==== Front Pediatr Res Pediatr Res Pediatric Research 0031-3998 1530-0447 Nature Publishing Group US New York 36344695 2367 10.1038/s41390-022-02367-3 Clinical Research Article Higher blood pressure in adolescent boys after very preterm birth and fetal growth restriction Liefke Jonas 1 Steding-Ehrenborg Katarina 1 Sjöberg Pia 1 Ryd Daniel 1 Morsing Eva 2 Arheden Håkan 1 Ley David 2 http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0041-9357 Hedström Erik erik.hedstrom@med.lu.se 13 1 grid.4514.4 0000 0001 0930 2361 Clinical Physiology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden 2 grid.4514.4 0000 0001 0930 2361 Paediatrics, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden 3 grid.4514.4 0000 0001 0930 2361 Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden 7 11 2022 7 11 2022 2023 93 7 20192027 17 8 2022 6 10 2022 13 10 2022 © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Background Although preterm birth predisposes for cardiovascular disease, recent studies in children indicate normal blood pressure and arterial stiffness. This prospective cohort study therefore assessed blood pressure and arterial stiffness in adolescents born very preterm due to verified fetal growth restriction (FGR). Methods Adolescents (14 (13–17) years; 52% girls) born very preterm with FGR (preterm FGR; n = 24) and two control groups born with appropriate birth weight (AGA), one in similar gestation (preterm AGA; n = 27) and one at term (term AGA; n = 28) were included. 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure and aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) and distensibility by magnetic resonance imaging were acquired. Results There were no group differences in prevalence of hypertension or in arterial stiffness (all p ≥ 0.1). In boys, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressures increased from term AGA to preterm AGA to preterm FGR with higher daytime and 24-hour mean arterial blood pressures in the preterm FGR as compared to the term AGA group. In girls, no group differences were observed (all p ≥ 0.1). Conclusions Very preterm birth due to FGR is associated with higher, yet normal blood pressure in adolescent boys, suggesting an existing but limited impact of very preterm birth on cardiovascular risk in adolescence, enhanced by male sex and FGR. Impact Very preterm birth due to fetal growth restriction was associated with higher, yet normal blood pressure in adolescent boys. In adolescence, very preterm birth due to fetal growth restriction was not associated with increased thoracic aortic stiffness. In adolescence, very preterm birth in itself showed an existing but limited effect on blood pressure and thoracic aortic stiffness. Male sex and fetal growth restriction enhanced the effect of preterm birth on blood pressure in adolescence. Male sex and fetal growth restriction should be considered as additional risk factors to that of preterm birth in cardiovascular risk stratification. issue-copyright-statement© International Pediatric Research Foundation, Inc 2023 ==== Body pmcBackground Preterm birth and low birth weight both predispose for cardiovascular disease later in life.1–3 Biomarkers of cardiovascular disease, such as increased blood pressure and aortic stiffness, have been observed already in childhood and adolescence after preterm birth and low birth weight.4,5 However, improvements in perinatal management have decreased peri- and neonatal mortality and morbidity,6–10 and recent studies show normal blood pressure and arterial stiffness in young children born extremely preterm.11–13 These recent studies show no additive effect of birth weight deviation as a marker of fetal growth restriction (FGR) to that of preterm birth on blood pressure and arterial stiffness.12,13 Birth weight for gestational age is a crude marker of impaired fetal growth and includes constitutionally small but healthy infants. True FGR, on the other hand, can with high sensitivity be verified by abnormal fetal blood flow as measured by fetal Doppler velocimetry using structured clinical protocols.14 Further, whether one sex is more susceptible to the effect of preterm birth on blood pressure and arterial stiffness is not clear.12,13,15 We hypothesized that very preterm birth due to verified FGR is associated with elevated blood pressure and increased arterial stiffness in adolescence and that FGR exacerbates the effect of preterm birth. We secondly hypothesized that sex has a modifying effect on relationships between FGR, very preterm birth and cardiovascular outcomes. The current study therefore examined adolescents born very preterm due to FGR, verified with abnormal fetal blood flow velocimetry, using sensitive measures of blood pressure variations and aortic stiffness. 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurements (24-hour ABPM) is the preferred method for assessing blood pressure variations,16 and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the reference standard to assess aortic stiffness using pulse wave velocity (PWV) and distensibility as surrogate markers.17–19 The specific aims were to assess the impact of very preterm birth and FGR on (1) 24-hour ABPM; (2) PWV and distensibility in the ascending and descending thoracic aorta using MRI; and (3) possible modifying effects by sex. Methods Study population and protocol Examinations were performed at Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden, between 2014 and 2019. The Regional Ethical Review board in Lund, Sweden, approved the study (Dnr 2013/244). All participants, and their guardians when appropriate, provided written informed consent before participation. Participants underwent 24-hour ABPM and MRI, and blood were sampled for measures of kidney function. Weight and height were measured in conjunction with 24-hour ABPM or MRI. Body surface area (BSA) was calculated using the Mosteller formula.20 As part of a prospective cohort study, the current study included adolescents born very preterm with early onset FGR actively delivered due to fetal blood flow velocity abnormality between the years 1998 and 2004. Subjects had a birth weight <2 standard deviations,21 absent or reversed end-diastolic blood flow in the umbilical artery as determined by a standardized protocol using Doppler velocimetry, and were delivered with cesarean section between 24–29 gestational weeks (preterm FGR). Two control groups with birth weight appropriate for gestational age (AGA) born in the same time-period (1998–2004) were identified and a total of 102 participants were included prospectively and divided into three groups forming 34 matching triplets (Fig. 1). The first control group was a subset (n = 34) of all children (n = 371) who were born very preterm and who were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit at Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. The causes of very preterm birth in this group included preterm premature rupture of the membranes, ablatio placentae, chorioamnionitis and being delivered as the healthy matched twin to a same sex individual in the preterm FGR group.9 This group was selected to match the preterm FGR group for sex, gestational age at delivery, and year of birth and thus consisted of those born very preterm without FGR (preterm AGA). Twins formed a matched pair if the following criteria were met; one twin was born with FGR, the other twin was born AGA, was of same sex, had normal blood flow in the umbilical artery, and twin-to-twin transfusion had been excluded.9 The second control group consisted of children born at term after normal pregnancy and were matched to both groups for sex and year of birth, forming the third triplet (term AGA). Detailed peri- and neonatal data and follow-up studies of cardiovascular, neuro-cognitive and pulmonary outcomes during childhood have been reported previously.9,22–24Fig. 1 Inclusion flowchart. Upper panel shows initial inclusion of the original cohort. Middle panel shows the current follow-up in adolescence. Lower panel shows the number of individuals who underwent 24-hour ABPM and MRI. FGR fetal growth restriction, AGA appropriate for gestational age, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, 24-hour ABPM 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurements. All individuals from the original cohort were contacted via mail and by phone and asked to participate in this prospective cohort study in adolescence. Potential differences in the presence of peri- and neonatal confounders, e.g., maternal smoking, preeclampsia and bronchopulmonary dysplasia in those who participated versus those who opted out from follow-up were evaluated. Preeclampsia was defined as diastolic blood pressure >90 mmHg on two or more consecutive occasions >4 h apart, arising after 20 weeks of gestation, and proteinuria >300 mg/L in two random clean-catch midstream urine specimens collected ≥4 h apart. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia was defined as need for supplemental oxygen (FiO2 >0.30) at an age corresponding to 36 gestational weeks. 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement 24-hour ABPM was performed according to clinical routine. In short, systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressure were measured every 20 min over 24 hours, and activity and potential symptoms were reported. Daytime and nighttime periods were reviewed both separately and combined (SpaceLabs Medical ABP-monitor model 90207 or Ultralite TM 90217A, Issaquah). Quality assessment and evaluation of the activity diary together with blood pressure readings was performed by a physician (PS) with 10 years of experience. Generally, >80% of successful readings was deemed sufficient for inclusion. Evaluation was in accordance with European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines, using reference values for children and adolescents based on sex, age, and height.16,25 Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were graded as normal (<90th percentile), prehypertension (≥90th to <95th percentile) or hypertension (≥95th percentile) for daytime and nighttime separately. A nocturnal decrease in mean arterial blood pressure <10% was graded as pathological and in addition to reference values for children,25 systolic or diastolic blood pressures above adult reference values were graded as hypertension. Normal values for adults were defined for 24 hours as <130/80 mmHg, for daytime <135/85 mmHg, and for nighttime <120/70 mmHg.16 Magnetic resonance imaging Participants were imaged in supine position using a 1.5T MR scanner (Philips Achieva, Best, the Netherlands; or Magnetom Aera, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). Flow data were acquired in the ascending aorta and descending aorta at diaphragm level using a 2D phase-contrast gradient recalled echo sequence with retrospective ECG gating. Typical parameters were 35 timeframes per cardiac cycle, temporal resolution 23 ms, TR/TE = 9/6 ms, flip angle = 15°, 1.2 × 1.2 × 6 mm (Philips), and TR/TE = 10/3 ms, flip angle = 20°, 1.5 × 1.5 × 5 mm (Siemens). Velocity encoding was 150–250 cm/s to optimize for individual velocity resolution and to avoid aliasing. Respiratory-gated 3D angiography of the thoracic aorta was acquired using a T2-prepared balanced steady-state free precession sequence with isotropic resolution 0.88 mm (Philips) or 0.55 mm (Siemens). Images were analyzed in Segment 3 (http://segment.heiberg.se, Medviso AB, Lund, Sweden).26 Two observers with 5 (JL) and 6 years (DR) of MRI experience performed analyses. Vessel morphology The ascending aorta and descending aorta at diaphragm level were delineated in magnitude images throughout the cardiac cycle using automatic segmentation with manual correction as needed, and guided by phase-contrast images where appropriate. Linear background phase correction was performed.27 Quantitative flow, flow curves, and cross-sectional area change throughout the cardiac cycle were analyzed. Arterial stiffness Aortic PWV was assessed as previously described,28 using the time-to-foot transit time method and blood pulse traveling distance by manual centerline 3D angiography between flow planes (Fig. 2), with flow-curve baseline correction.19Fig. 2 Measurement of pulse wave velocity in the thoracic aorta. a Shows non-contrast-enhanced 3D angiography of the thoracic aorta with flow measurement planes (solid lines) perpendicular to the ascending aorta and descending aorta at diaphragm level, and the aortic centerline distance (Δd; dashed line) between flow measurement planes. b Shows delineations of the ascending aorta in a magnitude image (b1) and phase-contrast image (b2). c Shows corresponding delineations of the descending aorta at diaphragm level (c1 and c2). d Shows flow curves for the ascending aorta (solid line) and descending aorta (dashed line) used to assess pulse wave velocity using the time-to-foot method. Pulse wave traveling time (Δt) was calculated as the time between upslope tangents intersecting the baseline. Pulse wave velocity was calculated by dividing the aortic centerline distance (Δd) with the time difference (Δt). Thoracic aortic distensibility in the ascending aorta and descending aorta at diaphragm level was calculated as Amax−AminAmin⋅ΔP, where Amax and Amin are the maximum and minimum cross-sectional areas during the cardiac cycle, and ΔP equals the brachial blood pressure difference between systole and diastole.29 Oscillometric brachial blood pressure was acquired immediately after the respective flow acquisition. Cystatin C Blood samples were collected in EDTA test tubes and directly centrifuged (Thermo Scientific Megafuge 8, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham) at 1500 G for ten minutes, pipetted (Eppendorf Research plus 100–1000 μL, Hamburg, Germany) into cryotubes, and stored at −80 °C (Panasonic Ultra-low Temperature freezer, MDF-DU702VH-PE, Panasonic Healthcare Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan). Cystatin C was measured at Skåne University Hospital Clinical Chemistry laboratory using validated routine clinical assays. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Caucasian, Asian, Pediatric and Adult (CAPA) equation.30 Statistical analyses Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 26.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, New York) and GraphPad Prism 9 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, California). Artwork was performed using the free and open-source vector graphics editor Inkscape (https://inkscape.org/). For 24-hour ABPM data, boys and girls were analyzed separately as per clinical routine whereas MRI data were analyzed both with both sexes combined and separately. Data are expressed as median (range). Kruskal-Wallis with Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test assessed group differences. The Jonckheere-Terpsta and Kendall’s Tau-b tests assessed trends between groups. Pearson’s chi-squared test or Fisher’s Exact Test assessed categorical variables. P values <0.05 were considered to show statistically significant differences. Results Study population A total of 79 adolescents agreed to participate in the current study (14 (13–17) years, 52% girls). Figure 1 shows a flowchart of inclusion and Table 1 shows subject characteristics at birth and in adolescence as well as neonatal morbidity. In adolescence, when stratifying for sex, girls born preterm FGR were shorter than girls born term AGA (157 vs. 164 cm; p = 0.003). Of those who underwent pharmacological treatment for persistent ductus arteriosus (PDA), 2/10 individuals in the preterm FGR group and 3/9 individuals in the preterm AGA group also underwent surgical treatment for closure of the PDA while one individual in the preterm FGR group underwent surgical treatment alone (Table 1). Data from the follow-up study in childhood for the study population included in the current study show that there were no differences in parents’ educational level between the preterm FGR, preterm AGA or term AGA groups, with 22, 25 and 26 of the mothers (p = 0.99) and 23, 25 and 27 of the fathers (p = 0.80) having gone through upper secondary school education. The respective numbers for university education were 11, 13 and 13 for mothers (p = 0.99) and 7, 8 and 10 for fathers (p = 0.80). The number of families who were cohabited at time of follow-up in childhood (~7 years) were 18, 18 and 25 for the respective group (p = 0.10).22Table 1 Subject characteristics and neonatal morbidity. P values Between Preterm FGR vs. Preterm FGR vs. Preterm AGA vs. Preterm FGR Preterm AGA Term AGA Groups Preterm AGA Term AGA Term AGA Peri-and neonatal characteristics n = 24 n = 27 n = 28  Gestational age at birth (days) 188 (172 to 204) 193 (171 to 208) 280 (269 to 285) 0.0001 >0.99 0.0001 0.0001  Gestational age at birth (weeks + days) 26 + 6 (24 + 4 to 29 + 1) 27 + 4 (24 + 3 to 29 + 5) 40 + 0 (38 +  to –40 + 5) 0.0001 >0.99 0.0001 0.0001  Birth weight (g) 643 (395 to 976) 1100 (660 to 1790) 3485 (2850 to 4390) 0.0001 0.003 0.0001 0.0001  Birth weight deviation (%) –34.6 (−62.7 to −22.5) −3.6 (−23.3 to 14.3) −1.6 (−16. to –28.8) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 >0.99  Maternal age (years) 33 (20–42) 31 (17–41) 31 (21–41) 0.2  Preeclampsia (n (%)) 8 (33%) 1 (4%)# 0 <0.01a  Antenatal steroid treatment (n (%)) 23 (96%) 26 (100%)# 0 0.5a  Multiple birth (n (%)) 5 (21%) 6 (22%) 0 >0.99a  Cesarean section (n (%)) 24 (100%) 15 (56%) 0 <0.0001a  Smoking in pregnancy (n (%)) 2 (8%) 6 (22%) 3 (11%) 0.3  Ablatio placentae (n (%)) 0 3 (11%)## 0 0.2a Neonatal morbidity  Severe IVH grade III–IV (n (%)) 2 (8%) 3 (11%) 0 >0.99a  Any grades of IVH (n (%)) 3 (13%) 7 (26%) 0 0.3a  Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (n (%)) 18 (75%) 7 (26%) 0 0.001a  Severe retinopathy of prematurity (n (%)) 2 (8%) 3 (11%) 0 >0.99a  Necrotizing enterocolitis (n (%)) 2 (8%) 0 0 0.2a  Surgical treatment for PDA (n (%)) 3 (13%) 3 (11%) 0 0.6a  Pharmacological treatment for PDA (n (%)) 10 (42%) 9 (33%) 0 0.5a  Septicemia (n (%)) 13 (54%) 6 (22%) 0 0.02a  Asphyxia; Apgar score <7 at 5 min (n (%)) 1 (4%) 6 (22%) 0 0.1a  Periventricular leukomalacia (n (%)) 1 (4%) 1 (4%) 0 >0.99a  Inotropic support (n (%)) 10 (42%) 8 (30%) 0 0.4a  Surfactant treatment (n (%)) 13 (54%) 15 (56%) 0 >0.99a  Postnatal steroid treatment (n (%)) 9 (38%)## 4 (15%)# 0 0.06a  Ventilatory support at 36 GW (n (%)) 4 (17%) 2 (7%) 0 0.4a Characteristics in adolescence  Age (years) 15 (13–17) 15 (13–16) 15 (13–16) 0.9  Weight (kg) 51 (30–90) 56 (37–75) 58 (37–89) 0.1  Weight deviation (SD) −1 (−4.6–2.9) 0.1 (−3–1.5) 0.4 (−2.3–2.6) 0.07  Length (cm) 160 (150–180)1 167 (149–183) 167 (155–189) 0.01 0.03 0.02 >0.99  BMI (kg/m²) 20 (13–28) 21 (15–24) 21 (15–25) 0.9  BSA (m²) 1.5 (1.1–2.1) 1.6 (1.2–2.0) 1.7 (1.3–2.2) 0.06  Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 105 (87–123) 107 (88–120) 102 (89–130) 0.37  Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 53 (41–74) 54 (45–65) 50 (44–80) 0.08 Data are presented as median (range). Neonatal data missing in one (#) and two (##) individuals. FGR fetal growth restriction, AGA birth weight appropriate for gestational age, IVH intraventricular hemorrhage, PDA persistent ductus arteriosus, GW gestational week, N/A not applicable, SD standard deviation, BMI body mass index, BSA body surface area. 1Girls born preterm FGR were shorter than girls born term AGA (157 (150–165 cm) vs. (164 (157–176 cm); p = 0.003). Bold indicates differences between groups. aComparison performed between preterm FGR and preterm AGA. Table 2 shows comparisons of perinatal characteristics and neonatal morbidity between those who participated in the current study and those included in the original cohort who opted out from follow-up in the current study.Table 2 Comparison of perinatal characteristics and neonatal morbidity between study participants in the current cohort (opted in) and those who opted out from follow-up (opted out) from the original cohort. Preterm FGR Preterm AGA Term AGA Opted in Opted out P Opted in Opted out P Opted in Opted out P n = 24 n = 10 n = 27 n = 7 n = 28 n = 6 Perinatal characteristics  Girls (%) 54 33 0.3 52 29 0.4 50 33 0.7  Gestational days (days) 188 191 0.6 193 180 0.1 280 279 0.7  Birth weight (g) 643 660 0.8 1100 875 0.04 3485 3580 0.3  Birth weight deviation (%) −34.6 −43.4 0.3 −3.6 −11.4 0.1 −1.6 −1.2 0.7  Maternal age (years) 33 28 0.01 31 32 0.4 31 29 0.2  Preeclampsia (%) 33 0.3 1 4 0# 1 0 0 N/A  Antenatal steroid treatment (%) 96 90 0.5 100 86# 0.2 0 0 N/A  Multiple birth (%) 21 30 0.7 22 14# 1 0 0 N/A  Cesarean section (%) 100 100 1 56 86# 0.2 0 0 N/A  Primipara (%) 67 40 0.3 44 60# 0.7 25 33 1  Smoking during pregnancy (%) 8 30 0.1 22 0# 0.3 11 33 0.2  Ablatio placentae (%) 0 0 N/A 12 57# 0.03 0 0 N/A Neonatal morbidity  Severe IVH grade III–IV (%) 8 10 1 11 29 0.6 0 0 N/A  Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (%) 75 60 0.4 26 43# 0.6 0 0 N/A  Severe retinopathy of prematurity (%) 8 30 0.1 11 14# 1 0 0 N/A  Necrotizing enterocolitis (%) 8 20 0.6 0 0 N/A 0 0 N/A  Surgical or pharmacological treatment for PDA (%) 46 40 0.8 33 43# 0.6 0 0 N/A  Septicemia (%) 54 50 1 22 14# 0.4 0 0 N/A  Asphyxia; Apgar score <7 at 5 min (%) 4 20 0.2 22 14# 1 0 0 N/A  Periventricular leukomalacia (%) 4 0 1 4 14# 0.4 0 0 N/A  Inotropic support (%) 42 1 0.1 30 57# 0.2 0 0 N/A  Surfactant treatment (%) 54 60 1 56 86# 0.2 0 0 N/A  Postnatal steroid treatment (%) 41 38 1 15 57# 0.04 0 0 N/A  Ventilatory support at 36 GW (%) 17 40 0.2 7 0 1 0 0 N/A Neonatal data missing in one (#) individual. FGR fetal growth restriction, AGA birth weight appropriate for gestational age, IVH intraventricular hemorrhage, PDA Persistent ductus arteriosus, N/A not appropriate, GW gestational weeks. Bold indicates differences between groups. Blood pressure Figure 3 and Tables 1, 3 show blood pressure data. There were no group differences in systolic (p = 0.37) or diastolic (p = 0.08) office blood pressure measurements (Table 1) and no difference observed after stratifying for sex (all p ≥ 0.38). There were no differences in the prevalence of prehypertension, hypertension, or pathological day-to-night ratio in mean arterial blood pressure between groups (all p ≥ 0.1) (Table 3).Fig. 3 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurements in boys (left panel) and girls (right panel). Upper row shows systolic blood pressures, middle row shows diastolic blood pressures and lower row shows mean arterial blood pressure. Left panel shows daytime blood pressures, middle panel show nighttime blood pressures and right panel shows 24-hour blood pressures in adolescents born preterm with fetal growth restriction (preterm FGR), preterm with birth weight appropriate for gestational age (preterm AGA), and adolescents born at term (term AGA). For boys, median daytime and 24-hour mean arterial blood pressures were higher in preterm FGR compared to the term AGA group ((93 (88–101 mmHg) vs. 86 (76–101 mmHg); p = 0.03) and (88 (85–97 mmHg) vs. 82 (73–93 mmHg); p = 0.03, respectively)). FGR fetal growth restriction, AGA birth weight appropriate for gestational age. Lines indicate median. Table 3 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurements. Preterm FGR Preterm AGA Term AGA P between groups n = 20 n = 27 n = 23 Daytime  Systolic blood pressure   Prehypertensive (n (%)) 1 (5%) 2 (7%) 0 0.63   Hypertensive (n (%)) 2 (10%) 4 (15%) 1 (4%) 0.48  Diastolic blood pressure   Prehypertensive (n (%)) 2 (10%) 1 (4%) 1 (4%) 0.68   Hypertensive (n (%)) 0 0 0 N/A Nighttime  Systolic blood pressure   Prehypertensive (n (%)) 2 (10%) 0 0 0.08   Hypertensive (n (%)) 3 (15%) 1 (4%) 0 0.1  Diastolic blood pressure   Prehypertensive (n (%)) 1 (5%) 0 0 0.29   Hypertensive (n (%)) 1 (5%) 0 1 (4%) 0.52 Nocturnal dip (<10%) 3 (15%) 3 (11%) 2 (9%) 0.9 Data are presented as number (%). FGR fetal growth restriction, AGA birth weight appropriate for gestational age, N/A not applicable. There was no difference in systolic blood pressure between groups for either sex as determined by 24-hour ABPM (all p ≥ 0.21). In boys, the preterm FGR group had higher daytime mean arterial blood pressure (93 mmHg vs. 86 mmHg; p = 0.03) and 24-hour mean arterial blood pressure (88 vs. 82 mmHg; p = 0.03) as compared to the term AGA group. Further, in boys, trend analyses showed increasing diastolic and mean arterial blood pressures from term AGA to preterm AGA to preterm FGR for 24-hour and for daytime blood pressure (all p ≤ 0.03) (Fig. 3). In girls, no group differences or trends were observed in any blood pressure variables (all p ≥ 0.1) (Fig. 3). Arterial stiffness Table 4 shows blood flow measurements, aortic centerline distance and cross-sectional area of the ascending aorta and descending aorta at diaphragm level. There were no differences in these variables after correction for BSA between groups (all p ≥ 0.06).Table 4 Magnetic resonance imaging variables. P Preterm FGR Preterm AGA Term AGA Between all groups n = 22 n = 22 n = 26 Stroke volume (ml) 68 (53–104) 74 (52–115) 81 (54–121) 0.08 Cardiac output (L/min) 5.2 (2.8–7.4) 5.8 (3.1–9.2) 6.1 (4.0–9.5) 0.3 Cardiac index (L/min/m²) 3.4 (1.9–4.9) 3.6 (2.2 –5.5) 3.6 (2.6–5.2) 0.7 Aortic distance (3D angiography) (mm) 170 (150–227)(p = 0.02) 190 (149–258) 193 (153–237) 0.02 Aortic distance (3D angiography) (mm/m²) 112 (87–149) 116 (94–169) 116 (86–150) 0.8 Ascending aorta  Minimal cross-sectional area (cm²) 3.4 (2.5–4.7)(p = 0.02) 3.5 (2.6–5.5) 4 (3.0–5.7) 0.01  Minimal cross-sectional area (cm²/m²) 2.2 (1.5–2.9) 2.1 (1.5–3.2) 2.4 (1.8–3.3) 0.1  Maximal cross-sectional area (cm²) 5.0 (3.6–6.5)(p = 0.02) 5.1 (3.8–7.7) 5.8 (4.6–8.4) 0.01  Maximal cross-sectional area (cm²/m²) 3.1 (2.4–4.2) 3.1 (2.6–4.5) 3.5 (2.7–4.9) 0.08 Descending aorta  Minimal cross-sectional area (cm²) 1.1 (0.7–1.8) 1.1 (0.8–1.7) 1.3 (0.8–2.4) 0.1  Minimal cross-sectional area (cm²/m²) 0.7 (0.5–1.2) 0.7 (0.5–1.0) 0.8 (0.6–1.3) 0.2  Maximal cross-sectional area (cm²) 1.7 (1.3–2.6)(p = 0.01) 1.9 (1.3–2.6) 2.0 (1.3–3.5) 0.02  Maximal cross-sectional area (cm²/m²) 1.1 (0.9–1.7) 1.2 (0.8–1.5) 1.2 (1.0–1.8) 0.06 Arterial stiffness  Pulse wave velocity (m/s) 3.7 (3.2–5.1) 3.7 (3.1–4.6) 3.6 (3.1–5.0) 0.7  Distensibility ascending aorta (10−3 mmHg−1) 9.4 (4.4–14.7) 9.4 (6.6–13.9) 9.4 (6.0–12.5) >0.9  Distensibility descending aorta (10−3 mmHg−1) 9.4 (4.8–17.9) 11.3 (5.9–16.7) 10.6 (7.0–17.7) 0.5 Data are presented as median (range). Differences were only found between preterm FGR and term AGA. Bold indicates differences between groups. FGR fetal growth restriction, AGA birth weight appropriate for gestational age. Figure 4 and Table 4 shows PWV and aortic distensibility. There were no differences in PWV or distensibility in the ascending aorta or the descending aorta at diaphragm level between groups (all p ≥ 0.5). When stratifying for sex, median PWV was higher in girls in the preterm AGA group as compared to girls in the term AGA group (3.9 m/s vs. 3.5 m/s; p = 0.04).Fig. 4 Thoracic aortic pulse wave velocity and aortic distensibility. Left graph shows pulse wave velocity, middle graph shows distensibility in the ascending aorta and right graph shows distensibility in the descending aorta at diaphragm level. Closed circles indicate boys and open circles indicate girls. For girls, median pulse wave velocity was higher in preterm AGA group as compared to the term AGA group (3.9 m/s vs. 3.5 m/s; p = 0.04). FGR fetal growth restriction, AGA birth weight appropriate for gestational age. Lines indicate median. Interobserver variability for aortic centerline distance and PWV, reported as median (95% LoA; i.e., 2.5th to 97.5th percentile), were −6 (−2 to −12) mm and −0.2 (−0.6 to 0.02) m/s, respectively. Median aortic centerline distance between observes was 195 mm whereas median PWV was 3.9 m/s. Cystatin C Median cystatin C-based eGFR were for the preterm FGR group 94 [IQR 78–109] ml/min/1.73 m2, for the preterm AGA group 100 [IQR 85–118] ml/min/1.73 m2 and for the term AGA group 100 [IQR 89–110] ml/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.35). Discussion The current study shows that very preterm birth due to early onset fetal growth restriction is associated with subtle blood pressure increases in adolescent boys. Further, arterial stiffness was increased in girls born very preterm with appropriate birth weight. Renal function did not differ between groups. Blood pressure There were no group differences in prevalence of prehypertension or hypertension as determined by 24-hour ABPM in adolescence. Similar observations, also using 24-hour ABPM, have been noted in a recent cohort of extremely preterm children (~8 years old) born between 2008 and 2011,11 however the effect of FGR or birth weight deviation on blood pressure was not studied. As in the current study, kidney function was normal in the previous study,11 indicating a limited negative effect of very and extremely preterm birth on kidney function and blood pressure in childhood and adolescence. In absolute numbers, with no adjustment for age or height, there were no differences in systolic blood pressure for either daytime or nighttime for either sex. However, boys born preterm FGR had higher diastolic and mean arterial blood pressures in comparison with boys in the term AGA group. This is partly in line with the nation-wide follow-up study of the ’Extremely Preterm Infants in Sweden Study’ (EXPRESS) cohort,12 which showed that boys but not girls have higher but still normal systolic and diastolic office blood pressure compared to controls. The current study, using 24-hour ABPM, indicates an additive effect of FGR to that of very preterm birth on blood pressure in boys. The ‘EXPRESS’ study lacked the definition of true FGR as the study did not have access to fetal blood flow velocity measurements. Further, the ‘EXPRESS’ study used office blood pressure, which in the current study showed no difference between groups, as opposed to the observed differences based on 24-hour ABPM. Trends in higher blood pressures for boys born preterm FGR as compared to preterm AGA may be due to differences in peri- and neonatal morbidity as both maternal hypertension and the presence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, with higher prevalence in the preterm FGR group, are associated with increased blood pressure and arterial stiffness.31–33 The current and other recent studies.11,12 indicate that preterm birth associates with higher but still normal blood pressure in childhood and adolescence, with male sex and FGR as possible exacerbating factors. Earlier studies show strong associations between preterm birth and hypertension,3,15,34 with a possible lessened effect of preterm birth on blood pressure in those born after 1990.34 These earlier studies, in contrast to the current study and more recent studies, suggest female sex as an exacerbating factor.15 Whether the current and other recent cohorts, born in late 1990s and later, continues to show a limited and sex-specific effect of preterm birth and FGR on blood pressure when reaching adulthood remains to be studied. Nevertheless, even a small increase in blood pressure as observed for boys in the preterm FGR group in the current study, may have negative effects on future incidence of cardiovascular disease.35,36 Although not significantly different, maternal smoking was almost three times as common in the preterm AGA group as compared to the preterm FGR group and could be hypothesized to be associated with increased blood pressure in this group.37 Other factors indicative of socioeconomic differences,38 such as parental educational status and cohabitation in childhood that are known to impact blood pressure,39 were similar between groups. Socioeconomic factors could thus not explain blood pressure differences between groups in the current study. Further, the differences found using 24-hour ABPM were not observed using standard office blood pressure, underscoring the increased sensitivity of 24-hour ABPM in the assessment of future cardiovascular risk after very preterm birth and FGR. Arterial stiffness The current study showed that PWV and aortic distensibility were similar between groups, irrespective of preterm birth and FGR. This is in contrast to earlier studies indicating increased arterial stiffness after either preterm birth or low birth weight.4,5,40,41 Whether low birth weight due to FGR exacerbates the effect of preterm birth is not clear from these earlier studies. Contrary to Cheung et al.,41 the current study showed no differences in arterial stiffness between groups and thus no additive effect of FGR to that of very preterm birth. More in line with the current study, however, the recent ‘EXPRESS’ studies showed normal office blood pressure,12 lower carotid stiffness, and no increase in aortic stiffness assessed by ultrasonography.13 in children born extremely preterm compared to those born at term. When stratifying for sex, PWV was higher for girls in the preterm AGA group as compared to girls in the term AGA group. Increased arterial stiffness has previously been shown in adolescent girls born very or extremely preterm with no additional effect of low birth weight for gestational age to that of preterm birth.5 In contrast to that previous study, however, the current study population had normal blood pressure, possibly indicating improved cardiovascular outcome in this more recent study population. Finally, both the ascending and descending aorta were smaller in the preterm FGR group as compared to the term AGA group. Although not significant after BSA adjustment, most likely due to sample size, a visual trend of smaller vessels was observed for both groups born very preterm. A smaller and stiffer arterial tree increases afterload and is hypothesized to predispose for hypertension and cardiovascular disease both in those born preterm and after FGR.42 Differences in arterial stiffness and aortic dimensions between the preterm groups in the current study suggest differences in vascular development and subsequent response to extrauterine life. Whether differences in aortic dimensions or arterial stiffness are indicative of future cardiovascular disease in the current population remain to be shown. Limitations Not all individuals from the original cohort participated in the current study, limiting statistical power. However, the strict inclusion criteria and close matching between groups and minimal differences in peri- and neonatal data observed between those participating and those who opted out, limit the potential negative effects of the small sample size. Finally, puberty may affect results and onset of puberty was not determined. It is however likely that most if not all participants were in puberty.43 Conclusions Very preterm birth due to early onset fetal growth restriction is associated with higher, yet normal blood pressure in adolescent boys. This difference suggests an existing but limited impact of very preterm birth on cardiovascular risk in adolescence, possibly enhanced by male sex and fetal growth restriction. Acknowledgements The authors thank Margareta Gebka for inclusion of study participants and study management. Author contributions Conceptualization: E.M., D.L., E.H., H.A.; Methodology: J.L., E.M., D.L., E.H., H.A.; Formal analysis and investigation: J.L., D.R., P.S., E.H.; Writing—original draft preparation: J.L.; Writing—review and editing: All authors; Funding acquisition: E.H., D.L.; Resources: E.H., D.L.; Supervision: E.H., K.S.E., D.L. Funding Funding was received from the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation (20180510 and 20200808), the Swedish governmental funding of clinical research (ALF), Swedish Research Council grant (2020-01236), Region Skåne, Skåne University Hospital, and Anna Lisa och Sven-Eric Lundgrens stiftelse för medicinsk forskning. Open access funding provided by Lund University. Data availability Anonymized raw and/or analyzed data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Informed consent All participants and their guardians when appropriate provided written informed consent before participation and regarding publishing their data. Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. ==== Refs References 1. Crump C Association of Preterm Birth With Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease in Adulthood JAMA Pediatr. 2019 173 736 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.1327 31157896 2. Barker DJP Osmond C Winter PD Margetts B Simmonds SJ Weight in infancy and death from ischaemic heart disease Lancet 1989 334 577 580 10.1016/S0140-6736(89)90710-1 3. Crump C Winkleby MA Sundquist K Sundquist J Risk of hypertension among young adults who were born preterm: a Swedish national study of 636,000 births Am. J. Epidemiol. 2011 173 797 803 10.1093/aje/kwq440 21320866 4. Rossi P Respective Roles of Preterm Birth and Fetal Growth Restriction in Blood Pressure and Arterial Stiffness in Adolescence J. Adolesc. Health 2011 48 520 522 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.08.004 21501813 5. Bonamy A-KE Preterm Birth Contributes to Increased Vascular Resistance and Higher Blood Pressure in Adolescent Girls Pediatr. Res. 2005 58 845 849 10.1203/01.PDR.0000181373.29290.80 16183828 6. Norman M Association Between Year of Birth and 1-Year Survival Among Extremely Preterm Infants in Sweden During 2004-2007 and 2014-2016 JAMA 2019 321 1188 10.1001/jama.2019.2021 30912837 7. Zeitlin J Changes in care and outcome of very preterm babies in the Parisian region between 1998 and 2003 Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010 95 F188 F193 10.1136/adc.2008.156745 19395393 8. Jobe AH Pharmacology Review: Why Surfactant Works for Respiratory Distress Syndrome NeoReviews 2006 7 e95 e106 10.1542/neo.7-2-e95 9. Brodszki J Early intervention in management of very preterm growth-restricted fetuses: 2-year outcome of infants delivered on fetal indication before 30 gestational weeks Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2009 34 288 296 10.1002/uog.7321 19705404 10. Crowley, P. A. Antenatal corticosteroid therapy: A meta-analysis of the randomized trials, 1972 to 1994. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 173, 322–335 (1995). 11. Rakow A Kidney volume, kidney function, and ambulatory blood pressure in children born extremely preterm with and without nephrocalcinosis Pediatr. Nephrol. 2019 34 1765 1776 10.1007/s00467-019-04293-9 31338588 12. Edstedt Bonamy, A. et al. Blood Pressure in 6‐Year‐Old Children Born Extremely Preterm. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 6, e005858 (2017). 13. Mohlkert L-A Preterm arteries in childhood: dimensions, intima-media thickness, and elasticity of the aorta, coronaries, and carotids in 6-y-old children born extremely preterm Pediatr. Res. 2017 81 299 306 10.1038/pr.2016.212 28195589 14. Lees CC ISUOG Practice Guidelines: diagnosis and management of small‐for‐gestational‐age fetus and fetal growth restriction Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2020 56 298 312 10.1002/uog.22134 32738107 15. Hovi P Blood Pressure in Young Adults Born at Very Low Birth Weight: Adults Born Preterm International Collaboration Hypertension 2016 68 880 887 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.08167 27572149 16. Williams B 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension Eur. Heart J. 2018 39 3021 3104 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339 30165516 17. Grotenhuis HB Validation and reproducibility of aortic pulse wave velocity as assessed with velocity-encoded MRI J. Magn. Reson. Imaging JMRI 2009 30 521 526 10.1002/jmri.21886 19711407 18. Voges I Normal values of aortic dimensions, distensibility, and pulse wave velocity in children and young adults: a cross-sectional study J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 2012 14 77 10.1186/1532-429X-14-77 23151055 19. Lundström, S., Liefke, J., Heiberg, E. & Hedström, E. Pulse Wave Velocity Measurements by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Neonates and Adolescents: Methodological Aspects and Their Clinical Implications. Pediatr. Cardiol. 10.1007/s00246-022-02894-0 (2022). 20. Mosteller RD Simplified calculation of body-surface area N. Engl. J. Med. 1987 317 1098 10.1056/NEJM198710223171717 3657876 21. Maršál K Intrauterine growth curves based on ultrasonically estimated foetal weights Acta Paediatr. 1996 85 843 848 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1996.tb14164.x 8819552 22. Morsing E Asard M Ley D Stjernqvist K Marsal K Cognitive Function After Intrauterine Growth Restriction and Very Preterm Birth Pediatrics 2011 127 e874 e882 10.1542/peds.2010-1821 21382944 23. Morsing E Liuba P Fellman V Maršál K Brodszki J Cardiovascular function in children born very preterm after intrauterine growth restriction with severely abnormal umbilical artery blood flow Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2014 21 1257 1266 10.1177/2047487313486044 23613223 24. Morsing E Gustafsson P Brodszki J Lung function in children born after foetal growth restriction and very preterm birth: Lung function after very preterm IUGR Acta Paediatr. 2012 101 48 54 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02435.x 21824191 25. Lurbe E Management of high blood pressure in children and adolescents: recommendations of the European Society of Hypertension J. Hypertens. 2009 27 1719 1742 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32832f4f6b 19625970 26. Heiberg E Design and validation of Segment–freely available software for cardiovascular image analysis BMC Med. Imaging 2010 10 1 10.1186/1471-2342-10-1 20064248 27. Hofman MBM In-vivo validation of interpolation-based phase offset correction in cardiovascular magnetic resonance flow quantification: a multi-vendor, multi-center study J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 2019 21 30 10.1186/s12968-019-0538-3 31104632 28. Dorniak K Required temporal resolution for accurate thoracic aortic pulse wave velocity measurements by phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and comparison with clinical standard applanation tonometry BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2016 16 110 10.1186/s12872-016-0292-5 27387199 29. Hoeks, A. P. G. Non-invasive study of the local mechanical arterial characteristics in humans. in The Arterial System in Hypertension (eds. Safar, M. E. & O’Rourke, M. F.) vol. 144 119–134 (Springer Netherlands, 1993). 30. Grubb A Generation of a new cystatin C-based estimating equation for glomerular filtration rate by use of 7 assays standardized to the international calibrator Clin. Chem. 2014 60 974 986 10.1373/clinchem.2013.220707 24829272 31. Davis EF Clinical cardiovascular risk during young adulthood in offspring of hypertensive pregnancies: insights from a 20-year prospective follow-up birth cohort BMJ Open 2015 5 e008136 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008136 26105032 32. Hurst JR Respiratory and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Survivors of Extremely Preterm Birth at 19 Years Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2020 202 422 432 10.1164/rccm.202001-0016OC 32302489 33. Flahault A Arterial Structure and Stiffness Are Altered in Young Adults Born Preterm Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2020 40 2548 2556 10.1161/ATVBAHA.120.315099 32847389 34. de Jong F Monuteaux MC van Elburg RM Gillman MW Belfort MB Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Preterm Birth and Later Systolic Blood Pressure Hypertension 2012 59 226 234 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.181784 22158643 35. Cook NR Cohen J Hebert PR Taylor JO Hennekens CH Implications of small reductions in diastolic blood pressure for primary prevention Arch. Intern. Med. 1995 155 701 709 10.1001/archinte.1995.00430070053006 7695458 36. Whelton SP Association of Normal Systolic Blood Pressure Level With Cardiovascular Disease in the Absence of Risk Factors JAMA Cardiol. 2020 5 1011 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1731 32936272 37. Högberg L Effects of maternal smoking during pregnancy on offspring blood pressure in late adolescence J. Hypertens. 2012 30 693 699 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32835168f4 22388229 38. McHale P Mediators of socioeconomic inequalities in preterm birth: a systematic review BMC Public Health 2022 22 1134 10.1186/s12889-022-13438-9 35668387 39. Bann D Fluharty M Hardy R Scholes S Socioeconomic inequalities in blood pressure: co-ordinated analysis of 147,775 participants from repeated birth cohort and cross-sectional datasets, 1989 to 2016 BMC Med. 2020 18 338 10.1186/s12916-020-01800-w 33203396 40. Levent E The relation of arterial stiffness with intrauterine growth retardation: Arterial stiffness and intrauterine growth Pediatr. Int. 2009 51 807 811 10.1111/j.1442-200X.2009.02905.x 19508453 41. Cheung YF Relation of arterial stiffness with gestational age and birth weight Arch. Dis. Child. 2004 89 217 221 10.1136/adc.2003.025999 14977693 42. Martyn CN Greenwald SE Impaired synthesis of elastin in walls of aorta and large conduit arteries during early development as an initiating event in pathogenesis of systemic hypertension Lancet Lond. Engl. 1997 350 953 955 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)10508-0 43. Brix N Timing of puberty in boys and girls: A population‐based study Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2019 33 70 78 10.1111/ppe.12507 30307620