==== Front BMC Geriatr BMC Geriatr BMC Geriatrics 1471-2318 BioMed Central London 4095 10.1186/s12877-023-04095-7 Research Anticholinergic exposure and its association with dementia/Alzheimer's disease and mortality in older adults Poonawalla Insiya B. IPoonawalla@humana.com 1 Xu Yihua 1 Gaddy Rainelle 2 James Alex 2 Ruble Matt 2 Burns Salina 2 Dixon Suzanne W. 1 Suehs Brandon T. 1 1 grid.417716.2 0000 0004 0429 1546 Humana Healthcare Research, Humana Inc., 500 W Main St, Louisville, KY 40202 USA 2 grid.417716.2 0000 0004 0429 1546 Humana Pharmacy Solutions, Humana Inc., 500 W Main St, Louisville, KY 40202 USA 30 6 2023 30 6 2023 2023 23 40111 1 2023 7 6 2023 © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. Background Use of anticholinergic (ACH) medications is associated with increased risk of cognitive decline in the elderly. However, little is known about this association from a health plan perspective. Methods This retrospective cohort study used the Humana Research Database to identify individuals with at least one ACH medication dispensed in 2015. Patients were followed until incidence of dementia/Alzheimer’s disease, death, disenrollment or end of December 2019. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to assess the association between ACH exposure and study outcomes, adjusting for demographics and clinical characteristics. Results A total of 12,209 individuals with no prior ACH use or dementia/Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis were included. As ACH polypharmacy increased (i.e., from no ACH exposure, to one, two, three, and four or more ACH medications), there was a stair-step increase in the incidence rate of dementia/Alzheimer’s disease (15, 30, 46, 56 and 77 per 1,000 person-years of follow-up) and in the incidence of mortality (19, 37, 80, 115 and 159 per 1,000 person-years of follow-up). After adjusting for confounders, ACH exposure to one, two, three and four or more ACH medications was associated with a 1.6 (95% CI 1.4–1.9), 2.1 (95% CI 1.7–2.8), 2.6 (95% CI 1.5–4.4), and 2.6 (95% CI 1.1–6.3) times, respectively, increased risk of a dementia/Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis compared to periods of no ACH exposure. ACH exposure to one, two, three and four or more medications was associated with a 1.4 (95% CI 1.2–1.6), 2.6 (95% CI 2.1–3.3), 3.8 (95% CI 2.6–5.4), and 3.4 (95% CI 1.8–6.4) times, respectively, increased risk of mortality compared to periods of no ACH exposure. Conclusions Reducing ACH exposure may potentially minimize long-term adverse effects in older adults. Results suggest populations which may benefit from targeted interventions to reduce ACH polypharmacy. Keywords Anticholinergic Dementia Alzheimer’s disease Mortality Beers criteria issue-copyright-statement© BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023 ==== Body pmcBackground The 2015 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria recommend against concurrent use of three or more central nervous system and two or more anticholinergic (ACH) medications in the elderly due to increased risk of cognitive decline [1]. The updated 2019 Beers Criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults added drugs with strong ACH properties to their list based on more recent evidence [2], which continues to accumulate to support these recommendations. For example, in a diverse population of 6,249 Latino adults residing in four major U.S. cities, ACH drug use at two points in time during an average 7-year follow-up was associated with lower global cognition, learning, memory, and executive functioning [3]. Additionally, among 8,216 older adults in Great Britain, recurrent use of ACH medications that were scored 3 on the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB3) scale was linked with dementia by year 10 of cohort follow-up [4]. However, the impact on dementia was not observed in patients on ACH medications characterized with a lower anticholinergic burden of ACB 1 or 2 or in those who had no prior use. Due to the possible negative effects of ACH exposure, medications with higher ACH activity such as oxybutynin now include a caution for patients with preexisting dementia treated with cholinesterase inhibitors because adding ACH drugs may exacerbate cognitive symptoms [5]. Prospective data also support the connection between increasing ACH exposure and increasing rates of cognitive decline and dementia in older populations [6], and two recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses found the risk of incident dementia and cognitive decline increased with increasing ACH exposure [5, 7]. Despite these potential risks, older individuals may be initiated to or continued on these agents because the ACH medication class is broad and includes therapies for several conditions affecting older individuals such as depression [8], overactive bladder [9, 10], and Parkinson’s disease [11]. The issue of polypharmacy may further complicate this clinical picture when assessing the possible risks and benefits of ACH medications for older adults. Clinical consequences of polypharmacy in older adults include cognitive impairment, disability, falls, frailty, increased healthcare use, and mortality [12]. For example, an Italian multicenter cohort study found approximately half of the cohort of 342 older adults with mild cognitive impairment took three or more drugs per day, and at the end of one year, the odds of dementia were six times higher for those taking more than three medications compared with similar adults taking fewer than three drugs. Further evidence demonstrated dementia risk was five times higher for those assessed with Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS) ≥ 1 [13]. In another example, a polypharmacy study of a population of patients aged ≥ 65 years from an outpatient multi-morbidity clinic in Australia found exposure to polypharmacy in the sedative and ACH medication classes in particular was linked to future mortality [14]. While the impact of ACH burden on cognition is well documented globally [15–19], less is known regarding the prevalence and intensity of ACH use in large, U.S. health plan populations, and of how ACH polypharmacy in particular may affect the risk of dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, and mortality in this population. Health plans may play a unique role in helping to mitigate medication-related problems such as polypharmacy in the elderly, adding further value to considering the issue through a health plan lens. To address this issue, we used real-world claims to describe the demographics and clinical characteristics of a large population of Medicare Advantage prescription drug (MAPD) plan beneficiaries newly dispensed ACH medications and analyzed the relationship between polypharmacy and cumulative ACH therapy exposure on incident dementia/Alzheimer’s disease and mortality. Methods Study design This retrospective cohort study used the Humana Research Database to identify MAPD patients, 65–89 years of age, newly initiated on an ACH medication with an Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden scale (ACB) score 2 or 3 [20, 21] between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2015 (index date = first ACH exposure). The cut point of 89 years was chosen to reflect organizational data and privacy policies requiring exclusion of patients 90 years and older from research studies. The ACB score is a high-quality anticholinergic burden scale [22] and is based on a systematic review by Boustani et al. which ranks drugs from a scale of one to three [20]. An ACB score of 2 or 3 indicates drugs with established and clinically relevant cognitive ACH effects, as compared to a score of one, which indicates drugs with potential ACH effects. Eligible patients had 12-months pre-index continuous enrollment, and were followed up until the end of enrollment, death, or end of study period (December 31, 2019) whichever occurred first (Fig. 1).Fig. 1 Study design Patients with any exposure to a prescription ACH medication or any evidence of a diagnosis or medication use for dementia/Alzheimer’s disease any time prior to 2015 (until 2007) were excluded from the study. Study exposure Using pharmacy claims data, we measured time-varying ACH exposure to account for changes in medication regimens over extended periods of follow-up. ACH exposure was measured in two ways: i. Time-varying person-time level ACH polypharmacy measure for medication exposure on each follow-up day (i.e., no exposure, 1, 2, 3, ≥ 4 ACH medications), and ii. Cumulative ACH exposure measure derived by summing each person’s standardized daily ACH exposure intensity during the follow-up, and categorized as low, moderate, high and very high. Exposure intensity was measured taking into account both drug-specific properties (i.e., anticholinergic activity) and patient-specific dosing. It was measured with medication coverage arrays using Defined Daily Dose (DDD) [23] to standardize dosing across different medications and the drug-specific ACB score to provide a scale by strength of anticholinergic activity. The DDD is the assumed average maintenance dose per day for a drug used for its main indication in adults. For each anticholinergic dispensing, the Standardized Daily Dose (SDD) of the medication was calculated by taking the estimated number of dosage units consumed in a day multiplied by the unit strength then divided by the DDD, as described by the following equation:SDD=[(Numberofunitsdispensed/days′supply)*unitdose]/DDD For example, if 90 tablets of oxybutynin-immediate release 5 mg were dispensed with a days’ supply of 30, where the DDD for oxybutynin is 15 mg, then the calculation would be: [(90 tablets/30 days’ supply)*5 mg]/15 mg = 1.0 SDD. A value of 1.0 SDD indicates that for the period of time covered by the prescription dispensing, the patient received 1.0 standardized dose per day covered with medication. Once the SDD for an individual dispensing is determined, the SDD was multiplied by the ACB scale score of the medication dispensed to yield a drug and patient–specific measure of the Standardized Daily Anticholinergic Exposure (SDACE). This value was input into a medication days’ coverage array for the period of time including the index date through the last day covered based on the days’ supply for the dispensing. A grace period of 15 days’ supply was added to each anticholinergic dispensing to account for partial adherence to treatment and residual anticholinergic effect, unless the days’ supply is ≤ 7 then 3 days was added. Using array-based methods, the drug-specific SDACE was aggregated at the patient level to account for coverage with multiple medications on a given day, yielding a Summated Standardized Daily Anticholinergic Exposure (SumSDACE) measure that reflected the total anticholinergic intensity of exposure for each patient on each day of follow-up, taking into account all anticholinergic medication that the individual was receiving. Cumulative anticholinergic exposure was then measured as the cumulative SumSDACE for all preceding days during the follow-up period. Breakpoints for categorization of cumulative anticholinergic exposure (i.e., into low, moderate, high, and very-high cumulative exposure categories) were determined using all post-index follow-up times and were based on initial assessment of the distribution of the data and then informed by clinical judgment and existing literature. Study outcomes The dementia/Alzheimer’s disease study outcome was defined by the presence of ≥ 2 relevant diagnosis codes on medical claims or by the presence of ≥ 1 relevant diagnosis code on a medical claim and ≥ one prescription claim for a cognition-enhancing medication (rivastigmine, galantamine, donepezil or memantine). Mortality was measured using information from the enrollment data provided by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Statistical analysis Crude incidence rates were reported as rate per 1,000 person-years. Since patients dynamically start and stop treatment with ACH medications over the course of an extended period of follow-up, a series of extended Cox regression models were computed accounting for time-varying ACH exposure when examining the relationship to incident dementia/Alzheimer’s disease and mortality outcomes. Regression models were adjusted for patient demographics, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index [24–26], RxRisk-V score [27], baseline medication use, baseline healthcare resource use, and time-varying use of other high-risk non-ACH medications associated with cognitive impairment (i.e., non-ACB drugs included in the drug classes anxiolytic benzodiazepines, anticonvulsant benzodiazepines, anti-depressants, anti-convulsants, anti-psychotics, barbiturate hypnotics, sedative hypnotics, anti-Parkinson drugs and anti-nausea/vertigo agents). [28–31] The Elixhauser comorbidity index uses 31 categories of ICD-9 and ICD-10 diagnosis codes [24, 26] to calculate a score that is associated with hospital charges, length of stay, and mortality [26]. The RxRisk score is a pharmacy-based measure of comorbidity burden that was originally developed to assess medication burden in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) population [27], ranges from 0–45, and has been shown to be predictive of healthcare costs and mortality in a range of populations [27, 31–38]. Two of the original RxRisk-V categories (neurogenic bladder and ostomy) are not included in the current implementation because products associated with these conditions (urinary catheters and colostomy supplies, respectively) are not captured in outpatient pharmacy claims. Hence the composite score in the present study ranges from 0 to 43. Results We identified 12,209 individuals with no prior ACH therapy use and no prior diagnoses of dementia or Alzheimer’s disease (Fig. 2). The cohort was 57.6% female, 80.6% White, 13.2% with low-income subsidy and dual Medicare-Medicaid eligibility status, with a mean age of 72.2 years. Prevalence of non-ACH high-risk medication use was 51.2% (Table 1). We observed maximum concurrent ACH use of one, two, three, or four or more therapies during the follow-up period in 59%, 30%, 8%, and 3% of the cohort, respectively. Individuals exposed to four or more ACH medications had the highest baseline utilization of inpatient stays (16.7%) and emergency department visits (29.7%, Table 1).Fig. 2 Attrition diagram Table 1 Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, by highest ACH polypharmacy exposure attained Anticholinergic Polypharmacy Variables Total 1 medication 2 medications 3 medications 4 + medications P value N 12,209 7,153 3,708 1,001 347 Age, mean [SD] 72.2 [5.6] 72.3 [5.5] 72.0 [5.7] 72.3 [5.8] 72.4 [6.1] 0.0049 Gender, n(%)  Female 7,038 (57.6) 4,089 (57.2) 2,138 (57.7) 602 (60.1) 209 (60.2) 0.2429  Male 5,168 (42.3) 3,063 (42.8) 1,569 (42.3) 398 (39.8) 138 (39.8) Race/Ethnicity, n(%)  White 9,843 (80.6) 5,712 (79.9) 3,007 (81.1) 826 (82.5) 298 (85.9) 0.0182  Black 1,497 (12.3) 927 (13.0) 424 (11.4) 112 (11.2) 34 (9.8)  Other/unknown 869 ( 7.1) 514 (7.2) 277 (7.5) 63 (6.3) 15 (4.3) Geographic Region, n(%)  Northeast 295 (2.4) 184 (2.6) 77 (2.1) 26 (2.6)  < 10 0.0177  Midwest 2,192 (18.0) 1,245 (17.4) 694 (18.7) 176 (17.6) 77 (22.2)  South 8,150 (66.8) 4,792 (67.0) 2,443 (65.9) 677 (67.7) 238 (68.6)  West 1,569 (12.9) 931 (13.0) 493 (13.3) 121 (12.1) 24 (6.9) Low Income/ Dual Eligibility Status, n(%)  Low income subsidy (LIS) Only 565 (4.6) 323 (4.5) 163 (4.4) 51 (5.1) 28 (8.1)  < 0.001  Dual eligibility (DE) Only  < 10  < 10  < 10  < 10 0 (0.0)  LIS and DE 1,608 (13.2) 874 (12.2) 482 (13.0) 170 (17.0) 82 (23.6) Elixhauser comorbidity index, mean [SD] 1.7 [1.8] 1.6 [1.7] 1.8 [1.8] 2.0 [2.0] 2.5 [2.5]  < 0.001 Rx Risk-V score, mean [SD] 3.4 [2.2] 3.3 [2.1] 3.6 [2.2] 3.7 [2.4] 3.7 [2.7]  < 0.001 Non-ACH high-risk medication usea, n(%) 6,249 (51.2) 3,547 (49.6) 1,981 (53.4) 545 (54.4) 176 (50.7)  < 0.001 Pre-index inpatient visit n (%) 1,282 (10.5) 705 (9.9) 381 (10.3) 138 (13.8) 58 (16.7)  < 0.001 Pre-index emergency department visit n(%) 2,901 (23.8) 1,631 (22.8) 903 (24.4) 264 (26.4) 103 (29.7) 0.002 ACH Anticholinergic, SD Standard deviation aNon-ACH high-risk medications included anxiolytic benzodiazepines, anticonvulsant benzodiazepines, antidepressants, anti-convulsants, anti-psychotics, barbiturate hypnotics, sedative hypnotics, anti-Parkinson drugs and anti-nausea/vertigo agents not included on the ACB scale As ACH polypharmacy increased, there was a stair-step increase in the incidence of dementia/Alzheimer’s disease (Table 2) and in the incidence of mortality (Table 3). For example, moving from periods of no ACH exposure to 1, 2, 3 and ≥ 4 ACH medications, the incidence rate of dementia/Alzheimer’s disease increased from 15 per 1,000 person-years to 31, 46, 56 and 77 (Table 2) and the incidence rate for mortality increased from 19 per 1,000 person-years to 37, 79, 115 and 159 (Table 3), respectively. A similar stair-step increase in the incidence rate of both outcomes was observed as cumulative ACH exposure increased from moderate to high to very high compared to the period of low ACH exposure.Table 2 Incidence rates and hazard ratios for the incidence of Dementia/Alzheimer's disease Measure Events Person-time (years) Crude IR (per 1,000 PY) Adjusted Hazard Ratio (95% CI) Overall 819 41,437 19.77 Anticholinergic polypharmacy  No ACH exposure 474 31,249 15.17 Reference  1 ACH meds 253 8290 30.52 1.64 (1.39—1.93)  2 ACH meds 69 1515 45.54 2.17 (1.67—2.83)  3 ACH meds 17 305 55.74 2.59 (1.54—4.36)   ≥ 4 ACH meds 6 78 76.92 2.59 (1.06—6.32) Cumulative Anticholinergic Exposure  Low 386 22,246 17.35 Reference  Moderate 202 10,688 18.90 1.05 (0.88—1.25)  High 108 4424 24.41 1.17 (0.93—1.48)  Very High 123 4079 30.15 1.32 (1.04—1.68) IR Incidence rate, PY Person years Table 3 Incidence rates and hazard ratios for mortality Measure Events Person-time (years) Crude IR (per 1,000 PY) Adjusted Hazard Ratio (95% CI) Overall 1129 42,887 26.33 Anticholinergic polypharmacy  No ACH exposure 623 32,133 19.39 Reference  1 ACH meds 321 8680 36.98 1.42 (1.2—1.6)  2 ACH meds 131 1638 79.98 2.64 (2.1—3.3)  3 ACH meds 40 347 115.27 3.75 (2.6—5.4)   ≥ 4 ACH meds 14 88 159.09 3.36 (1.8—6.4) Cumulative Anticholinergic Exposure  Low 494 22,752 21.70 Reference  Moderate 279 11,051 25.20 1.21 (1.01—1.41)  High 162 4655 34.80 1.51 (1.25—1.83)  Very High 194 4429 43.80 2.11 (1.76—2.52) IR Incidence rate, PY Person years After adjusting for confounders, ACH exposure to one, two, three and four or more ACH medications was associated with a 1.6 (95% CI 1.4–1.9), 2.1 (95% CI 1.7–2.8), 2.6 (95% CI 1.5–4.4), and 2.6 (95% CI 1.1–6.3) times, respectively, increased risk of a dementia/Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis compared to periods of no ACH exposure (Table 2). Similarly, ACH exposure to one, two, three and four or more medications was associated with a 1.4 (95% CI 1.2–1.6), 2.6 (95% CI 2.1–3.3), 3.8 (95% CI 2.6–5.4), and 3.4 (95% CI 1.8–6.4) times, respectively, increased risk of mortality compared to periods of no ACH exposure (Table 3). Discussion Greater ACH burden was associated with an increased rate of dementia/Alzheimer’s disease and mortality in this study of seniors enrolled in a Medicare Advantage health plan. While the magnitude of effect differed across our results, the directionality is in line with a recent meta-analysis that documented a 46% increased odds of incident dementia in patients with ≥ 3 months of ACH medication use [5]. Additionally, reflecting on our results, a Cochrane Database review and meta-analysis with 968,428 participants in total suggested a possible doubling of the risk of dementia with ACH drug exposure and that a greater ACB score increases the risk of dementia [39]. Furthermore, two other systematic reviews and meta-analyses reported a positive association between ACH burden and risk of mortality across the majority of the included studies spanning from 1990 to 2018 [40, 41]. The authors of those studies acknowledged short follow-up time as an important limitation, with only a few of the studies meeting the criteria for superior quality. In our study, we were able to follow patients for four years enabling a more robust data collection in comparison to many existing studies. With this longer-term evaluation, we found the risk of cognitive decline and mortality with ACH exposure may apply across a wide range of populations and settings. Additionally, we considered the intersection of polypharmacy with ACH drug exposure and found that significant portions of this population were prescribed more than one ACH medication. Of note, 30% of this population was prescribed two or more ACH therapies, 8% used three or more, and 3% used four or more drugs with ACH activity on at least one day during their follow-up. These results should be concerning, as a recently published meta-analysis of 2.9 million elderly individuals reported a 28% increased risk of mortality associated with use of five or more drugs [42]. These results represent a significant number of older individuals exposed to the well-documented risks of cognitive decline and increased mortality that are associated with this therapeutic class of medications [43–45]. Health plans have an opportunity and important role in minimizing ACH exposure for enrolled patients. For example, coordinated educational outreach efforts can be made to pharmacy, provider, and patients on the safety concerns with the use of multiple anticholinergics. While we did not specifically assess the impact of ACH therapy on other treatment outcomes, more than 50% of our cohort was exposed to non-ACH, high-risk therapy. These results point toward the importance of assessing both ACH and total polypharmacy in future research and when designing de-prescribing programs with the intention of lowering the risk of cognitive decline. Future research should continue to further define these relationships and provide insights into optimal policies and programs to address ACH exposure/polypharmacy in the elderly, particularly with the understanding that cognitive decline and its attendant sequelae can lead to a loss of independence [46]. Limitations Dementia may not be well represented in administrative claims data, and diagnosis codes do not provide information on severity of dementia. This study used a broad range of diagnosis codes and an extended follow-up period (3–5 years) to identify new onset cases. Additionally, this study focuses only on prescription medication utilization which is well captured using claims data; however, over-the-counter medications, such as some antihistamines, may have strong anticholinergic effects and are not captured in prescription claims, which would lead to underestimating ACH polypharmacy. It is not possible to know from claims data if the drug was indicated for as needed versus daily use. Hence, DDD was an assumed average maintenance dose per day for a drug used for its main indication in adults. We assumed that a patient took the medications based on the days’ supply variable. This may lead to an overestimate of ACH exposure. Similar to other retrospective database studies, this study was subject to limitations including coding errors of omission and commission, incomplete claims, unreliable clinical coding, and unobservable factors that also may have influenced the outcomes. For example, while pharmacy claims and days’ supply on prescription fills indicate the possession of pharmacotherapy, we are unable to verify if the patient took the medication. This study used data from a single data source, and as such the results may not be generalized to the general population. However, Humana is a large national health plan with beneficiaries residing in a broad array of geographic regions. Conclusions ACH medication use is common among health plan members residing in broad geographic regions of the United States. ACH drugs were associated with significantly increased risk of dementia and mortality in this real-world population of older adults. Reducing ACH exposure may potentially minimize long-term adverse effects in older adults. Results suggest populations which may benefit from targeted interventions to reduce ACH polypharmacy. Abbreviations ACB Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden ACH Anticholinergic ARS Anticholinergic Risk Scale COPD Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease DDD Defined Daily Dose SDACE Standardized Daily Anticholinergic Exposure SDD Standardized Daily Dose SumSDACE Summated Standardized Daily Anticholinergic Exposure Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Amy Hu, PharmD, and Joanna Peyron, BS for their consultation work and Mary Costantino, PhD for her contributions editing. Authors' contributions IBP, RG, MR, SB, YX and BTS conceptualized and designed the study. YX created the data sets and analyzed the data. SWD created the first manuscript draft. SWD, IBP, YX, RG, AJ, MR, SB, and BTS reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the final version of the manuscript. Funding Humana Healthcare Research funded the research and manuscript development. No external funds were used in the creation of this work. Availability of data and materials The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due the proprietary nature of the work but may be available in summary form from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate This study followed the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki for all human or animal experimental investigations. The Humana Healthcare Research Human Subject Protection Office (HHR HSPO) used the US Department of Health and Human Services regulations 45 CFR 46 and the Office of Human Research Protections Guidance on Coded Private Information or Specimens Use in Research, Guidance (2008) to grant this study a waiver from informed consent and ethics approval because it did not constitute human subjects research and did not require institutional review board oversight. The decision was based on the determination that the research involved only analysis of anonymized and coded information, and the researchers could not readily identify the individuals from which the information was derived. Analysis was performed on a limited data set, and additional administrative permissions were not required to access the data used in the study. Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests I declare that the authors have no competing interests as defined by BMC, or other interests that might be perceived to influence the results and/or discussion reported in this paper. Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. ==== Refs References 1. American Geriatrics Society 2015 Updated Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63(11):2227–46. 2. American Geriatrics Society 2019 Updated AGS Beers Criteria® for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019;67(4):674–94. 3. Posis AIB Tarraf W Gonzalez KA Soria-Lopez JA Léger GC Stickel AM Anticholinergic drug burden and neurocognitive performance in the study of latinos-investigation of neurocognitive aging J Alzheimers Dis 2022 86 1 53 65 10.3233/JAD-215247 35001889 4. Grossi CM Richardson K Fox C Maidment I Steel N Loke YK Anticholinergic and benzodiazepine medication use and risk of incident dementia: a UK cohort study BMC Geriatr 2019 19 1 276 10.1186/s12877-019-1280-2 31638906 5. Dmochowski RR Thai S Iglay K Enemchukwu E Tee S Varano S Increased risk of incident dementia following use of anticholinergic agents: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis Neurourol Urodyn 2021 40 1 28 37 10.1002/nau.24536 33098213 6. Gray SL Anderson ML Dublin S Hanlon JT Hubbard R Walker R Cumulative use of strong anticholinergics and incident dementia: a prospective cohort study JAMA Intern Med. 2015 175 3 401 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.7663 25621434 7. Taylor-Rowan M Edwards S Noel-Storr AH McCleery J Myint PK Soiza R Anticholinergic burden (prognostic factor) for prediction of dementia or cognitive decline in older adults with no known cognitive syndrome Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021 5 5 Cd013540 34097766 8. Jaffe RJ Novakovic V Peselow ED Scopolamine as an antidepressant: a systematic review Clin Neuropharmacol 2013 36 1 24 26 10.1097/WNF.0b013e318278b703 23334071 9. Thiagamoorthy G Cardozo L Robinson D Current and future pharmacotherapy for treating overactive bladder Expert Opin Pharmacother 2016 17 10 1317 1325 10.1080/14656566.2016.1186645 27253972 10. Matta R, Gomes T, Juurlink D, Jarvi K, Herschorn S, Nam RK. Receipt of Overactive Bladder Drugs and Incident Dementia: A Population-based Case-control Study. Eur Urol Focus. 2021. 11. Ghossein N, Kang M, Lakhkar AD. Anticholinergic Medications. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK555893/. Accessed 2 Jan 2023. 12. Chippa V, Roy K. Geriatric Cognitive Decline and Polypharmacy. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK574575/. Accessed 2 Jan 2023. 13. Trevisan C Limongi F Siviero P Noale M Cignarella A Manzato E Mild polypharmacy and MCI progression in older adults: the mediation effect of drug-drug interactions Aging Clin Exp Res 2021 33 1 49 56 10.1007/s40520-019-01420-2 31758500 14. Masnoon N Kalisch Ellett L Shakib S Caughey GE Predictors of mortality in the older population: the role of polypharmacy and other medication and chronic disease-related factors Drugs Aging 2020 37 10 767 776 10.1007/s40266-020-00794-7 32885396 15. Kalisch Ellett LM Pratt NL Ramsay EN Barratt JD Roughead EE Multiple anticholinergic medication use and risk of hospital admission for confusion or dementia J Am Geriatr Soc 2014 62 10 1916 1922 10.1111/jgs.13054 25284144 16. Joung KI Kim S Cho YH Cho SI Association of anticholinergic use with incidence of Alzheimer's disease: population-based cohort study Sci Rep 2019 9 1 6802 10.1038/s41598-019-43066-0 31043628 17. Fox C Richardson K Maidment ID Savva GM Matthews FE Smithard D Anticholinergic medication use and cognitive impairment in the older population: the medical research council cognitive function and ageing study J Am Geriatr Soc 2011 59 8 1477 1483 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03491.x 21707557 18. Campbell NL Perkins AJ Bradt P Perk S Wielage RC Boustani MA Association of anticholinergic burden with cognitive impairment and health care utilization among a diverse ambulatory older adult population Pharmacotherapy 2016 36 11 1123 1131 10.1002/phar.1843 27711982 19. Egberts A Moreno-Gonzalez R Alan H Ziere G Mattace-Raso FUS Anticholinergic drug burden and delirium: a systematic review J Am Med Dir Assoc 2021 22 1 65 73.e4 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.04.019 32703688 20. Boustani M Campbell N Munger S Maidment I Fox C Impact of anticholinergics on the aging brain: a review and practical application Aging Health 2008 4 3 310 320 10.2217/1745509X.4.3.311 21. Salahudeen MS Duffull SB Nishtala PS Anticholinergic burden quantified by anticholinergic risk scales and adverse outcomes in older people: a systematic review BMC Geriatr 2015 15 31 10.1186/s12877-015-0029-9 25879993 22. Lisibach A Benelli V Ceppi MG Waldner-Knogler K Csajka C Lutters M Quality of anticholinergic burden scales and their impact on clinical outcomes: a systematic review Eur J Clin Pharm 2021 77 2 147 162 10.1007/s00228-020-02994-x 23. WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. Norwegian Institute of Public Health. Defined Daily Dose Definition and General Considerations. 2018. https://www.whocc.no/ddd/definition_and_general_considera/. Accessed 2 Jan 2023. 24. Quan H Sundararajan V Halfon P Fong A Burnand B Luthi JC Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data Med Care 2005 43 11 1130 1139 10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.83 16224307 25. Klabunde CN Potosky AL Legler JM Warren JL Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data J Clin Epidemiol 2000 53 12 1258 1267 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00256-0 11146273 26. Elixhauser A Steiner C Harris DR Coffey RM Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data Med Care 1998 36 1 8 27 10.1097/00005650-199801000-00004 9431328 27. Sloan KL Sales AE Liu CF Fishman P Nichol P Suzuki NT Construction and characteristics of the RxRisk-V: a VA-adapted pharmacy-based case-mix instrument Med Care 2003 41 6 761 774 10.1097/01.MLR.0000064641.84967.B7 12773842 28. Suehs BT Caplan EO Hayden J Ng DB Gaddy RR The relationship between anticholinergic exposure and falls, fractures, and mortality in patients with overactive bladder Drugs Aging 2019 36 10 957 967 10.1007/s40266-019-00694-5 31359329 29. Moore AR O'Keeffe ST Drug-induced cognitive impairment in the elderly Drugs Aging 1999 15 1 15 28 10.2165/00002512-199915010-00002 10459729 30. Tannenbaum C Paquette A Hilmer S Holroyd-Leduc J Carnahan R A systematic review of amnestic and non-amnestic mild cognitive impairment induced by anticholinergic, antihistamine GABAergic and opioid drugs Drugs Aging 2012 29 8 639 658 22812538 31. Zhang YR Xu W Zhang W Wang HF Ou YN Qu Y Modifiable risk factors for incident dementia and cognitive impairment: an umbrella review of evidence J Affect Disord 2022 314 160 167 10.1016/j.jad.2022.07.008 35863541 32. Sales AE Liu C-F Sloan KL Malkin J Fishman PA Rosen AK Predicting costs of care using a pharmacy-based measure risk adjustment in a veteran population Med Care 2003 41 6 753 10.1097/01.MLR.0000069502.75914.DD 12773841 33. Fishman PA Goodman MJ Hornbrook MC Meenan RT Bachman DJ Rosetti MCO Risk adjustment using automated ambulatory pharmacy data: the RxRisk model Med Care 2003 41 1 84 10.1097/00005650-200301000-00011 12544546 34. Farley JF Harley CR Devine JW A comparison of comorbidity measurements to predict healthcare expenditures Am J Manag Care 2006 12 2 110 16464140 35. Johnson ML El-Serag HB Tran TT Hartman C Richardson P Abraham NS Adapting the Rx-Risk-V for mortality prediction in outpatient populations Med Care 2006 44 8 793 797 10.1097/01.mlr.0000218804.41758.ef 16862043 36. Fan VS Maciejewski ML Liu C-F McDonell MB Fihn SD Comparison of risk adjustment measures based on self-report, administrative data, and pharmacy records to predict clinical outcomes Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol 2006 6 1 21 36 10.1007/s10742-006-0004-1 37. Vitry A Wong SA Roughead EE Ramsay E Barratt J Validity of medication-based co-morbidity indices in the Australian elderly population Aust NZ J Public Health 2009 33 2 126 130 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2009.00357.x 38. Lu CY Barratt J Vitry A Roughead E Charlson and Rx-Risk comorbidity indices were predictive of mortality in the Australian health care setting J Clin Epidemiol 2011 64 2 223 228 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.015 21172602 39. Woodford HJ Stevenson JM Anticholinergic drugs and dementia: time for transparency in the face of uncertainty Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021 9 Ed000154 34494256 40. Graves-Morris K Stewart C Soiza RL Taylor-Rowan M Quinn TJ Loke YK The prognostic value of anticholinergic burden measures in relation to mortality in older individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis Front Pharmacol 2020 11 570 10.3389/fphar.2020.00570 32411001 41. Ali S Peterson GM Bereznicki LR Salahudeen MS Association between anticholinergic drug burden and mortality in older people: a systematic review Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2020 76 3 319 335 10.1007/s00228-019-02795-x 31832732 42. Li Y Zhang X Yang L Yang Y Qiao G Lu C Association between polypharmacy and mortality in the older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2022 100 104630 10.1016/j.archger.2022.104630 35101709 43. Coupland CAC Hill T Dening T Morriss R Moore M Hippisley-Cox J Anticholinergic Drug Exposure and the Risk of Dementia: A Nested Case-Control Study JAMA Intern Med 2019 179 8 1084 1093 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0677 31233095 44. Fox C Smith T Maidment I Chan WY Bua N Myint PK Effect of medications with anti-cholinergic properties on cognitive function, delirium, physical function and mortality: a systematic review Age Ageing 2014 43 5 604 615 10.1093/ageing/afu096 25038833 45. Sørensen SR Frederiksen JD Anru PL Masud T Petrovic M Rosholm JU Use of drugs with anticholinergic properties at hospital admission associated with mortality in older patients: a danish nationwide register-based cohort study Drugs Real World Outcomes 2022 9 1 129 140 10.1007/s40801-021-00270-7 34414558 46. Marshall GA Amariglio RE Sperling RA Rentz DM Activities of daily living: where do they fit in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease? Neurodegener Dis Manag 2012 2 5 483 491 10.2217/nmt.12.55 23585777