==== Front BMC Oral Health BMC Oral Health BMC Oral Health 1472-6831 BioMed Central London 3149 10.1186/s12903-023-03149-x Research Oral cancer knowledge, attitudes, and practices among senior dental students in Yemen: a multi-institution study Shamala Anas 1 Halboub Esam 2 Al-Maweri Sadeq Ali 3 Al-Sharani Hesham 4 Al-Hadi Mona 5 Ali Raheq raheq.ali.96@gmail.com 6 Laradhi Hajer 6 Murshed Heba 6 Mohammed Marwan Mansoor 7 Ali Kamran 3 1 grid.444917.b 0000 0001 2182 316X Department of Preventive and Biomedical Science, College of Dentistry, University of Science & Technology, Sanaa, Yemen 2 grid.411831.e 0000 0004 0398 1027 Department of Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia 3 grid.412603.2 0000 0004 0634 1084 College of dental medicine, QU health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar 4 grid.444909.4 Faculty of Dentistry, Department of maxillofacial surgery, Ibb University, Ibb, Yemen 5 grid.440745.6 0000 0001 0152 762X Dental Medicine Postgraduate Program, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia 6 grid.444917.b 0000 0001 2182 316X Internship program, College of Dentistry, University of Science & Technology, Sanaa, Yemen 7 grid.412789.1 0000 0004 4686 5317 Department of Oral and Craniofacial Health Sciences, College of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates 30 6 2023 30 6 2023 2023 23 43529 4 2023 20 6 2023 © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. Background The “Knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP)” approach is crucial in health system. Appreciating the current KAP status will reveal the extent of the efficiency of applied health strategies, and subsequently help to determine the appropriate health policy to be employed for improving the health indicators of a given disease/condition, including Oral Cancer (OC). This large-scale cross-sectional study aimed to assess knowledge, attitude, and practice on OC among senior dental students in Yemen. Methods A pre-validated online questionnaire was used for data collection. It consisted of a series of close-ended questions on knowledge, attitudes and practices related to OC. Yemeni dental students in clinical levels (4th and 5th years) from nine dental schools based in four major cities were invited to complete the survey. The SPSS Version 28.0 was used for data analysis. Differences by different grouping factors were assessed by Chi-squared and Mann Whitney-U tests, as appropriate. Results A total of 927 students completed the questionnaire: a response rate of 43%. While the majority identified smoking (93.8%), and smokeless tobacco (92.1%) as potential risk factors of OC, only 76.2% recognized sun exposure as a risk factor for lip cancer and only 50% were aware of old age as a risk factor of OC. Regarding clinical signs of OC, 84.1% reported that OC can present as non-healing ulcer, but only two thirds of the participants recognized that OC can present as a white and/or red lesion. With respect to practices, although 92.1% reported asking their patients regarding oral habits, only 78% reported they regularly carry out a soft tissue examination. Only 54.5% of the participants considered themselves to be well-trained to provide smoking cessation advice, and 21% were confident regarding their knowledge on OC. The 5th year students showed significantly better knowledge and practices than the 4th year students did (p < 0.01). Conclusion The study suggests significant gaps in knowledge, attitudes, and practices of senior dental students in Yemen regarding OC. The findings also underscore the urgent need to improve OC teaching and training of undergraduate dental students, and to provide periodic well-structured continuing professional development activities for dental professionals. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-023-03149-x. Keywords Oral cancer Knowledge practice Dental students Yemen issue-copyright-statement© BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023 ==== Body pmcIntroduction Oral cancer (OC) is a significant global public health problem, with an estimated 377,713 new cases and 177,757 associated deaths in 2020 [1]. Unfortunately, the burden of OC largely affects underdeveloped and developing countries [1]. Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most common type of OC accounting for over 90% cases. The etiopathogenesis of OC is quite complex, and multiple factors - either individually or synergistically - are involved. Indeed, around 85% of OC cases are preventable as they are attributed to modifiable risk factors including smoking, smokeless tobacco, betel nut, and alcohol, and sun exposure in context of lip and skin cancer [2, 3]. Nevertheless, although the large fraction of OC is preventable as indicated above, along with the increasingly huge advancement in all medical aspects [4], the incidence of OC still on the rise especially among young age groups, and the mortality rates have not declined [2, 5]. Like many other developing countries, cancer remains a major public health issue in Yemen. Although there is no accurate data on the incidence rate of OC in Yemen (due to lack of national cancer registries), data from tertiary oncology centers in Yemen have showed high relative frequencies of OC, and unfortunately most cases were diagnosed in advanced stages [6–8]. Additionally, a relatively recent systematic review on OC epidemiology in the Arab world, revealed that Yemenis have one of the highest incidence rates in the region, especially among young patients < 45 year old [9]. Such a grave scenario may be attributed to a multitude of factors, including the low socioeconomic status, the limited availability of specialist services, lack of public awareness, and the high prevalence of OC risk factors like smoking, smokeless tobacco (locally known as Shammah), and water pipe smoking [10–15]. The ongoing nine-year civil war has also had a negative impact on the economy and health services. The socioeconomic and humanitarian conditions deteriorated markedly, resulting in devastating consequences for the local population and contributed to indulgence of the youth in smoking, shammah use and khat chewing (a deep-rooted habit in the country). Along with that, the almost total collapse in the healthcare system contributed to delay in early diagnosis and treatment of OC [16]. Undoubtedly, early detection of OC is critical for achieving favorable treatment outcomes and higher survival rates [4]. Dentists and allied dental care professional play a pivotal role in the fight against OC and contribute to prevention, early detection, and prompt referral of suspected OC to relevant specialists. However, previous studies suggest gaps in the knowledge and confidence of healthcare providers including dental professionals to detect and refer OC [17–23]. Previous studies on dental students and graduates have also highlighted similar deficiencies in recognition and timely referral to the specialists [18–21, 24–27]. The common factors underlying lack of knowledge and clinical detection of OC amongst dentists and dental students relate to insufficient training and exposure to suspected OC. Data regarding the knowledge, attitudes, and practices on OC among Yemeni dentists and dental students are limited. Apart from one single-institute study on Yemeni dental students [28], which revealed inadequate knowledge and practices among the students, there is limited published literature in this context. Hence, the present study aimed to investigate the knowledge, attitudes and practices of clinical dental students in Yemen regarding OC prevention and early detection. Methods Ethics approval The Ethics Committee, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Science and Technology, Sana`a, Yemen, approved the study protocol (No: EAC/UST230). Participation was voluntary, informed consents were obtained from all participants, and all data were processed anonymously. Settings The study was conducted in five dental colleges in four densely-populated cities (Sana’a University and University of Science and Technology, Sana’a city; Ibb University, Ibb city; Aden University, Aden city; and Taiz University, Taiz city). Data collection was done from May to November 2022. Study design Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study. Sampling technique Convenience sampling was used. Participants The study targeted Yemeni dental students in clinical levels (4th and 5th year undergraduate dental students) in the five dental colleges indicated above. Data Collection A web-based questionnaire was used in the present study using a pre-validated questionnaire, adopted from previous studies [28, 29]. The questionnaire was prefaced with an introductory paragraph to clarify the objective of the study, assure anonymous and voluntary participation, and confirm that the responses will be confidential, and accessible only by the authors. The questionnaire consisted of 38 items divided into 4 parts (Appendix). The first part of questionnaire was about the characteristics and demographic data: Gender, age, university, and whether it is public or private, smoking, academic year (4th versus 5th levels), and city. The second part included 22 questions addressed the knowledge about the epidemiological and most common clinical characteristics of OC, and its risk factors. Except for the question about “the most common intraoral site of squamous cell carcinoma”, the responses to the remaining questions were either “Yes”, “No”, or “I don’t Know”. The third part comprised four questions on the clinical examination and diagnostic steps practiced by the respondents with “Yes”, No”, and “Not sure” as responses. The last part of questionnaire comprised six questions addressing the attitudes of the participants toward OC; responses varied as per the questions (see the tables). The questionnaire was prepared as Google Form, and then distributed to the targeted sample (year 4, 5 students) via different means of social media (WhatsApp, Facebook, and Telegram). Reminders were sent three times, with two-week intervals. Responses to the questionnaire were sensitive to the Internet Protocol (IP) Address assuring no duplicated responses. The research was self-funded and there are no conflicts of interest to be reported. Statistical analysis The data were obtained as excel file and exported for analysis into SPSS (IBM Corp. Released 2021. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 28.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). Data were presented as frequencies and percentages. Differences in responses to the items of the questionnaire were assessed using Chi-squared test. In order to provide an overall score for the items which assessed knowledge and practice (where there were correct answers), each correct response was given a score of 1 while incorrect responses received a score of zero. yielding a maximum score of 22 for knowledge-based items and a maximum score of 4 for practice-related items. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test showed that scores for both domains were abnormally distributed. Therefore, the differences in these scores by the different demographic factors were assessed using Mann Whitney-U test. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05. Results A total of 927 undergraduate dental students in clinical levels (4th and 5th year) from four main cities in Yemen participated in the present study, with an overall response rate of 43% (response rate in different cities: Sana’a, 47%; Aden, 44%; Ibb, 41%; and Taiz, 40%). Number of participants and the response rate from each city are presented in Supplementary Table 1. Of these, 573 (62%) were females and 351 (38%) were males. The mean age of the participants was 23.13 ± 1.42 years. Around 67% of the respondents were from public universities, while the remaining (33%) were from private universities. The demographic data of the study participants are summarized in Table 1. Table 1 Demographic information of the study sample Variable Subgroups n (%) Gender (N = 924) Males 351 (38) Females 573 (62) Study levels (N = 927) 4th 525 (56.6) 5th 402 (43.4) Smoking (N = 919) Yes 132 (14.4) No 787 (85.6) University (N = 927) Public 621 (67) Private 306 (33) City (N = 927) Sana’a 446 (48.1) Aden 143 (15.4) Taiz 224 (24.2) Ibb 114 (12.3) Age (N = 823); Mean ± SD* 23.13 ± 1.42 *SD: standard deviation Most of the participants (86.5%) recognized that OSCC is the most frequent type of OC. However, only 61.6% of the students knew that the tongue and floor of the mouth are the most common sites of occurrence, and only 59% were aware that OC is typically discovered in the late stage (Table 1). Regarding knowledge on the risk factors of OC, most of the students correctly reported smoking (93.8%), smokeless tobacco (92.1%), alcohol intake (82%), immunosuppression (76.5%), sun exposure for lip cancer (76.2%), and chronic trauma (72.8%) as OC risk factors. However, fewer students reported viral factors (65.9%), ill-fitting dentures (64.1%) and old age (51.6%) as risk factors (Table 2). Table 2 Knowledge on oral cancer, and its risk factors and clinical signs among dental students by the year of study Questions Responses Study level Total p value 4th 5th Demographics Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common form of oral cancer (N = 904) No 26 (5.1) 14 (3.5) 40 (4.4) < 0.001 Yes 414 (81.5) 368 (92.9) 782 (86.5) I don’t know 68 (13.4) 14 (3.5) 82 (9.1) The most common site of Squamous cell carcinoma (N = 915) Tongue and FOM* 275 (53.3) 289 (72.4) 564 (61.6) < 0.001 Buccal mucosa 149 (28.9) 69 (17.3) 218 (23.8) Gingiva 45 (8.7) 14 (3.5) 59 (6.4) Lips 47 (9.1) 27 (6.8) 74 (8.1) Squamous cell carcinomas mostly diagnosed at advanced stage (N = 857) No 135 (27.8) 95 (25.6) 230 (26.8) 0.003 Yes 267 (54.9) 239 (64.4) 506 (59) I don’t know 84 (17.3) 37 (10) 121 (14.1) Risk factors Qat chewing (N = 916) No 164 (31.5) 136 (34.3) 300 (32.8) 0.484 Yes 313 (60.2) 234 (59.1) 547 (59.7) I don’t know 43 (8.3) 26 (6.6) 69 (7.5) Smoking (N = 918) No 34 (6.5) 16 (4) 50 (5.4) 0.188 Yes 438 (92.5) 378 (95.5) 861 (93.8) I don’t know 5 (1) 2 (0.5) 7 (0.8) Smokeless tobacco use (N = 916) No 35 (6.8) 17 (4.3) 52 95.7) 0.115 Yes 468 (90.5) 376 (94.2) 844 (92.1) I don’t know 4 (2.7) 6 (1.5) 10 (2.2) Alcohol consumption (N = 915) No 70 (13.5) 33 (8.3) 103 (11.3) 0.021 Yes 409 (79) 341 (85.9) 750 (82) I don’t know 39 (7.5) 23 (5.8) 62 (6.8) Viral factors (N = 911) No 112 (21.7) 82 (20.8) 194 (21.3) 0.030 Yes 326 (63.1) 274 (69.5) 600 (65.9) I don’t know 79 (15.3) 38 (9.8) 117 (12.8) Sun exposure for lip cancer (N = 911) No 91 (17.5) 50 (12.8) 141 (15.5) < 0.001 Yes 370 (71.2) 324 (82.9) 694 (76.2) I don’t know 59 (11.3) 17 (4.2) 76 (8.3) Immunosuppression (N = 903) No 70 (13.7) 49 (12.5) 119 (13.2) 0.811 Yes 387 (75.7) 304 (77.6) 691 (76.5) I don’t know 54 (10.6) 39 (9.9) 93 (10.3) Chronic trauma (N = 913) No 133 (25.7) 43 (10.9) 176 (19.3) < 0.001 Yes 333 (64.3) 332 (84.1) 665 (72.8) I don’t know 52 (10) 20 (5.1) 72 (7.9) Older age (N = 909) No 219 (42.5) 100 (25.4) 319 (35.1) < 0.001 Yes 219 (42.5) 260 (63.5) 469 (51.6) I don’t know 77 (15) 44 (11.2) 121 (13.3) Low consumption of fruits and vegetables (N = 900) No 272 (53.4) 191 (48.8) 463 (51.4) 0.031 Yes 139 (27.3) 138 (35.3) 277 (30.8) I don’t know 98 (19.3) 52 (15.9) 160 (17.8) Family history of cancer (N = 914) No 122 (23.5) 91 (23.1) 213 (23.3) 0.146 Yes 358 (68.8) 285 (72.2) 643 (70.4) I don’t know 40 (7.7) 18 (4.6) 58 (6.3) Poor oral hygiene (N = 906) No 156 (30.4) 127 (32.3) 283 (31.2) 0.598 Yes 309 (60.2) 236 (60.1) 545 (60.2) I don’t know 48 (9.4) 30 (7.6) 78 (8.6) Poorly fitting denture (N = 916) No 155 (29.8) 72 (18.2) 227 (24.8) < 0.001 Yes 291 (55.9) 296 (74.9) 587 (64.1) I don’t know 75 (14.4) 27 (6.8) 102 (11.1) Clinical signs Non-healing ulcer (N = 914) No 50 (9.6) 25 (6.3) 75 (8.2) < 0.001 Yes 413 (79.4) 356 (90.4) 769 (84.1) I don’t know 57 (11) 13 (3.3) 70 (7.7) Red lesion (N = 903) No 114 (22.3) 86 (22) 200 (22.1) 0.074 Yes 320 (62.5) 265 (67.8) 585 (64.8) I don’t know 78 (15.2) 40 (10.2) 118 (13.1) White lesion (N = 902) No 95 (18.7) 70 (17.8) 165 (18.3) < 0.001 Yes 327 (64.2) 294 (74.8) 621 (68.8) I don’t know 87 (17.1) 29 (7.4) 116 (12.9) Speckled (red and white) lesion (N = 897) No 61 (12) 29 (7.5) 90 (10) < 0.001 Yes 358 (70.5) 324 (83.3) 682 (76) I don’t know 89 (17.5) 36 (9.3) 125 (13.9) Lump (N = 906) No 48 (9.4) 50 (12.7) 98 (10.8) 0.110 Yes 420 (81.9) 319 (81.2) 739 (81.6) I don’t know 45 (8.8) 24 (6.1) 69 (7.6) Bleeding (N = 907) No 191 (37.1) 133 (33.9) 324 (35.7) 0.007 Yes 212 (41.2) 199 (50.8) 411 (45.3) I don’t know 112 (21.7) 60 (15.3) 172 (19) *FOM: floor of the mouth The participants showed a good knowledge about most of the clinical signs associated with OC: presentation as a non-healing ulcer (84.1%), a red lesion (64.8%), a white lesion (68.8%), a speckled lesion (76%) or a lump (81.6%). However, only 45.3% reported bleeding as a possible clinical sign of OC. Generally, 5th year students showed better knowledge of OC compared to 4th year students; there were significant differences between the two groups in most of the items related to knowledge (p < 0.05; Table 2). Regarding the practices and attitudes of dental students towards OC prevention and early detection, most of the students (92.1%) reported asking their patients about the use of tobacco, and 83.1% reported advising patients to quit tobacco. Around 79% of the participants reported experience of clinical examination of oral soft tissues, but less than half of the participants reported that they had the opportunity to examine patients with a suspicious oral lesion. Moreover, only 54.5% of the participants reported that they had received enough training to provide smoking cessation advice; 36.7% reported that they have sufficient knowledge on prevention and detection of OC; and 21% reported being well-informed about OC. Around 35.2% reported that the university training was adequate for OC examination, while 88.3% of students expressed the need for more information on OC-related topics (Table 3). Table 3 Practice and attitude of dental students regarding oral cancer prevention, diagnosis, and treatment by the year of study Questions Responses Study level Total p value 4th 5th Practices Do you routinely ask patients if they use tobacco? (N = 915) No 42 (8.1) 30 (7.6) 72 (7.9) 0.805 Yes 477 (91.9) 366 (92.4) 843 (92.1) Do you advise your patients to quite tobacco? (N = 912) No 107 (20.7) 47 (11.9) 154 (16.9) < 0.001 Yes 409 (79.3) 349 (88.1) 758 (83.1) Do you examine patient’s oral mucosa routinely? (N = 907) No 110 (21.4) 81 (20.6) 191 (21.1) 0.805 Yes 403 (78.6) 313 (79.4) 716 (78.9) Have you had the opportunity to examine patients with a suspicious oral lesion? (N = 880) No 248 (50.1) 161 (41.8) 409 (46.5) 0.002 Yes 207 (41.8) 205 (53.2) 412 (46.8) Not sure 40 (8.1) 19 (4.9) 59 (6.7) Attitudes Do you feel adequately trained to provide tobacco cessation advice? (N = 901) No 190 (37.5) 123 931.2) 313 (34.7) 0.008 Yes 254 (50.1) 237 (60.2) 491 (54.5) Not sure 63 (12.4) 34 (8.6) 97 (10.8) As regards to the clinical appearance of oral cancer, how knowledgeable do you feel? (N = 879) Poorly informed 355 (71.1) 245 (64.5) 600 (68.3) 0.065 Well informed 92 (18.4) 94 (24.7) 186 (21.2) Very well informed 52 (10.4) 41 (10.8) 93 (10.6) Do you consider that the university provided adequate training on oral cancer examination? (N = 892) No 296 (58.8) 218 (56) 514 (57.6) 0.001 Yes 159 (31.9) 155 (39.8) 314 (35.2) Not sure 48 (9.5) 16 (4.1) 64 (7.2) Do you feel that you have sufficient knowledge concerning prevention and detection of oral cancer? (N = 897) No 320 (63.2) 203 (51.9) 523 (58.3) 0.002 Yes 161 (31.8) 168 (43) 329 (36.7) Not sure 25 (4.9) 20 (5.1) 45 (5) Would you like more information or teaching on oral cancer? (N = 897) No 48 (9.5) 37 (9.5) 85 (9.5) 0.463 Yes 444 (87.7) 348 (89) 792 (88.3) Not sure 14 (2.8) 6 (1.5) 20 (2.2) The mean and median scores of OC knowledge and practice by domain are presented in Table 4. Students in the 5th year showed significantly higher knowledge and practice scores than students in 4th year did (P < 0.001). Additionally, students in public universities showed slightly better knowledge scores than those from the private universities did (p = 0.021). However, no significant differences were found with respect to the practice scores. Gender of the participants did not show significant differences in the overall knowledge and practice scores (Table 4), yet there were some differences in some individual items (Supplementary Tables 1, 2). Individual items in the questionnaire that had significant differences university-wise are shown in Table S2. Additionally, KAP items with unsatisfactory responses are presented in supplementary Fig. 1. Table 4 Mean and median scores of knowledge and practice by demographic factors Variable Categories (N/N) Knowledge score P value Practice score P value Median (IQR) Mean ± SD Median (IQR) Mean ± SD Stage of study Year 4(415/489) 15 (12–17) 14.65 ± 3.45 < 0.001 3 (2 − 4) 2.91 ± 0.93 < 0.001 Year 5 (342/382) 17 (14–19) 16.44 ± 3.54 3 (3–4) 3.14 ± 0.88 Smoking No (657/744) 15 (13–18) 15.48 ± 3.64 0.555 3 (3–4) 3.03 ± 0.9 0.199 Yes (98/121) 15 (13–17) 15.28 ± 3.33 3 (2–4) 2.88 ± 1.02 Gender Males (297/333) 15 (13–18) 15.36 ± 3.84 0.778 3 (2–4) 2.92 ± 1 0.117 Females (458/537) 15 (13–18) 15.51 ± 3.44 3 (3–4) 3.06 ± 0.86 University Private (199/274) 15 (13–17) 14.94 ± 3.34 0.021 3 (2–4) 2.95 ± 0.88 0.063 Public (558/598) 16 (13–18) 15.64 ± 3.68 3 (3–4) 3.04 ± 0.93 All tests were conducted using Mann-Whitney test. N/N: number of responses in knowledge and practice, respectively; IQR: interquartile range; SD: standard deviation For a patient with a potential diagnosis of OC, the majority of students suggested referral to oral and maxillofacial surgeons (48.1%) and oral medicine specialists (37.2%; Fig. 1). Fig. 1 Participants’ referral preference of suspected oral cancer cases (%) Discussion This is the first large-scale, multi-institution study to evaluate OC knowledge and practices among clinical dental students in Yemen. Given the large sample size from nine Universities located in four major cities, the data may be considered to be representative of all clinical dental students in Yemen. The present findings should be interpreted with caution considering the relative low response rate (43%), which might have introduced a non-response bias, and thus the generalizability of the results is questionable. However, it should be noted that this response rate is reasonable and comparable to other web-based surveys among dental students and professionals worldwide [22, 26, 28, 30]. Overall, the results showed that although the participants had a fair knowledge of OC, significant gaps regarding OC prevention and early detection were identified. While the majority correctly identified tobacco and alcohol as risk factors of OC, only two thirds of the students recognized sun exposure as a risk factor for lip cancer and only 50% reported old age as a risk factor of OC. Low confidence was reported by the participants to provide smoking cessation advice as only 45% thought they are well-trained to provide advice such. Only 21% were satisfied with their knowledge of OC. The results also showed that 5th year students had significantly better knowledge and practices than the 4th year students (P < 0.01 each). One of the key findings of this study relates to the inadequate knowledge the participants showed about the risk factors and clinical signs of OC. Although the vast majority of the participants identified tobacco and alcohol as the main risk factors, a considerable proportion were not aware that other factors such as age, viral factors, sun exposure are also potential risk factors. These results are consistent with other studies conducted in Saudi Arabia [22], Romania [23], and Turkey [24]. Similarly, the students revealed fair knowledge regarding the clinical signs of OC, a finding similar to those of many previous studies elsewhere [25–27]. Regarding the practices of OC prevention and early detection, the present survey demonstrated a relatively good level of practice among the participants. Nevertheless, some areas were flagged up where their practices need to be improved. The primary prevention of OC is through reducing common risk factors including tobacco habits. In this context, the dental professionals can play pivotal role through educating their patients on the risk factors and advise them to quit deleterious habits such as smoking and other tobacco habits. It is heartening to observe that most of the participants reported asking their patients about their habits and advising them to quit the bad ones. These findings are consistent with many previous studies [22, 23]. The secondary prevention of OC is through screening and early detection using visual examination of oral mucosal. More than three quarters of the participants reported routinely performing clinical oral mucosa examination. This finding is consistent with many previous studies [25–27, 31, 32]. Not surprisingly, the results reveled that 5th year students have significantly higher knowledge and better practices scores than 4th year students. These differences may be attributed primarily to increased clinical exposure and consolidation of knowledge related to OC. This finding is in accordance with that demonstrated among dental students in Palestine [21]. More importantly, the findings underscore the need to further enhance the clinical exposure of dental students and provided regular continuing professional development activities on OC during the undergraduate program and beyond. Despite students’ interests to actively participate in the early detection and prevention of OC, the low confidence was reported as a barrier against their ability to undertake clinical examination, and provide preventive advice to patients. Previous studies on dental students and new graduates from several regions across the globe highlighted the lack of preparedness to refer cases of suspected OC to specialists. Recent data from the Global Cancer Observatory shows that the incidence of OC is likely to rise by 40% by 2040 with a corresponding increase in the associated mortality [33]. Therefore, the dental institutions need to adopt robust and multipronged strategies to enhance teaching and training of dental students on OC to ultimately prepare future generations of well-trained dentists. Firstly, the undergraduate dental curricula need to be revisited to ensure a comprehensive coverage and continually updated information on OC clinical manifestation, clinical detection, preventative strategies to address risk factors, and understanding the role of multidisciplinary team (MDT) in the management. Second, active participation of students can be ensured by incorporating student led presentations and workshops including role playing to gain an understanding of referral pathways and preventive advice. Third, it is also important to provide dental students with regular exposure to assessment, screening, diagnosis and follow-up of suspected OC in outpatient settings, MDT clinics, as well as observing patients undergoing cancer surgery and post-operative care in specialist settings. Finally, community outreach programs can be used effectively to raise public awareness about OC and the importance of regular screenings. This will in turn have a positive impact on student learning and help them consolidate their approach to public education and prevention. In addition, dental education must expose the undergraduate students to the emerging technologies which are currently employed in OC screening. There is growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in OC screening and detection by frontline healthcare workers. Studies suggest that AI can diagnose cancer with greater accuracy than trained clinicians, a matter that strengthens the argument for its development to provide clinical benefits for the patients [34]. It is only a matter of time that widespread use of AI in cancer diagnosis and treatment planning may become a norm in the fight against cancer [35]. Dental education needs to consider the growing role of technology and train the students in OC using the available AI tools. Eventually, the early detection of OC could be revolutionized by AI, with applications being developed for use by both frontline healthcare workers and the general public. In our study, lack of training and confidence were reported as the main barriers to performing oral mucosal screening for cancerous and precancerous lesions. Both of them could be managed by enhancing the dental undergraduate curricula and provisioning continuing educational programs and training on OC prevention and early detection. It is worth mentioning that undergraduate dental program in Yemen is a 5- year program, and OC topics is taught in oral medicine, oral pathology and oral surgery in third, fourth and fifth years. According to this study, there might be weakness points in teaching the topics relevant to OC either in the quantity, the strategy or both. Of note, the teaching strategy in Yemen is still following the traditional method with less engagement of students in the learning process. Therefore, an integrated approach to teach OC with great emphasis on clinical training on oral mucosal examination is highly warranted. The present study has some limitations which need to be acknowledged. Firstly, given the self-reported nature of surveys, the respondents’ answers do not necessarily reflect their real practices and perceptions, along with the fact that the recall bias exists. Secondly, the selection bias is an important potential limitation as the dental students who chose to participate in the survey may be more interested in OC than those who did not participate. Therefore, the results are likely not generalizable to non-respondents. Another limitation is that patients with oral mucosal diseases, like OC, or salivary gland diseases seldom attend dental college seeking diagnosis and treatment. Basically, patients attend therein for dental services. So, the clinical exposure of dental students to these diseases is minimum, or even lacking. Accordingly, their training and practice on these diseases is basically theoretical rather than clinically-oriented. Despite these potential limitations, the present study provides very valuable information on the knowledge and practices of OC among senior dental students in Yemen and may serve as a reference point for future studies. In conclusion, this study sheds light on notable deficiencies in OC knowledge and practices among senior dental students in Yemen, which may have adverse effects on early detection, referral, and prevention of OC. While the majority of participants acknowledged oral squamous cell carcinoma as the primary type of cancer and identified smoking as a significant risk factor, knowledge gaps were identified regarding the most common intraoral sites for OC, additional risk factors, and providing smoking cessation advice to patients. Furthermore, participants expressed limited clinical experience in examining patients with suspicious oral lesions and expressed a desire for further education and training to enhance their skills in recognizing and referring suspected OC cases. These findings emphasize the urgent need to enhance OC teaching and training for undergraduate dental students and provide structured continuing professional development opportunities for dental professionals. It is recommended that further research be conducted to assess the knowledge and skills of undergraduate dental students, particularly in countries with a high incidence of OC. Additionally, it is important to monitor the impact of increased clinical exposure on students’ abilities to recognize suspicious oral lesions, in order to identify the most effective strategies for improving their capabilities. Electronic supplementary material Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary Material 1 Supplementary Material 2 Acknowledgements The authors would like to express their gratitude to all individuals, who agreed to participate in the study. Author Contributions A.S., S.A. and E.H. conceived the study. R.A., H.M, H.L., H.A. and M.A. collected the data. E.H., M.M analyzed the results. S.A. and A.S. wrote the first draft. K.A. and E.H. reviewed the draft. S.A., H.A., H.M., H.L. and R.A. edited the draft. E.H. wrote the final draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript draft. Funding Not applicable. Data Availability The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary material. Declarations Ethical approval and consent to participate All methods in this cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study were carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The Ethics Committee, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Science and Technology, Sana`a, Yemen, approved the study protocol (No: EAC/UST230). Participation was voluntary, and all data were processed anonymously. Written consent was obtained from all participants. Consent to Publication Not applicable. Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest as defined by BMC, or other interests that might be perceived to influence the results and/or discussion reported in this paper. Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. ==== Refs References 1. Sung H Ferlay J Siegel RL Laversanne M Soerjomataram I Jemal A Bray F Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries CA Cancer J Clin 2021 71 3 209 49 10.3322/caac.21660 33538338 2. Zhu S Zhang F Zhao G Zhang X Zhang X Li T Hu C Zhu W Li D Trends in the global burden of oral cancer joint with attributable risk factors: results from the global burden of disease study 2019 Oral Oncol 2022 134 106189 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.106189 36208599 3. Bouvard V Nethan ST Singh D Warnakulasuriya S Mehrotra R Chaturvedi AK Chen TH Ayo-Yusuf OA Gupta PC Kerr AR IARC Perspective on oral Cancer Prevention N Engl J Med 2022 387 21 1999 2005 10.1056/NEJMsr2210097 36378601 4. Gómez I Warnakulasuriya S Varela-Centelles PI López-Jornet P Suárez-Cunqueiro M Diz-Dios P Seoane J Is early diagnosis of oral cancer a feasible objective? Who is to blame for diagnostic delay? Oral Dis 2010 16 4 333 42 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2009.01642.x 20233328 5. Al-Maweri SA Halboub E Warnakulasuriya S Impact of COVID-19 on the early detection of oral cancer: a special emphasis on high risk populations Oral Oncol 2020 106 104760 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104760 32423663 6. Halboub E Al-Mohaya M Abdulhuq M Al-Mandili A Al-Anazi Y Oral squamous cell carcinoma among Yemenis: Onset in young age and presentation at advanced stage J Clin Exp Dent 2012 4 4 e221 225 10.4317/jced.50824 24558559 7. Halboub ES Abdulhuq M Al-Mandili A Oral and pharyngeal cancers in Yemen: a retrospective study East Mediterr Health J 2012 18 9 985 91 10.26719/2012.18.9.985 23057394 8. Halboub ES, Al-Anazi YM, Al-Mohaya MA. Characterization of yemeni patients treated for oral and pharyngeal cancers in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J, 32(11):1177–82. 9. Al-Jaber A, Al-Nasser L, El-Metwally A. Epidemiology of oral cancer in arab countries. Saudi Med J, 37(3):249. 10. Al-Maweri SA Al-Jamaei A Saini R Laronde DM Sharhan A White oral mucosal lesions among the yemeni population and their relation to local oral habits J Investig Clin Dent 2018 9 2 e12305 10.1111/jicd.12305 29178288 11. Al-Maweri SA, Warnakulasuriya S, Samran A. Khat (Catha edulis) and its oral health effects: an updated review. J Investig Clin Dent 2018, 9(1). 12. Nasher AT Al-Hebshi NN Al-Moayad EE Suleiman AM Viral infection and oral habits as risk factors for oral squamous cell carcinoma in Yemen: a case-control study Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2014 118 5 566 572e561 10.1016/j.oooo.2014.08.005 25442493 13. Al-Maweri SA Alaizari NA Al-Sufyani GA Oral mucosal lesions and their association with tobacco use and qat chewing among yemeni dental patients J Clin Exp Dent 2014 6 5 e460 466 10.4317/jced.51706 25674309 14. Spatial temporal Demographic patterns in prevalence of chewing tobacco use in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis from the global burden of Disease Study 2019 Lancet Public Health 2021 6 7 e482 99 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00065-7 34051920 15. Al-Maweri SA Addas A Tarakji B Abbas A Al-Shamiri HM Alaizari NA Shugaa-Addin B Public awareness and knowledge of oral cancer in Yemen Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014 15 24 10861 5 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.24.10861 25605190 16. Devi S Yemen’s health system has “collapsed”, warns UN Lancet 2021 397 10289 2036 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01197-1 34062136 17. Coppola N, Mignogna MD, Rivieccio I, Blasi A, Bizzoca ME, Sorrentino R, Lo Muzio L, Spagnuolo G, Leuci S. Current knowledge, attitudes, and practice among Health Care Providers in OSCC awareness: systematic review and Meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021, 18(9). 18. Alqutaibi AY Borzangy S Al-Maweri SA Aboalrejal A Early detection of oral cancer and potentially malignant disorders: experiences, practices, and beliefs of prosthodontists practicing in Saudi Arabia J Prosthet Dent 2021 126 4 569 74 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.08.007 32994033 19. López-Jornet P Camacho-Alonso F Molina-Miñano F Knowledge and attitudes about oral cancer among dentists in Spain J Eval Clin Pract 2010 16 1 129 33 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01132.x 20367825 20. Ahmed NHM Naidoo S Oral Cancer knowledge, attitudes, and Practices among dentists in Khartoum State, Sudan J Cancer Educ 2019 34 2 291 6 10.1007/s13187-017-1300-x 29151257 21. Khattab NMA Elheeny AAH Tony GA Oral-cancer knowledge, practice, and attitude assessment of dentists in Upper Egypt: a cross-sectional study Clin Exp Dent Res 2019 5 2 121 7 10.1002/cre2.160 31049214 22. Alaizari NA Al-Maweri SA Oral cancer: knowledge, practices and opinions of dentists in yemen Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014 15 14 5627 31 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.14.5627 25081677 23. Halboub E Jafer MA Khormi HI Kariri AA Atiah SA Lughbi SJ Ba-Hattab R Al-Maweri SA Attitudes and practices of tobacco cessation counseling among saudi dental professionals: a nationwide cross-sectional survey Niger J Clin Pract 2022 25 4 502 8 10.4103/njcp.njcp_1784_21 35439911 24. Shadid RM Abu Ali MA Kujan O Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of oral cancer prevention among dental students and interns: an online cross–sectional questionnaire in Palestine BMC Oral Health 2022 22 1 381 10.1186/s12903-022-02415-8 36064693 25. Kujan O Alzoghaibi I Azzeghaiby S Altamimi MA Tarakji B Hanouneh S Idress M Alenzi FQ Iqbal M Taifour S Knowledge and attitudes of saudi dental undergraduates on oral cancer J Cancer Educ 2014 29 4 735 8 10.1007/s13187-014-0647-5 24699922 26. Dumitrescu AL Ibric S Ibric-Cioranu V Assessing oral cancer knowledge in romanian undergraduate dental students J Cancer Educ 2014 29 3 506 13 10.1007/s13187-014-0659-1 24771107 27. Keser G Pekiner FN Assessing oral Cancer Awareness among Dental Students J Cancer Educ 2019 34 3 512 8 10.1007/s13187-018-1332-x 29446005 28. Al-Maweri SA Abbas A Tarakji B Al-Jamaei AS Alaizari NA Al-Shamiri HM Knowledge and opinions regarding oral cancer among yemeni dental students Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015 16 5 1765 70 10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.5.1765 25773823 29. Carter LM Ogden GR Oral cancer awareness of undergraduate medical and dental students BMC Med Educ 2007 7 44 10.1186/1472-6920-7-44 18005417 30. Alhajj MN Al-Maweri SA Folayan MO Halboub E Khader Y Omar R Amran AG Al-Batayneh OB Celebić A Persic S Oral health practices and self-reported adverse effects of E-cigarette use among dental students in 11 countries: an online survey BMC Oral Health 2022 22 1 18 10.1186/s12903-022-02053-0 35081945 31. Carter LM Ogden GR Oral cancer awareness of undergraduate medical and dental students BMC Med Educ 2007 7 1 1 8 10.1186/1472-6920-7-44 17233923 32. Joseph BK Sundaram DB Ellepola AN Assessing oral cancer knowledge among undergraduate dental students in Kuwait University J Cancer Educ 2015 30 415 20 10.1007/s13187-014-0734-7 25238788 33. Ali K Oral cancer-the fight must go on against all odds Evid-Based Dent 2022 23 4 5 10.1038/s41432-022-0243-1 35338315 34. Ardila D Kiraly AP Bharadwaj S Choi B Reicher JJ Peng L Tse D Etemadi M Ye W Corrado G End-to-end lung cancer screening with three-dimensional deep learning on low-dose chest computed tomography Nat Med 2019 25 6 954 61 10.1038/s41591-019-0447-x 31110349 35. Baniulyte G Ali K Artificial intelligence-can it be used to outsmart oral cancer? Evid-Based Dent 2022 23 1 12 3 10.1038/s41432-022-0238-y 35338317