declining participation were not recorded. Data preparation and analysis Answer forms stating no participation in family medical care were excluded. Answer forms missing at least 30% answers were excluded (‘non-responders’). Data were collected and analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics 27. During analysis, missing values were excluded listwise. Mann–Whitney U tests were performed to analyse differences in central tendencies between two groups and significances tested asymptotically (Z: standardised score, effect size r =|Z| /√n). Effect sizes were estimated to be small (0.1), medium (0.3) or large (0.5) according to Cohen (Cohen 1988). p values smaller than 0.05 were considered significant. Results Representative interview statements have been selected to portray the results. Additional quotes can be found in Supplement D: Interview Results. Samples A total of five FP were interviewed; two of them were female, three were male. All of them practised in a city (more than 100.000 habitants). Four had at least 10 years’ experience of general practice. The sample is described within Supplement B: Flow Chart Family Physician Interviews. A total of 61 questionnaires were included in the questionnaire analysis. Male FP participated slightly more often than female (55.7% or 44.3%), their ages ranging from 33 to 74 years (mean value 53.71 ± 9.26 years). Most of them practised as FP for more than 20 years (46.0%), 31.1% between 10 and 19 years, and 23.0% for less than 10 years. The demographic data are shown in Table 1. Table 1 Characteristics of the trial population (N = 61) Criteria Number Percentage (%) Gender  Female 27 44.3  Male 34 55.7 Age (years)  Under 40 7 11.5  40—49 8 13.1  50—59 31 50.8  60—69 11 18.0  Over 70 2 3.3  n.a 2 3.3 Practising as family physician for … years  Less than 5 9 14.8  5–9 5 8.2  10–19 19 31.1  20–25 14 23.0  More than 25 14 23.0 Type of doctor’s practice  Single practice 22 36.1  Group practice 36 59.0  Medical care centre 3 4.9 Number of inhabitants in the community of the physician’s practice  1.000 – 9.999 3 4.9  10.000 – 99.999 26 41.6  100.000 – 500.000 30 49.2  More than 500.000 1 1.6  n.a 1 1.6 Attending to number of cancer patients (per month)   < 10 19 31.1  11—20 19 31.1   > 20 21 34.5  n.a 2 3.3 Importance of nutrition and physical activity in cancer patients All five FP agreed on the high relevance of nutrition and PA in cancer patients. Likewise in the survey, close to all FP valued nutrition and physical as (very) important both during (n = 53, 91.4%) and after (n = 59, 100%) cancer therapy. Eighty-five percent (n = 51, 85.0%) of the FP reported to talk about these topics with their cancer patients. For this fundamental theme, three sub-themes were identified: (a) constraints in nutrition and PA, (b) nutrition and PA as supportive treatment and (c) habits.“Cancer patients lose weight unexpectedly. [During treatment,] they become weak. Some cannot walk a staircase. Some cannot taste or swallow their food.” (No. 3, Pos. 18ff) “There is no cure without operation, radio- or chemotherapy. Nutritional or exercise therapy does not heal the cancer. But without it, recovery might be impaired.” (No. 4, 99ff) “Someone who likes to eat sweet will not suddenly omit sweets or meat. In addition, dining can be a ritual and unifying experience. In a family of connoisseurs, it is a challenging task to adhere to a diet.” (No. 5, Pos. 245ff) “Patients whose exercise routine is limited by their disease regain quality of life when I tell them to exercise like they are used to. Not quite as vigorous, but to the best of their ability.” (No. 3, 256ff) Responsibilities of participants in cancer care While many people and institutions took part in cancer care, the interviewed FP highlighted the responsibilities for following participants in unison: (a) oncologists, (b) rehabilitation institutions, (c) FP, (d) relatives, and (e) politics.“The oncologist usually conducts the […] therapy. I think he is pivotal in the acute treatment of the patient.” (No. 1, Pos. 61f) “During acute therapy, the patient fights to survive and is hardly accessible [to information on nutrition and physical activity]. During rehabilitation, they learn that exact information.” (No. 1, Pos. 116ff) “It is our [the family physicians’] duty to give lifestyle advice. The family physician attends to the whole patient and sees him on a regular basis.” (No. 1, Pos. 69f) “The relatives take care of the patient and support him/her. Sometimes I call them to request their support for the patient.” (No. 4, Pos. 57) “Politics clearly influences patient care. But political decisions are ultimately about money. (…) The political intent does hardly care [for patient care].” (No. 5, Pos. 82ff) In the interviews, the FP suggested that rehabilitation would be the best point in time to convey information on nutrition and PA to cancer patients. The questionnaire yielded concordant results, as can be seen in Fig. 1.Fig. 1 Preferred points in time to convey information on nutrition and physical activity (N = 61, several answers possible) Two thirds (n = 40, 65.6%) of the FP viewed themselves as primary reference persons to address nutrition and PA in cancer patients, and they reported to see cancer patients on a regular basis. However, they hardly had access to the patient during his initial treatment. In the survey, the FP reported to attend to more cancer patients in follow-up care than during their treatment (Z = − 3.264, r = 0.301, p = 0.001). More than half of the physicians (n = 33, 56.9%) arranged appointments with cancer patients on a regular basis. The frequencies cancer patients are summoned in different phases of their treatment are shown in Fig. 2. FP arranged appointments with cancer patients during their treatment more frequently than in the first 5 years of follow-up care (Z = − 3.413, r = 0.712, p = 0.001), usually monthly or more often. Accordingly, patients were summoned more frequently in their first 5 years of follow-up care than the years after (Z = − 2.798, r = 0.495, p = 0.005), usually quarterly.Fig. 2 Frequencies of family physicians appointing cancer patients in different treatment phases (Nafterwards = 31, Ntreatment, rejecting = 32, Nfollow-up = 33) Challenges for family physicians in cancer patient care The interviewed physicians reported on issues they faced providing cancer patient care. Three sub-themes stood out: (a) unsatisfactory communication with other healthcare providers, (b) unfamiliarity with information sources, and (c) lack of time to inform themselves or their patients.“[As family physician,] you get left out (…). Neither do I receive updates from the specialist I referred to (…), nor from the clinicians and rehabilitation institutions. Sometime later, the patient arrives with his treatment done (…), and I don’t know anything of what happened. (…) Although to be honest, in some cases the communication does work well.” (No. 3, Pos. 110ff). “I don’t know of any such information [on nutrition and physical activity in cancer patients].” (No. 1, Pos. 184) “From time to time, I try to browse the internet [for information]. But quickly I get into a lost position, not knowing which information to rely on.” (No. 5, Pos. 154ff) “We don’t have time to counsel on nutrition and physical activity.” (No. 2, Pos. 175) “We spend too many resources [e.g. time, personnel, material] on bureaucratic efforts, without use for anybody, and particularly without use for patients.” (No. 1, Pos. 307) In the interviews, timely communication between healthcare providers has been criticised repeatedly. Evaluating the communication between clinicians and FP in the survey, in general the latter were satisfied with discharge letters and phone calls. However, twenty-five (n = 15, 25.0%) and thirty-six percent (n = 21, 36.2%), respectively, reported that they did not receive letters or phone calls in a timely manner. The interviewed FP were not familiar with specific information on nutrition and PA in cancer patients, or where to find such information. In the survey, one-third of the FP (n = 19, 32.8%) were unfamiliar with sources on these topics. While the internet has been considered as information source, they had differing opinions on its reliability. In the survey, the FP reported that if they searched for such information, they would utilise medical journals (rank 1 and 2: n = 30, 62.5%) and guidelines (rank 1 and 2: n = 24, 50%) the most. Browsing the internet was ranked both high by 18 (rank 1 and 2: 37.5%) and low by 26 physicians (rank 4 and 5: 54.2%). The rankings of different information sources are reported in Fig. 3.Fig. 3 Sources for information on nutrition and physical activity in cancer patients of family physicians (Rank 1: utilised the most; Rank 5: utilised the least; N = 48) The FP raised concern in the interviews that they lacked time to inform their cancer patients on nutrition and PA. In the survey, the FP reported that they would like to dedicate more time during cancer patient consultation addressing nutrition and PA than they currently did (Z = − 6.237, r = 0.565, p < 0.001). For example, the interview respondents deemed bureaucratic efforts in general too time-consuming. The majority of questionnaire participants (n = 44, 72.1%) experienced too much bureaucratic efforts to initiate and sustain programs to encourage a healthy lifestyle, such as Disease Management Programs. Approaches to improve lifestyle counselling by family physicians All five FP proposed ideas on how to improve the involvement of family physicians in counselling on nutrition and PA to cancer patients. The following three approaches were each considered by at least two FP.“I would sometimes like an update by phone; or a discharge letter which doesn’t arrive four to five months late or which is directly handed to the patient.” (No. 2, Pos. 46ff) “Validated papers or review articles that show which nutritional and exercise is significantly improving the patient’s wellbeing would be useful. But I guess those do exist – if you know where to search for them.” (No. 5, Pos. 303ff) “It would be really easy to improve nutrition and physical activity in cancer patients. In Germany, we already have Disease Management Programs. Part of these structured treatment programs are not only regular follow-up appointments, but also patient education and counselling.” (No. 1, Pos. 269ff) “Disease Management Programs are economic stimulus programs for physicians with little benefit for the patient. Follow-up care would work fine without them.” (No. 5, Pos. 257ff) In the interviews, differing opinions on implementing structured treatment programs such as Disease Management Programs (DMP) to improve lifestyle counselling by FP have been disclosed. The survey shows similar results with either half of FP advocating (n = 29, 48.3%) or rejecting (n = 31, 51.7%) the proposal of establishing DMP for additional types of cancer. Discussion To our knowledge, this is the first study capturing the perception of FP regarding nutrition and PA in cancer patient care in Germany. The results indicate that they acknowledge the importance of these lifestyle factors in cancer treatment and frequently address them. However, they have little knowledge of reliable information sources hereof. Since FP feel responsible to give lifestyle advice, counselling could be improved by providing compiled information and continuous education on nutrition and PA. Furthermore, communication between FP and other healthcare providers needs improvement to keep FP up to date and integrate them into structured treatment programs. Family physicians convey the importance of nutrition and physical activity. The importance and benefit of nutrition and PA in cancer patients are well established. Congruent to other data, almost every FP in our study acknowledges the importance of nutrition and PA during cancer treatment and follow-up care as these topics occur in various ways (Pilotto et al. 2022; Waterland et al. 2020): weight loss as first cancer symptom; cancer- and treatment-related restraints in everyday tasks, but also worsening their outcome; alleviation of symptoms, outcome, and QoL by means of nutrition and PA (Arends et al. 2017; Edvardsen et al. 2015; Lee et al. 2016; Mouri et al. 2018). To adapt a beneficial lifestyle requires the patient to pick up old or new habits, which can constitute either a facilitator or barrier (Pilotto et al. 2022). Beyond the treatment phase, adhering to a healthy lifestyle has been shown to improve the patient’s QoL and reduce cancer relapses (Arends et al. 2017; Cormie et al. 2017; Mouri et al. 2018). The majority of FP feel responsible to convey this importance of nutrition and PA to cancer patients. Eighty-five percent report addressing these topics with their cancer patients. This perception is congruent to previous studies on opinions of cancer care providers (Jefford et al. 2020; Pilotto et al. 2022; Sisler et al. 2016; Waterland et al. 2020). Family physicians lack knowledge and time for counselling. Many HCP are involved in nutritional care and exercise therapy, such as oncologists, FP, dietitians, physical therapists, and nurses. While acknowledging their responsibilities in lifestyle counselling, many report lacking knowledge and time to provide advice on nutrition and PA to cancer patients, as is also true in our study (Avancini et al. 2020; "EFAD and ESDN Oncology Statement Paper on the Role of the Dietitian in Oncology," 2021; Kirbiyik and Ozkan 2018; Massoud et al. 2021; Pilotto et al. 2022; van Veen et al. 2017; Waterland et al. 2020). As shown in previous studies, FP reported a lack of FP-specific resources, programs, and journal articles to educate themselves on nutrition and PA in cancer patient (Ciarlo et al. 2016; Waterland et al. 2020). Concordantly, one-third of our sample were not familiar with any sources on these topics, indicating a need for improvement. As nutrition and PA in cancer patients are among the information needs of FP, such information should be readily accessible, brief, concise, and reliable (Ciarlo et al. 2016). Although the internet could provide an opportunity to fulfil these requirements, in general, the FP do not use it more than other sources of expert information. This mirrors the ambivalence towards the internet as source of information: whereas almost 40% of FP would utilise it the most, more than 50% would use it the least; on one hand, the internet is readily accessible, but it is time-consuming identifying reliable information with a high percentage of websites providing false information or information of low quality (Ogasawara et al. 2018). To exploit its full potential, a compilation of reliable and trustworthy online resources for FP should be established, as they do exist, e.g. in form of articles, guidelines, and brochures (Brown et al. 2012; Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft 2022; Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie: Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft et al. 2021; Tajan & Vousden 2020). Integration of family physicians in structured treatment programs Even though FP attend to cancer patients on a regular basis, the general practice setting lacks the time required to affect lifestyle behaviours in cancer patients (McPhail and Schippers 2012; Waterland et al. 2020). It is rather the shared responsibility of many HCP to encourage a beneficial lifestyle in cancer patients. As also concluded by previous authors, HCP should receive continual education on nutrition and PA in cancer patients to reinforce awareness of its importance (Erickson et al. 2018). Furthermore, specialists in nutrition and PA are available, but structural referral pathways appear to be missing (Erickson et al. 2018; Pilotto et al. 2022). Since FP contribute substantially to coordinating cancer patient care, such pathways should be established and FP integrated (Druel et al. 2020; Edbrooke et al. 2020; Hickner et al. 2007; Jefford et al. 2020; Sisler et al. 2016). This could be realised through structured treatment programs like Disease Management Programs (DMP), as suggested by FP. DMP are structured treatment programs for chronically ill patients. They rest on evidence-based medicine and exist in Germany for various diseases like breast cancer, diabetes mellitus, and coronary heart disease (Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung). Patients enrolled in DMP regularly visit HCP like their FP, and they receive information on their disease. Information on nutrition and PA should become part of DMP for cancer. Since attitudes of FP towards DMP are varying, their concerns regarding bureaucratic efforts and challenges in documentation requirements must be considered, and the benefit of DMP on patient care quality must be subject to continuous scrutiny to ensure applicable and effective health programs (Wangler and Jansky 2021). Family physicians are missing timely updates FP conduct a major part of cancer patient care. As our study indicates in line with other data, they are more intensely involved at the time of diagnosis and in follow-up care (Hickner et al. 2007; Waterland et al. 2020). Currently, they are missing out on timely updates on their patients’ status, and they would like to be more integrated during acute cancer treatment (Easley et al. 2017; Hickner et al. 2007; Waterland et al. 2020). To ultimately achieve this, interdisciplinary communication is mandatory. While the FP were generally content regarding interdisciplinary communication, they criticised its timeliness, leading to missing information on their patient’s current treatment. This perception is in line with studies on communication between primary and secondary HCP (Easley et al. 2016, 2017; McConnell et al. 1999; Suija et al. 2016; Vermeir et al. 2015). Poor communication can lead to various negative outcomes, such as wasting the physician’s time and lengthening the patient’s stay, subsequently causing medical errors, stress, and frustration (Vermeir et al. 2015; Waterland et al. 2020). Utilising electronic communication to exchange information between primary and secondary care providers and mutual feedback yield the potential to approach this issue (Pannell and Tyrrell-Price 2017; Vermeir et al. 2015). Limitations and future research Due to the small sample size of the interviews, the results are scarcely applicable to FP at large. All interviewed physicians practised in cities with more than 100.000 inhabitants. Since only 32% of the German population live in such cities, the transferability of this study’s results to physicians practising in more rural areas is limited (Europäische Kommission eurostat 2021). Besides, saturation of aspects mentioned by the participants has not necessarily been reached, therefore, further notable remarks may have been missed. Moreover, the non-random acquisition of interviewees is susceptible to causing bias. Finally, socially desirable answers cannot be excluded. The FP recognised the significance of lifestyle in cancer prevention, but that aspect is beyond the scope of this study. The questionnaire was not validated but developed by experts including oncologists, FP, and statisticians based on preceding qualitative research, literature research, and experience in their field of work. Due to the small sample size, the results are not necessarily representative or applicable to FP at large. Furthermore, a selection bias may have caused physicians to preferably participate in the study if they are already familiar with nutrition and PA in cancer patients. Socially desirable answers cannot be excluded. Future research on these topics should aim to recruit a larger randomised sample size to reduce bias-susceptibility and improve external validity, enhancing transferability to FP at large. Conclusion Since FP lack time to look to educate themselves, information should be readily available, concise, and reliable. The internet could fulfil these criteria; however, as it is vast and ever-growing, navigating can be confusing. Compilating existing information sources on these topics such as medical guidelines, journal articles, and other websites, could help them to acquire knowledge and counsel cancer patients confidently in this regard. FP desire improvements in interdisciplinary communication and want to be integrated more during cancer treatment. Development of structured treatment programs could address the latter and provide benefits to patient care and outcomes. This would facilitate to involve FP into giving lifestyle advice to cancer patients as they do feel responsible to do so. Supplementary Information Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.Supplementary file1 (DOCX 2550 KB) Acknowledgements Thank you to all participating family physicians for their time and devotion to contribute to this study. Author contributions SJB and JH conceived of the presented idea. SJB and JH created the interview guideline. SJB carried out the interviews. SJB analysed the interview with support from JH. SJB wrote the manuscript with support from JH, VM and JB. JH supervised the project. All authors reviewed the manuscript. Funding Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript. Data availability Data available on request due to privacy restrictions. The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, S. J. Boesenecker. The data are not publicly available due to their containing information that could compromise the privacy of research participants. Declarations Conflict of interests The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. Ethics approval This study was approved by the Ethics Commission of the University Hospital of Jena (Reg.-Nr. 2021–2149-Bef). All participants gave informed written consent. Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. ==== Refs References Antoun S Birdsell L Sawyer MB Venner P Escudier B Baracos VE Association of skeletal muscle wasting with treatment with sorafenib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: results from a placebo-controlled study J Clin Oncol 2010 28 6 1054 1060 10.1200/jco.2009.24.9730 20085939 Arends J Bachmann P Baracos V Barthelemy N Bertz H Bozzetti F Fearon K Hütterer E Isenring E Kaasa S Krznaric Z Laird B Larsson M Laviano A Mühlebach S Muscaritoli M Oldervoll L Ravasco P Solheim T Preiser JC ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients Clin Nutr 2017 36 1 11 48 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.07.015 27637832 Argiles JM Busquets S Stemmler B Lopez-Soriano FJ Cancer cachexia: understanding the molecular basis Nat Rev Cancer 2014 14 11 754 762 10.1038/nrc3829 25291291 Artherholt SB Fann JR Psychosocial care in cancer Curr Psychiatry Rep 2012 14 1 23 29 10.1007/s11920-011-0246-7 22068509 AuYoung M Linke SE Pagoto S Buman MP Craft LL Richardson CR Hutber A Marcus BH Estabrooks P Sheinfeld Gorin S Integrating physical activity in primary care practice Am J Med 2016 129 10 1022 1029 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.02.008 26953063 Avancini A Sartori G Gkountakos A Casali M Trestini I Tregnago D Bria E Jones LW Milella M Lanza M Pilotto S Physical activity and exercise in lung cancer care: will promises be fulfilled? Oncologist 2020 25 3 e555 e569 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0463 32162811 Awad S Tan BH Cui H Bhalla A Fearon KC Parsons SL Catton JA Lobo DN Marked changes in body composition following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for oesophagogastric cancer Clin Nutr 2012 31 1 74 77 10.1016/j.clnu.2011.08.008 21875767 Bantle JP Wylie-Rosett J Albright AL Apovian CM Clark NG Franz MJ Hoogwerf BJ Lichtenstein AH Mayer-Davis E Mooradian AD Wheeler ML Nutrition recommendations and interventions for diabetes: a position statement of the American diabetes association Diabetes Care 2008 31 Suppl 1 S61 78 10.2337/dc08-S061 18165339 Booth AO Nowson CA Patient recall of receiving lifestyle advice for overweight and hypertension from their General Practitioner BMC Fam Pract 2010 11 8 10.1186/1471-2296-11-8 20113530 Bower MR Martin RC 2nd Nutritional management during neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer J Surg Oncol 2009 100 1 82 87 10.1002/jso.21289 19373870 Brauer PM Sergeant LA Davidson B Goy R Dietrich L Patient reports of lifestyle advice in primary care Can J Diet Pract Res 2012 73 3 122 127 10.3148/73.3.2012.122 22958629 Brown JC Winters-Stone K Lee A Schmitz KH Cancer, physical activity, and exercise Compr Physiol 2012 2 4 2775 2809 10.1002/cphy.c120005 23720265 Brown T Avenell A Edmunds LD Moore H Whittaker V Avery L Summerbell C Systematic review of long-term lifestyle interventions to prevent weight gain and morbidity in adults Obes Rev 2009 10 6 627 638 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00641.x 19754634 Bye A Sandmael JA Stene GB Thorsen L Balstad TR Solheim TS Pripp AH Oldervoll LM Exercise and nutrition interventions in patients with head and neck cancer during curative treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis Nutrients 2020 12 11 3233 10.3390/nu12113233 33105699 Capuano G Gentile PC Bianciardi F Tosti M Palladino A Di Palma M Prevalence and influence of malnutrition on quality of life and performance status in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer before treatment Support Care Cancer 2010 18 4 433 437 10.1007/s00520-009-0681-8 19562384 Castro I Waclawovsky G Marcadenti A Nutrition and physical activity on hypertension: implication of current evidence and guidelines Curr Hypertens Rev 2015 11 2 91 99 10.2174/1573402111666150429170302 25921545 Ciarlo G Liebl P Zell J Fessler J Koester MJ Ruetters D Mugele K Huebner J Information needs of oncologists, general practitioners and other professionals caring for patients with cancer Eur J Cancer Care (engl) 2016 25 6 1015 1023 10.1111/ecc.12557 27550233 Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. L. Erlbaum Associates. https://books.google.de/books?id=gA04ngAACAAJ Cormie P Zopf EM Zhang X Schmitz KH The impact of exercise on cancer mortality, recurrence, and treatment-related adverse effects Epidemiol Rev 2017 39 1 71 92 10.1093/epirev/mxx007 28453622 Datema FR Ferrier MB Baatenburg de Jong RJ Impact of severe malnutrition on short-term mortality and overall survival in head and neck cancer Oral Oncol 2011 47 9 910 914 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2011.06.510 21802345 Dean E Skinner M Myezwa H Mkumbuzi V Mostert K Parra DC Shirley D Söderlund A de Andrade AD Abaraogu UO Bruno S Clark D Gylfadóttir S Jones A Veluswamy SK Lomi C Moffat M Morris D Stensdotter AK Wong WP Health competency standards in physical therapist practice Phys Ther 2019 99 9 1242 1254 10.1093/ptj/pzz087 31189180 Deftereos, I., Yeung, J. M. C., Arslan, J., Carter, V. M., Isenring, E., Kiss, N., & On Behalf Of The Nourish Point Prevalence Study, G Assessment of Nutritional Status and Nutrition Impact Symptoms in Patients Undergoing Resection for Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer: Results from the Multi-Centre NOURISH Point Prevalence Study Nutrients 2021 13 10 3349 10.3390/nu13103349 34684353 Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft. (2022) Broschüren zum Thema Krebs. Retrieved February 12, 2022 from https://www.krebsgesellschaft.de/aktuelle-themen/service/broschueren.html Druel V Gimenez L Paricaud K Delord JP Grosclaude P Boussier N Bugat MR Improving communication between the general practitioner and the oncologist: a key role in coordinating care for patients suffering from cancer BMC Cancer 2020 20 1 495 10.1186/s12885-020-06993-0 32487036 Easley J Miedema B Carroll JC Manca DP O'Brien MA Webster F Grunfeld E Coordination of cancer care between family physicians and cancer specialists: Importance of communication Can Fam Physician 2016 62 10 e608 e615 27737996 Easley J Miedema B O'Brien MA Carroll J Manca D Webster F Grunfeld E The role of family physicians in cancer care: perspectives of primary and specialty care providers Curr Oncol 2017 24 2 75 80 10.3747/co.24.3447 28490920 Edbrooke L Granger CL Denehy L Physical activity for people with lung cancer Aust J Gen Pract 2020 49 4 175 181 10.31128/ajgp-09-19-5060 32233342 Edvardsen E Skjønsberg OH Holme I Nordsletten L Borchsenius F Anderssen SA High-intensity training following lung cancer surgery: a randomised controlled trial Thorax 2015 70 3 244 250 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-205944 25323620 EFAD & ESDN Oncology Statement Paper on the Role of the Dietitian in Oncology Kompass Nutrition & Dietetics 2021 1 3 117 117 10.1159/000519850 Erickson N Paradies K Buchholz D Huebner J Nutrition care of cancer patients-a survey among physicians and nurses Eur J Cancer Care (engl) 2018 27 4 e12855 10.1111/ecc.12855 29767834 Europäische Kommission eurostat. (2021) Korrespondenztabelle LAU - NUTS 2021, EU-27 und EFTA / verfügbare Kandidatenländer. In EU-27_LAU-2021-NUTS-2021.xlsx (Ed.). Ferlay J Soerjomataram I Dikshit R Eser S Mathers C Rebelo M Parkin DM Forman D Bray F Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012 Int J Cancer 2015 136 5 E359 386 10.1002/ijc.29210 25220842 Garabige V Giraud P De Rycke Y Girod A Jouffroy T Jaulerry C Brunin F Rodriguez J Impact of nutrition management in patients with head and neck cancers treated with irradiation: is the nutritional intervention useful? Cancer Radiother 2007 11 3 111 116 10.1016/j.canrad.2006.11.005 17218137 Halilova KI Pisu M Azuero A Williams CP Kenzik KM Williams GR Rocque GB Martin MY Kvale EA Demark-Wahnefried W Healthy lifestyle discussions between healthcare providers and older cancer survivors: data from 12 cancer centers in the Southeastern United States Cancer Med 2019 8 16 7123 7132 10.1002/cam4.2568 31568695 Harris SB Petrella RJ Lambert-Lanning A Leadbetter W Cranston L Lifestyle management for type 2 diabetes. Are family physicians ready and willing? Can Fam Physician 2004 50 9 1235 1243 15508373 https://www.cfp.ca/content/cfp/50/9/1235.full.pdf Hickner J Kent S Naragon P Hunt L Physicians' and patients' views of cancer care by family physicians: a report from the American academy of family physicians national research network Fam Med 2007 39 2 126 131 17273955 Hilfiker R Meichtry A Eicher M Nilsson Balfe L Knols RH Verra ML Taeymans J Exercise and other non-pharmaceutical interventions for cancer-related fatigue in patients during or after cancer treatment: a systematic review incorporating an indirect-comparisons meta-analysis Br J Sports Med 2018 52 10 651 658 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096422 28501804 Hübner J Muenstedt K Muecke R Micke O Stoll C Kleeberg UR Buentzel J Dennert G Prott FJ Counseling cancer patients on complementary and alternative medicine. Background, theory, and implementation of nationwide counseling facilities Strahlenther Onkol 2013 189 8 613 617 10.1007/s00066-013-0392-4 23824107 Hudon C St-Cyr Tribble D Bravo G Hogg W Lambert M Poitras ME Family physician enabling attitudes: a qualitative study of patient perceptions BMC Fam Pract 2013 14 8 10.1186/1471-2296-14-8 23305144 Jager-Wittenaar H Dijkstra PU Vissink A van der Laan BF van Oort RP Roodenburg JL Malnutrition and quality of life in patients treated for oral or oropharyngeal cancer Head Neck 2011 33 4 490 496 10.1002/hed.21473 20824806 Jefford M Koczwara B Emery J Thornton-Benko E Vardy JL The important role of general practice in the care of cancer survivors Aust J Gen Pract 2020 49 5 288 292 10.31128/ajgp-10-19-5133 32416654 Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung. (2021–12–23). Disease-Management-Programme. Retrieved January 07 from https://www.kbv.de/html/dmp.php Keinki C Seilacher E Ebel M Ruetters D Kessler I Stellamanns J Rudolph I Huebner J Information needs of cancer patients and perception of impact of the disease, of self-efficacy, and locus of control J Cancer Educ 2016 31 3 610 616 10.1007/s13187-015-0860-x 25994358 Kimura M Naito T Kenmotsu H Taira T Wakuda K Oyakawa T Hisamatsu Y Tokito T Imai H Akamatsu H Ono A Kaira K Murakami H Endo M Mori K Takahashi T Yamamoto N Prognostic impact of cancer cachexia in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer Support Care Cancer 2015 23 6 1699 1708 10.1007/s00520-014-2534-3 25430482 Kirbiyik F Ozkan E Knowledge and practices of medical oncologists concerning nutrition therapy: a survey study Clin Nutr ESPEN 2018 27 32 37 10.1016/j.clnesp.2018.07.004 30144890 Lang V Walter S Fessler J Koester MJ Ruetters D Huebner J The role of the general practitioner in cancer care: a survey of the patients' perspective J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2017 143 5 895 904 10.1007/s00432-017-2343-4 28188361 Leach HJ Devonish JA Bebb DG Krenz KA Culos-Reed SN Exercise preferences, levels and quality of life in lung cancer survivors Support Care Cancer 2015 23 11 3239 3247 10.1007/s00520-015-2717-6 25832895 Leduc C Antoni D Charloux A Falcoz PE Quoix E Comorbidities in the management of patients with lung cancer Eur Respir J 2017 10.1183/13993003.01721-2016 28356370 Lee JLC Leong LP Lim SL Nutrition intervention approaches to reduce malnutrition in oncology patients: a systematic review Support Care Cancer 2016 24 1 469 480 10.1007/s00520-015-2958-4 26404858 Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie: Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, & AWMF. (2021, 2021–09) Komplementärmedizin in der Behandlung von onkologischen PatientInnen, Langversion 1.1. Retrieved May 9, 2022 from https://www.leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/leitlinien/komplementaermedizin/ Lewandowska A Rudzki G Lewandowski T Prochnicki M Rudzki S Laskowska B Brudniak J Quality of life of cancer patients treated with chemotherapy Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020 10.3390/ijerph17196938 33374440 Lim SL Ong KC Chan YH Loke WC Ferguson M Daniels L Malnutrition and its impact on cost of hospitalization, length of stay, readmission and 3-year mortality Clin Nutr 2012 31 3 345 350 10.1016/j.clnu.2011.11.001 22122869 Maddocks M Physical activity and exercise training in cancer patients Clin Nutr ESPEN 2020 40 1 6 10.1016/j.clnesp.2020.09.027 33183519 Maddocks M Mockett S Wilcock A Is exercise an acceptable and practical therapy for people with or cured of cancer? A Systematic Rev Cancer Treat Rev 2009 35 4 383 390 10.1016/j.ctrv.2008.11.008 19131171 Martin L Jia C Rouvelas I Lagergren P Risk factors for malnutrition after oesophageal and cardia cancer surgery Br J Surg 2008 95 11 1362 1368 10.1002/bjs.6374 18844265 Maschke J Kruk U Kastrati K Kleeberg J Buchholz D Erickson N Huebner J Nutritional care of cancer patients: a survey on patients' needs and medical care in reality Int J Clin Oncol 2017 22 1 200 206 10.1007/s10147-016-1025-6 27485457 Massoud M Ikdais W Zeghondy J Saad A Provision of lifestyle recommendations to cancer patients: results of a nationally representative survey of hematologists/oncologists J Cancer Educ 2021 36 4 702 709 10.1007/s13187-020-01691-8 32016911 Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse (12. ed.). Beltz Verlag. McConnell D Butow PN Tattersall MH Improving the letters we write: an exploration of doctor-doctor communication in cancer care Br J Cancer 1999 80 3–4 427 437 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690374 10408849 McPhail S Schippers M An evolving perspective on physical activity counselling by medical professionals BMC Fam Pract 2012 13 31 10.1186/1471-2296-13-31 22524484 McTiernan A Friedenreich CM Katzmarzyk PT Powell KE Macko R Buchner D Pescatello LS Bloodgood B Tennant B Vaux-Bjerke A George SM Troiano RP Piercy KL Physical activity in cancer prevention and survival: a systematic review Med Sci Sports Exerc 2019 51 6 1252 1261 10.1249/mss.0000000000001937 31095082 Montoya JE Domingo F Jr Luna CA Berroya RM Catli CA Ginete JK Sanchez OS Juat NJ Tiangco BJ Jamias JD Nutritional status of cancer patients admitted for chemotherapy at the national kidney and transplant institute Singapore Med J 2010 51 11 860 864 21140112 Mouri T Naito T Morikawa A Tatematsu N Miura S Okayama T Omae K Takayama K Promotion of behavioral change and the impact on quality of life in elderly patients with advanced cancer: a physical activity intervention of the multimodal nutrition and exercise treatment for advanced cancer program Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2018 5 4 383 390 10.4103/apjon.apjon_21_18 30271820 Norman K Stobäus N Smoliner C Zocher D Scheufele R Valentini L Lochs H Pirlich M Determinants of hand grip strength, knee extension strength and functional status in cancer patients Clin Nutr 2010 29 5 586 591 10.1016/j.clnu.2010.02.007 20299136 O'Brien BC Harris IB Beckman TJ Reed DA Cook DA Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations Acad Med 2014 89 9 1245 1251 10.1097/acm.0000000000000388 24979285 Ogasawara R Katsumata N Toyooka T Akaishi Y Yokoyama T Kadokura G Reliability of cancer treatment information on the internet: observational study JMIR Cancer 2018 4 2 e10031 10.2196/10031 30559090 Pannell LM Tyrrell-Price J Communication between primary and secondary care Br J Hosp Med (lond) 2017 78 8 464 466 10.12968/hmed.2017.78.8.464 28783394 Philip EJ Coups EJ Feinstein MB Park BJ Wilson DJ Ostroff JS Physical activity preferences of early-stage lung cancer survivors Support Care Cancer 2014 22 2 495 502 10.1007/s00520-013-2002-5 24091722 Pilotto S Avancini A Menis J Sperduti I Giaj Levra M Berghmans T Bironzo P Brandão M De Ruysscher D Edwards J Faivre-Finn C Girard N Greillier L Hendriks L Lantuejoul S Mauer M Novello S O'Brien M Reck M Milella M Exercise in lung cancer, the healthcare providers opinion (E.C.H.O.): results of the EORTC lung cancer group (LCG) survey Lung Cancer 2022 169 94 101 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.05.009 35691097 Pressoir M Desné S Berchery D Rossignol G Poiree B Meslier M Traversier S Vittot M Simon M Gekiere JP Meuric J Serot F Falewee MN Rodrigues I Senesse P Vasson MP Chelle F Maget B Antoun S Bachmann P Prevalence, risk factors and clinical implications of malnutrition in French comprehensive cancer centres Br J Cancer 2010 102 6 966 971 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605578 20160725 Rock CL Doyle C Demark-Wahnefried W Meyerhardt J Courneya KS Schwartz AL Bandera EV Hamilton KK Grant B McCullough M Byers T Gansler T Nutrition and physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors CA Cancer J Clin 2012 62 4 243 274 10.3322/caac.21142 22539238 Sarwer DB von Sydow Green A Vetter ML Wadden TA Behavior therapy for obesity: where are we now? Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2009 16 5 347 352 10.1097/MED.0b013e32832f5a79 19623061 Scott BR Tharmalingam S The LNT model for cancer induction is not supported by radiobiological data Chem Biol Interact 2019 301 34 53 10.1016/j.cbi.2019.01.013 30763552 Sigal RJ Armstrong MJ Bacon SL Boulé NG Dasgupta K Kenny GP Riddell MC Physical activity and diabetes Can J Diabetes 2018 42 Suppl 1 S54 s63 10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.10.008 29650112 Sisler J Chaput G Sussman J Ozokwelu E Follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: practical guide to survivorship care for family physicians Can Fam Physician 2016 62 10 805 811 27737976 Suija K Kordemets T Annuk K Kalda R the role of general practitioners in cancer care: a mixed method design J Cancer Educ 2016 31 1 136 141 10.1007/s13187-015-0834-z 25876172 Tajan M Vousden KH Dietary approaches to cancer therapy Cancer Cell 2020 37 6 767 785 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.04.005 32413275 Tong A Sainsbury P Craig J Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups Int J Qual Health Care 2007 19 6 349 357 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 17872937 Trajkovic-Vidakovic M de Graeff A Voest EE Teunissen SC Symptoms tell it all: a systematic review of the value of symptom assessment to predict survival in advanced cancer patients Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2012 84 1 130 148 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2012.02.011 22465016 Uster A Ruehlin M Mey S Gisi D Knols R Imoberdorf R Pless M Ballmer PE Effects of nutrition and physical exercise intervention in palliative cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial Clin Nutr 2018 37 4 1202 1209 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.05.027 28651827 van den Berg MG Rasmussen-Conrad EL Wei KH Lintz-Luidens H Kaanders JH Merkx MA Comparison of the effect of individual dietary counselling and of standard nutritional care on weight loss in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy Br J Nutr 2010 104 6 872 877 10.1017/s0007114510001315 20441684 van Veen MR Beijer S Adriaans AM Vogel-Boezeman J Kampman E Development of a website providing evidence-based information about nutrition and cancer: fighting fiction and supporting facts online JMIR Res Protoc 2015 4 3 e110 10.2196/resprot.4757 26350824 van Veen MR Hoedjes M Versteegen JJ van de Meulengraaf-Wilhelm N Kampman E Beijer S Improving oncology nurses' knowledge about nutrition and physical activity for cancer survivors Oncol Nurs Forum 2017 44 4 488 496 10.1188/17.Onf.488-496 28632252 van Veen MR Mols F Smeets L Kampman E Beijer S Colorectal cancer survivors' beliefs on nutrition and cancer; correlates with nutritional information provision Support Care Cancer 2020 28 3 1255 1263 10.1007/s00520-019-04934-7 31227989 van Veen MR Winkels RM Janssen SHM Kampman E Beijer S Nutritional information provision to cancer patients and their relatives can promote dietary behavior changes independent of nutritional information needs Nutr Cancer 2018 70 3 483 489 10.1080/01635581.2018.1446092 29537887 Vermeir P Vandijck D Degroote S Peleman R Verhaeghe R Mortier E Hallaert G Van Daele S Buylaert W Vogelaers D Communication in healthcare: a narrative review of the literature and practical recommendations Int J Clin Pract 2015 69 11 1257 1267 10.1111/ijcp.12686 26147310 Wangler J Jansky M Attitudes to and experience of disease management programs in primary care-an exploratory survey of general practitioners in Germany Wien Med Wochenschr 2021 171 13–14 310 320 10.1007/s10354-021-00867-1(EinstellungenundErfahrungeninBezugaufDisease-Management-ProgrammeinderPrimarversorgung-eineexplorativeBefragungunterHausarztinnenundHausarzteninDeutschland.) 34338907 Waterland JL Edbrooke L Appathurai A Lawrance N Temple-Smith M Denehy L ‘Probably better than any medication we can give you’: General practitioners' views on exercise and nutrition in cancer Aust J Gen Pract 2020 49 8 513 518 10.31128/AJGP-12-19-5176 32738865 Wattanapisit A Tuangratananon T Thanamee S Physical activity counseling in primary care and family medicine residency training: a systematic review BMC Med Educ 2018 18 1 159 10.1186/s12909-018-1268-1 29970092 Wie GA Cho YA Kim SY Kim SM Bae JM Joung H Prevalence and risk factors of malnutrition among cancer patients according to tumor location and stage in the National Cancer Center in Korea Nutrition 2010 26 3 263 268 10.1016/j.nut.2009.04.013 19665873 Zhou W Webster KE Smith EL Chen W Veliz PT Reddy RM Larson JL Physical activity in surgical lung cancer patients: a systematic review Support Care Cancer 2022 30 8 6473 6482 10.1007/s00520-022-07018-1 35384612