==== Front PLoS One PLoS One plos PLOS ONE 1932-6203 Public Library of Science San Francisco, CA USA 10.1371/journal.pone.0288004 PONE-D-22-28954 Research Article Medicine and Health Sciences Women's Health Maternal Health Pregnancy Medicine and Health Sciences Women's Health Obstetrics and Gynecology Pregnancy Medicine and Health Sciences Medical Conditions Infectious Diseases Viral Diseases Covid 19 Medicine and Health Sciences Epidemiology Medical Risk Factors Medicine and Health Sciences Diagnostic Medicine Virus Testing Medicine and Health Sciences Women's Health Maternal Health Birth Preterm Birth Medicine and Health Sciences Women's Health Obstetrics and Gynecology Birth Preterm Birth Medicine and Health Sciences Women's Health Maternal Health Pregnancy Pregnancy Complications Preterm Birth Medicine and Health Sciences Women's Health Obstetrics and Gynecology Pregnancy Pregnancy Complications Preterm Birth Biology and Life Sciences Developmental Biology Embryology Placenta Biology and Life Sciences Anatomy Reproductive System Placenta Medicine and Health Sciences Anatomy Reproductive System Placenta Medicine and Health Sciences Medical Conditions Symptomatic Diseases Medicine and Health Sciences Medical Conditions Infectious Diseases Respiratory Infections Medicine and Health Sciences Medical Conditions Respiratory Disorders Respiratory Infections Medicine and Health Sciences Pulmonology Respiratory Disorders Respiratory Infections Impact of timing and severity of COVID-19 infection in pregnancy on intrauterine fetal growth- a registry-based study from Qatar COVID-19 infection in pregnancy and fetal growth restriction Farrell Thomas Conceptualization Data curation Formal analysis Investigation Methodology Supervision Writing – original draft Writing – review & editing 1 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6903-5445 Minisha Fathima Data curation Formal analysis Methodology Writing – original draft Writing – review & editing 1 * Abu Yaqoub Salwa Data curation Investigation Methodology Visualization Writing – review & editing 1 Rahim Abubaker Abdel Conceptualization Data curation Investigation Methodology Writing – original draft Writing – review & editing 1 Omar Mai Conceptualization Data curation Investigation Methodology Writing – original draft 1 Ahmed Huda Conceptualization Data curation Methodology Writing – review & editing 1 Lindow Stephen Conceptualization Data curation Formal analysis Methodology Writing – original draft Writing – review & editing 2 Abraham Merlin Rajam Conceptualization Data curation Formal analysis Methodology Writing – review & editing 3 Gassim Mahmoud Conceptualization Data curation Formal analysis Methodology Visualization Writing – review & editing 4 Al-Dewik Nader Conceptualization Data curation Methodology Writing – original draft Writing – review & editing 3 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2871-2248 Ahmed Shamsa Conceptualization Data curation Supervision Visualization Writing – review & editing 1 Al-Rifai Hilal Conceptualization Data curation Project administration Validation Visualization Writing – review & editing 5 Q-precious group ¶ 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women’s Wellness and Research Centre, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar 2 Director of Master’s Projects, Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland 3 Department of Research, Women’s Wellness and Research Centre, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar 4 Department of Pharmacology, Women’s Wellness and Research Centre, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar 5 Chief Executive Officer, Women’s Wellness and Research Centre, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar Petry Clive J. Editor University of Cambridge, UNITED KINGDOM Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. ¶ Members of the Q precious group are listed in acknowledgments. * E-mail: fathim999@gmail.com, fminisha@hamad.qa 30 6 2023 2023 30 6 2023 18 6 e028800424 10 2022 16 6 2023 © 2023 Farrell et al 2023 Farrell et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Background The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted pregnant women, increasing maternal and neonatal morbidity. The placenta is a potential target for the pathophysiological processes due to the increased thrombotic inflammatory activation and inadequate uteroplacental perfusion and oxygenation, potentially causing intrauterine growth restriction. This study investigates the impact of gestational age at diagnosis of COVID-19 and the presence of symptoms on intrauterine fetal growth in pregnant women. Methods A retrospective review of COVID-19 positive pregnant women in Qatar from March 2020 to March 2021 was conducted. They were divided based on trimester of pregnancy in which they were infected. The outcomes included birthweight, customised fetal birthweight centiles, small for gestational age (SGA) baby and daily growth increments, compared between the trimesters and between symptomatic and asymptomatic women. Results In our cohort, 218 women (20.5%) were infected in the first trimester, 399 (37.5%) in the second and 446 (42%) in the third. Women in the second trimester were significantly younger and symptomatic. Women infected in the first trimester were least likely to have diabetes. The mean birthweight, risk of SGA (11.5% vs 10% vs 14.6%, p = 0.302), and median customized growth centiles (47.6% vs 45.9% vs 46.1%)were similar between the groups. Symptomatic women had significantly lower mean birthweight (3147 gms vs 3222 gms) and median birthweight centiles (43.9% vs 54.0%)compared to the asymptomatic (p<0.05 for both). In women infected within 20 weeks of gestation, a delay in daily fetal growth increments was noted with symptomatic disease, although not statistically significant. Conclusion This study shows that women with symptomatic disease had lower birth centiles and birth weights. This was regardless of the gestational age at which they were infected. Early symptomatic disease seems to have an impact on fetal growth velocity; however, larger studies are needed to corroborate these findings. The author(s) received no specific funding for this work. Data AvailabilityData cannot be shared publicly because of hospital confidentiality and data sharing policies. Data can be made available from the HMC Institutional Data Access / Ethics Committee for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data. The following email address can be used to direct data access request pabdulrouf@hamad.qa, Dr. Abdul Rouf, Assistant Directior, Pharmacy; Director of Research Operations, WWRC Research Centre, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha. OutbreaksCOVID-19 Data Availability Data cannot be shared publicly because of hospital confidentiality and data sharing policies. Data can be made available from the HMC Institutional Data Access / Ethics Committee for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data. The following email address can be used to direct data access request pabdulrouf@hamad.qa, Dr. Abdul Rouf, Assistant Directior, Pharmacy; Director of Research Operations, WWRC Research Centre, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha. ==== Body pmcIntroduction Background and rationale Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19), which is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus, was declared a global pandemic at the start of 2020 by the World Health Organization (WHO). Since then, a plethora of articles has attempted to determine the relationship between the virus and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. As a result, pregnant women were designated as a vulnerable group based on initial reports of increased risk of stillbirth, preterm birth and fetal growth restriction (FGR). Evidence suggests that infection in the later stages of pregnancy is associated with more severe adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes; however, this may be due to a lack of data concerning COVID-19 infection in the early stages of pregnancy [1]. In addition, those pregnant women with COVID-19 who were symptomatic carried a greater risk of adverse outcomes than asymptomatic women [2]. There is increasing evidence that COVID-19 infection is vertically transmitted [3, 4]. The placenta seems to become a potential target for pathophysiological processes that could affect pregnancy outcomes in COVID-19 patients due to increased thrombotic risk and inflammatory activation [5–7]. As placental oxygenation is central in regulating fetoplacental angiogenesis, inadequate uteroplacental perfusion and oxygenation due to placental ischemia and abnormal angiogenesis are considered the primary cause of fetal intrauterine growth restriction and decreased fetal growth velocity [8, 9]. Although the pathophysiological mechanisms that cause fetal growth restriction likely start in the first half of pregnancy, the clinical signs of ischemic placental disease might become apparent late in pregnancy. Study aims The primary aim of this study was to assess the impact of gestational age at diagnosis of COVID-19 and symptoms status on fetal growth (assessed using birthweight and customised birthweight centiles) in a cohort of pregnant women delivering in a large tertiary maternity unit in Qatar. The secondary aim was to explore the differences in fetal growth and velocity (assessed using birthweight, customised birthweight centiles and customised fetal growth velocity z scores) according to symptom status in a subgroup of women who were infected in the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. Materials and methods Study design and setting The Q-PRECIOUS is an active national perinatal registry consisting of women diagnosed with COVID-19 infection during their pregnancies from the beginning of the pandemic. The registry includes all women receiving maternity care within the State of Qatar (public or private sector). The registry was approved by the Medical Research Centre (MRC), Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC), Qatar (MRC- 01-21-122) and by the Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC) Institutional Review Board (IRB), with a waiver of consent provided. Since all the data for this study was extracted from the registry, additional approval was not required as per the corporation MRC policies. The registry consists of data extracted from retrospective chart reviews of women infected with COVID-19 during their pregnancies, via the Cerner Millennium® patient electronic health records. The list for the registry was sourced from the Ministry of Public Health COVID-19 records. We accessed the anonymized data of women infected between March 2020 and March 2021 after prior approval of our study from the registry lead. We did not extract or use any patient identifiable variables like hospital number, name, or date of birth for the analysis. The data cleaning and analysis was performed in the Department of Research, Women’s Wellness and Research Centre, the largest tertiary maternity centre in the country and location of the registry database. Study participants The diagnosis of COVID-19 infection was made following a positive RT-PCR (reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction) naso-oropharyngeal swab test analysed in the central Department of Laboratory and Pathology, HMC. Women were screened either due to clinical suspicion of COVID-19, as part of contact tracing or during screening for elective hospital admission. Pregnancy needed to be confirmed either clinically and/or by a urine or blood pregnancy test and/or by a pelvic ultrasound at the time of infection. Women having a miscarriage (delivery below the period of viability ≤24 completed weeks of gestation as per local hospital guidelines) were excluded as the main aim was to assess the effect of Covid-19 on intrauterine fetal growth. Additionally, a subgroup of women infected in the first 20 weeks of gestation were included in the secondary analysis. This group included all women who had undergone a minimum of two third trimester ultrasounds for fetal biometry, a minimum of two and a maximum of six weeks apart (in order to ensure both scans are in the third trimester). This allowed us to investigate women who got infected early but carried on their pregnancies beyond 34 weeks. Variable definitions and data source As part of the national COVID-19 prevention and control policies, any person testing positive was contacted by a health professional enquiring about symptoms. Pregnant women reporting any WHO-advised disease-related symptoms [10] were grouped in the symptomatic group, and the remaining women formed the asymptomatic comparison group. The symptoms reported ranged from common ones such as cough, fever, myalgia and sore throat to more severe rarer symptoms such as shortness of breath and chest pain. The gestational age at diagnosis of COVID-19 infection was determined from the estimated delivery date, based on either a dating ultrasound performed in the first trimester of pregnancy or, when this is not available, the last menstrual period (LMP). Gestational age in completed weeks at the time of COVID-19 infection was then categorised into- the first trimester (up to 13 completed weeks), second trimester (14–27 weeks), and third trimester (28–40 weeks), forming the main exposure groups. The maternal age, body mass index (BMI), parity and country of nationality were extracted from medical records. Preexisting maternal medical conditions such as asthma, chronic hypertension, and diabetes were recorded as binary variables. Medical conditions with counts less than five were grouped into the ’other medical illness’ category to safeguard patient confidentiality. They included diseases affecting the cardiovascular system, haematological system, autoimmune conditions, renal diseases, gastrointestinal disorders, malignancy, etc. Pregnancy variables such as hypothyroidism, gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension (including preeclampsia and eclampsia), anaemia and fetal gender were also collected. The main outcome variables included birthweight- defined as the weight measured in grams within the first hour of birth, and a customised birthweight centile which adjusted the birthweight for maternal parity, ethnicity, height and weight, fetal sex, fetal weight and gestational at birth, calculated using the software program GROW (Gestation Network; Birmingham, UK) [11–14]. The babies were further classified as small for gestational age (SGA if centiles ≤10%) and large for gestational age (LGA if centiles ≥90%). The subgroup of women infected within the first 20 weeks of gestation were selected because during this period, the primary and secondary waves of placental invasion occur and infection during this period has a higher probability of adverse effects on the placental circulation [15]. An additional outcome parameter for this subgroup of women, was fetal growth velocity z score, calculated using third trimester ultrasound scans. The estimated fetal weight (EFW) reported in each ultrasound scan and the interval, in days, between scan 1 and scan 2 were used to calculate the fetal growth per day over the time period for each baby. The EFW was calculated using the Hadlock’s formula including ultrasound estimation of fetal head circumference, biparietal diameter, femur length and abdominal circumference [16]. Individual growth increment Z scores (standardised scores) were calculated using the observed growth for each baby and the mean and standard deviation (SD) for the entire subgroup [17]. Statistical analysis The continuous demographic variables were represented as mean ± SD or median ± range according to the assessment of normality (done by visual assessment- histograms; and Shapiro Wilk test SW). The categorical variables were represented as frequency and percentage. The baseline variables were compared among the three trimester groups using ANOVA/ Kruskal Wallis test for continuous and Chi-Square/Fishers exact test for categorical as appropriate. The birthweight and gestational age at delivery in days were compared between the three exposure groups using one-way ANOVA. The customised birthweight centiles were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test. The categorical outcomes (proportion of preterm birth, SGA and LGA) were compared using Chi-square test. Further adjusted analysis was done only if statistically significant results were noted in the univariate analysis. The women were then divided according to symptom status (symptomatic vs asymptomatic disease), separately for the entire cohort and the subgroup getting infected within 20 weeks. The outcomes were compared using Student t-test/ Mann Whitney U test for continuous variables or Chi-square/Fishers for categorical variables. The significance level was set at p-value less than 0.05. All analysis was conducted using Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 28 (IBM Corp., New York). Results There were 1063 women infected with COVID-19 in pregnancy; 218 (20.5%) were infected in the first trimester, 399 (37.5%) in the second and the remaining 446 (42%) in the third trimester. Table 1 outlines the characteristics of the women according to the trimester in which they were infected. 10.1371/journal.pone.0288004.t001 Table 1 Comparison of baseline and pregnancy factors according to trimester of infection. Baseline and Pregnancy risk factors 1st trimester infection N = 218 2nd trimester infection N = 399 3rd trimester infection N = 446 p-value Maternal age- years (Mean, SD)* 30.6 (±5.5) 30.4 (±5.3) 31.4 (±5.3) 0.018 Maternal BMI- kg/m2 (Mean, SD)* 29.2 (±5.6) 30.4 (±6.3) 31.1 (±13.0) 0.057 Maternal parity (Mean, SD)* 2.1 (±1.7) 1.9 (±1.6) 2.0 (±1.7) 0.347 Qatari Nationality (Number, %N) 171 (78.4%) 284 (71.2%) 313 (70.2%) 0.069 COVID-19 symptoms (Number, %N) Asymptomatic 68 (31.2%) 107 (26.8%) 164 (36.8%) 0.001 1 symptom 38 (17.4%) 70 (17.5%) 97 (21.7%) ≥ 2 symptoms 112 (51.4%) 222 (55.6%) 185 (41.5%) Fever (Number, %N) 69 (31.7%) 138 (34.6%) 135 (30.3%) 0.400 No co-morbidity (Number, %N) 111 (50.9%) 177 (44.4%) 195 (43.7%) 0.187 Hypertensive disease (Number, %N) 11 (5.1%) 11 (2.8%) 12 (2.7%) 0.220 Hypothyroidism (Number, %N) 21 (9.6%) 38 (9.5%) 41(9.2%) 0.979 Diabetes (Number, %N) None 150 (68.8%) 253 (63.9%) 284 (63.7%) 0.040 Gestational diabetes 56 (25.7%) 135 (33.8%) 151 (33.9%) Preexisting diabetes 12 (5.5%) 9 (2.3%) 11 (2.5%) SD- standard deviation, BMI- body mass index, N- number of women in each exposure group, kg/m2- kilograms/metres2, ^ analysed using ANOVA- Analysis of variance; p<0.05 considered evidence against null hypothesis of no difference. There was a significant difference in symptomatology between the groups, with women infected with COVID-19 in the second trimester more likely to have two or more symptoms and least likely to be asymptomatic. Additionally, women in the second trimester were significantly younger (30.4 years old) compared to 30.6 and 31.4 years old in the first and third trimesters, respectively. Women infected in the first trimester were more likely to have preexisting diabetes but less likely to develop gestational diabetes during pregnancy. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups’ maternal BMI, parity, nationality, hypertension, hypothyroidism, or cholestasis of pregnancy. The comparison of outcomes between the three groups is shown in Table 2. The gestational age at birth in days and birthweight in grams were normally distributed (SW test p>0.05). There was no difference noted in gestational age or birthweight between the groups. The customised birthweight centile was compared non-parametrically- no difference was noted between the trimesters. More than 12% of the cohort delivered SGA babies. Those infected in the third trimester had a higher chance of having an SGA baby, but this did not reach statistical significance. The risk of LGA babies (overall 11.9%) and preterm birth (overall 10.6%) did not vary according to the trimester of acquiring COVID-19. 10.1371/journal.pone.0288004.t002 Table 2 Comparison of outcome variables among the exposure groups. Outcome variables Total N = 1063 1st trimester infection N = 218 2nd trimester infection N = 399 3rd trimester infection N = 446 P value Gestational age at delivery (days) Mean (SD)* 267.7(± 13.2) 267.7 (± 12.6) 267.6 (± 13.3) 267.9 (± 13.8) 0.947 Birthweight in grams; Mean (SD)* 3171 (± 536) 3170 (± 541) 3173 (± 531) 3169 (± 537) 0.994 Customised birthweight centile; Median (Range)** 47.0 (0–100) 47.6 (0–100) 45.9 (0–100) 46.1 (0–100) 0.752 Birthweight centile; Number, %N <10 th - SGA 130 (12.2%) 25 (11.5%) 40 (10.0%) 65 (14.6%) 0.302 10-90 th 807 (75.9%) 164 (75.2%) 310 (77.7%) 333 (74.7%) >90 th - LGA 126 (11.9%) 29 (13.3%) 49 (12.3%) 48 (10.8%) Preterm births; Number, %N 113 (10.6%) 25 (11.5%) 36 (9.0%) 52 (11.7%) 0.418 SD- standard deviation, IQR- interquartile range, N- number of women in each exposure group, SGA- small for gestational age, LGA- large for gestational age, * analysis done using ANOVA- Analysis of variance; **- analysis done using Kruskal Wallis test; p<0.05 considered evidence against null hypothesis of no difference. There were 724 women in the entire cohort (68%) who developed symptomatic COVID-19. The outcomes were also compared between asymptomatic and symptomatic women (Table 3). Mean maternal age and maternal BMI were significantly higher in the symptomatic group. Furthermore, the mean birthweight (3147 ± 537 vs 3222 ± 528; p<0.05) and median customised birth centiles (43.9% vs 54.0%; p = 0.004) were significantly lower in this group than in asymptomatic women. 10.1371/journal.pone.0288004.t003 Table 3 Comparison between symptomatic and asymptomatic COVID. Variables in 1063 women Asymptomatic (N = 339) Symptomatic (N = 724) p value Maternal age, years, Mean (±SD)* 30.4 (± 5.2) 31.1 (± 5.4) 0.047 Maternal BMI, kg/m2, Mean (±SD) * 29.5 (± 6.2) 30.9 (± 10.9) 0.028 Birthweight in grams, Mean (±SD)* 3222 (± 528) 3147 (± 537) 0.033 Customised birthweight centile; Median (Range)** 54.0 (0.2–100) 43.9 (0–100) 0.004 Birthweight centile Number, %N <10th centile (SGA) 36 (10.6%) 94 (13.0%) 0.190 10-90th centile 255 (75.2%) 552 (76.2%) >90th centile (LGA) 48 (14.2%) 78 (10.8%) Preterm birth; Number, %N 35 (10.3%) 78 (10.8%) 0.825 *- analysis done using Student t-test; **- analysis done using Mann Whitney U test; BMI- body mass index; SD- standard deviation; IQR- interquartile range; SGA- small for gestational age; LGA- Large for gestational age; p<0.05 considered evidence against null hypothesis of no difference Ninety-four symptomatic women (13%) gave birth to an SGA baby compared to 10% of asymptomatic women, although the difference was not significant. Fig 1A demonstrates that in each trimester, the asymptomatic patients had higher birthweight centiles than the symptomatic women; however, there was no difference in birthweight centiles between each trimester of infection (analysed by Kruskal Wallis test, p = 0.752). When infected in the first and second trimesters, symptomatic women had a higher risk of SGA babies (12.0% vs 10.3% in first trimester, 9.6% vs 7.5% in second trimester) compared to asymptomatic women, although not statistically significant. When infected in the third trimester, the risks are similar (11.3% vs 12.2%) in the groups (Fig 1B). 10.1371/journal.pone.0288004.g001 Fig 1 A. Birthweight centiles according to trimester of COVID-19 infection in symptomatic and asymptomatic women. B. Risks of SGA babies according to trimester of COVID-19 infection in symptomatic and asymptomatic women. In the 175 women who were infected in the first 20 weeks of pregnancy and satisfied the inclusion criteria for the secondary analysis, 132 developed symptoms (75%). The birthweight, birthweight centile and fetal growth velocity z score were compared between symptomatic and asymptomatic women within this subgroup, as shown in Table 4. Tests for normality of distribution indicated that the birthweight centile (SW 0.95, p<0.001), the Z score (SW 0.93, p<0.001) and the growth velocity (SW 0.95, p<0.001) were not normally distributed data. 10.1371/journal.pone.0288004.t004 Table 4 Comparison between symptomatic and asymptomatic in women infected with COVID-19 within 20 weeks of gestation. Variables Total women = 175 Asymptomatic (n = 43) Symptomatic (n = 132) P value Birthweight in grams, Mean (SD) * 3284 (468) 3061 (554) 0.019 Birthweight centile, Median (Range) ** 71.2 (4.4–100) 48.2 (0–100) 0.010 Estimated fetal weight in grams Mean (SD) First ultrasound 1923 (418) 1868 (517) 0.528 Second ultrasound 2855 (443) 2769 (536) 0.343 Number of days between ultrasound scans Median (Range) ** 30 (14–42) 30 (14–42) 0.768 Daily increment in EFW in grams/day Median (Range) ** 29.5 (7.8–52.4) 29.4(-3.0–53.3) 0.413 Standardised Z score, Median (Range) ** 0.75 (-4.1–5.2) 0.63 (-6.4–5.6) 0.368 *- analysis performed using Student t-test; **- analysis performed using Mann Whitney U test; SD- standard deviation; IQR- interquartile range; p<0.05 considered evidence against null hypothesis of no difference In this subgroup, symptomatic women had significantly smaller babies (3061 gms vs 3284 gms; p = 0.019) and smaller median fetal birthweight centiles (48.2% vs 71.2%, p = 0.01) compared to the asymptomatic women. The timing of the ultrasound scans and mean estimated fetal weights in the scans were similar between the groups. The fetal growth velocity z score was lower in the symptomatic women group, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. Discussion Summary of findings The main study results show no significant difference in birthweight, or customised birthweight centiles according to the trimester of pregnancy during which the women tested positive for COVID-19. However, symptomatic women in the whole cohort were significantly more likely to have infants with lower birthweight and mean birthweight centiles. In the secondary analysis in the subgroup of women infected within the first 20 weeks of gestation, symptomatic women had significantly lower birthweight and birthweight centiles. They also have lower fetal growth velocity standardised z scores compared to the asymptomatic, although this did not reach statistical significance. Comparison with existing literature In a large cohort study enrolling 2789 pregnant women who had COVID-19 in Israel, over the same time as this study, 17% got infected in the first trimester and 48% in the third [18]. Our study reports comparable findings of 42% of women being infected in the third trimester and the least proportion (20.5%) in the first. The rationale for looking at the timing of COVID-19 infection stems from reports showing the possibility of the placenta being affected due to maternal infection, attributed to the expression of the COVID-19 target angiotensin receptor enzyme 2 (ACE2) in the placenta [19]. Therefore, the expectation is that infection during earlier trimesters could affect the placental circulation more and lead to consequences such as preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, abruption and preterm birth compared to infection in the third trimester. However, our study could not find evidence for this hypothesis, and COVID-19 infection in pregnancy seemed to affect the placenta equally regardless of the trimester of infection. The SGA rate in this cohort of 12.2% is much higher than previous reports from the country, showing an SGA rate of 6% in 2017 [20]. A similar SGA rate of 15% was reported in a study of COVID-19 pregnancies from a neighbouring country in the Middle East [21]. This study reported no significant difference in the SGA risk according to the gestational age of infection, similar to our conclusion. Fallach et al. reported no significant effect of the trimester of infection on growth restriction, even though they report a higher risk of SGA than COVID-19 negative pregnancies, supporting the findings in our study [18]. The overall gestational age at delivery in our cohort is around 268 days or 38 completed weeks of gestation, a figure comparable with a recent meta-analysis [22]. The meta-analysis also reported a mean birthweight of 3144 grams in COVID-19 pregnancies, which matches our results (mean birthweight of 3171 grams). Our study further adds to the evidence that COVID-19 in pregnancy is unlikely to decrease the mean birthweight, adjusted customised birthweight centile or gestational age at birth because most pregnancies progress to term without complications. Additionally, there was no difference in the mean birthweights or adjusted centiles between the trimesters. This supports the results from a large time-series matched analysis done in England comparing the pre-COVID era with the COVID era, where similar findings are reported [23]. In this study, we were interested in the SGA risk in symptomatic COVID-19 compared to asymptomatic disease, as recent evidence shows higher odds for small for gestational age babies with symptomatic disease. A meta-analysis comparing symptomatic and asymptomatic disease (that included ten studies) showed a much higher risk of preterm birth and SGA and lower mean birthweight in symptomatic disease compared to asymptomatic [24]. Our results show that overall, the birth weight and customised birthweight centiles are lower in symptomatic disease, regardless of trimester of infection. Since gestational age at delivery and maternal demographics are included in the calculation of customised birthweight centiles and classification of SGA, increased preterm birth or any maternal demographics such as age or BMI are unlikely to be confounding factors here. In symptomatic disease, the virus proceeds to invade the cells with ACE2 and replicate rapidly, resulting in a cytokine storm- this is much less or absent in asymptomatic disease [25]. Since the placenta also expresses ACE2, it’s more likely that symptomatic disease affects the placental circulation more, pointing towards a possible association between symptomatic COVID-19 infection and SGA. In Qatar, the risk of preterm birth is nearly 9% in the general population [26]. In this study, nearly 10.6% of the cohort had a preterm birth (slightly higher risk). This could be explained by the increased iatrogenic requirement for premature delivery in order to improve maternal recovery from severe disease. A large multinational cohort study looking at COVID-19 in pregnancy, reports a risk of 11% in asymptomatic women and 13% in symptomatic (which reached nearly 30% when the women had severe symptoms) [27]. In our study, the risks are similar regardless of symptoms as the majority had only mild symptoms. A prospective study in Italy, published in 2021, looked at the impact of COVID on fetal growth measured as the changes in the ultrasound parameters, compared to women without COVID in pregnancy and according to the trimester of infection [28]. No significant differences were noted between the groups, and they did not support increased fetal surveillance for COVID affected pregnancies. However, they had a small sample size of 49 COVID pregnancies and did not consider disease symptoms. The results of our study point towards a possible decrease in fetal growth in symptomatic disease developing before 20 weeks of gestation (the period of pregnancy when the placental blood flow is being established and, therefore, more likely for the disease to affect fetal growth). This is shown in the significantly lesser birthweight centile in the symptomatic group. The lack of significant results in the fetal growth scores could be due to a lack of power and larger prospective studies are needed to corroborate these findings. Strengths and limitations This study is the first of its kind in the country, with data collection performed by an expert team of physicians handling and interpreting electronic medical records. In addition, periodic reviews were done to ensure the adequacy and accuracy of the data collected. The birthweight outcome was recorded for all patients and was measured using similar scales in the same way by the midwives. Even though there is the possibility of human error, the birthweight is entered in multiple documents and in the official birth notification and is unlikely to be wrong. The birthweight centiles were calculated using data with no missing values, hence unlikely to have associated errors. However, there are some limitations considering the retrospective nature of the study. The classification into symptomatic and asymptomatic is based on patient-reported symptoms- this can be subject to misclassification as patients could have possibly denied symptoms due to the social stigma and fear of isolation surrounding COVID-19. We have not done an adjusted analysis for the main exposure groups due to the lack of statistically significant results in the univariate analysis. The association between the symptom status and the perinatal outcomes were exploratory (in the main cohort and the subgroup), and further adjusted analyses in a larger cohort of women are needed. There is also a lack of data regarding potential confounders like smoking status, socioeconomic status and antenatal care that can affect the exposure and the outcome- the possibility of confounding must be kept in mind while interpreting these results. Conclusion In this cohort of women infected with COVID-19 during their pregnancies, the trimester of pregnancy in which they were infected did not have an impact on perinatal outcomes such as mean birthweight, mean adjusted birthweight centiles and risk of SGA. However, these women did experience a higher risk of SGA than the nationally expected rate- implying that COVID-19 could possibly affect fetal growth through vertical transmission to the placenta regardless of the gestational age at diagnosis. Symptomatic women had lower mean birthweight and birthweight centiles and a higher risk of SGA than asymptomatic women, regardless of when they were infected. Being infected within the first 20 weeks of gestation could impact fetal growth velocity. Further larger studies are required to corroborate these findings. However, this evidence points towards changing practice and increasing fetal surveillance in women who develop COVID-19 during pregnancy to reduce neonatal morbidity. We would like to acknowledge the members of the Q-PRECIOUS group responsible for setting up and successfully running the registry: Dr. Huda Abdulla Hussain Saleh Dr Lolwa Mohd. Abdulla I Alansari Dr. Mai Abdulla S A Al-Qubaisi Dr. Moza Sulaiman H Al Hail Dr. Muna A. Rahman S. Al. Maslamani Dr. Najat Ali Mohsen Khenyab Dr. Faten Altaher Mohd. Taha Dr. Zeena Saeed Bu Shurbak Dr. Mohammed A J Abukhattab Dr. Khalil Mohd. Khalil Salameh Dr. Anvar Paraparambil Vellamgot Dr. Mohd. Z.M. Abu Khalil Dr. Teresa Sandra Erice Rivero Mr. Shaban Fathy Kamel Mohammed Mr. Haseebur Rahman Khan Mohammed Ms. Haila Sowayed S. Johar Mr. Palli Valappila Abdul Rouf Mr. Binny Thomas Dr. Naela S R Almallahi Dr. Ahmed Bahieeldin Mohamed Hassan Sweilim Dr. Amina Sayed Omar Dr. Anas Aljasem Dr. Devi Krishna Remadevi Dr. Ebtehag elfadil Ahmed Dr. Einass Isameldin A Wagealla Dr. Ekhlas Mohamed Dr. Emad Adel Alhajhasan Dr. Feras Moha. Kheir Qaddour Dr. Ghinwa Khodor Lawand Dr. Haifa Shaikh Dr. Hamda Ahmed Abdi Dr. Hind Mohamed Abdel Aal Mohamed Dr. Jaber Mohammed J A Alsulaiti Dr. Jis Thomas Dr. Komal Rafique Dr. Megha Misra Dr. Noor Saleh Ahmed Bawazir Dr. Nuda Elnagi Mousa Hago Dr. Riham Mosaad Ragab El Midany Dr. Sagda Abdelazim Hassabelrasoul Ahmed Dr. Sreenisha Sreenivasan Somini Dr. Wisam Ali Mohammad Al-Sheikh Dr. Yusra Mohamed. Affiliation: Women’s Wellness and Research Centre, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar ==== Refs References 1 Badr D. A. , Picone O. , Bevilacqua E. , Carlin A. , Meli F. , Sibiude J. , et al . Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 and Pregnancy Outcomes According to Gestational Age at Time of Infection. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021;27 (10 ):2535–2543. doi: 10.3201/eid2710.211394 34352196 2 Khan D. , Hamid L. R. , Ali A. , Salam R. A. , Zuberi N. , Lassi Z. S. , et al . Differences in pregnancy and perinatal outcomes among symptomatic versus asymptomatic COVID-19 infected pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021, 21 : 801–816. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04250-1 34852783 3 Moltner S , de Vrijer B ,Banner H . Placental infarction and intrauterine growth restriction following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2021, 18 : 1–2. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06176-7 34406458 4 Li M , Chen L , Zhang J , Xiong C , Li X . The SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 expression of maternal-fetal interface and fetal organs by single cell transcriptome study. PLoS One 2020, 15 (4 ): e0230295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230295 32298273 5 Tang N , Li D , Wang X , Sun Z . Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. J Thromb Haemost. 2020; 18 (4 ):844–7. doi: 10.1111/jth.14768 32073213 6 Schett G , Sticherling M , Neurath MF . COVID-19: risk for cytokine targeting in chronic inflammatory diseases? Nat Rev Immunol. 2020 May;20 (5 ):271–2. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-0312-7 32296135 7 Bertero L , Borella F , Botta G , Carosso A , Cosma S , Bovetti M , et al . Placenta histopathology in SARS-CoV-2 infection: analysis of a consecutive series and comparison with control cohorts. Virchows Arch. 2021;1 :1–14. doi: 10.1007/s00428-021-03097-3 33934229 8 Arroyo JA , Winn VD : Vasculogenesis and angiogenesis in the IUGR placenta. Semin Perinatol 2008, 32 :172–177. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2008.02.006 18482617 9 Ahmed A , Perkins J : Angiogenesis and intrauterine growth restriction. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2000, 14 :981–998. doi: 10.1053/beog.2000.0139 11141345 10 World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) [Internet]. [cited 2021 Oct 18]. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/question-and-answers-hub/q-a-detail/coronavirus-disease-covid-19. 11 Gardosi J. , Mongelli M. , Wilcox M. , Chang A. An adjustable fetal weight standard. Ultra Obstet Gynecol. 1995;6 (3 ):168–174. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.06030168.x 8521065 12 Mongelli M. , Figueras F. , Francis A. , Gardosi J. A customised birthweight calculator developed for an Australian population. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;47 (2 ):128–131. 13 Gardosi J , Francis A . A customised standard to assess fetal growth in a US population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201 (1 ):25.e1–25.e7. 14 Premru-Srsen T. , Verdenik I. , Mihevc Ponikvar B. , Hugh O. , Francis A. , Gardosi J. Customised birthweight standard for a Slovenian population. J Perinat Med. 2019;47 (3 ):270–275. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2018-0219 30653469 15 Lyall F. , Bulmer J. N. , Duffie E. , Cousins F. , Theriault A. , & Robson S. C. (2001). Human trophoblast invasion and spiral artery transformation: the role of PECAM-1 in normal pregnancy, preeclampsia, and fetal growth restriction. The American journal of pathology, 158 (5 ), 1713–1721. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64127-2 11337369 16 Hadlock FP , Harrist RB , Sharman RS , Deter RL , Park SK . Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements—a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151 : 333–337. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90298-4 3881966 17 Owen P , Donnet ML , Ogston SA , Christie AD , Howie PW , Patel NB . Standards for ultrasound fetal growth velocity. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;103 (1 ):60–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09516.x 8608100 18 Fallach N. , Segal Y. , Agassy J. , Perez G. , Peretz A. , Chodick G. , et al . Pregnancy outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 infection by trimester: A large, population-based cohort study. PLoS One. 2022;17 (7 ):e0270893. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270893 35857758 19 Rad H. S. , Röhl J. , Stylianou N. , Allenby M. C. , Bazaz S. R. , Warkiani M. E. , et al . The Effects of COVID-19 on the Placenta During Pregnancy. Front Immunol. 2021;12 :743022. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.743022 34603330 20 Younes S. , Samara M. , Salama N. , Al-Jurf R. , Nasrallah G. , Al-Obaidly S. , et al . Incidence, risk factors, and feto-maternal outcomes of inappropriate birth weight for gestational age among singleton live births in Qatar: A population-based study. PLoS One. 2021;16 (10 ):e0258967. Published 2021 Oct 28. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258967 34710154 21 Sunder A , Varghese B , Darwish B , Shaikho N , Rashid M . Impacts and effects of COVID-19 infection in pregnancy. Saudi Med J. 2022;43 (1 ):67–74. doi: 10.15537/smj.2022.43.1.20210694 35022286 22 Di Toro F. , Gjoka M. , Di Lorenzo G. , De Santo D. , De Seta F. , Maso G. , et al . Impact of COVID-19 on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021;27 (1 ):36–46. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.10.007 33148440 23 Wilkinson M , Johnstone ED , Simcox LE , Myers JE . The impact of COVID-19 on pregnancy outcomes in a diverse cohort in England. Sci Rep. 2022;12 (1 ):942. Published 2022 Jan 18. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-04898-5 35042979 24 Khan D. , Hamid L. R. , Ali A. , Salam R. A. , Zuberi N. , Lassi Z. S. , et al . Differences in pregnancy and perinatal outcomes among symptomatic versus asymptomatic COVID-19-infected pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 21 , 801 (2021). doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04250-1 34852783 25 Parasher A. COVID-19: Current understanding of its Pathophysiology, Clinical presentation and Treatment, Postgraduate Medical Journal 2021;97 :312–320. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-138577 32978337 26 Salama E E. I. A. S. , Salama H. S. , & Alobaidly S. H. (2021). Socioeconomic Risk Factors for Preterm Birth in the state of Qatar: A Population-based Study. Acta bio-medica: Atenei Parmensis, 92 (3 ), e2021186. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92i3.11292 34212910 27 Smith L.H. , Dollinger C.Y. , VanderWeele T.J. et al . Timing and severity of COVID-19 during pregnancy and risk of preterm birth in the International Registry of Coronavirus Exposure in Pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 22 , 775 (2022). doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05101-3 36258186 28 Rizzo G. , Mappa I. , Maqina P. , Bitsadze V. , Khizroeva J. , Makatsarya A. , et al . Effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection during the second half of pregnancy on fetal growth and hemodynamics: A prospective study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021;100 (6 ):1034–1039. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14130 33604901